Next Article in Journal
Cathepsin L, a Target of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1-α, Is Involved in Melanosome Degradation in Melanocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
miR-29b Regulates TGF-β1-Induced Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Heat Shock Protein 47 Expression in Airway Epithelial Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Allicin Associated with Fibrosis in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hsp100 Molecular Chaperone ClpB and Its Role in Virulence of Bacterial Pathogens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms22168601
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Chaperones and miRNAs in Epilepsy: Pathogenic Implications and Therapeutic Prospects

by
Leila Zummo
1,2,†,
Alessandra Maria Vitale
1,3,†,
Celeste Caruso Bavisotto
1,3,
Marco De Curtis
4,
Rita Garbelli
4,
Anna Teresa Giallonardo
5,6,
Carlo Di Bonaventura
5,6,
Martina Fanella
5,6,
Everly Conway de Macario
7,
Francesco Cappello
1,3,
Alberto J. L. Macario
3,7 and
Antonella Marino Gammazza
1,*
1
Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico—Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy
3
Euro-Mediterranean Institute of Science and Technology (IEMEST), 90139 Palermo, Italy
4
Epilepsy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy
5
Department of Human Neurosciences “Sapienza”, University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
6
Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy
7
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland at Baltimore-Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology (IMET), Baltimore, MD 21202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(16), 8601; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168601
Submission received: 10 July 2021 / Revised: 5 August 2021 / Accepted: 6 August 2021 / Published: 10 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Molecular Chaperones: Role and Targeting in Health and Disease)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Epilepsy is a pathologic condition with high prevalence and devastating consequences for the patient and its entourage. Means for accurate diagnosis of type, patient monitoring for predicting seizures and follow up, and efficacious treatment are desperately needed. To improve this adverse outcome, miRNAs and the chaperone system (CS) are promising targets to understand pathogenic mechanisms and for developing theranostics applications. miRNAs implicated in conditions known or suspected to favor seizures such as neuroinflammation, to promote epileptic tolerance and neuronal survival, to regulate seizures, and others showing variations in expression levels related to seizures are promising candidates as useful biomarkers for diagnosis and patient monitoring, and as targets for developing novel therapies. Components of the CS are also promising as biomarkers and as therapeutic targets, since they participate in epileptogenic pathways and in cytoprotective mechanisms in various epileptogenic brain areas, even if what they do and how is not yet clear. The data in this review should help in the identification of molecular targets among the discussed miRNAs and CS components for research aiming at understanding epileptogenic mechanisms and, subsequently, develop means for predicting/preventing seizures and treating the disease.

1. Introduction

In the last decade or so, there has been an impressive progress in many fields of medicine, including the neurosciences, stemming from various developments such as novel molecular biologic methods, genomics, proteomics, identification and characterization of miRNAs, and definition of the chaperone system (CS) and its diseases. A better understanding of miRNAs and the CS has had a significant impact in neurology due to their roles in the development, maturation, and pathology of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Here, we will briefly discuss some of the advances pertinent to miRNAs and the CS in epilepsy.

1.1. Epilepsy: A Spectrum of Disorders

Epilepsy is one of the most common and serious neurological disorders, affecting nearly 50 million people worldwide and resulting in a major socioeconomic burden [1,2] (WHO report: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/epilepsy accessed on 6 August 2021). It is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by a predisposition to generate recurrent unprovoked epileptic seizures. A seizure is “a transient occurrence of signs and/or symptoms due to abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain”, as defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE, [3,4]). Seizures are usually described as having focal or generalized onset; however, in certain cases, the onset cannot be readily determined (unknown onset). Focal onset seizures are generated by abnormal activity starting from a brain region, and they are further classified “with intact consciousness” and “with altered level of consciousness”, whereas generalized seizures arise in bilaterally distributed brain networks [5,6]. Another definition states: epilepsy is a “chronic disease of the brain characterized by an enduring (i.e., persisting) predisposition to generate seizures, unprovoked by any immediate central nervous system insult, and by the neurobiologic, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of seizure recurrences” [7].
Epilepsy may not be considered a single condition but a spectrum of disorders that share an alteration in the brain that increases the likelihood of seizures.
The etiologies of epilepsy and epileptic syndromes are diverse, for instance brain lesions, neoplasms, malformation of cortical development, and tuberous sclerosis complex are major causes of drug-resistant epilepsy and sometimes require surgical interventions [8]. When the etiology is known, epilepsy is categorized as symptomatic or of structural/metabolic etiology, and if the etiology is unknown, the disorder is classified as cryptogenic [4]. The course of epileptic syndromes and their response to the available therapies differ. Seizures can be controlled with appropriate drugs in approximately 70% of cases, but the remaining 30% of patients are intractable with standard medical treatments [9,10]. Hence, there is an urgent need for the clarification of mechanisms of epileptogenesis and for the development of antiepileptogenic therapies [11].

1.2. Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE)

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of focal epilepsy in adults, accounting for 60% of cases [12]. Several subclassifications exist regarding the neuroanatomical origin of the seizures, with the distinction between mesial and lateral temporal seizure onsets being one of the most widely used.
Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) arises in the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and amygdale, while lateral temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE) arises in the neocortex on the outer surface of the temporal lobe of the brain.
More than 90% of patients with MTLE report a visceral aura, most commonly an epigastric sensation with a tendency to increase with time. Other auras consist of an abnormal sense of taste, an aversive smell, déjà vu, or a dreamy sensation. Fear is the most reported affective symptom, although other complex emotional symptoms may also occur. Autonomic symptoms include changes in skin color, blood pressure, heart rate, and piloerection. As seizures usually involve areas of the limbic system, which control emotions and memory, some individuals may have memory problems [13,14].
The most common pathology underlying mesial temporal lobe epilepsy is hippocampal sclerosis (HS). It is characterized by a severe loss of the principal neurons associated with the widening of the granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus, termed granule cell dispersion, which is observed in about 40–50% of surgical temporal lobe specimens [15,16]. This condition is often associated with a history of febrile seizures in infancy. Temporal lobe epilepsy associated with HS is often progressive with the worsening of seizures, impairment of cognitive function, and psychiatric disorders, and is accompanied by significant morbidity and mortality [17,18].
Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy, especially with pathologically or radiologically proven mesial temporal sclerosis, is considered a highly refractory and drug-resistant type of epilepsy. Pharmaco-resistance is the “failure of an adequate trial of two tolerated, appropriately chosen, and used antiepileptic drug (AED) schedules (whether as monotherapies or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom” as per ILAE [8]. In this scenario, resection surgery has been recognized as an effective treatment for pharmaco-resistant TLE-HS [19,20,21,22]. However, one third of surgically treated patients presented unfavorable results. Considering the variety of treatment options that are available, future efforts should focus on advocating for early referral of patients with drug-resistant TLE-HS for more comprehensive epilepsy management.
It is clear from current knowledge that pharmaco-resistance in epilepsy is a multifactorial phenomenon, but, based on existing proofs, more work is needed to test, reinforce, and integrate the current theories, with the goal of guiding the development of better epilepsy therapies. Until more data become available, it is fair to say that transporter overexpression is most likely not the only factor that plays in pharmaco-resistance, and that the best evidence available only supports the plausibility for the clinical role of efflux transporters in refractory epilepsy. Obviously, a better understanding of the relationship between epileptogenesis and the development of pharmaco-resistance will help to treat epilepsy by preventing the development of pharmaco-resistance against antiepileptic drugs.

2. MiRNAs: Localization, Functions, and Roles during Neurodegeneration

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous 22-nucleotide-long noncoding single stranded RNAs that regulate the expression of target genes post-transcriptionally by affecting either the stability or the translation of their mRNAs [23]. Their biogenesis requires highly regulated cleavage events. The first, intranuclear, involves the Drosha microprocessor that generates a long hairpin-shaped RNA molecule called pre-miRNA. The resulting pre-miRNA is transported via exportin-5 and Ran-GTP to the cytoplasm for processing by the RNAase III enzyme Dicer to form an immature duplex of 20–25 nucleotides [23,24,25,26,27]. Finally, after duplex unwinding by a not-yet-identified helicase-like enzyme, one strand is degraded, whereas the other matures into the miRNA, which subsequently binds to Argonaute (Ago) proteins to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), able to interact with the specific target mRNAs and inhibit their translation or cause their degradation, depending on whether complementarity to the target mRNA sequence is incomplete or complete, respectively [28]. Over 2000 human miRNAs have been discovered thus far, which regulate the vast majority of protein-encoding genes, and, thus, affect most, if not all, biological events, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and death, playing a significant role during various stages of growth and development [29,30,31,32]. Multiple studies have investigated the variation of miRNA expression patterns in various neurological diseases, including epilepsy, to assess their role in disease pathogenesis and their usefulness as diagnostic biomarkers, as well as to develop efficacious therapeutic strategies [33,34]. Different miRNAs have been implicated in a variety of processes involved in epileptogenesis, such as neuroinflammation, blood brain barrier (BBB) dysfunctions, apoptosis, ion channel dysregulation, axonal guidance, and synaptic plasticity [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], all of which point to them as promising therapeutic targets [45,46] (Figure 1, Table 1).

MiRNAs and Epilepsy

miRNAs may be involved in the development of epilepsy by regulating those pathological processes mediating epileptogenesis, such as neuroinflammation, neuronal cell death, synaptic remodeling, formation of epileptic circuits, deregulation of neurotrophic factors, and glial cell dysfunction [34]. miRNA expression patterns may be useful for diagnosis and prognostication. For instance, there is a marked variation in miRNA expression patterns in rats with post-status epilepticus, with 19 upregulated and 7 downregulated miRNAs, including miRNA-21, miRNA-22, miRNA-34a, and miRNA-125a, all targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK or MAP kinase) and the long-term potentiation pathways [50]. In plasma of an epileptic rat model, free and exosomal miRNAs, e.g., miR-8071 and the miRNAs associated with the immune response miR-21-5p, miR142-5, and miR-146a-5p, showed different levels compared to healthy controls [51,72]. Exosomal miR-8071 levels were significantly associated with disease duration or seizure frequency [51]. The question of whether miRNAs are altered only during seizures and/or just before and/or after them, or chronically between seizures, has emerged from those observations. The levels of miRNAs in blood can be determined with good reproducibility and are demonstrative of disease status. miRNAs derived from diverse tissues/organs are stable and resistant to nuclease digestion as well as other harsh conditions, including extended storage, freeze–thaw cycles, boiling, and low/high pH [73]. These miRNAs, in biological fluids, may traverse the damaged BBB after epilepsy onset or originate from controlled release in extracellular vesicles (EVs), such as exosomes [74,75].
miRNAs can migrate in exosomes released by CNS cells, including neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia [76]. Therefore, it is pertinent to study the role of EVs, including exosomes, in epileptogenic mechanisms and in the establishing of drug resistance, because these mechanisms are still poorly understood [76].
Acute neurological insults and prolonged seizures can regulate miRNA expression in the brain [35,50]. Several miRNAs have been found to be differentially expressed in the hippocampus of TLE or status epilepticus (SE) models. In patients with TLE, a subset of miRNAs was proposed to be a potential regulator of a variety of processes involved in epilepsy, such as neuroinflammation, BBB dysfunctions, apoptosis, ion channel abnormalities, tumors, and disorders of axonal guidance, cell proliferation, neuronal function, and synaptic plasticity [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. For instance, the inflammation-related miR-21, miR-132 [39], and miR-146a [35,36] are upregulated in chronic stages following epileptic status in animal models and TLE patients. These observations support the notion that neuroinflammation plays a role in the pathogenesis of TLE, with miR-221 and miR-222 targeting the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1, which mediates intercellular interactions in inflammation [77]), being downregulated in MTLE-HS patients [37]. In this case, therapeutic upregulation of miRNAs could reduce neuroinflammation. miR-124 is downregulated in patients with epilepsy and in rats after drug-induced seizures [43], while its upregulation had an antiepileptic effect by inhibiting the expression of CREB, a key regulator in epileptogenesis [43]. miR-184 is upregulated in KA-treated mice and positively correlates with the development of epileptic tolerance and with neuronal survival following mild and severe seizures, while its inhibition increases neuronal death after seizures [38]. On the contrary, miR-134, which has been implicated in the control of dendritic spine morphology [78,79], is upregulated in experimental and human epilepsy [44], while miR-134 silencing with antagomirs generates a seizure-refractory state and attenuates epileptic seizures TLE [44].
Twenty miRNAs with altered expression in the human epileptic hippocampus were identified in MTLE-HS patients, with 19 of them being upregulated and one downregulated [80].
In summary, because the expression of genes depends on the balance of miRNAs present in the cell, an abnormal up or downregulation of specific miRNAs might influence genes and pathways, resulting in pathology. Two strategies for developing miRNA-based therapeutics have been proposed: (a) to develop mimics or agomirs to restore a loss of function of miRNAs and increase their effectiveness; and (b) to produce inhibitors or antagomirs to block endogenous miRNAs and, thus, increase expression of the mRNA targets [81].

3. The Chaperone System and the Chaperonopathies

The chaperone (or chaperoning) system (CS) of an organism is composed of molecular chaperones (some of which are named heat shock protein, or Hsp), co-chaperones, chaperone co-factors, and chaperone interactors and receptors [82,83]. The canonical function of the CS is maintenance of protein homeostasis, and, in this, it collaborates with the ubiquitin–proteasome system and with chaperone-mediated autophagy [84,85]. In addition, some components of the CS have non-canonical functions unrelated to protein homeostasis but pertinent to inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer [86,87,88,89,90,91,92]. Although chaperones are typically cytoprotective, when abnormal, they can become pathogenic and cause diseases, i.e., the chaperonopathies [82,87]. In this part of the article, we discuss critical aspects of epilepsy, in which the canonical and non-canonical functions of the CS are involved, focusing on the chaperones. These have been grouped in various ways; a classification useful to practitioners and to researchers is based on molecular size. The various groups include chaperones within the following molecular weight ranges, in kDa: 200 and over; 100–199; 81–99, 65–80, 55–64, 35–54, and 34 or lower [87,93]. Within these groups are included families of phylogenetically related molecules, such as the Hsp90, Hsp70, and alpha-crystallin chaperones, which belong in the 81–99, 65–80, and 34 or lower ranges (named small Hsp or sHsp), respectively. Within the 55–64 range are the chaperonins, Hsp60, and CCT (chaperonin-containing TCP-1), namely chaperonins of Group I and II, respectively. One or more chaperones in each of those ranges have been implicated in diseases of the nervous system, and we will discuss some that are related to epilepsy.

3.1. Molecular Chaperones in Epilepsy

The role of molecular chaperones in epilepsy has not yet been fully clarified. They may be considered markers of an epileptic condition and the associated brain damage/injury, or directly involved in cytoprotective mechanisms in response to seizures [94,95,96,97] (Figure 1, Table 1).

3.1.1. sHsp

Hsp27 (HSPB1; HSP28) belongs to the family of small heat shock proteins, is highly inducible in the CNS in response to various insults, such as hyperthermia, ischemia, hypoxia, and seizures, and contributes to neuroprotection thanks to its active role in protein quality control and its antiapoptotic activity [98]. This cytoprotective activity has also been observed in epileptic brains. Hsp27 was found highly expressed in neocortex obtained from epileptic patients during neurosurgery, with a prevalence in astrocytes and in cerebral blood vessel walls, whereas only low amounts were detected in control brains [52]. Although the reasons for its increase were not elucidated, it was suggested that Hsp27 could serve as marker to specifically localize the cortical regions affected by seizures, which, in turn, could allow the study of the morphological and functional pathology-related alterations. These results and inferences are in agreement with those obtained in rat models, showing a focal increase in Hsp27 after the administration of kainic acid (KA) or pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), both inducing seizures [52,53,54,55], indicating that elevated levels of Hsp27 occurred in a seizure-dependent manner in specific brain areas.
Some evidence indicates that the observed Hsp27 upregulation in specific areas of the brain affected by seizures could be not a mere indicator of brain injury, but also a protective mechanism to counteract the seizure-induced damage. Accordingly, in mice engineered to overexpress human Hsp27, a significantly reduced seizure activity and a decrease in hippocampal damage after the administration of KA was observed [99]. The neuroprotective role of Hsp27 in epilepsy was further confirmed by the abnormal expression of HSPBAP1 (heat shock 27-kDa associated protein 1), observed in the neocortex of patients with intractable epilepsy (IE) [100]. Normally, HSPBAP1 is not expressed in adult brain tissue and, although its functions still remain unclear, it was suggested that they might be opposite to the biological functions of Hsp27 [101]. HSPBAP1 was expressed in the neuronal and glial cells of the temporal lobe of patients with IE, whereas its expression was absent in the control tissues, suggesting its involvement in the pathogenesis and progression of the disease, likely by inhibiting Hsp27 activity. Thus, HSPBAP1 appears an attractive therapeutic target in the treatment of IE patients [100]. However, since the possible functional relationships between Hsp27 and HSPBAP1 have not yet been fully clarified, it cannot be excluded that they can also cooperate in hampering the seizures.
As with Hsp27, α-B crystallin (HSPB5; CRYAD), another molecular chaperone belonging to the small heat shock protein family, was proposed as a promising tissue marker for epileptic foci, enabling the mapping of the extent of the focus and its margins [56]. α-B crystallin was found overexpressed both in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, including neuron-associated satellite cells and, occasionally, also in neurons of neocortex, hippocampus, and amygdala of brains from epileptic children [56]. Moreover, in some cases, there was a graded immunoreactivity, which was more intense at, or near, the epileptic focus, and, vice versa, diminished and disappeared away from it [56].

3.1.2. Hsp60

Mitochondrial dysfunction, free radical production, and oxidative stress are considered both consequence and cause of epileptic seizures [102]. Studies with animal models have shown that prolonged epileptic seizures result in free radical production; oxidative damage of proteins, lipids, and DNA; and mitochondrial dysfunction, contributing to seizure-induced brain damage [102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. The oxidative stress resulting from mitochondrial dysfunction could be epileptogenic, rendering the brain more susceptible to epileptic seizures and contributing to epilepsy development [102]. These data could explain the observed association between Hsp60 dysfunction and epileptogenesis [57].
Hsp60 (HSPD1; Cpn60) is a group I chaperonin constitutively expressed and further induced under stress conditions. It typically resides within the mitochondrial matrix, where it assists protein folding, ensuring mitochondrial protein homeostasis [109]. However, other non-canonical locations and functions of Hsp60 have been reported [86,110,111]. Hsp60 functional impairment is implicated in mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, which, in turn, can affect neuronal excitability and seizure susceptibility [49]. Hsp60 levels were found significantly decreased in the hippocampus of epileptic rats, and it was suggested that diminution of the chaperonin could contribute to the development of oxidative stress and increased neuronal excitability [58]. However, Hsp60 levels, as our group previously observed, can also increase in response to the oxidative stress induced by epileptic seizures [57]. For instance, Hsp60 levels were found increased in the dentate gyrus and hippocampus proper and plasma obtained from maximal dentate activation (MDA)-stimulated rats (Figure 2). Likewise, Hsp60 levels in plasma from TLE patients were higher after epileptic seizures than before the seizures and higher than controls, suggesting that this chaperonin can be considered a biomarker of hippocampal stress, potentially useful for diagnosis and patient management [57].

3.1.3. Hsp70

Hsp70 designates a family of chaperones, some members of which are highly expressed in the CNS and believed to be cytoprotective by inhibiting apoptosis [98,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119]. In neurodegenerative disorders, increased levels of some members of the Hsp70 family are associated with a neuroprotection [120]. The levels of the heat-inducible Hsp70 and its mRNA increased in brains damaged by seizures [59]. In rat models, a direct relationship between frequency, duration, and intensity of seizures induced by KA, flurothyl, or bicuculline administration was observed, and Hsp72 increased in brain regions susceptible to epileptic injury [60,61,62,63]. It remains to be determined whether this Hsp72 augmentation is only a marker for brain injury, or if it has a neuroprotective effect, as suggested by gene transfer experiments [47].
The levels of a non-specified member of the Hsp70 family were investigated in brain tissues from TLE patients and from KA-induced epileptic rodent brains and in primary cultured neurons, and were found increased at the beginning of epileptogenesis, but not at later stages or in dying neurons [64]. Thus, high levels of Hsp70 might be considered a useful indicator for the localization of stressed neurons in the acute phase of epilepsy, but its role in epileptogenesis, protective or otherwise, remains to be elucidated [64]. The reasons for Hsp70 increase were not fully investigated; it could represent a response to stress but without protective effect. In TLE patients, a complete remission of mesial TLE seizures post-surgery was associated with decreased levels of an unspecified Hsp70 in CA4 and subiculum [65]. High Hsp72 levels were observed in the early phase following status epilepticus in a TLE rat model (electrical post-SE model), compared to the later chronic phase, and it was suggested that the chaperone might contribute to the onset of excessive inflammation, triggering molecular and cellular reorganization and generation of a hyperexcitable epileptic network [66]. Thus, the modulation of Hsp72 expression during the early days following an epileptogenic insult could be considered a target for developing antiepileptic therapies. In this regard, it was observed that, in a KA-induced model of TLE, the epileptic stress induced Hsp70 upregulation, resulting in degradation of the Kv4 channels complexes, and, thus, increasing neuronal hyperactivity and exacerbating seizures [48]. Hsp70 pharmacological inhibition suppressed neuronal hyper excitability, attenuating acute or chronic epilepsy by restoring the expression and function of Kv4 channels and, thus, enhancing the A-type current in hippocampal neurons, confirming that the chaperone is a promising therapeutic target for epilepsy treatment [48]. Unfortunately, which member of the Hsp70 family was involved was not stated, limiting the usefulness of this report.
In addition, extracellular Hsps could be useful biomarkers for epileptic conditions. The levels of an unspecified member of the Hsp70 family in serum were significantly higher in epileptic children with febrile seizures than in healthy controls [67]. These results agreed with those from previous studies, also showing that Hsp70 serum levels correlated positively with duration of epilepsy, and negatively with memory scores, hippocampal volume, and cognitive function [68,69,70].

3.1.4. Hsp90

Seizure suppression was observed following Hsp90-β inhibition, which induces an increase in the glutamate transporter-1 (GLT-1) that maintains low extracellular glutamate concentrations [70,71]. Thus, also in this case, chaperone inhibition emerges as a potential antiepileptic strategy.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

miRNAs and members of the molecular chaperone system play a central role in the development and maturation of the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as in their pathology. Thus, the evaluation of variations in their expression patterns has emerged as a promising diagnostic and prognostic parameter, and also as a strategy for designing and implementing novel therapeutic procedures. Epilepsy, which includes a broad spectrum of syndromes, is a serious challenge for clinicians, not only due to the disabling and difficult-to-manage signs, but also due to the elevated frequency of drug-resistant forms, requiring surgical intervention. A novel and promising scenario in the development of new therapeutic options is the identification and modulation of miRNAs that regulate genes involved in processes related to epileptogenesis, such as neuroinflammation, BBB dysfunctions, apoptosis, ion channel dysregulation, axonal guidance, and synaptic plasticity abnormalities. Molecular chaperones, which can be markers of an epileptic condition and the associated brain damage, or directly involved in cytoprotective mechanisms in response to seizures, could help implement targeted therapeutic strategies, aiming to block/inhibit possible detrimental chaperones (negative chaperonotherapy) or, conversely, to promote the activity of the chaperones with a cytoprotective role (positive chaperonotherapy).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z., A.M.V., C.C.B. and A.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Z., A.M.V., C.C.B. and A.M.G.; writing—review and editing, E.C.d.M., F.C., A.J.L.M. and A.M.G.; figure preparation and editing, A.M.V. and A.J.L.M.; supervision, M.D.C., R.G., A.T.G., C.D.B., M.F. and A.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Alberto J. L. Macario and Everly Conway de Macario were partially supported by IMET and IEMEST. This is IMET contribution number IMET 21-010 This work was supported by LICE Foundation (Lega Italiana contro l’Epilessia).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, B.S.; Lowenstein, D.H. Epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 349, 1257–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. GBD 2016 Epilepsy Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. Neurol. 2019, 18, 357–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Fisher, R.S.; van Emde Boas, W.; Blume, W.; Elger, C.; Genton, P.; Lee, P.; Engel, J. Epileptic Seizures and Epilepsy: Definitions Proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia 2005, 46, 470–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Berg, A.T.; Berkovic, S.; Brodie, M.J.; Buchhalter, J.; Cross, H.; Boas, W.V.E.; Engel, J.; French, J.; Glauser, T.A.; Mathern, G.W.; et al. Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: Report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology, 2005–2009. Epilepsia 2010, 51, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fisher, R.S.; Cross, J.H.; French, J.A.; Higurashi, N.; Hirsch, E.; Jansen, F.E.; Lagae, L.; Moshe, S.; Peltola, J.; Perez, E.R.; et al. Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Scheffer, I.E.; Berkovic, S.; Capovilla, G.; Connolly, M.B.; French, J.; Guilhoto, L.; Hirsch, E.; Jain, S.; Mathern, G.W.; Moshe, S.; et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Beghi, E. The Epidemiology of Epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology 2020, 54, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sheng, J.; Liu, S.; Qin, H.; Li, B.; Zhang, X. Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Surgery. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018, 16, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kwan, P.; Brodie, M.J. Potential Role of Drug Transporters in the Pathogenesis of Medically Intractable Epilepsy. Epilepsia 2005, 46, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kwan, P.; Arzimanoglou, A.; Berg, A.T.; Brodie, M.J.; Hauser, W.A.; Mathern, G.; Moshe, S.; Perucca, E.; Wiebe, S.; French, J. Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: Consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2009, 51, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. McNamara, J.O.; Huang, Y.Z.; Leonard, A.S. Molecular Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Epileptogenesis. Sci. STKE 2006, 2006, re12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shorvon, S.; Guerrini, R. Acute symptomatic seizures--should we retain the term? Epilepsia 2010, 51, 722–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hoppe, C.; Elger, C.E.; Helmstaedter, C. Long-term memory impairment in patients with focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2007, 48, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rayner, G.; Siveges, B.; Allebone, J.; Pieters, J.; Wilson, S.J. Contribution of autobiographic memory impairment to subjective memory complaints in focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2020, 102, 106636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jardim, A.P.; Duarte, J.T.C.; Lancellotti, C.L.P.; Carrete, H., Jr.; Centeno, R.S.; Scorza, C.A.; Cavalheiro, E.A.; Guaranha, M.S.B.; Yacubian, E.M.T. Granule cell dispersion is associated with hippocampal neuronal cell loss, initial precipitating injury, and other clinical features in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis. Seizure 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mo, J.; Zhao, B.; Adler, S.; Zhang, J.; Shao, X.; Ma, Y.; Sang, L.; Hu, W.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; et al. Quantitative assessment of structural and functional changes in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2021, 11, 1782–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. de Oliveira, G.N.M.; Kummer, A.; Salgado, J.V.; Portela, E.J.; Sousa-Pereira, S.R.; David, A.; Teixeira, A.L. Psychiatric disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy: An overview from a tertiary service in Brazil. Seizure 2010, 19, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Asadi-Pooya, A.A.; Stewart, G.R.; Abrams, D.J.; Sharan, A. Prevalence and Incidence of Drug-Resistant Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in the United States. World Neurosurg. 2017, 99, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wiebe, S.; Blume, W.T.; Girvin, J.P.; Eliasziw, M.; Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Surgery for Temporal-Lobe Epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wiebe, S.; Jette, N. Pharmacoresistance and the role of surgery in difficult to treat epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012, 8, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Tisi, J.; Bell, G.S.; Peacock, J.L.; McEvoy, A.W.; Harkness, W.F.; Sander, J.; Duncan, J.S. The long-term outcome of adult epilepsy surgery, patterns of seizure remission, and relapse: A cohort study. Lancet 2011, 378, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Engel, J.; Wiebe, S.; French, J.; Sperling, M.; Williamson, P.; Spencer, D.; Gumnit, R.; Zahn, C.; Westbrook, E.; Enos, B. Practice Parameter: Temporal Lobe and Localized Neocortical Resections for Epilepsy. Epilepsia 2003, 44, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hutvagner, G.; McLachlan, J.; Pasquinelli, A.E.; Bálint, É.; Tuschl, T.; Zamore, P.D. A Cellular Function for the RNA-Interference Enzyme Dicer in the Maturation of the let-7 Small Temporal RNA. Science 2001, 293, 834–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, Y.; Jeon, K.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.; Kim, V.N. MicroRNA maturation: Stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 4663–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lee, Y.; Ahn, C.; Han, J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Yim, J.; Lee, J.; Provost, P.; Rådmark, O.; Kim, S.; et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 425, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bohnsack, M.T.; Czaplinski, K.; Görlich, D. Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs. RNA 2004, 10, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vermeulen, A.; Robertson, B.; Dalby, A.B.; Marshall, W.S.; Karpilow, J.; Leake, D.; Khvorova, A.; Baskerville, S. Double-stranded regions are essential design components of potent inhibitors of RISC function. RNA 2007, 13, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lewis, B.P.; Shih, I.-H.; Jones-Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Burge, C.B. Prediction of Mammalian MicroRNA Targets. Cell 2003, 115, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Shi, Y.; Jin, Y. MicroRNA in cell differentiation and development. Sci. China Ser. C Life Sci. 2009, 52, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chen, J.-F.; Mandel, E.M.; Thomson, J.M.; Wu, Q.; E Callis, T.; Hammond, S.M.; Conlon, F.L.; Wang, D.-Z. The Role of MicroRNA-1 and MicroRNA-133 in Skeletal Muscle Proliferation and Differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2005, 38, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tzur, G.; Israel, A.; Levy, A.; Benjamin, H.; Meiri, E.; Shufaro, Y.; Meir, K.; Khvalevsky, E.; Spector, Y.; Rojansky, N.; et al. Comprehensive Gene and microRNA Expression Profiling Reveals a Role for microRNAs in Human Liver Development. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Bian, S.; Sun, T. Functions of Noncoding RNAs in Neural Development and Neurological Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2011, 44, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, J.; Zhao, J. MicroRNA Dysregulation in Epilepsy: From Pathogenetic Involvement to Diagnostic Biomarker and Therapeutic Agent Development. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 650372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aronica, E.; Fluiter, K.; Iyer, A.; Zurolo, E.; Vreijling, J.; van Vliet, E.; Baayen, J.C.; Gorter, J.A. Expression pattern of miR-146a, an inflammation-associated microRNA, in experimental and human temporal lobe epilepsy. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31, 1100–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Omran, A.; Peng, J.; Zhang, C.; Xiang, Q.-L.; Xue, J.; Gan, N.; Kong, H.; Yin, F. Interleukin-1β and microRNA-146a in an immature rat model and children with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2012, 53, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kan, A.A.; van Erp, S.; Derijck, A.A.H.A.; De Wit, M.; Hessel, E.V.S.; O’Duibhir, E.; de Jager, W.; Van Rijen, P.C.; Gosselaar, P.H.; De Graan, P.N.E.; et al. Genome-wide microRNA profiling of human temporal lobe epilepsy identifies modulators of the immune response. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3127–3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. McKiernan, R.C.; Jiménez-Mateos, E.; Sano, T.; Bray, I.; Stallings, R.L.; Simon, R.P.; Henshall, D.C. Expression profiling the microRNA response to epileptic preconditioning identifies miR-184 as a modulator of seizure-induced neuronal death. Exp. Neurol. 2012, 237, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Peng, J.; Omran, A.; Ashhab, M.U.; Kong, H.; Gan, N.; He, F.; Yin, F. Expression Patterns of miR-124, miR-134, miR-132, and miR-21 in an Immature Rat Model and Children with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2013, 50, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kaalund, S.S.; Veno, M.; Bak, M.; Møller, R.; Laursen, H.; Madsen, F.; Broholm, H.; Quistorff, B.; Uldall, P.; Tommerup, N.; et al. Aberrant expression of miR-218 and miR-204 in human mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis-Convergence on axonal guidance. Epilepsia 2014, 55, 2017–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zucchini, S.; Marucci, G.; Paradiso, B.; Lanza, G.; Roncon, P.; Cifelli, P.; Ferracin, M.; Giulioni, M.; Michelucci, R.; Rubboli, G.; et al. Identification of miRNAs Differentially Expressed in Human Epilepsy with or without Granule Cell Pathology. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alsharafi, W.A.; Xiao, B.; Abuhamed, M.M.; Luo, Z. miRNAs: Biological and clinical determinants in epilepsy. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 8, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xuefeng, W.; Liu, J.; Jiang, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, K.; et al. The microRNA miR-124 suppresses seizure activity and regulates CREB1 activity. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2016, 18, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jiménez-Mateos, E.; Engel, T.; Merino-Serrais, P.; McKiernan, R.C.; Tanaka, K.; Mouri, G.; Sano, T.; O’Tuathaigh, C.; Waddington, J.L.; Prenter, S.; et al. Silencing microRNA-134 produces neuroprotective and prolonged seizure-suppressive effects. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Brennan, G.; Henshall, D.C. MicroRNAs as regulators of brain function and targets for treatment of epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 506–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, M.-M.; Li, X.-M.; Zheng, X.-P.; Yu, J.-T.; Tan, L. MicroRNAs dysregulation in epilepsy. Brain Res. 2014, 1584, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yenari, M.A.; Fink, S.L.; Sun, G.H.; Chang, L.K.; Patel, M.; Kunis, D.M.; Onley, D.; Ho, D.Y.; Sapolsky, R.M.; Steinbrg, G.K. Gene therapy with HSP72 is neuroprotective in rat models of stroke and epilepsy. Ann. Neurol. 1998, 44, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hu, F.; Zhou, J.; Lu, Y.; Guan, L.; Wei, N.-N.; Tang, Y.; Wang, K. Inhibition of Hsp70 Suppresses Neuronal Hyperexcitability and Attenuates Epilepsy by Enhancing A-Type Potassium Current. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Waldbaum, S.; Patel, M. Mitochondria, oxidative stress, and temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2010, 88, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Hu, K.; Zhang, C.; Long, L.; Long, X.; Feng, L.; Li, Y.; Xiao, B. Expression profile of microRNAs in rat hippocampus following lithium–pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 488, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yan, S.; Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Meng, F.; Zhang, K.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J. Altered microRNA profiles in plasma exosomes from mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 4136–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bidmon, H.-J.; Görg, B.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Behne, F.; Lahl, R.; Pannek, H.W.; Speckmann, E.-J.; Zilles, K. Heat Shock Protein-27 Is Upregulated in the Temporal Cortex of Patients with Epilepsy. Epilepsia 2004, 45, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schwob, J.; Fuller, T.; Price, J.; Olney, J. Widespread patterns of neuronal damage following systemic or intracerebral injections of kainic acid: A histological study. Neuroscience 1980, 5, 991–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Plumier, J.-C.; Armstrong, J.; Landry, J.; Babity, J.; Robertson, H.; Currie, R. Expression of the 27,000 mol. wt heat shock protein following kainic acid-induced status epilepticus in the rat. Neuroscience 1996, 75, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kato, K.; Katoh-Semba, R.; Takeuchi, I.K.; Ito, H.; Kamei, K. Responses of Heat Shock Proteins hsp27, αB-Crystallin, and hsp70 in Rat Brain After Kainic Acid-Induced Seizure Activity. J. Neurochem. 2002, 73, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sarnat, H.B.; Flores-Sarnat, L. α-B-Crystallin as a Tissue Marker of Epileptic Foci in Paediatric Resections. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 36, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Marino Gammazza, A.; Colangeli, R.; Orban, G.; Pierucci, M.; Di Gennaro, G.; Lo Bello, M.; D’Aniello, A.; Bucchieri, F.; Pomara, C.; Valentino, M.; et al. Hsp60 response in experimental and human temporal lobe epilepsy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, X.-Y.; Yang, J.-L.; Chen, L.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, M.-L.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Li, F.-Q.; Tang, M.-H.; Liang, S.-F.; Wei, Y.-Q. Comparative proteomics and correlated signaling network of rat hippocampus in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Proteomics 2008, 8, 582–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Krueger, A.M.R.; Armstrong, J.N.; Plumier, J.-C.; Robertson, H.A.; Currie, R. Cell specific expression of Hsp70 in neurons and glia of the rat hippocampus after hyperthermia and kainic acid-induced seizure activity. Mol. Brain Res. 1999, 71, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gass, P.; Prior, P.; Kiessling, M. Correlation between seizure intensity and stress protein expression after limbic epilepsy in the rat brain. Neuroscience 1995, 65, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gonzalez, M.F.; Shiraishi, K.; Hisanaga, K.; Sagar, S.M.; Mandabach, M.; Sharp, F.R. Heat shock proteins as markers of neural injury. Mol. Brain Res. 1989, 6, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lowenstein, D.H.; Simon, R.P.; Sharp, F.R. The pattern of 72-kDa heat shock protein-like immunoreactivity in the rat brain following flurothyl-induced status epilepticus. Brain Res. 1990, 531, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shimosaka, S.; So, Y.T.; Simon, R.P. Distribution of HSP72 induction and neuronal death following limbic seizures. Neurosci. Lett. 1992, 138, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, T.; Hsu, C.; Liao, W.; Chuang, J.S. Heat shock protein 70 expression in epilepsy suggests stress rather than protection. Acta Neuropathol. 2007, 115, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kandratavicius, L.; Hallak, J.E.; Carlotti, C.G.; Assirati, J.A.; Leite, J.P. Hippocampal expression of heat shock proteins in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with psychiatric comorbidities and their relation to seizure outcome. Epilepsia 2014, 55, 1834–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gualtieri, F.; Nowakowska, M.; Von Rüden, E.-L.; Seiffert, I.; Potschka, H. Epileptogenesis-Associated Alterations of Heat Shock Protein 70 in a Rat Post-Status Epilepticus Model. Neuroscience 2019, 415, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kamel, M.M.; Mounir, S.M.; Okaily, N.I.; Abdelzaher, M.H.; Hassan, M.H. Possible Role of Heat Shock Protein 70 in Childhood Seizures. Int. J. Epilepsy 2018, 5, 087–091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Chang, C.-C.; Lui, C.-C.; Lee, C.-C.; Chen, S.-D.; Chang, W.-N.; Lu, C.-H.; Chen, N.-C.; Chang, A.Y.W.; Chan, S.H.H.; Chuang, Y.-C. Clinical significance of serological biomarkers and neuropsychological performances in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. BMC Neurol. 2012, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Oraby, A.M.; Raouf, E.A.; El-Saied, M.M.; Abou-Khadra, M.K.; Helal, S.I.; Hashish, A. Cognitive Function and Heat Shock Protein 70 in Children with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Child. Neurol. 2017, 32, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sha, L.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Shi, X.; Wu, L.; Shen, Y.; Xu, Q. Pharmacologic inhibition of Hsp90 to prevent GLT-1 degradation as an effective therapy for epilepsy. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 214, 547–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Sha, L.; Chen, T.; Deng, Y.; Du, T.; Ma, K.; Zhu, W.; Shen, Y.; Xu, Q. Hsp90 inhibitor HSP990 in very low dose upregulates EAAT2 and exerts potent antiepileptic activity. Theranostics 2020, 10, 8415–8429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Gorter, J.A.; Iyer, A.; White, I.; Colzi, A.; van Vliet, E.A.; Sisodiya, S.; Aronica, E. Hippocampal subregion-specific microRNA expression during epileptogenesis in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 62, 508–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Chen, X.; Ba, Y.; Ma, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: A novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Choi, J.-W.; Kim, S.-C.; Hong, S.-H.; Lee, H.-J. Secretable Small RNAs via Outer Membrane Vesicles in Periodontal Pathogens. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gourlay, J.; Morokoff, A.; Luwor, R.; Zhu, H.-J.; Kaye, A.H.; Stylli, S. The emergent role of exosomes in glioma. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2017, 35, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gupta, A.; Pulliam, L. Exosomes as mediators of neuroinflammation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2014, 11, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Dietrich, J.-B. The adhesion molecule ICAM-1 and its regulation in relation with the blood–brain barrier. J. Neuroimmunol. 2002, 128, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schratt, G.M.; Tuebing, F.; Nigh, E.A.; Kane, C.G.; Sabatini, M.E.; Kiebler, M.; Greenberg, M.E. A brain-specific microRNA regulates dendritic spine development. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 439, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Christensen, M.; Larsen, L.A.; Kauppinen, S.; Schratt, G. Recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated microRNA delivery into the postnatal mouse brain reveals a role for miR-134 in dendritogenesis in vivo. Front. Neural Circuits 2010, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Bencúrová, P.; Baloun, J.; Musilova, K.; Radova, L.; Tichy, B.; Pail, M.; Zeman, M.; Brichtova, E.; Hermanova, M.; Pospisilova, S.; et al. MicroRNA and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis: Whole miRNome profiling of human hippocampus. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 1782–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Baumann, V.; Winkler, J. MiRNA-based therapies: Strategies and delivery platforms for oligonucleotide and non-oligonucleotide agents. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1967–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Macario, A.J.L.; Conway de Macario, E. Sick chaperones, cellular stress, and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Macario, A.J.L.; Conway de Macario, E. Molecular mechanisms in chaperonopathies: Clues to understanding the histopathological abnormalities and developing novel therapies. J. Pathol. 2020, 250, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Kocaturk, N.M.; Gozuacik, D. Crosstalk Between Mammalian Autophagy and the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 6, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Tekirdag, K.; Cuervo, A.M. Chaperone-mediated autophagy and endosomal microautophagy: Jointed by a chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 5414–5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Henderson, B.; Fares, M.A.; Lund, P.A. Chaperonin 60: A paradoxical, evolutionarily conserved protein family with multiple moonlighting functions. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88, 955–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Macario, A.J.L.; Conway de Macario, E.; Cappello, F. The Chaperonopathies. Diseases with Defective Molecular Chaperones, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  88. Calderwood, S.K.; Gong, J. Heat Shock Proteins Promote Cancer: It’s a Protection Racket. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Jeffery, C.J. Protein moonlighting: What is it, and why is it important? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Saini, J.; Sharma, P.K. Clinical, Prognostic and Therapeutic Significance of Heat Shock Proteins in Cancer. Curr. Drug Targets 2017, 19, 1478–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Milani, A.; Basirnejad, M.; Bolhassani, A. Heat-shock proteins in diagnosis and treatment: An overview of different biochemical and immunological functions. Immunotherapy 2019, 11, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yun, C.W.; Kim, H.J.; Lim, J.H.; Lee, S.H. Heat Shock Proteins: Agents of Cancer Development and Therapeutic Targets in Anti-Cancer Therapy. Cells 2019, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Macario, A.J.L. Heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones: Implications for pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Int. J. Clin. Lab. Res. 1995, 25, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sasahira, M.; Lowry, T.; Simon, R.P.; Greenberg, D.A. Epileptic tolerance: Prior seizures protect against seizure-induced neuronal injury. Neurosci. Lett. 1995, 185, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Stringer, J.L.; Agarwal, K.S.; Dure, L.S. Is cell death necessary for hippocampal mossy fiber sprouting? Epilepsy Res. 1997, 27, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Henshall, D.C.; Murphy, B. Modulators of neuronal cell death in epilepsy. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2008, 8, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Romi, F.; Helgeland, G.; Gilhus, N.E. Heat-Shock Proteins in Clinical Neurology. Eur. Neurol. 2011, 66, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Franklin, T.; Krueger-Naug, A.M.; Clarke, D.B.; Arrigo, A.-P.; Currie, R.W. The role of heat shock proteins Hsp70 and Hsp27 in cellular protection of the central nervous system. Int. J. Hyperth. 2005, 21, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Akbar, M.T.; Lundberg, A.M.; Liu, K.; Vidyadaran, S.; Wells, K.E.; Dolatshad, H.; Wynn, S.; Wells, D.; Latchman, D.S.; de Belleroche, J. The Neuroprotective Effects of Heat Shock Protein 27 Overexpression in Transgenic Animals against Kainate-induced Seizures and Hippocampal Cell Death. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 19956–19965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Xi, Z.-Q.; Sun, J.-J.; Wang, X.-F.; Li, M.-W.; Liu, X.-Z.; Wang, L.-Y.; Zhu, X.; Xiao, F.; Li, J.-M.; Gong, Y.; et al. HSPBAP1 is found extensively in the anterior temporal neocortex of patients with intractable epilepsy. Synapse 2007, 61, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jiang, M.; Ma, Y.; Cheng, H.; Ni, X.; Guo, L.; Xie, Y.; Mao, Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel human gene (HSPBAP1) from human fetal brain. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2001, 95, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Patel, M. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress: Cause and consequence of epileptic seizures. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 37, 1951–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bruce, A.J.; Baudry, M. Oxygen free radicals in rat limbic structures after kainate-induced seizures. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 993–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gluck, M.R.; Jayatilleke, E.; Shaw, S.; Rowan, A.; Haroutunian, V. CNS oxidative stress associated with the kainic acid rodent model of experimental epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2000, 39, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lan, J.; Henshall, D.C.; Simon, R.P.; Chen, J. Formation of the Base Modification 8-Hydroxyl-2–Deoxyguanosine and DNA Fragmentation Following Seizures Induced by Systemic Kainic Acid in the Rat. J. Neurochem. 2001, 74, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Patel, M.; Liang, L.-P.; Ii, L.J.R. Enhanced hippocampal F2-isoprostane formation following kainate-induced seizures. J. Neurochem. 2008, 79, 1065–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kudin, A.P.; Kudina, T.A.; Seyfried, J.; Vielhaber, S.; Beck, H.; Elger, C.E.; Kunz, W.S. Seizure-dependent modulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in rat hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 15, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Liang, L.-P.; Patel, M. Seizure-induced changes in mitochondrial redox status. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 40, 316–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ostermann, J.; Horwich, A.L.; Neupert, W.; Hartl, F.-U. Protein folding in mitochondria requires complex formation with hsp60 and ATP hydrolysis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1989, 341, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Cechetto, J.D.; Soltys, B.J.; Gupta, R.S. Localization of Mitochondrial 60-kD Heat Shock Chaperonin Protein (Hsp60) in Pituitary Growth Hormone Secretory Granules and Pancreatic Zymogen Granules. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2000, 48, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Cappello, F.; Conway de Macario, E.; Marasà, L.; Zummo, G.; Macario, A.J.L. Hsp60 expression, new locations, functions, and perspectives for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2008, 7, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Beere, H.M.; Wolf, B.B.; Cain, K.; Mosser, D.D.; Mahboubi, A.; Kuwana, T.; Tailor, P.; Morimoto, R.I.; Cohen, G.M.; Green, D.R. Heat-shock protein 70 inhibits apoptosis by preventing recruitment of procaspase-9 to the Apaf-1 apoptosome. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gabai, V.; Yaglom, J.A.; Volloch, V.; Meriin, A.B.; Force, T.; Koutroumanis, M.; Massie, B.; Mosser, D.D.; Sherman, M.Y. dHsp72-Mediated Suppression of c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase Is Implicated in Development of Tolerance to Caspase-Independent Cell Death. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 6826–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Saleh, A.; Srinivasula, S.M.; Balkir, L.; Robbins, P.D.; Alnemri, E.S. Negative regulation of the Apaf-1 apoptosome by Hsp70. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000, 2, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kroemer, G. Heat Shock Protein 70 Neutralizes Apoptosis-Inducing Factor. Sci. World J. 2001, 1, 590–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ravagnan, L.; Gurbuxani, S.; Susin, S.A.; Maisse, C.; Daugas, E.; Zamzami, N.; Mak, T.; Jäättelä, M.; Penninger, J.; Garrido, C.; et al. Heat-shock protein 70 antagonizes apoptosis-inducing factor. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Park, H.; Lee, J.; Huh, S.; Seo, J.; Choi, E. Hsp72 functions as a natural inhibitory protein of c-Jun N-terminal kinase. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Park, H.-S.; Cho, S.-G.; Kim, C.K.; Hwang, H.S.; Noh, K.T.; Kim, M.-S.; Huh, S.-H.; Kim, M.J.; Ryoo, K.; Kim, E.K.; et al. Heat Shock Protein Hsp72 Is a Negative Regulator of Apoptosis Signal-Regulating Kinase 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 7721–7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Stankiewicz, A.R.; Lachapelle, G.; Foo, C.P.Z.; Radicioni, S.M.; Mosser, D.D. Hsp70 Inhibits Heat-induced Apoptosis Upstream of Mitochondria by Preventing Bax Translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 38729–38739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Leak, R.K. Heat shock proteins in neurodegenerative disorders and aging. J. Cell Commun. Signal. 2014, 8, 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 08601 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular chaperones and miRNAs in epilepsy. The levels of Hsp27 (1), α-B crystallin (2), Hsp60 (3), and Hsp70s (4) are increased in epilepsy (A). Hsp27 could play a cytoprotective role due to its antiapoptotic activity (B) and could be a marker of the cortical tissue affected by seizures (C). The neuroprotective role of Hsp27 is also suggested by the abnormal expression of the Hsp27 inhibitor HSPBAP1 in epileptic tissue (D). In addition, the chaperone α-B crystallin is a promising tissue marker of epileptic foci (E). Likewise, Hsp72 (and other members of the Hsp70 family) increase in the epileptic status and can be considered potential markers of epileptic tissue foci (F). Hsp72 overexpression plays a cytoprotective role by promoting neuronal survival during seizures (G) [47] but overexpression following epileptic stress is accompanied by increased neuronal hyperactivity; thus, pharmacological inhibition of the chaperone suppresses neuronal hyper excitability (H) [48]. A similar seizure-suppression effect was observed following Hsp90-β inhibition (H). Mitochondrial dysfunction, free radical production, and oxidative stress are considered both cause, and consequence of epileptic seizures (I). Mitochondrial Hsp60 increases in response to the oxidative stress induced by epileptic seizures, pointing to its potential as epileptic tissue biomarker [49]. The levels of Hsp70 and Hsp60 increase in plasma and/or serum of epileptic patients following seizures; thus, assessing the levels of these chaperones is a promising way to retrospectively diagnose seizures and may help in patient follow up. sequential measurements after a seizure may reveal profiles useful for predicting a new seizure (J). Altered expression of different miRNAs has an impact on various cellular processes pertinent to epilepsy (K). For instance, miR-21 and miR-132 [39] and miR-146a [35,36] are upregulated following epileptic status both in animal models and MTLE patients showing neuroinflammation; miR-184 is upregulated in KA-treated mice and positively correlates with the development of epileptic tolerance and with neuronal survival following mild and severe seizures [38]; miR-124 is downregulated in patients with epilepsy and rats after drug-induced seizures and, when it is augmented, it suppresses seizures by inhibiting the expression of CREB, a key regulator in epileptogenesis [43].
Figure 1. Molecular chaperones and miRNAs in epilepsy. The levels of Hsp27 (1), α-B crystallin (2), Hsp60 (3), and Hsp70s (4) are increased in epilepsy (A). Hsp27 could play a cytoprotective role due to its antiapoptotic activity (B) and could be a marker of the cortical tissue affected by seizures (C). The neuroprotective role of Hsp27 is also suggested by the abnormal expression of the Hsp27 inhibitor HSPBAP1 in epileptic tissue (D). In addition, the chaperone α-B crystallin is a promising tissue marker of epileptic foci (E). Likewise, Hsp72 (and other members of the Hsp70 family) increase in the epileptic status and can be considered potential markers of epileptic tissue foci (F). Hsp72 overexpression plays a cytoprotective role by promoting neuronal survival during seizures (G) [47] but overexpression following epileptic stress is accompanied by increased neuronal hyperactivity; thus, pharmacological inhibition of the chaperone suppresses neuronal hyper excitability (H) [48]. A similar seizure-suppression effect was observed following Hsp90-β inhibition (H). Mitochondrial dysfunction, free radical production, and oxidative stress are considered both cause, and consequence of epileptic seizures (I). Mitochondrial Hsp60 increases in response to the oxidative stress induced by epileptic seizures, pointing to its potential as epileptic tissue biomarker [49]. The levels of Hsp70 and Hsp60 increase in plasma and/or serum of epileptic patients following seizures; thus, assessing the levels of these chaperones is a promising way to retrospectively diagnose seizures and may help in patient follow up. sequential measurements after a seizure may reveal profiles useful for predicting a new seizure (J). Altered expression of different miRNAs has an impact on various cellular processes pertinent to epilepsy (K). For instance, miR-21 and miR-132 [39] and miR-146a [35,36] are upregulated following epileptic status both in animal models and MTLE patients showing neuroinflammation; miR-184 is upregulated in KA-treated mice and positively correlates with the development of epileptic tolerance and with neuronal survival following mild and severe seizures [38]; miR-124 is downregulated in patients with epilepsy and rats after drug-induced seizures and, when it is augmented, it suppresses seizures by inhibiting the expression of CREB, a key regulator in epileptogenesis [43].
Ijms 22 08601 g001
Ijms 22 08601 g002 550
Figure 2. Hsp60 in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy. Shown are the levels and preferential localization of Hsp60 in control non-stimulated rats (ctrl) and in maximal dentate activation (MDA)-stimulated rats. (A–C). Immunohistochemical staining for Hsp60 in the hippocampus of control non-stimulated rats; DG, dentate gyrus; CA3, Cornu Ammonis area 3; CA1, Cornu Ammonis area 1. (D–F). Microphotographs of Hsp60 levels in the hippocampus of MDA-stimulated rats, ipsilateral to the perforant pathway stimulation (MDAI). (G–I). Microphotographs of Hsp60 levels in the hippocampus of MDA-stimulated rats, contralateral to the perforant pathway stimulation (MDAC). As shown in the microphotographs A–C and in the corresponding insets, in ctrl animals, Hsp60 was detected in all the hippocampal sectors. In the DG, Hsp60 immunoreactivity was in the granular cell layer, whereas, in the CA3 and CA1 sectors, it was, for the most part, in the pyramidal cell layer. The images of MDA-stimulated rats (D–I) and the corresponding insets show that the Hsp60 immunoreactivity was increased in the DG, CA3, and CA1 sectors in MDAI and MDAC compared to ctrl rats. This Hsp60 increase was observed in neuron somata and neuropil. Green scale bar = 100 µm. Reproduced from reference [57], published under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Figure 2. Hsp60 in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy. Shown are the levels and preferential localization of Hsp60 in control non-stimulated rats (ctrl) and in maximal dentate activation (MDA)-stimulated rats. (A–C). Immunohistochemical staining for Hsp60 in the hippocampus of control non-stimulated rats; DG, dentate gyrus; CA3, Cornu Ammonis area 3; CA1, Cornu Ammonis area 1. (D–F). Microphotographs of Hsp60 levels in the hippocampus of MDA-stimulated rats, ipsilateral to the perforant pathway stimulation (MDAI). (G–I). Microphotographs of Hsp60 levels in the hippocampus of MDA-stimulated rats, contralateral to the perforant pathway stimulation (MDAC). As shown in the microphotographs A–C and in the corresponding insets, in ctrl animals, Hsp60 was detected in all the hippocampal sectors. In the DG, Hsp60 immunoreactivity was in the granular cell layer, whereas, in the CA3 and CA1 sectors, it was, for the most part, in the pyramidal cell layer. The images of MDA-stimulated rats (D–I) and the corresponding insets show that the Hsp60 immunoreactivity was increased in the DG, CA3, and CA1 sectors in MDAI and MDAC compared to ctrl rats. This Hsp60 increase was observed in neuron somata and neuropil. Green scale bar = 100 µm. Reproduced from reference [57], published under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).
Ijms 22 08601 g002
Table
Table 1. Representative examples of molecular chaperones and miRNAs involved in epileptogenesis.
Table 1. Representative examples of molecular chaperones and miRNAs involved in epileptogenesis.
MoleculeStatePossible RoleReference
MiRNAsmiR-146aUpregulated in chronic stages following epileptic status in TLE patientsEnhancer of neuroinflammation[35,36]
miR-221, miR-222Downregulated in MTLE-HS patientsEnhancer of neuroinflammation[37]
miR-184Upregulated in KA-treated micePromotion of epileptic tolerance and
neuronal survival in response to seizures		[38]
miR-21, miR-132Upregulated in chronic stages following epileptic status in TLE patientsEnhancer of neuroinflammation[39]
miR-124Downregulated in patients with epilepsy and in rats after drug-induced seizuresAntiepileptic effect and seizure
suppression following miRNA
upregulation		[43]
miR-134Upregulated in experimental and human epilepsyEnhancer of epileptic seizures and
hyperexcitable state		[44]
miRNA-21, miRNA-22, miR-34a, and miR-125aDecreased in post status epilepticus rat hippocampus and peripheral bloodPossible involvement in molecular
mechanisms of neuronal death,
inflammation, and epileptogenesis		[50]
miR-8071Downregulated in exosomes from MTLE-HS patientsBiomarker for disease duration or seizure frequency[51]
Molecular chaperonesHsp27High levels in neocortex of epileptic patientsMarker to localize the brain regions affected by seizures[52]
Focal increased levels in rat brain areas affected by seizuresMarker of epileptic regions[52,53,54,55]
α-B crystallinIncreased levels in specific brain regions from epileptic
children		Tissue marker for epileptic foci[56]
Hsp60Increased levels in the dentate gyrus and hippocampus proper and plasma from MDA-stimulated ratsBiomarker of hippocampal stress[57]
High levels in plasma from TLE patientsBiomarker of hippocampal stress[57]
Decreased levels in the hippocampus of
epileptic rats		Induction of oxidative stress and neuronal excitability[58]
Hsp70Increased level of heat-inducible Hsp70 in brains damaged by seizuresNeuroprotective[59]
Increased level of Hsp72 in rat epileptic brain regionsMarker of brain injury and/or
neuroprotection		[47,60,61,62,63]
High levels at the beginning of epileptogenesisIndicator for the localization of stressed neurons in the acute phase of epilepsy[64]
Decreased levels in CA4 and subiculum from TLE patients post-surgeryMarker of seizure activity[65]
High expression of Hsp72 in the early phase following status epilepticus in a TLE rat modelEnhancer of a hyperexcitable epileptic
network		[66]
High levels in KA-induced model of TLEEnhancer of a hyperexcitable epileptic
network through the degradation of the Kv4 channels complexes		[48]
High levels in serum from epileptic patientsBiomarker for epileptic condition[67,68,69,70]
Hsp90Chaperone-induced inhibitionIncrease in glutamate transporter-1
(GLT-1) and seizure suppression		[70,71]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zummo, L.; Vitale, A.M.; Caruso Bavisotto, C.; De Curtis, M.; Garbelli, R.; Giallonardo, A.T.; Di Bonaventura, C.; Fanella, M.; Conway de Macario, E.; Cappello, F.; et al. Molecular Chaperones and miRNAs in Epilepsy: Pathogenic Implications and Therapeutic Prospects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168601

AMA Style

Zummo L, Vitale AM, Caruso Bavisotto C, De Curtis M, Garbelli R, Giallonardo AT, Di Bonaventura C, Fanella M, Conway de Macario E, Cappello F, et al. Molecular Chaperones and miRNAs in Epilepsy: Pathogenic Implications and Therapeutic Prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(16):8601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168601

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zummo, Leila, Alessandra Maria Vitale, Celeste Caruso Bavisotto, Marco De Curtis, Rita Garbelli, Anna Teresa Giallonardo, Carlo Di Bonaventura, Martina Fanella, Everly Conway de Macario, Francesco Cappello, and et al. 2021. "Molecular Chaperones and miRNAs in Epilepsy: Pathogenic Implications and Therapeutic Prospects" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 16: 8601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168601

APA Style

Zummo, L., Vitale, A. M., Caruso Bavisotto, C., De Curtis, M., Garbelli, R., Giallonardo, A. T., Di Bonaventura, C., Fanella, M., Conway de Macario, E., Cappello, F., Macario, A. J. L., & Marino Gammazza, A. (2021). Molecular Chaperones and miRNAs in Epilepsy: Pathogenic Implications and Therapeutic Prospects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(16), 8601. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168601

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop