sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Nature Based Solutions to Support Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Development

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2022) | Viewed by 60235

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Water Research Institute of the National Research Council (IRSA-CNR), Bari, Italy
Interests: water resources management; water-related risks assessment and mitigation; resilience assessment; environmental sustainability; integrated modelling; participatory approaches

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ICATALIST, S.L., Calle Cifuentes, 5, 28021 Madrid, Spain
Interests: water security; social innovation; collaborative decision making; water governance; climate change adaptation and green infrastructure; groundwater strategic management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
DRAXIS ENVIRONMENTAL S.A., 54-56 Themistokli Sofouli St., 54655 Thessaloniki, Greece
Interests: climate change adaptation and blue-green infrastructure; natural flood management; natural capital assessments and ecosystem services approaches; resilience-thinking; water governance; cost-benefit analysis; groundwater resources management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
ICATALIST, S.L., Calle Cifuentes, 5, 28021 Madrid, Spain
Interests: NBS business models; water-energy-food nexus; social and technological innovation; climate change adaptation and green infrastructure; integrated surface and groundwater management

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There are growing concerns due to the increase of both frequency and magnitude of natural disasters, and particularly of water-related risks (floods and droughts). Such extremes have severe effects on communities, on the economy, and on the environment, which may be even worsened by additional pressures such as climate change. Policy- and decision-makers are thus increasingly aware of the need for more systemic perspectives oriented at supporting climate change adaptation, water-related risk reduction, sustainable development, and conservation and restoration of ecosystems. In this direction, EU policies are supporting the ‘working with nature’ method, and nature-based solutions (NBS) are becoming central in responding to multiple challenges. The European Commission defines NBS to societal challenges as “solutions that are inspired and supported by nature, which are cost-effective, simultaneously provide environmental, social and economic benefits and help build resilience. Such solutions bring more, and more diverse, nature and natural features and processes into cities, landscapes and seascapes, through locally adapted, resource-efficient and systemic intervention”.

A growing attention on NBS is coupled with a rising interest in the scientific literature, although several gaps and barriers still exist and need to be carefully addressed. For example, additional evidence on the functioning of NBS and on their hydrological performances is needed, e.g., when operating as a network of measures or in comparison/integration with grey infrastructures. Furthermore, a stronger evidence base is required on the capability of NBS to provide multidimensional benefits and co-benefits, with a specific attention to their dynamic evolution and the potential presence of trade-offs. Additionally, innovative methods and tools accounting for a deeper stakeholder involvement should be fostered, in order both to support the inclusion of local/expert knowledge as well as to increase the sense of awareness about NBS potential. Last but not least, innovative while feasible business models need to be sought in order to make NBS investable and financially self-sufficient in the long term, and thus enable and catalyse their implementation.

In this framework, the present Special Issue aims at collecting a wide range of experiences related to NBS design, assessment, and/or implementation, and interdisciplinary approaches are welcome. We invite papers focusing on, but not limited to, the following topics:

  • NBS design and effectiveness assessment, hydrological performances;
  • Integrated modeling of NBS and analysis of systemic impacts;
  • Benefit/co-benefit production and trade-offs both at urban and at watershed scale;
  • NBS flexibility and scalability;
  • Cost-effectiveness of NBS, valuation, and evaluation;
  • Tools and methods for supporting decision- and policy-making;
  • Public participation to support NBS implementation.
  • Innovative and feasible business models for NBS.

Dr. Alessandro Pagano
Dr. Elena López Gunn
Dr. Leon Kapetas
Dr. Beatriz Mayor
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Nature Based Solutions
  • water-related risks
  • ecosystem services
  • co-benefits assessment
  • sustainable development

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (10 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 2041 KiB  
Article
People’s Perception of Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation: The Case of Veneto Region (Italy)
by Giacomo Bernello, Elena Mondino and Lucia Bortolini
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4621; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084621 - 12 Apr 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3944
Abstract
Floods have become more frequent due to a growing number of extreme rainfall events linked to climate change and increased urbanization. Additionally, 66% of the world’s population is expected to live in urban areas by 2050, making flood prevention and risk reduction increasingly [...] Read more.
Floods have become more frequent due to a growing number of extreme rainfall events linked to climate change and increased urbanization. Additionally, 66% of the world’s population is expected to live in urban areas by 2050, making flood prevention and risk reduction increasingly important. Sustainability, resilience and ecosystem services are essential to increase human well-being in urban environments. Nature-based Solutions (NBS) can provide all the benefits of urban green spaces combined with flood mitigation. This work aims to provide useful information to promote the adoption of NBS to build communities resilient to climate change by exploring how people’s perception of and willingness to implement some NBS. To this end, an online survey was conducted to investigate the knowledge and the perception of NBS and grey infrastructures among people in Veneto, a north-Eastern region of Italy. Data analysis revealed a significant correlation between previous knowledge of water management systems and the perceived effectiveness of some NBS. Behaviors linked to the level of connection with the territory have also been found to influence the perceived effectiveness of NBS. This study provides insights into the dynamics behind the implementation of NBS to reduce the risk of urban flooding and can help policymakers adapt urban plans to promote the adoption of NBS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1265 KiB  
Article
Innovating with Nature: Factors Influencing the Success of Nature-Based Enterprises
by Siobhan McQuaid, Esmee D. Kooijman, Mary-Lee Rhodes and Sheila M. Cannon
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12488; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212488 - 12 Nov 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6269
Abstract
Nature-based enterprises (NBEs) have recently emerged as important actors in the delivery of nature-based solutions (NBS) to societal challenges, but little is known about the context in which they operate and the factors influencing their development. The empirical research undertaken in this study [...] Read more.
Nature-based enterprises (NBEs) have recently emerged as important actors in the delivery of nature-based solutions (NBS) to societal challenges, but little is known about the context in which they operate and the factors influencing their development. The empirical research undertaken in this study provides a first insight into the most significant barriers and enablers nature-based enterprises face in their external environment. Findings were drawn from a review of literature triangulated with a survey of 148 nature-based enterprises and interviews with the founders/CEOs of 22 NBEs. Political factors were identified as the most significant external influence, with increased awareness and incorporation of NBS into relevant policies and economic instruments seen to play a significant role in market development. Conversely, policy inconsistencies and poorly designed public procurement approaches present significant challenges. Other key influencing factors relate to financing (both public and private), lack of industry standards and impact measurement. Industry networking and access to education, training and skill development emerged as key enablers, with university collaborations highly regarded. Further in-depth research is recommended to explore indications of disparities in the levels of awareness, financing, and skills gaps across different regions of Europe and different nature-based economic activities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 35228 KiB  
Article
Conceptual and Operational Integration of Governance, Financing, and Business Models for Urban Nature-Based Solutions
by Aitziber Egusquiza, Maider Arana-Bollar, Amaia Sopelana and Javier Babí Almenar
Sustainability 2021, 13(21), 11931; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111931 - 28 Oct 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3686
Abstract
Governance, financing, and business models are deeply interlinked and relevant for the successful implementation of urban nature-based solutions (NBS). However, during the definition of urban NBS projects the importance and interrelation of these models are usually neglected. To overcome this limitation, this paper [...] Read more.
Governance, financing, and business models are deeply interlinked and relevant for the successful implementation of urban nature-based solutions (NBS). However, during the definition of urban NBS projects the importance and interrelation of these models are usually neglected. To overcome this limitation, this paper presents an overarching framework (conceptual and operational) and a derived preselection web tool which interrelate governance, financing, and business models for NBS projects. First, based on recent literature, governance, financing, and business models that could be applied to NBS were mapped, and their integration proposed. Later, key contextual factors influencing NBS implementation were identified. They form the basis of a WHAT–WHO–HOW framework that structures the links between specific NBS projects, their implementation context, and the most suitable models. From that framework, and an analysis of 50 successful NBS case studies, a suitability matrix was developed with known models. The matrix allows pairing types of NBS and their initiating actors with suitable financing and governance models. Lastly, a tailored NBS business model canvas was designed to evaluate the business model components. From the overarching framework, the preselection web tool was created to guide decision-making on suitable governance, finance, and business models in the early phases of NBS projects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1575 KiB  
Article
State of the Art and Latest Advances in Exploring Business Models for Nature-Based Solutions
by Beatriz Mayor, Helen Toxopeus, Siobhan McQuaid, Edoardo Croci, Benedetta Lucchitta, Suhana E. Reddy, Aitziber Egusquiza, Monica A. Altamirano, Tamara Trumbic, Andreas Tuerk, Gemma García, Efrén Feliu, Cosima Malandrino, Joanne Schante, Anne Jensen and Elena López Gunn
Sustainability 2021, 13(13), 7413; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137413 - 2 Jul 2021
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 8818
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NBS) offer multiple solutions to urban challenges simultaneously, but realising funding for NBS remains a challenge. When the concept of NBS for societal challenges was first defined by the EC in 2017, financing was recognised as one of the major challenges [...] Read more.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) offer multiple solutions to urban challenges simultaneously, but realising funding for NBS remains a challenge. When the concept of NBS for societal challenges was first defined by the EC in 2017, financing was recognised as one of the major challenges to its mainstreaming. The complexity of NBS finance has its origin in the multiple benefits/stakeholders involved, which obscures the argument for both public and private sector investment. Since 2017, subsequent waves of EU research- and innovation-funded projects have substantially contributed to the knowledge base of funding and business models for NBS, particularly in the urban context. Collaborating and sharing knowledge through an EU Task Force, this first set of EU projects laid important knowledge foundations, reviewing existing literature, and compiling empirical evidence of different financing approaches and the business models that underpinned them. The second set of EU innovation actions advanced this knowledge base, developing and testing new implementation models, business model tools, and approaches. This paper presents the findings of these projects from a business model perspective to improve our understanding of the value propositions of NBS to support their mainstreaming. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1397 KiB  
Article
Nature-Based Solutions Tools for Planning Urban Climate Adaptation: State of the Art
by Ilse M. Voskamp, Claudia de Luca, Monserrat Budding Polo-Ballinas, Helena Hulsman and Reinder Brolsma
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6381; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116381 - 4 Jun 2021
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 8392
Abstract
Despite the recognized potential of nature-based solutions (NBSs) to support climate adaptation, there are still wide barriers for a wider uptake of such NBS in urban areas. While tailored NBS tools could facilitate and accelerate this process, a comprehensive mapping of their availability [...] Read more.
Despite the recognized potential of nature-based solutions (NBSs) to support climate adaptation, there are still wide barriers for a wider uptake of such NBS in urban areas. While tailored NBS tools could facilitate and accelerate this process, a comprehensive mapping of their availability and capacity to respond to cities’ challenges is missing. This research aims to provide an overview of tools that intend to facilitate the uptake of NBS for urban climate adaptation supporting cities in overcoming their challenges. To do so, this paper (i) presents the results of interviews and workshops with municipal officers and decision-makers from different European cities that identified the challenges they experience with NBS uptake; (ii) selects and reviews NBS tools and (iii) analyzes them on their capacity to address these implementation challenges. Our research revealed four key challenges that municipal officers experience: resources availability; level of expertise, know-how or competence; the institutional setting, and collaborative governance and planning. The results from the tools’ review show that existing tools can support overcoming a lack of expertise (31), but, to a smaller extent, can also be of use when experiencing the institutional setting (13), availability of resources (11), and collaborative governance and planning (10) as a challenge. This work provides researchers and tool developers with insights into potential market saturation as well as scarcity of certain types of tools that would match cities’ challenges, highlighting needs and opportunities for new tool development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 813 KiB  
Article
Communities of Innovation for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: Niche Creation and Anticipation
by Elena López-Gunn, Julian Swinkels, Gerardo Anzaldúa, Manuel Bea, Maria Conceição Colaço, Māra Deksne, Nensi Lalaj, Hugh McDonald and Marta Rica
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 5180; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095180 - 6 May 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2861
Abstract
This paper presents the concept of communities of innovation for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. The paper discusses the added value of these types of communities to help address uncertain futures from the impact of climate change, which are highly context [...] Read more.
This paper presents the concept of communities of innovation for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. The paper discusses the added value of these types of communities to help address uncertain futures from the impact of climate change, which are highly context dependent. The paper frames these communities of innovation as part of innovation ecosystems in order to reflect on their key elements and added value. We argue that climate change and disaster risk management responses need to meet the needs of those experiencing problems with those that can offer solutions in distinct localities, including those that could fund or finance potential innovative solutions. Developing communities of innovation with the specific task of anticipating and creating niche solutions has been gaining traction in the EU. Some developed under the H2020 BRIGAID project are analysed here for other emergent COIs, as future-oriented communities tasked with the challenge to reduce disaster risks and enhance the climate resilience in their own spaces. This paper reflects on the experience of participants in these communities and their reflections and experience on whether these offer a useful form of organisation to anticipate future challenges, create niche solutions, and bring innovations to the market. The paper concludes with how communities of innovation can contribute to niche design and narratives of change to help achieve social and environmental resilience to reframe and help transition and transform current systems into more resilient, future-oriented communities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3784 KiB  
Article
Natural Assurance Schemes Canvas: A Framework to Develop Business Models for Nature-Based Solutions Aimed at Disaster Risk Reduction
by Beatriz Mayor, Pedro Zorrilla-Miras, Philippe Le Coent, Thomas Biffin, Kieran Dartée, Karina Peña, Nina Graveline, Roxane Marchal, Florentina Nanu, Albert Scrieciu, Javier Calatrava, Marisol Manzano and Elena López Gunn
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1291; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031291 - 26 Jan 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3244
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly being promoted because they can solve different pursued aims together with providing an additional array of multiple ecosystem services or co-benefits. Nevertheless, their implementation is still being curbed by several barriers, for example, a lack of examples, a [...] Read more.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly being promoted because they can solve different pursued aims together with providing an additional array of multiple ecosystem services or co-benefits. Nevertheless, their implementation is still being curbed by several barriers, for example, a lack of examples, a lack of finance, and a lack of business cases. Therefore, there is an urgent need to facilitate the construction of business models and business cases that identify the elements required to capture value. These are necessary to catalyze investments for the implementation of NBS. This article presents a tool called a Natural Assurance Schemes (NAS) canvas and explains how it can be applied to identify business models for NBS strategies providing climate adaptation services, showing an eye-shot summary of critical information to attract funding. The framework is applied in three case studies covering different contexts, scales, and climate-related risks (floods and droughts). Finally, a reflective analysis is done, comparing the tool with other similar approaches while highlighting the differential characteristics that define the usefulness, replicability, and flexibility of the tool for the target users, namely policymakers, developers, scientists, or entrepreneurs aiming to promote and implement NAS and NBS projects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 825 KiB  
Article
Innovating with Nature: From Nature-Based Solutions to Nature-Based Enterprises
by Esmee D. Kooijman, Siobhan McQuaid, Mary-Lee Rhodes, Marcus J. Collier and Francesco Pilla
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1263; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031263 - 26 Jan 2021
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 12071
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NBS) to address societal challenges have been widely recognised and adopted by governments in climate change and biodiversity strategies. Nevertheless, significant barriers exist for the necessary large-scale implementation of NBS and market development is still in its infancy. This study presents [...] Read more.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) to address societal challenges have been widely recognised and adopted by governments in climate change and biodiversity strategies. Nevertheless, significant barriers exist for the necessary large-scale implementation of NBS and market development is still in its infancy. This study presents findings from a systematic review of literature and a survey on private sector agents in the planning and implementation of NBS, with the aim to identify them. In this study, we propose a typology for organisations delivering NBS and a categorisation of their economic activities. The most common organisation type found is nature-based enterprise which offers products or services where nature is a core element and used sustainably and engages in economic activity. Moreover, eleven categories of economic activities were identified, ranging from ecosystem restoration, living green roofs, and eco-tourism to smart technologies and community engagement for NBS. Nature-based enterprises contribute to a diverse range of sustainable economic activities, that standard industry classification systems do not adequately account for. The recognition of the value created by these activities is essential for designing effective policy support measures, and for market development of the sector and its potential to facilitate the wider adoption of NBS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 5740 KiB  
Article
Introducing Nature into Cities or Preserving Existing Peri-Urban Ecosystems? Analysis of Preferences in a Rapidly Urbanizing Catchment
by Cécile Hérivaux and Philippe Le Coent
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 587; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020587 - 9 Jan 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 3655
Abstract
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly being promoted as a means to address societal and environmental challenges, especially flood risk reduction. In the context of rapidly urbanizing catchments, NBS can take part of the development of sustainable cities, either by conserving peri-urban ecosystems from [...] Read more.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly being promoted as a means to address societal and environmental challenges, especially flood risk reduction. In the context of rapidly urbanizing catchments, NBS can take part of the development of sustainable cities, either by conserving peri-urban ecosystems from urban sprawl or by developing green infrastructure in the cities. Both can provide a wide range of co-benefits (e.g., climate regulation, air quality regulation), but also generate some negative effects (e.g., mobility issues, unsafety, allergens). We develop and implement a Discrete Choice Experiment survey to analyse people’s perception of co-benefits and negative effects, and associated preferences for the two types of NBS at a catchment scale. The results obtained from 400 households living in a French Mediterranean catchment highlight that people associate numerous co-benefits to NBS, but also negative effects. Our estimations reveal that resident households are ready to contribute large amounts through a tax increase for the development of NBS (from 140 to 180 EUR/year, on average). There is however a strong heterogeneity of preferences at the catchment scale influenced by income, location of the respondent along an urban–rural gradient, and perception of the importance of ecosystem services. These differences may reflect urban environmental inequalities at the catchment scale, which are important to take into account in order to avoid distributive inequalities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1395 KiB  
Article
The Quest for Adaptation through Spatial Planning and Ecosystem-Based Tools in Resilience Strategies
by Konstantina-Dimitra Salata and Athena Yiannakou
Sustainability 2020, 12(14), 5548; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145548 - 9 Jul 2020
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4909
Abstract
As climate change and other interdependent challenges are expected to become increasingly acute and unpredictable, so the need for policies and measures to reduce risks and uncertainties in order to adapt to these changes becomes more imperative. Cities can influence their adaptation, resilience, [...] Read more.
As climate change and other interdependent challenges are expected to become increasingly acute and unpredictable, so the need for policies and measures to reduce risks and uncertainties in order to adapt to these changes becomes more imperative. Cities can influence their adaptation, resilience, and eventually their sustainability through spatial planning with the use of more ecosystem-based planning tools, such as Green Infrastructure (GI). The present paper is an attempt to assess whether and how city strategies address the objective of an adaptation which interconnects the criteria of vulnerability, adaptability, and resilience through spatial planning. For this purpose, the paper examines the Resilience Strategies of seven European cities of the 100 Resilient Cities initiative (100RC). Based on a thematic analysis, the paper investigates whether these strategies incorporate a spatial planning approach which contributes to adaptation to climate change, focusing on GI as a spatial planning tool. The paper argues that there is room for improvement in all the examined strategies, as none of them fully incorporate the concept of GI, and, furthermore, that some critical planning principles which contribute to adaptation are missing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop