Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Autoantibodies on IVF Treatment and Outcome: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Approaches towards Longevity: Reprogramming, Senolysis, and Improved Mitotic Competence as Anti-Aging Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
Strengthening the AntiTumor NK Cell Function for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms20040891
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Insights into the Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition during Aging

by
Francisco Santos
1,†,
Cristiana Moreira
1,†,
Sandrina Nóbrega-Pereira
1,2 and
Bruno Bernardes de Jesus
1,*
1
Department of Medical Sciences and Institute of Biomedicine—iBiMED, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(4), 891; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040891
Submission received: 6 January 2019 / Revised: 8 February 2019 / Accepted: 15 February 2019 / Published: 19 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanism of Longevity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a cellular process by which differentiated epithelial cells undergo a phenotypic conversion to a mesenchymal nature. The EMT has been increasingly recognized as an essential process for tissue fibrogenesis during disease and normal aging. Higher levels of EMT proteins in aged tissues support the involvement of EMT as a possible cause and/or consequence of the aging process. Here, we will highlight the existing understanding of EMT supporting the phenotypical alterations that occur during normal aging or pathogenesis, covering the impact of EMT deregulation in tissue homeostasis and stem cell function.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a biological process that allows static epithelial cells to transdifferentiate into cells with a mesenchymal phenotype [1]. Important features that characterize epithelial cells include cell–cell adhesion and an apical-basal polarity, which are established through the arrangement of tight junctions, adherens junctions, desmosomes, and gap junctions [2]. These cells are placed on a basement membrane and form one or more layers that act as a barrier that delineates tissues and organs [3,4].
Cells within certain epithelia are able to move back and forth between epithelial and mesenchymal states through EMT and its reverse, the mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) [5]. The conversion of epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells is particularly important during embryogenesis, mainly in the establishment of body plan and organogenesis. In later adult stages, the processes underlying EMT can be reactivated for wound healing and tissue regeneration [6]. Nevertheless, pathological activation of EMT can adversely cause organ fibrosis and is also implicated in cancer, contributing to tumor progression and metastasis [2,6]. Indeed, cancer and aging are two common traits of the aging process [7]. A better understanding of how aging results in tissue dysfunction and/or cancer is an important question nowadays and may result in strategies circumventing age-related pathologies [8].
During EMT, epithelial cells undergo a significant phenotypic alteration that starts with the loss of cell–cell junction proteins, such as E-cadherin, desmoplakin, occludin and connexin, which, consequently, leads to the loss of the apical-basal polarity. These alterations are accompanied by the upregulation of mesenchymal-type N-cadherin, and the accumulation of fibronectin in the extracellular matrix (ECM). Furthermore, the cytoskeleton goes through a significant rearrangement, which involves the replacement of cytokeratin by vimentin, resulting in changes in cell shape, going from a cuboidal to a spindle form [1,2,5,9,10,11]. Newly formed mesenchymal cells acquire a front-rear polarity and favor cell-ECM rather than cell–cell adhesions. These cells exhibit motility and, in some cases, gain the ability to degrade ECM proteins by matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), giving rise to an invasive behavior [2,4,6]. Recent data suggest that, because EMT is a transitional process, several intermediate states can be observed, and, in different contexts, many of these intermediate phenotypes can be considered the final states. Partial EMT states have been observed in embryonic development, cancer and fibrosis (reviewed in reference [12]).
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition is triggered by many signaling pathways and transcription factors, both in physiological and pathological settings [13]. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is considered the most potent activator of EMT, leading to the activation of signaling pathways that culminate in the expression of genes that encode EMT transcription factors (EMT-TFs). The three main families of EMT-TFs with essential roles in EMT include SNAI (Snail and Slug), TWIST (TWIST1 and TWIST2), and ZEB (ZEB1 and ZEB2) [4,14,15,16]. These transcription factors repress E-cadherin expression, therefore contributing to the disassemble of cell–cell junctions and leading to the induction of EMT [17]. Furthermore, Snail and ZEB repress the expression of certain genes that have an important role in cell polarity, namely CRB1 (which encodes the Crumbs protein), whose inactivation enhances signaling by TGF-β, strengthening the EMT process [18,19,20]. Nevertheless, other growth factors (e.g., insulin-like growth factor (IGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF)) and signaling pathways (e.g., Hedgehog and Wnt) can also trigger EMT by the expression of the aforementioned transcription factors [13,14].
Non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) [21], also play an important role in EMT by regulating the expression of EMT-TFs [14]. Several miRNAs reduce the expression of EMT-TFs; for example, members of the miR-200 family target ZEB factors, preventing the downregulation of E-cadherin and the initiation of EMT, contributing to the maintenance of the epithelial phenotype [22]. Tumor suppressor p53 also plays a role in negatively regulating EMT by inducing miRNAs that target EMT-TFs. For instance, p53 inhibits Snail and ZEB1 by inducing miR-34 and miR-200c, respectively [23,24]. Furthermore, p53 upregulates MDM2 and forms a complex of p53-MDM2-Slug to promote degradation of Slug, leading to the increased expression of E-cadherin [25]. In contrast, miR-544a and miR-21 act by targeting epithelial differentiation markers, thus promoting EMT [26,27]. Similarly, lncRNAs ZEB1 antisense 1 (ZEB1-AS1) and ZEB2 natural antisense transcript (ZEB2-NAT) promote the expression of ZEB1 and ZEB2, respectively, leading to increased metastasis and poor prognosis in numerous types of cancer [28].
Several reports have shown that sirtuins (SIRT), a family of class III histone deacetylases, may also play a role in EMT, acting as both enhancers and repressors of this process [29,30,31]. Sirtuin 1 is involved in aging [32,33,34], and in numerous types of cancer, such as prostate cancer, where ZEB1 recruits SIRT1 to the E-cadherin promoter. Sirtuin 1 deacetylates histone H3 and reduces binding of RNA polymerase II to the promoter, thus suppressing E-cadherin expression [35]. It has been suggested that SIRT1 plays a role in recruiting SIRT7 to the E-cadherin promoter, and that this interaction is responsible for inducing EMT [36]. Other SIRTs involved in EMT are SIRT2 and SIRT4. Overexpression of SIRT2 leads to an increased expression of Slug, resulting in a stronger repression of E-cadherin [37]. Sirtuin 4, on the other hand, is associated with an upregulation of E-cadherin and a reduced expression of vimentin via inhibition of glutamate dehydrogenase, thus blocking glutamine metabolism [38].
Due to the involvement of EMT in different pathways, it was proposed to classify EMT into three subtypes, based on the biological context that they occur in [6,39]. Type 1 EMT plays a role during embryogenesis and organ development and gives rise to cells with the potential to undergo the MET process, thus generating epithelial cells. Type 1 EMT neither causes fibrosis nor induces an invasive phenotype [6]. Type 2 EMT acts during organ fibrosis, wound healing, and regeneration, usually occurring after tissue injuries. Examples of organ fibrosis through type 2 EMT occur in the liver, lung, and kidney, which are explored further in this review. Several markers have been employed to distinguish epithelial cells undergoing EMT, for instance during inflammation. Amongst them are type 1 collagen, α-SMA (α-smooth muscle actin), vimentin, desmin, discoidin domain receptor 2 or FSP1 (fibroblast-specfic protein 1) [40,41,42,43,44,45]. Type 2 EMT can sustain tissue fibrosis until ongoing inflammation. Lastly, type 3 EMT occurs during cancer progression and this transition is involved in the acquisition of the potential to migrate and colonize distant organs [6,46]. During neoplastic progression, cancer cells acquire genetic and epigenetic marks affecting oncogenes and tumor suppressors, eventually resulting in the activation of type 3 EMT programs, giving them potential to invade and metastasize. Importantly, type 3 EMT is not equal for all cancer cells. Some cells may retain epithelial markers, while others may have both epithelial and mesenchymal markers or be fully mesenchymal. It is, however, unclear which signals give cancer cells through the EMT process [47]. Despite the differences between EMT subtypes, a common network may underline similarities between the processes, which could guide to mutual activators or repressors [47].
Our previous observations on the increased expression of Zeb2 during biological aging and their involvement as a barrier during cellular reprogramming of aged cells [28] motivated us to address whether EMT may be involved in the progression of age-related pathologies, and whether EMT is limiting the acquisition of stem cell properties restraining the reprogramming of aged cells.

2. EMT Balance during Biological Aging

Aging is a complex and multifactorial process characterized by the functional decline of cells, tissues, and organs, and is accompanied by an increased risk of the development of age-related diseases [7,8,48]. Amongst other characteristics, advanced age is known to contribute to pathological fibrosis and has been recognized as a risk factor for fibrotic disorders [49,50,51,52]. Tissue repair and regeneration is an essential process for maintaining the integrity and survival of organisms; however, some of the mechanisms involved become less reliable with aging, resulting in a decreased repairing capacity and progressive loss of tissue structure and function [53,54]. Fibroblasts, the major cellular mediators of fibrosis, are responsible for the deposition of ECM components (Figure 1) and, when these cells accumulate, an excess of fibrotic tissue is formed, compromising the function of vital organs [44,55,56]. Some fibroblasts have been proven to derive from epithelial cells that have undergone EMT, suggesting that this process has an important role in tissue fibrosis [45,57]. As example, EMT has been considered a key process that contributes to kidney fibrosis and the decline of renal function [58]. E-cadherin and α-SMA, which is a specific marker for mesenchymal fibroblasts, were found, respectively, in lower and higher levels in old rats, suggesting that kidney epithelial cells experience EMT to originate fibroblasts [59]. Likewise, in the heart (see Table 1), a similar EMT process, named endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT), is responsible for the emergence of fibroblasts that originate from endothelial cells. The excessive deposition of ECM leads to cardiac fibrosis, which is common in patients with advanced cardiac failure [45]. Similarly, fibrosis is characteristic of cardiovascular pathology in accelerated aging syndromes such as Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), comparable to the cardiovascular pathologies observed in geriatric patients [60]. Additionally, differential TGF-β signaling has been found to be altered in older cells, closely resembling the profiles in progeroid cells of patients with HGPS [61]. Furthermore, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), characterized by the loss of respiratory function due to the excessive deposition of ECM, exhibits an abnormal Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which can induce EMT [62]. In normal adult lungs, the expression of β-catenin is restricted to cell membranes in endothelial and epithelial cells. However, in IPF patients, β-catenin is present in the nucleus, suggesting the involvement of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in EMT [62]. Additionally, IGF-II seems to be responsible for inducing EMT and may contribute to the relocation of β-catenin to the nucleus during the process [63]. Similarly, impairment of the properties of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a key event during several diseases, including multiple sclerosis [64], or human aging [65]. Under these conditions, EndMT may have a potential role during BBB dysfunction in neurological disorders [64] and probably normal human aging. Indeed, studies in the living human brain and post-mortem tissue demonstrated the collapse of the BBB in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders [66]. Alzheimer’s disease is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by specific biomarkers, including the disease-specific transcriptional biomarker Alz, which appears later in pathogenesis and is enriched in genes associated with EMT [67].
Senescent cells may also play an important role in inducing EMT. These cells are characterized by a permanent cell cycle arrest and increase with age in mammalian tissues [69]. Furthermore, senescent cells may have harmful effects on tissue microenvironment and may contribute to age-related diseases, having been found at sites of some of these diseases, such as osteoarthritis and atherosclerosis [70,71]. Senescent cells, including senescent fibroblasts, acquire a senescent-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), which is characterized by the increased secretion of certain cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Senescent-associated secretory phenotype derived from senescent fibroblasts has the ability to induce EMT in neighboring epithelial cells and has been shown to contribute to EMT in non-aggressive human breast cancer cell lines [70,71]. These cells, treated with conditioned medium from senescent cells, showed a decreased expression of E-cadherin, cell membrane-associated β-catenin and cytokeratin, and an increased expression of vimentin, which are all hallmarks of EMT. Interestingly, blocking antibodies against interleukins IL-6 and IL-8 seems to decrease the invasion stimulated by the conditioned medium of senescent cells. Furthermore, adding IL-6 and IL-8 to the conditioned medium of pre-senescent cells seems to promote invasion [70]. In the prostate, a greater amount of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was found to be present in the conditioned medium of senescent fibroblasts in comparison to that of pre-senescent fibroblasts. Hepatocyte growth factor is associated with the disintegration of cell–cell junctions, the disruption of epithelial cell morphogenesis, and the stimulation of migration and invasion, thus promoting EMT in surrounding epithelia [72,73,74]. An age-related change in the expression levels of some growth factors, namely TGF-β, EGF, and IGFs, is likely to contribute to the increase of EMT with age and play an important role in progressive fibrosis [53]. Moreover, the expression of HGF has been found to be higher in skin fibroblasts from old individuals and in response to IGFs that increase with aging [75,76]. p53 may also play a role in targeting the SASP. Coppé and colleagues found that p53 prevents the SASP, meaning that cells that lacked p53 secreted higher levels of many of the SASP components [70], further suggesting a role of p53 in preventing EMT. However, an age-associated decline in p53 activity has been observed [77]. In this study, young and old mice were treated with ionizing radiation and the tissues were examined for the p53 protein. They found that tissues from old mice showed significantly lower levels of p53 compared to their young counterparts [77]. Furthermore, a subsequent study revealed that the deletion of p53 in mice at 12 months resulted in a significantly faster tumor incidence than mice at three months, emphasizing the fact that p53 function becomes progressively more important in preventing cancer as the organism ages [78]. Given the decline of p53 levels with aging, it is reasonable to suggest that the prevention of SASP by p53 becomes less effective as individuals get older, meaning that SASP-specific components would accumulate and contribute to the induction of EMT and, therefore, play a role in tissue fibrosis.

Is EMT Truly Involved in Liver Fibrosis?

Several studies have been trying to respond to whether EMT is behind liver fibrosis. Under experimental conditions, two major types of liver cells can undergo EMT: hepatocytes and cholangiocytes [79]. Incubation of hepatocytes with TGF-β leads to EMT, with cells losing epithelial markers and acquiring mesenchymal markers (such as type I collagen and vimentin). Studies in mice are inconclusive as to whether EMT may have a role in liver fibrosis. In mice, EMT does not contribute to liver fibrosis through the observation that epithelial cells cannot be converted into mesenchymal cells [80,81]. Similarly, EMT in cholangiocytes was recently assessed with lineage-tracing methodology [82]. Following labeling of cholangiocytes, they concluded that EMT of cholangiocytes does not participate in the biogenesis of liver fibrosis in mice.
On the other hand, evidence supporting EMT during liver fibrosis was confirmed in humans and in vitro. Expression of several mesenchymal markers has been observed in parenchymal cells of patients with liver diseases [83,84,85]. Namely, EMT markers were found in patients with several liver conditions, such as primary biliary cholangitis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [83,86], biliary atresia and primary sclerosing cholangitis [87]. These results support the involvement of EMT in chronic liver disease, particularly demonstrating the expression of mesenchymal markers in parenchymal cells. Further evidence supporting EMT during liver fibrosis comes from in vitro experiments showing that rat hepatocytes treated with TGF-β undergo EMT (assessed through the detection of high levels of vimentin, Snail and other mesenchymal markers) [88,89]. Additionally, stimulation of murine primary hepatocytes with TGF-β leads to the acquisition of mesenchymal markers and loss of epithelial characteristics [80,90,91]. TGF-β induces EMT through the regulation of transcriptional factors such as Snail, which is involved in the regulation of EMT [92]. Snail, alone, is able to induce EMT in adult hepatocytes. As with hepatocytes, rat cholangiocytes isolated after bile duct ligation show reduced expression of epithelial markers [86]. Additionally, administration of TGF-β induces mesenchymal characteristics in cultured primary human cholangiocytes [93]. TGF-β has been recognized as a critical factor leading to collagen deposition during fibrogenesis. In vitro, it was previously reported that TGF-β1 induces EMT in hepatocytes through the activation of Snail and Smad2/3 [91]. Similarly, in mature hepatocytes, claudin-1 was repressed by TGF-β, leading to EMT [92]. On the other hand, blocking TGF-β signaling by Smad7 in hepatocytes strongly impacts the fibrogenic response. Curcumin, schizandrin, and propolis were shown to inhibit EMT through interference with TGF-β signaling [94,95]. The TGF-β network is a major inducer of EMT. Despite contradictory results on their involvement on liver fibrosis [96,97], further studies are needed to elucidate whether TGF-β participates in fibrotic liver pathobiology. In addition to TGF-β, several pathways have been associated with EMT during liver fibrosis (reviewed in reference [47]). One well-documented pathway is the Hedgehog signaling (Hh) pathway, which is crucial in tissue remodeling and organogenesis [47,98]. Hh activation seems to be implicated in the formation of fibrotic tissue through EMT [84,86,99,100,101,102]. As an example, during non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), epithelial genes are suppressed by Sonic Hh, and activation of the Hh pathway in mouse models of NAFLD leads to EMT [84].
Currently, the mechanism supporting or not the involvement of EMT during liver fibrosis is not fully elucidated. A detailed comprehension of EMT and its exact role during organ fibrosis upsurges as a request for designing anti-fibrotic targeted therapeutics.

3. EMT in Acquired Stem Cell Properties during Aging

The ability of stem cells to maintain pluripotency is one of their most important characteristics. However, with aging, the regenerative potential of stem cells declines [103,104,105,106]. Aging of stem cells is the result of several intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as the accumulation of cellular damage and toxic metabolites, loss of proteostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and telomere shortening [7,107,108,109,110,111]. Together, these factors can lead to senescence, cell death, and stem cell exhaustion. Like differentiated cells, stem cells are also unprotected from stimuli that promote aging [112]. For instance, the decrease in cell cycle activity of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) was demonstrated by studies in aged mice [113,114] and there is evidence correlating the increased FGF signaling to the loss of quiescence in the aged muscle stem cell niche leading to stem cell depletion and diminished self-renewing capacity [115]. We have previously demonstrated that Zeb2 was early activated in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells in the absence of pluripotency conditions. Both EMT and MET are key processes during cellular transdifferentiation [15]. During development, EMT is responsible for the formation of the neural crest delamination, heart valve differentiation and lung organogenesis [2]. Conversely, during adulthood, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) has been shown to produce stem-like properties in cancer cells through MET, exhibiting characteristics of cancer stem cells [116]. Additionally, several EMT genes have been correlated with the presence of stem-like characteristics in cancer cells. For instance, induction of EMT in immortalized human mammary epithelial cells (HMLEs) resulted in the acquisition of mesenchymal traits and in the expression of stem cell markers. Epithelial cells that undergo EMT not only gain mesenchymal traits, but also acquire features that are characteristic of stem cells [117]. HMLEs, after being induced to go through EMT, by the expression of Snail or TWIST, developed a CD44highCD24low expression pattern, which is distinctive of stem cells, including normal mammary epithelial stem cells and human breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) [117]. This provides a link between EMT and features associated with CSCs, including self-renewal and the ability to produce differentiated non-stem cells [118]. These CD44highCD24low cells were also characterized by markers associated with EMT, namely a decreased expression of E-cadherin and an increase of the expression of fibronectin and vimentin, and exhibited increased tumorigenic properties [117]. For a concise review on the role of EMT-TFs in tumorigenesis see reference [119].

4. Role of EMT during the Reprogramming of Aged Cells

In 2006 and 2007, Yamanaka and colleagues described how the expression of four transcription factors in, respectively, mice skin and adult human fibroblasts rejuvenate their properties to a “stem-like” condition named induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [120,121]. Induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming was a major advance for the study of tissue plasticity, in vitro tissue generation, and tissue regeneration strategies. However, several age-related processes have a negative impact on the properties of different cells and tissues, turning them refractory to the reprogramming process. As previously considered, the efficiency of reprogramming of adult cells into iPSCs decreases with aging [122,123]. For instance, the increased expression of the tumor suppressors p16INK4a and p53 during aging are barriers to the reprogramming of somatic cells into iPSCs, and their absence facilitates the reprogramming of aged cells.
During the reprogramming of somatic cells, cells of mesenchymal origin, such as fibroblasts, need to undergo MET to generate intermediate cells with epithelial features (and ultimately iPSC) under the influence of the Yamanaka reprogramming factors (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4) [14,48,124]. Oct4 and Sox2 suppress EMT-inducing transcription factor Snail, c-Myc downregulates TGF-β1 and its receptors, and Klf4 induces the expression of E-cadherin. These factors, together with bone morphogenic protein 7 (BMP7), are responsible for repressing TGF-β signaling, thus preventing the EMT process and promoting an epithelial phenotype [15,125]. Cells must acquire an epithelial phenotype before they fully reprogram into iPSCs, probably due to the epithelial nature of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the inner mass of the blastocyst [73,126]. It has been previously shown that reprogramming mouse embryonic fibroblasts and human adult fibroblasts into iPSCs requires a sequential EMT–MET process, during which cells express EMT-TFs and exhibit an enhanced motility before acquiring an epithelial phenotype [125]. In line with the involvement of MET during reprogramming, blocking the action of certain growth factors (e.g., IGF-I) with chemical inhibitors has shown to enable MET and, therefore, improve cell reprogramming [127]. Also, fibroblasts from old mice have been shown to express higher levels of ZEB2 compared to fibroblasts from young mice, contributing to the inefficient reprogramming of old fibroblasts [28]. The DNA binding domains of ZEB2 (and ZEB1) are composed of two zinc finger clusters located towards the N and C-terminal ends. These zinc-finger clusters bind to a CACCTG DNA motif called E-box. In addition to being important for DNA binding, the Zn-finger domains also mediate physical interactions with other transcription factors. These domains of ZEB2 interact, for instance, with Pc2 [128,129]. ZEB2 was initially described as a transcriptional repressor [130], in particular as an EMT-inducer, by repressing E-cadherin and other epithelial genes. ZEB factors repress transcription through competing and displacing transcriptional activators from their binding sequences in the DNA [131,132]. Several reports have shown that post-translational modifications of ZEB factors also contribute to the activator or repressor switch [133,134]. In human cells, ZEB2-NAT, which is a lncRNA antisense of ZEB2, regulates the latter’s expression and increases with aging, further contributing to an inefficient reprogramming. LncRNAs were shown to play important regulatory roles in modulating transcriptionally networks and altering transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally the coding transcriptome [21,135,136]. Downregulation of ZEB2-NAT leads to a decreased expression of ZEB2, therefore improving reprogramming [28]. Similar to Zeb2/Zeb2-NAT, BMP can induce the expression of the miR-200 and miR-205 families of miRNAs, suppressing ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression [137,138]. Furthermore, miR-302 and miR-372 contribute to the downregulation of TGF-β receptor type II, increasing the efficiency of reprogramming [139].
It is worth mentioning that several lncRNAs have been shown to regulate EMT transcription factors. Examples are the lncRNA LEIGC, regulating EMT in gastric cancer, HOTAIR, or Zeb1-AS1 [124,140,141]. Several lncRNAs have been shown to target directly the EMT markers, through mechanisms not fully described. LncRNAs DREH and AOC4P, for instance, regulate vimentin expression during tumor metastasis or enhances vimentin degradation during hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively, leading to tumor suppressive effects [142,143,144]. In summary, EMT is regulated by several pathways, many of which regulated through lncRNAs. Although much of the knowledge linking EMT and lncRNAs was assessed from the biology of cancer, EMT regulation by lncRNAs may prove fundamental for other molecular processes.

5. Future Directions

Here, we discussed the possible involvement of EMT during the aging process. Whether attenuation of the EMT pathway may act positively on age-related pathologies is still unknown. Metformin, an extensively used anti-diabetic drug that has been shown to protect against several age-related pathologies [145,146,147,148], directly binds to and inhibits TGF-β1, suppressing TGF-β1 receptor dimerization and downstream signal transduction [149]. Indeed, it was previously observed that TGF-β1-deficient mice survived longer and exhibited less myocardial fibrosis compared to age-matched controls [150].
In a similar way, caloric restriction, which is characterized by a decreased food intake, avoiding malnutrition, delays the aging process in several species. Interestingly, caloric restriction in humans shows significantly lower TGF-β1 levels compared with the Western diet group (29.4 ± 6.9 ng/mL to 35.4 ± 7.1 ng/mL, respectively) [151]. These results guide to the possible targeting of EMT as an anti-aging strategy.

Funding

This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) (PTDC/BIM-MED/0032/2014). S.N.-P. has a FCT contract.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kalluri, R.; Neilson, E.G. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and its implications for fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1776–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Thiery, J.P.; Huang, R.Y.J.; Nieto, M.A. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease. Cell 2009, 139, 871–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Huang, R.Y.-J.; Guilford, P.; Thiery, J.P. Early events in cell adhesion and polarity during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 4417–4422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lamouille, S.; Xu, J.; Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 178–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, J.M.; Dedhar, S.; Kalluri, R.; Thompson, E.W. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: New insights in signaling, development, and disease. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 172, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kalluri, R.; Weinberg, R.A. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bernardes de Jesus, B.; Blasco, M.A. Telomerase at the intersection of cancer and aging. Trends Genet. 2013, 29, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bernardes de Jesus, B.; Blasco, M.A. Aging by telomere loss can be reversed. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Micalizzi, D.S.; Farabaugh, S.M.; Ford, H.L. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: Parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2010, 15, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nieto, M.A. The Ins and Outs of the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Health and Disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 27, 347–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bax, N.A.M.; Pijnappels, D.A.; van Oorschot, A.A.M.; Winter, E.M.; de Vries, A.A.F.; van Tuyn, J.; Braun, J.; Maas, S.; Schalij, M.J.; Atsma, D.E.; et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation alters electrical conductivity of human epicardial cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 2675–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Nieto, M.A.; Huang, R.Y.Y.J.; Jackson, R.A.A.; Thiery, J.P.P. EMT: 2016. Cell 2016, 166, 21–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lim, J.; Thiery, J.P. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: Insights from development. Development 2012, 138, 3471–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Skrypek, N.; Goossens, S.; De Smedt, E.; Vandamme, N.; Berx, G. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition: Epigenetic Reprogramming Driving Cellular Plasticity. Trends Genet. 2017, 33, 943–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kishi, S.; Bayliss, P.E.; Hanai, J.-I. A prospective epigenetic paradigm between cellular senescence and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in organismal development and aging. Transl. Res. 2015, 165, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Craene, B.D.; Berx, G. Regulatory networks defining EMT during cancer initiation and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peinado, H.; Olmeda, D.; Cano, A. Snail, ZEB and bHLH factors in tumour progression: An alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Spaderna, S.; Schmalhofer, O.; Wahlbuhl, M.; Dimmler, A.; Bauer, K.; Sultan, A.; Hlubek, F.; Jung, A.; Strand, D.; Eger, A.; et al. The transcriptional repressor ZEB1 promotes metastasis and loss of cell polarity in cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Whiteman, E.L.; Liu, C.J.; Fearon, E.R.; Margolis, B. The transcription factor snail represses Crumbs3 expression and disrupts apico-basal polarity complexes. Oncogene 2008, 27, 3875–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Varelas, X.; Samavarchi-Tehrani, P.; Narimatsu, M.; Weiss, A.; Cockburn, K.; Larsen, B.G.; Rossant, J.; Wrana, J.L. The Crumbs Complex Couples Cell Density Sensing to Hippo-Dependent Control of the TGF-β-SMAD Pathway. Dev. Cell 2010, 19, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sousa-Franco, A.; Rebelo, K.; da Rocha, S.T.; Bernardes de Jesus, B. LncRNAs regulating stemness in aging. Aging Cell 2018, e12870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, S.M.; Gaur, A.B.; Lengyel, E.; Peter, M.E. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 894–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, N.H.; Kim, H.S.; Li, X.Y.; Lee, I.; Choi, H.S.; Kang, S.E.; Cha, S.Y.; Ryu, J.K.; Yoon, D.; Fearon, E.R.; et al. A p53/miRNA-34 axis regulates Snail1-dependent cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, T.; Veronese, A.; Pichiorri, F.; Lee, T.J.; Jeon, Y.J.; Volinia, S.; Pineau, P.; Marchio, A.; Palatini, J.; Suh, S.S.; et al. p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition through microRNAs targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, S.P.; Wang, W.L.; Chang, Y.L.; Wu, C.T.; Chao, Y.C.; Kao, S.H.; Yuan, A.; Lin, C.W.; Yang, S.C.; Chan, W.K.; et al. p53 controls cancer cell invasion by inducing the MDM2-mediated degradation of Slug. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yanaka, Y.; Muramatsu, T.; Uetake, H.; Kozaki, K.I.; Inazawa, J. miR-544a induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the activation of WNT signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, Z.; Jin, Z.Y.; Liu, C.H.; Xie, F.; Lin, X.S.; Huang, Q. MicroRNA-21 regulates biological behavior by inducing EMT in human cholangiocarcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 4684–4694. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bernardes de Jesus, B.; Marinho, S.P.; Barros, S.; Sousa-Franco, A.; Alves-Vale, C.; Carvalho, T.; Carmo-Fonseca, M. Silencing of the lncRNA Zeb2-NAT facilitates reprogramming of aged fibroblasts and safeguards stem cell pluripotency. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Vassilopoulos, A.; Fritz, K.S.; Petersen, D.R.; Gius, D. The human sirtuin family: Evolutionary divergences and functions. Hum Genom. 2011, 5, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. O’Callaghan, C.; Vassilopoulos, A. Sirtuins at the crossroads of stemness, aging, and cancer. Aging Cell 2017, 16, 1208–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Correia, M.; Perestrelo, T.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Ribeiro, M.F.; Pereira, S.L.; Sousa, M.I.; Ramalho-Santos, J. Sirtuins in metabolism, stemness and differentiation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2017, 1861, 3444–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yuan, Y.; Cruzat, V.F.; Newsholme, P.; Cheng, J.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y. Regulation of SIRT1 in aging: Roles in mitochondrial function and biogenesis. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2016, 155, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Satoh, A.; Brace, C.S.; Rensing, N.; Cliften, P.; Wozniak, D.F.; Herzog, E.D.; Yamada, K.A.; Imai, S. Sirt1 extends life span and delays aging in mice through the regulation of Nk2 homeobox 1 in the DMH and LH. Cell Metab. 2013, 18, 416–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Herranz, D.; Munoz-Martin, M.; Canamero, M.; Mulero, F.; Martinez-Pastor, B.; Fernandez-Capetillo, O.; Serrano, M. Sirt1 improves healthy ageing and protects from metabolic syndrome-associated cancer. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Byles, V.; Zhu, L.; Lovaas, J.D.; Chmilewski, L.K.; Wang, J.; Faller, D.V.; Dai, Y. SIRT1 induces EMT by cooperating with EMT transcription factors and enhances prostate cancer cell migration and metastasis. Oncogene 2012, 31, 4619–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Malik, S.; Villanova, L.; Tanaka, S.; Aonuma, M.; Roy, N.; Berber, E.; Pollack, J.R.; Michishita-Kioi, E.; Chua, K.F. SIRT7 inactivation reverses metastatic phenotypes in epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhou, W.; Ni, T.K.; Wronski, A.; Glass, B.; Skibinski, A.; Beck, A.; Kuperwasser, C. The SIRT2 Deacetylase Stabilizes Slug to Control Malignancy of Basal-like Breast Cancer. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1302–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Miyo, M.; Yamamoto, H.; Konno, M.; Colvin, H.; Nishida, N.; Koseki, J.; Kawamoto, K.; Ogawa, H.; Hamabe, A.; Uemura, M.; et al. Tumour-suppressive function of SIRT4 in human colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhao, Y.L.; Zhu, R.T.; Sun, Y.L. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in liver fibrosis. Biomed. Rep. 2016, 4, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Strutz, F.; Okada, H.; Lo, C.W.; Danoff, T.; Carone, R.L.; Tomaszewski, J.E.; Neilson, E.G. Identification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Okada, H.; Danoff, T.M.; Kalluri, R.; Neilson, E.G. Early role of Fsp1 in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, F563–F574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zeisberg, M.; Hanai, J.; Sugimoto, H.; Mammoto, T.; Charytan, D.; Strutz, F.; Kalluri, R. BMP-7 counteracts TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reverses chronic renal injury. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 964–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lee, H.Y.; Jeon, H.S.; Song, E.K.; Han, M.K.; Park, S.I.; Lee, S.I.; Yun, H.J.; Kim, J.R.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, Y.C.; et al. CD40 ligation of rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis: Evidence of NF-kappaB-dependent, CD40-mediated bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 1747–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Iwano, M.; Plieth, D.; Danoff, T.M.; Xue, C.; Okada, H.; Neilson, E.G. Evidence that fibroblasts derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zeisberg, E.M.; Tarnavski, O.; Zeisberg, M.; Dorfman, A.L.; McMullen, J.R.; Gustafsson, E.; Chandraker, A.; Yuan, X.; Pu, W.T.; Roberts, A.B.; et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to cardiac fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 952–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kalluri, R. EMT: When epithelial cells decide to become mesenchymal-like cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2009, 119, 1417–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yu, K.; Li, Q.; Shi, G.; Li, N. Involvement of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in liver fibrosis. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mahmoudi, S.; Brunet, A. Aging and reprogramming: A two-way street. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Biernacka, A.; Frangogiannis, N.G.; Cardiology, D.; Einstein, A.; Ny, B. Aging and Cardiac Fibrosis. Aging Dis. 2011, 2, 158–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yang, H.-C.; Fogo, A.B. Fibrosis and renal aging. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2014, 4, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Miyaaki, H.; Ichikawa, T.; Nakao, K.; Yatsuhashi, H.; Furukawa, R.; Ohba, K.; Omagari, K.; Kusumoto, Y.; Yanagi, K.; Inoue, O.; et al. Clinicopathological study of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Japan: The risk factors for fibrosis. Liver Int. 2008, 28, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Raghu, G.; Chen, S.Y.; Yeh, W.S.; Maroni, B.; Li, Q.; Lee, Y.C.; Collard, H.R. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older: Incidence, prevalence, and survival, 2001–2011. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014, 2, 566–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schmitt, R.; Cantley, L.G. The impact of aging on kidney repair. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2008, 294, F1265–F1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jeyapalan, J.C.; Ferreira, M.; Sedivy, J.M.; Herbig, U. Accumulation of senescent cells in mitotic tissue of aging primates. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2007, 128, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Cufí, S.; Vazquez-martin, A.; Oliveras-ferraros, C.; Joven, J.; Menendez, J.A. Metformin against TGF β-induced epithelial-to- mesenchymal transition (EMT): From cancer stem cells to aging-associated fibrosis. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 4461–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Neilson, E.G. Setting a trap for tissue fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2005, 11, 373–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, R.; Liang, J.; Ni, S.; Zhou, T.; Qing, X.; Li, H.; He, W.; Chen, J.; Li, F.; Zhuang, Q.; et al. A Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition Initiates and Is Required for the Nuclear Reprogramming of Mouse Fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, Y. New Insights into Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Kidney Fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Dong, D.; Cai, G.-Y.; Ning, Y.-C.; Wang, J.-C.; Lv, Y.; Cui, S.-Y.; Fu, B.; Guo, Y.-N.; Chen, X.-M. Alleviation of senescence and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in aging kidney by short-term caloric restriction and caloric restriction mimetics via modulation of AMPK/mTOR signaling. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 16109–16121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Olive, M.; Harten, I.; Mitchell, R.; Beers, J.K.; Djabali, K.; Cao, K.; Erdos, M.R.; Blair, C.; Funke, B.; Smoot, L.; et al. Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria: Correlation with the vascular pathology of aging. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 2301–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Aliper, A.M.; Csoka, A.B.; Buzdin, A.; Jetka, T.; Roumiantsev, S.; Moskalev, A.; Zhavoronkov, A. Signaling pathway activation drift during aging: Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome fibroblasts are comparable to normal middle-age and old-age cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2015, 7, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Chilosi, M.; Poletti, V.; Zamò, A.; Lestani, M.; Montagna, L.; Piccoli, P.; Pedron, S.; Bertaso, M.; Scarpa, A.; Murer, B.; et al. Aberrant Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2003, 162, 1495–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morali, O.G.; Delmas, V.; Moore, R.; Jeanney, C.; Thiery, J.P.; Larue, L. IGF-II induces rapid β-catenin relocation to the nucleus during epithelium to mesenchyme transition. Oncogene 2001, 20, 4942–4950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Derada Troletti, C.; de Goede, P.; Kamermans, A.; de Vries, H.E. Molecular alterations of the blood-brain barrier under inflammatory conditions: The role of endothelial to mesenchymal transition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1862, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Montagne, A.; Barnes, S.R.; Sweeney, M.D.; Halliday, M.R.; Sagare, A.P.; Zhao, Z.; Toga, A.W.; Jacobs, R.E.; Liu, C.Y.; Amezcua, L.; et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 2015, 85, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sweeney, M.D.; Sagare, A.P.; Zlokovic, B.V. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Podtelezhnikov, A.A.; Tanis, K.Q.; Nebozhyn, M.; Ray, W.J.; Stone, D.J.; Loboda, A.P. Molecular insights into the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and its relationship to normal aging. PloS ONE 2011, 6, e29610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hackett, T.L.; Warner, S.M.; Stefanowicz, D.; Shaheen, F.; Pechkovsky, D.V.; Murray, L.A.; Argentieri, R.; Kicic, A.; Stick, S.M.; Bai, T.R.; et al. Induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary airway epithelial cells from patients with asthma by transforming growth factor-beta1. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 180, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bernardes de Jesus, B.; Blasco, M.A. Assessing cell and organ senescence biomarkers. Circ. Res. 2012, 111, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Coppé, J.-P.; Patil, C.K.; Rodier, F.; Sun, Y.; Muñoz, D.P.; Goldstein, J.; Nelson, P.S.; Desprez, P.-Y.; Campisi, J. Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotypes Reveal Cell-Nonautonomous Functions of Oncogenic RAS and the p53 Tumor Suppressor. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6, 2853–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Laberge, R.-M.; Awad, P.; Campisi, J.; Desprez, P.-Y. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by Senescent Fibroblasts. Cancer Microenviron. 2012, 5, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bavik, C.; Coleman, I.; Dean, J.P.; Knudsen, B.; Plymate, S.; Nelson, P.S. The gene expression program of prostate fibroblast senescence modulates neoplastic epithelial cell proliferation through paracrine mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nakashiro, K.I.; Hayashi, Y.; Oyasu, R. Immunohistochemical expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met/HGF receptor in benign and malignant human prostate tissue. Oncol. Rep. 2003, 10, 1149–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Khoury, H.; Naujokas, M.A.; Zuo, D.; Sangwan, V.; Frigault, M.M.; Petkiewicz, S.; Dankort, D.L.; Muller, W.J.; Park, M. HGF Converts ErbB2/Neu Epithelial Morphogenesis to Cell Invasion. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 16, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Skrtic, S.; Wallenius, V.; Ekberg, S.; Brenzel, A.; Gressner, A.M.; Jansson, J.O. Insulin-like growth factors stimulate expression of hepatocyte growth factor but not transforming growth factor β1in cultured hepatic stellate cells. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 4683–4689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Miyazaki, M.; Gohda, E.; Kaji, K.; Namba, M. Increased hepatocyte growth factor production by aging human fibroblasts mainly due to autocrine stimulation by interleukin-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 246, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Feng, Z.; Hu, W.; Teresky, A.K.; Hernando, E.; Cordon-Cardo, C.; Levine, A.J. Declining p53 function in the aging process: A possible mechanism for the increased tumor incidence in older populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16633–16638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Hinkal, G.; Parikh, N.; Donehower, L.A. Timed somatic deletion of p53 in mice reveals age-associated differences in tumor progression. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Choi, S.S.; Diehl, A.M. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions in the liver. Hepatology 2009, 50, 2007–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Taura, K.; Miura, K.; Iwaisako, K.; Osterreicher, C.H.; Kodama, Y.; Penz-Osterreicher, M.; Brenner, D.A. Hepatocytes do not undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition in liver fibrosis in mice. Hepatology 2010, 51, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Lee, S.J.; Kim, K.H.; Park, K.K. Mechanisms of fibrogenesis in liver cirrhosis: The molecular aspects of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. World J. Hepatol. 2014, 6, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Scholten, D.; Osterreicher, C.H.; Scholten, A.; Iwaisako, K.; Gu, G.; Brenner, D.A.; Kisseleva, T. Genetic labeling does not detect epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of cholangiocytes in liver fibrosis in mice. Gastroenterology 2010, 139, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Diaz, R.; Kim, J.W.; Hui, J.J.; Li, Z.; Swain, G.P.; Fong, K.S.; Csiszar, K.; Russo, P.A.; Rand, E.B.; Furth, E.E.; et al. Evidence for the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in biliary atresia fibrosis. Hum. Pathol. 2008, 39, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Syn, W.K.; Jung, Y.; Omenetti, A.; Abdelmalek, M.; Guy, C.D.; Yang, L.; Wang, J.; Witek, R.P.; Fearing, C.M.; Pereira, T.A.; et al. Hedgehog-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and fibrogenic repair in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 1478–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sicklick, J.K.; Choi, S.S.; Bustamante, M.; McCall, S.J.; Perez, E.H.; Huang, J.; Li, Y.X.; Rojkind, M.; Diehl, A.M. Evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in adult liver cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2006, 291, G575–G583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Omenetti, A.; Porrello, A.; Jung, Y.; Yang, L.; Popov, Y.; Choi, S.S.; Witek, R.P.; Alpini, G.; Venter, J.; Vandongen, H.M.; et al. Hedgehog signaling regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition during biliary fibrosis in rodents and humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 3331–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Dooley, S.; Hamzavi, J.; Ciuclan, L.; Godoy, P.; Ilkavets, I.; Ehnert, S.; Ueberham, E.; Gebhardt, R.; Kanzler, S.; Geier, A.; et al. Hepatocyte-specific Smad7 expression attenuates TGF-beta-mediated fibrogenesis and protects against liver damage. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 642–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Valdes, F.; Alvarez, A.M.; Locascio, A.; Vega, S.; Herrera, B.; Fernandez, M.; Benito, M.; Nieto, M.A.; Fabregat, I. The epithelial mesenchymal transition confers resistance to the apoptotic effects of transforming growth factor Beta in fetal rat hepatocytes. Mol. Cancer Res. 2002, 1, 68–78. [Google Scholar]
  89. Munker, S.; Wu, Y.L.; Ding, H.G.; Liebe, R.; Weng, H.L. Can a fibrotic liver afford epithelial-mesenchymal transition? World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4661–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Godoy, P.; Hengstler, J.G.; Ilkavets, I.; Meyer, C.; Bachmann, A.; Muller, A.; Tuschl, G.; Mueller, S.O.; Dooley, S. Extracellular matrix modulates sensitivity of hepatocytes to fibroblastoid dedifferentiation and transforming growth factor beta-induced apoptosis. Hepatology 2009, 49, 2031–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Nitta, T.; Kim, J.S.; Mohuczy, D.; Behrns, K.E. Murine cirrhosis induces hepatocyte epithelial mesenchymal transition and alterations in survival signaling pathways. Hepatology 2008, 48, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Cicchini, C.; Filippini, D.; Coen, S.; Marchetti, A.; Cavallari, C.; Laudadio, I.; Spagnoli, F.M.; Alonzi, T.; Tripodi, M. Snail controls differentiation of hepatocytes by repressing HNF4alpha expression. J. Cell Physiol. 2006, 209, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Rygiel, K.A.; Robertson, H.; Marshall, H.L.; Pekalski, M.; Zhao, L.; Booth, T.A.; Jones, D.E.; Burt, A.D.; Kirby, J.A. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition contributes to portal tract fibrogenesis during human chronic liver disease. Lab Investig. 2008, 88, 112–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Park, J.H.; Yoon, J. Schizandrin inhibits fibrosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in transforming growth factor-beta1-stimulated AML12 cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015, 25, 276–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kao, H.F.; Chang-Chien, P.W.; Chang, W.T.; Yeh, T.M.; Wang, J.Y. Propolis inhibits TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human alveolar epithelial cells via PPARgamma activation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2013, 15, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yang, L.; Inokuchi, S.; Roh, Y.S.; Song, J.; Loomba, R.; Park, E.J.; Seki, E. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in hepatocytes promotes hepatic fibrosis and carcinogenesis in mice with hepatocyte-specific deletion of TAK1. Gastroenterology 2013, 144, 1042–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mu, X.; Pradere, J.P.; Affo, S.; Dapito, D.H.; Friedman, R.; Lefkovitch, J.H.; Schwabe, R.F. Epithelial Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling Does Not Contribute to Liver Fibrosis but Protects Mice From Cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 720–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ingham, P.W.; McMahon, A.P. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: Paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 3059–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Omenetti, A.; Bass, L.M.; Anders, R.A.; Clemente, M.G.; Francis, H.; Guy, C.D.; McCall, S.; Choi, S.S.; Alpini, G.; Schwarz, K.B.; et al. Hedgehog activity, epithelial-mesenchymal transitions, and biliary dysmorphogenesis in biliary atresia. Hepatology 2011, 53, 1246–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Choi, S.S.; Omenetti, A.; Witek, R.P.; Moylan, C.A.; Syn, W.K.; Jung, Y.; Yang, L.; Sudan, D.L.; Sicklick, J.K.; Michelotti, G.A.; et al. Hedgehog pathway activation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions during myofibroblastic transformation of rat hepatic cells in culture and cirrhosis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009, 297, G1093–G1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Omenetti, A.; Popov, Y.; Jung, Y.; Choi, S.S.; Witek, R.P.; Yang, L.; Brown, K.D.; Schuppan, D.; Diehl, A.M. The hedgehog pathway regulates remodelling responses to biliary obstruction in rats. Gut 2008, 57, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Swiderska-Syn, M.; Syn, W.K.; Xie, G.; Kruger, L.; Machado, M.V.; Karaca, G.; Michelotti, G.A.; Choi, S.S.; Premont, R.T.; Diehl, A.M. Myofibroblastic cells function as progenitors to regenerate murine livers after partial hepatectomy. Gut 2014, 63, 1333–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Schultz, M.B.; Sinclair, D.A. When stem cells grow old: Phenotypes and mechanisms of stem cell aging. Development 2016, 143, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Oh, J.; Lee, Y.D.; Wagers, A.J. Stem cell aging: Mechanisms, regulators and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Med. 2014, 20, 870–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Moorefield, E.C.; Andres, S.F.; Blue, R.E.; Van Landeghem, L.; Mah, A.T.; Santoro, M.A.; Ding, S. Aging effects on intestinal homeostasis associated with expansion and dysfunction of intestinal epithelial stem cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2017, 9, 1898–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Marion, R.M.; Blasco, M.A. Telomeres and telomerase in adult stem cells and pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 695, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Blanco, R.; Munoz, P.; Flores, J.M.; Klatt, P.; Blasco, M.A. Telomerase abrogation dramatically accelerates TRF2-induced epithelial carcinogenesis. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Blasco, M.A. The epigenetic regulation of mammalian telomeres. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Blasco, M.A. Telomere length, stem cells and aging. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 640–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Flores, I.; Benetti, R.; Blasco, M.A. Telomerase regulation and stem cell behaviour. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2006, 18, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Flores, I.; Canela, A.; Vera, E.; Tejera, A.; Cotsarelis, G.; Blasco, M.A. The longest telomeres: A general signature of adult stem cell compartments. Genes Dev. 2008, 22, 654–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lopez-Otin, C.; Blasco, M.A.; Partridge, L.; Serrano, M.; Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 2013, 153, 1194–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Morrison, S.J.; Wandycz, A.M.; Akashi, K.; Globerson, A.; Weissman, I.L. The aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 1011–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Chambers, S.M.; Shaw, C.A.; Gatza, C.; Fisk, C.J.; Donehower, L.A.; Goodell, M.A. Aging hematopoietic stem cells decline in function and exhibit epigenetic dysregulation. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Chakkalakal, J.V.; Jones, K.M.; Basson, M.A.; Brack, A.S. The aged niche disrupts muscle stem cell quiescence. Nature 2012, 490, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Chang, C.C.; Hsu, W.H.; Wang, C.C.; Chou, C.H.; Kuo, M.Y.; Lin, B.R.; Chen, S.T.; Tai, S.K.; Kuo, M.L.; Yang, M.H. Connective tissue growth factor activates pluripotency genes and mesenchymal-epithelial transition in head and neck cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 4147–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mani, S.A.; Guo, W.; Liao, M.J.; Eaton, E.N.; Ayyanan, A.; Zhou, A.Y.; Brooks, M.; Reinhard, F.; Zhang, C.C.; Shipitsin, M.; et al. The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells with Properties of Stem Cells. Cell 2008, 133, 704–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Chaffer, C.L.; Weinberg, R.A. A Perspective on Cancer Cell Metastasis. Science 2011, 331, 1559–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sato, R.; Semba, T.; Saya, H.; Arima, Y. Concise Review: Stem Cells and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer: Biological Implications and Therapeutic Targets. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 1997–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yamanaka, S. A fresh look at iPS cells. Cell 2009, 137, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Banito, A.; Rashid, S.T.; Acosta, J.C.; Li, S.D.; Pereira, C.F.; Geti, I.; Pinho, S.; Silva, J.C.; Azuara, V.; Walsh, M.; et al. Senescence impairs successful reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells. Genes Dev. 2009, 23, 2134–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Wang, B.; Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y.; Yada, E.; Ito, N.; Nishiyama, T.; Nakamura, M.; Ono, Y.; Motohashi, N.; Segawa, M.; Masuda, S.; et al. Reprogramming efficiency and quality of induced Pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated from muscle-derived fibroblasts of mdx mice at different ages. PLoS Curr. 2011, 3, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Li, T.; Xie, J.; Shen, C.; Cheng, D.; Shi, Y.; Wu, Z.; Deng, X.; Chen, H.; Shen, B.; Peng, C.; et al. Upregulation of long noncoding RNA ZEB1-AS1 promotes tumor metastasis and predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2016, 35, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Liu, X.; Sun, H.; Qi, J.; Wang, L.; He, S.; Liu, J.; Feng, C.; Chen, C.; Li, W.; Guo, Y.; et al. Sequential introduction of reprogramming factors reveals a time-sensitive requirement for individual factors and a sequential EMT-MET mechanism for optimal reprogramming. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Nieto, M.A. Epithelial plasticity: A common theme in embryonic and cancer cells. Science 2013, 342, 1234850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Chen, T.; Shen, L.; Yu, J.; Wan, H.; Guo, A.; Chen, J.; Long, Y.; Zhao, J.; Pei, G. Rapamycin and other longevity-promoting compounds enhance the generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Aging Cell 2011, 10, 908–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Long, J.; Zuo, D.; Park, M. Pc2-mediated sumoylation of Smad-interacting protein 1 attenuates transcriptional repression of E-cadherin. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 35477–35489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Nishimura, G.; Manabe, I.; Tsushima, K.; Fujiu, K.; Oishi, Y.; Imai, Y.; Maemura, K.; Miyagishi, M.; Higashi, Y.; Kondoh, H.; et al. DeltaEF1 mediates TGF-beta signaling in vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation. Dev. Cell 2006, 11, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Grooteclaes, M.L.; Frisch, S.M. Evidence for a function of CtBP in epithelial gene regulation and anoikis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 3823–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Postigo, A.A.; Dean, D.C. ZEB, a vertebrate homolog of Drosophila Zfh-1, is a negative regulator of muscle differentiation. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 3935–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Ponticos, M.; Partridge, T.; Black, C.M.; Abraham, D.J.; Bou-Gharios, G. Regulation of collagen type I in vascular smooth muscle cells by competition between Nkx2.5 and deltaEF1/ZEB1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 24, 6151–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Van Grunsven, L.A.; Taelman, V.; Michiels, C.; Opdecamp, K.; Huylebroeck, D.; Bellefroid, E.J. deltaEF1 and SIP1 are differentially expressed and have overlapping activities during Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 2006, 235, 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Postigo, A.A. Opposing functions of ZEB proteins in the regulation of the TGFbeta/BMP signaling pathway. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 2443–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Mattick, J.S.; Makunin, I.V. Non-coding RNA. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 15, R17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Angrand, P.O.; Vennin, C.; Le Bourhis, X.; Adriaenssens, E. The role of long non-coding RNAs in genome formatting and expression. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Gregory, P.A.; Bert, A.G.; Paterson, E.L.; Barry, S.C.; Tsykin, A.; Farshid, G.; Vadas, M.A.; Khew-Goodall, Y.; Goodall, G.J. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Samavarchi-Tehrani, P.; Golipour, A.; David, L.; Sung, H.K.; Beyer, T.A.; Datti, A.; Woltjen, K.; Nagy, A.; Wrana, J.L. Functional genomics reveals a BMP-Driven mesenchymal-to-Epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Subramanyam, D.; Lamouille, S.; Judson, R.L.; Liu, J.Y.; Bucay, N.; Derynck, R.; Blelloch, R. Multiple targets of miR-302 and miR-372 promote reprogramming of human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Han, Y.; Ye, J.; Wu, D.; Wu, P.; Chen, Z.; Chen, J.; Gao, S.; Huang, J. LEIGC long non-coding RNA acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric carcinoma by inhibiting the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xu, Z.Y.; Yu, Q.M.; Du, Y.A.; Yang, L.T.; Dong, R.Z.; Huang, L.; Yu, P.F.; Cheng, X.D. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR suppresses tumor invasion and reverses epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 9, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Huang, J.F.; Guo, Y.J.; Zhao, C.X.; Yuan, S.X.; Wang, Y.; Tang, G.N.; Zhou, W.P.; Sun, S.H. Hepatitis B virus X protein (HBx)-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) down-regulated expression by HBx (Dreh) inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by targeting the intermediate filament protein vimentin. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1882–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Wang, T.H.; Lin, Y.S.; Chen, Y.; Yeh, C.T.; Huang, Y.L.; Hsieh, T.H.; Shieh, T.M.; Hsueh, C.; Chen, T.C. Long non-coding RNA AOC4P suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by enhancing vimentin degradation and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 23342–23357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Xu, Q.; Deng, F.; Qin, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Z.; Xing, Z.; Ji, A.; Wang, Q.J. Long non-coding RNA regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. El Messaoudi, S.; Rongen, G.A.; Riksen, N.P. Metformin therapy in diabetes: The role of cardioprotection. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2013, 15, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Leone, A.; Di Gennaro, E.; Bruzzese, F.; Avallone, A.; Budillon, A. New perspective for an old antidiabetic drug: Metformin as anticancer agent. Cancer Treat. Res. 2014, 159, 355–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Nasri, H.; Baradaran, A.; Ardalan, M.R.; Mardani, S.; Momeni, A.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. Bright renoprotective properties of metformin: Beyond blood glucose regulatory effects. Iran J. Kidney Dis. 2013, 7, 423–428. [Google Scholar]
  148. Barzilai, N.; Crandall, J.P.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Espeland, M.A. Metformin as a Tool to Target Aging. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 1060–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Xiao, H.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, M.; Liu, J.; Chen, R.; Shen, J.; Wu, J.; Lu, Z.; et al. Metformin is a novel suppressor for transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Brooks, W.W.; Conrad, C.H. Myocardial fibrosis in transforming growth factor beta(1)heterozygous mice. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2000, 32, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Meyer, T.E.; Kovacs, S.J.; Ehsani, A.A.; Klein, S.; Holloszy, J.O.; Fontana, L. Long-term caloric restriction ameliorates the decline in diastolic function in humans. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 00891 g001 550
Figure 1. Role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in aging. Pro-EMT signals (eg. transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and transcription factor ZEB2) and senescent fibroblasts with a senescent-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) accumulate in aged tissues, which are responsible for the induction of EMT. Epithelial cells lose their cell–cell junctions and apical-basal polarity. Cells begin to express N-cadherin, acquire front-rear polarity and gain motility, thus transdifferentiating into mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts. Fibroblasts produce extracellular matrix (ECM) components and are the main cellular mediators of fibrosis. When these cells accumulate (e.g., due to EMT), excessive fibrotic tissue is formed, affecting the function of vital organs. This figure was produced using Servier Medical Art.
Figure 1. Role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in aging. Pro-EMT signals (eg. transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and transcription factor ZEB2) and senescent fibroblasts with a senescent-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) accumulate in aged tissues, which are responsible for the induction of EMT. Epithelial cells lose their cell–cell junctions and apical-basal polarity. Cells begin to express N-cadherin, acquire front-rear polarity and gain motility, thus transdifferentiating into mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts. Fibroblasts produce extracellular matrix (ECM) components and are the main cellular mediators of fibrosis. When these cells accumulate (e.g., due to EMT), excessive fibrotic tissue is formed, affecting the function of vital organs. This figure was produced using Servier Medical Art.
Ijms 20 00891 g001
Table
Table 1. Expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers in fibrotic organs.
Table 1. Expression of epithelial and mesenchymal markers in fibrotic organs.
OrganCharacteristicsReference
Ijms 20 00891 i001
  • ↓ Expression of E-cadherin
  • ↑ Expression of α-smooth muscle actin (SMA)
  • ↑ Expression of Zeb1
[59]
Ijms 20 00891 i002
  • Fibroblasts marked with β-gal and FSP-1
  • ↑ Expression of TGF-β mRNA
  • ↑ Of phosphorylated Smad2/3 in the nucleus
[45]
Ijms 20 00891 i003
  • Nuclear β-catenin
  • ↓ Expression of E-cadherin
  • ↑ Expression of α-SMA, fibronectin and vimentin
[62,68]
Ijms 20 00891 i004
  • Fibroblasts marked with β-gal and FSP-1
  • ↓ Expression of E-cadherin
[45]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, F.; Moreira, C.; Nóbrega-Pereira, S.; Bernardes de Jesus, B. New Insights into the Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition during Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040891

AMA Style

Santos F, Moreira C, Nóbrega-Pereira S, Bernardes de Jesus B. New Insights into the Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition during Aging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(4):891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040891

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Francisco, Cristiana Moreira, Sandrina Nóbrega-Pereira, and Bruno Bernardes de Jesus. 2019. "New Insights into the Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition during Aging" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 4: 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040891

APA Style

Santos, F., Moreira, C., Nóbrega-Pereira, S., & Bernardes de Jesus, B. (2019). New Insights into the Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition during Aging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(4), 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040891

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop