Next Article in Journal
Computational Estimation of the Acidities of Pyrimidines and Related Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Confirming the Molecular Basis of the Solvent Extraction of Cadmium(II) Using 2-Pyridyl Oximes through a Synthetic Inorganic Chemistry Approach and a Proposal for More Efficient Extractants
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Changes in Anthocyanin Accumulation and Cellular Antioxidant Activities in Two Varieties of Grape Berries during Fruit Maturation under Different Climates
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Metal Cations on the Aqueous Behavior of Dopamine. Thermodynamic Investigation of the Binary and Ternary Interactions with Cd2+, Cu2+ and UO22+ in NaCl at Different Ionic Strengths and Temperatures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural Identification of Metalloproteomes in Marine Diatoms, an Efficient Algae Model in Toxic Metals Bioremediation

by
Christos T. Chasapis
1,2,3,*,
Massimiliano Peana
4,* and
Vlasoula Bekiari
2
1
Department of Animal Production, Fisheries and Aquaculture, University of Patras, 30200 Messolonghi, Greece
2
Department of Crop Science, University of Patras, 30200 Messolonghi, Greece
3
Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology, Hellas (FORTH/ICE-HT), 26504 Patras, Greece
4
Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(2), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020378
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 18 December 2021 / Accepted: 4 January 2022 / Published: 7 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Intoxication: General Aspects and Chelating Agents)

Abstract

:
The biosorption of pollutants using microbial organisms has received growing interest in the last decades. Diatoms, the most dominant group of phytoplankton in oceans, are (i) pollution tolerant species, (ii) excellent biological indicators of water quality, and (iii) efficient models in assimilation and detoxification of toxic metal ions. Published research articles connecting proteomics with the capacity of diatoms for toxic metal removal are very limited. In this work, we employed a structural based systematic approach to predict and analyze the metalloproteome of six species of marine diatoms: Thalassiosira pseudonana, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Fragilariopsis cylindrus, Thalassiosira oceanica, Fistulifera solaris, and Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata. The results indicate that the metalloproteome constitutes a significant proportion (~13%) of the total diatom proteome for all species investigated, and the proteins binding non-essential metals (Cd, Hg, Pb, Cr, As, and Ba) are significantly more than those identified for essential metals (Zn, Cu, Fe, Ca, Mg, Mn, Co, and Ni). These findings are most likely related to the well-known toxic metal tolerance of diatoms. In this study, metalloproteomes that may be involved in metabolic processes and in the mechanisms of bioaccumulation and detoxification of toxic metals of diatoms after exposure to toxic metals were identified and described.

1. Introduction

Anthropogenic activity mainly due to mining, technological activities, and agricultural applications have led to a vast dispersion of toxic metals in natural environments [1,2,3]. Toxic metals are introduced into the atmosphere, soil, coastal, and marine environments through a variety of sources, including emissions and wastewater from metal-based industries, improper waste disposal, as well as from household effluents [4,5]. Once dispersed, toxic metals can be taken in by humans through food, water, and air and accumulated in the body, affecting various biological functions and causing multiple organ damage and serious diseases such as cancer [1,6]. Thus, environmental pollution of toxic metals (in the form of their ions) is a problem of great concern, leading to increasing interest in the scientific community in developing methodologies to address and reduce their harmful effects.
In recent years, techniques that utilize biological mechanisms of microorganisms and plants to eradicate hazardous contaminants and restore polluted environments to their original condition are increasingly being used. Thanks to their characteristic enzymes and biological processes such as bioaccumulation, biomineralization, bioabsorption, and biotransformation, these organisms maintain the homeostasis of toxic metals and use them as a source of energy for their growth and development [7,8]. In this way, diatoms have developed resistance to toxic metals, adapting their metabolism in order to survive in an environment polluted with these contaminants [8,9,10].
Diatoms are the most dominant and diverse group of phytoplankton, which account for 45% oceanic primary productivity due to their higher growth rate and competitive characteristics over other groups of microalgae [11]. Diatoms are unicellular eukaryotic microscopic plants with approximately 200 genera and more than 100,000 species. Diatom cells exist within a unique silica cell wall, known as frustules, which is synthesized intracellularly by the polymerization of silicic acid monomers. During biosorption and bioaccumulation (when algae adsorb toxic metals), exposed parts of the diatoms undergo substitution of different metal ions or complexation with toxic metals at the frustules [12]. Furthermore, the principal organic constituents of a diatom’s cell walls, peptidoglycans, polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins, act as biotic ligands for metal binding [13,14]. Molecular mechanisms of diatoms enables them to differentiate between essential and non-essential metals (for human life) for their growth and development [10,15,16]. The metal binding to the surface depends on metal requirements for intracellular metabolic activities and consequently some toxic metal ions are transported into the cells and utilized for different metabolic functions [10]. Upon their accumulation, the microalgae produce reactive oxygen species (ROS), which act as signaling molecules in order to control cell metabolism [17] and induce a programmed cell death process in various diatom species [18,19].
Diatoms have attracted considerable attention due to their success in various environmental conditions, and studies that utilize genetic manipulation and metabolic engineering are needed to provide insight into their adaptation capacity [20]. Due to their short life cycles, diatoms are used as bioindicators of water quality in rivers, lakes, and oceans by changing their diversity and density [21,22,23], and recently diatom applications for specific industrial wastewater treatment have been investigated [24].
Though diatom algae are one of the most studied species in terms of cellular and molecular responses to metal toxicity, the identification of metalloproteome that is involved in their characteristic biosorption machinery is very limited. The holistic identification of the metallo-binding proteins/enzymes and the elucidation of possible correlations with the metabolic pathways responsible for metal sequestration by diatoms is a crucial prerequisite for their molecular manipulation in order to improve survival rates and stability when exposed to high metal concentration and to discover novel artificial bio-chelators for toxic metals decontamination [20,25].
In this work, we identified the metalloproteomes for essential (Zn, Cu, Ca, Co, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni) and non-essential (Cd, Hg, Pb, Ba, Cr, As) metal ions for six marine diatoms species: Fistulifera solaris, Fragilariopsis cylindrus, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Thalassiosira pseudonana, Thalassiosira oceanica, and Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata, by applying a systematic structure-based approach. This study allowed highlighting possible molecular linkages between the metalloproteome of diatoms and their cellular mechanism of bioaccumulation, homeostasis, and detoxification after their exposure to an environment contaminated by toxic metals. Their intracellular metabolic activities and their unique adaptation in marine environments poor in essential metals are also discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Identification of Diatom Metalloproteomes

Metal-binding proteomes of six marine diatoms species (Table 1) have been identified by applying a systematic structure-based approach used previously to propose putative metalloproteomes in various organisms, such as bacteria, viruses, and toxicological models [26,27,28]. The approach combines strategies based on structural data and annotation to identify known metal-binding domains in their sequences [29,30].
All 3D structures of Zn2+ Cu1+/2+, Ca2+, Co2+/3+, Fe2+/3+, Mg2+, Mn2+/4+, Ni2+, Cd2+, Hg2+, Pb2+, Ba2+, Cr2+/3+ and As3+—binding proteins have been provided by the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (https://www.rcsb.org/, accessed on 10 November 2021) and MetalPDB (https://metalpdb.cerm.unifi.it/, accessed on 10 November 2021) [31]. From these structures, each specific metal-binding pattern (MBP) involved in the interaction of specific proteins with the specific metal was extracted. This set served as the starting point for the search of MBP in the diatom proteomes. All the proteomes were downloaded from the protein resource UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed on 10 November 2021) [32]. Then, to achieve maximal identification coverage, all the diatom proteomes were analyzed for the relevant Pfam (protein families) metal-binding domains [33]. Each protein was scanned for the occurrence of Pfam domains using the HMM search function of HMMER 3.1b2 (http://hmmer.org/, accessed on 10 November 2021) [34] and a threshold of 0.05 for the E value (as calculated by Pfam). False positives were filtered out by searching MBPs in the retrieved protein sequences, and by rejecting those lacking the MBPs. The MBP filter was applied, assuming that the predicted proteins contained all the ligands of the MBP with spacing within each sequence maintained within ±20% of total number of amino acids (or ±1 amino acid for short spacing).

2.2. Functional Classification, Gene Ontology Annotation, and Localization of Metal-Binding Proteins

Functional classification of metalloproteins was obtained using DAVID web server (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 10 November 2021) [35]. Gene Ontology (GO) terms were retrieved by ClueGO plug-in [36] of Cytoscape v.3.0.0 [37] and the KEGG pathway annotation [38]. The subcellular localization of metalloproteins was based on UniProt web source [32].

3. Results

3.1. Non-Essential Metal Binding (Non-EMB) Proteome of Six Diatom Species

The identified metalloproteins bound to non-essential metals (relative to the sum of Cd, Hg, Pb, Ba, Cr and As proteins), represent 11%, 10.5%, 8.3%, 8.2%, 8%, and 8% of the Thalassiosira pseudonana, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata, Fistulifera solaris, Thalassiosira oceanica, and Fragilariopsis cylindrus proteome, respectively. All the non-essential metal binding (non-EMB) proteins (for the six diatom species) are listed in the Supplementary Materials (datasheet-1) and their percentage contents per species are illustrated in Figure 1. Recurrent proteins that bind to different metals were identified and the average percentage of unique binding proteins for the six diatoms per metal type was calculated: 2.2%, 0.01%, 6.8%, 0.01%, and 1.2% for Cd, Hg, Pb, Ba, Cr, and As, respectively. The Pb-binding proteins showed, in all the diatom proteomes, the highest content (up to 9%), followed by Cd (up to 3%), Hg, As and Ba (up to 1.9%), and Cr (less than 1%). The majority of non-EMB proteins is localized in the membrane (62%), then in the cytoplasm (12%), and the ribosome (12%). The average enzymatic content in the non-EMB proteomes of six diatom species is ~53%. The percentage of non-EMB binding enzymes in the total number of enzymes for each diatom species and their classification, based on Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers, are presented in Figure 2 and Table 2.
The most significant molecular function GO terms represented in non-EMB proteomes refer to catalytic activity (53%), transmembrane transporter activity (11%), structural constituent of ribosome (7%), and antioxidant activity (1%). The majority of the proteins that are ribosomal and involved in antioxidant activity are Pb- and Hg-binding molecules, respectively. Sixty-four percent of the enzymes are involved in metabolic processes, taking part in a complex sequence of controlled biochemical reactions (metabolic pathways) which allow diatoms to grow, maintain, and respond to environmental changes. In particular, the majority of them are involved in the production of primary metabolites lactic acid and certain amino acids (87%) and in nitrogen metabolism (87%). The rest are involved in catabolic pathways: break down of carbon compounds with release of energy used by diatom cells (17%) and in methylation (6.7%).

3.2. Essential Metal Binding (EMB) Proteome of Six Diatom Species

The identified EMB proteins (relative to the sum of Zn, Cu, Ca, Co, Fe, Mg, Mn, and Ni proteins) represent 6.2%, 5.9%, 5.6%, 4.9%, 4.7%, and 4.1% of the Fistulifera solaris, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Thalassiosira pseudonana, Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata, Fragilariopsis cylindrus, and Thalassiosira oceanica proteome, respectively. All the EMB proteins are listed in the Supplementary Materials (datasheet-2) and their percentage contents per species are illustrated in Figure 3. Recurrent proteins that bind to different metals were identified and the average percentage of unique binding proteins for the six diatoms per metal type was calculated: 2.9%, 0.08%, 0.5%, 0.0%, 1.3%, 0.9%, 0.5%, and 0.09% for Zn, Cu, Ca, Co, Fe, Mg, Mn, and As, respectively.
In all species of diatoms, the Zn-binding proteins have the highest content (up to 3%), followed by Fe (up to 1.5%), Mg (up to 1%), Mn and Ca (up to 0.5%), and Co, Cu and Ni (less than 0.1%). The majority of EMB proteins is localized in the membrane (55%) and then in the cytoplasm (11%). The average enzymatic content in the EMB proteomes of the six diatom species is ~33%. The percentage of EMB binding enzymes in the total number of enzymes for each diatom species and their classification, based on Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers, are presented in Figure 2 and Table 2. The most significant molecular function GO terms represented in EMB proteomes refer to catalytic activity (33%), molecular function regulator (2%), antioxidant activity (1.7%) and transcription regulator activity and transmembrane transporter activity (less than 1%). Eighty-four percent of the identified enzymes are involved in metabolic pathways. The majority of them is involved in the production of primary metabolites (73%), in nitrogen metabolism (66%), in catabolic pathways (11%), and in methylation and protein glycosylation (3% and 1.4%, respectively).

3.3. Non-Essential Metal Binding in Essential Metal Binding Sites in Diatom Metalloproteins

Since diatoms are microorganisms with a unique toxic metal tolerance and a mechanism that utilizes toxic metals in the catalytic site of enzymes in the absence of the associated essential metal, in this work, we attempted to discover possible EMB proteins that could bind a toxic metal. Based on the present analysis, the content of the proteins with EMB motifs that was identified in the non-EMB proteome in all six diatom proteomes ranges from 6 to 7%. Specifically, the averages of the possible binding rates of non-essential metals to each type of EMB motif in diatom proteomes are presented in pie charts in Figure 4.
Based in the present analysis, the most important diatom enzymes that share EMB and non-EMB motifs are: (i) Cu2+ transmembrane transporter and electron transfer activity (for instance plastocyanin), (ii) Ca2+ binding proteins (including Calmodulin, Phosphoinositide phospholipase C and Peptidylprolyl isomerase), and (iii) Mg2+ transmembrane transporters and Mg2+ binding proteins with catalytic activity, including transferring phosphorus-containing groups, protein kinase, and hydrolase activity.

4. Discussion

This work describes, for the first time, an in silico identification of the metalloproteome for marine diatoms, a group of phytoplankton efficient in assimilation and detoxification of toxic metal ions. The results indicate that the metalloproteome constitutes a significant proportion of the total proteome of diatoms (~13%). Specifically, in the six species of diatoms analyzed, the non-EMB proteome is significant larger than those observed for essential metals, (for instance in Thalassiosira oceanica, they are 8% and 4.1%, respectively). In EMB proteome, the Zn-binding proteins have the highest content (up to 3%), followed by Fe (up to 1.5%), Mg (up to 1%), Mn and Ca (up to 0.5%), and Co, Cu and Ni (less than 0.1%). These results are in agreement with data from other organisms: Zn-binding proteins have the highest content and constitute up to 9%, 5%, and 6% of the metalloproteome in Eukarya, Bacteria, and Archea, respectively [39]. In eukaryotes and prokaryotes, the size of the Cu proteome was below 1% [40]. The higher frequency for the Zn-binding proteins was somehow expected because Zn2+ is one of the most abundant metal ions in living organisms and it is bound to proteins or enzymes which are involved in a variety of fundamental biological processes.
In non-EMB proteome, the Pb-binding proteins showed the highest content (up to 9%), followed by Cd (up to 3%), Hg, As and Ba (up to 1.9%), and Cr (less than 1%). Τhe above non-EMB protein contents are comparable to those previously reported for Tetrahymena sp. [26,41]. Tetrahymena are ciliated protozoa that inhabit streams, lakes, and ponds and are mostly known for their use as a tool for toxicological studies and “whole-cell biosensor” (WCB) for detecting toxic metals pollution in aquatic or soil samples [26,28]. Interestingly, in diatoms, the content of enzymes is higher in non-EMB compared to EMB proteome. That means that toxic metals may be involved in large-scale metabolic processes and multiple cellular pathways. In fact, the majority of non-EMB proteins were enzymes involved in organic substances, nitrogen compounds, biosynthetic and primary diatoms metabolic processes, and the rest of them has important biological functions (including antioxidant activity and transmembrane transporter activity).
Various toxic metals ions, including Cd2+ may bind to Zn2+ and Cu2+-coordination motifs of proteins in archaeal, bacterial, and eukaryotic organisms (metallothioneins [42], zinc transporters [26,43] and proteolytic enzymes [44], RING domains of E3 ligases [45,46], superoxide dismutase [47,48], catalase [49,50], and glutathione reductase [51,52]). Also, previous studies have shown that ion sensors like calmodulin (CaM, calcium sensor) are activated effectively by other metals (i.e., Pb2+ and Ba2+), in fact with higher affinity than Ca2+ [53,54,55]. These observations could be explained, at least in part, by a similar coordination geometry for both Ca2+, Pb2+ and Ba2+ in the EF-hands of CaM, suggesting similar mechanisms when CaM is activated by different metal ions. It was proposed that the toxicity-related activation mechanism of CaM by lead may have two aspects: hyperactivation at low concentration of Pb2+ and inactivation at high concentrations, leading to the possible study of this molecule as a concentration sensitive sensor for Pb2+ [53]. According to the present study, predicted non-EMB proteins are enzymes with typical Zn-, Cu-, Ca-, Co-, Fe-, Mg-, Mn-, and Ni-binding motifs. This observation is in agreement with the remarkable ability of diatoms for the biogeochemical cycling of cadmium and their significant competitive advantage to survive in an oceanic environment poor in essential metals, but rich in toxic metals (usually Cd). Diatoms utilize Cd2+ as a catalytic metal ion in carbonic anhydrase, leading to lowest cadmium concentrations in surface water than the depths [56,57].
Our study reveals that essential metal binding motifs that could utilize non-essential metal ions belong mostly to proteins with metal ion transporter activity: Copper transporter, CaM (Ca+2-transporter), H(+)-exporting diphosphatase (Mg+2-transporter), and Transmembrane protein 163 and PHD domain-containing protein (Zn+2-transporters). These results suggest that Ca, Mg, Cu, and Zn proteins and enzymes could be involved in toxic metal homeostasis, subcellular distribution, and detoxification, after diatom’s exposure to toxic metals, since essential metal transmembrane transporters may constitute the main candidates for non-essential toxic metal uptake in diatoms.
Diatoms are excellent biological indicators, and they are used as bio-monitors of pollution. Several studies indicate that diatoms are pollutant-resistant species which varies from one species to another in response to their habitat and the types of metals they are exposed to [10]. This study reveals the order Pb2+ > Cd2+ > Hg2+ for the toxic metal binding capability of diatom proteomes. According to the literature, Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum, have been characterized as toxic metal tolerant diatom species and potential candidates for toxic metal removal applications [58,59]. Since these two diatoms have a slightly higher content of non-EMB proteins compared to the others, we can suppose that the other four diatoms (Fragilariopsis cylindrus, Thalassiosira oceanica, Fistulifera solaris, Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata) probably exhibit the same toxic metal tolerant capacity.
The volume of research work done on application of diatoms for toxic metal removal is quite sparse compared to green and blue green algae [12]. Some reports revealed possible biosorption and bioaccumulation of toxic metals by diatoms. For instance: (i) in Thalassiosira oceanica, the Cd absorption process involves Cd intake during Fe deficiency [60,61], (ii) in Thalassiosira pseudonana, Cd, Cu, and Zn absorption involves antioxidant activity, ROS scavenging [62], and (iii) in Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Cd, Pb, and Cu absorption involves phytochelatins and antioxidant enzymes [15,63,64]. Based on our results, the proteins which are involved in the experimentally reported Cd absorption of Thalassiosira oceanica are proteins with Cd-binding motif and cation transporter activity such as: the ATPase-coupled cation transmembrane transporter (HMA domain-containing protein, UniProt ID: K0SDM0), and the ion trans domain-containing protein (UniProt ID: K0S7Z5), and intracellular calcium binding receptor CaM (UniProt ID: K0T731). In Thalassiosira pseudonana, the reported Cd, Cu, and Zn absorption may be facilitated through proteins with binding motifs that could replace essential metals (Cu, Zn, and Fe) by non-essential ones (Cd) and antioxidant activity such as: Superoxide dismutase (UniProt ID: B8C2J5), Cytochrome C peroxidase (UniProt ID: B5YMA2), Ascorbate peroxidase (UniProt ID: B8CFA9), and Catalase-peroxidase (UniProt ID: B8CF21). Finally, in Phaeodactylum tricornutum, the mechanism of the reported absorption of toxic Cd and Pb may involve antioxidant enzymes with binding motifs that could substitute Fe by Cd and Pb, such as Catalase-peroxidase (UniProt ID: B5Y4Y9), Ascorbate peroxidase (UniProt ID: B7G384), and Superoxide dismutase (UniProt ID: B7FPQ3).

5. Perspectives

In the present work, metalloproteome of six species of marine diatoms: Thalassiosira pseudonana, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Fragilariopsis cylindrus, Thalassiosira oceanica, Fistulifera solaris, and Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata was analyzed. The main outcomes are the discovery of possible molecular linkages between metalloproteome of diatoms and (i) their cellular machinery for the toxic metal bioaccumulation, homeostasis, and detoxification after diatom’s exposure to toxic metals, (ii) their intracellular metabolic activities, and (iii) the unique adaptation of diatoms to marine life in essential metal-poor environments. As the published research on proteome level regarding the application of diatoms for toxic metal removal is limited, this work and the provided list of diatom metalloproteins could be useful for future studies related to individual metal binding enzymes of various diatoms and offer insights useful for metabolic engineering efforts for biotechnological production of strains with high-toxic metal removal performing. Moreover, these results are of interest in ecotoxicology, where the mechanisms underlying the metal tolerance in marine diatoms remain a matter of research. The discovering of novel natural or artificial bio-chelators of toxic metals would broaden the spectrum of their metal binding affinity and consequently the collection of metal contaminants in polluted water by diatoms as transgenic plants are not able to do so without soil. Furthermore, the optimization of metal recovery by diatoms could be even used to recover raw materials from wastewater, reducing the cost of their purification.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded online. datasheet-1 (non-EMB proteome), datasheet-2 (EMB proteome).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.T.C. and M.P.; methodology, C.T.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.T.C.; input, M.P. and V.B.; visualization, C.T.C. and M.P.; writing—review and editing: C.T.C. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Pelucelli, A.; Zoroddu, M.A. An updated overview on metal nanoparticles toxicity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021, 76, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. Exp. Suppl. 2012, 101, 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Khan, S.; Cao, Q.; Zheng, Y.M.; Huang, Y.Z.; Zhu, Y.G. Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 152, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fu, F.; Wang, Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 407–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peana, M.; Pelucelli, A.; Medici, S.; Cappai, R.; Nurchi, V.M.; Zoroddu, M.A. Metal Toxicity and Speciation: A Review. Curr. Med. Chem. 2021, 28, 7190–7208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brar Satinder, K.; Verma, M.; Surampalli, R.Y.; Misra, K.; Tyagi, R.D.; Meunier, N.; Blais, J.F. Bioremediation of Hazardous Wastes—A Review. Pract. Period. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste Manag. 2006, 10, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ayangbenro, A.; Babalola, O. A New Strategy for Heavy Metal Polluted Environments: A Review of Microbial Biosorbents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, W.; Liu, X.; Sun, P.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H.; Hong, M.; Mao, Z.-W.; Zhao, J. Simple Whole-Cell Biodetection and Bioremediation of Heavy Metals Based on an Engineered Lead-Specific Operon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 3363–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kiran Marella, T.; Saxena, A.; Tiwari, A. Diatom mediated heavy metal remediation: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 305, 123068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sethi, D.; Butler, T.O.; Shuhaili, F.; Vaidyanathan, S. Diatoms for Carbon Sequestration and Bio-Based Manufacturing. Biology 2020, 9, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lin, Z.; Li, J.; Luan, Y.; Dai, W. Application of algae for heavy metal adsorption: A 20-year meta-analysis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, J.; Zhou, B.; Chen, F.; Pan, K. How marine diatoms cope with metal challenge: Insights from the morphotype-dependent metal tolerance in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tesson, B.; Genet, M.J.; Fernandez, V.; Degand, S.; Rouxhet, P.G.; Martin-Jézéquel, V. Surface Chemical Composition of Diatoms. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 2011–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hernández-Ávila, J.; Salinas-Rodríguez, E.; Cerecedo-Sáenz, E.; Reyes-Valderrama, M.; Arenas-Flores, A.; Román-Gutiérrez, A.; Rodríguez-Lugo, V. Diatoms and Their Capability for Heavy Metal Removal by Cationic Exchange. Metals 2017, 7, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zoroddu, M.A.; Aaseth, J.; Crisponi, G.; Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M. The essential metals for humans: A brief overview. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 195, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, C.-S.; Liang, J.-R.; Lin, Q.; Li, C.; Bowler, C.; Anderson, D.M.; Wang, P.; Wang, X.-W.; Gao, Y.-H. Cellular Responses Associated with ROS Production and Cell Fate Decision in Early Stress Response to Iron Limitation in the Diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 5510–5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lane, N. Marine microbiology: Origins of Death. Nature 2008, 453, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chung, C.C.; Hwang, S.P.; Chang, J. Cooccurrence of ScDSP gene expression, cell death, and DNA fragmentation in a marine diatom, Skeletonema costatum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8744–8751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Huang, W.; Daboussi, F. Genetic and metabolic engineering in diatoms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2017, 372, 20160411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fernández, M.R.; Martín, G.; Corzo, J.; de la Linde, A.; García, E.; López, M.; Sousa, M. Design and Testing of a New Diatom-Based Index for Heavy Metal Pollution. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2017, 74, 170–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pandey, L.K.; Kumar, D.; Yadav, A.; Rai, J.; Gaur, J.P. Morphological abnormalities in periphytic diatoms as a tool for biomonitoring of heavy metal pollution in a river. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.-W.; Huang, L.; Ji, P.-Y.; Chen, C.-P.; Li, X.-S.; Gao, Y.-H.; Liang, J.-R. Using a mixture of wastewater and seawater as the growth medium for wastewater treatment and lipid production by the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 289, 121681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tiwari, A.; Marella, T.K. Potential and Application of Diatoms for Industry-Specific Wastewater Treatment. In Application of Microalgae in Wastewater Treatment; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bozarth, A.; Maier, U.-G.; Zauner, S. Diatoms in biotechnology: Modern tools and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chasapis, C.T.; Andreini, C.; Georgiopolou, A.K.; Stefanidou, M.E.; Vlamis-Gardikas, A. Identification of the zinc, copper and cadmium metalloproteome of the protozoon Tetrahymena thermophila by systematic bioinformatics. Arch. Microbiol. 2017, 199, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Peana, M.; Chasapis, C.T.; Simula, G.; Medici, S.; Zoroddu, M.A. A Model for Manganese interaction with Deinococcus radiodurans proteome network involved in ROS response and defense. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2018, 50, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Stefanidou, M.; Loutsidou, A.C.; Chasapis, C.T.; Spiliopoulou, C.A. Immunotoxicity of Cocaine and Crack. Curr. Drug Abus. Rev. 2011, 4, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Andreini, C.; Bertini, I.; Cavallaro, G.; Decaria, L.; Rosato, A. A Simple Protocol for the Comparative Analysis of the Structure and Occurrence of Biochemical Pathways Across Superkingdoms. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chasapis, C.T. Interactions between metal binding viral proteins and human targets as revealed by network-based bioinformatics. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2018, 186, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Putignano, V.; Rosato, A.; Banci, L.; Andreini, C. MetalPDB in 2018: A database of metal sites in biological macromolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D459–D464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bateman, A.; Martin, M.-J.; Orchard, S.; Magrane, M.; Agivetova, R.; Ahmad, S.; Alpi, E.; Bowler-Barnett, E.H.; Britto, R.; Bursteinas, B.; et al. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D480–D489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L.J.; et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Finn, R.D.; Clements, J.; Eddy, S.R. HMMER web server: Interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W29–W37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bindea, G.; Mlecnik, B.; Hackl, H.; Charoentong, P.; Tosolini, M.; Kirilovsky, A.; Fridman, W.-H.; Pagès, F.; Trajanoski, Z.; Galon, J. ClueGO: A Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1091–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Shannon, P. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kanehisa, M. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Andreini, C.; Banci, L.; Bertini, I.; Rosato, A. Zinc through the Three Domains of Life. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 3173–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Andreini, C.; Banci, L.; Bertini, I.; Rosato, A. Occurrence of Copper Proteins through the Three Domains of Life: A Bioinformatic Approach. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chasapis, C.T. Preliminary results from structural systems biology approach in Tetrahymena thermophila reveal novel perspectives for this toxicological model. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 201, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Freisinger, E.; Vašák, M. Cadmium in Metallothioneins. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2013, 11, 339–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chmielowska-Bak, J.; Gzyl, J.; Rucinska-Sobkowiak, R.; Arasimowicz-Jelonek, M.; Deckert, J. The new insights into cadmium sensing. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dalkas, G.A.; Chasapis, C.T.; Gkazonis, P.V.; Bentrop, D.; Spyroulias, G.A. Conformational Dynamics of the Anthrax Lethal Factor Catalytic Center. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 10767–10769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Birkou, M.; Chasapis, C.T.; Marousis, K.D.; Loutsidou, A.K.; Bentrop, D.; Lelli, M.; Herrmann, T.; Carthy, J.M.; Episkopou, V.; Spyroulias, G.A. A Residue Specific Insight into the Arkadia E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity and Conformational Plasticity. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 2373–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chasapis, C.T.; Loutsidou, A.K.; Orkoula, M.G.; Spyroulias, G.A. Zinc Binding Properties of Engineered RING Finger Domain of Arkadia E3 Ubiquitin Ligase. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2010, 2010, 323152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Polykretis, P.; Cencetti, F.; Donati, C.; Luchinat, E.; Banci, L. Cadmium effects on superoxide dismutase 1 in human cells revealed by NMR. Redox Biol. 2019, 21, 101102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bailey, D.B.; Ellis, P.D.; Fee, J.A. Cadmium-113 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of cadmium-substituted derivatives of bovine superoxide dismutase. Biochemistry 2002, 19, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, R.; Liu, R.; Chen, Y. Molecular mechanism on cadmium-induced activity changes of catalase and superoxide dismutase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 77, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, Y.-Q.; Liu, G.-D.; Hou, C.-C.; Han, Y.-L.; Zhu, J.-Q. Effect of cadmium exposure on antioxidant enzyme catalase in different tissues of Acrossocheilus fasciatus. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2016, 12, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Buono, D.; Mimmo, T.; Terzano, R.; Tomasi, N.; Cesco, S. Effect of cadmium on antioxidative enzymes, glutathione content, and glutathionylation in tall fescue. Biol. Plant. 2014, 58, 773–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zeng, G.; Qu, D.; Gu, J.; Zhou, M.; Chai, L. Cadmium-induced oxidative stress and response of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in Bechmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. Chemosphere 2007, 69, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kursula, P.; Majava, V. A structural insight into lead neurotoxicity and calmodulin activation by heavy metals. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 2007, 63, 653–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Richardt, G.; Federolf, G.; Habermann, E. Affinity of heavy metal ions to intracellular Ca2+-binding proteins. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1986, 35, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ouyang, H.; Vogel, H.J. Metal ion binding to calmodulin: NMR and fluorescence studies. BioMetals 1998, 11, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, Y.; Feng, L.; Jeffrey, P.D.; Shi, Y.; Morel, F.M.M. Structure and metal exchange in the cadmium carbonic anhydrase of marine diatoms. Nature 2008, 452, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Boyle, E.A.; Sclater, F.; Edmond, J.M. On the marine geochemistry of cadmium. Nature 1976, 263, 42–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rijstenbil, J.W.; Derksen, J.W.M.; Gerringa, L.J.A.; Poortvliet, T.C.W.; Sandee, A.; van den Berg, M.; van Drie, J.; Wijnholds, J.A. Oxidative stress induced by copper: Defense and damage in the marine planktonic diatom Ditylum brightwellii, grown in continuous cultures with high and low zinc levels. Mar. Biol. 1994, 119, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Torres, E.; Cid, A.; Herrero, C.; Abalde, J. Removal of cadmium ions by the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin accumulation and long-term kinetics of uptake. Bioresour. Technol. 1998, 63, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Loix, C.; Huybrechts, M.; Vangronsveld, J.; Gielen, M.; Keunen, E.; Cuypers, A. Reciprocal Interactions between Cadmium-Induced Cell Wall Responses and Oxidative Stress in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lane, E.S.; Jang, K.; Cullen, J.T.; Maldonado, M.T. The interaction between inorganic iron and cadmium uptake in the marine diatom Thalassiosira oceanica. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2008, 53, 1784–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Łukowski, A.; Dec, D. Influence of Zn, Cd, and Cu fractions on enzymatic activity of arable soils. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2018, 190, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Morelli, E.; Scarano, G. Copper-induced changes of non-protein thiols and antioxidant enzymes in the marine microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Morelli, E.; Scarano, G. Synthesis and stability of phytochelatins induced by cadmium and lead in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mar. Environ. Res. 2001, 52, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The percentage content of non-EMB proteins in the proteomes of the six diatoms analyzed.
Figure 1. The percentage content of non-EMB proteins in the proteomes of the six diatoms analyzed.
Molecules 27 00378 g001
Figure 2. The percentage of metal binding enzymes in the total number of enzymes for the six diatom species analyzed.
Figure 2. The percentage of metal binding enzymes in the total number of enzymes for the six diatom species analyzed.
Molecules 27 00378 g002
Figure 3. The percentage content of EMB proteins in the proteomes of the six diatoms studied in the present work.
Figure 3. The percentage content of EMB proteins in the proteomes of the six diatoms studied in the present work.
Molecules 27 00378 g003
Figure 4. Average protein overlaps between EMB-proteome (for Cu, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Zn) and non-EMB proteome for the six diatom species studied.
Figure 4. Average protein overlaps between EMB-proteome (for Cu, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Zn) and non-EMB proteome for the six diatom species studied.
Molecules 27 00378 g004
Table 1. UniProt IDs and proteome size of the six species of diatoms studied.
Table 1. UniProt IDs and proteome size of the six species of diatoms studied.
Proteome IDOrganismStrainNumber of Proteins Number of Characterized
Proteins in UniProt Database
UP000198406Fistulifera solarisJPCC DA058020.31910.169
UP000095751Fragilariopsis cylindrusCCMP110218.0757.692
UP000000759Phaeodactylum tricornutumCCAP 1055/110.46510.447
UP000001449Thalassiosira pseudonanaCCMP133511.7186.672
UP000266841Thalassiosira oceanicaCCMP100534.4316.681
UP000291116Pseudo-nitzschia multistriataB85611.9074.108
Table 2. Classes of the enzymes and their average % content in non-EMB and EMB in proteomes of the six diatom species studied in this work.
Table 2. Classes of the enzymes and their average % content in non-EMB and EMB in proteomes of the six diatom species studied in this work.
Enzyme ClassE.C NumberAverage % Content
EMB ProteomeNon-EMB Proteome
Oxidoreductases1136
Transferases 22419
Hydrolases 33027
Lyases 462.5
Isomerases52.42
Ligases 650
Translocases73.40
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chasapis, C.T.; Peana, M.; Bekiari, V. Structural Identification of Metalloproteomes in Marine Diatoms, an Efficient Algae Model in Toxic Metals Bioremediation. Molecules 2022, 27, 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020378

AMA Style

Chasapis CT, Peana M, Bekiari V. Structural Identification of Metalloproteomes in Marine Diatoms, an Efficient Algae Model in Toxic Metals Bioremediation. Molecules. 2022; 27(2):378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020378

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chasapis, Christos T., Massimiliano Peana, and Vlasoula Bekiari. 2022. "Structural Identification of Metalloproteomes in Marine Diatoms, an Efficient Algae Model in Toxic Metals Bioremediation" Molecules 27, no. 2: 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020378

APA Style

Chasapis, C. T., Peana, M., & Bekiari, V. (2022). Structural Identification of Metalloproteomes in Marine Diatoms, an Efficient Algae Model in Toxic Metals Bioremediation. Molecules, 27(2), 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27020378

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop