Next Article in Journal
Living in Promiscuity: The Multiple Partners of Alpha-Synuclein at the Synapse in Physiology and Pathology
Next Article in Special Issue
The Origin and Evolution of Release Factors: Implications for Translation Termination, Ribosome Rescue, and Quality Control Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Applications of In-Cell NMR in Structural Biology and Drug Discovery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ribosome Structure, Function, and Early Evolution
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Ribosome as a Missing Link in Prebiotic Evolution III: Over-Representation of tRNA- and rRNA-Like Sequences and Plieofunctionality of Ribosome-Related Molecules Argues for the Evolution of Primitive Genomes from Ribosomal RNA Modules

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(1), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010140
by Robert Root-Bernstein 1 and Meredith Root-Bernstein 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(1), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20010140
Submission received: 11 December 2018 / Revised: 21 December 2018 / Accepted: 23 December 2018 / Published: 2 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure, Function and Evolution of the Ribosome)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an interesting manuscript,

I would like to suggest only the following revision. Authors have to tell us in a clear way why they are sure that RNA-like sequences are very ancient traits and not acquired traits.

After this revision, the manuscript could be accepted.


Author Response

"Authors have to tell us in a clear way why they are sure that RNA-like sequences are very ancient traits and not acquired traits." There are two possible interpretations of this request. One is to address the literal one of explaining why we think that "RNA-like sequences" are ancient and not acquired, which involves citing more of the well-known literature regarding an RNA-world origin of life. The other is that the reviewer is asking us to address how we know that ribosomal RNA, more specifically, is an ancient molecule predating cells rather than a derived set of molecules that evolved with or after cellular life. We have now addressed both possibilities in our Discussion section and provided additional citations both to the key RNA-world literature and to the many taxonomic studies that demonstrate that ribosomes evolved significantly prior to the first universal ancestors of modern cellular life.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript Root-Bernstein et. al., provide evidences to support their previously claimed "Ribosome-first" theory. To substantiate their claim they provide adequate literature and new data. Using both sources they show that, evolved genomes contain rRNA like sequences at significantly higher frequencies. These genes code for both non-ribosomal proteins and ribosomal proteins with extra-ribosomal functions. 

    Overall its a well written manuscript and it provides ample information for the "Ribosome-first" theory. 

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for her or his positive comments.

Back to TopTop