Next Article in Journal
Two-Photon Polarization Dependent Spectroscopy in Chirality: A Novel Experimental-Theoretical Approach to Study Optically Active Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Diversity-Oriented Synthesis of a Library of Substituted Tetrahydropyrones Using Oxidative Carbon-Hydrogen Bond Activation and Click Chemistry
Previous Article in Journal
Selenol Protecting Groups in Organic Chemistry: Special Emphasis on Selenocysteine Se-Protection in Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Challenges and Perspectives of Chemical Biology, a Successful Multidisciplinary Field of Natural Sciences
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Polymer to Small Organic Molecules: A Tight Relationship between Radical Chemistry and Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis

Department of Chemical Core Technologies, Nerviano Medical Sciences S.r.l., V.le Pasteur, 10, 20014, Nerviano (MI), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2011, 16(4), 3252-3314; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16043252
Submission received: 8 March 2011 / Revised: 28 March 2011 / Accepted: 11 April 2011 / Published: 18 April 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity Oriented Synthesis)

Abstract

:
Since Gomberg’s discovery of radicals as chemical entities, the interest around them has increased through the years. Nowadays, radical chemistry is used in the synthesis of 75% of all polymers, inevitably establishing a close relationship with Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis. More recently, the interest of organic chemists has shifted towards the application of usual “in-solution” radical chemistry to the solid-phase, ranging from the use of supported reagents for radical reactions, to the development of methodologies for the synthesis of small molecules or potential libraries. The aim of this review is to put in perspective radical chemistry, moving it away from its origin as a synthetic means for solid supports, to becoming a useful tool for the synthesis of small molecules.

Abbreviations

AIBN
Azo-bis-isobutyronitrile
AMBN
azobismethylisobutyronitrile
ATRC
Transition-metal-catalyzed atom transfer radical cyclization
9-BBN
9-Borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane
CAN
Ceric ammonium nitrate
DAST
Diethylaminosulfur trifluoride
DCE
1,2-Dichloroethane
DCM
Dichloromethane
DIC
Diisopropyl carbodiimide
DIPAD
Diisopropyl azadicarboxylate
DIPEA
diisopropylethylamine
DLP
lauroylperoxide
DMA
N,N-Dimethylacetamide
DMAP
4-dimethylaminopyridine
DMF
N,N-Dimethylaminoformamide
EPHP
N-ethylpiperidine hypophosphite
FRET
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
HASC
α-Hetero-Atom Substituted Carbonyl
HBTU
2-(1H-Benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate
HMPA
Hexamethylphosphoramide
IBX
2-Iodoxybenzoic acid
LA
Lewis acid
NMM
N-methyl morpholine
NMP
N-methyl pyrrolidine
NMQ
N-methylquinolinium
PMHS
Polymethylhydrosiloxane
RCM
Ring-closing metathesis
SET
single electron transfer
SP
Solid-phase
SPS
Solid-phase synthesis
TBGH
Tributylgermanium hydride
TBTH
Tributyltin hydride
TEMPO
Tetramethyl pentahydropyridine oxide
TFA
Trifluoroacetic acid
THF
Tetrahydrofuran
TON
Turnover number
TTF
Tetrathiofulvalene
TTMSS
Tris(trimethylsilyl)silane
Troc
2,2,2-Trichloroethoxycarbonyl

1. Introduction

Since Gomberg’s discovery of free radicals as chemical entities [1], the interest around this electron-deficient species has increased throughout the years. Their success arrived during WWII, when radical chemistry took a primary role in the manufacturing of synthetic substitutes of natural rubber. Nowadays, radical processes are used to prepare 75% of all polymers, including the solid supports employed in organic synthesis.
An additional and interesting application of radical chemistry involves post polymerization modifications, which transforms the surface of the polymer for several purposes [2,3,4]. The change of polymers’ surface characteristics allows the acquisition of new properties of the solid phase (SP) and, although this represents an interesting scientific aspect of the subject, touching the field of organic synthesis as well, it is also somewhat out of the purpose of this review and, for those interested, it would be more appropriate to refer to more specific literature.
Inevitably, all of these roles of radical chemistry have allowed creating a thread with SP synthesis. SP synthesis is an important feature in modern organic chemistry, however, the role of free radicals includes more than the methodologies just used for polymerization. The real boost came after physical organic chemists begun to determine absolute rates of radical reactions [5,6], together with the advent of new spectroscopic techniques (ESR) to detect them. At that point, radical chemistry became a more and more common methodology for day-to-day organic synthesis. With a wider range of available radical reactions, several applications in the synthesis of natural compounds, drug-like molecules and functional groups interconversion strategies were identified. It would have been just a matter of time to find extensions of those methodologies to SP approaches.
This review focuses on the applications of radical chemistry in solid-phase synthesis of single or classes of compounds, which includes also resin loading and cleavage and the use of solid-supported reagents. This subject has been last reviewed a few years ago [7]. The aim of this work is not to offer a comprehensive overview of the applications of radical chemistry on SP, but rather to emphasize the methodologies and developments in a field that might be useful in daily organic chemistry.
However, since classical radical chemistry is governed by kinetic considerations, before going through the examples that the literature offers on the subject it is fundamental to understand how radical reactions behave when they take place on the surface of a solid bead. In this respect it is important to mention Curran’s work [8], dealing with the measurement of the kinetics of radical reactions on SPs. Curran calculated the rates of common reactions involving radical precursors anchored to an Ellman THP resin by the ratio of the possible products, in relation to the same reaction run in solution.
He found that the rate constant of H-abstraction from Bu3SnH by an alkyl radical linked to SP is probably not so different from the solution-phase one. This means that reactions of polymer-bound radicals, at least those mediated by tin hydride, can be planned as if they were performed in solution.
On the other hand, experiments performed with the generation of aryl radicals demonstrated that Ellman’s resin behaves like a solvent with relatively reactive C-H bonds. This means that H-abstraction from the polymer backbone is a feasible process, implicating that, at least in the case of the studied aryl radical, it is difficult to set up reactions whose kinetics are slow. Accordingly, for resin-bound aryl radicals there is a limitation to the fastest intramolecular classes, while slower intra- and bimolecular reactions will suffer from competing hydrogen transfer from the backbone and linker C-H bonds.

2. Solid-Supported Reagents, Resins and Linkers

Among the various relationships between radical chemistry and SP, two interesting aspects are the use of special resins or linkers cleavable under radical conditions and solid-supported reagents designed to assist radical reactions in solution. In this regard, this section will provide a review of the literature.

2.1. Linkers and Resins

In the quest for reliable, clean and flexible linkers for SP synthesis, an important role is assigned to those cleavable via radical mechanisms. In particular, photolabile moieties represent the great majority of the type and several resins with appropriately designed linkers are commercially available. Since this specific subject covers more than 20 years of research and has been accurately review in the past, we refer readers to more appropriate publications [9,10].
Beside light-sensitive linkers, a number of studies have treated innovative linkages based on cleavage under radical conditions. Radical cleavage of linker units usually enables the introduction of either a hydrogen atom at the cleavage site (traceless linker [11]), or, which is of even more relevance in the context of diversity oriented synthesis [12], of an additional diversity element (diversity linker unit [13]). In this section of the review, the attention will be shifted among the “key” atom in the linker.

2.1.1. Sulfur-Based Linkers

In the need of new methods for SP synthesis with C-H bond formation after cleavage (traceless linker strategy), a linking strategy consisting in the presence of a sulfur atom, in different oxidation states susceptible of radical cleavage, was developed. The work performed by Janda [14] falls under this category (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. Janda’s sulfur-based linker.
Scheme 1. Janda’s sulfur-based linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g001
Loading of test compound 4 was performed on a soluble PEG-polymer using the pre-loaded linker 3. Reductive cleavage with C-H bond formation was tried under classical radical conditions; however, hydrogenolysis (Ni-Raney) gave better yield (94%) after shorter reaction time (3 h).
In the following example, Winssinger and coworkers [15] completed the synthesis of a series of derivatives of the natural product aigialomycin D, in order to explore the potential activities of this class of compounds (Scheme 2). Polymer-supported 8 was generated from 7 through functionalization of the benzyl carbon and subsequent RCM. Cleavage from the resin under radical conditions gave reduced products 9.
Scheme 2. Winssinger’s sulfur-based linker.
Scheme 2. Winssinger’s sulfur-based linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g002
Radical desulfonation is a known reaction in solution-phase synthesis [16]. Based on this reaction, Luo and Huang [17] studied the potentiality of sulfonamide moieties as traceless linkers cleaved by radical mechanism in order to generate a library of secondary amides (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Huang’s sulfur-based linker.
Scheme 3. Huang’s sulfur-based linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g003
The results of the final cleavage were deeply dependent on the nature of the R1 group. Generally speaking, substituents containing electron-donating groups (such as a m-methoxyphenyl group) were cleaved successfully, while those containing electron-withdrawing moieties, such as a nitrophenyl group, gave no cleavage at all. In the former case, the presence of o,p-methoxyphenyl groups gave by-products from a competitive radical cascade, while, in the latter, reduction and acetylation of the resulting amino group were necessary to perform radical cleavage. The proposed mechanism (Scheme 4) gives an idea about how the nature of R1 can influence the radical fragmentation. In fact, if R1 contains a carbon atom capable to form a stable radical, the direction of the fragmentation can vary from the one illustrated, yielding unwanted side-products.
Scheme 4. Huang’s proposed mechanism.
Scheme 4. Huang’s proposed mechanism.
Molecules 16 03252 g004
D’Herde and De Clercq [18] used the single-electron reductive property of samarium(II) for the cleavage of PS-β-benzolyloxysulfones in a Julia-Lythgoe olefination, where the SP-sulfone partly works as a traceless linker (Scheme 5). The best E:Z ratio (19:20 = 94:6) was obtained when R = Bz and 1,3-dimethyl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2(1H)-pyrimidinone (DMPU) was used as an additive, although isolated yields were rather low (around 25%).
Scheme 5. De Clercq’s proposed mechanism.
Scheme 5. De Clercq’s proposed mechanism.
Molecules 16 03252 g005
Radical cyclization to prepare azoles has been explored in solid-phase synthesis using a thiophenyl linker [19], using benzimidazole as a probe heterocycle. To prove the validity of the methodology, the same reactions were also carried out in solution (Scheme 6). Radical precursors 21a-c were loaded on the resins through the acid moiety on the arylthiol.
Scheme 6. Bowman’s sulfur-based linker.
Scheme 6. Bowman’s sulfur-based linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g006
For n = 1, under the best conditions, only a 11% of desired product 22a was observed, in line with the results obtained in solution, indicating that this 5-exo-trig cyclization is not strongly favored. For n = 2 the reaction was smoother and use of TBTH gave a 60% of isolated 22b. When TBGH was used, a lower yield of 22b was isolated (22%), while TTMSS gave similar results (20%). For n = 3, again poor yields were obtained (4%), just as the reaction run in solution with TBTH. Three resins were used for the scope, however, if Wang and Rink resins gave similar results, amino-Merrifield proved to be unsuitable, as only traces of desired products were found (for n = 1). The rationale behind the use of 2-thioaryl derivative is summarized in the proposed mechanism (Scheme 7).
Scheme 7. Bowman’s proposed mechanism.
Scheme 7. Bowman’s proposed mechanism.
Molecules 16 03252 g007
The 2-thiophenyl group behaves as a radical leaving group to achieve rearomatization and, subsequently, as radical carrier to abstract a hydrogen atom from the metal hydride, propagating the chain [20]. Following the mechanism, it is possible to note that the desired cyclized product 22 is released after formation, while side-products, such as non-cyclized, reduced 24 and unreacted starting material are left on the resin.
In order to shorten the reaction times, focused microwave irradiation was also used. As a test case radical precursor 21b (n = 2) on Wang resin was taken. Under optimized conditions (using AMBN) a 52% yield was obtained, very close to the 60% obtained under conventional heating, but with dramatically shortened reaction times (20 min vs. 7 h). The reaction was also run on 21a (n = 1) on amino-Merrifield resin, giving poor yields (3% of 22).
Among the new SP techniques, the α-Hetero-Atom Substituted Carbonyl (HASC) traceless linker studied by Procter, occupies an important role. It exploits the SET characteristics of Sm(II) for reductive cleavage of an X-C bond. The general idea of the methodology starts with the attachment of α-halo-carbonyl compounds to an appropriate resin, followed by further transformation of the resin-linked compounds, ending in the reductive cleavage from the resin (Scheme 8).
Scheme 8. Procter’s HASC strategy.
Scheme 8. Procter’s HASC strategy.
Molecules 16 03252 g008
Heterocycle synthesis was performed following this strategy using a sulfur-linkage [21,22,23]. Benzylthiol resin 27 was prepared from Merrifield resin, treated with the appropriate α-bromoacetamide and oxidized (Scheme 9). This activated substrate was then submitted to the Pummerer cyclization to yield oxindole 28, which could be cleaved using SmI2, giving the final products 29 in good yield, or alternatively, it could be further functionalized with allyl bromide prior to detachment (Scheme 10).
Scheme 9. Procter’s use of a sulfur linker for the synthesis of oxindoles.
Scheme 9. Procter’s use of a sulfur linker for the synthesis of oxindoles.
Molecules 16 03252 g009
Scheme 10. Procter’s synthesis of 3-allyl oxindoles.
Scheme 10. Procter’s synthesis of 3-allyl oxindoles.
Molecules 16 03252 g010
Tetrahydroquinolones were prepared in a similar fashion, using a Heck reaction followed by sulfur oxidation and Michael addition to perform cyclization. A couple of examples are shown in Scheme 11.
Scheme 11. Procter’s use of a sulfur linker for the synthesis of tetrahydroquinolones.
Scheme 11. Procter’s use of a sulfur linker for the synthesis of tetrahydroquinolones.
Molecules 16 03252 g011
Reductive cleavage from the resin was performed before further functionalization to give 36 or the sulfur-bearing carbon atom was derivatized and only subsequently cleaved off the resin to give 38.
In Scheme 12 an example of samarium iodide-mediated cyclative cleavage to give 40 through a radical or ionic process is shown.
Scheme 12. Example of SmI2-mediated cyclative cleavage.
Scheme 12. Example of SmI2-mediated cyclative cleavage.
Molecules 16 03252 g012
The general mechanism for samarium-induced reductive cleavage of α-heteroatom carbonyl compounds is displayed in the scheme below (Scheme 13).
Scheme 13. Procter’s proposed mechanism.
Scheme 13. Procter’s proposed mechanism.
Molecules 16 03252 g013
The cleavage mechanism was studied in solution for cyclopropyl derivative 41. The samarium SET reductive cleavage would account for a radical type 44, leading to cyclopropyl ring opening (compound 43) via a cyclopropylmethyl radical. However, since there was no trace of ring-opened derivative 43, the alternative and more probable explanation accounts for different intermediates such as 45-46. The presence of a samarium enolate of the kind of 46 was demonstrated by the capturing of electrophiles during cleavage.

2.1.2. Selenium (and Tellurium)-based Linkers

A number of reports deal with the use of selenium linkers, which are known to be amenable to several cleavage strategies, and the topic has been reviewed recently [24]. The following section is simply meant to highlight the value of such types of linkers in contemporary SPS.
Ruhland and coworkers produced interesting works replacing sulfur with selenium, which proved to be a versatile traceless linker in both aliphatic C-H bond-forming reactions, taking advantage of easier homolytic cleavage, and alkene formation by selenium oxidation followed by β-elimination. In a first paper [25] bromopolystyrene 47 was obtained through thallium acetate-catalyzed bromination of commercially available polystyrene.
Scheme 14. Ruhland’s synthesis of selenium-based resin.
Scheme 14. Ruhland’s synthesis of selenium-based resin.
Molecules 16 03252 g014
After lithiation with BuLi, the resin was treated with selenium, in order to replace the metal anion. Reduction with NaBH4 was necessary because of the occurrence, during work-up in the presence of air (step 2) of Se-Se bridges. Reduction gave back the swelling properties to the resin, lost because of the high degree of cross-linking encountered in step 2. Loading of resin 49 resulted lower compared to the bromopolystyrene 47, probably due to incomplete reaction with selenium or partial availability of the metal in the resin itself. To prove the utility of resin 49, it was carried out the synthesis of an alkyl-aryl ether small library using the Mitsunobu reaction (Scheme 15).
Scheme 15. Ruhland’s synthesis of ethers library.
Scheme 15. Ruhland’s synthesis of ethers library.
Molecules 16 03252 g015
After application of the Mitsunobu protocol, cleavage was performed under radical conditions. Contrary to the reaction carried out in solution, the tributylstannyl phenyl selenide 56, often a problem for efficient purification, remained anchored on the SP and the only by-product of the cleavage was the excess Bu3SnH, which was efficiently separated by SP extraction.
Polymer-bound tellurium was next introduced by the same group [26], which was prepared exploiting a strategy similar to the above. Also in this case a small library based on the Mitsunobu reaction was produced, following tributyltin-mediated product detachment. Interestingly and contrary to expectations, it was found that the reactivity of the polystyrene-bound tellurium towards homolysis is lower in comparison to the polystyrene-bound selenium. This is possibly due to residual elemental tellurium (remaining within the resin) interfering with the radical chain process in the cleavage step.
The selectivity of bond cleavage offers an important general advantage when utilizing this SP methodology. However, contamination of the cleaved products by tin derivatives can hold back its use, especially for biologically interesting libraries. To address this issue the same group showed later that it is possible to use greener traceless cleavage, exploiting silanes or germanes as valid alternatives to tin-containing reagents. In fact, it was demonstrated [27] that among others especially tris(trimethylsilyl)silane, performs similarly to tributyltin hydride in homolytically cleaving alkyl-selenium derivatives. On the other hand, resin-bound tellurium appears to have a preference for tris(trimethylsilyl)germane (see Scheme 16). In general, however, both yield and purity are superior for the polystyrene-bound selenium, though tellurium is somewhat less sensitive to the number of cleavage reagent equivalents.
Scheme 16. Tris(trimethylsilyl)germane.
Scheme 16. Tris(trimethylsilyl)germane.
Molecules 16 03252 g016
A chiral selenium electrophile has been also developed and applied to the stereoselective selenenylation of alkenes. The linker has been generated on solid-phase by loading a methoxymethyl-protected selenophenol to a suitable polymeric support, and subsequently generating the electrophile by reaction with bromine at low temperature (Scheme 17). Indeed, mesoporous silica proved superior to other supports, although its loading is usually low. Polystyrene works better than TentaGel and it was predominantly used for the stereoselective additions. Selenenylation of alkenes in the presence of a suitable nucleophile, usually an alcohol, yielded up to 80% ee, making the polymer-supported reagent almost equally attractive as its soluble counterpart (Scheme 18).
Scheme 17. Synthesis of asymmetric selenyl linker.
Scheme 17. Synthesis of asymmetric selenyl linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g017
Different cleavage protocols were shown in the paper, including the classical oxidation followed by β-elimination, tributyltin hydride-mediated homolytical carbon-selenium bond cleavage and also the use of allyltributyltin, which led to the introduction of an allyl moiety in the product (Scheme 18).
Scheme 18. Application of asymmetric selenyl linker.
Scheme 18. Application of asymmetric selenyl linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g018
Supported selenyl bromide was prepared also by Nicolaou and coworkers [28] and showed its utility, beside that of a series of other selenium-containing resins, for the use in combinatorial chemistry as linkers (Scheme 19).
Scheme 19. Nicolaou’s preparation of PS-selenyl bromide.
Scheme 19. Nicolaou’s preparation of PS-selenyl bromide.
Molecules 16 03252 g019
Compound62 was exploited to load alkene 63, and subsequently cleaved under radical conditions (Scheme 20).
Scheme 20. Nicolaou’s SP alkene selenylation.
Scheme 20. Nicolaou’s SP alkene selenylation.
Molecules 16 03252 g020
Compound 62 can also be reduced to resin 65 (Scheme 21), which can be reacted with halides to load the corresponding alkane. Standard cleavage under radical conditions gave reduction product 69 (Scheme 21).
Scheme 21. Nicolaou’s modification of PS-selenyl bromide.
Scheme 21. Nicolaou’s modification of PS-selenyl bromide.
Molecules 16 03252 g021
Scheme 22. Nicolaou’s use of resin 65.
Scheme 22. Nicolaou’s use of resin 65.
Molecules 16 03252 g022
In addition, the same resin 62 can give the phtalimido-derivatives 66, used for insertion of benzyl alcohol (product 71) onto the alkene moiety (70), after radical cleavage (Scheme 23).
Scheme 23. Nicolaou’s use of resin 66.
Scheme 23. Nicolaou’s use of resin 66.
Molecules 16 03252 g023
In another interesting work, the same group [29,30] used selenium-based linkers, followed by reductive radical cleavage from the resin, for the synthesis of a small library of 2-deoxy glycosides (Scheme 24).
Scheme 24. Nicolaou’s synthesis of 2-deoxy glycoside library.
Scheme 24. Nicolaou’s synthesis of 2-deoxy glycoside library.
Molecules 16 03252 g024
A small library of 3 × 3 was generated (3 “donors”-the sugars described by R1, R2 and R3- and 3 “acceptors”, described by R4), with overall yields between 11-32%. The key reaction was the 1,2-seleno migration promoted by diethylaminosulfur trifluoride (DAST), while radical cleavage was typical of selenium-based linkers. Selenium-functionalized resins were exploited by Nicolaou’s group [31,32] also in the studies towards the synthesis of heterocycles, namely indolines, indoline-based policyclic systems and indoles, which were obtained via different mechanisms of radical cleavage (Scheme 25).
Scheme 25. Nicolaou’s SP selenium-based synthesis of heterocycles.
Scheme 25. Nicolaou’s SP selenium-based synthesis of heterocycles.
Molecules 16 03252 g025
Starting from solid-supported selenyl bromide, indolines 75 were prepared by Lewis-acid mediated cycloloaddition using the appropriate o-allyl anilines. Subsequent functionalization at the nitrogen atom and/or at the substituent on the benzene ring allowed the introduction of additional diversity elements. Use of different cleavage strategies enabled then the preparation of small libraries of drug-like molecules. This represents an interesting extension of this methodology to combinatorial chemistry for the synthesis of bioactive compounds. In Scheme 26 a classical traceless cleavage is shown. The mechanism entails the homolytic cleavage of the Se-C bond, therefore generating a carbon-centred radical, quenched by the hydrogen-donor Bu3SnH.
Scheme 26. Nicolaou’s selenium traceless linker strategy.
Scheme 26. Nicolaou’s selenium traceless linker strategy.
Molecules 16 03252 g026
In the cyclization cleavage shown in Scheme 27, formation of a carbon-centred radical was exploited by using an appropriate alkene moiety on the nitrogen side-chain. Radical addition/cyclization was then followed by quenching of the resulting radical by tin hydride. The products of the reactions were polycyclic indoline derivatives, with only one diasteroisomer isolated.
Scheme 27. Nicolaou’s synthesis of tetracycle 84.
Scheme 27. Nicolaou’s synthesis of tetracycle 84.
Molecules 16 03252 g027
An example of cleavage by radical rearrangement is shown in Scheme 28. In this case, the lack of H-donor makes the C-centred radical enough long-living to perform a shift. Although the nature of the shift is unknown, any of the supposed intermediates radical 88 and 89 can undergo oxidation to the indole ring by loss of a hydrogen atom.
Scheme 28. Nicolaou’s C-centred radical shift.
Scheme 28. Nicolaou’s C-centred radical shift.
Molecules 16 03252 g028
Very interesting are also other examples from the same group [33], which used the same cycloloadition/radical cleavage methodology to construct [3.3.1]bicycles from properly designed substrates (Scheme 29 and Scheme 30).
Scheme 29. Nicolaou’s synthesis of bicycle 91.
Scheme 29. Nicolaou’s synthesis of bicycle 91.
Molecules 16 03252 g029
Scheme 30. Nicolaou’s synthesis of bicycle 93.
Scheme 30. Nicolaou’s synthesis of bicycle 93.
Molecules 16 03252 g030
As before, bicycles 90 (Scheme 29) and 92 (Scheme 30) were prepared by electrophilic cyclization with a solid-supported-SeBr resin, while cleavage was performed in a traceless manner (Scheme 29) or by trapping the resulting C-centred radical with allystannane (Scheme 30).
Although the methodologies shown above proved efficient for the synthesis of small compound libraries, it is important to highlight a major drawback that is implicit in the cleavage mechanism. In fact it was necessary to separate the desired products from the residues of the radical reaction, an option often tedious and difficult that biases the use of toxic tin derivatives for in-solution radical chemistry.
Another interesting cleavage methodology was reported by Engman and coworkers [34], who studied the radical carbonylation/cyclization to make tetrahydrofuran-3-ones. The method was first developed in solution, exploiting alkyl phenyl selenides and then applied to a selenium-based resin 94, prepared in a few steps from cross-linked (1%) polystyrene (Scheme 31).
Scheme 31. Engman’s use of a selenium linker.
Scheme 31. Engman’s use of a selenium linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g031
TTMSS was chosen instead of the more common TBTH, which gave a large amount of reduced (non-cyclized) product, whereas, increasing the concentration of the H-donor resulted in poorer yields of the desired vs. reduction product. TBGH) gave worse results compared to TTMSS. Lower carbon monoxide pressure gave also more product of reduction. The final product 95 was isolated as a 9:1 mixture of cis/trans isomers (55% yield calculated over 3 steps, 2 of them for the synthesis of 94).
Fujita et al. [35] used PS-arylselenides for the selenolactonization on 3-butenoic acids with successive cleavage via radical reduction (Scheme 32). The yield of the process to give 98 was rather low (20%), a result explained by Ph3SnH-promoted side-reactions with the amide linker.
Scheme 32. Fujita’s SP selenolactonization of 3-butenoic acids.
Scheme 32. Fujita’s SP selenolactonization of 3-butenoic acids.
Molecules 16 03252 g032
Polystyrene-supported selenosulfonates can be conveniently prepared from the easily accessible selenobromide by reaction with arylsulfinates. Qian and Huang [36] studied the radical addition of such PS-selenosulfonates to alkenes, with subsequent oxidation-elimination of selenium to obtain vinyl sulfones (Scheme 33).
Scheme 33. Huang’s synthesis of selenosulfonates.
Scheme 33. Huang’s synthesis of selenosulfonates.
Molecules 16 03252 g033
Radical addition was performed under classical radical conditions and the overall yields after cleavage were rather high. The same group also performed the radical addition of PS-arylselenosulfonates to alkynes, followed by oxidation to selenoxide and syn-elimination to give acetylenic sulfones 105 [37] or by acidic hydrolytic cleavage from the SP, for the preparation of β-keto sulfones 106 [38] (Scheme 34).
Scheme 34. Huang’s synthesis of acetylenic sulfones and β-keto sulfones.
Scheme 34. Huang’s synthesis of acetylenic sulfones and β-keto sulfones.
Molecules 16 03252 g034
Cleavage under oxidation-elimination conditions (to give 105) gave higher yields compared to the acidic cleavage (to give 106), as shown. In any case, there was practically no need for further purification after cleavage from the resin and the PS-diselenide obtained after acidic cleavage could be regenerated.
In another interesting work, a solid-supported selenosulfone as radical transfer agent [39]. In this case however, the reaction led to a cyclization product that, therefore, remained anchored to the SP. Only successively this was cleaved form the resin by the classical oxidation-elimination protocol (Scheme 35).
Scheme 35. Huang’s SP-atom transfer cyclization.
Scheme 35. Huang’s SP-atom transfer cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g035
The isolated yields were calculated after cleavage (44-58%, 12 examples), using two different selenylarylsulfonyl resins.

2.1.3. Oxygen-based Linkers

Samarium (II) iodide is a useful reagent, exploited for several scopes, having the characteristic of being a powerful single-electron reducing agent. All the examples below, where fission of either a carbon-oxygen or a nitrogen-oxygen bond has been exploited to release organic molecules from a solid support, make use of samarium iodide.

2.1.3.1. Cleavage of Hydroxylamine-based Linkers

Abell and colleagues [40] used SmI2 for the traceless cleavage of N-O bond on substrates appropriately linked to SP. With this methodology it was generated a small library of amides and ureas (Scheme 36).
Scheme 36. Abell’s amides and ureas library.
Scheme 36. Abell’s amides and ureas library.
Molecules 16 03252 g036
Although yields were modest, the purities of the cleaved products 112 were rather high.
The same cleavage technique was exploited by Andersson [41] that started from a polystyrene-based resin to synthesize tertiary amines (Scheme 37).
Scheme 37. Andersson’s reductive cleavage.
Scheme 37. Andersson’s reductive cleavage.
Molecules 16 03252 g037
Although SmI2 gave clean cleaved products, the cleavage method used for the library production exploited the alternative LiI, which worked under neutral conditions.
Another example of the reductive cleavage promoted by SmI2 was shown by Meloni and Taddei [42], who applied it to the synthesis of β-lactams (Scheme 38). Polystryerene-bound hydroxylamine was once again used as the starting material.
Scheme 38. Taddei’s synthesis of β-lactams.
Scheme 38. Taddei’s synthesis of β-lactams.
Molecules 16 03252 g038

2.1.3.2. Addition of Ketyl Radicals to α-β Unsaturated Esters

Procter’s group [43,44] used a Sm(II) based radical chemistry for the enantioselective synthesis of γ-butyrolactones on SP exploiting (1R, 2S)-ephedrine linker as the chiral auxiliary. Bromo-Wang resin was first functionalized with (1R, 2S)-ephedrine and successively esterified at the alcohol group with the appropriate α,β-unsaturated acyl chloride to give 117. This was, in turn, used in a reaction involving a ketyl radical addition to the anchored α,β-unsaturated ester. The subsequent cyclative cleavage led to the formation of lactone 119 (Scheme 39).
Scheme 39. Procter’s asymmetric lactones synthesis.
Scheme 39. Procter’s asymmetric lactones synthesis.
Molecules 16 03252 g039
Under optimized conditions, the reaction gave rather high isolated yields (apart for a few exceptions) and diasteroselectivities. The same conditions were applied to the synthesis of lactone 121 (Scheme 40), a moderate DNA-binding metabolite isolated from Streptomyces GT61115.
Scheme 40. Synthesis of lactone 121.
Scheme 40. Synthesis of lactone 121.
Molecules 16 03252 g040
Cyclative cleavage gives back, beside the desired product, the resin functionalized with the asymmetric linker, which can be reused. Following Procter’s lead on asymmetric induction for samarium-mediated radical synthesis of γ-butyrolactones, Dai and coworkers [45] linked axially chiral crotonates on Rink amide resin for the same purpose (Scheme 41).
Scheme 41. Dai’s chiral crotonates on Rink amide resin.
Scheme 41. Dai’s chiral crotonates on Rink amide resin.
Molecules 16 03252 g041
Reaction of 122 or 123 with aldehydes 124 and 126 gave reasonable isolated yields (125 = 58%, 127 = 66%), with a good cis/trans selectivity (125 = 71: 29; 127 = 89: 11) and good ee (125-cis: 94%, 125-trans: 89%; 127-cis = 127-trans: 88%). The mechanism of chiral transfer was supposed to pass through an intermediate were the samarium atom coordinates the oxygens from 122 (or 123) and the oxygen of the ketyl radical which performs the 1,4-addition to the crotonates.

2.1.3.3. HASC Traceless Linker

The HASC traceless linker developed by Procter and mentioned above (see Scheme 8) has been exploited also using oxygen-based linkers. Applications of the ether linkage involve the synthesis of functionalized carbonyl compounds [46,47] (Scheme 42). Resin 128 was synthesized starting from bromo Wang resin, derivatized with the appropriate phenol and functionalised with α-bromo-γ-butyrolactone. Lactone ring-opening was performed with some amines (pyrrolidine, morpholine, tetrahydroisoquinoline and methoxymethylamine) and the resulting alcohol protected accordingly. When Weinreib hydroxylamine was used, the obtained tertiary amide was successively reacted with a Grignard reagent (BnMgCl, i-PrMgCl, c-PrMgCl) to yield the corresponding ketone. Cleavage of 129 from the resin gave products 130 in good yields after 4-5 steps.
Scheme 42. Procter’s application of HASC strategy.
Scheme 42. Procter’s application of HASC strategy.
Molecules 16 03252 g042

2.1.4. “Carbon–Based” Linkers

Floreancig’s group [48,49] used an oxidative release (often cyclorelease) on the appropriate polymer-supported precursors. The mechanism involved in the oxidative cleavage is presented in Scheme 43.
Scheme 43. Floreancig’s proposed mechanism.
Scheme 43. Floreancig’s proposed mechanism.
Molecules 16 03252 g043
The process, (Electron Transfer Initiated Cyclization, ETIC) starts with single electron oxidation and mesolytic cleavage of the C-C bond of the homobenzylic ether, forming a benzylic radical and an oxocarbenium ion. The resulting cation is successively transformed in a neutral species, giving a cyclised product if an appropriate nucleophile is present in the molecule, or an aldehyde (or ketone) if there is loss of the oxygen-bound “R” group (when present). To test this methodology on support, appropriate soluble ROMP polymers were prepared (Scheme 44).
The five equations prove the feasibility of the method, either by intramolecular trapping (equations 1-3), or by oxidative traceless release (equations 4-5). In the former case either formation of a C-O bond (equation 1) or a C-C bond (equation 2 and 3), which occurred with high diasteroselectivity, is shown. In the latter case formation of the aldehyde 138 of equation 4 requires loss of a THP group.
Scheme 44. Application of lROMP polymers.
Scheme 44. Application of lROMP polymers.
Molecules 16 03252 g044
The purity of the products after this particular cleavage was rather high, due to the characteristic mechanism of the reaction, which ensured cyclocleavage or oxidative release only when the appropriate nucleophile was correctly installed in the molecule. This means that any impurity will be retained on the support, in a kind of purification step. Therefore, it is possible to perform several steps on the support, without the fear of accumulating side-products that have to be separated at the end of the process.
An interesting application of thiohydroxamate (THA) linker strategy was proposed by Routledge [50]. In previous reports [51,52] the same group presented a traceless THA linker, cleavable under photolytic conditions, but in the need of novel SP-linkers, a second-generation THA linker, stable under diverse chemical and photolytic conditions, was studied (Scheme 45).
Scheme 45. Routledge’s THA linkeras polymer-supported radical source.
Scheme 45. Routledge’s THA linkeras polymer-supported radical source.
Molecules 16 03252 g045
Although 141 proved to be stable to heat and light, it was sensitive to nucleophilic cleavage, which might make it of limited application for SP preparation of libraries. On the other hand, 141 was found useful as polymer-supported radical source. The nature of the linker allows the generation of a carbon-centred radical ultimately arising from a carbon-carbon bond fission, that can be appropriately exploited for successive reaction such as the one depicted above. The only product found was 142, even if isolated in moderate yield.

2.2. Solid-Supported Reagents

Another important aspect of radicals exploiting SP deals with the use of supported reagents for radical reactions. This combination allows toxic reagents, often difficult to separate from the desired products in solution, to be used with ease of purification and little contamination. Since the most important reagents in radical chemistry are represented by organostannanes, it was obvious that the initial efforts to translate in-solution radical chemistry to SP, would have involved tin-base reagents.
From this point of view, several works have tried to bind organostannanes on solid supports, in order to reproduce common radical reactions and make work-up easier with little or no contamination from the toxic metal. Within this class, organostannylhydrides occupy a dominant role. Neumann’s group successfully immobilized dibutyltinhydride on SP with a two-carbon spacer between the metal and the aromatic ring of polystyrene to obtain resin 145, whose applications were highlighted in successive publications [53,54]. When employed for radical cyclization (Scheme 46), the results obtained were comparable with the same reaction run in solution with Bu3SnH (36%:0%:64%).
Scheme 46. Use of resin 145 for radical cyclization.
Scheme 46. Use of resin 145 for radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g046
An application to the Barton dehydroxylation reaction [55], which has been exploited extensively later by the same group in a series of derivatized alcohols [56], is shown in Scheme 47. An example of deamination following preparation of the correspondent isocyanides is instead shown in Scheme 48.
Scheme 47. Barton dehydroxylation using resin 145.
Scheme 47. Barton dehydroxylation using resin 145.
Molecules 16 03252 g047
Scheme 48. Deamination reaction using resin 145.
Scheme 48. Deamination reaction using resin 145.
Molecules 16 03252 g048
The supported tin hydride was recycled by reduction of the filtered resin, maintaining a good efficiency. Following a similar path, Dumartin and coworkers [57,58] synthesized supported organostannanes with spacer of 2, 3 and 4 carbon atoms, in order to avoid β-elimination of the stannane as by-product, therefore producing recyclable and more stable reagents for radical reactions. In a successive paper [59], the same group used the anchored –Bu2SnX (X = halogen) with a C-4 spacer for catalytic reductions of haloalkanes in the presence of NaBH4 and AIBN. The length of the spacer proved to be important for reaction yields (due to more accessibility of the metal centre) and residual pollution by the metal.
Deleuze [60] prepared a macroporous organotin chloride by inclusion of a suitable organostannyl-styrene precursor in the polymerization reaction. The so prepared supported reagent (in combination with NaBH4) proved to be comparable to Bu3SnH in reducing alkylhalides in solution.
Dumartin’s group [61] investigated the possibility to use tin-based reducing agent in catalytic amount, as it had been done in solution [62]. In particular, their attention focused on the use of siloxanes, particularly polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS), for the regeneration of catalytic amounts of TBTH. However, PMHS proved ineffective using polymer-bound organostannane 154, evidently because it was incapable of penetrating the PS beads.
Scheme 49. Dumartin’s catalytic approach.
Scheme 49. Dumartin’s catalytic approach.
Molecules 16 03252 g049
An alternative was chosen and found in trimethoxysilane, giving good results. The reactivation of the tin by-product is highlighted in the scheme (Scheme 49). An alternative to organostannyl hydrides in radical chemistry is represented by the combination organodistannanes/sensitizer/H-donor via, for example initiation. Neumann also studied anchored distannanes on SP [63,64], which can easily be prepared starting from the commercial polystyrene. The tin chloride derivative 157 was synthesized by conventional chemistry, and subsequently treated with Bogdanivic’s magnesium (Mg-anthracene-3THF) to form the distannane 158.Scheme 50
Scheme 50. Neumann’s organodistannane.
Scheme 50. Neumann’s organodistannane.
Molecules 16 03252 g050
This could be used as the equivalent non-supported reagent in the addition of tert-butyl iodide to acetylenes, yielding similar results. However, the advantage is that after the reaction the polymer containing SnI groups can be recovered by filtration, and completely regenerated in a straightforward manner by reaction with Bogdanivic’s magnesium.
Scheme 51. Addition of tert-butyl iodide to acetylenes.
Scheme 51. Addition of tert-butyl iodide to acetylenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g051
Interestingly, when the polymer was treated with the bromide 162 in the presence of acetone as long-lived triplet sensitizer, and 2-propanol as weak H-donor, the corresponding radical 163 thus generated evolved in a somewhat unexpected manner. In fact, instead of the anticipated reduction, a cyclization product was obtained.Scheme 52
Scheme 52. Resin 158-mediated radical cyclization.
Scheme 52. Resin 158-mediated radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g052
Generally speaking, the possibility to chose the H-donor strength (and, therefore, to direct the radical reaction in one of the competitive pathways), the ease of separation of the tin-residues and the little contamination, make this option reagent a feasible suitable choice.
Enholm and colleagues [65] studied the use of allystannane anchored to SP. This toxic reagent is used in the allylation of organohalides (or other homolytic functions) under radical conditions and suffers of the common problems encountered with tin-containing reagents. The use of supported tin reagent leads to ease of purification and minimal contamination of the products. In order to enhance the rates of the intermolecular reaction at test, it was chosen a soluble non-cross-linked polystyrene support (Scheme 53), which induces a 100-fold increase in the rate of intermolecular radical reaction compared to the heterogeneous classical SP reactions.
Scheme 53. Enholm’s allylstannane.
Scheme 53. Enholm’s allylstannane.
Molecules 16 03252 g053
It was found that the best combination <number of reactive sites-polymer properties> led to a 33% of loading capacity. Test reaction is shown in Scheme 54.
Scheme 54. Application of allylstannane 166.
Scheme 54. Application of allylstannane 166.
Molecules 16 03252 g054
Without going through the details, it is worth underlining some features of the methodology: electron-deficient substrates worked best, while electron-rich did not work at all. This behavior was attributed to the “philicity” of the generated tin radical, which is rather electron-rich (nucleophilic), generating a mismatch with the radical substrate. Interestingly, tertiary radicals, that gave no reaction in solution, gave a 50% yield. Finally, this procedure displayed a strong regioselectivity towards dihalides substrates, yielding a product of single allylation, strongly preferring electron-deficient radicals. In an extension of the precedent methodology, the same group [66] performed the preparation of another organotin-supported reagent for the reduction of organohalides (Scheme 55).
Scheme 55. Enholm’s reduction of organohalides.
Scheme 55. Enholm’s reduction of organohalides.
Molecules 16 03252 g055
The preparation of 170 was performed following the synthesis depicted in Scheme 53, where 165 was only treated with HClSnBu2. The catalytic methodology used by Enholm is well established [67]. It is widely used for radical reduction of organohalides and represents a useful way to avoid the excess of tin-derivatives, toxic and difficult to separate. The application of the catalytic strategy to the SP allows a low loading of tin-supported reagent and, in addition, the use of a soluble support speeds up the reaction times compared to heterogeneous analogue reactions. Primary alkyl halides reacted quickly with 0.1 eq. of 170 and when the amount of supported reagent was lowered, some reactions took longer. It is worth noting that use of a dihalides with only 1 equivalent of 170 gave only one product of reduction.
Contamination with tin was evaluated via degradation of the products followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), showing the presence of very low residual amount of the metal (around 10 ppm).
In a very early example of solid-supported organotin reagents, Ueno and coworkers [68] compared in-solution radical cyclizations under classical conditions (Bu3SnH/AIBN) with the use of polymer-bound radical carrier (Bu3SnCl/NaBH4) for the synthesis of 2-alkoxytetrahydrofurans (Scheme 56).
Scheme 56. Ueno’s synthesis of 2-alkoxytetrahydrofurans.
Scheme 56. Ueno’s synthesis of 2-alkoxytetrahydrofurans.
Molecules 16 03252 g056
It was found that the reactions were higher-yielding when polystyrene-bound organotin chloride 172 was used as radical carrier. The supported reagent could be used several times after appropriate washing.
Trialkylgermanium hydrides have shown a high potential in radical chemistry often hindered by their high costs, due to their lower toxicity in comparison to that of the corresponding organostannane.
In the need of new reagents, Mochida’s group [69] studied the synthesis of polymer-supported germanium hydrides, either via functionalization of polystyrene or by addition to the polymerization mixture of a suitable germanium-derivatized styrene. The supported reagents were tested for the reduction of organic halides, finding comparable results to known in-solution analogous reactions. In addition, it was demonstrated the opportunity of regeneration of the insoluble reagent by reduction with LiAlH4.
Bowman’s group [70] also performed the synthesis of resin-bound germanium hydrides. Examples of their applications, which always gave reasonable results, are shown below (Scheme 57).
Scheme 57. Bowman’s use of SP- germanium hydrides.
Scheme 57. Bowman’s use of SP- germanium hydrides.
Molecules 16 03252 g057
In the quest of radical sources on SP, the work presented by Murphy’s group [71] represents an alternative to the immobilized organostannanes previously described. Tetrathiofulvalene (TTF) is the promoter for the radical-polar crossover reaction [72,73,74], a methodology used to generate aryl radicals from aryldiazonium salts. The reaction run in solution suffers from the need for separation of TTF by-products and Murphy’s goal was immobilization of the promoter in order to simplify work-up (Scheme 58).
Scheme 58. Murphy’s synthesis of PS-TTF.
Scheme 58. Murphy’s synthesis of PS-TTF.
Molecules 16 03252 g058
Hydroxymethyltetrathiofulvalene 187 was prepared and loaded to a gel-type resin and used for test in radical cyclization reactions, as the example shown below (Scheme 59).
Scheme 59. Murphy’s use of PS-TTF.
Scheme 59. Murphy’s use of PS-TTF.
Molecules 16 03252 g059
The reactions tested were successful, with comparable results with the homologous run in solution, even if slightly lower-yielding. A major concern was the presence of side-products such as the deoxygenated analogue of 194, possibly arising from H-abstraction by the radical intermediate 191 from the polymer benzylic hydrogens, or products of reaction of cation 193 with the aryl backbone of the resin. In both cases, it was proved that none of these concerns was factual and the reactions resulted rather clean. In addition, contamination of the products from TTF by-products was absent and it was also proven that the SP-TTF could be recycled after regeneration by reduction with NaBH4 in methanol.
Giacomelli and colleagues [75] successfully attempted a useful extrapolation of the classic Barton-Crich thiohydroxamates chemistry [76] in a work where a new polymer-supported radical source was prepared and tested. N-hydroxythiazole 2(3)-thione 195 was synthesized and loaded on a Gly-Wang resin to obtain radical source 196 (Scheme 60).
Scheme 60. Giacomelli’s interpretation of Barton-Crich thiohydroxamates chemistry.
Scheme 60. Giacomelli’s interpretation of Barton-Crich thiohydroxamates chemistry.
Molecules 16 03252 g060
The polymer-supported reagent was then tested for the generation of alkyl radicals (Scheme 61), where R = C(CH3)3; CH2Ph; CH(Me)CH2Ph; CH2CH2CH(NHBoc)COOt-Bu) and alkoxyl radical (Scheme 62).
Scheme 61. Use of resin 196 for the generation of alkyl radicals.
Scheme 61. Use of resin 196 for the generation of alkyl radicals.
Molecules 16 03252 g061
Scheme 62. Use of resin 196 for the generation of alkoxyl radicals.
Scheme 62. Use of resin 196 for the generation of alkoxyl radicals.
Molecules 16 03252 g062
In both cases the reactions were successful, proving this methodology valid for the generation of radicals and having the additional advantage of ease of purification compared to the often tedious experience of purifying the in-solution analogues.
Transition-metal-catalyzed atom transfer radical cyclization (ATRC) represents an alternative, tin-free, non-reductive, catalytic, radical cyclization methodology. Clark’s group [77,78] studied the efficiency of this method for the construction of small molecule by anchoring the ligand to SP. In a first attempt [77], functionalized silica was used for the support of the N-alkyl-2-pyridylmethanimine ligands (Scheme 63).
Scheme 63. Clark’s ATRC approach.
Scheme 63. Clark’s ATRC approach.
Molecules 16 03252 g063
All the reactions were high-yielding, the major difference among them being the time necessary to get to completion (from 1 to 36 h). The stereochemistry is not shown, although the trans isomer resulted to generally be the major one. The catalysts 206 and 207 were prepared by treatment of the immobilized ligand with CuX and 206 was also reused at least 3 times, giving still good yields (92→90→86%), but longer reaction times (3→24→36 h), a deactivation probably caused by the formation of an inactive CuCl2 complex. In a successive paper, Clark [78] used different supports and several ligands, in order to determine the best combination to improve the efficiency of the reaction (Scheme 64).
Scheme 64. Clark’s catalyst improvements.
Scheme 64. Clark’s catalyst improvements.
Molecules 16 03252 g064
Running the above reaction at room temperature, some differences among the catalysts (obtained after treatment of supported ligands of type I or II with CuX) arose, since there was a clear superiority of those of type I vs. type II, in terms of reaction times and conversions (yields were, however, rather high). Raising the temperature to reflux, the reaction times were less than 30 min, independently of the catalyst used. Some more substrates were investigated, giving interesting results. For instance, in (Scheme 65) the catalyzed radical addition to a terminal alkyne is described. The absolute yields were high (88-98%), independently of the ligand used, even if type I catalysts were slightly better. E:Z ratio was almost the same for the ligand screening, however, the presence of reduced product 216 varied between 11-6%, being 0% when silica type I was used.
Scheme 65. Example of radical addition to a terminal alkyne.
Scheme 65. Example of radical addition to a terminal alkyne.
Molecules 16 03252 g065
In Scheme 66 is depicted a 5-endo-trig radical polar crossover addition, a normally disfavored process following Baldwin’s rules [79,80], but feasible when polyamine-copper catalysts such as type II (Scheme 64) are used [81]. In this case a mixture of 218 and 219 was obtained. The best yield (100%) was found when 210 was used as ligand, while 220 was isolated in low yield (15%) as the sole product when type I Janda Jel ligand was used.
Scheme 66. Clark’s 5-endo-trig radical polar crossover addition.
Scheme 66. Clark’s 5-endo-trig radical polar crossover addition.
Molecules 16 03252 g066
Finally, in Scheme 67 a 4-exo-trig cyclization is represented. This also is a disfavored process according to Baldwin’s rules, which was successful only when 210 was used as ligand.
Scheme 67. Clark’s 4-exo-trig radical cyclization.
Scheme 67. Clark’s 4-exo-trig radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g067
Nagashima and coworkers [82] studied the same reaction, using different copper complex as the catalyst. In this case, in fact, the metal-ligand complex used for the catalysis was immobilized on a very peculiar SP the (PMHS). The siloxane gel [bipy]@Si contained, embedded, a bypyridine ligand and it was synthesized from PHMS and 4,4′-bis(allyloxymethyl)-2,2′-bipyridine (DAbipy) by the platinum-catalyzed hydrosilylation of alkenes. The catalyst was then tested on several radical precursors (Scheme 68).
Scheme 68. Nagashima’s Cu-catalytic complex.
Scheme 68. Nagashima’s Cu-catalytic complex.
Molecules 16 03252 g068
The synthesis of the actual catalyst [Cu/bipy]@Si was completed after treatment of [bipy]@Si with CuCl. The metal was easily soaked into the gel, forming the active complex, which resulted more stable to air than the not-embedded version and that can be filtrated from the organic solvents used for the reaction and re-used with small loss of TON. Metal leakage inferior to the detection limit was observed.
Scheme 69. Application of [Cu/bipy]@Si to 5-exo-trig radical cyclization.
Scheme 69. Application of [Cu/bipy]@Si to 5-exo-trig radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g069
Scheme 70. Application of [Cu/bipy]@Si to 4-exo-trig radical cyclization.
Scheme 70. Application of [Cu/bipy]@Si to 4-exo-trig radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g070
The reactions shown in Scheme 69 and Scheme 70 were all pretty successful (97-99%) and when the reaction gave low yields at room temperature, simple heating gave almost complete conversions.
Hypervalent iodine reagents can be used for the generation of alkoxy radicals under irradiation conditions. Teduka and Togo [83] used polystyrene-supported (diacetoxyiodo)benzene for the synthesis of 2-substituted 1,3-dioxolanes (Scheme 71), 2-substituted tetrahydrofurans (Scheme 72) and 2-substituted 1,3-dioxanes (Scheme 73).
Scheme 71. Togo’s synthesis of 1,3-dioxolanes.
Scheme 71. Togo’s synthesis of 1,3-dioxolanes.
Molecules 16 03252 g071
Scheme 72. Togo’s synthesis of 2-substituted tetrahydrofurans and dioxolanes.
Scheme 72. Togo’s synthesis of 2-substituted tetrahydrofurans and dioxolanes.
Molecules 16 03252 g072
Scheme 73. Togo’s synthesis of 2-substituted-1,3-dioxanes.
Scheme 73. Togo’s synthesis of 2-substituted-1,3-dioxanes.
Molecules 16 03252 g073
Oxidation of alcohols to the corresponding aldehyde or ketone represents a very common reaction in daily organic synthesis; however, there is always a need for new and milder methods for sensitive molecules, especially in SP organic chemistry. Kashiwagi’s group [84] studied a mild and efficient methodology, using a catalytic two-phase system, under basic conditions. (Scheme 74)
Scheme 74. Kashiwagi’s catalytic two-phase system.
Scheme 74. Kashiwagi’s catalytic two-phase system.
Molecules 16 03252 g074
The oxidation mechanism is displayed above and consists of an interface interaction between the oxidant (K3[Fe(CN)6]) in aqueous, basic solution and the hydroxylamine polymer-bound (TEMPO-PS) in organic phase (toluene), formed after oxidation of the alcohol 232. The base (2,6-lutidine) was necessary to close the catalytic cycle, yielding the desired carbonyl 233. Interestingly, in was found that this method has a rather high chemoselectivity, preferring primary alcohols oxidation to secondary alcohols.

3. Exploitation of Radical Chemistry in SP Synthesis

The importance of radicals in organic chemistry has grown considerably over the past three decades and several methodologies have been studied and set up to face the need of new routes for the synthesis of target molecules or classes of compounds. In this section, the studies and applications of those methodologies to SP will be discussed. Following our goal to provide a reference for the day-to-day use of solid-phase radical reactions, we have not based our classification on mechanistic grounds, but more simply on the formal way to generate a new bond.

3.1. Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation through Intermolecular Reactions

3.1.1. Substitutions Alpha to Carbonyl Groups

The first examples of intermolecular free radical allylation reaction on solid support was reported by Sibi and Chandramouli [85], for the synthesis of simple α-allyl acetic acids (Scheme 75).
Scheme 75. Sibi’s allylation reaction on supported α-bromo.
Scheme 75. Sibi’s allylation reaction on supported α-bromo.
Molecules 16 03252 g075
Wang resin was used as the solid support and the reactions were carried out using allyltin derivatives. As shown in the scheme, the reactions were rather successful and allylation was more effective (95% yield) when R3 was either and electron-donating (OAc) or electron-withdrawing (CO2CH3) group, while substitution around the C-centered radical gave lower yield (58%) for R1 = R2 = CH3. Allyl transfer reaction was studied also by Enholm’s group [86] who worked on a soluble support (Scheme 76).
Scheme 76. Enholm’s allyl transfer reaction.
Scheme 76. Enholm’s allyl transfer reaction.
Molecules 16 03252 g076
The polymer (non-cross-linked polystyrene) was functionalized to obtain the radical precursors. As shown in Scheme 76, 236 could be reacted with allyltributyltin derivatives under radical conditions, allowing allylation of the carbonyl α-carbon.
Scheme 77. Enholm’s allyl transfer reaction.
Scheme 77. Enholm’s allyl transfer reaction.
Molecules 16 03252 g077
Allylation of the same radical precursor (α-bromo carboxylate) linked this time to the polymer by means of a sugar moiety is shown in Scheme 77. When the reaction was performed in solution, use of a Lewis acid increased stereoselectivity. However, in the case shown in Scheme 77 any Lewis acid (LA) used gave premature cleavage. Fortunately, in this case a good stereoselectivity (97% ee) was found without any LA addition: this can be explained invoking the Lewis acidity of Bu3SnBr (formed during the reaction), which coordinates preferentially to one face of the sugar molecule directing the allyl attack. Enholm studied a series of intermolecular radical reactions also exploiting ROMP polymers [87] (see below).
Scheme 78. Enholm’s use of ROMP polymers for the synthesis of 241.
Scheme 78. Enholm’s use of ROMP polymers for the synthesis of 241.
Molecules 16 03252 g078
Scheme 79. Enholm’s use of ROMP polymers for the synthesis of 243.
Scheme 79. Enholm’s use of ROMP polymers for the synthesis of 243.
Molecules 16 03252 g079
Scheme 80. Enholm’s use of ROMP polymers for the synthesis of 245.
Scheme 80. Enholm’s use of ROMP polymers for the synthesis of 245.
Molecules 16 03252 g080
The polymers 240, 242 and 244 (Scheme 78, Scheme 79, Scheme 80) were prepared by building the appropriate norbornene precursors that were subsequently treated with Grubbs’ catalyst (see below). Treatment of the so obtained soluble polymers under radical conditions gave the desired products of allylation (Scheme 78) or reduction (Scheme 79) in good yields. A tremendous advantage of this type of polymers is represented by the presence of at least one molecule of substrate in each monomer, giving a 100% loading capacity to the polymer. In the case of Scheme 80, where each monomer contains two reactive sites, a 200% theoretical loading of the resin was obtained.
Linhardt and coworkers [88] used SmI2 as a SET reagent for the C-glycosilation of Neu5Ac on SP. Since carboxyl TentaGel resin failed to give any desired product, the reaction was run on a less hydrophilic material, namely a functionalized controlled pore glass (CPG). The glass was derivatized in order to present an amine group handle (Scheme 81). Methyl ester of neuraminic acid was first esterified with a spacer that was subsequently attached to the support. As shown in the scheme below, the results of the C-glycosilation reaction were rather satisfactory.
Scheme 81. Linhardt’s C-glycosilation.
Scheme 81. Linhardt’s C-glycosilation.
Molecules 16 03252 g081

3.1.2. Radical Addition to Alkenes

Radical addition to unsaturated C-C bonds represents one of the most common reactions in radical chemistry. The efficacy of the intermolecular versions of such reactions is heavily dependent on the nature of reaction itself. An early example of this chemistry on SP was presented by Zhu and Ganesan [89], that proved the efficiency of alkyl radical addition to acrylates attached to a chosen resin (Scheme 82).
Scheme 82. Ganesan’s radical addition to supported alkenes.
Scheme 82. Ganesan’s radical addition to supported alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g082
Scheme 83. Ganesan’s radical addition using Rink resin.
Scheme 83. Ganesan’s radical addition using Rink resin.
Molecules 16 03252 g083
The alkyl radicals were generated by photolysis of the corresponding Barton esters 247 and addition was generally good, with the exception of the stabilized benzyl radical that gave poor conversion (yields refer to the use of PS-Wang resin, as Tentagel-Wang gave lower yields). The reaction was performed using a Wang (Scheme 82) or a Rink (Scheme 83) resin. In the latter case yield was lower, a result in accord to the in-solution reaction, probably due to the differences between acrylate ester 246 and acryl amide 249.
1,2-Radical initiated addition of haloalkanes to C=C bonds is employed in commercial routes for the preparation of dihaloethenylcyclopropane carboxylic acids, and the development of cleaner and easier methods has brought Kumar and colleagues [90] to attempt the reaction anchoring the olefin to SP (Scheme 84).
Scheme 84. Kumar’s radical addition to supported alkenes.
Scheme 84. Kumar’s radical addition to supported alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g084
The olefins were linked to Wang or Merrifiled resins by their carboxylic unit and the reactions were run in the presence of butyronitrile as a cosolvent (except when CCl4 was used as reagent). Yields varied from moderate to high, for reaction times between 24 and 48 h, making this method effective, but rather slow. The synthesis of racemic α-amino acids was described by Yim [91] that applied the mercury method for the generation of alkyl radicals in the presence of polymer-supported dehydroalanine (Scheme 85).
Scheme 85. Yim’s radical addition to supported alkene.
Scheme 85. Yim’s radical addition to supported alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g085
Addition of the alkyl radical on the double bond was effective and after cleavage reasonable yields of the desired products were isolated. When the same reaction was performed under more usual radical conditions (Bu3SnH, AIBN, t-BuI, PhH, under reflux), only trace amounts of the product (8%) were isolated, while prolonged heating led only to decomposition. The reason for this behavior was attributed to the poor swelling of the Wang resin in the solvent used in the attempt (benzene).
Caddick’s group [92] prepared a small array of amide derivatives by intermolecular radical addition of C-centered radicals to an activated acrylate anchored to a resin. Aminomethyl-polystyrene resin was chosen as the SP where to anchor the acrylate ester of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-hydroxybenzoic acid (256). The choice of such electron-poor acrylate was made in order to facilitate the radical reaction and obtain an amide after cleavage with an appropriate amine. The general synthetic scheme of this high-yielding methodology is represented in Scheme 86.
Scheme 86. Caddick’s radical addition to supported alkene.
Scheme 86. Caddick’s radical addition to supported alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g086
In Scheme 87 and Scheme 88 the use of carbohydrate derivatives as radical precursors (258 and 260 respectively) is shown. In these cases, α-amino acids were used as amines, although the yields were lower compared to the previous case.
Scheme 87. Synthesis of compound 259.
Scheme 87. Synthesis of compound 259.
Molecules 16 03252 g087
Scheme 88. Synthesis of compound 261.
Scheme 88. Synthesis of compound 261.
Molecules 16 03252 g088

3.1.3. Radical Addition to Oxime

Among the literature references regarding the use of radical chemistry on SP, Naito’s group contributed by studying the reactivity of SP-supported oxime ethers. In their works [93,94,95,96,97], they studied the addition of appropriate alkyl iodides to polymer-supported glyoxylic oxime ether, giving the first example of intermolecular radical reaction exploiting triethyl borane or diethyl zinc as radical initiators. The methodology was used for the synthesis of unnatural aminoacids (Scheme 89).
Scheme 89. Naito’s radical addition to supported oxime.
Scheme 89. Naito’s radical addition to supported oxime.
Molecules 16 03252 g089
After loading the oxime to the solid phase (264), a first attempt was made using only Et3B in DCM, which worked as initiator and terminator to afford, after cleavage, aminoacid 266 where R = Et. Running the reaction with an alkyl iodide R-I in the presence of Bu3SnH, a range of products were obtained, thus, when R = i-Pr, c-hexyl, t-Bu, s-Bu, the corresponding unnatural amino acids were recovered in good yields, while the unstable primary radical i-Bu and the bulky adamantyl gave lower yields. In all the reactions, a small amount (5-30%) of 266 (R = Et) was found as by-product from the competitive addition of ethyl radical arising from Et3B. The reaction was also run in the presence of Et2Zn, which gave comparable results to the Et3B; in both cases the radical chain was effective also at low temperatures (-78 °C). Successively, they tried to run the reaction under iodine-atom transfer mechanism, using Et3B and i-PrI, but avoiding Bu3SnH. In this case a large amount of product where R = Et was found. The increased competition of the side-reaction was not explained, however, a change in solvent and temperature (toluene, 80 °C) as well as the use of a larger amount or alkyl iodide (60 eq.) gave a better selectivity towards the desired product (5.7:1 vs. 2:1). Such selectivity, however, remained lower compared to the reaction run in solution.
In general, when the reaction was run in the presence of an organic solvent, Wang resin proved to be slightly better compared to TentaGel OH. However, when the reaction was tried in aqueous media, which is normally effective in solution, Wang resin did not work at all because of its poor swelling properties. Success was achieved with TentaGel OH resin, where it was necessary to use a solution of Et3B in THF or MeOH (compared to the hexane solution used in the previous attempts) to obtain a monophasic solution. The reaction was run in a mixture H2O-MeOH (2:1, v/v, at 70 °C), under iodine atom transfer conditions and the overall yields were acceptable though lower compared to the ones run in organic solvents; a comparable amount of ethylated product was obtained.
Although the methodology described by Naito was biased by the presence of the undesired product of ethyl radical addition, the use of aqueous solvents and the absence of the toxic tin hydride make this procedure quite appealing. The same group also studied the stereoselective version [96,97,98,99] of the above-described reaction, using a chiral auxiliary (Scheme 90).
Scheme 90. Naito’s stereoselective radical addition to supported oxime.
Scheme 90. Naito’s stereoselective radical addition to supported oxime.
Molecules 16 03252 g090
Oppolzer’s camphorsultam was chosen as an auxiliary, while the reactions were tested in SP (using Wang resin) and in solution. The oxime was attached to a carboxylic acid derivative which, in the SP version, served as the spacer between the reactive moiety and the polymeric support (compound 267). In a first attempt, it was decided to try ethylation of 267 following the method described in Scheme 88, using Et3B or Et2Zn at low temperatures (-78 °C) in order to facilitate stereoselectivity. In both cases the results were very promising, high yields (59-74%), with little variation between solvents (DCM slightly better than toluene) and radical source (Et3B slightly better than Et2Zn), with diastereoselectivity higher than 95%. In order to prove the general validity of the method, radical addition from a different radical source was tried. At first Bu3SnH was used together with an alkyl iodide, but results were disappointing: low yield (around 40%) and a mixture of products were obtained (addition of ethyl radical prevailed). When the reaction was run without the tin hydride, yield improved (78%), but the great majority was still the undesired product (5:1), which was in contrast with the analogous solution-phase reaction. In order to overcome these problems, the conditions were changed: the reaction was performed using a mixture of R-I (30 eq.) and toluene (4:1) under iodine atom transfer conditions in the presence of Et3B or Et2Zn (5 eq.), and at higher temperatures (0 °C). This led to higher yields (R = i-Pr: 69% Et3B, 53% Et2Zn; R = c-hexyl: 58% Et3B, 41% Et2Zn), and higher stereoselectivities (>90%) compared to the in-solution reactions. The reason for the presence of such large amount of by-product in SP was not explained, however, this tendency increased at lower temperatures, suggesting that triethylborane concentrate on solid-support as Lewis acid, releasing a large amount of ethyl radical around the surface of the polymer.
In an approach similar to the one described by Naito in Scheme 89, Kim and colleagues [100] performed the synthesis of α-aminoesters by addition of alkyl radical to an anchored phenylsulfonyl oxime ether (Scheme 91).
Scheme 91. Kim’s radical addition to supported oxime ether.
Scheme 91. Kim’s radical addition to supported oxime ether.
Molecules 16 03252 g091
The reaction was successful for unactivated alkyl radicals, lower-yielding in the case of addition of benzyl radicals (either from benzyl iodide or bromide), while no reaction was observed for α-carbonyl radicals, which suggests that the process is governed by radical philicity.

3.2. Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation through Intramolecular Reactions

3.2.1. Radical Addition to Oximes

In successive papers [96,97,101,102,103], Naito’s group continued to study the reactivity of oxime ethers on solid-support by testing a 5-exo-trig radical cyclization for the synthesis of pyrrolidines (Scheme 92 and Scheme 93).
Scheme 92. Naito’s SP-atom transfer radical cyclization into oxime-alkene.
Scheme 92. Naito’s SP-atom transfer radical cyclization into oxime-alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g092
Scheme 93. Naito’s SP-atom transfer radical cyclization into oxime-alkyne.
Scheme 93. Naito’s SP-atom transfer radical cyclization into oxime-alkyne.
Molecules 16 03252 g093
Resins 271 (Scheme 92) and 274 (Scheme 93) were prepared and reacted to test their cyclization potentiality. The major difference between the reactions depicted in Scheme 89, Scheme 90, Scheme 91 was failure of cyclization at low temperature. For this reason, it was necessary to use toluene as solvent, heated up to 80 °C. The use of Bu3SnH as XH gave reasonable yield when AIBN was used as radical initiator (Scheme 92: 47%). Better results were obtained using Et3B (Scheme 92: 64%; Scheme 93: 77%), while further variation of the radical initiator did not improve the process: in fact, 9-BBN gave only trace of product and Et2Zn gave successful cyclization, but low yield (Scheme 92: 26%). Use of TTMSS in place of Bu3SnH gave lower yield (Scheme 92: 50%). As observed previously (see Scheme 89), the desired reaction is always in competition with ethyl radical addition-cyclization and when a less reactive radical precursor such as Et3SiH was used, the sole product was X = Et. The same reaction was successfully tried on an appropriate substrate containing a solid-supported α,β-unsaturated amide (Scheme 94) and extended to check the possibility of stereoselection using an asymmetric substrate (Scheme 95).
Scheme 94. Radical addition to an electron-poor alkene.
Scheme 94. Radical addition to an electron-poor alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g094
Scheme 95. Example of stereoselective addition/cyclization reaction.
Scheme 95. Example of stereoselective addition/cyclization reaction.
Molecules 16 03252 g095
The radical addition to an electron-poor alkene is shown in Scheme 94. In a first attempt the addition of a stannyl radical was tested and product 279 was recovered after cleavage in good yield (64%). The same reaction was then run under iodine-atom transfer conditions, using different R-I. The results were satisfying, although a large amount of alkyl iodide had to be used (30 eq.). The only reaction that failed was the one with the bulky t-Bu radical (R = i-Pr: 69%; c-hexyl: 54%; c-pentyl: 59%; s-Bu: 55%). The results obtained using EtnM without R-I were rather interesting, thus, when Et3B was used, a 72% of 279 product (R = Et) was isolated, while the use of Et2Zn gave only a 12% of the same product.
Scheme 95 displays the stereoselective addition/cyclization reaction promoted by alkyl radicals, using asymmetric substrate 280. The reaction was run in a strong excess of R-I (4:1 v/v with toluene), because, with smaller amounts, the product of ethyl radical addition was predominant. The products 281 were recovered in reasonable yields (R = i-Pr: 57%; c-hexyl: 50%; Et: 92%, when the reaction was run with only Et3B), but with a constant diasterometic ratio of 8:1, independently of the nature of the adding radical.

3.2.2. Radical Addition to Alkenes, Alkynes and Arenes

A radical cyclization for the synthesis of 2-oxindoles was studied by Fukase’s group [104]. In this case, N-(2-bromophenyl)acrylamides were anchored to the SP and treated under classical radical conditions (Bu3SnH, AIBN) (Scheme 96).
Scheme 96. Fukase’s SP-radical cyclization into alkenes.
Scheme 96. Fukase’s SP-radical cyclization into alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g096
Oxindoles such as 283 were obtained smoothly under MW irradiation (<1 h), compared to conventional heating (24 h). Interestingly, the reaction was run in DMF, a solvent where Bu3SnH is rather insoluble. This characteristic forced an increase in concentration of the H-donor on the surface of the resin. In addition, the same reaction run in solution gave no product at all, sustaining the thesis of concentration effect [105].
Bowman and coworkers [106] studied the addition of reactive aryl radicals to azoles and extended the methodology to SP using less toxic and troublesome TBGH and TTMSS (Scheme 97).
Scheme 97. Bowman’s SP-radical addition into pyrazole.
Scheme 97. Bowman’s SP-radical addition into pyrazole.
Molecules 16 03252 g097
The probe scaffold was anchored to a Wang resin. The results were rather disappointing compared to the relative reactions carried out in solution: in fact, when TBGH was used only 20% of 285 was isolated after cleavage, together with 70% of unreacted 286. However, switching to TTMSS improved the yield of 285 (53%), but this time, the side product was the reduced, uncyclized 287 (27%).
De Maesmaeker and Wendeborn [107] studied the functionalization of cyclohexendiol derivatives via radical cyclization on solid phase. Cyclization was performed using an aryl radical (Scheme 98) and a vinyl radical (Scheme 99), giving in both cases a mixture of products.
Scheme 98. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkene.
Scheme 98. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g098
Scheme 99. De Maesmaeker’s SP-vinyl radical cyclization into alkene.
Scheme 99. De Maesmaeker’s SP-vinyl radical cyclization into alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g099
In the first case (Scheme 97), product 289a was obtained as the minor component together with the prematurely reduced starting material 290, and the product of over-reduction of 289a (289b, X = H). Unfortunately, it resulted impossible to achieve complete removal of the chlorine atom without increasing the amount of 290. In the second reaction (Scheme 98), a large amount of reduced product 293 was found, while chlorine atom resisted in the desired product 292.
Du and Armstrong [108] provided a milder approach to the synthesis of solid-supported benzofurans via radical cyclization, which is based on the use of SmI2 (Scheme 100).
Scheme 100. Armstrong’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkenes.
Scheme 100. Armstrong’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g100
Yields were measured over 5 steps (4 of them necessary to synthesize 294). The reaction was run at room temperature and a range of diverse substituted alkenes was tested. The cyclization reaction took place in almost all cases, being the α,β-unsaturated ester (294 with R’ = COOEt) derivative an exception. However, in some cases, the yields were lower due to a variable amount of disproportionation product. This side-reaction proved to be substrate-dependent more than SP-dependent, since parallel test reactions in solution were carried out, revealing similar problematic. A major drawback of this approach could be the use of toxic reagents in excess (HMPA was necessary for the reaction to take place) and the difficulty in washing out the samarium ions when ungrafted polystyrene resin (Rink) was used. The latter problem was resolved using polyethylene glycol grafted resin, which swells well in aqueous solvents, making wash-up with NaHCO3 saturated solution more efficient for the elimination of Sm3+ impurities from the beads. In a subsequent paper [109], the same group brought forward the reaction depicted in the previous scheme by capture of the anionic metal derivative, formed after cyclization, with an electrophile (Scheme 101).
Scheme 101. Example of radical cyclization/electrophile capture.
Scheme 101. Example of radical cyclization/electrophile capture.
Molecules 16 03252 g101
The electrophiles chosen were aldehydes, using reaction conditions similar to those described earlier. As reference, the test reactions were also run in solution, where it was acknowledged the short half-life of the anion formed.
Compared to the previous example, attachment to the SP was performed via an appropriate handle on the benzene ring. In a first attempt Rink resin was used, giving no product of electrophilic quenching of the anion. Since the amide nitrogen in the linking group of Rink was supposed to be responsible for early interception of the anion generated after radical cyclization, it was decided to use the ester linkage of TentaGel S BHP resin (a resin also swelling better in the solvent used for the reaction). In this case, interception was effective, even if in a mixture with simple cyclized product. Since the yields were strongly dependent on the electrophile nature, this method did not present the quality necessary to be used in combinatorial chemistry.
Following the same idea, Berteina and De Maesmaeker [110] tested the 5-exo-trig cyclization to form 2,3-dihydro-benzofurans. Either the aryl iodide or the unsaturated counterpart, tethered by means of an oxygen atom, was directly anchored to aminomethylphenyl functionalized polystyrene beads. Usually, a spacer was inserted between the resin and the reactive molecule. As first attempt, the radical cyclization was performed under usual radical conditions (Scheme 102).
Scheme 102. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkenes.
Scheme 102. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g102
The radical cyclization depicted in Scheme 102 was effective, high yielding and no product of early reduction or starting material was found.
Interception of the alkyl radical formed after cyclization with allytributyltin was also attempted (Scheme 103). For R1 = H, the reaction gave a good yield of desired product 300 (beside 22% of simple cyclized product 299), while for R1 = CH3 or Ph, yields were pretty low and after cleavage the main product was found to be the unreacted starting material (beside 10% of 299), demonstrating a slower reaction that can be explained on the basis of steric hindrance.
Scheme 103. Example of radical cyclization/allyl interception.
Scheme 103. Example of radical cyclization/allyl interception.
Molecules 16 03252 g103
In a second attempt, it was chosen to have the unsaturated moiety, in this case an alkyne, directly connected to the SP. The reaction led to a mixture of two products 302 and 303 (Scheme 104).
Scheme 104. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclizatino into alkyne.
Scheme 104. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclizatino into alkyne.
Molecules 16 03252 g104
In another publication [111], the same group used a similar 5-exo-trig cyclization to form 1,3-dihydro-isobenzofurans (Scheme 105).
Scheme 105. De Maesmaeker’s synthesis of benzofurans 305.
Scheme 105. De Maesmaeker’s synthesis of benzofurans 305.
Molecules 16 03252 g105
The acid-labile Rink linker was necessary since, following the strategy adopted in Scheme 103 and Scheme 104, low yields of desired products (due to partial decomposition under the basic cleavage conditions) were obtained. This change of plan gave almost quantitative yields after cleavage.
In another experiment, it was evaluated the radical cyclization onto an aromatic ring, which yielded a benzoquinoline (Scheme 106).
Scheme 106. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into a benzene ring.
Scheme 106. De Maesmaeker’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into a benzene ring.
Molecules 16 03252 g106
In this case, it was necessary to use large amounts of H-donor and, most importantly, of radical initiator (AIBN), added in aliquots during the reaction. Lower amounts of the reagents gave uncompleted conversions. The need of a large excess of AIBN is probably due to its role played in the aromatization step after cyclization.
Also Routledge’s group [112] used the intramolecular radical cyclization to form tetrahydrofurans derivatives (such as the one depicted in Scheme 100) testing the use of hypophosphite salts as radical carriers in alternative to the toxic TBTH on SP (Scheme 107).
Scheme 107. Routledge’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkene.
Scheme 107. Routledge’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g107
As reference, the reaction was first run using TBTH (10 eq., toluene, reflux, 4 h) and AIBN (1 eq.), on a 2% divinylbenzene cross-linked carboxypolystyrene resin, giving a 95% yield of cyclized product 311a (beside 4% of 309 and 1% of 310). The reaction was then run using N-ethylpiperidine hypophosphite (EPHP, 20 eq.) and AIBN (3 eq.), but at best, only a 57% yield of 311a was isolated (besides 38% of 309 and 5% of 310). The reason for this behavior was initially supposed to lay in the nature of the solvent used (toluene), since EPHP is a salt and its concentration on the surface of the resin could be low in apolar solvents. However, when the reaction was run in polar mixtures (THF-EtOH 4:1), no real change of product distribution was observed (63% 311a, 31% 309, 6% 310). The attention was then shifted to the nature of the solid phase and a range of cross-linked and PEG grafted solid-supports was tested. The idea was that resins more hydrophilic than polystyrene would allow the radical carrier to approach the solid surface. For the purpose the following resins were used: NovaSyn® TG carboxy resin, a macroporous resin (ArgoPore®), PEG grafted resins, HypoGel® and ArgoGel® and the polytetrahydrofuran cross-linked resin, J andaJel®. The best results were obtained using the latter, which gave a 98% of 311a (beside a 2% of 310), under optimized conditions (20 eq. EPHP, initiator 2 eq., THF-EtOH 4:1, 48 h, under reflux). To confirm the validity of the choice made, a different reaction was carried out, using a primary alkyl radical precursor 312 (Scheme 108).
Scheme 108. Structure of alkyl radical precursor 312.
Scheme 108. Structure of alkyl radical precursor 312.
Molecules 16 03252 g108
The reaction was successful, with a 92% yield of desired cyclized product. The use of alternatives such as EPHP on SP could allow radical chemistry to become a more useful method for SP synthesis, with potential extension to combinatorial and medicinal chemistry.
In a recent paper [113], the same group studied the influence of microenvironment effects in the reaction depicted in Scheme 107 by determination of deuterium incorporation in the cyclized product. In order to do so, cyclization was carried out using deuterated EPHP or Bu3SnD in deuterated solvents (d8-THF: d6-EtOH 4:1 or 1:1; d4-MeOH; d6-benzene). The ratio of deuterated product 311b (R=D) versus 311a (R=H) was measured by GC-MS analysis.
The objective was the rationalization of the role played by the polymer backbone/linker in the radical H-abstraction, a side-reaction encountered in radical chemistry on SP. A first conclusion was that, as already observed by Curran [8], all resins can compete with relatively slow H-transfer reactions (such as H-abstraction from EPHP by an alkyl radical). However, the overall picture indicated that there are multiple factors influencing radical chemistry on SP: nature of the resin and linker (flexibility), solvent (swelling properties) and nature of the radical carrier (bond strength and solubility). Therefore, a general prediction of the effects of a specific resin on kinetics and mechanism of a radical reaction is rather difficult and the combination of the above-mentioned factors need to be considered case-by-case.
A more traditional approach was used by Balasubramanian and coworkers [114], who performed aryl radicals cyclization into alkenes to prepare benzofuran derivatives (Scheme 109) and alkyl radicals cyclization into alkynes to prepare functionalized furans (Scheme 110). The reactions were run using a very large excess of the H-donor, Bu3SnH. When the same excess of organostannyl hydride was used in solution, large amount of early reduction products were normally obtained. Therefore, somehow, use of the solid phase seemed to neutralize this inconvenience.
Scheme 109. Balasubramanian’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkene.
Scheme 109. Balasubramanian’s SP-aryl radical cyclization into alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g109
Scheme 110. Balasubramanian’s SP-alkyl radical cyclization into alkene.
Scheme 110. Balasubramanian’s SP-alkyl radical cyclization into alkene.
Molecules 16 03252 g110
Both carboxylated PS and TentaGel-COOH were used as resins. The main difference among them was the amount of radical initiator needed; in fact, in the former case, an excess of AIBN had to be used, while in the latter, only 6% mol was sufficient to perform complete conversion. The reason for this different behavior was attributed to chain-terminating processes involving the benzylic hydrogen on the polystyrene backbone, absent in the TentaGel resin. The lack of reduced side-products was tested on a slower (three orders of magnitude) reaction (shown in Scheme 110) usually more sensitive to early reduction, but even in this case it was not observed.
In an application to the synthesis of molecule of biological interest, a 5-exo-trig radical cyclization was performed by Lown’s group [115] for the synthesis of 1-chloromethyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-benz[e]indole (seco-CBI) and a polyamide conjugate (Scheme 111).
Scheme 111. Lown’s use of SP-aryl radical cyclization for the synthesis of seco-CBI.
Scheme 111. Lown’s use of SP-aryl radical cyclization for the synthesis of seco-CBI.
Molecules 16 03252 g111
The radical reaction was carried out starting from bromo-Wang resin according to the procedures applied in solution, commonly used for the synthesis of CC-1065 derivatives. To measure the efficacy of the reaction on SP, the product of cyclization was first acetylated and then cleaved, to yield a total 74% (48% plus a 26% of the product with the Boc protecting group still in place). The synthesis of a bis-polyamide-seco-CBI conjugate was completed using 318 and performing additional amide couplings both on solid- and solution-phase. Toru and colleagues [116] performed the intramolecular radical addition of an alkyl radical to unsaturated C-C bonds, in order to form γ-butyrolactones (Scheme 112).
Scheme 112. Toru’s SP-alkyl radical cyclization into alkenes.
Scheme 112. Toru’s SP-alkyl radical cyclization into alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g112
Merrifield resin was functionalized with an appropriate linear spacer and radical precursors 319 were prepared on the SP by addition of allyl (or propargyl) alcohols to the loaded vinyl ether, in the presence of NBS. The radical reaction was performed under common conditions and the excess of H-donor did not give uncyclized, reduced side-products. The toxic organotin by-products were separated by filtration and washing, while cleavage of the desired products from the resin was achieved using Jones’ oxidation. Yields were rather satisfactory, even when a 5-exo-dig cyclization on a triple bond was tested (47%, E:Z = 1:9).
During his studies towards the use of supported radical chemistry, Enholm [117] proposed the first example of stereoselective radical cyclization on a soluble support. The use of soluble supports (precipitating at –78 °C in MeOH) represent a great advantage for SP radical reactions since, according to the authors, the rates of the reactions involved are similar to those run in solution. Thus, a custom polymer incorporating a chiral auxiliary unit was synthesized by ring opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP). The radical reaction studied was a 6-exo-trig cyclization (Scheme 113).
Scheme 113. Enholm’s stereoselective alkyl radical cyclization on ROMP polymer.
Scheme 113. Enholm’s stereoselective alkyl radical cyclization on ROMP polymer.
Molecules 16 03252 g113
After building the monomer, the polymer was prepared employing a Grubbs-type ruthenium-based catalyst. Each monomer contained a succinimide anchor tethered to an (+)-isosorbide unit (the chiral auxiliary) esterificated with the radical precursor. After the ROMP, the polymer obtained reacted under radical conditions in the presence of a Lewis acid. Subsequent cleavage with lithium hydroxide afforded the desired acid 323. Constructing the polymer in this way, it was possible to achieve a 100% loading, a result not viable using commercial resins. The results were encouraging since, beside an 80% isolated yield, there was a >99% ee (being ZnCl2 the best solution). The use of a combination of low temperatures and Lewis acid for stereoselective radical cyclization is known [118,119,120,121,122,123], however, in this case, the use of zinc chloride proved to be far more better than other LA (such as MgBr2 or Yb(OTf)3), probably owing to the presence of the polymer-embedded sugar which creates a favorable environment for zinc-mediated stereoselection.
Kilburn’s group [124] exploited the reactivity of isocyanides to perform thiol-mediated radical cyclizations to obtain pyrroline or pyrrolidinone derivatives. In Scheme 114 a Wang-type resin was used. Treatment under radical cyclization conditions in the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol gave resin 325 that after trifluoroacetic acid-mediated cleavage gave pyrrolidinone 326 in reasonable yields.
Scheme 114. Kilburn’s thiol-mediated radical cyclization into SP-isocyanides.
Scheme 114. Kilburn’s thiol-mediated radical cyclization into SP-isocyanides.
Molecules 16 03252 g114
When HMBA-AM resin was used (Scheme 115), the use of ethanethiol during the cyclization step gave rise to resin 328, which could be cleaved under nucleophilic conditions preserving the pyrroline structure to yield amide derivative 329. In both cases the starting isonitrile was built on resin, which has the advantage of avoiding the handling of the unpleasant substance.
Scheme 115. Kilburn’s pyrroline synthesis.
Scheme 115. Kilburn’s pyrroline synthesis.
Molecules 16 03252 g115
Harrowven and colleagues [125] reported two new methods for radical cyclization on SP using supported dienes and, respectively, thiyl and tosyl radical. In this case heating of the loaded resin in the presence of AIBN and the radical precursor (PhSH or TsSePh) in an appropriate solvent was sufficient (Scheme 116).
Scheme 116. Harrowven’s SP-atom transfer radical cyclization into alkenes-alkenes.
Scheme 116. Harrowven’s SP-atom transfer radical cyclization into alkenes-alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g116
Radical precursors 330a-e were loaded on a PS-Wang resin. The results obtained when using phenylthiol (X = S, Y = H) as radical source/cyclization promoter were rather satisfactory, with yields of 331 ranging between 69-78%; when using p-tolyl benzeneselenosulfonate (X = Se, Y = Ts) on the same substrates, the desired products 332 were recovered in comparable yields (66-74%). The isomeric product distribution followed Beckwith’s guidelines for radical cyclizations [126,127].

3.3. Carbon-Heteroatom Formation

An interesting radical cyclization initiated by IBX was discovered [128,129,130] and thoroughly studied by Nicolaou. Mechanism and limits of the reaction as well as an application in solid-phase were subsequently reported [131] (Scheme 117). The interesting mechanism comprises a radical reaction initiated by IBX (A), where THF actively participate (B) and explains the reason for the need of an aryl amide for the success of the reaction. While it was tested and performed with good results in solution, the extension to the SP resulted in poor yield of the desired product (15%), probably due to oxidation of the resin by the IBX excess.
Scheme 117. Nicolaou’s IBX-promoted SP-radical cyclization.
Scheme 117. Nicolaou’s IBX-promoted SP-radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g117
Caddick and coworkers performed the addition of sulfonyl radicals to isolated alkenes (Scheme 118) and alkynes (Scheme 119) [132] and the best conditions are displayed below. Interestingly, the nature of solvent, linker (eq. 1,2 of Scheme 118 vs. eq. 1,2 of Scheme 119) and resin did have great influence on the reaction outcome, spanning between combinations were there was no reaction at all, to conditions giving decomposition.
Scheme 118. Caddick’s radical addition to alkynes.
Scheme 118. Caddick’s radical addition to alkynes.
Molecules 16 03252 g118
Scheme 119. Caddick’s radical addition to alkenes.
Scheme 119. Caddick’s radical addition to alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g119
During the studies about the transformation of hydrophilic to hydrophobic groups, in order to change the pharmacological properties of molecules, Plourde Jr. [133] explored the intermolecular radical addition of thiols to supported alkenes (Scheme 120 and Scheme 121).
Scheme 120. Plourde Jr.’s radical addition to supported alkenes.
Scheme 120. Plourde Jr.’s radical addition to supported alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g120
The reactions were run under the usual radical conditions, even if when the carbamate linker was used (Scheme 121) an uncommon solvent for radical reactions such as DMF was chosen. Yields were generally good, however, when R = Ar or HetAr, no reactions was observed (not shown). Addition of a thiol-bearing resin to an alkene was employed also for the synthesis of a new linker useful for the synthesis of amines. In order to improve the scope of the 2-(thiobenzyl)ethyl carbamate linker normally used for such a purpose, Timár and Gallagher [134] proposed to start from Merrifield SH resin.
Scheme 121. Example of Plourde Jr.’s use of carbamate linker.
Scheme 121. Example of Plourde Jr.’s use of carbamate linker.
Molecules 16 03252 g121
This (Scheme 122) was treated with the previously prepared N-vinyloxycarbonyl derivative 348, under radical conditions. Addition of the benzyl thiyl radical to the vinyloxy moiety loaded the desired starting material to the resin, giving 349, which was treated under oxidative/basic conditions for cleavage. This modification offers an entry for secondary amines, complementing the original procedure (exploiting the reaction between a supported alcohol and an isocyanate), only viable for primary amines.
Scheme 122. Gallagher’s SP-radical synthesis of amines.
Scheme 122. Gallagher’s SP-radical synthesis of amines.
Molecules 16 03252 g122
A possible problem in SP intermolecular radical reactions consists of the lower rate constants compared to the reactions run in solution, probably due to the heterogeneous nature of SP reactions. Zard’s group [135] tried to address this problem by synthesizing a Wang-type soluble support. This support was then compared with the classical polystyrene Wang resin, via the radical addition of supported xanthates to olefins in solution and by the addition of immobilized olefins to free xanthates. Soluble support 357 was synthesized by xanthate polymerization and employed for intermolecular test radical addition. (Scheme 123)
Scheme 123. Zard’s synthesis of soluble support for radical cyclization.
Scheme 123. Zard’s synthesis of soluble support for radical cyclization.
Molecules 16 03252 g123
In Scheme 124 the supported xanthate was reacted with an excess olefin 360 under tin-free radical conditions. For both resins, the reaction was biased by the formation of by-products, compared to the one run without exploiting polymers. However, 359b (soluble support) gave cleaner reaction profile and higher yields (54% vs. 26%) compared to 359a (Wang). For Wang resin a large excess of olefin 360 and 30% mol of lauroyl peroxide (DLP) needed to be used, while for the soluble support, a 3-fold excess of 360 and 40% DLP were needed to complete the reaction.
Scheme 124. Zard’s use of supported xanthates.
Scheme 124. Zard’s use of supported xanthates.
Molecules 16 03252 g124
When the reagents were inverted (Scheme 125), in both cases, the reaction did not go to completion and side-product 365 was found in similar proportion to the desired product. Despite this, the reaction was substantially cleaner compared to the one described in Scheme 124, even if it was still needed a consistent amount of DLP (50% mol) compared to the polymer-free reaction. Final yields were reasonable (52% for Wang, 70% for soluble support). The presence of side product 365 says that at certain xanthate concentrations, the intermolecular reaction is in competition with the intramolecular process, preventing the reaction to go forward in the desired direction. These results suggest that intermolecular radical processes are viable on SP and that the use of soluble support has more benefits compared to the heterogeneous classical SP synthesis.
Scheme 125. Zard’s use of supported alkenes.
Scheme 125. Zard’s use of supported alkenes.
Molecules 16 03252 g125
Back and Zhai [136] performed a radical addition of PS-arylselenosulfonates to alkynes (Scheme 126).
Scheme 126. Back’s SP-radical addition of resin 366 to free alkynes.
Scheme 126. Back’s SP-radical addition of resin 366 to free alkynes.
Molecules 16 03252 g126
Scheme 127. Back’s SP-radical addition of resin 369 to free alkynes.
Scheme 127. Back’s SP-radical addition of resin 369 to free alkynes.
Molecules 16 03252 g127
Acetylenic sulfones of the kind of 368 (or 370) are useful synthones for a variety of reactions (such as cycloadditions). Their first attempt to perform their synthesis on SP through radical addition to 1-hexyne is displayed in Scheme 127. Radical reaction and subsequent oxidation-elimination to restore the triple bond were effective, however, when 368 was further reacted under cyclization conditions, it did not yield any product. For this reason, it was added a spacer to the SP, therefore, resin 369 was prepared and reacted to yield products 370. Finally, 370 were successfully reacted under cyclization conditions, giving the desired products in good yields.
In the quest for new methodologies viable for the synthesis of small molecules on SP, Attardi and Taddei [137] presented a radical approach for the construction of unnatural amino acids and their small oligopeptides (Scheme 128).
Scheme 128. Taddei’s SP-synthesis of unnatural AAs by radical approach.
Scheme 128. Taddei’s SP-synthesis of unnatural AAs by radical approach.
Molecules 16 03252 g128
In the example reported above the Wang resin anchored Barton ester 371 was obtained by coupling of the correspondent acid with 1-hydroxy-2-pyridinethione. The photolabile product was submitted to irradiation to give radical fragmentation and loss of CO2, followed by trapping with CBrCl3. To minimize side-products it was necessary the use of DMF as solvent and 50 equivalents of the halogenated chemical reagent. After cleavage, a respectable 72% yield was obtained. The same process was applied to di- and tri-peptides, while the resulting alkylbromides were further reacted with nucleophiles to obtain the desired unnatural aminoacid side-chain.

3.4. Other

Troc (2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl) group is a widely used protecting group in organic, especially oligosaccharide, chemistry. Since its removal is often performed under heterogeneous conditions, it is not ideal for SP chemistry. Fukase [105] studied a methodology for Troc removal on a substrate anchored to SP, performed using a radical methodology (Scheme 129). The conditions used were tested in solution before extension of the methodology to SP and it was found that DMF was the best solvent (the reaction did not proceed in toluene), probably due to a concentration effect of the organotin derivative to the polymer support; and that the reactions proceeded slowly under conventional heating, therefore, microwave irradiation seemed to be the best choice. Since the amount of (Bu3Sn)2 was substoichiometric, an involvement of DMF in the catalytic cycle was also suggested. Beside the high yields obtained, the method was also effective because of the absence of dichloroethoxycarbonylated byproducts.
Scheme 129. Fukase’s SP Troc radical deprotection.
Scheme 129. Fukase’s SP Troc radical deprotection.
Molecules 16 03252 g129
The couple 2-aminobenzoic acid (Abz) and 3-nitrotyrosine (Tyr(3-NO2)) is used as fluorophore-quencher combination in FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) methodology for monitoring structural, functional, or aggregation changes in evaluated biomolecules. Since the couple can be easily incorporated in peptides, it would be of great advantage having a method for selective nitration of tyrosine incorporated on a peptide anchored to SP. Savinov and colleagues [138] did find this very mild, SP-friendly methodology for selective nitration of phenols. After a careful optimization of the reaction conditions and a mechanistic study, the reaction was tested on resin-bound substrates (Scheme 130).
Scheme 130. Savinov’s nitration of phenols.
Scheme 130. Savinov’s nitration of phenols.
Molecules 16 03252 g130
The right solvent for the reaction (THF) was first identified in solution, where some evidence of chemoselectivity was also found. Most importantly, the reaction worked only when a phenol hydroxyl group was present. Subsequently, the protocol was tested on dipeptide 375, confirming the need for a free phenolic hydroxyl group and, finally, on a peptide such as 376, giving the desired nitrotyrosine derivative 378 in good yield. The hypothesized mechanism was confirmed by the isolation of the O-nitroso derivative (such as 380) and the observation of the stabilized phenoxyl radical of 379, with its characteristic blue color. Decomposition of an O-nitroso derivative such as 380 led to nitric oxide, which underwent oxidation (probably from air oxygen) to nitrogen dioxide that subsequently coupled with the phenoxyl radical to give the nitration products. It is clear from the proposed mechanism, that the phenol hydroxyl group participates in the reaction, in fact, when anisole was subjected to the same experimental conditions, no nitrated products were observed.

4. Conclusions

Radical chemistry, despite having a long-standing tradition and deep relationships with polymers, has become one of the available means for solid-phase synthesis only in relatively recent years. Nevertheless, the wealth of the examples we have provided above witnesses the fruition of such a merging.
On the other hand, in the same period of time the concept of diversity-oriented synthesis (DOS) [12] has abruptly emerged in organic chemistry, with the goal of providing collections of small molecules. A number of tools are available to achieve such an end and in this context, as this review has illustrated, radical chemistry applied to SP represents an important and valid alternative.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Paolo Trifirò for his helpful assistance.

References and Notes

  1. Gomberg, M. An Instance of Trivalent Carbon: Triphenylmethyl. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1900, 22, 757–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Geng, Y.; Discher, D.E.; Justynska, J.; Schlaad, H. Grafting Short Peptides onto Polybutadiene-block-poly(ethylene oxide): A Platform for Self-Assembling Hybrid Amphiphiles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45, 7578–7581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Siegenthaler, K.O.; Schäfer, A.; Studer, A. Chemical Surface Modification via Radical C-C Bond-Forming Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5826–5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hensarling, R.M.; Doughty, V.A.; Chan, J.W.; Patton, D.L. Clicking Polymer Brushes with Thiol-yne Chemistry: Indoors and Out. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14673–14675. [Google Scholar]
  5. Walling, C. Some properties of radical reactions important in synthesis. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3887–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Newcomb, M. Competition Methods and Scales for Alkyl Radical Reaction Kinetics. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1151–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gansäuer, A.; McGhee, A.; Procter, D. Radical Chemistry on Solid Support. In Radicals in Synthesis II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 264, pp. 93–134. [Google Scholar]
  8. Curran, D.P.; Yang, F.; Cheong, J.H. Relative Rates and Approximate Rate Constants for Inter- and Intramolecular Hydrogen Transfer Reactions of Polymer-Bound Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14993–15000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lloyd-Williams, P.; Albericio, F.; Giralt, E. Convergent solid-phase peptide synthesis. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 11065–11133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bochet, C.G. Photolabile protecting groups and linkers. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 125–142. [Google Scholar]
  11. Reitz, A.B. Recent advances in traceless linkers. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 1999, 2, 358–364. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schreiber, S.L. Target-Oriented and Diversity-Oriented Organic Synthesis in Drug Discovery. Science 2000, 287, 1964–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scott, P.J.H.; Steel, P.G. Diversity Linker Units for Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2006, 2251–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jung, K.W.; Zhao, X.Y.; Janda, K.D. A linker that allows efficient formation of aliphatic C-H bonds on polymeric supports. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6491–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barluenga, S.; Dakas, P.Y.; Ferandin, Y.; Meijer, L.; Winssinger, N. Modular Asymmetric Synthesis of Aigialomycin D, a Kinase-Inhibitory Scaffold. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2006, 45, 3951–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Parsons, A.F.; Pettifer, R.M. A radical approach to N-desulfonylation. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1667–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, J.; Huang, W. A new strategy for solid phase synthesis of a secondary amide library using sulfonamide linker via radical traceless cleavage. Mol. Divers. 2003, 6, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. D'Herde, J.N.P.; J. de Clercq, P. Carbon-carbon bond formation on solid support. Application of the classical Julia-Lythgoe olefination. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6657–6659. [Google Scholar]
  19. Allin, S.M.; Bowman, W.R.; Karim, R.; Rahman, S.S. Aromatic homolytic substitution using solid phase synthesis. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4306–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roberts, B.P. Polarity-reversal catalysis of hydrogen-atom abstraction reactions: concepts and applications in organic chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McAllister, L.A.; Brand, S.; de Gentile, R.; Procter, D.J. The first Pummerer cyclisations on solid phase. Convenient construction of oxindoles enabled by a sulfur-link to resin. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2003, 2380–2381. [Google Scholar]
  22. Turner, K.L.; Baker, T.M.; Islam, S.; Procter, D.J.; Stefaniak, M. Solid-Phase Approach to Tetrahydroquinolones Using a Sulfur Linker Cleaved by SmI2. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McAllister, L.A.; Turner, K.L.; Brand, S.; Stefaniak, M.; Procter, D.J. Solid Phase Approaches to N-Heterocycles Using a Sulfur Linker Cleaved by SmI2. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6497–6507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. McAllister, L.A.; McCormick, R.A.; Procter, D.J. Sulfide- and selenide-based linkers in phase tag-assisted synthesis. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 11527–11576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruhland, T.; Andersen, K.; Pedersen, H. Selenium-Linking Strategy for Traceless Solid-Phase Synthesis: Direct Loading, Aliphatic C-H Bond Formation upon Cleavage and Reaction Monitoring by Gradient MAS NMR Spectroscopy. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9204–9211. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruhland, T.; Torang, J.; Pedersen, H.; Madsen, J.C.; Bang, K.S. Traceless Solid Phase Synthesis with Polystyrene-Bound Tellurium and in Comparison with Polystyrene-Bound Selenium. Synthesis 2004, 2323–2328. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruhland, T.; Torang, J.; Pedersen, H.; Madsen, J.C.; Bang, K.S. Green Traceless Cleavage from Resin-Bound Selenium and Tellurium and Analysis by 2D 29Si/1H HR-MAS NMR Spectroscopy. Synthesis 2005, 1635–1640. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nicolaou, K.C.; Pastor, J.; Barluenga, S.; Winssinger, N. Polymer-supported selenium reagents for organic synthesis. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 1998, 1947–1948. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nicolaou, K.C.; Mitchell, H.J.; Fylaktakidou, K.C.; Suzuki, H.; Rodríguez, R.M. 1,2-Seleno Migrations in Carbohydrate Chemistry: Solution and Solid-Phase Synthesis of 2-Deoxy Glycosides, Orthoesters, and Allyl Orthoester. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nicolaou, K.C.; Fylaktakidou, K.C.; Mitchell, H.J.; van Delft, F.L.; Rodríguez, R.M.; Conley, S.R.; Jin, Z. Total Synthesis of Everninomicin 13,384-1—Part 4: Explorations of Methodology; Stereocontrolled Synthesis of 1,1′-Disaccharides, 1,2-Seleno Migrations in Carbohydrates, and Solution- and Solid-Phase Synthesis of 2-Deoxy Glycosides and Orthoesters. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3166–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nicolaou, K.C.; Roecker, A.J.; Pfefferkorn, J.A.; Cao, G.Q. A Novel Strategy for the Solid-Phase Synthesis of Substituted Indolines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2966–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nicolaou, K.C.; Roecker, A.J.; Hughes, R.; van Summeren, R.; Pfefferkorn, J.A.; Winssinger, N. Novel strategies for the solid phase synthesis of substituted indolines and indoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 11, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nicolaou, K.C.; Pfefferkorn, J.A.; Cao, G.Q.; Kim, S.; Kessabi, J. A Facile Method for the Solution and Solid-Phase Synthesis of Substituted [3.3.1] Bicycles. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 807–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berlin, S.; Ericsson, C.; Engman, L. Radical Carbonylation/Reductive Cyclization for the Construction of Tetrahydrofuran-3-ones and Pyrrolidin-3-ones. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8386–8396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fujita, K.I.; Watanabe, K.; Oishi, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Taguchi, Y. Preparation of Polymer-Supported Selenocyanates and their Application to Solid-Phase Oxyselenenylation-Deselenylation. Synlett 1999, 1999, 1760–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qian, H.; Huang, X. Polystyrene-Supported Selenosulfonates: Efficient Reagents for Regio- and Stereocontrolled Synthesis of Vinyl Sulfones. Synlett 2001, 1913–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qian, H.; Huang, X. Polystyrene-supported selenosulfonates: efficient reagents for the synthesis of acetylenic sulfones. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1059–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qian, H.; Huang, X. Solid-Phase Synthesis of alpha-Keto Sulfones. Synthesis 2006, 1934–1936. [Google Scholar]
  39. Qian, H.; Huang, X. Radical Cyclization of 1,6-Diene Using Polystyrene-Supported Selenosulfones. J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Myers, R.M.; Langston, S.P.; Conway, S.P.; Abell, C. Reductive Cleavage of N-O Bonds Using Samarium(II) Iodide in a Traceless Release Strategy for Solid-Phase Synthesis. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gustafsson, M.; Olsson, R.; Andersson, C.M. General combinatorial synthesis of tertiary amines on solid support. A novel conditional release strategy based on traceless linking at nitrogen. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meloni, M.M.; Taddei, M. Solid-Phase Synthesis of beta-Lactams via the Miller Hydroxamate Approach. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kerrigan, N.J.; Hutchison, P.C.; Heightman, T.D.; Procter, D.J. Application of an ephedrine chiral linker in a solid-phase, 'asymmetric catch-release' approach to gamma-butyrolactones. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2003, 21, 1402–1403. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kerrigan, N.J.; Hutchison, P.C.; Heightman, T.D.; Procter, D.J. Development of a solid-phase 'asymmetric resin-capture-release' process: application of an ephedrine chiral resin in an approach to gamma-butyrolactones. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 2476–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dai, W.M. Efficient Remote Axial-to-Central Chirality Transfer in Enantioselective SmI2-Mediated Reductive Coupling of Aldehydes with Crotonates of Atropisomeric 1-Naphthamides. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2445–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McKerlie, F.; Procter, D.J.; Wynne, G. Reduction of alpha-aryloxy carbonyl compounds with samarium(II) iodide. A new traceless linker for the solid phase synthesis of carbonyl compounds. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2002, 21, 584–585. [Google Scholar]
  47. McKerlie, F.; Rudkin, I.M.; Wynne, G.; Procter, D.J. Evaluation of a new linker system cleaved using samarium(II) iodide. Application in the solid phase synthesis of carbonyl compounds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 2805–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, H.; Wan, S.; Floreancig, P.E. Oxidative Cyclorelease from Soluble Polymeric Supports. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3814–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Floreancig, P.E. Development and Applications of Electron-Transfer-Initiated Cyclization Reactions. Synlett 2007, 38, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Whitehead, D.M.; Helliwell, P.A.; McKeown, S.C.; Routledge, A. Synthesis, chemical stability and application of a thiohydroxamic acid linker (THA) for solid-phase organic synthesis. React. Funct. Polym. 2009, 69, 884–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Horton, J.R.; Stamp, L.M.; Routledge, A. A photolabile 'traceless' linker for solid-phase organic synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9181–9184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Whitehead, D.M.; Jackson, T.; McKeown, S.C.; Wilson, K.; Routledge, A. Application of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy in Determining the Structure of Solid-Phase Bound Substrates. J. Comb. Chem. 2002, 4, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gerigk, U.; Gerlach, M.; Neumann, W.P.; Vieler, R.; Weintritt, V. Polymer-Supported Organotin Hydrides as Immobilized Reagents for Free Radical Synthesis. Synthesis 1990, 1990, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gerlach, M.; Joerdens, F.; Kuhn, H.; Neumann, W.P.; Peterseim, M. A polymer-supported organotin hydride and its multipurpose application in radical organic synthesis. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5971–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barton, D.H.R.; McCombie, S.W. A new method for the deoxygenation of secondary alcohols. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1975, 1574–1585. [Google Scholar]
  56. Neumann, W.P.; Peterseim, M. Elegant Improvement of the Deoxygenation of Alcohols Using a Polystyrene-Supported Organotin Hydride. Synlett 1992, 1992, 801–802. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ruel, G.; Ngo, K.T.; Dumartin, G.; Delmond, B.; Pereyre, M. Un nouvel hydrure organostannique greffé sur support insoluble. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 444, C18–C20. [Google Scholar]
  58. Dumartin, G.; Ruel, G.; Kharboutli, J.; Delmond, B.; Connil, M.F.; Jousseaume, B.; Pereyre, M. Straightforward Synthesis and Reactivity of Polymer-supported Organotin Hydrides. Synlett 1994, 1994, 952–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dumartin, G.; Pourcel, M.; Delmond, B.; Donard, O.; Pereyre, M. In situ generated, polymer-supported organotin hydrides as clean reducing agents. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4663–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chemin, A.; Deleuze, H.; Maillard, B. Preparation and reactivity of a macroporous polymer-supported organotin hydride catalyst. Eur. Polym. J. 1998, 34, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boussaguet, P.; Delmond, B.; Dumartin, G.; Pereyre, M. Catalytic and supported Barton-McCombie deoxygenation of secondary alcohols: a clean reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3377–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lopez, R.M.; Hays, D.S.; Fu, G.C. Bu3SnH-Catalyzed Barton-McCombie Deoxygenation of Alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6949–6950. [Google Scholar]
  63. Harendza, M.; Lessmann, K.; Neumann, W.P. A Polymer-Supported Distannane as Photochemical, Regenerable Source of Stannyl Radicals for Organic Synthesis. Synlett 1993, 1993, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Junggebauer, J.; Neumann, W.P. An improved synthesis of a polymer-supported distannane and its application to radical formation. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Enholm, E.J.; Gallagher, M.E.; Moran, K.M.; Lombardi, J.S.; Schulte, J.P. An Allylstannane Reagent on Non-Cross-Linked Polystyrene Support. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 689–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Enholm, E.J.; Schulte, J.P. Convenient Catalytic Free Radical Reductions of Alkyl Halides Using an Organotin Reagent on Non-Cross-Linked Polystyrene Support. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1275–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Corey, E.J.; Suggs, J.W. Method for catalytic dehalogenations via trialkyltin hydrides. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 2554–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ueno, Y.; Chino, K.; Watanabe, M.; Moriya, O.; Okawara, M. Homolytic carbocyclization by use of a heterogeneous supported organotin catalyst. A new synthetic route to 2-alkoxytetrahydrofurans and gamma-butyrolactones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 5564–5566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mochida, K.; Sugimoto, H.; Yasuo, Y. First polymer-supported organogermanium hydrides and their reduction of organic halides. Polyhedron 1997, 16, 1767–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bowman, W.R.; Krintel, S.L.; Schilling, M.B. New Solid Phase Triorganogermanium Hydrides for Radical Synthesis. Synlett 2004, 2004, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar]
  71. Patro, B.; Merrett, M.; Murphy, J.A.; Sherrington, D.C.; Morrison, M.G.J.T. Radical-polar crossover reactions with polymer-supported tetrathiafulvalene. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7857–7860. [Google Scholar]
  72. Baguley, P.A.; Walton, J.C. Flight from the Tyranny of Tin: The Quest for Practical Radical Sources Free from Metal Encumbrances. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 3072–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fletcher, R.; Kizil, M.; Lampard, C.; Murphy, J.A.; Roome, S.J. Tetrathiafulvalene-mediated stereoselective synthesis of the tetracyclic core of Aspidosperma alkaloids. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 2341–2352. [Google Scholar]
  74. Callaghan, O.; Lampard, C.; Kennedy, A.R.; Murphy, J.A. A novel total synthesis of (+/-)-aspidospermidine. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 995–1002. [Google Scholar]
  75. de Luca, L.; Giacomelli, G.; Porcu, G.; Taddei, M. A New Supported Reagent for the Photochemical Generation of Radicals in Solution. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 855–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Barton, D.H.R.; Crich, D.; Motherwell, W.B. The invention of new radical chain reactions. Part VIII. Radical chemistry of thiohydroxamic esters; A new method for the generation of carbon radicals from carboxylic acids. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3901–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Clark, A.J.; Filik, R.P.; Haddleton, D.M.; Radigue, A.; Sanders, C.J.; Thomas, G.H.; Smith, M.E. Solid-Supported Catalysts for Atom-Transfer Radical Cyclization of 2-Haloacetamides. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8954–8957. [Google Scholar]
  78. Clark, A.J.; Geden, J.V.; Thom, S. Solid-Supported Copper Catalysts for Atom-Transfer Radical Cyclizations: Assessment of Support Type and Ligand Structure on Catalyst Performance in the Synthesis of Nitrogen Heterocycles. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1471–1479. [Google Scholar]
  79. Baldwin, J.E. Rules for ring closure. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1976, 734–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Baldwin, J.E.; Cutting, J.; Dupont, W.; Kruse, L.; Silberman, L.; Thomas, R.C. 5-Endo-trigonal reactions: a disfavoured ring closure. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1976, 736–738. [Google Scholar]
  81. Clark, A.J.; Dell, C.P.; Ellard, J.M.; Hunt, N.A.; McDonagh, J.P. Efficient room temperature copper(I) mediated 5-endo radical cyclisations. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8619–8623. [Google Scholar]
  82. Motoyama, Y.; Kamo, K.; Yuasa, A.; Nagashima, H. Catalytic atom-transfer radical cyclization by copper/bipyridine species encapsulated in polysiloxane. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2010, 46, 2256–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Teduka, T.; Togo, H. I2-Mediated Photochemical Preparation of 2-Substituted 1,3-Dioxolanes and Tetrahydrofurans from Alcohols with Polymer-Supported Hypervalent Iodine Reagent, PSDIB. Synlett 2005, 2005, 923–926. [Google Scholar]
  84. Kashiwagi, Y.; Ikezoe, H.; Ono, T. Oxidation of Alcohols with Nitroxyl Radical Resins under Two-Phase Conditions. Synlett 2006, 2006, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sibi, M.P.; Chandramouli, S.V. Intermolecular free radical reactions on solid support. Allylation of esters. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8929–8932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Enholm, E.J.; Gallagher, M.E.; Jiang, S.; Batson, W.A. Free Radical Allyl Transfers Utilizing Soluble Non-Cross-Linked Polystyrene and Carbohydrate Scaffold Supports. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3355–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Enholm, E.J.; Gallagher, M.E. Free Radical Reactions on Soluble Supports from Ring-Opening Metathesis. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3397–3399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Baytas, S.N.; Wang, Q.; Karst, N.A.; Dordick, J.S.; Linhardt, R.J. Solid-Phase Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of C-Sialosides. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 6900–6903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhu, X.; Ganesan, A. Intermolecular Conjugate Addition of Alkyl Radicals on Solid Phase. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kumar, H.M.S.; Chakravarthy, P.P.; Rao, M.S.; Reddy, P.S.R.; Yadav, J.S. Free radical addition of haloalkanes to polymer bound olefins and its application to the solid-phase synthesis of pyrethroids. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7817–7819. [Google Scholar]
  91. Yim, A.M.; Vidal, Y.; Viallefont, P.; Martinez, J. Solid-phase synthesis of alpha-amino acids by radical addition to adehydroalanine derivative. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4535–4538. [Google Scholar]
  92. Caddick, S.; Hamza, D.; Wadman, S.N.; Wilden, J.D. Solid-Phase Intermolecular Radical Reactions 2: Synthesis of C-Glycopeptide Mimetics via a Novel Acrylate Acceptor. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1775–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Miyabe, H.; Fujishima, Y.; Naito, T. Novel Synthesis of alpha-Amino Acid Derivatives through Triethylborane-Induced Solid-Phase Radical Reactions. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2174–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Miyabe, H.; Nishimura, A.; Fujishima, Y.; Naito, T. Carbon-carbon bond construction on solid support: triethylborane-induced radical reactions of oxime ethers. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 1901–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Miyabe, H.; Ueda, M.; Naito, T. Carbon-Carbon Bond Construction Based on Radical Addition to C=N Bond. Synlett 2004, 2004, 1140–1157. [Google Scholar]
  96. Miyabe, H. Development of Solid-Phase Radical Reactions Using Oxime Ethers as a Radical Acceptor. Yakugaku Zasshi 2000, 120, 667–676. [Google Scholar]
  97. Miyabe, H. Development of Carbon Radical Addition to Imine Derivatives. Yakugaku Zasshi 2003, 123, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Miyabe, H.; Konishi, C.; Naito, T. Stereocontrol in Solid-Phase Radical Reactions: Radical Addition to Oxime Ether Anchored to Polymer Support. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1443–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Miyabe, H.; Konishi, C.; Naito, T. Diastereoselective Solid-Phase Radical Addition to Oxime Ether Anchored to Polymer Support. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jeon, G.H.; Yoon, J.Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.S. Radical Reaction of Phenylsulfonyl Oxime Ethers on Solid Support: Application to the Synthesis of alpha-Amino Esters. Synlett 2000, 2000, 128–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Miyabe, H.; Tanaka, H.; Naito, T. Triethylborane-induced solid-phase radical cyclization of oxime ethers. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8387–8390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Miyabe, H.; Fujii, K.; Tanaka, H.; Naito, T. Solid-phase tandem radical addition-cyclisation reaction of oxime ethers. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2001, 831–832. [Google Scholar]
  103. Miyabe, H.; Tanaka, H.; Naito, T. Solid-Phase Tandem Radical Addition-Cyclization Reaction: Triethylborane-Induced Reaction of Oxime Ethers Anchored to Polymer Support. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Akamatsu, H.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S. Solid-Phase Synthesis of Indol-2-ones by Microwave-Assisted Radical Cyclization. Synlett 2004, 2004, 1049–1053. [Google Scholar]
  105. Tokimoto, H.; Fukase, K. New deprotection method of the 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) group with (Bu3Sn)2. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6831–6832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Allin, S.M.; Bowman, W.R.; Elsegood, M.R.J.; McKee, V.; Karim, R.; Rahman, S.S. Synthetic applications of aryl radical building blocks for cyclisation onto azoles. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 2689–2696. [Google Scholar]
  107. Berteina, S.; de Mesmaeker, A.; Wendeborn, S. Functionalization via Radical Cyclization of Cyclohexenediol Derivatives Bound to Polystyrene. Synlett 1999, 1999, 1121–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Du, X.; Armstrong, R.W. Synthesis of Benzofuran Derivatives on Solid Support via SmI2-Mediated Radical Cyclization. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5678–5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Du, X.; Armstrong, R.W. SmI2-mediated sequential radical cyclization/anionic capture of aryl iodides on solid support. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2281–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Berteina, S.; Mesmaeker, A.D. Application of radical chemistry to solid support synthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5759–5762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Berteina, S.; Wendeborn, S.; de Mesmaeker, A. Radical and Palladium-Mediated Cyclization of Ortho-Iodo Benzyl Enamines: Application to Solid Phase Synthesis. Synlett 1998, 1998, 1231–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chevet, C.; Jackson, T.; Santry, B.; Routledge, A. A Cleaner Approach to Solid-Supported Radical Chemistry: Application of Hypophosphite Salts to Intramolecular C-C Bond Formation on the Solid-Phase. Synlett 2005, 2005, 477–480. [Google Scholar]
  113. Helliwell, P.A.; Bailey, V.A.; Chevet, C.; Clarke, D.B.; Lloyd, A.; Macarthur, R.; Routledge, A. A mass spectrometric investigation into microenvironmental effects in solid-supported radical chemistry. React. Funct. Polym. 2010, 70, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Routledge, A.; Abell, C.; Balasubramanian, S. An Investigation into Solid-Phase Radical Chemistry-Synthesis of Furan Rings. Synlett 1997, 1997, 61–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Jia, G.; Iida, H.; Lown, J.W. Solid-Phase Synthesis of 1-Chloromethyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-benz[e]indole (seco-CBI) and a Polyamide Conjugate. Synlett 2000, 2000, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Watanabe, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Takao, G.; Toru, T. Radical cyclization on solid support: Synthesis of gamma-butyrolactones. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3411–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Enholm, E.J.; Cottone, J.S. Highly Diastereoselective Radical Cyclizations on Soluble Ring Opening Metathesis Supports. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3959–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Renaud, P.; Gerster, M. Use of Lewis Acids in Free Radical Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 2562–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Murakata, M.; Jono, T.; Mizuno, Y.; Hoshino, O. Construction of Chiral Quaternary Carbon Centers by Catalytic Enantioselective Radical-Mediated Allylation of alpha-Iodolactones Using Allyltributyltin in the Presence of a Chiral Lewis Acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11713–11714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Porter, N.A.; Giese, B.; Curran, D.P. Acyclic stereochemical control in free-radical reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nishida, M.; Hayashi, H.; Yamaura, Y.; Yanaginuma, E.; Yonemitsu, O.; Nishida, A.; Kawahara, N. A simple preparation of (R)-(2-cyclopentenyl)acetic acid and (R)-(2-cyclohexenyl)acetic acid using beta-diastereoselective radical cyclization in the presence of Lewis acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 269–272. [Google Scholar]
  122. Nishida, M.; Ueyama, E.; Hayashi, H.; Ohtake, Y.; Yamaura, Y.; Yanaginuma, E.; Yonemitsu, O.; Nishida, A.; Kawahara, N. Lewis Acid-Promoted Diastereoselective Radical Cyclization Using Chiral alpha,beta-Unsaturated Esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6455–6456. [Google Scholar]
  123. Badone, D.; Bernassau, J.M.; Cardamone, R.; Guzzi, U. Diastereoselective Chelation-Controlled Radical Cyclization of Chiral Oxazolidinone-Derived 2-Alkenamides and Modeling of the Transition State. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lamberto, M.; Corbett, D.F.; Kilburn, J.D. Thiol-mediated free radical cyclisations of isocyanides on solid support. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 8541–8543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Harrowven, D.C.; May, P.J.; Bradley, M. Sulfur-mediated radical cyclisation reactions on solid support. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 503–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Beckwith, A.L.J.; Schiesser, C.H. Regio- and stereo-selectivity of alkenyl radical ring closure: A theoretical study. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3925–3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Spellmeyer, D.C.; Houk, K.N. Force-field model for intramolecular radical additions. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 959–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Nicolaou, K.C.; Baran, P.S.; Zhong, Y.L.; Choi, H.S.; Yoon, W.H.; He, Y.; Fong, K.C. Total Synthesis of the CP Molecules CP-263,114 and CP-225,917 − Part 1: Synthesis of Key Intermediates and Intelligence Gathering. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1669–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nicolaou, K.C.; Baran, P.S.; Zhong, Y.L.; Fong, K.C.; He, Y.; Yoon, W.H.; Choi, H.S. Total Synthesis of the CP Molecules CP-225,917 and CP-263,114 − Part 2: Evolution of the Final Strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1676–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nicolaou, K.C.; Zhong, Y.L.; Baran, P.S. New Synthetic Technology for the Rapid Construction of Novel Heterocycles − Part 1: The Reaction of Dess-Martin Periodinane with Anilides and Related Compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nicolaou, K.C.; Baran, P.S.; Zhong, Y.L.; Barluenga, S.; Hunt, K.W.; Kranich, R.; Vega, J.A. Iodine(V) Reagents in Organic Synthesis. Part 3: New Routes to Heterocyclic Compounds via o-Iodoxybenzoic Acid-Mediated Cyclizations: Generality, Scope, and Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2233–2244. [Google Scholar]
  132. Caddick, S.; Hamza, D.; Wadman, S.N. Solid-phase intermolecular radical reactions 1. Sulfonyl radical addition to isolated alkenes and alkynes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7285–7288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Plourde Jr, R.; Johnson Jr, L.L.; Longo, R.K. Solid-Phase Free Radical Addition of Thiols to Allyl Ethers. Synlett 2001, 2001, 439–441. [Google Scholar]
  134. Timár, Z.; Gallagher, T. Constructing the 2-(thiobenzyl)ethyl carbamate linker via thiyl radical addition. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3173–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Dublanchet, A.C.; Lusinchi, M.; Zard, S.Z. Xanthates and solid-phase chemistry. A new soluble polymer analogue of Wang resin. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5715–5721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Back, T.G.; Zhai, H. Cyclizations and cycloadditions of acetylenic sulfones on solid supports. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2006, 21, 326–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Attardi, M.E.; Taddei, M. The Barton radical decarboxylation on solid phase. A versatile synthesis of peptides containing modified amino acids. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3519–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Koley, D.; Colon, O.C.; Savinov, S.N. Chemoselective Nitration of Phenols with tert-Butyl Nitrite in Solution and on Solid Support. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4172–4175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mirizzi, D.; Pulici, M. From Polymer to Small Organic Molecules: A Tight Relationship between Radical Chemistry and Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis. Molecules 2011, 16, 3252-3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16043252

AMA Style

Mirizzi D, Pulici M. From Polymer to Small Organic Molecules: A Tight Relationship between Radical Chemistry and Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis. Molecules. 2011; 16(4):3252-3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16043252

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mirizzi, Danilo, and Maurizio Pulici. 2011. "From Polymer to Small Organic Molecules: A Tight Relationship between Radical Chemistry and Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis" Molecules 16, no. 4: 3252-3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16043252

APA Style

Mirizzi, D., & Pulici, M. (2011). From Polymer to Small Organic Molecules: A Tight Relationship between Radical Chemistry and Solid-Phase Organic Synthesis. Molecules, 16(4), 3252-3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules16043252

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop