Next Article in Journal
Bader’s Topological Bond Path Does Not Necessarily Indicate Stabilizing Interaction—Proof Studies Based on the Ng@[3n]cyclophane Endohedral Complexes
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Mixed Chitin Esters via Acylation of Chitin in Deep Eutectic Solvents
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Bis-Chalcones and Evaluation of Its Effect on Peroxide-Induced Cell Death and Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cytokine Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
N-, O- and S-Heterocycles Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 17
10.3390/molecules28176338
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nickel-Imidazolium Low Transition Temperature Mixtures with Lewis-Acidic Character

by
Mario Martos
and
Isidro M. Pastor
*
Institute of Organic Synthesis, University of Alicante, ctra. San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(17), 6338; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176338
Submission received: 26 July 2023 / Revised: 16 August 2023 / Accepted: 19 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Reactions in Deep Eutectic Solvents)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Low transition temperature mixtures (LTTMs) are a new generation of solvents that have found extensive application in organic synthesis. The interactions between the components often generate highly activated, catalytically active species, thus opening the possibility of using LTTMs as catalysts, rather than solvents. In this work, we introduce a nickel-based imidazolium LTTM, study its thermal behavior and explore its catalytic activity in the solvent-free allylation of heterocycles with allylic alcohols. This system is effective in this reaction, affording the corresponding products in excellent yield without the need for additional purifications, thus resulting in a very environmentally friendly protocol.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the last three decades, increasing concern about the impact of human activity in nature has led scientists to experience a shift towards more sustainable processes. Within organic chemistry, commonly used volatile organic solvents (VOS) have been a particularly important field of study as they constitute the main component of every reaction by weight [1]. Volatility, toxicity, flammability and low biodegradability are the main concerns being voiced; therefore, since the mid-1990s, the field of alternative solvents has been experiencing massive growth [2]. In this way, water, supercritical fluids, perfluorinated solvents, ionic liquids or biomass-derived substances have all been studied as potential replacements for VOS [2,3]. However, drawbacks related to the solubilization of hydrophobic compounds, reactivity, potential toxicity and the cost of operation have ultimately prevented any of these from displacing VOS as commodity solvents [2]. In the early 2000s, Abbott and coworkers introduced Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES) as a new breed of highly tunable and renewable solvents. According to their original definition, DES were combinations of two or more components which interact in a way that causes a depression in the melting point of the mixture [4]. This component-based definition was later revised by Coutinho and coworkers, who proposed a new definition of DES based on the non-ideality of the mixture, i.e., the experimental depression in the melting point being significantly more pronounced than the theoretical ideal value [5]. At present, the term Low Transition Temperature Mixtures (LTTMs) is used to refer to low-melting mixtures in general, including every type of DES [6].
LTTMs have been used as reaction media for a broad range of transformations, including cross-coupling reactions [7], C-H activation reactions [8], asymmetric organocatalysis [9,10], photochemistry [11], the addition of organometallic compounds [12,13] and the synthesis of heterocycles [14]. In addition, many LTTMs (such as those based on metal halides combined with organic salts or with organocatalytic scaffolds) are intrinsically active, serving as both promoters and reaction media [15,16]. In this sense, some LTTMs have been used in catalytic amount to promote reactions in solventless conditions, which contributes further to reducing the environmental impact of synthetic protocols [17].
In this work, we report a novel LTTM based on nickel chloride and 1-methoxycarbonylmethy-3-methylimidazolium chloride (mcmimCl). Nickel-based LTTMs have been extensively studied in several fields, such as in liquid crystals, as many of them present a long-range order visible through polarized optic microscopy (POM) [18,19]. In addition, many nickel salts exhibit thermochromism in the presence of humidity, due to the reversible formation of deep blue tetrachloronickelate(II) anions and halogen-bridged octahedral anions [20]. Regarding catalysis, the application of Ni-LTTMs to this field is somewhat limited, with only a few examples reporting their use for the oxygen evolution reaction [21], nitroarene reduction [22], dehydration of sugars [23], cross-coupling [24] and multicomponent reactions [25]. Herein, we present a study on the formation, structure and properties of nickel-mcmimCl LTTMs, as well as a study of their catalytic activity in allylation reactions using alcohols as substrates. Sustainability metrics (E-factor, stoichiometric factor, atom economy, Andraos’ reaction mass efficiency, materials recovery parameter and EcoScale) have been calculated to unbiasedly assess the environmental impact of the methodology.

2. Results and Discussion

Our choice of imidazolium salt was based on our previous experience with imidazolium LTTMs. We found that monocarboxy-imidazolium salts performed the best for the formation of low-melting mixtures [26], while being significantly more biodegradable than their dialkylimidazolium counterparts [27,28]. Thus, we combined mcmimCl with anhydrous nickel(II) chloride in several molar proportions, obtaining deep blue liquids which were then analyzed through differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), obtaining the traces compiled in Figure 1.
As evidenced by the traces, in most cases, the mixtures do not present any significant thermal events other than glass transitions (Figure 1, panels a–d), the exception being the 4:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture, which exhibits an exothermic event (onset 66.9 °C) immediately followed by an endothermic event (Figure 1e). This behavior is consistent with a supercooled mixture, in which the molten phase becomes metastable due to slow phase change kinetics [29]. This could be the reason why none of the other mixtures present any events save from glass transitions.
The striking deep blue color observed upon mixing and heating the samples reveals the presence of the tetrachloronickelate (NiCl42−) anion, the formation of which is also the likely cause for the melting point depression of these LTTMs (Figure 2a). Tetrahalometallates of copper, nickel or cobalt are well-known for their tendency to form liquid crystals with a long-range order, which are of interest in ion-conductive and optic materials [19]. Thus, we decided to study the stoichiometric mixture (2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2) in more detail.
First, we performed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments, which confirmed the presence of the NiCl42− anion in the mixture (Figure 2b). From the obtained results, the interaction between the components seems to be complete and homogeneous, as both the nickel and chlorine surveys show a single species of each (Figures S19–S21, Supplementary Information).
We then subjected the 2:1 mixture to further DSC analysis using a much slower temperature gradient of 2 °C/min for both cooling and heating to mitigate the effect of the slow phase change kinetics, obtaining the trace shown in Figure 3.
In this case, three thermal events are apparent in the trace: two overlapped endothermic events (onset 56 °C and 80 °C, respectively, with a total enthalpy of 76.4 J/g) and a subtle exothermic event at 108 °C, with an enthalpy of 16.9 J/g. This pattern is unconventional for typical LTTMs, which tend to show a single melting event. It is, however, similar to the thermal behavior reported for some liquid crystals, which often show multiple events in DSC corresponding to transitions to semi-ordered mesophases [19]. In this case, the first event would be then attributed to the fusion of the crystallized mixture—as no glass transitions are apparent during the heating cycle—which is overlapped with a much larger peak corresponding to the transition to a semi-ordered liquid state. The final event would correspond to the formation of an isocratic liquid.
Thus, we decided to study the mixture through POM upon cooling from the isocratic state at 150 °C. However, we were only able to observe the formation of crystals from the homogeneous isocratic mixture. This is probably due to the very narrow interval of temperatures in which the ordered phase exists (15 °C at a cooling rate of 2 °C/min), which may result in immediate solidification into crystals upon entering an ordered state.
At this point, we shifted our attention to potential applications of these systems in catalysis. We were particularly interested in Lewis acidic catalysis, based on our previous experience with metal-imidazolium LTTMs. Allyl compounds and indoles are biologically relevant motifs [30,31,32]. Thus, we selected the allylation of heterocycles with allylic alcohols as a benchmark to assess the efficacy of the nickel-based imidazolium salt LTTMs, taking the same reaction conditions for comparison. This reaction, which has been studied with different Lewis acidic catalysts, proceeds through an SN1 mechanism in which the catalytic system activates the alcohol and/or the nucleophile. Thus, indole was combined with (E)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-ene-1-ol, in a 1:1 molar ratio, for 2 h at 80 °C in the absence of a solvent, obtaining the results described in Table 1.
Using just 5 mol% of 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 we observed a full conversion to the product after the reaction time had elapsed (Table 1, entry 1). In an attempt to decrease the amount of materials used, we tested the 1:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture as well, obtaining the same results (Table 1, entry 2). An inconvenient trait of the assayed mixtures is their marked hygroscopic character, which requires careful manipulation and storage under an inert atmosphere to avoid hydration. Thus, we considered the possibility of testing a 1:1 mixture of mcmimCl and nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate. This mixture, of an intense green color, presents thermochromic behavior arising from the displacement of the aquo ligands caused by chloride, forming deep-blue tetrachloronickelate anions. Upon cooling, the mixture transitions from blue-back to green, then slowly to yellow, due to the formation of halogen-bridged hydrated polymeric octahedral anions (Figure S46, Supplementary Information). This behavior is fully reversible and consistent with the reports in the literature [33,34]. For this particular mixture, the dehydration of the nickel begins at around 45 °C (Figure S18, Supplementary Information); thus, at the reaction temperature and considering the small amount of LTTM used, the mixture should be essentially equal to the anhydrous mixture. Indeed, we obtained the product in quantitative conversion, and due to the high efficacy of the catalyst, the use of stoichiometric reagents and the absence of solvents, we were able to isolate 1 in quantitative yield by adding a small amount of ethyl acetate (a sustainable solvent) and filtering off the LTTM (Table 1, entry 6). A visual inspection of the reaction vessel confirmed our theory, as a deep blue liquid was present at the end of the reaction. The LTTM interaction clearly has a very important role in the catalytic performance of the system, as the individual components were not able to promote the reaction to the same degree or at all (Table 1, entries 4 to 6).
Encouraged by our good results, we decided to continue assessing the catalytic performance of the system by assaying several differently substituted heterocycles, obtaining the results described in Scheme 1.
In general terms, the LTTM showed an excellent performance, affording the allylation products in excellent to quantitative yields. The indoles reacted exclusively at the C-3 position and did not require any sort of protecting group. The electronic effects did not seem to significantly influence the outcome of the reaction, as differently substituted indoles were obtained in comparable yield, although some less electron-rich substrates took longer to fully react. Interestingly, even severely sterically hindered indoles reacted smoothly (Scheme 1, compounds 3 and 4). The protocol was extended to other heterocycles, which selectively reacted at the nitrogen. Triazole gave good results, as did 5-phenyltetrazole (Scheme 1, compounds 10 and 11). Carbazole, a challenging substrate, reacted smoothly to afford compound 12 in quantitative yield after filtration, as did 3,6-dichlorocarbazole (Scheme 1, compound 13). Remarkably, this nickel-LTTM was able promote the allylation of electron-rich benzenes, such as 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, obtaining the product in excellent yield (Scheme 1, compound 14). Compounds 1 to 12 were obtained as sufficiently pure after just filtering off the catalyst, which results in a very environmentally friendly protocol.
Recyclability is one of the most important aspects of heterogeneous catalysts and further contributes to reducing the impact of synthetic methodologies. Thus, we set up the synthesis of 1 once more. After the reaction time had elapsed, a small amount of ethyl acetate was used to remove the product, with the insoluble LTTM remaining in the vessel, which was then reloaded with fresh starting materials. In this way, we were able to reuse the catalyst three times without any loss of activity. To determine the stability of the catalyst, an additional cycle was carried out after leaving the catalyst exposed to air (at 30 °C with relative humidity of >50%) overnight. The LTTM remained in its yellow polymeric form and was still able to afford product 1 in quantitative conversion (Figure 4). A visual inspection of the vessel after the reaction confirmed a transition back to the blue tetrachloronickelate form, thus confirming the robustness of the nickel-imidazolium LTTM.
We then decided to calculate the sustainability metrics to assess the impact of the methodology and to compare it with the established protocols reported in the literature. Taking the synthesis of compound 1 as a model reaction, the E-factor was calculated and the yields (Y), atom economy (AE), reaction mass efficiency (RMEAndraos), materials recovery parameter (MRP) and stoichiometric factors (SF) were combined into a vector magnitude ratio (VMR, range 0–1) for quick comparison (see Supplementary Information for the equations used and any additional considerations) [35]. In addition, the qualitative aspects of the processes were assessed by means of the EcoScale [36], obtaining the results described in Table 2 and Figure 5.
In general terms, the protocol using the 1:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2·6H2O mixture has better sustainability metrics than the comparable methodologies reported in the literature. The E-factor sits second lowest of the purification-free methods due to the use of neat conditions (Table 1, entry 1), and is firmly within the desirable range for the production of bulk chemicals [42]. The material efficiency metrics, measured by the VMR, are comparable to the rest of the methodologies, although this is mainly due to them having similar values of yields, a similar stoichiometric factor and the exact same atom economy. As these three are the largest values of the VMR, they exert a buffer effect over the calculation. Looking at the RME, our methodology sits third best overall, with a value of 20.1% (Table S2). Regarding the EcoScale, this protocol obtains a score of 79, with the main penalty coming from the use of nickel. Nevertheless, the value is classified as excellent according to the scoring system proposed by the authors [36].
It should be mentioned that, although the methodology using bcmimCl has slightly better metrics for this particular reaction, the nickel-imidazolium LTTM catalyst results in higher yields in general (particularly noticeable with difficult substrates, such as 2-phenylindole or carbazole) [37], and its high activity enables the use of other substrates, such as 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, which are incompatible with the bcmimCl protocol. Consequently, the nickel-based Lewis acid catalyst described herein exhibits not only comparable metrics to the best previously reported methodologies, but also greater robustness in terms of its recyclability and activity.

3. Materials and Methods

All reagents and solvents used are commercially available (Acros (Waltham, MA, USA), Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), Fluorochem (Glossop, UK), Fluka (Freehold, NJ, USA), Merck (Darmstadt, Germany)) and were used without further purification. DSC experiments were carried out at the Thermal Analysis and Porous Solids unit of the Research Technical Services of the University of Alicante (SSTTI-UA) with TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA) Q250 differential scanning calorimeter. Samples were analyzed in sealed aluminum crucibles under nitrogen atmosphere. NMR spectra were recorded at the NMR Unit of the SSTTI-UA using Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) AV300 Oxford, AV400 and Avance Neo 400 solution-state NMR spectrometers. 1H spectra were recorded at 300 or 400 MHz, whereas 13C spectra were recorded at 75 or 100 MHz. The solvent used was deuterated chloroform (CDCl3), with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) are provided in ppm and coupling constants (J) are reported in hertz (Hz). Low-resolution mass spectra of the compounds were recorded on an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, USA) 5973 Network mass spectrometer equipped with a 70 eV electronic impact (EI) ionization source and a quadrupolar mass detector operating in single ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Samples were introduced through an Agilent 6890N gas chromatography instrument equipped with a Technokroma TRB-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm), using helium as the mobile phase. Fragmentations are reported according to their mass to charge ratio (m/z), along with their relative intensity in parenthesis. XPS analyses were carried out at the X-ray unit of the SSTTI-UA with a Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) K-Alpha instrument using a monochrome Al K-α X-ray source.

3.1. Procedure for the Preparation of 1-(Methoxycarbonylmethyl)-3-methylimidazolium Chloride (mcmimCl)

In a glass round bottom flask, methylimidazole (40 mmol, 3.2 mL) and methyl chloroacetate (40 mmol, 3.5 mL) were combined. The mixture was sonicated for 1 h, causing the formation of a dense white solid. The product was crushed with 10 mL of diethyl ether, which was then decanted off. After drying, 7.5 g of pure mcmimCl was obtained (98% yield).

3.2. Procedure for the Preparation of the McmimCl:xNiCl2·(6H2O) Mixtures

In a glass vial, mcmimCl (1 mmol, 190 mg) was combined with a suitable amount of nickel precursor. A magnet was then added and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C until homogeneous (around 1 h). For mixtures containing anhydrous NiCl2, argon was added to the flask to protect the LTTM from moisture.

3.3. General Procedure for the Allylation of Heterocycles Promoted by Ni-imidazolium LTTMs

In a glass microwave tube, Ni-LTTM (5 mol%, 5 mg (hydrated) or 4 mg (anhydrous)), (E)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-ene-1-ol (0.25 mmol, 53 mg) and indole (1 equivalent) were added. The mixture was stirred at 80 °C until completion (monitored by GC-MS). After the reaction was completed, 0.5 mL of ethyl acetate was used to remove the product, which was then filtered through a pad of cotton and magnesium sulfate. After washing the pad with an additional 0.5 mL, removing the solvent under vacuum afforded the pure allylation products (1 to 12). In the case of products 13 and 14, some excess starting material remained, so the yields were calculated through NMR.

3.4. Spectral Data of Compounds 1 to 14

  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-1H-indole (1) [37,41]: Yellow oil, obtained pure, 99% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 7.97 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.52 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 7.45–7.28 (m, 12H, CHAr), 7.11 (ddd, J = 8.1, 7.1, 0.8 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.94 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.80 (dd, J = 15.9, 7.4 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.52 (br d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.20 (br d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 143.5, 137.7, 136.8, 132.7, 130.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 127.3, 126.9, 126.5, 126.5, 122.8, 122.2, 119.9, 119.5, 118.8, 111.3, 46.4; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 310 (M+ + 1, 24), 309 (M+, 100), 308 (M+ − 1, 39), 294 (10), 232 (36), 230 (16), 218 (16), 217 (17), 206 (28), 204 (17), 202 (8), 192 (15), 191 (16), 130 (18), 115 (17).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (2) [37]: Yellow oil, obtained pure, 98% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 7.52–7.49 (m, 1H, CHAr), 7.45–7.24 (m, 12H, CHAr), 7.09 (ddd, J = 8.0, 6.9, 1.1 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.84 (s, 1H, CHN), 6.80 (dd, J = 16.0, 7.4 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.52 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.19 (br d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, C=CCH), 3.78 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 143.7, 137.6, 137.5, 132.8, 130.5, 128.6, 128.5, 127.5, 127.3, 127.3, 126.5, 126.4, 121.7, 120.1, 119.0, 117.2, 109.3, 46.3, 32.8; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 324 (M+ + 1, 25), 323 (M+, 100), 322 (M+ − 1, 36), 247 (9), 246 (45), 244 (9), 232 (14), 231 (9), 220 (28), 219 (8), 218 (12), 217 (8), 204 (8), 192 (11), 191 (16), 144 (27), 131 (8), 122 (10), 115 (11).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-2-methyl-1H-indole (3) [37,41]: Yellow oil, obtained pure, 92% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 7.63 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.28–7.24 (m, 5H, CHAr), 7.19–7.14 (m, 6H, CHAr), 7.12–7.09 (m, 2H, CHAr) 6.99 (ddd, J = 8.1, 7.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.88 (ddd, J = 8.1, 7.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.74 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.32 (dd, J = 15.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.05 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, C=CCH), 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 143.6, 137.7, 135.5, 132.3, 131.7, 130.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.4, 128.1, 127.2, 126.4, 126.2, 121.0, 119.5, 119.4, 112.9, 110.4, 45.2, 12.5; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 324 (M+ + 1, 26), 323 (M+, 100), 322 (M+ − 1, 20), 309 (17), 308 (69), 246 (28), 244 (10), 232 (15), 231 (12), 230 (21), 220 (15), 218 (29), 217 (20), 202 (9), 192 (11), 191 (27), 144 (29), 131 (10), 130 (10), 115 (17).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-2-phenyl-1H-indole (4) [37]: Yellow oil, obtained pure, 98% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 8.11 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.62–7.59 (m, 2H, CHAr), 7.55–7.50 (m, 3H, CHAr), 7.48–7.41 (m, 6H, CHAr), 7.37–7.33 (m, 4H, CHAr), 7.28–7.24 (m, 3H, CHAr) 7.09 (ddd, J = 8.1, 7.1, 1.0 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.99 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.3 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.50 (dd, J = 15.8, 1.0 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.38 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 143.6, 137.6, 136.3, 135.7, 133.0, 132.4, 131.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.4, 128.1, 128.0, 127.2, 126.4, 126.2, 122.2, 121.3, 119.8, 113.9, 111.1, 45.3.; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 386 (M+ + 1, 31), 385 (M+, 100), 384 (M+ − 1, 19), 341 (22), 331 (16), 309 (12), 308 (46), 306 (17), 304 (11), 295 (26), 294 (97), 292 (9), 291 (11), 280 (18), 278 (8), 230 (14), 218 (9), 217 (13), 205 (8), 204 (23), 203 (8), 202 (9), 194 (9), 193 (45), 192 (22), 191 (22), 189 (8), 178 (9), 176 (7), 165 (14), 153 (9), 152 (10), 146 (10), 115 (9).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-9-ethyl-1H-indole (5) [37]: Reddish oil, obtained pure, 99% yield; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δH = 7.95 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.50–7.30 (m, 11H, CHAr), 7.14–7.11 (m, 2H, CHAr), 6.94 (dd, J = 2.4, 0.7 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.86 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.58 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.24 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H, C=CCH), 2.93 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 1.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 143.6, 137.6, 135.6, 132.8, 130.6, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 127.2, 126.7, 126.6, 126.4, 122.4, 120.7, 119.8, 119.2, 117.7, 46.4, 24.0, 13.9.; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 338 (M+ + 1, 26), 337 (M+, 100), 336 (M+ − 1, 32), 308 (23), 281 (10) 261 (7), 260 (34), 235 (7), 234 (27), 231 (9), 230 (19), 218 (9), 217 (13), 204 (9), 192 (13), 191 (21), 158 (17), 115 (11).
  • (E)-4-Bromo-3-(1,3-diphenylallyl)-1H-indole (6) [37]: Faint yellow oil, obtained pure, 98% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 8.08 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.43–7.25 (m, 12H, CHAr), 7.07–7.03 (m, 1H, CHAr), 6.94 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.81 (dd, J = 15.9, 6.6 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.32 (dd, J = 15.9, 1.4 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.99 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 144.0, 137.9, 137.7, 133.9, 130.8, 129.1, 128.6, 128.3, 127.2, 126.4, 126.3, 125.0, 124.9, 124.5, 123.1, 119.2, 114.6, 110.7, 44.9.; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 390 (M+ + 3, 25), 389 (M+ + 2, 99), 388 (M+ + 1, 43), 387 (M+, 100), 386 (M+ − 1, 19), 312 (25), 311 (8), 310 (30), 309 (13), 308 (40), 307 (11), 306 (14), 298 (9), 296 (9), 286 (23), 284 (27), 231 (17), 230 (38), 229 (7), 228 (9), 217 (36), 210 (21), 208 (26), 205 (10), 204 (29), 203 (12), 202 (14), 192 (36), 191 (37), 189 (8), 177 (8), 176 (10).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-5-methoxy-1H-indole (7) [37]: Brownish oil, obtained pure, 99% yield; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 7.98 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.43–7.25 (m, 11H, CHAr), 6.90–6.87 (m, 3H, CHAr), 6.77 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.3 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.50 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.13 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, C=CCH), 3.76 (s, 3H, OCH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 153.8, 143.4, 137.5, 132.5, 131.9, 130.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.5, 127.3, 127.2, 126.4, 126.3, 123.5, 118.3, 112.2, 111.9, 101.8, 55.8, 46.3; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 340 (M+ + 1, 25), 339 (M+, 100), 338 (M+ − 1, 32), 324 (11), 308 (11), 263 (9), 262 (34), 253 (11), 236 (25), 209 (12), 204 (10), 192 (16), 191 (26), 160 (17), 147 (9), 115 (8).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-5-formyl-1H-indole (8) [37]: Faint yellow oil, 99% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 9.92 (s, 1H, CHO), 8.92 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.99 (m, 1H, CHAr), 7.78 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 7.46–7.25 (m, 11H, CHAr), 7.06 (dd, J = 2.2, 0.7 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 6.77 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.3 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.49 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.21 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 192.9, 142.9, 140.4, 137.3, 132.0, 131.1, 129.2, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 127.5, 126.8, 126.4, 125.7, 124.7, 122.3, 120.6, 112.1, 46.0.; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 338 (M+ + 1, 32), 337 (M+, 100), 336 (M+ − 1, 26), 308 (22), 260 (25), 234 (9), 218 (14), 217 (8), 209 (15), 204 (25), 193 (21), 192 (35), 191 (31), 115 (21).
  • (E)-3-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-5-fluoro-1H-indole (9) [37,41]: Faint yellow oil, obtained pure, 99% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 7.96 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.46–7.26 (m, 12H, CHAr), 7.15 (dd, J = 9.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H, CHAr), 7.01–6.97 (m, 2H, CHAr), 6.78 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.4 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.53 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 5.13 (d, J =7.3 Hz, 1H, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 157.7 (d, J = 234.5 Hz), 143.1, 137.5, 133.3, 132.2, 130.9, 128.6, 128.5, 127.4, 127.3 (d, J = 9.8 Hz), 126.7, 126.5, 124.5, 118.9 (d, J = 4.7 Hz), 111.9 (d, J = 9.7 Hz), 110.6 (d, J = 26.5 Hz), 104.9 (d, J = 23.6 Hz), 46.3; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 328 (M+ + 1, 24), 327 (M+, 100), 326 (M+ − 1, 35), 312 (11), 250 (31), 249 (9), 248 (16), 236 (18), 235 (16), 224 (28), 223 (7), 222 (16), 192 (20), 191 (22), 148 (21), 115 (17).
  • (E)-1-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole (10) [37]: Colorless oil, obtained pure, 96% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 8.17 (s, 1H, CHAr), 8.05 (s, 1H, CHAr), 7.45–7.28 (m, 10H, CHAr), 6.70 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.54 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 6.21 (br d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 152.1, 142.7, 137.7, 135.6, 134.8, 129.2, 128.8, 128.8, 128.6, 127.5, 126.9, 125.7, 66.2; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 261 (M+, 26), 233 (17), 206 (11), 193 (25), 192 (70), 191 (59), 190 (9), 189 (14), 178 (20), 165 (14), 157 (14), 146 (11), 145 (100), 144 (17), 130 (7), 117 (17), 116 (8), 115 (59), 91 (22), 89 (10), 77 (11).
  • (E)-2-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazole (11) [37]: Colorless oil, obtained pure, 96% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 8.25–8.23 (m, 2H, CHAr), 7.54–7.32 (m, 13H, CHAr), 6.97 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.7 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.80–6.71 (m, 2H, HC=CH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 165.3, 137.2, 135.6, 135.1, 130.4, 129.1, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 127.53, 127.5, 127.0, 124.9, 69.9; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 283 (19), 282 (90), 267 (20), 265 (14), 252 (9), 205 (31), 204 (37), 203 (44), 202 (35), 192 (13), 191 (100), 190 (11), 189 (19), 178 (16), 165 (18), 152 (7), 126 (10), 91 (8).
  • (E)-9-(1,3-Diphenylallyl)-9H-carbazole (12) [37]: Yellow oil, obtained pure, 99% yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 8.23 (dt, J = 7.7, 0.9 Hz, 2H, CHAr), 7.48–7.28 (m, 16H, CHAr), 7.03 (dd, J = 15.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.72–6.68 (m, 2H, C=CHPh, C=CCH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 140.2, 139.1, 136.3, 134.2, 128.8, 128.7, 128.2, 127.9, 127.3, 126.8, 125.9, 125.7, 123.7, 120.4, 119.3, 110.5, 59.9; MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 359 (M+, 8), 194 (18), 193 (100), 192 (40), 191 (29), 189 (13), 178 (19), 167 (61), 166 (18), 165 (13), 140 (8), 139 (10), 115 (44), 91 (7).
  • (E)-3,6-dichloro-9-(1,3-diphenylallyl)-9H-carbazole (13): White oil, obtained with traces of 3,6-dichlorocarbazole, 99% NMR yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 8.08–8.07 (m, 2H, CHAr), 7.44–7.28 (m, 14H, CHAr), 6.93 (dd, J = 15.7, 6.9 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.64–6.59 (m, 2H, C=CHPh, C=CCH); MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 431 (M+ + 4, 14), 430 (M+ + 3, 22), 429 (M+ + 2, 72), 428 (M+ + 1, 41), 427(M+, 100), 426 (18), 394 (9), 393 (9), 392 (26), 356 (8), 341 (7), 327 (7), 322 (8), 314 (12), 253 (20), 237 (11), 235 (15), 193 (41), 192 (61), 191 (50), 189 (7), 178 (19), 165 (10).
  • (E)-2-(1,3-diphenylallyl)-1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (14) [43]: Colorless oil, obtained with leftover 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, 96% NMR yield; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 7.49 (m, 2H, CHAr), 7.38–7.22 (m, 8H, CHAr), 7.05 (dd, J = 15.8, 8.6 Hz, 1H, PhC=CH), 6.60 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H, C=CHPh), 6.26 (s, 2H, CHAr), 5.54 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, C=CCH), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.80 (s, 6H, 2xOCH3); MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%): 361 (M+ + 1, 28), 360 (M+, 100), 330 (20), 329 (75), 283 (14), 269 (23), 255 (7), 254 (19), 252 (8), 251 (8), 239 (13), 238 (18), 193 (14), 192 (66), 191 (42), 182 (11), 181 (83), 179 (7), 168 (12), 167 (7), 165 (11), 141 (9), 121 (8), 115 (13), 91 (25).

4. Conclusions

To summarize, we have presented a series of novel nickel chloride:carboxy-imidazolium LTTMs. The formation of the tetrachloronickelate anion was determined visually and confirmed by XPS analysis, with it being the reason for the melting point depression of these mixtures. The thermal behavior of the mixtures was analyzed through DSC, observing the formation of metastable glass phases at the standard 5 °C/min temperature gradients. Careful analysis revealed evidence of a more complex phase system than that of a regular LTTM, which could be compatible with a liquid crystal. Then, the system was applied as a catalyst for the allylation of heterocycles with (E)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-ene-1-ol in solvent-free conditions, finding that the catalytic LTTM could be generated in situ from its much more convenient hydrated form without a loss of activity. A series of differently substituted indoles as well as other heterocycles and electron-rich arenes were successfully allylated, obtaining the products in excellent yields without the need for purification in most cases, and the catalyst could be successfully recycled four times without a loss of its activity. To finish, we calculated the sustainability metrics to unbiasedly assess the impact of this methodology and compared it with the protocols described in the literature. We obtained an E-factor of 3.9, a VMR of 0.771 and an EcoScale score of 79, which was consistently within the best scoring methodologies, thus proving the sustainability of the protocol. Given the characteristics (in terms of efficiency, activity, sustainability) of using this type of LTMM as catalysts, it will be of interest to continue exploring synthetic applications in other reactions, as well as with other nucleophiles and electrophiles.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28176338/s1: Sustainability metrics (Equations (S1)–(S7), Tables S1 and S2, Figures S1–S12); Differential Scanning Calorimetry traces (Figures S13–S18); XPS analyses (Figures S19–S21); 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra (Figures S22–S45); Miscellaneous images (Figure S46).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and I.M.P.; methodology, M.M. and I.M.P.; validation, M.M. and I.M.P.; formal analysis, M.M. and I.M.P.; investigation, M.M. and I.M.P.; resources, I.M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and I.M.P.; supervision, I.M.P.; project administration, I.M.P.; funding acquisition, I.M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (grant number PID2021-127332NB-I00), Generalitat Valenciana (grant numbers AICO/2021/013 and IDIFEDER/2021/013) and University of Alicante (grant numbers VIGROB-316, UAUSTI22-23, UADIF22-104).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the administrative and technical support of the Research Technical Services of the University of Alicante (https://sstti.ua.es/en; accessed on 26 July 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish results.

Sample Availability

Samples of all the compounds are available from the authors with reasonable request.

References

  1. Jessop, P.G. Searching for Green Solvents. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alonso, D.A.; Baeza, A.; Chinchilla, R.; Guillena, G.; Pastor, I.M.; Ramón, D.J. Deep Eutectic Solvents: The Organic Reaction Medium of the Century. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 2016, 612–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Handy, S.; Lavender, K. Organic Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents: Paal-Knorr Reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 4377–4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abbott, A.P.; Capper, G.; Davies, D.L.; Rasheed, R.K.; Tambyrajah, V. Novel Solvent Properties of Choline Chloride/Urea Mixtures. Chem. Commun. 2003, 1, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Martins, M.A.R.; Pinho, S.P.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Insights into the Nature of Eutectic and Deep Eutectic Mixtures. J. Solution Chem. 2019, 48, 962–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Francisco, M.; van den Bruinhorst, A.; Kroon, M.C. Low-Transition-Temperature Mixtures (LTTMs): A New Generation of Designer Solvents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3074–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hooshmand, S.E.; Afshari, R.; Ramón, D.J.; Varma, R.S. Deep Eutectic Solvents: Cutting-Edge Applications in Cross-Coupling Reactions. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 3668–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. González-Gallardo, N.; Saavedra, B.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J. A Jackpot C–H Activation Protocol Using Simple Ruthenium Catalyst in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 4941–4951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Torregrosa-Chinillach, A.; Sánchez-Laó, A.; Santagostino, E.; Chinchilla, R. Organocatalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Addition of Aldehydes to Maleimides and Nitroalkenes in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Molecules 2019, 24, 4058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Alonso, D.A.; Burlingham, S.-J.; Chinchilla, R.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J.; Tiecco, M. Asymmetric Organocatalysis in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 29, 4065–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Procopio, D.; Marset, X.; Guillena, G.; Di Gioia, M.L.; Ramón, D. Visible-Light-Mediated Amide Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. González-Gallardo, N.; Saavedra, B.; Guillena, G.; Ramón, D.J. Indium-Mediated Allylation of Carbonyl Compounds in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cicco, L.; Salomone, A.; Vitale, P.; Ríos-Lombardía, N.; González-Sabín, J.; García-Álvarez, J.; Perna, F.M.; Capriati, V. Addition of Highly Polarized Organometallic Compounds to N-Tert-Butanesulfinyl Imines in Deep Eutectic Solvents under Air: Preparation of Chiral Amines of Pharmaceutical Interest. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 3583–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Perrone, S.; Messa, F.; Troisi, L.; Salomone, A. N-, O- and S-Heterocycles Synthesis in Deep Eutectic Solvents. Molecules 2023, 28, 3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Curti, F.; Tiecco, M.; Pirovano, V.; Germani, R.; Caselli, A.; Rossi, E.; Abbiati, G. P-TSA-Based DESs as “Active Green Solvents” for Microwave Enhanced Cyclization of 2-Alkynyl-(Hetero)-Arylcarboxylates: An Alternative Access to 6-Substituted 3,4-Fused 2-Pyranones. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 1904–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rollo, M.; Raffi, F.; Rossi, E.; Tiecco, M.; Martinelli, E.; Ciancaleoni, G. Depolymerization of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) under Mild Conditions by Lewis/Brønsted Acidic Deep Eutectic Solvents. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 456, 141092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martos, M.; Pastor, I.M. Iron-Based Imidazolium Salt as Dual Lewis Acid and Redox Catalyst for the Aerobic Synthesis of Quinazolines. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 36, e202200839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bowlas, C.J.; Bruce, D.W.; Seddon, K.R. Liquid-Crystalline Ionic Liquids. Chem. Commun. 1996, 14, 1625–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goossens, K.; Lava, K.; Bielawski, C.W.; Binnemans, K. Ionic Liquid Crystals: Versatile Materials. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4643–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferraro, J.R.; Sherren, A.T. Some New Thermochromic Complexes of Nickel(II) of the Type [RxNH4-x]2NiCl4. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2498–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chinnappan, A.; Bandal, H.; Ramakrishna, S.; Kim, H. Facile Synthesis of Polypyrrole/Ionic Liquid Nanoparticles and Use as an Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seyedi, N.; Shirini, F.; Tajik, H. Nickel Ion-Containing DABCO Based Ionic Liquid: An Efficient Catalyst for the Convenient Chemoselective Reduction of Nitroarenes, N-Acetylation of Arylamines, and One-Pot Reductive Acetylation of Nitroarenes. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1285, 135547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chinnappan, A.; Jadhav, A.H.; Kim, H.; Chung, W.-J. Ionic Liquid with Metal Complexes: An Efficient Catalyst for Selective Dehydration of Fructose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 237, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhong, C.; Sasaki, T.; Tada, M.; Iwasawa, Y. Ni Ion-Containing Ionic Liquid Salt and Ni Ion-Containing Immobilized Ionic Liquid on Silica: Application to Suzuki Cross-Coupling Reactions between Chloroarenes and Arylboronic Acids. J. Catal. 2006, 242, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yarinia, R.; Shirini, F.; Langarudi, M.S.N.; Seyyedi, N. Introduction of a New Nano Sized Ni-Based Salt for the Acceleration of the Synthesis of Pyrano[2,3-d]Pyrimidinone and 1,4-Dihydropyridine Derivatives. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2022, 42, 6795–6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martos, M.; Pastor, I.M. Imidazolium-Urea Low Transition Temperature Mixtures for the UHP-Promoted Oxidation of Boron Compounds. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 347, 118349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gathergood, N.; Garcia, M.T.; Scammells, P.J. Biodegradable Ionic Liquids: Part I. Concept, Preliminary Targets and Evaluation. Green Chem. 2004, 6, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gore, R.G.; Myles, L.; Spulak, M.; Beadham, I.; Garcia, T.M.; Connon, S.J.; Gathergood, N. A New Generation of Aprotic yet Brønsted Acidic Imidazolium Salts: Effect of Ester/Amide Groups in the C-2, C-4 and C-5 on Antimicrobial Toxicity and Biodegradation. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2747–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hall, C.L.; Potticary, J.; Hamilton, V.; Gaisford, S.; Buanz, A.; Hall, S.R. Metastable Crystalline Phase Formation in Deep Eutectic Systems Revealed by Simultaneous Synchrotron XRD and DSC. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 10726–10729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Astrain-Redin, N.; Sanmartin, C.; Sharma, A.K.; Plano, D. From Natural Sources to Synthetic Derivatives: The Allyl Motif as a Powerful Tool for Fragment-Based Design in Cancer Treatment. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 3706–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, M.-Z.; Zhou, C.-Y.; Guo, Z.; Wong, E.L.-M.; Wong, M.-K.; Che, C.-M. Gold(I)-Catalyzed Enantioselective Intermolecular Hydroarylation of Allenes with Indoles and Reaction Mechanism by Density Functional Theory Calculations. Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 812–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, B.; Pu, X.-Y.; Liu, Z.-C.; Xiao, W.-J.; Chen, J.-R. Highly Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Indole Allylic Alkylation Using Binaphthyl-Based Phosphoramidite-Thioether Ligands. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 1246–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bhattacharya, R.; Ghosh, A. Thermal Analysis of Pyridinium Tetrachloronickelate(II); Tetrahedral ⇌ Octahedral Structural Transformation. J. Chem. Res. 2001, 8, 332–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gu, C.-D.; Tu, J.-P. Thermochromic Behavior of Chloro-Nickel(II) in Deep Eutectic Solvents and Their Application in Thermochromic Composite Films. RSC Adv. 2011, 1, 1220–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Andraos, J. Reaction Green Metrics: Problems, Exercises and Solutions; CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group): Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Aken, K.; Strekowski, L.; Patiny, L. EcoScale, a Semi-Quantitative Tool to Select an Organic Preparation Based on Economical and Ecological Parameters. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martos, M.; Pérez-Almarcha, Y.; Pastor, I.M. DES-Type Interactions To Promote Solvent-Free and Metal-Free Reactions between Nitrogen-Containing Heterocycles and Allylic Alcohols. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 44, e202201221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Trillo, P.; Baeza, A.; Nájera, C. Direct Nucleophilic Substitution of Free Allylic Alcohols in Water Catalyzed by FeCl3⋅6 H2O: Which Is the Real Catalyst? ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 1538–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Trillo, P.; Baeza, A.; Nájera, C. Fluorinated Alcohols As Promoters for the Metal-Free Direct Substitution Reaction of Allylic Alcohols with Nitrogenated, Silylated, and Carbon Nucleophiles. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 7344–7354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Le Bras, J.; Muzart, J. Brønsted-Acid-Catalyzed Coupling of Electron-Rich Arenes with Substituted Allylic and Secondary Benzylic Alcohols. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7942–7948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zárate-Roldán, S.; Gimeno, M.C.; Herrera, R.P. Alkylation of Amines with Allylic Alcohols and Deep Eutectic Solvents as Metal-Free and Green Promoters. Green Chem. 2023, 25, 5601–5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sheldon, R.A. The E-Factor: Fifteen Years On. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1273–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.-L.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.-L.; Han, Y.-C.; Wang, D.; Chen, Y.-J. Calix[n]arene Sulfonic Acids Bearing Pendant Aliphatic Chains as Recyclable Surfactant-Type Brønsted Acid Catalysts for Allylic Alkylation with Allyl Alcohols in Water. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 28 06338 g001
Figure 1. DSC traces of the (a) 1:2 (b) 1:1 (c) 2:1 (d) 3:1 (e) 4:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixtures at a heating rate of 5 °C/min. Endothermic events are represented as negative peaks along the y axis.
Figure 1. DSC traces of the (a) 1:2 (b) 1:1 (c) 2:1 (d) 3:1 (e) 4:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixtures at a heating rate of 5 °C/min. Endothermic events are represented as negative peaks along the y axis.
Molecules 28 06338 g001
Molecules 28 06338 g002
Figure 2. (a) Freshly prepared 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture. (b) XPS Ni 2p3/2 spectrum of the 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture (blue) and NiCl2 (red).
Figure 2. (a) Freshly prepared 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture. (b) XPS Ni 2p3/2 spectrum of the 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture (blue) and NiCl2 (red).
Molecules 28 06338 g002
Molecules 28 06338 g003
Figure 3. DSC trace of the 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture at a heating rate of 2 °C/min. Endothermic events are represented as negative peaks along the y axis.
Figure 3. DSC trace of the 2:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2 mixture at a heating rate of 2 °C/min. Endothermic events are represented as negative peaks along the y axis.
Molecules 28 06338 g003
Molecules 28 06338 sch001
Scheme 1. Allylation of heterocycles promoted by the 1:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2·6H2O mixture. Isolated yields by filtration through cotton and magnesium sulfate. a NMR yield using durene as internal standard.
Scheme 1. Allylation of heterocycles promoted by the 1:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2·6H2O mixture. Isolated yields by filtration through cotton and magnesium sulfate. a NMR yield using durene as internal standard.
Molecules 28 06338 sch001
Molecules 28 06338 g004
Figure 4. Recyclability studies of the nickel-imidazolium LTTM for the preparation of compound 1. In blue, consecutive cycles; in green, cycle after leaving the catalyst open to the air overnight.
Figure 4. Recyclability studies of the nickel-imidazolium LTTM for the preparation of compound 1. In blue, consecutive cycles; in green, cycle after leaving the catalyst open to the air overnight.
Molecules 28 06338 g004
Molecules 28 06338 g005
Figure 5. Sustainability metrics for the preparation of 1. Comparison between methodologies omitting chromatographic purification.
Figure 5. Sustainability metrics for the preparation of 1. Comparison between methodologies omitting chromatographic purification.
Molecules 28 06338 g005
Table 1. Preliminary studies for the allylation of indole with (E)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-ene-1-ol a.
Table 1. Preliminary studies for the allylation of indole with (E)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-ene-1-ol a.
Molecules 28 06338 i001
Entry[Cat.]Conversion to 1
12:1 mcmimCl:NiCl299
21:1 mcmimCl:NiCl299
31:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2·6H2O99 (99) b
4NiCl248
5NiCl2·6H2O5
6mcmimCl16
a Reaction conditions: Alcohol (0.25 mmol), indole (0.25 mmol), catalyst (5 mol%), 80 °C, 2 h. b Isolated yield.
Table 2. Sustainability metrics for the preparation of 1.
Table 2. Sustainability metrics for the preparation of 1.
Molecules 28 06338 i002
Entry Ref.CatalystConditionsE-FactorVMREcoScale
15 mol% 1:1 mcmimCl:NiCl2·6H2ONeat, 2 h, 80 °C
1:1 (Alcohol/Indole)		3.90.77179
2 [37] 10 mol% bcmimClNeat, 2 h, 80 °C
1:1 (Alcohol/Indole)		1.90.79089
3 [38] 10 mol% FeCl3·6H2OH2O, 24 h, 90 °C
1:2 (Alcohol/Indole)		17.6 †0.668 †70
4 [39] -HFIP, 24 h, 50 °C
1:1.5 (Alcohol/Indole)		1.4 †0.748 †77
5 [40] 10 mol% p-TSADCM, 2 h, 50 °C
1:1 (Alcohol/Indole)		94.8 †0.776 †79
6 [41] -1:2 choline chloride:lactic acid, 29 h, 60 °C
1:1 (Alcohol/Indole)		360.4 †0.750 †69
† Purification by column chromatography omitted (highly method and operator dependent, worth approx. 500–1500 extra E-factor).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martos, M.; Pastor, I.M. Nickel-Imidazolium Low Transition Temperature Mixtures with Lewis-Acidic Character. Molecules 2023, 28, 6338. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176338

AMA Style

Martos M, Pastor IM. Nickel-Imidazolium Low Transition Temperature Mixtures with Lewis-Acidic Character. Molecules. 2023; 28(17):6338. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176338

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martos, Mario, and Isidro M. Pastor. 2023. "Nickel-Imidazolium Low Transition Temperature Mixtures with Lewis-Acidic Character" Molecules 28, no. 17: 6338. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176338

APA Style

Martos, M., & Pastor, I. M. (2023). Nickel-Imidazolium Low Transition Temperature Mixtures with Lewis-Acidic Character. Molecules, 28(17), 6338. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28176338

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop