Next Article in Journal
Photocatalytic H2 Production by Visible Light on Cd0.5Zn0.5S Photocatalysts Modified with Ni(OH)2 by Impregnation Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Isolation of α-Glucosidase Inhibitors from Siraitia grosvenorii Roots Using Bio-Affinity Ultrafiltration and Comprehensive Chromatography
Previous Article in Journal
CRISISS: A Novel, Transcriptionally and Post-Translationally Inducible CRISPR/Cas9-Based Cellular Suicide Switch
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction and Verification of Curcumin as a Potential Drug for Inhibition of PDCoV Replication in LLC-PK1 Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial CHX-CaCl2 Coatings on Maxillofacial Fixatures for Infection Prevention

1
Centre for Oral Bioengineering, Bart’s and the London, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK
2
Barts Health NHS Trust, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 1FR, UK
3
Centre for Biochemical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
4
Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(12), 9801; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129801
Submission received: 11 May 2023 / Revised: 29 May 2023 / Accepted: 30 May 2023 / Published: 6 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Drug Discovery and Application of New Technologies)

Abstract

:
Maxillofacial surgery placement of fixatures (Leonard Buttons, LB) at close proximity to surgical incisions provides a potential reservoir as a secondary local factor to advanced periodontal disease, with bacterial formation around failed fixatures implicating plaque. To address infection rates, we aimed to surface coat LB and Titanium (Ti) discs using a novel form of chlorhexidine (CHX), CHX-CaCl2 and 0.2% CHX digluconate mouthwash as a comparison. CHX-CaCl2 coated, double-coated and mouthwash coated LB and Ti discs were transferred to 1 mL artificial saliva (AS) at specified time points, and UV-Visible spectroscopy (254 nm) was used to measure CHX release. The zone of inhibition (ZOI) was measured using collected aliquots against bacterial strains. Specimens were characterized using Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). SEM displayed copious dendritic crystals on LB/ Ti disc surfaces. Drug release from double-coated CHX-CaCl2 was 14 days (Ti discs) and 6 days (LB) above MIC, compared to the comparison group (20 min). The ZOI for the CHX-CaCl2 coated groups was significantly different within groups (p < 0.05). CHX-CaCl2 surface crystallization is a new drug technology for controlled and sustained CHX release; its antibacterial effectiveness makes this drug an ideal adjunct following clinical and surgical procedures to maintain oral hygiene and prevent surgical site infections.

1. Introduction

Maxillofacial trauma has a common and acute presentation in accident and emergency departments, with the incidence increased within the UK from 4% (1998) to 10% (2020), according to a BOAMS survey [1,2]. Mandibular fractures are prone to infection, and strategies to reduce surgical site infection remain ineffective and are targeted at smoking cessation and alcohol withdrawal, with no proven efficacy [3,4]. Surgical site infection remains a considerable problem with increased cost and morbidity to the patient [3]. Recently, our group demonstrated that advanced periodontal disease was a highly significant cofactor in surgical site infection (mandibular fractures) with an odds ratio of 74. Maxillofacial plate removal is primarily due to infection in 46.7% of the cases [5,6] and results from biofilm development [7], which mandates further surgery.
Contemporaneous management of mandibular fracture involves maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). This commonly involves using wires and metal fixatures to localise the fractures following the application of surgical fixatures (e.g., arch bars and Leonard Buttons) [8,9,10,11], followed by intra-oral surgical access in the buccal sulcus and application of load-sharing osteosynthesis according to Champy principles. It is postulated that the dependent position of the surgical incision in the buccal sulcus makes the site vulnerable to biofilm-producing bacteria, and strategies to reduce this load may prove beneficial to fracture management.
Currently, a Chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate mouthwash (0.12%, 0.2% and 1%) is used prior to and following craniomaxillofacial surgery and as a recommended longer-term postoperative mouthwash [12]. These mouth-rinse adjuncts were also recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimize transmission upon treatment [13,14], and various detection methods were suggested [15]. Infection rates are, nevertheless, still high (4–10%) in MMF patients, and this needs improvement. A solution to this problem may be the use of a novel crystalline form of chlorhexidine (CHX-CaCl2) formulated by Luo et al. [16], which provides a safe and effective antimicrobial with substantivity. Novel CHX-CaCl2 particles also demonstrated a surface crystallisation mechanism when synthesised in conjunction with gold nanorods [17]. This technology may, therefore, have the potential to be applied to metallic MMF close to the fracture site.
The aim of this study was to synthesise a CHX-CaCl2particle antimicrobial coating onto MMF to improve oral hygiene and reduce infection rates in the maxillofacial traumatology that is lacking within research. A slow CHX release from the coated MMF may reduce infections and prevent plaque build-up, maintaining oral hygiene.

2. Results

2.1. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) Results

The EDS results for the titanium disc and the LB (Ti element) are shown in Figure 1a,b and the quantitative elemental composition (atomic %) is displayed in Table 1.

2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Results

SEM photomicrographs presented in Figure 2 show the CHX-CaCl2 crystals on the single coated Ti disc (a–c), double-coated Ti disc (d–f), and lapped Ti disc (g–i). There was a dense dispersal of CHX-CaCl2 crystals (Figure 2a) binding dendritically to the Ti disc surfaces and linking to other crystals (Figure 2b,c). The double coating of Ti discs displayed a fine dispersal of CHX-CaCl2 crystals on the surface (Figure 2d), with partially formed crystallites growing on a bed of crystallites (Figure 2e). The CHX-CaCl2 crystal primary growth appeared to be from a central nucleus outwards in a wheat-sheaf appearance (Figure 2f). The lapped Ti disc displayed a dispersed coating (Figure 2g) with a bi-modal distribution of CHX-CaCl2 crystals (Figure 2h), where smaller crystal formation was associated with flaws on the lapped surface (Figure 2h,i). There was no coating observed for the Corsodyl-coated Ti disc surface (Figure 2j,k), which displayed the Ti disc’s coarse surface and grain boundaries (Figure 2k,l).
Figure 3a shows the uncoated Leonard Button (LB) displaying a coarse and columnar surface (Figure 3b). Figure 3c displays signs of some agglomerated spherical CHX-CaCl2 crystals on the LB’s concave surface and a uniform crystal distribution on its convex surface (Figure 3d). The CHX-CaCl2 crystals are growing in association with the LB’s surface flaws (Figure 3e). Figure 3f illustrates the unique spherical morphology of the crystals, with dendrites binding uniformly to the LB’s coarse metal surface. The intimate contact of the CHX-CaCl2 crystals’ tendrils at the LB surface interface is evident in Figure 3f.

2.3. Light Profilometry Results

The mean surface roughness (Ra) is indicated in Table 2 for the lapped and unlapped Ti discs. Figure 4 illustrates the primary and grid mapping of (a) the Ti disc and (b) the lapped Ti disc specimen.

2.4. Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis) Results

The calibration concentrations against absorbance were highly correlated for the Chlorhexidine diacetate (CHXD) and CHX digluconate standards (r2 = 1 and 0.99). Figure 5a,b demonstrates the cumulative CHXD release for the Ti disc Grps. 1–4 and Leonard Button Grps. 5–7. A rapid release of the CHXD is illustrated across all groups within the first 10 min, then an increase in CHXD release was observed after 24 h for the single coated CHX-CaCl2 (Grps. 1–3 and 5–6). Figure 5 shows a sustained release of CHXD up to 14 days (>2.5 ppm) for the double-CHX-CaCl2-coated Ti discs (Grp. 2) and up to 6 days (>2.5 ppm) for single CHX-CaCl2-coated Ti discs (Grp. 1). Single CHX-CaCl2 coating of LB resulted in a sustained CHXD release of 3 days and increased to 6 days for double coating (>2.5 ppm). However, the commercial mouthwash (Grps. 3 and 7) coated Ti discs and LB indicated a CHX release of 20 min (>2.5 ppm).

2.5. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Results

The CHX-CaCl2 crystals displayed unique peaks synonymous with the patented form [18]. The XRD data indicate the 2-theta peaks in Figure 6.

2.6. Zone of Inhibition (ZOI) Results

The CHXD standard concentrations (ppm) were correlated with the mean diameter (mm) of the zone of inhibition for S. mutans (r2 = 0.98) and P. gingivalis (r2 = 0.97). ZOI results are shown in Figure 7a,b for Ti discs and Figure 7c,d for LB. For the S. mutans and P. gingivalis groups, ZOI was observed at all time points (1 h, 24 h, 48 h and 144 h) for the CHX-CaCl2 coated groups, whereas no ZOI was observed for the commercial mouthwash groups (Grps. 4 and 7; Figure 7). The ZOI for single and double CHX-CaCl2 coated Ti discs and LB were significantly different (p < 0.05) within groups for both pathogens tested (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

The proximity of arch bars and Leonard Buttons to the surgical incision site, coupled with biofilm, causing infection requires the need for strategic reduction in plaque biofilm volume. This could be achieved by utilising the novel CHX-CaCl2 coating technique described.
The Leonard Button and Ti discs’ elemental compositions were consistent with the literature [19,20] for metals used in maxillofacial surgery (>99% Titanium, Table 1). To standardise our novel CHX-CaCl2 coating procedure, the Ti discs and Leonard Buttons were coated with ethanol to enhance surface reactivity [21]. Both Ti discs and the LBs were successfully coated using surface crystallisation of CHX-CaCl2 crystals. Upon synthesis of the CHX-CaCl2 crystals, a rapid coprecipitation reaction occurred, forming a white precipitate with remarkable substantivity on Ti discs and LB (Figure 5). This reaction was due to the coordinating ability of the bisguanide group with calcium ions and with chlorine ions associated with the rate of formation [17]. Previous synthesis of CHXD with strontium chloride or zinc chloride demonstrated the aforementioned coordination ability, yielding antimicrobial crystals of dendritic nature with reduced cytotoxicity [22].
The CHX-CaCl2 crystals formed copiously on the Ti disc and Leonard Button surfaces, with various crystal sizes and evidence of particle coalescence (Figure 2b,c). An Ostwald ripening process may be responsible as larger CHX-CaCl2 crystals appear to grow at the expense of the smaller crystals through reducing the total free energy or by defect-related phenomena [23,24]. Luo et al. [13] reacted CHXD with CaCl2, together with differing amounts of gold nanorods, where crystal size and crystal number were correlated with gold nanorod addition, indicating a surface-crystallisation mechanism. The lapping of Ti discs in this study altered the surface-flaw size (Table 2), reducing visible surface crystallisation (Figure 2g–i) and drug release from 6 to 3 days (Figure 5). Fewer sites were, therefore, available for nucleation and crystal growth after lapping, supporting a surface crystallisation mechanism. Fine crystallites (5 µm) were growing in association with flaws on the lapped Ti surface (Figure 2g–i), which may also not have contributed to a long-lasting drug-release effect. Page and Sear [25] indicated the importance of grooving on the surface to control crystal growth when evaluating using computer simulations. The differing geometries and surfaces of wires and Leonard Buttons will, therefore, affect CHX-CaCl2 crystallisation and the effective wetting of the substrates. The rapid surface crystallization (<3 s) at the metal interface suggests good wetting, as it appeared crystallites grew by the extension of dendrites on the titanium surface (Figure 3d–f), ensuring rapid growth at the MMF site for effective and sustained drug release (Figure 5b). The importance of hydrophilicity of a surface is significant within the interaction between a solid state and the liquid state. Suematsu et al. [26] suggested that the rapid growth rate of dendritic NaCl crystals was due to growing on hydrophilic rather than hydrophobic surfaces.
Double coating of the Ti discs and Leonard Buttons using the novel CHX-CaCl2 mouthwash resulted in a doubling of the sustained CHXD drug release (Figure 5). There were changes to some of the crystal morphology for the layered crystallites, which had a partially formed wheat-sheaf appearance. This illustrated a more primary crystal growth from a central nucleus (Figure 2f). This may be due to the presence of residual reactants and their effects on the stoichiometry of secondary reactants. In particular, this simple multiple application of the novel rinse affords a double crystal-layer application on the Leonard Buttons, which is useful for maintenance or oral hygiene. Currently, a CHX digluconate mouthwash (0.2% CHX) is recommended as a postoperative mouthwash for craniomaxillofacial patients, which lacks substantivity and was antibacterially ineffective in the ZOI experiments and below minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) after 20 min (Figure 7). The ZOI studies revealed that at time points associated with wound healing [27], the CHX-CaCl2 coated groups were effective against both aerobic and anaerobic pathogens (Figure 7a–d). This may significantly contribute to bacterial inhibition at orthopedic bars, plates and MMF sites. The addition of CHX-CaCl2 coatings on surgical fixatures and teeth following surgical procedures may, therefore, help in reducing infections and maintaining oral hygiene.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy

A titanium (Ti) sheet (1.2 mm depth, T60, Grade 4 Ti, Titanium services, Vourles, France) was laser cut (Lasercut Works Ltd., London, UK) into discs (8 mm diameter) to mimic the size of a Leonard Button (LB). The elemental composition of the Ti disc and Leonard Button (Lot 260785572, Synergy Health, Stryker, UK) was analysed using Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) (Oxford Instruments, High Wycombe, UK) in a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV, spot size 3.0, and with a 10 mm working distance. INCA ver.4.09 software (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK) was used for EDS analysis.

4.2. Surface Coating of CHX-CaCl2 Particles

Twelve Ti discs were soaked in ethanol for 5 min in an ultrasonic bath and then dried in a 37 °C incubator (Benchmark Scientific Inc., Sayreville, NJ, USA) for 20 min. The Ti discs (Grp. 1, n = 3) were placed in a custom petri dish and coated using 1 mL (15 mg/mL) of CHXD (C6143, Lot WXBC6938V, Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) and left for 1 min. The amount of 1 mL of CaCl2 (0.33 M, C8106, Lot SLCD1523, Sigma-Aldrich) was then added using a Pasteur pipette and left for 1 min (23 °C), allowing the precipitation of CHX-CaCl2 crystals. Grp. 2 Ti discs (n = 3) were double coated by repeating this crystallisation process.
To assess the effect of the surface roughness, Ti discs (n = 3) were lapped manually using P240 silicon carbide paper (WS Flex 18C Hermes, Hamburg, Germany) for 2 min (Grp. 3). The lapped Ti discs were then single coated using the previous method. As a commercial comparison, (Grp. 4) Ti discs (n = 3) were coated with 2 mL of a commercial mouthwash (Corsodyl, 0.2%, CHX digluconate, Batch No 8480230, PL 44673/0059, Omega Pharma Manufacturing GmbH & Co, KG, Herrenberg, Germany) and left for 1 min according to the mouthwash protocol [28]. The CHX-CaCl2-coating process was repeated for Leonard Buttons, where Grp. 5 was single coated, Grp. 6 double coated and Grp. 7 was coated with 2 mL of the commercial mouthwash (Corsodyl) according to the previous protocols.

4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The Ti discs and LB before and after CHX-CaCl2 coating were characterised using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, FEI Inspect-F, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Ti discs and LB were gold-coated using a sputter coater (SC7620, Emitech, Chelmsford, UK) for 40 s at 20 mA, then viewed using SEM in the secondary electron imaging mode, with an accelerating voltage of 10 KV, spot size 3 and a working distance of 10 mm.

4.4. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

Coated Ti discs (Grp. 1–4) and LB (Grp. 5–7) specimens from Section 4.2. were transferred to universal tubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Swindon, UK, Lot M355760) containing 1 ml of artificial saliva (AS, pH 7) at 37 °C prepared according to Ten Cate et al. [29]. Ti discs and LB (Grp. 1–7) were relocated to tubes of fresh AS media at time intervals according to Table 3. Collected aliquots were analysed using UV-Visible Spectroscopy (UV-Vis) (Lambda 265, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) to measure the chlorhexidine release at 254 nm. A calibration curve was obtained by measuring CHXD and CHX-Digluconate standards (0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 ppm) and plotted as absorbance versus concentration.

4.5. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

For X-ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis, the precipitated CHX-CaCl2 particles (Section 4.2) were reacted in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes (n = 6), then centrifuged twice for 1 min at 90 rpm (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was removed and replaced with deionised water and recentrifuged. The CHX-CaCl2 particles were then freeze-dried at −100 °C, at 0.009 mBar for 1 day (ScanVac CoolSafe Freeze Drying, Allerød, Denmark). The CHX-CaCl2 particles were analysed using an X’Pert Pro powder diffractometer (Panalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands). The reflective mode used power at a 45 kV tension unit and 40 mA as a current unit at a 6° angle, and the data were collected with an X’Celerator detector from 5° to 70° 2 Theta, with a step size of 0.005°.

4.6. Non-Contact Light Profilometry

Surface analysis of Ti discs (Grps. 1 and 2) was analysed using a non-contact 3D light profilometer (Proscan 2000, Scantron, Taunton, UK), where an S16/3.5 Chromatic sensor (Stil S.A., Aix-en-Provence, France) scanned at 100 Hz frequency with a 3.5 mm measuring range and a 75 nm axial resolution. The digitisation, image analysis and the mean area surface roughness (Ra) were analysed using the dedicated software (Proscan 2000, ver.2.1.8.8+ software, Proform ver.1.41 software, Scantron Industrial Products Ltd., Taunton, UK). To ensure maximum sensitivity of light was achieved for calibration purposes, a dark background measurement was carried out prior to scanning. The Ti disc and lapped Ti disc’s scanned surface was limited to 4 × 4 mm, at step size of 5 µm. The surface mapping was retrieved from the scanned sample and mean x and y measurements automated via the Proform ver.1.41 software through 801-line counts in x and y.

4.7. Preparation of Pathogens

S. mutans (NCTC 10449) strains were cultured on Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA) (Lot 2426701, Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) on agar plates placed in 37 °C aerobic incubation for 2 days. The 2-day colonies were inoculated in 10 mL Tryptone soya broth (TSB) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and placed for 24 h incubation. The P. gingivalis strain (W50) was cultured on Blood Agar (BA) base No. 2 (lot 2359559, CM0271 Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) agar plates that were supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood in an anaerobic incubator (Don Whitley, UK) at 37 °C for 3 days. The 3–5 days colonies were inoculated in 10 mL Brain Heart Infusion (BHI). The broth was supplemented with equal-volume amounts of 100 µL of Vitamin K and hemin, then incubated overnight.

4.8. Kirby–Bauer Test (Zone of Inhibition)

The optical density of pathogens in Section 4.7 was achieved by diluting the culture broth to 0.1 in a Bio Photometer at 600 nm (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). The bacterial suspension was then used for calculating Colony forming unit (Cfu), where broth inoculum was standardised at 6.36 × 106 Cfu per mL. 100 μL bacterial suspension was spread onto TSA plates for S. mutans strains; BA plates for P. gingivalis, and holes were made using a sterilised cork borer (0.9 cm diameter). The CHXD and CHX digluconate dilution standards of 100 μL were pipetted into the holes, then incubated overnight at 37 °C. The diameter (mm) of the zone was measured across the formed zone using a ruler at 24 h to measure the inhibition of bacterial growth. A standard curve of concentration (ppm) versus the distance of the zone was used to calculate the zone of inhibition. This process was repeated with samples obtained from the drug-release time points (1 h, 24 h, 48 h and 144 h) for coated Ti discs (Grps. 1, 2 and 4) and Leonard Buttons (Grps. 5–7), with AS used as a control. Significant differences within groups (p < 0.05) were measured using a one-way ANOVA (Tukey test; Sigma plot ver.12.5, Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

There is increasing evidence that periodontal disease is heavily implicated in the progression of surgical site infection in intraoral incisions used in osteosynthesis of the mandible. The proximity of the dental fixatures to the surgical incision and the dependent position of the incision could potentially promote colonization of the wound from bacteria previously coating the fixation material. This work illustrates for the first time the rapid and successful coating of Leonard Buttons and Ti discs using a CHX-CaCl2 mouth rinse and its responsive surface crystallisation. The ability to control and sustain CHXD release from this novel coating, and its antibacterial effectiveness, makes this an ideal adjunct following surgical procedures to maintain oral hygiene and prevent infections. The previous encouraging laboratory results will be further tested in a prospective trial to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of this new technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, H.F.A. and M.J.C.; methodology, H.F.A. and M.J.C.; validation, H.F.A., D.G., G.S. and M.J.C.; formal analysis, H.F.A., D.G. and M.J.C.; investigation, H.F.A.; resources, H.F.A., D.C., D.G., S.H., G.S. and M.J.C.; data curation, H.F.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.F.A.; writing—review and editing, H.F.A., D.C., S.H., G.S. and M.J.C.; visualisation, H.F.A., S.H. and M.J.C.; supervision, D.G., G.S. and M.J.C.; project administration, H.F.A., D.G., G.S. and M.J.C.; funding acquisition, H.F.A. and M.J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the State of Kuwait for providing sponsorship for this research in their PhD, and Queen Mary University of London. The author would also like to thank Richard Whiteley for his assistance in XRD analysis, Abish Stephen for microbiology training, and Eleni Trikoili and Rui Sun for their valuable contribution to the preliminary developmental work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of this study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Davies, R.; Hammond, D.; Ridout, F.; Hutchison, I.; Magennis, P. British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons’ National Facial Injury Surveys: Hard tissue facial injuries presenting to UK emergency departments. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 58, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hutchison, I.; Magennis, P.; Shepherd, J.; Brown, A. The BAOMS United Kingdom survey of facial injuries part 1: Aetiology and the association with alcohol consumption. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1998, 36, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Oksa, M.; Haapanen, A.; Marttila, E.; Snall, J. Simple dentate area fractures of the mandible—Can we prevent postoperative infections? Acta. Odontol. Scand. 2022, 80, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmed, A.; Wu, E.; Sarai, R.; Williams, R.; Breeze, J. Potentially modifiable patient factors in mandible fracture complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021, 60, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Janaphan, K.; Hashem, I.; Smith, C.; Holmes, S.; Chatzopoulou, D. Periodontal disease as a primary cause of surgical site infection in fractures of the mandible: Is smoking a confounding variable? Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2022, 60, 1424–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hanson, J.; Lovald, S.; Cowgill, I.; Erdman, M.; Diamond, B. National hardware removal rate associated with internal fixation of facial fractures. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2011, 69, 1152–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abdelfadil, E.; Salem, A.S.; Mourad, S.I.; Al-Belasy, F.A. Infected mandibular fractures: Risk factors and management. Oral. Hyg. Health 2013, 102, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghazali, N.; Benlidayi, M.E.; Abizadeh, N.; Bentley, R.P. Leonard buttons: A Reliable method of intraoperative intermaxillary fixation in bilateral mandibular fractures. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 70, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leonard, T. The button wire as an aid to fixation. Br. J. Oral Surg. 1977, 14, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sahoo, N.K.; Mohan, R. IMF screw: An ideal intermaxillary fixation device during open reduction of mandibular fracture. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2010, 9, 170–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pedemonte, C.; Valenzuela, K.; González, L.E.; Vargas, I.; Noguera, A. Types of intermaxillary fixation and their interaction with palatine fracture reduction. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 77, 2083.e1–2083.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kosutic, D.; Uglesic, V.; Perkovic, D.; Persic, Z.; Solman, L.; Lupi-Ferandin, S.; Knezevic, P.; Sokler, K. Preoperative antiseptics in clean/contaminated maxillofacial and oral surgery: Prospective randomized study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009, 38, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. ADA. American Dental Association Interim Guidance for Minimizing Risk of COVID-19 Transmission. 2020. Available online: https://www.kavo.com/en-us/resource-center/ada-interim-guidance-minimizing-risk-covid-19-transmission (accessed on 8 August 2021).
  14. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Dental Settings during the COVID-19 Response. 2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/dental-settings.html (accessed on 11 August 2021).
  15. Wang, G.; Wang, L.; Meng, Z.; Su, X.; Jia, C.; Qiao, X.; Pan, S.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, M. Visual detection of COVID-19 from materials aspect. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 1304–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Luo, D.; Shahid, S.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Cattell, M.J. Synthesis of novel chlorhexidine spheres with controlled release from a UDMA–HEMA resin using ultrasound. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Luo, D.; Hasan, S.; Shahid, S.; Khlebtsov, B.N.; Cattell, M.J.; Sukhorukov, G.B. Gold nanorod mediated chlorhexidine microparticle formation and near-infrared light induced release. Langmuir 2017, 33, 7982–7993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cattell, M.; Sukhorukov, G.; Saroash, S.; Luo, D. Chlorhexidine Crystal Forms and Uses Thereof in Medicine. WO 2017/158379 Al, 21 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  19. Joseph, L.A.; Israel, O.K.; Edet, E.J.; Ekwumemgbo, P.A. Determination of metal ions released by stainless steel arch bar into bio-fluids. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2009, 23, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gilardino, M.S.; Chen, E.; Bartlett, S.P. Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstr. 2009, 2, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. León, C.P.; Sagisaka, K.; Fujita, D.; Han, L. Ethanol adsorption on rutile TiO2(110). RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 8550–8557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, R.; Zhang, J.; Whiley, R.A.; Sukhorukov, G.B.; Cattell, M.J. Synthesis, drug release, and antibacterial properties of novel dendritic CHX-SrCl2 and CHX-ZnCl2 particles. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ostwald, W. Studien über die bildung und umwandlung fester Körper. 1. Abhandlung: Übersättigung und Überkaltung. Z. Phys. Chem. 1987, 22, 289–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Q.; Peng, X.; Nie, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Shangguan, J.; Zhu, C.; Bustillo, K.C.; Ercius, P.; Wang, L.; Limmer, D.T.; et al. Defect-mediated ripening of core-shell nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Page, A.J.; Sear, R.P. Crystallization controlled by the geometry of a surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 17550–17551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Suematsu, N.J.; Iwamoto, J.; Ishii, Y.; Yamamoto, A. Dendrite pattern formation of sodium chloride crystal. Materials 2021, 14, 4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lorenz, H.P.; Longaker, M.T. Wounds: Biology, pathology, and management. In Essential Practice of Surgery; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. NICE. Chlorhexidine Drug, BNF Content Published by NICE. Bnf.nice.org.uk. 2019. Available online: https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drug/chlorhexidine.html#indicationsAndDoses (accessed on 20 February 2021).
  29. Cate, J.T.; Exterkate, R.; Buijs, M. The relative efficacy of fluoride toothpastes assessed with pH cycling. Caries Res. 2006, 40, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. EDS spectra of (a) Ti disc; (b) Leonard Button.
Figure 1. EDS spectra of (a) Ti disc; (b) Leonard Button.
Ijms 24 09801 g001
Figure 2. SEM photomicrographs of a copious coating of CHX-CaCl2 crystals on single coated Ti disc (ac); double-coated Ti disc (df); lapped Ti disc (gi) and Ti disc coated with Corsodyl (jl).
Figure 2. SEM photomicrographs of a copious coating of CHX-CaCl2 crystals on single coated Ti disc (ac); double-coated Ti disc (df); lapped Ti disc (gi) and Ti disc coated with Corsodyl (jl).
Ijms 24 09801 g002
Figure 3. SEM photomicrographs of LB uncoated (a,b) and single coated with CHX-CaCl2 particles (cf).
Figure 3. SEM photomicrographs of LB uncoated (a,b) and single coated with CHX-CaCl2 particles (cf).
Ijms 24 09801 g003
Figure 4. Light profilometry results displaying the grid and primary mapping of (a) Ti disc and (b) Lapped Ti disc.
Figure 4. Light profilometry results displaying the grid and primary mapping of (a) Ti disc and (b) Lapped Ti disc.
Ijms 24 09801 g004
Figure 5. Mean cumulative CHXD drug release of: (a) of Ti disc (Grps. 1–4); (b) LB (Grps. 5–7). Plot values represent n = 3 readings at each time point.
Figure 5. Mean cumulative CHXD drug release of: (a) of Ti disc (Grps. 1–4); (b) LB (Grps. 5–7). Plot values represent n = 3 readings at each time point.
Ijms 24 09801 g005
Figure 6. XRD plot of CHX-CaCl2.
Figure 6. XRD plot of CHX-CaCl2.
Ijms 24 09801 g006
Figure 7. ZOI results for P. gingivalis strains on (a) coated Ti discs; (c) coated LB and for S. mutans strains on (b) coated Ti discs; (d) coated LB. * indicates a significant difference within groups (p < 0.05). ** indicates a highly significant difference within groups (p < 0.001).
Figure 7. ZOI results for P. gingivalis strains on (a) coated Ti discs; (c) coated LB and for S. mutans strains on (b) coated Ti discs; (d) coated LB. * indicates a significant difference within groups (p < 0.05). ** indicates a highly significant difference within groups (p < 0.001).
Ijms 24 09801 g007
Table 1. Composition of Titanium disc and Leonard Button (atomic %).
Table 1. Composition of Titanium disc and Leonard Button (atomic %).
Mean (SD) of Elements (Atomic %)
SpectrumSiTiCrFeGa
Titanium disc 99.57
(0.38)
0.13
(0.11)
0.31
(0.27)
Leonard Button0.52
(0.20)
99.26
(0.34)
0.04
(0.08)
0.28
(0.11)
0.30
(0.08)
Table 2. Mean surface roughness (Ra) of specimens from Groups 1 and 3.
Table 2. Mean surface roughness (Ra) of specimens from Groups 1 and 3.
SamplesMean X
(µm)
Mean Y
(µm)
Average (µm)
Ti disc
(Group 1)
4.24.24.2
Lapped Ti disc
(Group 3)
3.33.33.3
Table 3. UV-Vis schedule for the release assay.
Table 3. UV-Vis schedule for the release assay.
WeekDayTime Interval (min/h)
1st Week1st Day (Monday)5 min~10:05 (10:00 am start)
10 min~10:10
20 min~10:20
40 min~10:40
60 min
(1 h)
~11:00
120 min
(2 h)
~12:00
180 min
(3 h)
~13:00
240 min
(4 h)
~14:00
300 min
(5 h)
~15:00
360 min
(6 h)
~16:00
420 min
(7 h)
~17:00
2nd Day (Tuesday)2 readings~10:00 and ~16:00
3rd Day (Wednesday)2 readings~10:00 and ~16:00
4th Day (Thursday)2 readings~10:00 and ~16:00
5th Day (Friday)2 readings~10:00 and ~16:00
6th Day (Saturday)1 reading~12:00
7th Day (Sunday)1 reading~12:00
2nd WeekMonday1 reading~12:00
Friday1 reading~12:00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alostath, H.F.; Chatzopoulou, D.; Holmes, S.; Gould, D.; Sukhorukov, G.; Cattell, M.J. Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial CHX-CaCl2 Coatings on Maxillofacial Fixatures for Infection Prevention. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129801

AMA Style

Alostath HF, Chatzopoulou D, Holmes S, Gould D, Sukhorukov G, Cattell MJ. Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial CHX-CaCl2 Coatings on Maxillofacial Fixatures for Infection Prevention. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(12):9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129801

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alostath, Hawraa F., Domniki Chatzopoulou, Simon Holmes, David Gould, Gleb Sukhorukov, and Michael J. Cattell. 2023. "Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial CHX-CaCl2 Coatings on Maxillofacial Fixatures for Infection Prevention" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 12: 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129801

APA Style

Alostath, H. F., Chatzopoulou, D., Holmes, S., Gould, D., Sukhorukov, G., & Cattell, M. J. (2023). Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial CHX-CaCl2 Coatings on Maxillofacial Fixatures for Infection Prevention. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(12), 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129801

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop