Next Article in Journal
Unravelling the Role of Metallothionein on Development, Reproduction and Detoxification in the Wall Lizard Podarcis sicula
Next Article in Special Issue
Autophagy and Human Neurodegenerative Diseases—A Fly’s Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering Molecular Mechanisms of Interface Buildup and Stability in Porous Si/Eumelanin Hybrids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detailed Characterization of Sympathetic Chain Ganglia (SChG) Neurons Supplying the Skin of the Porcine Hindlimb
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Proteostasis of Huntingtin in Health and Disease

Cologne Excellence Cluster for Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Joseph Stelzmann Strasse 26, 50931 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(7), 1568; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071568
Submission received: 14 June 2017 / Revised: 15 July 2017 / Accepted: 18 July 2017 / Published: 19 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuronal Protein Homeostasis in Health and Disease)

Abstract

:
Huntington’s disease (HD) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor dysfunction, cognitive deficits and psychosis. HD is caused by mutations in the Huntingtin (HTT) gene, resulting in the expansion of polyglutamine (polyQ) repeats in the HTT protein. Mutant HTT is prone to aggregation, and the accumulation of polyQ-expanded fibrils as well as intermediate oligomers formed during the aggregation process contribute to neurodegeneration. Distinct protein homeostasis (proteostasis) nodes such as chaperone-mediated folding and proteolytic systems regulate the aggregation and degradation of HTT. Moreover, polyQ-expanded HTT fibrils and oligomers can lead to a global collapse in neuronal proteostasis, a process that contributes to neurodegeneration. The ability to maintain proteostasis of HTT declines during the aging process. Conversely, mechanisms that preserve proteostasis delay the onset of HD. Here we will review the link between proteostasis, aging and HD-related changes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Huntington’s disease (HD) is the most common inherited neurodegenerative disorder with an incidence of 0.38 per 100,000 persons per year [1,2]. The characteristic symptoms of HD are excessive motor movements, cognitive decline and psychiatric abnormalities [3,4]. Neuronal loss occurs in many brain regions, but striatal medium spiny neurons undergo the greatest neurodegeneration [5,6]. HD patients usually die within 15–20 years of the disease onset [4]. HD is inherited in a dominant manner and caused by abnormal expansions of CAG repeats in the Huntingtin (HTT) gene [1]. These mutations expand the polyglutamine stretch (polyQ) of the N-terminal domain of the HTT protein, resulting in proteotoxicity and protein aggregation [1,7,8]. HTT is variable in its structure, as the many polymorphisms of the gene lead to different numbers of polyQ repeats in the protein. The wild-type HTT gene encodes a large protein of approximately 350 kDa that contains 6–35 polyQ repeats. In individuals affected by HD, HTT protein contains >35 polyQ repeats [1]. Normal function of HTT is involved in several biological processes such as transcriptional regulation, ciliogenesis, apoptosis, vesicle trafficking, autophagy and embryonic development [9]. Although loss of normal function could also contribute to HD [9,10], experimental data and the dominant inheritance pattern of HD indicate that gain-of-function of mutant HTT is toxic and triggers neurodegeneration (Figure 1) [1,11,12,13]. The function, folding and clearance of HTT are controlled by different protein homeostasis (proteostasis) mechanisms including the chaperome network, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy-lysosome pathways [14,15,16,17,18]. The accumulation of polyQ-expanded aggregates has been proposed to contribute to neurodegeneration [19]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which these aggregates induce neural dysfunction and death remain unsolved. PolyQ-expanded fibrils may collapse distinct proteostasis nodes such as chaperones and protein clearance mechanisms (Figure 2) [20,21,22,23], sequester regulatory components such as transcription factors [24] or physically obstruct neuronal extensions [25]. Growing evidence indicates that intermediate species called “oligomers” formed during the aggregation or disaggregation process also induce neurotoxicity [26,27,28,29].
Whereas mutant HTT can collapse the proteostasis network, mechanisms that preserve or increase proteostasis ameliorate HD-related changes (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3) [17]. Conversely, a decline in the ability to maintain proteostasis during the aging process could underlie the late onset of HD (Figure 1). In this regard, it is important to note that the length of the polyQ repeats correlates with the disease progression and unusually long polyQ stretches predict younger HD onset [1,30,31]. Experiments in model organisms show that highly expanded polyQ repeats accelerates HD-related changes, proteotoxicity and protein aggregation [17,32], suggesting that the cellular ability to maintain proteostasis of mutant HTT depends on the polyQ length. In this review, we discuss recent insights into distinct nodes of proteostasis of HTT and how this network can be adapted to ameliorate HD.

2. Regulation of Mutant HTT Aggregation by the Chaperome Network

Nascent proteins are synthesized by the ribosome as linear chains of amino acids that must fold into the correct three-dimensional structure to perform their biological function(s) [33]. This process is particularly inefficient for larger proteins and its dysfunction can lead to protein aggregation [33]. Molecular chaperones facilitate the folding of newly synthesized proteins into their proper native conformation [33,34,35,36]. Moreover, chaperones assure the proper folding and localization of proteins during all their life cycle. When the structure of proteins is challenged by stress conditions or aggregation-prone mutations (e.g., polyQ-expanded HTT), a series of cellular stress responses are activated to correct proteostatic deficiencies [37,38]. For instance, chaperones assist the refolding of proteins when their structure is challenged upon stress conditions such as hyperthermia, hypoxia, oxidative stress, exposure to toxins and misfolding-prone mutations [36,37,39,40]. Moreover, chaperones bind to exposed hydrophobic regions of nascent or misfolded polypeptides, thus preventing these residues from forming aberrant interactions with other proteins [41]. In addition, chaperones participate at different levels of protein aggregation and disaggregation processes to reduce aberrant inclusions or intermediates [34]. If refolding activities are not sufficient to assure the proper function of proteins, chaperones promote the degradation of damaged and misfolded proteins [37]. Thus, the chaperome network (i.e., chaperones and co-chaperones) preserves proteostasis by preventing protein misfolding and aggregation.
The human chaperome network consists of 88 chaperones and 244 co-chaperones [42]. Chaperones are classified according to their molecular weight into six conserved classes: 40 kilodalton heat shock proteins (HSP40s), HSP60s (chaperonins), HSP70s, HSP90s, HSP100, and the small HSPs [43]. Chaperones are also subdivided into two groups depending on their source of energy for the chaperone activity: ATP-dependent (e.g., HSP70s, HSP90s, HSP100s, chaperonins) and ATP-independent molecular chaperones (e.g., small HSPs and conditionally activated chaperones) [42,44,45]. Whereas distinct chaperones such as members of the HSP90 and HSP70 families are involved in different aspects of the proteostasis network (e.g., folding of nascent proteins, refolding, degradation of unnecessary or damaged proteins), specific set of chaperones evolved to primarily protect the cell from proteotoxic stress [46]. Multiple co-chaperones assist chaperones in their vast range of proteostatic tasks such as the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-domain-containing family (e.g., CHIP, HOP), the BAG-domain-containing family (BAG1–BAG6) and DNAJ-domain-containing HSP40s [42,43].
Defects in chaperone function are linked with HD [37,47,48]. Indeed, numerous studies in HD mammalian cells and model organisms (e.g., yeast, worms, files and mice) have highlighted the direct role of chaperones in modulating mutant HTT aggregation and toxicity (Figure 3) [42,47,49,50,51,52]. Distinct molecular chaperones can modulate polyQ-expanded toxicity through different mechanisms, showing synergy in suppression of neurodegeneration [49]. For instance, chaperones can inhibit polyQ-expanded aggregation by either preventing intramolecular conformational changes in mutant HTT or promoting its degradation via protein clearance mechanisms. Chaperones can also interfere at different steps of the aggregation process such as primary nucleation, elongation and fragmentation of fibril and secondary nucleation [34].
The interaction of members of the Hsp70 family and their DNAJ-domain-containing Hsp40 co-chaperones (e.g., hdj-1) inhibit the formation of spherical aggregates by promoting the accumulation of less toxic fibrillar and amorphous inclusions [53,54]. Overexpression of Hsp40s and/or Hsp70s in D. melanogaster and mouse models suppresses polyQ-mediated neurodegeneration [55,56,57,58,59]. Besides multiple Hsp40s [42,51,57,60,61], other Hsp70s co-chaperones also determine polyQ-expanded aggregation and toxicity. For instance, the co-chaperones BAG1 and CHIP are involved in the aggregation fate of mutant HTT via their interaction with HSP70s [62,63,64]. The differential ability to induce the HSP70 system exhibited by different neuronal types could provide a potential explanation to the higher neurodegeneration of the striatum in HD [65]. Notably, cerebellar neurons induce Hsp70s levels upon mutant HTT overexpression. On the contrary, striatal neurons cannot sufficiently upregulate their chaperone system to overcome this proteotoxic stress [65].
Whereas numerous independent studies established a link between HSP70s and HD, in vitro experiments indicate that HSP90s do not directly modulate polyQ aggregation [54]. Indeed, overexpression of members of the HSP90 family does not suppress polyQ toxicity [51]. However, the inhibition of HSP90 induces heat-shock response (HSR) and reduces polyQ-expanded HTT aggregation in HD organismal models and cells [66]. The HSR is a cellular mechanism controlled by the transcription factor HSF1 that induces the expression of multiple chaperones to ameliorate acute proteotoxic stress [67]. Interestingly, activation of HSR delays HD-related changes in D. melanogaster and C. elegans models [59,68,69]. However, the beneficial effects of HSR activation in HD mouse models were transient and diminished with disease progression [70]. Moreover, the transgenic overexpression of HSR-inducible Hsp70 (HSPA1A) and the small Hsp27 (HSPB1) in mouse models is characterized by modest or absent effects in HD onset and aggregate formation [71,72,73]. Although mutant HTT induces a mild upregulation of several small HSPs (e.g., Hspb3, Hspb6, Hspb7) [74], the expression of polyQ-expanded proteins per se does not activate the HSR, providing a potential explanation to the lack of strong effects of HSR-canonical chaperones in polyQ disease [75]. In this regard, a screen for polyQ modifiers identified two DNAJ-containing HSP40s (DNAJB6 and DNAJB8), which are not activated by HSF1 [76]. Remarkably, DNAJB6 inhibits the conversion of soluble polyQ-expanded HTT peptides into amyloid fibrils, particularly by suppressing primary nucleation of aggregation [77]. Moreover, DNAJB6 overexpression delays polyQ-expanded aggregation and extends lifespan in HD mouse models [77].
Another key regulator of mutant HTT aggregation is the TRiC/CCT complex (T-complex protein-1 ring complex, also called CCT for chaperonin containing TCP1). This chaperonin complex consists of two stacked rings formed by eight paralogous subunits (CCT1–CCT8) [78,79]. Mutation or loss of a single subunit is sufficient to impair the assembly and function of the TRiC/CCT complex [79], a process that accelerates mutant HTT aggregation and worsens HD-related changes [42,50,51,52]. Conversely, simultaneous overexpression of all eight CCT subunits reduces polyQ-expanded HTT aggregation and neurodegeneration [50]. Ectopic expression of specific single subunits (i.e., CCT1, CCT8) can also ameliorate HD-related changes. Since CCT8 is sufficient to increase the assembly of the TRiC/CCT complex, overexpression of this single subunit results in reduced polyQ aggregation [80]. Although CCT1 overexpression does not increase TRiC/CCT assembly, this subunit promotes the interaction between HTT and TRiC/CCT complex resulting in a remodeling of HTT aggregates and, therefore, reduced neurotoxicity [52].
Taken together, the chaperome network is a central modulator of mutant HTT aggregation and toxicity. In addition, it is also important to note that polyQ aggregates can also sequester molecular chaperones such as inducible and constitutively expressed HSP70s and their co-chaperones (e.g., hdj-1, hdj-2), a process that could directly contribute to the proteostasis collapse and neurodegeneration observed in HD (Figure 2) [7,24,81,82,83].

3. The Mechanistic Links between the Ubiquitin Proteasome-System (UPS) and HD

Protein clearance mechanisms are essential to adjust the proteome composition to the specific requirements of a particular cell type and status [17,84], including the degradation of numerous cellular regulatory factors and structural components. In addition, protein clearance systems terminate toxic, damaged and misfolded proteins to diminish aberrant protein aggregation and proteotoxicity [17,84]. Impairment of protein clearance mechanisms contributes to HD pathology [85,86,87]. Conversely, enhancement of these mechanisms can ameliorate the proteotoxic stress associated with polyQ-expanded aggregation [15,17,88]. Notably, blockade of mutant HTT expression in inducible HD models at an age that have already presented symptomatic changes results in disappearance of pathological aggregates and amelioration of behavioral phenotype [89]. These findings provided experimental evidence of clearance mechanisms to scavenge polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates in neurons.
The ubiquitin proteasome-system (UPS) is the primary selective proteolytic process, regulating the degradation of both unnecessary and misfolded proteins [17]. Proteins are tagged for proteasomal degradation by the attachment of ubiquitin molecules, an evolutionary conserved small protein of 8.5 kDa (Figure 4) [90]. Ubiquitination is accomplished through a sequential mechanism involving three enzymes [91]. In the first step of the ubiquitination cascade, the E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme activates ubiquitin in an ATP-dependent manner. Then, activated ubiquitin is transferred to an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. In the third step, E3 ubiquitin ligases catalyze the transfer of ubiquitin to their specific target proteins [92]. The same three-step sequential mechanism links additional ubiquitin molecules to one of the seven lysine residues of the primary ubiquitin, forming a polyubiquitin chain. A chain of at least four lysine 48-linked ubiquitin molecules is the main signal for proteasomal recognition and degradation, whereas other ubiquitin chains participate in different biological processes such as signal transduction [93]. The proteasome is a macromolecular proteolytic machinery formed by the assembly of multiple subunits. The main core of the proteasome is the 20S particle, which contains the catalytic subunits [94]. However, free 20S complex is normally inactive in the cell and its activation requires the binding of regulatory proteasome particles [95]. The most common regulatory particle is the 19S core, which binds to 20S forming active 26S/30S proteasomes [96,97,98]. 19S is central for recognition, unfolding and, finally, translocation to the catalytic 20S core of polyubiquitinated targets [17,97,98]. Besides the 19S, other regulatory factors can also activate the 20S catalytic core such as the Blm10/PA200 protein or the PA28 complex (also known as 11S) [99].
Cumulative evidence indicates a role of the UPS in the regulation of polyQ-expanded HTT aggregation and toxicity (Figure 3). In human HD postmortem brains and model organisms, polyQ-expanded HTT inclusions contain ubiquitinated proteins as well as components of the proteasome [24,100,101,102,103,104,105]. Moreover, pharmacological studies based on both HD cellular and animal models showed that downregulation of proteasome activity by specific inhibitors results in increased aggregation of mutant HTT [105,106]. Likewise, knockdown of different proteasome subunits results in diminished proteasome activity and triggers the accumulation of polyQ-expanded repeats in HD models [51,86]. Conversely, enhancement of proteasome assembly/activity has been proven beneficial in HD organismal models. For instance, proteasome activation with sulforaphane promotes elimination of mutant HTT in cell culture [107]. Overexpression of specific proteasome subunits also ameliorates HD-related changes. For example, the scaffolding proteasome subunit PSMD11/Rpn6 promotes the assembly of 26S/30S proteasomes and decreases polyQ aggregation in HD C. elegans models [86]. A genetic gain-of-function screen showed that increased levels of Rpn11 block the age-associated decline of 26S/30S proteasome activity, suppressing polyQ-expanded aggregation and neurodegeneration in HD D. melanogaster models [108]. Increased expression of other proteasome regulators such as PA28γ activator also ameliorates neurodegeneration induced by polyQ-expanded HTT in striatal neuronal cultures [109]. Besides direct proteasome activity regulators, overexpression of other UPS components also has beneficial effects in HD models. For instance, ectopic expression of ubiquilin-1, a factor that facilitates protein disposal through the proteasome, delays mutant HTT accumulation and extends lifespan in HD mouse models [110]. Moreover, the overexpression of distinct proteins with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity (e.g., Hrd1, Parkin, CHIP) improves clearance of mutant HTT and reduces cell death [62,111,112].
Besides the direct role of the UPS in reducing the accumulation of mutant HTT oligomers and aggregates, the impairment of proteasome activity by polyQ-expanded HTT also determines the severity of HD-related changes [113] (Figure 2). In contrast to the soluble form of HTT, aggregated HTT has been found ubiquitinated itself, suggesting an impairment of the UPS to degrade polyQ-expanded HTT that could aggravate HD [101]. Moreover, proteasome activity is downregulated in HD patients and mice models [101]. These findings support the hypothesis of a global dysfunction of proteasome function induced by mutant HTT, a process that could result in proteostasis collapse [20]. Indeed, in vitro studies suggest that the proteasome is not able to cleave within expanded polyQ stretches and the failure of these undegradable sequences to exit the proteasome could affect proteasome activity [114]. Notably, cells transiently transfected with polyQ-expanded fragments exhibit decrease proteasome activity [115]. Likewise, degradation of proteasomal reporters (i.e., ubiquitinated GFP) is impaired in cells overexpressing a fragment of mutant HTT [22,116,117]. In HD mouse models, the expression of ubiquitinated mutant HTT in its aggregated form inhibits 26S/30S proteasome activity [21]. A potential molecular mechanism to explain this phenomenon could rely on intrinsic properties of polyQ proteins that could prevent their efficient clearance, resulting in the trapping of proteasomes within aggregates [22]. Although these findings suggest that mutant HTT impairs the proteasome machinery, it is important to note that other studies do not support this model. For instance, a study reported increased proteasome activity in neuronal cells expressing polyQ-expanded HTT [102]. In addition, other studies did not find a direct effect of polyQ aggregates on blocking 26S/30S proteasomes [116,117], suggesting that mutant HTT could alter UPS function by impinging on either the activity or distribution of UPS modulators. Alternatively, alteration of proteasome activity could also be due to a general proteostasis collapse induced by the sequestration of chaperones by mutant HTT and the concomitant accumulation of misfolded proteins [117]. Interestingly, mutant HTT not only affects proteasomal degradation of cytosolic proteins but also ER-associated degradation (ERAD), a process that induces ER stress [27]. Remarkably, ERAD collapse is triggered by the sequestration of the cytosolic chaperone p97/VCP [27]. Since ER stress precedes the accumulation of polyQ aggregates, the presence of oligomeric mutant HTT could be sufficient to induce sequestration of p97/VCP chaperone [27]. Altogether, the findings discussed here indicate that: (1) the proteasome directly contributes to clear mutant HTT and inhibit its aggregation; and (2) proteasome activity is impaired by mutant HTT, a process that could contribute to general proteostasis collapse and neurodegeneration. Thus, modulation of the UPS could be a potential therapeutic approach for HD.

4. The Dual Role of PolyQ-Expanded HTT in the Autophagy-Lysosome System

Autophagy degrades cytosolic fractions as well as damaged or outlived organelles and macromolecules, including proteins. Autophagy not only function as a cellular recycling system but also as a protective mechanism to terminate misfolded and aggregated proteins [17,37]. The catalytic component of autophagy is the lysosome, a membrane-bound organelle that contains cellular hydrolases, nucleotidases, glycosidases, lipases, and proteases. The three most characterized types of autophagy are macroautophagy, microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), which differ on their cargo recognition and delivery system to lysosomes [118]. Macroautophagy (hereafter referred as autophagy) is a bulk clearance process that starts with the formation of a double membrane structure known as the phagophore, a process regulated by the ULK complex (Figure 5) [84,119,120]. Then, the VPS34-BECN1 complex promotes the expansion of the phagophore. Once the cytoplasmic fraction and/or organelles are engulfed into the phagophore, the membrane elongates until it closes forming the autophagosome. Finally, autophagosomes are trafficked and fused to the lysosome for degradation of their content. In microautophagy, parts of the cytoplasm are delivered directly to the lysosomes [121]. In CMA, chaperones such as HSP70 mediate the degradation of proteins with the pentapeptide motif KFERQ [122].
Whereas autophagy and microautophagy can degrade organelles and proteins, CMA is essentially involved in protein degradation [123]. Although autophagy was originally defined as a bulk degradation mechanism, it is emerging as a selective proteolytic system where adapters/receptors such as p62/SQSTM1 and NBR1 bind to both ubiquitinated proteins and autophagy components to induce lysosomal degradation of specific cargos [85,124,125]. The discovery of these adapters provided a molecular link between autophagy and the UPS, which could lead to novel therapeutic strategies in proteostasis-related diseases [124]. In this regard, it is important to note that autophagy is able to degrade large protein complexes and aggregates [17,37], whereas protein inclusions block the proteasome machinery (Figure 2 and Figure 3) [116]. This role of autophagy in proteostasis includes degradation of aberrant aggregates triggered by polyQ-expanded HTT expression [126,127]. Accordingly, dysregulation of autophagy hastens HD-related changes. For instance, loss of p62/SQTM1 increases cell death induced by mutant HTT [128]. Conversely, enhancement of autophagy ameliorates HD-related proteotoxicity [88,129,130]. For example, inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin induces autophagy resulting in decreased toxicity of mutant HTT in flies and mice [88]. Likewise, small molecules that activate autophagy promote clearance of polyQ-expanded HTT in yeast, fly and mammalian HD models [130].
Besides the role of autophagy in the degradation of mutant HTT aggregates, several independent findings reported autophagy dysfunction in HD [131]. For instance, HD mouse models and cells from HD patients exhibit impaired ability of autophagic vacuoles to recognize cytosolic cargo [132]. Remarkably, HTT can function as a scaffolding protein for selective autophagy, having a direct role on autophagy regulation [133]. Thus, HTT has a dual impact on HD as an aggregation-prone protein and also as a scaffolding protein involved in autophagy, adding a new layer of complexity to HD [133]. Whereas the N-terminal domain of HTT contains the polyQ-expanded region that leads to its aggregation, the C-terminal domain is essential to bind to ULK1 and p62. Interaction of HTT with these factors is crucial for the progress of two main stages of autophagy: autophagy induction and cargo recognition [133]. Moreover, the C-terminal domain of mutant HTT interacts with p97/VCP in the mitochondria inducing mitophagy, a selective form of autophagy that degrades this organelle [134]. In parallel, the N-terminal domain also participates in activation of autophagy as mutant HTT aggregates sequester and inactivate mTOR [88]. Moreover, HTT can undergo proteolytic post-translational modifications by caspases that generate N- and C-terminal fragments [135]. The addition of 14 carbon myristate to a glycine residue exposed on a caspase-3-cleaved 34-amino acid fragment of HTT (HTT553–586) induces autophagosome formation, a process altered in HD cellular models [136,137]. Notably, it has been recently shown that the isolated polyQ tract of the deubiquitinating enzyme ataxin 3 is sufficient to regulate BECN1 and autophagy in an mTOR-independent manner. However, a polyQ-expanded N-terminal HTT fragment comprising exon 1, which occurs in vivo as a result of alternative splicing, blocks ataxin 3-BECN1 interaction in a competing manner resulting in impaired autophagy [138]. Taken together, these findings highlight the key role of autophagy in HD, either as a mechanism to scavenge mutant HTT or an essential biological process directly regulated by HTT function (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

5. The Melding Fields of Proteostasis of Aging, Pluripotency and HD

With age, the proteostasis network undergoes a decline in its function, a process that contributes to the onset of age-related diseases such as HD (Figure 1) [139]. For instance, the expression of 32% of the chaperome network is downregulated in human brains with age [42]. These include ATP-dependent chaperones such as cytosolic HSP90, HSP70 family members (e.g., HSPA8, HSPA14) and subunits of the TRiC/CCT complex [42]. On the other hand, only 19.5% of the chaperome network is upregulated during human brain aging [42]. Interestingly, these changes in the chaperome network were further promoted in the brains of HD patients when compared to age-matched control groups [42]. In support of a role of chaperone dysfunction in HD, knockdown experiments of distinct chaperones which are downregulated during aging (e.g., HSPA14, HSPA8 or CCT subunits) worsen proteotoxicity in HD mammalian and C. elegans models [42]. Likewise, protein clearance mechanisms are downregulated with aging and mimicking this condition at early ages hastens HD-related changes in disease models [17]. A direct link between aging, polyQ-expanded aggregation and HD-related changes has been established in invertebrate models [32,140,141]. In both D. melanogaster and C. elegans models that express polyQ of different lengths, the onset of polyQ-expanded aggregation and severity of neurodegeneration not only correlates with repeat length but also age [32,140,141]. Concomitantly, the proteostasis collapse induced by polyQ aggregates in these models [141,142] could further accelerate age-related proteostasis and the aging process itself. Indeed, treating C. elegans models with Thioflavin T, a compound that binds polyQ-expanded aggregates, slows protein aggregation and dramatically extends lifespan [143,144]. Remarkably, mechanisms that extend longevity enhance the proteostasis network and preserve the integrity of the proteome during aging [17,48]. For instance, well-characterized longevity mechanisms such as reduced insulin/IGF-1 pathway or dietary restriction induce autophagy and proteasome activity [86,145,146,147,148], resulting in a delay of polyQ-expanded aggregation and other HD-related changes [17,48].
Further evidence of a link between the age-related decline in proteostasis and HD was provided by studies using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from HD patients. These cells opened a new door to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying HD. As such, iPSCs are an invaluable resource for drug screening to identify novel therapeutic approaches [149]. HD-iPSCs can be terminally differentiated into neurons (including striatal neurons) with HD-related phenotypes such as cumulative risk of death over time and increased vulnerability to stressors [149]. In addition, proteotoxicity induced via oxidative stress or autophagy inhibition leads to increased degeneration in HD neurons compared with controls [149]. Despite these HD-related changes, mutant HTT-expressing neurons present important limitations for disease modeling such as lack of polyQ aggregation and robust neurodegeneration [149,150]. Despite the efforts to detect polyQ-expanded inclusions under different conditions (e.g., cellular stressors, proteasome inhibitors) in neurons from HD-iPSCs, the presence of aggregates has not been observed in these cells [149,150]. The lack of polyQ aggregates in HD neurons could reflect the long period of time before aggregates accumulate in HD, supporting a role of age-related proteostasis dysfunction in this process [149]. Remarkably, HD human neurons do not accumulate detectable mutant HTT inclusions at 12 weeks after transplantation into HD rat models whereas these inclusions could be observed after 33 weeks of transplantation [150]. These findings also suggest a rejuvenation process during the reprogramming process that prevents polyQ aggregation in differentiated neurons until they undergo a demise of proteostasis with age. Indeed, iPSCs exhibit an increased proteostasis network linked with their immortality and ability to generate differentiated cells with an intact proteome [151,152,153]. For instance, iPSCs have increased assembly of the TRiC/CCT complex, a process regulated by intrinsic high levels of the CCT8 subunit [80]. In addition, iPSCs exhibit enhanced expression of PSMD11/RPN6, resulting in up-regulation of proteasome assembly and activity [154]. In somatic tissues, overexpression of CCT8 and PSMD11/RPN-6 induces TRiC/CCT assembly and 26S/30S proteasome assembly, respectively [80,154]. Moreover, overexpression of CCT8 and PSMD11/RPN6 in neuronal cells of HD C. elegans models mimics the proteostasis network of immortal iPSCs and reduces polyQ-expanded aggregation [80,154]. Besides intrinsic TRiC/CCT and proteasome assembly, pluripotent stem cells also exhibit autophagy induction during their neural differentiation, supporting the hypothesis of a rejuvenation step to generate “healthy neurons” [155,156].

6. Concluding Remarks

In the last two decades, numerous studies have demonstrated the positive impact on HD-related changes induced by mechanisms that can enhance proteostasis or preserve this network during the aging process. Modulation of distinct nodes of the proteostasis network can have distinct effects on mutant HTT to control its toxicity: it can reduce the aggregation or formation of mutant HTT oligomers and also stimulate the degradation of these toxic factors. Moreover, manipulation of proteostasis either genetically or pharmacologically can also compensate the proteostasis collapse induced by mutant HTT expression. Thus, it will be of central importance to define novel regulatory proteostasis pathways. In this paradigm, it will be important to define regulatory pathways that can simultaneously enhance multiple proteostasis nodes or delay the global proteostasis decline characteristic of the aging process. In these lines, iPSCs from HD patients represent an important source of human striatal neurons for discovery of proteostasis regulators in the relevant cells. A potential step towards personalized cell therapy will be genome editing of HD-iPSCs to compensate proteostasis defects in their derived neurons.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2015_A118).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CMAChaperon-Mediated Autophagy
HDHuntington’s disease
HTTHuntingtin
HSRHeat-shock response
EREndoplasmic reticulum
ERADEndoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation
iPSCsInduced pluripotent stem cells
TRiC/CCTT-complex protein-1 ring complex/Chaperonin containing TCP1 complex
UPSUbiquitin-proteasome system

References

  1. Finkbeiner, S. Huntington’s disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a007476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pringsheim, T.; Wiltshire, K.; Day, L.; Dykeman, J.; Steeves, T.; Jette, N. The incidence and prevalence of Huntington’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov. Disord. 2012, 27, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mendez, M.F. Huntington’s disease: Update and review of neuropsychiatric aspects. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 1994, 24, 189–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ross, C.A.; Tabrizi, S.J. Huntington’s disease: From molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Graveland, G.A.; Williams, R.S.; DiFiglia, M. Evidence for degenerative and regenerative changes in neostriatal spiny neurons in Huntington’s disease. Science 1985, 227, 770–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Vonsattel, J.P.; DiFiglia, M. Huntington disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1998, 57, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davies, S.W.; Turmaine, M.; Cozens, B.A.; DiFiglia, M.; Sharp, A.H.; Ross, C.A.; Scherzinger, E.; Wanker, E.E.; Mangiarini, L.; Bates, G.P. Formation of neuronal intranuclear inclusions underlies the neurological dysfunction in mice transgenic for the HD mutation. Cell 1997, 90, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Scherzinger, E.; Lurz, R.; Turmaine, M.; Mangiarini, L.; Hollenbach, B.; Hasenbank, R.; Bates, G.P.; Davies, S.W.; Lehrach, H.; Wanker, E.E. Huntingtin-encoded polyglutamine expansions form amyloid-like protein aggregates in vitro and in vivo. Cell 1997, 90, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saudou, F.; Humbert, S. The biology of huntingtin. Neuron 2016, 89, 910–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cattaneo, E.; Zuccato, C.; Tartari, M. Normal huntingtin function: An alternative approach to Huntington’s disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 919–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bates, G. Huntingtin aggregation and toxicity in Huntington’s disease. Lancet 2003, 361, 1642–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, C.E.; Tydlacka, S.; Orr, A.L.; Yang, S.H.; Graham, R.K.; Hayden, M.R.; Li, S.; Chan, A.W.; Li, X.J. Accumulation of N-terminal mutant huntingtin in mouse and monkey models implicated as a pathogenic mechanism in Huntington’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008, 17, 2738–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zuccato, C.; Valenza, M.; Cattaneo, E. Molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutical targets in Huntington’s disease. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 905–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, X.; Wang, C.E.; Huang, S.; Xu, X.; Li, X.J.; Li, H.; Li, S. Inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome system leads to preferential accumulation of toxic N-terminal mutant huntingtin fragments. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 2445–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rubinsztein, D.C. The roles of intracellular protein-degradation pathways in neurodegeneration. Nature 2006, 443, 780–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Thompson, L.M.; Aiken, C.T.; Kaltenbach, L.S.; Agrawal, N.; Illes, K.; Khoshnan, A.; Martinez-Vincente, M.; Arrasate, M.; O’Rourke, J.G.; Khashwji, H.; et al. IKK phosphorylates huntingtin and targets it for degradation by the proteasome and lysosome. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187, 1083–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vilchez, D.; Saez, I.; Dillin, A. The role of protein clearance mechanisms in organismal ageing and age-related diseases. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wyttenbach, A.; Carmichael, J.; Swartz, J.; Furlong, R.A.; Narain, Y.; Rankin, J.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Effects of heat shock, heat shock protein 40 (hdj-2), and proteasome inhibition on protein aggregation in cellular models of Huntington’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 2898–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tipping, K.W.; van Oosten-Hawle, P.; Hewitt, E.W.; Radford, S.E. Amyloid fibres: Inert end-stage aggregates or key players in disease? Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015, 40, 719–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ardley, H.C.; Hung, C.C.; Robinson, P.A. The aggravating role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in neurodegeneration. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Diaz-Hernandez, M.; Valera, A.G.; Moran, M.A.; Gomez-Ramos, P.; Alvarez-Castelao, B.; Castano, J.G.; Hernandez, F.; Lucas, J.J. Inhibition of 26S proteasome activity by huntingtin filaments but not inclusion bodies isolated from mouse and human brain. J. Neurochem. 2006, 98, 1585–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Holmberg, C.I.; Staniszewski, K.E.; Mensah, K.N.; Matouschek, A.; Morimoto, R.I. Inefficient degradation of truncated polyglutamine proteins by the proteasome. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 4307–4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Park, S.H.; Kukushkin, Y.; Gupta, R.; Chen, T.; Konagai, A.; Hipp, M.S.; Hayer-Hartl, M.; Hartl, F.U. PolyQ proteins interfere with nuclear degradation of cytosolic proteins by sequestering the Sis1p chaperone. Cell 2013, 154, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Suhr, S.T.; Senut, M.C.; Whitelegge, J.P.; Faull, K.F.; Cuizon, D.B.; Gage, F.H. Identities of sequestered proteins in aggregates from cells with induced polyglutamine expression. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gunawardena, S.; Her, L.S.; Brusch, R.G.; Laymon, R.A.; Niesman, I.R.; Gordesky-Gold, B.; Sintasath, L.; Bonini, N.M.; Goldstein, L.S. Disruption of axonal transport by loss of huntingtin or expression of pathogenic polyQ proteins in Drosophila. Neuron 2003, 40, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lajoie, P.; Snapp, E.L. Formation and toxicity of soluble polyglutamine oligomers in living cells. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e15245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Leitman, J.; Ulrich Hartl, F.; Lederkremer, G.Z. Soluble forms of polyQ-expanded huntingtin rather than large aggregates cause endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schaffar, G.; Breuer, P.; Boteva, R.; Behrends, C.; Tzvetkov, N.; Strippel, N.; Sakahira, H.; Siegers, K.; Hayer-Hartl, M.; Hartl, F.U. Cellular toxicity of polyglutamine expansion proteins: Mechanism of transcription factor deactivation. Mol. Cell 2004, 15, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Takahashi, T.; Kikuchi, S.; Katada, S.; Nagai, Y.; Nishizawa, M.; Onodera, O. Soluble polyglutamine oligomers formed prior to inclusion body formation are cytotoxic. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008, 17, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sanchez, I.; Mahlke, C.; Yuan, J. Pivotal role of oligomerization in expanded polyglutamine neurodegenerative disorders. Nature 2003, 421, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Snell, R.G.; MacMillan, J.C.; Cheadle, J.P.; Fenton, I.; Lazarou, L.P.; Davies, P.; MacDonald, M.E.; Gusella, J.F.; Harper, P.S.; Shaw, D.J. Relationship between trinucleotide repeat expansion and phenotypic variation in Huntington’s disease. Nat. Genet. 1993, 4, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brignull, H.R.; Moore, F.E.; Tang, S.J.; Morimoto, R.I. Polyglutamine proteins at the pathogenic threshold display neuron-specific aggregation in a pan-neuronal Caenorhabditis elegans model. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 7597–7606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hartl, F.U. Cellular homeostasis and aging. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2016, 85, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Balchin, D.; Hayer-Hartl, M.; Hartl, F.U. In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control. Science 2016, 353, aac4354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hartl, F.U.; Bracher, A.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 2011, 475, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Quinlan, R.A.; Ellis, R.J. Chaperones: Needed for both the good times and the bad times. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20130091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Labbadia, J.; Morimoto, R.I. The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 435–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Morimoto, R.I. Proteotoxic stress and inducible chaperone networks in neurodegenerative disease and aging. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 1427–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gidalevitz, T.; Prahlad, V.; Morimoto, R.I. The stress of protein misfolding: From single cells to multicellular organisms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a009704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tyedmers, J.; Mogk, A.; Bukau, B. Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rudiger, S.; Buchberger, A.; Bukau, B. Interaction of Hsp70 chaperones with substrates. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997, 4, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Brehme, M.; Voisine, C.; Rolland, T.; Wachi, S.; Soper, J.H.; Zhu, Y.; Orton, K.; Villella, A.; Garza, D.; Vidal, M.; et al. A chaperome subnetwork safeguards proteostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Cell Rep. 2014, 9, 1135–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002, 295, 1852–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Haslbeck, M.; Vierling, E. A first line of stress defense: Small heat shock proteins and their function in protein homeostasis. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 1537–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Saibil, H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Albanese, V.; Yam, A.Y.; Baughman, J.; Parnot, C.; Frydman, J. Systems analyses reveal two chaperone networks with distinct functions in eukaryotic cells. Cell 2006, 124, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kakkar, V.; Meister-Broekema, M.; Minoia, M.; Carra, S.; Kampinga, H.H. Barcoding heat shock proteins to human diseases: Looking beyond the heat shock response. Dis. Model. Mech. 2014, 7, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Taylor, R.C.; Dillin, A. Aging as an event of proteostasis collapse. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chan, H.Y.; Warrick, J.M.; Gray-Board, G.L.; Paulson, H.L.; Bonini, N.M. Mechanisms of chaperone suppression of polyglutamine disease: Selectivity, synergy and modulation of protein solubility in Drosophila. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 2811–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kitamura, A.; Kubota, H.; Pack, C.G.; Matsumoto, G.; Hirayama, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Kimura, H.; Kinjo, M.; Morimoto, R.I.; Nagata, K. Cytosolic chaperonin prevents polyglutamine toxicity with altering the aggregation state. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Nollen, E.A.; Garcia, S.M.; van Haaften, G.; Kim, S.; Chavez, A.; Morimoto, R.I.; Plasterk, R.H. Genome-wide RNA interference screen identifies previously undescribed regulators of polyglutamine aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 6403–6408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tam, S.; Geller, R.; Spiess, C.; Frydman, J. The chaperonin TRiC controls polyglutamine aggregation and toxicity through subunit-specific interactions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 1155–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jana, N.R.; Tanaka, M.; Wang, G.; Nukina, N. Polyglutamine length-dependent interaction of Hsp40 and Hsp70 family chaperones with truncated N-terminal huntingtin: Their role in suppression of aggregation and cellular toxicity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 2009–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Muchowski, P.J.; Schaffar, G.; Sittler, A.; Wanker, E.E.; Hayer-Hartl, M.K.; Hartl, F.U. Hsp70 and Hsp40 chaperones can inhibit self-assembly of polyglutamine proteins into amyloid-like fibrils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 7841–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cummings, C.J.; Sun, Y.; Opal, P.; Antalffy, B.; Mestril, R.; Orr, H.T.; Dillmann, W.H.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Over-expression of inducible HSP70 chaperone suppresses neuropathology and improves motor function in SCA1 mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 1511–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fernandez-Funez, P.; Nino-Rosales, M.L.; de Gouyon, B.; She, W.C.; Luchak, J.M.; Martinez, P.; Turiegano, E.; Benito, J.; Capovilla, M.; Skinner, P.J.; et al. Identification of genes that modify ataxin-1-induced neurodegeneration. Nature 2000, 408, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Kazemi-Esfarjani, P.; Benzer, S. Genetic suppression of polyglutamine toxicity in Drosophila. Science 2000, 287, 1837–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lin, X.; Cummings, C.J.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Expanding our understanding of polyglutamine diseases through mouse models. Neuron 1999, 24, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Warrick, J.M.; Chan, H.Y.; Gray-Board, G.L.; Chai, Y.; Paulson, H.L.; Bonini, N.M. Suppression of polyglutamine-mediated neurodegeneration in Drosophila by the molecular chaperone HSP70. Nat. Genet. 1999, 23, 425–428. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Krobitsch, S.; Lindquist, S. Aggregation of huntingtin in yeast varies with the length of the polyglutamine expansion and the expression of chaperone proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1589–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Willingham, S.; Outeiro, T.F.; DeVit, M.J.; Lindquist, S.L.; Muchowski, P.J. Yeast genes that enhance the toxicity of a mutant huntingtin fragment or α-synuclein. Science 2003, 302, 1769–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jana, N.R.; Dikshit, P.; Goswami, A.; Kotliarova, S.; Murata, S.; Tanaka, K.; Nukina, N. Co-chaperone CHIP associates with expanded polyglutamine protein and promotes their degradation by proteasomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 11635–11640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jana, N.R.; Nukina, N. BAG-1 associates with the polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin aggregates. Neurosci. Lett. 2005, 378, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Katsuno, M.; Sang, C.; Adachi, H.; Minamiyama, M.; Waza, M.; Tanaka, F.; Doyu, M.; Sobue, G. Pharmacological induction of heat-shock proteins alleviates polyglutamine-mediated motor neuron disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16801–16806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Tagawa, K.; Marubuchi, S.; Qi, M.L.; Enokido, Y.; Tamura, T.; Inagaki, R.; Murata, M.; Kanazawa, I.; Wanker, E.E.; Okazawa, H. The induction levels of heat shock protein 70 differentiate the vulnerabilities to mutant huntingtin among neuronal subtypes. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Herbst, M.; Wanker, E.E. Small molecule inducers of heat-shock response reduce polyQ-mediated huntingtin aggregation. A possible therapeutic strategy. Neurodegener. Dis. 2007, 4, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Morimoto, R.I. The heat shock response: Systems biology of proteotoxic stress in aging and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2011, 76, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fujikake, N.; Nagai, Y.; Popiel, H.A.; Okamoto, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Toda, T. Heat shock transcription factor 1-activating compounds suppress polyglutamine-induced neurodegeneration through induction of multiple molecular chaperones. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 26188–26197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Neef, D.W.; Turski, M.L.; Thiele, D.J. Modulation of heat shock transcription factor 1 as a therapeutic target for small molecule intervention in neurodegenerative disease. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Labbadia, J.; Cunliffe, H.; Weiss, A.; Katsyuba, E.; Sathasivam, K.; Seredenina, T.; Woodman, B.; Moussaoui, S.; Frentzel, S.; Luthi-Carter, R.; et al. Altered chromatin architecture underlies progressive impairment of the heat shock response in mouse models of Huntington disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3306–3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Hansson, O.; Nylandsted, J.; Castilho, R.F.; Leist, M.; Jaattela, M.; Brundin, P. Overexpression of heat shock protein 70 in R6/2 Huntington’s disease mice has only modest effects on disease progression. Brain Res. 2003, 970, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hay, D.G.; Sathasivam, K.; Tobaben, S.; Stahl, B.; Marber, M.; Mestril, R.; Mahal, A.; Smith, D.L.; Woodman, B.; Bates, G.P. Progressive decrease in chaperone protein levels in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease and induction of stress proteins as a therapeutic approach. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 1389–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Zourlidou, A.; Gidalevitz, T.; Kristiansen, M.; Landles, C.; Woodman, B.; Wells, D.J.; Latchman, D.S.; de Belleroche, J.; Tabrizi, S.J.; Morimoto, R.I.; et al. Hsp27 overexpression in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington’s disease: Chronic neurodegeneration does not induce Hsp27 activation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007, 16, 1078–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jimenez-Sanchez, M.; Lam, W.; Hannus, M.; Sonnichsen, B.; Imarisio, S.; Fleming, A.; Tarditi, A.; Menzies, F.; Ed Dami, T.; Xu, C.; et al. siRNA screen identifies QPCT as a druggable target for Huntington’s disease. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Seidel, K.; Meister, M.; Dugbartey, G.J.; Zijlstra, M.P.; Vinet, J.; Brunt, E.R.; van Leeuwen, F.W.; Rub, U.; Kampinga, H.H.; den Dunnen, W.F. Cellular protein quality control and the evolution of aggregates in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3). Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2012, 38, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hageman, J.; Rujano, M.A.; van Waarde, M.A.; Kakkar, V.; Dirks, R.P.; Govorukhina, N.; Oosterveld-Hut, H.M.; Lubsen, N.H.; Kampinga, H.H. A DNAJB chaperone subfamily with HDAC-dependent activities suppresses toxic protein aggregation. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 355–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kakkar, V.; Mansson, C.; de Mattos, E.P.; Bergink, S.; van der Zwaag, M.; van Waarde, M.A.; Kloosterhuis, N.J.; Melki, R.; van Cruchten, R.T.; Al-Karadaghi, S.; et al. The S/T-rich motif in the DNAJB6 chaperone delays polyglutamine aggregation and the onset of disease in a mouse model. Mol. Cell 2016, S1097–S2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Leitner, A.; Joachimiak, L.A.; Bracher, A.; Monkemeyer, L.; Walzthoeni, T.; Chen, B.; Pechmann, S.; Holmes, S.; Cong, Y.; Ma, B.; et al. The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Structure 2012, 20, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Spiess, C.; Meyer, A.S.; Reissmann, S.; Frydman, J. Mechanism of the eukaryotic chaperonin: Protein folding in the chamber of secrets. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Noormohammadi, A.; Khodakarami, A.; Gutierrez-Garcia, R.; Lee, H.J.; Koyuncu, S.; Konig, T.; Schindler, C.; Saez, I.; Fatima, A.; Dieterich, C.; et al. Somatic increase of CCT8 mimics proteostasis of human pluripotent stem cells and extends C. elegans lifespan. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Cummings, C.J.; Mancini, M.A.; Antalffy, B.; DeFranco, D.B.; Orr, H.T.; Zoghbi, H.Y. Chaperone suppression of aggregation and altered subcellular proteasome localization imply protein misfolding in SCA1. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kazantsev, A.; Preisinger, E.; Dranovsky, A.; Goldgaber, D.; Housman, D. Insoluble detergent-resistant aggregates form between pathological and nonpathological lengths of polyglutamine in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 11404–11409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Perez, M.K.; Paulson, H.L.; Pendse, S.J.; Saionz, S.J.; Bonini, N.M.; Pittman, R.N. Recruitment and the role of nuclear localization in polyglutamine-mediated aggregation. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 143, 1457–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wong, E.; Cuervo, A.M. Integration of clearance mechanisms: The proteasome and autophagy. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a006734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Nixon, R.A. The role of autophagy in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 983–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Vilchez, D.; Morantte, I.; Liu, Z.; Douglas, P.M.; Merkwirth, C.; Rodrigues, A.P.; Manning, G.; Dillin, A. RPN-6 determines C. elegans longevity under proteotoxic stress conditions. Nature 2012, 489, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zabel, C.; Nguyen, H.P.; Hin, S.C.; Hartl, D.; Mao, L.; Klose, J. Proteasome and oxidative phoshorylation changes may explain why aging is a risk factor for neurodegenerative disorders. J. Proteom. 2010, 73, 2230–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ravikumar, B.; Vacher, C.; Berger, Z.; Davies, J.E.; Luo, S.; Oroz, L.G.; Scaravilli, F.; Easton, D.F.; Duden, R.; O’Kane, C.J.; et al. Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Yamamoto, A.; Lucas, J.J.; Hen, R. Reversal of neuropathology and motor dysfunction in a conditional model of Huntington’s disease. Cell 2000, 101, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Glickman, M.H.; Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: Destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 373–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Pickart, C.M.; Eddins, M.J. Ubiquitin: Structures, functions, mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Pickart, C.M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70, 503–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Finley, D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 477–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kish-Trier, E.; Hill, C.P. Structural biology of the proteasome. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 2013, 42, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kisselev, A.F.; Goldberg, A.L. Monitoring activity and inhibition of 26S proteasomes with fluorogenic peptide substrates. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 398, 364–378. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Fabre, B.; Lambour, T.; Garrigues, L.; Ducoux-Petit, M.; Amalric, F.; Monsarrat, B.; Burlet-Schiltz, O.; Bousquet-Dubouch, M.P. Label-free quantitative proteomics reveals the dynamics of proteasome complexes composition and stoichiometry in a wide range of human cell lines. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 3027–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Schmidt, M.; Finley, D. Regulation of proteasome activity in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Tanaka, K. The proteasome: From basic mechanisms to emerging roles. Keio J. Med. 2013, 62, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Stadtmueller, B.M.; Hill, C.P. Proteasome activators. Mol. Cell 2011, 41, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. DiFiglia, M.; Sapp, E.; Chase, K.O.; Davies, S.W.; Bates, G.P.; Vonsattel, J.P.; Aronin, N. Aggregation of huntingtin in neuronal intranuclear inclusions and dystrophic neurites in brain. Science 1997, 277, 1990–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Finkbeiner, S.; Mitra, S. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in Huntington’s disease. ScientificWorldJournal 2008, 8, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Jana, N.R.; Zemskov, E.A.; Wang, G.; Nukina, N. Altered proteasomal function due to the expression of polyglutamine-expanded truncated N-terminal huntingtin induces apoptosis by caspase activation through mitochondrial cytochrome c release. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sieradzan, K.A.; Mechan, A.O.; Jones, L.; Wanker, E.E.; Nukina, N.; Mann, D.M. Huntington’s disease intranuclear inclusions contain truncated, ubiquitinated huntingtin protein. Exp. Neurol. 1999, 156, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Stenoien, D.L.; Cummings, C.J.; Adams, H.P.; Mancini, M.G.; Patel, K.; DeMartino, G.N.; Marcelli, M.; Weigel, N.L.; Mancini, M.A. Polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptors form aggregates that sequester heat shock proteins, proteasome components and SRC-1, and are suppressed by the hdj-2 chaperone. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999, 8, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Waelter, S.; Boeddrich, A.; Lurz, R.; Scherzinger, E.; Lueder, G.; Lehrach, H.; Wanker, E.E. Accumulation of mutant huntingtin fragments in aggresome-like inclusion bodies as a result of insufficient protein degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell 2001, 12, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. McNaught, K.S.; Perl, D.P.; Brownell, A.L.; Olanow, C.W. Systemic exposure to proteasome inhibitors causes a progressive model of Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 2004, 56, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Liu, Y.; Hettinger, C.L.; Zhang, D.; Rezvani, K.; Wang, X.; Wang, H. Sulforaphane enhances proteasomal and autophagic activities in mice and is a potential therapeutic reagent for Huntington’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2014, 129, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Tonoki, A.; Kuranaga, E.; Tomioka, T.; Hamazaki, J.; Murata, S.; Tanaka, K.; Miura, M. Genetic evidence linking age-dependent attenuation of the 26S proteasome with the aging process. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Seo, H.; Sonntag, K.C.; Kim, W.; Cattaneo, E.; Isacson, O. Proteasome activator enhances survival of Huntington’s disease neuronal model cells. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Safren, N.; El Ayadi, A.; Chang, L.; Terrillion, C.E.; Gould, T.D.; Boehning, D.F.; Monteiro, M.J. Ubiquilin-1 overexpression increases the lifespan and delays accumulation of huntingtin aggregates in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington’s disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Tsai, Y.C.; Fishman, P.S.; Thakor, N.V.; Oyler, G.A. Parkin facilitates the elimination of expanded polyglutamine proteins and leads to preservation of proteasome function. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 22044–22055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Yang, H.; Zhong, X.; Ballar, P.; Luo, S.; Shen, Y.; Rubinsztein, D.C.; Monteiro, M.J.; Fang, S. Ubiquitin ligase Hrd1 enhances the degradation and suppresses the toxicity of polyglutamine-expanded huntingtin. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313, 538–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ciechanover, A.; Brundin, P. The ubiquitin proteasome system in neurodegenerative diseases: Sometimes the chicken, sometimes the egg. Neuron 2003, 40, 427–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Venkatraman, P.; Wetzel, R.; Tanaka, M.; Nukina, N.; Goldberg, A.L. Eukaryotic proteasomes cannot digest polyglutamine sequences and release them during degradation of polyglutamine-containing proteins. Mol. Cell 2004, 14, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bence, N.F.; Sampat, R.M.; Kopito, R.R. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science 2001, 292, 1552–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bennett, E.J.; Bence, N.F.; Jayakumar, R.; Kopito, R.R. Global impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by nuclear or cytoplasmic protein aggregates precedes inclusion body formation. Mol. Cell 2005, 17, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hipp, M.S.; Patel, C.N.; Bersuker, K.; Riley, B.E.; Kaiser, S.E.; Shaler, T.A.; Brandeis, M.; Kopito, R.R. Indirect inhibition of 26S proteasome activity in a cellular model of Huntington’s disease. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196, 573–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. He, C.; Klionsky, D.J. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Ann. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 67–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Sarkar, S.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Huntington’s disease: Degradation of mutant huntingtin by autophagy. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 4263–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yang, Z.; Klionsky, D.J. Eaten alive: A history of macroautophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Sahu, R.; Kaushik, S.; Clement, C.C.; Cannizzo, E.S.; Scharf, B.; Follenzi, A.; Potolicchio, I.; Nieves, E.; Cuervo, A.M.; Santambrogio, L. Microautophagy of cytosolic proteins by late endosomes. Dev. Cell 2011, 20, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Dice, J.F. Chaperone-mediated autophagy. Autophagy 2007, 3, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Cuervo, A.M. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: Selectivity pays off. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 21, 142–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Kirkin, V.; Lamark, T.; Johansen, T.; Dikic, I. NBR1 cooperates with p62 in selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets. Autophagy 2009, 5, 732–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lamark, T.; Kirkin, V.; Dikic, I.; Johansen, T. NBR1 and p62 as cargo receptors for selective autophagy of ubiquitinated targets. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 1986–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Martinez-Vicente, M.; Cuervo, A.M. Autophagy and neurodegeneration: When the cleaning crew goes on strike. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Qin, Z.H.; Wang, Y.; Kegel, K.B.; Kazantsev, A.; Apostol, B.L.; Thompson, L.M.; Yoder, J.; Aronin, N.; DiFiglia, M. Autophagy regulates the processing of amino terminal huntingtin fragments. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003, 12, 3231–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Bjorkoy, G.; Lamark, T.; Brech, A.; Outzen, H.; Perander, M.; Overvatn, A.; Stenmark, H.; Johansen, T. P62/SQSTM1 forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtin-induced cell death. J. Cell Biol. 2005, 171, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Ravikumar, B.; Duden, R.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Aggregate-prone proteins with polyglutamine and polyalanine expansions are degraded by autophagy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Sarkar, S.; Perlstein, E.O.; Imarisio, S.; Pineau, S.; Cordenier, A.; Maglathlin, R.L.; Webster, J.A.; Lewis, T.A.; O’Kane, C.J.; Schreiber, S.L.; et al. Small molecules enhance autophagy and reduce toxicity in Huntington’s disease models. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Cortes, C.J.; La Spada, A.R. The many faces of autophagy dysfunction in Huntington’s disease: From mechanism to therapy. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Martinez-Vicente, M.; Talloczy, Z.; Wong, E.; Tang, G.; Koga, H.; Kaushik, S.; de Vries, R.; Arias, E.; Harris, S.; Sulzer, D.; et al. Cargo recognition failure is responsible for inefficient autophagy in Huntington’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Rui, Y.N.; Xu, Z.; Patel, B.; Chen, Z.; Chen, D.; Tito, A.; David, G.; Sun, Y.; Stimming, E.F.; Bellen, H.J.; et al. Huntingtin functions as a scaffold for selective macroautophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Guo, X.; Sun, X.; Hu, D.; Wang, Y.J.; Fujioka, H.; Vyas, R.; Chakrapani, S.; Joshi, A.U.; Luo, Y.; Mochly-Rosen, D.; et al. VCP recruitment to mitochondria causes mitophagy impairment and neurodegeneration in models of Huntington’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Wellington, C.L.; Ellerby, L.M.; Gutekunst, C.A.; Rogers, D.; Warby, S.; Graham, R.K.; Loubser, O.; van Raamsdonk, J.; Singaraja, R.; Yang, Y.Z.; et al. Caspase cleavage of mutant huntingtin precedes neurodegeneration in Huntington’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 7862–7872. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  136. Martin, D.D.; Heit, R.J.; Yap, M.C.; Davidson, M.W.; Hayden, M.R.; Berthiaume, L.G. Identification of a post-translationally myristoylated autophagy-inducing domain released by caspase cleavage of huntingtin. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 3166–3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Martin, D.D.; Ladha, S.; Ehrnhoefer, D.E.; Hayden, M.R. Autophagy in Huntington disease and huntingtin in autophagy. Trends Neurosci. 2015, 38, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ashkenazi, A.; Bento, C.F.; Ricketts, T.; Vicinanza, M.; Siddiqi, F.; Pavel, M.; Squitieri, F.; Hardenberg, M.C.; Imarisio, S.; Menzies, F.M.; et al. Polyglutamine tracts regulate beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Nature 2017, 545, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Lopez-Otin, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Jackson, G.R.; Salecker, I.; Dong, X.; Yao, X.; Arnheim, N.; Faber, P.W.; MacDonald, M.E.; Zipursky, S.L. Polyglutamine-expanded human huntingtin transgenes induce degeneration of Drosophila photoreceptor neurons. Neuron 1998, 21, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kikis, E.A.; Gidalevitz, T.; Morimoto, R.I. Protein homeostasis in models of aging and age-related conformational disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 694, 138–159. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  142. Gidalevitz, T.; Ben-Zvi, A.; Ho, K.H.; Brignull, H.R.; Morimoto, R.I. Progressive disruption of cellular protein folding in models of polyglutamine diseases. Science 2006, 311, 1471–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Alavez, S.; Lithgow, G.J. Pharmacological maintenance of protein homeostasis could postpone age-related disease. Aging Cell 2012, 11, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Alavez, S.; Vantipalli, M.C.; Zucker, D.J.; Klang, I.M.; Lithgow, G.J. Amyloid-binding compounds maintain protein homeostasis during ageing and extend lifespan. Nature 2011, 472, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Lee, C.K.; Klopp, R.G.; Weindruch, R.; Prolla, T.A. Gene expression profile of aging and its retardation by caloric restriction. Science 1999, 285, 1390–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Matilainen, O.; Arpalahti, L.; Rantanen, V.; Hautaniemi, S.; Holmberg, C.I. Insulin/IGF-1 signaling regulates proteasome activity through the deubiquitinating enzyme UBH-4. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 1980–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Melendez, A.; Talloczy, Z.; Seaman, M.; Eskelinen, E.L.; Hall, D.H.; Levine, B. Autophagy genes are essential for dauer development and life-span extension in C. elegans. Science 2003, 301, 1387–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Rubinsztein, D.C.; Marino, G.; Kroemer, G. Autophagy and aging. Cell 2011, 146, 682–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Consortium, H.D.I. Induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with Huntington’s disease show CAG-repeat-expansion-associated phenotypes. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11, 264–278. [Google Scholar]
  150. Jeon, I.; Lee, N.; Li, J.Y.; Park, I.H.; Park, K.S.; Moon, J.; Shim, S.H.; Choi, C.; Chang, D.J.; Kwon, J.; et al. Neuronal properties, in vivo effects, and pathology of a Huntington’s disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2012, 30, 2054–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Garcia-Prat, L.; Sousa-Victor, P.; Munoz-Canoves, P. Proteostatic and metabolic control of stemness. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 20, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Lee, H.J.; Gutierrez-Garcia, R.; Vilchez, D. Embryonic stem cells: A novel paradigm to study proteostasis? FEBS J. 2017, 284, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Vilchez, D.; Simic, M.S.; Dillin, A. Proteostasis and aging of stem cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Vilchez, D.; Boyer, L.; Morantte, I.; Lutz, M.; Merkwirth, C.; Joyce, D.; Spencer, B.; Page, L.; Masliah, E.; Berggren, T.W.; et al. Increased proteasome activity in human embryonic stem cells is regulated by PSMD11. Nature 2012, 489, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Jang, J.; Wang, Y.; Lalli, M.A.; Guzman, E.; Godshalk, S.E.; Zhou, H.; Kosik, K.S. Primary cilium-autophagy-Nrf2 (PAN) axis activation commits human embryonic stem cells to a neuroectoderm fate. Cell 2016, 165, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Sanchez-Danes, A.; Richaud-Patin, Y.; Carballo-Carbajal, I.; Jimenez-Delgado, S.; Caig, C.; Mora, S.; di Guglielmo, C.; Ezquerra, M.; Patel, B.; Giralt, A.; et al. Disease-specific phenotypes in dopamine neurons from human iPS-based models of genetic and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012, 4, 380–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Huntington’s disease (HD) is caused by mutations in the Huntingtin gene (HTT) that expand the polyQ stretch of HTT protein, resulting in its aggregation and proteotoxicity. In individuals affected by HD, HTT contains >35 polyQ repeats. The length of the polyQ stretch correlates with the accumulation of toxic polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates and oligomers. The protein homeostasis (proteostasis) network controls the folding and clearance of mutant HTT, reducing its proteotoxicity. However, the accumulation of polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates and oligomers can result in a collapse of proteostasis, a feature that contributes to the neurodegeneration phenotype. With age, organisms lose the ability to maintain the proteostasis network; a process that could explain the late onset of HD. Conversely, mechanisms that extend longevity sustain proteostasis with age, reducing the accumulation of toxic mutant HTT aggregates and oligomers.
Figure 1. Huntington’s disease (HD) is caused by mutations in the Huntingtin gene (HTT) that expand the polyQ stretch of HTT protein, resulting in its aggregation and proteotoxicity. In individuals affected by HD, HTT contains >35 polyQ repeats. The length of the polyQ stretch correlates with the accumulation of toxic polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates and oligomers. The protein homeostasis (proteostasis) network controls the folding and clearance of mutant HTT, reducing its proteotoxicity. However, the accumulation of polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates and oligomers can result in a collapse of proteostasis, a feature that contributes to the neurodegeneration phenotype. With age, organisms lose the ability to maintain the proteostasis network; a process that could explain the late onset of HD. Conversely, mechanisms that extend longevity sustain proteostasis with age, reducing the accumulation of toxic mutant HTT aggregates and oligomers.
Ijms 18 01568 g001
Figure 2. Proteostasis collapse induced by mutant HTT. When HTT contains more than 35 polyQ repeats, it aggregates and also forms toxic oligomers. The accumulation of polyQ-expanded aggregates and oligomers collapses distinct proteostasis nodes such as the chaperone network, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) and autophagy. Moreover, wild-type HTT act as a scaffolding protein directly involved in autophagy regulation whereas mutations in HTT can disrupt its normal function.
Figure 2. Proteostasis collapse induced by mutant HTT. When HTT contains more than 35 polyQ repeats, it aggregates and also forms toxic oligomers. The accumulation of polyQ-expanded aggregates and oligomers collapses distinct proteostasis nodes such as the chaperone network, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) and autophagy. Moreover, wild-type HTT act as a scaffolding protein directly involved in autophagy regulation whereas mutations in HTT can disrupt its normal function.
Ijms 18 01568 g002
Figure 3. The proteostasis network reduces aggregation and proteotoxicity of mutant HTT. Different proteostasis nodes such as the chaperome network, the UPS and autophagy-lysosome pathways, control the folding, aggregation and clearance of HTT. Chaperones participate at distinct levels of HTT proteostasis, including the regulation of aggregation and disaggregation processes to reduce the accumulation of aberrant inclusions and/or intermediates. If refolding activities are not sufficient to assure the proper function of HTT, chaperones may also promote its degradation through protein clearance mechanisms. The UPS is mostly involved in the degradation of HTT monomers whereas autophagy can degrade large polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates.
Figure 3. The proteostasis network reduces aggregation and proteotoxicity of mutant HTT. Different proteostasis nodes such as the chaperome network, the UPS and autophagy-lysosome pathways, control the folding, aggregation and clearance of HTT. Chaperones participate at distinct levels of HTT proteostasis, including the regulation of aggregation and disaggregation processes to reduce the accumulation of aberrant inclusions and/or intermediates. If refolding activities are not sufficient to assure the proper function of HTT, chaperones may also promote its degradation through protein clearance mechanisms. The UPS is mostly involved in the degradation of HTT monomers whereas autophagy can degrade large polyQ-expanded HTT aggregates.
Ijms 18 01568 g003
Figure 4. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Unnecessary, damaged and misfolded proteins are marked for proteasomal degradation by the attachment of ubiquitin molecules via a three-step sequential mechanism. In the first step, ubiquitin is activated in an ATP-dependent manner by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). Then, activated ubiquitin is transferred to ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s) forming E2-ubiquitin thioester structures. Finally, E3 ligases catalyze the attachment of ubiquitin to their specific substrate by binding both the E2-ubiquitin thioester structure and the target protein. The same cascade ubiquitination mechanism links additional molecules to the primary ubiquitin through internal ubiquitin lysines, forming a polyubiquitin chain. A chain of at least four lysine 48-linked ubiquitins is considered the primary signal for proteasomal degradation. E3 enzymes confer specificity to the UPS. Accordingly, more than 600 E3 ligases have been identified in humans so far. After the polyubiquitination cascade process, target substrates are recognized and degraded by the 26S/30S proteasome.
Figure 4. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Unnecessary, damaged and misfolded proteins are marked for proteasomal degradation by the attachment of ubiquitin molecules via a three-step sequential mechanism. In the first step, ubiquitin is activated in an ATP-dependent manner by the ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). Then, activated ubiquitin is transferred to ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s) forming E2-ubiquitin thioester structures. Finally, E3 ligases catalyze the attachment of ubiquitin to their specific substrate by binding both the E2-ubiquitin thioester structure and the target protein. The same cascade ubiquitination mechanism links additional molecules to the primary ubiquitin through internal ubiquitin lysines, forming a polyubiquitin chain. A chain of at least four lysine 48-linked ubiquitins is considered the primary signal for proteasomal degradation. E3 enzymes confer specificity to the UPS. Accordingly, more than 600 E3 ligases have been identified in humans so far. After the polyubiquitination cascade process, target substrates are recognized and degraded by the 26S/30S proteasome.
Ijms 18 01568 g004
Figure 5. The autophagy-lysosome system. Autophagy, or macroautophagy, starts with the formation of a double membrane structure known as the phagophore, which can be either newly synthesized or originated from the plasma membrane, ER or mitochondria. The ULK complex (formed by, among others, ULK1/2, ATG13, FIP200 and ATG101) regulates this first step of autophagy. Then, the VPS34-BECN1 complex (formed by VPS34, BECN1, AMBRA1, ATG14L and other proteins) promotes the expansion of the phagophore. Once the cytoplasmic fraction is engulfed into the phagophore, the membrane elongates until it closes forming the autophagosome, a process regulated by the ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 complex. Conjugation of cytosolic LC3 (LC3I) to phosphatidylethanolamine generates LC3II, which is recruited to the membrane of the autophagosome. Finally, LC3II-containing autophagosomes are trafficked to the lysosome for degradation of their content including polyQ-expanded aggregates.
Figure 5. The autophagy-lysosome system. Autophagy, or macroautophagy, starts with the formation of a double membrane structure known as the phagophore, which can be either newly synthesized or originated from the plasma membrane, ER or mitochondria. The ULK complex (formed by, among others, ULK1/2, ATG13, FIP200 and ATG101) regulates this first step of autophagy. Then, the VPS34-BECN1 complex (formed by VPS34, BECN1, AMBRA1, ATG14L and other proteins) promotes the expansion of the phagophore. Once the cytoplasmic fraction is engulfed into the phagophore, the membrane elongates until it closes forming the autophagosome, a process regulated by the ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 complex. Conjugation of cytosolic LC3 (LC3I) to phosphatidylethanolamine generates LC3II, which is recruited to the membrane of the autophagosome. Finally, LC3II-containing autophagosomes are trafficked to the lysosome for degradation of their content including polyQ-expanded aggregates.
Ijms 18 01568 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koyuncu, S.; Fatima, A.; Gutierrez-Garcia, R.; Vilchez, D. Proteostasis of Huntingtin in Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071568

AMA Style

Koyuncu S, Fatima A, Gutierrez-Garcia R, Vilchez D. Proteostasis of Huntingtin in Health and Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(7):1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071568

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koyuncu, Seda, Azra Fatima, Ricardo Gutierrez-Garcia, and David Vilchez. 2017. "Proteostasis of Huntingtin in Health and Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 7: 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071568

APA Style

Koyuncu, S., Fatima, A., Gutierrez-Garcia, R., & Vilchez, D. (2017). Proteostasis of Huntingtin in Health and Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(7), 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071568

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop