Sustainability

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

373 KiB

Open AccessEditorial

Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability

by Susan M. Koger

Sustainability 2013, 5(7), 3006-3008; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5073006 - 10 Jul 2013

Cited by 15 | Viewed by 7367

Abstract

I am honored to introduce this special issue of Sustainability, which exemplifies how the field of Psychology can contribute to multi- and inter-disciplinary efforts to create a sustainable society. In fact, achieving the goal of environmental, economic, and social sustainability is predicated [...] Read more.

I am honored to introduce this special issue of Sustainability, which exemplifies how the field of Psychology can contribute to multi- and inter-disciplinary efforts to create a sustainable society. In fact, achieving the goal of environmental, economic, and social sustainability is predicated on changing human behavior; the purview of Psychologists (reviewed in [1], see also [2–7]). So-called “environmental problems” are really problems of human behavior, caused by collective human actions and their underlying thoughts, beliefs, feelings, and values [1]. Consequently, research from various sub-fields of psychology can [...] Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

959 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Revealing the Value of “Green” and the Small Group with a Big Heart in Transportation Mode Choice

by David Gaker and Joan L. Walker

Sustainability 2013, 5(7), 2913-2927; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5072913 - 3 Jul 2013

Cited by 27 | Viewed by 7868

Abstract

To address issues of climate change, people are more and more being presented with the greenhouse gas emissions associated with their alternatives. Statements of pounds or kilograms of CO₂ are showing up in trip planners, car advertisements, and even restaurant menus under [...] Read more.

To address issues of climate change, people are more and more being presented with the greenhouse gas emissions associated with their alternatives. Statements of pounds or kilograms of CO₂ are showing up in trip planners, car advertisements, and even restaurant menus under the assumption that this information influences behavior. This research contributes to the literature that investigates how travelers respond to such information. Our objective is to better understand the “value of green” or how much travelers are willing to pay in money in order to reduce the CO₂ associated with their travel. As with previous work, we designed and conducted a mode choice experiment using methods that have long been used to study value of time. The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, we employ revealed preference data, whereas previous studies have been based on stated preferences. Second, we provide new insight on how the value of green is distributed in the population. Whereas previous work has specified heterogeneity either systematically or with a continuous distribution, we find that a latent class choice model specification better fits the data and also is attractive behaviorally. The best fitting latent class model has two classes: one large class (76% of the sample) who are not willing to spend any time or money to reduce their CO₂ and a second class (24% of the sample) who value reducing their CO₂ at a very high rate of $2.68 per pound of reduction—our so-called small group with a big heart. We reanalyzed three datasets that we had previously collected and found considerable robustness of this two class result. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

563 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Synthesizing the Experiments and Theories of Conservation Psychology

by Richard Osbaldiston

Sustainability 2013, 5(6), 2770-2795; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062770 - 20 Jun 2013

Cited by 22 | Viewed by 9844

Abstract

Within the field of environmental psychology, there are two distinct bodies of literature. First, there are experimental studies that have evaluated techniques for getting people to perform conservation behaviors. Second, there are theoretical studies that have surveyed people to create some type of [...] Read more.

Within the field of environmental psychology, there are two distinct bodies of literature. First, there are experimental studies that have evaluated techniques for getting people to perform conservation behaviors. Second, there are theoretical studies that have surveyed people to create some type of theoretical model that explains conservation behaviors. These two types of research almost never overlap. This research project attempts to bridge these two literatures. Specifically, we coded over 100 environmental experiments for the type of treatment that each one employed and the effect size that was reported. Then we mapped the ten leading treatments on to the main components of six leading theoretical models. Our findings indicate that a moderate amount of variance in the effect sizes of the experimental literature is explained by the theoretical models and that one of the strongest predictors of conservation behavior is the situation or context. While we acknowledge the limitations of our method, this research raises a fundamentally important question: Why are our theories somewhat limited at predicting the behavior patterns that we see in our experiments? Are our theories built on the wrong set of psychological constructs, or are our experiments manipulating the wrong set of variables? Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

723 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Coping with Climate Change among Adolescents: Implications for Subjective Well-Being and Environmental Engagement

by Maria Ojala

Sustainability 2013, 5(5), 2191-2209; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052191 - 14 May 2013

Cited by 134 | Viewed by 19749

Abstract

The objective of this questionnaire study was to investigate how Swedish adolescents (n = 321) cope with climate change and how different coping strategies are associated with environmental efficacy, pro-environmental behavior, and subjective well-being. The results were compared to an earlier study on [...] Read more.

The objective of this questionnaire study was to investigate how Swedish adolescents (n = 321) cope with climate change and how different coping strategies are associated with environmental efficacy, pro-environmental behavior, and subjective well-being. The results were compared to an earlier study on 12-year-olds, and the same coping strategies, problem-focused coping, de-emphasizing the seriousness of the threat, and meaning-focused coping, were identified. As in the study on children, problem-focused and meaning-focused coping were positively related to felt efficacy and environmental behavior, while de-emphasizing the threat was negatively related to these measures. As expected, the more problem-focused coping the adolescents used, the more likely it was that they experienced negative affect in everyday life. This association was explained by the tendency for highly problem-focused adolescents to worry more about climate change. In contrast, meaning-focused coping was positively related to both well-being and optimism. When controlling for well-known predictors such as values and gender, meaning-focused and problem-focused coping were independent positive predictors of environmental efficacy and pro-environmental behavior, while de-emphasizing the threat was a negative predictor of pro-environmental behavior. The results are discussed in relation to coping theories and earlier studies on coping with climate change. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

661 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Persuasive Normative Messages: The Influence of Injunctive and Personal Norms on Using Free Plastic Bags

by Judith I.M. De Groot, Wokje Abrahamse and Kayleigh Jones

Sustainability 2013, 5(5), 1829-1844; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5051829 - 29 Apr 2013

Cited by 95 | Viewed by 22882

Abstract

In this exploratory field-study, we examined how normative messages (i.e., activating an injunctive norm, personal norm, or both) could encourage shoppers to use fewer free plastic bags for their shopping in addition to the supermarket’s standard environmental message aimed at reducing [...] Read more.

In this exploratory field-study, we examined how normative messages (i.e., activating an injunctive norm, personal norm, or both) could encourage shoppers to use fewer free plastic bags for their shopping in addition to the supermarket’s standard environmental message aimed at reducing plastic bags. In a one-way subjects-design (N = 200) at a local supermarket, we showed that shoppers used significantly fewer free plastic bags in the injunctive, personal and combined normative message condition than in the condition where only an environmental message was present. The combined normative message did result in the smallest uptake of free plastic bags compared to the injunctive and personal normative-only message, although these differences were not significant. Our findings imply that re-wording the supermarket’s environmental message by including normative information could be a promising way to reduce the use of free plastic bags, which will ultimately benefit the environment. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

384 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Spreading the Eco-Message: Using Proactive Coping to Aid Eco-Rep Behavior Change Programming

by Brittany Bloodhart, Janet K. Swim and Matthew J. Zawadzki

Sustainability 2013, 5(4), 1661-1679; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041661 - 18 Apr 2013

Cited by 18 | Viewed by 8007

Abstract

Making pro-environmental behavior changes can be difficult, particularly when these changes challenge daily routines and comfortable lifestyles. We designed and implemented an eco-representative intervention program to help students reduce their energy use by proactively coping with barriers to pro-environmental behavior change, and then [...] Read more.

Making pro-environmental behavior changes can be difficult, particularly when these changes challenge daily routines and comfortable lifestyles. We designed and implemented an eco-representative intervention program to help students reduce their energy use by proactively coping with barriers to pro-environmental behavior change, and then communicate effective behavior change strategies to student peers. Twenty-nine first-year college students participated in a four-week proactive coping training to change five environmentally impactful behaviors and then spread behavior change messages to fellow residents during a two-week energy challenge. Eco-reps successfully changed their own behaviors in a pro-environmental direction by generating important barriers and successful facilitators for behavior change, and eco-rep residence halls were more likely to reduce energy and maintain reductions compared to non-eco-rep halls. Implications for future environmental behavior change interventions are discussed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

472 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Conservation Psychology: A Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education?

by Elissa Pearson

Sustainability 2013, 5(3), 1266-1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5031266 - 19 Mar 2013

Cited by 6 | Viewed by 8085

Abstract

Human actions have contributed to numerous environmental challenges, including climate change and a significant loss of the world’s biodiversity. As the scientific study of human thought and behaviour, psychology has much to offer in better understanding these issues, as well as fostering greater [...] Read more.

Human actions have contributed to numerous environmental challenges, including climate change and a significant loss of the world’s biodiversity. As the scientific study of human thought and behaviour, psychology has much to offer in better understanding these issues, as well as fostering greater sustainability in human actions. Yet, despite this recognition, and increasing calls from leaders in psychology education to produce graduates capable of applying their disciplinary knowledge to such real-world issues to solve worldwide behaviourally-based problems; this may not be adequately addressed in current psychology training. The present study assessed the content of all APAC (Australian Psychology Accreditation Council) approved psychology programs within Australia to determine the proportion which offered a psychology-focused course (unit) specifically in conservation or sustainability. Based on the data advertised through each university website, it appears that only one of 39 programs currently offers such a course, with one other university implementing a conservation psychology course in 2013. Thus 95% of current APAC-accredited programs in Australia do not have a strong focus on training psychology graduates to contribute to addressing these important issues. The need for greater integration of conservation psychology content into undergraduate psychology education in Australia and beyond is discussed. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

991 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Exploring the Attitudes-Action Gap in Household Resource Consumption: Does “Environmental Lifestyle” Segmentation Align with Consumer Behaviour?

by Peter Newton and Denny Meyer

Sustainability 2013, 5(3), 1211-1233; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5031211 - 19 Mar 2013

Cited by 94 | Viewed by 19018

Abstract

Consumption is a transcending challenge for the 21st century that is stimulating research on multiple pathways required to deliver a more environmentally sustainable future. This paper is nested in what is a much larger field of research on sustainable consumption and reports on [...] Read more.

Consumption is a transcending challenge for the 21st century that is stimulating research on multiple pathways required to deliver a more environmentally sustainable future. This paper is nested in what is a much larger field of research on sustainable consumption and reports on part of a major Australian Research Council study into the determinants of household resource consumption, based on a survey of 1,250 residents in Melbourne, Australia. Three environmental lifestyle segments are established that represent the spectrum of attitudes, opinions and intentions across the surveyed population: “committed” greens, “material” greens and “enviro-sceptics” (representing respectively 33.5%, 40.3% and 26.3% of the population). Each segment was found to display distinctive socio-demographic attributes, as well as urban geographies. However, few differences were found in relation to each segment’s actual consumption of energy, water, housing space, urban travel and domestic appliances. The research findings indicate that in these areas of urban resource consumption—all principal contributors to the ecological footprint of households—there are sets of factors at work that override attitudes, opinions and intentions as indicators of consumer behaviour. Some of these factors are information, organization and finance related and are the focus of much public policy. However, the persistence of well ingrained habits and practices among individuals and households and the lack of norms and values in western societies that explicitly promote environmental conservation among its population, are fundamentally involved in the attitude-action gap and constitute important avenues for future research and action. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

525 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Assessing Sustainable Behavior and its Correlates: A Measure of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Altruistic and Equitable Actions

by César Tapia-Fonllem, Victor Corral-Verdugo, Blanca Fraijo-Sing and Maria Fernanda Durón-Ramos

Sustainability 2013, 5(2), 711-723; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711 - 15 Feb 2013

Cited by 157 | Viewed by 17034

Abstract

Measures of sustainable behavior (SB) usually include the self-report of activities aimed at the conservation of the natural environment. The sustainability notion explicitly incorporates both the satisfaction of human needs and the need of conserving the natural environment. Yet, the assessment of sustainable [...] Read more.

Measures of sustainable behavior (SB) usually include the self-report of activities aimed at the conservation of the natural environment. The sustainability notion explicitly incorporates both the satisfaction of human needs and the need of conserving the natural environment. Yet, the assessment of sustainable behaviors rarely considers the protection of the social environment as situation to investigate. In this paper, we propose the use of an instrument assessing SB, which includes the report of pro-ecological and frugal actions in addition to altruistic and equitable behaviors. The responses provided by 807 Mexican undergraduates to a questionnaire investigating those four instances of SB were processed within a structural equation model. Emotional (indignation due to environmental destruction, affinity towards diversity, happiness) and rational (intention to act) factors assumedly linked to sustainable behavior were also investigated. Significant interrelations among pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable behaviors resulted, suggesting the presence of a higher-order-factor that we identified as SB. This factor, in turn, significantly correlated with the rest of the investigated pro-environmental factors. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

556 KiB

Open AccessReview

Understanding the Reasons for Behavioral Failure: A Process View of Psychosocial Barriers and Constraints to Pro-Ecological Behavior

by Rui Gaspar

Sustainability 2013, 5(7), 2960-2975; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5072960 - 5 Jul 2013

Cited by 35 | Viewed by 10842

Abstract

For many years now, behavior change projects and research on pro-ecological behavior seem to have encountered difficulties in answering the question: why do people fail to act? That is, what are the barriers and constraints that prevent people from acting in a pro-ecological [...] Read more.

For many years now, behavior change projects and research on pro-ecological behavior seem to have encountered difficulties in answering the question: why do people fail to act? That is, what are the barriers and constraints that prevent people from acting in a pro-ecological way? In order to fill the gap, this paper aims to operationalize the concepts of barriers and constraints, based on an approach that considers the role of behavioral goals (“to achieve X”). In addition, it aims to present a preliminary approach focused on understanding the processes involved in the barriers and constraints emergence and their consequent effect on the implementation of behavioral goals into behaviors. This is done in order to allow for a better understanding of: (1) how the interaction between individual/dispositional characteristics and the characteristics of the situation in which individuals are in, may result in the inhibition/constraining of pro-ecological goals implementation into behaviors; and (2) the role of conscious and unconscious processes in this. Examples of barriers and constraints will be given, in order to make salient the need for future research to address these and for behavioral change projects to take them into consideration. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

566 KiB

Open AccessReview

Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being

by Leonie A. Venhoeven, Jan Willem Bolderdijk and Linda Steg

Sustainability 2013, 5(4), 1372-1386; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372 - 25 Mar 2013

Cited by 131 | Viewed by 25351

Abstract

Although pro-environmental behaviour is often believed to be difficult, aggravating, and potentially threatening one’s quality of life, recent studies suggest that people who behave in a more pro-environmental way are actually more satisfied with their lives. In this manuscript, we aim to explain [...] Read more.

Although pro-environmental behaviour is often believed to be difficult, aggravating, and potentially threatening one’s quality of life, recent studies suggest that people who behave in a more pro-environmental way are actually more satisfied with their lives. In this manuscript, we aim to explain this apparent paradox by reviewing theoretical arguments and empirical evidence for both sides of the coin: why would acting pro-environmentally decrease one’s well-being, and why would it increase one’s well-being? We conclude that part of the answer lies in a different view on what well-being entails, and more specifically, whether the focus is on hedonic well-being (i.e., feeling pleasure) or eudaimonic well-being (i.e., feeling meaningful). Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

Published Papers (11 papers)

Editorial

Research

Review

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI