Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Biocatalytically Oligomerized Epicatechin with Potent and Specific Anti-proliferative Activity for Human Breast Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Overexpression of the Pdx-1 Homeodomain Transcription Factor Impairs Glucose Metabolism in Cultured Rat Hepatocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anti-carcinogenic Effects of the Flavonoid Luteolin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules13102674
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation of Proanthocyanidins in Plants

by
Fei He
,
Qiu-Hong Pan
,
Ying Shi
and
Chang-Qing Duan
*
Center for Viticulture and Enology, College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, P.R. China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2008, 13(10), 2674-2703; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13102674
Submission received: 11 August 2008 / Revised: 21 October 2008 / Accepted: 23 October 2008 / Published: 28 October 2008
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenolics and Polyphenolics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Proanthocyanidins (PAs), also known as condensed tannins, are a group of polyphenolic secondary metabolites synthesized in plants as oligomers or polymers of flavan-3-ol units via the flavonoid pathway. Due to their structural complexity and varied composition, only in the recent years has the study on the biosynthesis and regulation of PAs in plants taken off, although some details of the synthetic mechanism remain unclear. This paper aims to summarize the status of research on the structures of PAs in plants, the genes encoding key enzymes of biosynthetic pathway, the transport factors, the transcriptional regulation of PA biosynthesis and the genetic manipulation of PAs. The problems of this field were also discussed, including the nature of the final “enzyme” which catalyzes the polymerization reaction of PAs and the possible mechanism of how the elementary units of flavanols are assembled in vivo.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Proanthocyanidins (PAs), also known as condensed tannins, are oligomers or polymers of flavan-3-ol units, which have been used as medicines or tanning agents by humans since ancient times and whose chemistry and synthesis have been studied for many decades [1,2]. As one of the most ubiquitous groups of all plant phenolics, PAs are synthesized via the phenylpropanoid and the flavonoid pathways, and are widespread throughout the plant kingdom, presenting diverse biological and biochemical activities, including protection against predation (herbivorous animals) and pathogen attack (both bacteria and fungal), as well as restricting the growth of neighboring plants [3,4,5,6]. PAs are also widely distributed in foods of plant origin, particularly in fruits, legume seeds, cereal grains and different beverages such as juice, wine, cider, tea and cocoa, where they contribute to the bitter flavor and astringency and have a significant influence on the mouth feel [7,8]. In recent years, considerable attention has been drawn to PAs and their monomers because of their potential beneficial effects on human health such as immunomodulatory and anticancer activities, antioxidant and radical scavenging functions, anti-inflammatory activities, cardio-protective properties, vasodilating and antithrombotic effects, UV-protective functions, etc [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Although PAs, extracted from various plants, especially grapes, have been widely used as nutritional supplements, their safety and potential long term toxicity still need to be further investigated to allow a systematic evaluation [16].
Nowadays, relying upon modern analytical techniques such as high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), mass spectrometry (MS), circular dichroism (CD) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), researchers have been able to detect the low molecular weight compositions of PAs and their derivatives in either natural products or in artificial solutions, and provide a comprehensive understanding of their structures and chemical properties [17,18,19]. On the other hand, with the application of acid-catalyzed PA cleavage in the presence of a nucleophile, such as phloroglucinol, benzyl mercaptan or other nucleophilic agent, researchers can use a post-HPLC analysis to estimate PA polymers from natural products [20,21]. Furthermore, researchers have identified a series of landmarks in PA biosynthesis by means of biochemical, genetic and biogenetic methods, including the recent isolation of the gene for leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR), the functional identification of BANYULS (BAN, the gene for anthocyanidin reductase in Arabidopsis thaliana) and the discovery of a host of new biochemical and regulatory elements and transport factors [22]. However, some important questions in the field of PA biosynthesis remain unanswered. For example, how do flavan-3-ol units polymerize to produce PAs and whether this polymerization is enzyme-mediated or not, as well as what is the exact “enzyme” [1,23].
As early as the 1980s, Stafford commented on the similarities between PAs and lignins, primarily in their common origins as polyphenolic polymers and their potential functions in plant defense [24]. Dixon et al. highlighted this comment and further speculated on the potential commonalities between them with respect to their mode of assembly and the importance of their stereochemistry [1]. Besides these, other previous reviews summarized the foregoing achievement in almost every aspect of the study of PAs mainly in the past 20 years [2,7,9,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. This paper will review the important concepts and updates in the research of PAs with regard to the elucidation of structure and stereochemistry, the general biosynthetic pathway, the potential polymerization mechanisms, their transport, regulation and genetic manipulation. The future trends in this field are also discussed.

Structures of proanthocyanidins

PAs are oligomers and polymers composed of elementary flavan-3-ol units. As they occur widely in the plant kingdom and are considered the second most abundant group of natural phenolics after lignins, the structure complexity of PAs has been studied for many decades [7,32]. However, their structures were still ill defined until the recent application of modern technologies such as NMR, CD and MS. Generally, the structure variability of PAs depends upon the nature (the stereochemistry at the chiral centers and the hydroxylation pattern) of the flavan-3-ol extension and end units, the location and stereochemistry of the interflavan linkage (IFL) between the monomeric units and the degree of polymerization (DP) [1]. Additionally, derivatizations such as O-methylation, O-acylation, C- and O-glycosylation are involved in the rearrangement products of PAs [2].
Molecules 13 02674 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of the 2R-type flavan-3-ols 1, 2 and the 2S-type ent-flavan-3-ols 3, 4.
Figure 1. Structures of the 2R-type flavan-3-ols 1, 2 and the 2S-type ent-flavan-3-ols 3, 4.
Molecules 13 02674 g001
As the building blocks of PAs, the flavan-3-ol units have the typical C6-C3-C6 flavonoid skeletons. The heterocyclic benzopyran ring is referred to as the C ring, the fused aromatic ring as the A ring, and the phenyl constituent as the B ring [33]. They differ structurally according to the nature of the stereochemistry of the asymmetric carbons on the C rings and the number of hydroxyl groups on the B rings. 2,3-trans-(+)-Catechin and 2,3-cis-(-)-epicatechin are stated to be the most usual monomeric units in PAs, which have the opposite stereochemistry of the chiral C3 carbon on the C rings (Figure 1, 1-2). As observed in (+)-catechin (2R, 3S) and (-)-epicatechin (2R, 3R), the C2configuration is almost always R, but some exceptions are found in monocotyledons and in selected dicotyledonous families in succession, such as Rhus, Uncaria, Polygonum, Rapheolepsis and Schinopsis [34,35,36], where flavan-3-ols with 2S type configuration are consequently distinguished by the prefix enantio (ent-), which may further enhance the structure complexity of PAs (Figure 1, 3-4).
Acting in the early steps of the flavonoid pathway, the cytochrome P450 monooxygenases flavonoid 3’-hydroxylase (F3’H) and flavonoid 3’,5’-hydroxylase (F3’5’H) catalyze the formation of the 3’-hydroxyl and 3’,5’-hydroxyl groups on the B rings, respectively [37,38]. Thus, the presence or absence of these two enzymes determines the B-ring hydroxylation pattern of the monomeric units in PAs (Figure 1). Generally, the term proanthocyanidins refers to the release of anthocyanidins from extension positions after being boiled with strong mineral acid. Correspondingly, procyanidins designate oligomers and polymers with 3’,4’-dihydroxyl pattern ((+)-catechin and/or (-)-epicatechin units) extension units, while propelargonidins or prodelphinidins designate oligomers and polymers with extension units of 4’-hydroxyl pattern ((+)-afzelechin and/or (-)-epiafzelechin units) or 3’,4’,5’-trihydroxyl pattern ((+)-gallocatechin and/or (-)-epigallocatechin), respectively. Therefore, PAs can thus be classified, according to the differences in hydroxylation patterns, into several subgroups: propelargonidins (3,4’,5,7-hydroxyl), procyanidins (3,3’,4’,5,7-hydroxyl), prodelphinidins (3,3’,4’,5,5’,7-hydroxyl), proguibourtinidins (3,4’,7-hydroxyl), profisetinidins (3,3’,4’,7-hydroxyl), prorobinetinidins (3,3’,4’,5’,7-hydroxyl), proteracacidins (4’,7,8-hydroxyl), promelacacidins (3’,4’,7,8-hydroxyl), proapigeninidins (4’,5,7-hydroxyl) and proluteolinidins (3’,4’,5,7-hydroxyl), some of which have been synthesized by chemical methods and have not been found to date in Nature [2,30,31]. In fact, when several types of units are present in a plant species or organ they are found together in mixed polymers.
PAs are linked between the C4 position of the upper unit and the C8 or C6 position of the lower unit, and the type of IFL can be either α or β type. Generally, the IFL between C4 and C8 position are stereochemically predominant in procyanidins and prodelphinidins, as the C4→C8 IFL and the C4→C6 IFL are usually present in a ratio of 3:1 [2], but in 5-deoxy PAs, the C4→C6 IFL is predominant [39,40]. Oligomeric and polymeric PAs which are composed of flavan-3-ol units linked mainly through C4→C8 and/or C4→C6 IFL are categorized as B-type PAs. Among the dimers, procyanidins B1, B2, B3 and B4 are linked by the C4→C8 IFL and are the most frequently occurring in plants, whereas procyanidins B5, B6, B7 and B8 are linked by the C4→C6 IFL and are also widespread [23]. On the other hand, the flavan-3-ol units can also be doubly linked by an additional ether bond between C2 position of the upper unit and the oxygen at C7 or C5 position of the lower unit. The oligomers or polymers which contain both C2β→O→7 ether-type IFL and C4→C8 or C4→C6 IFL, as well as those which contain both C2β→O→5 ether-type IFL and C4→C6 IFL are categorized as A-type PAs, which are found in various food of plant origin, such as cranberry, plum, avocado, peanut, etc [32]. The structures of the B-type procyanidins (B1-B8, and C1) and A-type procyanidins (A1-A2) are shown in Figure 2.
However, with more and more new PA oligomers being identified and characterized, the old nomenclature system of PAs with simple letters and numbers no longer meets the needs of researchers. As a result, it is difficult to use it to present a clear understanding of a PA’s structure [41]. A new nomenclature, derived from polysaccharides, was later introduced to name the increasing number of new structures. In this nomenclature, the elementary units of the oligomers are designated with the name of the corresponding flavan-3-ol monomers [42]. The IFL and its location and direction are indicated in parentheses with an arrow (→) and its configuration is described as α or β. In A-type PAs, both linkages are indicated within the parentheses, but it is unnecessary to indicate the oxygen in the additional ether bond since it is obvious from the substitution pattern of flavan-3-ol extension units. For instance, according to this nomenclature, procyanidin dimer B1 is named as epicatechin-(4β→8)-catechin, dimer A1 is named as epicatechin-(4β→8, 2β→7)-catechin and trimer C1 is named as [epicatechin-(4β→8)]2-epicatechin [23].
Molecules 13 02674 g002 550
Figure 2. Structures of the B-type procyanidins 5-12, 15 and A-type procyanidins 13-14.
Figure 2. Structures of the B-type procyanidins 5-12, 15 and A-type procyanidins 13-14.
Molecules 13 02674 g002
The degree of polymerization (DP) is another variable factor for the structure complexity of PAs. Since PAs were first elucidated in 1960s, more than 200 oligomers with DPs of no more than 5 have been well identified and characterized [7,43]. However, plant PA polymers usually have higher DPs. For example, the DP of PAs in cider apple skin and pulp range from 7 to 190, in brown or black soybean coat it can be up to 30 and even more [44,45]. Researchers also usually use mean degree of polymerization (mDP) to evaluate the molecular weight of PAs. For example, the mDP of PAs in pear is from 13 to 44, and in grape seeds it is from 2.3 to 16.7 [46,47]. Interestingly, if all constitutive units and linkages can be distributed at random within a polymer, the number of possible isomers increases exponentially with the chain length, which can be calculated: a given N-DP with x types of constitutive units and y types of linkages is able to generate Nx (N-1)y possible isomers [48].
The presence or absence of modifications of the monomeric flavan-3-ol units further enhances the structure complexity of PAs. Various methyl, acyl or glycosyl substituents of the monomeric units of PAs all occur in natural products [28]. For example, the 3-hydroxyl group of the flavan-3-ol units of B-type PAs in grape seeds is usually esterified with gallic acid [1]. A recent report even shows evidence for the existence of galloylated A-type procyanidins in grape seeds [49]. Besides, free (-)-epigallo-catechin gallate is abundant in tea [50] and (-)-epicatechin gallate is contained in grape seeds [47]. Further more, gallic acid substituted (+)-catechin and (+)-gallocatechin also exist in grape [51,52]. In addition, glycosyl substituent is another common modification of the flavan-3-ol units, for the sugar is usually linked to the 3-hydroxyl group and also to the 5-hydroxyl group sometimes [53,54]. However, PA heterosides are less frequently detected than other flavonoid glycosides, such as anthocyanins.
It is noteworthy to point that as early as the 1970s, modern NMR technology was used to investigate the presence of PA dimers, and was used to demonstrate the phenomenon of their conformational isomerism and to propose two different forms of restricted rotation about IFL: one compact and the other extended [55]. In a rather recent study, through NMR and molecular modeling, researchers revealed the three-dimensional (3D) structures of five B-type PA dimers and their conformational exchange in water and hydro-alcoholic media. Interestingly, they found that the compact form for these PA dimers dominated in most cases and further discussed this finding in relation with tannin-saliva protein interactions which rendered PAs the flavor of astringency in wine [18].
It is well known that the structure determines the property for chemicals [56]. The structure complexity of PAs endows them with multiple biochemical properties, mainly including the interaction of proteins, the chelation of metals and the antioxidant bioactivity [57,58,59]. Surely, these essential properties are not only the basis of their various protective functions for plants, but also their potential nutritional effects for human beings.

General biosynthetic pathway of flavonoids

PAs are synthesized as oligomeric or polymeric end products of one of several branches of the flavonoid pathway, which shares the same upstream pathway with anthocyanins (Figure 3). Because of their great contribution to red color of plants, the biosynthesis of anthocyanins has been extensively investigated at the biochemical and genetic levels [60,61]. In recent years, the cloning and identification of a series of key structure genes relating to the formation of the direct precursors of PAs also lead us to a new era to understand the pathway [22]. Generally, investigations with plant mutants have largely promoted the identification of key structure genes in this pathway, as shown in Table 1 [62,63,64].
As is usual for flavonoid formation, the first committed step of the pathway is the condensation and subsequent intramolecular cyclization of three malonyl-CoA molecules with one 4-coumaroyl-CoA molecule to produce a naringenin chalcone [65]. This process is catalyzed by the ubiquitous plant enzyme chalcone synthase (CHS, EC 2.3.1.74, locus for AtCHS: At5g13930), which possesses extensive biological functions. CHS is found to mainly localize on the endoplasmic reticulum and tonoplast of the epidermal cells in Arabidopsis roots, and also in the chloroplasts or chromoplast of grape berry cells [66,67]. Additionally, the two kinds of precursors are derived from phenylalanine and acetyl-CoA, respectively.
The second step of the pathway is the isomerization of the naringenin chalcone to the naringenin, which can occur spontaneously, without enzymatic activity. However, chalcone isomerase (CHI, EC 5.5.1.6, locus for AtCHI: At3g55120) stereospecifically directs and greatly accelerates the intramolecular cyclization of chalcones to form the flavanones in the cytoplasm of plant cells (about 107-fold more efficiently), which serve as exclusive substrates for downstream reactions [68]. In addition, the production of (2S)-flavanone by the catalysis of CHI is highly stereoselective, for the fact that pure CHI catalyzes the formation of (2S)-flavanone over 105-fold faster than to the (2R)-flavanone and yields over 99.999% of the (2S)-flavanone in the products [69]. Following studies of the reaction mechanism of CHI also support the statement of that CHI controls the preferred formation of the biologically active (2S)-flavanones. For example, only the (2S)-isomer bounds in the CHI active site and the steric clash prevents the formation (2R)-naringenin [70,71]. Further more, the localization of CHI is also mainly on the endoplasmic reticulum and tonoplast of the epidermal cells in Arabidopsis roots, just like CHS [66]. Hither, the basic skeleton of all flavonoids which consist of three C6-C3-C6 aromatic rings has been generated through the catalysis of CHS and CHI.
Table
Table 1. Partial mutants used for identifying structure genes in the general biosynthetic pathway of flavonoids in Arabidopsis thaliana, Maize and Barley.
Table 1. Partial mutants used for identifying structure genes in the general biosynthetic pathway of flavonoids in Arabidopsis thaliana, Maize and Barley.
 Structure proteinsPlant species
ArabidopsisMaizeBarley
 CHStt4c2
 CHItt5chiant30
 F3’Htt7pr1ant1, ant2, ant 5
 F3Htt6fht1ant17, ant22
 DFRtt3a1ant18
 ANSans/tt18a2
 ANRban
 Transportertt12
The following steps are related to the “Gird” section with the B-ring hydroxylation [22]. Flavonoid 3’-hydroxylase (F3’H, EC 1.14.13.21, locus for AtF3’H: At5g07990) or flavonoid 3’,5’-hydroxylase (F3’5’H, EC 1.14.13.88, no F3’5’H gene in Arabidopsis thaliana) can catalyze the conversion of naringenin into eriodictyol or pentahydroxyflavanone, respectively. These two enzymes both belong to the P450 monooxygenase superfamily of membrane-bound hemoproteins and work dependent upon NADPH and O2 [37,38]. All of the three (2S)-flavanones mentioned above can be oxidated to yield dihydroflavonols (dihydrokaempferol, dihydroquercetin and dihydromyricetin, respectively) stereospecifically by flavanone 3-β-hydroxylase (F3H, EC 1.14.11.9, locus for AtF3H: At3g51240), which is a non-heme iron enzyme and acts dependent upon Fe2+, O2, 2-oxoglutarate and ascorbate [72,73]. However, dihydrokaempferol can also be the potential substrate of F3’H or F3’5’H, which can convert it to dihydroquercetin or dihydromyricetin, respectively. Thus, both flavanones and dihydroflavonols can be hydroxylated by F3’H and F3’5’H, and the presence or absence of the two enzymes determines the B-ring hydroxylation pattern of dihydroflavonol, as well as the subsequent monomers in PAs and anthocyanins [37,38].
Molecules 13 02674 g003 550
Figure 3. The general flavonoid pathway leading to the biosynthesis of PAs.
Figure 3. The general flavonoid pathway leading to the biosynthesis of PAs.
Molecules 13 02674 g003
Following these, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR, EC 1.1.1.219, locus for AtF3H: At5g42800), depending upon NADPH, reduces dihydroflavonols (dihydrokaempferol, dihydroquercetin and dihydromyricetin) to form leucoanthocyanidins (also named flavan-3,4-diols, leucopelargonidin, leucocyanidin and leucodelphinidin, respectively) [74]. Different from the key enzymes in the early steps of the flavonoid pathway, DFR belongs to the plant reductase-epimerase-dehydrogenase (RED) superfamily. It is also worthwhile to point out that the conversion of (2R,3R)-dihydroflavonols to (2R,3S,4S)-leucoanthocyanidins by DFR is also stereospecific [75].
Anthocyanidin synthase (ANS, EC 1.14.11.19, Locus for AtANS: At4g22880), also known as leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX), is also a non-haem Fe2+, O2, 2-oxoglutarate and ascorbate dependent oxygenase [76]. ANS used to be recognized as the first pivotal enzyme of anthocyanin formation, but now it has been considered to play a significant role in PA biosynthesis as well [77]. In one pathway branch, leucoanthocyanidin molecules are oxidized by the catalysis of ANS to form colored anthocyanidins (pelargonidin, cyanidin and delphinidin, respectively) firstly [78]. These unstable anthocyanidins could be further converted into colorless (2R,3R)-flavan-3-ols [(-)-epiafzelechin, (-)-epicatechin and (-)-epigallocatechin, respectively] by the action of anthocyanidin reductase (ANR, EC 1.3.1.77, locus for BAN: At1g61720) [79,80]. Recently, researchers demonstrated that ANS from Arabidopsis thaliana is also able to convert its natural substrate leucoanthocyanidin to cis- and trans- dihydroquercetin in vitro, as well as quercetin, showing its flavonol synthase (FLS) activity with leucoanthocyanidin as substrate [81]. A more recent report reveals that beyond the oxidation of leucoanthocyanidins, ANS from Gerbera hybrida can also catalyze the oxidation of (+)-catechin to form an novel 4,4-dimer (93 %) and the conversion of (+)-catechin to cyanidin (7%) in vitro, suggesting its FLS activity with (+)-catechin as substrate [82].
In another pathway branch, leucoanthocyanidins can be converted into (2R,3S)-flavan-3-ols [(+)-afzelechin, (+)-catechin and (+)-gallocatechin, respectively] by leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR, EC.1.17.1.3, no LAR gene in Arabidopsis thaliana) [83]. Interestingly, some plants such as Vitis vinifera, Gossypium arboretum and Gossypium raimondii, contain two homologous LAR genes, whereas other plants such as Hordeum vulgare, Phaseolus coccineus, Pinus taeda, Vitis shuttleworthii only have a single LAR gene in the cells [84]. No LAR gene has ever been found in Arabidopsis thaliana, so PAs in this plant are composed of only (-)-epicatechin units [1]. Both LAR and ANR are two members of the isoflavone reductase-like (IFR-like) group of the plant RED super family, which are both localized in the cytosol [84,85]. Thus, the two familiar potential precursors, 2,3-cis-2R,3R-(-)-epicatechin and 2,3-trans-2R,3S-(+)-catechin are synthesized from two distinct pathway branches by two different substrates and two distinct enzymes, although the difference between these two potential precursors is only in the cis- or trans- stereochemistry at the C2 and the C3 positions of the C-ring [1]. However, there are still no exact answers at present to the existence and the formation of the biosynthetic ent-flavan-3-ols, including 2,3-cis-2S,3S-(+)-epicatechin and 2,3-trans-2S,3R-(-)-catechin.
Additionally, the unstable anthocyanidins can be also glycosylated at the 3-O-position to produce their corresponding anthocyanidin 3-glycosides by the catalysis of UDP-glucose:anthocyanidin/ flavonoid 3-glucosyltransferase (UFGT or 3-GT, EC 2.4.1.115, locus for AtUFGT: At5g54060), leading to the absolute branch pathway of anthocyanin biosynthesis [86,87].
Both (2R,3R)-flavan-3-ols and (2R,3S)-flavan-3-ols, as well as (2R,3S,4S)-flavan-3,4-diols are proposed as the potential precursors of PAs. However, the identity of the final “enzyme” which catalyzes the polymerization reaction of these precursors to form PAs and the exact mechanism whereby the elementary units of flavanols are assembled in vivo remain unknown [1,22,23]. Thus, a unilateral genetic or molecular genetic research approach seems to be not enough, and the debate concerning the operation of an enzymatic or nonenzymatic mechanism for PA condensation still continues. Recently, a plasma membrane H+-ATPase (AHA10, locus for AtAHA10: At1g17260) is found to be required for the formation of PAs in the seed coat endothelium of Arabidopsis thaliana, the mutant of which can disrupt both the PA biosynthesis and the vacuole biogenesis. Further studies support the hypothesis that AHA10 or even other P-type proton pumps in plants could help acidify cytoplasmic or vacuolar compartments [88]. According to the proposed mechanism of acid catalysis of PA formation, flavan-3-ol (terminal unit) can be added to a quinone methide or its protonated carbocation (the precursor of extension unit) nonenzymatically under acidic environment [22]. Thus, the founding of AHA10 is essential to promote such nonenzymatic polymerization mechanisms for PAs.

Transport factors of proanthocyanidin precursors

Generally, the known enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway of flavonoid are observed to mostly locate on the endoplasmic reticulum membranes or in the cytoplasm [66]. However, it is well known that PAs accumulate in the vacuole. Thus, the intracellular transport of PA precursors, flavan-3-ols and/or flavan-3,4-diols from the site of synthesis to the site of storage is a crucial problem in PA biosynthesis.
Up to now, only two genes involved in transport processes required for PA biosynthesis have been identified from the seed coat of Arabidopsis thaliana by genetic analysis methods. Both of the genes are obtained from the transparent testa mutations (light-colored seeds) which are caused by reductions of PA deposition in vacuoles of endothelial cells, and are named as tt12 and tt19, respectively. However, the functional relation between TT12 and TT19 remains unclear until now [89,90].
The TT12 gene (locus: At3g59030) encodes a protein with 12 transmembrane segments exhibiting similarity to prokaryotic and eukaryotic secondary MATE (multidrug and toxic compound extrusion) transporters. This gene is expressed specifically in the endothelial layer of the developing seed coats, suggesting that TT12 may be involved in the accumulation of PA precursors in vacuoles [89]. Further studies reveal that flavan-3-ols and PAs are absent, and quercetin-3-O-rhamnosides are reduced in the vacuoles of tt12 mutant seeds, and this transporter is localized to the tonoplast. Finally, TT12 is demonstrated to act as a vacuolar flavonoid/H+-antiporter on the vacuolar membrane of PA-synthesizing cells of the seed coat. It mediates the MgATP-dependent transport of cyanidin-3-O-glucoside in vitro but not the aglycones cyanidin and epicatechin. Furthermore, TT12 transports neither glycosylated flavonols and procyanidin dimers nor nonglycosylated flavan-3-ol monomers and dimers [91]. As a consequence, a series of new questions about the biosynthesis of PAs are put forward.
The TT19 (locus: At5g17220) gene is a member of the Arabidopsis thaliana glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene family, which is required for transferring anthocyanins into vacuoles. Because the deposition pattern of PA precursors in the tt19 mutant is also different from that in the wild type, TT19 may participate in the PA pathway with an unclear role in flavonoid accumulation [90]. Similar GST genes are also found in other plants. In maize, the Bronze-2 gene encoding a GST is related to the deposition of red and purple pigments (anthocyanins) in the vacuoles of maize issues [92]. In petunia, the AN9 gene encoding a GST involved in anthocyanin transport is quite similar to the TT19 gene functionally, which can complement the Arabidopsis thaliana tt19 mutation with respect to allowing vacuolar uptake of anthocyanins, but can not restore the deposition of PAs [93]. Recently, four specific genes are identified as systematically co-expressed with anthocyanin accumulation in grape berries. One of them is a type-I GST gene which is orthologous to the Bronze-2 gene and the AN9 gene and encodes a flavonoid binding GST protein required for vacuolar transport of anthocyanins [94].
However, no such MATE transporter factors have been found in grapes until now. Interestingly, some very recent research shows the evidence for a putative flavonoid translocator similar to mammalian bilitranslocase (BTL, TC 2.A.65.1.1) in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries of cultivar Merlot (red grapes) during ripening, which is responsible for the transport of anthocyanins [95].

Potential polymerization mechanisms for proanthocyanidins

Although the biosynthesis of the precursors of PAs has been well known for several years, a clear polymerization mechanism is still unknown [23]. Most of models state that the electrophilic C4 position of the extension unit (flavan-3,4-diol) condenses with the nucleophilic C8 or C6 position of the start/terminal unit (flavan-3-ol) to produce PAs [96,97]. However, these models neglect the fact that the enzymatic formation of flavan-3,4-diol is stereospecific 2,3-trans, whereas lots of the extension units are 2,3-cis in plants [75]. To support this, Porter characterized 58 procyanidin oligomers from plants of more than two dozen different species, and found that (-)-epicatechin accounted for 55% and 81% as the start and extension units, respectively [98,99]. This paradox has been standing for a long time and partially been solved by the functional identification of BANYULS in recent years [79]. Up to now, some highly speculative solutions have been developed for the mechanism of PAs condensation.
In one previously proposed route, 2R,3S,4S-leucoanthocyanidins are first converted into 2R,3S-quinone methides, which can be used as the 2R,3S- extension units directly. Meanwhile, they can also be converted into 2R,3R-quinone methides via the flavan-3-en-3-ol intermediates, which can be condensed as the 2R,3R- extension units directly [100]. Furthermore, these trans- or cis- quinone methides could be converted to their corresponding carbocations which could be attacked by (+)-catechins or (-)-epicatechins directly to produce the PAs (Figure 4). However, these hypotheses are lack of direct experimental proof in vivo until now, and the only experimental basis comes from the reports of Creasey and Swain, who first chemically synthesized leucocyanidin from (+)-dihydroquercetin and make it possible to synthesize procyanidins through the condensation reactions of leucocyanidin with either (+)-catechin or (-)-epicatechin in vitro [101].
In another model, flavan-3-ols [(+)-catechins or (-)-epicatechins] are converted to their corresponding quinone methides by the catalysis of polyphenol oxidase (PPO). These quinone methides can be further converted to carbocations via flavan-3-en-3-ol intermediates or be reduced to carbocations through coupled non-enzymatic oxidation, and these carbocations can be accepted as the direct extension units [1]. Interestingly, o-quinones are also supposed to be derived from (+)-catechins or (-)-epicatechins by enzymatic or nonenzymatic reduction [1]. And also via flavan-3-en-3-ol intermediates, o-quinones could be converted to their corresponding carbocations which may participate in the condensation reaction (Figure 5). However, this hypothesis is highly speculative and does not have any direct experimental support.
Molecules 13 02674 g004 550
Figure 4. Putative route of the generation of quinone methides or carbocations from flavan-3,4-diols.
Figure 4. Putative route of the generation of quinone methides or carbocations from flavan-3,4-diols.
Molecules 13 02674 g004
The general localization of PPO is on the plastids (or chloroplasts), whereas the formation and accumulation of PAs is in the vacuoles [102]. Therefore, the model of PPO mediated PA polymerization requires the existence a novel form of PPO with alternative localization [1]. Recently, aureusidin synthase, a flavonoid biosynthetic PPO that catalyzes the oxidative formation of aurones from chalcones in snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) and is responsible for the yellow coloration of flowers, is found to localize within the vacuole lumen, showing us the variability of the PPO localization [103].
Molecules 13 02674 g005 550
Figure 5. Putative route of the generation of quinone methides or carbocations from flavan-3-ols.
Figure 5. Putative route of the generation of quinone methides or carbocations from flavan-3-ols.
Molecules 13 02674 g005
However, in the PPO mediated oxidative polymerization of flavan-3-ols, researchers do not obtain PAs with natural structures, but rather a series of oxidative flavan-3-ols oligomers with particular configurations. For example, in the oxidation of (+)-catechins in aqueous systems carried out using grape PPO as catalysts, some yellow pigments and colorless products of oligomeric (+)-catechins are formed [104]. In another report of Oszmianski and Lee, the enzymatic oxidation of (+)-catechin, chlorogenic acid and their mixture with PPO also produce unnatural dimers and other polymers of (+)-catechin, polymers of chlorogenic acid and copolymers of (+)-catechin and chlorogenic acid, respectively [105]. Here, such oxidative dimers of flavan-3-ols are identified as dehydrodicatechins, which are usually formed as a result of enzymatic oxidation, chemical oxidation or autoxidation of flavan-3-ols [104,106,107]. Generally, the oxidative dimers of flavan-3-ols linked by C6’→C8 or C6’→C6 IFL are classified as B-type dehydrodicatechins, resulting from the repeated condensation reactions between the A-ring of the lower unit and the B-ring of the upper unit through a mechanism of so-called ‘‘head to tail’’ polymerization. Correspondingly, the oxidative dimers which contain additional C-O-C ether-type IFL are classified as A-type dehydrodicatechins, as shown in Figure 6 [104]. Furthermore, a new TT10 gene is obtained through the Arabidopsis thaliana tt10 mutant, which encodes a protein that may be involved in the oxidative polymerization of flavonoids and functions as a laccase-type flavonoid oxidase. Interestingly, the major products resulting from TT10 activity are also yellow quinone-methide epicatechin dimers and trimers, which are not characterized but possibly related to dehydrodicatechins [108]. Therefore, the model of PPO mediated PA polymerization can not obtain direct experimental support from the previous studies, and PAs might not be simply formed through the PPO-mediated condensation mechanism.
Molecules 13 02674 g006 550
Figure 6. Structures of PPO mediated oligomeric flavan-3-ols: B-type (16) and A-type (17) dehydrodicatechins.
Figure 6. Structures of PPO mediated oligomeric flavan-3-ols: B-type (16) and A-type (17) dehydrodicatechins.
Molecules 13 02674 g006
Anthocyanins and anthocyanidins are other groups of potential substrates for PA polymerization [1]. On one hand, anthocyanins are shown to condense with PA monomers (flavan-3-ols), oligomers or polymers in wine to change its tannin composition, as well as its color and mouth-feel [109,110]. And on the other hand, anthocyanidins are mainly present as their corresponding flavylium ions under acidic conditions. These ions may be converted to quinone methides and then to carbocations depending upon PPO [111]. Carbocations can condense with each other as the extension units, and also condense with flavan-3-ols through non-enzymatic oxidation [112].
Furthermore, the biogenesis of 2,3-cis-2R,3R-PAs from 2,3-trans-2R,3R-dihydroflavonols may also be accounted for by tautomerism between quinone methide and flav-3-en-3-ol intermediates [113]. Although flavan-3-en-3-ols may be released from ANR theoretically, no dimeric or oligomeric PAs are detected to form with ANR reactions in vitro [79].

Regulation of proanthocyanidins biosynthesis

Similar to other secondary metabolism pathways in plants, the biosynthetic pathway of PA is under complex control by multiple regulatory genes at the transcriptional level [27]. According to gene structure, these regulatory genes are categorized into six different families: Myc transcriptional factors (encoding basic helix–loop-helix proteins, bHLH), Myb transcriptional factors, WD40-like protein, WRKY transcription factors, MADS homeodomain genes and TFIIIA-like proteins “WIP”, as summarized in Table 2 [22].
Generally, Myc genes, together with other regulatory genes such as Myb genes, make a widely control of the biosynthesis of PAs, as well as some other flavonoid end products like anthocyanins [114,115,116,117]. WD40-like protein is required for the accumulation of anthocyanins and PAs, as well as the formation of root hair and trichome [118]. Recently, researchers found that in Arabidopsis thaliana, several Myb and Myc proteins form ternary MYB-BHLH-WDR (MBW) complexes with WD-repeat proteins that regulate the transcription of genes involved in biosynthesis of anthocyanins and PAs [119]. For example, TT2 (Myb family), TT8 (Myc family), and TTG1 (WD-like protein) form a transcriptional complex capable of directly activating the expression of BAN [120]. WRKY transcription factor is a zinc finger-like protein which acts downstream of WD40-like protein, and also affects the accumulation of PAs [121]. Furthermore, a recent study also suggests that the WRKY transcription factor is directly regulated by Myb transcription factors, such as TT2, etc [122]. MADS homeodomain genes directly regulate BAN and may act upstream of other regulatory genes, but they affect the accumulation of PAs regionally [123,124]. WIP proteins specifically control the assembly of PAs polymer, rather than the formation of monomeric flavan-3-ol units [125]. Additionally, WIP proteins also interact with developmental genes, such as BAN, to control PA biosynthesis. However, besides these six major families, there are also regulatory genes of other types which also have direct or indirect influences on the genes of biosynthesis of anthocyanins and/or PAs, such as ANTHOCYANINLESS2 (ANL2) which is a homeobox gene of the homedomain-leucine zipper (HD-ZIP IV) family, AtDOF4;2 which is a member of DNA-binding-with-one-finger (DOF) transcription factor family, etc [126,127].
Table
Table 2. Transcription factors involved in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Table 2. Transcription factors involved in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Families Genes Locus Gene regulated
 MYC TT8 At4g09820 BAN, DFR
   GL3/EGL3 At5g41315/At1g63650 DFR
 MYB TT2 At5g35550 BAN, DFR, ANS, TT12, AHA10, TT8, TTG2
   PAP1/PAP2 At1g56650/At1g66390 PAL,CHS, DFR, ANS, TT8
 WD40 TTG1 At5g24520 BAN, DFR, TT8, TTG2
 WRKY TTG2 At2g37260 BAN, TT12
 MADS TT16 At5g23260 BAN, TT2
 WIP TT1 At1g34790 BAN
On the other hand, these regulatory genes can also be classified into three different categories according to their functions: (1) regulation of the general genes in the pathway of flavonoid biosynthesis down to anthocyanidins, (2) modulation of the branch pathway of PAs, including the biosynthesis, transport and polymerization of the subunits of PAs; and (3) control of the developmental processes for the generation of the cells accumulating PAs specially [1]. So far, most of the regulatory genes and regulation mechanism have been characterized in Arabidopsis thaliana by using several mutants with low level of PAs or with low levels of both anthocyanins and PAs. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the first category of transcriptional factors which regulate the general flavonoid biosynthesis down to anthocyanidins includes PAP1 & PAP2 (Myb family), GL3 & EGL3 (Myc family) and TTG1, which are connected in a hierarchical network to regulate flavonoid synthesis [115,118,119,128]. The second category of regulatory genes in Arabidopsis thaliana includes TT2, TT8 and TTG1, modulating the expression of the late flavonoid biosynthetic genes, such as DFR, ANS, BAN, the transport factor TT12 and the proton pump AHA10 [116,118,129]. The third category of transcription factors includes TT1, TT16 and TTG2 in Arabidopsis thaliana, and they regulate organ and cell development for PA deposition, as well as the transcription of PA specific genes [121,122,123,125].
It is worth pointing out that a series of Myb and Myc genes are found to work as negative regulators of the biosynthetic pathway of anthocyanins and PAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. MYBL2 encodes a R3-MYB-related protein that interacts with MBW complexes and directly modulates the expression of flavonoid target genes. The loss of MYBL2 activity leads to a dramatic increase in the accumulation of anthocyanins, while overexpression of MYBL2 in seeds inhibits the biosynthesis of PAs, showing its negative regulation on the pathway [130]. MYB4 is a R2R3-MYB that can interact with BHLH proteins controlling the expression of flavonoid structural genes and repress the transcription of early genes in phenylpropanoid metabolism [131,132]. Myc negative regulators affecting flavonoid TTG1-dependent pathways also exist in Arabidopsis thaliana. BHLH32 in Arabidopsis negatively regulates root hair formation, anthocyanin accumulation and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase (PPCK) expression, all of which are induced by (inorganic phosphate) Pi starvation. For example, BHLH32 seems to act as a negative regulator of DFR in Pi-sufficient conditions [133].
Molecules 13 02674 g007 550
Figure 7. Interactions among the transcription factors and the structure proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Figure 7. Interactions among the transcription factors and the structure proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Molecules 13 02674 g007
The relationship between the transcription factors and the structure proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana is illustrated in Figure 7. As shown, a complex regulatory network controls PA accumulation in plants [134]. Almost all of these transcription factors regulate the expression of BAN, suggesting its essential function among the structure genes in the biosynthetic pathway. Meanwhile, TT2, TT8 and TTG1 play a central role in the regulation of the PA biosynthesis and have complicated interactions. For example, TT8 controls its own expression in a feedback regulation involving TTG1 and homologous MYB (TT2, PAP1) and MYC (TT8, GL3 and EGL3) factors [128,129]. However, the direct or indirect regulation of these regulators by internal or external signals leading to controlled responses is more perplexing [135]. In plants, it is well known that fertilization is a key signal to start the PA biosynthesis, as it is required for the differentiation of PA-accumulating cells and the activation of the promoter of BAN, as well as most of other specific structure genes [84,136,137]. Additionally, more and more environmental factors are found to have significant influences on the biosynthesis of PA and anthocyanins in plants, such as light stress and shading, atmospheric change (CO2, N2, O2 and O3), temperature (day and night), exogenous plant hormones (abscisic acid, naphthaleneacetic acid and ethylene), infection of pathogens (bacteria and fungal), UV (UV-A and UV-B) or solar radiation, nitrogen, water and Pi deficiency, etc. These environmental factors do not only manipulate the expression of the structure genes, but also widely affect the functions of the transcription factors [138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149].
Similar regulatory genes are also identified in maize, which are coordinately active at the transcriptional level especially in the aleurone and belong to the first three types: Myc transcriptional factors (R, B-Peru, Sn, Lc), Myb transcriptional factors (Cl, P) and WD40-like protein (PAC1) [150,151,152].
However, until now, only one major class of regulatory genes related to PA biosynthesis has been found in grape: the Myb transcriptional factors. VvMYBPA1, which was cloned and characterized from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) tissues of cultivar Shiraz (red grapes), controls the expression of the pathway genes of PAs including both VvLAR1 and VvANR, but do not activate the promoter of VvUFGT which is considered as an anthocyanin specific gene. That means VvMYBPA1 is specific to regulate the biosynthesis of PAs in grape [153]. Another group of Myb family transcriptional factors in grape named as VvMYBA, including VvMYBA1, VvMYBA2 and VvMYBA3, are only expressed after véraison (grape color change) and demonstrated to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis during ripening [154,155,156]. VvMYB5a is the third grape transcriptional factor that is expressed mainly at the early steps of berry development (prior to véraison) and affects the metabolism of a series of polyphenols, including flavanols, anthocyanins, PAs and even lignins. It is thus suggested that VvMYB5a regulates a series of branches of phenylpropanoid pathway in grapevine, but not only that of flavonoids [157].

Genetic manipulation of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis

PAs have been recognized to play a significant role in the prevention of pasture bloat and the enhancement of bypass proteins [158,159]. Thus, the induction of PA biosynthesis in some forages, such as alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), can largely solve the problems of pasture blot and protein loss [158]. On the other hand, PAs also have negative influences on non-ruminant livestock, because of their properties of non-specific interaction with protein and complexation of metal ions [160,161]. As a result, the reduction of PA content in some crops, such as canola (Brassica napus L.), can also increase their values for non-ruminant livestock feed. However, it is difficult to manipulate the content of PAs in plants by using conventional breeding strategies, such as induced mutation, somaclonal variation and somatic hybridization [20]. Genetic manipulation of PA biosynthesis has its unique advantage, and a lot of the efforts have been drawn to manipulate the PA biosynthesis in the forage legumes, such as alfalfa and Lotus corniculatus (bird’s foot trefoil). Generally, the genes of both structure enzymes and transcription factors are used in the attempts to genetically engineer PA biosynthesis [162,163,164,165,166,167,168].
Three maize anthocyanin regulatory genes C1 (Myb family), Lc and B-peru (Myc family), are all introduced respectively to the genetic alternation of alfalfa which does not produce PAs naturally. However, only in the Lc- transgenic alfalfa both anthocyanins and PAs are accumulated in leaf tissue under stress conditions of high light intensity or low temperature [162]. These results indicate that PA biosynthesis can be stimulated by some Myc transcription factors in alfalfa, and offer us a feasible way to obtain bloat-safe alfalfa forage for ruminants [163].
In contrast, much more efforts have been put into the genetic engineering of that in Lotus corniculatus, a common forage legume which naturally produces PAs. Antisense down-regulation of DFR expression successfully reduces its PA content of up to ≈80% in hair root cultures, but over-expression of DFR in hairy roots results in variable influences on PA content and its monomer composition [164,165]. In another research, over-expression of a maize anthocyanin regulatory gene Sn (Myc family) leads to unexpectedly increase in PA accumulation and to dramatically increase in the number of tannin-containing cells in its tissue [166]. Further studies suggest that light and the transgene Sn synergistically affects the PA biosynthesis, as well as the structure genes in the pathway, such as DFR, ANS, ANR and LAR [167,168].
Beside these, a lot of attempts have been performed in a series of model plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, tobacco and Medicago truncatula, the purpose of which is mainly to clarify the exact functions of the structure genes and the transcription factors, or their functional relations [169,170]. In addition, it is worthwhile to mention that although grapevine is not suitable for being manipulated as the target plant, it is an ideal choice as the gene source, especially for the regulatory genes. Actually, some of Myb transcription factors in grapevine have already been introduced to other model plants. For example, the ectopic expression of VvMYB5a in tobacco has been used in the functional identification of this gene, and the VvMYBPA1 gene can complement the Arabidopsis TT2 gene in its PA deficient mutant [153,157].

Discussion and Conclusions

In the past few years, our knowledge of the mechanism of PA biosynthesis has been changed by a series of advances. Nowadays, researchers have a deep understanding of the structure diversity of PAs, find and identify a host of structure genes and their regulatory factors, and even genetically manipulate the accumulation of PAs or other end products of flavonoid pathway in some plants. However, a number of important questions remain unclear, some of which have been discussed emphatically by previous researcher, as illustrated below [1,22,23].
What mechanism controls the flux at the interface between the anthocyanin and PA pathways, the known structure proteins and/or the regulatory factors? What are the functional relationships between them? Do the circumstance factors have influence on the flux control?
Is LAR unnecessary for the biosynthesis of PAs, as its absence in Arabidopsis thaliana, as well as its product of (+)-catechin? Is this phenomenon a sign of evaluation for plants, or not? How are LAR and ANR regulated at the protein level (translation level)?
What are the exact extension units of PAs, flavan-3-ols, flavan-3,4-diols or their derivates? Does the monomer availability mainly restrict the diversity of the PA composition? How are the ent-flavan-3-ols formed, by nonenzymatic isomerization or enzymatic alternation?
How exactly are the PA precursors transported into the vacuole? Is TT12 the only MATE transporter in plants? Does it cooperate with TT19? How are these glycosylated cyanidin monomers used in vacuole? Is there any homologous transporter which allow vacuolar uptake of nonglycosylated flavan-3-ol monomers as the direct precursors for PAs?
How PA oligomers or polymers are actually assembled in vivo? Is it a nonenzymatic process or operated by one or more structure proteins? If it belongs to an enzymatic mechanism, what are the exact compositions of these enzymes? Is it a polymerase for the direct condensation, or a PPO for the formation of quinone methides? Furthermore, what is the location for the condensation within the vacuole?
We speculate that the answers to the above questions will be obtained depending upon the applications of the biochemical, genetic and biogenetic technologies in no distant further, for example, the screening of the mutants specific to PA condensation in Arabidopsis thaliana or barley, the preparation and application of the antibodies of the key enzymes or transcription factors involved in the biosynthesis of PAs, the application of technologies of protein-protein interaction, etc [171,172,173]. On the other hand, further achievements in other areas of PA studies will also facilitate and accelerate our understanding of this group of polyphenolic secondary metabolites to extent our eyeshot of the natural products and to improve our daily life.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No.30671467 to C.-Q.D).

References and Notes

  1. Dixon, R.A.; Xie, D.Y.; Sharma, S.B. Proanthocyanidins - a final frontier in flavonoid research? New Phytol. 2005, 165, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bruyne, T.D.; Pieters, L.; Deelstra, H.; Vlietinck, A. Condensed vegetable tannins: Biodiversity in structure and biological activities. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1999, 27, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Koes, R.; Verweij, W.; Quattrocchio, F. Flavonoids: a colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feeny, P. Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding by winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 1970, 51, 565–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scalbert, A. Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3875–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bais, H.P.; Vepachedu, R.; Gilroy, S.; Callaway, R.M.; Vivanco, J.M. Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: from molecules and genes to species interactions. Science 2003, 301, 1377–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Santos-Buelga, C.; Scalbert, A. Proanthocyanidins and tannin-like compounds – nature, occurrence, dietary intake and effects on nutrition and health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1094–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peleg, H.; Gacon, K.; Schlich, P.; Noble, A.C. Bitterness and astringency of flavan-3-ol monomers, dimers and trimers. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Prior, R.L.; Gu, L. Occurrence and biological significance of proanthocyanidins in the American diet. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2264–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, M.; Yang, B.; Wang, J.S.; Liu, Y.; Yu, L.M.; Jiang, Y.M. Immunomodulatory and anticancer activities of flavonoids extracted from litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) pericarp. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rao, L.J.M.; Yada, H.; Ono, H.; Ohnishi-Kameyama, M.; Yoshida, M. Occurrence of antioxidant and radical scavenging proanthocyanidins from the Indian minor spice nagkesar (Mammea longifolia planch and triana syn). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Subarnas, A.; Wagner, H. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of the proanthocyanidin shellegueain A from Polypodium feei METT. Phytomedicine 2000, 7, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sato, M.; Maulik, G.; Ray, P.S.; Bagchi, D.; Das, D.K. Cardioprotective effects of grape seed proanthocyanidin against ischemic reperfusion injury. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1999, 31, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sano, T.; Oda, E.; Yamashita, T.; Naemura, A.; Ijiri, Y.; Yamakoshi, J.; Yamamoto, J. Anti-thrombotic effect of proanthocyanidin, a purified ingredient of grape seed. Thromb. Res. 2005, 115, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sharma, S.D.; Meeran, S.M.; Katiyar, S.K. Dietary grape seed proanthocyanidins inhibit UVB-induced oxidative stress and activation of mitogenactivated protein kinases and nuclear factor-кB signaling in vivo SKH-1 hairless mice. Mol. Cancer. Ther. 2007, 6, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yamakoshi, J.; Saito, M.; Kataoka, S.; Kikuchi, M. Safety evaluation of proanthocyanidin-rich extract from grape seeds. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2002, 40, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gu, L.; Kelm, M.A.; Hammerstone, J.F.; Zhang, Z.; Beecher, G.; Holden, J.; Haytowitz, D.; Prior, R.L. Liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization mass spectrometric studies of proanthocyanidins in foods. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38, 1272–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tarascou, I.; Barathieu, K.; Simon, C.; Ducasse, M.A.; André, Y.; Fouquet, E.; Dufourc, E.J.; Freitas, V.; Laguerre, M.; Pianet, I. A 3D structural and conformational study of procyanidin dimers in water and hydro-alcoholic media as viewed by NMR and molecular modeling. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2006, 44, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Slade, D.; Ferreira, D.; Marais, J.P.J. Circular dichroism, a powerful tool for the assessment of absolute configuration of flavonoids. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2177–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matthews, S.; Mila, I.; Scalbert, A.; Pollet, B.; Lapierre, C.; Hervé du Penhoat, C.L.M.; Rolando, C.; Donnelly, D.M.X. Method for estimation of proanthocyanidins based on their acid depolymerization in the presence of nucleophiles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 1195–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kennedy, J.A.; Jones, G.P. Analysis of proanthocyanidin cleavage products following acid-catalysis in the presence of excess phloroglucinol. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marles, M.A.S.; Ray, H.; Gruber, M.Y. New perspectives on proanthocyanidin biochemistry and molecular regulation. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, D.Y.; Dixon, R.A. Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis – still more questions than answers? Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 2127–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stafford, H.A. Proanthocyanidins and the lignin connection. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schofield, P.; Mbugua, D.M.; Pell, A.N. Analysis of condensed tannins: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2001, 91, 21–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kelm, M.A.; Hammerstone, J.F.; Schmitz, H.H. Identification and quantitation of flavanols and proanthocyanidins in foods: How good are the datas? Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2005, 12, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tian, L.; Pang, Y.; Dixon, R.A. Biosynthesis and genetic engineering of proanthocyanidins and (iso)flavonoids. Phytochem. Rev. 2007, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  28. Buzzini, P.; Turchetti, B.; Ieri, F.; Goretti, M.; Branda, E.; Mulinacci, N.; Romani, A. Catechins and proanthocyanidins: naturally occurring O-heterocycles with antimicrobial activity. TopHeterocycl. Chem. 2007, 10, 239–263. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rasmussen, S.E.; Frederiksen, H.; Krogholm, K.S.; Poulsen, L. Dietary proanthocyanidins: occurrence, dietary intake, bioavailability, and protection against cardiovascular disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2005, 49, 159–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ferreira, D.; Li, X.C. Oligomeric proanthocyanidins: naturally occurring O-heterocycles. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2000, 17, 193–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ferreira, D.; Slade, D. Oligomeric proanthocyanidins: naturally occurring O-heterocycles. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2002, 19, 517–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gu, L.; Kelm, M.A.; Hammerstone, J.F.; Beecher, G.; Holden, J.; Haytowitz, D.; Prior, R.L. Screening of foods containing proanthocyanidins and their structural characterization using LC-MS/MS and thiolytic degradation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7513–7521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ribéreau-Gayon, P. Plant Phenolics; Hafner Publishing Company: New York, 1972; p. 254. [Google Scholar]
  34. Geiss, F.; Heinrich, M.; Hunkler, D.; Rimpler, H. Proanthocyanidins with (+)-epicatechin units from Byrsonima crassifolia bark. Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 635–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Santos-Buelga, C.; Kolodzieij, H.; Treutter, D. Procyanidin trimers possessing a doubly linked structure from Aesculus hippocastanum. Phytochemistry 1995, 38, 499–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ferreira, D.; Bekker, R. Oligomeric proanthocyanidins: naturally occurring O-heterocycles. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1996, 13, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Holton, T.A.; Brugliera, F.; Lester, D.R.; Tanaka, Y.; Hyland, C.D.; Menting, J.G.T.; Lu, C.Y.; Farcy, E.; Stevenson, T.W.; Cornish, E.C. Cloning and expression of cytochrome P450 genes controlling flower colour. Nature 1993, 366, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ayabe, S.; Akashi, T. Cytochrome P450s in flavonoid metabolism. Phytochem. Rev. 2006, 5, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Malan, J.C.S.; Young, D.A.; Steynberg, J.P.; Ferreira, D. Oligomeric flavanoids. Part 10. Structure and synthesis of the first tetrahydropyrano[3,2-g]chromenes related to (4,6)-bis-(-)-fisetinidol profisetinidins. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  40. Steynberg, P.J.; Steynberg, J.P.; Bezuidenhoudt, B.C.B.; Ferreira, D. Cleavage of the interflavanyl bond in 5-deoxy (A ring) proanthocyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 31–32. [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson, R.S.; Jacques, D.; Haslam, E.; Tanner, R.J.N. Plant proanthocyanidins -Part 1- Introduction: the isolation, structure and distribution in nature of plant procyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1982, 1387–1399. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hemingway, R.W.; Foo, L.Y.; Porter, L.J. Linkage isomerism in trimeric and polymeric 2,3-cis-procyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1982, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Weinges, K.; Freundenberg, K. Condensed proanthocyanidins from cranberries and cola nuts. Chem. Commun. 1965, 2, 220–222. [Google Scholar]
  44. Guyot, S.; Marnet, N.; Drilleau, J. Thiolysis-HPLC characterization of apple procyanidins covering a large range of polymerization states. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Takahata, Y.; Ohnishi-Kameyama, M.; Furuta, S.; Takahashi, M.; Suda, I. Highly polymerized procyanidins in brown soybean seed coat with a high radical-scavenging activity. J. Agric. FoodChem. 2001, 49, 5843–5847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ferreira, D.; Guyot, S.; Marnet, N.; Delgadillo, I.; Renard, C.M.; Coimbra, M.A. Composition of phenolic compounds in a Portuguese pear (Pyrus communis L. var. S. Bartolomeu) and changes after sun-drying. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 4537–4544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prieur, C.; Rigaud, J.; Cheynier, V.; Moutounet, M. Oligomeric and polymeric procyanidins from grape seeds. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 781–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cheynier, V. Polyphenols in foods are more complex than often thought. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 223S–229S. [Google Scholar]
  49. Passos, C.P.; Cardoso, S.M.; Domingues, M.R.M.; Domingues, P.; Silva, C.M.; Coimbra, M.A. Evidence for galloylated type-A procyanidins in grape seeds. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 1457–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Forrest, G.I.; Bendall, D.S. The distribution of polyphenols in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.). Biochem J. 1969, 113, 741–755. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee, C.Y.; Jaworski, A. Phenolic compounds in white grapes grown in New York. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1987, 38, 277–281. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee, C.Y.; Jaworski, A. Identification of some phenolics in white grapes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1990, 41, 87–89. [Google Scholar]
  53. Achmadi, S.; Syahbirin, G.; Choong, E.T.; Hemingway, R.W. Catechin-3-O-rhamnoside chain extender units in polymeric procyanidins from mangrove bark. Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 217–219. [Google Scholar]
  54. Iida, N.; Inatomi, Y.; Murata, H.; Inada, A.; Murata, J.; Lang, F.A.; Matsuura, N.; Nakanishi, T. A new flavone xyloside and two new flavan-3-ol glucosides from Juniperus communis var. depressa. Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fletcher, A.C.; Porter, L.J.; Haslam, E.; Gupta, R.K. Plant proanthocyanidins. Part 3. Conformational and configurational studies of natural procyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1977, 1628–1637. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zucker, W.V. Tannins: does structure determine function? An ecological perspective. Am. Nat. 1983, 121, 335–365. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sarni-Manchado, P.; Cheynier, V.; Moutounet, M. nteractions of grape seed tannins with salivary proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kennedy, J.A.; Powell, K.J. Polyphenol interactions with aluminium(III) and iron(III): their possible involvement in the podzolization process. Aust. J. Chem. 1985, 38, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Weber, H.A.; Hodges, A.E.; Guthrie, J.R.; O’Brien, B.M.; Robaugh, D.; Clark, A.P.; Harris, R.K.; AlgaierL, J.W.; Smith, C.S. Comparison of proanthocyanidins in commercial antioxidants: grape seed and pine bark extracts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Saito, K.; Yamazaki, M. Tansley review no. 138 Biochemistry and molecular biology of the late-stage of biosynthesis of anthocyanin: lessons from Perilla frutescens as a model plant. New Phyto. 2002, 155, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Springob, K.; Nakajima, J.; Yamazaki, M.; Saito, K. Recent advances in the biosynthesis and accumulation of anthocyanins. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2003, 20, 288–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Abrahams, S.; Tanner, G.J.; Larkin, P.J.; Ashton, A.R. Identification and biochemical characterization of mutants in proanthocyanidin pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2002, 130, 561–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cone, K.C. Anthocyanin synthesis in maize aleurone tissue. Plant Cell Monogr. 2007, 8, 121–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jende-Strid, B. Genetic control of flavonoid biosynthesis in barley. Hereditas 1993, 119, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kreuzaler, F.; Hahlbrock, K. Enzymatic synthesis of aromatic compounds in higher plants. Formation of naringenin (5,7,4'-trihydroxyflavanone) from p-coumaroyl coenzyme A and malonyl coenzyme A. FEBS Lett. 1972, 28, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Saslowsky, D.; Winkel-Shirley, B. Localization of flavonoid enzymes in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J. 2001, 27, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tian, L.; Wan, S.B.; Pan, Q.H.; Zheng, Y.J.; Huang, W.D. A novel plastid localization of chalcone synthase in developing grape berry. Plant Sci. 2008, 175, 431–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cain, C.C.; Saslowsky, D.E.; Walker, R.A.; Shirley, B.W. Expression of chalcone synthase and chalcone isomerase proteins in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 35, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bednar, R.A.; Hadcock, J.R. Purification and Characterizationo of Chalcone Isomerase from Soybeans. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 9582–9588. [Google Scholar]
  70. Jez, J.M.; Bowman, M.E.; Dixon, R.A.; Noel, J.P. Structure and mechanism of the evolutionarily unique plant enzyme chalcone isomerase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jez, J.M.; Noel, J.P. Reaction mechanism of chalcone isomerase. J. Biol.Chem. 2002, 277, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Britsch, L.; Dedio, J.; Saedler, H.; Forkmann, G. Molecular characterization of flavanone 3β-hydroxylases. Consensus sequence, comparison with related enzymes and the role of conserved histidine residues. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993, 217, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lukačin, R.; Urbanke, C.; Gröning, I.; Matern, U. The monomeric polypeptide comprises the functional flavanone 3β-hydroxylase from Petunia hybrida. FEBS Lett. 2000, 467, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Martens, S.; Teeri, T.; Forkmann, G. Heterologous expression of dihydroflavonol 4-reductases from various plants. FEBS Lett. 2002, 531, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Petit, P.; Granier, T.; d’Estaintot, B.L.; Manigand, C.; Bathany, K.; Schmitter, J.M.; Lauvergeat, V.; Hamdi, S.; Gallois, B. Crystal structure of grape dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, a key enzyme in flavonoid biosynthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 1345–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nakajima, J.; Tanaka, Y.; Yakushiji, H.; Saito, K. Reaction mechanism from leucoanthocyanidin to anthocyanidin 3-glucoside, a key reaction for coloring in anthocyanin biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 25797–25803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pelletier, M.K.; Murrell, J.R.; Shirley, B.W. Characterization of flavonol synthase and leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase genes in Arabidopsis. Further evidence for differential regulation of “Early” and “Late” genes. Plant Physiol. 1997, 11, 1437–1445. [Google Scholar]
  78. Saito, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Gong, Z; Tanaka, Y.; Yamazaki, M. Direct evidence for anthocyanidin synthase as a 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenase molecular cloning and functional expression of cDNA from a red forma of Perilla frutescens. Plant J. 1999, 17, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xie, D.Y.; Sharma, S.B.; Paiva, N.L.; Ferreira, D.; Dixon, R.A. Role of anthocyanidin reductase, encoded by BANYULS in plant flavonoid biosynthesis. Science 2003, 299, 396–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xie, D.Y.; Sharma, S.B.; Dixon, R.A. Anthocyanidin reductases from Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis thaliana. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 422, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Welford, R.W.D.; Turnbull, J.J.; Claridge, T.D.W.; Prescott, A.G.; Schofield, C.J. Evidence for oxidation at C-3 of the flavonoid C-ring during anthocyanin biosynthesis. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1828–1829. [Google Scholar]
  82. Wellmann, F.; Griesser, M.; Schwab, W.; Martens, S.; Eisenreich, W.; Matern, U.; Lukačin, R. Anthocyanidin synthase from Gerbera hybrida catalyzes the conversion of (+)-catechin to cyanidin and a novel procyanidin. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1642–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tanner, G.J.; Francki, K.T.; Abrahams, S.; Watson, J.M.; Larkin, P.J.; Ashton, A.R. Proanthocyanidin Biosynthesis in Plants. Proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in plants. Purification of legume leucoanthocyanidin reductase and molecular cloning of its cDNA. J. Biol Chem. 2003, 278, 31647–31656. [Google Scholar]
  84. Bogs, J.; Downey, M.O.; Harvey, J.S.; Ashton, A.R.; Tanner, G.J.; Robinson, S.P. Proanthocyanidin synthesis and expression of genes encoding leucoanthocyanidin reductase and anthocyanidin reductase in developing grape berries and grapevine leaves. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pang, Y.; Peel, G.J.; Wright, E.; Wang, Z.; Dixon, R.A. Early steps in proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ford, C.M.; Boss, P.K.; Høj, P.B. Cloning and characterization of Vitis vinifera UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase, a homologue of the enzyme encoded by the maize Bronze-1 locus that may primarily serve to glucosylate anthocyanidins in vivo. J. Biol Chem. 1998, 273, 9224–9233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kim, J.H.; Kim, B.G.; Ko, J.H.; Lee, Y.; Hur, H.G.; Lim, Y.; Ahn, J.H. Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of a flavonoid glycosyltransferase from Arabidopsis thalian. Plant Sci. 2006, 170, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Baxter, I.R.; Young, J.C.; Armstrong, G.; Foster, N.; Bogenschutz, N.; Cordova, T.; Peer, W.A.; Hazen, S.P.; Murphy, A.S.; Harper, J.F. A plasma membrane H+-ATPase is required for the formation of proanthocyanidins in the seed coat endothelium of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 2649–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Debeaujon, I.; Peeters, A.J.M.; Léon-Kloosterziel, K.M.; Koornneef, M. The TRANSPARENT TESTA12 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a multidrug secondary transporter-like protein required for flavonoid sequestration in vacuoles of seed coat endothelium. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 853–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kitamura, S.; Shikazono, N.; Tanaka, A. TRANSPARENT TESTA19 is involved in the accumulation of both anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2004, 37, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Marinova, K.; Pourcel, L.; Weder, B.; Schwarz, M.; Barron, D.; Routaboul, J.M.; Debeaujon, I.; Klein, M. The Arabidopsis MATE transporter TT12 acts as a vacuolar Flavonoid/H+-Antiporter active in proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells of the seed coat. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2023–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Marrs, K.A.; Alfenlto, M.R.; Lloyd, A.M.; Walbot, V. A glutathione S-transferase involved in vacuolar transfer encoded by the maize gene Bronze-2. Nature 1995, 375, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mueller, L.A.; Goodman, C.D.; Silady, R.A.; Walbot, V. AN9, a petunia glutathione S-transferase required for anthocyanin sequestration, is a flavonoid-binding protein. Plant Physiol 2000, 123, 1561–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ageorges, A.; Fernandez, L.; Vialet, S.; Merdinoglu, D.; Terrier, N.; Romieu, C. Four specific isogenes of the anthocyanin metabolic pathway are systematically co-expressed with the red colour of grape berries. Plant Sci. 2006, 170, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Braidot, E.; Petrussa, E.; Bertolini, A.; Peresson, C.; Ermacora, P.; Loi, N.; Terdoslavich, M.; Passamonti, S.; Macrì, F.; Vianello, A. Evidence for a putative flavonoid translocator similar to mammalian bilitranslocase in grape berries (Vitis vinifera L.) during ripening. Planta 2008, 228, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Botha, J.J.; Ferreira, D.; Roux, D.G. Synthesis of condensed tannins. Part 4. A direct biomimetic approach to [4,6]- and [4,8]- biflavonoids. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 1235–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Delcour, J.A.; Ferreira, D.; Roux, D.G. Synthesis of condensed tannins. Part 9. The condensation sequence of leucocyanidin with (+)-catechin and with the resultant procyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983, 1711–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Porter, L.J. The Flavonoids. In Flavans and Proanthocyanidins; Harborne, J.B., Ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1988; pp. 21–62. [Google Scholar]
  99. Porter, L.J. The Flavonoids: Advances in Research Since 1986. In Flavans and Proanthocyanidins; Harborne, J.B., Ed.; Chapman& Hall: London, UK, 1993; pp. 23–55. [Google Scholar]
  100. Hemingway, R.W.; Laks, P.E. Condensed tannins: a proposed route to 2R,3R-(2,3-cis)-proanthocyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 746–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Creasey, L.L.; Swain, T. Structure of condensed tannins. Nature 1965, 208, 151–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vaughn, K.C.; Lax, A.R.; Duke, S.O. Polyphenol oxidase: the chloroplast enzyme with no established function. Physiol. Plant. 1988, 72, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ono, E.; Hatayama, M.; Isono, Y.; Sato, T.; Watanabe, R.; Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.; Fukuchi-Mizutani, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Kusumi, T.; Nishino, T.; Nakayama, T. Localization of a flavonoid biosynthetic polyphenol oxidase in vacuoles. Plant J. 2006, 45, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Guyot, S.; Vercauteren, J.; Cheynier, V. Structural determination of colourless and yellow dimers resulting from (+)-catechin coupling catalyzed by grape polyphenoloxidase. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Oszmianski, J.; Lee, C.Y. Enzymatic oxidative reaction of catechin and chlorogenic acid in a model system. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 1202–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Oszmianski, J.; Cheynier, V.; Moutounet, M. Iron-catalyzed oxidation of (+)-catechin in model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 1712–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sun, W.; Miller, J.M. Tandem mass spectrometry of the B-type procyanidins in wine and B-type dehydrodicatechins in an autoxidation mixture of (+)-catechin and (-)-epicatechin. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pourcel, L.; Routaboul, J.M.; Kerhoas, L.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L.; Debeaujon, I. TRANSPARENT TESTA10 Encodes a laccase-like enzyme involved in oxidative polymerization of flavonoids in Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2966–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vidal, S.; Cartalade, D.; Souquet, J.M.; Fulcrand, H.; Cheynier, V. Changes in proanthocyanidin chain length in winelike model solutions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2261–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Remy-Tanneau, S.; Guernevé, C.L.; Meudec, E.; Cheynier, V. Characterization of a colorless anthocyanin-flavan-3-ol dimer containing both carbon-carbon and ether interflavanoid linkages by NMR and mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3592–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yokotsuka, K.; Singleton, V.L. Disappearance of anthocyanins as grape juice is prepared and oxidized with PPO and PPO substrates. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1997, 48, 13–25. [Google Scholar]
  112. Escribano-Bailon, T.; Dangles, O.; Brouillard, R. Coupling reactions between flavylium ions and catechin. Phytochemistry 1996, 41, 1583–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hemingway, R.W.; Laks, P.E. Condensed tannins: a proposed route to 2R,3R-(2,3-cis)-proanthocyanidins. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 746–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nesi, N.; Debeaujon, I.; Jond, C.; Pelletier, G.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. The TT8 gene encodes a basic helix-loop-helix domain protein required for expression of DFR and BAN genes in Arabidopsis Siliques. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1863–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ramsay, N.A.; Walker, A.R.; Mooney, M.; Gray, J.C. Two basic-helix-loop-helix genes (MYC-146 and GL3) from Arabidopsis can activate anthocyanin biosynthesis in a white-flowered Matthiola incana mutant. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 52, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nesi, N.; Jond, C.; Debeaujon, I.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. The Arabidopsis TT2 gene encodes an R2R3 MYB domain protein that acts as a key determinant for proanthocyanidin accumulation in developing seed. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2099–2114. [Google Scholar]
  117. Borevitz, J.; Xia, Y.; Blount, J.W.; Dixon, R.A.; Lamb, C. Activation tagging identifies a conserved MYB regulator of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2383–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Walker, A.R.; Davison, P.A.; Bolognesi-Winfield, A.C.; James, C.M.; Srinivasan, N.; Blundell, T.L.; Esch, J.J.; Marks, M.D.; Gray, J.C. The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 1337–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gonzalez, A.; Zhao, M.; Leavitt, J.M.; Lloyd, A.M. Regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway by the TTG1/bHLH/Myb transcriptional complex in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 2008, 53, 814–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Baudry, A.; Heim, M.A.; Dubreucq, B.; Caboche, M.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of BANYULS and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004, 39, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Johnson, C.S.; Kolevski, B.; Smyth, D.R. TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2, a trichome and seed coat development gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a WRKY transcription factor. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 1359–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ishida, T.; Hattori, S.; Sano, R.; Inoue, K.; Shirano, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Shibata, D.; Sato, S.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Okada, K.; Wadaa, T. Arabidopsis TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2 is directly regulated by R2R3 MYB transcription factors and is involved in regulation of GLABRA2 transcription in epidermal differentiation. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2531–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Nesi, N.; Debeaujon, I.; Jond, C.; Stewart, A.J.; Jenkins, G.I.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. The TRANSPARENT TESTA16 locus encodes the Arabidopsis bisister MADS domain protein and is required for proper development and pigmentation of the seed coat. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2463–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lalusin, A.G.; Nishita, K.; Kim, S.H.; Ohta, M.; Fujimura, T. A new MADS-box gene (IbMADS10) from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) is involved in the accumulation of anthocyanin. Mol. Gen. Genomics. 2006, 275, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sagasser, M.; Lu, G.H.; Hahlbrock, K.; Weisshaar, B.A. A. thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA 1 is involved in seed coat development and defines the WIP subfamily of plant zinc finger proteins. Gene. Dev. 2001, 16, 138–149. [Google Scholar]
  126. Kubo, H.; Kishi, M.; Goto, K. Expression analysis of ANTHOCYANINLESS2 gene in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Skirycz, A.; Jozefczuk, S.; Stobiecki, M.; Muth, D.; Zanor, M.I.; Witt, I.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Transcription factor AtDOF4;2 affects phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. NewPhytol. 2007, 175, 425–438. [Google Scholar]
  128. Zhang, F.; Gonzalez, A.; Zhao, M.; Payne, C.T.; Lloyd, A. A network of redundant bHLH proteins functions in all TTG1-dependent pathways of Arabidopsis. Development 2003, 130, 4859–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Baudry, A.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. TT8 controls its own expression in a feedback regulation involving TTG1 and homologous MYB and bHLH factors, allowing a strong and cell-specific accumulation of flavonoids in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2006, 46, 768–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dubos, C.; Le Gourrierec, J.; Baudry, A.; Huep, G.; Lanet, E.; Debeaujon, I.; Routaboul, J.-M.; Alboresi, A.; Weisshaar, B.; Lepiniec, L. MYBL2 is a new regulator of flavonoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2008, 55, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zimmermann, I.M.; Heim, M.A.; Weisshaar, B.; Uhrig, J.F. Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. Plant J. 2004, 40, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jin, H.; Cominelli, E.; Bailey, P.; Parr, A.; Mehrtens, F.; Jones, J.; Tonelli, C.; Weisshaar, B.; Martin, C. Transcriptional repression by AtMYB4 controls production of UV-protecting sunscreens in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 6150–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Chen, Z.-H.; Nimmo, G.A.; Jenkins, G.I.; Nimmo, H.G. BHLH32 modulates several biochemical and morphological processes that respond to Pi starvation in Arabidopsis. Biochem. J. 2007, 405, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  134. Broun, P. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis: a complex network of conserved regulators involved in multiple aspects of differentiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Endt, D.V.; Kijne, J.W.; Memelink, J. Transcription factors controlling plant secondary metabolism: what regulates the regulators? Phytochemistry 2002, 61, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Devic, M.; Guilleminot, J.; Debeaujon, I.; Bechtold, N.; Bensaude, E.; Koornneef, M.; Pelletier, G.; Delseny, M. The BANYULS gene encodes a DFR-like protein and is a marker of early seed coat development. Plant J. 1999, 19, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Debeaujon, I.; Nesi, N.; Perez, P.; Devic, M.; Grandjean, O.; Caboche, M.; Lepiniec, L. Proanthocyanidin-accumulating cells in Arabidopsis testa: regulation of differentiation and role in seed development. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2514–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cominelli, E.; Gusmaroli, G.; Allegra, D.; Galbiati, M.; Wade, H.K.; Jenkins, G.I.; Tonelli, C. Expression analysis of anthocyanin regulatory genes in response to different light qualities in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Peltonen, P.A.; Vapaavuori, E.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Accumulation of phenolic compounds in birch leaves is changed by elevated carbon dioxide and ozone. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11, 1305–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mori, K.; Sugaya, S.; Gemma, H. Decreased anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries grown under elevated night temperature condition. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 105, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ubi, B.E.; Honda, C.; Bessho, H.; Kondo, S.; Wada, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Moriguchi, T. Expression analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in apple skin: effect of UV-B and temperature. Plant Sci. 2006, 170, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jeong, S.T.; Goto-Yamamoto, N.; Kobayashi, S.; Esaka, M. Effects of plant hormones and shading on the accumulation of anthocyanins and the expression of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in grape berry skins. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. El-Kereamy, A.; Chervin, C.; Roustan, J.P.; Cheynier, V.; Souquet, J.M.; Moutounet, M.; Raynal, J.; Ford, C.; Latché, A.; Pech, J.C.; Bouzayen, M. Exogenous ethylene stimulates the long-term expression of genes related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in grape berries. Physiol. Plant. 2003, 119, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Punyasiri, P.A..; Tanner, G.J.; Abeysinghe, I.S.B.; Kumar, V.; Campbell, P.M.; Pradeepa, N.H.L. Exobasidium vexans infection of Camellia sinensis increased 2,3-cis isomerisation and gallate esterification of proanthocyanidins. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 2987–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kortekamp, A. Expression analysis of defence-related genes in grapevine leaves after inoculation with a host and a non-host pathogen. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Hirner, A.A.; Veit, S.; Seitz, H.U. Regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in UV-A-irradiated cell cultures of carrot and in organs of intact carrot plants. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ryan, K.G.; Swinny, E.E.; Markham, K.R.; Winefield, C. Flavonoid gene expression and UV photoprotection in transgenic and mutant Petunia leaves. Phytochemistry 2002, 59, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Lea, U.S.; Slimestad, R.; Smedvig, P.; Lillo, C. Nitrogen deficiency enhances expression of specific MYB and bHLH transcription factors and accumulation of end products in the flavonoid pathway. Planta 2007, 225, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Castellarin, S.D.; Matthews, M.A.; Gaspero, G.D.; Gambetta, G.A. Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries. Planta 2007, 227, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Taylor, L.P.; Briggs, W.R. Genetic Regulation and Photocontrol of Anthocyanin Accumulation in Maize Seedlings. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hartmann, U.; Sagasser, M.; Mehrtens, F.; Stracke, R.; Weisshaar, B. Differential combinatorial interactions of cis-acting elements recognized by R2R3-MYB, BZIP, and BHLH factors control light-responsive and tissue-specific activation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 155–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Carey, C.C.; Strahle, J.T.; Selinger, D.A.; Chandler, V.L. Mutations in the pale aleurone color1 regulatory gene of the Zea mays anthocyanin pathway have distinct phenotypes relative to the functionally similar TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Bogs, J.; Jaffé, F.W.; Takos, A.M.; Walker, A.R.; Robinson, S.P. The grapevine transcription factor VvMYBPA1 regulates proanthocyanidin synthesis during fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1347–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kobayashi, S.; Goto-Yamamoto, N.; Hirochika, H. Association of VvmybA1 gene expression with anthocyanin production in grape (Vitis vinifera) skin-color mutants. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2005, 74, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Walker, A.R.; Lee, E.; Bogs, J.; McDavid, D.A.J.; Thomas, M.R.; Robinson, S.P. White grapes arose through the mutation of two similar and adjacent regulatory genes. Plant J. 2007, 49, 772–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kobayashi, S.; Ishimaru, M.; Hiraoka, K.; Honda, C. Myb-related genes of the Kyoho grape (Vitis labruscana) regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis. Planta 2002, 215, 924–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Deluc, L.; Barrieu, F.; Marchive, C.; Lauvergeat, V.; Decendit, A.; Richard, T.; Carde, J.P.; Mérillon, J.M.; Hamdi, S. Characterization of a grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor that regulates the phenylpropanoid pathway. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Goplen, B.P.; Howarth, R.E.; Sarkar, S.K.; Lesins, K. A search for condensed tannins in annual and perennial species of Medicago, Trigonella, and Onobrychis. Crop Sci. 1980, 20, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Lees, G.L. Condensed tannins in some forage legumes: their role in the prevention of ruminant pasture bloat. Basic Life Sci. 1992, 59, 915–934. [Google Scholar]
  160. Robbins, C.T.; Mole, S.; Hagerman, A.E.; Hanley, T.A. Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in dry matter digestion? Ecologl. 1987, 68, 1606–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sarwar, G.; Bell, J.M.; Sharby, T.F.; Jones, J.D. Nutritional evaluation of meals and meal fractions derived from rape and mustard seed. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1981, 61, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ray, H.; Yu, M.; Auser, P.; Blahut-Beatty, L.; Mckersie, B; Bowley, S.; Westcott, N.; Coulman, B.; Lloyd, A.; Gruber, M.Y. Expression of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins after transformation of alfalfa with maize Lc. Plant Physiology 2003, 132, 1448–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, Y.; Frutos, P.; Gruber, M.Y.; Ray, H.; McAllister, T.A. In vitro ruminal digestion of anthocyanidin-containing alfalfa transformed with the maize Lc regulatory gene. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2006, 86, 1119–1130. [Google Scholar]
  164. Carron, T.R.; Robbins, M.P.; Morris, P. Genetic modification of condensed tannin biosynthesis in Lotus corniculatus. 1. Heterologous antisense dihydroflavonol reductase down-regulates tannin accumulation in ‘hairy root’ cultures. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1994, 87, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar]
  165. Bavage, A.D.; Davies, I.G.; Robbins, M.P.; Morris, P. Expression of an Antirrhinum dihydroflavonol reductase gene results inchanges in condensed tannin structure and accumulation in root cultures of Lotus corniculatus (bird’s foot trefoil). Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 35, 443–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Robbins, M.P.; Paolocci, F.; Hughes, J.W.; Turchetti, V.; Allison, G.; Arcioni, S.; Morris, P.; Damiani, F. Sn, a maize bHLH gene, modulates anthocyanin and condensed tannin pathways in Lotus corniculatus. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Paolocci, F.; Bovone, T.; Tosti, N.; Arcioni, S.; Damiani, F. Light and an exogenous transcription factor qualitatively and quantitatively affect the biosynthetic pathway of condensed tannins in Lotus corniculatus leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1093–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Paolocci, F.; Robbins, M.P.; Madeo, L.; Arcioni, S.; Martens, S.; Damiani, F. Ectopic expression of a basic helix-loop-helix gene transactivates parallel pathways of proanthocyanidin biosynthesis. Structure, expression, analysis, and genetic control of leucoanthocyanidin 4-reductase and anthocyanidin reductase genes in Lotus corniculatus. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 504–516. [Google Scholar]
  169. Sharma, S.B.; Dixon, R.A. Metabolic engineering of proanthocyanidins by ectopic expression of transcription factors in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 44, 62–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Xie, D.Y.; Sharma, S.B.; Wright, E.; Wang, Z.Y.; Dixon, R.A. Metabolic engineering of proanthocyanidins through co-expression of anthocyanidin reductase and the PAP1 MYB transcription factor. Plant J. 2006, 45, 895–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Abrahams, S.; Tanner, G.J.; Larkin, P.J.; Ashton, A.R. Identification and biochemical characterization of mutants in proanthocyanidin pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 561–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Tian, L.; Kong, W.F.; Pan, Q.H.; Zhan, J.C.; Wen, P.F.; Chen, J.Y.; Wan, S.B.; Huang, W.D. Expression of the chalcone synthase gene from grape and preparation of an anti-CHS antibody. Protein Expres. Purif. 2006, 50, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Hunt, A.G.; Xu, R.; Addepalli, B.; Rao, S.; Forbes, K.P.; Meeks, L.R.; Xing, D.; Mo, M.; Zhao, H.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Dampanaboina, L.; Marion, A.; Von Lanken, C.; Li, Q.Q. Arabidopsis mRNA polyadenylation machinery: Comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions and gene expression profiling. BMC Genomic. 2008, 9. Article number 220. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, F.; Pan, Q.-H.; Shi, Y.; Duan, C.-Q. Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation of Proanthocyanidins in Plants. Molecules 2008, 13, 2674-2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13102674

AMA Style

He F, Pan Q-H, Shi Y, Duan C-Q. Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation of Proanthocyanidins in Plants. Molecules. 2008; 13(10):2674-2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13102674

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Fei, Qiu-Hong Pan, Ying Shi, and Chang-Qing Duan. 2008. "Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation of Proanthocyanidins in Plants" Molecules 13, no. 10: 2674-2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13102674

APA Style

He, F., Pan, Q. -H., Shi, Y., & Duan, C. -Q. (2008). Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation of Proanthocyanidins in Plants. Molecules, 13(10), 2674-2703. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13102674

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop