sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Corporate Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (CSSREN)

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainable Management".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2023) | Viewed by 22840

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Åkerlundinkatu 2 A, 4th Floor, 33100 Tampere, Finland
2. Big Data Excellence Centre, Kazimieras Simonavičius University (KSU) Dariaus ir Girėno St. 21, LT-02189 Vilnius, Lithuania
Interests: sustainable development; sustainable development goals; corporate social responsibility; smart specialisation strategy (S3); deal of the European Union; green transition; smart cities; digital transformation; Industry 4.0/5.0; sustainable growth strategies of companies; social system theory; big data analytics; business intelligence; business model; dynamic capabilities; visionary leadership; generative AI; innovation management; eco-innovations; circular economy; waste management in supply chains
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Civil Engineering, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, Finland
2. Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Interests: innovation; entrepreneurship; ecosystem; coevolution; temporary forms of organizing; creative and cultural industries; business models
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The key “economic problem” usually arises as a need to relate economic and ethical factors that appear to be contradictory in society and organizations. There is a so-called background, the self-understanding of positive economics, that economics is a kind of exact social science and it thus does not rely on normative theory. However, mainstream economics always contains normative starting points. They are especially visible in terms of efficiency or optimality and well-being. In the case of economics, the normative foundation is taken seriously; economics should also include the concept of economic borders with responsibility. The juxtaposition of economics and ethics is thus partly artificial. Downstream economics always relies on normative argumentation, albeit implicitly. It is central that the starting point is an interpretation of utilitarianism based on a strong principle of inviolability.

The distinction between sustainable and unsustainable development already involves setting out an ethical issue. For this reason alone, there is a need for a Special Issue of Sustainability.

It has become clear that the concepts of both well-being and optimality are problematically used in this basic economic theory. There is no reason to criticize economic discourse for 'immorality', but rather to reveal the normative rationale on which economic theory is based. "Economy" and the distinction between “ethics,” including economic speech in the form of criticism, reinforces the problematic notion of free economics without any discussions of responsibility.

Responsible behaviors are increasingly being embedded into new platforms, business models and strategies that are designed to meet environmental, societal and governance deficits. Sustainability in the long run is the core of business operations, and responsibility is examined through the company’s economic, social and environmental impact. Responsibility plays a part in the competitiveness of companies in markets. Responsibility cannot be fulfilled by only talking about it. Responsibility-related issues must be instilled into the heart of the company’s business practices and business model. It can be used to compete for clients, personnel and investors. A successful company profits not just its owners, but also its stakeholders and society as a whole. The areas of voluntary responsibility are based on values, attitudes, as well as ethical and moral considerations. Responsibility requires strong ethical leadership, responsibility-taking on an individual level, as well as company-level learning, all of which are essential aspects of developing responsible business practices. Real actions, contracts and a commitment to the company and the essence of sustainable development are needed. Society needs responsible companies, and companies need society. Both societal partners will take care of their duties, thereby supporting and improving sustainable development on a wider scale.

Traditionally, responsibility issues have been linked to economic, social and environmental pillars of sustainability. Therefore, key notions of Corporate Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Environmental Management have become very popular in academia as corporations are moving beyond old models of transparency, business ethics and stakeholder engagement. Shareholders are now more aware of broader questions of responsibility.

New challenges are linked to ecological transparency, more socially responsible business models and better environmental management systems, taking circular economy and biodiversity challenges more seriously into consideration. Ecological innovations and R&D focusing on green transition challenges are also receiving more attention. This Special Issue of Sustainability provides the opportunity for scholars, research groups, specialists and students to contribute to newest scholarly discussions about the CSSREN field with a broad analysis on the subject of Corporate Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Management. It is important to pay attention to three focal areas: (1) the significance of responsibility; (2) definitions of economic, social and environmental responsibility and (3) organizations’ strategies, values and leadership styles when organizations aim to demonstrate responsibility in their business.

Inside corporations and companies, key functions are production, PR and marketing, human resource management, supply chain planning, accounting knowledge management and R&D activities. All these important sub-functions of business administration are in rapid transition process where CSSREN issues and ethical questions are becoming more relevant.

This Special Issue aims to build a larger situation analysis of these vital changes in modern companies and corporations. We hope to receive scientific articles with fresh insights into the key challenges of Corporate Sustainability, Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

Prof. Dr. Jari Kaivo-oja
Dr. Antti Ainamo
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • corporate social responsibility (CSR)
  • organizational social responsibility (OSR)
  • corporate sustainability
  • environmental management

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

17 pages, 757 KiB  
Article
Unpacking the Mechanisms of Network Embeddedness for Low-Carbon Innovation in Chinese Enterprises: A Dynamic and Cognitive Theory Perspective
by Yuguo Jiang, Enock Mintah Ampaw and Feifei Xu
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11498; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511498 - 25 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1072
Abstract
In the context of low-carbon economies, there is a clarion call for enterprises to change traditional economic management styles in order to achieve optimal gains. Against this background, the mechanism to improve low-carbon innovation capabilities of enterprises has become the holy grail for [...] Read more.
In the context of low-carbon economies, there is a clarion call for enterprises to change traditional economic management styles in order to achieve optimal gains. Against this background, the mechanism to improve low-carbon innovation capabilities of enterprises has become the holy grail for top management teams. Based on the social network, dynamic ability and upper echelon theories, this study explores the impact of network embeddedness on low-carbon innovation of enterprises and further analyzes the intermediary role of low-carbon dynamic abilities and the moderating role of executives’ low-carbon cognition. To achieve the objectives of this study, a sample of 386 enterprises in China were selected for the study. The results show that (1) Both structural embeddedness and relational embeddedness have significant positive effects on enterprises low-carbon innovation; (2) A low-carbon dynamic ability functions as a partially mediated factor between structural embeddedness and enterprise low-carbon innovation; (3) Low-carbon dynamic capacity plays a complete intermediary role between relational embeddedness and enterprise low-carbon innovation; (4) Executives’ low-carbon cognition moderates the relationship between low-carbon dynamic ability and low carbon innovation of enterprises. That is, the stronger the executives’ low-carbon cognition, the stronger the positive impact of dynamic ability on enterprise low-carbon innovation and vice versa. This study expands research in social network theory and the low-carbon innovation of enterprises. Furthermore, this study provides a solid theoretical basis for enterprises to effectively carry out low-carbon innovation while providing a solid reference for enterprises to improve their low-carbon innovation aspirations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2838 KiB  
Article
Corporate Social Responsibility: Where Does It Come from, and Where Does It Go? Evolution of the Conceptual Structure from 1975 to 2021
by Mario A. Morales-Parragué, Rodrigo A. Varela-Laso, Luis Araya-Castillo and Fidel Molina-Luque
Sustainability 2023, 15(7), 5770; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075770 - 26 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 5526
Abstract
From the first discussions on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the 1950s to today, there is evidence of a ramification of concepts associated with CSR that produce a web of relationships that evolves in different directions. This paper analyses the conceptual structure of [...] Read more.
From the first discussions on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the 1950s to today, there is evidence of a ramification of concepts associated with CSR that produce a web of relationships that evolves in different directions. This paper analyses the conceptual structure of the CSR field, contributing to understanding its development and evolution between 1975 and 2021, opening a discussion of what these concept relationships might show in the understanding, development, and future application of CSR in business and society. For this purpose, networks of concepts were identified by using the SciMAT software on 6861 papers obtained from the WOS database in the Business and Management categories in the field of study. The results show that the field still appears to be far from understood and is very focused on the interests of companies. We offer and opportunity to rethink its purpose from a perspective that integrates other dimensions that concentrate on the society–business relationship. Based on these results, this study presents new research directions to explore both the drivers and results of the application of CSR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 789 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Outcomes of Customer Engagement in DSR: The Role of Affective Commitment and Gamification Affordance
by Xin Zhang, Jun Wan and Yongsheng Jin
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 5037; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065037 - 12 Mar 2023
Viewed by 2961
Abstract
Embedding gamified charity into digital social responsibility (DSR) programs has stimulated customers to behave in prosocial and pro-environment ways in daily life. Prior studies on customer outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have yielded fragmented findings in an offline environment. To reap the [...] Read more.
Embedding gamified charity into digital social responsibility (DSR) programs has stimulated customers to behave in prosocial and pro-environment ways in daily life. Prior studies on customer outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) have yielded fragmented findings in an offline environment. To reap the maximum returns of DSR, this study deconstructs sustainable customer engagement outcomes of DSR into external outcomes, including customer citizenship behavior, and internal outcomes, such as customers’ intention to continue. Moreover, this study examined the role of affective commitment and gamification affordance within a single framework of customer response to DSR. The findings of an empirical study carried out in the DSR programs prove that the underlying psychological mechanisms between customer engagement in DSR and various customer outcomes are mediated by affective commitment and moderated by gamification affordance. This study contributes to the DSR stream of sustainable engagement outcomes by proposing a theoretical framework to clearly understand the psychological mechanisms and boundary conditions influencing the customer response to DSR. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 849 KiB  
Article
How Does Intelligent Manufacturing Affect the ESG Performance of Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from China
by Lipeng Sun and Nur Ashikin Mohd Saat
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 2898; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042898 - 6 Feb 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5511
Abstract
It is no longer possible for China’s economy to grow by relying on the rapid expansion of manufacturing. On the one hand, China’s previous rough manufacturing development pattern seriously harmed the environment. On the other hand, China’s manufacturing productivity and international competitiveness have [...] Read more.
It is no longer possible for China’s economy to grow by relying on the rapid expansion of manufacturing. On the one hand, China’s previous rough manufacturing development pattern seriously harmed the environment. On the other hand, China’s manufacturing productivity and international competitiveness have decreased as a result of the disappearance of demographic dividends and growing labor costs. China’s manufacturing firms must simultaneously increase productivity while lowering environmental pollution. This study, which takes intelligent manufacturing pilot demonstration projects as a quasi-natural experiment, investigates the impact of intelligent manufacturing (IM) on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance using data from 2149 listed manufacturing firms in China from 2009 to 2021. The results indicate that ESG performance of the listed firms could be improved using IM. The heterogeneity test reveals that IM in non-state-owned firms helps to improve ESG performance at the 1% significance level, while the effect is not significant in state-owned firms. Moreover, the effect in eastern China is significant at the 1% level and at the 5% level in western China, but not significant in central and northeastern China. The two channels through which IM improves corporate ESG performance are promoting innovation investment and improving the quality of the information environment. This study also verifies that both internal and external supervision could strengthen the positive impact of IM on corporate ESG performance, which provides empirical evidence for strengthening the supervision of manufacturing firms. The conclusions of the study reveal the internal force of manufacturing firms to improve ESG performance and also provide theoretical support for their implementation of IM projects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 696 KiB  
Systematic Review
Drivers, Challenges and Outcomes of Environmental Management System Implementation in Public Sector Organizations: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence
by Marie-France Waxin, Aaron Bartholomew, Fang Zhao and Ayesha Siddiqi
Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7391; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097391 - 28 Apr 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5891
Abstract
Our research objectives were to conduct a systematic literature review of the empirical articles on the drivers, challenges and outcomes of environmental management system (EMS) implementation in public sector organizations (PSOs) in the Scopus database, published in English. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we [...] Read more.
Our research objectives were to conduct a systematic literature review of the empirical articles on the drivers, challenges and outcomes of environmental management system (EMS) implementation in public sector organizations (PSOs) in the Scopus database, published in English. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we identified, reviewed and analyzed 11 selected articles. We used content analysis to identify important themes and concepts. First, we mapped the selected literature. We then identified four main categories of drivers (environmentally strategic, social/stakeholders, regulatory and organizational efficiency), five categories of challenges (budgetary, human resource, technical, managerial and regulatory) and five categories of outcomes (improvement in environmental management practices, environmental performance, awareness of environmental issues, image and organizational efficiency). Finally, we identified important avenues for future research that should be explored further. This article synthesizes the knowledge on EMS implementation in PSOs and offers new insights. It will help EMS scholars and practitioners develop a broader and more critical understanding of the issues specific to EMS implementation in PSOs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop