Next Article in Journal
Identification of a Novel Linear B-Cell Epitope on the Nucleocapsid Protein of Porcine Deltacoronavirus
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Expression of miRNAs and Behavioral Change in the Cuprizone-Induced Demyelination Mouse Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms21020647
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ecotopic Expression of the Antimicrobial Peptide DmAMP1W Improves Resistance of Transgenic Wheat to Two Diseases: Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot

by
Qiang Su
,
Ke Wang
and
Zengyan Zhang
*
The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(2), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020647
Submission received: 26 December 2019 / Revised: 15 January 2020 / Accepted: 16 January 2020 / Published: 18 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important staple crop. Sharp eyespot and common root rot are destructive diseases of wheat. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are small peptides with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. In this study, we synthesized the DmAMP1W gene, encoding Dahlia merckii DmAMP1, and investigated the antifungal role of DmAMP1W in vitro and in transgenic wheat. Protein electrophoresis analysis and in vitro inhibition results demonstrated that the synthesized DmAMP1W correctly translated to the expected peptide DmAMP1W, and the purified peptide inhibited growths of the fungi Rhizoctonia cerealis and Bipolaris sorokiniana, the pathogenic causes of wheat sharp eyespot and common root rot. DmAMP1W was introduced into a wheat variety Zhoumai18 via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The molecular characteristics indicated that DmAMP1W could be heritable and expressed in five transgenic wheat lines in T1–T2 generations. Average sharp eyespot infection types of these five DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines in T1–T2 generations decreased 0.69–1.54 and 0.40–0.82 compared with non-transformed Zhoumai18, respectively. Average common root rot infection types of these transgenic lines and non-transformed Zhoumai18 were 1.23–1.48 and 2.27, respectively. These results indicated that DmAMP1W-expressing transgenic wheat lines displayed enhanced-resistance to both sharp eyespot and common root rot. This study provides new broad-spectrum antifungal resources for wheat breeding.

1. Introduction

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important food crop, feeding ≈35% of the world’s population [1]. Sharp eyespot is one of the most serious diseases for wheat production in different regions around the world [2]. Since late 1990s, sharp eyespot has seriously endangered wheat production in China, resulting in 10%–30% yield losses of wheat [3,4]. Rhizoctonia cerealis, a necrotrophic fungus, is the major pathogen of sharp eyespot in China. In nature, R. cerealis reproduces asexually and exists primarily as vegetative mycelium and/or sclerotia [5]. It can infect the roots and basal stems at any time during the wheat growing season, and in turn can devastate the transport of tissues in stems of wheat and obstruct transportation of nutrition substances [3,6]. Common root rot, caused by the soil-borne fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana, is another important disease of wheat [7]. B. sorokiniana mainly infects the roots and stem bases of wheat plants. Besides, some B. sorokiniana strains also can cause spot blotch, leaf spot disease, seedling blight, head blight and black point in wheat and barley [8,9]. Breeding resistant wheat cultivars are a friendly-environmental approach to protect wheat from fungal diseases. However, it is difficult to breed wheat varieties with resistance to sharp eyespot and common root rot by using traditional method, since no effective resistance accessions are available. Introducing alien genes conferring disease resistance by genetic transformation is an efficient alternative.
To defend against pathogens, plants can produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which have an effect on growth inhibition against microorganisms [10,11,12]. Plant AMPs are structurally small, positively charged and cysteine-rich. AMPs are involved in various antifungal activities in vitro [10,13,14,15]. Some AMPs can directly affect cell membranes of fungi and change their structure, thereby inhibiting growth of the fungi [16,17,18]. For instance, Rs-AFP1, Rs-AFP2 and Rs-AFP3/4, isolated from seeds of Raphanus sativus, are the most in-depth-studied antimicrobial peptides in plant disease resistance [19,20,21]. Some studies have shown that Rs-AFP2 can resist to a variety of fungal diseases, such as rice sheath blight, rice blast, wheat sharp eyespot and fusarium head blight [13,20]. Similarly, Br-AMP1 (Brassica rapa) [22], Psd1 (Pisum sativum) [23], VrD1 (Vigna radiata) and MtDef2 (Medicago trunculata) [24] are seed specific AMPs, which can inhibit growth of several fungal pathogens. DmAMP1 was isolated from the seeds of Dhalia merckii and was reported to inhibit many fungal pathogens [25,26,27,28]. Bioassay showed that the DmAMP1 peptide extracted from leaves of transgenic papaya inhibited growth of Phytophthora palmivora in vitro; thus, ecotopic expression of DmAMP1 enhanced resistance to this fungal disease in the transgenic papaya [25]. Jha et al. indicated that ecotopic expression of DmAMP1 in transgenic rice could significantly enhance resistance to blast and rice sheath blight diseases. They demonstrated that DmAMP1 was expressed independently in the transgenic rice lines and was not associated with rice PR-1a gene [26]. With the development of gene synthesis technology, synthetic peptide genes have been more and more used to defend against various fungal and bacterial pathogens [29]. Expression of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide D4E1 improved resistance of transgenic cotton plants to black root rot, because growths of the pathogenic fungi Fusarium verticillioides and Verticillium dahlia were inhibited by the protein isolated from D4E1 transgenic plants in vitro [30]. NaD1 (from Nicotiana alata) exhibited antifungal activity against F. vasinfectum and V. dahlia [31]. Ace-AMP1 could effectively enhance resistance against rice blast, sheath blight and bacterial leaf blight in vivo and in vitro, respectively [32]. In addition, Ace-AMP1 could increase resistance to fungal diseases powdery mildew and take-all in transgenic wheat plants [33,34]. However, defense function of DmAMP1 is poorly understood in wheat.
In this report, we aimed to study the inhibition activity of DmAMP1W against wheat disease pathogenic fungi in vitro and in transgenic wheat. The current results indicated that DmAMP1W peptide encoded by the synthesized DmAMP1W inhibited against growths of R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana, and DmAMP1W-expressing transgenic wheat plants displayed enhanced resistance to both fungal pathogens.

2. Results

2.1. Heterogonous Expression and Purification of DmAMP1W

The open-reading-frame sequence (ORF) of DmAMP1W was artificially synthesized according to wheat favor codons. It was predicted to encode the DmAMP1 amino acid sequence. The protein sequence analysis showed that the DmAMP1W peptide consists of 84 amino acid (AA) residues, with a molecular weight of 9.26 KD and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) 7.68. SignalP4.0 and NCBI blastp showed that the DmAMP1W protein contained a signal peptide (locating number 1–28 AA residues) and a Knot1 domain (at 30 to 78 AA) harboring eight cysteines (Supplemental Figure S1). The DmAMP1W mature peptide was identical to that of DmAMP1 [35] (Supplementary Figure S2).
The ORF of DmAMP1W was sub-cloned and fused with the MBP tag in the prokaryotic expression vector pMAL-C5X (Figure 1A). The malE-DmAMP1W, where malE encodes the MBP tag, was predicted to encode the recombinant protein MBP-DmAMP1W. In order to obtain more amounts of MBP-DmAMP1W soluble fusion protein, we optimized the expression conditions. We established the optimum cultivation and induction conditions, when the culture cell density was OD600 = 0.6, the culture was induced by the addition of 0.1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) under 28 °C and for ≈ 12 h at 180 rpm. Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE, 12%) analysis showed that a clear expression protein band was found and should be MBP-DmAMP1W (Figure 1B). The MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W proteins were purified using Amylose Resin and were eluted by the MBP elution buffer, respectively. When these two solubilized proteins were monitored by gel electrophoresis, the sizes of the proteins were consistent with theoretical molecular masses of MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W (Figure 1C). MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W proteins were dissolved in MBP elution buffer (0.04% maltose solution) to final concentration of 65 μg/mL.

2.2. DmAMP1W In Vitro Inhibits Growth of R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana

To examine inhibiting activity of the DmAMP1W against growths of fungal pathogens of wheat sharp eyespot and common root rot, 65 μg/mL MBP and 65 μg/mL MBP-DmAMP1W were injected into the small pores of PDA mediums, respectively, and then R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana were inoculated onto the PDA mediums. All treatments were performed three times. The results indicated that mycelium growths of R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana in PDA mediums injected with MBP-DmAMP1W were obviously inhibited compared with the MBP-treated (control) parts (Figure 2). Interestingly, three days after inoculation, when the mycelium filled up MBP-treated PDA medium, the areas treated with MBP-DmAMP1W formed inhibition zones, and they lasted for 10 d.

2.3. Generation and Molecular Characterization of DmAMP1W Transgenic Wheat

The monocot expression vector pWMB122-DmAMP1W (Figure 3A), encoding DmAMP1W–His fusion protein, was used to transform a high-yield wheat cv. Zhouami18 via Agrobacterium-mediated method. As expected, transgenic wheat plants were generated. Using PCR by the primers specific to the transformation construct, an amplified product with 267-bp length was present in all the positive plants and the positive control vector (pWMB122-DmAMP1W), but absent in the negative plants and non-transformed (WT) recipient Zhouami18 (Figure 3B). Simi-quantitative RT-PCR results indicated that the fragment specific to the DmAMP1W transcript was observed in both five positive transgenic wheat lines and pWMB122-DmAMP1W plasmid, but absent in WT Zhouami18. Further RT-qPCR analysis indicated that DmAMP1W could be expressed in all the tested organs (spike, leaf, leaf sheath and stem) of the transgenic wheat plants, and the highest expression occurred in the stems (Figure 3D). Western blot (immunoblot) analysis exhibited that DmAMP1W–His fusion protein was expressed in these five transgenic wheat lines but not in WT Zhoumai18 (Figure 3E).

2.4. DmAMP1W Expression Improves Resistance of Transgenic Wheat to Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot

To investigate defense ability of DmAMP1W in wheat against R. cerealis, we assessed resistance of DmAMP1W transgenic wheat plants in T1–T2 generations to sharp eyespot after the pathogen inoculation. The assessment results indicated that these five DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines displayed significantly enhanced-resistance to R. cerealis compared to WT Zhoumai18. According to the assessment results of T1 resistance to sharp eyespot, five lines with heightened-resistance, namely DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5, were selected to further assess in T2 generation. Average infection types (Its) of these five transgenic wheat lines (DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5) in T1–T2 generations were 1.37–2.22 and 2.30–2.72, while those of WT Zhoumai18 plants were 2.91 and 3.12. The average ITs of these five transgenic wheat lines decreased 0.69–1.54 and 0.40–0.82 compared with WT Zhoumai18, respectively (Table 1). Meanwhile, the disease severities and indices of these DmAMP1W transgenic wheat plants were significantly less and decreased than those of WT Zhoumai18 plants (Figure 4A, Table 1). The above results proved that expression of DmAMP1W significantly increased resistance of the transgenic wheat plants to sharp eyespot.
Moreover, the common root rot severity assessment displayed that, compared with WT Zhoumai18, these five transgenic lines (DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5) in T2 generation exhibited significantly enhanced resistance to B. sorokiniana infection (Figure 4B); the average ITs and common root rot disease indices of these five transgenic wheat lines were 1.23–1.48 and 24.60–29.60, whereas the average IT and disease index of WT Zhoumai18 were 2.27 and 45.40, respectively (Table 2). These results suggested that expression of DmAMP1W improved resistance of the transgenic wheat plants to common root rot.

3. Discussion

Wheat is one of the most important staple crops globally. Wheat often is inflicted by many abiotic and biotic stresses. The pathogenic fungi R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana seriously reduce wheat yield in many regions of the world. It is difficult to breed wheat varieties with resistance to both diseases because of the lack of high resistance genes in wheat. It is an effective way to introduce genes with good performance to solve this problem. Broad-spectrum and stable resistance make AMPs candidates for transgenic breeding [21,36]. Our earlier works demonstrated that transgenic wheat plants expressing exogenous AMP genes exhibited increased resistance to fungal pathogens, such as Gaeumannomyces graminisvar. tritici [37], Fusarium graminearum and R. cerealis [20]. Therefore, generation of transgenic crops expressing AMPs has been an effective approach against fungal diseases [38,39,40,41]. Although Jha et al. reported that transgenic rice lines expressing DmAMP1 gene improved resistance to the diseases rice blast and rice sheath blight [26], it has not been verified that the resistance abilities of DmAMP1 to fungi diseases in wheat are real.
The correct processing, stable and efficient expression of antimicrobial peptides in transgenic plants are of great significance for the antifungal activity in plants [26]. In this study, according to wheat preference codons, we synthesized DmAMP1W gene sequence that encodes DmAMP1 mature peptide, and a signal peptide sequence was added at the N terminal in order to secretion of DmAMP1W. We chose DmAMP1 because of its clear disease resistance mechanism and multiple verifications that it can effectively improve plant resistance to fungal diseases [25,26,27,28]. Heterologous expression and SDS-PAGE analyses indicated that the MBP-DmAMP1W recombinant protein was highly expressed in Escherichia coli. In vitro testing demonstrated that the synthesized DmAMP1W had the expected activity and DmAMP1W inhibited effectively against mycelium growth of R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana. Interestingly, DmAMP1W could inhibit the fungal growth in vitro for ten days. In the transformed vector pWMB122-DmAMP1W, DmAMP1W was controlled by the maize ubiquitin promoter. Through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, we generated DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines and investigated the antifungal ability in transgenic wheat lines. DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines exhibited enhanced-resistance to R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana compared to WT Zhoumai18, which supported our experiments in vitro. Expression of DmAMP1 in transgenic rice and papaya boosted resistance against the fungal pathogens M. oryzae, B. sorokiniana [26], and P. palmivora [25], respectively. Our results broaden the antifungal spectrum of DmAMP1 and support the conclusion of previous studies [25,26]. These reports proved that DmAMP1 could be used to improve resistance to fungal diseases in various transgenic plant species.
Given the great harm and cost of plant protection chemicals, researchers are more inclined to develop efficient and eco-friendly methods to control plant pathogens [26]. Generation of a broad-spectrum of disease resistant crops has always been a goal for breeders. In previous studies, Rogozhin et al. found that Ns-D2 inhibited hyphal growth of B. sorokiniana, F. oxysporum, B. cinerea and Ph. Infestans, and its antifungal activity is similar to Rs-AFP1 and Rs-AFP2, two radish AMPs [42]. Rs-AFP2 and DmAMP1 were widely transformed into several crops, such as wheat [20], rice [13,26], maize [43] and papaya [25], and these transgenic crop plants exhibited enhanced resistance to various pathogens [13,20,25,26,43]. In this study, DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines in T1–T2 generations were monitored by PCR, semi-quantitative RT-PCR and western blot assays. The results demonstrated that DmAMP1W could be expressed in five DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines in T1–T2 generations. Accordingly, disease assessment results in two consecutive years exhibited that these five DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines, DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5, displayed enhanced resistance to sharp eyespot in T1–T2 generations. In detail, sharp eyespot infection types in five transgenic lines decreased 0.69–1.54 and 0.40–0.82 compared with WT Zhoumai18, respectively. Also, expression of DmAMP1W could improve resistance of transgenic wheat to common root rot, whose common root rot infection types decreased 0.79–1.04 compared with WT Zhoumai18. The expression assay demonstrated that DmAMP1W transcript at the adult-plant stage was widespread in the tested organs (spike, leaf, leaf sheath and stem) of the transgenic wheat and the highest expression might be in the stems. In view of R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana pathogens mainly attack the base stems and roots of wheat plants, and the high expression of DmAMP1W in stems is conducive to defense of transgenic wheat against infection of these pathogens. Although we tried to examine the expression of DmAMP1W in all the organs of the transgenic wheat at the adult-plant stage, unfortunately, it was difficult to extract RNA from the root for analysis in this stage. Therefore, to clarify the issue further, we need to examine DmAMP1W expression in organs of the transgenic wheat plants at the seedling stage in the future. Taken together, the results proved that DmAMP1W peptide has resistance activity to both R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana in vitro and in transgenic wheat.
In conclusion, we synthesized the DmAMP1W gene according to wheat preference codons, and characterized its antifungal role in vitro and in transgenic wheat. Our results demonstrated that the synthesized DmAMP1W could correctly translate to the expected peptide. Expressing DmAMP1W peptide could inhibit mycelia growth of R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana in vitro. Moreover, we probed into the defensive function of DmAMP1W in transgenic wheat against these fungal pathogen challenges, and the results demonstrated that ectopic expression of DmAMP1W increased resistance of the transgenic wheat to sharp eyespot and common root rot. In addition, DmAMP1W expression was the highest in the stems of the transgenic wheat plants, which benefited to control of the both soil-borne diseases. Our work provides new broad-spectrum antifungal accessions for wheat breeding against sharp eyespot and common root rot.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Pathogenic Fungi

A highly-yield wheat cultivar Zhoumai 18 was used as the transformed recipient in this research. The common root rot pathogenic fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana strain ACC30209 was preserved in our laboratory. The sharp eyespot pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia cerealis strain RC0301 was provided by Huaigu Chen and Shibin Cai in Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China.

4.2. Construction of pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W Prokaryotic Expression Vector

The ORF sequence of DmAMP1W gene was amplified by PCR using the pMBW122-DmAMP1W plasmid as the template and with the primers (DmAMP1W-BamHI-F-: 5′-CTAGGATCCATGGTGAACAGGTCCGT-3′, DmAMP1W-EcoRI-R: 5′-CACGAATTCTCAG CAGTTGAAGTAGCAGA-3′, and the underlined stands for restriction sites to introduce BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites). Subsequently, it was subcloned into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of pMAL-C5X vector and was fused with MBP epitope tag. The recombinant vector was confirmed by sequencing and named pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W.

4.3. Induction, Extraction and Purification of MBP-DmAMP1W Fusion Proteins

The pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W and pMAL-C5X were transformed in E. coli DE3 competent cells. The transformed competent cells were grown in 200 mL LB medium (100 μg/mL ampicillin) until OD600 was 0.6, and then transformed competent cells were induced with 0.1 mM concentrations of IPTG under 28 °C for 12 h at 180 rpm.
The culture was divided into 50 mL tubes and then centrifuged at 4000 × g for 20 min to harvest cells. The cells were suspended in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) and divided in 1.5 mL tubes with 10 μL lysozyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Boston, MA, USA). Then, the cells were broken up by freeze-thaw method. The cell debris was centrifuged for 15 min at 4 °C and 12,000 × rpm. The clear supernatant, containing soluble fraction, was collected and purified; 100 μL Amylose Resin (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) was flowed with PBS buffer (pH 7.4) 3 times, and then the supernatant solution was incubated with Amylose Resin at 4 °C with end-over-end rotation overnight. The MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W were eluted by the MBP elution buffer (0.04% maltose solution), respectively. BCA method was used to confirm the protein concentration referring to the Easy II Protein Quantitative Kit (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) instruction. After that, a total of 10 μL of the purified proteins were analyzed by 12% SDS–PAGE (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.4. MBP-DmAMP1W Antifungal Activity Assay In Vitro

The mycelial growth inhibition method [44] was used to indicate the antifungal activity of the sample with the radius of the inhibition zone. The R. cerealis and B. sorokiniana were inoculated in the center of PDA medium to culture for 2 d at 25 °C. After that, two symmetrical holes were punched in the medium, and MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W were injected into the hole, respectively. After the proteins infiltrated the medium, the mycelial growth was observed for 10 days.

4.5. Generation of DmAMP1W Transgenic Wheat Plants

DmAMP1W was artificially synthesized according to the amino acid sequence of an antimicrobial peptide DmAMP1 isolated from dahlia. The DmAMP1W, with a His epitope tag, was subcloned into the Sam I and Sac I sites of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation vector pWMB122 [45]. In the resulting transformed vector pMBW122-DmAMP1W, the DmAMP1W–His fusion gene was driven by the maize ubiquitin (Ubi) promoter and terminated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens nopaline synthase gene (Tnos).

4.6. DNA and RNA Extractions and cDNA Synthesis of Wheat

For molecular analysis of transgenic wheat plants, the leaves of DmAMP1W transgenic wheat plants were collected at jointing stage to isolate DNA and RNA. Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves using the CTAB method [46]. To analyze the tissue expression pattern of DmAMP1W in transgenic wheat lines, the transgenic wheat plants at the tillering stage were inoculated with R. cerealis RC0301. At 30 dpi, the roots, stem, leave, and spike were collected and deployed to RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON, Canada). The RNA samples were reverse-transcribed to cDNA using FastQuant RT Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.7. PCR and RT-(q)PCR Analyses of DmAMP1W Transgene in Wheat

The DmAMP1W transgenic plants was monitored by PCR using transgene-specific primers (DmAMP1W-TF: 5′-ATGAAGTTGCCGGGATTGC-3′ located in the DmAMP1W coding region; DmAMP1W-TR: 5′-AAAACCCATCTCATAAATAACG-3′ located in Tnos). The PCR reaction was set as follows: 94 °C for 3 min; 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min, for 32 cycles; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to analyze the transcription of DmAMP1W in different transgenic lines. TaActin (TaActin-F: 5′-CACTGGAATGGTCAAGGCTG-3′ and TaActin-R: 5′-CTCCATGTCATCCCAGTTG-3′) was used as internal control. In the 25 μL amplification reaction, the amounts of templates added were adjusted (Zhoumai18, 1.0 μL; DA1, 0.75 μL; DA2, 2.0 μL; DA3, 5.0 μL; DA4 7.0 μL; DA5, 1.5 μL) according to the TaActin electrophoretic brightness in different lines. And the following materials were added: 12.5 μL of 2 × PCR Mixture; 0.75 μL of forward and reverse primers (gene-specific primers for DmAMP1W were: DmAMP1W-RT-57F: 5′-TGTGCTTGCCGTTC CTCA-3′ and DmAMP1W-RT-211R: 5′-CATCTCCGACATCGCCTC-3′), and added ddH2O to 25 μL. PCR went for 27 cycles and the products were examined using agarose gel electrophoresis under 120 V for 20 min.
The SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (TliRNaseH Plus, Takara Bio, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used to RT-qPCR assays. The ABI PRISM 7500 was used to detect according to the manufacturer’s instruction (the program: 95 °C for 30 s; 95 °C for 5 s, 57 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 34 s, for 40 cycles; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min). The relative expression level was calculated as described by Livak and Schmittgen [47].

4.8. Western Blot Analysis on DmAMP1W Transgene Wheat

According to the plant protein extraction kit’s (CWBIO, Jiangsu, China) manufacturer’s instructions, total soluble proteins were extracted from the leaves of five transgenic and WT wheat lines. In brief, 200 μg of leaves each wheat line were crushed to fine powder in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in plant protein extraction reagent (990 μL) with a protease inhibitor cocktail (10 μL). Then, total soluble proteins were obtained by centrifugation (12,000 × g, 4 °C). Total soluble proteins (10 μL) from each line were heated for 10 min at 100 °C, and the proteins were separated on 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (0.22 μm, Millipore, Boston, MA, USA).
The western blots were incubated with a 4000-fold dilution of Anti-His Mouse Monoclonal Antibody (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) at 4 °C and waved for 10 h. Subsequently, using the 4000-fold dilution of secondary antibody Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L, TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), conjugated to horseradish peroxidase at 25 °C and waved for 1 h. The DmAMP1W–His proteins were visualized using the ECL Western Blot Detection.

4.9. Wheat Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot Assessments

In T1-T2 generations, DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines and recipient Zhoumai18 were inoculated with R. cerealis RC0301 as described by Chen et al. [3]. The infection types (ITs, it is graded from 0 to 5) and disease index (DI) were evaluated at the harvest stage as described by Zhu et al. [48].
Following the protocol of Dong et al. [49], wheat plant response assays with B. sorokiniana were carried out. In T2 generation, the experimental plants were planted in fields, and at the tillering stage, all the wheat plants were inoculated with B. sorokiniana. And the transgenic recipient Zhoumaii18 was used as control. Infection types (ITs, it is graded from 0 to 4) of wheat plants and disease index (DI) of a wheat line were evaluated at the harvest stage as described by Dong et al. [49].

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/2/647/s1.

Author Contributions

Z.Z. designed the experiments, supervised the work, and revised and edited the manuscript. Q.S. performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the draft manuscript; K.W. transformed the gene into wheat. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National “Key Sci-Tech” program of China (2016ZX08002-001-004).

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Xiuliang Zhu and Xingguo Ye for help in transformation construct and generation of transgenic wheat. The study and paper are funded by the National “Key Sci-Tech” program of China (2016ZX08002-001-004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

AAamino acid
AMPantimicrobial peptide
DIdisease index
IPTGisopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside
ITinfection type
MBPmaltose binding protein
RT-qPCRreverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction
PBSphosphate buffer saline

References

  1. Scofield, S.R.; Huang, L.; Brandt, A.S.; Gill, B.S. Development of a virus-induced gene-silencing system for hexaploid wheat and its use in functional analysis of the Lr21-mediated leaf rust resistance pathway. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138, 2165–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Hamada, M.S.; Yin, Y.; Chen, H.; Ma, Z. The escalating threat of Rhizoctonia cerealis, the causal agent of sharp eyespot in wheat. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, H.; Liu, H.; Du, L.; Xu, H.; Xin, Z. Overexpression of TiERF1 enhances resistance to sharp eyespot in transgenic wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 4195–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhu, X.; Lu, C.; Du, L.; Ye, X.; Liu, X.; Coules, A.; Zhang, Z. The wheat NB-LRR gene TaRCR1 is required for host defence response to the necrotrophic fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lemańczyk, G.; Kwaśna, H. Effects of sharp eyespot (Rhizoctonia cerealis) on yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2013, 135, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wang, M.; Zhu, X.; Wang, K.; Lu, C.; Luo, M.; Shan, T.; Zhang, Z. A wheat caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase TaCOMT-3D positively contributes to both resistance to sharp eyespot disease and stem mechanical strength. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wei, X.; Shan, T.; Hong, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z. TaPIMP2, a pathogen-induced MYB protein in wheat, contributes to host resistance to common root rot caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kumar, J.; Schafer, P.; Huckelhoven, R.; Langen, G.; Baltruschat, H.; Stein, E.; Nagarajan, S.; Kogel, K.H. Bipolaris sorokiniana, a cereal pathogen of global concern: Cytological and molecular approaches towards better control double dagger. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2002, 3, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, U.; Joshi, A.K.; Kumar, S.; Chand, R.; Roder, M.S. Mapping of resistance to spot blotch disease caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana in spring wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nawrot, R.; Barylski, J.; Nowicki, G.; Broniarczyk, J.; Buchwald, W.; Gozdzicka-Jozefiak, A. Plant antimicrobial peptides. Folia Microbiol. 2014, 59, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Yount, N.Y.; Yeaman, M.R. Peptide antimicrobials: Cell wall as a bacterial target. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1277, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Parisi, K.; Shafee, T.; Quimbar, P.; van der Weerden, N.L.; Bleackley, M.R.; Anderson, M.A. The evolution, function and mechanisms of action for plant defensins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 88, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jha, S.; Chattoo, B.B. Expression of a plant defensin in rice confers resistance to fungal phytopathogens. Transgenic Res. 2010, 19, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Osborn, R.W.; De Samblanx, G.W.; Thevissen, K.; Goderis, I.; Torrekens, S.; Van Leuven, F.; Attenborough, S.; Rees, S.B.; Broekaert, W.F. Isolation and characterisation of plant defensins from seeds of Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Hippocastanaceae and Saxifragaceae. FEBS Lett. 1995, 368, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tang, S.S.; Prodhan, Z.H.; Biswas, S.K.; Le, C.F.; Sekaran, S.D. Antimicrobial peptides from different plant sources: Isolation, characterisation, and purification. Phytochemistry 2018, 154, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thevissen, K.; Terras, F.R.; Broekaert, W.F. Permeabilization of fungal membranes by plant defensins inhibits fungal growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 5451–5458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Thevissen, K.; Osborn, R.W.; Acland, D.P.; Broekaert, W.F. Specific binding sites for an antifungal plant defensin from Dahlia (Dahlia merckii) on fungal cells are required for antifungal activity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lacerda, A.F.; Vasconcelos, E.A.; Pelegrini, P.B.; Grossi, D.S.M. Antifungal defensins and their role in plant defense. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. De Lucca, A.J.; Jacks, T.J.; Broekaert, W.J. Fungicidal and binding properties of three plant peptides. Mycopathologia 1998, 144, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, Z.; Ren, L.; Du, L.; Zhang, B.; Xu, H.; Xin, Z. Expression of a radish defensin in transgenic wheat confers increased resistance to Fusarium graminearum and Rhizoctonia cerealis. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2011, 11, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sher, K.R.; Iqbal, A.; Malak, R.; Shehryar, K.; Attia, S.; Ahmed, T.; Ali, K.M.; Arif, M.; Mii, M. Plant defensins: Types, mechanism of action and prospects of genetic engineering for enhanced disease resistance in plants. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Terras, F.; Schoofs, H.; Thevissen, K.; Osborn, R.W.; Vanderleyden, J.; Cammue, B.; Broekaert, W.F. Synergistic enhancement of the antifungal activity of wheat and barley thionins by radish and oilseed rape 2S albumins and by barley trypsin inhibitors. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Almeida, M.S.; Cabral, K.S.; de Medeiros, L.N.; Valente, A.P.; Almeida, F.C.; Kurtenbach, E. cDNA cloning and heterologous expression of functional cysteine-rich antifungal protein Psd1 in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 395, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Spelbrink, R.G.; Dilmac, N.; Allen, A.; Smith, T.J.; Shah, D.M.; Hockerman, G.H. Differential antifungal and calcium channel-blocking activity among structurally related plant defensins. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2055–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zhu, Y.J.; Agbayani, R.; Moore, P.H. Ectopic expression of Dahlia merckii defensin DmAMP1 improves papaya resistance to Phytophthora palmivora by reducing pathogen vigor. Planta 2007, 226, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jha, S.; Tank, H.G.; Prasad, B.D.; Chattoo, B.B. Expression of Dm-AMP1 in rice confers resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and Rhizoctonia solani. Transgenic Res. 2009, 18, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Thevissen, K.; Francois, I.E.; Takemoto, J.Y.; Ferket, K.K.; Meert, E.M.; Cammue, B.P. DmAMP1, an antifungal plant defensin from dahlia (Dahlia merckii), interacts with sphingolipids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 226, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Im, Y.J.; Idkowiak-Baldys, J.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P.; Takemoto, J.Y. IPT1-independent sphingolipid biosynthesis and yeast inhibition by syringomycin E and plant defensin DmAMP1. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 223, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Montesinos, E.; Bardaji, E. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides as agricultural pesticides for plant-disease control. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 1225–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rajasekaran, K.; Cary, J.W.; Jaynes, J.M.; Cleveland, T.E. Disease resistance conferred by the expression of a gene encoding a synthetic peptide in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2005, 3, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gaspar, Y.M.; McKenna, J.A.; McGinness, B.S.; Hinch, J.; Poon, S.; Connelly, A.A.; Anderson, M.A.; Heath, R.L. Field resistance to Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium dahliae in transgenic cotton expressing the plant defensin NaD1. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Patkar, R.N.; Chattoo, B.B. Transgenic Indica rice expressing ns-LTP-Like protein shows enhanced resistance to both fungal and bacterial pathogens. Mol. Breed. 2006, 17, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roy-Barman, S.; Sautter, C.; Chattoo, B.B. Expression of the lipid transfer protein Ace-AMP1 in transgenic wheat enhances antifungal activity and defense responses. Transgenic Res. 2006, 15, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P.; Lemaire, K.; Winderickx, J.; Dickson, R.C.; Lester, R.L.; Ferket, K.K.; Van Even, F.; Parret, A.H.; Broekaert, W.F. A gene encoding a sphingolipid biosynthesis enzyme determines the sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an antifungal plant defensin from dahlia (Dahlia merckii). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9531–9536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yang, K.; Liu, X.; Du, L.P.; Ye, X.G.; Zhang, Z.Y. Development and characterization of AcAMP-sn transgenic wheat with enhanced resistance to wheat take-all. Acta Agron. Sin. 2014, 40, 22. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Almasia, N.I.; Bazzini, A.A.; Hopp, H.E.; Vazquez-Rovere, C. Overexpression of snakin-1 gene enhances resistance to Rhizoctonia solani and Erwinia carotovora in transgenic potato plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 9, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rong, W.; Qi, L.; Wang, J.; Du, L.; Xu, H.; Wang, A.; Zhang, Z. Expression of a potato antimicrobial peptide SN1 increases resistance to take-all pathogen Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in transgenic wheat. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2013, 13, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Breen, S.; Solomon, P.S.; Bedon, F.; Vincent, D. Surveying the potential of secreted antimicrobial peptides to enhance plant disease resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ali, S.; Ganai, B.A.; Kamili, A.N.; Bhat, A.A.; Mir, Z.A.; Bhat, J.A.; Tyagi, A.; Islam, S.T.; Mushtaq, M.; Yadav, P.; et al. Pathogenesis-related proteins and peptides as promising tools for engineering plants with multiple stress tolerance. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 212–213, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silva, M.S.; Arraes, F.; Campos, M.A.; Grossi-de-Sa, M.; Fernandez, D.; Candido, E.S.; Cardoso, M.H.; Franco, O.L.; Grossi-de-Sa, M.F. Review: Potential biotechnological assets related to plant immunity modulation applicable in engineering disease-resistant crops. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Das, K.; Datta, K.; Karmakar, S.; Datta, S.K. Antimicrobial peptides-small but mighty weapons for plants to fight phytopathogens. Protein Pept. Lett. 2019, 26, 720–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rogozhin, E.A.; Oshchepkova, Y.I.; Odintsova, T.I.; Khadeeva, N.V.; Veshkurova, O.N.; Egorov, T.A.; Grishin, E.V.; Salikhov, S.I. Novel antifungal defensins from Nigella sativa L. seeds. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhu, X.; Zhao, J.; Abbas, H.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, M.; Huang, J.; Cheng, W.; Wang, B.; Bai, C.; Wang, G.; et al. Pyramiding of nine transgenes in maize generates high-level resistance against necrotrophic maize pathogens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 2145–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, B.; Lu, Y.; Xin, Z.; Zhang, Z. Identification and antifungal assay of a wheat β-1,3-glucanase. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, K.; Liu, H.; Du, L.; Ye, X. Generation of marker-free transgenic hexaploid wheat via an Agrobacterium-mediated co-transformation strategy in commercial Chinese wheat varieties. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Saghai-Maroof, M.A.; Soliman, K.M.; Jorgensen, R.A.; Allard, R.W. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 8014–8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, X.; Yang, K.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Q.; Rong, W.; Du, L.; Ye, X.; Qi, L.; Zhang, Z. The wheat AGC kinase TaAGC1 is a positive contributor to host resistance to the necrotrophic pathogen Rhizoctonia cerealis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6591–6603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Dong, N.; Liu, X.; Lu, Y.; Du, L.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Xin, Z.; Zhang, Z. Overexpression of TaPIEP1, a pathogen-induced ERF gene of wheat, confers host-enhanced resistance to fungal pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2010, 10, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 00647 g001 550
Figure 1. Expression and purification of MBP-DmAMP1W. (A) Construction of pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W prokaryotic expression vector. In Escherichia coli, malE-DmAMP1W was predicted to encode the recombinant protein MBP-DmAMP1W. (B) SDS-PAGE (12%) analysis of MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W fusion protein. Lane 1, protein marker. Lane 2 and 3, the supernatant of cell lysate of pMAL-C5X DE3. Lanes 4–7, the supernatant of cell lysate of pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W DE3. The black arrow represents the target protein. (C) SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W fusion protein. Lane 1, protein marker. Lane 2, purified MBP tag protein. Lane 3 and 4, purified MBP-DmAMP1W fusion protein.
Figure 1. Expression and purification of MBP-DmAMP1W. (A) Construction of pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W prokaryotic expression vector. In Escherichia coli, malE-DmAMP1W was predicted to encode the recombinant protein MBP-DmAMP1W. (B) SDS-PAGE (12%) analysis of MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W fusion protein. Lane 1, protein marker. Lane 2 and 3, the supernatant of cell lysate of pMAL-C5X DE3. Lanes 4–7, the supernatant of cell lysate of pMAL-C5X-DmAMP1W DE3. The black arrow represents the target protein. (C) SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W fusion protein. Lane 1, protein marker. Lane 2, purified MBP tag protein. Lane 3 and 4, purified MBP-DmAMP1W fusion protein.
Ijms 21 00647 g001
Ijms 21 00647 g002 550
Figure 2. Inhibitory activity of DmAMP1W against Rhizoctonia cerealis and Bipolaris sorokiniana. The growth of pathogenic fungi mycelium within five days after inoculation was exhibited from left to right. The fungal mycelia on plates were treated by 65 μg/mL MBP and 65 μg/mL MBP-DmAMP1W, respectively. CK and AMP on the mediums represent MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W treatments, respectively. These assays were conducted three times with similar results.
Figure 2. Inhibitory activity of DmAMP1W against Rhizoctonia cerealis and Bipolaris sorokiniana. The growth of pathogenic fungi mycelium within five days after inoculation was exhibited from left to right. The fungal mycelia on plates were treated by 65 μg/mL MBP and 65 μg/mL MBP-DmAMP1W, respectively. CK and AMP on the mediums represent MBP and MBP-DmAMP1W treatments, respectively. These assays were conducted three times with similar results.
Ijms 21 00647 g002
Ijms 21 00647 g003 550
Figure 3. Plant expression vector and molecular characterization in DmAMP1W transgenic wheat plants. (A) Plant expression vector pWMB122:DmAMP1W–His. Tnos, 3′ untranslated terminator region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens nopaline synthase gene. The arrow indicates the fragment amplified in the PCR detection. (B) PCR patterns of DmAMP1W in T1–T2 transgenic plants. WT indicates the non-transformed Zhoumai18. P represents pWMB122:DmAMP1W–His vector as positive control. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 represent DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. (C) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR assays of DmAMP1W transcript in transgenic wheat. The amplification of semi-quantitative RT-PCR took 27 cycles. WT indicates the non-transformed Zhoumai18. P represents pWMB122:DmAMP1W–His vector as positive control. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 represent DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of the organ expression pattern of DmAMP1W in transgenic wheat lines at 30 d post R. cerealis inoculation. Total RNA was extracted from spike, leaf, leaf sheath and stem organs of the five transgenic wheat lines. Each sample of three technique replications was averaged and statistically treated (Student’s t-test; ** p < 0.01). Error bars represents standard errors. (E) DmAMP1W–His fusion protein in transgenic plants in T2 and recipient Zhoumai18 was monitored by immunoblot analysis with the polyclonal anti-His antibody.
Figure 3. Plant expression vector and molecular characterization in DmAMP1W transgenic wheat plants. (A) Plant expression vector pWMB122:DmAMP1W–His. Tnos, 3′ untranslated terminator region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens nopaline synthase gene. The arrow indicates the fragment amplified in the PCR detection. (B) PCR patterns of DmAMP1W in T1–T2 transgenic plants. WT indicates the non-transformed Zhoumai18. P represents pWMB122:DmAMP1W–His vector as positive control. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 represent DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. (C) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR assays of DmAMP1W transcript in transgenic wheat. The amplification of semi-quantitative RT-PCR took 27 cycles. WT indicates the non-transformed Zhoumai18. P represents pWMB122:DmAMP1W–His vector as positive control. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 represent DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of the organ expression pattern of DmAMP1W in transgenic wheat lines at 30 d post R. cerealis inoculation. Total RNA was extracted from spike, leaf, leaf sheath and stem organs of the five transgenic wheat lines. Each sample of three technique replications was averaged and statistically treated (Student’s t-test; ** p < 0.01). Error bars represents standard errors. (E) DmAMP1W–His fusion protein in transgenic plants in T2 and recipient Zhoumai18 was monitored by immunoblot analysis with the polyclonal anti-His antibody.
Ijms 21 00647 g003
Ijms 21 00647 g004 550
Figure 4. Typical symptoms of sharp eyespot and common root rot in DmAMP1W transgenic and non-transformed wheat plants. (A) Typical symptoms of sharp eyespot in DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines and non-transformed wheat cv. Zhoumai18. Zhoumai18 was the transgenic recipient. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 represent DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. IT indicates infection type. WT represents the recipient Zhoumai18. (B) Typical symptoms of common root rot in DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines and non-transformed wheat cv. Zhoumai18. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 indicate DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. IT represents infection type. WT represents the recipient Zhoumai18.
Figure 4. Typical symptoms of sharp eyespot and common root rot in DmAMP1W transgenic and non-transformed wheat plants. (A) Typical symptoms of sharp eyespot in DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines and non-transformed wheat cv. Zhoumai18. Zhoumai18 was the transgenic recipient. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 represent DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. IT indicates infection type. WT represents the recipient Zhoumai18. (B) Typical symptoms of common root rot in DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines and non-transformed wheat cv. Zhoumai18. DA1, DA2, DA3, DA4 and DA5 indicate DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines. IT represents infection type. WT represents the recipient Zhoumai18.
Ijms 21 00647 g004
Table
Table 1. Responses of DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines to sharp eyespot.
Table 1. Responses of DmAMP1W transgenic wheat lines to sharp eyespot.
LinesT1T2
ITDIITDI
DA12.17 **43.41 **2.50 **50.00 **
DA21.81 **36.27 **2.57 **51.40 **
DA32.22 *44.36 *2.72 *54.40 *
DA41.72 **34.47 **2.30 **46.00 **
DA51.37 *27.31 *2.68 *53.60 *
WT2.9158.223.1262.48
* or ** represent a significant difference between each transgenic wheat line and WT Zhoumai18 at p < 0.05 or 0.01 (Student’s t-test). IT represents infection type. DI represents eyespot disease index of each wheat line.
Table
Table 2. Responses of DmAMP1W transgenic wheat to common root rot.
Table 2. Responses of DmAMP1W transgenic wheat to common root rot.
LinesITDI
DA11.44 **28.80 **
DA21.23 **24.60 **
DA31.38 **27.60 **
DA41.48 **29.60 **
DA51.33 **26.60 **
WT2.2745.40
** represents significant difference between each transgenic wheat line and WT Zhoumai18 at p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). IT represents infection type. DI represents disease index of common root rot.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, Q.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Z. Ecotopic Expression of the Antimicrobial Peptide DmAMP1W Improves Resistance of Transgenic Wheat to Two Diseases: Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020647

AMA Style

Su Q, Wang K, Zhang Z. Ecotopic Expression of the Antimicrobial Peptide DmAMP1W Improves Resistance of Transgenic Wheat to Two Diseases: Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(2):647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020647

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Qiang, Ke Wang, and Zengyan Zhang. 2020. "Ecotopic Expression of the Antimicrobial Peptide DmAMP1W Improves Resistance of Transgenic Wheat to Two Diseases: Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 2: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020647

APA Style

Su, Q., Wang, K., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Ecotopic Expression of the Antimicrobial Peptide DmAMP1W Improves Resistance of Transgenic Wheat to Two Diseases: Sharp Eyespot and Common Root Rot. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(2), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020647

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop