Next Article in Journal
EDEM3 Domains Cooperate to Perform Its Overall Cell Functioning
Next Article in Special Issue
Placental Immune Responses to Viruses: Molecular and Histo-Pathologic Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Osteoclastogenic Potential of Tissue-Engineered Periosteal Sheet: Effects of Culture Media on the Ability to Recruit Osteoclast Precursors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of Maternal Microbiota and Diet in Cord Blood Cytokine and Immunoglobulin Profiles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms22042170
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Impact of Selected Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Pregnancy and Female Fertility

by
Katarzyna Smolarczyk
1,†,
Beata Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska
1,†,
Ewa Rudnicka
2,
Dariusz Szukiewicz
3,
Blazej Meczekalski
4,
Roman Smolarczyk
2,* and
Wojciech Pieta
2,*
1
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-008 Warsaw, Poland
2
Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
3
Department of General and Experimental Pathology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
4
Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-535 Poznan, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 2170; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042170
Submission received: 6 December 2020 / Revised: 15 February 2021 / Accepted: 16 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reproductive Immunology and Pregnancy)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium are a common cause of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) which can lead to tubal factor infertility (TFI). TFI is one of the most common causes of infertility, accounting for 30% of female fertility problems. STIs can also have an impact on pregnancy, leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Escalating antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium represents a significant problem and can be therapeutically challenging. We present a comprehensive review of the current treatment options, as well as the molecular approach to this subject. We have given special attention to molecular epidemiology, molecular diagnostics, current and new treatments, and drug resistance.

1. Introduction

Infection agents such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi can impair various human functions, including reproduction and pregnancy. Among the most common microorganisms which cause sexually transmitted diseases are Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and, to a lesser extent, Mycoplasma genitalium [1,2,3]. Infection can ascend from the vagina, through the cervix, to the upper genital tract, the endometrium, and ultimately to the fallopian tubes and clinically presents as acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [3]. Approximately 15% of women with PID then develop tubal factor infertility (TFI) and the number of episodes of PID is directly proportional to the risk of infertility [4,5]. TFI ranks among the most common causes of infertility, accounting for 30% of female fertility problems [6].
Microorganisms such as C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae can not only affect tubal patency but are also associated with pregnancy complications, including ectopic pregnancy, recurrent pregnancy loss, and preterm birth [7]. In addition, other pathogens such as M. genitalium can also play a role in pregnancy complications [7,8].
Infections caused by these pathogens are common around the world and have a great impact, as mentioned, on reproductive health. Recovering from the disease does not give immunity. Therefore, timely diagnosis and timely treatment are very important. The spreading of the drug resistance of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis necessitates the development of new drugs and treatment regimens.
This paper presents the latest data on molecular diagnostics, current and new treatments, and drug resistance.

2. Epidemiology

2.1. General Epidemiology (Including Epidemiology in Women and/or Pregnant Women)

Each year, there are an estimated 357 million new cases worldwide of four curable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among people 15–49 years of age: C. trachomatis is acquired by 131 million people, N. gonorrhoeae is acquired by 78 million people, syphilis by 5.6 million people, and trichomoniasis by 143 million people [9]. Gonorrhea, one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STIs), continues to be a major public health concern worldwide. In 2016, there were about 87 million new cases of gonorrhea; 20 cases per 1000 population were in women, and 26 cases per 1000 population were in men (15–49 years of age) worldwide [10]. The rates of cases of gonorrhea reported in the USA increased by 75.2% between 2009 and 2017, from a historic low of 98.1 cases per 100,000 population in 2009 to 170.6 cases per 100,000 population in 2017 [11]. China suffered a dramatic increase of 38.5% in N. gonorrhoeae infections, from 100,245 cases reported in 2015 to 138,855 cases in 2017, following over 10 years of sustaining a stable, or even slightly decreased, incidence with 109,525 cases each year [12]. With the exception of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV), chlamydial infections are widely diffused among the general population, mainly affecting young people 16–24 years of age. Risk factors include high frequency of changing partners, multiple partners, unprotected sex, and being unmarried [13]. In the USA in 2018, 1,758,668 cases of chlamydia were reported to the CDC, which represents a 19% increase since 2014 [14]. For 2018, 26 EU/EEA Member States reported 406,406 confirmed cases of chlamydia infection (https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/AER-for-2018-STI-chlamydia.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2020)) To our knowledge, the population prevalence of M. genitalium has not been ascertained systematically. Nonsystematic reviews have reported prevalence estimates ranging from 0.7% to 3.3% in the general population and from zero to 20% in a range of female study populations described as “low risk” [15]. There is a limited amount of data regarding the rates of STIs during pregnancy. Analysis shows the incidence rate of chlamydia was 6.7 per 100 person years (py) and 9.9/100 py during pregnancy; the incidence rate of gonorrhea was 2.7/100 py and 4.9/100 py during pregnancy. Prevalence among pregnant women differs depending on the regions. In a systematic review, N. gonorrhoeae ranged from 1.2% in Latin America to 4.6% in Southern Africa, and C. trachomatis ranged from 0.8% in Asia to 11.2% in Latin America.

2.2. Genotyping and Molecular Epidemiology

N. gonorrhoeae genotyping is usually based on one or more of four methods: WGS (Whole Genome Sequencing), NG-MAST (Neisseria gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing), MLST (Multi-locus Sequence Typing), and NG-STAR (Neisseria gonorrhoeae Sequence Typing for Antimicrobial Resistance). WGS enables the classification of investigated strains into related groups of so-called clades. As there is currently no worldwide database of N. gonorrhoeae clades (at the end of 2020) it is almost impossible to compare the strains in a wider perspective. However, WGS can help to simultaneously identify the NG-MAST, MLST, and NG-STAR sequence types of the bacteria.
NG-MAST is the most utilized method of N. gonorrhoeae genotyping. The method involves sequencing the 490 bp fragment of the porB gene encoding porin B and the 390 bp fragment of the tbpB gene that encodes the B unit of the transferrin-binding protein. The NG-MAST worldwide database makes it possible to determine the allele number of each investigated gene. About 12,800 porB alleles and about 3200 tbpB alleles were described by the end of 2020. NG-MAST types are established in the database of the porB and tbpB allele combination. About 22,000 NG-MAST sequence types were described by the end of 2020. About 30% of identified NG-MAST types are classified in a few hundred genogroups. In most European countries, the predominant genogroups are: G1407 (often associated with antibiotic resistance), G2992, G225, G51 G21, G387, G4995, G7445, G292, and G2400. Affiliation to some genogroups is often correlated with spread of the antimicrobial-resistant variants. High-level ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae strains belong to G1407, G564, G1791, G1866, G4019, G5267, G11018, and G11110. The high-level resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin together occurred in an N. gonorrhoeae strain classified as G1866. However, the prevalence of the G1407 genogroup has decreased recently in Europe and in some countries, such as Russia, the genogroup practically does not occur [16,17,18,19]
MLST has been used for a long time for the genotyping of many species of bacteria and some fungi too. MLST typing of N. gonorrhoeae is based on the sequencing of 450–500 bp fragments of seven genes involved in basic metabolism: abcZ, adk, fumC, gdh, glnA, gnd, and pyrD. The allele number of each gene can be determined in a public worldwide database and the sequence type is defined in the database of the seven-allele combination. The most prevalent N. gonorrhoeae MLST types in the European Union are: ST1901, ST9363, and ST7363 [18]. High-level ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae strains belong to ST1901, ST1903, ST7363, ST12039, and ST13637. N. gonorrhoeae simultaneously resistant to ceftriaxone and azithromycin was classified as ST12039 [16,17,18,19].
NG-STAR is a method that has been used since 2017 and is based on sequencing fragments of seven genes associated with beta-lactam, fluoroquinolone, and macrolide resistance: penA (which encodes PBP2), mtrR (which encodes the repressor protein of the membrane pump mtrCDE), porB (which encodes porin B), ponA (which encodes PBP1), gyrA (which encodes a subunit of gyrase), parC (which encodes a subunit of topoisomerase IV), and the 23S rRNA gene (which contains a target site for azithromycin). The numbers of the alleles of the genes can be checked in public world databases and the NG-STAR type is determined on the basis of the seven-allele combination. By the end of 2020, about 3200 NG-STAR types as well as several hundred clonal complexes (CCs) were described [20]. NG-STAR seems to be the method best correlated with antimicrobial resistance. The high-level ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae strains belong to ST16 (CC90), ST133 (CC38), ST139 (CC139), ST226 (CC348), ST227 (CC348), ST233 (CC199), ST996 (CC73), and ST1133 (CC199). N. gonorrhoeae simultaneously resistant to ceftriaxone and azithromycin was classified as ST996 [16,17,18,19,20].
Types among C. trachomatis isolates are determined on the basis of a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the gene encoding the bacterial major outer membrane protein (MOMP) ompA. The investigation of C. trachomatis serovars/genovars is important not only from the epidemiological point of view but also because they have different pathogenic potentials. A, B, Ba, and C types cause trachoma, D-K, Da, Ia, and Ja cause urethritis and cervicitis, and L1–L3 and their subvariants, such as L2a and L2b, cause LGV. Most of the urogenital strains in Europe and worldwide belong to the E and F genotypes [21,22]. The most common LGV variant in Europe is L2b, but LGV is extremely rare in European women and mainly occurs in men who have sex with men (MSM) [23].
Four different schemes of the MLST method based on the analysis of fragments of seven genes have been used to genotype C. trachomatis. The data making it possible to determine genotypes are accessible in public databases for molecular typing and microbial genome diversity, Chlamydiales. The methods have a high discriminatory power; however, various schemes can create some problems when comparing the results. One of the most used schemes is based on the glyA, mdhC, pdhA, yhbG, pykF, leuS, and lysS genes. The most common sequence types are ST39 and ST34, which are associated with genotypes E and F [21,24].
The WGS of C. trachomatis strains makes it possible to determine four main clades: ocular, urogenital T1 (which involves the most common genovars, E and F), urogenital T2 (a less prevalent genovar), and LGV [25].
M. genitalium genotypes are determined on the basis of the mgpB gene. In the genotyping of strains from MSM in Germany, the most common types were 4, 6, 113, and 108 [26,27].
The data concerning WGS of M. genitalium genotypes are still incomplete. The WGS of 28 M. genitalium strains from different geographic regions makes it possible to determine that there are two main clades. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the parC and 23SrRNA genes were associated with fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance, respectively [28].

3. Pathogenesis (in Women)

3.1. The Pathogenesis of Fallopian Tube Damage

Among the most common microorganisms involved in the pathogenesis of tubal damage are C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and M. genitalium [1]. C. trachomatis remains the most common bacterial cause of tubal obstructions, lacerations, and formations of adhesions which may disrupt the passing of oocytes through the tubes [4,6,10]. The serovars D-K of C. trachomatis have an affinity to the epithelial cells of the urogenital tract, migrating from the cervix to the uterus and the fallopian tubes, causing chronic inflammation [29]. The increased amount of heat shock protein (HSP; cHSP10 and cHSP57/60) synthesized by C. trachomatis also induces a proinflammatory immune response in the human fallopian tube epithelia, resulting in scarring and tubal occlusion [30,31]. The link between tubal factor infertility and previous C. trachomatis infection is so strong that the chlamydial antibody titer is commonly used in clinical practice as a surrogate marker for tubal factor infertility [30]. It should also be mentioned that C. trachomatis infections are commonly asymptomatic, implying a pathogenic strategy for the evasion of innate inflammatory immune responses. The outer membrane of C. trachomatis contains lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a known potent agonist of inflammatory innate immunity. Yanget al. found that C. trachomatis LPS is not capable of engaging the canonical TLR4/MD-2 or noncanonical caspase-11 inflammatory pathways [32]. The inability of C. trachomatis to trigger an innate immunity inflammatory response may explain the high incidence of asymptomatic chlamydial genital infection.
Primary N. gonorrhoeae infection is present in the endocervix often with concomitant urethral infection. Ascending infection may occur in 10–20% of infected women and can result in acute PID that can manifest as salpingitis, endometritis, and tubo-ovarian abscess, leading to sterility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain [33]. Cytokines IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α, produced by tubal epithelial cells after being challenged by N. gonorrhoeae, may contribute to the development of gonococcus-induced infertility [34]. During initial infection, following initial host cell interaction, N. gonorrhoeae attachment and subsequent colonization depends on type IV pili forming microcolonies on the epithelial cell surface. Adherence to the epithelial surface and subsequent pilus retraction bring the gonococci close to the cell surface [35]. In particular, N. gonorrhoeae attacks the epithelial cells of the fallopian tube, both initially by attaching to the nonciliated mucosal cells and by sloughing off ciliated mucosal cells. The resulting damage to the fallopian tubes hinders the transportation of the ovum along the tubes, elevating the risk of infertility and ectopic pregnancy [36].
While N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis are known to be pathogens in salpingitis and tubal infertility, in many cases, other microorganisms are identified, i.e., M. genitalium. M. genitalium is strongly associated with cervicitis, endometritis, salpingitis, and PID, and in many cases can be the cause of infertility [37]. Antibody tests were positive in patients with tubal factor infertility, even in cases where chlamydiosis was excluded [37]. McGowin et al. found that the organism can attach to the epithelial cells of the reproductive tract and can induce cellular immune responses that result in inflammation [38,39]. In short, adhesion of M. genitalium to the host epithelial cells induces an acute inflammatory response via highly expressed immune sensors including Toll-like receptors 2 and 6. The binding of these receptors to M. genitalium and its lipoproteins results in NF-ĸB activation and acute induction of the genes involved in host defense. Those proinflammatory signals include potent chemokines that ultimately result in leukocyte recruitment to the site of infection. In addition to leukocytes, M. genitalium induces very potent proinflammatory responses from monocytes/macrophages, that are common to female reproductive tract tissues [40]. In another in vitro study by Baczynska et al., it was demonstrated that M. genitalium adhered to the epithelium of the human fallopian tube, causing the swelling of the cilia and the separation of the cilia from the epithelium [41]. In comparison with infections caused by C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, the damage to the fallopian tubes caused by M. genitalium tends to be moderate, but when left untreated, it may accumulate and yield serious long-term consequences for fertility [38].

3.2. The Pathogenesis of Infections during Pregnancy

Microorganisms like C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae can not only affect tubal patency, but they are also associated with pregnancy complications, including ectopic pregnancy, recurrent pregnancy loss, and preterm birth [7]. The chlamydial 10 kDa and 57 kDa HSPs (cHSP10 and cHSP57/60) have a similar structure to human proteins and there is cross-reactivity between the human HSP60 and the bacterial cHSP60, which leads to the formation of antibodies against the HSP60. It has been found that these antibodies have a negative impact on embryonal growth and increase the probability of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as repeated implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage [42]. Equils et al. established that cHSP57/60 induces trophoblast apoptosis by stimulating Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4), which is responsible for the immune response in the placenta [43].
C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections have also been linked to other adverse pregnancy outcomes, including chorioamnionitis, placentitis, premature rupture of the membranes, and preterm birth. Vertical transmission from the genital tract can also cause conjunctivitis and pneumonitis in newborns [7].
The role of M. genitalium in maternal infections and its impact on the outcome of pregnancy has been studied less and the evidence that the pathogen is associated with pregnancy complications is limited [7]. According to the last meta-analysis by Lis et al., M. genitalium infection has been shown to be significantly associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion and preterm birth in some studies, but evidence is inconsistent and further research is needed to consolidate the conclusions [44].

4. Symptoms in Women with Special Attention to the Impact on Pregnancy and Infertility

4.1. Neisseria gonorrhoeae

N. gonorrhoeae infection can be either symptomatic or asymptomatic in women (up to 50% infections can be asymptomatic). Symptoms are also less prominent if the infection affects the throat or the anal area. The most common manifestations of gonococcal infection include altered vaginal discharge, pain of the lower abdomen, or pain during sexual intercourse (which is associated with cervicitis), as well as dysuric symptoms (pain, burning sensation, itching, stinging, tingling when urinating or soon after), and occasional intermenstrual bleeding or menorrhagia [45].
The first symptoms usually occur 3–7 days after the intercourse (usually within the first week). Possible complications due to infection in women include disseminated gonorrhea, gonococcal arthritis, conjunctivitis, inflammation of the great vestibular gland, and Fitz–Hugh–Curtis syndrome. Gonococcal infection can also lead to PID which is strongly associated with TFI [46]. TFI is also dependent on the number and severity of PID episodes [47]. PID includes inflammation of the endometrium, the ovaries, and the fallopian tubes. Tubal abscesses may also be present.
Research regarding adverse birth outcomes and maternal infections indicates that gonorrhea is also strongly associated with a 60% increased probability of small for gestational age (SGA) infants and a 40% increased probability of low birth weight (LBW) infants. Other possible complications during pregnancy include prematurity and neonatal infection, increased perinatal mortality, premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum endometritis [3] (see Table 1).

4.2. Chlamydia trachomatis

C. trachomatis infection can be either symptomatic or asymptomatic in women and 70–95% of infected women have no symptoms. The first symptoms usually occur 3–7 weeks after the intercourse. Women’s symptoms usually include an abnormal vaginal discharge and a burning sensation when urinating. Additional symptoms are presented in Figure 1. About 2.5–4.5% of women with chlamydia will develop PID if the chlamydia infection is untreated [48].
PID can be a main cause of infertility, difficulty getting pregnant, or of tubal pregnancy [47]. Therefore, many countries recommend routine screening to identify most infections. Maternal C. trachomatis infection can also result in infant conjunctivitis and pneumonia and maternal postpartum endometritis.

4.3. Mycoplasma genitalium

Up to 81.9% of patients with M. genitalium infection are asymptomatic [3]. If symptoms are present, they usually include urethritis, increased or altered vaginal discharge, bleeding between periods, pain during intercourse, discharge or bleeding after intercourse, and abdominal pain.
M. genitalium infection can result in cervicitis, postpartum endometritis, neonatal disease, and reactive arthritis [49].
The role of M. genitalium infection in infertility is underestimated. The infection can lead to fallopian tube disorders. It has been proven that M. genitalium can be present in up to 16% of infertile women [50]. Adverse pregnancy outcomes include spontaneous abortion, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, and recurrent pregnancy loss. Rectal and pharyngeal infections are usually asymptomatic [51].
Neonates of M. genitalium positive mothers should be observed for conjunctivitis and respiratory tract infections [51].

5. Molecular Diagnostics

The most recommended methods for the laboratory diagnosis of chlamydial infection, M. genitalium infection, and gonorrhea are nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). Over the last decade, NAATs have replaced traditional diagnostic methods. Molecular methods are more sensitive than culture and less demanding when it comes to the collection, storage, and transportation of clinical specimens. However, in the case of N. gonorrhoeae, culture is still recommended because it is an inexpensive method that makes it possible to perform antimicrobial susceptibility tests and epidemiological genotyping of the bacteria [61]. Because the culture of M. genitalium and C. trachomatis is expensive and time and labor consuming, these methods are not currently used in routine diagnostics. Compared with enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or direct immunofluorescence (DIF), NAATs are not only more sensitive but also more specific. The EIA and DIF tests can be utilized for the diagnosis of C. trachomatis only in cases when NAATs are not accessible. In women, urine is not the optimal specimen for NAATs because of the possible occurrence of amplification inhibitors, however, self-collected or physician-collected vaginal swabs are highly acceptable [51,61,62,63].
The most important methods currently used in the molecular diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium infections are real-time PCR, strand displacement amplification (SDA) and transcription-mediated amplification (TMA). There are many commercial tests that can be utilized in the diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis. FDA-approved tests are presented in Table 2 [62,64].
Although the tests are usually highly specific and sensitive, some false-positive and false-negative results have been described. The reason for false-positive results can be cross-reaction with identical or very similar DNA fragments occurring in other related species. In particular, in the case of N. gonorrhoeae, cross-reactions with other Neisseria species can occur [65].
False-negative results can be caused by sequence variations in target fragments in the host DNA. The problem can, for example, affect the sensitivity of tests that use cryptic plasmids as a target in the diagnosis of C. trachomatis infections. Such tests cannot detect a new variant of C. trachomatis, the so-called “Swedish variant”, possessing a 377 BP deletion in the plasmid or plasmid-free C. trachomatis. Another variant connected with false-negative results of the Aptima Combo 2 assay was single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the bacterial gene encoding 23S rRNA (Finnish new variant C. trachomatis - nvCT). However, the problem has now been resolved and a new version of the test detects Finnish nvCT [62,63,66]. N. gonorrhoeae false-negative results caused by genetic variations of the target site are less common and concerns only some tests produced by laboratories (home-made tests) [64].
Home-made tests for the diagnosis of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and M. genitalium infections should be enhanced with quality control.
There are many real-time PCR tests, detecting MgPa adhesion protein 66 and G3PDH or 16S rRNA genes of M. genitalium. Another method used in the diagnosis of M. genitalium infection is transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) detecting the unique fragments of 23SrRNA or 16S rRNA. A problem in the laboratory diagnosis of M. genitalium can be the very small number of bacteria in the specimen and this can affect sensitivity [51,64].
The Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium Assay from Hologic Inc. is the first FDA-approved test for the diagnosis of M. genitalium infection (Table 2). The test detects 16s rRNA of M. genitalium and is based on target capture, transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), and hybridization protection assay (HPA) technologies [67]. Because of the high prevalence of the resistance to azithromycin, macrolide resistance tests are recommended before treatment. There are many home-made NAATs that detect mutations in 23S rRNA responsible for resistance, but recently some commercial tests have appeared as well. An interesting solution is the Resistance Plus MG FleXible (RPMG Flex) assay (SpeeDx). This is a multiplex qPCR test detecting the gene encoding the MgPa adhesion protein and simultaneously detects five 23S rRNA mutations (A2058G, T, or C, and A2059G or C) [68].
Another problem is that most NAATs are time consuming. In the case of sexually transmitted infection, the optimal solution would be a fast, specific, and sensitive point of care test. Unfortunately, most of the investigated point of care NAATs had insufficient sensitivity to be approved for use. However, promising results (a sensitivity of 97%) have been achieved with the io® single module system (Atlas Genetics Ltd.), which is a 30-minute point of care test to detect C. trachomatis in women [69]. Among the sensitive and specific FDA-approved tests (see Table 2), the Xpert CT/NG is relatively fast (90 min) [70].

6. Therapy (with Special Attention to Therapy in Pregnant Women)

6.1. Neisseria gonnorhoeae

The new guidelines published by the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI) recommend, as a first-line treatment, ceftriaxone IM 1 g in a single dose and azithromycin 2 g in a single oral dose. In cases when NAATs to detect C. trachomatis and control tests for gonorrhea are performed, monotherapy with ceftriaxone 1 g is acceptable as well.
Patients for whom injections are contraindicated or who refuse to have injections can receive second-line treatment consisting of cefixime 400 mg plus azithromycin 2 g in single oral doses.
The recommended treatment for patients allergic to cephalosporin includes spectinomycin 2 g IM in a single dose and azithromycin 2 g in a single dose. An alternative treatment for allergic patients is gentamicin 240 mg IM in a single dose and azithromycin 2 g in a single oral dose. After a positive confirmation of N. gonorrhoeae sensitivity, ciprofloxacin 500 mg in a single oral dose can be used as well. If adverse gastrointestinal symptoms are anticipated, then azithromycin in all of these treatments can be given in divided doses of 1 g followed by another 1 g after 6–12 hours. In case of confirmed ceftriaxone resistance, the recommended treatment for all patients who received lower doses of the antibiotics or the alternative treatment is ceftriaxone 1 g and azithromycin 2 g. Either spectinomycin and azithromycin or gentamicin and azithromycin, in doses as described above, can be used as well.
According to the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), first-line treatment consists of ceftriaxone 250 mg IM in a single dose together with azithromycin 1 g in a single oral dose. Second-line treatment includes cefixime 400 mg in a single oral dose together with azithromycin 1 g in a single oral dose. In case of confirmed N. gonorrhoeae resistance to ceftriaxone or a patient’s allergy to the antibiotic, single oral doses of gemifloxacin 320 mg together with azithromycin 2 g in a single oral dose or single doses of gentamicin 240 mg IM together with azithromycin 2 g can be used. Pregnant women should get the same first-line dual therapy protocol.
Spectinomycin 2 g IM in a single dose together with azithromycin 2 g in a single oral dose can be used as an alternative treatment. Aminoglycosides (gentamicin) or quinolones (ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin) should not be used for the treatment of gonorrhea in pregnant women [45,71].

6.2. Chlamydia trachomatis

Uncomplicated C. trachomatis infection is usually treated with doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for seven days or azithromycin 1 g orally immediately (according to IUSTI, azithromycin is second-line treatment) [63]. As doxycycline is contraindicated in pregnancy, the first-line treatment for C. trachomatis infection in pregnant women is azithromycin 1 g orally.
The second-line treatment includes amoxicillin 500 mg three times a day for seven days orally or erythromycin 500 mg four times a day for seven days orally. The third-line treatment includes josamycin 500 mg three times a day or 1000 mg twice a day for seven days orally.

6.3. Mycoplasma genitalium

The first-line treatment of M. genitalium infection is azithromycin 500 mg on day one, followed with 250 mg on days 2–5 or josamycin 500 mg for 10 days (orally, three times a day). The second-line treatment is moxifloxacin 400 mg for 7–10 days (orally). The third-line treatment includes doxycycline 100 mg twice a day for 14 days. A cure rate of approximately 90% can be achieved with pristinamycin 1 g four times a day for 10 days. If the infection is complicated with PID then the treatment is moxifloxacin 400 mg once a day for 14 days [51].
Guidelines slightly differ for pregnant women. Azithromycin is the first-choice treatment, but if this treatment cannot be implemented, then some authors consider postponing treatment until after pregnancy. Moxifloxacin is contraindicated in pregnancy and there are no data about using pristinamycin in pregnancy.

7. Antibiotic Resistance

7.1. Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Escalating antibiotic resistance in N. gonorrhoeae represents a significant problem. In 2017, N. gonorrhoeae was placed on the WHO global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria which includes 12 pathogens for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Multiresistant N. gonorrhoeae strains, including strains resistant to beta-lactams (ceftriaxone, cefixime, and penicillin) and simultaneously resistant to azithromycin and ciprofloxacin, have appeared all over the world.
The susceptibility/resistance to antibiotics among N. gonorrhoeae strains in most European countries is monitored as part of the European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP) [72,73]. In the project, genomes of strains collected from different countries are sequenced with the WGS method, which makes it possible to identify the reasons for their drug resistance and to determine the epidemiologic genotypes using the NG-MAST, NG-STAR, and MLST systems. The sequences of newly described resistance determinants are accessible in the worldwide NG-STAR database [18].
N. gonorrhoeae resistance to oxyimino-cephalosporins (ceftriaxone and cefixime) is connected with the combination of mutations in bacterial genes but crucially important are changes in the penA gene, which encodes PBP2 transpeptidase. Based on differences in the penA gene, a 1745–1752 bp fragment, about 395 alleles of PBP2 have been described. The alleles are divided into 165 main types (1–5, 7, 9–19, 21–22, 27, 34–35, 37–179) and many subtypes. The proteins can differ from each other in one to more than 60 amino acids. The increase in oxyimino-cephalosporin MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) can also be determined by the overproduction of MtrCDE and amino acid substitutions in the PorB1b protein but neither of the two mechanisms can cause resistance to cephalosporins alone. MtrCDE is a membrane pump protein that removes beta-lactams, macrolides, tetracyclines, rifampicin, and detergents from bacterial cells. Overproduction of MtrCDE is caused by substitutions in the repressor protein regulating the production of MtrCDE (G45D and A39T) and mutations in the promotor region of the mtrR gene. The substitution of amino acids in the PorB1b protein at positions 120 and 121 causes changes in the MIC levels of penicillins, cephalosporins, and tetracyclines. The sequencing of 30 bp fragments of the porB1b gene revealed the following substitutions in the PorB1b protein: G120C, D, E, K, N, Q, R, S, or T and A121D, G, N, S, or V [74,75].
High-level resistance to penicillin is determined by the production of beta-lactamases encoded by genes located in bacterial plasmids. The most common enzyme is TEM-1 but others, such as TEM-135, TEM-220, TEM-75, TEM-141, and TEM-198, can also appear. Chromosomal resistance to penicillin is caused by a combination of mutations: overproduction of the MtrCDE pump and substitutions of amino acids in the PorB1b (120/121) and PonA (421) proteins. The penicillin MIC is usually lower than in the case of the production of beta-lactamases [76,77].
Resistance to macrolides (azithromycin) is connected with transition in the rrl (23S rRNA) gene: A2049G (high-level resistance to azithromycin, MIC > 256 mg/L) or C2611T azithromycin (MIC in the range of 2–16 mg/L in the case of transition in all four alleles of the gene). Overproduction of the membrane pump MtrCDE can cause an azithromycin MIC of about 0.5 mg/L [20].
N. gonorrhoeae resistance to quinolones is caused by amino acid substitutions in topoisomerases II and IV GyrA (S91F or T, D95A, G, N, or Y) and ParC (D86N, S87C, I, K, N, R, or Y, S88A or P, E91A, G, K, or Q) [75,76].
Resistance to tetracyclines can be caused by the production of TetM, a protein that actively protects the bacterial ribosome from the action of antibiotics. TetM in N. gonorrhoeae is encoded by genes localized in the conjugative plasmids and determines a tetracycline MIC of 16–64 mg/L. Two types of tetracycline plasmids have been identified, which have been named Dutch and American. Chromosomal resistance to tetracyclines (with a tetracycline MIC of 2–4 mg/L) is associated with a combination of the overproduction of the membrane pump MtrCDE and mutations in the penB, penC, and rpsJ genes [78,79].

7.2. Chlamydia trachomatis

C. trachomatis is relatively sensitive to antibiotics; however, a few cases of resistance have been described. The reason for C. trachomatis resistance to macrolides (azithromycin) can be a mutation in the rplD gene that encodes the ribosomal L4 protein (substitution Q66K) connected with 23S rRNA conformational changes of the II, III, and V 23S rRNA domains. Other mutations that can lead to macrolide resistance are transversion A2058C and transition T2611C (Escherichia coli numbering) in the peptidyl-transferase region of the 23S rRNA gene and mutations in rplV encoding L22 protein (substitutions Q52K, R65C, V77A) [80].
Resistance to tetracyclines in C. trachomatis is caused by the production of the Tet(C) efflux pump encoded by genes located in genomic islands inserted into the bacterial chromosome. To date, two genomic islands (6 kb and 13.5 kb) have been described in C. trachomatis. The tetC gene can usually be found with the tetR (regulatory) gene and the insertion sequence IScs605. Resistance to tetracyclines may be transmitted horizontally from C. suis to C. trachomatis [81].
C. trachomatis resistance to quinolones (ciprofloxacin) is associated with a mutation in the gyrA gene (substitution S83I in the GyrA protein). Resistance to rifampicin can be caused by a mutation in the rpoB gene encoding the beta subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase [82].

7.3. Mycoplasma genitalium

M. genitalium is inherently resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics, because of the absence of a cell wall. The bacteria are usually sensitive to tetracyclines in vitro, however, clinical efficacy of doxycycline treatment is only 20–40%. The percentage of strains resistant to macrolides (azithromycin) and quinolones (moxifloxacin) has increased in recent years [83].
M. genitalium resistance to macrolides (azithromycin) is connected with point mutations in 2058 and 2059 (E. coli numbering) in the V region of 23S rRNA. Resistance to quinolones (moxifloxacin) in this species can be associated with mutations in the topoisomerase IV gene causing substitutions in the ParC protein (especially S83R, S83I, D87N, or D87Y) [84,85].
The data concerning the prevalence of the mutations in different geographic regions are incomplete, but according to accessible information, the overall prevalence of macrolide-resistant strains increased from 10% before 2010 to 51.4% in 2016–2017. The prevalence of moxifloxacin-resistant strains remained the same, at 7.7%, during this period. The percentage of M. genitalium-resistant to antibiotics is higher in the South Pacific and the American WHO regions than in the European region [51,86].

8. New Antibiotics

8.1. Marketing Authorization Already Approved

Delafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, indicated for treatment of skin infections and community-acquired pneumonia, demonstrated high in vitro activity against N. gonorrhoeae, including ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, and is active against C. trachomatis. Clinical studies would be necessary to define the real effectiveness of the antibiotic. Another new antibiotic from this group, sitafloxacin, was effective against M. genitalium in vitro and in an investigated group of Japanese patients with cervicitis and urethritis. However, fluoroquinolones are contraindicated in pregnant women and should be used with caution in other patients and not as a first-line treatment, because of reports of serious adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity, tendinopathies, neurological symptoms, arrhythmias, and an increased risk of aortic dissection [83].
Solithromycin is a fluoroketolide which the FDA approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. The antibiotic inhibits the synthesis of bacterial proteins and has a similar but not identical mechanism of action to the macrolides. Solithromycin binds to bacterial rRNA in three different sites and is usually active against macrolide-resistant bacteria. Solithromycin also shows activity against N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium. However, the phase 3 clinical trial has shown that the monotherapy of gonorrhea with oral solithromycin is less successful (80% negative tests of cure) than the standard treatment with ceftriaxone and azithromycin (84% negative tests of cure) [87].
Lefamulin is a new pleuromutilin antibiotic approved in the United States in 2019 and in Europe in 2020 for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Pleuromutilins inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl transferase center in the 50S bacterial ribosome. Pleuromutulins have been used for many years in veterinary medicine but lefamulin is the first pleuromutilin approved for use in humans. The mechanism of action of lefamulin is different to that of macrolides and the antibiotic is usually active against macrolide-resistant bacteria. The antibiotic showed high in vitro activity against N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium, including antibiotic-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae and M. genitalium [88].

8.2. Investigational Drugs

Zoliflodacin (AZD 0914 or ETX 0914, Entasis Therapeutics) is a spiropyrimidinetrione that inhibits bacterial DNA gyrase/topoisomerase using a different mechanism of action than quinolones. Zoliflodacin is active against many bacteria, including N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium [89].
Another new bacterial DNA synthesis inhibitor is gepotidacin (GlaxoSmithKline), a triazaacenaphthylene that targets bacterial topoisomerase II. Similar to zoliflodacin, the antibiotic has a mechanism of action distinct from that of fluoroquinolones and is active against different species of bacteria, including sexually transmitted bacteria. Gepotidacin and zoliflodacin have started phase 3 of clinical investigations, including establishing the effectiveness for the treatment of gonorrhea. Phase 2 of clinical trials revealed a good safety profile and effectiveness for the treatment of gonorrhea; however, rare treatment failures were reported in the case of both antibiotics [89,90].
DIS-73285 and SMT-571 are novel small molecule antimicrobials that exhibit high in vitro activity against N. gonorrhoeae, including antibiotic-resistant strains. These antimicrobials have completely new, distinct mechanisms of action. SMT-571 interferes with bacterial cell division and the targets of DIS-73285 are electron transfer proteins (ETFs) A/B/D of N. gonorrhoeae. In the case of SMT-571, initial in vivo studies confirmed oral bioavailability. Clinical trials should be able to show whether one or both of these interesting substances will be a new treatment for gonorrhea [91,92].
Apramycin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic produced by Streptomyces tenebrarius and is used in veterinary medicine. The antibiotic binds to the bacterial ribosome more selectively than other aminoglycosides, which probably improves safety and especially reduces the possibility of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. The antibiotic has demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity against N. gonorrhoeae in vitro, including spectinomycin-resistant strains [93].
Aminomethyl spectinomycins (N-benzyl-substituted 3′-(R)-3′-aminomethyl-3′-hydroxy spectinomycin) are new spectinomycin analogs. The antibiotics are in vitro active against many respiratory tract pathogens and against N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium [94].

9. Conclusions

The number of STIs is rising worldwide. Screening programs (using sensitive and specific diagnostic methods), fast and effective treatment of detected cases, and proper prophylaxis should be implemented to avoid possible complications due to STIs such as fertility-related issues and adverse pregnancy outcomes. It may be important to track epidemiological outbreaks and the spread of individual strains using molecular methods.
The rapid spread of antibiotic-resistant N. gonorrhoeae and M. genitalium necessitates the monitoring of the problem and the development of new drugs and treatment regimens.

Author Contributions

All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

STIsSexually transmitted infections
PIDPelvic inflammatory disease
TFITubal factor infertility
CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
LGVlymphogranuloma venereum
WGSWhole genome sequencing
NG-MASTNeisseria gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing
MLSTMultilocus sequence typing
NG-STARNeisseria gonorrhoeae sequence typing for antimicrobial resistance
MOMPMajor outer membrane protein
MSMMen who have sex with men
CTChlamydia trachomatis
TLR-4Toll-like receptor 4
SGASmall for gestational age
LBWLow birth weight
NAATsNucleic acid amplification tests
EIAEnzyme immunoassay
DIFDirect immunofluorescence
SDAStrand displacement amplification
TMAnvCTTranscription-mediated amplificationNew variant C. trachomatis
SNPSingle-nucleotide polymorphism
HPAHybridization protection assay
Euro-GASPMICEuropean Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance ProgrammeMinimum inhibitory concentration
ETFsElectron transfer proteins
MGMycoplasma genitalium

References

  1. Pellati, D.; Mylonakis, I.; Bertoloni, G.; Fiore, C.; Andrisani, A.; Ambrosini, G.; Armanini, D. Genital tract infections and infertility. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 140, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Paavonen, J. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the female genital tract: State of the art. Ann. Med. 2012, 44, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tsevat, D.G.; Wiesenfeld, H.C.; Parks, C.; Peipert, J.F. Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 216, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Schuchardt, L.; Rupp, J. Chlamydia trachomatis as the Cause of Infectious Infertility: Acute, Repetitive or Persistent Long-Term Infection? Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2018, 412, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Weström, L. Effect of acute pelvic inflammatory disease on fertility. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1975, 121, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mårdh, P.A. Tubal factor infertility, with special regard to chlamydial salpingitis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 17, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Olaleye, A.O.; Babah, O.A.; Osuagwu, C.S.; Ogunsola, F.T.; Afolabi, B.B. Sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy—An update on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 255, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peuchant, O.; Le Roy, C.; Desveaux, C.; Paris, A.; Asselineau, J.; Maldonado, C.; Chêne, G.; Horovitz, J.; Dallay, D.; de Barbeyrac, B.; et al. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Mycoplasma genitalium should it be integrated into routine pregnancy care in French young pregnant women? Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 82, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Sexually Transmitted Infections in Europe 2013; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. World Health Organization. Report on Global Sexually Transmitted Infection Surveillance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2017; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Overview of the National Legal Infectious Disease Epidemic in 2018; CDC China: Beijing, China, 2019. Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/jkj/new_index.shtml (accessed on 30 September 2019).
  13. Manavi, K. A review on infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006, 20, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. CDC. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2018; Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. McGowin, C.L.; Anderson-Smits, C. Mycoplasma genitalium: An emerging cause of sexually transmitted disease in women. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1001324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Banhart, S.; Jansen, K.; Buder, S.; Tamminga, T.; Calvignac-Spencer, S.; Pilz, T.; Martini, A.; Dudareva, S.; Nikisins, S.; Dehmel, K.; et al. Molecular epidemiological typing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates identifies a novel association between genogroup G10557 (G7072) and decreased susceptibility to cefixime, Germany, 2014 to 2017. Euro Surveill. 2020, 25, 1900648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shaskolskiy, B.; Dementieva, E.; Kandinov, I.; Chestkov, A.; Kubanov, A.; Deryabin, D.; Gryadunov, D. Genetic diversity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence types in Russia and Europe. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 93, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harris, S.R.; Cole, M.J.; Spiteri, G.; Sánchez-Busó, L.; Golparian, D.; Jacobsson, S.; Goater, R.; Abudahab, K.; Yeats, C.A.; Bercot, B.; et al. Public health surveillance of multidrug-resistant clones of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Europe: A genomic survey. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 758–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kenyon, C.; Laumen, J.; Van Dijck, C.; De Baetselier, I.; Abdelatti, S.; Manoharan-Basil, S.S.; Unemo, M. Gonorrhoea treatment combined with population-level general cephalosporin and quinolone consumption may select for Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance at the levels of NG-MAST genogroup: An ecological study in Europe. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 23, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Golparian, D.; Sánchez-Busó, L.; Cole, M.; Unemo, M. Neisseria gonorrhoeae sequence typing for antimicrobial resistance (NG-STAR) clonal complexes are consistent with genomic phylogeny and provide simple nomenclature, rapid visualization and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) lineage predictions. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thapa, J.; Watanabe, T.; Isoba, M.; Okubo, T.; Abe, K.; Minami, K.; Yamaguchi, H. Chlamydia trachomatis isolated from cervicovaginal samples in Sapporo, Japan, reveals the circulation of genetically diverse strains. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nunes, A.; Gomes, J.P. Evolution, phylogeny, and molecular epidemiology of Chlamydia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 23, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Smolarczyk, K.; Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B.; Majewski, S.; Rudnicka, E.; Unemo, M.; Fiedor, P. Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)—An emerging problem in Poland. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patiño, L.H.; Camargo, M.; Muñoz, M.; Ríos-Chaparro, D.I.; Patarroyo, M.A.; Ramírez, J.D. Unveiling the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes and core genome phylogenies for genotyping Chlamydia Trach. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Borges, V.; Cordeiro, D.; Salas, A.I.; Lodhia, Z.; Correia, C.; Isidro, J.; Fernandes, C.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Azevedo, J.; Alves, J.; et al. Chlamydia trachomatis: When the virulence-associated genome backbone imports a prevalence-associated major antigen signature. Microb. Genom. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hjorth, S.V.; Björnelius, E.; Lidbrink, P.; Falk, L.; Dohn, B.; Berthelsen, L.; Ma, L.; Martin, D.H.; Jensen, J.S. Sequence-based typing of Mycoplasma genitalium reveals sexual transmission. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 2078–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Dumke, R.; Rust, M.; Glaunsinger, T. MgpB types among Mycoplasma genitalium strains from men who have sex with men in Berlin, Germany, 2016–2018. Pathogens 2020, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fookes, M.C.; Hadfield, J.; Harris, S.; Parmar, S.; Unemo, M.; Jensen, J.S.; Thomson, N.R. Mycoplasma genitalium: Whole genome sequence analysis, recombination and population structure. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Beatty, W.L.; Morrison, R.P.; Byrne, G.I. Persistent chlamydiae: From cell culture to a paradigm for chlamydial pathogenesis. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 58, 686–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Linhares, I.M.; Witkin, S.S. Immunopathogenic consequences of Chlamydia trachomatis 60 kDa heat shock protein expression in the female reproductive tract. Cell Stress Chaperones 2010, 15, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Akande, V.A.; Hunt, L.P.; Cahill, D.J.; Caul, E.O.; Ford, W.C.; Jenkins, J.M. Tubal damage in infertile women: Prediction using chlamydia serology. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 1841–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yang, C.; Briones, M.; Chiou, J.; Lei, L.; Patton, M.J.; Ma, L.; McClarty, G.; Caldwell, H.D. Chlamydia trachomatis lipopolysaccharide evades the canonical and concanonical inflammatory pathways to subvert innate immunity. mBio 2019, 10, e00595-19. [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hughes, G.; Fenton, K.A. Recent trends in gonorrhoea—An emerging public health issue? Euro Surveill. 2000, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Maisey, K.; Nardocci, G.; Imarai, M.; Cardenas, H.; Rios, M.; Croxatto, H.B.; Heckels, J.E.; Christodoulides, M.; Velasquez, L.A. Expression of proinflammatory cytokines and receptors by human fallopian tubes in organ culture following challenge with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Quillin, S.J.; Seifert, H.S. Neisseria gonorrhoeae host adaptation and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lenz, J.D.; Dillard, J.P. Pathogenesis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the host defense in ascending infections of human Fallopian tube. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cohen, C.R.; Manhart, L.E.; Bukusi, E.A.; Astete, S.; Brunham, R.C.; Holmes, K.K.; Sinei, S.K.; Bwayo, J.J.; Totten, P.A. Association between Mycoplasma genitalium and acute endometritis. Lancet 2002, 359, 765–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McGowin, C.L.; Ma, L.; Martin, D.H.; Pyles, R.B. Mycoplasma genitalium-encoded MG309 activates NF-kappaB via Toll-like receptors 2 and 6 to elicit proinflammatory cytokine secretion from human genital epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 1175–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. McGowin, C.L.; Popov, V.L.; Pyles, R.B. Intracellular Mycoplasma genitalium infection of human vaginal and cervical epithelial cells elicits distinct patterns of inflammatory cytokine secretion and provides a possible survival niche against macrophage-mediated killing. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. McGowin, C.L.; Totten, P.A. The unique microbiology and molecular pathogenesis of Mycoplasma genitalium. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216 (Suppl. 2), S382–S388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Baczynska, A.; Funch, P.; Fedder, J.; Knudsen, H.J.; Birkelund, S.; Christiansen, G. Morphology of human Fallopian tubes after infection with Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma hominis--in vitro organ culture study. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 22, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Paavonen, J.; Eggert-Kruse, W. Chlamydia trachomatis: Impact on human reproduction. Hum. Reprod. Update 1999, 5, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Equils, O.; Lu, D.; Gatter, M.; Witkin, S.S.; Bertolotto, C.; Arditi, M.; McGregor, J.A.; Simmons, C.F.; Hobel, C.J. Chlamydia heat shock protein 60 induces trophoblast apoptosis through TLR4. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 1257–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Lis, R.; Rowhani-Rahbar, A.; Manhart, L.E. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: A meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Unemo, M.; Ross, J.; Serwin, A.B.; Gomberg, M.; Cusini, M.; Jensen, J.S. 2020 European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int. J. STD AIDS 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Heumann, C.L.; Quilter, L.A.S.; Eastment, M.C.; Heffron, R.; Hawes, S.E. Adverse birth outcomes and maternal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: A population-based cohort study in Washington state. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2017, 44, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Weström, L.; Joesoef, R.; Reynolds, G.; Hagdu, A.; Thompson, S.E. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex. Transm. Dis. 1992, 19, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Haggerty, C.L.; Gottlieb, S.L.; Taylor, B.D.; Low, N.; Xu, F.; Ness, R.B. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 201, S134–S155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Taylor-Robinson, D. Mycoplasma genitalium—An up-date. Int. J. STD AIDS 2002, 13, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rajkumari, N.; Kaur, H.; Roy, A.; Gupta, N.; Dhaliwal, L.K.; Sethi, S. Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with infertility in North Indian women. Indian J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS 2015, 36, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Jensen, J.S.; Cusini, M.; Gomberg, M.; Moi, H. 2016 European guideline on Mycoplasma genitalium infections. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 30, 1650–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Baud, D.; Regan, L.; Greub, G. Emerging role of Chlamydia and Chlamydia-like organisms in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 21, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Baud, D.; Goy, G.; Jaton, K.; Osterheld, M.-C.; Blumer, S.; Borel, N.; Vial, Y.; Hohlfeld, P.; Pospischil, A.; Greub, G. Role of Chlamydia trachomatis in miscarriage. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1630–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Silva, M.J.P.M.D.A.; Florêncio, G.L.D.; Gabiatti, J.R.E.; Amaral, R.L.D.; Eleutério Júnior, J.; Gonçalves, A.K.D.S. Perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with chlamydial infection: A meta-analysis study. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 15, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Likitnukul, S.; Kusmiesz, H.; Nelson, J.D.; McCracken, G.H., Jr. Role of genital mycoplasmas in young infants with suspected sepsis. J. Pediatr. 1986, 109, 971–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Temmerman, M.; Plummer, F.A.; Kiragu, D.; Farah, A.; Wamola, I.A.; Brunham, R.C.; Piot, P. Gonorrhoea in pregnancy. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992, 12, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ismail, M.A.; Moawad, A.H.; Poon, E.; Henderson, C. Role of Chlamydia trachomatis in postpartum endometritis. J. Reprod. Med. 1987, 32, 280–284. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rours, G.I.J.G.; Duijts, L.; Moll, H.A.; Arends, L.R.; de Groot, R.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Hofman, A.; Steegers, E.A.P.; Mackenbach, J.P.; Ott, A.; et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection during pregnancy associated with preterm delivery: A population-based prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 26, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Labbé, A.C.; Frost, E.; Deslandes, S.; Mendonça, A.P.; Alves, A.C.; Pépin, J. Mycoplasma genitalium is not associated with adverse outcomes of pregnancy in Guinea-Bissau. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2002, 78, 289–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kacerovský, M.; Pavlovský, M.; Tosner, J. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes and genital mycoplasmas. Acta Med. 2009, 52, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bignell, C.; Unemo, M. 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int. J. STD AIDS 2013, 24, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae-2014. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2014, 63, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lanjouw, E.; Ouburg, S.; de Vries, H.J.; Stary, A.; Radcliffe, K.; Unemo, M. 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Int. J. STD AIDS 2016, 27, 333–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Trembizki, E.; Costa, A.-M.G.; Tabrizi, S.N.; Whiley, D.M.; Twin, J. Opportunities and pitfalls of molecular testing for detecting sexually transmitted pathogens. Pathology 2015, 47, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tabrizi, S.N.; Unemo, M.; Limnios, A.E.; Hogan, T.R.; Hjelmevoll, S.O.; Garland, S.M.; Tapsall, J. Evaluation of six commercial nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 3610–3615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Unemo, M.; Hansen, M.; Hadad, R.; Puolakkainen, M.; Westh, H.; Rantakokko-Jalava, K.; Thilesen, C.; Cole, M.J.; Boiko, I.; Lan, P.T.; et al. Sensitivity, specificity, inclusivity and exclusivity of the updated Aptima Combo 2 assay, which provides detection coverage of the new diagnostic-escape Chlamydia trachomatis variants. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Gaydos, C.A.; Manhart, L.E.; Taylor, S.N.; Lillis, R.A.; Hook, E.W., 3rd; Klausner, J.D.; Remillard, C.V.; Love, M.; McKinney, B.; Getman, D.K. Molecular testing for Mycoplasma genitalium in the United States: Results from the AMES prospective multicenter clinical study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01125-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Drud, S.T.; Njuguna, P.; Ebeyan, S.; Erskine, S.; Holm, M.; Johansson, S.C.; Tan, L.Y.; Jensen, J.S. Evaluation of the resistancePlus MG FleXible assay for detection of wild-type and 23S rRNA-mutated Mycoplasma genitalium strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e01900-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Harding-Esch, E.M.; Cousins, E.C.; Chow, S.L.C.; Phillips, L.T.; Hall, C.L.; Cooper, N.; Fuller, S.S.; Nori, A.V.; Patel, R.; Thomas-William, S.; et al. A 30-min nucleic acid amplification point-of-care test for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: A prospective, multi-center study of diagnostic accuracy. EBioMedicine 2018, 28, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Jacobsson, S.; Boiko, I.; Golparian, D.; Blondeel, K.; Kiarie, J.; Toskin, I.; Peeling, R.W.; Unemo, M. WHO laboratory validation of Xpert(®) CT/NG and Xpert(®) TV on the GeneXpert system verifies high performances. APMIS 2018, 126, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Workowski, K.A.; Bolan, G.A. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR 2015, 64, 1–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Cole, M.J.; Quaye, N.; Jacobsson, S.; Day, M.; Fagan, E.; Ison, C.; Pitt, R.; Seaton, S.; Woodford, N.; Stary, A.; et al. Ten years of external quality assessment (EQA) of Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Europe elucidate high reliability of data. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cole, M.J.; Quinten, C.; Jacobsson, S.; Day, M.; Amato-Gauci, A.J.; Woodford, N.; Spiteri, G.; Unemo, M.; Euro-GASPnetwork. The European gonococcal antimicrobial surveillance programme (Euro-GASP) appropriately reflects the antimicrobial resistance situation for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the European Union/European Economic Area. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Unemo, M.; Del Rio, C.; Shafer, W.M. Antimicrobial resistance expressed by Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A major global public health problem in the 21st century. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Demczuk, W.; Sidhu, S.; Unemo, M.; Whiley, D.M.; Allen, V.G.; Dillon, J.R.; Cole, M.; Seah, C.; Trembizki, E.; Trees, D.L.; et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae sequence typing for antimicrobial resistance, a novel antimicrobial resistance multilocus typing scheme for tracking global dissemination of N. gonorrhoeae strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 1454–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B.; Majewska, A.; Malejczyk, M.; Mlynarczyk, G.; Majewski, S. Multiresistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A new threat in second decade of the XXI century. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 209, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shaskolskiy, B.; Dementieva, E.; Kandinov, I.; Filippova, M.; Petrova, N.; Plakhova, X.; Chestkov, A.; Kubanov, A.; Deryabin, D.; Gryadunov, D. Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates to beta-lactam antibiotics (benzylpenicillin and ceftriaxone) in Russia, 2015–2017. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Shaskolskiy, B.; Dementieva, E.; Leinsoo, A.; Petrova, N.; Chestkov, A.; Kubanov, A.; Deryabin, D.; Gryadunov, D. Tetracycline resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Russia, 2015–2017. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 63, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gascoyne, D.M.; Heritage, J.; Hawkey, P.M.; Turner, A.; van Klingeren, B. Molecular evolution of tetracycline-resistance plasmids carrying TetM found in Neisseria gonorrhoeae from different countries. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1991, 28, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Deguchi, T.; Hatazaki, K.; Ito, S.; Kondo, H.; Horie, K.; Nakane, K.; Mizutani, K.; Tsuchiya, T.; Yasuda, M.; Yokoi, S.; et al. Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance is uncommon in clinical strains of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Infect. Chemother. 2018, 24, 610–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dugan, J.; Rockey, D.D.; Jones, L.; Andersen, A.A. Tetracycline resistance in Chlamydia suis mediated by genomic islands inserted into the chlamydial inv-like gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3989–3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Mestrovic, T.; Ljubin-Sternak, S. Molecular mechanisms of Chlamydia trachomatis resistance to antimicrobial drugs. Front. Biosci. (Landmark. Ed.) 2018, 23, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Bradshaw, C.S.; Jensen, J.S.; Waites, K.B. New horizons in Mycoplasma genitalium treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216, S412–S419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tagg, K.A.; Jeoffreys, N.J.; Couldwell, D.L.; Donald, J.A.; Gilbert, G.L. Fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2245–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Murray, G.L.; Bodiyabadu, K.; Danielewski, J.; Garland, S.M.; Machalek, D.A.; Fairley, C.K.; Jensen, J.S.; Williamson, D.A.; Tan, L.Y.; Mokany, E.; et al. Moxifloxacin and sitafloxacin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium infection: Association with parC mutation G248T (S83I) and concurrent gyrA mutations. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Machalek, D.A.; Tao, Y.; Shilling, H.; Jensen, J.S.; Unemo, M.; Murray, G.; Chow, E.P.F.; Low, N.; Garland, S.M.; Vodstrcil, L.A.; et al. Prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1302–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Chen, M.Y.; McNulty, A.; Avery, A.; Whiley, D.; Tabrizi, S.N.; Hardy, D.; Das, A.F.; Nenninger, A.; Fairley, C.K.; Hocking, J.S.; et al. Solithromycin versus ceftriaxone plus azithromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated genital gonorrhoea (SOLITAIRE-U): A randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mendes, R.E.; Paukner, S.; Doyle, T.B.; Gelone, S.P.; Flamm, R.K.; Sader, H.S. Low prevalence of gram-positive isolates showing elevated lefamulin MIC results during the SENTRY surveillance program for 2015–2016 and characterization of resistance mechanisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e02158-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Bradford, P.A.; Miller, A.A.; O’Donnell, J.; Mueller, J.P. Zoliflodacin: An oral spiropyrimidinetrione antibiotic for the treatment of Neisseria gonorrheae, including multi-drug-resistant isolates. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 1332–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Scangarella-Oman, N.E.; Hossain, M.; Dixon, P.B.; Ingraham, K.; Min, S.; Tiffany, C.A.; Perry, C.R.; Raychaudhuri, A.; Dumont, E.F.; Huang, J.; et al. Microbiological analysis from a phase 2 randomized study in adults evaluating single oral doses of gepotidacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01221-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Jacobsson, S.; Mason, C.; Khan, N.; Meo, P.; Unemo, M. In vitro activity of the novel oral antimicrobial SMT-571, with a new mechanism of action, against MDR and XDR Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Future treatment option for gonorrhoea? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1591–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Jacobsson, S.; Mason, C.; Khan, N.; Meo, P.; Unemo, M. High in vitro activity of DIS-73285, a novel antimicrobial with a new mechanism of action, against MDR and XDR Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3244–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Riedel, S.; Vijayakumar, D.; Berg, G.; Kang, A.D.; Smith, K.P.; Kirby, J.E. Evaluation of apramycin against spectinomycin-resistant and -susceptible strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 1311–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bruhn, D.F.; Waidyarachchi, S.L.; Madhura, D.B.; Shcherbakov, D.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, J.; Abdelrahman, Y.M.; Singh, A.P.; Duscha, S.; Rathi, C.; et al. Aminomethyl spectinomycins as therapeutics for drug-resistant respiratory tract and sexually transmitted bacterial infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 02170 g001 550
Figure 1. Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Symptoms and possible impact on fertility.
Figure 1. Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Symptoms and possible impact on fertility.
Ijms 22 02170 g001
Table
Table 1. Adverse pregnancy outcomes regarding N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium infections.
Table 1. Adverse pregnancy outcomes regarding N. gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, and M. genitalium infections.
Neisseria gonorrhoeaeChlamydia trachomatisMycoplasma genitalium
Ectopic pregnancy ⇐⇐ pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) ⇒⇒ infertility
[3,44,52]
Miscarriage
[53]
Increased perinatal mortalityIncreased perinatal mortality
[54]		Recurrent pregnancy loss
[53]
Neonatal infection (conjunctivitis)Neonatal infection
(conjunctivitis, pneumonia)		Neonatal infection
[55]
Postpartum endometritis
[56]		Postpartum endometritis
–ve [54]/+ve [57]		Postpartum endometritis
Low birth weight
(LBW) [43]
Preterm birth
[44,52]
Small for gestational age (SGA) [43]Not small for gestational age (SGA) [58]Not small for gestational age (SGA) [59]
Premature rupture of membranes
[52,60]
Table
Table 2. FDA-approved tests utilized in the diagnosis of NG- N. gonorrhoeae, CT -C. trachomatis and MG -M. genitalium. SDA: strand displacement amplification, TMA: transcription-mediated amplification, ORF- open reading frame.
Table 2. FDA-approved tests utilized in the diagnosis of NG- N. gonorrhoeae, CT -C. trachomatis and MG -M. genitalium. SDA: strand displacement amplification, TMA: transcription-mediated amplification, ORF- open reading frame.
NAATProducer Detected PathogenMethods UsedTarget
Aptima Combo 2 assayHologic Inc.CT/NGTMANG, specific regions in 16S rRNA
CT, specific regions in 23Sr RNA
Aptima CT assayHologic Inc.CTTMASpecific regions in 16S rRNA
Aptima NG assayHologic Inc.NGTMASpecific regions in 16S rRNA
Abbott RealTime CT/NGAbbottCT/NGreal-time PCRCT, two specific regions in cryptic plasmid
NG, specific sequence in OPA gene
cobas 4800 CT/NG TestRoche DiagnosticsCT/NGPCRCT, two targets, one in cryptic plasmid and one in chromosome
NG, direct repeat (DR) 9 specific regions
ProbeTec ET CT/GC Amplified DNA assayBecton DickinsonCT/NGSDACT, specific region in cryptic plasmid (ORF)
NG, pilin gene inverting protein homolog
ProbeTec CT QX Amplified DNA assayBecton DickinsonCTSDASpecific region in cryptic plasmid (ORF)
ProbeTec NG QX Amplified DNA assayBecton DickinsonNGSDASpecific region in pilin gene
Xpert CT/NGCepheidCT/NGreal-time PCRCT, specific chromosomal DNA sequence
NG, two specific chromosomal DNA sequences (both should be detected for a positive result)
Aptima Mycoplasma genitalium AssayHologic Inc.MGTMASpecific regions in 16s rRNA
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smolarczyk, K.; Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B.; Rudnicka, E.; Szukiewicz, D.; Meczekalski, B.; Smolarczyk, R.; Pieta, W. The Impact of Selected Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Pregnancy and Female Fertility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042170

AMA Style

Smolarczyk K, Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska B, Rudnicka E, Szukiewicz D, Meczekalski B, Smolarczyk R, Pieta W. The Impact of Selected Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Pregnancy and Female Fertility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(4):2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smolarczyk, Katarzyna, Beata Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, Ewa Rudnicka, Dariusz Szukiewicz, Blazej Meczekalski, Roman Smolarczyk, and Wojciech Pieta. 2021. "The Impact of Selected Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Pregnancy and Female Fertility" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 4: 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042170

APA Style

Smolarczyk, K., Mlynarczyk-Bonikowska, B., Rudnicka, E., Szukiewicz, D., Meczekalski, B., Smolarczyk, R., & Pieta, W. (2021). The Impact of Selected Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Diseases on Pregnancy and Female Fertility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(4), 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22042170

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop