Next Article in Journal
Cyanidin-3-O-Glucoside Induces the Apoptosis of Human Gastric Cancer MKN-45 Cells through ROS-Mediated Signaling Pathways
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Alkali Iodide Salts in the Inclusion Process of Phenolphthalein in β-Cyclodextrin: A Spectroscopic and Theoretical Study
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Struvite, Antimicrobial, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Aqueous and Ethanolic Extracts of Saussurea costus (Falc) Lipsch Asteraceae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Infrared Spectra and Phototransformations of meta-Fluorophenol Isolated in Argon and Nitrogen Matrices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Organophosphorus Azoles Incorporating a Tetra-, Penta-, and Hexacoordinated Phosphorus Atom: NMR Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemistry

A. E. Favorsky Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 Favorsky St., 664033 Irkutsk, Russia
Molecules 2023, 28(2), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020669
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 9 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Computational Spectroscopy)

Abstract

:
The review presents extensive data (from the author’s work and the literature) on the stereochemical structure of functionalized organophosphorus azoles (pyrroles, pyrazoles, imidazoles and benzazoles) and related compounds, using multinuclear 1H, 13C, 31P NMR spectroscopy and quantum chemistry. 31P NMR spectroscopy, combined with high-level quantum-chemical calculations, is the most convenient and reliable approach to studying tetra-, penta-, and hexacoordinated phosphorus atoms of phosphorylated N-vinylazoles and evaluating their Z/E isomerization.

1. Introduction

Phosphorus compounds are attracting considerable research attention due to their wide application in life sciences, agrochemistry and materials science. Over the last decades, the chemistry of organophosphorus compounds is progressing rapidly, owing to their broad utility in the national economy. Diverse biological activity and easy degradation on the simplest non-toxic products allows the organophosphorus compounds (OPC) to be ranked among the top products for chemical plant protection. Phosphorus-containing compounds are reported to be in drugs, insecticides, fungicides, polymer plasticizers and stabilizers, catalysts and components for improvement of lubricating oils’ quality; however, there is more [1,2,3]. Organophosphorus complexes have gained widespread acceptance in science and engineering [4,5,6,7]. However, so far, only a small amount (less than 10%) of the produced phosphorus is spent on the synthesis of organic derivatives. Moreover, organophosphorus compounds are mainly phosphoric acid esters, and only some of them contain one or more P-C bonds. -depth insight into the chemical behavior and biological activity of these systems is impossible without elucidation of structural peculiarities, spectral properties and tautomeric rearrangements.
A well-known method for the preparation of compounds with a P–C bond is the interaction of phosphorus pentachloride with various nucleophiles (alkenes, alkadienes, alkynes, ethers and esters and tertiary amines including functionalized azoles, etc.). The availability of initial reagents, mild reaction conditions and the ability to vary the structure of the final OPC are advantages of this method. This reaction has not exhausted its synthetic capabilities in terms of the covering of new nucleophiles. Therefore, research in this area still remains a challenge.
The search for new low-waste ways to obtain the phosphorus-containing derivatives of heterocycles, including azoles, through the direct phosphorylation of C–H bonds is a relevant topic. In recent years, phosphorylated azoles have attracted much attention because of the presence of their structural motif in many bioactive naturally occurring and synthetic molecules [8,9,10,11]. Organophosphorus azoles exhibit antiblastic, insecticidal, antihypertensive, hypoglycemic, neurodegenerative and antiexudative activities, among others [10,11,12].
Our ongoing research on functionalized azoles and related compounds has been presented in a monograph on nitroazoles [13] and several reviews devoted to the chemistry of five-membered azoles and their benzannelated analogs [14,15,16,17], organosilicon azoles [18], NMR spectroscopy and mass-spectrometry of nitroazoles [19,20], and structure and electronic effects of five-membered nitrogenated heterocycles [21]. Furthermore, tautomerism and the stereochemical structure of functional azoles have been comprehensively researched [22,23,24,25,26]. The problems of prototropy of NH-unsubstituted azoles [23] and silylotropy of N-silylated analogs [25,26] have been discussed and analyzed in detail using the methods of multinuclear and dynamic NMR spectroscopy and quantum chemistry. The results of the study of the structural peculiarities and tautomerism of functionalized azoles in the solid state using the nuclear quadrupole resonance method [24] summarized.
Azole derivatives are a structural core of numerous biologically important compounds, such as hemoglobin, chlorophyll, antibiotics and vitamin B12. Additionally, they are involved in solar energy fixation, oxygen transfers in natural conditions (in vivo) and other life-sustaining processes. Many medicinal products, plant growth regulators and organic synthesis intermediates are obtained from azoles [13,27].
The stereochemistry of functionalized azoles incorporating phosphorus atoms is a challenging topic in heterocyclic chemistry because the correct interpretation of their chemical behavior and biological activity depends on understanding the factors that determine the stereochemical features and relative stability of their isomers. The study of the structure of phosphorylated N-vinilazoles is very important for understanding the reactivity and mechanism of their bioactivity. One of the possible ways of assembling the biologically active organophosphorus and azole moieties in one molecule is the phosphorylation of 1-vinylazoles with phosphorus pentachloride. N-vinyl-substituted azoles are usually phosphorylated on a double bond. The lone electron pair (LEP) of the nitrogen atom in 1-vinilazoles, as in vinyl pyrroles, is included in the π-system of the heterocycle. An increase in number of nitrogen atoms in the azole ring, in contrast to pyrroles, enhances the acceptor properties of the heterocycle with respect to the N-vinyl moiety.
The decrease of nucleophilicity of the N-vinyl fragment of 1-vinilazoles compared with N-vinylpyrroles should reduce the side reactions of chlorination and resinification upon phosphorylation with phosphorus pentachloride. Meanwhile, the presence of pyridine nitrogen atoms in the azole cycles with enhanced nucleophilicity can direct the attack of phosphorus pentachloride in the ring to furnish donor-acceptor complexes containing a hexacoordinated phosphorus atom. Thus, vinyl derivatives of azoles can be the objects of both the donor–acceptor interaction of the azole nucleus with electron-acceptors, and of electrophilic reactions through the double bond of 1-vinylazoles. The reaction course depends on such parameters as the basicity of different sites, the π–electron charge value of pyridine nitrogen, the final charge of pyrrole nitrogen and the polarization of a double bond.
An evaluation of the basicity of 1-vinylazole derivatives shows that imidazole heterocycles have the highest basicity, while that of pyrazoles and 1,2,3-triazoles is reduced, owing to the mutual inductive influence of heteroatoms in the cycle [28,29]. In addition, the basicity of azoles is usually lowered by benzoannelation. The basicity of pyrazoles is much lower than that of imidazoles, and this is a common property of heterocycles with two adjacent nitrogen atoms in the ring (Table 1).
The phosphorylation reaction involving the vinyl group plays the main role in the interaction of N-vinylpyrazoles with phosphorus pentachloride by reducing the basicity of the heterocycle.
The stereochemical structure of phosphorus-containing azoles obtained by the action of phosphorus pentachloride on vinylazoles and related compounds was studied by multinuclear 1H, 13C, 15N, 31P, and two-dimensional (2D) NMR spectroscopy [22,30,31,32,33,34].

2. The Stereochemical Structure of Phosphorylated N-Vinylpyrazoles, N-Vinylindazoles and N-Vinylbenzotriazoles

1-vinylpyrazoles, 1- and 2-vinylindazoles, and 1-vinylbenzotriazole, having a reduced basicity of the azole moiety, are phosphorylated by phosphorus pentachloride exclusively at the N-vinyl group. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrazole, 1-vinyl-substituted 3- or 5-methylpyrazoles, 1-vinyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole, and 2-vinylindazole creates geometrically favorable conditions (due to the neighboring pyridine nitrogen atom and the N-vinyl moiety) for the construction of a donor–acceptor bond between the trichlorophosphonic fragment and the pyridine nitrogen atom of the heterocycle to form Z-isomers (14) (Scheme 1) [31,33].
The Z-configuration of the compounds 14 is stable at room temperature, while upon heating, a partial Z-E-isomerization occurs. The isomerization proceeds much more easily in passing from enaminotrichlorophosphonium hexachlorophosphates (14) to 2-(N-pyrazolyl)ethenylphosphonic acid chloroanhydrides (58), and occurs during storage of phosphonic acid chloroanhydrides. This process is facilitated by a decrease in the electron-withdrawing properties of the dichlorophosphoryl moiety compared with the trichlorophosphonic group. Apparently, the presence of hydrogen chloride in the reaction medium promotes Z-E-isomerization due to the possible reversible hydrochlorination of the double bond of the compounds 58. The analogous conversions are observed in the phosphorylation of 2-vinylindazole (9, 10) (Scheme 1). In this case, the pyridine nitrogen atom has a higher basicity than that of 1-vinylindazole, as in the methylated analogs [28] (Table 1).
The reaction of phosphorus pentachloride with low basicity 1-vinylindazole produces exclusively E-isomers (11, 12) (Scheme 2).
Meanwhile, the electron-withdrawing action of the nitro group reduces the basicity of the heterocycle; therefore, phosphorylation of 1-vinyl-3,5-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole (13, 14) produces E-isomers [22,28,31,33] (Scheme 3).
Apparently, the low basicity of the pyridine nitrogen atom of compounds (11, 13) does not allow the formation of a stable donor–acceptor bond under experimental conditions; therefore, it is not possible to detect the Z-isomers of these azoles.
The donor–acceptor interaction in the Z-isomers of the compounds (14, 9) manifests itself so strongly that positive charge is delocalized with the participation of the ring, and the phosphorus atom in the trichlorophosphonic group turns out to be pentacoordinated. In the 31P NMR spectra, this leads to the appearance of a signal in the range of −(40–70) ppm that is indicative of significant shielding of the phosphorus nucleus; consequently, there is a shift of positive charge towards the heterocyclic nitrogen atom (Table 2).
It should be noted that the reaction of 1-vinylpyrazoles with phosphorus pentachloride (at a ratio of 1:1) leads to compounds containing a hexacoordinated phosphorus atom (1517) (Scheme 4).
The signals observed in the 31P NMR spectra at −(160–200) ppm are assigned to the phosphorus nucleus of the bipolar ions 1517. The values of coupling constants 3JPH of approximately 68 Hz and 3JHH 6 Hz indicate that the Z-configuration of the N-ethenyl fragment is retained in compounds with a hexacoordinated phosphorus atom (Table 3).
The NMR spectral data of E- and Z-isomers of 2-(N-azolyl)-ethenylphosphonic acid dichloroanhydrides are presented in Table 4 [30,31,33]. Z-isomers of alkenylphosphonates show an insignificant high-field shift of the resonance signals of the phosphorus nucleus. The low value of this shift points to the absence of prominent donor–acceptor interactions between the pyridine nitrogen atom and dichlorophosphoryl group of the 5Z8Z, 10Z.
The decrease in the nucleophilicity of the adjacent pyridine nitrogen atom in 1-vinylbenzotriazole also increases the competitiveness of the N-vinyl group in the reaction with phosphorus pentachloride. 1-vinylbenzotriazole is phosphorylated by phosphorus pentachloride to form benzotriazolyl-N-ethenyltrichlorophosphonium hexachlorophosphorate (18), which is easily transformed into enaminophosphonic (19) and enaminophosphinic (20) derivatives [22,30,33] (Scheme 5).
The 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR spectra of the phosphorylation products of 1-vinylbenzotriazole indicate the formation of exclusively E-isomers of the phosphorylated 1820 (Table 2 and Table 4). Apparently, this fact is explained by the reduced basicity of the pyridine nitrogen atom (N-2) in 1-vinylbenzotriazole that is typical of 1-alkylsubstitutes (Table 1).
The data of 31P NMR spectra show that the reaction mixture after the action of SO2 on hexachlorophosphorates 14, 9 contains, along with the major compounds 58, 10, hydrochlorination products 2125 in minor amounts (Table 5) [33].
The multiple signals of the phosphorus atom of compounds 2125 appear in a lower field than the signals of the compounds 58, 10. In this case, small variations in 2125 insignificantly change the chemical shifts (33–35 ppm) and coupling constants (Table 5).
The phosphorylation of 1-acetyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole furnishes pyrazolium hexachlorophosphorate 26—2-chloro-2-(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)ethenyltrichlorophosphonium—in the form of the E-isomer (Scheme 6) [31].
In the 31P NMR spectrum of 26, a doublet at –52.7 ppm (2JPH=47 Hz) corresponds to the PCl3+ fragment. Complex salt 26 is easily converted into 2-chloro-2-(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)ethenylphosphonic acid dichloride (27). In the 31P NMR spectrum of 27, δ 19.9 ppm with 2JPH = 21 Hz.

3. Computation of 31P NMR Chemical Shifts of Tetra-, Penta- and Hexacoordinated Phosphorus Atom in Phosphorylated N-Vinylpyrazoles

Advances in the theoretical methods used to calculate NMR parameters have led to a major breakthrough in NMR computational applications for structural studies of organic molecules including organophosphates. This has stimulated top-level investigations of conformational and configurational manifestations (tasks) in molecular, intramolecular and intermolecular interactions, along with spectral assignment and structural explanation. Key attention is paid to the study of 31P NMR chemical shifts that allow us to shed a light on various structural aspects of organophosphorus compounds. The range of phosphorus chemical shifts is known to exceed 500 ppm, which evidences the importance of 31P NMR spectroscopy for structural studies of organophosphorus compounds [35,36,37,38].
One of the most intriguing features of 31P NMR spectroscopy relates to the effects originating from the intra- and intermolecular coordination of phosphorus with heteroatoms containing a lone electron pair. In this case, the coordination effect can reach significant values comparable to the full range of changes in the chemical shifts of phosphorus. So, for example, phosphorus pentachloride, a well-known electrophilic phosphorylating agent, both in the crystalline state and in polar solvents dissociates into ions, and in non-polar solvents exists in a pentacoordinated state; meanwhile, the chemical shift of phosphorus varies from –300 to +80 depending on the degree of coordination (Equation (1)) [33] (Table 6).
2 PCl 5     PCl 4 +   +   PCl 6   -
Indeed, an increase in the coordination number of phosphorus from 3 to 6 leads to a dramatic shielding of the 31P nucleus from approximately +200 to −300 ppm [39]. The theoretical study of this interesting effect seems to be a challenging task of great practical importance. In addition to the available experimental data, modern quantum chemical calculations allow a deeper understanding of the nature of the relationship between the 31P NMR chemical shifts and the structure of phosphoroorganic compounds with different coordination numbers.
The effect of intramolecular coordination on 31P nuclear shielding in the series of tetracoordinated, pentacoordinated and hexacoordinated N-vinylpyrazoles represented by 2-(1-pyrazolyl)ethenyltrichlorophosphonium hexachlorophosphorate (1) and 2-(1-pyrazolyl)ethenyltetrachlorophosphonium (15) has been examined [33,37,40,41]. Phosphorylated pyrazole 1 has two configurational isomers, 1E and 1Z, containing tetracoordinate and pentacoordinate phosphorus atoms, respectively; meanwhile, compound 15 is isolated only as the Z-isomer, 15Z, the latter having a hexacoordinate phosphorus atom (Scheme 7).
The Z configuration of isomer 1 is stable at room temperature, and the Z-E-isomerization occurs only upon heating. The presence of hydrogen chloride in the reaction medium facilitates Z-E-isomerization due to the possibility of reversible hydrochlorination of the double bond of this compound.
The obtained experimental data show that in the 31P NMR spectrum of compound 1Z, a signal is observed at −55.2 ppm, which, in comparison with the chemical shift of its configurational isomer 1E (+94.4 ppm), indicates a significant shielding of the phosphorus nucleus due to the possible appearance of a donor–acceptor interaction between the phosphorus atom of the chlorophosphonium group and the pyridine nitrogen atom, that is, a structure with a pentacoordinated phosphorus atom. Such a donor–acceptor interaction in 15Z contributes to the formation of a structure with a hexacoordinated phosphorus atom (δ31P = −216.2 ppm). To confirm the conclusions about intramolecular coordination obtained from the analysis of experimental data, ab initio calculations of the shielding constant of the phosphorus nucleus in these compounds were carried out.
The shielding constants were calculated for the preferred conformations of azoles 1 and 15 localized at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level for the gas phase, alongside using the polarizable continuum model (PCM) to take into account effect of the medium, in this case nitromethane. The structures of the most stable conformers and relative energies of compounds 1 and 15 are shown in Figure 1 [40,41].
According to the results of the theoretical conformational analysis at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level, internal rotation around the N-C bond in 1E, 1Z and 15Z leads to the existence of two stable rotational conformations, s-cis and s-trans, with dihedral angle values NNCC = 0° and 180°, respectively. The only exception is the s-trans conformer of 15Z, for which this angle is 170°. This is explained by steric interactions between the bulky group of PCl4 and the pyrazole ring.
Characteristically, for compounds 1Z and 15Z, both in the gas phase and taking into account the solvent field, the s-cis conformation is the most favorable, the energy of which is much lower than the corresponding values for the s-trans conformers, which leads to almost 100% content of the s-cis-form. The relative stability of the E- and Z-isomers of 1 (s-cis conformers) depends on the solvent’s nature. In the gas phase, the Z-isomer is more stable than the E-isomer by 1.6 kcal/mol, whereas calculations that take into account the solvent field gave almost similar energies for both isomers. Thus, the possibility for experimentally observable ZE-isomerization of salt 1 at elevated temperature was theoretically substantiated.
Fundamentally important information about the nature of intramolecular coordination in phosphorylated N-vinylpyrazoles can be obtained from calculations of the shielding constant of the 31P nucleus, which were carried out in terms of the density functional theory (DFT) by the B3LYP method [42,43] within the framework of the gradient-invariant atomic orbital (GIAO) approach [44]. It has been shown earlier [37,45] that relativistic effects are of decisive importance in the calculation of δ31P for molecules containing elements of the third or more periods. For example, in the series of phosphines (CH3)3PX, where X = O, S, and Se for trimethylphosphine sulfide and trimethylphosphine selenide, the value of the spin–orbital contribution reaches 10 and 40 ppm, respectively. On the other hand, for PCl4+ cation, the spin–orbital interaction also results in a high-field shift of the phosphorus resonance signal by 40–50 ppm. These data indicate that the calculation of the 31P NMR chemical shifts in the chlorophosphonium group of compounds 1 and 15 requires allowance for the spin–orbital interaction.
The contribution of spin–orbital interaction is taken into account in terms of the zero-order regular approximation (ZORA) for the relativistic effects [46,47] implemented in the ADF 2009 software package [48]. As basis sets for nonrelativistic calculations, the triple-split Kutzelnigg IGLO-III was used [49], which showed the best results in calculating 31P NMR chemical shifts in phosphines and phosphine oxides [50]. For calculations taking into account the spin–orbit interaction, a double-split Slater-type basis set DZP [51,52] was employed. The method for calculating the relativistic values of the 31P NMR chemical shifts within the framework of the ZORA approach included the calculation of the nonrelativistic value of the chemical shift δNR and the spin–orbit contribution δSO, the sum of which leads to the relativistic value δR. The medium was taken into account in the framework of the COSMO continuum model [53,54]. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts δcalc (ppm) are given relative to 75% H3PO4 aqueous solution, recalculated according to Equation (2) and given in [55]:
δ calc   = σ calc ( PH 3 )   σ calc   -   266 . 1
Here, σcalc is the absolute shielding constant of the phosphorus nucleus of the studied phosphine, and σcalc (PH3) is the absolute shielding constant of the phosphorus nucleus PH3, calculated at the same level of theory.
The calculated 31P NMR chemical shift values for the s-cis and s-trans conformations of compounds 1 and 15 are shown in Table 7. The results of the GIAO-B3LYP/DZP calculations are in good agreement with the experimental values for the respective preferred conformations of compounds 1E and 15Z. The calculation error does not exceed 25 ppm, both in the case of calculation in the gas phase and with allowance for the effects of the medium. However, in the case of the s-cis conformer 1Z, the calculated value of the 31P NMR chemical shift by 160 ppm exceeds the experimental value, which indicates that in the gas phase and under conditions of nonspecific solvation, the formation of the intramolecular N→P coordination bond does not occur. Indeed, geometry optimization of the s-cis-conformer does not lead to a change in the distance between the phosphorus and nitrogen atoms.
The fundamental moment in the formation of an intramolecular coordination bond in compound 1Z is the influence of the solvent, in this case nitromethane. In this regard, an additional theoretical study of the structure of the complex of compound 1Z with one nitromethane molecule was carried out, which included optimization of the geometry in the gas phase and in the solvent medium (Figure 2).
The formation of the 1Z complex with a nitromethane molecule reduces the energy of the system, while in the gas phase, an intramolecular dative bond between the phosphorus atom and the pyridine-type nitrogen atom is not formed. The P–N interatomic distance shortens to 2.018 Å upon passing from the gas phase to the solution, which indicates the presence of a donor–acceptor interaction between the phosphorus and nitrogen atoms, and the stabilization of this structure by the solvent. Calculations of the 31P NMR chemical shift for this complex indeed indicate a significant low-frequency shift of the phosphorus resonance signal due to the formation of an intramolecular dative bond. Exceeding the calculated value of the 31P NMR chemical shift by 45 ppm may be due to the insufficient theoretical level of the used solvation model. Perhaps, for a correct description of intramolecular coordination bonding, it is necessary to use a larger number of solvent molecules to model the solvate shell [40,41].
The change in the phosphorus signal can be assessed by comparing the δP values for the s-cis and s-trans conformers of the respective isomers. Both 1Z conformers are characterized by almost the same δP values, which may be due to the lack of coordination. Upon transition to the 1Z complex with nitromethane, the formation of an intramolecular dative N→P bond leads to a low-frequency shift of the phosphorus signal by 120 ppm. The coordination effect for compound 15Z is estimated at 155 ppm for the gas phase and 170 ppm for solution. The spin–orbit interaction makes a significant contribution to the overall coordination shift of the phosphorus signal. The formation of a dative bond in 1Z and 15Z is accompanied by an increase in the spin–orbit contribution by 9.5 and 25 ppm, respectively; these values are 8 and 15% of the coordination induced shift.
Thus, the results of this study indicate the need to take into account the relativistic corrections and medium effects when calculating the shielding constants for phosphorus nuclei.

4. The Structural Features of Molecular Complexes of Vinylazoles with Phosphorus Pentachloride

N-vinylpyrazoles, as well as the corresponding indazoles and benzotriazoles, are phosphorylated at the double bond by phosphorus pentachloride to provide azoles containing the tetra-, penta-, or hexacoordinated phosphorus atom. N-vinylimidazoles or N-vinylbenzimidazoles, having highly basic isolated (separated) pyridine nitrogen atoms, interact in the cycle with phosphorus pentachloride in a different way. Donor–acceptor complexes in these reactions are initially generated.
The reaction of N-vinylimidazole with phosphorus pentachloride, even with its excess, produces the donor–acceptor complex 28 with the involvement (participation) of the pyridine nitrogen atom [32]. Consequently, the electron-withdrawing properties of the ring are enhanced and the nucleophilicity of the N-vinyl group decreases, which hinders its phosphorylation. The interaction of the vinylimidazole with the phosphorus pentachloride in benzene solution saturated by hydrogen chloride gives the complex 29, containing the protonated nitrogen atom in the position 3 (Scheme 8).
Analogously, the action of PCl5 on N-vinylbenzimidazole provides a donor–acceptor complex 30, whereas 3-H-1-vinylbenzimidazolinium hexachlorophosphate 31 is formed in the presence of hydrogen chloride. 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR data of complexes 2831 are shown in Table 8.
The presence of three proton signals of N-vinyl groups in the 1H NMR spectra of compounds (2831) in nitromethane indicates that the vinyl group does not participate in the phosphorylation reaction. The signals recorded in the region −(258–296) ppm in the 31P NMR spectra are typical for the hexacoordinated phosphorus atom.
1-allyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole [32] and the corresponding 1-propyl and 1-isopropyl derivatives interact with phosphorus pentachloride exclusively with the participation of the pyridine nitrogen atom of heterocycle. The presence of a pyridine nitrogen atom with increased nucleophilicity in the azole ring directs the attack of phosphorus pentachloride into the heterocycle to form the donor–acceptor complexes 32, 321 and 322 (Scheme 9).
The phosphorus singlet signals in the 31P NMR spectra of compounds 32, 321 and 322 appear in the −(260–264) ppm region and characterize the hexacoordinated phosphorus atom (Table 8).
C-alkenylazoles, like N-vinilazoles, are phosphorylated at the double bond. It has been established that 1-benzyl-3-vinyl-5-chloropyrazole and 1-benzyl-3-isopropenyl-5-chloropyrazole are phosphorylated by phosphorus pentachloride at the vinyl and isopropenyl groups to produce organyl trichlorophosphonium hexachlorophosphonium 33 and 34 (Scheme 10) [32].
Hexachlorophosphorates 33, 34, under the action of acetone in diethyl ether, are easily converted into phosphonic acid dichlorides 35, 36 (Table 8).

5. Quantum-Chemical Calculations of 31P NMR Chemical Shifts of Molecular Complexes of Azoles

Theoretical examination of molecular complexes of phosphorus pentachloride with 1-vinylimidazole (28) and 1-allyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole (32) have been carried out [41,56]. The phosphorus atom of the chlorophosphonium group can form a donor–acceptor bond with a pyridine nitrogen atom containing the lone electron pair (i.e., an sp2-hybridized nitrogen atom). As a result, the coordination number of phosphorus atom increases to 5 or 6, and its resonant signal in the 31P NMR spectrum is shifted up-field. In addition, the presence in the heterocycle of nitrogen atoms of the pyridine type having increased nucleophilicity makes it possible to direct the attack of phosphorus pentachloride not to the double bond of the vinyl group, but to the heterocycle, with the formation of the corresponding intermolecular donor–acceptor complexes 28 and 32 [32,34,56] (Scheme 8 and Scheme 9). The 31P NMR spectra of 28 and 32 contain a singlet in the region δ31P from −258 to −296 ppm, which is typical of six-coordinate phosphorus atoms. Quantum chemical calculations of 31P NMR chemical shifts in 28 and 32 were carried out for the gas phase and taking into account the effect of the solvent in order to evaluate the effect of intermolecular coordination on the 31P shielding constants (chemical shifts) (Table 9).
The phosphorus shielding constants were calculated at the GIAO-B3LYP/DZP level of theory, taking into account the spin–orbital relativistic interaction in terms of the ZORA [46,47]. The theoretical 31P chemical shifts δcalc (ppm) were recalculated according to Equation (1) and are given relative to 85% aqueous H3PO4 [55]. All calculations were performed for molecular complexes, with geometric parameters optimized in terms of the density functional theory using B3LYP hybrid functional and a 6-311G(d,p) basis set for the gas phase, and with account taken of the solvent field (nitromethane). The solvent effect was simulated according to the polarizable continuum model (PCM); nitromethane was selected as a solvent, and the experimental 31P NMR spectra were recorded in this solvent. The most favorable conformations of complexes 28 and 32 and their relative energies are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
The calculated 31P NMR chemical shifts of complex 28 both in the gas phase and in solution are in good agreement with the experimental values (see Table 10). Deviations do not exceed 12 ppm, which may indicate the complexation of vinylimidazole with phosphorus pentachloride. The theoretical conformational analysis data also evidence the generation of an N→P bond, because the distance between the pyridine nitrogen atom and the phosphorus atom is not higher than 2 Å, and the configuration of the phosphorus atom is modified to be octahedral, which is typical for sp3d2 hybridization. It should also be noted that consideration of the solvent effect in the geometry optimization leads to a shortening of the P–N distance in both conformers 28 by about 0.1 Å, which eventually favors more appropriate calculation of the 31P chemical shift.
The calculated 31P chemical shift of complex 32 in the gas phase (−63 ppm) differs significantly from the experimental value (−264.3 ppm) and corresponds to the range typical of five-coordinate phosphorus atoms, about −80 ppm (Table 9). Based on calculations for the gas phase by means of B3LYP/6-311G(d,p), the distance between pyridine nitrogen atoms and phosphorus atoms exceeds 4 Å, while the PCl5 molecule retains the bipyramidal configuration. Thus, the formation of a molecular complex between 1-allyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole and phosphorus pentachloride does not occur in the gas phase. Taking into account the influence of the solvent (nitromethane), the P–N distance shortens to 2 Å, and (as in complex 28) the steric configuration of the PCl5 molecule transforms from trigonal bipyramidal to octahedral. This is accompanied by an increase in the calculated 31P NMR chemical shift (up to −282.5 ppm) in the energetically most favorable s-trans conformer.
Assessment of the 31P chemical shifts of the starting phosphorus pentachloride and its molecular complexes with azoles shows that the creation of the N→P dative bond is attended by a low-frequency shift of the phosphorus signal by 220 ppm, of which 60 ppm is due to the contribution of the spin–orbit interaction [56].
The effect of the solvent must be taken into consideration when optimizing the geometric parameters and calculating the 31P NMR chemical shifts for intra- and intermolecular complexes formed with the participation of a phosphorus atom and a nitrogen atom in heteroaromatic systems. As in the case of intramolecular coordination in the 15Z isomer, allowance for the effect of the solvent is of decisive importance because the solvent is responsible for the stabilization of such complexes. Accounting for relativistic effects is essential for the accuracy of predicting 31P chemical shifts. The contribution of the spin–orbit interaction is about 200 ppm, and neglecting this contribution would lead to incorrect predictions.

6. Theoretical 31P NMR Chemical Shifts of Pyrazolylphosphine and Related Compounds

A similar theoretical approach was applied to the study of 31P NMR chemical shifts and the stereochemical behavior of phosphonic acid dichlorides containing the POCl2 group at the C=C and C=N double bonds, i.e., 2-(pyrazolyl)ethenylphosphonic acid dichloride (5) and the related compounds, N-dichlorophosphonylimin obenzoic acid chloride (37), N′-dichlorophosphoryl-N,N-dimethylchloroformamidine (38). These were prepared by the phosphorylation of N,N-dimethylurea with phosphorus pentachloride [57] and 1-trichlorophosphazo-1-chloro-2-dichlorophosphoryl-2-azaethene (39) obtained by the interaction of urea with phosphorus pentachloride [58]. The 31P NMR chemical shifts were also calculated by the GIAO-B3LYP-ZORA/DZP for the predominant conformation of compounds 5, 3739 for the gas phase (Table 10) [59]. The theoretical 31P NMR chemical shift values are also recalculated by the Equation (2).
Analysis of the NMR spectra shows that compound 5 existed in the form of two isomers which were assigned by the measurement of spin–spin coupling constants 3JPH that sharply differed between the configurational isomers with respect to the double bond [33]. In addition to these data, it was interesting to test the possibility of using 31P NMR chemical shifts for the configuration assignment of compounds containing a double bond C=C linked to a phosphorus atom. Therefore, we calculated the 31P NMR chemical shifts and performed the theoretical conformational analysis of these compounds in order to explore the influence of configuration and the conformational effects on the 31P NMR spectra. The results of these calculations, including the localization of the prevailing conformers, the calculation of the relative energies (Erel) and 31P NMR chemical shifts of compound 5, are presented in Table 11.
The internal rotation in both isomers 5 around the P–N bond as well as the rotation of the pyrazole ring around the C–N bond is allowed. The calculations show that four rotational conformers are localized for each isomer (Table 11). Theoretical data reveal that the E-isomer 5 is energetically more favorable than the Z-isomer in all probable conformations, as evidenced by the experimentally observed isomerization of the 5Z-isomer into the E-isomer during heating or storage. The most stable conformations of the E-isomer are s-cis-s-cis and s-trans-s-cis, with an energy difference of 1.4 kcal/mol. The energy of the other two conformations, s-cis-gauche and s-trans-gauche, is much higher and, therefore, they are practically absent in the equilibrium mixture. The equilibrium in the 5Z-isomer is almost completely shifted to the s-cis-gauche conformation due to steric hindrances preventing the existence of other conformers (Table 11).
The 31P chemical shift values in the E-isomer 5 change within a fairly narrow range of 29–33 ppm, indicating the absence of any electronic effects at conformational variations. However, the range of 31P NMR chemical shift variation in the Z-isomer is much larger, at 16–33 ppm. In the energetically more favorable s-cis-gauche and s-cis-s-trans conformers, a low-frequency shift seems to be due to the influence of the lone electron pair of the pyridine nitrogen atom. Nevertheless, in the s-trans-s-cis-conformer, where this interaction is absent, the chemical shift is the same as in the E-isomer, indicating an insignificant effect of the configuration change at the double bond on the 31P NMR chemical shifts (Table 11) [59].
Compounds 3739 exist in solution as individual isomers, the configuration assignment of which is a rather complicated problem and cannot be directly solved on the basis of NMR spectroscopy data. For this purpose, theoretical conformational analysis and calculation of the 31P NMR chemical shifts were performed for each of the conformers of both isomers 3739 containing the C=N–POCl2 fragment (Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14, respectively).
The results of conformational analysis indicate that the Z-isomers of compounds 3739 (Table 12, Table 13 and Table 14) are more favorable in terms of energy, and their energy is 2–9 kcal/mol lower than that of the E-isomers. The internal rotation around the N–P bond in the Z-isomers 3739 points to the existence of three stable rotational conformers: s-cis, s-trans, and gauche. The three conformers are close in energy; however, in all cases the gauche form predominates, while the relative energy of s-cis and s-trans conformers is about 0.7 kcal/mol. This evidences almost equal content of these conformers in an equilibrium mixture. In the E-isomers of compounds 3739, strong steric strains between the substituent and the bulky POCl2 group were found. The gauche conformer is also the most stable in the E-isomers. However, in E-isomer 37, all three possible conformers can exist: s-cis, s-trans, and gauche (Table 12), and steric strain in s-cis and s-trans conformers leads to a significant deviation of the benzene ring from the double bond plane.
Conformational transitions in compound 39 (Table 14) occur due to the rotation of the N=PCl3 fragment around C–N bond, which delivers two rotational conformations, s-cis and s-trans, while the s-cis forms in the Z-isomer are more favorable than the corresponding s-trans conformations by 3–5 kcal/mol. According to calculations in the E-isomer, only s-trans conformations with gauche and s-trans-orientations of the P=O bond can exist.
A similar influence on 31P NMR chemical shifts is detected in compounds 3739. Both isomers of compounds 3739 in s-cis- and gauche-forms have almost identical 31P NMR chemical shifts. The only exclusions are s-cis-conformer 37E and gauche-conformer 38E which are characterized by a low-frequency shift of the resonance 31P signal of about 10–15 ppm; this is perhaps attributable to the changes in the bond angles and bond lengths due to steric interactions compared with energetically favorable conformations. The up-field displacement of the phosphorus chemical shift in s-trans-conformations by approximately 15 ppm seems to be due to the formation of the C=N–P=O conjugated system, which may indicate a decrease in the length of the ordinary N–P bond by 0.2 Å compared with the s-cis- and gauche-forms. An analogous effect was observed in compound 39Z during rotation around the C–N bond. At the s-trans-location of the P=N and C=N bonds, the position of the 31P NMR signal has a low-frequency shift of 30 ppm, which can be explained by the conjugation effect.
Thus, there is good agreement between the theoretical and experimental 31P NMR chemical shift values in the corresponding compounds in their prevailing conformations. In this case, taking into account the presence of the conformational equilibrium, the chemical shifts must be averaged with consideration of the occupancy of the rotational conformations. The theoretical 31P chemical shift values averaged over all localized conformations of E- and Z-isomers of compounds 5, 3739 are comparable with the experimental data (Table 10) [59].

7. The Stereochemical Structure of Phosphorylated Pyrroles and Their Annulated Analogs

1-vinylpyrroles and their annulated analogs, indoles and carbazoles have also been phosphorylated by the reaction with phosphorus pentachloride to provide various phosphorylation products both at the vinyl group and at the pyrrole cycle [60,61,62,63]. The introduction of a phosphorus-containing fragment into the pyrrole rings is a structural motif of bioactive natural products and pharmaceutical drugs [64,65,66,67]. It allows us to expect the appearance of unusual biological activity in the phosphorylated pyrroles. The natural compound psilocybin, dimethyltryptamine-4-phosphate, is known to have strong hallucinogenic activity [62].
1-vinylpyrrole-2-carbaldehydes react stereoselectively with an excess of phosphorus pentachloride involving both formyl and vinyl groups to produce E-2-(2-dichloromethylpyrrol-1-yl)vinylphosphonium hexachlorophosphates 40 and 41 (Scheme 11, Table 15).
The 31P NMR signals of salts 40, 41 detected at –296 ppm and 89.7–92.1 ppm are assigned to PCl6 and PCl3+, correspondently, wherein the signals of PCl3+ cations appear as doublets of doublets, 2JPH = 13 Hz and 3JPH = 33 Hz. This indicates the E-configuration of the vinyl fragment. Besides which, the 31P NMR spectrum of salt 40 in MeNO2 has multiple signals at 66.6 ppm with 2JPH = 7.9 Hz and 3JPH = 25.7 Hz. This can be attributable to 3,3-dichloro-6-(dichloromethyl)-1H-1k5-pyrrolo-[1,2-a]-1,3-azaphospholidinium hexachlorophosphate 42 (approx. 8–10%, 31P NMR) [68]. The latter is most likely produced via electrophilic cyclization of the Z-isomer 40 (Scheme 11).
The 31P NMR signals of E-2-(2-dichloromethyl-1-pyrrol-1-yl)vinylphosphonyl dichlorides 44, 45 are in the region of 31.9–34.4 ppm (dd, JPH = 23.1–24.8 Hz) and belong to the POCl2 fragment. The 31P NMR spectrum of dichloride 44 exhibits a low intensity signal at 20.7 ppm, which evidences the presence of the corresponding cyclic phosphinyl chloride 43 (6%, 31P NMR). In addition, phosphonyl chloride 44 is readily transformed to the corresponding phosphonic acid 46. It should be noted that the values of the 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of the pyrrole ring atoms in the considered phosphorylated series are weakly sensitive to the influence of a substituent (to substituent change).
1-vinyl-2-trifluoroacetylpyrroles react with phosphorus pentachloride selectively at the vinyl group to provide E-2-(2-trifluoroacetylpyrrol-1-yl)vinylphosphonium hexachlorophosphates 47, 48, which further turn into E-2-(2-trifluoroacetylpyrrol-1-yl)vinylphosphonyl dichlorides 49, 50 in almost quantitative yields (Scheme 12, Table 16) [60]. Particularly, in this case, the carbonyl group in the pyrrole ring remains unaffected.
Similarly, the phosphorus signals in the NMR spectra of salts 47, 48, resonating at –297 ppm and 95.7–97.1 ppm, related to PCl6 and PCl3+, correspondently, where the cation signals are observed as doublets 2JPH = 33 Hz and 3JPH = 35 Hz, which indicate the E-configuration. The proton constant 3JHH =16 Hz (vinyl group) in the 1H NMR spectra also points to the E-isomer.
The NMR data confirm that E-isomerism is retained upon passing from complex salts 47, 48 to the corresponding phosphonic acid dichlorides 49, 50 and dichlorophosphines 51, 52.
The phosphorylation of N-vinylpyrroles which do not contain strong electron-withdrawing groups in the ring, as well as their annulated analogues, N-vinylindole and N-vinylcarbazole, has been studied [61]. The interaction of these pyrroles with phosphorus pentachloride yields various products of phosphorylation both at the pyrrole ring and at the vinyl group (Scheme 13, Table 17).
Hexachlorophosphates 5355 after the action of SO2, are converted into the corresponding pyrrolo [1,2-a]-1oxo-1,3-dichloro-4,1-azaphospholanes 5658 (Table 17). The reaction of the salts 5355 and triethylamine proceeds via the elimination of hydrogen chloride to give rise the corresponding phosphol-2-enes 59, 60, the structure of which was confirmed by 1H, 13C and 31P NMR spectroscopy data [61].
The phosphorylation of indoles and carbazoles occurs exclusively at the vinyl group, as evidenced by the NMR data [61]. The indole and carbazole fragments of the latter are not attacked by phosphorus pentachloride (Scheme 14).
31P NMR signals in the spectra of salts 61 and 63 are observed in the region of about –298 ppm and 92–95 ppm, and are assigned to PCl6 and PCl3+, correspondently, thus indicating the E-configuration. A proton constant of about 3JHH =16 Hz in the ethenyl group in the 1H NMR spectra also indicates the E-isomer. The E-isomers are preserved upon passing from salts 61 and 63 to the corresponding phosphonic acid dichlorides 62 and 64.

8. Conclusions

Azoles are the structural core of the most popular drugs used for the treatment of various diseases. Interest in organophosphorus compounds, including those containing azolyl moieties, increases every year due to their high and unusual (specific) biological activity [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. In recent years, in connection with the rapid development of experimental technology, previously very problematic studies that are of key importance for the stereochemistry of heterocycles have become rather more possible and routine. This has greatly expanded the possibilities of and increased the information potential of NMR spectroscopy. The use (involvement) of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, in particular 31P, and quantum chemistry (high-level quantum chemical calculations) simplifies the problems associated with stereochemical behavior, for example, Z/E-isomerization of chlorophosphorylated N-vinylazoles. Increasing the coordination number of phosphorus from 3 to 6 leads to a dramatic shielding of the 31P nucleus from about +200 to −300 ppm. Theoretical study of this extraordinary effect in combination (supplement) with experimental data allows a deeper understanding of the nature of the relationship between 31P NMR chemical shifts and the structure of organophosphorus compounds with different coordination numbers. 31P NMR spectroscopy is the most convenient, powerful and straightforward express method for the recognition of tetra-, penta-, and hexacoordinated phosphorus atoms in phosphorylated N-vinylazoles, and for the identification of the stereochemical structure of isomeric forms of organophosphorus products.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Dedicated to anniversary of Vladimir Rozinov, renowned expert in the chemistry of organophosphorus compounds. This work was carried out within the framework of the research project of Russian Academy of Sciences # 121021000264-1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, W.-Q.; Ma, J.-A. Stabilized Nucleophiles with Electron Deficient Alkenes, Alkynes, Allenes. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Knochel, P., Molander, G.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 4, pp. 1–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zarate, C.; Van Gemmeren, M.; Somerville, R.; Martin, R. Chapter Four-Phenol Derivatives: Modern Electrophiles in Cross-Coupling Reactions. Adv. Organometall. Chem. 2016, 66, 143–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gusarova, N.K.; Trofimov, B.A. Organophosphorus chemistry based on elemental phosphorus: Advances and horizons. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020, 89, 225–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Müller, C. Copper(I) complexes of low-coordinate phosphorus(III) compounds. In Copper(I) Chemistry of Phosphines, Functionalized Phosphines and Phosphorus Heterocycles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Clausing, S.T.; Morales, D.; Orthaber, S.A. Preparation, photo- and electrochemical studies of a homoleptic imine-phosphaalkene Cu(I) complex. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2020, 513, 119958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gafurov, Z.N.; Kagilev, A.A.; Kantyukov, A.O.; Sinyashin, O.G.; Yakhvarov, D.G. The role of organonickel reagents in organophosphorus chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 438, 213889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zagidullin, A.A.; Sakhapov, I.F.; Miluykov, V.A.; Yakhvarov, D.G. Nickel Complexes in C-P Bond Formation. Molecules 2021, 26, 5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yurko, E.O.; Gryaznova, T.V.; Kholin, K.V.; Khrizanforova, V.V.; Budnikova, Y.H. External oxidant-free cross- coupling: Electrochemically induced aromatic C–H phosphonation of azoles with dialkyl-H-phosphonates under silver catalysis. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Budnikova, Y.H. Opportunities and challenges for combining electro- and organometallic catalysis in C(sp2)-H phosphonation. Pure Appl. Chem. 2018, 91, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abdurakhmanova, E.R.; Kondratyuk, K.M.; Holovchenko, O.V.; Brovarets, V.S. The synthesis and transformation of 4-phosphorylated derivatives of 1,3-azoles. J. Org. Pharm. Chem. 2018, 16, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Semenyuta, I.V.; Kobzar, O.L.; Hodyna, D.M.; Brovarets, V.S.; Metelytsia, L.O. In silico study of 4-phosphorylated derivatives of 1,3-oxazole as inhibitors of Candida albicans fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase II. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Medvedeva, E.N.; Babkin, V.A.; Rozinov, V.G.; Dmitrichenko, M.Y.; Popova, O.V.; Hindu, S.O. Use of phosphonoacetic acid derivatives to increase the efficiency of peroxide bleaching of cellulose. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2000, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  13. Larina, L.I.; Lopyrev, V.A. Nitroazoles: Synthesis, Structure and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; 446p. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lopyrev, V.A.; Larina, L.I.; Voronkov, M.G. Nitration of Azoles. Rev. Heteroat. Chem. 1994, 11, 27–64. [Google Scholar]
  15. Larina, L.I.; Lopyrev, V.A.; Voronkov, M.G. Methods of nitroazoles synthesis. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 30, 1141–1179. [Google Scholar]
  16. Larina, L.I.; Lopyrev, V.A. Synthesis of nitrobenzazoles. Part 1. In Targets in Heterocyclic Systems—Chemistry and Properties; Attanasi, O.A., Spinelli, D., Eds.; Italian Society Chemistry: Rome, Italy, 2005; Volume 9, pp. 327–365. [Google Scholar]
  17. Larina, L.I.; Titiva, I.A.; Lopyrev, V.A. Synthesis of nitrobenzazoles. Part 2. In Targets in Heterocyclic Systems—Chemistry and Properties; Attanasi, O.A., Spinelli, D., Eds.; Italian Society Chemistry: Rome, Italy, 2006; Volume 10, pp. 321–359. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lopyrev, V.A.; Larina, L.I.; Voronkov, M.G. Trimethylsilylazoles chemistry. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 37, 149–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Larina, L.I.; Lopyrev, V.A. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Nitroazoles. In Topics in Heterocyclic Systems—Synthesis, Reactions and Properties; Attanasi, O.A., Spinelli, D., Eds.; Research Signpost: Trivandrum, India, 1996; Volume 1, pp. 187–237. [Google Scholar]
  20. Larina, L.I.; Lopyrev, V.A.; Klyba, L.V.; Bochkarev, V.N. Mass spectrometry of nitroazoles. In Targets in Heterocyclic Systems—Chemistry and Properties; Attanasi, O.A., Spinelli, D., Eds.; Italian Society Chemistry: Rome, Italy, 1998; Volume 2, pp. 443–470. [Google Scholar]
  21. Larina, L.I.; Lopyrev, V.A.; Vakulskaya, T.I. Quantitative estimation of electronic substituent effects in five membered, nitrogen-containing aromatic heterocycles. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1986, 55, 411–425. [Google Scholar]
  22. Larina, L.I. NMR Spectroscopy and Structure of Substituted Azoles. Ph.D. Thesis, Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Irkutsk, Russia, 2003; 385p. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  23. Larina, L.I. Tautomerism and Structure of azoles: Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2018, 124, 233–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Larina, L.I. Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Spectroscopy: Tautomerism and structure of functional azoles. Crystals 2019, 9, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Semenov, A.V.; Larina, L.I.; Demina, M.M. Stereochemistry and tautomerism of silicon-containing 1,2,3-triazole: Ab initio and NMR study. Struct. Chem. 2020, 31, 1927–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Larina, L.I. Organosilicon azoles: Structure, silylotropy and NMR spectroscopy. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2021, 133, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boyer, J.H. Nitroazoles: The C-Nitro Derivatives of Five-Membered N- and N,O-Heterocycles; VCH Publishers: Deerfield Beach, FL, USA, 1989; 368p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Catalan, J.; Abboud, J.M.; Elguero, J.J. Basicity and Acidity of Azoles. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1987, 41, 187–274. [Google Scholar]
  29. Katritzky, A.R.; Pozharskii, A.F. Handbook of Heterocyclic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Pergamon: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2000; 734p. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rozinov, V.G.; Pensionerova, G.A.; Donskikh, V.I.; Kalabina, A.V.; Domnina, E.S.; Skvortsova, G.G. Unsaturated organophosphorus compounds based on 1-vinylbenzotriazole. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1983, 53, 697–698. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Rozinov, V.G.; Dmitrichenko, M.Y.; Eskova, L.A.; Zhilyakov, A.V. Intramolecular interaction at phosphorylation of vinyl pyrazoles and azolides. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1997, 67, 1921–1922. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Larina, L.I.; Rudyakova, E.V.; Savosik, V.A.; Levkovskaya, G.G.; Rozinov, V.G.; Dmitrichenko, M.Y. Phosphorylation of C-alkenylsubstituted pyrazoles with phophorus pentachloride. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2009, 79, 1221–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Larina, L.I.; Rozinov, V.G.; Dmitrichenko, M.Y.; Eskova, L.A. NMR investigation of chlorophosphorylation products of N-vinylazoles. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2009, 47, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Larina, L.I.; Rozinov, V.G.; Rudyakova, E.V.; Savosik, V.A.; Levkovskaya, G.G.; Dmitrichenko, M.Y.; Bidusenko, I.A. Reaction of phosphorus pentachloride with N-vinylimidazole and N-vinylbenzimidazole. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2010, 80, 374–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kaupp, M.; Bühl, M.; Malkin, V.G. (Eds.) Calculation of NMR and EPR Parameters. In Theory and Applications; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  36. Latypov, S.K.; Polyancev, F.M.; Yakhvarov, D.G.; Sinyashin, O.G. Quantum chemical calculations of 31P NMR chemical shifts: Scopes and limitations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 6976–6987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Krivdin, L.B. Recent advances in computational 31P NMR: Part 1. Chemical shifts. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2020, 58, 478–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Krivdin, L.B. Recent advances in computational 31P NMR: Part 2. Spin–spin coupling constants. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2020, 58, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chesnut, D.B.; Quin, L.D. A study of NMR chemical shielding in 5-coordinate phosphorus compounds (phosphoranes). Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 12343–12349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chernyshev, K.A.; Larina, L.I.; Chirkina, E.A.; Rozinov, V.G.; Krivdin, L.B. Quantum-chemical calculation of NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules: III. Intramolecular coordination effects on the 31P NMR chemical shifts of phosphorylated N-vinylazoles. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 47, 1859–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chernyshev, K.A.; Larina, L.I.; Chirkina, E.A.; Krivdin, L.B. The effects of intramolecular and intermolecular coordination on 31P nuclear shielding: Phosphorylated azoles. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2012, 50, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ditchfield, R. Molecular Orbital Theory of Magnetic Shielding and Magnetic Susceptibility. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 5688–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chernyshev, K.A.; Krivdin, L.B. Quantum-chemical calculations of NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules: II. Influence of medium, relativistic effects, and vibrational corrections on phosphorus magnetic shielding constants in the simplest phosphines and phosphine chalcogenides. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 47, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wolff, S.K.; Ziegler, T.; van Lenthe, E.; Baerends, E.J. Density functional calculations of nuclear magnetic shieldings using the zeroth-order regular approximation (ZORA) for relativistic effects: ZORA nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 7689–7698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fukui, H.; Baba, T.J. Calculation of nuclear magnetic shieldings. XV. Ab initio zeroth-order regular approximation method. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 7836–7844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. SCM. ADF2009.01, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Available online: http://www.scm.com (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  49. Kutzelnigg, W.; Fleischer, U.; Schindler, M. NMR Basic Principles and Progress; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1990; p. 165. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chernyshev, K.A.; Krivdin, L.B. Quantum-chemical calculations of NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules: I. Phosphines, phosphine oxides, and phosphine sulfides. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 46, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Van Lenthe, E.; Baerends, E.J. Optimized Slater-type basis sets for the elements 1–118. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1142–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jensen, F. Introduction to Computational Chemistry; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  53. Klamt, A.; Schüürmann, G. COSMO: A new approach to dielectric screening in solvents with explicit expressions for the screening energy and its gradient. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1993, 2, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Klamt, A. Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents: A New Approach to the Quantitative Calculation of Solvation Phenomena. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 2224–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wüllen, C.V. A comparison of density functional methods for the calculation of phosphorus-31 NMR chemical shifts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 2137–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chernyshev, K.A.; Larina, L.I.; Chirkina, E.A.; Rozinov, V.G.; Krivdin, L.B. Quantum-chemical calculation of NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules: IV. Effect of intermolecular coordination on 31P NMR shielding constants and chemical shifts of molecular complexes of phosphorus pentachloride with azoles. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 47, 1865–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Larina, L.I.; Rozinov, V.G.; Chernyshev, K.A. The products of phosphorylation of N,N-dialkylureas and dialkylcyanamides with phosphorus pentachloride. NMR spectroscopy study. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2012, 82, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rozinov, V.G.; Kolbina, V.E.; Dmitrichenko, M.Y.; Dolgushin, G.V.; Donskikh, V.I. Diphosphorylated chloroformamidine from urea. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1994, 64, 1746–1753. [Google Scholar]
  59. Chernyshev, K.A.; Larina, L.I.; Chirkina, E.A.; Rozinov, V.G.; Krivdin, L.B. Quantum-chemical calculation of NMR chemical shifts of organic molecules: V. Stereochemical structure of unsaturated phosphonic acids dichlorides from 31P NMR spectral data. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 48, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rozinov, V.G.; Pensionerova, G.A.; Donskih, V.I.; Sergienko, L.M.; Petrova, O.V.; Kalabina, A.V.; Mikhaleva, A. IPhosphorus-containing enamines. III. Phosphorylation of N-vinyl-substituted trifluoroacetylpyrroles. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1984, 54, 2241–2246. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rozinov, V.G.; Pensionerova, G.A.; Donskih, V.I.; Sergienko, L.M.; Korostova, S.E.; Mikhaleva, A.I.; Dolgushin, G.V. Reaction of alkyl- and phenyl-substituted N-vinylpyrroles with phosphorus pentachloride. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1986, 56, 790–804. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gurevich, P.A.; Yaroshevskaya, V.A. Phosphorus-containing indole and pyrrole derivatives (review). Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2000, 36, 1361–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dmitrichenko, M.Y.; Ivanov, A.V.; Bidusenko, I.A.; Ushakov, I.A.; Mikhaleva, A.I.; Trofimov, B.A. Reaction of 1-vinylpyrrole-2-carbaldehydes with phosphorus pentachloride: A stereoselective synthesis of E-2-(2-dichloromethylpyrrol-1-yl)vinylphosphonyl dichlorides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1317–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tan, Q.; Xu, B. CH bond activation as a powerful tool in the construction of biologically active nitrogen-containing heterocycles. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2016, 9, 299–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, J.; Chen, X.; Xie, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, G.-J. Carbazole and triarylpyrrole synthesis from anilines and cyclohexanones or acetophenones under transition-metal-free condition. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 5743–5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Georgiades, S.N.; Nicolaou, P.G. Recent advances in carbazole syntheses. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2019, 129, 1–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Das, A.; Banik, B.K. Microwave-assisted synthesis of N-heterocycles. In Microwaves in Chemistry Applications; Chapter 5; ResearchGate: Berlin, Germany, 2021; pp. 143–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rozinov, V.G.; Rybkina, V.V.; Kalabina, A.V.; Glukhikh, V.I.; Donskikh, V.I.; Seredkina, S.G. On the mechanism of phosphorylation of alkenes by phosphorus pentachloride. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1981, 51, 1747–1756. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hu, L.; Fang, Y.; Hayafuji, T.; Ma, Y.; Furuyashiki, T. Azoles activate Atf1-mediated transcription through MAP kinase pathway for antifungal effects in fission yeast. Genes Cells 2015, 20, 695–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Salat-Canela, C.; Paulo, E.; Sánchez-Mir, L.; Carmona, M.; Ayté, J.; Oliva, B.; Hidalgo, E. Deciphering the role of the signal- and Sty1 kinase-dependent phosphorylation of the stress-responsive transcription factor Atf1 on gene activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 13535–13644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Sánchez-Mir, L.; Salat-Canela, C.; Paulo, E.; Carmona, M.; Ayté, J.; Oliva, B.; Hidalgo, E. Phospho-mimicking Atf1 mutants bypass the transcription activating function of the MAP kinase Sty1 of fission yeast. Curr. Genet. 2018, 64, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Yurko, E.O.; Gryaznova, T.V.; Khrizanforova, V.V.; Khrizanforov, M.N.; Toropchina, A.V.; Budnikova, Y.H.; Sinyashin, O.G. Electrochemical oxidative phosphorylation of azoles in the presence of silver catalysts. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2018, 67, 102–107. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Z.; Jian, Y.; Chen, Y.; Kistler, H.C.; He, P.; Ma, Z.; Yin, Y. A phosphorylated transcription factor regulates sterol biosynthesis in Fusarium graminearum. Nat Commun. 2019, 10, 1228–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Khandelwal, N.K.; Wasi, M.; Nair, R.; Gupta, M.; Kumar, M.; Mondal, A.K.; Gaur, N.A.; Prasad, R. Vacuolar sequestration of azoles, a novel strategy of azole antifungal resistance conserved across pathogenic and nonpathogenic yeast. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01347-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Zhang, M.; Zhao, F.; Wang, S.; Lv, S.; Mou, Y.; Yao, C.; Zhou, Y.; Li, F. Molecular mechanism of azoles resistant Candida albicans in a patient with chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. BMC Infect. Diseas. 2020, 20, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Sellers-Moya, A.; Nuévalos, M.; María Molina, M.; Martín, H. Clotrimazole-induced oxidative stress triggers novel yeast Pkc1-independent cell wall integrity MAPK pathway circuitry. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rocha, S.; Lucas, M.; Silva, V.L.M.; Gomes, P.M.O.; Silva, A.M.S.; Araújo, A.N.; Aniceto, N.; Guedes, R.C.; Corvo, M.L.; Fernandes, E. Pyrazoles as novel protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) inhibitors: An in vitro and in silico study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 181, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rocha, S.; Aniceto, N.; Guedes, R.C.; Albuquerque, H.M.T.; Silva, V.L.M.; Silva, A.M.S.; Corvo, M.L.; Fernandes, E.; Freitas, M. An In Silico and an In Vitro inhibition analysis of glycogen phosphorylase by flavonoids, styrylchromones, and pyrazoles. Nutrients 2022, 14, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Silva, V.L.M.; Silva, A.S.M. Revisiting the chemistry of vinylpyrazoles: Properties, synthesis, and reactivity. Molecules 2022, 27, 3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hu, C.; Zhou, M.; Cao, X.; Xue, W.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Sun, X. Coordinated regulation of membrane homeostasis and drug accumulation by novel kinase STK-17 in response to antifungal azole treatment. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 23, e0012722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrazoles and 2-vinylindazole.
Scheme 1. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrazoles and 2-vinylindazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch001
Scheme 2. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylindazole.
Scheme 2. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylindazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch002
Scheme 3. The phosphorylation of 1-vinyl-3,5-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole.
Scheme 3. The phosphorylation of 1-vinyl-3,5-dimethyl-4-nitropyrazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch003
Scheme 4. The formation of hexacoordinated N-vinylpyrazoles.
Scheme 4. The formation of hexacoordinated N-vinylpyrazoles.
Molecules 28 00669 sch004
Scheme 5. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylbenzotriazole.
Scheme 5. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylbenzotriazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch005
Scheme 6. The phosphorylation of 1-acetyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole.
Scheme 6. The phosphorylation of 1-acetyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch006
Scheme 7. Tetra-, penta- and hexacoordinated phosphorus atoms in N-vinylpyrazoles.
Scheme 7. Tetra-, penta- and hexacoordinated phosphorus atoms in N-vinylpyrazoles.
Molecules 28 00669 sch007
Figure 1. Predominant conformations and relative total energies (kcal/mol) of the s-cis and s-trans conformers of compounds 1 and 15 calculated by the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method for the gas phase and with taking into account the solvation effects within the polarizable continuum model (in parentheses).
Figure 1. Predominant conformations and relative total energies (kcal/mol) of the s-cis and s-trans conformers of compounds 1 and 15 calculated by the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method for the gas phase and with taking into account the solvation effects within the polarizable continuum model (in parentheses).
Molecules 28 00669 g001
Figure 2. Preferred conformations and relative total energies (kcal/mol) of compound 1Z and its complex with nitromethane molecule, calculated by the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method and taking into account the solvation effects within the polarizable continuum model. Bond lengths are given in Å.
Figure 2. Preferred conformations and relative total energies (kcal/mol) of compound 1Z and its complex with nitromethane molecule, calculated by the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method and taking into account the solvation effects within the polarizable continuum model. Bond lengths are given in Å.
Molecules 28 00669 g002
Scheme 8. The phosphorylation of N-vinylimidazole and N-vinylbenzimidazole.
Scheme 8. The phosphorylation of N-vinylimidazole and N-vinylbenzimidazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch008
Scheme 9. The phosphorylation of 1-allyl-, 1-propyl- and 1-isopropyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole.
Scheme 9. The phosphorylation of 1-allyl-, 1-propyl- and 1-isopropyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch009
Scheme 10. The phosphorylation of 1-benzyl-3-vinyl-5-chloropyrazole and 1-benzyl-3-isopropenyl-5-chloropyrazole.
Scheme 10. The phosphorylation of 1-benzyl-3-vinyl-5-chloropyrazole and 1-benzyl-3-isopropenyl-5-chloropyrazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch010
Figure 3. Predominant conformations of the complex of N-vinylimidazole with PCl5 optimized by the B3LYP/6-311G** method, and their relative energies. Bond lengths are given in Å. The relative energies and bond lengths, calculated taking into account the solvent effect (nitromethane) within the PCM, are given in parentheses.
Figure 3. Predominant conformations of the complex of N-vinylimidazole with PCl5 optimized by the B3LYP/6-311G** method, and their relative energies. Bond lengths are given in Å. The relative energies and bond lengths, calculated taking into account the solvent effect (nitromethane) within the PCM, are given in parentheses.
Molecules 28 00669 g003
Figure 4. Predominant conformations of the complex of 1-allyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole with PCl5 32 calculated by the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method, and their relative energies. Solvent (nitromethane) effect was taken into account within the PCM. Interatomic distances are given in Å.
Figure 4. Predominant conformations of the complex of 1-allyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazole with PCl5 32 calculated by the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) method, and their relative energies. Solvent (nitromethane) effect was taken into account within the PCM. Interatomic distances are given in Å.
Molecules 28 00669 g004
Scheme 11. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrrole-2-carbaldehydes.
Scheme 11. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrrole-2-carbaldehydes.
Molecules 28 00669 sch011
Scheme 12. The phosphorylation of 1-vinyl-2-trifluoroacetylpyrroles.
Scheme 12. The phosphorylation of 1-vinyl-2-trifluoroacetylpyrroles.
Molecules 28 00669 sch012
Scheme 13. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrroles.
Scheme 13. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylpyrroles.
Molecules 28 00669 sch013
Scheme 14. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylindole and 1-vinylcarbazole.
Scheme 14. The phosphorylation of 1-vinylindole and 1-vinylcarbazole.
Molecules 28 00669 sch014
Table 1. The basicity of substituted azoles.
Table 1. The basicity of substituted azoles.
Compoundpk (BH+)Compoundpk (BH+)
1-methylpyrazole2.061-methylimidazole7.12
1-ethylpyrazole1.941-ethylimidazole7.19
1-t-buthylpyrazole1.921-n-propylimidazole7.16
1,3-dimethylpyrazole2.771-n-butylimidazole7.16
1,4-dimethylpyrazole2.441,2-dimethylimidazole8.00
1,3,5-trimethylpyrazole3.741-methylbenzimidazole5.55
1-methylindazole0.301-ethylbenzimidazole5.62
2-methylindazole2.011-n-propylbenzimidazole5.46
1-methyl-1,2,4-triazole3.201-n-butylbenzimidazole5.31
1-methyl-3-nitro-1,2,4-triazole−3.511-methyl-5-nitrobenzimidazole3.66
1,3-dimethyl-1,2,4-triazole3.641-methyl-6-nitrobenzimidazole4.2
1-methyl-1,2,3-triazole1.231-methyl-7-nitrobenzimidazole3.25
1-methyl-4-bromo-1,2,3-triazole−1.651-methyl-5-chlorobenzimidazole4.66
1-methyl-5-bromo-1,2,3-triazole−0.47benzotriazole8.38
1-methyl-4-formyl-1,2,3-triazole−0.585(6)-chlorobenzotriazole7.7
2-methyl-1,2,3-triazole<14,5,6,7-tetrachlorobenzotriazole5.48
Table 2. The 1H and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of hexachlorophosphorates 14, 9, 11, 13, 18.
Table 2. The 1H and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of hexachlorophosphorates 14, 9, 11, 13, 18.
NoStructureδ1Hδ31P, JPH
=CH-PCl3Molecules 28 00669 i001PCl6Molecules 28 00669 i002
1EMolecules 28 00669 i0037.96 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 24.8, 3JHH =14.1
7.64 dd, 1H, =CH-P
2JPH = 38.5, 3JHH = 14.1
7.21 d, H-5, 3JHH = 6.5
7.21 d, H-3, 3JHH = 5.5
6.1 dd, H-4
3JHH = 6.5, 3JHH = 5.5
94.4
2JPH = 38.5
3JPH = 24.8
−296.0
1ZMolecules 28 00669 i0048.26 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 67.7, 3JHH = 6.1
7.84 dd, =CH-P
2JPH = 61.4 1H, 3JHH = 6.1
7.36 d, H-5, 3JHH = 6.7
7.18 d, H-3, 3JHH = 5.9
6.1 dd, H-4
3JHH = 6.7, 3JHH = 5.9
−55.2
2JPH = 61.4
3JPH = 67.7
−295.2
2EMolecules 28 00669 i0058.02 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 27.5, 3JHH = 13.3
7.43 dd, 1H, =CH-P
3JPH = 39.7, 3JHH = 13.3
7.21 d, H-5, 3JHH = 5.7
6.48 d, H-4, 3JHH = 5.7
2.67 s, CH3-3
92.9
2JPH = 39.7
3JPH = 27.5
−296.6
2ZMolecules 28 00669 i0068.34 dd 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 62.3, 3JHH = 6.3
7.42 dd, 1H, =CH-P
2JPH = 62.3, 3JHH = 6.3
7.23 s, H-5
6.40 s, H-4
2.68 s, CH3-3
−71.4
2JPH = 62.3
3JPH = 65.7
−295.0
3EMolecules 28 00669 i0078.40 dd 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 27.5, 3JHH = 15.2
7.66 dd 1H, =CH-P
2JPH = 39.7, 3JHH = 15.2
7.11 s, H-3
6.35 s, H-4
2.80 s, CH3-5
94.6
2JPH = 39.7
3JPH = 27.5
−296.0
3ZMolecules 28 00669 i0088.44 dd 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 67.2, 3JHH = 6.8
7.73 dd 1H, =CH-P
2JPH = 61.0, 3JHH = 6.8
7.32 s, H-3
6.45 s, H-4
2.82 s, CH3-5
−39.4
2JPH = 61.0
3JPH = 67.2
−296.1
4ZMolecules 28 00669 i0098.54 dd, =CH-N
3JPH = 64.5, 3JHH = 6.7
7.63 dd, =CH-P
2JPH = 60.3, 3JHH = 6.7
6.41 s, H-4
2.89 s, CH3-5
2.76 s, CH3-3
−52.9
2JPH = 60.3
3JPH = 64.5
−296.4
9ZMolecules 28 00669 i0108.27 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 23.8, 3JHH = 6.8
7.90 s, H-5
7.68 dd, 1H, =CH-P
2JPH = 35.1, 3JHH = 6.8
7.39–7.50 4H, Ph
−78.7
2JPH = 35.1
3JPH = 23.8
−285.0
11EMolecules 28 00669 i0118.16 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 22.8, 3JHH = 14.1
7.81 s, H-3
7.60 dd, 1H, =CH-P
3JPH = 34.1, 3JHH = 14.1
7.24–7.43 4H Ph
73.2
2JPH = 34.1
3JPH = 22.8
−298.5
13EMolecules 28 00669 i0128.47 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 25.8, 3JHH = 13.4
7.59dd 1H, =CH-P
2JPH = 38.1, 3JHH = 13.4
2.78 s, CH3-5
2.59 s, CH3-3
96.1
2JPH = 38.1
3JPH = 25.8
−294.9
18EMolecules 28 00669 i0137.84 dd, 1H, =CH-N
3JPH = 27.6, 3JHH = 14.4
7.49 dd, 1H, =CH-P
3JPH = 32.1, 3JHH = 14.4
7.24–7.43 4H Ph
92.1
2JPH = 32.1
3JPH = 27.6
−296.2
Table 3. The 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of hexacoordinated N-vinylpyrazoles (1517).
Table 3. The 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of hexacoordinated N-vinylpyrazoles (1517).
CompoundRR′δ31P3JPH2JPH
15HH−216.268.1 55.7
16MeH−165.068.2 56.1
17MeMe−198.868.0 58.0
Table 4. The 1H and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of azolylphosphonates 58, 10, 12, 14, 19.
Table 4. The 1H and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of azolylphosphonates 58, 10, 12, 14, 19.
NoStructureδ1Hδ31P
5EMolecules 28 00669 i0147.71 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 21.8, 3JHH = 14.2
7.60 d, 1H, H-5 3JHH = 5.2
7.23 d, 1H, H-3 3JHH = 5.8
6.64 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.7, 3JHH = 14.2
6.15 dd, 1H, H-4
3JHH = 5.8, 3JHH = 5.2
30.7
2JPH = 28.7
3JPH = 21.8
5ZMolecules 28 00669 i0157.57 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 57.0, 3JHH = 6.7
7.64 d, 1H, H-5, 3JHH = 5.6
7.21 d, 1H, H-3, 3JHH = 5.9
6.46 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.7, 3JHH = 6.7
6.12 dd, 1H, H-4
3JHH 5.9, 3JHH 5.6
23.9
2JPH = 28.0
3JPH = 57.0
6EMolecules 28 00669 i0167.75 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 22.0, 3JHH = 14.5
7.58 d, 1H, H-5, 3JHH = 5.7
6.63 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.5, 3JHH = 14.5
6.30 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 5.7
2.35 s, 3H, CH3-3
31.3
2JPH = 28.5
3JPH = 22.0
6ZMolecules 28 00669 i0177.81 d, 1H, H-5, 3JHH = 5.5
7.34 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 57.6, 3JHH = 11.0
6.60 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.5, 3JHH = 11.0
6.30 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 5.5
2.33 s, 3H, CH3-3
24.4
2JPH = 28.5
3JPH = 57.6
7EMolecules 28 00669 i0187.64 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 21.4, 3JHH = 14.4
7.56 d, 1H, H-3, 3JHH =5.1
6.35 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.5, 3JHH = 14.4
6.12 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 5.1
2.31 s, 3H, CH3-5
32.3
2JPH = 28.4
3JPH = 21.4
7ZMolecules 28 00669 i0197.53 d, 1H, H-3 3JHH = 5.3
7.26 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 54.9, 3JHH = 10.5
5.73 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.8, 3JHH = 10.5
6.05 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 5.3
2.34 s, 3H, CH3-5
26.8
2JPH = 28.8
3JPH = 54.9
8EMolecules 28 00669 i0207.59 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 20.8, 3JHH = 13.7
6.47 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.6, 3JHH = 13.7
5.96 s, 1H, H-4
2.18 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.13 s, 3H, CH3-3
29.4
2JPH = 28.6
3JPH = 20.8
8ZMolecules 28 00669 i0217.24 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 53.7, 3JHH = 10.3
5.60 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 28.8, 3JHH = 10.3
5.92 s, 1H, H-4
2.25 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.18 s, 3H, CH3-3
24.5
2JPH = 28.8
3JPH = 53.7
14EMolecules 28 00669 i0227.74 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 21.5, 3JHH = 14.0
6.84 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 29.0, 3JHH = 14.0
2.32 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.27 s, 3H, CH3-3
26.9
2JPH = 29.0
3JPH = 21.5
14ZMolecules 28 00669 i0237.59 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 52.9, 3JHH = 9.0
6.73 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 26.8, 3JHH = 9.0
2.37 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.23 s, 3H, CH3-3
26.9
2JPH = 26.8
3JPH = 52.9
10ZMolecules 28 00669 i0248.44 s, 1H, H-3
7.70 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 56.0, 3JHH = 10.7
7.20–7.70 m, 4H, Ph
5.98 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 24.9, 3JHH = 10.7
22.4
2JPH = 24.9
3JPH = 56.0
12EMolecules 28 00669 i0258.24 s, 1H, H-3
8.14 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 27.8, 3JHH = 14.0
7.30–7.76 m, 4H, Ph
6.63 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 20.5, 3JHH = 14.0
30.8
2JPH = 27.8
3JPH = 20.5
19EMolecules 28 00669 i0268.26 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 21.8, 3JHH = 14.9
7.32, 7.51, 7.69, 7.90 4H, Ph
6.91 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 25.2, 3JHH = 14.9
28.5
2JPH = 25.2
3JPH = 21.8
Table 5. 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of hydrochlorated products of azolylphosphonic dichloroanhydrides (2125).
Table 5. 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of hydrochlorated products of azolylphosphonic dichloroanhydrides (2125).
Compound2122232425
StructureMolecules 28 00669 i027Molecules 28 00669 i028Molecules 28 00669 i029Molecules 28 00669 i030Molecules 28 00669 i031
δ, ppm35.0 ddd33.5 ddd34.7 ddd33.9 ddd34.2 m
JPH, Hz2J = 17.7
2J = 13.5
3J = 8.3
2J = 17.3
2J = 13.0
3J = 7.9
2J = 17.8
2J = 13.9
3J = 8.0
2J = 17.0
2J = 13.2
3J = 7.5
-
Table 6. Coordination number of phosphorous chlorides and their 31P NMR chemical shifts.
Table 6. Coordination number of phosphorous chlorides and their 31P NMR chemical shifts.
Phosphorous Chloride PCl 3 PCl 4 + PCl 5 PCl 6
Coordination number3456
31P NMR chemical shift, ppm+217+80−80−298
Table 7. The 31P NMR chemical shifts of compounds 1 and 15 (ppm) calculated with both nonrelativistic GIAO-B3LYP/IGLO-III and quasi-relativistic ZORA-GIAO-B3LYP/DZP levels.
Table 7. The 31P NMR chemical shifts of compounds 1 and 15 (ppm) calculated with both nonrelativistic GIAO-B3LYP/IGLO-III and quasi-relativistic ZORA-GIAO-B3LYP/DZP levels.
MediumCompoundConformationB3LYP/
IGLO-III
B3LYP/DZPExperiment CH3NO2, 25 °C
δNRδSOδR
Gas phase1Es-cis145.5146.5−34.4112.1-
s-trans147.6148.5−34.5114.0
1Zs-cis140.2143.6−35.2108.4-
s-trans134.2137.2−34.7102.5
1Z⋯CH3NO2s-cis131.6136.2−35.9100.3
2Zs-cis−97.2−91.8−99.2−191.0-
s-trans33.137.7−73.2−35.5
Nitro
methane
1Es-cis150.7156.7−33.7123.094.4
s-trans151.6157.0−34.0123.0
1Zs-cis139.8145.4−34.6110.8−55.2
s-trans138.3145.4−34.4111.0
1Z⋯CH3NO2s-cis27.634.0−44.1−10.1
15Zs-cis−111.8−108.7−89.4−198.1−216.2
s-trans33.035.8−63.8−28.0
Table 8. 1H, 13C and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated azoles 2836 (CDCl3).
Table 8. 1H, 13C and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated azoles 2836 (CDCl3).
NoCompound1H13C31P
28Molecules 28 00669 i0329.27 s, 1H, H-2
8.17 d, 1H, H-5, 3JHH = 2.0
7.37 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 2.0
7.06 dd, 1H, =CH,
3JHH = 15.5 trans, 3JHH =8.7 cis
5.70 d 1H =CH2, 3JHH = 15.5 trans
5.32 d 1H =CH2, 3JHH = 8.6 cis
137.56 C-2
128.81 =CH
126.33 C-4
114.60 C-5
109.77 =CH2
−258.0
29Molecules 28 00669 i03313.3 br s, NH
8.76 s, 1H, H-2
7.65 d, 1H, H-5, 3JHH = 2.0
7.47 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH 2.0
7.13 dd, 1H, =CH,
3JHH 15.6 trans, 3JHH = 8.8 cis
5.76 d, 1H, =CH2, 3JHH = 15.6 trans
5.35 d, 1H, =CH2, 3JHH = 8.8 cis
134.28 C-2
129.19 =CH
121.33 C-4
119.82 C-5
110.66 =CH2
−291.7
30Molecules 28 00669 i0349.18 s, 1H, H-2
7.88 d, 1H, H-7, 3JHH = 6.8
7.83 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 7.1
7.62 m, 2H, H-5,6
7.33 dd, 1H, =CH,
3JHH = 15.8 trans, 3JHH = 8.8 cis
5.97 d 1H =CH2, 3JHH = 15.8 trans
5.65 d 1H =CH2, 3JHH = 8.8 cis
144.28 C-2
139.08 C-9
132.58 C-8
129.08 C-5
123.17 =CH
122.78 C-6
120.31 C-4
119.82 C-7
113.68 =CH2
−259.1
31Molecules 28 00669 i03513.6 br s NH
9.16 s, 1H, H-2
7.88 d, 1H, H-7, 3JHH = 7.2
7.82 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 7.4
7.66 m, 2H, H-5,6
7.37 dd, 1H, =CH,
3JHH = 15.8 trans, 3JHH = 8.8 cis
5.92 d, 1H, =CH2, 3JHH = 15.8 trans
5.68 d, 1H, =CH2, 3JHH = 8.8 cis
147.56 C-2
142.38 C-9
134.85 C-8
129.98 C-5
124.27 =CH
122.89 C-6
121.93 C-4
118.18 C-7
114.82 =CH2
−293.2
32Molecules 28 00669 i0366.70 s, 1H, H-4
6.06 m, 1H, =CH
5.67 d, 1H, =CH2, 3JHH = 15.1 trans
5.49 d, 1H, =CH2, 3JHH = 8.2 cis
5.24 m, 2H, CH2
2.91 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.80 s, 3H, CH3-3
145.42 C-3
144.32 C-5
120.83 C-4
119.17 =CH2
107.2 –CH=
49.61 NCH2
10.43 CH3
10.28 CH3
−264.3
32-1Molecules 28 00669 i0376.33 s, 1H, H-4
4.55 t, 2H, NCH2, 3JHH = 6.8
2.92 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.85 s, 3H, CH3-3
2.54 m, 2H, CH2
1.63 t, 3H, CH3, 3JHH = 6.6
144.11 C-3
143.40 C-5
109.60 C-4
48.79 NCH2
23.61 CH2
9.83 2CH3
9.54 CH3
−261.5
32–2Molecules 28 00669 i0386.11 s, 1H, H-4
4.70 sept, CH, 3JHH = 6.7
2.80 s, 3H, CH3-5
2.76 s, 3H, CH3-3
1.59 d, 6H, CH3, 3JHH = 6.6
146.51 C-3
145.79 C-5
107.93 C-4
52.98 CH
21.19 (CH3)2
9.65 CH3
9.44 CH3
−260.2
33Molecules 28 00669 i0397.50–7.58 Ph
6.77 s, 1H, H-4
6.34 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 58.9, 3JHH = 15.4
6.23 d, 1H, =CH, 3JHH = 15.4
5.31 s, 2H, CH2
148.09 br s C-5
141.18 C-3
129.20 –CH=
128.8–127.0 Ph
126.9 P–CH=, 1JPC = 155.1
106.82 C-4
52.60 CH2
71.9 d PCl+3
2JPH = 58.9
−295.3 PCl6
34Molecules 28 00669 i0407.50–7.58 Ph
6.77 s, 1H, H-4
6.34 dd, 1H, P–CH=,
2JPH = 58.9, 3JHH = 15.4
6.23 s, 1H, =CH,
5.31 s, 2H, CH2
150.78 br s C-5
144.49 d, C-CH3, 2JPC = 10.5
133.52 C-3
129.0–127.0 Ph
124.49 =CH, 1JPC = 153.7
110.78 C-4
57.60 CH2
28.80 d, CH3, 3JPC = 28.9
77.0 d PCl+3
2JPH = 60.3
−294.4 PCl6
35Molecules 28 00669 i0417.30–7.38 Ph
6.70 s, 1H, H-4
6.20 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 29.3, 3JHH =14.8
6.14 dd, 1H, =CH, 3JPH = 23.2
3JHH = 14.8
5.31 s, 2H, CH2
150.91 br s, C-5
135.12 C-3
131.2 –CH=
128.86, 128.20
127.80,127.42 Ph
126.0 d, P–CH=, 1JPC = 153.1
103.61 C-4
50.61 CH2
24.2 dd POCl2
2JPH = 29.3
3JPH = 23.2
36Molecules 28 00669 i0427.28–7.35 Ph
6.79 s, 1H, H-4
6.18 d, 1H, =CH, 2JPH = 34.3
5.36 s, 2H, CH2
2.34 d, 3H, CH3, 4JPH = 1.2
152.01br s C-5
146.99 d, C-CH3, 2JPC = 9.9
135.12 C-3
128.82, 128.24
127.88, 127.51 Ph
121.42 =CH, 1JPC = 150.4
106.68 C-4
53.56 CH2
24.82 d, CH3, 3JPC = 26.8
28.9 d POCl2
2JPH = 34.3
Table 9. The 31P NMR chemical shifts of complexes 28 and 32 calculated by the GIAO-B3LYP/DZP method, taking into accountspin–orbital interaction in comparison with the experimental data.
Table 9. The 31P NMR chemical shifts of complexes 28 and 32 calculated by the GIAO-B3LYP/DZP method, taking into accountspin–orbital interaction in comparison with the experimental data.
MediumCompoundConformerChemical Shift, ppm
δNRδSOδRδexp
Gas phase28s-cis−69.0−201.4−270.4-
s-trans−57.8−210.8−268.6
32s-cis81.4−144.5−63.1-
s-trans82.3−145.2−62.9
Nitromethane28s-cis−79.7−181.6−261.3−258.0
s-trans−80.2−181.9−262.1
32s-cis−71.0−204.7−275.7−264.3
s-trans−74.9−207.6−282.5
Table 10. Experimental and theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts of phosphines 5 and 3739 calculated by the GIAO-B3LYP-ZORA/DZP method.
Table 10. Experimental and theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts of phosphines 5 and 3739 calculated by the GIAO-B3LYP-ZORA/DZP method.
NoCompoundIsomerChemical Shift, ppm
Calculated aExperimental
5Molecules 28 00669 i043E33.031.3
Z22.023.9
37Molecules 28 00669 i044E−3.3−0.6
Z−3.1-
38Molecules 28 00669 i045E−14.9−0.5
Z−9.8
39Molecules 28 00669 i046E−2.0
−12.9 = PCl3
1.6
22.0 = PCl3
Z−5.7
19.9 = PCl3
-
a Averaged by conformational states.
Table 11. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers of the compound 5.
Table 11. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers of the compound 5.
StructureIsomerConformerErel, kcal/molChemical Shift, ppm
Molecules 28 00669 i047Es-cis-s-cis0.033.6
Molecules 28 00669 i048Es-cis-gauche3.129.3
Molecules 28 00669 i049Es-trans-s-cis1.430.6
Molecules 28 00669 i050Es-trans-gauche4.029.5
Molecules 28 00669 i051Zs-cis-gauche4.721.4
Molecules 28 00669 i052Zs-cis-s-trans6.322.9
Molecules 28 00669 i053Zs-trans-s-cis6.532.8
Molecules 28 00669 i054Zs-trans-s-trans6.516.6
Table 12. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers 37.
Table 12. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers 37.
StructureIsomerConformerErel, kcal/molChemical Shift, ppm
Molecules 28 00669 i055Es-cis5.0−15.9
Molecules 28 00669 i056Egauche3.9−1.3
Molecules 28 00669 i057Es-trans8.9−50.8
Molecules 28 00669 i058Zs-cis0.5−1.4
Molecules 28 00669 i059Zgauche0.0−0.3
Molecules 28 00669 i060Zs-trans0.7−14.8
Table 13. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers 38.
Table 13. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers 38.
StructureIsomerConformerErel, kcal/molChemical Shift, ppm
Molecules 28 00669 i061Egauche4.0−14.9
Molecules 28 00669 i062Zs-cis0.5−5.8
Molecules 28 00669 i063Zgauche0.0−4.5
Molecules 28 00669 i064Zs-trans0.3−21.4
Table 14. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers 39.
Table 14. Theoretical values of 31P NMR chemical shifts and relative energies of conformers 39.
StructureIsomerConformerErel, kcal/mol Chemical Shift, ppm
Molecules 28 00669 i065Es-trans-gauche1.81.7
Molecules 28 00669 i066Es-trans-s-trans2.7−18.7
Molecules 28 00669 i067Zs-trans-s-cis3.7−3.4
Molecules 28 00669 i068Zs-trans-gauche3.4−2.4
Molecules 28 00669 i069Zs-trans-s-trans4.5−19.6
Molecules 28 00669 i070Zs-cis-s-cis0.4−2.3
Molecules 28 00669 i071Zs-cis-gauche0.0−2.1
Molecules 28 00669 i072Zs-cis-s-trans0.5−18.1
Table 15. 1H, 13C and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated pyrroles (DMSO-d6).
Table 15. 1H, 13C and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated pyrroles (DMSO-d6).
NoStructureδ 1Hδ 13Cδ 31P
40Molecules 28 00669 i0738.31 m, 1H, N–CH= 7.21 m, 1H, H-5
6.82 s, 1H, CHCl2
6.45 m, 1H, H-3
6.23 m, 1H, H-4
6.16 m, 1H, P–CH=
148.7 d, N–CH=, 2JPC = 37.5
130.9 C-2, 121.4 C-5
114.2 C-3, 112.6 C-4
95.8 d, P–CH=, 1JPC = 180.0
62.0 CHCl2
92.1 PCl3+
–296.1 PCl6
41Molecules 28 00669 i0749.11 m, 1H, N–CH= 8.41–8.33 m, 5H, Ph
7.54 m, 1H, H-3
7.22 m, 1H, H-4
7.10 s, 1H, CHCl2
6.59 m, 1H, P–CH=
150.6 d, N–CH=, 2JPC = 38.0
135.5 C-2, 133.5 C-5
133.0 132.8 131.1 130.9 Ph
119.5 C-3, 118.4 C-4
102.3 d, P–CH=, 1JPC = 170.0
62.5 CHCl2
89.7 PCl3+
–296.2 PCl6
44Molecules 28 00669 i0758.22 m, 1H, N–CH= 7.12 m, 1H, H-5
6.80 s, 1H, CHCl2
6.39 m, 1H, H-3
6.20 m, 1H, H-4
6.07 m, 1H, P–CH=
141.3 d, N–CH=, 2JPC = 21.0
131.5 C-2, 128.7 C-5
114.0 C-4, 112.3 C-3
106.5 d, P–CH=, 1JPC = 167.0
61.8 CHCl2
31.9 POCl2
45Molecules 28 00669 i0769.87 m, 1H, N–CH= 8.28–7.82 m, 5H, Ph
7.70 m, 1H, H-3
6.97 s, 1H, CHCl2
6.81 m, 1H, H-4
5.73 m, 1H, P–CH=
142.9 d, N–CH=, 2JPC = 19.9
137.0 C-2, 134.0 C-5
131.5 130.4 129.6 128.0 Ph
124.1 C-3, 117.9 C-4
112.5 d, P–CH=, 1JPC = 193.8
62.9 CHCl2
33.7 POCl2
46Molecules 28 00669 i0778.26 m, 1H, N–CH= 7.13 m, 1H, H-5
6.77 s, 1H, CHCl2
6.41 m, 1H, H-3
6.27 m, 1H, H-4
6.21 m, 1H, P–CH=
140.9 d, N–CH=, 2JPC = 25.8
131.7 C-2, 128.8 C-5
114.9 C-4, 111.9 C-3
107.1 d, P–CH=, 1JPC = 208.0
61.8 CHCl2
12.4 PO(OH)2
Table 16. 1H, and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated trifluoroacetylpyrroles (CDCl3).
Table 16. 1H, and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated trifluoroacetylpyrroles (CDCl3).
NoStructureδ 1Hδ 31P
49Molecules 28 00669 i0788.59 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 23.3, 3JHH = 15.6
7.50 s, 1H, H-4
6.59 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 25.7, 3JHH = 15.6
6.49 s, 1H, H-3
2.61 s, 3H, CH3
28.6
2JPH = 25.7
3JPH = 23.3
50Molecules 28 00669 i0798.72 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 24.2, 3JPH = 15.7
7.22 s, 1H, H-3
6.59 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 25.9, 3JHH = 15.7
2.5–2.7 m, 4H, H-4,7
1.6–1.9 m, 4H, H-5,6
29.1
2JPH = 25.9
3JPH = 24.2
51Molecules 28 00669 i0808.50 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JHH = 15.3, 3JPH = 12.5
7.39 s, 1H, H-4
6.42 dd, 1H, P–CH=
3JHH = 15.3, 2JPH = 9.4
6.38 s, 1H, H-3
2.59 s, 3H, CH3
153.5
2JPH = 9.4
3JPH = 12.5
52Molecules 28 00669 i0818.28 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JHH = 15.5, 3JPH = 14.5
6.99 s, 1H, H-3
6.46 dd, 1H, P–CH=
3JHH = 15.5, 2JPH = 7.3
2.4–2.7 m, 4H, H-4,7
1.7–1.9 m, 4H, H-5,6
160.6 2
JPH = 7.3
3JPH = 14.5
Table 17. 1H, and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated pyrroles 56, 57 (CDCl3).
Table 17. 1H, and 31P NMR chemical shifts (δ, ppm) and coupling constants (J, Hz) of phosphorylated pyrroles 56, 57 (CDCl3).
NoStructureδ 1Hδ 31P
56Molecules 28 00669 i0826.68 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 4.0
6.39 m, 1H, H3
6.19 d, 1H, H-3, 3JHH = 4.0
3.49 m, 1H, H1
3.17 m, 1H, H2
2.3 s, 3H, CH3
35.3
2JPH1 = 13.5
2JPH2 = 14.5
3JPH3 = 27.5
57Molecules 28 00669 i0837.4–7.1 m, 5H, Ph
6.75 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 4.0
6.31 m, 1H, H3
6.15 d, 1H, H-3, 3JHH = 4.0
3.33 m, 1H, H1
3.05 m, 1H, H2
34.6
2JPH1 = 14.0
2JPH2 = 14.0
3JPH3 = 28.0
59Molecules 28 00669 i0847.38 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 39.2, 3JHH = 6.1
6.62 dd, 1H, H-3
3JHH = 4.2, 3JPH-3 = 2.6
5.84 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 4.2
5.69 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 17.9, 3JHH = 6.1
2.07 s, 3H, Me
28.6
2JPH = 17.9
3JPH = 39.2
3JPH-3 = 2.6 (H-3)
60Molecules 28 00669 i0857.4–7.1 m, 5H, Ph
7.38 dd, 1H, N–CH=
3JPH = 39.5, 3JHH = 6.5
6.62 dd, 1H, H-3
3JHH = 4.2, 3JPH-3 = 2.8
5.84 d, 1H, H-4, 3JHH = 4.2
5.69 dd, 1H, P–CH=
2JPH = 18.0, 3JHH = 6.5
26.4
3JPH = 39.5 N–CH=
2JPH = 18.0 P–CH=
3JPH = 2.8 (H-3)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Larina, L. Organophosphorus Azoles Incorporating a Tetra-, Penta-, and Hexacoordinated Phosphorus Atom: NMR Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemistry. Molecules 2023, 28, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020669

AMA Style

Larina L. Organophosphorus Azoles Incorporating a Tetra-, Penta-, and Hexacoordinated Phosphorus Atom: NMR Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemistry. Molecules. 2023; 28(2):669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Larina, Lyudmila. 2023. "Organophosphorus Azoles Incorporating a Tetra-, Penta-, and Hexacoordinated Phosphorus Atom: NMR Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemistry" Molecules 28, no. 2: 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020669

APA Style

Larina, L. (2023). Organophosphorus Azoles Incorporating a Tetra-, Penta-, and Hexacoordinated Phosphorus Atom: NMR Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemistry. Molecules, 28(2), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020669

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop