Next Article in Journal
Influence of Three Modification Methods on the Structure, Physicochemical, and Functional Properties of Insoluble Dietary Fiber from Rosa roxburghii Tratt Pomace
Next Article in Special Issue
Visible Light-Driven Photocatalysis of Al-Doped SrTiO3: Experimental and DFT Study
Previous Article in Journal
Extraction and In Vitro Skincare Effect Assessment of Polysaccharides Extract from the Roots of Abelmoschus manihot (L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advances in the Application of Bi-Based Compounds in Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules29092108
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrothermally Synthesized ZnCr- and NiCr-Layered Double Hydroxides as Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalysts

by
Sergei A. Kurnosenko
,
Oleg I. Silyukov
*,
Ivan A. Rodionov
,
Anna S. Baeva
,
Andrei A. Burov
,
Alina V. Kulagina
,
Silvestr S. Novikov
and
Irina A. Zvereva
Department of Chemical Thermodynamics and Kinetics, Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(9), 2108; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092108
Submission received: 26 February 2024 / Revised: 30 April 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 2 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalysis for Energy Transformation Reactions and Wastewater Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The layered double hydroxides (LDHs) of transition metals are of great interest as building blocks for the creation of composite photocatalytic materials for hydrogen production, environmental remediation and other applications. However, the synthesis of most LDHs is reported only by the conventional coprecipitation method, which makes it difficult to control the catalyst’s crystallinity. In the present study, ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs have been successfully prepared using a facile hydrothermal approach. Varying the hydrothermal synthesis conditions allowed us to obtain target products with a controllable crystallite size in the range of 2–26 nm and a specific surface area of 45–83 m2∙g−1. The LDHs synthesized were investigated as photocatalysts of hydrogen generation from aqueous methanol. It was revealed that the photocatalytic activity of ZnCr-LDH samples grows monotonically with the increase in their average crystallite size, while that of NiCr-LDH ones reaches a maximum with intermediate-sized crystallites and then decreases due to the specific surface area reduction. The concentration dependence of the hydrogen evolution activity is generally consistent with the standard Langmuir–Hinshelwood model for heterogeneous catalysis. At a methanol content of 50 mol. %, the rate of hydrogen generation over ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs reaches 88 and 41 μmol∙h−1∙g−1, respectively. The hydrothermally synthesized LDHs with enhanced crystallinity may be of interest for further fabrication of their nanosheets being promising components of new composite photocatalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent decades, heterogeneous photocatalysis has become one of the topical areas of chemical science due to its relevance in solving problems of renewable energy production, environmental remediation and fine organic synthesis [1]. The continuous development of hydrogen evolution photocatalysts, initiated by Fujishima and Honda’s discovery of water photoelectrolysis [2], involves both the search for new, more efficient materials and the applying of advanced modifications to well-known ones [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], such as titanium dioxide TiO2 [13,14,15,16,17]. Despite the significant progress made in this field [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], photocatalytic overall water splitting with a high enough efficiency still remains a challenging task for most materials available due to the thermodynamic and kinetic limitations of the reaction [27,28,29]. In view of this, great attention in recent studies has also been paid to the photocatalytic reforming of bioalcohols, carbohydrates and other plant biomass derivatives to obtain hydrogen with much higher quantum yields [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], as well as to the use of integrated approaches in the design of new photocatalytic systems [39,40,41].
A promising alternative to conventional TiO2-based materials is represented by layered oxide, hydroxide, nitride and other photocatalysts [42]. The features of a particular layered structure may improve spatial charge separation, involve the interlayer reaction zone in the photocatalytic cycle, and provide a researcher with a powerful toolbox of potential approaches to the further enhancement of photocatalytic performance, such as ion exchange, interlayer organic modification and exfoliation into nanosheets [43,44,45,46]. Typical representatives of such materials are layered double hydroxides (LDHs)—crystalline solids with a general formula [MII1−xMIIIx(OH)2]x+[(An−)x/n∙yH2O]x−, whose structure is characterized by a regular alternation of brucite-like layers [MII1−xMIIIx(OH)2]x+ (MII = Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+; MIII = Al3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, Co3+, Ga3+, etc.) and interlayer spaces occupied by anions An− and intercalated water molecules [47]. The attractiveness of LDHs as photocatalysts is supposed to be due to their compositional flexibility, tunable band gap, ease of synthesis and relatively low cost [48,49,50,51,52,53]. In addition, many LDHs have been revealed to possess band edge potentials that are suitable for hydrogen evolution and a bandgap energy Eg < 3 eV, allowing them to utilize visible light [54,55,56]. Regarding the objects of this study, ZnCr-and NiCr-LDHs have already been tested in the reactions of hydrogen [57,58,59,60] and oxygen [61,62,63] generation, decomposition of organic dyes [64,65,66,67], insecticides [68] and antibiotics [69,70] as well as reduction of olefins by hydrazine [71].
However, some important aspects of LDH-based photocatalyst creation remain underdeveloped or questionable. For instance, the synthesis of most LDHs is usually conducted via the conventional coprecipitation method with sodium hydroxide as a precipitant [72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79], which makes it difficult to control the product’s crystallinity and morphology being of high significance for photocatalytic applications. In view of this, a preferable alternative is hydrothermal synthesis using urea [80,81,82] or, better yet, hexamethylenetetramine (HMT) [83], which slowly hydrolyzes upon heating, gradually increasing the pH of the reaction medium and creating favorable conditions for LDH crystal growth. Nevertheless, the HMT-assisted method has been investigated in detail only for MgAl-LDH [83]. Another more important problem is the inconsistency of the literature data on a bandgap energy of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs and, consequently, their intrinsic light absorption range. For instance, the studies [57,59,71] claim that the bandgap energy of ZnCr-LDHs falls in the range of 2.0–2.5 eV, which allows the corresponding photocatalysts to function under purely visible light. At the same time, the authors of another report [84] state that ZnCr-LDH has a bandgap energy of about 3.9 eV, allowing it to utilize only ultraviolet irradiation. Similar contradictions can be found between the values for NiCr-LDHs, which range from 2 [71] to 4 eV [70]. The hydrogen evolution performance of ZnCr-LDHs also differs extremely widely. For instance, the paper [85] reveals that unmodified ZnCr-LDH is not active under visible light at all, while, according to another publication [58], it exhibits an incredibly high hydrogen generation rate of about 60 mmol∙h−1∙g−1. In addition, there is little data in the literature on the dependence of LDHs’ hydrogen evolution activity on the concentration of the reaction solution. Such a dependence can usually be satisfactorily described by the conventional Langmuir–Hinshelwood model adopted from standard heterogeneous catalysis [86]. This model assumes that the reactant’s adsorption by the catalyst is mono-layer and equilibrium while the catalyst surface is homogeneous, that is, all adsorption centers on it are completely equivalent and equally accessible to the reactant molecules. That being said, the filling of the reaction centers does not affect the properties of the still vacant sites. Within these assumptions, the concentration dependence of the reaction rate resembles the classic Langmuir adsorption isotherm: its value first rises almost linearly with the increasing reactant concentration, then the slope of the graph gradually decreases and the curve reaches a plateau. This course of the dependence corresponds to the gradual filling of the surface with reactant molecules: when all the active centers are occupied, the reaction rate cannot be additionally improved by increasing the reactant content in the solution. The practical significance of obtaining such dependencies is that they make it possible to establish the optimal concentration of the reaction solution to achieve the highest rate of the target reaction (in particular, of hydrogen evolution).
With all this in mind, the present study focuses on the development and optimization of the HMT-assisted hydrothermal method for the synthesis of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs as hydrogen evolution photocatalysts. This study pays special attention to the correlation between synthesis conditions, the crystallinity of the LDHs and their photocatalytic performance, as well as considering the dependence of the latter on the aqueous methanol concentration within the framework of Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetics.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs

In the present study, ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs have been synthesized by a facile hydrothermal method, using HMT as an alkalizing agent. A key advantage of this approach over conventional coprecipitation with sodium hydroxide is the homogeneity in the composition of the solution during the formation of LDHs due to gradual HMT hydrolysis, accompanied by the release of ammonia, which should be more favorable for LDH crystal growth.
The ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs were initially synthesized under the conditions generally adopted from the publication on MgAl-LDH [83], with the cation ratio MII:MIII = 2:1, implying heating of the aqueous solutions of the metal nitrates with a 3-fold HMT excess at a rate of 150 °C∙h−1, up to 150 °C, followed by isothermal maintenance for 1 d and cooling down for approximately 1 h (the default conditions). The resulting samples were identified by means of an XRD analysis (Figure 1, red patterns). It was shown that both LDHs are single-phase compounds not containing any crystalline impurities and that their patterns are similar to those of their counterparts synthesized by the coprecipitation method (PDF cards N° 00-052-0010 and N° 00-052-1626). The XRD patterns were successfully indexed in a hexagonal system and the lattice parameters were found to be a = 3.11 Å, c = 22.7 Å and a = 3.07 Å, c = 22.7 Å for the ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs, respectively. The greater a lattice parameter of ZnCr-LDH is apparently associated with a larger Zn2+ crystallographic radius compared to that of Ni2+. At the same time, the c parameters of both samples are equal, indicating that their interlayer spaces have approximately the same width. With all that said, the HMT-assisted method of hydrothermal synthesis proved to be fully applicable to the LDHs under consideration.
Since the crystallinity of heterogeneous photocatalysts is one of key factors affecting their activity, subsequent experiments aimed at studying the relationship between their hydrothermal synthesis conditions (Table 1) and average crystallite size L.
The XRD patterns of all the samples obtained are presented in Figure S1 and the correlation between their synthesis conditions and resulting crystallinity is shown in Figure 2. In the first series of experiments, the synthesis temperature was chosen as the variable parameter (Figure 2a). It was shown that, for both LDHs, the average crystallite size rises monotonically with increasing temperature, from 11.0 nm at 100 °C to 17.6 nm at 150 °C for ZnCr-LDH and from 2.0 nm at 100 °C to 16.4 nm at 200 °C for NiCr-LDH, which is seen from the narrowing of the reflections at half maximum. However, the synthesis of ZnCr-LDH appears to be infeasible at temperatures above 150 °C: the XRD patterns of the products obtained at 175 °C and 200 °C do not exhibit any reflections from the target layered phase but show those of ZnCr2O4 and Cr2O3 (Figure 1 and Figure S1), indicating that the target LDH is instable in this temperature range. On the contrary, all the NiCr-LDH samples prepared at temperatures of 100–200 °C do not contain perceptible by-phases. The second series of experiments was devoted to the influence of the synthesis duration at a constant temperature of 150 °C (Figure 2b). In the case of ZnCr-LDHs, a heating elongation from 6 h to 1 d leads to a relatively small increase in crystallite size, from 17.3 to 17.6 nm, and longer experiments result in the target product decomposition into ZnCr2O4 and Cr2O3 (Figure S1). Meanwhile, the crystallite size of NiCr-LDHs increases monotonically with the synthesis duration, from 9.3 nm at 6 h to 17.5 nm at 7 d. Concerning HMT loading (Figure 2c), the 3-fold excess turned out to be optimal in terms of the crystallinity and phase purity of the products, while the use of the 2- or 4-fold excess was shown to give a smaller crystallite size and, in the case of ZnCr-LDHs, cause the formation of undesirable by-phases. An increase in the MII:MIII ratio is accompanied by the gradual crystallite size reduction from 17.6 nm at 2:1 to 14.2 nm at 4:1 for ZnCr-LDHs and from 12.3 nm at 2:1 to 6.2 nm at 4:1 for NiCr-LDHs (Figure 2d). The highest crystallinity was achieved via combining the optimal temperature (150 °C for ZnCr- and 200 °C for NiCr-LDH) with slow heating (25 °C∙h−1) and a continuous stirring of the reaction mixture: 18.0 nm crystallites were obtained for ZnCr-LDH and 25.7 nm ones for NiCr-LDH. Generally, the data obtained show that the HMT-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of pure single-phase ZnCr-LDH is feasible in a narrower range of conditions than that of NiCr-LDH. Nevertheless, their variation allows one to prepare the samples with different crystallite sizes.
Further in-depth investigations and photocatalytic tests were performed for five selected representatives of each LDH (MII:MIII = 2:1) with various average crystallite sizes: 11.0–18.0 for ZnCr- and 2.0–25.7 for NiCr-LDH (Table 2).
Prior to the quantitative analysis, the LDHs obtained were examined by means of Raman spectroscopy (Figure 3a). The low-frequency region of the spectra (80–600 cm−1) is represented by a set of bands corresponding to the metal–oxygen vibrational modes located in the brucite-like layer [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. In the case of ZnCr-LDH, these bands are offset by 20–70 cm−1 to the low-frequency area compared to those of NiCr-LDH, which, to a zero approximation, may be explained by a greater zinc atomic mass. The Raman peaks at 695 and 1059 cm−1 should be attributed to the bending and stretching modes of the interlayer carbonate anions, respectively [87]. In addition, the spectra show low-intensity peaks of water bending (1620 cm−1) and wide asymmetric peaks of the hydroxyl group stretching (3000–3700 cm−1) belonging to the brucite-like layer and intercalated water molecules. At the same time, the spectra do not exhibit a 1044 cm−1 band that could correspond to nitrate anions [87]. Thus, the latter appear to be absent in the interlayer space or, at least, their content is significantly lower than that of the carbonates. Moreover, bands of carbon–hydrogen stretching (2800–3100 cm−1) are not observed, indicating that the final LDH samples do not contain perceptible amounts of residual HMT or the organic products of its hydrolysis and oxidation.
The quantitative compositions of the LDHs synthesized were determined using a combination of EDX, ICP-AES, CHN- and TG analyses (Table 2). The actual MII:MIII cation ratios measured by the first two methods were found to be in good agreement with each other and correspond to the expected value of 2:1. The elemental CHN analysis revealed an absence of nitrogen in the samples and a carbon content of 1.9–2.0%. According to the aforementioned Raman spectra (Figure 3a), the LDHs in question are free of residual organics, which allows for the attributing of all the carbon detected to the interlayer carbonate anions. In this case, their content per formula unit [MII2MIII(OH)6]+ is 0.5 and, thereby, the interlayer space does not contain nitrates and other anions compensating for the brucite-like layer’s charge. This result is fully consistent with the data of the Raman spectroscopy (Figure 3a), pointing to the absence of nitrates in the samples. To find the amount of intercalated water (y), the LDHs were additionally studied by means of TG (Figure 3b). The curves obtained demonstrate several overlapping mass loss stages during which the samples should undergo a deintercalation of the interlayer molecules and decomposition of the brucite-like layers. The strict attribution of these stages to the liberation of water and carbon dioxide cannot be made without additional investigations. However, if the cationic and anionic compositions are known and the final thermolysis products are assumed to be Zn2CrO3.5 and Ni2CrO3.5, the difference between the total experimental and theoretical mass losses corresponds to the required water amount (y). Taking all this into account, the quantitative compositions of the LDHs prepared are [Zn2Cr(OH)6]+[(CO3)0.5∙yH2O]− and [Ni2Cr(OH)6]+[(CO3)0.5∙yH2O]−, where y = 1.1–2.3 depending on specific synthesis conditions (Table 2).
The regions of intrinsic light absorption and the optical bandgap energies Eg of the LDHs were examined by means of DRS with a Kubelka–Munk transformation (Figure 4a,b). As noted in the introduction, the available literature provides the reader with contradictory Eg values for the samples in question, which range from 2 to 4 eV. Apparently, these discrepancies originate from the complex structure of the ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs’ spectra in comparison with those of traditional TiO2-based photocatalysts and, as a consequence, lead to ambiguous attribution of the absorption peaks to the interband transition. Indeed, both LDHs exhibit at least two distinctive absorption bands, marked as (1) and (2) in the visible spectrum area, as well as two overlapping ones, designated as (3,4), in the ultraviolet region (Figure 4a,b).
The rigorous determination of Eg from these spectra may be achieved with the use of additional information on the band structure of the samples. In particular, the results of quantum chemical calculations [95,96,97] indicate that the valence band top of the LDHs is formed by oxygen 2p-orbitals and, to a lesser extent, by chromium (ZnCr-LDH) or nickel 3d-orbitals (NiCr-LDH). The conduction band predominantly consists of 3d-orbitals of chromium (ZnCr-LDH) or those of nickel with a smaller chromium contribution (NiCr-LDH). The calculated energy gap between the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum is 2.0–2.6 eV. Therefore, it is the absorption peaks (2) that should actually relate to the genuine interband transition (Figure 4a,b). Meanwhile, according to the predicted densities of electronic states [95,96,97], the overlapping peaks (3,4) should correspond to the transitions from the valence band to higher energy 3d-orbitals of chromium and 4s-orbitals of zinc. With that said, the optical bandgap energies Eg of the photocatalysts prepared were found to be 2.37 eV (ZnCr-SHS) and 2.47 eV (NiCr-SHS), which corresponds to long-wave intrinsic absorption edges of 523 and 502 nm, respectively. Thus, both LDHs are expected to exhibit photocatalytic activity not only under ultraviolet but also under visible irradiation.
A necessary condition for hydrogen generation over semiconductor photocatalysts is the more negative potential of the conduction band minimum relative to the proton reduction potential (0 V vs. SHE at pH = 0). To confirm this issue for the LDHs prepared, their band edge potentials were evaluated using VB-XPS and DRS data (Figure 4). The conduction band minima were established to be approximately −0.35 V and −0.60 V vs. SHE for the ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs, respectively (Table 3). Consequently, the reactions of hydrogen evolution from aqueous solutions are thermodynamically allowed over the LDHs in question.
To estimate the intensity of radiative electron–hole recombination, the most crystalline samples (ZnCr-SHS with L = 18.0 nm and NiCr-SHS with L = 25.7 nm) were investigated by means of TR-PLS (Figure 5). The same measurements were also performed for two reference photocatalysts of hydrogen production, tested earlier under the same conditions (titanium dioxide TiO2 P25 Degussa and layered perovskite-like oxides H2Ln2Ti3O10, Ln = La, Nd) [98] (Figure S2). All the samples were excited at λ = 265 nm and their photoluminescence decay was detected at the maximum of each emission spectrum. The average photoluminescence lifetimes of both LDHs (Table 3) were determined to be slightly less than those for TiO2 P25 Degussa (2.0 μs) and 2.5–3 times less than for H2Ln2Ti3O10 (4.8 μs for Ln = La, 5.4 μs for Ln = Nd). This comparison indicates that the unmodified LDHs in question are characterized by a greater electron–hole recombination rate than the aforementioned layered oxides adopting a perovskite structure.
To study the specific surface area and particle morphology, the LDHs obtained were analyzed by means of the BET (Table 2) and SEM methods (Figure 6). It was revealed that the specific surface area of ZnCr-LDHs increases with their average crystallite size L, from 58 m2∙g−1 for ZnCr-100 (L = 11.0 nm) to 83 m2∙g−1 for ZnCr-SHS (L = 18.0 nm). Among NiCr-LDHs, on the contrary, the greatest specific surface area of 76 m2∙g−1 was observed for the sample with intermediate crystallinity, NiCr-DC (L = 12.3 nm), while the least, NiCr-100 (L = 2.0 nm), and the most crystalline samples, NiCr-SHS (L = 25.7 nm), possess a surface area of only 47 and 45 m2∙g−1, respectively. These trends cannot be explained in light of the conventional idea of a symbatic increase in crystallite and particle sizes [99,100,101] usually leading to a reduction in a specific surface area. Since the LDHs’ morphology is characterized by pronounced particle agglomeration (Figure 6), their specific surface may be rather affected by the features of these agglomerates (the number of cavities, their volume, etc.) than by the sizes of the constituent particles. For instance, the agglomerates of ZnCr-100 (L = 11.0 nm) show a relatively dense packing of the particles, while those of ZnCr-SHS (L = 18.0 nm) exhibit numerous voids, which is consistent with the greater specific surface area of the latter.

2.2. Photocatalytic Activity of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs

The hydrothermally synthesized LDHs with various average crystallite sizes have been investigated as photocatalysts of hydrogen evolution from 1 mol. % aqueous methanol under both ultraviolet and purely visible irradiation. The kinetic curves obtained under ultraviolet light (Figure 7) demonstrate linear behavior, pointing to the stable hydrogen generation rate maintained throughout the whole measurement time. When the lamp is turned off, the curves reach a plateau corresponding to a zero reaction rate.
In the series of ZnCr-LDHs, the hydrogen evolution activity increases monotonically with the average crystallite size, from 0.48 μmol∙h−1 (φ = 0.0029%) for ZnCr-100 (L = 11.0 nm) to 0.95 μmol∙h−1 (φ = 0.0057%) for ZnCr-SHS (L = 18.0 nm) (Figure 8). Apparently, this activity growth is caused by two key factors: the suppression of electron–hole recombination at the boundaries of the crystal lattice’s discontinuity and the enhancement of the active surface for more efficient reactant adsorption. In the series of NiCr-LDHs, the photocatalytic performance increases with crystallite size, reaches a maximum value of 0.4 μmol∙h−1 (φ = 0.0024%) for NiCr-DC (L = 12.3 nm), and then starts to decline (Figure 8). This trend is generally consistent with the relative change in specific surface area that appears to influence the LDH’s activity more strongly than its crystallinity. Moreover, the activity correlates with the amount of interlayer water (y) in the LDHs (Table 2), which may point to its potential involvement in the methanol oxidation, as supposed earlier for layered ion-exchangeable oxides [98,102,103,104]. On the whole, ZnCr-LDHs exhibit the 2–3 times greater activity under the chosen conditions than NiCr-LDHs.
However, both LDHs have demonstrated zero hydrogen evolution activity in aqueous methanol being irradiated by purely visible light (λ = 425 nm), despite the suitable bandgap energy. The same inactivity was reported earlier for ZnCr-LDH in a formaldehyde degradation reaction [95]. Meanwhile, several studies have reported the presence of photocatalytic activity in the visible region under conditions close to those used by us [57,58]. This fact indicates that, depending on the experimental factors (synthesis method, details of the photocatalytic measurement), these LDHs are apparently capable of generating hydrogen evolution from aqueous solutions of methyl alcohol not only under ultraviolet light.
Although the hydrogen evolution rate over both LDHs under ultraviolet irradiation was non-zero, its value proved to be several times lower than in the case of the conventional photocatalyst TiO2 P25 Degussa and layered oxides H2Ln2Ti3O10 under the same conditions [98]. One of possible reasons for this may be the relatively small difference between the conduction band minimum and the proton reduction potential at neutral pH (especially in the case of ZnCr-LDH), which does not provide an enough reaction driving force. Another reason may be associated with the severe electron–hole recombination in the unmodified LDHs, which follows from the significantly lower photoluminescence lifetimes of these photocatalysts in comparison to those of other layered materials (in particular, layered perovskite-structured oxides).
The photocatalytic performance of two most active samples (ZnCr-SHS and NiCr-DC) was additionally evaluated in the methanol concentration range of 0–50 mol. %. Corresponding hydrogen evolution curves are shown in Figure S3. The concentration dependences obtained (Figure 9) are consistent with the standard Langmuir–Hinshelwood model for heterogeneous catalysis [86]: the hydrogen evolution rate increases sharply with the increasing methanol content in the low-concentration area and asymptotically approaches its maximum value in the high-concentration area. This behavior of the graphs is conventionally explained by the gradual filling of active centers on the catalyst surface with adsorbed reactants. In the low-concentration range, most of the active sites are vacant and the catalyst’s performance remains untapped. In the high-concentration region, on the contrary, practically all the active sites are occupied and the reaction rate cannot be boosted via the supply of excess reactants to the catalyst surface.
The highest hydrogen evolution activities achieved in 50 mol. % aqueous methanol over ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs are 88 μmol∙h−1∙g−1 (φ = 0.013%) and 41 μmol∙h−1∙g−1 (φ = 0.0062%), respectively. Undoubtedly, these compounds demonstrate relatively low performance in comparison with the layered oxide photocatalysts tested earlier under the same conditions [98,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109]. However, the LDHs under study differ from the aforementioned layered oxides in their intrinsic absorption of visible light, which may make them promising light-sensitive components of composite photocatalysts.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Hydrothermal Synthesis of LDHs with Various Crystallite sizes

The general methodology of the hydrothermal synthesis of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs was adopted from the study [83], where it had been developed for MgAl-LDH. The synthesis was conducted using hydrates of Zn(NO3)2 (Vekton, Saint Petersburg, Russia), Ni(NO3)2 (LenReaktiv, Saint Petersburg, Russia), Cr(NO3)3 (Chemcraft, Kaliningrad, Russia) and anhydrous hexamethylenetetramine (CH2)6N4 (HMT) (Vekton, Saint Petersburg, Russia). The nitrates were previously recrystallized from water and exact compositions of their hydrates were determined gravimetrically.
The selected LDH synthesis strategy is based on gradual HMT hydrolysis upon heating, with the formation of ammonia, which increases the reaction medium’s pH and results in the crystallization of the target LDHs. In the case of the cation ratio MII:MIII = 2:1, the key chemical processes occurring during the synthesis may be described by the following equations:
(CH2)6N4 + 10H2O = 6H2CO + 4NH4OH,
H2CO + [O] = CO2 + H2O ↔ CO32− + 2H+,
4MII(NO3)2 + 2MIII(NO3)3 + 12NH4OH + (NH4)2CO3 + 2yH2O =
2[MII2MIII(OH)6]+[(CO3)0.5∙yH2O]− + 14NH4NO3,
where [O] is a generalized designation of the oxidizing agent (nitrate anion, residual air oxygen, or formaldehyde in a disproportionation reaction [110]), MII = Zn or Ni and MIII = Cr.
The default synthesis conditions were as follows: Weights corresponding to 2.50 mmol of Zn(NO3)2 or Ni(NO3)2 and 1.25 mmol of Cr(NO3)3 hydrates (MII:MIII = 2:1) were dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water. Separately, 6.56 mmol of HMT was dissolved in 15 mL of water, which corresponds to a 3-fold HMT excess relative to the amount required for the complete alkaline hydrolysis of the nitrates. The solutions obtained were passed through membrane filters with pores of 200 nm to remove dust particles and other undesirable centers of crystallization, mixed in the 50 mL polymer vessels of steel hydrothermal reactors and purged with argon. The reactors were thoroughly shaken, heated to a temperature of 150 °C at an approximate rate of 150 °C∙h−1, kept for 1 d and cooled naturally for approximately 1 h to 25 °C. The solid products obtained were separated via centrifuging, rinsed with distilled water several times to achieve a supernatant pH ≈ 7 and dried in a vacuum desiccator for 1 d.
In subsequent experiments, the hydrothermal synthesis conditions were varied to investigate their influence on the crystallinity and phase purity of the final LDHs, as well as to obtain the samples with different average crystallite sizes and specific surface areas (Table 1).

3.2. Determination of Quantitative Composition of LDHs

The quantitative compositions of the LDHs (2:1) obtained were sought in the form [Zn2Cr(OH)6]+[(NO3)1−x(CO3)0.5x∙yH2O]− and [Ni2Cr(OH)6]+[(NO3)1−x(CO3)0.5x∙yH2O]−, assuming that the interlayer space may only contain carbonates, nitrates and water. The cation ratio was controlled by an energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. The amounts of nitrate and carbonate anions per formula unit were calculated from the nitrogen and carbon content in the samples, measured via an elemental CHN analysis. The intercalated water amount y was found from the mass loss observed during the samples’ thermolysis in air atmosphere, assuming that its final products correspond to the gross formulas Zn2CrO3.5 and Ni2CrO3.5.

3.3. Determination of Bandgap Energy and Band Edge Potentials

To find the bandgap energies Eg, the diffuse reflectance spectra of the samples were transformed into coordinates (F⋅hν)1/2 = f(hν), where F = (1 − R)2∙(2R)−1 is the Kubelka–Munk function of a reflection coefficient R [111]. The bands of intrinsic absorption were identified using the previous theoretical investigations of the LDHs’ energy structure [95,96,97]. Low-energy linear shoulders of these bands were extrapolated to intersect the baseline and an abscissa of the intersection point was considered an optical bandgap energy Eg.
The valance band maxima EV vs. a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) were determined using the formula EV = EV′ + W − 4.44, where EV′ is an abscissa of the point obtained via the extrapolation of the linear sections of the valence band X-ray photoelectron spectrum at low binding energies, W is a work function [96] and 4.44 eV is a relative shift of electron energy scales vs. a vacuum and SHE. The conduction band minima EC vs. SHE were found according to the formula EC = EV − Eg [112,113].

3.4. Determination of Average Photoluminescence Lifetimes

Average photoluminescence lifetimes τ were calculated based on the time-resolved photoluminescence spectra of the samples. The luminescence decay graphs were fitted by a biexponential function, I(t) = A1∙exp(−t/t1) + A2∙exp(−t/t2) + I0, using OriginPro 9.5 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). The τ values were found via the formula τ = (A1∙t12 + A2∙t22)∙(A1∙t1 + A2∙t2)−1, where An and tn are the amplitudes and time constants, respectively, determined during fitting [114].

3.5. Investigation of Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic activity in the reaction of hydrogen evolution from 1 mol. % aqueous methanol was studied for 5 samples of each LDH with a different crystallite size (Table 2). The experiments were carried out under both ultraviolet irradiation (DRT-125 mercury lamp, 125 W, λ > 220 nm) and purely visible light (LED source, 100 W, λ = 425 nm) in the photocatalytic laboratory setting used in our previous reports [98,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109] and described in detail in Information S1. The spectra of the light sources are shown in Figure S4. The photocatalytic performance of the samples was evaluated in terms of the hydrogen evolution rate ω and apparent quantum efficiency φ.
In a typical photocatalytic experiment, 25 mg of the sample was placed in a round-bottom flask containing 50 mL of 1 mol. % aqueous methanol with a pH ≈ 6. The flask was sealed, shaken and sonicated in an Elmasonic S10H bath (Elma, Singen, Germany) for 10 min. The suspension obtained was pumped into the reaction compartment of the cell, after which the magnetic stirrer, light filter and light source were turned on. The reaction suspension was purged with argon for 30 min to remove air residues and, after this, kept under irradiation for 2 h, during which the hydrogen content in the gas circuit was analyzed chromatographically at 15 min intervals. After this, the light source was turned off to organize a dark stage and make sure that the photocatalytic reaction stopped. In the end, the areas of hydrogen’s chromatographic peaks were converted to hydrogen amounts that, in turn, were used to plot kinetic curves. The latter were approximated by linear functions and differentiated to find the hydrogen evolution rates ω. The apparent quantum efficiencies of the reactions were calculated using the equation φ = 2∙ω∙f−1∙100%, where f is the lamp photon flux in the photocatalyst absorption range measured previously, as described in Information S2.
To investigate the dependence of the hydrogen evolution activity on the aqueous methanol concentration, a series of similar photocatalytic measurements were conducted using the LDHs that demonstrated the highest performance in the aforementioned experiments and taking 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 10, 25 and 50 mol. % methanol solutions.

3.6. Instrumentation

3.6.1. XRD

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a Rigaku Miniflex II benchtop Röntgen diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation, an angle range 2θ = 3–60° and a scanning rate of 10°∙min−1. The phase composition was determined using Rigaku PDXL 2 software and the powder diffraction files (PDF) of The International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD). The indexing of the diffraction patterns, calculation of the lattice parameters and average crystallite sizes L were performed on the basis of all the reflections observed, using DiffracPlus Topas software (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).

3.6.2. Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectra were measured on a Bruker Senterra spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) in the spectral range of 80–3700 cm−1, using a 785 nm laser (power 50 mW, single accumulation time 120 s, 8 repetitions) for ZnCr-LDHs and a 532 nm laser (power 5 mW, single accumulation time 60 s, 4 repetitions) for NiCr-LDHs. In the first case, the signal was collected in a luminescence subtraction mode and the region of 1500–3700 cm−1 was upscaled 10 times.

3.6.3. SEM-EDX

The morphology and elemental composition of the samples were studied on a Zeiss Merlin scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an Oxford Instruments INCAx-act energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic microanalyzer (EDX) (Abingdon, UK).

3.6.4. ICP-AES

The cation ratio in the samples was additionally controlled by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on a Shimadzu ICPE-9000 spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan). The samples were preliminarily dissolved in 12 M hydrochloric acid and the solutions obtained were diluted 100 times prior to their analysis.

3.6.5. CHN Analysis

The nitrogen and carbon content in the samples was determined via an elemental CHN analysis on a Euro EA3028-HT analyzer (EuroVector, Pavia, Italy).

3.6.6. TG

A thermogravimetric (TG) analysis was performed on a Netzsch TG 209 F1 Libra thermobalance (Selb, Germany) in a synthetic air atmosphere. The temperature program included heating from room temperature to 950 °C at a rate of 10 °C∙min−1, followed by a 20 min isotherm at 950 °C to achieve the establishing of a constant mass.

3.6.7. DRS

Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were recorded on a Persee T8DCS spectrophotometer equipped with an SI19-1 integrating sphere (Auburn, CA, USA) in the range of 190–900 nm after sample deposition on a barium sulfate substrate.

3.6.8. VB-XPS

The X-ray photoelectron spectra of the valence band region (VB-XPS) were measured on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Escalab 250Xi spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) with a monochromatized Al Kα X-ray source and binding energy scale calibration on a C 1s peak at 284.8 eV.

3.6.9. TR-PLS

Time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy (TR-PLS) was performed using a Horiba Jobin Yvon Fluorolog-3 spectrofluorometer (Kyoto, Japan). The samples were excited by a 265 nm light-emitting diode and the photoluminescence decay was measured at 380 nm.

3.6.10. BET

The specific surface area S was measured on a Quadrasorb SI adsorption analyzer (Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Prior to the analysis, 100–150 mg of each sample was degassed at 25 °C for 12 h. Adsorption isotherms were measured at a liquid nitrogen temperature (−196 °C), with nitrogen as an adsorbate. The values of the specific surface areas were calculated via the conventional multipoint Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method (BET).

3.6.11. pH-Metry

The pH values of the wash water during the sample rinsing after hydrothermal synthesis were monitored using a laboratory pH-meter Mettler Toledo SevenCompact S220 equipped with an InLab Expert Pro-ISM electrode (Greifensee, Switzerland).

4. Conclusions

The present study has demonstrated the applicability of a facile hydrothermal method to the preparation of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs using metal nitrates and hexamethylenetetramine as an alkalizing agent. All the syntheses resulted in either the formation of a carbonate rather than a nitrate form of the LDHs, or the formation of its decomposition products (at high temperatures). The analysis of the qualitative and quantitative compositions of the obtained samples showed that, in all cases, the carbonate was the only interlayer anion. Additionally, the resulting LDHs contained water, the amount of which depended on their synthesis conditions. Varying the synthesis conditions allowed us to obtain target samples with various average crystallite sizes of 2–26 nm and specific surface areas of 45–83 m2∙g−1. The optical bandgap energies of the LDHs were revealed to be 2.37 and 2.47 eV, which potentially allows them to utilize visible light during photocatalytic processes. However, both LDHs demonstrated non-zero photocatalytic activity in the reaction of hydrogen evolution from aqueous methanol only under ultraviolet irradiation. The performance of ZnCr-LDHs grows monotonically with their average crystallite size, while that of NiCr-LDHs reaches its maximum with intermediate-sized crystallites and then decreases due to the specific surface area reduction. The concentration dependences of the hydrogen evolution activity of both LDHs are generally consistent with the conventional Langmuir–Hinshelwood model for heterogeneous catalysis. In 50 mol. % aqueous methanol, the hydrogen generation rate over ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs reaches 88 and 41 μmol∙h−1∙g−1, respectively. The low activity of the tested samples may be due, among other things, to the relatively high rate of the recombination of electrons and holes indicated by the photoluminescence measurements. Another possible reason for the low activity is the insufficient accessibility of the interlayer space of the carbonate form of LDHs, which is a potential reaction zone for water and methanol molecules, which causes the reaction proceeding only on the external surface of the particles. Obtaining forms of LDHs intercalated with organic molecules or exfoliated into separate nanosheets might serve as an effective way to solve this problem. Although the activities achieved for now are not very impressive compared to those of the layered oxide photocatalysts tested earlier, these hydrothermally synthesized LDHs with enhanced crystallinity may be of great interest for the further fabrication of their nanosheets and designing new composite photocatalysts, including those active under visible light.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29092108/s1, Figure S1: XRD patterns of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs synthesized under various conditions; Figure S2: Photoluminescence spectra and decay graphs with average photoluminescence lifetimes for TiO2 P25 Degussa and layered perovskite-like oxides H2La2Ti3O10 and H2Nd2Ti3O10; Figure S3: Kinetic curves of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from aqueous methanol of various concentrations over ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs; Figure S4: Emission spectra of light sources used in photocatalytic experiments; Information S1: Scheme and operating principle of the photocatalytic setting; Information S2: Determination of the lamp photon flux.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.K. and O.I.S.; methodology, S.A.K., O.I.S. and I.A.Z.; investigation, S.A.K., A.S.B., A.A.B., A.V.K. and S.S.N.; resources, O.I.S., I.A.R. and I.A.Z.; data curation, S.A.K. and O.I.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.K.; writing—review and editing, S.A.K., O.I.S. and I.A.R.; visualization, S.A.K.; supervision, O.I.S. and I.A.Z.; project administration, O.I.S. and I.A.Z.; funding acquisition, O.I.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research and the APC were funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-73-10110.

Data Availability Statement

The research data are available in the body of the article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted using the equipment of the Saint Petersburg State University Research Park: Center for X-ray Diffraction Studies, Center for Optical and Laser Research, Center for Chemical Analysis and Materials Research, Center for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Interdisciplinary Center for Nanotechnology, Center for Studies in Surface Science, and Center for Diagnostics of Functional Materials for Medicine, Pharmacology and Nanoelectronics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Goodarzi, N.; Ashrafi-Peyman, Z.; Khani, E.; Moshfegh, A.Z. Recent Progress on Semiconductor Heterogeneous Photocatalysts in Clean Energy Production and Environmental Remediation. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rozhkova, E.; Ariga, K. From Molecules to Materials: Pathways to Artificial Photosynthesis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ismail, A.A.; Bahnemann, D.W. Photochemical Splitting of Water for Hydrogen Production by Photocatalysis: A Review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 128, 85–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, H.; Kamarudin, S.K.; Minggu, L.J.; Kassim, M. Hydrogen from Photo-Catalytic Water Splitting Process: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takanabe, K. Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Quantitative Approaches toward Photocatalyst by Design. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 8006–8022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Walter, M.G.; Warren, E.L.; McKone, J.R.; Boettcher, S.W.; Mi, Q.; Santori, E.A.; Lewis, N.S. Solar Water Splitting Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6446–6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kausar, F.; Varghese, A.; Pinheiro, D.; Devi, K.R.S. Recent Trends in Photocatalytic Water Splitting Using Titania Based Ternary Photocatalysts—A Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 22371–22402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, H.; Mao, Q.; Jian, L.; Dong, Y.; Zhu, Y. Photodeposition of Earth-Abundant Cocatalysts in Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Methods, Functions, and Mechanisms. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 1774–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moridon, S.N.F.; Arifin, K.; Yunus, R.M.; Minggu, L.J.; Kassim, M.B. Photocatalytic Water Splitting Performance of TiO2 Sensitized by Metal Chalcogenides: A Review. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 5892–5907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, R.; Li, C. Scalable Solar Water Splitting Using Particulate Photocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 33, 100577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. O’Neill, J.S.; Kearney, L.; Brandon, M.P.; Pryce, M.T. Design Components of Porphyrin-Based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Systems: A Review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 467, 214599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bellardita, M.; García-López, E.I.; Marcì, G.; Palmisano, L. Photocatalytic Formation of H2 and Value-Added Chemicals in Aqueous Glucose (Pt)-TiO2 Suspension. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 5934–5947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhou, M.; Li, Y.; Peng, S.; Lu, G.; Li, S. Effect of Epimerization of D-Glucose on Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation over Pt/TiO2. Catal. Commun. 2012, 18, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bahadori, E.; Ramis, G.; Zanardo, D.; Menegazzo, F.; Signoretto, M.; Gazzoli, D.; Pietrogiacomi, D.; Michele, A. Di Photoreforming of Glucose over CuO/TiO2. Catalysts 2020, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bellardita, M.; García-López, E.I.; Marcì, G.; Nasillo, G.; Palmisano, L. Photocatalytic Solar Light H2 Production by Aqueous Glucose Reforming. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 4522–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iervolino, G.; Vaiano, V.; Murcia, J.J.; Rizzo, L.; Ventre, G.; Pepe, G.; Campiglia, P.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Navío, J.A.; Sannino, D. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Degradation of Glucose over Fluorinated and Platinized TiO2 Catalysts. J. Catal. 2016, 339, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, Z.; Ye, Z.; Shangguan, W. Recent Advances of Hydrogen Production through Particulate Semiconductor Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Front. Energy 2022, 16, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yao, Y.; Gao, X.; Meng, X. Recent Advances on Electrocatalytic and Photocatalytic Seawater Splitting for Hydrogen Evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 9087–9100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, F.; Wang, Q. Redox-Mediated Electrocatalytic and Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2022, 35, 101097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sahani, S.; Malika Tripathi, K.; Il Lee, T.; Dubal, D.P.; Wong, C.P.; Chandra Sharma, Y.; Young Kim, T. Recent Advances in Photocatalytic Carbon-Based Materials for Enhanced Water Splitting under Visible-Light Irradiation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 252, 115133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Abazari, R.; Adegoke, K.A.; Maxakato, N.W.; Bello, O.S.; Tahir, M.; Tasleem, S.; Sanati, S.; Kirillov, A.M.; Zhou, Y. Metal–Organic Frameworks and Derived Materials as Photocatalysts for Water Splitting and Carbon Dioxide Reduction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 469, 214664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jaryal, R.; Kumar, R.; Khullar, S. Mixed Metal-Metal Organic Frameworks (MM-MOFs) and Their Use as Efficient Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution from Water Splitting Reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 464, 214542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pattanayak, P.; Singh, P.; Bansal, N.K.; Paul, M.; Dixit, H.; Porwal, S.; Mishra, S.; Singh, T. Recent Progress in Perovskite Transition Metal Oxide-Based Photocatalyst and Photoelectrode Materials for Solar-Driven Water Splitting. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.; Yang, B.; He, H.; Yang, S.; Duan, X.; Wang, S. Bismuth-Based Complex Oxides for Photocatalytic Applications in Environmental Remediation and Water Splitting: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 150215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Subramanyam, P.; Meena, B.; Biju, V.; Misawa, H.; Challapalli, S. Emerging Materials for Plasmon-Assisted Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2022, 51, 100472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bie, C.; Wang, L.; Yu, J. Challenges for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Chem 2022, 8, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, A.; Likozar, B.; Jana, R.; Chanu, W.C.; Singh, M.K. A Review of Hydrogen Production Processes by Photocatalytic Water Splitting—From Atomistic Catalysis Design to Optimal Reactor Engineering. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 33282–33307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hota, P.; Das, A.; Maiti, D.K. A Short Review on Generation of Green Fuel Hydrogen through Water Splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 48, 523–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Christoforidis, K.C.; Fornasiero, P. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Rift into the Future Energy Supply. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 1523–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Puga, A.V. Photocatalytic Production of Hydrogen from Biomass-Derived Feedstocks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 315, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, R.; Yoshida, H.; Fujita, S.-I.; Arai, M. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Glycerol and Water with NiOx/TiO2 Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 144, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Taboada, E.; Angurell, I.; Llorca, J. Hydrogen Photoproduction from Bio-Derived Alcohols in an Optical Fiber Honeycomb Reactor Loaded with Au/TiO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 281, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Al-Azri, Z.H.N.; Chen, W.T.; Chan, A.; Jovic, V.; Ina, T.; Idriss, H.; Waterhouse, G.I.N. The Roles of Metal Co-Catalysts and Reaction Media in Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: Performance Evaluation of M/TiO2 Photocatalysts (M = Pd, Pt, Au) in Different Alcohol-Water Mixtures. J. Catal. 2015, 329, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dosado, A.G.; Chen, W.T.; Chan, A.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Waterhouse, G.I.N. Novel Au/TiO2 Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Production in Alcohol-Water Mixtures Based on Hydrogen Titanate Nanotube Precursors. J. Catal. 2015, 330, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Dong, H.; Hu, Z.; Qi, Z.; Li, L. Fabrication of a Cu2O/Au/TiO2 Composite Film for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Aqueous Solution of Methanol and Glucose. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2017, 219, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, C.; Wang, H.; Ming, J.; Liu, M.; Fang, P. Hydrogen Generation by Photocatalytic Reforming of Glucose with Heterostructured CdS/MoS2 Composites under Visible Light Irradiation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 16968–16978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jaswal, R.; Shende, R.; Nan, W.; Shende, A. Photocatalytic Reforming of Pinewood (Pinus Ponderosa) Acid Hydrolysate for Hydrogen Generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 2839–2848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wan, S.; Xu, J.; Cao, S.; Yu, J. Promoting Intramolecular Charge Transfer of Graphitic Carbon Nitride by Donor–Acceptor Modulation for Visible-light Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Interdiscip. Mater. 2022, 1, 294–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ding, Y.; Maitra, S.; Wang, C.; Halder, S.; Zheng, R.; Barakat, T.; Roy, S.; Chen, L.-H.; Su, B.-L. Vacancy Defect Engineering in Semiconductors for Solar Light-driven Environmental Remediation and Sustainable Energy Production. Interdiscip. Mater. 2022, 1, 213–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, B.; Fu, X.; Wang, K.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, B.; Li, J. Chemically Bonded BiVO4/Bi19Cl3S27 Heterojunction with Fast Hole Extraction Dynamics for Continuous CO2 Photoreduction. Adv. Powder Mater. 2024, 3, 100140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, F.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H. Layered Photocatalytic Nanomaterials for Environmental Applications. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2023, 34, 107523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schaak, R.E.; Mallouk, T.E. Perovskites by Design: A Toolbox of Solid-State Reactions. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 1455–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Uppuluri, R.; Sen Gupta, A.; Rosas, A.S.; Mallouk, T.E. Soft Chemistry of Ion-Exchangeable Layered Metal Oxides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2401–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rodionov, I.A.; Zvereva, I.A. Photocatalytic Activity of Layered Perovskite-like Oxides in Practically Valuable Chemical Reactions. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2016, 85, 248–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maeda, K.; Mallouk, T.E. Two-Dimensional Metal Oxide Nanosheets as Building Blocks for Artificial Photosynthetic Assemblies. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 92, 38–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, Q.; Yu, Y.; Li, J.; Nan, H.; Luo, S.; Jia, C.; Deng, P.; Zhong, S.; Tian, X. Recent Progress in Layered Double Hydroxide-Based Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ChemElectroChem 2022, 9, e202101387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jo, Y.K.; Lee, J.M.; Son, S.; Hwang, S.J. 2D Inorganic Nanosheet-Based Hybrid Photocatalysts: Design, Applications, and Perspectives. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2019, 40, 150–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, G.; Zou, J.; Chen, X.; Yu, J.; Jiao, F. Layered Double Hydroxides Materials for Photo(Electro-) Catalytic Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 397, 125407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Janani, F.Z.; Taoufik, N.; Khiar, H.; Boumya, W.; Elhalil, A.; Sadiq, M.; Puga, A.V.; Barka, N. Nanostructured Layered Double Hydroxides Based Photocatalysts: Insight on Synthesis Methods, Application in Water Decontamination/Splitting and Antibacterial Activity. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 25, 101263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, B.; Zeng, Z.; Zeng, G.; Gong, J.; Xiao, R.; Ye, S.; Chen, M.; Lai, C.; Xu, P.; Tang, X. Powerful Combination of G-C3N4 and LDHs for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance: A Review of Strategy, Synthesis, and Applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 272, 101999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sherryna, A.; Tahir, M. Recent Developments in Layered Double Hydroxide Structures with Their Role in Promoting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 2093–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yapryntsev, A.D.; Baranchikov, A.E.; Ivanov, V.K. Layered Rare-Earth Hydroxides: A New Family of Anion-Exchangeable Layered Inorganic Materials. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2020, 89, 629–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ng, S.F.; Lau, M.Y.L.; Ong, W.J. Engineering Layered Double Hydroxide–Based Photocatalysts Toward Artificial Photosynthesis: State-of-the-Art Progress and Prospects. Sol. RRL 2021, 5, 2000535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Boumeriame, H.; Da Silva, E.S.; Cherevan, A.S.; Chafik, T.; Faria, J.L.; Eder, D. Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH)-Based Materials: A Mini-Review on Strategies to Improve the Performance for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 64, 406–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, Z.-Z.; Zhang, C.; Zeng, G.-M.; Tan, X.-F.; Huang, D.L.; Zhou, J.-W.; Fang, Q.-Z.; Yang, K.-H.; Wang, H.; Wei, J.; et al. State-of-the-Art Progress in the Rational Design of Layered Double Hydroxide Based Photocatalysts for Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical H2/O2 Production. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 446, 214103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baliarsingh, N.; Mohapatra, L.; Parida, K. Design and Development of a Visible Light Harvesting Ni-Zn/Cr-CO32− LDH System for Hydrogen Evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 4236–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Parida, K.; Mohapatra, L. Recent Progress in the Development of Carbonate-Intercalated Zn/Cr LDH as a Novel Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Aimed at the Utilization of Solar Light. Dalt. Trans. 2012, 41, 1173–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, G.; Lin, B.; Qiu, Y.; He, L.; Chen, Y.; Gao, B. Highly Efficient Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation by Immobilizing CdSe Nanocrystals on ZnCr-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 4758–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sohail, M.; Kim, H.; Kim, T.W. Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance of a Ti-Based Metal-Organic Framework for Hydrogen Production: Hybridization with ZnCr-LDH Nanosheets. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, B.; Mao, L.; Shi, J.; Chen, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yao, J.; Lu, Y. Facile Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembly of 2D Perovskite Niobate and Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets for Enhanced Photocatalytic Oxygen Generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 34276–34286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fu, Y.; Ning, F.; Xu, S.; An, H.; Shao, M.; Wei, M. Terbium Doped ZnCr-Layered Double Hydroxides with Largely Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3907–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Silva, C.G.; Bouizi, Y.; Fornés, V.; García, H. Layered Double Hydroxides as Highly Efficient Photocatalysts for Visible Light Oxygen Generation from Water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13833–13839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, J.Z.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H. Magnetic Fe3O4/ZnCr-Layered Double Hydroxide Composite with Enhanced Adsorption and Photocatalytic Activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 185–186, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Thao, N.T.; Nga, H.T.P.; Vo, N.Q.; Nguyen, H.D.K. Advanced Oxidation of Rhodamine B with Hydrogen Peroxide over Zn–Cr Layered Double Hydroxide Catalysts. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2017, 2, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhu, J.; Fan, H.; Sun, J.; Ai, S. Anion-Exchange Precipitation Synthesis of α-Ag2WO4/Zn-Cr Layered Double Hydroxides Composite with Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 120, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, X.; Jiang, Z.; Sun, F.; Chen, Y.; Shi, C.; Zhang, Z.; Qian, G.; Ruan, X. Intercalated-Laurate-Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities of Ni/Cr-Layered Double Hydroxides. Catalysts 2023, 13, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xia, S.; Qian, M.; Zhou, X.; Meng, Y.; Xue, J.; Ni, Z. Theoretical and Experimental Investigation into the Photocatalytic Degradation of Hexachlorobenzene by ZnCr Layered Double Hydroxides with Different Anions. Mol. Catal. 2017, 435, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Feng, X.; Li, X.; Luo, H.; Su, B.; Ma, J. Facile Synthesis of Ni-Based Layered Double Hydroxides with Superior Photocatalytic Performance for Tetracycline Antibiotic Degradation. J. Solid State Chem. 2022, 307, 122827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Feng, X.; Li, X.; Su, B. Photocatalytic Degradation Performance of Antibiotics by Peanut Shell Biochar Anchored NiCr-LDH Nanocomposites Fabricated by One-Pot Hydrothermal Protocol. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 666, 131337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xiadong, M.; Yanqi, X.; Tan, L.; Zhao, Y.; Song, Y.-F. Visible-Light-Induced Hydrogenation of C=C Bonds by Hydrazine over Ultrathin Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 14315–14322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xia, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, X.; Pan, G.; Ni, Z. The Photocatalytic Property for Water Splitting and the Structural Stability of CuMgM Layered Double Hydroxides (M=Al, Cr, Fe, Ce). Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 114, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Parida, K.; Satpathy, M.; Mohapatra, L. Incorporation of Fe3+ into Mg/Al Layered Double Hydroxide Framework: Effects on Textural Properties and Photocatalytic Activity for H2 Generation. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 7350–7357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nayak, S.; Pradhan, A.C.; Parida, K.M. Topotactic Transformation of Solvated MgCr-LDH Nanosheets to Highly Efficient Porous MgO/MgCr2O4 Nanocomposite for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 8646–8661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chen, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Luo, Y.; Mao, C.J. Engineering Ultrafine NiS Cocatalysts as Active Sites to Boost Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production of MgAl Layered Double Hydroxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 506, 144999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, B.; Pan, J.; Jiang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Zhao, C.; Wang, J.; Song, C.; Zheng, Y.; Li, C. The Bimetallic Iron−nickel Sulfide Modified g-C3N4 Nano-Heterojunction and Its Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production Enhancement. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 766, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nayak, S.; Swain, G.; Parida, K. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities of RhB Degradation and H2 Evolution from in Situ Formation of the Electrostatic Heterostructure MoS2/NiFe LDH Nanocomposite through the Z-Scheme Mechanism via p-n Heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 20923–20942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Nayak, S.; Mohapatra, L.; Parida, K. Visible Light-Driven Novel g-C3N4/NiFe-LDH Composite Photocatalyst with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity towards Water Oxidation and Reduction Reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 18622–18635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, Z.; Deng, H.; Zhang, M.; Yang, Z.; Hu, D.; Wang, Y.; Yan, K. One-Step Facile Synthesis of Nickel-Chromium Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoflakes for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 2099–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ye, W.; Fang, X.; Chen, X.; Yan, D. A Three-Dimensional Nickel-Chromium Layered Double Hydroxide Micro/Nanosheet Array as an Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 19484–19491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Megala, S.; Sathish, M.; Harish, S.; Navaneethan, M.; Sohila, S.; Liang, B.; Ramesh, R. Enhancement of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Water Splitting by Construction of Two Dimensional g-C3N4/NiAl Layered Double Hydroxides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 144656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fei, W.; Song, Y.; Li, N.; Chen, D.; Xu, Q.; Li, H.; He, J.; Lu, J. Fabrication of Visible-Light-Active ZnO/ZnFe-LDH Heterojunction on Ni Foam for Pollutants Removal with Enhanced Photoelectrocatalytic Performance. Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Okamoto, K.; Iyi, N.; Sasaki, T. Factors Affecting the Crystal Size of the MgAl-LDH (Layered Double Hydroxide) Prepared by Using Ammonia-Releasing Reagents. Appl. Clay Sci. 2007, 37, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jiang, H.; Katsumata, K.-I.; Hong, J.; Yamaguchi, A.; Nakata, K.; Terashima, C.; Matsushita, N.; Miyauchi, M.; Fujishima, A. Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 on Cu2O-Loaded Zn-Cr Layered Double Hydroxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 224, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Luo, B.; Song, R.; Jing, D. ZnCr LDH Nanosheets Modified Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 23427–23436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liu, B.; Zhao, X.; Terashima, C.; Fujishima, A.; Nakata, K. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analysis of Heterogeneous Photocatalysis for Semiconductor Systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 8751–8760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kloprogge, J.T.; Wharton, D.; Hickey, L.; Frost, R.L. Infrared and Raman Study of Interlayer Anions CO32−, NO3−, SO42− and ClO4− in Mg/Al-Hydrotalcite. Am. Mineral. 2002, 87, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Al-Jaberi, M.; Naille, S.; Dossot, M.; Ruby, C. Interlayer Interaction in Ca-Fe Layered Double Hydroxides Intercalated with Nitrate and Chloride Species. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1102, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Frost, R.L.; Erickson, K.L. Raman Spectroscopic Study of the Hydrotalcite Desautelsite Mg6Mn2CO3(OH)16·4H2O. Spectrochim. Acta-Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2005, 61, 2697–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Frost, R.L.; Reddy, B.J. Thermo-Raman Spectroscopic Study of the Natural Layered Double Hydroxide Manasseite. Spectrochim. Acta-Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2006, 65, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Frost, R.L.; Scholz, R.; López, A.; Theiss, F.L. Vibrational Spectroscopic Study of the Natural Layered Double Hydroxide Manasseite Now Defined as Hydrotalcite-2H − Mg6Al2(OH)16[CO3]×4H2O. Spectrochim. Acta-Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 118, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kloprogge, J.T.; Hickey, L.; Frost, R.L. Heating Stage Raman and Infrared Emission Spectroscopic Study of the Dehydroxylation of Synthetic Mg-Hydrotalcite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2001, 18, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Manríquez, M.E.; Hernández-Cortez, J.G.; Wang, J.A.; Chen, L.F.; Zuñiga-Moreno, A.; Gómez, R. Synthesis of Transition Metal Doped Lamellar Double Hydroxides as Base Catalysts for Acetone Aldol Condensation. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 118, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mora, M.; Jiménez-Sanchidrián, C.; Rafael Ruiz, J. Raman Spectroscopy Study of Layered-Double Hydroxides Containing Magnesium and Trivalent Metals. Mater. Lett. 2014, 120, 193–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, F. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation into the Elimination of Organic Pollutants from Solution by Layered Double Hydroxides. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 140–141, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xu, S.M.; Yan, H.; Wei, M. Band Structure Engineering of Transition-Metal-Based Layered Double Hydroxides toward Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution from Water: A Theoretical-Experimental Combination Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 2683–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, C.; Ma, B.; Xu, S.; Li, D.; He, S.; Zhao, Y.; Han, J.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Visible-Light-Driven Overall Water Splitting with a Largely-Enhanced Efficiency over a Cu2O@ZnCr-Layered Double Hydroxide Photocatalyst. Nano Energy 2017, 32, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kurnosenko, S.A.; Voytovich, V.V.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Kirichenko, S.O.; Minich, I.A.; Malygina, E.N.; Khramova, A.D.; Zvereva, I.A. Photocatalytic Activity of n-Alkylamine and n-Alkoxy Derivatives of Layered Perovskite-like Titanates H2Ln2Ti3O10 (Ln = La, Nd) in the Reaction of Hydrogen Production from an Aqueous Solution of Methanol. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dani Nandiyanto, A.B.; Kito, Y.; Hirano, T.; Ragadhita, R.; Le, P.H.; Ogi, T. Spherical Submicron YAG:Ce Particles with Controllable Particle Outer Diameters and Crystallite Sizes and Their Photoluminescence Properties. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 30305–30314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Jena, S.; Mishra, D.K.; Soam, A.; Jakhar, N.; Mallick, P. Control Growth of NiFe2O4 Phase in Thermal Annealed α-Fe2O3/NiFe2O4 Nanocomposites for the Beneficial Magnetic Application. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2021, 127, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, Q.; Kartikowati, C.W.; Horie, S.; Ogi, T.; Iwaki, T.; Okuyama, K. Correlation between Particle Size/Domain Structure and Magnetic Properties of Highly Crystalline Fe3O4 Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Voytovich, V.V.; Kurnosenko, S.A.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Minich, I.A.; Zvereva, I.A. Study of n-Alkylamine Intercalated Layered Perovskite-like Niobates HCa2Nb3O10 as Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Production from an Aqueous Solution of Methanol. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Voytovich, V.V.; Kurnosenko, S.A.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Bugrov, A.N.; Minich, I.A.; Malygina, E.N.; Zvereva, I.A. Synthesis of n-Alkoxy Derivatives of Layered Perovskite-like Niobate HCa2Nb3O10 and Study of Their Photocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Production from an Aqueous Solution of Methanol. Catalysts 2021, 11, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kurnosenko, S.A.; Voytovich, V.V.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Zvereva, I.A. Photocatalytic Activity and Stability of Organically Modified Layered Perovskite-like Titanates HLnTiO4 (Ln = La, Nd) in the Reaction of Hydrogen Evolution from Aqueous Methanol. Catalysts 2023, 13, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rodionov, I.A.; Maksimova, E.A.; Pozhidaev, A.Y.; Kurnosenko, S.A.; Silyukov, O.I.; Zvereva, I.A. Layered Titanate H2Nd2Ti3O10 Intercalated with n-Butylamine: A New Highly Efficient Hybrid Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production from Aqueous Solutions of Alcohols. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kurnosenko, S.A.; Voytovich, V.V.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Zvereva, I.A. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Aqueous Solutions of Glucose and Xylose over Layered Perovskite-like Oxides HCa2Nb3O10, H2La2Ti3O10 and Their Inorganic-Organic Derivatives. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rodionov, I.A.; Gruzdeva, E.O.; Mazur, A.S.; Kurnosenko, S.A.; Silyukov, O.I.; Zvereva, I.A. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation from Aqueous Methanol Solution over n-Butylamine-Intercalated Layered Titanate H2La2Ti3O10: Activity and Stability of the Hybrid Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kurnosenko, S.A.; Voytovich, V.V.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Malygina, E.N.; Zvereva, I.A. Influence of HB2Nb3O10-Based Nanosheet Photocatalysts (B = Ca, Sr) Preparation Method on Hydrogen Production Efficiency. Catalysts 2023, 13, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Minich, I.A.; Kurnosenko, S.A.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Kalganov, V.D.; Zvereva, I.A. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Layered Perovskite-Like Titanate K2La2Ti3O10 Ultrafine Nanoplatelets. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2023, 97, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Akgül, G.; Kruse, A. Hydrothermal Disproportionation of Formaldehyde at Subcritical Conditions. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 73, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Makuła, P.; Pacia, M.; Macyk, W. How To Correctly Determine the Band Gap Energy of Modified Semiconductor Photocatalysts Based on UV-Vis Spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 6814–6817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tan, H.L.; Abdi, F.F.; Ng, Y.H. Heterogeneous Photocatalysts: An Overview of Classic and Modern Approaches for Optical, Electronic, and Charge Dynamics Evaluation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1255–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Chambers, S.A.; Droubay, T.; Kaspar, T.C.; Gutowski, M. Experimental Determination of Valence Band Maxima for SrTiO3, TiO2, and SrO and the Associated Valence Band Offsets with Si(001). J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanom. Struct. Process. Meas. Phenom. 2004, 22, 2205–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, Y.; Natakorn, S.; Chen, Y.; Safar, M.; Cunningham, M.; Tian, J.; Li, D.D.U. Investigations on Average Fluorescence Lifetimes for Visualizing Multi-Exponential Decays. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 576862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 02108 g001
Figure 1. XRD patterns of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs synthesized at various temperature.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs synthesized at various temperature.
Molecules 29 02108 g001
Molecules 29 02108 g002
Figure 2. Dependence of average crystallite size on hydrothermal synthesis conditions: temperature (a), duration (b), HMT excess (c) and cation ratio (d).
Figure 2. Dependence of average crystallite size on hydrothermal synthesis conditions: temperature (a), duration (b), HMT excess (c) and cation ratio (d).
Molecules 29 02108 g002
Molecules 29 02108 g003
Figure 3. Raman spectra (a) and TG curves (b) of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Figure 3. Raman spectra (a) and TG curves (b) of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Molecules 29 02108 g003
Molecules 29 02108 g004
Figure 4. Diffuse reflectance spectra (a), corresponding Kubelka–Munk plots (b) and VB-XPS (c) for ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Figure 4. Diffuse reflectance spectra (a), corresponding Kubelka–Munk plots (b) and VB-XPS (c) for ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Molecules 29 02108 g004
Molecules 29 02108 g005
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectra (a) and decay graphs for ZnCr- (b) and NiCr-LDHs (c).
Figure 5. Photoluminescence spectra (a) and decay graphs for ZnCr- (b) and NiCr-LDHs (c).
Molecules 29 02108 g005
Molecules 29 02108 g006
Figure 6. SEM images of ZnCr- (a–d) and NiCr-LDHs (e–h) with various crystallite sizes.
Figure 6. SEM images of ZnCr- (a–d) and NiCr-LDHs (e–h) with various crystallite sizes.
Molecules 29 02108 g006
Molecules 29 02108 g007
Figure 7. Kinetic curves of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from 1 mol. % aqueous methanol under ultraviolet irradiation over ZnCr- (a) and NiCr-LDHs (b) with various crystallite sizes.
Figure 7. Kinetic curves of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from 1 mol. % aqueous methanol under ultraviolet irradiation over ZnCr- (a) and NiCr-LDHs (b) with various crystallite sizes.
Molecules 29 02108 g007
Molecules 29 02108 g008
Figure 8. Hydrogen evolution rates and apparent quantum efficiencies achieved in 1 mol. % aqueous methanol under ultraviolet irradiation over ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs with various crystallite sizes and specific surface areas.
Figure 8. Hydrogen evolution rates and apparent quantum efficiencies achieved in 1 mol. % aqueous methanol under ultraviolet irradiation over ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs with various crystallite sizes and specific surface areas.
Molecules 29 02108 g008
Molecules 29 02108 g009
Figure 9. Dependence of hydrogen evolution activity of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs on aqueous methanol concentration.
Figure 9. Dependence of hydrogen evolution activity of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs on aqueous methanol concentration.
Molecules 29 02108 g009
Table 1. Conditions for hydrothermal synthesis of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Table 1. Conditions for hydrothermal synthesis of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Experiment SeriesTemperature, °CDuration, dHMT ExcessMII:MIII RatioHeating Rate, °C∙h−1Stirring Rate, rpm
Default conditions15013-fold2:1150−
Variable temperature10013-fold2:1150−
125
150
175
200
Variable duration1500.253-fold2:1150−
1
3
7
Variable HMT excess15012-fold2:1150−
3-fold
4-fold
Variable MII:MIII ratio15013-fold2:1150−
3:1
4:1
Slow heating and stirring150 (ZnCr)13-fold2:1251000
200 (NiCr)
Table 2. Average crystallite sizes L, quantitative compositions (cation ratios MII:MIII and water amounts per formula unit y) and specific surface areas S of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs chosen for photocatalytic experiments.
Table 2. Average crystallite sizes L, quantitative compositions (cation ratios MII:MIII and water amounts per formula unit y) and specific surface areas S of ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs chosen for photocatalytic experiments.
Sample AbbreviationL, nmSynthesis ConditionsMII:MIII RatioyS, m2∙g−1
EDXICP-AES
ZnCr-LDH
ZnCr-10011.0100 °C, 1 d2:12:1.011.158
ZnCr-12514.8125 °C, 1 d−−−−
ZnCr-150-6h16.0150 °C, 6 h2:12:1.031.570
ZnCr-DC17.6150 °C, 1 d−−−−
ZnCr-SHS18.0150 °C, 1 d, slow heating, stirring2:12:1.052.083
NiCr-LDH
NiCr-1002.0100 °C, 1 d2:12:0.972.147
NiCr-1255.8125 °C, 1 d−−−−
NiCr-DC12.3150 °C, 1 d2:12:0.982.376
NiCr-20016.4200 °C, 1 d−−−−
NiCr-SHS25.7200 °C, 1 d, slow heating, stirring2:12:0.961.945
Table 3. Light absorption regions, band edge potentials vs. SHE and average photoluminescence lifetimes for ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
Table 3. Light absorption regions, band edge potentials vs. SHE and average photoluminescence lifetimes for ZnCr- and NiCr-LDHs.
SampleEg, eVλmax, nmEV, VEC, Vτ, μs
ZnCr-SHS2.375232.02−0.351.8
NiCr-SHS2.475021.87−0.601.9
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurnosenko, S.A.; Silyukov, O.I.; Rodionov, I.A.; Baeva, A.S.; Burov, A.A.; Kulagina, A.V.; Novikov, S.S.; Zvereva, I.A. Hydrothermally Synthesized ZnCr- and NiCr-Layered Double Hydroxides as Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalysts. Molecules 2024, 29, 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092108

AMA Style

Kurnosenko SA, Silyukov OI, Rodionov IA, Baeva AS, Burov AA, Kulagina AV, Novikov SS, Zvereva IA. Hydrothermally Synthesized ZnCr- and NiCr-Layered Double Hydroxides as Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalysts. Molecules. 2024; 29(9):2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurnosenko, Sergei A., Oleg I. Silyukov, Ivan A. Rodionov, Anna S. Baeva, Andrei A. Burov, Alina V. Kulagina, Silvestr S. Novikov, and Irina A. Zvereva. 2024. "Hydrothermally Synthesized ZnCr- and NiCr-Layered Double Hydroxides as Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalysts" Molecules 29, no. 9: 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092108

APA Style

Kurnosenko, S. A., Silyukov, O. I., Rodionov, I. A., Baeva, A. S., Burov, A. A., Kulagina, A. V., Novikov, S. S., & Zvereva, I. A. (2024). Hydrothermally Synthesized ZnCr- and NiCr-Layered Double Hydroxides as Hydrogen Evolution Photocatalysts. Molecules, 29(9), 2108. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29092108

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop