Next Article in Journal
Cannabinoid Receptors Overexpression in a Rat Model of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) after Treatment with a Ketogenic Diet
Previous Article in Journal
Huntingtin: A Protein with a Peculiar Solvent Accessible Surface
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms22062879
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cytokine Signature of Dengue Patients at Different Severity of the Disease

by
Irwin Puc
1,
Tzu-Chuan Ho
1,
Ko-Lun Yen
1,
Amrita Vats
1,
Jih-Jin Tsai
2,3,4,
Po-Lin Chen
5,
Yu-Wen Chien
6,7,
Yu-Chih Lo
8,* and
Guey Chuen Perng
1,9,*
1
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
2
Tropical Medicine Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
3
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
4
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807378, Taiwan
5
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
6
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
7
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
8
Department of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
9
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(6), 2879; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062879
Submission received: 27 January 2021 / Revised: 7 March 2021 / Accepted: 9 March 2021 / Published: 12 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Endocrinology and Metabolism)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clinical presentations of dengue fever (DF) are diverse and non-specific, causing unpredictable progression and outcomes. Its progression and severity have been associated with cytokine levels alteration. In this study, dengue patients were classified into groups following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme to investigate the cytokine signature at different severity of the disease: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A); dengue with warning signs (B); severe dengue (C); other fever (OF) and healthy (Healthy). We analyzed 23 different cytokines simultaneously, namely IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-33, CD14, CD54, CD62E, CD62L, CD62p, CD106, CD121b, CD154, CD178, GM-CSF, IFN-g, MIF, ST2 and TNF from patients admitted to National Cheng Kung University Hospital during the 2015 Taiwan dengue outbreak. Cytokines TNF, CD54, CD62E, CD62L, CD62P, GM-CSF, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, INF-g and MIF were elevated while CD106, CD154, IL-4 and L-33 were decreased when compared to the control. IL-10 demonstrated to be a potential diagnostic marker for DF (H and A group; AUC = 0.944, H and OF group; AUC = 0.969). CD121b demonstrated to be predictive of the SD (A and B group; AUC = 0.744, B and C group; AUC = 0.775). Our results demonstrate the cytokine profile changes during the progression of dengue and highlight possible biomarkers for optimizing effective intervention strategies.

1. Introduction

Dengue is currently regarded as the most common arthropod-borne viral disease transmitted by Aedes mosquito in tropical and subtropical areas. Its incidence has increased more than 30 folds in recent years along with the geographic expansion of its Aedes vector mosquito [1]. Globally, it is estimated that 3.9 billion people from more than 128 countries are at risk of dengue virus (DENV) infection, with 284–528 million cases occurring each year, of which 96 million manifest clinically with a severe form of the disease [2,3]. World Health Organization (WHO) reports that approximately 500,000 people with severe dengue require hospitalization each year, and about 2.5% of those affected die [4]. Despite dengue being first isolated more than 70 years ago and affecting almost half of the world’s population, to date, there is no protective vaccine or effective treatments available [5]. The lack of such a “cure” can be attributed to our incomplete understanding of dengue immunopathogenesis, lack of a suitable animal model that would mimic similar clinical symptoms as patients and the inherent dangers of seronegative subjects receiving live-attenuated dengue vaccines [6].
DENV is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA whose genome is 11 kb in length which encodes three structural (capsid, membrane, envelope) and seven non-structural (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B and NS5) proteins [7]. There are four distinct serotypes of DENV. Dengue exhibits symptoms ranging from mild fever or flu-like illness, typical dengue fever (DF) to potentially lethal severe dengue (SD), dengue hemorrhage fever (DHF) or dengue shock syndrome (DSS). However, there are no specific features used to distinguish between acute mild dengue and severe dengue because each serotype of DENV can cause nearly identical clinical manifestations in humans as well as circulate in the same niche [8,9]. Moreover, acute dengue has shown symptoms ranging from high fever, myalgia and headaches which are also observed in Zika and Chikungunya virus infections [10,11]. The mechanism by which only a small portion of dengue-infected patients go on to develop a more severe form of the disease remains a baffling mystery and has been a subject of intense study and debate over recent years [3,12,13]. The risk to develop SD is plausibly due to many factors, dengue serotype, secondary infection by a heterologous serotype, age, comorbidity, poor clinical prognosis, diagnosis, virulence and the host immune response [14,15].
Even though several risk factors for the progression of SD have been proposed, our complete understanding of the pathogenesis of SD remains unknown. Regardless, one of the well-known hypotheses that might explain the reason why a secondary DENV infection leads to SD complication is antibody-dependent enhancement [16,17]. Another hypothesis on the progression of SD is the phenomenon known as a cytokine storm, which is the alteration of cytokine and chemokine levels that cause the endothelial cells to malfunction and eventually lead to vascular permeability of endothelial cells and plasma leakage as seen in DHF and DSS [18]. Cytokines and chemokines are small proteins ranging from 8 to 40 kDa, and they are cell signaling molecules that interact with each other to orchestrate a variety of functions including cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, maturation and immunity [10,11]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the concentrations of cytokines, mediators and soluble receptors are significantly increased during DENV infection, this dysregulation of certain cytokines has major implications in dengue pathogenesis especially in DHF and DSS [19,20,21,22]. By now, it is common knowledge that DENV can infect various immune cells like dendritic cells and monocytes which contribute to the production of inflammatory cytokines. This increased unregulated production of cytokines can aggravate pathogenesis, organ failure and cause death [23].
As such, dengue possesses a significant challenge in clinical management and detection especially during an outbreak, mainly due to poor prognostics in being able to differentiate between individuals who have DF from those who might progress to SD or sometimes even may result in over-hospitalization depending on the criterion used for hospital admission [24]. For this reason, the cytokine storm has been studied to try and distinguish potential patterns or biomarkers that can be used to detect SD. Using these specific cytokine profile patterns would allow us to have a better understanding of the progression of dengue pathogenesis, allowing quicker diagnosis to predict patients who would likely proceed to SD and reducing the mortality rate.
Therefore, in this study, we aimed to explore the relationship between cytokines levels at different phases of dengue fever with an objective to identify a biomarker that could help in distinguishing dengue fever from SD or the progression of the disease.

2. Results

2.1. Characteristics of Cytokine Distribution

A total of 328 cytokine levels were observed and analyzed from 243 patients’ sera to investigate the changes in cytokine profiles during different phases of DENV infection. This is a retrospective study and the complete demographic descriptions of the enrolled patients had been previously reported. In his cytokine study, available data demographic characteristics were shown in Table 1, the mean age of the population was 59.94 (range 18–93 years, standard deviation 19.55). Patients were classified according to the 2009 WHO dengue classification guidelines into dengue without warning sign symptoms (A) which consisted of 128 patients; dengue with warning signs which consisted of 103 (B) and severe dengue (C) which consisted of 53 patients. Eight patients who had fever but were dengue negative were classified as other fever (OF). The healthy (Healthy) control group consisted of 36 patients. There were significant overlaps within the cytokine levels among the group. Some of the cytokines in fever people were found to be lower than healthy controls, while others were found to be significantly higher in dengue patients compared to the healthy controls even though variations among different categories of dengue and OF were observed.

2.2. Cytokine Profile in Dengue Patients and Healthy Group

Our first priority was to compare the levels of IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-33, CD14, CD54, CD62E, CD62L, CD62p, CD106, CD121b, CD154, CD178, GM-CSF, IFN-g, MIF, ST2 and TNF in plasma samples of dengue group, OF group and Healthy group. There was a clear indication that the immune system was activated since there was a noticeable change in the expression of most of the Pro and Anti-inflammatory cytokines when compared to the healthy control Figure 1. Cytokine profile analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the levels of TNF (p = 0.0046), CD54 (p < 0.001), CD62E (p < 0.001), CD62P (p = 0.01), GM-CSF (p = 0.0080), IL-1b (p = 0.0065), IL-2 (p = 0.0159), IL-6 (p < 0.001), IL-8 (p < 0.001), IL-10 (p < 0.001), IL-12p70 (p < 0.001), IL-17A (p = 0.0310), INF-g (p < 0.001) and MIF (p = 0.0005) when compared to the healthy control. A significant decrease in the levels of CD106 (p < 0.001), CD154 (p < 0.001), IL-4 (p < 0.001) and L-33 (p < 0.001) was observed when compared to the healthy control. It was noted that only cytokines CD154, GM-CSF and IL-2 had a statistically significant difference between the three groups (DENV, Healthy and OF), however, CD62L (p = 0.03), CD178 (p = 0.0293) and IL-8 (p = 0.0498) also differentiated DENV from patients with OF. There was no significant difference between any of the groups for cytokines CD14, CD121b and ST2 Supplementary Figure S1. Our results suggest that these group of cytokines can be used as a potential marker to distinguish between dengue fever and OF.

2.3. Cytokine Profile in Dengue Patients of Different Severity

Since the involvement of cytokines is hypothesized to be involved in the progression of SD, we explored the profile change in the levels of cytokines in dengue patients at the different severity of the disease. It was clearly observed that almost all cytokines expression levels were increased when compared to the healthy control mean (baseline) Figure 2. Cytokine profile analysis revealed a significant difference in the levels of CD62E (p < 0.001), CD62P (p < 0.001), CD106 (p = 0.0333), CD121b (p < 0.001), IL-6 (p < 0.005) and IL-8 (p < 0.001). Not only did these cytokines reveal a significant difference between the different groups (A, B and C), but also showed an increased pattern expression along with the disease severity Figure 2. CD154 (p < 0.001) also showed a significant difference between the different groups (A, B and C), but exhibited a decreasing pattern along with the disease severity Figure 2. CD62L (p < 0.001) showed a significant difference between the different groups but did not show any pattern along with the disease severity. Even though IL-1b and IL-10 showed a visible increase pattern along with the disease severity there was no significant difference between the A and B groups, and the B and C groups, respectively. IL-4 and IFN-g also showed a decreasing pattern along with the disease severity but showed no differences in statistical analysis between B and C and A and B groups, respectively. Of note, there was no significant difference for cytokines CD14, CD176, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-33, MIF and ST2 between any of the groups Supplementary Figure S2.

2.4. Cytokine Profile of Dengue Patients at Different Days of Fever

To better observe the overall changes of individual cytokines, the expression profile of individual cytokines for different days of fever and disease severity were plotted—Supplementary Figure S3. It was observed that all the cytokines concentration fluctuated significantly in the different groups and over the days of fever as reflected by the mean and graphs—Table 1. Vascular damage and hemorrhage are the hallmark features of increased vascular permeability in dengue patients. Clinical evidence suggests that vascular damage plays a key role in the pathophysiology of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). During disease progression, infected cells produce inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10. As a result of this stimulation, endothelial cells increase the expression of adhesion molecules such as CD62E (E-Selectin), CD106 (VCAM-1) and CD62P (P-Selectin) which leads to local inflammation, endothelial damage and plasma leakage [25,26,27]. Hence, our results demonstrated that adhesion molecules like CD54, CD106, CD62E, CD62L, CD62P and CD154, based upon the days of fever, all exhibited this fluctuation in their expression starting from day 0 when compared to the healthy control mean (baseline) but become more normal (baseline) in the recovery phase after day 8 Figure 3. Of note, the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines like GM-CSF, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8 remained at an all-time high especially during the critical phase of the disease, CD178 remained at an all-time low Figure 4. On the other hand, cytokines like MIF, IL-10, and IL-33 peaked during the critical phase of the disease but became more normalized at the recovery phase after day 8 Figure 4. IL-1b, IL-12p70, IL-17A, TNF and ST2 showed no visible trend and fluctuated between the days of fever Figure 4.

2.5. Potential Biomarker for Dengue Fever Diagnosis and Predictive Marker of Dengue Severity

To possibly determine a potential cytokine to serve as a diagnostic tool for dengue virus, ROC curves were drawn for DENV, H and OF groups. The ROC curve was plotted only for cytokines that showed a significant difference in statistical analysis between the three groups. IL-33 was excluded from the ROC curve due to the OF group not having data, also CD14, CD12b and ST2 for not showing any significant differences in statistical analysis between the groups. Interestingly, the area under ROC curve of IL-10 proved to be the largest among all cytokines. A concentration of >0.499434 pg/mL was the optimal cutoff value for distinguishing between the H and DENV group (AUC = 0.944, Sensitivity = 89.79, Specificity = 86.11), while a concentration of >0.950302 pg/mL was the optimal cutoff value (AUC = 0.969, Sensitivity = 87.5, Specificity = 88.89) for distinguishing between the H and OF group Figure 5A,B and Supplementary Table S1.
To further evaluate the diagnostic potential marker for distinguishing between the different disease severity, ROC curves were drawn. The ROC curve was plotted only for cytokines that showed significant differences in statistical analysis between the three groups. CD14, CD178, CD12p70, IL-17A, IL-33, MIF and ST2 were excluded from the ROC curve for not showing any significant differences in statistical analysis between the groups. It was observed that the area under ROC curve for CD121b did a better job in discriminating between the disease severity Figure 6A and Supplementary Table S1. A concentration of ≤1564.64 pg/mL was the optimal cutoff value (AUC = 0.744, Sensitivity = 71.87, Specificity = 66.99) for distinguishing between the A and B group, while a concentration of >4418.043 pg/mL was the optimal cutoff value (AUC = 0.775, Sensitivity = 71.70, Specificity = 77.67) for distinguishing between the B and C group Figure 6A,B, and Supplementary Table S1.

3. Discussions

In this study, we compared twenty-three different cytokines profile pattern, namely IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-33, CD14, CD54, CD62E, CD62L, CD62p, CD106, CD121b, CD154, CD178, GM-CSF, IFN-g, MIF, ST2 and TNF of dengue patients at different severity of the disease, with the aim to understand their profile during different phases of dengue and their possible association with the disease severity.
Dengue exhibits a wide spectrum of clinical features that usually start to be prominent after an incubation period of approximately 3–10 days, but the majority of cases are asymptomatic [28]. Apart from the wide spectrum of symptoms, clinician and health care services face a huge challenge during an outbreak that sometimes lead to poor prognostics and diagnosis in being able to differentiate between individuals who have dengue, other fevers or even chikungunya. For example, during an outbreak, misdiagnosis is common especially in countries that lack screening devices. Clinicians tend not to confirm their diagnosis in the laboratory since when working off symptoms alone, common flu, other fevers and dengue fever are extremely similar in the acute stages, therefore DENV infection is not assumed masking the spread of the disease [8,29]. Our study adds more to our already known knowledge and widens our diagnostic toolbox of cytokines for potentially describing a novel panel of clinically informative biomarkers to distinguish dengue fever from other fever. There was a significant difference between DENV, H and OF groups for cytokines CD154, GM-CSF and IL-2, suggesting that they can be used as markers for distinguishing between dengue fever and OF Figure 1. To further explore a potential cytokine to serve as a diagnostic tool for the dengue virus, ROC curves were drawn for DENV, H and OF groups. Interestingly, the area under ROC curve of IL-10 proved to be the largest among all cytokines. A concentration of >0.499434 mg/mL was the optimal cutoff value for predicting dengue fever (Sensitivity = 89.79, Specificity = 86.11) Figure 5A,B and Supplementary Table S1. IL-10 is a cytokine with pleiotropic effects in immunoregulation and inflammation, including the inhibition of immune mediator secretion, antigen presentation and phagocytosis [30]. Over the years, evidence has shown that microbes such as fungi, bacteria and viruses can regulate the host cell IL-10 expression that would allow persistent infection. There has also been an emerging role of IL-10 in dengue virus infection associating it with enhancing the infection severity and contributing to the pathogenesis of dengue infections by inhibiting DENV-specific T cell responses or downstream signaling; however the mechanism for such responses are in need of further investigation [30,31].
Compared with dengue without symptoms and dengue with symptoms, patients suffering from severe dengue often have poorer outcomes and a higher mortality rate. Recently, severe dengue clinical data of signs and symptoms have shown that bleeding, vomiting, nausea, skin rash, hepatosplenomegaly and abdominal pain are associated with severe dengue causing an estimated 500,000 people requiring hospitalization each year and having an estimated 2.5% case fatality, annually [4,32]. Therefore, identifying an ideal biomarker would not only allow us to identify the individuals who would be at great risk of developing severe dengue but more importantly allow clinicians to make early intervention and quicker diagnosis of the disease severity. Numerous studies have demonstrated evidence to support the cytokine storm theory which is a role for cytokines where the concentrations of cytokines, mediators and soluble receptors may be significantly disrupted during dengue infection [33,34]. Even though progress has been made in recent years in trying to understand the mechanisms of cytokine production during the disease severity, our understanding remains incomplete, especially due to conflicting results in the cytokine levels observed by different studies [20]. Although the conflicting results are likely due to differences in the study design, the way the samples are processed, the timing of sample collection, and importantly due to the differences in the study cohort, the possibility that different pathways could lead to similar clinical manifestations is also considered [20].
In this study, we also provide evidence that cytokine dysfunction reflected by cytokine storm could contribute to the disease severity. Our observations demonstrated that some cytokines fluctuated dramatically while some exhibited a pattern in the early illness phase and maintained a pattern as the illness progressed. Cytokine expression profile of dengue patients at different severity of the disease showed that almost all cytokines expression levels were increased when compared to the healthy control mean (baseline) Figure 2. Previous research has demonstrated that cytokines such as TNF, IFN-g, GM-CSF, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and ST2 are found to be related to plasma leakage in DHF/DSS and can serve as a biomarker but have failed to explain disease severity in many of the cases [6,35,36,37,38,39]. Most of our results were consistent with other findings, showing a significant difference compared to the healthy control. Increased levels of IFN-g, TNF, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and GM-CSF were also observed in our data coinciding with other findings that have been observed to increase in the DHF when compared to DF [40,41]. Interestingly, the area under ROC curve of CD121b did a better job in discriminating between the disease severity Figure 6A,B and Supplementary Table S1. Of note, it was also observed that CD121b was not only significantly different by statistical analysis among the different groups but also showed an increased pattern expression along with the disease severity and days of fever Figure 2 and Supplementary Figure S3. To our knowledge, this is the first time CD121b is observed as a potential biomarker for distinguishing between the disease severity. A concentration of >4418.043 pg/mL was the optimal cutoff value (Sensitivity = 71.70, Specificity = 77.67) for distinguishing between the A and B group, while a concentration of >0.499434 pg/mL was the optimal cutoff value (Sensitivity = 89.79, Specificity = 86.11) for distinguishing between the B and C group Figure 6B, and Supplementary Table S1.
CD121b, also known as IL-1R2 is an interleukin receptor that acts as a decoy receptor and as a negative regulator for certain cytokines that belong to the interleukin-1 receptor family (IL-1). This protein binds interleukin-1α (IL1A), interleukin-1β (IL1B), and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL1RA), preventing them from binding to their regular receptors (interleukin receptor type 1, IL-1R1) and thereby inhibiting the transduction of their signaling or hinder the signaling complex assembly. The IL-1 family of cytokines and receptors is unique in immunology because the IL-1 family and Toll-like receptor (TLR) families share similar functions, they play a central role in the regulation of immune and inflammatory response [42,43]. Over the years, surfacing research show that the IL-1 family plays a major role as a proinflammatory cytokine in cancer, heart conditions and various immune diseases, but its role with CD121b is not fully understood [44,45]. CD121b is expressed by neutrophils, T cells and mainly expressed by myeloid cells. Non-immune cells like keratinocytes and some types of epithelial cells have also been observed to express CD121b under normal conditions, but increases upon inflammation [46,47]. Moreover, recent publications have further demonstrated the crucial role of CD121b and inflammation in Alzheimer’s patients, sepsis, Hodgkin lymphoma and IgG4-related disease [48].
There are certain limitations in our study, one of the limitations was that we could not identify the previous infection history of the patients to see whether this was a secondary infection. Taiwan had experienced two other dengue outbreaks before the 2015 Taiwan (Tainan) outbreak: the first in Penghu County in 2011 and the second being in Kaohsiung City in 2014 [49]. Hence it is logical to speculate that probably some of the cases were secondary infection and could lead to a difference in results. Another limitation in our study involves the low number of volunteers in the Healthy control group and OF group.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethical Statement and Study Cohort

In this study, a total of 328 cytokine levels were observed and analyzed from 243 patients’ sera. The total 328 data points analyzed consisted of measurements taken from patients who had single or multiple admission to the hospital, as well as measurements taken at different days of fever. Samples with written informed consent were obtained from patients as they were admitted to National Cheng Kung University Hospital between July and October during the 2015 Taiwan dengue outbreak (IRB #B-ER-104-178). To maintain the confidentiality of samples, clinical data were recorded with a serial ID in the report. Patients that were found to be positive for DENV-2 were classified into 3 groups according to the day of illness and clinical symptoms following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme [21,50]. These categories included, dengue without warning sign symptoms (A) which consisted of 128 patients; dengue with warning signs which consisted of 103 (B) and severe dengue (C) which consisted of 53 patients. Eight patients who had fever but were dengue negative were classified as other fever (OF). The healthy (Healthy) control group consisted of 36 patients. Data characteristics of the patient such as age, cytokine level and general statistics in this study were provided in Table 1. This is a retrospective study and complete demographic descriptions of the enrolled patients had been previously reported [49].

4.2. Dengue Confirmatory Tests

These samples collected during 2015 dengue outbreaks in Taiwan have been reported previously [49]. Some of the specimens were reaffirmed by SD BIOLINE Dengue Duo Rapid Test kit (Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) and by plaque assay for the viral titers in these specimens. Patients that were dengue negative were categorized as other fever (OF) in this experiment. Furthermore, those who presented symptoms such as cough, obstructions, other un-wellness, or immunocompromised disease were excluded from the healthy control group.

4.3. Cytokine Identification and Quantification

Cytometric Bean Assay (CBA) (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used to quantify the cytokine levels in each sample. Twenty-three different cytokines, namely IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IL-33, CD14, CD54, CD62E, CD62L, CD62p, CD106, CD121b, CD154, CD178, GM-CSF, IFN-g, MIF, ST2 and TNF were evaluated simultaneously in each sample. The patient’s plasma was used to analyze these cytokines levels using BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). In summary, 30 μL of the patient’s plasma was diluted with sample buffer from the cytometric bead array (CBA) kit following to the manufacturer’s instruction, followed by mixing it with specific beads conjugated with specific antibodies (Abs) which would exhibit a specific fluorescent intensity in proportion to the number of bound analytes when being analyzed using the BD LSR Fortessa.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

All raw data were stored in a computerized database (MS Excel 2016, Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated for all patients in this study and summarized in Table 1. Statistical Analysis was performed using R- Studio v1.2.5042 (RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Boston, MA, USA) and Graph-Pad Prim v7 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) Kruskal–Wallis test was performed on all groups, whereas the Mann–Whitney test was used to compare groups head to head. Boxplots and scatter plots were used to visualize the distribution of the cytokine data within the different groups or for the different days of fever. A p-Value < 0.05 was considered as significantly different by statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic values in discriminating dengue fever and disease severity. The optimal diagnostic cutoff value was determined according to Youden’s J-statistic, and the relative sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, these observations from previous research and our work further provide new insight and evidence on the possible role of CD121b in DENV infection and its potential to serve as a diagnostic marker and warrants further investigation. In our study, we found that the IL-10 could be a potential diagnostic marker for DF and CD121b a potential predictor marker for the disease severity based upon the cut-off value in ROC curve. However, one parameter alone cannot be exclusively utilized as a marker to predict DF or the disease severity. Hence, the current findings can provide key information in understanding and exploring possible predictors of severe dengue and its progression in patients without any warning signs who might later develop to severe dengue. In addition, the suggested panel of cytokines in the study, along with already investigated sources add more to our understanding of the role of cytokines during DENV. It is possible to implement these cytokines in clinical practice to improve patients’ supportive care.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/6/2879/s1, Figure S1: The levels of cytokines in DENV patients, Figure S2: The levels of cytokines in DENV patients with different severity, Figure S3: The levels of cytokines in DENV patients at different days of fever, Table S1: Area under the curve of cytokines describing the performances of cytokines in discriminating: DENV- differentiating from Healthy (Healthy) and other fever (OF); DENV severity- differentiating from dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C).

Author Contributions

I.P. wrote the draft of the manuscript and assisted in analyzing data. T.-C.H. organized the samples and performed the cytokine assays. K.-L.Y. and A.V. assisted in data analysis and graph presentation. J.-J.T., P.-L.C. and Y.-W.C. assisted in sample collections and in obtaining the IRB. Y.-C.L. assisted in data collection and provided the guidance of writing the manuscript. G.C.P. designed the overall study and edited the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported, in part, by the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C., The Aim for the Top University Project to the National Cheng Kung University (GCP), Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW104-CDC-C-114-114901) (GCP) and National Health Research Institutes (NHRI-110A1-MRCO-03212101) (JJT), and National Science Council Grant (NSC 102-2320-B-006–049, MOST 103-2320-B-006-030-MY3, MOST-106-2321-B-006 -012 -, MOST 107-2314-B-006 -063 -MY3) (GCP).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital (protocol code IRB #B-ER-104-178 and the date of approval was 16 October 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper if applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The study did not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare not to have any conflict of interests.

References

  1. Ebi, K.L.; Nealon, J. Dengue in a changing climate. Environ. Res. 2016, 151, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Brady, O.J.; Gething, P.W.; Bhatt, S.; Messina, J.P.; Brownstein, J.S.; Hoen, A.G.; Moyes, C.L.; Farlow, A.W.; Scott, T.W.; Hay, S.I. Refining the Global Spatial Limits of Dengue Virus Transmission by Evidence-Based Consensus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhatt, S.; Gething, P.W.; Brady, O.J.; Messina, J.P.; Farlow, A.W.; Moyes, C.L.; Drake, J.M.; Brownstein, J.S.; Hoen, A.G.; Sankoh, O.; et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 2013, 496, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. WHO. Dengue and Severe Dengue World Health Organization 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dengue-and-severe-dengue (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  5. Hotta, S. Experimental Studies on Dengue: I. Isolation, Identification and Modification of the Virus. J. Infect. Dis. 1952, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rathakrishnan, A.; Wang, S.M.; Hu, Y.; Khan, A.M.; Ponnampalavanar, S.; Lum, L.C.S.; Manikam, R.; Sekaran, S.D. Cytokine Expression Profile of Dengue Patients at Different Phases of Illness. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Guzman, M.G.; Gubler, D.J.; Izquierdo, A.; Martinez, E.; Halstead, S.B. Dengue infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yung, C.-F.; Lee, K.-S.; Thein, T.-L.; Tan, L.-K.; Gan, V.C.; Wong, J.G.X.; Lye, D.C.; Ng, L.-C.; Leo, Y.-S. Dengue serotype-specific differences in clinical manifestation, laboratory parameters and risk of severe disease in adults, Singapore. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 92, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Mello, C.P.P.; Drusano, G.L.; Rodriquez, J.L.; Kaushik, A.; Brown, A.N. Antiviral Effects of Clinically-Relevant Interferon-α and Ribavirin Regimens against Dengue Virus in the Hollow Fiber Infection Model (HFIM). Viruses 2018, 10, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kurane, I.; Ennis, F.A. Cytokines in dengue virus infections: Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Semin. Virol. 1994, 5, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Turner, M.D.; Nedjai, B.; Hurst, T.; Pennington, D.J. Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2014, 1843, 2563–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chatchen, S.; Sabchareon, A.; Sirivichayakul, C. Serodiagnosis of asymptomatic dengue infection. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 11–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Burke, D.S.; Nisalak, A.; Johnson, D.E.; Nisalak, A. A Prospective Study of Dengue Infections in Bangkok. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 38, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beltrán-Silva, S.L.; Chacón-Hernández, S.S.; Moreno-Palacios, E.; Pereyra-Molina, J. Clinical and differential diagnosis: Dengue, chikungunya and Zika. Rev. Méd. Hosp. Gen. Méx. 2018, 81, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vogels, C.B.F.; Rückert, C.; Cavany, S.M.; Perkins, T.A.; Ebel, G.D.; Grubaugh, N.D. Arbovirus coinfection and co-transmission: A neglected public health concern? PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Guzman, M.G.; Vazquez, S. The complexity of antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus infection. Viruses 2010, 2, 2649–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Dejnirattisai, W.; Jumnainsong, A.; Onsirisakul, N.; Fitton, P.; Vasanawathana, S.; Limpitikul, W.; Puttikhunt, C.; Edwards, C.; Duangchinda, T.; Supasa, S.; et al. Cross-reacting antibodies enhance dengue virus infection in humans. Science 2010, 328, 745–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Chaturvedi, U.C.; Agarwal, R.; Elbishbishi, E.A.; Mustafa, A.S. Cytokine cascade in dengue hemorrhagic fever: Implications for pathogenesis. FEMS Immunol. Med Microbiol. 2000, 28, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Martina, B.E.E.; Koraka, P.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E. Dengue Virus Pathogenesis: An Integrated View. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 564–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Srikiatkhachorn, A.; Mathew, A.; Rothman, A.L. Immune-mediated cytokine storm and its role in severe dengue. Semin. Immunopathol. 2017, 39, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Huang, J.; Liang, W.; Chen, S.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, H.; Mok, C.K.P.; Zhou, Y. Serum Cytokine Profiles in Patients with Dengue Fever at the Acute Infection Phase. Dis. Markers 2018, 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.P.; Peng, H.J.; Zhang, X.H.; Zhou, F.Y.; Liu, Z.H.; Chen, X.G. Predictive Symptoms and Signs of Severe Dengue Disease for Patients with Dengue Fever: A Meta-Analysis. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Rathore, A.P.S.; John, A.L.S. Immune responses to dengue virus in the skin. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Thein, T.-L.; Gan, V.C.; Lye, D.C.; Yung, C.-F.; Leo, Y.-S. Utilities and Limitations of the World Health Organization 2009 Warning Signs for Adult Dengue Severity. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Elmy Saniathi, N.K.; Djoko Rianto, B.U.; Juffrie, M.; Soetjiningsih, S. Dengue hemorrhagic fever: The role of Soluble E-Selektin, Soluble Intra Cellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (Sicam-1) and Soluble Vascular Cellular Adhesion Molecule -1 (Svcam-1) in overweight children. Bali Med. J. 2018, 8, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liao, B.; Tang, Y.; Hu, F.; Zhou, W.; Tang, X.; Zhang, F. Serum levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecules may correlate with the severity of dengue virus-1 infection in adults. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2015, 4, e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vitoria, W.O.; Thomé, L.S.; Kanashiro-Galo, L.; De Carvalho, L.V.; Penny, R.; Santos, W.L.C.; Vasconcelos, P.F.D.C.; Sotto, M.N.; Duarte, M.I.S.; Quaresma, J.A.S.; et al. Upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in renal tissue in severe dengue in humans: Effects on endothelial activation/dysfunction. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20180353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chan, M.; Johansson, M.A. The Incubation Periods of Dengue Viruses. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Furuya-Kanamori, L.; Liang, S.; Milinovich, G.; Magalhaes, R.J.S.; Clements, A.C.A.; Hu, W.; Brasil, P.; Frentiu, F.D.; Dunning, R.; Yakob, L. Co-distribution and co-infection of chikungunya and dengue viruses. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Trifunović, J.; Miller, L.; Debeljak, Ž.; Horvat, V. Pathologic patterns of interleukin 10 expression—A review. Biochem. Med. 2015, 25, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Malavige, G.N.; Jeewandara, C.; Alles, K.M.L.; Salimi, M.; Gomes, L.; Kamaladasa, A.; Jayaratne, S.D.; Ogg, G.S. Suppression of Virus Specific Immune Responses by IL-10 in Acute Dengue Infection. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Soe, H.J.; Yong, Y.K.; Al-Obaidi, M.M.J.; Raju, C.S.; Gudimella, R.; Manikam, R.; Sekaran, S.D. Identifying protein biomarkers in predicting disease severity of dengue virus infection using immune-related protein microarray. Medicine 2018, 97, e9713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rothman, A.L. Immunity to dengue virus: A tale of original antigenic sin and tropical cytokine storms. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kotowicz, K.; Callard, R.E.; Klein, N.J.; Jacobs, M.G. Interleukin-4 increases the permeability of human endothelial cells in culture. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2004, 34, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mangione, J.N.A.; Huy, N.T.; Lan, N.T.P.; Mbanefo, E.C.; Ha, T.T.N.; Bao, L.Q.; Nga, C.T.P.; van Tuong, V.; van Dat, T.; Thuy, T.T.; et al. The association of cytokines with severe dengue in children. Trop. Med. Health 2014, 42, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Patro, A.R.K.; Mohanty, S.; Prusty, B.K.; Singh, D.K.; Gaikwad, S.; Saswat, T.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Das, B.K.; Tripathy, R.; Ravindran, B. Cytokine Signature Associated with Disease Severity in Dengue. Viruses 2019, 11, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Imad, H.A.; Phumratanaprapin, W.; Phonrat, B.; Chotivanich, K.; Charunwatthana, P.; Muangnoicharoen, S.; Khusmith, S.; Tantawichien, T.; Phadungsombat, J.; Nakayama, E.; et al. Cytokine Expression in Dengue Fever and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Patients with Bleeding and Severe Hepatitis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2020, 102, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hsieh, C.-C.; Hong, M.-Y.; Ho, T.-S.; Liu, C.-C.; Perng, G.-C.; Chuang, C.-C. Dynamic changes of soluble ST2 levels predicted fatality and were involved in coagulopathy in dengue fever in the elderly. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Flores-Mendoza, L.K.; Estrada-Jiménez, T.; Sedeño-Monge, V.; Moreno, M.; Manjarrez, M.D.C.; González-Ochoa, G.; Peña, L.M.-P.; Reyes-Leyva, J. IL-10 and socs3 Are Predictive Biomarkers of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 5197592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Pinto, L.M.; Oliveira, S.A.; Braga, E.L.; Nogueira, R.M.; Kubelka, C.F. Increased Pro-inflammatory Cytokines (TNF-a and IL-6) and Anti-inflammatory Compounds (sTNFRp55 and sTNFRp75) in Brazilian Patients during Exanthematic Dengue Fever. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 1999, 94, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Green, S.; Vaughn, D.W.; Kalayanarooj, S.; Nimmannitya, S.; Suntayakorn, S.; Nisalak, A.; Rothman, A.L.; Ennis, F.A. Elevated plasma interleukin-10 levels in acute dengue correlate with disease severity. J. Med Virol. 1999, 59, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Peters, V.A.; Joesting, J.J.; Freund, G.G. IL-1 receptor 2 (IL-1R2) and its role in immune regulation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Dinarello, C.A. Overview of the IL-1 family in innate inflammation and acquired immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 281, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dinarello, C.A.; Simon, A.; van der Meer, J.W.M. Treating inflammation by blocking interleukin-1 in a broad spectrum of diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 633–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mantovani, A.; Barajon, I.; Garlanda, C. IL-1 and IL-1 regulatory pathways in cancer progression and therapy. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 281, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fenini, G.; Contassot, E.; French, L.E. Potential of IL-1, IL-18 and Inflammasome Inhibition for the Treatment of Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Groves, R.W.; Sherman, L.; Mizutani, H.; Dower, S.K.; Kupper, T.S. Detection of interleukin-1 receptors in human epidermis. Induction of the type II receptor after organ culture and in psoriasis. Am. J. Pathol. 1994, 145, 1048–1056. [Google Scholar]
  48. Schlüter, T.; Schelmbauer, C.; Karram, K.; Mufazalov, I.A. Regulation of IL-1 signaling by the decoy receptor IL-1R2. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 96, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yeh, C.Y.; Chen, P.L.; Chuang, K.T.; Shu, Y.-C.; Chien, Y.-W.; Perng, G.C.; Ko, W.-C.; Ko, N.-Y. Symptoms associated with adverse dengue fever prognoses at the time of reporting in the 2015 dengue outbreak in Taiwan. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. WHO. World Health Organization and the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). In Dengue Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 22 02879 g001 550
Figure 1. The levels of cytokines in DENV patients. Patients were divided into three groups: Laboratory confirmed DENV-2 patients (DENV), laboratory confirmed DENV negative (OF) and healthy volunteers (Healthy). Only cytokines having a significance difference between either DENV, Healthy or OF were shown here. Cytokines with no significance difference can be found in Supplementary Figure S1. Mean ± SEM. Horizontal dotted line represents health mean average. N.D (no data). p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***.
Figure 1. The levels of cytokines in DENV patients. Patients were divided into three groups: Laboratory confirmed DENV-2 patients (DENV), laboratory confirmed DENV negative (OF) and healthy volunteers (Healthy). Only cytokines having a significance difference between either DENV, Healthy or OF were shown here. Cytokines with no significance difference can be found in Supplementary Figure S1. Mean ± SEM. Horizontal dotted line represents health mean average. N.D (no data). p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***.
Ijms 22 02879 g001
Ijms 22 02879 g002 550
Figure 2. The levels of cytokines in DENV patients with different severity. DENV patients were divided into three groups according to the day of illness and clinical symptoms following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C). Only cytokines having a significance difference between either A, B or C were shown here. Remaining cytokines can be found in Figure 2. Mean ± SEM. Horizontal dotted line represents health mean average. p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***.
Figure 2. The levels of cytokines in DENV patients with different severity. DENV patients were divided into three groups according to the day of illness and clinical symptoms following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C). Only cytokines having a significance difference between either A, B or C were shown here. Remaining cytokines can be found in Figure 2. Mean ± SEM. Horizontal dotted line represents health mean average. p < 0.05 *; p < 0.01 **; p < 0.001 ***.
Ijms 22 02879 g002
Ijms 22 02879 g003 550
Figure 3. The level of Adhesion molecules in dengue patients at different days of fever. Graphs representing the levels between the different groups of DENV patients previously divided following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C). Colored shadings represent the different phases of dengue fever. Horizontal dotted line represents healthy mean average. Mean ± SEM.
Figure 3. The level of Adhesion molecules in dengue patients at different days of fever. Graphs representing the levels between the different groups of DENV patients previously divided following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C). Colored shadings represent the different phases of dengue fever. Horizontal dotted line represents healthy mean average. Mean ± SEM.
Ijms 22 02879 g003
Ijms 22 02879 g004 550
Figure 4. The level of Pro and Anti-Inflammatory molecules in dengue patients at different days of fever Graphs representing the levels between the different groups of DENV patients previously divided following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C). Colored shadings represent the different phases of dengue fever. Horizontal dotted line represents healthy mean average. Mean ± SEM.
Figure 4. The level of Pro and Anti-Inflammatory molecules in dengue patients at different days of fever Graphs representing the levels between the different groups of DENV patients previously divided following the 2009 WHO dengue classification scheme: dengue without warning sign symptoms (A), dengue with warning signs (B) and severe dengue (C). Colored shadings represent the different phases of dengue fever. Horizontal dotted line represents healthy mean average. Mean ± SEM.
Ijms 22 02879 g004
Ijms 22 02879 g005 550
Figure 5. ROC curve of cytokines. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Performance of ROC curves of TNF, IFN-g, IL-17A, IL-12p70, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-2, IL-2, IL-1b, GM-CSF, CD178, CD154, CD106, CD62P, CD62L, CD62E, CD54 and CD14 for predicting DENV and differentiating from Healthy (H) and other fever (OF). Plots depict he tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. The closer the curve follows the left-hand border and the top border of the ROC space, the more accurate the test. (A) ROC curve compared between DENV patients and healthy subjects. (B) ROC curve compared between healthy subject and other fever patients.
Figure 5. ROC curve of cytokines. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Performance of ROC curves of TNF, IFN-g, IL-17A, IL-12p70, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-2, IL-2, IL-1b, GM-CSF, CD178, CD154, CD106, CD62P, CD62L, CD62E, CD54 and CD14 for predicting DENV and differentiating from Healthy (H) and other fever (OF). Plots depict he tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. The closer the curve follows the left-hand border and the top border of the ROC space, the more accurate the test. (A) ROC curve compared between DENV patients and healthy subjects. (B) ROC curve compared between healthy subject and other fever patients.
Ijms 22 02879 g005
Ijms 22 02879 g006 550
Figure 6. ROC curve of cytokines. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Performance of ROC curves of TNF, IFN-g, IL-17A, IL-12p70, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-2, IL-2, IL-1b, GM-CSF, CD178, CD151, CD121b, CD106, CD62P, CD62L, CD62E and CD54 for predicting DENV severity and differentiating from dengue without warning sign symp-toms A, dengue with warning signs B and severe dengue C. Plots depict he tradeoff between sensitivity and speci-ficity. The closer the curve follows the left-hand border and the top border of the ROC space, the more accurate the test. (A) ROC curve compared between dengue without warning sign symptoms and dengue with warning signs. (B) ROC curve compared between dengue with warning signs and severe dengue.
Figure 6. ROC curve of cytokines. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Performance of ROC curves of TNF, IFN-g, IL-17A, IL-12p70, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-2, IL-2, IL-1b, GM-CSF, CD178, CD151, CD121b, CD106, CD62P, CD62L, CD62E and CD54 for predicting DENV severity and differentiating from dengue without warning sign symp-toms A, dengue with warning signs B and severe dengue C. Plots depict he tradeoff between sensitivity and speci-ficity. The closer the curve follows the left-hand border and the top border of the ROC space, the more accurate the test. (A) ROC curve compared between dengue without warning sign symptoms and dengue with warning signs. (B) ROC curve compared between dengue with warning signs and severe dengue.
Ijms 22 02879 g006
Table
Table 1. Study Cohort Summary and laboratory parameters. A, dengue without warning symptoms; B, Dengue with warning signs; C, Sever Dengue; OF, other febrile infection; Healthy, Healthy; CD14, cluster of differentiation; CD54, cluster of differentiation 54; CD62E, E-selectin;CD62L, L-selectin; CD62p, P-selectin; CD106, cluster of differentiation 106; CD121B, Cluster of Differentiation 121 β; CD154, Cluster of Differentiation 154; CD178, cluster of differentiation 178; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL-1b, Interleukin 1 beta; IL-2, interleukin 2; L-4, interleukin 4; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-8, interleukin 8; IL-10, interleukin 10;IL-12p70, interleukin 12p70; IL-17A, interleukin 17A; IL-33, interleukin 133; IFN-g, interferon gamma; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; ST2,TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Cytokine concentration in pg/mL. Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test for continuous variable not-normally distributed; mean ± SD; number (percentage of total); median (minimum–maximum); N.D (no data).
Table 1. Study Cohort Summary and laboratory parameters. A, dengue without warning symptoms; B, Dengue with warning signs; C, Sever Dengue; OF, other febrile infection; Healthy, Healthy; CD14, cluster of differentiation; CD54, cluster of differentiation 54; CD62E, E-selectin;CD62L, L-selectin; CD62p, P-selectin; CD106, cluster of differentiation 106; CD121B, Cluster of Differentiation 121 β; CD154, Cluster of Differentiation 154; CD178, cluster of differentiation 178; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL-1b, Interleukin 1 beta; IL-2, interleukin 2; L-4, interleukin 4; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-8, interleukin 8; IL-10, interleukin 10;IL-12p70, interleukin 12p70; IL-17A, interleukin 17A; IL-33, interleukin 133; IFN-g, interferon gamma; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; ST2,TNF, tumor necrosis factor. Cytokine concentration in pg/mL. Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test for continuous variable not-normally distributed; mean ± SD; number (percentage of total); median (minimum–maximum); N.D (no data).
Demographics A B C Healthy OF p Value SD
Total128(39%)103(31%)53(16%)36(11%)8(3%)
Age (years)(54)18–86(67)26–93(71)55–84(47)22–80(51)24–83
IL-1b0.9585 ± 2.9411.623 ± 5.49317.65 ± 66.620.1789 ± 0.55791.13 ± 1.387<0.0165b,c,d,e,f,h,j
IL-24.593 ± 9.3473.693 ± 4.5877.91 ± 10.972.327 ± 4.0312.55 ± 9.966<0.0174b,d,e,f,g,h,j
IL-424.79 ± 46.5646.32 ± 108.459,499 ± 293,4432.827 ± 3.435214.8 ± 563.7<0.0357a,b,c,e,f,g,h,i
IL-80.2349 ± 0.76670.2769 ± 1.5160.208 ± 0.37717.89 ± 3.06738.69 ± 67.47<0.0132a,b,c,e,f,h,i,j
IL-626.24 ± 93.67135.9 ± 417.31447 ± 33510.3075 ± 0.826516.86 ± 25.73<0.0086a,b,c,f,h,j
IL-1010.34 ± 17.7834.05 ± 116.432.01 ± 65.550.2933 ± 0.3240.1373 ± 0.3502<0.0003c,f
IL-17A0.5347 ± 1.1920.513 ± 0.78121.227 ± 3.2320.1923 ± 0.39360.08852 ± 0.1501<0.0381c,f,h
IL-12p703.568 ± 10.312.271 ± 5.64910.12 ± 30.761.009 ± 3.0063.164 ± 4.554<0.0335a,b,c,f,h
IL-33454.1 ± 103.9452.3 ± 384.9378 ± 73.81350.4 ± 86.95N.DNS
CD1435,861 ± 35,86174,193 ± 207,43982,228,957 ± 402,093,646305,911 ± 1,174,61537,812 ± 16,759<0.0429c,f
CD546,033,111 ± 30,288,666698,840,332 + 6,609,196,581136224 ± 141633108,486 ± 143,6751,305,628 + 2,110,778<0.0182b,c,e,f,h,i,j
CD62E4644 ± 3360258,653 ± 2,538,32716535 ± 287143916 ± 24266160 ± 4018<0.0104a,b,e,f,h,i
CD62L1,415,889 ± 13,713,537524,272 ± 3,791,1225,005,464 ± 35,347,942166,876 ± 680,047162,093 ± 430,665<0.0114a,b,c,e,g,h,i,j
CD62P6833 ± 459310,865 ± 11,11617,773 ± 10,2907198 ± 46727610 ± 3141<0.0025a,b,e,f,h,i
CD1067916 ± 14,40218,292 ± 34,42338,789 ± 36,74054,096 ± 50,6776913 ± 2126<0.0333a,b,c,e,f,i,j
CD121b1539 ± 12773229 ± 27717111 ± 44782970 ± 22841286 ± 690.5<0.003b,c,e,f,i,
CD154537.3 ± 424.6357.4 ± 371.8278.2 ± 5375.91682 ± 1039703.2 ± 432.8<0.0088a,b,c,e,f,g,h,i,j
CD17826.69 ± 10.2928.46 ± 17.8929.1 ± 21.2728.32 ± 12.6717.4 ± 9.591<0.0358d,g,i.j
GM-CSF0.7341 ± 2.0910.3437 ± 0.79581.57 ± 3.9860.1625 ± 0.31371.574 ± 2.119<0.0156b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
IFN-g8.178 ± 26.473.526 ± 6.0773.337 ± 8.5820.3811 ± 1.0543.965 ± 4.153<0.0117b,c,e,f,h,j
MIF21,536 ± 11,19846,859 ± 47,06160,101 ± 71,4878769 ± 2618N.D<0.0387c,f,h
ST2838.2 ± 623.93906 ± 527226998 ± 65830210.5 ± 264.9N.D<0.0047f,h
TNF2.061 ± 13.910.4251 ± 1.4412.232 ± 7.3170.5135 ± 0.52480.2321 ± 0.2905<0.0031b,c,e,f
Significant difference (S.D): (a) between A and B; (b) between A and C; (c) between A and Healthy; (d) between A and OF; (e) between B and C; (f) between B and Healthy; (g) between B and OF; (h) between C and Healthy; (i) between C and OF; (j) between Healthy and OF.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Puc, I.; Ho, T.-C.; Yen, K.-L.; Vats, A.; Tsai, J.-J.; Chen, P.-L.; Chien, Y.-W.; Lo, Y.-C.; Perng, G.C. Cytokine Signature of Dengue Patients at Different Severity of the Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062879

AMA Style

Puc I, Ho T-C, Yen K-L, Vats A, Tsai J-J, Chen P-L, Chien Y-W, Lo Y-C, Perng GC. Cytokine Signature of Dengue Patients at Different Severity of the Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(6):2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062879

Chicago/Turabian Style

Puc, Irwin, Tzu-Chuan Ho, Ko-Lun Yen, Amrita Vats, Jih-Jin Tsai, Po-Lin Chen, Yu-Wen Chien, Yu-Chih Lo, and Guey Chuen Perng. 2021. "Cytokine Signature of Dengue Patients at Different Severity of the Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 6: 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062879

APA Style

Puc, I., Ho, T. -C., Yen, K. -L., Vats, A., Tsai, J. -J., Chen, P. -L., Chien, Y. -W., Lo, Y. -C., & Perng, G. C. (2021). Cytokine Signature of Dengue Patients at Different Severity of the Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(6), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062879

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop