Next Article in Journal
Asteltoxins with Antiviral Activities from the Marine Sponge-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sp. SCSIO XWS02F40
Next Article in Special Issue
Strong and Nonspecific Synergistic Antibacterial Efficiency of Antibiotics Combined with Silver Nanoparticles at Very Low Concentrations Showing No Cytotoxic Effect
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanism of NO Photocatalytic Oxidation on g-C3N4 Was Changed by Pd-QDs Modification
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Nanostructured Lipid System as a Strategy to Improve the in Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Copper(II) Complexes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mini Review of Phytochemicals and Plant Taxa with Activity as Microbial Biofilm and Quorum Sensing Inhibitors

by
Chieu Anh Kim Ta
and
John Thor Arnason
*
Phytochemistry Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2016, 21(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21010029
Submission received: 11 November 2015 / Revised: 7 December 2015 / Accepted: 17 December 2015 / Published: 26 December 2015

Abstract

:
Microbial biofilms readily form on many surfaces in nature including plant surfaces. In order to coordinate the formation of these biofilms, microorganisms use a cell-to-cell communication system called quorum sensing (QS). As formation of biofilms on vascular plants may not be advantageous to the hosts, plants have developed inhibitors to interfere with these processes. In this mini review, research papers published on plant-derived molecules that have microbial biofilm or quorum sensing inhibition are reviewed with the objectives of determining the biosynthetic classes of active compounds, their biological activity in assays, and their families of occurrence and range. The main findings are the identification of plant phenolics, including benzoates, phenyl propanoids, stilbenes, flavonoids, gallotannins, proanthocyanidins and coumarins as important inhibitors with both activities. Some terpenes including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes and triterpenes also have anti-QS and anti-biofilm activities. Relatively few alkaloids were reported. Quinones and organosulfur compounds, especially from garlic, were also active. A common feature is the polar nature of these compounds. Phytochemicals with these activities are widespread in Angiosperms in temperate and tropical regions, but gymnosperms, bryophytes and pteridophytes were not represented.

1. Introduction

Microbial biofilms are organized aggregations of cells attached to a substratum and surrounded by a self-produced extrapolymeric substance (EPS) matrix. These biofilms develop on many biotic and abiotic surfaces such as plant leaves and medical devices. The formation of a biofilm is a complex process, which requires the coordinated expression of many specific genes. The interconversion between planktonic and biofilm growth is controlled by a cell-to-cell communication system known as quorum sensing (QS). QS involves signal molecules called autoinducers that are released by the microbes themselves. Gram-positive bacteria use autoinducing peptides (AIPs) for signaling and Gram-negative bacteria have lipid-based molecules known as N-acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs) [1,2,3,4,5]. In fungi such as Candida albicans, the quorum sensing molecules are farnesol and tyrosol [6,7]. Once populations reach a specific density or threshold, expression of certain genes such as virulence factors and adhesion proteins can occur. In many bacterial species, QS induction is required in order for biofilm formation to occur; in other species such as Staphylococcus aureus, repression of QS is necessary [8].
Many human pathogens are also biofilm formers; these are responsible for many persistent nosocomial infections especially in the immunocompromised population. These pathogens include Pseudomonas aeruginosa [9], Burkholderia cepacia [10], Listeria monocytogenes [11], Staphylococcus aureus [8] and Candida albicans [12], to name a few. With the rapid increase in antibiotic resistance to conventional therapies and the development of multi-resistant superbugs, the need for alternative antimicrobials is of particular interest. Current strategies to combat the increasing antibiotic resistance include targeting QS to prevent the formation of new biofilms and inhibiting the growth of existing biofilms. A recent comprehensive review [13] describes many chemical agents that inhibit bacterial biofilm formation derived from medicinal chemistry and biodiversity sources.
Within this large field of study, we focused in the present mini-review on the presence of quorum sensing and biofilm inhibitors against both bacteria and fungi in terrestrial plants, which has been documented in numerous plant species using various model microorganism bioassays. The presence of biofilms in plants is of interest for a fundamental understanding of the phenomenon in nature and also for its practical application. First, the discovery of these substances in plants informs chemical ecologists of potential new defense mechanisms in plants for future studies as well as which taxa and habitats are involved. In addition, it provides new insight into the use of these substances and plants in traditional medicine. The identification of the classes of plant derived secondary metabolites (phytochemicals) provides information on the evolution of these compounds, substances of interest for mechanistic studies and lead metabolites for analoging, quantitative structure-activity studies and drug development.
The objective of this mini review was to describe phytochemicals from terrestrial plant taxa and that can affect microbial quorum sensing and biofilm formation. Plant literature published before 2015 is summarized from searches that were performed using PubMed and Web of Science. The results are organized into a discussion of model organism bioassays used for assessing QS and biofilm inhibition, the different biosynthetic classes of active phytochemicals with representative substances and an overview of the taxa with activity.

2. Model Organism Bioassays

Bioluminescence or the production of light in marine bacteria such as Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio fischeri has been widely used to assess the ability of natural and synthetic compounds to interfere with quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. In these species, light production is mediated by the luxCDABEGH operon, which is under QS control [14,15]. Similarly, Chromobacterium violaceum produces a purple pigment, violacein, which is also cell density-dependent. This species is popular in screening studies as it can be used to visually assess QS inhibition in a disc diffusion assay [16]. The lux operon is used in many reporter strains along with the lacZ gene and green fluorescent protein (GFP). These strains include Agrobacterium tumefaciens NTL4 [16], Escherichia coli MT102 (pSB403) [17], Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 [18], and Vibrio harveyi [19], among others. The production of autoinducers can be quantified directly using luminescence, fluorescence, and absorbance of pigments or directly via chromatographic techniques such as High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detection (HPLC-DAD). For Gram-positive bacteria, QS inhibition is usually measured directly by quantifying the concentration of autoinducing peptides using HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) [20].
Many biofilm models have been developed using various microbial species and surfaces. The simplest and most popular assay involves growing a biofilm in a microtiter plate in the presence and absence of the compound of interest and then measuring the stained biofilm mass at the optimal wavelength [21]. This method can be used with fungi, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, dual-species and mixed-species biofilms has been studied with many different substrates.

3. Phytochemicals as QS and Biofilm Inhibitors

Phytochemicals reported in the literature are arranged according to the biosynthetic groups described in Dewick [22]. A discussion of their bioactivities follows.

3.1. Phenolics

3.1.1. Phenylpropenoids

By far, phenolics represent the highest number of active compounds reported in terms of their effects on quorum sensing and biofilm formation when compared to all other classes (Table 1). Eugenol, a phenylpropene present in many plants, has been shown to inhibit the production of QS-mediated violacein in Chromobacterium violaceum and virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 by 32% to 56% at concentrations of 50 to 200 μM, respectively [23]. This compound was also effective against biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates [23,24,25]. Cinnamaldehyde, another phenylpropene, was reported by Brackman et al. [26] to interfere with the AI-2-mediated QS system in Vibrio spp. (65% inhibition at 100 µM). In terms of biofilm formation, cinnamaldehyde was shown to be effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes [24], Staphylococcus epidermidis [27], and Cronobacter sakazakii [28]. In these studies, the active concentration ranged from 946 µM to 38 mM, which were reported to inhibit the formation of new and preformed biofilms as well as downregulate the expression of biofilm-associated genes [24,27,28].

3.1.2. Benzoic Acid Derivatives

Benzoic acid derivatives such as vanillin and gallic acid showed mixed effects depending on the organism and concentration tested. In a study by Ponnusamy et al. [29], 250 μg/mL of vanillin inhibited QS in Chromobacterium violaceum and biofilm formation in Aeromonas hydrophila. The anti-biofilm activity of vanillin was also confirmed by Kappachery et al. [30] using different abiotic surfaces. At a concentration of 0.18 mg/mL, pre-treatment with vanillin reduced the biofilm formation of Aeromonas hydrophila on membrane filters by 90% [30]. In another study, at 200 μg/mL vanillin enhanced AHL production in Escherichia coli JDL271/pAL105 and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 by at least two-fold [31]. Similarly, gallic acid at 200 μg/mL had no effect on P. aeruginosa PA14 biofilms [32] but inhibited P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation by 30% [31] and enhanced Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms by three-fold at a similar concentration [33]. At a much higher concentration of 1 mM, gallic acid was shown to inhibit Eikenella corrodens biofilm formation by 80% [34]. In terms of QS, Borges et al. [35] saw a 59% reduction in violacein production at 1 mg/mL using Chromobacterium violaceum.
Other benzoic acid derivatives have also been reported to have anti-QS and anti-biofilm effects. Ellagic acid at 36 μg/disc showed greater QS inhibition in C. violaceum when compared to the positive control Delisea pulchra (Greville) Montagne extract [32]. This activity was confirmed by Huber et al. [17] who observed QS inhibition in E. coli MT102 and Pseudomonas putida at concentrations of 40 μg/mL and 30 μg/mL, respectively. This compound was not effective against P. aeruginosa PA14 biofilms at 10 μg/mL [32]. In another study, ellagic acid inhibited biofilm formation in various Streptococcus dysgalactiae strains by 70% at 4 μg/mL [36]. At higher concentrations of 15 to 40 μg/mL, ellagic acid was inhibitory against Escherichia coli, Burkholderia cepacia, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida albicans biofilms [37].
Table 1. Phenolics and derivatives affecting microbial quorum sensing (QS) and/or biofilm formation.
Table 1. Phenolics and derivatives affecting microbial quorum sensing (QS) and/or biofilm formation.
Active Constituents (Source Plants)Biological ActivitiesRef.
Phenylpropenoids
eugenol (various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i001
  • Inhibited las QS-mediated elastase production (32% at 200 μM) and pqs QS-mediated pyocanin production (56% at 50 μM) in P. aeruginosa, QS-mediated violacein production in C. violaceum (48% at 150 μM)
  • Decreased biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (43% at 400 μM)
  • Inhibited formation of new and inactivated preformed biofilms in L. monocytogenes (2.5 mM and 25 mM, respectively)
  • Downregulated genes critical to L. monocytogenes biofilm formation (2.5 mM)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates (MIC = 63.5 μg/mL)
[23]
[23]
[24]
[24]
[25]
cinnamaldehyde
(Cinnamomum sp.—Lauraceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i002
  • Inhibited formation of new and inactivated preformed biofilms in L. monocytogenes (0.75 mM and 10 mM, respectively)
  • Inhibited AI-2-mediated QS in Vibrio spp. (65% at 100 μM)
  • Downregulated genes involved in L. monocytogenes biofilm formation (0.75 mM)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. epidermidis (MIC = 125 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited formation of new and inactivated mature biofilms in C. sakazakii (750 μM and 38 mM, respectively) and downregulated expression biofilm-related genes
[24]
[26]
[24]
[27]
[28]
Benzoic Acid Derivatives
vanillin
(Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews—Orchidaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i003
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum CV026 (69%) and biofilm formation in A. hydrophila (50%) at 0.25 mg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in A. hydrophila on membrane filters by 90% with pre-treatment of 0.18 mg/mL
  • Enhanced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (3-fold at 200 μg/mL) and A. tumefaciens C58 (2-fold at 25 μg/mL) and AHL production in E. coli JDL271/pAL105 at 40 μg/mL
[29]
[30]
[31]
gallic acid
(various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i004
  • Enhanced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (2-fold at 25 μg/mL) and A. tumefaciens C58 (2-fold at 100 μg/mL); reduced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 by 30% at 200 μg/mL
  • Increased biofilm formation in S. epidermidis by 3-fold at 188 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by 80% at 1 mM
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum ATCC 12472 (59% at 1 mg/mL)
[31]
[33]
[34]
[35]
ellagic acid
(various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i005
  • Inhibited biofilm formation (50% at 40 μg/mL) and swarming motility (100% at 20 μg/mL) in B. cepacia
  • Inhibited QS in E. coli MT102 (pSB403) by 40% at 40 μg/mL and P. putida (pKR-C12) by 40% at 30 μg/mL
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum: 18.3 mm at 36 μg
  • Reduced biofilm formation in S. dysgalactiae strains by 70% at 4 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus ATCC 11632 (60% at 15 μg/mL), MRSA ATCC 33591 (70% at 20 μg/mL), E. coli ATCC 10536 (60% at 15 μg/mL), and C. albicans ATCC 90028 (50% at 20 μg/mL)
[17]
[17]
[32]
[36]
[37]
Tannins
1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-ß-d-glucopyranose
(various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i006
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus (IC50 = 3.6 μM)
[38]
punicalagin
(Punica granatum L. (Lythraceae) and Combretaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i007
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum and swimming/swarming motility in S. typhimurium SL1344 at 15.6 μg/mL
  • Downregulated expression of motility and QS related genes in S. typhimurium at 15.6 μg/mL
[39]
hamamelitannin
(Hamamelis virginiana L.—Hamamelidaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i008
  • Inhibited agr QS regulator RNAIII and δ-hemolysin production at 50 μg/mL
  • Reduced cell attachment of MRSA to polystyrene plate at 4 μg/mL
  • In mice infection model, treatment of grafts with 30 mg/mL showed no detectable MRSA and MRSE load after 7 days
[40]
tannic acid
(various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i009
  • Enhanced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PA14 at 100 μg/mL
  • Inhibited QS in P. putida (pKR-C12) by 40% at 30 μg/mL and E. coli MT102 (pSB403) by 20% at 60 μg/mL
  • Inhibited violacein production in C .violaceum (21.8 mm at 500 μg)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PA14 (72% at 200 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited S. aureus biofilm formation (60% at 2 μM) and increased isaA expression (a transglycosylase) Reduced expression of genes responsible for QS and virulence in S. aureus at 20 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus by >50% at 20 μg/mL
[17]
[17]
[32]
[32]
[41]
[42]
[42]
Stilbenes
resveratrol
(various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i010
  • Inhibited S. aureus biofilm formation (30%) and enhanced S. epidermidis biofilm formation (1.5-fold) at 100 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PA14 and E. coli O157:H7 at 50 μg/mL
  • Inhibited P. acnes biofilm formation by 80% at 0.32%
[33]
[42]
[43]
pterostilbene
(Vitis sp.—Vitaceae and Ericaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i011
  • Inhibited formation of new and mature C. albicans SC5314, Y0109, 0304103, and 01010 biofilms at 16 μg/mL
  • Inhibited hyphal formation in C. albicans at 4 μg/mL
  • Treatment of 16 μg/mL altered expression of genes involved in morphological transition, ergosterol biosynthesis, filamentation, and cell surface proteins; also effective in rat central venous catheter infection model
[44]
Flavonoids
quercetin
(various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i012
  • Inhibited AI-induced bioluminescence in V. harveyi BB886, MM32 (75% at 6.25 μg/mL) and biofilm formation in E. coli O157:H7, V. harveyi BB120 (60% at 6.25 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in MRSA (>80%) and MSSA (>50%) strains at 1 μg/mL
  • Reduced expression of genes involved in QS and virulence in S. aureus at 10 μg/mL
[45]
[46]
[46]
(−)-catechin
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae and others)
Molecules 21 00029 i013
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum CV026 (50% at 2 mM), pyocyanin (50% at 0.25 mM) and elastase production (30% at 4 mM) in P. aeruginosa PAO1
  • Reduced biofilm formation and downregulated QS genes expression in P. aeruginosa PAO1 by at 4 mM
[47]
(−)-epicatechin
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae and others)
Molecules 21 00029 i014
  • Increased AHL production in E. coli JDL271/pAL105 at 40 to 200 μg/mL
  • Enhanced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (2-fold at 200 μg/mL) and A. tumefaciens C58 (2-fold at 400 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. coli JM109 by 40% at 1 mg/mL
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum ATCC 12472 (33% at 1 mg/mL)
  • Inhibited elastase activity in P. aeruginosa PAO1 by 40% at 4 mM
[31]
[31]
[35]
[35]
[47]
(–)-gallocatechin
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i015
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by >60% at 1 mM (MIC = 0.5 mM)
[34]
(–)-epigallocatechin
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae and others)
Molecules 21 00029 i016
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by >60% at 1 mM (MIC = 0.25 mM)
[34]
(–)-catechin gallate
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i017
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by >60% at 1 mM (MIC = 0.1 mM)
[34]
(–)-epicatechin gallate
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae and others)
Molecules 21 00029 i018
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by >60% at 1 mM (MIC = 0.1 mM)
[34]
(–)-gallocatechin gallate
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i019
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by >60% at 1 mM (MIC = 0.1 mM)
[34]
(−)-epigallocatechin gallate
(Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze—Theaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i020
  • Inhibited QS in E. coli MT102 (pSB403) and P. putida (pKR-C12) (>50% and 40% at 40 μg/mL, respectively)
  • Reduced biofilm formation (30%) and swarming motility in B. cepacia (100%) at 40 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. corrodens by >60% at 1 mM (MIC = 0.1 mM)
[17]
[17]
[34]
Diarylheptanoids
curcumin
(Curcuma longa L.—Zingiberaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i021
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. epidermidis (MIC = 25 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation and AHLs production in P. aeruginosa at 1 μg/mL
  • Altered expression of QS-related genes, reduced virulence factors production (60% to 80%) and mortality in infection models (28% to 80%) with treatment of 3 μg/mL in P. aeruginosa PAO1
  • Completely inhibited biofilm formation in H. pylori ATCC 43504 and other clinical isolates at 8 μg/mL for up to 10 days
  • Inhibited sortase A activity (IC50 = 10 μM) and biofilm formation in S. mutans UA159 (at 15 μM)
  • Completely eradicated 48-h and 14-day biofilms and reduced biomass of 8-week biofilm in E. faecalis ATCC 29212 (625 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation (50%), alginate production (20% to 70%), and motility in V. harveyi, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. vulnificus at 75 μg/mL
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum CV026 and virulence factors production in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and S. marcescens FJ584421 at 100 μg/mL (56%–63%)
  • Inhibited swimming motility by 50% in E. coli ATCC 10536 (50 μg/mL), P. aeruginosa PAO1 (50 μg/mL), P. mirabilis ATCC 7002 (75 μg/mL), and S. marcescens FJ584421 (75 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. coli (52%), P. aeruginosa PAO1 (89%), P. mirabilis (52%), and S. marcescens (76%) at 100 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation (50%) and surface adhesion (15%) in C. albicans at 50 μg/mL
[27]
[48]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[53]
[53]
[54]

3.1.3. Tannins

Tannins including ellagitannins and proanthocyanidins are another type of phenolic that has documented biofilm and quorum sensing inhibitory activities. At a concentration of ~4 μM, 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-β-d-glucopyranose (a common precursor of gallotannins) inhibited biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus by 50% [38]. Punicalagin [39] and hamamelitannin [40] are other tannins that can interfere with QS in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. In a study by Li et al. [39], punicalagin (an ellagitannin found in pomegranate and Combretaceae species) inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum as well as swimming and swarming motility in Salmonella typhimurium SL1344 at 15.6 μg/mL. Further analyses by these authors showed a downregulation of QS and motility-related genes in S. typhimurium at the same concentration. Similarly, hamamelitannin (a gallotannin from American witch-hazel) was shown to reduce cell attachment of methicillin-resistant Stapylococcus aureus in vitro at 4 μg/mL [40]. At a higher concentration of 50 μg/mL, δ–hemolysin production and QS regulator RNAIII in S. aureus were inhibited by hamamelitannin. Furthermore, this decrease in virulence was confirmed in vivo with a graft infection model using rats. At pre-treatment of 30 mg/mL, implanted grafts showed no detectable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) loads after 7 days [40]. Tannic acid was reported to be active against both Gram-negative at Gram-positive bacteria. At 100 μg/mL, Huber et al. [17] showed an enhancement of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14; however, a 72% inhibition was observed at 200 μg/mL against PA14 biofilms in another study [32]. In other studies, anti-biofilm activities were shown at lower concentrations from 3.4 to 20 μg/mL against S. aureus [41,42]. In terms of QS, inhibition was observed in Pseudomonas putida at 30 μg/mL [17] and S. aureus at 20 μg/mL [42].

3.1.4. Stilbenes and Flavonoids

Stilbenes such as resveratrol and pterostilbene have been reported to interfere with the formation of both fungal and bacterial biofilms. In a study by Cho et al. [42], 50 μg/mL of resveratrol inhibited P. aeruginosa PA14 and E. coli O157:H7 biofilms. In another study, Coenye et al. [43] showed that resveratrol at 0.32% also inhibited biofilm formation in Propionibacterium acnes. At a higher concentration of 100 μg/mL, this compound was inhibitory to S. aureus biofilms but actually enhanced biofilm formation in S. epidermidis [33]. For pterostilbene, Li et al. [44] showed that treatment of 16 μg/mL inhibited new and mature biofilms in various Candida albicans strains. In the same study, at a concentration of 4 μg/mL pterostilbene prevented hyphal formation in the same fungal strains. Transcriptomic analyses showed that this compound altered the expression of genes involved in morphological transition, ergosterol biosynthesis, filamentation and cell surface proteins. Furthermore, in a rat central venous catheter infection model, treatment of pterostilbene showed anti-biofilm effects in a dose-dependent manner [44].
Flavonoids are another type of phenolic that showed inhibitory activities in quorum sensing and biofilm formation. In a study by Vikram et al. [45], quercetin was shown to inhibit bioluminescence in Vibryo harveyi strains by 75% at a concentration of 6.25 μg/mL. Lee et al. [46] reported anti-biofilm activities of this compound against E. coli O157:H7 and V. harveyi BB120 at the same concentration as well as inhibition of S. aureus biofilms at 1 μg/mL. Microarray analyses by the same authors showed that quercetin reduced the expression of genes involved in QS and virulence of S. aureus. Other flavonoids such as catechins from green tea (Camellia sinensis L.) also showed similar effects. In a study by Matsunaga et al. [34], (−)-gallocatechin, (−)-epigallocatechin, (−)-catechin gallate, (−)-epicatechin gallate, (−)-gallocatechin gallate, and (−)-epigallocatechin gallate all inhibited biofilm formation in Eikenella corrodens at 1 mM. (−)-catechin, a related compound, also inhibited violacein and virulence factors production in Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, respectively [47]. However, (−)-epicatechin (another related compound) showed different activity depending on the tested organism. At 200 μg/mL, (−)-epicatechin enhanced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 and Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 [31]. At higher concentrations of 1 mg/mL, this compound inhibited Escherichia coli JM109 biofilms by 40% [35]. In terms of QS, (−)-epicatechin inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum at 1 mg/L [35] but increased AHL production in E. coli DL271/pAL105 at concentrations of 40 to 200 μg/mL [31]. (−)-epigallocatechin gallate also showed QS inhibitory activities against E. coli MPT102 and Pseudomonas putida as well as swarming motility in Burkholderia cepacia at 40 μg/mL [17].

3.1.5. Diarylheptanoids

Another noteworthy phenolic in terms of QS and biofilm activities is curcumin (a diarylheptanoid found in turmeric). This compound has been well studied and showed various pleiotropic biological effects. Karaman et al. [55] showed that this compound enhanced biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus at 16 μg/mL. The opposite effect was seen by Rudrappa and Bais [48] and Pattiyathanee et al. [49] where curcumin inhibited AHL production and biofilm growth in P. aeruginosa PAO1 at 1 μg/mL and completely inhibited biofilm formation in Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates at 8 μg/mL, respectively. At higher concentrations from 25 to 625 μg/mL, this compound displayed anti-biofilm activities against Staphylococcus epidermidis, Vibrio sp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, Proteus mirabilis, Serratia marcescens, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans [25,27,50,51,52,53,54]. In terms of QS, curcumin inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum as well as virulence factors production in Vibrio sp., P. aeruginosa PAO1, S. marcescens at concentrations ranging from 3 μg/mL to 100 μg/mL [48,52,53].

3.2. Terpenoids

Different types of terpenes such as monoterpenes, limonoids, and triterpenes have also been reported to have anti-biofilm and/or anti-QS activities (Table 2). Thymol and carvacrol (monoterpenes) were shown to be effective against new and existing biofilms of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [24,56,57]. In a study by Upadhyay et al. [24], thymol inhibited the formation of new Listeria monocytogenes biofilms and inactivated preformed ones at 0.5 mM and 5 mM, respectively. At the lower concentration, genes critical to L. monocytogenes biofilm development were downregulated [24]. Using the same model organism, the authors showed that carvacrol also effective at concentrations of 0.65 mM and 10 mM against new and existing biofilms, respectively. This compound also downregulated biofilm-associated genes in L. monocytogenes at 0.65 mM [24]. In another study, Soumya et al. [56] reported inhibitory activities of these monoterpenes against different strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At a concentration of 0.1%, thymol reduced the biofilm mass of P. aeruginosa strains ATCC 27853, CIP A22 and IL5 by 86%, 54% and 70%, respectively. Similarly, 0.04% of carvacrol inhibited biofilms of the same strains by more than 90% [56]. The inhibitory activity of thymol was also confirmed by Qiu et al. [57] where treatment with 64 µg/mL resulted in more than five-fold reduction of enterotoxin genes expression in Staphylococcus aureus.
Sesquiterpenoids such as salvipisone and acanthospermolides were shown to reduce biofilm growth in P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis [58,59,60]. At a concentration of 37.5 µg/mL, salvipisone (from the roots of Salvia sclarea L.) inhibited preformed S. epidermidis biofilms by at least 85% and preformed S. aureus biofilms by 85% [58,59]. In another study, a number of acanthospermolides isolated from Acanthospermum hispidum DC. showed inhibitory activities against P. aeruginosa biofilms by at least 70% at 2.5 µg/mL [60].
Table 2. Terpenoids affecting microbial quorum sensing (QS) and/or biofilm formation.
Table 2. Terpenoids affecting microbial quorum sensing (QS) and/or biofilm formation.
Active Constituents (Source Plants)Biological ActivitiesRef.
Monoterpenes
thymol
(Thymus vulgaris L.—Lamiaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i022
  • Inhibited formation of new and inactivated preformed biofilms in L. monocytogenes (0.5 mM and 5 mM, respectively)
  • Downregulated genes critical to L. monocytogenes biofilm formation (0.5 mM)
  • Inhibited formation of biofilm in P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, CIP A22, and IL5 at 0.1% by 86%, 54%, and 70%, respectively
  • Downregulated expression of enterotoxin genes in S. aureus at 64 μg/mL (>5-fold)
[24]
[24]
[56]
[57]
carvacrol
(Thymus vulgaris L. and other Lamiaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i023
  • Inhibited formation of new and inactivated preformed biofilms in L. monocytogenes (0.65 mM and 10 mM, respectively)
  • Downregulated genes critical to L. monocytogenes biofilm formation (0.65 mM)
  • Inhibited formation of biofilm in P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, CIP A22, and IL5 at 0.04% by >90%
[24]
[24]
[56]
Sesquiterpenes
salvipisone
(Salvia sclarea L.—Lamiaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i024
  • Reduced preformed biofilm of S. epidermidis RP12 (>90%), 6756/99 (85%) and S. aureus 1474/01 (85%) at 37.5 μg/mL
[58,59]
acanthospermolide
(Acanthospermum hispidum DC.—Asteraceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i025
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa (70% at 2.5 μg/mL)
[60]
Triterpenoids
isolimonic acid
(Citrus × aurantium L.—Rutaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i026
  • Inhibited AI-induced bioluminescence in V. harveyi BB170 (60% at 6.25 μg/mL) and biofilm formation in V. harveyi BB120 (40% at 100 μg/mL)
[61]
ichangin
(Citrus × aurantium L.—Rutaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i027
  • Inhibited AI-induced bioluminescence in V. harveyi BB170 (90%) and biofilm formation in V. harveyi BB120 (40%) at 100 μg/mL
[61]
betulinic acid
(various species) Molecules 21 00029 i028
  • Enhanced biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PA14 at 100 μg/mL
[42]
ursolic acid
(various species) Molecules 21 00029 i029
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (>87%), E. coli JM109 (50%), and V. harveyi BB120 (57%) at 10 μg/mL
  • Induced expression of chemotaxic and motility genes and repressed sulphur metabolism in E. coli K-12 at 10 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 by 35% at 10 μg/mL
[21]
[21]
[62]
gymnemic acids
(Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.)
R.Br. ex Sm.—Apocynaceae and Asclepiadaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i030
  • Mixture of 4 acids at 40 μg/mL inhibited yeast-to-hypha transition in C. albicans SC5314 and induced conversion of hyphae back to yeast form (100% after 11 h)
  • Inhibited conidial germination and hyphal growth in Aspergillus fumigates by 74% at 40 μg/mL
  • Treatment of 40 μg/mL mixture improved survival in C. albicans-fed C. elegans infection model (100% rescue) by inhibiting formation of invasive hyphae
[63]
Limonoids (derived from triterpenes) isolated from Citrus × aurantium L. (bitter orange) showed anti-QS activities at low concentrations [61]. These include isolimonic acid, ichangin and several other compounds; a 17% to 83% inhibition of bioluminescence in Vibryo harveyi was observed at 6.25 μg/mL and dose-dependent activity was seen for all compounds tested [61]. Other triterpenoids are reported to have differing activities. Betulinic acid, a lupane triterpene, showed no activity at 5 μg/mL in a bioassay with P. aeruginosa PA14 [32]; at 100 μg/mL biofilm formation is greatly enhanced in the same strain [42]. Ursane triterpenoids, on the other hand, have been documented to have good inhibitory activities. Ursolic acid has been shown to inhibit P. aeruginosa PAO1, E. coli JM109, and V. harveyi BB120 biofilms by 35% to 87% at 10 μg/mL [21,62]. This compound was not active against P. aeruginosa PA14 biofilm at a concentration of 5 μg/mL [32]. Furthermore, gymnemic acids (ursane triterpene glycosides) isolated from Gymnema sylvestre (Retz.) R.Br. ex Sm. (Apocynaceae) have been reported by Vediyappan et al. [63] to inhibit yeast-to-hypha transition in Candida albicans SC5314. At 40 µg/mL, the four-compound mixture inhibited hyphal transition and induced the conversion of hyphae to yeast form; 100% conversion was observed after 11 h. These compounds also inhibited conidial germination and hyphal growth in Aspergillus fumigates at the same concentration. Furthermore, treatment of the gymnemic acids mixture, at 40 μg/mL, significantly improved the survival rate of Candida albicans-infected Caenorhabditis elegans and resulted in 100% rescue [63].

3.3. Sulfur-Containing Phytochemicals

Sulfur-containing compounds (Table 3) such as allicin, ajoene, and thiocyanates have been shown to interfere with biofilm formation and quorum sensing of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [32,64,65,66,67,68]. Allicin (from garlic) inhibited Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm adhesion as well as the expression of QS-regulated virulence factors in P. aeruginosa PAO1 [64,65]. At a concentration of 1.1 mg/mL, a 74% reduction in biofilm mass was observed in P. aeruginosa PA14 [32]. In another study using GFP-transformed P. aeruginosa PAO1, treatment of 128 µg/mL of allicin resulted in a 50% decrease in biofilm thickness and a 70% decrease of EPS production [64]. For S. epidermidis strains, 4 mg/mL of allicin inhibited biofilm formation by more than 90% [65]. Similarly, ajoene (also from garlic) inhibited QS in reporter strains P. aeruginosa lasB-gfp, P. aeruginosa rhlA-gfp and E. coli luxI-gfp with 50% effective concentrations (EC50) ranging from 15 to 100 µM [66]. In the same study, ajoene also downregulated virulence factors expression (elastase, rhamnolipid, enterotoxins) by five-fold at 80 µg/mL [66]. Furthermore, using a mouse pulmonary infection model, subcutaneous treatment of ajoene at 25 mg/kg, significantly improved bacteria clearance after three days [66]. Thiocyanates such as sulforaphane and allyl isothiocyanate (from Brassicaceae species) have been reported to inhibit QS in Escherichia coli and Chromobacterium violaceum as well as reduce biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Listeria monocytogenes [35,67,68]. In a study by Ganin et al. [67], complete inhibition of QS in E. coli DH5 (pJN105L) (pSC11) was observed at 100 µM of sulforaphane. This compound also inhibited biofilm formation and pyocyanin production (QS-mediated) in P. aeruginosa PAO1 by 60% and 70% at concentrations of 37 µM and 100 µM, respectively. Similarly, allyl isothiocyanate was shown to reduce violacein production (QS-controlled) in C. violaceum by 70% at 5 µg/mL [66]. The anti-biofilm activity of this compound was demonstrated in L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosa and E. coli where treatment with 1 mg/mL resulted in 61 to 100% inhibition [68].
Table 3. Other biosynthetic classes of phytochemicals affecting microbial quorum sensing (QS) and/or biofilm formation.
Table 3. Other biosynthetic classes of phytochemicals affecting microbial quorum sensing (QS) and/or biofilm formation.
Active Constituents (Source Plants)Biological ActivitiesRef.
Sulfur-Containing Compounds
allicin (Allium sativum L.—Amaryllidaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i031
  • Inhibited P. aeruginosa PA14 biofilm (74% at 1 μL).
  • Reduced adhesion of GFP-transformed P. aeruginosa PAO1, EPS production (70%), biofilm thickness (50%), and expression of virulence factors at 128 μg/mL
  • Inhibited biofilm formation by >90% in S. epidermidis strains at 4 mg/mL
[32]
[64]
[65]
ajoene (Allium sativum L.—Amaryllidaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i032
  • Inhibited QS in P. aeruginosa lasB-gfp (IC50 = 15 μM), rhlA-gfp (IC50 = 50 μM), E. coli luxI-gfp (IC50 = 100 μM) reporter strains
  • Downregulated QS-regulated virulence factors (5-fold at 80 μg/mL) and improved bacteria clearance in mouse infection model (subcutaneous treatment of 25 mg/kg body weight)
[66]
[66]
sulforaphane (Brassicaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i033
  • Inhibited lasR-mediated QS in E. coli DH5 (pJN105L) (pSC11) completely at 100 μM
  • Inhibited biofilm formation (60% at 37 μM) and pyocyanin production in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (70% at 100 μM)
[67]
Sulfur-Containing Compounds
allyl isothiocyanate (Brassicaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i034
  • Inhibited violacein production in C. violaceum ATCC 12472 (70% at 5 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in L. monocytogenes (61%), P. aeruginosa (90%), E. coli (100%) at 1 mg/mL
[35]
[68]
Coumarins
aesculetin (various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i035
  • Inhibited QS in C. violaceum CV026, P. aeruginosa, E. coli JB523 (30% to 60% at 500 μM)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus strains (53% to 77% at 128 μg/mL)
  • Reduced expression of biofilm-related genes (motility, adhesion, virulence) in E. coli O157:H7 at 50 μg/mL
[18]
[36]
[69]
umbelliferone (Apiaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i036
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in E. coli O157:H7 (>80% inhibition at 50 μg/mL)
  • Reduced expression of biofilm-related genes (motility and adhesion) in E. coli O157:H7 at 50 μg/mL
  • Inhibited formation of S. aureus CECT 976 biofilm by 50% at 800 μg/mL
[69]
[69]
[70]
Quninones
chrysophanol (various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i037
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (44%) and S. maltophilia (38%) at 200 μM
[71]
emodin (various species)
Molecules 21 00029 i038
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (75%) and S. maltophilia (43%) at 20 μM
[71]
shikonin (Boraginaceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i039
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (44%) and S. maltophilia (54%) at 200 μM
[71]
purpurin (Rubia tinctorum L.—Rubiaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i040
  • Inhibited yeast-to-hypha transition in C. albicans SC5314 at 3 μg/mL
  • Inhibited formation of new and preformed C. albicans biofilms (50% at 5 μg/mL and 30% at 10 μg/mL, respectively)
  • Downregulated expression of hypha-specific genes in C. albicans at 5 to10 μg/mL
[72]
Alkaloids
berberine (Berberidaceae species and others)
Molecules 21 00029 i041
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates (MIC = 63.5 μg/mL)
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. epidermidis ATCC 35984 (50% at 30 μg/mL) and SE243 (50% at 45 μg/mL)
[25]
[73]
chelerythrine (Papaveraceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i042
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus 6538P (50% at 15 μM) and S. epidermidis RP62A (50% at 9 μM)
[74]
sanguinarine (Papaveraceae species)
Molecules 21 00029 i043
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in S. aureus 6538P (50% at 25 μM) and S. epidermidis RP62A (50% at 5 μM)
[74]
Alkaloids
reserpine (Rauwolfia sp.—Apocynaceae)
Molecules 21 00029 i044
  • Inhibited biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae clinical isolates (MIC = 15.6 μg/mL)
[25]

3.4. Coumarins

Coumarins have been documented to possess QS and biofilm inhibitory activities (Table 3). Aesculetin was reported to inhibit QS in C. violaceum, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli JB523 by 30% to 78% at 500 μM [18]. In other studies, Dürig et al. [36] and Lee et al. [69] showed that aesculetin was effective against S. aureus biofilms (>50% inhibition at 128 μg/mL) and reduced the expression of biofilm-related genes (at 50 μg/mL) in E. coli O157:H7, respectively. Furthermore, aesculetin decreased Shiga-like toxin production in E. coli O157:H7 and reduced virulence in a C. elegans infection model [69]. Lee et al. [69] also reported that umbelliferone (another coumarin) inhibited biofilm formation (90%) and expression of motility and adhesion genes expression in E. coli O157:H7 at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. The anti-biofilm activity of umbelliferone was also confirmed in S. aureus CECT976 by Monte et al. [70] where treatment with 800 µg/mL caused a 50% inhibition in biofilm formation.

3.5. Quinones

Quinones have also been reported to have anti-biofilm activities against bacterial and fungal species (Table 3). In a study by Ding et al. [71], quinones such as chrysophanol, emodin, and shikonin all showed inhibitory activities against biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Emodin was more 10 times more active than both chrysophanol and shikonin as treatment with 20 µM caused a 75% reduction in biofilm growth for P. aeruginosa PAO1 and a 43% reduction in S. maltophilia. Chrysophanol and shikonin both required a higher concentration of 200 µM to elicit the same level of activity in both bacterial species. Purpurin, another quinone, was shown to repress yeast-to-hypha transition in Candida albicans SC5314 at 3 μg/mL [72]. At higher concentrations of 5 to 10 μg/mL, this compound was effective against new and existing C. albicans biofilms (30% to 50% inhibition). Further analyses showed that purpurin downregulated the expression of hypha-specific genes [72].

3.6. Alkaloids

In regard to alkaloids, relatively few compounds have been reported to have inhibitory activities against bacterial biofilm (Table 3). In particular, Wang et al. [73] and Magesh et al. [25] showed that berberine inhibited the biofilm formation in Staphylococcus eipidermidis and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. At a concentration of 63.5 μg/mL, berberine decreased biofilm growth in different K. pneumoniae clinical isolates [25]. Treatment of 30 to 45 µg/mL of berberine resulted in 50% inhibition of S. epidermidis biofilms [73]. Similarly, chelerythrine and sanguinarine were also effective against Gram-positive biofilms of S. aureus and S. epidermidis at micromolar concentrations [74]; the 50% inhibitory concentrations were reported to range from 15 to 25 µM for S. aureus and 5 to 9 µM for S. epidermidis [74] Resperine, an alkaloid from Rauwolfia sp. (Apocynaceae), also showed inhibitory activity against K. pneumoniae biofilms with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 15.6 μg/mL [25].
Overall the literature shows that the biosynthetic classes of compounds inhibiting biofilms and QS are diverse. The published literature to date reports activity mostly with phenolics, terpenoids, organosulfur compounds, and quinones but relatively few alkaloids or other types of secondary metabolites reported.

4. Taxa and Habitats

A wide variety of plant families are represented in the literature from which active compounds were isolated. At least 21 families are described in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. They are angiosperms and many more could be added if the re-occurrence of compounds in different families is considered. However, this represents a relatively small number of the total 642 plant families described in The Plant List [75]. Both monocots and eudicots are represented but gymnosperms, bryophytes and pteridophytes are either absent or under-represented in the literature. Many plant families are characteristic of tropical or subtropical areas such as Zingiberaceae, Rubiaceae, Lauraceae and Theaceae or temperate areas such as Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Ericaceae, Berberidaceae and Apiaceae. Few records describe plant families of arid areas or dry habitats. For example, there are no records of common families Cactaceae, Poaceae, or Crassulaceae. This may be a sampling bias and there are few systematic studies to make any firm conclusions at this time but this could be a rich area of study. Our own observations are that tropical plants are a rich source of biofilm and QS inhibitors [76]. In rainforests, the high humidity and ever-wet conditions are ideal for bacterial biofilm growth. When these occur on leaves, the exopolysaccharide layer is a perfect habitat for germination of bryophyte spores, which leads to fouling of leaves and a decline in plant health as fouled leaves cannot performance photosynthesis (the bryophyte mat prevents sunlight from reaching the mesophyll layer).

5. Conclusions

The results presented in this mini review show that plant species contain many reported phytochemicals that interfere with microbial quorum sensing and biofilm formation. The biosynthetic classes of compounds involved is diverse but has not been systematically examined. The identified inhibitors may be a rich mine of lead compounds to produce drugs to address the growing problem of antibiotic resistance or to develop adjuvant therapies to impede pathogen success. The chemical ecology of these compounds as natural defenses is still largely untouched and their role in traditional medicines is an interesting topic for future investigation.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author Contributions

Chieu Anh Kim Ta performed the literature searches and draft manuscript. John Thor Arnason assisted with the development of the concept, analysis of data and writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AHL
N-acyl-homoserine lactone
AIPs
autoinducing peptides for signaling
EPS
extrapolymeric substance
GFP
green fluorescent protein
HPLC-DAD
High performance liquid chromatography, diode array detection
QS
quorum sensing

References

  1. Davies, D.G.; Parsek, M.R.; Pearson, J.P.; Iglewski, B.H.; Costerton, J.W.; Greenberg, E.P. The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm. Science 1998, 280, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Davey, M.E.; O’Toole, G.A. Microbial Biofilms: From Ecology to Molecular Genetics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 847–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Donlan, R.M.; Costerton, J.W. Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 167–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J.W.; Stoodley, P. Bacterial Biofilms: From the Natural Environment to Infectious Diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Raffa, R.B.; Iannuzzo, J.R.; Levine, D.R.; Saeid, K.K.; Schwartz, R.C.; Sucic, N.T.; Terleckyj, O.D.; Young, J.M. Bacterial Communication (“Quorum Sensing”) Via Ligands and Receptors: A Novel Pharmacologic Target for the Design of Antibiotic Drugs. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 312, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alem, M.A.; Oteef, M.D.; Flowers, T.H.; Douglas, L.J. Production of Tyrosol by Candida albicans Biofilms and its Role in Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Development. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1770–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sudoh, M.; Nagahashi, S.; Doi, M.; Ohta, A.; Takagi, M.; Arisawa, M. Cloning of the Chitin Synthase 3 Gene from Candida albicans and its Expression during Yeast-Hyphal Transition. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 241, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cramton, S.E.; Gerke, C.; Schnell, N.F.; Nichols, W.W.; Götz, F. The Intercellular Adhesion (Ica) Locus is Present in Staphylococcus aureus and is Required for Biofilm Formation. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 5427–5433. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Singh, P.K.; Schaefer, A.L.; Parsek, M.R.; Moninger, T.O.; Welsh, M.J.; Greenberg, E.P. Quorum-Sensing Signals Indicate that Cystic Fibrosis Lungs are Infected with Bacterial Biofilms. Nature 2000, 407, 762–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Huber, B.; Riedel, K.; Hentzer, M.; Heydorn, A.; Gotschlich, A.; Givskov, M.; Molin, S.; Eberl, L. The Cep Quorum-Sensing System of Burkholderia cepacia H111 Controls Biofilm Formation and Swarming Motility. Microbiology 2001, 147, 2517–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Borucki, M.K.; Peppin, J.D.; White, D.; Loge, F.; Call, D.R. Variation in Biofilm Formation among Strains of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 7336–7342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mukherjee, P.K.; Chandra, J. Candida Biofilm Resistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 2004, 7, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rabin, N.; Zheng, Y.; Opoku-Temeng, C.; Du, Y.; Bonsu, E.; Sintim, H.O. Agents that inhibits bacterial biofilm formation. Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 647–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nealson, K.H.; Platt, T.; Hastings, J.W. Cellular Control of the Synthesis and Activity of the Bacterial Luminescent System. J. Bacteriol. 1970, 104, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Meighen, E.A. Molecular Biology of Bacterial Bioluminescence. Microbiol. Rev. 1991, 55, 123–142. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Adonizio, A.L.; Downum, K.; Bennett, B.C.; Mathee, K. Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity of Medicinal Plants in Southern Florida. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 105, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Huber, B.; Eberl, L.; Feucht, W.; Polster, J. Influence of Polyphenols on Bacterial Biofilm Formation and Quorum-Sensing. Z. Naturforsch. C 2003, 58, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brackman, G.; Hillaert, U.; van Calenbergh, S.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Use of Quorum Sensing Inhibitors to Interfere with Biofilm Formation and Development in Burkholderia Multivorans and Burkholderia Cenocepacia. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Girennavar, B.; Cepeda, M.L.; Soni, K.A.; Vikram, A.; Jesudhasan, P.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Pillai, S.D.; Patil, B.S. Grapefruit Juice and its Furocoumarins Inhibits Autoinducer Signaling and Biofilm Formation in Bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 125, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, P. Purification and Identification of Quorum Sensing Signal Peptide AIP of Lactobacillus Pentosus. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 15, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ren, D.; Zuo, R.; Barrios, A.F.G.; Bedzyk, L.A.; Eldridge, G.R.; Pasmore, M.E.; Wood, T.K. Differential Gene Expression for Investigation of Escherichia Coli Biofilm Inhibition by Plant Extract Ursolic Acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4022–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dewick, P.M. Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: West Sussex, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhou, L.; Zheng, H.; Tang, Y.; Yu, W.; Gong, Q. Eugenol Inhibits Quorum Sensing at Sub-Inhibitory Concentrations. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 35, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Upadhyay, A.; Upadhyaya, I.; Kollanoor-Johny, A.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Antibiofilm Effect of Plant Derived Antimicrobials on Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol. 2013, 36, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Magesh, H.; Kumar, A.; Alam, A.; Priyam; Sekar, U.; Sumantran, V.N.; Vaidyanathan, R. Identification of Natural Compounds which Inhibit Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 51, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Brackman, G.; Defoirdt, T.; Miyamoto, C.; Bossier, P.; van Calenbergh, S.; Nelis, H.; Coenye, T. Cinnamaldehyde and Cinnamaldehyde Derivatives Reduce Virulence in Vibrio spp. by Decreasing the DNA-Binding Activity of the Quorum Sensing Response Regulator LuxR. BMC Microbiol. 2008, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sharma, G.; Raturi, K.; Dang, S.; Gupta, S.; Gabrani, R. Combinatorial Antimicrobial Effect of Curcumin with Selected Phytochemicals on Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 16, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Amalaradjou, M.A.R.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Effect of trans-cinnamaldehyde on Inhibition and Inactivation of Cronobacter sakazakii Biofilm on Abiotic Surfaces. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ponnusamy, K.; Paul, D.; Kweon, J.H. Inhibition of Quorum Sensing Mechanism and Aeromonas hydrophila Biofilm Formation by Vanillin. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2009, 26, 1359–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kappachery, S.; Paul, D.; Yoon, J.; Kweon, J.H. Vanillin, a Potential Agent to Prevent Biofouling of Reverse Osmosis Membrane. Biofouling 2010, 26, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Plyuta, V.; Zaitseva, J.; Lobakova, E.; Zagoskina, N.; Kuznetsov, A.; Khmel, I. Effect of Plant Phenolic Compounds on Biofilm Formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. APMIS 2013, 121, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ta, C.A.; Freundorfer, M.; Mah, T.F.; Otarola-Rojas, M.; Garcia, M.; Sanchez-Vindas, P.; Poveda, L.; Maschek, J.A.; Baker, B.J.; Adonizio, A.L.; et al. Inhibition of Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation by Extracts of Neotropical Rainforest Plants. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Morán, A.; Gutiérrez, S.; Martínez-Blanco, H.; Ferrero, M.; Monteagudo-Mera, A.; Rodríguez-Aparicio, L. Non-Toxic Plant Metabolites Regulate Staphylococcus Viability and Biofilm Formation: A Natural Therapeutic Strategy Useful in the Treatment and Prevention of Skin Infections. Biofouling 2014, 30, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Matsunaga, T.; Nakahara, A.; Minnatul, K.M.; Noiri, Y.; Ebisu, S.; Kato, A.; Azakami, H. The Inhibitory Effects of Catechins on Biofilm Formation by the Periodontopathogenic Bacterium, Eikenella Corrodens. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 2445–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Borges, A.; Serra, S.; Cristina Abreu, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Salgado, A.; Simões, M. Evaluation of the Effects of Selected Phytochemicals on Quorum Sensing Inhibition and in Vitro Cytotoxicity. Biofouling 2014, 30, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dürig, A.; Kouskoumvekaki, I.; Vejborg, R.M.; Klemm, P. Chemoinformatics-Assisted Development of New Anti-Biofilm Compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bakkiyaraj, D.; Nandhini, J.R.; Malathy, B.; Pandian, S.K. The Anti-Biofilm Potential of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Extract Against Human Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens. Biofouling 2013, 29, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lin, M.H.; Chang, F.R.; Hua, M.Y.; Wu, Y.C.; Liu, S.T. Inhibitory Effects of 1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-Galloyl-Beta-d-Glucopyranose on Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, G.; Yan, C.; Xu, Y.; Feng, Y.; Wu, Q.; Lv, X.; Yang, B.; Wang, X.; Xia, X. Punicalagin Inhibits Salmonella Virulence Factors and Has Anti-Quorum-Sensing Potential. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 6204–6211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kiran, M.D.; Adikesavan, N.V.; Cirioni, O.; Giacometti, A.; Silvestri, C.; Scalise, G.; Ghiselli, R.; Saba, V.; Orlando, F.; Shoham, M.; et al. Discovery of a Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor of Drug-Resistant Staphylococcal Infections by Structure-Based Virtual Screening. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 73, 1578–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Payne, D.E.; Martin, N.R.; Parzych, K.R.; Rickard, A.H.; Underwood, A.; Boles, B.R. Tannic Acid Inhibits Staphylococcus aureus Surface Colonization in an IsaA-Dependent Manner. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cho, H.S.; Lee, J.; Ryu, S.Y.; Joo, S.W.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli O157: H7 Biofilm Formation by Plant Metabolite ε-Viniferin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 7120–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Coenye, T.; Brackman, G.; Rigole, P.; de Witte, E.; Honraet, K.; Rossel, B.; Nelis, H.J. Eradication of Propionibacterium Acnes Biofilms by Plant Extracts and Putative Identification of Icariin, Resveratrol and Salidroside as Active Compounds. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, D.D.; Zhao, L.X.; Mylonakis, E.; Hu, G.H.; Zou, Y.; Huang, T.K.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.Y. In Vitro and in Vivo Activities of Pterostilbene against Candida albicans Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 2344–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Vikram, A.; Jayaprakasha, G.; Jesudhasan, P.; Pillai, S.; Patil, B. Suppression of Bacterial cell-cell Signalling, Biofilm Formation and Type III Secretion System by Citrus Flavonoids. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, J.; Park, J.; Cho, H.S.; Joo, S.W.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Anti-Biofilm Activities of Quercetin and Tannic Acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Biofouling 2013, 29, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vandeputte, O.M.; Kiendrebeogo, M.; Rajaonson, S.; Diallo, B.; Mol, A.; El Jaziri, M.; Baucher, M. Identification of Catechin as One of the Flavonoids from Combretum Albiflorum Bark Extract that Reduces the Production of Quorum-Sensing-Controlled Virulence Factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rudrappa, T.; Bais, H.P. Curcumin, a Known Phenolic from Curcuma Longa, Attenuates the Virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in Whole Plant and Animal Pathogenicity Models. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 1955–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pattiyathanee, P.; Vilaichone, R.; Chaichanawongsaroj, N. Effect of Curcumin on Helicobacter Pylori Biofilm Formation. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 5106–5115. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hu, P.; Huang, P.; Chen, M.W. Curcumin reduces Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by inhibiting sortase A activity. Arch. Oral Biol. 2013, 58, 1343–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Neelakantan, P.; Subbarao, C.; Sharma, S.; Subbarao, C.V.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Gutmann, J.L. Effectiveness of Curcumin against Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2013, 71, 1453–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Packiavathy, I.A.S.V.; Sasikumar, P.; Pandian, S.K.; Ravi, A.V. Prevention of Quorum-Sensing-Mediated Biofilm Development and Virulence Factors Production in Vibrio spp. by Curcumin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 10177–10187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Packiavathy, I.A.S.V.; Priya, S.; Pandian, S.K.; Ravi, A.V. Inhibition of Biofilm Development of Uropathogens by curcumin—An Anti-Quorum Sensing Agent from Curcuma Longa. Food Chem. 2014, 148, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shahzad, M.; Sherry, L.; Rajendran, R.; Edwards, C.; Combet, E.; Ramage, G. Inhibitory effect of plant (poly)phenolics on growth and biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2014, 73, E28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Karaman, M.; Firinci, F.; Ayyildiz, Z.A.; Bahar, İ.H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Suşlarında Imipenem, Tobramisin ve Curcuminin Biyofilm Oluşumu Üzerine Etkisi. Mikrobiyol. Bul. 2013, 47, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Soumya, E.A.; Saad, I.K.; Hassan, L.; Ghizlane, Z.; Hind, M.; Adnane, R. Carvacrol and Thymol Components Inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa Adherence and Biofilm Formation. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 3229–3232. [Google Scholar]
  57. Qiu, J.; Wang, D.; Xiang, H.; Feng, H.; Jiang, Y.; Xia, L.; Dong, J.; Lu, J.; Yu, L.; Deng, X. Subinhibitory Concentrations of Thymol Reduce Enterotoxins A and B and α-Hemolysin Production in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kuźma, L.; Rózalski, M.; Walencka, E.; Rózalska, B.; Wysokińska, H. Antimicrobial Activity of Diterpenoids from Hairy Roots of Salvia Sclarea L.: Salvipisone as a Potential Anti-Biofilm Agent Active Against Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococci. Phytomedicine 2007, 14, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Walencka, E.; Rozalska, S.; Wysokinska, H.; Rozalski, M.; Kuzma, L.; Rozalska, B. Salvipisone and Aethiopinone from Salvia Sclarea Hairy Roots Modulate Staphylococcal Antibiotic Resistance and Express Anti-Biofilm Activity. Planta Med. 2007, 73, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cartagena, E.; Colom, O.A.; Neske, A.; Valdez, J.C.; Bardón, A. Effects of Plant Lactones on the Production of Biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Vikram, A.; Jesudhasan, P.R.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Pillai, S.D.; Patil, B.S. Citrus Limonoids Interfere with Vibrio harveyi Cell-Cell Signalling and Biofilm Formation by Modulating the Response Regulator LuxO. Microbiology 2011, 157, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hu, J.; Garo, E.; Goering, M.G.; Pasmore, M.; Yoo, H.; Esser, T.; Sestrich, J.; Cremin, P.A.; Hough, G.W.; Perrone, P. Bacterial Biofilm Inhibitors from Diospyros d Endo. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 118–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vediyappan, G.; Dumontet, V.; Pelissier, F.; D’Enfert, C. Gymnemic Acids Inhibit Hyphal Growth and Virulence in Candida albicans. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lin, L.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, G. Effects of Allicin on the Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm and the Production of Quorum-Sensing Controlled Virulence Factors. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  65. Pérez-Giraldo, C.; Cruz-Villalón, G.; Sánchez-Silos, R.; Martínez-Rubio, R.; Blanco, M.; Gómez-García, A. In Vitro Activity of Allicin against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Influence of Subinhibitory Concentrations on Biofilm Formation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 709–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Jakobsen, T.H.; van Gennip, M.; Phipps, R.K.; Shanmugham, M.S.; Christensen, L.D.; Alhede, M.; Skindersoe, M.E.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Friedrich, K.; Uthe, F.; et al. Ajoene, a Sulfur-Rich Molecule from Garlic, Inhibits Genes Controlled by Quorum Sensing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2314–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Ganin, H.; Rayo, J.; Amara, N.; Levy, N.; Krief, P.; Meijler, M.M. Sulforaphane and Erucin, Natural Isothiocyanates from Broccoli, Inhibit Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012, 4, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Borges, A.; Simões, L.; Serra, C.; Saavedra, M.; Simões, M. Activity of Allylisothiocyanate and 2-Phenylethylisothiocyanate on Motility and Biofilm Prevention of Pathogenic Bacteria. In Worldwide Research Efforts in the Fighting against Microbial Pathogens: From Basic Research to Technological Developments; Méndez-Vilas, E., Ed.; Brown Walker Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  69. Lee, J.; Kim, Y.; Cho, H.S.; Ryu, S.Y.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Coumarins Reduce Biofilm Formation and the Virulence of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 1037–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Monte, J.; Abreu, A.C.; Borges, A.; Simões, L.C.; Simões, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Phytochemicals against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus and Their Biofilms. Pathogens 2014, 3, 473–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Ding, X.; Yin, B.; Qian, L.; Zeng, Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, S. Screening for Novel Quorum-Sensing Inhibitors to Interfere with the Formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60, 1827–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tsang, P.W.; Bandara, H.; Fong, W. Purpurin Suppresses Candida albicans Biofilm Formation and Hyphal Development. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Wang, X.; Yao, X.; Zhu, Z.; Tang, T.; Dai, K.; Sadovskaya, I.; Flahaut, S.; Jabbouri, S. Effect of Berberine on Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 34, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Artini, M.; Papa, R.; Barbato, G.; Scoarughi, G.; Cellini, A.; Morazzoni, P.; Bombardelli, E.; Selan, L. Bacterial Biofilm Formation Inhibitory Activity Revealed for Plant Derived Natural Compounds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. The Plant List. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/ (accessed on 25 November 2015).
  76. Ta, C.A.K. Bacterial Biofilm Inhibition and Antifungal Activity of Neotropical Plants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ta, C.A.K.; Arnason, J.T. Mini Review of Phytochemicals and Plant Taxa with Activity as Microbial Biofilm and Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Molecules 2016, 21, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21010029

AMA Style

Ta CAK, Arnason JT. Mini Review of Phytochemicals and Plant Taxa with Activity as Microbial Biofilm and Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Molecules. 2016; 21(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21010029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ta, Chieu Anh Kim, and John Thor Arnason. 2016. "Mini Review of Phytochemicals and Plant Taxa with Activity as Microbial Biofilm and Quorum Sensing Inhibitors" Molecules 21, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21010029

APA Style

Ta, C. A. K., & Arnason, J. T. (2016). Mini Review of Phytochemicals and Plant Taxa with Activity as Microbial Biofilm and Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Molecules, 21(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21010029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop