Next Article in Journal
Exploring Adenosine Receptor Ligands: Potential Role in the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
β-Formyl- and β-Vinylporphyrins: Magic Building Blocks for Novel Porphyrin Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Alternative Access to Functionalized 2,8-Ethanonoradamantane Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring Anti-Prion Glyco-Based and Aromatic Scaffolds: A Chemical Strategy for the Quality of Life
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chemical Methods to Knock Down the Amyloid Proteins

1
Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry and Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2
Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing 100069, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2017, 22(6), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060916
Submission received: 5 March 2017 / Revised: 20 May 2017 / Accepted: 20 May 2017 / Published: 1 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women in Organic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Amyloid proteins are closely related with amyloid diseases and do tremendous harm to human health. However, there is still a lack of effective strategies to treat these amyloid diseases, so it is important to develop novel methods. Accelerating the clearance of amyloid proteins is a favorable method for amyloid disease treatment. Recently, chemical methods for protein reduction have been developed and have attracted much attention. In this review, we focus on the latest progress of chemical methods that knock down amyloid proteins, including the proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) strategy, the “recognition-cleavage” strategy, the chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) strategy, the selectively light-activatable organic and inorganic molecules strategy and other chemical strategies.

1. Introduction

Amyloid proteins contribute to many amyloid diseases [1,2,3,4], such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and type II diabetes [5,6]. Most of the amyloid proteins are untreatable with drugs and difficult to target by small molecules [7,8]. Until now, there have been no FDA-approved drugs for many amyloid diseases. Therefore, it is urgent to develop novel strategies for amyloid diseases’ treatment.
Impaired clearance of the amyloid proteins is one of the key factors for pathological generation. The balance between the production and clearance of amyloid proteins, such as amyloid-β (Aβ), Tau, α-synuclein, could be disrupted in the amyloid diseases. Currently, it is known that accelerating the clearance of the amyloid proteins may be one of the crucial approaches for treating amyloid diseases [9].
Generally, genetic and chemical methods are used to regulate the level of proteins untreatable with drugs. At present, chemical methods for protein reduction have drawn much attention, since they have some advantages compared with genetic methods [10,11,12,13], such as their universality and high efficiency. In view of the merits of the chemical methods, some researchers have applied some of them to reduce the level of amyloid proteins. In this review, we will make a detailed introduction of these methods as follows.

2. Proteolysis-Targeting Chimera Strategy

In recent years, Crews and Deshaies’s groups developed a molecule that could recruit target proteins to the ubiquitin ligase E3 [14]. This molecule was called proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC). Using this strategy, the MetAP-2 protein could be recruited to the E3 ligase Skp1-Cullin-F box complex (SCF) when the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, ubiquitin-binding enzyme E2 and ubiquitin are activated in vitro. Then, the target protein could be polyubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome [14]. Furthermore, Crews’s group continued to develop this strategy. Molecules coupled with a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) were designed. The new molecules could enter into the cells and induce the degradation of the FKBP12 and androgen receptor [15]. Together, the PROTACs as mentioned above contain three motifs: E3 ligase ligand, cell-penetrating peptide and recognition ligand. The E3 ligase ligand can effectively recruit E3 ligase to activate theubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), and the recognition ligand can bind to the target protein selectively (Figure 1).
Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) are one of the hallmarks of AD formed by Tau aggregates [16,17,18]. It was reported that Tau reduction could attenuate the Aβ-induced cytotoxicity and rescue the cognitive defects in the transgenic mouse models [19]. Therefore, Tau reduction may be a potential approach for AD treatment. Based on the PROTAC strategy, our group developed a functional molecule called TH006 to degrade AD-related protein Tau [20]. The Tau PROTAC TH006 consists of three parts: recruiting E3 ligase motif, Tau recognition motif and a penetrating peptide. The recruiting E3 ligase motif is a seven amino acid (ALAPYIP) sequence, which is derived from hypoxia inducible factor (HIF). HIF is the substrate of E3 ligase VHL [21,22]. The Tau recognition motif is the microtubule binding peptide YQQYQDATADEQG, which can specifically bind with Tau [23]. The penetrating peptide is poly-d-arginine (d-Arg)8, which is applied to promote the molecule to get into cells [15,24,25]. It was demonstrated that Tau PROTAC TH006 could penetrate into cells in a short time, and it was specific for Tau. In addition, Tau PROTAC TH006 could also induce the degradation of intracellular Tau significantly. Moreover, Tau PROTAC TH006 could reduce the Tau level in the transgenic mouse model and decrease the Aβ-induced cytotoxicity [20].
The initial PROTACs were also called peptidic PROTACs, and peptide fragments constituted them. Peptidic PROTACs lack cell permeability and traditional drug-like properties; thus, their further development was limited [26]. Recently, “Small-Molecule” PROTACs have been developed based on MDM2, VHL, CRBN (cereblon) and clAP1 E3 ligands. “Small-Molecule” PROTACs are more stable in vivo compared with peptidic PROTACs. Recently, Crews, Ciulli and their co-workers further rationally designed a nonpeptidic molecule based on the seven-amino acid sequence ALAPYIP. The nonpeptidic molecule not only possesses the same functions as ALAPYIP [27,28,29,30], but it is also more potent, drug-like and cell-permeable [31]. Furthermore, the nonpeptidic molecule was used to decrease proteins levels by >90% at nanomolar concentrations such as ERRα and RIPK2 [32,33].

3. “Recognition-Cleavage” Strategy

Typical ‘recognition-cleavage’ compounds contain two motifs; one is the recognition group that can bind to the target protein selectively (Figure 2A), and the other is the cleavage group that can cleave the target protein [34,35,36]. The “recognition-cleavage” strategy is also regarded as a promising approach to regulate the protein level.
It was reported that the catalytic center of the target-selective artificial proteases, the CoIII complex of cyclen ([CoIIIcyclen]), had the ability to hydrolyzation [37]. Based on the CoIIIcyclen, copper Cu(II)-cyclen was developed and widely used as the cleavage group [37]. The small lytic molecule, cyclen, is activated to serve as a hydrolase after catching Cu(II) [38]. Cu(II)-cyclen was applied to cleave the amyloid protein Aβ, Tau and amylin [34,35,36]. The Aβ recognition group is a short sequence from Aβ KLVFF, which is crucial for Aβ assembly. The pentapeptide KLVFF can also bind to Aβ or even block Aβ self-assembly [39,40,41]. The Tau recognition motif is segment hexapeptide VQIVYK, which is important for Tau assembly [8,42,43]. The amylin recognition motif is a short peptide NYGAIL chosen from the core sequence of hIAPP [36]. The Cu(II)-cyclen complex that ligated to the recognition motif can specifically recognize and degrade the target protein (Figure 2B). Moreover, this Cu(II)-cyclen complex with the recognition group can effectively prevent the aggregation of target protein [34,35,36]. The Cu(II)-cyclen complex has some advantages. For example, it could cause electrostatic repulsion to inhibit Aβ aggregation, and it could also reduce the level of free Cu(II) and decrease the oxidative stress [44]. Furthermore, the cyclen-recognition conjugations not only have a forceful cleavage effect, but they can also decrease the lytic molecules’ cytotoxicity to cells [34].

4. Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy Strategy

Autophagy is one of the cell quality control systems and contains three types: macroautophagy, microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). Among them, CMA can degrade the target protein with specificity [45]. The CMA degradation processing is roughly divided into three steps. Firstly, the target protein containing KFERQ sequence (CMA-targeting motif (CTM)) is recognized by the co-chaperone specifically. Then, the complex of the target protein and co-chaperone binds with LAMA2P. LAMA2P is on the membrane of the lysosome. Finally, the target protein is degraded by the lysosome (Figure 3).
It was proven that the target protein attached to the KFERQ sequence could be degraded by the CMA system [46,47]. Thus, the KFERQ sequence could activate the CMA system and be utilized to facilitate the degradation of endogenous proteins.
The CMA strategy was used to knock down the amyloid protein α-synuclein [48]. Yu Tian Wang and his colleagues designed and synthesized the peptide TAT-synCTM that consisted of three motifs: CTM, α-synuclein recognition peptide and a penetrating peptide TAT. It was demonstrated that β-synuclein sequence from 36 to 45 was specific for α-synuclein, so it could be used as a recognition domain. TAT-synCTM could mediate the degradation of endogenous α-synuclein in a dose- and time-dependent manner significantly [48]. The CMA strategy is a powerful approach to regulate protein level and may become a promising therapy for amyloid disease treatment.

5. Selectively Light-Activatable Organic and Inorganic Molecules Strategy

Light-activatable organic and inorganic molecules could produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) to serve as photocatalysts on photo-irradiation. Photocatalysts could selectively induce the degradation of the target protein [49]. Lately, many research groups have focused on developing selectively light-activatable organic and inorganic molecules (Figure 4).
In a few decades, selectively light-activatable organic molecules like 2-phenylquinoline-steroid hormone hybrids, porphyrin derivatives, fullerene-sugar hybrids and fullerene-sulfonic acid hybrids, were applied to degrade HIV-1 protease and ER-α, etc. [50,51,52]. The fullerene has strong binding affinity to peptide sequence KLVFF of Aβ. The experimental results demonstrated that the fullerene derivatives could be used to block Aβ aggregation and highly selectively degrade Aβ with photo-irradiation [53,54,55,56].
Recently, many inorganic molecules were developed for therapeutics and diagnostic probes [57]. Polyoxometalates (POMs), a type of inorganic fullerene-like compounds, could inhibit viral and tumor activities [58]. Furthermore, studies proved that POMs could prevent Aβ aggregation and be utilized as a photocatalyst [59,60,61]. Qu’s group selected K8[P2CoW17O61], a phosphotungstate inorganic compound, to verify its inhibition effect on Aβ aggregation. The results elucidated that K8[P2CoW17O61] could cause the degradation of not only the monomers, but also the oligomers of Aβ [62,63,64].

6. Other Chemical Strategies

Lately, some studies demonstrated that several small molecules could directly induce the degradation of proteins through activating the cell quality control systems. For example, a few researchers verified that trehalose and temsirolimus could activate the autophagy system to facilitate the clearance of Tau or Aβ [65,66]. However, these molecules could degrade all proteins without specificity.
Except the strategies mentioned above, there are some other promising approaches for protein degradation, which have not been applied to the degradation of amyloid protein. More recently, lenalidomide and pomalidomide were found to be able to recruit one of the E3 ligases to stimulate the ubiquitin-proteasome system and induce the degradation of the target protein [67,68,69]. Besides that, a destabilizing domain (DD) is usually used to regulate intracellular protein stability. The protein can be degraded directly when it is fused with DD. For example, an auxin-inducible degron (AID) can modulate the target protein stability in temporal and subcellular control through UPS [70,71,72]. In addition, the Crews and Hedstrom groups also developed hydrophobic tag methods, which could increase the surface hydrophobicity of the target protein to mimic the misfolded protein, targeting the protein for degradation [73,74,75]. Therefore, the protein attached with hydrophobic tags can be recognized by the chaperone and degraded by the proteasome. This strategy can achieve rapid and universal degradation of the target protein [75,76,77]. Together, these methods could be applied to reducing the amyloid protein levels with a high selectivity.

7. Conclusions and Outlook

Facilitating the clearance of the amyloid proteins is one of the favorable approaches for treating amyloid diseases. In the past two decades, chemical methods for protein knockdown have been developed rapidly. In this review, we have introduced some novel chemical methods to degrade the amyloid proteins. These strategies can degrade amyloid protein in vitro and in vivo effectively. In addition, we also briefly introduce other chemical strategies that have not been applied for the amyloid proteins yet. These strategies may become potential therapeutic strategies for the treatment of amyloid diseases.
Current chemical methods of degrading proteins present a design basis for developing new strategies. However, there is still much work to do due to the relatively poor physicochemical properties of these agents, such as a short half-time or relatively high cytotoxicity. It is necessary to develop more stable and drug-like molecules for clinical application.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (2013CB910700) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21472109, 81661148047).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kisilevsky, R. Biology of disease amyloidosis: A familiar problem in light of current pathogenic developments. Lab Investig. 1983, 49, 381–390. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rochet, J.C.; Lansbury, P.T. Amyloid fibrillogenesis: Themes and variations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sipe, J.D. Serum amyloid A: From fibril to function. Current status. Amyloid 2000, 7, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qi, Q.; Zhao, T.X.; An, B.L.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhong, C. Self-assembly and morphological characterization of two-component functional amyloid proteins. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2016, 12, 008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Selkoe, D.J. Alzheimer’s disease: Genotypes, phenotype and treatments. Science 1997, 275, 630–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hurle, M.R.; Helms, L.R.; Li, L.; Chan, W.; Wetzel, R. A role for destabilizing amino acid replacements in light chain amyloidosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 5446–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tompa, P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sawaya, M.R.; Sambashivan, S.; Nelson, R.; Ivanova, M.I.; Sievers, S.A.; Apostol, M.I.; Thompson, M.J.; Balbirnie, M.; Wiltzius, J.J.; McFarlane, H.T.; et al. Atomic structures of amyloid cross-beta spines reveal varied steric zippers. Nature 2007, 447, 453–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vigushin, D.; Lavender, J.; Pepys, M. Scintigraphic quantification and serial monitoring of human visceral amyloid deposits provide evidence for turnover and regression. Quart. J. Med. 1993, 86, 365–374. [Google Scholar]
  10. Soutschek, J.; Akinc, A.; Bramlage, B.; Charisse, K.; Constien, R.; Donoghue, M.; Elbashir, S.; Geick, A.; Hadwiger, P.; Harborth, J. Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature 2004, 432, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bumcrot, D.; Manoharan, M.; Koteliansky, V.; Sah, D.W. RNAi therapeutics: A potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tokatlian, T.; Segura, T. siRNA applications in nanomedicine. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2010, 2, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, D.S.; Chen, M.S.; Wu, W.H.; Guo, Y.; Chen, Y.X.; Zhao, Y.F.; Li, Y.M. Investigation on Small Molecules Targeting Cu(I) Preventing Copper-Mediated Neurotoxicity. Acta Chim. Sin. 2015, 73, 799–807. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sakamoto, K.M. Protacs: Chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1–Cullin–F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8554–8559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schneekloth, J.S. Chemical genetic control of protein levels: Selective in vivo targeted degradation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3748–3754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ballatore, C.; Lee, V.M.Y.; Trojanowski, J.Q. Tau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tolnay, M.; Probst, A. REVIEW: Tau protein pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 1999, 25, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Du, J.T.; Yu, C.H.; Zhou, L.X.; Wu, W.H.; Lei, P.; Zhao, Y.F.; Nakanishi, H.; Li, Y.M. Phosphorylation modulates the local conformation and self-aggregation ability of a peptide from the fourth tau microtubule-binding repeat. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 5012–5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Roberson, E.D.; Scearce-Levie, K.; Palop, J.J.; Yan, F.; Cheng, I.H.; Wu, T.; Gerstein, H.; Yu, G.-Q.; Mucke, L. Reducing endogenous tau ameliorates amyloid ß-induced deficits in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Science 2007, 316, 750–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chu, T.T.; Gao, N.; Li, Q.Q.; Chen, P.G.; Yang, X.F.; Chen, Y.X.; Zhao, Y.F.; Li, Y.M. Specific Knockdown of Endogenous Tau Protein by Peptide-Directed Ubiquitin-Proteasome Degradation. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Hon, W.C.; Wilson, M.I.; Harlos, K.; Claridge, T.D.; Schofield, C.J. Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 alpha by pVHL. Nature 2002, 417, 975–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Min, J.H.; Yang, H.; Ivan, M. Structure of an HIF-1α-pVHL complex: Hydroxyproline recognition in signaling. Science 2002, 296, 1886–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rivas, C.I.; Vera, J.C.; Maccioni, R.B. Anti-idiotypic antibodies that react with microtubule-associated proteins are present in the sera of rabbits immunized with synthetic peptides from tubulin's regulatory domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 6092–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Futaki, S.; Hirose, H.; Nakase, I. Arginine-rich peptides: Methods of translocation through biological membranes. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 2863–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Futaki, S. Intracellular Delivery Using Arginine Peptides. J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2004, 64, 164–167. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sakamoto, K.; Kim, K.-B.; Verma, R.; Ransick, A.; Stein, B.; Crews, C.M.; Deshaies, R.J. Development of protacs to target cancer-promoting proteins for ubiquitination and degradation. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2003, 2, 1350–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Buckley, D.L.; Van Molle, I.; Gareiss, P.C. Targeting the von Hippel–Lindau E3 ubiquitin ligase using small molecules to disrupt the VHL/HIF-1α interaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4465–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Van Molle, I.; Thomann, A.; Buckley, D.L. Dissecting fragment-based lead discovery at the von Hippel-Lindau protein: Hypoxia inducible factor 1α protein-protein interface. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 1300–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Buckley, D.L.; Gustafson, J.L.; Van Molle, I. Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Interaction between the E3 Ligase VHL and HIF1α. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 11463–11467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Galdeano, C.; Gadd, M.S.; Soares, P.; Scaffidi, S.; Van Molle, I.; Birced, I.; Hewitt, S.; Dias, D.M.; Ciulli, A. Structure-guided design and optimization of small molecules targeting the protein–protein interaction between the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) E3 ubiquitin ligase and the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunit with in vitro nanomolar affinities. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 8657–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Frost, J.; Galdeano, C.; Soares, P. Potent and selective chemical probe of hypoxic signalling downstream of HIF-α hydroxylation via VHL inhibition. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zengerle, M.; Chan, K.H.; Ciulli, A. Selective Small Molecule Induced Degradation of the BET Bromodomain Protein BRD4. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 1770–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bondeson, D.P.; Mares, A.; Smith, I.E.; Ko, E.; Campos, S.; Miah, A.H.; Mulholland, K.E.; Routly, N.; Buckley, D.L.; Gustafson, J.L.; et al. Catalytic in vivo protein knockdown by small-molecule PROTACs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wu, W.H.; Lei, P.; Liu, Q.; Hu, J.; Gunn, A.P.; Chen, M.S.; Rui, Y.F.; Su, X.Y.; Xie, Z.P.; Zhao, Y.F.; et al. Sequestration of Copper from beta-Amyloid Promotes Selective Lysis by Cyclen-Hybrid Cleavage Agents. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 31657–31664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hu, J.; Yu, Y.P.; Cui, W.; Fang, C.L.; Wu, W.H.; Zhao, Y.F.; Li, Y.M. Cyclen-hybrid compound captures copper to protect INS-1 cells from islet amyloid polypeptide cytotoxicity by inhibiting and lysing effects. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8023–8025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chu, T.T.; Li, Q.Q.; Qiu, T.; Sun, Z.Y.; Hu, Z.W.; Chen, Y.X.; Zhao, Y.F.; Li, Y.M. Clearance of the intracellular high level of the tau protein directed by an artificial synthetic hydrolase. Mol. Biosyst. 2014, 10, 3081–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Suh, J.; Yoo, S.H.; Kim, M.G. Cleavage agents for soluble oligomers of amyloid β peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 119, 7194–7197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Suh, J. Synthetic Artificial Peptidases and Nucleases Using Macromolecular Catalytic Systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tjernberg, L.O.; Naslund, J.; Lindqvist, F.; Johansson, J.; Karlstrom, A.R.; Thyberg, J.; Terenius, L.; Nordstedt, C. Arrest of-amyloid fibril formation by a pentapeptide ligand. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 8545–8548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yang, F.; Lim, G.P.; Begum, A.N.; Ubeda, O.J.; Simmons, M.R.; Ambe gaokar, S.S.; Chen, P.P.; Kayed, R.; Glabe, C.G.; Frautschy, S.A; et al. Curcumin inhibits formation of amyloid β oligomers and fibrils, binds plaques, and reduces amyloid in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 5892–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Jiao, Y.; Yang, P. Molecular dynamics studies of the inhibitory mechanism of copper (II) on aggregation of amyloid β-peptide. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2007, 18, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Von Bergen, M.; Friedhoff, P.; Biernat, J.; Heberle, J.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Mandelkow, E. Assembly of tau protein into Alzheimer paired helical filaments depends on a local sequence motif ((306)VQIVYK(311)) forming beta structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5129–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, C.; Sawaya, M.R.; Cheng, P.N.; Zheng, J.; Nowick, J.S.; Eisenberg, D. Characteristics of Amyloid-Related Oligomers Revealed by Crystal Structures of Macrocyclic beta-Sheet Mimics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6736–6744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gazit, E. A possible role for π-stacking in the self-assembly of amyloid fibrils. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dice, J.F. Peptide sequences that target cytosolic proteins for lysosomal proteolysis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1990, 15, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kaushik, S.; Cuervo, A.M. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: A unique way to enter the lysosome world. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Koga, H.; Martinez-Vicente, M.; Macian, F.; Verkhusha, V.V.; Cuervo, A.M. A photoconvertible fluorescent reporter to track chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Fan, X.; Jin, W.Y.; Lu, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.T. Rapid and reversible knockdown of endogenous proteins by peptide-directed lysosomal degradation. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Suzuki, A.; Hasegawa, M.; Ishii, M.; Matsumura, S.; Toshima, K. Anthraquinone derivatives as a new family of protein photocleavers. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 4624–4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Toshima, K.; Takano, R.; Maeda, Y.; Suzuki, M.; Asai, A.; Matsumura, S. 2-Phenylquinoline–Carbohydrate Hybrids: Molecular Design, Chemical Synthesis, and Evaluation of a New Family of Light-Activatable DNA-Cleaving Agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3733–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dougherty, T.J.; Gomer, C.J.; Henderson, B.W.; Jori, G.; Kessel, D.; Korbelik, M.; Moan, J.; Peng, Q. Photodynamic Therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1998, 90, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bernstein, R.; Prat, F.; Foote, C.S. On the mechanism of DNA cleavage by fullerenes investigated in model systems: Electron transfer from guanosine and 8-oxo-guanosine derivatives to C60. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 464–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, J.E.; Lee, M. Fullerene inhibits beta-amyloid peptide aggregation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 303, 576–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Maggini, M.; Scorrano, G.; Prato, M. Addition of azomethine ylides to C60: Synthesis, characterization, and functionalization of fullerene pyrrolidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9798–9799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ishida, Y.; Tanimoto, S.; Takahashi, D.; Toshima, K. Photo-degradation of amyloid β by a designed fullerene–sugar hybrid. Med. Chem. Commun. 2010, 1, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ishida, Y.; Fujii, T.; Oka, K. Inhibition of amyloid β aggregation and cytotoxicity by photodegradation using a designed fullerene derivative. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 2312–2315. [Google Scholar]
  57. Orvig, C.; Abrams, M. Medicinal Inorganic Chemistry:  Introduction. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2201–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hasenknopf, B. Polyoxometalates: Introduction to a class of inorganic compounds and their biomedical applications. Front. Biosci. 2005, 10, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Yue, B.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zou, Y.; Jin, S. Photocatalytic Degradation of Aqueous 4-Chlorophenol by Silica-Immobilized Polyoxometalates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1325–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bernardini, G.; Wedd, A.G.; Zhao, C.; Bond, A.M. Photochemical oxidation of water and reduction of polyoxometalate anions at interfaces of water with ionic liquids or diethylether. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11552–11557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Matt, B.; Xiang, X.; Kaledin, A.L.; Han, N.; Moussa, J.; Amouri, H.; Alves, S.; Hill, C.L.; Lian, T.; Musaev, D.G.; et al. Long lived charge separation in iridium (iii)-photosensitized polyoxometalates: Synthesis, photophysical and computational studies of organometallic–redox tunable oxide assemblies. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Geng, J.; Li, M.; Ren, J.; Wang, E.; Qu, X. Polyoxometalates as inhibitors of the aggregation of amyloid β peptides associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 123, 4270–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gao, N.; Sun, H.; Dong, K.; Ren, J.; Duan, T.; Xu, C.; Qu, X. Transition-metal-substituted polyoxometalate derivatives as functional anti-amyloid agents for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yoo, S.I.; Yang, M.; Brender, J.R.; Subramanian, V.; Sun, K.; Joo, N.E.; Kotov, N.A. Inhibition of amyloid peptide fibrillation by inorganic nanoparticles: Functional similarities with proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5110–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kruger, U.; Wang, Y.P.; Kumar, S.; Mandelkow, E.M. Autophagic degradation of tau in primary neurons and its enhancement by trehalose. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 2291–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Opattova, A.; Filipcik, P.; Cente, M.; Novak, M. Intracellular Degradation of Misfolded Tau Protein Induced by Geldanamycin is Associated with Activation of the Proteasome. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2013, 33, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Lu, G.; Middleton, R.E.; Sun, H.; Naniong, M.; Ott, C.J.; Mitsiades, C.S.; Wong, K.-K.; Bradner, J.E.; Kaelin, W.G. The myeloma drug lenalidomide promotes the cereblon-dependent destruction of Ikaros proteins. Science 2014, 343, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Krönke, J.; Udeshi, N.D.; Narla, A.; Grauman, P.; Hurst, S.N.; McConkey, M.; Svinkina, T.; Heckl, D.; Comer, E.; Li, X. Lenalidomide causes selective degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in multiple myeloma cells. Science 2014, 343, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Winter, G.E.; Buckley, D.L.; Paulk, J.; Roberts, J.M.; Souza, A.; Dhe-Paganon, S.; Bradner, J.E. Phthalimide conjugation as a strategy for in vivo target protein degradation. Science 2015, 348, 1376–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Holland, A.J.; Fachinetti, D.; Han, J.S.; Cleveland, D.W. Inducible, reversible system for the rapid and complete degradation of proteins in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3350–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Bonger, K.M.; Chen, L.C.; Liu, C.W.; Wandless, T.J. Small-molecule displacement of a cryptic degron causes conditional protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nishimura, K.; Fukagawa, T.; Takisawa, H.; Kakimoto, T.; Kanemaki, M. An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells. Nat. Method 2009, 6, 917–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Long, M.J.C.; Gollapalli, D.R.; Hedstrom, L. Inhibitor mediated protein degradation. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Shi, Y.; Long, M.J.C.; Rosenberg, M.M. Boc3Arg-linked ligands induce degradation by localizing target proteins to the 20S proteasome. ACS Chem. Biol. 2016, 11, 3328–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Neklesa, T.K.; Tae, H.S.; Schneekloth, A.R.; Stulberg, M.J.; Corson, T.W.; Sundberg, T.B.; Raina, K.; Holley, S.A.; Crews, C.M. Small-molecule hydrophobic tagging–induced degradation of HaloTag fusion proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xie, T.; Lim, S.M.; Westover, K.D.; Dodge, M.E.; Ercan, D.; Ficarro, S.B.; Udayakumar, D.; Gurbani, D.; Tae, H.S.; Riddle, S.M.; et al. Pharmacological targeting of the pseudokinase Her3. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Raina, K.; Noblin, D.J.; Serebrenik, Y.V.; Adams, A.; Zhao, C.; Crews, C.M. Targeted protein destabilization reveals an estrogen-mediated ER stress response. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) strategy degrades the target protein by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS).
Figure 1. Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) strategy degrades the target protein by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS).
Molecules 22 00916 g001
Figure 2. (A) Schematic diagram of “recognition-cleavage” strategy; (B) The structure of cyclen chelating Cu(II).
Figure 2. (A) Schematic diagram of “recognition-cleavage” strategy; (B) The structure of cyclen chelating Cu(II).
Molecules 22 00916 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) strategy.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) strategy.
Molecules 22 00916 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the selectively light-activatable organic and inorganic molecules strategy.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the selectively light-activatable organic and inorganic molecules strategy.
Molecules 22 00916 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, N.; Chen, Y.-X.; Zhao, Y.-F.; Li, Y.-M. Chemical Methods to Knock Down the Amyloid Proteins. Molecules 2017, 22, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060916

AMA Style

Gao N, Chen Y-X, Zhao Y-F, Li Y-M. Chemical Methods to Knock Down the Amyloid Proteins. Molecules. 2017; 22(6):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Na, Yong-Xiang Chen, Yu-Fen Zhao, and Yan-Mei Li. 2017. "Chemical Methods to Knock Down the Amyloid Proteins" Molecules 22, no. 6: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060916

APA Style

Gao, N., Chen, Y. -X., Zhao, Y. -F., & Li, Y. -M. (2017). Chemical Methods to Knock Down the Amyloid Proteins. Molecules, 22(6), 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22060916

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop