Next Article in Journal
Bacterial Expression and Kinetic Analysis of Carboxylesterase 001D from Helicoverpa armigera
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Serum Uric Acid and Ferritin in the Development and Progression of NAFLD
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Virulence Properties of Aeromonas veronii Isolated from Diseased Gibel Carp (Carassius gibelio)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diet, Microbiota, Obesity, and NAFLD: A Dangerous Quartet
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms17040490
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome after Liver Transplant

by
Stefano Gitto
and
Erica Villa
*
Department of Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria and University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 1, 41124 Modena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(4), 490; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040490
Submission received: 16 March 2016 / Revised: 25 March 2016 / Accepted: 28 March 2016 / Published: 2 April 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research 2016)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Liver transplant is the unique curative therapy for patients with acute liver failure or end-stage liver disease, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma. Increase of body weight, onset of insulin resistance and drug-induced alterations of metabolism are reported in liver transplant recipients. In this context, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and arterial hypertension can be often diagnosed. Multifactorial illnesses occurring in the post-transplant period represent significant causes of morbidity and mortality. This is especially true for metabolic syndrome. Non-alcoholic steatosis and steatohepatitis are hepatic manifestations of metabolic syndrome and after liver transplant both recurrent and de novo steatosis can be found. Usually, post-transplant steatosis shows an indolent outcome with few cases of fibrosis progression. However, in the post-transplant setting, both metabolic syndrome and steatosis might play a key role in the stratification of morbidity and mortality risk, being commonly associated with cardiovascular disease. The single components of metabolic syndrome can be treated with targeted drugs while lifestyle intervention is the only reasonable therapeutic approach for transplant patients with non-alcoholic steatosis or steatohepatitis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Liver transplant (LT) represents the curative treatment for patients with acute liver failure, end-stage liver disease and/or non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. After surgery, transplanted patients often develop an increase of body weight, insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic alterations [1]. Multifactorial disease such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hyperlipidemia and arterial hypertension are common complications after LT, all negatively affecting quality of life, morbidity and mortality [1]. Consolidated immunosuppressant drugs such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (cyclosporine (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC)) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORs) (such as sirolimus (SIR)) play a key role in the metabolic balance, favoring hyperglycemia, arterial hypertension and hyperlipidemia [2]. In this context, a significant amount of transplanted patients fulfill the criteria of metabolic syndrome (MS) which is strongly associated with an increased cardiovascular risk [1]. Since non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are considered the liver expression of MS, it is not surprising that both recurrent and de novo NAFLD/NASH can be found after LT [3]. Although post-LT steatosis shows an indolent outcome in terms of fibrosis progression, NAFLD/NASH should be considered for the stratification of morbidity and mortality risk of transplant patients. Notably, cardiovascular disease represents the major cause of death unrelated to liver disease and the third most common cause of mortality among transplant patients, accounting for 12%–16% of deaths. Today, targeted drugs for MS and NAFLD/NASH do not exist. Clinicians can use specific drugs against the single components of MS while a strong improvement of behavior in terms of diet and aerobic exercise is the only reasonable approach for recurrent or de novo NAFLD/NASH [1].
This review article focuses on the current literature regarding the main metabolic diseases affecting transplanted patients, the clinical impact of post-LT MS and NAFLD/NASH and, finally, the feasible therapeutic strategies.

2. Multifactorial Disease after Liver Transplant

The majority of transplant patients develop a rise in body weight after surgery. The highest weight increase occurs after the first six months and at one and three years from LT, and the median weight gain is 5.1 and 9.5 kg, respectively. Notably, at one and three years, 24% and 31% of transplant patients become obese [4]. However, the above-cited authors [4] reported that the vast part of enrolled patients were also obese before LT. Considering only patients who were not obese at the time of surgery, 15.5% at one year and 26.3% at three years had a body mass index (BMI) >30 [4]. In a further study, 23 patients were followed for nine months after LT. At the end of the study, 87 of the subjects were overweight or obese with a significant increase in fat mass and a minor improvement in lean mass [5]. Another study [6] showed progressive weight gain in the first year after LT, with one-third of patients becoming obese at the end of observation. Considering a follow-up of four years, overweight and obesity were found in 58% and 21% of cases and high BMI before LT was the main risk factor of post-LT obesity [7].
In this context, DM, hyperlipidemia and arterial hypertension can be often diagnosed after LT [1] (see Table 1).
Post-LT DM is associated with more significant morbidity with respect to pre-LT disease, determining an increased risk of post-operative infection and cardiovascular events [8,18]. The incidence of post-LT DM ranges from 10% to 64% [9]. Ahn et al. [19] showed that among 74 patients transplanted with post-LT DM, post-LT DM was transient in 56.8%, while in the others it was persistent. Although the underlying mechanisms are not yet clear, the main risk factors for the onset of post-LT DM are the following: male gender, high pre-LT BMI, positive family history, hepatitis C virus infection, older age, high dosage of immunosuppressant drugs and rapamycin gene polymorphisms [8]. A meta-analysis confirmed that male gender, high pre-LT BMI and positive family history are predictive of post-LT DM development [10]. Transcription factor 7-like 2 (TCF7L2) protein regulates cell proliferation and differentiation modifying the insulin secretion [20]. Notably, it was reported that polymorphisms of the TCF7L2 gene in LT donors are another independent risk factor of post-LT DM [11].
Among transplanted patients, a percentage ranging from 45% to 69% develops hyperlipidemia, which is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [12]. Increased nutrient intake, older age, body weight, presence of DM, renal impairment, immunosuppressive drugs, such as steroids, CSA, TAC, and SIR, are risk factors for post-LT hyperlipidemia [13,14]. Interestingly, the polymorphism of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in the donor may facilitate the development of hyperlipidemia in the recipient [15].
Arterial hypertension, an uncommon feature in subjects with chronic liver disease, arises in 50%–100% of patients after LT [9,16]. Post-LT hypertension usually develops in the first six months after LT as a consequence of systemic vasoconstriction, elevation in plasma endothelin-1 concentrations, and increased arterial stiffness [21]. Occurrence of post-LT hypertension is favored by obesity and older age and is often associated with impaired glycemia. Moreover, it is well known that both CNIs and corticosteroids have negative effects on pressure control [17].

3. Metabolic Impact of Immunosuppressant Drugs

It is well known that immunosuppressive agents might exert negative metabolic effects [22] (see Table 2).
Corticosteroids represent a key component of the immunosuppressant protocol in the first months after LT but are also necessary in the long-term management of patients transplanted for autoimmune or cholestatic liver disease. Corticosteroids show dose-related metabolic side effects. They increase appetite and fat depositions, drop fat oxidation, and lead to increased proteolysis and reduced protein synthesis [23,24]. Moreover, high doses of corticosteroids determine the rise of both IR and gluconeogenesis [25]. Corticosteroids also negatively alter lipid metabolism and steroid-free protocols might lead to a significant decrease in hypertriglyceridemia [34]. Corticosteroids also influence mineralocorticoid metabolism, causing sodium retention. Interestingly, steroids directly correlate with NAFLD/NASH occurrence in liver allografts [35].
CNIs may negatively affect energy metabolism and muscle mass [26] and CSA represents an independent predictor of post-LT weight gain [36]. Through a meta-analysis including 10 studies, Li et al. [10] demonstrated that TAC is an independent risk factor for post-LT DM. Regarding lipid metabolism, CSA has a more negative effect in comparison with TAC. The incidence of hyperlipidemia is higher in patients treated with CSA than with TAC (14% versus 5% and 49% versus 17%) [27,28]. CNIs also favor the onset of arterial hypertension determining arterial vasoconstriction. Among CNIs, TAC seems to have a lesser impact on arterial pressure in comparison to CSA, but data are not conclusive [29,30]. As expected, minimizing the use of CNIs improves their metabolic profile and, consequently, the long-term outcome of patients [37,38].
SIR increases triglyceride production, being the most dangerous immunosuppressant in terms of lipid alteration. Among patients treated with SIR, 55% develop hyperlipidemia [31]. In addition, SIR alters the insulin signaling pathway [31] and negatively affects muscle mass status [32]. Recently, Zimmermann et al. [33] conducted a study involving 92 transplant patients, reporting that patients treated with mTORs were at higher risk of hyperlipidemia and glycemic alteration with respect to patients under CNIs.

4. Metabolic Syndrome after Transplant

The definition of MS includes a combination of at least three of the following factors: arterial hypertension, IR, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein and obesity [39]. In the post-LT period, MS can be found in 50%–60% of patients. MS represents a relevant risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, which are the main causes of post-LT morbidity and mortality [39]. Interestingly, the prevalence of post-LT MS is about twice that of the general North American population [40]. Older age, obesity, pre-LT DM, genetic polymorphisms in the living donor and the use of high-dosage immunosuppressive drugs are risk factors for post-LT MS [9]. Sprinzl et al. [41] analyzed a cohort of 170 transplant patients with a follow-up of two years. The authors showed that de novo MS was present in one-third of patients and glycosylated hemoglobin ≥5% and arterial hypertension were independent risk factors for it. Moreover, the authors demonstrated a negative dose-dependent role for steroids. It was also confirmed that in the post-LT period, MS could be considered as a link toward NAFLD/NASH. Interestingly, it was reported that changes in intestinal microbiota might also play a relevant role in the development of MS after LT [42]. Fussner et al. [43] retrospectively analyzed 455 consecutive LT recipients with a long follow-up (8–12 years), suggesting that increased BMI was a strong predictor of MS at one year from the LT. Consequently, the authors suggested that preventing weight gain in the early months after LT might decrease the probability of MS. However, the authors suggested that older age, post-LT DM, prior family history of cardiovascular disease, altered serum troponin, but not MS, were independent predictors of cardiovascular events. It has to be underlined that specific treatments for MS are not yet available, while the only feasible way to manage it is to treat its single components [44].

5. Post-Transplant Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

In the pre-LT period, NAFLD and NASH represent the liver expression of altered metabolic status being associated in a large number of cases to IR, dyslipidemia and obesity. Considering the significant prevalence of metabolic diseases after LT, it is clear why both recurrent and de novo NAFLD/NASH can be found in transplant patients [41].
Burra et al. [45] reported that NASH recurrence ranges from 20% to 40%, this wide variability depending on the methodology used for the diagnosis. Notably, in the majority of cases the outcome of recurrent NAFLD/NASH is harmless, without an evolution toward cirrhosis [46]. Nevertheless, patients with recurrent NAFLD/NASH more frequently show cardiovascular disease and worse infection-related morbidity and mortality. This is evident considering that the recurrence of NASH is associated with DM, weight gain, and dyslipidemia [47]. Interestingly, genetic predisposition might play a role in the recurrence of NAFLD and NASH. The presence of the rs738409-G allele of the Patatin-like phospholipase in the LT recipients represents an independent risk factor for post-LT obesity, DM and steatosis [48,49].
The leading risk factors for the development of de novo NAFLD/NASH are the following: obesity, hyperlipidemia, DM, arterial hypertension, TAC-based immunosuppression, pre-LT alcoholic cirrhosis and liver graft steatosis [50]. Sprinzl et al. [41] analyzed the association between MS and post-LT NAFLD/NASH. Mixed vesicular steatosis was observed in 34.1% of patients. Hepatic steatosis was mild, moderate, and severe in 16.5%, 7.1%, and 2.9% of cases. Among patients with MS and steatosis, NASH was diagnosed only in 5.4% of patients, confirming that post-LT metabolic liver disease might be relevant not as a primary liver disease but as an indicator of cardiovascular risk. Remarkably, NAFLD/NASH patients showed higher triglyceride levels, elevated uric acid and higher BMI with respect to patients with MS but without liver disease. The authors demonstrated that obesity and dyslipidemia but not arterial hypertension and DM favored the onset of NAFLD/NASH among transplanted patients with MS. Another interesting assumption was that a BMI greater than 28.9 was the only specific risk factor for histological NASH. Mikolasevic et al. [51] identified the association between NAFLD/NASH and the development of post-LT cardiovascular and chronic kidney disease. Consequently, according to these authors, diagnosing NAFLD/NASH in the post-LT period might improve the stratification of cardiovascular and kidney damage risk.

6. Therapeutic Approach against Post-Transplant Dysmetabolism

The knowledge of pathogenesis is central for understanding the rationale of the therapeutic approach against MS and NAFLD/NASH. The onset of IR represents a true turning point. In fact, IR determines a status of chronic inflammation that favors the other metabolic alterations [52]. The molecular basis of IR depends on both genetic and non-genetic mechanisms. IR determines a chain of events involving inflammation, hypercoagulability, and atherogenesis. Notably, IR occurs firstly in the vascular structures, and this is one of the main reasons for its association with cardiovascular disease [53]. Regarding the NAFLD/NASH, the latest proposed model is the “multiparallel hits” [54]. According to this hypothesis, many events happen in parallel, and all are potential therapeutic targets. The main pathological characters are IR, oxidative stress, adipose and pancreatic tissues, altered lipid metabolism, bile acids, gut microbiota, and bacterial endotoxins.
As we reported, transplant patients often develop IR and an increase in body weight [1]. Interestingly, Kouz et al. [55] demonstrated that in patients transplanted for NASH-cirrhosis, most of the weight gain occurs in the first year after LT, while the increase of the weight is more progressive in subjects with a different etiology. However, regardless of the kind of pre-LT liver disease, after LT a relevant increase in dietary intake can be found, especially in patients with pre-LT severe dietary restrictions, gastrointestinal symptoms or anorexia. In detail, from the pre-LT period to one year after LT, calories rise from 27 to 32 kCal/kg and proteins from 0.8 to 1.3 g/kg per day [56]. Richardson et al. [5] showed that in overweight or obese transplant patients, more significant energy intake, higher consumption of both proteins and carbohydrates and doubled intake of fat can be found with respect to the pre-LT period.
The feasible pharmacological tools for treating the single metabolic disease, associated or not with NAFLD/NASH, should be used with caution for the possible drug-drug interactions [57]. Notably, a single drug for post-LT MS is not available. Based on these considerations, the main intervention after surgery should be a strong lifestyle control for both prevention and treatment of MS. However, the only randomized trial of exercise and dietary counseling after LT published in 2006 did not show a real advantage with this approach [58]. In this study, 151 liver transplant patients, randomized into exercise and dietary counseling or usual care, showed a similar increase in body weight, fat mass and lean mass. It should be underlined that full adherence to exercise and nutrition was obtained only in 37% of subjects.
Many drugs have been proposed for the treatment of NAFLD/NASH, but lifestyle intervention should be the first-line therapy. In particular, lifestyle modification is the standard of care according to the Italian, European, Asian-Pacific and North American guidelines [59,60,61,62]. The main targets for the usefulness evaluation should be a weight loss of 7% and 150 min/week of physical activity [63,64]. In particular, a weight loss of 7% has been seen to significantly decrease fat accumulation and reduce necroinflammation in non-transplanted patients with NAFLD/NASH [63]. Markedly, aerobic and resistance physical activity have an independent positive effect in decreasing fat in the liver, regardless of the weight loss [65,66]. Furthermore, clinicians should take into account that the physical activity per se improves cardio-respiratory fitness [67,68]. Vitamin E and pioglitazone represent the first-line pharmacological options. Both vitamin E and pioglitazone improve fat accumulation and liver inflammation. However, the use of vitamin E is limited to patients without DM and it has no clear effects on fibrosis. On the other hand, pioglitazone shows a negative impact on patients’ weight. In addition, the long-term safety of these drugs is uncertain. Many other drugs such as metformin, ursodeoxycholic acid, statins, pentoxifylline, and orlistat have been tested in pilot studies or randomized clinical trials with few results in terms of efficacy. Telmisartan, a safe antihypertensive drug, is an emerging drug with an interesting preliminary effect on NAFLD/NASH. It seems to have a positive impact on IR, liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis [52]. As recently reported in a review article by Lassailly et al. [69], many other drugs are in progress for the treatment of NAFLD/NASH, including obeticholic acid, liraglutide and elafibranor. Authors also suggest that bariatric surgery may be successful in well-selected obese patients with NAFLD/NASH.
Concerning the transplanted patient, none of the cited therapeutic options have been validated.

7. Conclusions

Starting in the first months after surgery, transplant patients tend to develop overweight or obesity, IR and, consequently, multifactorial diseases. Consequently, a high prevalence of multifactorial disease such as DM, hyperlipidemia and arterial hypertension can be found. All these metabolic features negatively influence the outcome of transplant patients in terms of quality of life, morbidity and mortality.
All the main immunosuppressant drugs, such as corticosteroids, CSA, TAC and SIR, favor the onset of metabolic alterations. Corticosteroids are surely very important in the first months after LT but also in the long-term in selected cases. They lead to weight gain and fat accumulation negatively affecting lipid, glycemic and pressure profiles. Moreover, they directly increase the risk of steatosis development. CNIs have a negative metabolic impact since they increase weight gain and reduce muscle mass. TAC seems to be superior compared to CSA concerning the metabolic risk in terms of the alteration of lipid and arterial pressure. It should be the first choice among CNIs. SIR is the immunosuppressant with the worst lipid profile. Moreover, SIR shows a worse glycemic profile with respect to CNIs and has a negative effect on the muscle mass status. The choice of immunosuppressant is central and related to many aspects and evaluations such as the cardiovascular and renal risks. In general, one of the main aims of clinicians should be to minimize the dosage of immunosuppressants. This last assumption is true especially in the long-term period and in patients with pre-LT etiology different from autoimmune or cholestatic disease and without a history of graft rejection.
The presence of criteria for MS is frequent in the post-LT period and represents the main indicator of cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality. NAFLD and its progressive form, represented by NASH, can be considered the liver expression of MS. Indeed, both recurrent and de novo NAFLD can be diagnosed in transplanted patients. The hepatic outcome of steatosis after surgery is generally not very aggressive, with few percentages of advanced fibrosis, in comparison with the pre-LT phase. However, together with MS, steatosis is a relevant indicator of increased cardiovascular risk. This assumption is important if we consider that cardiovascular disease is found in 10.6%, 20.7%, and 30.3% of recipients at one, five, and eight years from the LT [43]. Interestingly, post-LT NAFLD/NASH is also associated with an increased risk of infections and renal injury.
Clinicians might definitely use the diagnosis of NAFLD in the post-LT period as an indicator of increased cardiovascular and renal risk. Transplant patients with a first diagnosis of NAFLD should be closely monitored regarding peripheral atherosclerotic signs and kidney function. In this direction, the development of diagnostic algorithms with the use non-invasive tools is warranted. Karlas et al. [70] demonstrated that modern non-invasive liver graft assessments such as hepatic ultrasound and transient elastography might be able to properly detect both steatosis and graft fibrosis.
Specific therapeutic options against post-LT MS or NAFLD are not available. Targeted pharmacological tools can be used for each component of MS. So far, a strong behavioral change in terms of diet and aerobic exercise is the only reasonable approach for transplant patients for both primary and secondary care. Transplant patients should be educated starting from the first weeks after surgery for preventing the development of multifactorial diseases, MS and metabolic liver illness. A well-done stratification of the cardiovascular risk should be developed as soon as possible after LT. In the next years, the genetic study of recipients and donors might improve the quality of organ allocation, decreasing the metabolic complications after LT.

Author Contributions

Stefano Gitto and Erica Villa conceived and designed the article; Stefano Gitto wrote the paper; Erica Villa reviewed the manuscript and performed a critical revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

LTLiver Transplant
IRinsulin resistance
DMDiabetes mellitus
CNIscalcineurin inhibitors
CSAcyclosporine
TACtacrolimus
mTORsmammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors
SIRsirolimus
MSMetabolic Syndrome
NAFLDNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease
NASHNon-alcoholic steatohepatitis
BMIbody mass index
TCF7L2Transcription factor 7-like 2

References

  1. Watt, K.D.; Pedersen, R.A.; Kremers, W.K.; Heimbach, J.K.; Charlton, M.R. Evolution of causes and risk factors for mortality post-liver transplant: Results of the NIDDK long-term follow-up study. Am. J. Transplant. 2010, 10, 1420–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Charco, R.; Cantarell, C.; Vargas, V.; Capdevila, L.; Lázaro, J.L.; Hidalgo, E.; Murio, E.; Margarit, C. Serum cholesterol changes in long-term survivors of liver transplantation: A comparison between cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy. Liver Transpl. Surg. 1999, 5, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhagat, V.; Mindikoglu, A.L.; Nudo, C.G.; Schiff, E.R.; Tzakis, A.; Regev, A. Outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis versus patients with cirrhosis due to alcoholic liver disease. Liver Transplant. 2009, 15, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Richards, J.; Gunson, B.; Johnson, J.; Neuberger, J. Weight gain and obesity after liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2005, 18, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Richardson, R.A.; Garden, O.J.; Davidson, H.I. Reduction in energy expenditure after liver transplantation. Nutrition 2001, 17, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferreira, L.G.; Santos, L.F.; Anastácio, L.R.; Lima, A.S.; Correia, M.I. Resting energy expenditure, body composition, and dietary intake: A longitudinal study before and after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2013, 96, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Anastácio, L.R.; Ferreira, L.G.; de Sena Ribeiro, H.; Lima, A.S.; Vilela, E.G.; Toulson Davisson Correia, M.I. Body composition and over-weight of liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 2011, 92, 947–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lane, J.T.; Dagogo-Jack, S. Approach to the patient with new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 3289–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Parekh, J.; Corley, D.A.; Feng, S. Diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia: Prevalence over time and impact on long-term survival after liver transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2012, 12, 2181–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, D.W.; Lu, T.F.; Hua, X.W.; Dai, H.J.; Cui, X.L.; Zhang, J.J.; Xia, Q. Risk factors for new onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation: A meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 6329–6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ling, Q.; Xie, H.; Lu, D.; Wei, X.; Gao, F.; Zhou, L.; Xu, X.; Zheng, S. Association between donor and recipient TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms and the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation in a Han Chinese population. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bianchi, G.; Marchesini, G.; Marzocchi, R.; Pinna, A.D.; Zoli, M. Metabolic syndrome in liver transplantation: Relation to etiology and immunosuppression. Liver Transplant. 2008, 14, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Singh, S.; Watt, K.D. Long-term medical management of the liver transplant recipient: What the primary care physician needs to know. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2012, 87, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Morrisett, J.D.; Abdel-Fattah, G.; Hoogeveen, R.; Mitchell, E.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Pownall, H.J.; Opekun, A.R.; Jaffe, J.S.; Oppermann, S.; Kahan, B.D. Effects of sirolimus on plasma lipids, lipoprotein levels, and fatty acid metabolism in renal transplant patients. J. Lipid Res. 2002, 43, 1170–1180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Nikkilä, K.; Åberg, F.; Isoniemi, H. Transmission of LDLR mutation from donor through liver transplantation resulting in hypercholesterolemia in the recipient. Am. J. Transplant. 2014, 14, 2898–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hryniewiecka, E.; Zegarska, J.; Paczek, L. Arterial hypertension in liver transplant recipients. Transplant. Proc. 2011, 43, 3029–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zheng, J.; Wang, W.L. Risk factors of metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2015, 14, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wilkinson, A.; Davidson, J.; Dotta, F.; Home, P.D.; Keown, P.; Kiberd, B.; Jardine, A.; Levitt, N.; Marchetti, P.; Markell, M.; et al. Guidelines for the treatment and management of new-onset diabetes after transplantation. Clin. Transplant. 2005, 19, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ahn, H.Y.; Cho, Y.M.; Yi, N.J.; Suh, K.S.; Lee, K.U.; Park, K.S.; Kim, S.Y.; Lee, H.K. Predictive factors associated with the reversibility of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus following liver transplantation. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2009, 24, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Musavi, Z.; Azarpira, N.; Sangtarash, M.H.; Kordi, M.; Kazemi, K.; Geramizadeh, B.; Malek-Hosseini, S.A. Polymorphism of transcription factor-7-Like 2 (TCF7L2) gene and new-onset diabetes after liver transplantation. Int. J. Organ Transplant. Med. 2015, 6, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Neal, D.A.; Brown, M.J.; Wilkinson, I.B.; Alexander, G.J. Mechanisms of hypertension after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2005, 79, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Giusto, M.; Lattanzi, B.; Di Gregorio, V.; Giannelli, V.; Lucidi, C.; Merli, M. Changes in nutritional status after liver transplantation. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 10682–10690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Van den Ham, E.C.; Kooman, J.P.; Christiaans, M.H.; Leunissen, K.M.; van Hooff, J.P. Posttransplantation weight gain is predominantly due to an increase in body fat mass. Transplantation 2000, 70, 241–242. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Mercier, J.G.; Hokanson, J.F.; Brooks, G.A. Effects of cyclosporine A on skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiration and endurance time in rats. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 151, 1532–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rodríguez-Perálvarez, M.; Germani, G.; Darius, T.; Lerut, J.; Tsochatzis, E.; Burroughs, A.K. Tacrolimus trough levels, rejection and renal impairment in liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Transplant. 2012, 12, 2797–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sakuma, K.; Yamaguchi, A. The functional role of calcineurin in hypertrophy, regeneration, and disorders of skeletal muscle. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2010, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rabkin, J.M.; Corless, C.L.; Rosen, H.R.; Olyaei, A.J. Immunosuppression impact on long-term cardiovascular complications after liver transplantation. Am. J. Surg. 2002, 183, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manzarbeitia, C.; Reich, D.J.; Rothstein, K.D.; Braitman, L.E.; Levin, S.; Munoz, S.J. Tacrolimus conversion improves hyperlipidemic states in stable liver transplant recipients. Liver Transplant. 2001, 7, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ojo, A.O.; Held, P.J.; Port, F.K.; Wolfe, R.A.; Leichtman, A.B.; Young, E.W.; Arndorfer, J.; Christensen, L.; Merion, R.M. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rossetto, A.; Bitetto, D.; Bresadola, V.; Lorenzin, D.; Baccarani, U.; de Anna, D.; Bresadola, F.; Adani, G.L. Cardiovascular risk factors and immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation. Transplant. Proc. 2010, 42, 2576–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Neff, G.W.; Montalbano, M.; Tzakis, A.G. Ten years of sirolimus therapy in orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Transplant. Proc. 2003, 35, 209S–216S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Miyabara, E.H.; Conte, T.C.; Silva, M.T.; Baptista, I.L.; Bueno, C.; Fiamoncini, J.; Lambertucci, R.H.; Serra, C.S.; Brum, P.C.; Curi, T.; et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 is involved in differentiation of regenerating myofibers in vivo. Muscle Nerve 2010, 42, 778–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zimmermann, A.; Zobeley, C.; Weber, M.M.; Lang, H.; Galle, P.R.; Zimmermann, T. Changes in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism under mTOR- and calcineurin-based immunosuppressive regimen in adult patients after liver transplantation. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 29, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Klintmalm, G.B.; Washburn, W.K.; Rudich, S.M.; Heffron, T.G.; Teperman, L.W.; Fasola, C.; Eckhoff, D.E.; Netto, G.J.; Katz, E. Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with daclizumab in HCV+ liver transplant recipients: 1-Year interim results of the HCV-3 study. Liver Transplant. 2007, 13, 1521–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Contos, M.J.; Cales, W.; Sterling, R.K.; Luketic, V.A.; Shiffman, M.L.; Mills, A.S.; Fisher, R.A.; Ham, J.; Sanyal, A.J. Development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis. Liver Transplant. 2001, 7, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Iadevaia, M.; Giusto, M.; Giannelli, V.; Lai, Q.; Rossi, M.; Berloco, P.; Corradini, S.G.; Merli, M. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk after liver transplantation: A single-center experience. Transplant. Proc. 2012, 44, 2005–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rodríguez-Perálvarez, M.; Germani, G.; Papastergiou, V.; Tsochatzis, E.; Thalassinos, E.; Luong, T.V.; Rolando, N.; Dhillon, A.P.; Patch, D.; O’Beirne, J.; et al. Early tacrolimus exposure after liver transplantation: Relationship with moderate/severe acute rejection and long-term outcome. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Heisel, O.; Heisel, R.; Balshaw, R.; Keown, P. New onset diabetes mellitus in patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors: A system-atic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Transplant. 2004, 4, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Watt, K.D.; Charlton, M.R. Metabolic syndrome and liver transplantation: A review and guide to management. J. Hepatol. 2010, 53, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ford, E.S.; Giles, W.H.; Dietz, W.H. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: Findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 2002, 287, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sprinzl, M.F.; Weinmann, A.; Lohse, N.; Tönissen, H.; Koch, S.; Schattenberg, J.; Hoppe-Lotichius, M.; Zimmermann, T.; Galle, P.R.; Hansen, T.; et al. Metabolic syndrome and its association with fatty liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl. Int. 2013, 26, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Qin, N.; Yang, F.; Li, A.; Prifti, E.; Chen, Y.; Shao, L.; Guo, J.; Le Chatelier, E.; Yao, J.; Wu, L.; et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 2014, 513, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fussner, L.A.; Heimbach, J.K.; Fan, C.; Dierkhising, R.; Coss, E.; Leise, M.D.; Watt, K.D. Cardiovascular disease after liver transplantation: When, what, and who is at risk. Liver Transplant. 2015, 21, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pagadala, M.; Dasarathy, S.; Eghtesad, B.; McCullough, A.J. Posttransplant metabolic syndrome: An epidemic waiting to happen. Liver Transplant. 2009, 15, 1662–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Burra, P.; Germani, G. Orthotopic liver transplantation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 2014, 9, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dureja, P.; Mellinger, J.; Agni, R.; Chang, F.; Avey, G.; Lucey, M.; Said, A. NAFLD recurrence in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 2011, 91, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Malik, S.M.; de Vera, M.E.; Fontes, P.; Shaikh, O.; Sasatomi, E.; Ahmad, J. Recurrent disease following liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis. Liver Transplant. 2009, 15, 1843–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Finkenstedt, A.; Auer, C.; Glodny, B.; Posch, U.; Steitzer, H.; Lanzer, G.; Pratschke, J.; Biebl, M.; Steurer, M.; Graziadei, I.; et al. Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 rs738409-G in recipients of liver transplants is a risk factor for graft steatosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 11, 1667–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Watt, K.D.; Dierkhising, R.; Fan, C.; Heimbach, J.K.; Tillman, H.; Goldstein, D.; Thompson, A.; Krishnan, A.; Charlton, M.R. Investigation of PNPLA3 and IL28B genotypes on diabetes and obesity after liver transplantation: Insight into mechanisms of disease. Am. J. Transplant. 2013, 13, 2450–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dumortier, J.; Giostra, E.; Belbouab, S.; Morard, I.; Guillaud, O.; Spahr, L.; Boillot, O.; Rubbia-Brandt, L.; Scoazec, J.Y.; Hadengue, A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in liver transplant recipients: Another story of “seed and soil”. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 105, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mikolasevic, I.; Orlic, L.; Hrstic, I.; Milic, S. Metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after liver or kidney transplantation. Hepatol. Res. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gitto, S.; Vitale, G.; Villa, E.; Andreone, P. Treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in adults: Present and future. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, F.; Pham, M.; Maloney, E.; Rizzo, N.O.; Morton, G.J.; Wisse, B.E.; Kirk, E.A.; Chait, A.; Schwartz, M.W. Vascular inflammation, insulin resistance, and reduced nitric oxide production precede the onset of peripheral insulin resistance. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1982–1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tilg, H.; Moschen, A.R. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology 2010, 52, 1836–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kouz, J.; Vincent, C.; Leong, A.; Dorais, M.; Räkel, A. Weight gain after orthotopic liver transplantation: Is nonalcoholic fatty liver disease cirrhosis a risk factor for greater weight gain? Liver Transplant. 2014, 20, 1266–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Merli, M.; Giusto, M.; Riggio, O.; Gentili, F.; Molinaro, A.; Attili, A.F.; Ginanni Corradini, S.; Rossi, M. Improvement of nutritional status in malnourished cirrhotic patients one year after liver transplantation. e-SPEN 2011, 6, e142–e147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Charlton, M. Evolving aspects of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 2013, 18, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Krasnoff, J.B.; Vintro, A.Q.; Ascher, N.L.; Bass, N.M.; Paul, S.M.; Dodd, M.J.; Painter, P.L. A randomized trial of exercise and dietary counseling after liver transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2006, 6, 1896–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Loria, P.; Adinolfi, L.E.; Bellentani, S.; Bugianesi, E.; Grieco, A.; Fargion, S.; Gasbarrini, A.; Loguercio, C.; Lonardo, A.; Marchesini, G.; et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A decalogue from the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) Expert Committee. Dig. Liver Dis. 2010, 42, 272–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ratziu, V.; Bellentani, S.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Day, C.; Marchesini, G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J. Hepatol. 2010, 53, 372–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Farrell, G.C.; Chitturi, S.; Lau, G.K.; Sollano, J.D.; Asia-Pacific Working Party on NAFLD. Guidelines for the assessment and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region: Executive summary. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22, 775–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chalasani, N.; Younossi, Z.; Lavine, J.E.; Diehl, A.M.; Brunt, E.M.; Cusi, K.; Charlton, M.; Sanyal, A.J.; American Gastroenterological Association; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 1592–1609. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Promrat, K.; Kleiner, D.E.; Niemeier, H.M.; Jackvony, E.; Kearns, M.; Wands, J.R.; Fava, J.L.; Wing, R.R. Randomized controlled trial testing the effects of weight loss on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2010, 51, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care 2002, 25, 2165–2171. [Google Scholar]
  65. George, A.; Bauman, A.; Johnston, A.; Farrell, G.; Chey, T.; George, J. Independent effects of physical activity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2009, 50, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hallsworth, K.; Fattakhova, G.; Hollingsworth, K.G.; Thoma, C.; Moore, S.; Taylor, R.; Day, C.P.; Trenell, M.I. Resistance exercise reduces liver fat and its mediators in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease independent of weight loss. Gut 2011, 60, 1278–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kantartzis, K.; Thamer, C.; Peter, A.; Machann, J.; Schick, F.; Schraml, C.; Königsrainer, A.; Königsrainer, I.; Kröber, S.; Niess, A.; et al. High cardiorespiratory fitness is an independent predictor of the reduction in liver fat during a lifestyle intervention in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2009, 58, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Targher, G.; Marra, F.; Marchesini, G. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Causal effect or epiphenomenon? Diabetologia 2008, 51, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lassailly, G.; Caiazzo, R.; Pattou, F.; Mathurin, P. Perspectives on treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Karlas, T.; Kollmeier, J.; Böhm, S.; Müller, J.; Kovacs, P.; Tröltzsch, M.; Weimann, A.; Bartels, M.; Rosendahl, J.; Mössner, J.; et al. Noninvasive characterization of graft steatosis after liver transplantation. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 50, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Multifactorial conditions affecting transplant patients.
Table 1. Multifactorial conditions affecting transplant patients.
DiseaseIncidenceRisk FactorsReferences
Diabetes mellitus10%–64%Male gender, high pre-LT BMI, family history, hepatitis C, older age, immunosuppressants, rapamycin gene polymorphisms, TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms (donor)[8,9,10,11]
Hyperlipidemia45%–69%Diet, older age, high BMI, DM, renal impairment, immunosuppressants, low-density lipoprotein receptor gene polymorphism (donor)[12,13,14,15]
Arterial hypertension50%–100%Obesity, older age, impaired glycemia, immunosuppressants[9,16,17]
LT: liver transplant; BMI, body mass index; TCF7L2, Transcription factor 7-like 2; DM, diabetes mellitus.
Table
Table 2. Most used immunosuppressant drugs and main metabolic side effects.
Table 2. Most used immunosuppressant drugs and main metabolic side effects.
DrugSide EffectsReferences
CorticosteroidsIncreased fat depositions, decreased fat oxidation, increased proteolysis, reduced protein synthesis, IR, hyperlipidemia, sodium retention, NAFLD[23,24,25]
CSADecreased energy metabolism and muscle mass, weight gain, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension[26,27,28,29,30]
TACDM, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension[10,27,28,29,30]
SIRDecreased muscle mass, hyperlipidemia, glycemic alteration[31,32,33]
CSA: cyclosporine; TAC: tacrolimus; SIR: sirolimus; IR, insulin resistance; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; DM, diabetes mellitus.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gitto, S.; Villa, E. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome after Liver Transplant. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040490

AMA Style

Gitto S, Villa E. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome after Liver Transplant. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(4):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gitto, Stefano, and Erica Villa. 2016. "Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome after Liver Transplant" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 4: 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040490

APA Style

Gitto, S., & Villa, E. (2016). Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic Syndrome after Liver Transplant. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(4), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040490

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop