Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
8.9
5.2
Journals
Vaccines
Special Issues
Vaccine Acceptance and Coverage
share announcement

Vaccine Acceptance and Coverage

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X). This special issue belongs to the section "Human Vaccines and Public Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 February 2025 | Viewed by 1323

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Ryoko Sato

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Independent, Boston, MA 02122, USA
Interests: vaccination; vaccine acceptance; vaccine hesitancy; vaccination coverage
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Christian Napoli

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: COVID-19 vaccination acceptance; COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy; lockdown; knowledges; behaviours; COVID-19; legionella; legionellosis; migrants; migrant's health; legionnaires' disease; chikungunya; dengue
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Vaccine Acceptance and Coverage is a collection of papers that evaluate the current situation around vaccine acceptance, including existing vaccines and new vaccines, factors associated with vaccine acceptance and how vaccine acceptance or hesitancy affects immunization coverage across the world.

In recent years with climate change, the emergence of new infectious diseases, and antimicrobial resistance, the role of vaccines in preventing the spread of infectious diseases is more important than ever.

Despite its importance, societies do not always accept vaccines. Vaccine hesitancy is a public health challenge and it is important to gather knowledge on the prevalence of vaccine acceptance or hesitancy and its factors across the globe to obtain insights into how best to mitigate vaccine hesitancy.

It is also crucial to study how vaccine acceptance and/or hesitancy impact immunization coverage. While vaccine effectiveness is scientifically proven, vaccine acceptance and hesitancy are specific to culture and contexts. Gathering information on the consequences of vaccine hesitancy and the potential impact on people’s lives is of crucial importance.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Ryoko Sato
Dr. Christian Napoli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • vaccine
  • vaccination
  • vaccine acceptance
  • vaccine hesitancy
  • vaccination coverage
  • immunization coverage

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 779 KiB  
Article
How Attribution of COVID-19 Crisis Responsibility Predicts Hong Kong Citizens’ Intention to Accept Vaccination
by Ji Won Kim, Qinxian Cai, Lang Kao and Yi-Hui Christine Huang
Vaccines 2024, 12(12), 1305; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12121305 - 22 Nov 2024
Viewed by 106
Abstract
Background: This study aims to illuminate the role of perceived crisis responsibility in shaping vaccination intention. By using the case of Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examined whether and how the allocation of crisis responsibility to the government predicts the public’s [...] Read more.
Background: This study aims to illuminate the role of perceived crisis responsibility in shaping vaccination intention. By using the case of Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examined whether and how the allocation of crisis responsibility to the government predicts the public’s intention to take vaccines, particularly by investigating its underlying mechanism. Method and Results: Based on a population-representative sample of Hong Kong adults (N = 3188), our results indicated that (1) the attribution of crisis responsibility directly led to lower vaccination intention, and (2) it also had indirect influences on vaccination intention through trust and anger; specifically, the crisis attribution resulted in less willingness to take vaccines via a decreased trust in government health agencies. We also found a serial mediation pathway in which anger aroused by the crisis attribution could decrease trust, which, in turn, yielded lower vaccination intentions. Conclusion: The findings of this study offer theoretical insights into the role of attribution of crisis responsibility in affecting vaccination decisions during a public health emergency. Further, these findings provide directions for crisis managers and public health authorities to develop communication strategies to motivate vaccine uptake and formulate an approach to tackle the pandemic crisis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Acceptance and Coverage)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 245 KiB  
Article
Barriers to Childhood Immunisation and Local Strategies in Four Districts in South Africa: A Qualitative Study
by James Michael Burnett, Nqobile Myende, Algernon Africa, Mercy Kamupira, Alyssa Sharkey, Janine Simon-Meyer, Lesley Bamford, Sufang Guo and Ashnie Padarath
Vaccines 2024, 12(9), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091035 - 10 Sep 2024
Viewed by 794
Abstract
Introduction: In South Africa over the past 20 years, immunisation has saved countless lives as well as prevented illnesses and disabilities. Despite this, vaccine-preventable illnesses remain a danger. The demand for and uptake of immunisation services are shaped by a variety of factors [...] Read more.
Introduction: In South Africa over the past 20 years, immunisation has saved countless lives as well as prevented illnesses and disabilities. Despite this, vaccine-preventable illnesses remain a danger. The demand for and uptake of immunisation services are shaped by a variety of factors that can either act as barriers or facilitators to immunisation uptake. The aim of this project was to identify the supply and demand barriers and develop local strategies to improve childhood immunisation in four zero-dose districts in South Africa. Materials and Methods: This study used a mixed-method approach. In each of these four districts, 15 in-depth key informant interviews with health workers and local health managers and four focus group discussions (10 participants per focus group discussion) with community members and caregivers were held over a three-month period. Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed using qualitative analysis software (Nvivo®) into 10 factors as identified as important in influencing immunisation demand and uptake in previous studies. A further four were identified during the data analysis process. Results: Despite the varying role of factors affecting demand and uptake of immunisation services, three consistent findings stand out as major barriers across all districts. The first is interaction with healthcare staff. This clearly highlights the crucial role that the interactions between patients and staff play in shaping perceptions and behaviours related to immunisation services. The second is the overall experience of care at healthcare facilities. This emphasises the role that patient experience of services plays in perceptions and behaviours related to immunisation services. The third is family dynamics. This highlights the important role family dynamics play in shaping individuals’ decisions regarding immunisation uptake as well as the impact it has on the ability of people to access health services. Discussion: The role played by the different factors in the demand and uptake of immunisation services varied across the four districts examined in this study. Each of the districts presents a unique landscape where different factors have varying degrees of importance in affecting the utilisation of immunisation services. In some districts, certain factors are major barriers, clearly hindering the demand and uptake of immunisation services, while in others, these same factors might be a relatively minor barrier. This discrepancy highlights the unique nature of healthcare challenges across the districts and the need for tailored strategy recommendations to address them effectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine Acceptance and Coverage)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop