Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Atorvastatin on Global Cerebral Ischemia-Induced Neuronal Death
Next Article in Special Issue
Mechanisms of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis in the Fallopian Tube and Ovary: Current Hypotheses, Etiologic Factors, and Molecular Alterations
Previous Article in Journal
Unlocking the Health Potential of Microalgae as Sustainable Sources of Bioactive Compounds
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characterization of the Survival Influential Genes in Carcinogenesis

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4384; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094384
by Divya Sahu †, Yu-Lin Chang †, Yin-Chen Lin and Chen-Ching Lin *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4384; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094384
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 18 April 2021 / Accepted: 20 April 2021 / Published: 22 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clarification of Mechanism of Carcinogenesis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Introduction

1- The first sentence needs to be revised: —they are essential for tumor cells [1, 2]— needs to be removed.

2- The second sentence should be trimmed as this is very long at the current way.

3- "they are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and require a huge expenditure of money" is suggested to be changed as "they are capital and labor-intensive and time-consuming".

Results

The quality of the figures is poor. The details are not readable. Please replace them with higher-quality images.

Discussion

The authors need to discuss the biological relevance of the identified SIGs shown in Fig. 7, in terms of survival according to the previously published papers. In other words, the credibility of the findings needs to be highlighted by discussing the roles of these genes in the survival of tumor cells.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This article is very interesting, but there are some points to revise before publishing.

  1. I think the last paragraph of “Introduction” included conclusion. Could you revise? Or, if this statement was based on previous your study, you should add references.
  2. The words of figure 4, 5, and 7 were too small to read. Could you revise?
  3. I would like to know how we use this results in clinical situation. What do you think about it?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop