Next Article in Journal
Two-Dimensional GeC/MXY (M = Zr, Hf; X, Y = S, Se) Heterojunctions Used as Highly Efficient Overall Water-Splitting Photocatalysts
Next Article in Special Issue
Colorimetric Immunoassays with Boronic Acid-Decorated, Peroxidase-like Metal-Organic Frameworks as the Carriers of Antibodies and Enzymes
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory, Wound Healing, and Anti-Diabetic Effects of Pure Active Compounds Present in the Ryudai Gold Variety of Curcuma longa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluorescence Sensors for the Detection of L-Histidine Based on Silver Nanoclusters Modulated by Copper Ions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Overview on the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors by the Signal Amplification of Enzyme- or Nanozyme-Based Catalysis Plus Redox Cycling

by
Ning Xia
1,*,
Fengli Gao
1,
Jiwen Zhang
1,
Jiaqiang Wang
1 and
Yaliang Huang
2,*
1
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anyang Normal University, Anyang 455000, China
2
School of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(12), 2796; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122796
Submission received: 21 April 2024 / Revised: 31 May 2024 / Accepted: 6 June 2024 / Published: 12 June 2024

Abstract

:
Enzyme-linked electrochemical immunosensors have attracted considerable attention for the sensitive and selective detection of various targets in clinical diagnosis, food quality control, and environmental analysis. In order to improve the performances of conventional immunoassays, significant efforts have been made to couple enzyme-linked or nanozyme-based catalysis and redox cycling for signal amplification. The current review summarizes the recent advances in the development of enzyme- or nanozyme-based electrochemical immunosensors with redox cycling for signal amplification. The special features of redox cycling reactions and their synergistic functions in signal amplification are discussed. Additionally, the current challenges and future directions of enzyme- or nanozyme-based electrochemical immunosensors with redox cycling are addressed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Electrochemical immunosensors have attracted widespread interest in clinical diagnosis, food quality control, and environmental protection [1,2,3]. The desirable combination of specific antibody–antigen recognition with convenient electrochemical methods endows immunosensors with inherent advantages, such as excellent selectivity, operational simplicity, and inherent miniaturization [4]. Under an electrical transducer, the immune recognition event of antigen–antibody interaction can be translated into a detectable chemical or physical parameter to produce an electrical output signal. Nonetheless, the low sensitivity of traditional electrochemical immunoassays cannot meet the need of the ultrasensitive determination of trace analytes [5]. In order to fulfill the urgent requirement of immunosensors with a high sensitivity and low detection limit, various signal amplification strategies have been integrated with immunoassays in the past decades [6,7], including enzymatic catalysis [8], DNA-based amplification techniques [9,10], and functional nanomaterials [11,12,13,14,15,16]. Among them, the perfect integration of the high specificity of enzymatic catalysis with the high simplicity of electrochemical techniques has become a successful approach for designing novel immunosensors in disease diagnosis, medicine research, and environmental monitoring [17,18,19,20].
Because of the high turnover frequency, good reaction selectivity, and excellent substrate specificity, enzymes have been popularly used as catalytic labels to provide high, stable, and reproducible signals, such as horseradish peroxidase (HRP) [21,22], alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [23,24], and glucose oxidase (GOx) [25,26]. Antigens or antibodies can be conjugated with reporter enzymes for molecular recognition and signal readout. After the specific antigen–antibody interaction, the enzymatic products are determined at the final step of immunoassays. The function of enzyme labeling is to catalytically generate a multitude of signal units, which can be feasibly determined by different electrochemical techniques. The change in electrochemical signal exhibits a stoichiometric relationship to the target concentration. Therefore, the single reporter enzyme at one recognition event can generate numerous signal molecules, eventually amplifying the electrochemical signal [27]. For example, a single-enzyme HRP can promote the generation of 107 signal molecules per minute [28]. Notwithstanding the signal amplification, the low signal intensity of enzymatic products will result in a low sensitivity of enzyme-linked electrochemical immunoassays. In this view, enzymatic reactions are always fused with other advanced amplification strategies to improve the sensitivity, such as nanomaterials [29], multi-enzymes [30], and redox cycling [31,32]. Among them, the strategy of coupling enzymatic catalysis with redox cycling has aroused widespread interest since it only requires the introduction of additional reagents to the electrolyte medium [33]. The redox cycle process involves the repetitive generation of electroactive substances through electrochemical, enzymatic, or chemical reactions. Consequently, a small amount of product from the enzymatic reaction can induce the generation of an enhanced electrochemical signal. For this consideration, electrochemical immunosensors, DNA sensors, and aptasensors have been widely developed through enzymatic reaction plus redox cycling [34,35,36,37]. The integration of redox cycling and enzymatic catalysis can also be introduced into optical bioassays, including fluorescence [38,39], colorimetry [40,41,42], and surface-enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy [43].
Although many reviews have focused on the signal-amplified strategies, few of them have paid attention to the guiding and systematic summary of the advances in electrochemical immunosensors based on enzyme- or nanozyme-based catalysis plus redox cycling [18,25,44,45,46,47]. In this review, we systematically summarize the recent developments of electrochemical immunosensors by the signal amplification of enzyme- or nanozyme-based catalysis plus redox cycling. After a brief overview of the types of redox cycling reactions, the applications of enzymatic catalysis plus redox cycling in electrochemical immunosensors are discussed according to the functions of natural enzymes (e.g., oxidoreductases and hydrolases) and artificial nanozymes. Furthermore, this review addresses the future perspectives on the development of electrochemical immunosensors with catalytic reaction plus redox cycling.

2. Types of Redox Cycling Reactions

Enzymatic products (P) can be accumulated in solution for a prolonged time and then participate in redox cycling for signal amplification. In redox cycling, the repeatedly coupled oxidation and reduction of signal reporters can produce highly amplified electrochemical signals without changing the background. Based on the types of electrochemical reactions occurring near or on the electrode surface, the system can be divided into electro-oxidization and electro-reduction. In the redox cycling of substances produced by enzymatic catalysis, the oxidized (or reduced) species can be repetitively reduced (or oxidized) through enzymatic, chemical, or electrochemical methods. Before the summarization of electrochemical immunosensors based on enzymatic catalysis plus redox cycling, it is necessary to briefly describe several typical but important redox cycling reactions in enzyme-linked immunoassays according to the method of redox cycling of electroactive signaling species.

2.1. Electrochemical–Enzymatic Redox Cycling

Oxidoreductases containing Cu or Fe ions, such as laccase, tyrosinase, and HRP, can be used as electrocatalysts to catalyze the redox reactions of substrates [48]. In the presence of extra oxidants, small redox molecules can be used as mediators to transfer electrons between the active center of the enzyme and the sensing electrode, including ferrocene (Fc) and its derivatives, 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and hydroquinone (HQ) [49,50,51,52,53,54]. Most of the hydrophobic mediators can penetrate the modification layers to exchange electrons with the sensing electrode.
The EN redox cycling schemes of oxidoreductase-based electrochemical biosensors are illustrated in Figure 1. In the HRP-based system, the mediator of TMB in the reduced form (TMBRed) is first enzymatically oxidized into TMBOx (the oxidized form of TMB) by HRP in the presence of H2O2. When TMBOx is electrochemically reduced back into its reducing format (TMBRed) at a suitable potential, the resulting TMBRed is immediately oxidized again through HRP enzymatic catalysis. This process will cause a great increase in the reduction current. In the GOx-based system, the mediator Os2+ or Fc is first electrochemically oxidized into Os3+ or ferricinium ion. The oxidized mediator is then enzymatically reduced into its reduced form by GOx in the presence of glucose, leading to an increase in the oxidation current. The enzyme catalysis, herein named EN redox cycling of the mediator between enzymatic oxidization (or reduction) and electrochemical reduction (or oxidization), can produce an enhancement in the current at the electrode. However, in the presence of trace amounts of targets, few enzyme labels were immobilized on the electrode to participate in the enzymatic catalysis. In a limited time, the amount of the re-generated mediators is relatively low even in the presence of a nonlimiting concentration of enzyme substrates. Thus, the signal amplification efficiency of the EN redox cycling can be enhanced by improving the turnover number of enzyme labels or using nanomaterials as nanocarriers to increase the amount of enzyme labels per immunocomplex.
Hydrolytic enzymes, such as ALP and β-Galactosidase (β-Gal), can be used as the primary enzyme reporter (E1) in combination with oxidoreductases to construct two enzymes-based strategies through the in situ detection of the hydrolytic products, which is named electrochemical–bienzymatic redox cycling [55,56]. In this method, oxidoreductases, such as GOx, glucose dehydrogenase (GDH), and diaphorase (DI), are required as the second enzyme (E2) for the one-step in situ regeneration of electroactive E1 product [57]. According to the function of enzymatic products, the strategies of the electrochemical–bienzymatic redox cycling system can be classified into two modes (Figure 2) [58]. In Figure 2a, the enzymatic product (P) generated from E1 serves as both the substrate of E2 and the electron mediator and can be recycled via repeated enzymatic reactions. In order to minimize the interference between the two enzymatic reactions, E1 should show no redox activity. Meanwhile, the optimal conditions for the two enzymes should be similar to ensure a high enzymatic efficiency. In Figure 2b, P serving as the co-substrate of E2 is continuously consumed during the enzymatic reactions. The bienzymatic redox cycling system in Figure 2a exhibits a higher amplification efficiency than that in Figure 2b.

2.2. Electrochemical–Chemical Redox Cycling

Redox cycling of enzymatic products can be achieved through simple chemical reactions without the use of additional enzymes or electrodes. For example, the enzymatic product (P) can be first electrochemically oxidized into its oxidized form (Q). The additional reducing agent can chemically reduce Q into P. The regeneration of P during electrochemical scanning will induce a significant enhancement in the current, which is defined as electrochemical–chemical (EC) redox cycling amplification (Figure 3a). In another type of EC redox cycling system (Figure 3b) [59], the enzymatic product P serves as a chemical reducing agent to continuously regenerate the redox mediator (R) from its electrochemically oxidized product (O) near the electrode. In this process, the redox mediator serves as an electrocatalyst to transfer the electron from enzymatic product P to the electrode. The amplification efficiency of the second redox cycling is lower than that of the first one, and it is always used in the determination of enzyme activity rather than enzyme-linked electrochemical biosensors.
Chemical–chemical (CC) redox cycling can be achieved between two additional reagents. In contrast to EC redox cycling, electrochemical–chemical–chemical (ECC) redox cycling is more effective at amplifying the electrochemical signal (Figure 3c) [60,61,62,63]. Generally, the electroactive mediator (RI) is electrochemically oxidized into OI, which can be reduced immediately by the enzymatic product (P). The oxidized enzymatic product (Q) is then rapidly reduced back to P in the presence of excess reducing agent (RII). In this method, RI serving as the redox mediator can be modified on the electrode surface (Figure 3c) or dispersed in the solution (Figure 3d). Redox cycling of the enzymatic product P between RI and RII can cause a significant increase in the anodic current. For the achievement of a low background signal and increased sensitivity, it is crucial to select an appropriate reducing agent, enzymatic substrate, redox mediator, and sensing electrode [64]. The reducing agent RII should be electrochemically inactive in the scanning potential window and the chemical reaction of RI/P and Q/RII should be very fast.
In addition, the enzymatic product P can promote the formation of electroactive metal deposition on the electrode surface to produce a detectable electrochemical signal. In this method, the enzymatic product P is regenerated from its oxidized form (Q) by the additional reducing substance RII. One of the most typical examples is enzymatic silver (Ag) biometallization, in which Ag+ (OI) is reduced by the enzymatic product P into metallic silver (RI) deposition on the solid substrate [65,66,67]. The electrochemical oxidation of the deposited Ag could produce a high electrochemical signal. In addition, such redox cycling systems have been widely used in optical bioassays, such as chemiluminescence [68,69,70,71,72], fluorescence [38,39], and SERS assays [43].

2.3. Electrochemical–Electrochemical Redox Cycling

The electrochemical–electrochemical (EE) redox cycling of electroactive species produced by enzymatic catalysis is another approach for improving the sensitivity of electrochemical immunoassays [73,74,75]. In the EE redox cycling, two electrodes in close proximity to each other can serve as the generator and collector. The signaling species are electrochemically oxidized or reduced iteratively at the generator electrode, and are then mass-transported through diffusion onto the collector electrode to be electrochemically reduced or oxidized. Under the repeated redox reactions between the generator–collector electrodes, the electrochemical signal could be greatly amplified (Figure 4) [76,77]. The electrode gap should be as narrow as possible to facilitate the diffusion of the redox couple and enhance the redox cycling efficiency. To date, various electrode systems have been reported for redox cycling, including interdigitated array (IDA) electrodes [78], twin-electrode thin-layer cells [79], vertically paired electrodes [80], rotating ring-disc electrodes [81], and others [82,83].

3. Oxidoreductases as the Signal Labels of Electrochemical Immunosensors

3.1. HRP

HRP is one of the most commonly used enzyme labels in EN redox cycling for signal amplification [84]. The enzyme active center can be activated by the substrate (H2O2) to a ferryloxy form that can be electrochemically reduced back in a catalytic cycle by using a redox mediator or substrate to shuttle the electron from the electrode to the redox center of the enzyme [85,86]. The oxidized form of the mediator or substrate can be quantified by recording the redox current for the determination of the enzyme activity. A variety of redox molecules have been utilized as the mediators of HRP-based redox cycling, such as TMB [87,88], HQ [89,90,91,92], catechol [93,94,95], thionine [96,97], o-phenylenediamine (OPD) [98,99], 3-hydroxyl-2-aminopyridine [100], 5-methyl-phenazinium methyl sulfate [101], and o-aminophenol [102]. As a proof, Doldan et al. reported HRP-based EN redox cycling for the determination of exosomes with signal-on and signal-off formats [103]. In this work, CD9 proteins on the surface of exosomes were specifically labeled with HRP-conjugated α-mouse IgG antibodies. The HRP-based EN redox cycling of TMB in the presence of H2O2 resulted in a significantly amplified electrochemical signal. In addition, HQ is another commonly used mediator for designing EN-redox-cycling-based biosensors with HRP enzymatic catalysis. Haque et al. developed an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of mouse IgG (Figure 5A) [104]. In this study, graphene oxide (GO) was deposited on the surface of an amine-terminated benzenediazonium-modified indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode via electrostatic and π-π stacking interactions. The deposited GO was then converted into electrochemically reduced graphene oxide (ERGO) through an electrochemical reduction method, followed by the modification of amphiphilic polymers for the covalent immobilization of antibodies. After the formation of the immunocomplex, HRP molecules were immobilized on the electrode surface. Under HRP-based EN redox cycling, the mediator HQ could be repetitively oxidized into p-benzoquinone (BQ) by HRP enzymatic catalysis. The resulting BQ was regenerated during the electrochemical reduction progress, thus producing an amplified current. However, in the HQ-mediated redox cycling system, the electrochemical reduction of H2O2 and the electrochemical oxidation of HQ may cause a high background and affect the analytical performance. Thus, a redox mediator with a formal potential lower than that of H2O2 is desirable for addressing this problem. Typically, Kang et al. used catechol as the mediator to develop an HRP-based EN redox cycling for the detection of mouse IgG [105]. Yan et al. reported an EN-redox-cycling-based electrochemical immunosensor for the determination of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with acetaminophen as the HRP substrate (Figure 5B) [106]. In this study, ERGO was used to partially decorate the ITO electrode for maintaining a high electrocatalytic activity for BQ reduction even at the immunosensing-layer-modified electrode. As an N-acetylated derivative of p-AP, acetaminophen with better stability against light exhibited a formal potential of 0.28 V, which is higher than that of HQ (0.03 V). The redox reaction of acetaminophen is highly reversible at neutral pH. The applied potential was set at 0 V to minimize the electrochemical reduction of H2O2 and avoid the electrochemical oxidation of acetaminophen. In HRP-based EN redox cycling, both the enzymatic oxidation of acetaminophen by HRP in the presence of H2O2 and the electrochemical reduction of the catalytic product were very fast.
The above redox cycling strategies always show a modest signal amplification efficiency because of the relatively low enzyme/antibody ratio (1:1). To increase the number of HRP molecules in the signal output step, nanomaterials with a large surface area have been used as carriers to load enzymes and detection antibodies for a wide detection range and high sensitivity, such as gold nanomaterials [107,108], magnetic nanoparticles [109], carbon nanotubes [110], graphene [111,112], silica nanoparticles [113,114], and so forth [115]. Tang et al. reported a magneto-controlled flow-through multiplexed immunoassay method for the simultaneous determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) using magnetic graphene nanosheets as capture probes and multifunctional nanogold hollow microspheres as distinguishable signal labels (Figure 6) [116]. In this work, nanogold hollow microspheres were used to load HRP, two electroactive molecules (Fc and thionine), and CEA/AFP antibodies. Antibody-modified magnetic graphene nanosheets served as filter-like networks to capture AFP and CEA. Thionine/Fc-mediated HRP-based redox cycling in the presence of H2O2 endowed the immunoassays with wide working ranges and low detection limits for the simultaneous detection of AFP and CEA.
In HRP-based immunosensors, the enzymatic products can be electrochemically reduced within the applied potential window. However, most of the mediators are electroactive, and H2O2 is easily reduced within the electrochemical potential window, resulting in high background current. Meanwhile, the electro-reduction of O2 dissolved in the solution may increase the background current when a highly electrocatalytic electrode is employed as the working electrode. To resolve this problem, several enzymes that can in situ catalyze the formation of H2O2 were integrated with the HRP-based immunoassays based on a bienzymatic cascade strategy. In order to avoid the potential side reactions in this method, it is critical to select the appropriate HRP substrate and preceding oxidase. GOx has been widely used as a preceding oxidase to catalyze the oxidation of the corresponding substrate in the presence of O2, which was accompanied with the production of H2O2 for the next HRP enzymatic catalysis [117,118,119,120]. However, the GOx-catalyzed reduction of the oxidized peroxidase substrate may hamper the immunosensing performance. Alternatively, Yan et al. reported an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of parathyroid hormone (PTH) based on a choline oxidase (ChOx)-HRP bienzymatic cascade (Figure 7) [117]. In this work, ChOx catalyzed the oxidation of choline, and the in situ generated H2O2 could subsequently oxidize acetaminophen through the HRP enzymatic catalysis. The performances between the ChOx-HRP and GOx-HRP systems were compared. It was demonstrated that the oxidized acetaminophen could not be reduced by ChOx in the presence of choline and that the signal-to-background ratio for the ChOx-HRP system was higher than that for the GOx-HRP system using acetaminophen as the HRP substrate.

3.2. GOx

GOx can catalyze the oxidation of glucose with O2 or other species as the electron acceptor [121]. The enzyme shows excellent stability and high catalytic activity over a broad pH range (pH 4~7) and thus has been widely used in immunoassays [122,123]. In the first-generation glucose monitoring system, GOx enzymatic catalysis was monitored by determining the level of the co-substrate (O2) or by-product (H2O2). However, other reductants in biological liquids can also be oxidized on the electrode at a similar potential, leading to a false positive signal. Meanwhile, differences in the oxygen tension of samples may bring fluctuations into the electrode response. As the substitute of O2, other redox mediators, such as Fc, osmium complexes, and Ru(NH3)63+, have been used to design GOx-based electrochemical biosensors by accelerating the electrical communication between the electrode and the catalytic center of GOx [124,125,126,127].
A relatively long incubation time for enzymatic catalysis can favor the generation of an increasing number of signal species, which is unfavorable in time-saving detection applications. To address this shortcoming, Singh et al. developed an incubation-period-free electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) based on GOx-based EN redox cycling, in which glucose was used as the reducing substrate and Ru(NH3)63+ was used as the redox mediator [128]. As shown in Figure 8A, ITO with a low and reproducible capacitive background current/charge was utilized as the sensing electrode. The applied potential was set at 0.05 V for the chronocoulometric measurement, which is higher than the formal potential of Ru(NH3)63+/Ru(NH3)62+ (−0.15 V). The redox couple undergoes a fast outer-sphere electron transfer reaction at the ITO electrode. The enzymatic reduction of Ru(NH3)63+ in air-saturated buffer was faster than that of the enzymatic reduction of O2. Meanwhile, the direct electro-oxidation of glucose at the ITO electrode surface and the direct reaction between glucose and Ru(NH3)63+ are slow, achieving a low background signal. After the attachment of GOx-modified IgG on the electrode, Ru(NH3)63+ was reduced to Ru(NH3)62+ with the transformation of glucose into gluconic acid. Then, Ru(NH3)62+ was re-oxidized back to Ru(NH3)63+ at the electrode surface. The repeated EN redox cycling produced a high chronocoulometric charge. Finally, the rapid Ru(NH3)62+-mediated electron transfer between the electrode and the GOx label and the acquisition of chronocoulometric charge at a potential in the mass transfer-controlled region obviously minimized the incubation period and improved the signal-to-background ratio.
In heterogeneous ELISA, multiple washing steps are required to remove the unbound labels and interfering species. Accordingly, Yang’s group reported a washing-free immunosensor for the sensitive and single-step detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum based on the EN redox cycling and proximity-dependent electron mediation between GOx and ITO electrodes [129]. As shown in Figure 8B, the captured GOx reporter has a faster electron mediation with the electrode than the unbound GOx because of the distance-dependent electron mediation of ferrocenemethanol (FcM) between GOx and ITO electrodes. The L-ascorbate oxidase (AOx)-catalyzed oxidation of L-ascorbic acid (AA) minimized the influence of AA. This washing-free immunosensor based on the EN redox cycling could sensitively determine PSA after an incubation period of 10 min.

3.3. Tyrosinase

As a copper-containing redox enzyme, tyrosinase manifests two catalytic properties (monooxygenase and oxidase activity), and has been widely used to construct enzyme electrodes for the determination of catechol and phenol via a redox cycling process [130,131,132,133,134,135]. The high and selective catalytic ability led to the application of tyrosinase in the affinity assay as a catalytic label or signal amplifier [136]. Tyrosinase can be used to design EN redox cycling schemes, in which tyrosinase serves simultaneously as the label to enzymatically generate the electroactive product (catechol) and to regenerate the oxidized form of the tyrosinase product (ortho-quinone). The regenerated ortho-quinone can be electrochemically reduced to produce an amplified electrochemical response. For instance, Chumyim developed an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of Salmonella Typhimurium cells based on tyrosinase multilayer-functionalized CNTs as electrochemical labels and EN redox cycling [137]. Akanda et al. reported integrated electrochemical–chemical–enzymatic (ECN) redox cycling for protein detection [138]. As illustrated in Figure 9, tyrosinase catalyzed the oxidation of phenol to o-benzoquinone in the presence of O2. Fc was used as the redox mediator to catalyze the reduction of o-benzoquinone through electro-reduction-based EC redox cycling. The combination of non-enzymatic EC redox cycling with the enzymatic CN redox system significantly amplified the signal and improved the biosensing performance.
Akanda et al. reported tyrosinase-responsive electrochemical oxidation-based EC redox cycling for the detection of CEA (Figure 10A) [139]. In this study, phenol and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide disodium salt in the reduced format (NADH) were employed as the enzyme substrate and the reducing agent, respectively. The low electroactivity of phenol and the high oxidation over-potential of NADH on the chitosan-modified GCE resulted in a negligible background. Tyrosinase with monooxygenase activity could catalyze the conversion of the poorly electroactive phenol into the highly electroactive product catechol at neutral pH. The EC redox cycling of catechol by NADH led to a greatly amplified voltammetric signal and high signal-to-noise ratio. The unfavorable tyrosinase-catalytic oxidation of catechol can be reduced back to catechol in the presence of excess NADH. Finally, the developed method was capable of determining CEA in a linear range of 1.0 pg/mL~0.1 μg/mL with a detection limit of 100 fg/mL. To further investigate the detailed information of tyrosinase as a catalytic label in immunoassay, Park et al. compared the applicability of four para-substituted phenolic compounds as tyrosinase substrates and three reducing agents for EC redox cycling (Figure 10B) [140]. In this work, 4-methoxyphenol and ammonia-borane (H3N−BH3, AB) were selected as the tyrosinase substrate and the reducing agent. The rapid EC redox cycling of the tyrosinase product led to a high electrochemical signal level. Meanwhile, the slow oxidation of AB on the low electrocatalytic ITO electrode at a low applied potential resulted in a low background. As a result, PTH was determined in a linear range of 2 pg/mL–1 μg/mL with a detection limit of 2 pg/mL.

3.4. GDH

The above oxidoreductases, including HRP, GOx, and tyrosinase, exhibit the highest activity when they are expressed and folded into the proper three-dimensional structure. In addition, many inactive enzymes (apoenzymes) require the covalent or non-covalent coupling of non-diffusional cofactors to trigger their catalytic activity. The possibility to reversibly modulate the activity of enzymes has been proven to be a valuable strategy for optical and electrochemical biosensors [141,142,143]. Typically, GDH is one of the prominent examples of apoenzymes. According to the redox cofactors, GDH can be subdivided into flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent GDH (FAD-GDH), pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)-dependent GDH (PQQ-GDH), and nicotine adenine dinucleotide (NAD) or nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP)-dependent GDH [144]. In contrast to GOx, GDH is insensitive to O2 and exhibits a higher redox potential and catalytic activity [145]. Moreover, the reduced form of GDH cannot be oxidized by the dissolved O2. Thus, GDH has been widely used to replace GOx for the design of electrochemical immunosensors [146]. The catalytic activity of PQQ-GDH can be activated through its reconstitution [147]. After the activation of apo-GDH by PQQ and Ca2+ ions, PQQ-GDH can catalyze the oxidation of glucose with a particularly high catalytic efficiency and turnover number. It can be regenerated into its oxidized form by a series of electron acceptors or mediators. The detailed mechanism and application of PQQ-GDH in redox-mediated electrochemical reactions have been reported by Limoges’s group [148,149].
Compared with other GDHs, the catalysis of FAD-GDH does not require external cofactors. Haque et al. developed an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of PTH with FAD-GDH-based EN redox cycling (Figure 11A) [150]. In this study, 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (PD), a heterocyclic electroactive quinone, was used as the electron mediator and ITO with a low electrocatalytic activity was employed as the working electrode to decrease the background current from the reduction of O2. In the presence of glucose, FAD-GDH catalyzed the rapid reduction of PD to 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-diol (PDol). In this process, PD was not reduced by glucose. Compared with other quinone-based electron mediators, PD-based EN redox cycling showed the highest signal-to-background ratio. In addition, Park et al. reported the interference-free duplex detection of total and active enzymes at a working electrode based on two different EN redox cycling reactions [151]. As illustrated in Figure 11B, the GDH label on the immunocomplex could initiate the EN redox cycling reaction in the presence of glucose and FcM, providing a high electrochemical signal without an incubation period at a higher applied potential (0.1 V vs. Ag/AgCl). Then, free PSA with proteolytic activity promoted the hydrolysis of the electro-inactive peptide substrates, resulting in the release of electroactive segments over an incubation period of 30 min. Under the EN redox cycling reaction in the presence of GDH, glucose, and 4-amino-1-naphthol (4-NH2-1-N), a strong electrochemical signal was obtained at a low applied potential (0.0 V).

3.5. FAD-Dependent Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GPDH)

The proximity-dependent electron mediation of FcM between the electrode and the enzyme label can facilitate the differentiation between the bound and unbound labels without washing steps. Based on this concept, Dutta et al. developed a washing-free heterogeneous immunosensor for the detection of PSA [129]. However, the high concentration of the enzyme substrate (glucose) was used to avoid the influence of pre-existing glucose in real physiological samples on the mediated oxidation of glucose by GOx. In addition, O2 dissolved in solution could competitively participate in the GOx-catalyzed oxidation of glucose, leading to a low sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Moreover, the applied potential of 0.13 V may cause the electro-oxidation of other interfering species. It has been reported that the reaction between FAD-GPDH and dissolved O2 is slow and the level of glycerol-3-phosphate (GP) in blood is low [152]. To avoid the interference of dissolved O2 and metabolites, Dutta et al. developed a low-interference washing-free electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of cardiac troponin I using FAD-GPDH, GP, and Ru(NH3)63+ as the signal label, an enzyme substrate, and an electron mediator (Figure 12) [153]. Under the catalysis of FAD-GPDH in the presence of GP, Ru(NH3)63+ was converted into Ru(NH3)63+, whose concentration near the electrode was higher than that in solution. The EN redox cycling of Ru(NH3)63+ allowed for continuous electron mediation. Therefore, the mediation between the ITO electrode and the bound GPDH was fast and that for the unbound antibody was slow. This method avoided the oxidation of uric acid and acetaminophen by using an applied potential near 0 V. In addition, AOx was added to oxidize AA and eliminate its interference. Under the optimized conditions, cardiac troponin I was determined in a linear range of 0.01–100 ng/mL.

3.6. DT-Diaphorase (DT-D)

DT-D is a flavin-containing oxidoreductase that can catalyze the reduction of redox mediators (e.g., metal complexes, quinones, and nitro(so) compounds) in the presence of NADH or NADPH [154]. Because of its unique properties, DT-D has been used in EN redox cycling for electrochemical immunosensors. For instance, Ichzan et al. designed an EN redox cycling system involving ITO electrodes, 1,4-naphthoquinone, DT-D, and NADH [155]. Nandhakumar et al. developed an electrochemical immunosensor with di(thioether sulfonate)-substituted quinoline-1,4-dione (QLS) as the electron mediator for DT-D-involving EN redox cycling [156]. As shown in Figure 13A, the naphthoquinone core was substituted with a thioether sulfonate group for the achievement of high hydrophilicity, rapid dissolubility, high stability, moderate formal potential, and high electron mediation ability. Then, QLS was used as the electron mediator for constructing GDH-based electrochemical glucose biosensors and DT-D-based electrochemical immunosensors. Under EN redox cycling in the presence of DT-D and NADH, the repetitive generation of the reduced form of QLS resulted in an amplified oxidation current. This method was capable of determining PTH with a detection limit of 2 pg/mL, which was lower than the normal PTH concentration in humans. The bimolecular rate constants between DT-D and some metal complexes as the electron acceptors are high (up to 109 M−1s−1), which is favorable in electrochemical immunosensors based on EC redox cycling. In addition, Bhatia et al. reported an electrochemical immunosensor for interleukin-8 (IL-8) detection using a DT-D-based polyenzyme label and EN redox cycling (Figure 13B) [157]. In this work, biotinylated DT-D and neutravidin were used to produce the polyenzyme labels. After the electrochemical oxidation of Os(bpy)2Cl2, the EN redox cycling of Os(bpy)2Cl2 in the presence of DT-D and NADH led to signal amplification. Under the optimized conditions, IL-8 was sensitively detected in a wide linear range from 1 pg/mL to 1 μg/mL with a detection limit of 1 pg/mL.
DT-D serving as a redox enzyme can catalyze the conversion of an electrochemically inactive substrate with a nitro group into an electroactive product with an amine group [158]. Kang et al. developed an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of PTH using DT-D as the bifunctional enzyme label for enzymatic amplification and redox cycling [159]. As displayed in Figure 14A, to minimize the direct reaction between nitro(so) compounds with NAD(P)H, six compounds containing a nitro or nitroso group were tested in terms of signal-to-background ratio. As a result, 4-nitroso-1-naphthol (4-NO-1-N) was selected as the enzyme substrate used to develop a DT-D-based sandwich-type immunosensor. DT-D catalyzed the reduction of 4-NO-1-N to 4-NH2-1-N by NADH (reaction i). The generated 4-NH2-1-N was electrochemically oxidized at the avidin-modified ITO electrode (reaction ii). The oxidized form of 4-NH2-1-N could be directly reduced back to 4-NH2-1-N by NADH and electrochemically oxidized again (reaction iii), which corresponded to EC redox cycling. Meanwhile, the oxidized species could be regenerated by NADH with the aid of DT-D (reaction iv), corresponding to EN redox cycling. Consequently, the combination of enzymatic catalysis and EC as well as EN redox cycling produced a highly amplified electrochemical signal. The electrochemical immunosensor achieved a wide linear range and a low detection limit (2 pg/mL). However, the DT-D-catalyzed soluble signaling species may diffuse away from the electrode surface during the incubation period, leading to a decreased electrochemical signal. To address this problem, Bhatia et al. reported an ultrasensitive method for the detection of PTH by combining the DT-D-catalyzed nitroso reduction and redox cycling with fast silver deposition (Figure 14B) [160]. In this work, the DT-D-based enzymatic generation of reductive 4-NH2-1-N catalyzed the reduction of Ag+ to insoluble Ag deposition on the ITO electrode. The oxidized form of 4-NH2-1-N was reduced back into 4-NH2-1-N by NADH through the CC (ii + iii) and CN (ii + iv) redox cycling process. Under the triple signal amplification (enzymatic amplification and CC and CN redox cycling), the generated silver deposition on the ITO electrode surface was electrochemically oxidized to produce a strong signal. By virtue of EE redox cycling, this electrochemical immunosensor showed a wide range from 100 fg/mL to 100 ng/mL and a detection limit of ~100 pg/mL, which was lower than that of the immunosensor using 4-NH2-1-N as the soluble signal species (2 pg/mL) [159]. However, this method required a washing step after Ag deposition because the DT-D substrate can be oxidized during the electrochemical oxidation of Ag deposition. To simplify the electrochemical assays and avoid the oxidation of the DT-D product, Bhatia et al. proposed a simple and fast method for Ag deposition using DT-D as the enzyme label and CN redox cycling of 1,4-naphthoquinone (NQ) by NADH [161].
Ichzan et al. found that DT-D could catalyze the reductive dephosphorylation of a phosphate-containing substrate using NADH or NADPH as the reductant [162]. Then, they developed a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of Gram-negative bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). As illustrated in Figure 14C, 1-amino-2-naphthyl phosphate (ANP) exhibited the highest electrochemical signal-to-background ratio compared with 4-aminophenyl phosphate and AAP. The EC and EN redox cycling of dephosphorylated product 1-amino-2-naphthol (AN) by NADH at low electrocatalytic ITO electrodes could generate a highly amplified electrochemical signal. Meanwhile, Nandhakumar et al. demonstrated that DT-D from Bacillus stearothermophilus possessed high carboxyl esterase-like activity in the presence of NADH and developed an electrochemical immunosensor for TSH detection using DT-D as the enzyme label [163]. The detailed working principle is shown in Figure 14D. The products generated from DT-D enzymatic catalysis participated in the fast EC and EE redox cycling by NADH, realizing the triple amplification and sensitive detection of TSH.
In addition, DT-D can participate in EN redox cycling with other enzymes, such as ALP [164], β-galactosidase [57], lactate dehydrogenase [165], and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)-dependent NAD-GDH [166]. Campàs et al. constructed a competitive electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of okadaic acid (OA) using ALP as the enzyme label and EN redox cycling of p-AP by DT-D and NADH [167]. Park et al. reported a wash-free amperometric detection of E. coli based on DT-D EN redox cycling (Figure 15) [168]. In this study, E. coli was captured by the anti-E. coli IgG-modified ITO electrode. The cell membrane endopeptidase of E. coli, OmpT could cleave the peptide bond in the substrate containing the segment of alanine–arginine–arginine–leucine–AP (A-R-R-L-AP). The generated R-L-AP was further hydrolyzed by leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), releasing an electroactive species AP that could trigger the EN and EC redox cycling in the presence of DT-D and NADH. Based on the two-sequential enzymatic cleavage and EN redox cycling, E. coli in tap water was determined with a detection limit of 103 CFU/mL.

3.7. Nanocatalysts or Artificial Enzymes

Despite the wide applications of natural enzymes, they still have several drawbacks, including poor environmental stability, high cost, difficulty in storage, and strict working conditions. To address these limitations, artificial enzymes have been exploited to mimic natural enzymes more effectively, including organic molecules, organic complexes, DNAzymes, and nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (i.e., nanozymes) [169,170,171]. These artificial enzymes have been widely used to construct electrochemical biosensors for the quantitative detection of disease biomarkers [172,173,174]. For instance, ferritin containing a ferric nanocore in the hollow protein cage can endow it with HRP-mimic activity [175]. It has been used to develop sandwich immunoassays due to its catalytic activity toward the oxidization of substrates in the presence of H2O2 [176,177]. Akanda reported an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of Enteropathogenic coli (E. coli) antigens using ferritin as a label to trigger electrochemical nanocatalyst redox cycling [178]. As displayed in Figure 16, in the presence of H2O2, ferritin was oxidized into the oxidized form, which could oxidize Ru(NH3)62+. The re-generated reduced form of ferritin could catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 again and the produced Ru(NH3)63+ was then electrochemically reduced back into Ru(NH3)62+. Ferritin-based redox cycling resulted in a high signal amplification efficiency and a low background signal.
Guanine-rich nucleic acid sequences can form G-quadruplex structures in the presence of cations (e.g., K+, Pb2+, and NH4+) and further bind with hemin to form hemin/G-quadruplex HRP-mimicking DNAzymes. Such artificial enzymes can be used for sensing events by catalyzing H2O2-mediated oxidation [179,180,181]. Although hemin in the DNAzyme can be directly measured by voltammetric techniques [182,183,184], EC redox cycling between hemin and additional oxidants can amplify the cathodic current [185,186]. Therefore, hemin/G-quadruplex-based DNAzymes have been widely used as electrocatalysts and biolabels for electrochemical immunoassays. For example, Tang et al. developed a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor for human IgG1 detection based on DNAzyme-containing DNA concatemers, which were formed by the self-assembly of short DNA fragments via a hybridization chain reaction (HCR). The dendritic DNA strands with rich G bases could bind with hemin to form hemin/G-quadruplexes, termed as DNAzyme concatemers [187]. In addition, electron mediators can enhance the efficiency of the electron transfer between the hemin and electrode and avoid the influence of dissolved oxygen, improving the detection sensitivity [188]. Zhang et al. reported the photoelectrochemical immunoassay of PSA by coupling DNAzyme concatemers with enzymatic biocatalytic precipitation [189]. As illustrated in Figure 17A, CdS:Mn/g-C3N4 nanohybrids were employed as photoactive materials and modified with capture antibodies. AuNPs was used to load the initiator strand and detection antibody. After the immune-reaction and HCR reaction, many DNAzymes formed between DNA concatemers and hemin effectively catalyzed the precipitation reaction toward 4-chloro-1-naphthol, thus leading to a decrease in the photocurrent. In addition, hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzymes can also be used as biocatalysts for driving other biocatalytic transformations under aerobic conditions, including the NADH oxidase-like oxidation of NADH to NAD+ and the oxidation of thiols to disulfides [190,191]. In this view, Li et al. reported the electrochemical immunoassay of prion proteins by integrating HCR with hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzymes for signal amplification (Figure 17B) [192]. In this study, the formed hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme could catalyze the aerobic oxidation of L-cysteine to L-cystine, accompanied by the generation of H2O2. The hemin/G-quadruplex was oxidized by H2O2 and then immediately electrochemically reduced back into the reduced formation at the electrode surface. The redox cycling of hemin in the presence of L-cysteine and dissolved oxygen resulted in an increase in the reduction current.
Nanoparticles with catalytic or enzyme-mimic ability (nanozymes) have received wide attention as catalytic labels for the signal-amplified detection of biorecognition events [193,194]. The nanocatalytic reactions can be integrated with redox cycling systems [195,196,197,198,199]. For example, Das et al. reported an electrochemical immunosensor for PSA detection based on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as nitrosoreductase-like nanocatalysts and ECC redox cycling amplification [200]. As displayed in Figure 18, a partially ferrocenyl-tethered dendrimer (Fc-D) deposited on an ITO electrode was sequentially modified with biotin, streptavidin, and biotin-labeled IgG. After the formation of a sandwich immune-complex, AuNPs catalyzed the reduction of p-nitrophenol (NP) into p-aminophenol (AP) in the presence of NaBH4. AP was immediately electrochemically oxidized into p-quinone imine (QI) with Fc as the electron mediator, and QI was reduced back to AP by the additional reducing reagent of NaBH4 and then re-oxidized at the electrode. The ECC redox cycling of AP could greatly increase the oxidation current of AP and significantly amplify the detection signal. Meanwhile, the slow electron transfer kinetics of NaBH4 on the ITO electrode resulted in a low background signal and the electronic mediation of Fc lowered the oxidation potential of AP. Furthermore, Yang’s group introduced magnetic beads into the immunoassays for mouse IgG detection [201]. Tang et al. reported the detection of α-fetoprotein using carbon-nanotube-enriched AuNPs as the nanolabels/nanocatalysts [202]. However, enzyme-like catalytic reactions always suffer from the problems of a low reaction rate and side reaction in O2-dissolved electrolyte solution. In addition, NaBH4 may undergo self-hydrolysis to generate many bubbles. To overcome these shortcomings, Nandhakumar et al. reported a redox-cycling-based immunosensor for the detection of PTH using 4-NO-1-N, Pd NPs, and H3N−BH3 [203]. As presented in Figure 19A, Pd NPs catalyzed the reduction of 4-NO-1-N into 4-NH2-1-N with H3N−BH3 as the reducing agent. 4-NH2-1-N was electrochemically oxidized at the ITO electrode and then regenerated through the reduction of H3N−BH3. Nandhakumar et al. reported a lateral flow immunosensor based on electrochemical nanocatalyst redox cycling using ferro/ferricyanide ([Fe(CN)6]3−/4−, Fe3+/2+), ammonia−borane (H3N−BH3, AB), and AuNP as the mediator, a reducing agent, and a catalytic label (Figure 19B), respectively [204]. In this work, Fe3+ was nanocatalytically reduced to Fe2+ in the presence of AuNP and AB, which produced a high current for electrochemical detection. Compared with the standard HRP-based enzymatic redox cycling, the detection platform with Fe3+/AuNP/AB-based electrochemical-nanocatalyst redox cycling enables better sensitivity, allowing for the detection of insulin with a detection limit down to 12 pM.
Thanks to the remarkable achievements in nanotechnology and nanoscience, more and more nanozymes have been introduced as the labels to replace natural enzymes for the development of redox-cycling-based biosensors [205,206]. Compared with natural enzymes, these nanozymes exhibit the merits of high stability, low cost, easy production, and tunable catalytic activity. Among them, Fe3O4 nanoparticles with enzyme-mimetic activity have been widely applied in the development of electrochemical biosensors [207,208]. For instance, Yang et al. developed a pseudo-bienzyme electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of AFP using hollow platinum-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles (HPtNPs-Fe3O4) as the peroxidase mimetic and GOx (Figure 20A) [209]. In this study, both HPtNPs and Fe3O4 nanoparticles show peroxidase-like catalytic ability to catalyze the oxidation of thionine by H2O2 that was produced through the GOx-catalyzed oxidation of glucose. Under the HPtNPs-Fe3O4-based ENc redox cycling of thionine, the reduction current was greatly improved. In addition, Ma et al. employed cubic Cu2O nanoframes as the HRP-mimicking labels to design electrochemical immunosensors [210]. As presented in Figure 20B, AuNPs-decorated 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-functionalized graphene sheets (Au@APTES-GS) were used to immobilize Ab1. Cu2O nanoframes were utilized to carry Ab2 and the redox mediator (ferrocenecarboxylic acid, Fc-COOH). Cu2O nanoframes with HRP-like activity could catalyze the oxidation of Fc-COOH by H2O2. The oxidized Fc-COOH was electrochemically reduced back into Fc-COOH immediately for the subsequent H2O2-mediated oxidation. Finally, the ENc redox cycling of Fc-COOH dramatically amplified the electrochemical signal. In addition, carbon-based nanostructures have been demonstrated to possess peroxidase-like catalytic activity, including graphene oxide and graphene quantum dots. Luo et al. used the nanocomposite of single-wall carbon nanotubes and a graphene quantum dots composite to catalyze the reaction between H2O2 and thionine for the detection of CEA [211].

4. Hydrolytic Enzymes as Signal Labels

4.1. ALP-Based Redox Cycling

4.1.1. ALP-Based EC Redox Cycling

ALP can catalyze the hydrolysis of orthophosphoric monoesters into alcohols or phenols. In view of its high turnover frequency and excellent stability, ALP has been widely used as the enzyme label in immunoassays for signal amplification [212,213]. The enzyme can catalyze the hydrolysis of electrochemically inactive substrates such as p-aminophenyl phosphate (p-APP) and L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (AAP) into an electroactive product of p-AP and AA, which can be electrochemically oxidized into p-quinone imine (QI) and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA), respectively [214,215,216]. To improve the detection sensitivity, reducing agents can be added to regenerate the enzymatic electroactive species after their electrochemical oxidation. In addition, reducing agents can also prevent the oxidation of enzymatic products by O2. To minimize the background current, electrochemical immunosensors require the use of ITO electrodes with low electrocatalytic activities for the additional reducing agents. However, ITO electrodes with low electroactivity show a low electrochemical oxidation rate for ALP enzymatic products, leading to a weak signal. Therefore, it is important to select the appropriate ALP enzymatic product, reducing agent, and sensing electrode. In p-AP redox cycling, several reducing agents have been used to regenerate p-AP, including NaBH4, hydrazine, and tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) [217,218]. The electro-oxidation of the ALP enzymatic product (p-AP) is slow at the ITO electrode and it is necessary to modify the electrode with electron-mediating species. Aiming to achieve a high signal-to-background ratio, ALP substrates should be electrochemically inactive and the corresponding ALP enzymatic products should be electrochemically oxidized at a low formal potential and high reaction rate [219]. Akanda et al. developed an ALP- and AAP-based EC redox-cycling-based immunosensor for the detection of troponin I (Figure 21A) [220]. In this work, the performances of AAP are compared with that of other ALP substrates (e.g., 1-naphthyl phosphate (NPP) and 4-amino-1-naphthyl phosphate (ANP)). The results indicate that AAP and AA are a better substrate and product than others in terms of the formal potential and electro-oxidation rate. Avidin-modified ITO electrodes without the immobilization of an electron mediator exhibited good voltametric behavior regarding the fast electro-oxidation of AA. TCEP showed a fast recycling reaction with low anodic current at the ITO electrode. The EC redox-cycling-based method exhibited a detection limit of 10 fg/mL for the detection of troponin I. In addition, the redox cycling of AA by TCEP could also be used to develop electrochemical immunosensors for the detection of Salmonella [221].
Aromatic dihydroxy and aminohydroxy compounds, including monoaromatic and diaromatic compounds, have been widely used as electroactive species for signal output in electrochemical biosensors due to their fast and two-electron redox reactions. Generally, the electrochemical oxidation of diaromatic compounds is faster than that of monoaromatic compounds. However, diaromatic compounds can be rapidly oxidized by dissolved O2 and the electrochemical reduction of the oxidized diaromatic compounds may suffer from the interference from O2. Although ortho-substituted aromatic dihydroxy and aminohydroxy compounds undergo faster electrochemical and catalytic reactions than the para-substituted compounds, they are susceptible to oxidation polymerization by dissolved O2 and subsequent nucleophilic addition. To exploit more ALP substrates and reductants for redox cycling, Seo et al. evaluated the performances of four strong reductants and nine aromatic dihydroxy and aminohydroxy compounds for the construction of effective EC redox cycling systems (Figure 21B) [222]. The results demonstrated that the combination of 1-amino-2-naphthol (1A2N) and H3N-BH3 led to a high signal-to-background ratio. The presence of excess H3N-BH3 could significantly prevent the oxidation and polymerization of 1A2N by dissolved O2. As a proof-of-concept, creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) was detected in a wide linear range with a low detection limit of 80 fg/mL.
In EC redox-cycling-involved electrochemical bioassays, enzymatic products as the signaling species are electrochemically reduced or oxidized at the electrode and then immediately regenerated by additional reducing agents. Similarly, the photogenerated holes at the photoelectrode can also oxidize or reduce enzymatic products to trigger the redox cycling process for signal amplification [223,224,225,226]. In 2018, Cao et al. first combined photogenerated-hole-induced chemical redox cycling with a split-type PEC immunoassay for myoglobin detection [227]. As displayed in Figure 22, ALP catalyzed the generation of AA as an electron donor, which was then oxidized by the photogenerated holes of a Bi2S3/Bi2Sn2O7 heterojunction photoelectrode. In the redox cycling process, the generated DHA was reduced by the reducing agent TCEP for repeated oxidation at the photoelectrode. The efficient regeneration of the electron donor AA resulted in the enhancement of the photocurrent response. Based on this principle, the developed PEC immunoassay allowed for the detection of myoglobin in a linear range from 4.0 × 10−13 to 1.0 × 10−7 g/mL. Besides the regeneration of enzymatic product AA by the additional reducing agents, the redox mediators that were oxidized by the photogenerated holes can also be regenerated by the enzymatic products, significantly amplifying the PEC signal [228,229].
Highly electrocatalytic gold electrodes are not suitable for redox cycling by general reducing agents because the redox reaction of them with a low oxidation potential at the gold surface will result in a high background signal. Therefore, there remains a great potential to exploit effective reducing agents for p-AP redox cycling with a low background current. Our group systematically evaluated the performances of biosensors in the presence of different reducing agents, including NaBH4, hydrazine, TCEP, NADH, NaSO3, and cysteamine, on the alkanethiol-covered gold electrodes [230]. The results suggest that the electrocatalytic ability of good electrodes was depressed by the insulating alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) [231,232,233] and that the performances in the case of TCEP and cysteamine were better than those of others. Then, our group developed a competitive electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of β-amyloid(1–42) (Aβ(1–42)) and total β-amyloid peptides based on p-AP redox cycling [234]. As shown in Figure 23, the conjugates of Aβ(22–42)-biotin-SA-ALP and Aβ(1–16)-biotin-SA-ALP were employed to competitively bind with monoclonal antibodies attached on the electrode surface. In the presence of TCEP, the enzymatic product (p-AP) was recycled through EC redox cycling, greatly amplifying the electrochemical signal.

4.1.2. ALP-Based ECC Redox Cycling

In the ECC redox cycling system, electroactive species are usually used as the electron mediators to accelerate the electrochemical oxidation of enzymatic products on the electrode. Meanwhile, the electron mediators can shift the oxidation potential of enzymatic products, avoiding the possible oxidation of the reductants and reducing the background current. In 2006, NaBH4 was firstly used as the reducing agent to develop the nanocatalyst-driven ECC redox cycling of p-AP [200]. However, the poor stability of NaBH4 at neutral or acidic solutions may limit the performance of the NaBH4-involved ECC redox cycling system. Thus, it is urgent to choose more stable reducing agents for ECC redox cycling. In 2007, Das et al. presented an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of mouse IgG based on p-AP redox cycling using electrochemically inactive hydrazine as the reducing agent (Figure 24A) [235]. To obtain a low background current, an ITO electrode was used because of its low electrocatalytic activity and weak capacitive current. Meanwhile, Fc-D was immobilized on the ITO electrode to enhance the electron transfer kinetics of p-AP in the presence of hydrazine. After the formation of sandwich immune complexes, p-APP was converted into p-AP, which could be electro-oxidized into p-QI at the Fc-D-modified ITO electrode. In the process, p-QI was immediately reduced back into p-AP by hydrazine, leading to signal amplification. The ECC redox cycling caused an increase in the current and thus improved the sensitivity.
NADH is a good reducing agent that can be utilized in EN redox cycling under the catalysis of diaphorase [236,237,238]. Moreover, a high over-potential is required for the electrochemical oxidation of NADH at noble metal electrodes [239]. In this view, Kwon et al. reported an electrochemical immunosensor for the determination of mouse IgG based on ECC-based p-AP redox cycling by NADH [240]. In this study, the gold electrode was modified with an SAM of long thiol molecules to reduce the background current and further modified with Fc-D to facilitate the oxidation of p-AP. NADH showing a slow electrochemical oxidation rate at the gold electrode exhibited a fast chemical reaction with p-AP for redox cycling.
As a commonly used reducing agent, TCEP can reduce electroactive species such as DHA and quinone (QI) at a fast rate [241,242]. More importantly, TCEP is resistant to oxidation by O2 and is very stable in a wide range of pH values. These characteristics are beneficial to the EC and ECC redox cycling systems. Akanda et al. reported an ECC redox cycling system for the ultrasensitive immunoassay of cardiac troponin I (Figure 24B) [243]. In this work, Ru(NH3)63+, a QI/AP couple, and TCEP were chosen to design an ECC redox cycling system as the oxidant, enzyme substrate/product, and reductant, respectively. The QI/AP couple facilitated a fast redox reaction with both Ru(NH3)63+ and TCEP. Under the high signal amplification of ECC redox cycling, this method achieved a detection limit of 10 fg/mL for the detection of cardiac troponin I.
Figure 24. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of an immunosensing layer (a) and the electrochemical detection for mouse IgG based on ECC redox cycling (b) [235]. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of ECC redox cycling for ultrasensitive immunosensors [243]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of (a) E. coli O157:H7 detection based on the ECC redox cycling that involves HQ (P), which is enzymatically generated from HQDP (S), (b) three-step electron transfer (purple lines) and unwanted electron transfer (green and sky-blue lines) in ideal ECC redox cycling [244]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic illustration of Aβ detection by ALP-based signal amplification combined with AA-triggered ECC redox cycling on an SAM-covered gold electrode [245]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Figure 24. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of an immunosensing layer (a) and the electrochemical detection for mouse IgG based on ECC redox cycling (b) [235]. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of ECC redox cycling for ultrasensitive immunosensors [243]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of (a) E. coli O157:H7 detection based on the ECC redox cycling that involves HQ (P), which is enzymatically generated from HQDP (S), (b) three-step electron transfer (purple lines) and unwanted electron transfer (green and sky-blue lines) in ideal ECC redox cycling [244]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic illustration of Aβ detection by ALP-based signal amplification combined with AA-triggered ECC redox cycling on an SAM-covered gold electrode [245]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g024
APP is prone to autohydrolysis and is unstable during long-term storage, which may cause unwanted redox cycling and a high background [246]. In addition, p-AP is light-sensitive and easily oxidized under air, which is unfavorable during the linear accumulation of p-AP for the relatively long-time incubation. Therefore, more ALP substrate/product couples should be explored for the combination of enzymatic amplification and redox cycling [247,248]. Akanda et al. evaluated the performances of five ALP substrate/product couples in terms of signal-to-background ratio and then developed an immunosensor for E. coli O157:H7 detection based on hydroquinone diphosphate (HQDP)/HQ-based redox cycling [244]. As displayed in Figure 24C, ALP catalyzed the hydrolysis of HQDP into HQ, which could trigger ECC redox cycling with Ru(NH3)63+ and TCEP as the oxidant and reductant, respectively. HQ exhibited a lower formal potential than p-AP and HQDP exhibited a higher formal potential than APP, leading to faster ECC redox cycling. The immunosensor based on an HQDP/HQ couple had a wide detection range from 103 to 108 CFU/mL. The AAP/AA couple is another suitable ALP substrate/product pair for developing redox cycling because of the easy dissolution of AAP and AA in aqueous solutions, the high formal potential of AAP, and the low formal potential of AA [249]. Our group investigated AA-triggered ECC redox cycling with FcA as the redox mediator at an SAM-covered gold electrode [245]. As displayed in Figure 24D, the ALP-conjugated mAb(1–16) was used to recognize the Aβ peptide. After the competitive immune interaction and the addition of AAP, the production of AA could trigger the ECC redox cycling and generate a strong amperometric signal. As a result, the currents decreased with an increase in Aβ concentration in the range from 1 pM to 0.2 nM with a detection limit of 0.2 pM.
In redox-cycling-involved electrochemical bioassays, electroactive species are electrochemically reduced or oxidized and then regenerated by other species. In addition, the photogenerated holes at the photoelectrode can also oxidize electroactive species to trigger redox cycling for signal amplification [250,251,252]. Liu’s group developed several photoelectrochemical (PEC) immunosensors by combining redox cycling with enzymatic amplification [253,254,255]. For example, they reported the split-type PEC immunoassay of myoglobin based on photoelectrochemical–chemical–chemical (PECCC) redox cycling [256]. As shown in Figure 25, ALP labels in sandwich immune complexes catalyzed the conversion of AAP into AA, which was then transferred into a detection cell containing FcA and TCEP. The redox mediator of FcA was oxidized by the holes in the Bi2S3/Bi2WO6 photoelectrode, initiating the PEC redox cycling process. The resulting oxidized product FcA+ was reduced back into FcA by AA and the generated DHA was reduced by TCEP for the next regeneration of FcA.

4.1.3. ALP-Based Ag Biometallization

Silver (Ag) enhancement on metal nanoparticles in the presence of a mild reducing agent is a promising signal amplification strategy for bioassays [257,258,259,260,261,262]. However, the slow reduction of silver ions in the absence of nanoparticle labels will result in a high background signal and poor reproducibility. Enzymatically generated reducing products can reduce silver ions in solution, leading to Ag deposition on the electrode, which is termed as biometallization [263,264]. Electrochemical stripping oxidation of the deposited Ag could provide a high electrochemical signal. The large differences in both formal potential and reaction rates with silver ions between the substrates and the products minimized Ag deposition and significantly decreased the background signal [265]. Aiming to achieve high signal amplification, Haque et al. proposed a CC redox-cycling-based enzymatic Ag biometallization strategy for the sensitive detection of creatine kinase-MB [266]. In this study, the enzyme product AP could reduce Ag+ into metallic Ag near the immunosensing surface. NADH was chosen as the strong reducing agent to rapidly reduce the oxidized form of AP (QI). To avoid electroless Ag deposition, an avidin- and BSA-modified ITO electrode was used for Ag deposition. The large Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) deposited on the electrode provided a high electrochemical stripping signal.

4.1.4. ALP-Based EN Redox Cycling

To amplify the electrochemical signal, it is attractive to couple ALP catalysis with other enzymatic reactions for the regeneration of ALP products to trigger EN redox cycling [267,268]. For example, in ALP/tyrosinase bienzymatic systems, ALP catalyzed the dephosphorylation of phenyl phosphate to produce phenol. The ALP product diphenol was catalytically oxidized by tyrosinase to produce quinine, which could be subsequently reduced at the electrode. The regenerated diphenol was then immediately oxidized into quinone by tyrosinase enzymatic catalysis, realizing signal amplification through phenol recycling [269]. Based on this principle, Piao et al. developed an ALP-labeled electrochemical immunosensor using tyrosinase-modified CNTs [270]. In this work, phenol generated from the ALP-catalyzed hydrolysis of phenyl phosphate was enzymatically converted into electrochemically measurable quinone. The produced catechol was repeatedly oxidized by tyrosinase for the next electrochemical reduction. In a scheme of catechol recycling, human IgG was determined with a detection limit of 0.19 ng/mL.

4.2. Protease

Protease can cleave a peptide bond between two specific amino acid residues. The enzyme plays a vital role in activating or deactivating biological functions in living organisms. To achieve the goal of fast, ultrasensitive, and washing-free detection, Park et al. reported a protease immunosensor based on selective affinity binding, selective proteolytic reaction, and proximity-dependent electrochemical reaction [271]. As illustrated in Figure 26, trypsin was captured by antitrypsin IgG on the electrode surface. The selective proteolytic hydrolysis of an electrochemically inactive p-AP-conjugated substrate by trypsin led to the generation of redox-active p-AP near the electrode rather than in the bulk solution. The electrochemical oxidation of the released redox-active species near the electrode provided a “signal-on” electrochemical signal, which was amplified by the EC redox cycling reaction. This method exhibited a high signal-to-background ratio and a low detection limit without a washing procedure. Recently, Shin et al. developed an immunosensor for trypsin detection using electrochemical-reduction-based redox cycling [272]. The proteolytically generated p-AP was enzymatically or chemically oxidized and then reduced at the electrode. The EC or EN redox cycling of the signaling species by TCEP induced an enhancement in the electrochemical signal.
The turnover number of proteases is generally lower than that of HRP and ALP, thus limiting their application in immunoassays without additional signal amplification. Two types of proteases can be used to design a propagating cascade reaction with higher signal amplification efficiency than that of a single-proteolytic reaction [273]. Generally, the first enzyme can continually activate the second pro-enzyme and each generated enzyme can produce many signal species. To further lower the detection limit and shorten the incubation period, propagating cascade reactions have been combined with redox cycling. For example, Park et al. reported the electrochemical detection of TSH by coupling the propagating cascade reaction with EC redox cycling (Figure 27A) [274]. In this work, ecarin was employed as the enzyme label to proteolytically transform inactive prothrombin into active thrombin, which could, in turn, cleave the p-AP-conjugated peptide substrate. The released electroactive p-AP was regenerated through an EC redox cycling reaction in the presence of NADH on the surface of an rGO-modified ITO electrode, leading to a significant increase in the electrochemical signal. In contrast to the propagating cascade reaction using different types of enzymes, the self-propagating autocatalytic reaction can produce signaling species more rapidly. However, the self-activation of the pro-enzyme will result in a high background signal. Recently, Park et al. developed an electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of PSA based on the autocatalytic activation of the trypsinogen mutant by trypsin [275]. As shown in Figure 27B, trypsin was used as the enzyme label for immunoassays and a trypsinogen mutant was selected as the inactive pro-enzyme to minimize the self-activation of trypsinogen. Trypsin generated in a short period of time could catalyze the conversion of the trypsinogen mutant into trypsin, resulting in the release of electroactive p-AP from the peptide substrate (GPR-AP). Then, the electrochemical oxidation of AP into QI triggered the EC redox cycling reaction to further enhance the electrochemical signal.
Peptides with a specific sequence can bind with metal ions, and the peptide–metal interaction can be modulated by the proteolytic cleavage of the peptide substrate [170]. For example, amino terminal Cu(II)- and Ni(II)-binding (ATCUN) peptides can bind with Cu(II) in a square planar configuration. Such Cu(II)–peptide complexes have been reported to exhibit good electrocatalytic ability toward water oxidation [276,277]. After that, Liu’s group developed an electrochemical immunosensor using trypsin as the signal label for the production of ACTUN-Cu(II) complexes as the electrocatalysts toward water oxidation [278]. As shown in Figure 28, trypsin immobilized on the surface of MWCNTs could cleave the peptide substrates to liberate ATCUN peptides for Cu(II) binding. The Cu(II) center in the formed ACTUN-Cu(II) complex was electrochemically oxidized into Cu(III) and then regenerated by water through an intramolecular coupling mechanism or nucleophilic attack of H2O on the high-oxidation-state CuIV=O intermediate. The redox cycling between ACTUN-Cu(II) and H2O greatly amplified the electrochemical signal. PSA was determined to be in the linear range of 10 pg/mL–2 ng/mL with a detection limit of 10 pg/mL.

4.3. Others

β-Galactosidase (β-Gal) can catalyze the hydrolysis of a p-aminophenyl galactopyranoside substrate into electroactive p-AP that can be readily determined by EN, EC, and ECC redox cycling [279,280,281]. Therefore, β-Gal has become one of the most commonly used labeling enzymes in bioassays [282,283,284,285]. For example, Yang’s group proposed electro-reduction-type EN redox cycling in a two-enzyme scheme for the detection of mouse IgG and CA 15-3 using β-Gal and tyrosinase (Figure 29) [286]. Although the ITO electrode showed low electrocatalytic activity toward the electro-reduction of the dissolved O2, it exhibited low electrocatalytic activity toward the electro-reduction of o-benzoquinone, which was unfavorable in EN redox cycling. Aiming to improve the electrocatalytic activity of the sensing electrode, graphene oxide (GO) was utilized to modify the ITO electrode with a high signal-to-background ratio. β-Gal catalyzed the hydrolysis of phenyl β-D-galactopyranoside (P-GP) into phenol, which was then oxidized into catechol and o-benzoquinone by tyrosinase catalysis. The formed o-benzoquinone was electrochemically reduced back into catechol, triggering EN redox cycling at a low potential. The results indicated that the two-enzyme scheme using the GO/ITO electrode showed better performances in terms of signal-to-background ratio, signal intensity, and detection limit.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have summarized the recent remarkable progress in the development and application of electrochemical immunosensors by the signal amplification of enzyme- or nanozyme-based catalysis plus redox cycling. Despite the delightful achievements, several challenges in this topic remain to be addressed. First, it is promising to improve the properties of the enzyme label turnover number and substrate affinity (Km) and to screen a new immune recognition element with a high binding affinity for the binding target. Second, the environmental factors, including temperature, pH, and activators or inhibitors, may influence the rate of catalytic and redox cycling reactions. More efforts should be devoted to exploring optimized experimental conditions and nanomaterials for the modification of electrodes for effective redox cycling systems. Third, different nanocarriers have been employed to effectively load enzymes for improved sensitivity, but most of the immobilization techniques show the defects of enzyme leaching, denaturation, and limited transfer efficiency. Fourth, despite the advantages of a low cost and high stability, the catalytic activity and efficiency of nanozymes are still lower than those of natural enzymes. Synthesis from different batches and the bioconjugation of nanozymes may result in poor reproducibility. It is a promising approach to expand the types of nanozymes with effective catalytic activity and high specificity for the design of nanocatalyst-based redox cycling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.X. and Y.H.; methodology, F.G. and Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, N.X., F.G., J.Z. and J.W.; writing—review and editing, N.X. and Y.H.; funding acquisition, N.X. and F.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science & Technology Foundation of Henan Province (242102310362), and the Program for Innovative Research Team of Science and Technology in Anyang Normal University (2023ASCXTD02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Felix, F.S.; Angnes, L. Electrochemical immunosensors-A powerful tool for analytical applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 102, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ochoa-Ruiz, A.G.; Parra, G.; López-Espinoza, D.; Astudillo, P.; Galyamin, D.; Sabaté, N.; Esquivel, J.P.; Vallejo-Cardona, A.A. Electrochemical immunosensors: The evolution from ELISA to EμPADs. Electroanalysis 2022, 35, 2200053–2200067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wen, W.; Yan, X.; Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. Recent advances in electrochemical immunosensors. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 138–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kokkinos, C.; Economou, A.; Prodromidis, M.I. Electrochemical immunosensors: Critical survey of different architectures and transduction strategies. TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 88–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mollarasouli, F.; Kurbanoglu, S.; Ozkan, S.A. The role of electrochemical immunosensors in clinical analysis. Biosensors 2019, 9, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ju, H. Signal amplification for highly sensitive immunosensing. J. Anal. Test. 2017, 1, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, Z.; Ma, Z. Multiple functional strategies for amplifying sensitivity of amperometric immunoassay for tumor markers: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 98, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, C.; La, M.; Yi, X.; Huang, M.; Xia, N.; Zhou, Y. Progress in electrochemical immunosensors with alkaline phosphatase as the signal label. Biosensors 2023, 13, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Q. Application of hybridization chain reaction (HCR) in electrochemical analysis. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2022, 17, 220227–220246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Newbigging, A.M.; Reid, M.S.; Li, X.F.; Le, X.C. Aptamers facilitating amplified detection of biomolecules. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 274–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.; Ma, X.; Chang, Y.; Guo, H.; Wang, W. Biosensors with boronic acid-based materials as the recognition elements and signal labels. Biosensors 2023, 13, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xing, Y.; Li, G.; Deng, D.; Liu, L. Overview on the design of magnetically assisted electrochemical biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, Y.; Lou, J.; Yang, L.; Liu, M.; Xia, N.; Liu, L. Design and application of electrochemical sensors with metal-organic frameworks as the electrode materials or signal tags. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, C.-X.; Xiong, F.; Liu, L.-L. Electrochemical biosensors with silver nanoparticles as signal labels. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 3869–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, J.; Tang, D. Non-enzymatic electrochemical immunoassay using noble metal nanoparticles: A review. Microchim. Acta 2015, 182, 2077–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, A.; Purohit, B.; Maurya, P.K.; Pandey, L.M.; Chandra, P. Engineered nanomaterial assisted signal-amplification strategies for enhancing analytical performance of electrochemical biosensors. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 1615–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nsabimana, A.; Lan, Y.; Du, F.; Wang, C.; Zhang, W.; Xu, G. Alkaline phosphatase-based electrochemical sensors for health applications. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 1996–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.-M.; Yang, X.-Y.; Zhang, S.-S. Electrochemical enzyme immunoassay using model labels. TrAC-Trend. Anal. Chem. 2008, 27, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shaban, S.M.; Byeok Jo, S.; Hafez, E.; Ho Cho, J.; Kim, D.-H. A comprehensive overview on alkaline phosphatase targeting and reporting assays. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2022, 465, 214567–214604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scheller, F.W.; Bauer, C.G.; Makower, A.; Wollenberger, U.; Warsinke, A.; Bier, F.F. Coupling of immunoassays with enzymatic recycling electrodes. Anal. Lett. 2001, 34, 1233–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, G.; Wan, Y.; Gau, V.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Song, S.; Fan, C. An enzyme-based E-DNA sensor for sequence-specific detection of femtomolar DNA targets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6820–6825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Torrente-Rodriguez, R.M.; Campuzano, S.; Montiel, V.R.; Montoya, J.J.; Pingarron, J.M. Sensitive electrochemical determination of miRNAs based on a sandwich assay onto magnetic microcarriers and hybridization chain reaction amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 516–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, D.; Huang, K.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L. Microfabricated disposable DNA sensors based on enzymatic amplification electrochemical detection. Electroanalysis 2001, 13, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, C.; Xing, D. Assays for alkaline phosphatase that use L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate as a substrate. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2023, 495, 215370–215423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wu, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, J.; Ding, Y. Recent advances in enzyme-enhanced immunosensors. Biotechnol. Adv. 2021, 53, 107867–107883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aizawa, M.; Morioka, A.; Suzuki, S.; Nagamura, Y. Enzyme immunosensor. III. Amperometric determination of human chorionic gonadotropin by membrane-bound antibody. Anal. Biochem. 1979, 94, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Limoges, B.; Marchal, D.; Mavre, F.; Saveant, J.M.; Schollhorn, B. Theory and practice of enzyme bioaffinity electrodes. Direct electrochemical product detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7259–7275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Lin, Y.; Tang, D.; Niessner, R.; Knopp, D. Enzymatic hydrolysate-induced displacement reaction with multifunctional silica beads doped with horseradish peroxidase-thionine conjugate for ultrasensitive electrochemical immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 8531–8540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cho, I.H.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Kang, M.S.; Paik, J.K.; Ku, S.; Cho, H.M.; Irudayaraj, J.; Kim, D.H. Current technologies of electrochemical immunosensors: Perspective on signal amplification. Sensors 2018, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kim, J.; Park, M. Recent progress in electrochemical immunosensors. Biosensors 2021, 11, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ju, H. Functional nanomaterials and nanoprobes for amplified biosensing. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 10, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wollenberger, U.; Schubert, F.; Pfeiffer, D.; Scheller, F.W. Enhancing biosensor performance using multienzyme systems. Trends Biotechnol. 1993, 11, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, L.; Xia, N.; Jiang, M.; Huang, N.; Guo, S.; Li, S.; Zhang, S. Electrochemical detection of amyloid-β oligomer with the signal amplification of alkaline phosphatase plus electrochemical–chemical–chemical redox cycling. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 754, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, L.; Xia, N.; Liu, H.; Kang, X.; Liu, X.; Xue, C.; He, X. Highly sensitive and label-free electrochemical detection of microRNAs based on triple signal amplification of multifunctional gold nanoparticles, enzymes and redox-cycling reaction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 53, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, L.; Du, H.; Zhao, H.; Li, J. Amplified electrochemical response of phenol by oxygenation of tyrosinase coupling with electrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycle. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 1728–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, L.; Xia, N.; Meng, J.-J.; Zhou, B.-B.; Li, S.-J. An electrochemical aptasensor for sensitive and selective detection of dopamine based on signal amplification of electrochemical-chemical redox cycling. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 775, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, L.; Gao, Y.; Liu, H.; Xia, N. An ultrasensitive electrochemical miRNAs sensor based on miRNAs-initiated cleavage of DNA by duplex-specific nuclease and signal amplification of enzyme plus redox cycling reaction. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2015, 208, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, H.; Wu, S.; Xiao, H.J.; Wang, H.B.; Fang, L.; Cao, J.T. Chemical-chemical redox cycling for improving the sensitivity of the fluorescent assay: A proof-of-concept towards DNA methylation detection. Talanta 2023, 268, 125363–125371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, H.; Wu, S.; Xing, Z.; Wang, H.B. ALP-assisted chemical redox cycling signal amplification for ultrasensitive fluorescence detection of DNA methylation. Analyst 2023, 148, 5753–5761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tang, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, F.; Yao, Y.; Hu, R. Colorimetric and photothermal dual-mode aptasensor with redox cycling amplification for the detection of ochratoxin A in corn samples. Food Chem. 2023, 439, 137968–137976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Jiao, C.; Zhu, Y.; Ji, T.; Cai, X.; Wang, J. Yolk-shell structured nanoreactor Au@Co3O4/CeO2@mSiO2 with superior peroxidase-like activity as nanozyme for ultra-sensitive colorimetric biosensing. Talanta 2023, 260, 124571–124581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L. Chemical redox-cycling for improving the sensitivity of colorimetric enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 1254–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, L.; Hu, Y.; Li, G.; Zou, S.; Ling, L. Chemical-chemical redox cycle signal amplification strategy combined with dual ratiometric immunoassay for surface-enhanced raman spectroscopic detection of cardiac troponin I. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 16677–16682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Monteiro, T.; Almeida, M.G. Electrochemical enzyme biosensors revisited: Old solutions for new problems. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 49, 44–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kucherenko, I.S.; Soldatkin, O.O.; Kucherenko, D.Y.; Soldatkina, O.V.; Dzyadevych, S.V. Advances in nanomaterial application in enzyme-based electrochemical biosensors: A review. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 4560–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, H. Enzyme-based ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensors. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, R.; Wang, D.; Deng, D.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, L. The applications of electrochemical immunosensors in the detection of disease biomarkers: A review. Molecules 2023, 28, 3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Muñoz-San Martín, C.; Pedrero, M.; Manuel de Villena, F.J.; Garranzo-Asensio, M.; Rodríguez, N.; Domínguez, G.; Barderas, R.; Campuzano, S.; Pingarrón, J.M. Disposable amperometric immunosensor for the determination of the E-cadherin tumor suppressor protein in cancer cells and human tissues. Electroanalysis 2018, 31, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, M.; Xu, Z.; Chen, L.; Yin, H.; Ai, S. Electrochemical immunosensing platform for DNA methyltransferase activity analysis and inhibitor screening. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 9072–9078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Volpe, G.; Draisci, R.; Palleschi, G.; Compagnone, D. 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine as electrochemical substrate for horseradish peroxidase based enzyme immunoassays. A comparative study. Analyst 1998, 123, 1303–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. He, Z.; Gao, N.; Jin, W. Determination of tumor marker CA125 by capillary electrophoretic enzyme immunoassay with electrochemical detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 497, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, S.; Luong, J.H.T. An electrocatalytic approach for the measurement of chlorophenols. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 327, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xia, N.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, K.; Gai, X.; Jing, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, L.; Qu, G. Ferrocene-phenylalanine hydrogels for immobilization of acetylcholinesterase and detection of chlorpyrifos. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2015, 746, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ruiz-Valdepenas Montiel, V.; Campuzano, S.; Torrente-Rodriguez, R.M.; Reviejo, A.J.; Pingarron, J.M. Electrochemical magnetic beads-based immunosensing platform for the determination of α-lactalbumin in milk. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ito, S.; Yamazaki, S.-i.; Kano, K.; Ikeda, T. Highly sensitive electrochemical detection of alkaline phosphatase. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 424, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Limoges, B.; Marchal, D.; Mavre, F.; Saveant, J.M. Theory and practice of enzyme bioaffinity electrodes. Chemical, enzymatic, and electrochemical amplification of in situ product detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7276–7285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Limoges, B.; Marchal, D.; Mavre, F.; Saveant, J.M. High amplification rates from the association of two enzymes confined within a nanometric layer immobilized on an electrode: Modeling and illustrating example. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6014–6015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Park, S.; Seo, S.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Sensitive electrochemical immunosensor using a bienzymatic system consisting of β-galactosidase and glucose dehydrogenase. Analyst 2021, 146, 3880–3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liao, Y.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.; Zhuo, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Bai, L.; Mao, L.; Yuan, S. In-situ produced ascorbic acid as coreactant for an ultrasensitive solid-state tris(2,2′-bipyridyl) ruthenium(II) electrochemiluminescence aptasensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 4815–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shuai, H.L.; Huang, K.J.; Chen, Y.X.; Fang, L.X.; Jia, M.P. Au nanoparticles/hollow molybdenum disulfide microcubes based biosensor for microRNA-21 detection coupled with duplex-specific nuclease and enzyme signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 89, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, Y.-X.; Huang, K.-J.; Lin, F.; Fang, L.-X. Ultrasensitive electrochemical sensing platform based on graphene wrapping SnO2 nanocorals and autonomous cascade DNA duplication strategy. Talanta 2017, 175, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jeong, J.; Das, J.; Choi, M.; Jo, J.; Aziz, M.A.; Yang, H. Arsenic(III) detection using electrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycling at bare indium-tin oxide electrodes. Analyst 2014, 139, 5813–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, L.; Peng, M. An electrochemical DNA sensor for ultrasensitive detection of ARID1a targeting PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor immunological response. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 2996–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dutta, G.; Lillehoj, P.B. An ultrasensitive enzyme-free electrochemical immunosensor based on redox cycling amplification using methylene blue. Analyst 2017, 142, 3492–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. da Silva Neves, M.M.P.; García, M.B.G.; Santos, D.H.; Fanjul-Bolado, P. Hydroquinone diphosphate/Ag+ as an enzymatic substrate for alkaline phosphatase catalyzed silver deposition. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 60, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yi, Z.; Li, X.Y.; Gao, Q.; Tang, L.J.; Chu, X. Aptamer-aided target capturing with biocatalytic metal deposition: An electrochemical platform for sensitive detection of cancer cells. Analyst 2013, 138, 2032–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Si, Y.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, N.; Qi, W.; Li, S.; Chen, L.; Wang, H. Ultrasensitive electroanalysis of low-level free microRNAs in blood by maximum signal amplification of catalytic silver deposition using alkaline phosphatase-incorporated gold nanoclusters. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 10406–10414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kishikawa, N.; Ohkubo, N.; Ohyama, K.; Nakashima, K.; Kuroda, N. Chemiluminescence assay for quinones based on generation of reactive oxygen species through the redox cycle of quinone. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 393, 1337–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fukuda, M.; El-Maghrabey, M.H.; Kishikawa, N.; Ikemoto, K.; Kuroda, N. Ultrasensitive determination of pyrroloquinoline quinone in human plasma by HPLC with chemiluminescence detection using the redox cycle of quinone. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 145, 814–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. El-Maghrabey, M.; Sato, Y.; Kaladari, F.; Kishikawa, N.; Kuroda, N. Development of quinone linked immunosorbent assay (QuLISA) based on using Folin’s reagent as a non-enzymatic tag: Application to analysis of food allergens. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2022, 368, 132167–132176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kaladari, F.; El-Maghrabey, M.; Kishikawa, N.; Kuroda, N. Development of signal multiplication system for quinone linked immunosorbent assay (Multi-QuLISA) by using poly-L-lysine dendrigraft and 1,2-naphthoquinone-4-sulfonate as enzyme-free tag. Talanta 2023, 253, 123911–123919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kaladari, F.; Kishikawa, N.; Shimada, A.; El-Maghrabey, M.; Kuroda, N. Anthracycline-functionalized dextran as a new signal multiplication tagging approach for immunoassay. Biosensors 2023, 13, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Niwa, O.; Xu, Y.; Halsall, H.B.; Heineman, W.R. Small-volume voltammetric detection of 4-aminophenol with interdigitated array electrodes and its application to electrochemical enzyme immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 1993, 65, 1559–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lee, G.Y.; Park, J.H.; Chang, Y.W.; Cho, S.; Kang, M.J.; Pyun, J.C. Redox cycling-based immunoassay for detection of carcinogenic embryonic antigen. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2017, 971, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, G.Y.; Park, J.H.; Chang, Y.W.; Cho, S.; Kang, M.J.; Pyun, J.C. Chronoamperometry-based redox cycling for application to immunoassays. ACS Sens. 2018, 3, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yamamoto, S.; Uno, S. Redox cycling realized in paper-based biochemical sensor for selective detection of reversible redox molecules without micro/nano fabrication process. Sensors 2018, 18, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bard, A.J.; Crayston, J.A.; Kittlesen, G.P.; Varco Shea, T.; Wrighton, M.S. Digital simulation of the measured electrochemical response of reversible redox couples at microelectrode arrays: Consequences arising from closely spaced ultramicroelectrodes. Anal. Chem. 1986, 58, 2321–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dotan, T.; Jog, A.; Kadan-Jamal, K.; Avni, A.; Shacham-Diamand, Y. In vivo plant bio-electrochemical sensor using redox cycling. Biosensors 2023, 13, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Neugebauer, S.; Stoica, L.; Guschin, D.; Schuhmann, W. Redox-amplified biosensors based on selective modification of nanopore electrode structures with enzymes entrapped within electrodeposition paints. Microchim. Acta 2008, 163, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Park, J.H.; Lee, G.Y.; Song, Z.; Bong, J.H.; Kim, H.R.; Kang, M.J.; Pyun, J.C. A vertically paired electrode for redox cycling and its application to immunoassays. Analyst 2023, 148, 1349–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Butler, D.; Ebrahimi, A. Rapid and sensitive detection of viral particles by coupling redox cycling and electrophoretic enrichment. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 208, 114198–114206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kang, M.; Mun, C.; Jung, H.S.; Ansah, I.B.; Kim, E.; Yang, H.; Payne, G.F.; Kim, D.H.; Park, S.G. Tethered molecular redox capacitors for nanoconfinement-assisted electrochemical signal amplification. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 3668–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Şen, M.; Avcı, İ. A simple microfluidic redox cycling-based device for high-sensitive detection of dopamine released from PC12 cells. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2023, 939, 117473–117479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fan, H.; Wang, X.; Jiao, F.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Q.; He, P.; Fang, Y. Scanning electrochemical microscopy of DNA hybridization on DNA microarrays enhanced by HRP-modified SiO2 nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 6511–6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, J.; Yan, Y.; Yan, F.; Ju, H. Electric field-driven strategy for multiplexed detection of protein biomarkers using a disposable reagentless electrochemical immunosensor array. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6072–6077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Valverde, A.; Povedano, E.; Montiel, V.R.; Yanez-Sedeno, P.; Garranzo-Asensio, M.; Barderas, R.; Campuzano, S.; Pingarron, J.M. Electrochemical immunosensor for IL-13 receptor α2 determination and discrimination of metastatic colon cancer cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 117, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. He, Y.N.; Chen, H.Y.; Zheng, J.J.; Zhang, G.Y.; Chen, Z.L. Differential pulse voltammetric enzyme-linked immunoassay for the determination of helicobacter pylori specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody. Talanta 1997, 44, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Höfs, S.; Hülagü, D.; Bennet, F.; Carl, P.; Flemig, S.; Schmid, T.; Schenk, J.A.; Hodoroaba, V.D.; Schneider, R.J. Electrochemical immunomagnetic ochratoxin A sensing: Steps forward in the application of 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine in amperometric assays. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8, 2597–2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Santandreu, M.; Alegret, S.; Fàbregas, E. Determination of β-HCG using amperometric immunosensors based on a conducting immunocomposite. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 396, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Ma, J.; Zhou, X.; Sun, X.; Jing, H.; Lin, M.; Zhou, C. Enzyme-catalyzed electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of soluble PD-L1 in breast cancer based on decorated covalent organic frameworks and carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2023, 1282, 341927–341935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Eletxigerra, U.; Martinez-Perdiguero, J.; Merino, S.; Barderas, R.; Ruiz-Valdepeñas Montiel, V.; Villalonga, R.; Pingarrón, J.M.; Campuzano, S. Electrochemical magnetoimmunosensor for progesterone receptor determination. Application to the simultaneous detection of estrogen and progesterone breast-cancer related receptors in raw cell lysates. Electroanalysis 2015, 28, 1787–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Valverde, A.; ben Hassine, A.; Serafín, V.; Muñoz-San Martín, C.; Pedrero, M.; Garranzo-Asensio, M.; Gamella, M.; Raouafi, N.; Barderas, R.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; et al. Dual amperometric immunosensor for improving cancer metastasis detection by the simultaneous determination of extracellular and soluble circulating fraction of emerging metastatic biomarkers. Electroanalysis 2019, 32, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Torriero, A.A.; Salinas, E.; Raba, J.; Silber, J.J. Sensitive determination of ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in biological fluids using an enzymatic rotating biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 22, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Xia, T.; Bian, C.; Liang, S.; Tang, X.; Wang, X. Electrochemical immunosensor for HBe antigen detection based on a signal amplification strategy: The co-catalysis of horseradish peroxidase and nanoporous gold. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2019, 284, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Attar, A.; Cubillana-Aguilera, L.; Naranjo-Rodriguez, I.; de Cisneros, J.L.; Palacios-Santander, J.M.; Amine, A. Amperometric inhibition biosensors based on horseradish peroxidase and gold sononanoparticles immobilized onto different electrodes for cyanide measurements. Bioelectrochemistry 2015, 101, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tang, D.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y. Electron-transfer mediator microbiosensor fabrication based on immobilizing HRP-labeled Au colloids on gold electrode surface by 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid monolayer. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, Z.; Ju, H. A disposable two-throughput electrochemical immunosensor chip for simultaneous multianalyte determination of tumor markers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sun, B.; Cai, J.; Li, W.; Gou, X.; Gou, Y.; Li, D.; Hu, F. A novel electrochemical immunosensor based on PG for early screening of depression markers-heat shock protein 70. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 111, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ju, H.; Yan, G.; Chen, F.; Chen, H. Enzyme-linked immunoassay of α-1-fetoprotein in serum by differential pulse voltammetry. Electroanalysis 1999, 11, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, S.; Zou, J.; Yu, F. Investigation of voltammetric enzyme-linked immunoassay based on a new system of HAP-H2O2-HRP. Talanta 2008, 76, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Campas, M.; Marty, J.L. Highly sensitive amperometric immunosensors for microcystin detection in algae. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ding, C.; Zhao, F.; Ren, R.; Lin, J.M. An electrochemical biosensor for α-fetoprotein based on carbon paste electrode constructed of room temperature ionic liquid and gold nanoparticles. Talanta 2009, 78, 1148–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Doldan, X.; Fagundez, P.; Cayota, A.; Laiz, J.; Tosar, J.P. Electrochemical sandwich immunosensor for determination of exosomes based on surface marker-mediated signal amplification. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 10466–10473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Haque, A.M.; Park, H.; Sung, D.; Jon, S.; Choi, S.Y.; Kim, K. An electrochemically reduced graphene oxide-based electrochemical immunosensing platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 1871–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kang, H.J.; Aziz, M.â.A.; Jeon, B.; Jo, K.; Yang, H. Strategy for low background-current levels in the electrochemical biosensors using horse-radish peroxidase labels. Electroanalysis 2009, 21, 2647–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yan, K.; Haque, A.J.; Nandhakumar, P.; Bhatia, A.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Boosting electrochemical immunosensing performance by employing acetaminophen as a peroxidase substrate. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 165, 112337–112343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tang, D.; Ren, J. In situ amplified electrochemical immunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigen using horseradish peroxidase-encapsulated nanogold hollow microspheres as labels. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 8064–8070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tang, D.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor for clinical immunoassay using thionine-doped magnetic gold nanospheres as labels and horseradish peroxidase as enhancer. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1582–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hou, Y.H.; Wang, J.J.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Lv, C.; Xia, L.; Hong, S.L.; Lin, M.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Z.L.; Pang, D.W. A colorimetric and electrochemical immunosensor for point-of-care detection of enterovirus 71. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yu, X.; Munge, B.; Patel, V.; Jensen, G.; Bhirde, A.; Gong, J.D.; Kim, S.N.; Gillespie, J.; Gutkind, J.S.; Papadimitrakopoulos, F.; et al. Carbon nanotube amplification strategies for highly sensitive immunodetection of cancer biomarkers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11199–11205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Deng, D.; He, H.; Yan, X.; Wang, Z.; Fan, C.; Luo, L. Effective immobilization of Au nanoparticles on TiO2 loaded graphene for a novel sandwich-type immunosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 102, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhong, Z.; Wu, W.; Wang, D.; Wang, D.; Shan, J.; Qing, Y.; Zhang, Z. Nanogold-enwrapped graphene nanocomposites as trace labels for sensitivity enhancement of electrochemical immunosensors in clinical immunoassays: Carcinoembryonic antigen as a model. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 2379–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhong, Z.; Li, M.; Xiang, D.; Dai, N.; Qing, Y.; Wang, D.; Tang, D. Signal amplification of electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of human serum IgG using double-codified nanosilica particles as labels. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 2246–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Knopp, D.; Tang, D.; Niessner, R. Review: Bioanalytical applications of biomolecule-functionalized nanometer-sized doped silica particles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 647, 14–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Arevalo, B.; Blazquez-Garcia, M.; Valverde, A.; Serafin, V.; Montero-Calle, A.; Solis-Fernandez, G.; Barderas, R.; Campuzano, S.; Yanez-Sedeno, P.; Pingarron, J.M. Binary MoS2 nanostructures as nanocarriers for amplification in multiplexed electrochemical immunosensing: Simultaneous determination of B cell activation factor and proliferation-induced signal immunity-related cytokines. Microchim. Acta 2022, 189, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tang, J.; Tang, D.; Niessner, R.; Chen, G.; Knopp, D. Magneto-controlled graphene immunosensing platform for simultaneous multiplexed electrochemical immunoassay using distinguishable signal tags. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5407–5414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yan, K.; Nandhakumar, P.; Bhatia, A.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Electrochemical immunoassay based on choline oxidase-peroxidase enzymatic cascade. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 171, 112727–112731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, Y.; Tsitkov, S.; Hess, H. Proximity does not contribute to activity enhancement in the glucose oxidase-horseradish peroxidase cascade. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13982–13990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Alim, S.; Kafi, A.K.M.; Rajan, J.; Yusoff, M.M. Application of polymerized multiporous nanofiber of SnO2 for designing a bienzyme glucose biosensor based on HRP/GOx. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Dai, Z.; Bao, J.; Yang, X.; Ju, H. A bienzyme channeling glucose sensor with a wide concentration range based on co-entrapment of enzymes in SBA-15 mesopores. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 23, 1070–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Karyakin, A.A. Glucose biosensors for clinical and personal use. Electrochem. Commun. 2021, 125, 106973–106976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, J.; Pearce, M.C.; Ting, B.P.; Ying, J.Y. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor employing glucose oxidase catalyzed deposition of gold nanoparticles for signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 27, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Bright, H.J.; Appleby, M. The pH dependence of the individual steps in the glucose oxidase reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244, 3625–3634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Chen, L.; Gorski, W. Bioinorganic composites for enzyme electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 2862–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Cass, A.E.; Davis, G.; Francis, G.D.; Hill, H.A.; Aston, W.J.; Higgins, I.J.; Plotkin, E.V.; Scott, L.D.; Turner, A.P. Ferrocene-mediated enzyme electrode for amperometric determination of glucose. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Gregg, B.A.; Heller, A. Cross-linked redox gels containing glucose oxidase for amperometric biosensor applications. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lai, G.; Yan, F.; Ju, H. Dual signal amplification of glucose oxidase-functionalized nanocomposites as a trace label for ultrasensitive simultaneous multiplexed electrochemical detection of tumor markers. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 9730–9736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Singh, A.; Park, S.; Yang, H. Glucose-oxidase label-based redox cycling for an incubation period-free electrochemical immunosensor. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 4863–4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Dutta, G.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Yang, H. Washing-free heterogeneous immunosensor using proximity-dependent electron mediation between an enzyme label and an electrode. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 4589–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cosnier, S.; Popescu, I.C. Poly(amphiphilic pyrrole)-tyrosinase-peroxidase electrode for amplified flow injection-amperometric detection of phenol. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 319, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fu, Y.; Li, P.; Bu, L.; Wang, T.; Xie, Q.; Chen, J.; Yao, S. Exploiting metal-organic coordination polymers as highly efficient immobilization matrixes of enzymes for sensitive electrochemical biosensing. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 6511–6517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Noh, S.; Yang, H. Sensitive phenol detection using tyrosinase-based phenol oxidation combined with redox cycling of catechol. Electroanalysis 2014, 26, 2727–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Besombes, J.L.; Cosnier, S.; Labbe, P. Polyphenol oxidase-catechol: An electroenzymatic model system for characterizing the performance of matrices for biosensors. Talanta 1996, 43, 1615–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cosnier, S.; Fombon, J.-J.; Labbe, P.; Limosin, D. Development of a PPO-poly amphiphilic pyrrole electrode for on site monitoring of phenol in aqueous effluents. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 1999, 59, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yan, K.; Wu, J.; Ji, W.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J. Integration of redox cycling in a photoelectrochemical sensing platform for tyrosinase activity evaluation. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 108, 106555–106559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kwon, J.; Kang, H.Y.; Yang, H. Permeabilization-free β-galactosidase-induction-based electrochemical detection of Escherichia coli. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2021, 337, 129768–129774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chumyim, P.; Rijiravanich, P.; Somasundrum, M.; Surareungchai, W. Tyrosinase multilayer-functionalised carbon nanotubes as electrochemical labels: Application to immunoassay. BioNanoScience 2014, 4, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Akanda, M.R.; Ju, H. An integrated redox cycling for electrochemical enzymatic signal enhancement. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 13480–13486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Akanda, M.R.; Ju, H. A tyrosinase-responsive nonenzymatic redox cycling for amplified electrochemical immunosensing of protein. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 9856–9861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Park, S.; Kwak, D.E.; Haque, A.J.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Phenolic tyrosinase substrate with a formal potential lower than that of phenol to obtain a sensitive electrochemical immunosensor. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 790–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Shen, D.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Pyrroloquinoline quinone-doped polymeric nanospheres as sensitive tracer for binding assays. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1564–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Zimmerman, L.B.; Lee, K.D.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Visual detection of single-stranded target DNA using pyrroloquinoline-quinone-loaded liposomes as a tracer. Anal. Biochem. 2010, 401, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zimmerman, L.B.; Worley, B.V.; Palermo, E.F.; Brender, J.R.; Lee, K.D.; Kuroda, K.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Absorbance-based assay for membrane disruption by antimicrobial peptides and synthetic copolymers using pyrroloquinoline quinone-loaded liposomes. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 411, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ferri, S.; Kojima, K.; Sode, K. Review of glucose oxidases and glucose dehydrogenases: A bird’s eye view of glucose sensing enzymes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2011, 5, 1068–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Flexer, V.; Mano, N. Wired pyrroloquinoline quinone soluble glucose dehydrogenase enzyme electrodes operating at unprecedented low redox potential. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 2465–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zayats, M.; Katz, E.; Baron, R.; Willner, I. Reconstitution of apo-glucose dehydrogenase on pyrroloquinoline quinone-functionalized Au nanoparticles yields an electrically contacted biocatalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12400–12406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Tatsumi, H.; Osaku, N. Sensitive electrochemical detection of the hydroxyl radical using enzyme-catalyzed redox cycling. Anal. Sci. 2011, 27, 1065–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Durand, F.; Limoges, B.; Mano, N.; Mavre, F.; Miranda-Castro, R.; Saveant, J.M. Effect of substrate inhibition and cooperativity on the electrochemical responses of glucose dehydrogenase. Kinetic characterization of wild and mutant types. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12801–12809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Zhang, L.; Miranda-Castro, R.; Stines-Chaumeil, C.; Mano, N.; Xu, G.; Mavre, F.; Limoges, B. Heterogeneous reconstitution of the PQQ-dependent glucose dehydrogenase immobilized on an electrode: A sensitive strategy for PQQ detection down to picomolar levels. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 2257–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Jiaul Haque, A.M.; Kwon, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, N.S.; Ho Yoon, Y.; Yang, H. Sensitive and low-background electrochemical immunosensor employing glucose dehydrogenase and 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione. Electroanalysis 2021, 33, 1877–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Park, S.; Shin, J.; Kwon, J.; Lee, W.; Kim, J.; Kim, G.; Joo, J.M.; Yang, H. Interference-free duplex detection of total and active enzyme concentrations at a single working electrode. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 1305–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Caduff, A.; Talary, M.S.; Zakharov, P. Cutaneous blood perfusion as a perturbing factor for noninvasive glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2010, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Dutta, G.; Park, S.; Singh, A.; Seo, J.; Kim, S.; Yang, H. Low-interference washing-free electrochemical immunosensor using glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as an enzyme label. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 3574–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Haque, A.J.; Nandhakumar, P.; Kim, G.; Park, S.; Yu, B.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Jon, S.; Yang, H. Diaphorase-catalyzed formation of a formazan precipitate and its electrodissolution for sensitive affinity biosensors. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 3932–3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Ichzan, A.M.; Hwang, S.H.; Cho, H.; Fang, C.S.; Park, S.; Kim, G.; Kim, J.; Nandhakumar, P.; Yu, B.; Jon, S.; et al. Solid-phase recombinase polymerase amplification using an extremely low concentration of a solution primer for sensitive electrochemical detection of hepatitis B viral DNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 179, 113065–113072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Nandhakumar, P.; Lee, W.; Nam, S.; Bhatia, A.; Seo, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Joo, J.M.; Yang, H. Di(thioether sulfonate)-substituted quinolinedione as a rapidly dissoluble and stable electron mediator and its application in sensitive biosensors. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2022, 11, e2101819–e2101827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Bhatia, A.; Na, H.S.; Nandhakumar, P.; Yu, B.; Jon, S.; Chung, J.; Yang, H. Electrochemical detection of interleukin-8 in human saliva using a polyenzyme label based on diaphorase and neutravidin. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2021, 326, 128979–128985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Prayikaputri, P.U.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Kim, S.; Yang, H. Sensitive electrochemical immunosensor via amide hydrolysis by DT-diaphorase combined with five redox-cycling reactions. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 224, 115058–115067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Kang, C.; Kang, J.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. DT-diaphorase as a bifunctional enzyme label that allows rapid enzymatic amplification and electrochemical redox cycling. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 7974–7980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Bhatia, A.; Nandhakumar, P.; Kim, G.; Kim, J.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Ultrasensitive detection of parathyroid hormone through fast silver deposition induced by enzymatic nitroso reduction and redox cycling. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1641–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bhatia, A.; Nandhakumar, P.; Kim, G.; Lee, N.-S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Simple and fast Ag deposition method using a redox enzyme label and quinone substrate for the sensitive electrochemical detection of thyroid-stimulating hormone. Biosen. Bioelectron. 2022, 197, 113773–113780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Ichzan, A.M.; Lee, S.; San Fang, C.; Nandhakumar, P.; Ha, H.; Joo, J.M.; Kim, K.S.; Yang, H. Use of a phosphatase-like DT-diaphorase label for the detection of outer membrane vesicles. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 4680–4686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Nandhakumar, P.; Ichzan, A.M.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Ma, S.; Kim, S.; Yang, H. Carboxyl esterase-like activity of DT-diaphorase and its use for signal amplification. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2966–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Rochelet-Dequaire, M.; Djellouli, N.; Limoges, B.; Brossier, P. Bienzymatic-based electrochemical DNA biosensors: A way to lower the detection limit of hybridization assays. Analyst 2009, 134, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Kang, J.; Shin, J.; Yang, H. Rapid and sensitive detection of NADH and lactate dehydrogenase using thermostable DT-diaphorase immobilized on electrode. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 1357–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Haque, A.M.J.; Nandhakumar, P.; Yang, H. Specific and rapid glucose detection using NAD-dependent glucose dehydrogenase, diaphorase, and osmium complex. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 876–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Campas, M.; de la Iglesia, P.; Le Berre, M.; Kane, M.; Diogene, J.; Marty, J.L. Enzymatic recycling-based amperometric immunosensor for the ultrasensitive detection of okadaic acid in shellfish. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 24, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Park, S.; Park, K.; Cho, H.; Kwon, J.; Kim, K.S.; Yang, H. Wash-free amperometric Escherichia coli detection via rapid and specific proteolytic cleavage by its outer membrane OmpT. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 4756–4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Zhang, X.; Lin, S.; Liu, S.; Tan, X.; Dai, Y.; Xia, F. Advances in organometallic/organic nanozymes and their applications. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2021, 429, 213652–213670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Liu, G.; Xia, N.; Tian, L.; Sun, Z.; Liu, L. Progress in the development of biosensors based on peptide-copper coordination interaction. Biosensors 2022, 12, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wei, H.; Wang, E. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): Next-generation artificial enzymes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6060–6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Mahmudunnabi, R.G.; Farhana, F.Z.; Kashaninejad, N.; Firoz, S.H.; Shim, Y.B.; Shiddiky, M.J.A. Nanozyme-based electrochemical biosensors for disease biomarker detection. Analyst 2020, 145, 4398–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Wang, X.; Dong, S.; Wei, H. Recent advances on nanozyme-based electrochemical biosensors. Electroanalysis 2022, 35, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zuccarello, L.; Barbosa, C.; Todorovic, S.; Silveira, C.M. Electrocatalysis by heme enzymes—Applications in biosensing. Catalysts 2021, 11, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, C.; Liu, Q.; Huang, X.; Zhuang, J. Ferritin nanocages: A versatile platform for nanozyme design. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023, 11, 4153–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Tang, Z.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, Y. Enzyme-mimic activity of ferric nano-core residing in ferritin and its biosensing applications. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 8611–8616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Watt, G.D.; Jacobs, D.; Frankel, R.B. Redox reactivity of bacterial and mammalian ferritin: Is reductant entry into the ferritin interior a necessary step for iron release? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 7457–7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Akanda, M.R.; Ju, H. Ferritin-triggered redox cycling for highly sensitive electrochemical immunosensing of protein. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 8028–8034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Hu, L.; Liu, X.; Cecconello, A.; Willner, I. Dual switchable CRET-induced luminescence of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) by the hemin/G-quadruplex-bridged aggregation and deaggregation of two-sized QDs. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6030–6035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Zhang, M.; Xu, S.; Minteer, S.D.; Baum, D.A. Investigation of a deoxyribozyme as a biofuel cell catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15890–15893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Funabashi, H. Hemin/G-quadruplex complex as a signal generator for electrochemical assays of bioanalytes. Electrochemistry 2016, 84, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Zhang, K.; Zhu, X.; Wang, J.; Xu, L.; Li, G. Strategy to fabricate an electrochemical aptasensor: Application to the assay of adenosine deaminase activity. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3207–3211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Yang, N.; Cao, Y.; Han, P.; Zhu, X.; Sun, L.; Li, G. Tools for investigation of the RNA endonuclease activity of mammalian Argonaute2 protein. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 2492–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Liu, S.; Wang, C.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Tang, B. Label-free and ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of nucleic acids based on autocatalytic and exonuclease III-assisted target recycling strategy. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2282–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Pelossof, G.; Tel-Vered, R.; Elbaz, J.; Willner, I. Amplified biosensing using the horseradish peroxidase-mimicking DNAzyme as an electrocatalyst. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 4396–4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Pelossof, G.; Tel-Vered, R.; Willner, I. Amplified surface plasmon resonance and electrochemical detection of Pb2+ ions using the Pb2+-dependent DNAzyme and hemin/G-quadruplex as a label. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3703–3709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Tang, J.; Hou, L.; Tang, D.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, J.; Chen, G. Hemin/G-quadruplex-based DNAzyme concatamers as electrocatalysts and biolabels for amplified electrochemical immunosensing of IgG1. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8180–8182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Alizadeh, N.; Hallaj, R.; Salimi, A. Dual amplified electrochemical immunosensor for Hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection using hemin/G-quadruplex immobilized onto Fe3O4-AuNPs or (hemin-amino-rGO-Au) nanohybrid. Electroanalysis 2017, 30, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhang, K.; Lv, S.; Lin, Z.; Tang, D. CdS:Mn quantum dot-functionalized g-C3N4 nanohybrids as signal-generation tags for photoelectrochemical immunoassay of prostate specific antigen coupling DNAzyme concatamer with enzymatic biocatalytic precipitation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 95, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Golub, E.; Freeman, R.; Willner, I. A hemin/G-quadruplex acts as an NADH oxidase and NADH peroxidase mimicking DNAzyme. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11710–11714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Golub, E.; Freeman, R.; Willner, I. Hemin/G-quadruplex-catalyzed aerobic oxidation of thiols to disulfides: Application of the process for the development of sensors and aptasensors and for probing acetylcholine esterase activity. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 12126–12133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Li, X.; Li, J.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J. A new electrochemical immunoassay for prion protein based on hybridization chain reaction with hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. Talanta 2018, 182, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Polsky, R.; Gill, R.; Kaganovsky, L.; Willner, I. Nucleic acid-functionalized Pt nanoparticles: Catalytic labels for the amplified electrochemical detection of biomolecules. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2268–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wu, D.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, H.; Yan, T.; Wei, Q. Corallite-like magnetic Fe3O4@mno2@Pt nanocomposites as multiple signal amplifiers for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 18786–18793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Peng, X.; Zhu, J.; Wu, Z.; Wen, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, M.-M.; Wang, S. High-efficient Pt@COF nanospheres-based electrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycling for ultrasensitive microRNAs biosensing. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2023, 392, 134074–134082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Selvaraju, T.; Das, J.; Jo, K.; Kwon, K.; Huh, C.H.; Kim, T.K.; Yang, H. Nanocatalyst-based assay using DNA-conjugated Au nanoparticles for electrochemical DNA detection. Langmuir 2008, 24, 9883–9888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Fang, C.S.; Oh, K.H.; Oh, A.; Lee, K.; Park, S.; Kim, S.; Park, J.K.; Yang, H. An ultrasensitive and incubation-free electrochemical immunosensor using a gold-nanocatalyst label mediating outer-sphere-reaction-philic and inner-sphere-reaction-philic species. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 5884–5887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Wu, S.; Song, J.; Zhao, Y.; Ge, Y.; Meng, C. Fabrication of highly catalytic silver nanoclusters/graphene oxide nanocomposite as nanotag for sensitive electrochemical immunoassay. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 906, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Tang, J.; Zhou, J.; Li, Q.; Tang, D.; Chen, G.; Yang, H. In situ amplified electronic signal for determination of low-abundance proteins coupling with nanocatalyst-based redox cycling. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1530–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Das, J.; Aziz, M.A.; Yang, H. A nanocatalyst-based assay for proteins: DNA-free ultrasensitive electrochemical detection using catalytic reduction of p-nitrophenol by gold-nanoparticle labels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16022–16023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Selvaraju, T.; Das, J.; Han, S.W.; Yang, H. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensing using magnetic beads and gold nanocatalysts. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 23, 932–9328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Tang, J.; Tang, D.; Su, B.; Huang, J.; Qiu, B.; Chen, G. Enzyme-free electrochemical immunoassay with catalytic reduction of p-nitrophenol and recycling of p-aminophenol using gold nanoparticles-coated carbon nanotubes as nanocatalysts. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3219–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Nandhakumar, P.; Kim, B.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Lee, K.; Yang, H. Nitrosoreductase-like nanocatalyst for ultrasensitive and stable biosensing. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Nandhakumar, P.; Munoz San Martin, C.; Arevalo, B.; Ding, S.; Lunker, M.; Vargas, E.; Djassemi, O.; Campuzano, S.; Wang, J. Redox cycling amplified electrochemical lateral-flow immunoassay: Toward decentralized sensitive insulin detection. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 3892–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Masud, M.K.; Yadav, S.; Islam, M.N.; Nguyen, N.T.; Salomon, C.; Kline, R.; Alamri, H.R.; Alothman, Z.A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Hossain, M.S.A.; et al. Gold-loaded nanoporous ferric oxide nanocubes with peroxidase-mimicking activity for electrocatalytic and colorimetric detection of autoantibody. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 11005–11013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Fan, H.; Guo, Z.; Gao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, D.; Ji, G.; Du, B.; Wei, Q. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor for carbohydrate antigen 72-4 based on dual signal amplification strategy of nanoporous gold and polyaniline-Au asymmetric multicomponent nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 64, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Lee, Y.; Garcia, M.A.; Frey Huls, N.A.; Sun, S. Synthetic tuning of the catalytic properties of Au-Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1271–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Wu, D.; Fan, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, H.; Wei, Q. Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunoassay for squamous cell carcinoma antigen using dumbbell-like Pt-Fe3O4 nanoparticles as signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 46, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Yang, Z.; Chai, Y.; Yuan, R.; Zhuo, Y.; Li, Y.; Han, J.; Liao, N. Hollow platinum decorated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as peroxidase mimetic couple with glucose oxidase for pseudobienzyme electrochemical immunosensor. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2014, 193, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ma, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, D.; Yan, T.; Wei, Q. Cubic Cu2O nanoframes with a unique edge-truncated structure and a good electrocatalytic activity for immunosensor application. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 78, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Du, D.; Lin, Y. SWCNTs@GQDs composites as nanocarriers for enzyme-free dual-signal amplification electrochemical immunoassay of cancer biomarker. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1042, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Martínez-García, G.; Agüí, L.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; Pingarrón, J.M. Multiplexed electrochemical immunosensing of obesity-related hormones at grafted graphene-modified electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 202, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Xu, Y.; Halsall, H.B.; Heineman, W.R. Solid-phase electrochemical enzyme immunoassay with attomole detection limit by flow injection analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1989, 7, 1301–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Park, M.; Song, Y.; Kim, K.J.; Oh, S.J.; Ahn, J.K.; Park, H.; Shin, H.B.; Kwon, S.J. Electrochemical immunosensor for human IgE using ferrocene self-assembled monolayers modified ITO electrode. Biosensors 2020, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Tang, H.T.; Lunte, C.E.; Halsall, H.B.; Heineman, W.R. p-Aminophenyl phosphate: An improved substrate for electrochemical enzyme immnoassay. Anal. Chim. Acta 1988, 214, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Heineman, W.R.; Halsall, B.; Xu, Y. Heterogeneous enzyme immunoassay of alpha-fetoprotein in maternal serum by flow-injection amperometric detection of 4-aminophenol. Clin. Chem. 1990, 36, 1941–1944. [Google Scholar]
  217. Walter, A.; Wu, J.; Flechsig, G.U.; Haake, D.A.; Wang, J. Redox cycling amplified electrochemical detection of DNA hybridization: Application to pathogen E. Coli bacterial RNA. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 689, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Cheng, F.F.; Zhang, J.J.; He, T.T.; Shi, J.J.; Abdel-Halim, E.S.; Zhu, J.J. Bimetallic Pd-Pt supported graphene promoted enzymatic redox cycling for ultrasensitive electrochemical quantification of microRNA from cell lysates. Analyst 2014, 139, 3860–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Yan, K.; Liu, Y.; Guan, Y.; Bhokisham, N.; Tsao, C.Y.; Kim, E.; Shi, X.W.; Wang, Q.; Bentley, W.E.; Payne, G.F. Catechol-chitosan redox capacitor for added amplification in electrochemical immunoanalysis. Colloids Surf. B 2018, 169, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Akanda, M.R.; Aziz, M.A.; Jo, K.; Tamilavan, V.; Hyun, M.H.; Kim, S.; Yang, H. Optimization of phosphatase- and redox cycling-based immunosensors and its application to ultrasensitive detection of troponin I. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 3926–3933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Kinchla, A.J.; Nugen, S.R. Rapid detection of salmonella using a redox cycling-based electrochemical method. Food Control 2016, 62, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Seo, J.; Ha, H.; Park, S.; Haque, A.J.; Kim, S.; Joo, J.M.; Yang, H. Immunosensor employing stable, solid 1-amino-2-naphthyl phosphate and ammonia-borane toward ultrasensitive and simple point-of-care testing. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 1240–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Liao, X.J.; Xiao, H.J.; Cao, J.T.; Ren, S.W.; Liu, Y.M. A novel split-type photoelectrochemical immunosensor based on chemical redox cycling amplification for sensitive detection of cardiac troponin I. Talanta 2021, 233, 122564–122570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Liu, X.; Cheng, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ge, L.; Huang, Y.; Li, F. Immobilization-free dual-aptamer-based photoelectrochemical platform for ultrasensitive exosome assay. Talanta 2024, 266, 125001–125009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Zhao, Y.; Xiang, J.; Cheng, H.; Liu, X.; Li, F. Flexible photoelectrochemical biosensor for ultrasensitive microRNA detection based on concatenated multiplex signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 194, 113581–113588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Qin, N.; Deng, L.; Wang, M.; Hun, X. Gold nanoparticles/Mo2C/MoO2-modified electrodes for nucleic acid detection through CRISPR/Cas12a photoelectrochemical assay. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 10701–10707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Cao, J.T.; Wang, B.; Dong, Y.X.; Wang, Q.; Ren, S.W.; Liu, Y.M.; Zhao, W.W. Photogenerated hole-induced chemical redox cycling on Bi2S3/Bi2Sn2O7 heterojunction: Toward general amplified split-type photoelectrochemical immunoassay. ACS Sens. 2018, 3, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Yi, W.; Cai, R.; Xiang, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Q.; Cui, Y.; Bian, X. A novel photoelectrochemical strategy based on an integrative photoactive heterojunction nanomaterial and a redox cycling amplification system for ultrasensitive determination of microRNA in cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 143, 111614–111619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Mi, Z.Z.; Hu, H.C.; Sun, J.J.; Wu, S.H. Heating promoted super sensitive electrochemical detection of p53 gene based on alkaline phosphatase and nicking endonuclease Nt.BstNBI-assisted target recycling amplification strategy at heated gold disk electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1275, 341583–341589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Xia, N.; Ma, F.; Zhao, F.; He, Q.; Du, J.; Li, S.; Chen, J.; Liu, L. Comparing the performances of electrochemical sensors using p-aminophenol redox cycling by different reductants on gold electrodes modified with self-assembled monolayers. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 109, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Van Rooijen, H.W.; Poppe, H. An electrochemical reactivation method for solid electrodes used in electrochemical detectors for high-performance liquid chromatography and flow injection analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 1981, 130, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Frederix, F.; Bonroy, K.; Laureyn, W.; Reekmans, G.; Campitelli, A.; Dehaen, W.; Maes, G. Enhanced performance of an affinity biosensor interface based on mixed self-assembled monolayers of thiols on gold. Langmuir 2003, 19, 4351–4357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Beulen, M.W.J.; Kastenberg, M.I.; van Veggel, F.C.J.M.; Reinhoudt, D.N. Electrochemical stability of self-assembled monolayers on gold. Langmuir 1998, 14, 7463–7467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Liu, L.; He, Q.; Zhao, F.; Xia, N.; Liu, H.; Li, S.; Liu, R.; Zhang, H. Competitive electrochemical immunoassay for detection of β-amyloid (1-42) and total β-amyloid peptides using p-aminophenol redox cycling. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 51, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Das, J.; Jo, K.; Lee, J.W.; Yang, H. Electrochemical immunosensor using p-aminophenol redox cycling by hydrazine combined with a low background current. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 2790–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Nassef, H.M.; Radi, A.-E.; O’Sullivan, C.K. Electrocatalytic sensing of NADH on a glassy carbon electrode modified with electrografted o-aminophenol film. Electrochem. Commun. 2006, 8, 1719–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Kato, D.; Iijima, S.; Kurita, R.; Sato, Y.; Jia, J.; Yabuki, S.; Mizutani, F.; Niwa, O. Electrochemically amplified detection for lipopolysaccharide using ferrocenylboronic acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 1527–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Kwon, J.; Cho, E.M.; Nandhakumar, P.; Yang, S.I.; Yang, H. Rapid and sensitive detection of aspergillus niger using a single-mediator system combined with redox cycling. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 13491–13497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Antiochia, R.; Lavagnini, I.; Pastore, P.; Magno, F. A comparison between the use of a redox mediator in solution and of surface modified electrodes in the electrocatalytic oxidation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. Bioelectrochemistry 2004, 64, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Kwon, S.J.; Yang, H.; Jo, K.; Kwak, J. An electrochemical immunosensor using p-aminophenol redox cycling by NADH on a self-assembled monolayer and ferrocene-modified Au electrodes. Analyst 2008, 133, 1599–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Lykkesfeldt, J. Determination of ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid in biological samples by high-performance liquid chromatography using subtraction methods: Reliable reduction with tris[2-carboxyethyl]phosphine hydrochloride. Anal. Biochem. 2000, 282, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Bova, M.P.; Mattson, M.N.; Vasile, S.; Tam, D.; Holsinger, L.; Bremer, M.; Hui, T.; McMahon, G.; Rice, A.; Fukuto, J.M. The oxidative mechanism of action of ortho-quinone inhibitors of protein-tyrosine phosphatase α is mediated by hydrogen peroxide. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 429, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Akanda, M.R.; Choe, Y.L.; Yang, H. "Outer-sphere to inner-sphere" redox cycling for ultrasensitive immunosensors. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 1049–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Akanda, M.R.; Tamilavan, V.; Park, S.; Jo, K.; Hyun, M.H.; Yang, H. Hydroquinone diphosphate as a phosphatase substrate in enzymatic amplification combined with electrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycling for the detection of E. coli O157:H7. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 1631–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Xia, N.; Liu, L.; Wu, R.; Liu, H.; Li, S.-J.; Hao, Y. Ascorbic acid-triggered electrochemical–chemical–chemical redox cycling for design of enzyme-amplified electrochemical biosensors on self-assembled monolayer-covered gold electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2014, 731, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Bauer, C.G.; Eremenko, A.V.; Ehrentreich-Forster, E.; Bier, F.F.; Makower, A.; Halsall, H.B.; Heineman, W.R.; Scheller, F.W. Zeptomole-detecting biosensor for alkaline phosphatase in an electrochemical immunoassay for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 2453–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Fang, C.S.; Kim, K.S.; Yu, B.; Jon, S.; Kim, M.S.; Yang, H. Ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of miRNA-21 using a zinc finger protein specific to DNA-RNA hybrids. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2024–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Liu, L.; Gao, Y.; Liu, H.; Du, J.; Xia, N. Electrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycling triggered by thiocholine and hydroquinone with ferrocenecarboxylic acid as the redox mediator. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 139, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Xia, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, L. An electrochemical microRNAs biosensor with the signal amplification of alkaline phosphatase and electrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycling. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 878, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Zhang, J.; Qin, N.; Wang, M.; Hun, X. Double-redox cycling signal amplification coupling Mo2C-graphyne-AuNPs modified electrode based photoelectrochemical assay for Aβ1-40 oligomers. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2021, 326, 128947–128955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Tan, X.; Yu, H.; Liang, B.; Han, M.; Ge, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Li, L.; Yu, J. A target-driven self-feedback paper-based photoelectrochemical sensing platform for ultrasensitive detection of ochratoxin A with an In2S3/WO3 heterojunction structure. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 1705–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Li, X.; Wang, R.; Liu, L.; Hun, X. Ti3C2@WSe2 as photoelectractive materials coupling with recombinase polymerase amplification for nucleic acid detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2022, 1214, 339961–339967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Wang, B.; Xu, Y.T.; Lv, J.L.; Xue, T.Y.; Ren, S.W.; Cao, J.T.; Liu, Y.M.; Zhao, W.W. Ru(NH3)63+/Ru(NH3)62+-mediated redox cycling: Toward enhanced triple signal amplification for photoelectrochemical immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 3768–3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Cao, J.T.; Lv, J.L.; Liao, X.J.; Ma, S.H.; Liu, Y.M. Photogenerated hole-induced chemical-chemical redox cycling strategy on a direct Z-scheme Bi2S3/Bi2MoO6 heterostructure photoelectrode: Toward an ultrasensitive photoelectrochemical immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 9920–9926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Cao, J.T.; Lv, J.L.; Liao, X.J.; Ma, S.H.; Liu, Y.M. A membraneless self-powered photoelectrochemical biosensor based on Bi2S3/BiPO4 heterojunction photoanode coupling with redox cycling signal amplification strategy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 195, 113651–113656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Wang, B.; Mei, L.P.; Ma, Y.; Xu, Y.T.; Ren, S.W.; Cao, J.T.; Liu, Y.M.; Zhao, W.W. Photoelectrochemical-chemical-chemical redox cycling for advanced signal amplification: Proof-of-concept toward ultrasensitive photoelectrochemical bioanalysis. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 12347–12351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Möller, R.; Csáki, A.; Köhler, J.M.; Fritzsche, W. Electrical classification of the concentration of bioconjugated metal colloids after surface adsorption and silver enhancement. Langmuir 2001, 17, 5426–5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Park, S.J.; Taton, T.A.; Mirkin, C.A. Array-based electrical detection of DNA with nanoparticle probes. Science 2002, 295, 1503–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Wang, J.; Xu, D.; Kawde, A.N.; Polsky, R. Metal nanoparticle-based electrochemical stripping potentiometric detection of DNA hybridization. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 5576–5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Moreno-Hagelsieb, L. Sensitive DNA electrical detection based on interdigitated Al/Al2O3 microelectrodes. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2004, 98, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Lv, J.L.; Wang, B.; Liao, X.J.; Ren, S.W.; Cao, J.T.; Liu, Y.M. Chemical-chemical redox cycling amplification strategy in a self-powered photoelectrochemical system: A proof of concept for signal amplified photocathodic immunoassay. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 1883–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Huang, N.; Xu, E.; Xie, J.; Liu, Y.; Deng, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Tian, J.; Liu, Y.; Ye, Q. A sliver deposition signal-enhanced optical biomolecular detection device based on reduced graphene oxide. Talanta 2022, 249, 123691–123697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Hwang, S.; Kim, E.; Kwak, J. Electrochemical detection of DNA hybridization using biometallization. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Moller, R.; Powell, R.D.; Hainfeld, J.F.; Fritzsche, W. Enzymatic control of metal deposition as key step for a low-background electrical detection for DNA chips. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Fanjul-Bolado, P.; Hernandez-Santos, D.; Gonzalez-Garcia, M.B.; Costa-Garcia, A. Alkaline phosphatase-catalyzed silver deposition for electrochemical detection. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5272–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Jiaul Haque, A.M.; Kim, J.; Dutta, G.; Kim, S.; Yang, H. Redox cycling-amplified enzymatic Ag deposition and its application in the highly sensitive detection of creatine kinase-MB. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 14493–14496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Li, Z.; Xu, Y.-T.; Hu, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, F.-Q.; Zhou, H.; Chen, G.-X.; Lin, P.; Zhao, W.-W.; Xu, J.-J.; et al. High-gain signal-on PEDOT:PSS organic photoelectrochemical transistor biosensing modulated by a MXene/MOFs/NiO schottky heterojunction. Sci. China Chem. 2022, 66, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Escamilla-Gomez, V.; Campuzano, S.; Pedrero, M.; Pingarron, J.M. Immunosensor for the determination of Staphylococcus aureus using a tyrosinase-mercaptopropionic acid modified electrode as an amperometric transducer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Carralero, V.; Gonzalez-Cortes, A.; Yanez-Sedeno, P.; Pingarron, J.M. Nanostructured progesterone immunosensor using a tyrosinase-colloidal gold-graphite-Teflon biosensor as amperometric transducer. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 596, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Piao, Y.; Jin, Z.; Lee, D.; Lee, H.J.; Na, H.B.; Hyeon, T.; Oh, M.K.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.S. Sensitive and high-fidelity electrochemical immunoassay using carbon nanotubes coated with enzymes and magnetic nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 3192–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Park, S.; Kim, G.; Seo, J.; Yang, H. Ultrasensitive protease sensors using selective affinity binding, selective proteolytic reaction, and proximity-dependent electrochemical reaction. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 11995–12000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Shin, J.; Park, K.; Park, S.; Yang, H. Trypsin detection using electrochemical reduction-based redox cycling. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2020, 42, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Lee, Y.M.; Jeong, Y.; Kang, H.J.; Chung, S.J.; Chung, B.H. Cascade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CELISA). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 25, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Park, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, G.; Lee, N.S.; Yoon, Y.H.; Yang, H. Combined signal amplification using a propagating cascade reaction and a redox cycling reaction for sensitive thyroid-stimulating hormone detection. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 7894–7901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Park, S.; Lee, H.; Yang, H. Sensitive affinity-based biosensor using the autocatalytic activation of trypsinogen mutant by trypsin with low self-activation. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2022, 5, 4516–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  276. Liu, L.; Deng, D.; Wang, Y.; Song, K.; Shang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Xia, N.; Zhang, B. A colorimetric strategy for assay of protease activity based on gold nanoparticle growth controlled by ascorbic acid and Cu(II)-coordinated peptide. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2018, 266, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Deng, D.; Liu, L.; Bu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, B. Electrochemical sensing devices using ATCUN-Cu(II) complexes as electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2018, 269, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Xia, N.; Deng, D.; Yang, S.; Hao, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; An, C.; Han, Q.; Liu, L. Electrochemical immunosensors with protease as the signal label for the generation of peptide-Cu(II) complexes as the electrocatalysts toward water oxidation. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2019, 291, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Noh, S.; Choe, Y.; Tamilavan, V.; Hyun, M.H.; Kang, H.Y.; Yang, H. Facile electrochemical detection of Escherichia coli using redox cycling of the product generated by the intracellular β-D-galactosidase. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2015, 209, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Adkins, J.A.; Boehle, K.; Friend, C.; Chamberlain, B.; Bisha, B.; Henry, C.S. Colorimetric and electrochemical bacteria detection using printed paper- and transparency-based analytic devices. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 3613–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. VanArsdale, E.; Tsao, C.Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Payne, G.F.; Bentley, W.E. Redox-based synthetic biology enables electrochemical detection of the herbicides dicamba and roundup via rewired Escherichia coli. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1180–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Chen, I.J.; White, I.M. High-sensitivity electrochemical enzyme-linked assay on a microfluidic interdigitated microelectrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 4375–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Zhou, Y.; Yin, H.; Li, X.; Li, Z.; Ai, S.; Lin, H. Electrochemical biosensor for protein kinase A activity assay based on gold nanoparticles-carbon nanospheres, phos-tag-biotin and β-galactosidase. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 86, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Li, Q.; Jin, J.; Lou, F.; Xiao, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, S. Carbon nanomaterials-based electrochemical immunoassay with β-galactosidase as labels for carcinoembryonic antigen. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 852–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Nistor, C.; Rose, A.; Wollenberger, U.; Pfeiffer, D.; Emneus, J. A glucose dehydrogenase biosensor as an additional signal amplification step in an enzyme-flow immunoassay. Analyst 2002, 127, 1076–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Park, S.; Singh, A.; Kim, S.; Yang, H. Electroreduction-based electrochemical-enzymatic redox cycling for the detection of cancer antigen 15-3 using graphene oxide-modified indium-tin oxide electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1560–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the EN redox cycling with HRP (a) and GOx (b) as the signal label of electrochemical biosensor.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the EN redox cycling with HRP (a) and GOx (b) as the signal label of electrochemical biosensor.
Molecules 29 02796 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of (a,b) two types of electrochemical–bienzymatic redox cycling systems.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of (a,b) two types of electrochemical–bienzymatic redox cycling systems.
Molecules 29 02796 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of (a,b) two types of electrochemical–chemical redox cycling, (c) electrochemical–chemical-chemical redox cycling, and (d) chemical–chemical redox cycling.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of (a,b) two types of electrochemical–chemical redox cycling, (c) electrochemical–chemical-chemical redox cycling, and (d) chemical–chemical redox cycling.
Molecules 29 02796 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the EE-redo -cycling-based enzyme-linked electrochemical biosensor.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the EE-redo -cycling-based enzyme-linked electrochemical biosensor.
Molecules 29 02796 g004
Figure 5. (A) Schematic illustration of the EN-redox-cycling-based electrochemical detection of mouse IgG using the ERGO-modified electrode [104]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of an EN-redox-cycling-based electrochemical immunoassay for TSH detection using (a) acetaminophen or (b) HQ as the HRP label substrate [106]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic illustration of the EN-redox-cycling-based electrochemical detection of mouse IgG using the ERGO-modified electrode [104]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of an EN-redox-cycling-based electrochemical immunoassay for TSH detection using (a) acetaminophen or (b) HQ as the HRP label substrate [106]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the multiplexed electrochemical immunoassay protocol and the measurement principle of the sandwich immunoassay [116]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the multiplexed electrochemical immunoassay protocol and the measurement principle of the sandwich immunoassay [116]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g006
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of (a) the reaction in which a preceding enzyme (Ox) catalyzes the corresponding substrate (S′) to the oxidized product (P′), during which H2O2 is generated and oxidizes the peroxidase substrate (S) to the electroactive signaling product (P) in the presence of HRP, (b) the electrochemical reaction of S′ and P′ on an electrode, (c) Ox-catalyzed reduction of P to S in the presence of S′, and (d) an electrochemical immunoassay for PTH detection using the ChOx-HRP cascade reaction and acetaminophen as the HRP substrate [117]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of (a) the reaction in which a preceding enzyme (Ox) catalyzes the corresponding substrate (S′) to the oxidized product (P′), during which H2O2 is generated and oxidizes the peroxidase substrate (S) to the electroactive signaling product (P) in the presence of HRP, (b) the electrochemical reaction of S′ and P′ on an electrode, (c) Ox-catalyzed reduction of P to S in the presence of S′, and (d) an electrochemical immunoassay for PTH detection using the ChOx-HRP cascade reaction and acetaminophen as the HRP substrate [117]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g007
Figure 8. (A) Schematic illustration of (a) an electrochemical immunosensor using GOx label-based EN redox cycling, (b) enzymatic glucose oxidation by O2, (c) homogeneous reaction of glucose and Ru(NH3)63+ [128]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of a washing-free immunosensor using proximity-dependent electron mediation and the reactions involved (af) [129]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. (A) Schematic illustration of (a) an electrochemical immunosensor using GOx label-based EN redox cycling, (b) enzymatic glucose oxidation by O2, (c) homogeneous reaction of glucose and Ru(NH3)63+ [128]. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of a washing-free immunosensor using proximity-dependent electron mediation and the reactions involved (af) [129]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g008
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of (a) the integration of EC and CN redox cycling containing mediator RI and its oxidized form OI, oxidant Q and its reduced form P, and oxidant of enzyme OII and its reduced form RII; and (b) example of the integrated ECN redox cycling for electrochemical enzymatic signal enhancement in the immunosensing of protein [138]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of (a) the integration of EC and CN redox cycling containing mediator RI and its oxidized form OI, oxidant Q and its reduced form P, and oxidant of enzyme OII and its reduced form RII; and (b) example of the integrated ECN redox cycling for electrochemical enzymatic signal enhancement in the immunosensing of protein [138]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g009
Figure 10. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the electrochemical immunosensor and immunoassay procedure with the tyrosinase label and EC redox cycling [139]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using Tyr (tyrosinase) as a catalytic label and 4-methoxyphenol as a reducing agent. Reprinted with permission from reference [140]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 10. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the electrochemical immunosensor and immunoassay procedure with the tyrosinase label and EC redox cycling [139]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using Tyr (tyrosinase) as a catalytic label and 4-methoxyphenol as a reducing agent. Reprinted with permission from reference [140]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g010
Figure 11. (A) Schematic illustration of an EN redox cycling-based electrochemical immunosensor [150]. Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH. (B) Schematic illustration of the interference-free duplex detection method using (left) a sandwich-type immunoassay for total PSA and (right) an enzymatic-reaction-based protease assay for free PSA [151]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Figure 11. (A) Schematic illustration of an EN redox cycling-based electrochemical immunosensor [150]. Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH. (B) Schematic illustration of the interference-free duplex detection method using (left) a sandwich-type immunoassay for total PSA and (right) an enzymatic-reaction-based protease assay for free PSA [151]. Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g011
Figure 12. Schematic illustration of a washing-free electrochemical immunosensor based on EN redox cycling in the presence of GP, GPDH, and Ru(NH3)63+ [153]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Figure 12. Schematic illustration of a washing-free electrochemical immunosensor based on EN redox cycling in the presence of GP, GPDH, and Ru(NH3)63+ [153]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g012
Figure 13. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical glucose sensor using GDH and QLS (a), and (b) that of an electrochemical immunosensor for PTH detection using DT-D and QLS [156]. Copyright 2022 Wiley. (B) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type immunoassay for IL-8 detection using a polyenzyme label based on diaphorase and neutravidin [157]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Figure 13. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical glucose sensor using GDH and QLS (a), and (b) that of an electrochemical immunosensor for PTH detection using DT-D and QLS [156]. Copyright 2022 Wiley. (B) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type immunoassay for IL-8 detection using a polyenzyme label based on diaphorase and neutravidin [157]. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g013
Figure 14. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using DT-D as an enzyme label [159]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using triple signal amplification strategy for fast silver deposition and electrochemical oxidation of the deposited silver [160]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type EC and EN redox-cycling-based electrochemical immunosensor for OMV detection [162]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor for TSH detection based on EC and EN redox cycling [163]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 14. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using DT-D as an enzyme label [159]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using triple signal amplification strategy for fast silver deposition and electrochemical oxidation of the deposited silver [160]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (C) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type EC and EN redox-cycling-based electrochemical immunosensor for OMV detection [162]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (D) Schematic illustration of a sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor for TSH detection based on EC and EN redox cycling [163]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g014
Figure 15. Schematic illustration of wash-free amperometric E. coli detection based on the sequential proteolytic cleavage by OmpT and LAP, and EN redox cycling [168]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 15. Schematic illustration of wash-free amperometric E. coli detection based on the sequential proteolytic cleavage by OmpT and LAP, and EN redox cycling [168]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g015
Figure 16. Schematic illustration of the preparation of electrochemical immunosensor and immunoassay procedure with ferritin-triggered redox cycling [178]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 16. Schematic illustration of the preparation of electrochemical immunosensor and immunoassay procedure with ferritin-triggered redox cycling [178]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g016
Figure 17. (A) Schematic illustration of the mechanism of the photocurrent generation of g-C3N4/CdS:Mn under visible-light irradiation and schematic illustration of PEC immunosensing system [189]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of the electrochemical immunosensor based on HCR and hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme for signal amplification [192]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 17. (A) Schematic illustration of the mechanism of the photocurrent generation of g-C3N4/CdS:Mn under visible-light irradiation and schematic illustration of PEC immunosensing system [189]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of the electrochemical immunosensor based on HCR and hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme for signal amplification [192]. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g017
Figure 18. Schematic representation of the preparation of an immunosensing layer (a). Schematic view of electrochemical detection of mouse IgG or PSA (b). Reprinted with permission from reference [200]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 18. Schematic representation of the preparation of an immunosensing layer (a). Schematic view of electrochemical detection of mouse IgG or PSA (b). Reprinted with permission from reference [200]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g018
Figure 19. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using Pd NPs as nanocatalytic labels [203]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the immuno-reaction scheme using Fe3+/AuNP/AB and TMB/HRP/H2O, in which Fe3+ and Fe2+ represent [Fe(CN)6]3− and [Fe(CN)6]4−, respectively [204]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Figure 19. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using Pd NPs as nanocatalytic labels [203]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the immuno-reaction scheme using Fe3+/AuNP/AB and TMB/HRP/H2O, in which Fe3+ and Fe2+ represent [Fe(CN)6]3− and [Fe(CN)6]4−, respectively [204]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g019
Figure 20. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the GOx/HPtNPs-Fe3O4 and the stepwise immunosensor fabrication process [209]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of the sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using cubic Cu2O nanoframes as the HRP-mimicking label [210]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Figure 20. (A) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the GOx/HPtNPs-Fe3O4 and the stepwise immunosensor fabrication process [209]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier. (B) Schematic illustration of the sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using cubic Cu2O nanoframes as the HRP-mimicking label [210]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g020
Figure 21. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using the generation of AA by ALP and the EC redox cycling of AA by TCEP [220]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using (i) enzymatic amplification and (ii) + (iii) EC redox cycling [222]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
Figure 21. (A) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using the generation of AA by ALP and the EC redox cycling of AA by TCEP [220]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of an electrochemical immunosensor using (i) enzymatic amplification and (ii) + (iii) EC redox cycling [222]. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g021
Figure 22. Schematic illustration of (a) sandwich immunoreaction in 1 well of 96-well plate and ALP-catalyzed generation of AA, (b) redox cycling for signal amplification on Bi2S3/Bi2Sn2O7 heterojunction [227]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 22. Schematic illustration of (a) sandwich immunoreaction in 1 well of 96-well plate and ALP-catalyzed generation of AA, (b) redox cycling for signal amplification on Bi2S3/Bi2Sn2O7 heterojunction [227]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g022
Figure 23. Schematic illustration of the detection of Aβ(1–42) (a) and total Aβ (b) using p-AP redox cycling by chemical reductants (c) [234]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Figure 23. Schematic illustration of the detection of Aβ(1–42) (a) and total Aβ (b) using p-AP redox cycling by chemical reductants (c) [234]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g023
Figure 25. Schematic illustration of (a) sandwich immunorecognition and ALP-catalyzed AA formation and (b) PECCC redox cycling amplification on Bi2S3/Bi2WO6 photoelectrode [256]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 25. Schematic illustration of (a) sandwich immunorecognition and ALP-catalyzed AA formation and (b) PECCC redox cycling amplification on Bi2S3/Bi2WO6 photoelectrode [256]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g025
Figure 26. Schematic illustration of three electrochemical trypsin detection methods: (a) new trypsin detection using affinity binding, washing process, and proteolytic reaction, (b) conventional washing-free trypsin detection using proteolytic reaction, and (c) new washing-free trypsin detection using both affinity binding and proteolytic reaction [271]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 26. Schematic illustration of three electrochemical trypsin detection methods: (a) new trypsin detection using affinity binding, washing process, and proteolytic reaction, (b) conventional washing-free trypsin detection using proteolytic reaction, and (c) new washing-free trypsin detection using both affinity binding and proteolytic reaction [271]. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g026
Figure 27. (A) Schematic illustration of an immunosensor using a propagating cascade reaction and a redox cycling reaction (a), and unwanted proteolytic reactions (b) [274]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the electrochemical sandwich-type immunosensor based on the autocatalytic activation of trypsinogen by trypsin, the proteolytic cleavage by trypsin, and EC redox cycling [275]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 27. (A) Schematic illustration of an immunosensor using a propagating cascade reaction and a redox cycling reaction (a), and unwanted proteolytic reactions (b) [274]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (B) Schematic illustration of the electrochemical sandwich-type immunosensor based on the autocatalytic activation of trypsinogen by trypsin, the proteolytic cleavage by trypsin, and EC redox cycling [275]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g027
Figure 28. Scheme illustration of the electrochemical immunosensor by the generation of ATCUN-Cu(II) metallopeptides as the electrocatalysts toward water oxidation [278]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 28. Scheme illustration of the electrochemical immunosensor by the generation of ATCUN-Cu(II) metallopeptides as the electrocatalysts toward water oxidation [278]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 02796 g028
Figure 29. Schematic illustration of (a) an electrochemical immunosensor using electro-reduction-based EN redox cycling combined with simultaneous enzymatic amplification (one-enzyme scheme) and (b) an electrochemical immunosensor using electro-reduction-based EN redox cycling combined with preceding enzymatic amplification (two-enzyme scheme) [286]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Figure 29. Schematic illustration of (a) an electrochemical immunosensor using electro-reduction-based EN redox cycling combined with simultaneous enzymatic amplification (one-enzyme scheme) and (b) an electrochemical immunosensor using electro-reduction-based EN redox cycling combined with preceding enzymatic amplification (two-enzyme scheme) [286]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 02796 g029
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, N.; Gao, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y. Overview on the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors by the Signal Amplification of Enzyme- or Nanozyme-Based Catalysis Plus Redox Cycling. Molecules 2024, 29, 2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122796

AMA Style

Xia N, Gao F, Zhang J, Wang J, Huang Y. Overview on the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors by the Signal Amplification of Enzyme- or Nanozyme-Based Catalysis Plus Redox Cycling. Molecules. 2024; 29(12):2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122796

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Ning, Fengli Gao, Jiwen Zhang, Jiaqiang Wang, and Yaliang Huang. 2024. "Overview on the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors by the Signal Amplification of Enzyme- or Nanozyme-Based Catalysis Plus Redox Cycling" Molecules 29, no. 12: 2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122796

APA Style

Xia, N., Gao, F., Zhang, J., Wang, J., & Huang, Y. (2024). Overview on the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors by the Signal Amplification of Enzyme- or Nanozyme-Based Catalysis Plus Redox Cycling. Molecules, 29(12), 2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29122796

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop