Next Article in Journal
Role of Exosomes in Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment
Previous Article in Journal
The Expression Profile of Dental Pulp-Derived Stromal Cells Supports Their Limited Capacity to Differentiate into Adipogenic Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms21082754
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterologous Expression of a Glycine soja C2H2 Zinc Finger Gene Improves Aluminum Tolerance in Arabidopsis

by
Yuan-Tai Liu
1,2,3,4,
Qi-Han Shi
1,2,3,4,
He-Jie Cao
1,2,3,4,
Qi-Bin Ma
1,2,3,4,
Hai Nian
1,2,3,4,* and
Xiu-Xiang Zhang
1,2,3,4,*
1
The State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
The Guangdong Provincial Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
The Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Breeding of Guangdong Province, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
4
The Guangdong Subcenter of National Center for Soybean Improvement, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(8), 2754; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082754
Submission received: 3 January 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 15 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aluminum (Al) toxicity limits plant growth and has a major impact on the agricultural productivity in acidic soils. The zinc-finger protein (ZFP) family plays multiple roles in plant development and abiotic stresses. Although previous reports have confirmed the function of these genes, their transcriptional mechanisms in wild soybean (Glycine soja) are unclear. In this study, GsGIS3 was isolated from Al-tolerant wild soybean gene expression profiles to be functionally characterized in Arabidopsis. Laser confocal microscopic observations demonstrated that GsGIS3 is a nuclear protein, containing one C2H2 zinc-finger structure. Our results show that the expression of GsGIS3 was of a much higher level in the stem than in the leaf and root and was upregulated under AlCl3, NaCl or GA3 treatment. Compared to the control, overexpression of GsGIS3 in Arabidopsis improved Al tolerance in transgenic lines with more root growth, higher proline and lower Malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation under concentrations of AlCl3. Analysis of hematoxylin staining indicated that GsGIS3 enhanced the resistance of transgenic plants to Al toxicity by reducing Al accumulation in Arabidopsis roots. Moreover, GsGIS3 expression in Arabidopsis enhanced the expression of Al-tolerance-related genes. Taken together, our findings indicate that GsGIS3, as a C2H2 ZFP, may enhance tolerance to Al toxicity through positive regulation of Al-tolerance-related genes.

1. Introduction

Crop growth is restricted on acid soils, which accounts for about 50% of global arable lands [1,2]. When the soil has a pH below 5, Al mainly exists as Al3+, which forms an Al complex in the soil [3,4]. Al3+ can inhibit root development by damaging cell walls [5] and the structure of cytoskeletons [6], affecting the plasma membrane structure [7,8,9] as well as impeding the stress of signaling pathways [10]. Consequently, nutrient uptake is inhibited, and root cell death is induced, which leads to significant reductions in crop yield [11,12]. Therefore, Al toxicity has been widely acknowledged as a global problem for plant growth and crop yield on acidic soil [11,12].
In the past few decades, many studies have clarified the mechanisms of plant tolerance to Al toxicity [13,14,15]. Up to now, two main mechanisms of Al resistance, Al exclusion and Al tolerance, have been investigated in most plant species. The external exclusion mechanism is that the root cells exclude Al3+ from the protoplasts by some ways, while the internal tolerance mechanism is to chelate Al3+ in the cell sap or isolate it to vacuoles [1]. Some plants chelate and detoxify Al3+ by secreting organic acids, such as malate, citrate and oxalate [16,17]. The gene Al-activated malate transporter 1 (ALMT1), which encodes an anion transporter/channel, was first identified in wheat. ALMT1 is responsible for Al-activated secretion of malate in plant roots. Previous studies showed that plants could release both malate and citrate in response to Al stress, with malate being essential for Al detoxification [11,18]. Al toxicity is mainly concentrated to the root apex, where phytohormones such as gibberellin, abscisic acid (ABA), and cytokinin are synthesized [19]. A previous study has reported that NO induced the synthesis of auxin and gibberellin to promote the degradation of the GA signal transduction inhibitory protein (DELLA proteins), which improved the plant’s tolerance to aluminum toxicity [19]. Thus, it can be seen that some phytohormones are involved in the Al-stress response. Plants also activate antioxidant defense to mitigate oxidative damage caused by aluminum toxicity; the defense systems include superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione (GSH) and proline. Plants can remove reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by aluminum stress in accordance with these complex enzyme systems; thus, enhancing plant antioxidant capacity can improve plant resistance to aluminum toxicity. Previous reports indicated that proline content in plants increases under stress, and a large amount of proline can alleviate the damage caused by adversity stress [20]. MDA content is an important parameter to reflect the potential antioxidant capacity of plants [21]. Proline and MDA can be used as physiological indicators for evaluating the resistance of plants to abiotic stress.
The zinc-finger protein (ZFP) family is one of the largest family of transcription factors in plants [22]. According to the number and position of the cysteine and histidine residues, zinc-finger proteins are divided into C2H2, C4, C6, C4HC3, C2HC, C2HC5, and combined types. Among them, C2H2 ZFP is a eukaryotic transcription factor, which contains 1–4 zinc finger structures, and, in plants, it has a highly conserved QALGGH motif, which plays an important role in abiotic stress [23]. Since the first C2H2 ZFP gene EPF1 was isolated from petunia [24], more C2H2 ZFP family genes have been found in plants and widely reported to be involved in responses to biotic and abiotic stresses [25]. In Arabidopsis, constitutive expression of AtZAT7 or AtZAT10 improved salt tolerance [25,26]. Overexpression of ZAT18 enhanced drought tolerance of Arabidopsis [27], whereas AtZAT6 could regulate biotic and abiotic stress tolerance through the Salicylic Acid (SA) activation pathway [28]. AtSIZ1 increased the tolerance to salinity by maintaining ionic homeostasis and osmotic equilibrium in Arabidopsis [29]. In rice, OsZFP179 participated in response to salt stress [30]. The C2H2 ZFP gene, Al resistance transcription factor 1 (ART1), mainly regulated the expressions of Al-tolerance-related genes in rice [31]. OsZFP252 could respond to salt and drought stress, whereas its overexpression enhanced proline and soluble sugar contents in rice plants as well as the expression of drought stress-related response genes was significantly upregulated [32]. In addition, OsZFP245 was induced by drought and cold and the over-expressed transgenic plants showed resistance to low temperature and drought [33]. Similar to rice and Arabidopsis, many ZFP genes that were involved in abiotic stress have been reported in other species. For instance, GhSTOP1 enhanced the resistance to Al and proton stress in transgenic cotton plants by delaying the lateral root initiation process. Heterologous expression of Zoysia japonica gene, ZjZFN1, improved salt tolerance in Arabidopsis [34]. A wheat gene TaZAT8 played essential roles in regulating tolerance to Pi deprivation through mediating P acquisition, ROS homeostasis and root system development [35]. Among the ZFP genes in soybean, over-expression of GsZFP1 improved the tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis, while GmZFP3 negatively regulated its drought tolerance [23]. Overexpression of GmZF1 made the transgenic Arabidopsis more adaptable to cold stress [36]. GmSTOP1 members have been found to play a critical role in H+ and Al toxicity through transcriptional regulation of H+ tolerance and Al tolerance genes [37].
Soybean is one of the most important oil and protein crops in the world, providing approximately 28% of the edible oil and 67% of the plant protein sources for human beings [38]. Wild soybean is a relative ancestor of soybean. In the process of domestication and improvement of soybeans, the genetic diversity of soybeans has declined sharply. The annual wild soybean has a large amount of genetic diversity and has preserved the excellent qualities lost in soybean. Therefore, via our previous work, we constructed Al-tolerant wild soybean gene expression profiles using the collected wild soybean resource in order to study the mechanism of resistance to acid aluminum stress. Although many studies have identified the functions of ZFP family members in abiotic stress and growth development in other plant species, the potential transcriptional regulation mechanism of Al tolerance in soybean is still unknown. In the current study, we cloned a C2H2 zinc-finger protein, GsGIS3, from the wild soybean BW69 line (Al-resistant line of Glycine Soja), aiming to analyze its role in Al stress tolerance and investigate its potential transcriptional regulation mechanism.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation and Bioinformatics Analysis of GsGIS3

A C2H2 ZFP gene, which was named GsGIS3, induced by acidic Al stress was isolated on the basis of Al-tolerant wild soybean gene expression profiles. The GsGIS3 cDNA sequence was obtained from the NCBI database under gene locus LOC100811796 and protein accession number of XP_003536676.1. The gene GIS3, located on soybean chromosome 10, the full-length genome sequence of GsGIS3 included 1 exon with an open reading frame (ORF) 852 bp in length. The predicted GsGIS3 protein comprises 283 amino acids (AA) (Figure 1A). The GsGIS3 protein contained one typical zinc finger structure and a QALGGH motif (Figure 1A). Its theoretical isoelectric point (pI) was 6.86, and its molecular weight (MW) was 29.66 KD. Phylogenetic analysis showed that GsGIS3 was most closely similar to the zinc finger protein GIS3 (GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS3) from Glycine max (Figure 1B).

2.2. Subcellular Localization of GsGIS3

We predicted by using the online website that GsGIS3 protein was localized in the nucleus. To verify the exact subcellular localization of GsGIS3, we constructed the fusion expression vector pCAMBIA1302-GsGIS3-GFP and conducted transient expression in N. benthamiana leaf cells. As determined by the laser confocal microscopic observations, pCAMBIA1302-GsGIS3-GFP protein accumulated mainly in the nucleus with strong signals of green fluorescence. In contrast, GFP alone was distributed evenly throughout all parts of the cell including the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 2). The results show that GsGIS3 was localized within the nucleus, which suggests that the GsGIS3 protein may act as a transcription factor.

2.3. Expression Patterns of GsGIS3

The quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to investigate the expression patterns of GsGIS3. As the reports showed, GsGIS3 was mainly expressed in the root and stem. However, GsGIS3 was expressed to a lesser degree in the leaf (Figure 3A). The expression level of GsGIS3 was higher in 2–4-cm root segments than in 0–2- and 4–6-cm root segments. In addition, GsGIS3 expression was considerably elevated in all tissues with Al treatment (Figure 3A,B). The results suggest that GsGIS3 protein may function as a C2H2 ZFP transcription factor in root and stem development in soybean. Compared to the control, different Al treatment concentrations could all significantly induce the upregulation of GsGIS3 expression, while the expression improved up to the highest level of five-fold at the treatment of 50 μM AlCl3 compared with those detected under control condition (Figure 3C), and the expression level decreased to 2.5-fold at the treatment of 100 μM AlCl3 compared with those detected under control condition. In addition, we analyzed the temporal expression pattern of GsGIS3 under acidic Al treatment over a period of 24 h; the experimental results indicated that GsGIS3 was quickly induced by Al treatment after a short time period and increased up to the highest expression level of 4.5-fold at 6 h (Figure 3D). To investigate the expression patterns of GsGIS3 response to other abiotic stresses, we analyzed the transcript abundance of GsGIS3 under NaCl, GA3, 6-BA and ABA treatments. Similarly, the transcription of GsGIS3 could be enhanced by NaCl and GA3 treatments. Under 200 mM NaCl treatment, the expression of GsGIS3 was increased rapidly up to the highest level of 9.3-fold after 6 h and then reduced to a lower level under the 12–24 h treatments (Figure 3E). For 100 μM GA3 treatment, GsGIS3 was also induced rapidly and similarly reached the highest expression level of 10.9-fold at 4 h, then the expression of GsGIS3 dropped a little and maintained at that level for a long time (Figure 3F). However, we found that GsGIS3 was not subjected to 6-BA and ABA treatment in this study (Figure 3G,H). The results suggest that GsGIS3 might play a potential role in Al stress or GAs-mediated pathways.

2.4. Overexpression of GsGIS3 Enhanced Plant Tolerance to Al toxicity

To explore the tolerance of GsGIS3 transgenic lines to Al stress, we identified the transcription levels of five homozygous transgenic lines and selected three lines with higher expression levels for subsequent experiments. Arabidopsis seedlings were treated at 0, 50 and 100 μM AlCl3 for seven days. Under the control growth conditions, no obvious difference was found between wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis. Under treatment of 100 μM AlCl3, all Arabidopsis roots were inhibited in varying degrees compared to the control; the root length of wild-type plants was 3.4 cm, while the root lengths of GsGIS3 transgenic lines ranged from 4 to 4.5 cm (Figure 4A,B). The transgenic lines showed better growth than wild-type plants in Al stress. Furthermore, under the control conditions, no difference was found in both wild-type plants and GsGIS3 transgenic lines. The contents of proline and MDA were improved in Al stress. However, under 100 mM AlCl3 treatment, proline contents in WT plants increased to 23 μg·g−1 of fresh weight while the proline contents in transgenic lines ranged from 43 to 56 μg·g−1 of fresh weight in transgenic lines, (Figure 4C). In addition, under 100 mM AlCl3 treatment, MDA accumulation in WT plants improved to 0.019 μmol.g-1 of fresh weight, while MDA contents in GsGIS3 transgenic lines increased to the range of 0.010–0.013 mmol·g−1 of fresh weight in Al stress (Figure 4D). MDA in wild-type was significantly higher than that of transgenic lines.
To further verify the tolerance of GsGIS3 to Al stress, seven-days-old transgenic lines and WT seedings were transformed to 1/30 Hoagland nutrient solution (without NH4H2PO4 and plus 1 mM CaCl2 and 2 μM AlCl3) for 21 days. Under the control growth conditions, no obvious difference was found between wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis. The total root lengths of transgenic lines and WT were about 130 cm, and the surface area of that was about 12 cm2. However, under AlCl3 treatment, all observed plants performed delayed growth and depressed root elongation; the total root length of the WT was 29 cm, while the total root lengths of GsGIS3 transgenic lines ranged from 43 to 47 cm. The SA of the WT was 2.2 cm2, while the SA of GsGIS3 transgenic lines ranged from 3.9 to 4.4 cm2. Less damage was found in transgenic lines compared to WT plants, which showed a higher total root length and total root surface area (Figure 5A–C). The results of phenotypic identification indicate that overexpression of the GsGIS3 gene enhanced the tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis to Al stress.

2.5. Overexpression of GsGIS3 Reduces the Hematoxylin Staining Degree of the Hairy Roots

To further verify the function of GsGIS3 in Al tolerance, homologous expression of GsGIS3 in soybean hairy roots was done using Hematoxylin staining. It was found that the staining of soybean hairy roots with the overexpression of GsGIS3 was shallower and that it was deeper in RNAi soybean hairy roots compared to control (Figure 6), indicating that overexpression of GsGIS3 improves the tolerance of the hairy roots to Al stress by reducing Al accumulation in soybean roots.

2.6. Expression Patterns of Al Stress/GA3-related Genes Regulated by GsGIS3

To further explore the potential transcriptional mechanism, we used qRT-PCR to assess the differential expression of these genes between GsGIS3 transgenic lines and WT plants. Two related Al tolerance genes AtALMT1 and AtALS3 and three GA-related genes including Gibberellin synthetase (GA3-oxidase) AtGA3OX1, Gibberellin synthesis receptor (Gibberellin insensitive dwarf1) AtGID1, and Gibberellin inactivation enzyme (2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases) AtGA2OX1 were selected to evaluate the changes in transcription. Under normal growth conditions, there was no significant difference in gene expression between WT plants and transgenic lines. Under Al stress, the expressions of AtALMT1, AtALS3 and AtGA2OX1 were upregulated in GsGIS3 transgenic lines with 10-fold, 1.8-fold, and 3-fold improvement as compared to those in the WT plants, respectively (Figure 7A,B,E). The expressions of AtGA3OX1 and AtGID1 were downregulated to 0.6-fold in GsGIS3 transgenic lines as compared to those in WT plants (Figure 7C,D).

3. Discussion

Plant growth and development are mainly constrained by Al rhizotoxicities on acid soil [3]. To adapt to these stress factors, multiple regulatory mechanisms involving a quantity of genes were discovered. The C2H2 ZFP family is one of the biggest transcription factor (TF) families in plants. Since Takatsuji discovered the first plant C2H2 zinc-finger protein gene EPF1 [24], many C2H2 ZFP family genes have been proved to play various roles in the resistance to abiotic stresses and plant growth as shown by previous studies [23,29,41]. However, few studies have attempted to interpret the C2H2 ZFP members’ functional roles and underlying transcriptional regulation mechanism in soybean. In our study, we cloned a typical zinc-finger protein, GsGIS3, from Glycine soja. The amino acid sequences alignment showed that GsGIS3 protein contained a QALGGH motif and one typical zinc finger structure, which was most similar to three other C2H2 ZFPs AtGIS3 (NP_177003.1), AtZFP6 (NP_176873.1), GmZF1 (AAZ03389.1) (Figure 1A). The GsGIS3 protein was localized in the nucleus (Figure 2), which was identical with that of STOP1 in Glycine max [37] and Vigna umbellate [42]. Similar results were found in GIS3 and ZFP6 protein in Arabidopsis [43], ZFN1 in Zoysia japonica [34], and ZFP1 in Glycine soja [44]. As extensively reported, we speculated that GsGIS3 protein might function as a typical C2H2 ZFP and play certain roles in plants.
The evolutionary tree analysis of GsGIS3 protein and other C2H2 ZFPs in different species showed that GsGIS3 protein had more similarity to AtGIS3 and AtZFP6 in Arabidopsis (Figure 1B). The GsGIS3 protein belongs to the GIS subfamily of C2H2 ZFPs. Recent research confirmed that the members of GIS subfamily such as AtGIS3 and AtZFP6 play significant roles in stem and root development through GA and cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis [43,45]. The GsGIS3 gene, which is constitutive expression with the rich transcripts in soybean stem and root, was upregulated rapidly by AlCl3 and GA3 treatment (Figure 3). Therefore, we speculated that GsGIS3 may be involved in the regulation of plant tolerance to Al stress through Gibberellins (GAs) pathways. To investigate its function, GsGIS3 was transformed into Arabidopsis to obtain the homologous lines to verify the Arabidopsis tolerance to Al stress. The seedling root elongation of GsGIS3 transgenic lines was found to exhibit better growth under Al stress than that of WT plants (Figure 4A and Figure 5A), which appeared in the form of higher total root length and total root surface area (Figure 5B,C). The phenotypes in response to Al stress were also consistent with other C2H2 ZFPs in different species. For instance, GhSTOP1 could improve Al and H+ stress tolerance in transgenic cotton plants, and it played a role as an essential gene to regulate the expression of several genes that are necessary for the tolerance mechanisms in acid aluminum soil and lateral root development [46]. In addition, STOP1-like proteins were indicated to associate with Al tolerance in sweet sorghum. A previous report indicated that proline content in plants increases under stress, and a large amount of proline can alleviate the damage caused by adversity stress [20]. Proline and MDA can be used as physiological indicators for evaluating the resistance of plants to abiotic stress [21]. MDA is an important parameter to reflect the potential antioxidant capacity of plants, the content of MDA is significantly accumulated when the plants are under stresses. In this study, the contents of proline and MDA in GsGIS3 transgenic lines and WT were also verified to monitor the resistance to Al stress, and the results were associated with phenotype observations. Transgenic lines showed higher proline but lower MDA contents than those in WT plants in Al stress (Figure 4B,C). This is similar to the previous research [34,47], indicating that over-expression of GsGIS3 may improve the resistance to Al stress through increasing the content of proline and decreasing the content of MDA.
To further verify the function of GsGIS3 in Al tolerance, homologous expression of GsGIS3 in soybean hairy roots was done using Hematoxylin staining. In the previous research, hematoxylin could easily combine with Al in the root to form a purplish red complex. The degree of Al staining combined with hematoxylin and root tip was deep, which means that more Al was accumulated in the root tip, which was sensitive to Al toxicity. Due to the blue-purple color of hematoxylin when complexing with Al, the visual evaluation of dyed roots can be used to detect the accumulation of Al in root tissues [48]. In recent years, there have been more and more reports on the use of soybean hairy root transformation to verify the function of the soybean Al resistance gene. For example, the dyed GmME1-OX hairy root tip was shallow, and the content of Al was low, indicating strong Al resistance [49]. After Al treatment, the hairy roots of over-expression were found to have the shallow color compared to the control, with the deep color observed of RNAi roots compared to the control, which showed that the Al ion content of GsGIS3-OX hairy root was lower than control (Figure 6). This supported the assumption that over-expression of GsGIS3 could enhance the resistance to Al stress.
Some studies have demonstrated that transcription factor could enhance tolerance to Al stresses through regulating the expression of Al-tolerance-related genes [37,42,50]. Several studies have reported that ALMT1 gene is related to Al tolerance in Arabidopsis [18], Brassica napus [51], and rye [52]. To explore the potential molecular regulatory mechanisms of GsGIS3 in Al stress responses, some Al-tolerance-related genes were assayed in wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis under normal and stress conditions. The increased transcript level of ALMT1 and ALS3 showed an improved Al tolerance capability in GsGIS3-over-expressing lines (Figure 7A,B), which was consistent with VuSTOP1 [42], GmSTOP1 [37] and WRKY46 [50]. ALMT1, which promotes malate secretion, is related to the most Al-tolerant phenotype in Arabidopsis, and previous reports indicated that transcription factor WRKY46 could bind the promoter of ALMT1 to modulate Al stress tolerance [50], suggesting that GsGIS3 may function as a regulator of ALMT1 to improve Al tolerance.
Recent studies on GAs have found that related genes and regulatory proteins in GAs synthesis and signaling pathways are closely related to the plant-stress-resistance. Plants can adapt to the adverse environment by regulating the expression of gibberellin-related metabolic genes to reduce the GA bioactivity in the plant, such as Gibberellin synthetase (GA20OXs and GA3OXs), Gibberellin inactivation enzyme (GA2OXs) and DELLAs [53,54,55]. A previous study has reported that NO induced the synthesis of auxin and gibberellin to promote the degradation of DELLA proteins, which improved the plant’s tolerance to aluminum toxicity [19]. Previous studies revealed that plants could improve their resistance to stress through reducing the accumulation of active gibberellin in plants [56], usually accompanied by the upregulation of GA2OX1 and the downregulation of GA3OX1 [57]. Similar results were also found in rice that over-expressed GA2OX5 increased the salt tolerance of rice, and its salt tolerance disappeared when GA3 was applied. Studies in Arabidopsis found that in DDF1-overexpressing transgenic Arabidopsis lines, the transcription level of GA2OX7 gene increased the resistance to salt [58]. In the study of the mitochondrial phosphate transporter (MPT) of Arabidopsis, the over-expressed MPT of Arabidopsis was found to be more sensitive to salt [59]. The research showed that the expression of GA3OX1 increased in the transgenic plant, while the expressions of GA2OXs decreased [59]. Furthermore, GID1 is the receptor of the active Gibberellin, and the reduction of GID1 can also result in the decrease of active Gibberellin [60]. The abovementioned research indicated that the plant could enhance resistance to abiotic stress through GAs pathways. In our study, the transcription level of GA2OX1 was upregulated by GsGIS3, whereas the expression of GA3OX1 was reduced in transgenic Arabidopsis in Al stress (Figure 7C,D) and the expression of AtGID1 was reduced in GsGIS3 transgenic plants, which suggest that GsGIS3 might promote plant tolerance to Al stress to a certain extent through GAs pathways.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

A type of Glycine soja, “BW69”, was used to clone GsGIS3 for investigation of GsGIS3 expression patterns in response to various stresses including AlCl3, NaCl, GA3, 6-BA and ABA. All wild soybean BW69 seeds were grown in an artificial climate chamber (22–24 °C temperature, 66% humidity with a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod), as described in detail previously [61]. After germination, the seedings were pre-cultured in surface-sterilized vermiculite for 2 days and then transplanted into the 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution (pH 5.8) when the cotyledons unfolded. After adapting for two days, for the experiments on response to different stresses, the wild soybean seedlings were treated in the 0.5 mM CaCl2 solutions with 50 μM AlCl3 (pH 4.5), 200 mM NaCl, 100 μM GA3, 100 μM 6-BA or 10 μM ABA for 24 h (n = 16 seedings per group). The root samples (6 cm long) were obtained from the seedings treated after 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h [43,47,61]. To analyze the tissue expression pattern of GsGIS3, the seedings with open cotyledons were cultured in the nutrient solutions (pH 5.8, 0.5 mM CaCl2) for 4 days after treatment with 50 μM AlCl3 for 6 h. Samples of root (6 cm long), stem leaf and different root sections (0–2, 2–4 and 4–6 cm) were collected from the seedings (n = 16 seedings per group). To analyze the influence of the Al concentration gradient on gene expression, the seedings with open cotyledons were cultured in the nutrient solutions (pH 5.8, 0.5 mM CaCl2) for 4 days, and then the seedings were treated with 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 μM AlCl3 (pH 4.5,0.5 mM CaCl2). Root samples (6 cm long) were harvested after 6 h treatments (n = 16 seedings per group). All samples were frozen with liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C [62]. Arabidopsis (ecotype Col-0) was used for GsGIS3 genetic transformation and grown in the 1:1 (v/v) mixture of peat soil: vermiculite.

4.2. GsGIS3 Gene Isolation

Based on the previous analysis of acidic aluminum tolerance-related gene expression profiles (unpublished data), we obtained the sequence information of the GsGIS3 gene from the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with the protein ID of XP_003536676.1. The GsGIS3 gene-specific primers were designed in accordance with the full-length cDNA, and the primers were used to isolate the gene from roots of BW69 by RT-PCR.

4.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The homologous genes and proteins of GsGIS3 were searched in the database of NCBI and Joint Genome Institute (JGI) (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/) according to the nucleotide sequence and the amino acid sequence of GsGIS3 protein. We aligned the nucleotide sequences with the software of DNAMAN. The prediction of the GsGIS3 protein conserved domain and structure was made using the NCBI blast results. We used the software of MEGA 7.0 to construct the phylogenetic trees by the Neighbor-Joining method; the number on the node represents the percentage of the boot value of 1000 replicates [63]. Its molecular weight (MW) and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) were computed through the Compute pI/MW tool (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/) [34]. We used an online website to speculate the localization of the protein (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/).

4.4. Vector Construction and Transformation of GsGIS3 in Arabidopsis

We used the specific primers to amplify the full coding sequence of GsGIS3 from the GsGIS3-pMD-18T vector, and then inserted it into the XbaI and EcoRI sites of pCAMBIA1301 by the restriction endonuclease. After the reforming reaction, the pCAMBIA1301-GsGIS3 fusion construct was produced under the action of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV 35S) promoter.
The complete coding sequence of GsGIS3 without a stop codon was inserted into the NcoI and SpeI restriction sites. Then, along with the green fusion protein (eGFP), a fusion construct of pCAMBIA1302-GsGIS3-eGFP was produced under the control of CaMV 35S promoter.
The sequence outside the conserved domain of GsGIS3 (206 bp) was inserted into the both ends of the RNAi vector pMU103 intron. The forward fragment was inserted into XmaI and SacI sites first, and then the reverse fragment was inserted into the AscI and AvrII sites.

4.5. Subcellular Localization of the GsGIS3 Protein

In accordance with previous research [40], localization of the GsGIS3 protein was performed. We transformed the plasmids into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by the heat shock method. Then, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens with plasmids was injected into the young leaves of 4-week-old tobacco plants in accordance with a previously described method [64]. After 48 h, we observed and photographed the lower epidermal cells of the leaves with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Germany).

4.6. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The samples, including the wild soybean and Arabidopsis, were used with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) method to extract the total RNA. Reversing transcription for single-stranded cDNA was synthesized with 1 mg total RNA using a HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme, NanJing, China). The qRT-PCR analyses were performed on a CFX96TM Real-Time system (United States) with ChamQ SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, NanJing, China) in a total volume of 20 μL. A two-step qRT-PCR was adopted and set as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 39 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The gene Actin3 or tubulin was chosen as the inner reference gene. Al resistance genes ALMT1 (At1G08430) and ALS3 (At1G08430) were selected to investigate transcriptional mechanisms of Al stress response. Genes related to Gibberellin anabolism and signal transduction of GA3OX1 (AT1G15550), GID1 (AT3G05120) and GA2OX1 (AT1G78440) were chosen to surmise the potential regulatory mechanism. β-tubulin gene was adopted as internal reference. The analyses for qPCR results were assessed by the 2–ΔΔCt method [65]. The specific primers are listed in Table S1.

4.7. Generation of Transgenic Plants

Using the previously described floral dip method [66], Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 transformed with construct plasmids was used to infect Arabidopsis plants to generate transgenic plants expressing GsGIS3. Transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were screened using, 20 mg/mL hygromycin. Positive transgenic plants were verified by reverse transcription PCR and genomic PCR. The T3 transgenic lines exhibiting 100% resistance to hygromycin were harvested for further phenotype research.

4.8. Acidic Aluminum Treatment in Transgenic Arabidopsis

For vegetative growth, all Arabidopsis seeds were surface-sterilized with 10% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min and then wash with sterilized ultra-pure water 5 times on a clean bench. The T3 generation Arabidopsis seeds were planted on 1/2 Murashige and Skoog (MS) (pH 5.8) agar medium. After the vernalization at 4 °C in darkness for 3 days, the seedings were transferred to the incubator (16 h light/8 h dark) at 22 °C for further treatment. For long-term AlCl3 treatment in 1/2 MS phytagel medium, the Arabidopsis seedlings with the consistent growing situation (1 cm long) in the 1/2 MS were selected to transfer to the medium containing 0, 50 and 100 μM AlCl3 (pH 4.5, 1/2MS) from the 1/2 MS phytagel medium (pH 5.8), and then the seedings were cultivated at 22 °C (16 h/8 h light/dark) for phenotype observation. For long-term AlCl3 treatment in nutrient solution, the Arabidopsis seedlings were cultivated in an artificial climate chamber (22–24 °C temperature, 66% humidity with a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod), and, when root length was up to 0.8–1 cm, they were transferred to 1/30 Hoagland nutrient solution (without NH4H2PO4 and plus 1 mM CaCl2 and 2 μM AlCl3) for 21 days [42]. Main root elongation was measured in accordance with previously described method [67]. The whole seedlings were used to measure the root indicators (n = 20 seedings per group). The root measurements that included total root length and total root surface areas (SA) were done via WinRHIZO system (Regent Instruments, Québec, Canada).

4.9. Measurements for Proline and MDA

A previously described protocol was followed to measure the content of free proline in plants [68]. Briefly, 5 mL of 3% sulfosalicylic acid were added in 100 mg of plant samples when they were ground sufficiently. After cooling at room temperature, we transferred the 2 mL supernatant to a new test tube, adding 2 mL of acid ninhydrin and 2 mL of glacial acetic and mixing thoroughly. The mixture was heated in a boiling water bath for 40 min, and 5 mL of toluene were added when it was cooling. After delamination, the toluene was absorbed to measure the proline content at 520-nm absorbance. For MDA measurement, we also ground 100 mg plant samples with 5 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in order to remove the 2 mL supernatant; 2 mL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) were added and boiled in the boiling water for 30 min after mixing well; and the MDA contents were measured at 450, 532 and 600 nm absorbance in accordance with the method described in detail previously [69].

4.10. Hematoxylin Staining in Soybean Hairy Roots

The pCAMBIA1301-GsGIS3 vector, RNAi vector and the empty pCAMBIA1301 vector were injected with Agrobacterium rhizogenes pathogenic strain K599 by electroporation [70], and the cotyledon Stage of WaYaoHuangDou (an aluminum sensitive type Soybean) plants were transformed using a syringe to inject the cotyledon. After several days of culturing under suitable temperature and humid environment, the hairy roots were harvested to study the Al ion accumulation degree of the soybean hairy roots by staining Hematoxylin [71]. After treating in the solution with AlCl3 (pH 4.5, 0.5 mM CaCl2) for 6 h, the roots were transferred into ultra-pure water to clean for 30 min, followed by staining with hematoxylin for 30 min. Lastly, the roots were cleaned again in ultra-pure water for 30 min, the hairy roots phenotypes were observed by the microscope (Leica, Germany).

4.11. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed by the mean ± SD of three biological replicates using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, United States). Student’s test at P = 0.01 or P = 0.05 was used to analyze the significant difference between observation values.

5. Conclusions

We isolated a wild soybean C2H2 zinc-finger protein gene, GsGIS3, which is upregulated in response to AlCl3, and GA3 and is enriched in the stem and root of soybean. The GsGIS3 protein is located in the nucleus. Heterologous overexpression of GsGIS3 in Arabidopsis enhances the resistance of transgenic plants to Al stress with MDA content reducing and proline accumulation. The analysis of molecular mechanisms showed that the enhanced resistance to Al stress in Arabidopsis might result in the comprehensive roles in relation to transcriptional activities of the Al tolerance related genes and/or GAs related genes. Therefore, the results above indicate that GsGIS3 may enhance the resistance to Al stresses through certain pathways related to Al stress and/or GAs.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/8/2754/s1. Figure S1: Molecular Identification of Transgenic lines. Table S1: Primer sequences used for quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

Author Contributions

Y.-T.L. contributed to the data collection, analysis, and the writing of the manuscript. Y.-T.L. and X.-X.Z. contributed to the drafting of the manuscript. X.-X.Z. contributed to the revising of the manuscript. Q.-H.S. and H.-J.C. contributed to the data collection and the laboratory work. Y.-T.L., H.N., Q.-B.M. and X.-X.Z. contributed to the conception of the idea, design, and revision of the first draft. H.N., Q.-B.M. and X.-X.Z. provided the Funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Projects of Science and Technology of Guangzhou (201804020015), the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-04-PS09); the grants from National Key Project for Research on Transgenic Biology in China (2014ZX0800921B-2); the grants from the NEW Varieties Cultivation of Genetically Modified Organisms (2016ZX08004002-007) and the Research Project of the State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources (SKLCUSA-b201804).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABAabscisic acid
GA3gibberellin A3
6-BA6-benzylamino-purine
MDAmalondialdehyde
TBAthiobarbituric acid
SODsuperoxide dismutase
PODperoxidase
CATcatalase
APXascorbate peroxidase
GSHglutathione
ROSreactive oxygen species
TCAtrichloroacetic acid

References

  1. Kochian, L.V.; Piñeros, M.A.; Liu, J.; Magalhaes, J.V. Plant adaptation to acid soils: The molecular basis for crop aluminum resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 571–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, J.; Wei, J.; Li, D.; Kong, X.; Rengel, Z.; Chen, L.; Yang, Y.; Cui, X.; Chen, Q. The role of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in plant responses to aluminum toxicity. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kochian, L.V. Cellular mechanisms of aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1995, 46, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, J.; Piñeros, M.A.; Kochian, L.V. The role of aluminum sensing and signaling in plant aluminum resistance. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014, 56, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Horst, W.J.; Schmohl, N.; Kollmeier, M.; Sivaguru, M. Does aluminium affect root growth of maize through interaction with the cell wall–plasma membrane–cytoskeleton continuum? Plant Soil 1999, 215, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sivaguru, M.; Baluška, F.; Volkmann, D.; Felle, H.H.; Horst, W.J. Impacts of aluminum on the cytoskeleton of the maize root apex. Short-term effects on the distal part of the transition zone. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Meriga, B.; Reddy, B.K.; Rao, K.R.; Reddy, L.A.; Kishor, P.K. Aluminium-induced production of oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa). J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 161, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kochian, L.V.; Hoekenga, O.A.; Pineros, M.A. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 459–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, G.; Nian, H.; Li, K.; Yu, Y.; Chen, L. Transcriptional and physiological changes of alfalfa in response to aluminium stress. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 149, 737–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramos-Díaz, A.; Brito-Argáez, L.; Munnik, T.; Hernández-Sotomayor, S.T. Aluminum inhibits phosphatidic acid formation by blocking the phospholipase C pathway. Planta 2007, 225, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Magalhaes, J.V.; Shaff, J.; Kochian, L.V. Aluminum-activated citrate and malate transporters from the MATE and ALMT families function independently to confer Arabidopsis aluminum tolerance. Plant J. 2009, 57, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ma, Q.; Yi, R.; Li, L.; Liang, Z.; Zeng, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhang, X.; Yin, X.; Cai, Z. GsMATE encoding a multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter enhances aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arbelaez, J.D.; Maron, L.G.; Jobe, T.O.; Piñeros, M.A.; Famoso, A.N.; Rebelo, A.R.; Singh, N.; Ma, Q.; Fei, Z.; Kochian, L.V. ALUMINUM RESISTANCE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 1 (ART 1) contributes to natural variation in aluminum resistance in diverse genetic backgrounds of rice (O. sativa). Plant Direct 2017, 1, e00014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Daspute, A.A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Panda, S.K.; Fakrudin, B.; Kobayashi, Y.; Tokizawa, M.; Iuchi, S.; Choudhary, A.K.; Yamamoto, Y.Y.; Koyama, H. Characterization of CcSTOP1; a C2H2-type transcription factor regulates Al tolerance gene in pigeonpea. Planta 2018, 247, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yokosho, K.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. An Al-inducible MATE gene is involved in external detoxification of Al in rice. Plant J. 2011, 68, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ryan, P.; Delhaize, E.; Jones, D. Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2001, 52, 527–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, J.F.; Ryan, P.R.; Delhaize, E. Aluminium tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hoekenga, O.A.; Maron, L.G.; Piñeros, M.A.; Cançado, G.M.; Shaff, J.; Kobayashi, Y.; Ryan, P.R.; Dong, B.; Delhaize, E.; Sasaki, T. AtALMT1, which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 9738–9743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. He, H.; He, L.; Gu, M. Interactions between nitric oxide and plant hormones in aluminum tolerance. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 469–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Natarajan, S.K.; Zhu, W.; Liang, X.; Zhang, L.; Demers, A.J.; Zimmerman, M.C.; Simpson, M.A.; Becker, D.F. Proline dehydrogenase is essential for proline protection against hydrogen peroxide-induced cell death. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Shi, H.; Ye, T.; Chan, Z. Exogenous application of hydrogen sulfide donor sodium hydrosulfide enhanced multiple abiotic stress tolerance in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L). Pers.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 71, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Takatsuji, H. Zinc-finger proteins: The classical zinc finger emerges in contemporary plant science. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 39, 1073–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, D.; Tong, J.; Xu, Z.; Wei, P.; Xu, L.; Wan, Q.; Huang, Y.; He, X.; Yang, J.; Shao, H. Soybean C2H2-type zinc finger protein GmZFP3 with conserved QALGGH motif negatively regulates drought responses in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Takatsuji, H.; Mori, M.; Benfey, P.; Ren, L.; Chua, N. Characterization of a zinc finger DNA-binding protein expressed specifically in Petunia petals and seedlings. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Quan, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q.; Chan, Z. The Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc finger transcription factor ZAT18 is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2991–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, M.-M.; Tang, H.-J.; Ding, L.-Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, H.-S. A novel rice C2H2-type zinc finger protein lacking DLN-box/EAR-motif plays a role in salt tolerance. Biochim. Et Biophys. Acta (Bba)-Gene Struct. Expr. 2007, 1769, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Agarwal, P.; Arora, R.; Ray, S.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, V.P.; Takatsuji, H.; Kapoor, S.; Tyagi, A.K. Genome-wide identification of C 2 H 2 zinc-finger gene family in rice and their phylogeny and expression analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 467–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, H.; Chan, Z. The cysteine2/histidine2-type transcription factor ZINC FINGER OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA 6-activated C-REPEAT-BINDING FACTOR pathway is essential for melatonin-mediated freezing stress resistance in Arabidopsis. J. Pineal Res. 2014, 57, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Han, G.; Yuan, F.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Sui, N.; Wang, B. AtSIZ1 improves salt tolerance by maintaining ionic homeostasis and osmotic balance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2019, 285, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sun, S.-J.; Guo, S.-Q.; Yang, X.; Bao, Y.-M.; Tang, H.-J.; Sun, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, H.-S. Functional analysis of a novel Cys2/His2-type zinc finger protein involved in salt tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 2807–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Yamaji, N.; Huang, C.F.; Nagao, S.; Yano, M.; Sato, Y.; Nagamura, Y.; Ma, J.F. A zinc finger transcription factor ART1 regulates multiple genes implicated in aluminum tolerance in rice. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 3339–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Xu, D.-Q.; Huang, J.; Guo, S.-Q.; Yang, X.; Bao, Y.-M.; Tang, H.-J.; Zhang, H.-S. Overexpression of a TFIIIA-type zinc finger protein gene ZFP252 enhances drought and salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 1037–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Huang, J.; Wang, J.F.; Wang, Q.H.; Zhang, H.S. Identification of a rice zinc finger protein whose expression is transiently induced by drought, cold but not by salinity and abscisic acid. DNA Seq. 2005, 16, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Teng, K.; Tan, P.; Guo, W.; Yue, Y.; Fan, X.; Wu, J. Heterologous expression of a novel Zoysia japonica C2H2 zinc finger gene, ZjZFN1, improved salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ding, W.; Wang, Y.; Fang, W.; Gao, S.; Li, X.; Xiao, K. TaZAT8, a C2H2-ZFP type transcription factor gene in wheat, plays critical roles in mediating tolerance to Pi deprivation through regulating P acquisition, ROS homeostasis and root system establishment. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 158, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yu, G.-H.; Jiang, L.-L.; Ma, X.-F.; Xu, Z.-S.; Liu, M.-M.; Shan, S.-G.; Cheng, X.-G. A soybean C2H2-type zinc finger gene GmZF1 enhanced cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, W.; Lin, Y.; Chen, Q.; Peng, W.; Peng, J.; Tian, J.; Liang, C.; Liao, H. Functional conservation and divergence of soybean GmSTOP1 members in proton and aluminum tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Goldberg, B.; Stacey, G. Genetics and Genomics of Soybean; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Su, J.; Duan, S.; Ao, Y.; Dai, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Liu, B.; Feng, D. A highly efficient rice green tissue protoplast system for transient gene expression and studying light/chloroplast-related processes. Plant Methods 2011, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lü, J.; Suo, H.; Yi, R.; Ma, Q.; Nian, H. Glyma11g13220, a homolog of the vernalization pathway gene VERNALIZATION 1 from soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], promotes flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 232. [Google Scholar]
  41. Muthamilarasan, M.; Bonthala, V.S.; Mishra, A.K.; Khandelwal, R.; Khan, Y.; Roy, R.; Prasad, M. C 2 H 2 type of zinc finger transcription factors in foxtail millet define response to abiotic stresses. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2014, 14, 531–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fan, W.; Lou, H.Q.; Gong, Y.L.; Liu, M.Y.; Cao, M.J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, J.L.; Zheng, S.J. Characterization of an inducible C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factor Vu STOP 1 in rice bean (Vigna umbellata) reveals differential regulation between low pH and aluminum tolerance mechanisms. New Phytol. 2015, 208, 456–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sun, L.; Zhang, A.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, A.; Bao, S.; Yu, H.; Gan, Y. GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS 3 (GIS 3) regulates trichome initiation and development in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Luo, X.; Cui, N.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, L.; Zhai, H.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Wang, X.; Zhu, D.; Li, Y. Over-expression of GsZFP1, an ABA-responsive C2H2-type zinc finger protein lacking a QALGGH motif, reduces ABA sensitivity and decreases stomata size. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1192–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhao, Y.; An, L.; Yan, A.; Meng, X.; Gan, Y. Z inc F inger P rotein 6 (ZFP 6) regulates trichome initiation by integrating gibberellin and cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 699–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kundu, A.; Das, S.; Basu, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Koyama, H.; Ganesan, M. GhSTOP1, a C2H2 type zinc finger transcription factor is essential for Aluminum and proton stress tolerance and lateral root initiation in cotton. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Xia, Z.; Cai, Z.; Ma, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Liu, J.; Nian, H. GmWRKY16 Enhances Drought and Salt Tolerance Through an ABA-Mediated Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rincón, M.; Gonzales, R.A. Aluminum partitioning in intact roots of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Sun, H.; Sun, Z.; Lin, B.; Sun, W.; You, J. Soybean NADP-malic enzyme functions in malate and citrate metabolism and contributes to their efflux under Al stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 8, 2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ding, Z.J.; Yan, J.Y.; Xu, X.Y.; Li, G.X.; Zheng, S.J. WRKY 46 functions as a transcriptional repressor of ALMT 1, regulating aluminum-induced malate secretion in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2013, 76, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ligaba, A.; Katsuhara, M.; Ryan, P.R.; Shibasaka, M.; Matsumoto, H. The BnALMT1 and BnALMT2 genes from rape encode aluminum-activated malate transporters that enhance the aluminum resistance of plant cells. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Fontecha, G.; Silva-Navas, J.; Benito, C.; Mestres, M.; Espino, F.; Hernández-Riquer, M.; Gallego, F. Candidate gene identification of an aluminum-activated organic acid transporter gene at the Alt4 locus for aluminum tolerance in rye (Secale cereale L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 114, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sakamoto, T.; Miura, K.; Itoh, H.; Tatsumi, T.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Ishiyama, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Agrawal, G.K.; Takeda, S.; Abe, K. An overview of gibberellin metabolism enzyme genes and their related mutants in rice. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1642–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Sun, T.-p. Gibberellin-GID1-DELLA: A pivotal regulatory module for plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Javid, M.G.; Sorooshzadeh, A.; Moradi, F.; Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M.; Allahdadi, I. The role of phytohormones in alleviating salt stress in crop plants. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 726. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bai, M.-Y.; Shang, J.-X.; Oh, E.; Fan, M.; Bai, Y.; Zentella, R.; Sun, T.-P.; Wang, Z.-Y. Brassinosteroid, gibberellin and phytochrome impinge on a common transcription module in Arabidopsis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hedden, P.; Thomas, S.G. Gibberellin biosynthesis and its regulation. Biochem. J. 2012, 444, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Magome, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Hanada, A.; Kamiya, Y.; Oda, K. The DDF1 transcriptional activator upregulates expression of a gibberellin-deactivating gene, GA2ox7, under high-salinity stress in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 56, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, W.; Miao, Q.; Sun, D.; Yang, G.; Wu, C.; Huang, J.; Zheng, C. The mitochondrial phosphate transporters modulate plant responses to salt stress via affecting ATP and gibberellin metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hirano, K.; Kouketu, E.; Katoh, H.; Aya, K.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M.; Matsuoka, M. The suppressive function of the rice DELLA protein SLR1 is dependent on its transcriptional activation activity. Plant J. 2012, 71, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zeng, Q.-Y.; Yang, C.-Y.; Ma, Q.-B.; Li, X.-P.; Dong, W.-W.; Nian, H. Identification of wild soybean miRNAs and their target genes responsive to aluminum stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, C.; Sun, X.; Duanmu, H.; Zhu, D.; Yu, Y.; Cao, L.; Liu, A.; Jia, B.; Xiao, J.; Zhu, Y. GsCML27, a gene encoding a calcium-binding EF-hand protein from Glycine soja, plays differential roles in plant responses to bicarbonate, salt and osmotic stresses. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kokkirala, V.R.; Yonggang, P.; Abbagani, S.; Zhu, Z.; Umate, P. Subcellular localization of proteins of Oryza sativa L. in the model tobacco and tomato plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 1336–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Willems, E.; Leyns, L.; Vandesompele, J. Standardization of real-time PCR gene expression data from independent biological replicates. Anal. Biochem. 2008, 379, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Liang, C.; Piñeros, M.A.; Tian, J.; Yao, Z.; Sun, L.; Liu, J.; Shaff, J.; Coluccio, A.; Kochian, L.V.; Liao, H. Low pH, aluminum, and phosphorus coordinately regulate malate exudation through GmALMT1 to improve soybean adaptation to acid soils. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1347–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Matthews, B.F.; Youssef, R.M. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-based transformation of soybean roots to form composite plants. Bio. Protoc. 2016, 6, e1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Delhaize, E.; Craig, S.; Beaton, C.D.; Bennet, R.J.; Jagadish, V.C.; Randall, P.J. Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)(I. Uptake and distribution of aluminum in root apices). Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 02754 g001 550
Figure 1. Amino acid sequence and phylogenetic analysis of GsGIS3. (A) The alignment of C2H2 zinc finger proteins. The position of the domain of zinc finger is labeled. GsGIS3 (XP_003536676.1), AtGIS3 (NP_177003.1), AtZFP6 (NP_176873.1), and GmZF1 (AAZ03389.1). (B) Phylogenetic analysis of GsGIS3 protein orthologs. The GsGIS3 protein is marked with a red box.
Figure 1. Amino acid sequence and phylogenetic analysis of GsGIS3. (A) The alignment of C2H2 zinc finger proteins. The position of the domain of zinc finger is labeled. GsGIS3 (XP_003536676.1), AtGIS3 (NP_177003.1), AtZFP6 (NP_176873.1), and GmZF1 (AAZ03389.1). (B) Phylogenetic analysis of GsGIS3 protein orthologs. The GsGIS3 protein is marked with a red box.
Ijms 21 02754 g001
Ijms 21 02754 g002 550
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of GsGIS3 protein. Subcellular localization of GsGIS3 protein in leaf epidermal cells of tobacco. The protein expression of GFP or GsGIS3-GFP from the leaves after agro-infiltration for 48 h was visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Germany) [39].
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of GsGIS3 protein. Subcellular localization of GsGIS3 protein in leaf epidermal cells of tobacco. The protein expression of GFP or GsGIS3-GFP from the leaves after agro-infiltration for 48 h was visualized using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Germany) [39].
Ijms 21 02754 g002
Ijms 21 02754 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression characteristics of GsGIS3. (A) GsGIS3 expression levels in root, stem, and leaf of Glycine soja. (B) Expression levels of GsGIS3 in Glycine soja roots in different sections. (C) Pattern of GsGIS3 expression under Al concentration gradients. (D) Temporal expression pattern of GsGIS3 under acidic aluminum exposure. (E–H) Patterns of GsGIS3 expression under the different conditions of abiotic stresses: 200 mM NaCl (E); 100 μM GA3 (F); 100 μM 6BA (G); and 10 μM abscisic acid (ABA) (H). GsGIS3 transcript abundance was assessed by qRT-PCR using the 2–ΔΔCt method with the actin Actin3 gene as an internal control [40]. The data are represented as the averages of three independent biological experiments ± SD, and asterisks indicate a significant difference (* P < 0.05; * P < 0.01) compared with the corresponding controls.
Figure 3. Expression characteristics of GsGIS3. (A) GsGIS3 expression levels in root, stem, and leaf of Glycine soja. (B) Expression levels of GsGIS3 in Glycine soja roots in different sections. (C) Pattern of GsGIS3 expression under Al concentration gradients. (D) Temporal expression pattern of GsGIS3 under acidic aluminum exposure. (E–H) Patterns of GsGIS3 expression under the different conditions of abiotic stresses: 200 mM NaCl (E); 100 μM GA3 (F); 100 μM 6BA (G); and 10 μM abscisic acid (ABA) (H). GsGIS3 transcript abundance was assessed by qRT-PCR using the 2–ΔΔCt method with the actin Actin3 gene as an internal control [40]. The data are represented as the averages of three independent biological experiments ± SD, and asterisks indicate a significant difference (* P < 0.05; * P < 0.01) compared with the corresponding controls.
Ijms 21 02754 g003
Ijms 21 02754 g004 550
Figure 4. Overexpression of GsGIS3 in Arabidopsis enhanced Al tolerance. (A) The phenotypes of transgenic lines and control under AlCl3 treatment for seven days. (B) Statistical analysis of root elongation. (C) The determination of proline content. (D) The determination of MDA content. The vertical columns for the average observation value of the three repetitions represent the means ± SD. Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the status of seedlings and accumulations of proline and MDA in plants of WT and GsGIS3 transgenic lines under Al stress. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and GsGIS3 transgenic lines (* P < 0.05). WT, wild-type of Arabidopsis (Col-0); L1, L4 andL5, GsGIS3 Arabidopsis transgenic lines of T3 generations.
Figure 4. Overexpression of GsGIS3 in Arabidopsis enhanced Al tolerance. (A) The phenotypes of transgenic lines and control under AlCl3 treatment for seven days. (B) Statistical analysis of root elongation. (C) The determination of proline content. (D) The determination of MDA content. The vertical columns for the average observation value of the three repetitions represent the means ± SD. Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the status of seedlings and accumulations of proline and MDA in plants of WT and GsGIS3 transgenic lines under Al stress. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and GsGIS3 transgenic lines (* P < 0.05). WT, wild-type of Arabidopsis (Col-0); L1, L4 andL5, GsGIS3 Arabidopsis transgenic lines of T3 generations.
Ijms 21 02754 g004
Ijms 21 02754 g005 550
Figure 5. Phenotype observation and indexes determination. (A) The phenotype of transgenic lines and control in 1/30 Hoagland nutrient solution with 2 μM AlCl3. (B) The total root length. (C) The total root surface area. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and GsGIS3 transgenic lines (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01). WT, wild-type of Arabidopsis (Col-0); L1, L4 and L5 GsGIS3 Arabidopsis transgenic lines of T3 generations; SA, the total root surface area. Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the status of seedlings and measure the root indexes.
Figure 5. Phenotype observation and indexes determination. (A) The phenotype of transgenic lines and control in 1/30 Hoagland nutrient solution with 2 μM AlCl3. (B) The total root length. (C) The total root surface area. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and GsGIS3 transgenic lines (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01). WT, wild-type of Arabidopsis (Col-0); L1, L4 and L5 GsGIS3 Arabidopsis transgenic lines of T3 generations; SA, the total root surface area. Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the status of seedlings and measure the root indexes.
Ijms 21 02754 g005
Ijms 21 02754 g006 550
Figure 6. Hematoxylin staining in soybean hairy roots. (A) Hematoxylin staining in soybean hairy roots. (B) The RNA molecular level identification. OX, GsGIS3-overexpressing transgenic soybean hairy roots; RNAi, GsGIS3-RNAi in soybean hairy roots; Control, Agrobacterium rhizogenes pathogenic strain K599 in soybean hairy roots. Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the status of seedlings and measure the root data.
Figure 6. Hematoxylin staining in soybean hairy roots. (A) Hematoxylin staining in soybean hairy roots. (B) The RNA molecular level identification. OX, GsGIS3-overexpressing transgenic soybean hairy roots; RNAi, GsGIS3-RNAi in soybean hairy roots; Control, Agrobacterium rhizogenes pathogenic strain K599 in soybean hairy roots. Three independent biological experiments were carried out to investigate the status of seedlings and measure the root data.
Ijms 21 02754 g006
Ijms 21 02754 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression Patterns of Al Stress/GA3-related Genes Regulated by GsGIS3: (A) AtALMT1 expression; (B) AtALS3 expression; (C) AtGA2XO1 expression; (D) AtGA3OX1 expression; and (E) AtGID1 expression. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01) compared with the controls.
Figure 7. Expression Patterns of Al Stress/GA3-related Genes Regulated by GsGIS3: (A) AtALMT1 expression; (B) AtALS3 expression; (C) AtGA2XO1 expression; (D) AtGA3OX1 expression; and (E) AtGID1 expression. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01) compared with the controls.
Ijms 21 02754 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.-T.; Shi, Q.-H.; Cao, H.-J.; Ma, Q.-B.; Nian, H.; Zhang, X.-X. Heterologous Expression of a Glycine soja C2H2 Zinc Finger Gene Improves Aluminum Tolerance in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082754

AMA Style

Liu Y-T, Shi Q-H, Cao H-J, Ma Q-B, Nian H, Zhang X-X. Heterologous Expression of a Glycine soja C2H2 Zinc Finger Gene Improves Aluminum Tolerance in Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(8):2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yuan-Tai, Qi-Han Shi, He-Jie Cao, Qi-Bin Ma, Hai Nian, and Xiu-Xiang Zhang. 2020. "Heterologous Expression of a Glycine soja C2H2 Zinc Finger Gene Improves Aluminum Tolerance in Arabidopsis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 8: 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082754

APA Style

Liu, Y. -T., Shi, Q. -H., Cao, H. -J., Ma, Q. -B., Nian, H., & Zhang, X. -X. (2020). Heterologous Expression of a Glycine soja C2H2 Zinc Finger Gene Improves Aluminum Tolerance in Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(8), 2754. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082754

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop