Topic Editors

Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, 38001 Tenerife, Spain
Prof. Dr. Shein-Chung Chow
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
Dr. Joao Goncalves
Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal

Biosimilars and Interchangeability

Abstract submission deadline
closed (31 October 2024)
Manuscript submission deadline
closed (31 December 2024)
Viewed by
3258

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Biological products include medications for treating many serious illnesses and chronic health conditions. A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to, and has no clinically meaningful differences from, a biological product already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which is also termed the reference product. All biological products are only approved after meeting both agencies’ rigorous approval standards. This definition is based on a comprehensive review of scientific evidence, which demonstrated that the biosimilar is highly similar to the reference product and that there are no clinically meaningful differences between the two products in terms of safety, purity, and potency (i.e., safety and efficacy). This evidence included comparisons of the products at an analytical level, using a comprehensive battery of chemical and biological tests and biological assays to confirm the similarities in the structural and functional characteristics of the two products (including those known to influence safety and efficacy).Additionally, it was supported by comparative data concerning human pharmacokinetics, clinical immunogenicity, safety, and overall effectiveness.

Nevertheless, an outstanding debate surrounds the question of whether biosimilars can be regarded as interchangeable with their reference biological products (and vice versa), or with biosimilars of the same reference product.

The EMA has not issued any official position or guidance on the interchangeability of biosimilars, as prescribing and advising physicians is the responsibility of each Member State of the European Union (EU). In Europe, a biosimilar that meets the rigorous regulatory requirements of the EU Biosimilar Approval Pathway may be considered interchangeable; however, it is at the discretion of each Member State to establish prescribing and dispensing protocols for the interchangeable use of biosimilars. In the United States, the regulatory assessment of biosimilar interchangeability differs from other approaches. The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (BPCIA) legally defines it, and biosimilars that are granted interchangeability status may be substituted for the reference biological product at the pharmacy level, subject to state laws, without the prescribing physician's intervention.

The development of biosimilar products may involve various facets, such as enhancing the recognition and evaluation of product attributes, defining acceptable differences in attributes more accurately between the reference product and the suggested biosimilar product, devising analytical methods to detect relevant disparities, and undertaking comparative analytical evaluation with advanced statistical methodologies. Additionally, exploring the use of in vitro and in silico methods to assess immunogenicity could potentially support demonstrating interchangeability between the reference product and the proposed interchangeable product. In this context, the “switching design” could be of interest.

We are pleased to invite all researchers and research teams that are interested in the field of biosimilars and interchangeability to contribute to this Topic with their manuscript(s). Full original research papers, short communications, and reviews regarding this topic are all welcome.

Dr. Alexis Oliva
Prof. Dr. Shein-Chung Chow
Dr. Joao Goncalves
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • biosimilars
  • interchangeability
  • analytical similarity
  • quality attributes
  • equivalence test
  • tiered approach
  • QR method
  • margin
  • reference product change
  • immunogenicity

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Biologics
biologics
- - 2021 21.8 Days CHF 1000
Molecules
molecules
4.2 7.4 1996 15.1 Days CHF 2700
Pharmaceuticals
pharmaceuticals
4.3 6.1 2004 13.9 Days CHF 2900
Pharmaceutics
pharmaceutics
4.9 7.9 2009 15.5 Days CHF 2900

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 772 KiB  
Article
Assessing Protein Content and Dimer Formation in the Bevacizumab Reference Product and Biosimilar Versions Marketed in Spain
by Alexis Oliva, Magdalena Echezarreta, Álvaro Santana-Mayor, Adrían Conde-Díaz, Joao Goncalves, Shein-Chung Chow and Matías Llabrés
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(12), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16121520 - 26 Nov 2024
Viewed by 690
Abstract
Background: The manufacture of biologics is a complex, controlled, and reproducible process that results in a product that meets specifications. This should be based on data from batches used to demonstrate manufacturing consistency. Ten batches of originator product (Avastin®) were analyzed [...] Read more.
Background: The manufacture of biologics is a complex, controlled, and reproducible process that results in a product that meets specifications. This should be based on data from batches used to demonstrate manufacturing consistency. Ten batches of originator product (Avastin®) were analyzed over a 10-year period. Methods: The β-expectation tolerance intervals and the process capability analysis were proposed to establish the specification limits for determining the acceptance criteria of the final product from the manufacturing process. Protein concentration and dimer content were utilized as CQAs. The analytical similarity between three biosimilars authorized in Spain since 2021 (Vegzelma®, Alymsys®, and Oyavas®) and the originator product were evaluated for both CQAs using two methods: the quality range (QR) method, based on one sample per batch, and the QRML one, which takes into account the inter- and intra-batch variability of the originator product. Results: The results indicate that the two main sources of variation are under control; even the level of variability observed is close to the capability of the analytical method. The manufacturing process, therefore, continues under statistical control. Similarity is demonstrated for the bevacizumab concentration regardless of the approach used, whereas similarity is demonstrated for the dimer content for only one of the biosimilar products. Conclusions: The proposed methodologies allow for the analysis of the consistency of the manufacturing process and the variability from batch to batch. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Biosimilars and Interchangeability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3228 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Critical Quality Attributes of an Anti-PCSK9 Monoclonal Antibody
by Thayana A. Cruz, Nicholas R. Larson, Yangjie Wei, Natalia Subelzu, Yaqi Wu, Christian Schöneich, Leda R. Castilho and Charles Russell Middaugh
Biologics 2024, 4(3), 294-313; https://doi.org/10.3390/biologics4030019 - 11 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1534
Abstract
During early development of biopharmaceuticals, suboptimal producing clones and production conditions can result in limited quantities of high-purity products. Here we describe a systematic approach, which requires minimal amounts of protein (~10 mg) to assess critical quality attributes of a monoclonal antibody (mAb). [...] Read more.
During early development of biopharmaceuticals, suboptimal producing clones and production conditions can result in limited quantities of high-purity products. Here we describe a systematic approach, which requires minimal amounts of protein (~10 mg) to assess critical quality attributes of a monoclonal antibody (mAb). A commercial anti-PCSK9 IgG2 (evolocumab, Repatha®) and an early-stage biosimilar candidate were compared head-to-head using a range of high-throughput physicochemical and in-vitro binding analytical methods. Overall, both mAbs were shown to be highly pure and primarily monomeric, to share an identical primary structure, and to have similar higher-order structural integrity, apparent solubility, aggregation propensity, and physical stability profiles under temperature and pH stress conditions. Low levels of dimers were detected for the innovator (1.2%) and the biosimilar candidate mAb (0.3%), which also presented fragments (1.2%). Regarding charge heterogeneity, the amount of the main charge isoform was 53.6% for the innovator and 61.6% for the biosimilar candidate mAb. Acidic species were 38% for the innovator and 30% for the biosimilar candidate. Variations in the relative content of a few N-glycan species were found. The in-vitro binding affinity to PCSK9 was monitored, and no differences were detected. The mathematical approach called “error spectral difference” (ESD), proposed herein, enabled a quantitative comparison of the biophysical datasets. The workflow used in the present work to characterize CQAs at early stages is helpful in supporting the development of biosimilar mAb candidates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Biosimilars and Interchangeability)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop