Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Evaluation of New Pyrazoles, Indazoles and Pyrazolines Prepared in Continuous Flow Mode
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Models to Study Immune Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Metformin May Alter the Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer Cells by Disrupting the L-Arginine Metabolism: A Preliminary Computational Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating Therapeutic Effects of Indole Derivatives Targeting Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Neurotoxin-Induced Cell and Mouse Models of Parkinson’s Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms24065318
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Osmotic Stress on the mRNA Expression of prl, prlr, gr, gh, and ghr in the Pituitary and Osmoregulatory Organs of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii

by
Ganesan Nagarajan
1,2,3,*,†,
Adimoolam Aruna
3,†,
Yu-Ming Chang
3,
Yousef Ahmed Alkhamis
4,5,
Roshmon Thomas Mathew
5 and
Ching-Fong Chang
2,3,*
1
Department of Basic Sciences, PYD, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
2
Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
3
Department of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
4
Animal and Fish Production Department, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Hofuf-420, Al-Asha 31982, Saudi Arabia
5
Fish Resources Research Center, King Faisal University, Hofuf-420, Al-Asha 31982, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(6), 5318; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065318
Submission received: 4 February 2023 / Revised: 5 March 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Unveiling the Impact of Metabolism on Neuroscience)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In euryhaline teleost black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii, the glucocorticoid receptor (gr), growth hormone receptor (ghr), prolactin (prl)-receptor (prlr), and sodium–potassium ATPase alpha subunit (α-nka) play essential physiological roles in the osmoregulatory organs, including the gill, kidney, and intestine, during osmotic stress. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of pituitary hormones and hormone receptors in the osmoregulatory organs during the transfer from freshwater (FW) to 4 ppt and seawater (SW) and vice versa in black porgy. Quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) was carried out to analyze the transcript levels during salinity and osmoregulatory stress. Increased salinity resulted in decreased transcripts of prl in the pituitary, α-nka and prlr in the gill, and α-nka and prlr in the kidney. Increased salinity caused the increased transcripts of gr in the gill and α-nka in the intestine. Decreased salinity resulted in increased pituitary prl, and increases in α-nka and prlr in the gill, and α-nka, prlr, and ghr in the kidney. Taken together, the present results highlight the involvement of prl, prlr, gh, and ghr in the osmoregulation and osmotic stress in the osmoregulatory organs (gill, intestine, and kidney). Pituitary prl, and gill and intestine prlr are consistently downregulated during the increased salinity stress and vice versa. It is suggested that prl plays a more significant role in osmoregulation than gh in the euryhaline black porgy. Furthermore, the present results highlighted that the gill gr transcript’s role was solely to balance the homeostasis in the black porgy during salinity stress.

1. Introduction

The end product of the hypothalamic–pituitary–interrenal (HPI) axis, “cortisol”, is a key endogenous glucocorticoid that has versatile function such as in respiration, osmoregulation, reproduction, immune responses, growth, and metabolism in teleosts [1]. It is well-known that during stress, cortisol forms a complex with the ligand-activated transcriptional factor, glucocorticoid receptor (gr), to bind specifically to the glucocorticoid response elements (GREs), which increases the transcription of target genes and takes a role in energy metabolism, inflammation, and neuromodulation [2,3,4]. In teleosts, there are two forms of gr genes (gr1 and gr2), and one mineralocorticoid receptor (mr) gene has been identified [5,6]. The trout gr1 had an additional nine amino acid residues (WRARQNTDG) in the DNA-binding domain [7]. An additional nine residues in gr1 confer a stronger binding affinity of the receptor to the GRE-responsive promoter, which corresponds with higher constitutive transcriptional activity [8]. In fish, cortisol stimulation and salinity stress both increase the amount of gr mRNA in different osmoregulatory tissues [9,10,11,12,13]. gr facilitates seawater (SW) acclimation by stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of ion-transporting chloride cells in the gill epithelium, as well as sodium–potassium ATPase (NKA) activity in osmoregulatory organs such as the gill, intestine, and kidney [14].
NKA, a universal membrane-bound enzyme, drives water and ion transport in various teleost osmoregulatory organs [15], mainly located in the mitochondria-rich cells of the gill filament [9,16]. Ion and water balance regulation is a critical physiological process for most fish. Freshwater (FW) fish face excessive hydration and ion loss through their gills and body surface. Fish can adapt to a hypotonic environment by increasing ion absorption and producing dilute urine [17]. When a euryhaline teleost makes the transition from hypoosmotic (FW) to hyperosmotic (SW) media, the fish tends to gain ions while losing water [15]. The gill nka mRNA plays an important role in acclimation during FW to SW transfer in teleosts, including rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss [18] and sea bream, Sparus aurata [19], and during SW to FW transfer in the black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii [20].
Growth hormone (gh), another traditional SW-adapting hormone in teleosts, promotes animal survival in SW environments by antagonizing the actions of prl [21,22]. In salmonids, the osmoregulatory actions of gh are well established, particularly in terms of promoting SW tolerance [23]. Hormones of the gh/prl family must interact with transmembrane receptors such as ghr/prlr that initiate the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in order to affect target tissues during salinity/osmoregulatory stress [24]. The receptors of gh/prl/cortisol have been found in tilapia gills and kidneys using a variety of methods, including hormone binding studies [25,26], molecular cloning [27], immunolocalization [28], and in situ hybridization [9].
prl has been shown to regulate a variety of functions in teleost fishes, including reproduction, immunomodulation, pigmentation, and seasonal acclimatization [29,30]. Due to its significance, prl is generally perceived as a “freshwater adapting hormone”, required for maintaining hydromineral balance in several teleosts that live in FW [31,32,33,34]. In addition, prl release also increases in response to physiologically relevant reductions in extracellular osmolality [35]. prl regulates the hydromineral balance in euryhaline fish by acting on the gill, kidney, and intestine via prlr [36,37] to promote ion uptake and water-extruding processes [23,31,38]. prlr transcripts were most abundant in the kidney, fewer in the gill, intestine, brain, and spleen, and at very low levels in the pituitary and other tissues studied in turbot, Scophthalmus maximus [39]. prlr transcripts have been found to be expressed in the gills of tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus and rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss [40], goldfish, Carassius auratus [41], Japanese flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus [42], sea bream, S. aurata [43,44], pufferfish, Takifugu rubripes [45], tilapia, O. mossambicus [46,47], and zebrafish, Danio rerio [48].
Since black porgy, A. schlegelii, is an euryhaline teleost that migrates from near-shore shallow areas to coastal waters near land or in estuaries during its larval to the juvenile stage [49], osmoregulation is an important way for it to maintain a stable internal environment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in gh/prl hormone gene expression in the pituitary gland, as well as their ghr/prlr/gr (isoform-1) receptors in the gill, kidney, and intestine, as well as serum osmolality and chloride concentrations when the black porgy were transferred from SW to 4 ppt and FW and vice versa at different salinity levels.

2. Results

2.1. Serum Osmolality and Chloride Concentrations

Both serum osmolality and chloride concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) increased when the fish were transferred from FW to SW on day 8 (Figure 1a, b). On the other hand, during the transfer of fish from SW to 4 ppt and SW to FW, both serum osmolality and chloride concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced on day 4 and day 8 as compared to the SW group (Figure 1c,d). There was no significant difference in serum osmolality and chloride concentrations during the transfer from FW to 4 ppt on day 4 (Figure 1a,b).

2.2. The Expression of prl and gh Transcripts in the Pituitary

The quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) analysis showed that the prl mRNA expressions were significantly reduced when the fish were transferred from FW to 4 ppt and SW on day 4 (0.5-fold, p < 0.05) and day 8 (2.8-fold, p < 0.05), respectively (Figure 2a). On the other hand, the prl transcripts were notably increased when the transfer was from SW to 4 ppt on day 4 (1.8-fold, p < 0.05) and from SW to FW on day 8 (3.1-fold, p < 0.05) (Figure 2c). Exposure to SW increased gh mRNA in the pituitary on day 8 at 34 ppt (1.3-fold, p < 0.05) in black porgy (Figure 2b). There was no significant difference in gh mRNA expression in the pituitary during the transfer from FW to 4 ppt on day 4 (Figure 2b) and from SW to 4 ppt on day 4 and FW on day 8 (Figure 2d).

2.3. The Expression of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr Transcripts in the Gill

The α-nka (0.32-fold in 4 ppt, p < 0.05; 0.41-fold in SW, p < 0.05) and prlr (0.75-fold in 4 ppt, p < 0.05 and 0.52-fold in SW, p < 0.05) transcripts were similarly decreased during the transfer from FW to 4 ppt on day 4 and SW on day 8 (Figure 3a,b). Interestingly, the SW acclimation significantly raised the GR transcripts (1.44-fold in SW, p < 0.05) on day 8 (Figure 3c), but no difference was found during the transfer from FW to 4 ppt on day 4 (Figure 3c). Similarly, the ghr transcripts were unaffected by increasing the salinity on day 4 and day 8 (Figure 3d). On the other hand, gill prlr transcripts were increased during the transfer from SW to 4 ppt on day 4 (1.44-fold in 4 ppt, p < 0.05) and from SW to FW on day 8 (1.70-fold in FW, p < 0.05) (Figure 3f). α-nkamRNA was increased in fish gills from SW to FW on day 8 (2.11-fold in FW, p < 0.05) but did not increase in fish from SW to 4 ppt on day 4 (Figure 3e). mRNA expression of gr and ghr in the gill was not changed by the osmoregulatory stress from SW to 4 ppt on day 4 (Figure 3g,h) and FW on day 8 (Figure 3g,h).

2.4. The Expression of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the Intestine

The α-nka transcripts increased significantly during SW transfer on day 8 (1.3-fold in SW, p < 0.05) in the intestine compared to FW (Figure 4a). No significant changes in the expression levels were detected in the intestine on day 4 during the transfer from FW to 4 ppt (Figure 4a). Similarly, during the transfer from FW to 4 ppt and SW, there was no significant difference in the expression of prlr, gr, and ghr mRNA (Figure 4b–d). The ghr transcripts were increased in the intestine during the transfer from SW to 4 ppt (Figure 4h) on day 4 (1.44-fold in 4 ppt, p < 0.05), whereas on day 8, there was no difference in SW to FW transfer (Figure 4h). In the black porgy intestine, α-nka, prlr, and gr transcripts on day 4 and day 8 were not affected by the osmotic stress from SW to 4 ppt and FW (Figure 4e–g).

2.5. The Expression of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the Kidney

During the transfer from FW to SW, the α-nka (0.81-fold in SW, p < 0.05) and prlr (0.62-fold in SW, p < 0.05) transcripts were significantly decreased in the kidney on day 8 (Figure 5a,b). On the other hand, the α-nka (1.3-fold in FW, p < 0.05), prlr (2.2-fold in FW, p < 0.05), and ghr (1.66-fold in FW, p < 0.05) transcripts were elevated during the transfer of fish from SW to FW on day 8 (Figure 5e,f,h). When the black porgy were transferred from FW to 4 ppt and SW, the gr and ghr mRNA showed no significant difference in the kidney (Figure 5c,d), and during the transfer from SW to 4 ppt and FW, fish did not show a significant difference in gr mRNA levels in the kidney on day 4 and day 8 (Figure 5g).

3. Discussion

The current study was carried out to investigate the expression pattern of hormones such as prl, gh, prlr, ghr, gr, and α-nka that are responsible for salinity and osmoregulatory stress in a euryhaline teleost, black porgy, during the transition from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and from SW to 4 ppt and FW acclimation at different time intervals. On day 4 and day 8, when the fish were transferred from SW to 4ppt and FW, their serum osmolality and chloride concentrations were significantly lower. On the other hand, these osmolality and chloride concentrations increased significantly on day 8, after transferring fish from 4 ppt to SW. When compared to FW-maintained fish, SW acclimation significantly increased serum osmolality and chloride levels in black porgy. As in other teleosts, serum chloride concentrations and osmolality decreased following transfer to FW [50,51,52]. During salinity changes, euryhaline teleosts face significant osmotic challenges. The endocrine system mediates osmoregulatory responses to salinity changes in the environment, which further initiates osmoregulatory tissues to modulate ion transport. Nevertheless, the gill is regarded as the primary site of total current sodium and chloride transport, which is controlled and mediated by chloride cell activity [53].
The expression of gh transcripts in osmoregulation varies among species [23]. The unaffected pituitary gh mRNA levels in SW and FW were reported in the euryhaline Mozambique tilapia [53,54,55], sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax [56], and olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus [17]. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the mRNA expression of gh in the pituitary and ghr in the gill during FW to 4 ppt and SW to 4 ppt and FW transfer of black porgy at any time point in this study. However, the long-time exposure to the high salinity significantly increased the gh mRNA in the pituitary on day 8 during the transfer of black porgy from 0 ppt to 34 ppt. The lack of change in the gh levels in black porgy does not rule out a possible role in osmoregulation in this species. On day 4, kidney ghr mRNA expression was also not changed in the response to salinity and osmoregulatory stress. Long-term exposure of SW to FW resulted in the changes in ghr transcripts in the kidney of the black porgy on day 8. The FW transfer induced the increases in ghr gene expression in the black porgy kidney on day 8. Continuous ghr mRNA expression in the kidney from 6 h after transfer to the end of the experiment indicated the possibility of a centralized gh/Igf axis action, as previously described in salmon [57].
Previous research in teleosts indicates that the pituitary hormone prl regulates salt and water homeostasis by influencing ion retention and water uptake via peripheral osmoregulatory organs [39]. Consistently, the present study revealed that prl mRNA transcripts increased from SW to 4 ppt and FW transfer on day 4 and day 8, and decreased significantly from FW to 0 ppt and SW transfer on day 4 and day 8 in the pituitary. The pituitary prl contributes to the fish systemic response to salinity changes [58]. prl regulates ion-conserving and water-secreting processes in osmoregulatory tissues such as the gills, kidney, intestine, and urinary bladder to mediate FW acclimation [48]. prl gene expression rises in response to the decreases in environmental salinity [59,60]; in some cases, these rises are triggered by direct extracellular osmolality [61]. A decrease in prl mRNA levels was shown in black chin tilapia beginning on the first post-experimental day after SW exposure and lasting throughout the SW period, which was restored in FW to baseline control levels [62]. This is consistent with the observation made in isolated prl cells that fish salinity acclimation history influences osmotic responsiveness [63,64,65,66,67]. Based on the wide range of tissues known to respond to prl across teleosts, it is widely assumed that prl is a conserved regulator of physiological responses to low-salinity environments [23].
As with the prl transcripts in the pituitary, a similar pattern of prlr mRNA expressions was observed in the gill when the black porgy transferred from SW to 4 ppt and FW, and from FW to 4 ppt and SW. The increased mRNA expression of prl in the pituitary and prlr in the gill of FW black porgy suggests that prl and prlr may have a potential function in FW adaptation. At 12 and 24 h, gill prlr mRNA levels were lower in SW-transferred fish compared to FW controls. Despite previous research showing that prlr gene expression is reduced in long-term SW-acclimated tilapia [46], this study concludes that rapid down-regulation of prlr occurs with SW acclimation [53]. It should also be stated that other factors, such as extracellular osmolality, may play a role in the regulation of prlr expression in teleost gills [53]. The concurrent changes in pituitary prl and gill prlr mRNA levels observed during the transfer of fish from SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4 and 8 in this study support a role for prl in promoting FW acclimation in black porgy.
In the present study, increased prlr and α-nka transcripts in the gill were associated with the transfer of fish from high salinity to low salinity. The expression of α-nka mRNA in the intestine increased when the fish were transferred from FW to SW on day 8. When the black porgy were transferred from SW to FW, the transcripts of prlr, α-nka, and ghr were significantly increased in the kidney. Branchial α-nka mRNA has been reported to be higher in FW in black porgy [68], which is consistent with the current study’s findings that NKA levels increased on day 8 in FW compared to SW. The expression of the α-nka gene in the intestine of the euryhaline black porgy increases during the transition from FW to SW on day 8, demonstrating the importance of this enzyme in successful marine osmoregulation [69]. Euryhaline fishes can maintain a narrow range of internal osmolality in response to a wide range of environmental salinities. Fish acclimated to FW experience hypoosmotic conditions with osmotic water gain and diffusive ion loss, whereas fish accustomed to SW experience dehydration. Teleost fishes have evolved complex physiological functions at the level of osmoregulatory organs such as the gill, kidney, and intestine, which are primarily governed by the endocrine system, to deal with such challenges [33,70,71].
The SW adaptation increased gill gr expression within 24 h and maintained it for up to 4 days in SW, indicating the importance of osmoregulation in a hyperosmotic environment [9]. In the gill of rainbow trout, the gr mRNA expression was significantly increased during acute netting stress [72] and SW acclimation [72,73]. On the other hand, the gr mRNA expressions of black porgy were unaffected by salinity and osmoregulatory stress on day 4 at 4 ppt. When the fish were transferred from FW to SW, the gr transcripts in the gills were significantly increased on day 8, implying that the gr transcript played a significant role in black porgy to cope with the homeostasis during SW acclimation. The intestine of fish, as with the gills, is an important osmoregulatory organ. Cortisol is a key regulator of fish osmoregulation, promoting intestinal ion and water absorption [74,75,76], and the SW adaptation of euryhaline teleosts, with a significant increase in gr mRNA in the intestine [77,78]. gr transcripts were significantly increased in the intestine and kidney of the SW fish on day 1 in tilapia [9], whereas neither kidney nor intestinal gene mRNA expression of gr changed during the course of salinity and osmoregulatory stress on day 4 and day 8. The data revealed the differences in the regulation and expression of the gr among organs such as the kidney, gill, and intestine that have different functions [6,79,80].
Comparative approaches of the present study concluded that the transfer of black porgy from SW to 4 ppt and FW, and from FW to 4 ppt and SW acclimation showed the opposite expression in the prl in the pituitary and prlr in the gill of black porgy. α-nka transcripts were increased in the fish gill acclimated to FW as compared to SW. The current study findings showed that the gill gr transcript was solely employed to reconcile homeostasis in the black porgy under salinity stress. Overall, during the transfer of black porgy from FW to 4 ppt and SW to 4 ppt, neither the kidney nor intestinal gene mRNA expression of prlr, α-nka, gr, and ghr changed during the course of the transfer from FW to 4 ppt and from SW to 4 ppt on day 4. Long-term salinity and osmoregulatory stress exposure, i.e., day 8, only affects the above transcripts in the black porgy intestine and kidney. The delayed increase in prlr, gr, α-nka, and ghr might be caused by the initiation of the endocrine process depending on the environmental salinity as well as the exposure time intervals among the various osmoregulatory organs of the black porgy.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Fish

Black porgy (2-year-old, n = 90; body weight = 375.70 ± 13.65 g, body length = 27.90 ± 0.30 cm) were cultured in SW and natural light system at a university aquarium (water temperature ranged from 19 to 24 °C). Fish were given pelleted dry food ad libitum at 1% (w/v) of their estimated body weight per day. The fish were anesthetized with 1% (v/v) glycophenol monophenyl ether and decapitated for each experiment. Pituitary, gill, kidney, and intestine samples were collected and stored in liquid nitrogen at −80 °C. The current experiments were carried out in accordance with the principles and procedures established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at National Taiwan Ocean University in Taiwan.

4.2. Experiment of Osmotic Transfer

In this study, two salinity experiments were carried out. Fish (n = 9 per group) were kept at 33 ppt for the experiment. The fish were randomly divided into two groups and kept in either SW or FW. After a 30-day acclimation period, the water salinity of fish (n = 9 per group) kept in FW was gradually changed to 4 ppt within 4 days (treated group; 4 day group, n = 9) and then from 4 ppt to 34 ppt SW) within another 4 days (treated group; 8 day group, n = 9). Similarly, fish kept in SW (n = 9 per group) were gradually changed to 4 ppt within 4 days (treated group; 4 day group, n = 9) and then from 4 ppt to FW within another 4 days (treated group; 8 day group, n = 9). Respective control groups (n = 9 per group) received the transfer but no salinity changes. The fish were sampled four and eight days after salinity transfer. Every day, the salinity of the water was checked and corrected as needed. The fish were anesthetized in 2-phenoxyethanol (0.4 mL/L) at the end of the experiment, and blood was collected from caudal vessels with a syringe in less than 5 min. The fish were then decapitated, and samples of the gills, intestine, kidney, and pituitary gland were taken, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction. Serum was obtained by centrifugation at 1000× g for 5 min at 4 °C and stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

4.3. RNA Extraction, the First-Strand cDNA Synthesis, and Cloning

TRIzol® reagent (Gibco BRL; Grand Island, NY, USA) was used to isolate RNA from the pituitary, gill, intestine, and kidney, which was then reverse transcribed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The resulting cDNA was used as a template for subsequent PCR amplification of the genes used in this study.
The prl (accession number EU 165342), prlr (EF 467927), α-nka (EF 621407), ghr (AF 502071), and gr (AY 921612) genes were cloned from the black porgy gill cDNA. Multiple alignments of previously published sequences of the respective genes were constructed using the CLUSTAL X program (Modified version 1.81, 10-06-2010) to identify the conserved region; primers were then designed based on this information (Table 1). PCR reactions were performed with 2.5 µL of 10X reaction buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 500 mM KCl), 1 μL of 10 mM dNTP, 1 µL of 2 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 μL each of 10 µM sense and antisense primers, 1 μL cDNA and 0.2 μL superscript enzyme (Invitrogen; Calsbad, CA, USA) in a final volume of 25 µL. The PCR conditions were set as follows: 94 °C for 5 min, 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s for 35 cycles, and 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were validated using 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining, and DNA fragments were excised using a Gel-M TM Gel Extraction system Kit (Bio 101) (VIOGENE; La Jolla, CA, USA) and cloned into pGEM® -T Easy vector (Promega; Madison, WI, USA). The insert was sequenced on a plasmid using a dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Perkin Elmer; Foster City, CA, USA) and submitted to BLAST for comparison to known sequences in the NCBI database.

4.4. Quantification of α-nka, prl, prlr, gr, and ghr by Q-PCR Analysis

Using the iQTM Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad Co., Hercules, CA, USA), Q-PCR was used to examine the gene expression of α-nka, prl, prlr, ghr, and gr in the pituitary, gill, kidney, and intestine during FW and SW acclimation. Primer expression software (Version 3.0, 30-06-2008, Applied Biosystem; Foster City, CA, USA) was used to design the primers (Table 1). According to our previous study, gene quantification of standards, samples, and controls was performed simultaneously in a Q-PCR machine (iQTM Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System; Bio-Rad Co.) using iQTM SYBR green (Bio-Rad Co.) as a dsDNA minor-groove binding agent, forward and reverse primers, and water [81]. The slope of the relationship between log input cDNA (transcript concentrations) vs. Ct was used to calculate PCR efficiency. The relative expression levels of α-nka, prl, prlr, ghr, and gr in the pituitary, gill, intestine, and kidney were calculated. The control data of the SW or FW group on day 4 were calculated as 1 and then calibrated with other data in the same experiment. The standard curve correlation was −0.999.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means standard deviation of the mean (mean ± SEM). The Student t-test was also used to determine whether there were significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group, which are denoted by asterisks (*).

Author Contributions

Conceived ideas and designed experiments: G.N., A.A. and C.-F.C.; performed animal experiment, collected samples, RNA isolation, cDNA cloning, and q-PCR data analysis: G.N., A.A. and Y.-M.C.; provided intellectual input for the paper: A.A., G.N., Y.A.A., R.T.M. and C.-F.C.; wrote manuscript: G.N., A.A. and C.-F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number INST082.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures and investigations were approved by the College of Life Science of the National Taiwan Ocean University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were performed in accordance with standard guiding principles (no. 89-91: 98038).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within this article. Raw data are available upon request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aruna, A.; Nagarajan, G.; Chang, C.F. Involvement of corticotrophin releasing hormone and corticosteroid receptor in the brain-pituitary-gill of tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) during the course of seawater acclimation. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2012, 24, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rose, A.J.; Vegiopoulos, A.; Herzig, S. Role of glucocorticoids and the glucocorticoid receptor in metabolism: Insights from genetic manipulations. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 122, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Garabedian, M.J.; Harris, C.A.; Jeanneteau, F. Glucocorticoid receptor action in metabolic and neuronal function. F1000Research 2017, 6, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lapp, H.E.; Bartlett, A.A.; Hunter, R. Stress and glucocorticoid receptor regulation of mitochondrial gene expression. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2019, 62, R121–R128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Greenwood, A.K.; Butler, P.C.; White, R.B.; DeMarco, U.; Pearce, D.; Fernald, R.D. Multiple corticosteroid receptors in a teleost fish: Distinct sequences, expression patterns, and transcriptional activities. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 4226–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bury, N.R.; Sturm, A.; Le Rouzic, P.; Lethimonier, C.; Ducouret, B.; Guiguen, Y.; Robinson Rechavi, M.; Laudet, V.; Rafestin-Oblin, M.E.; Prunet, P. Evidence for two distinct functional glucocorticoid receptors in teleost fish. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2003, 31, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lethimonier, C.; Tujague, M.; Kern, L.; Ducouret, B. Peptide insertion in the DNAbinding domain of fish glucocorticoid receptor is encoded by an additional exon and confers particular functional properties. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 194, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Takeo, J.; Hata, J.; Segawa, C.; Toyohara, H.; Yamashita, S. Fish glucocorticoid receptor with splicing variants in the DNA binding domain. FEBS Lett. 1996, 389, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aruna, A.; Nagarajan, G.; Chang, C.F. Differential expression pattern and localization of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors transcripts in osmoregulatory organs of freshwater and seawater acclimated tilapia. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 179, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aruna, A.; Nagarajan, G.; Chang, C.F. The acute salinity changes activate the dual pathways of endocrine responses in the brain and pituitary of tilapia. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2015, 211, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alderman, S.L.; McGuire, A.; Bernier, N.J.; Vijayan, M.M. Central and peripheral glucocorticoid receptors are involved in the plasma cortisol response to an acute stressor in rainbow trout. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 176, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Faught, E.; Vijayan, M.M. Mechanisms of cortisol action in fish hepatocytes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2016, 199, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, C.; Ding, J.; Gao, X.; Du, C.; Hou, C.; Wu, X.; Shen, W.; Zhu, J. Effects of acute low temperature stress on the hormones and gene expression of glucocorticoid receptor of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 99, 103018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marshall, W.S.; Cozzi, R.R.; Pelis, R.M.; McCormick, S.D. Cortisol receptor blockade and seawater adaptation in the euryhaline teleost Fundulus heteroclitus. J. Exp. Zool. 2005, 303, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weng, C.F.; Chiang, C.C.; Gong, H.; Chen, M.C.; Lin, C.J.; Huang, W.T.; Cheng, C.Y.; Hwang, P.P.; Wu, J.L. Acute Changes in Gill Na-K-ATPase and Creatine Kinase in Response to Salinity Changes in the Euryhaline Teleost, Tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2002, 75, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aruna, A.; Lin, C.J.; Nagarajan, G.; Chang, C.F. Neurohypophysial Hormones Associated with Osmotic Challenges in the Brain and Pituitary of the Euryhaline Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. Cells 2021, 10, 3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yuan, M.; Jia, Q.; Wang, T.; Lu, Q.; Tang, L.; Wang, Y.; Lu, W. Dynamic responses of prolactin, growth hormone and their receptors to hyposmotic acclimation in the olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2017, 254, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Richards, J.G.; Semple, J.W.; Bystriansky, J.S.; Schulte, P.M. Na+ ⁄ K+ -ATPase isoform switching in gills of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during salinity transfer. J. Exp. Biol. 2003, 206, 4475–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deane, E.E.; Woo, N.Y. Differential gene expression associated with euryhalinity in sea bream (Sparus sarba). Am. J Physiol. 2004, 287, 1054–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tomy, S.; Chang, Y.M.; Chen, Y.H.; Cao, J.C.; Wang, T.P.; Chang, C.F. Salinity effects on the expression of osmoregulatory genes in the euryhaline black porgy Acanthopagrus schlegeli. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2009, 161, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. McCormick, S.D. Endocrine control of osmoregulation in fish. Am. Zool. 2001, 41, 781–794. [Google Scholar]
  22. Breves, J.P.; Popp, E.E.; Rothenberg, E.F.; Rosenstein, C.W.; Maffett, K.M.; Guertin, R.R. Osmoregulatory actions of prolactin in the gastrointestinal tract of fishes. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2020, 298, 113589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sakamoto, T.; McCormick, S.D. Prolactin and growth hormone in fish osmoregulation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 147, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bole-Feysot, C.; Goffin, V.; Edery, M.; Binart, N.; Kelly, P.A. Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: Actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr. Rev. 1998, 19, 225–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Edery, M.; Young, G.; Bern, H.A.; Steiny, S. Prolactin receptors in tilapia (Sarotherodon mossambicus) tissues: Binding studies using I-125 labeled ovine prolactin. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1984, 56, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Auperin, B.; Rentier-Delrue, F.; Martial, J.A.; Prunet, P. Regulation of gill prolactin receptors in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) after a change in salinity or hypophysectomy. J. Endocrinol. 1995, 45, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sandra, O.; Sohm, F.; de Luze, A.; Prunet, P.; Edery, M.; Kelly, P.A. Expression cloning of a cDNA encoding a fish prolactin receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 6037–6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weng, C.F.; Lee, T.H.; Hwang, P.P. Immune localization of prolactin receptor in themitochondria-rich cells of the euryhaline teleost (Oreochromis mossambicus) gill. FEBS Lett. 1997, 405, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Harris, J.; Bird, D.J. Modulation of the fish immune system by hormones. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2000, 77, 63–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. San Martín, R.; Hurtado, W.; Quezada, C.; Reyes, A.E.; Vera, M.I.; Krauskopf, M. Gene structure and seasonal expression of carp fish prolactin short receptor isoforms. J. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 100, 970–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Manzon, L.A. The role of prolactin in fish osmoregulation: A review. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002, 125, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seale, A.P.; Riley, L.G.; Leedom, T.A.; Kajimura, S.; Dores, R.M.; Hirano, T.; Grau, E.G. Effects of environmental osmolality on release of prolactin, growth hormone and ACTH from the tilapia pituitary. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002, 128, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seale, A.P.; Stagg, J.J.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Breves, J.P.; Soma, S.; Watanabe, S.; Kaneko, T.; Cnaani, A.; Harpaz, S.; Lerner, D.T. Effects of salinity and prolactin on gene transcript levels of ion transporters, ion pumps and prolactin receptors in Mozambique tilapia intestine. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 206, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yamaguchi, Y.; Breves, J.P.; Haws, M.C.; Lerner, D.T.; Grau, E.G.; Seale, A.P. Acute salinity tolerance and the control of two prolactins and their receptors in the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Mozambique tilapia (O. mossambicus): A comparative study. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2018, 257, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Seale, A.P.; Fiess, J.C.; Hirano, T.; Cooke, I.M.; Grau, E.G. Disparate release of prolactin and growth hormone from the tilapia pituitary in response to osmotic stimulation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 145, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hirano, T. The spectrum of prolactin action in teleosts. In Comparative Endocrinology: Developments and Directions; Ralph, C.R., Liss, A.R., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 53–74. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandra, O.; Rouzic, P.L.; Rentier-Delrue, F.; Prunet, P. Transfer of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to a Hyperosmotic Environment Is Associated with Sustained Expression of Prolactin Receptor in Intestine, Gill, and Kidney. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001, 123, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bollinger, R.J.; Ellis, L.V.; Bossus, M.C.; Tipsmark, C.K. Prolactin controls Na+,Cl− cotransporter via Stat5 pathway in the teleost gill. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 477, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Z.; Ma, A.; Zhang, J.; Yang, S.; Cui, W.; Xia, D.; Qu, J. Cloning and molecular characterization of PRL and PRLR from turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and their expressions in response to short-term and long-term low salt stress. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 46, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Prunet, P.; Sandra, O.; Le Rouzic, P.; Marchand, O.; Laudet, V. Molecular characterization of the prolactin receptor in two fish species, tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss: A comparative approach. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2000, 78, 1086–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tse, D.L.Y.; Chow, B.K.C.; Chan, C.B.; Lee, L.T.O.; Cheng, C.H.K. Molecular cloning and expression studies of a prolactin receptor in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Life Sci. 2000, 66, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Higashimoto, Y.; Nakao, N.; Ohkubo, T.; Tanaka, M.; Nakashima, K. Structure and tissue distribution of prolactin receptor mRNA in Japanese flounder (Paralichtys olivaceus): Conserved and preferential expression in osmoregulatory organs. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001, 123, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Santos, C.R.A.; Ingleton, P.M.; Cavaco, J.E.B.; Kelly, P.A.; Edery, M.; Power, D.M. Cloning, characterization, and tissue distribution of prolactin receptor in the sea bream (Sparus aurata). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001, 121, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, X.; Jiao, B.; Fung, C.K.; Zhang, Y.; Ho, W.K.; Chan, C.B.; Lin, H.; Wang, D.; Cheng, C.H.K. The presence of two distinct prolactin receptors in seabream with different tissue distribution patterns, signal transduction pathways and regulation of gene expression by steroid hormones. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 194, 373–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, K.M.; Kaneko, T.; Aida, K. Prolactin and prolactin receptor expression in a marine teleost, pufferfish Takifugu rubripes. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 146, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pierce, A.L.; Fox, B.K.; Davis, L.K.; Visitacion, N.; Kitashashi, T.; Hirano, T.; Grau, E.G. Prolactin receptor, growth hormone receptor, and putative somatolactin receptor in Mozambique tilapia: Tissue specific expression and differential regulation by salinity and fasting. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2007, 154, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fiol, D.F.; Sanmarti, E.; Sacchi, R.; Kültz, D. A novel tilapia prolactin receptor is functionally distinct from its paralog. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 2007–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Breves, J.P.; Serizier, S.B.; Goffin, V.; McCormick, S.D.; Karlstrom, R.O. Prolactin regulates transcription of the ion uptake Na+/Cl− cotransporter (ncc) gene in zebrafish gill. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013, 369, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nagarajan, G.; Aruna, A.; Yousef, A.A.; Roshman, T.M.; Chang, C.F. Localization of the Neuropeptide Arginine Vasotocin and Its Receptor in the Osmoregulatory Organs of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii: Gills, Kidneys, and Intestines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mancera, J.M.; Pérez-Figares, J.M.; Fernández-Llebrez, P. Osmoregulatory responses to abrupt salinity changes in the euryhaline gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 1993, 106, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Min, B.H.; Choi, C.Y.; Chang, Y.J. Comparison of physiological conditions on black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli acclimated and reared in freshwater and seawater. J. Aquacult. 2005, 18, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  52. Chang, Y.J.; Min, B.H.; Choi, C.Y. Black porgy (Acanthopagrus schlegeli) prolactin cDNA sequence: mRNA expression and blood physiological responses during freshwater acclimation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2007, 147, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Breves, J.P.; Fox, B.K.; Pierce, A.L.; Thirano, T.; Grau, E.G. Gene expression of growth hormone family and glucocorticoid receptors, osmosensors, and ion transporters in the gill during seawater acclimation of mozambique tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus. J. Exp. Zool. 2010, 313A, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ayson, F.G.; Kaneko, T.; Hasegawa, S.; Hirano, T. Differential expression of two prolactin and growth hormone genes during early development of tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) in fresh water and seawater: Implications for possible involvement in osmoregulation during early life stages. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1994, 95, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tine, M.; de Lorgeril, J.; Panfili, J.; Diop, K.; Bonhomme, F.; Durand, J.D. Growth hormone and prolactin-1 gene transcription in natural populations of the black chinned tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron acclimatised to different salinities. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2007, 147, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Varsamos, S.; Xuereb, B.; Commes, T.; Flik, G.; Spanings-Pierrot, C. Pituitary hormone mRNA expression in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax in seawater and following acclimation to fresh water. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 191, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sakamoto, T.; Hirano, T. Expression of insulin-like growth factor I gene in osmoregulatory organs during seawater adaptation of the salmonid fish: Possible mode of osmoregulatory action of growth hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 1912–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Link, K.; Shved1, N.; Serrano, N.; Akgül, G.; Caelers, A.; Faass, O.; Mouttet, F.; Raabe, O.; D’Cotta, H.; Baroiller, J.F.; et al. Effects of seawater and freshwater challenges on the Gh/Igf system in the saline-tolerant black chin tilapia (Sarotherodon melanotheron). Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 976488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fuentes, J.; Brinca, L.; Guerreiro, P.M.; Power, D.M. PRL and GH synthesis and release from the sea bream (Sparus auratus L.) pituitary gland in vitro in response to osmotic challenge. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2010, 168, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Breves, J.P.; McCormick, S.D.; Karlstrom, R.O. Prolactin and teleost ionocytes: New insights into cellular and molecular targets of prolactin in vertebrate epithelia. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 203, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seale, A.P.; Watanabe, S.; Grau, E.G. Osmoreception: Perspectives on signal transduction and environmental modulation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 176, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moorman, B.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Lerner, D.T.; Gordon, E.G.; Seale, A.P. Rearing Mozambique tilapia in tidally-changing salinities: Effects on growth and the growth hormone/Insulin like growth factor 1 axis. Com. Biochem. Physiol. 2016, 198, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Seale, A.P.; Pavlosky, K.K.; Celino-Brady, F.T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Breves, J.P.; Lerner, D.T. Systemic versus tissue-level prolactin signaling in a teleost during a tidal cycle. J. Comp. Physiol. 2019, 189, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mohammed-Geba, K.; Mancera, J.M.; Martınez-Rodrıguez, G. Acclimation to different environmental salinities induces molecular endocrine changes in the GH/IGF-I axis of juvenile gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.). J. Comp. Physiol. B 2015, 185, 87–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mohammed-Geba, K.; González, A.A.; Suárez, R.A.; Galal-Khallaf, A.; MartosSitcha, J.A.; Ibrahim, H.M. Molecular performance of prl and Gh/Igf1 axis in the Mediterranean meagre, Argyrosomus regius, acclimated to different rearing salinities. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 43, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yan, J.J.; Lee, Y.C.; Tsou, Y.L.; Tseng, Y.C.; Hwang, P.P. Insulin-like growth factor 1 triggers salt secretion machinery in fish under acute salinity stress. J. Endocrinol. 2020, 246, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bortoletti, M.; Maccatrozzo, L.; Peruzzi, S.; Espen, J.; Strand, T.; Jobling, M. Dietary effects on biomarkers of growth, stress, and welfare of diploid and triploid Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) during parr-smolt transformation. Aquaculture Rep. 2022, 24, 101123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choi, C.Y.; An, K.W. Cloning and expression of Na+/K+ -ATPase and osmotic stress transcription factor 1 mRNA in black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli during osmotic stress. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2008, 149, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seidelin, M.; Madsen, S.S.; Blenstrup, H.; Tipsmark, C.K. Time-course changes in the expression of Na+, K+-ATPase in gills and pyloric caeca of brown trout (Salmo trutta) during acclimation to seawater. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2000, 73, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Marshall, W.S.; Grosell, M. Ion transport, osmoregulation, and acid-base balance. In The Physiology of Fishes, 3rd ed.; Evans, D.H., Clairborne, J.B., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 177–230. [Google Scholar]
  71. McCormick, S.D. The hormonal control of osmoregulation in teleost fish. In Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment; Farrell, A.P., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 1466–1473. [Google Scholar]
  72. Yada, T.; Hyodo, S.; Schreck, C.B. Effects of seawater acclimation on mRNA levels of corticosteroid receptor genes in osmoregulatory and immune systems in trout. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2008, 156, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nilsen, T.O.; Ebbesson, L.O.; Kiilerich, P.; Bjornsson, B.T.; Madsen, S.S.; McCormick, S.D.; Stefansson, S.O. Endocrine systems in juvenile anadromous and landlocked Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Seasonal development and seawater acclimation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2008, 155, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Karnaky, K.J. Regulating epithelia from the apical side: New insights. Focus on “Differential signaling and regulation of apical vs. basolateral EGFR in polarized epithelial cells”. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, C1417–C1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Loretz, C.A. Electrophysiology of ion transport in the teleost intestinal cells. In Cellular and Molecular Approaches to Fish Ionic Regulation, Fish Physiology; Wood, C.M., Shuttleworth, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1995; Volume 14, pp. 25–26. [Google Scholar]
  76. Collie, N.L.; Hirano, T. Mechanisms of hormone actions on intestinal transport. In Vertebrate Endocrinology: Fundamentals and Biomedical Implications, Regulation of Water and Electrolytes; Pang, P.K.T., Schreibman, M.P., Eds.; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987; Volume 2, pp. 239–270. [Google Scholar]
  77. Prunet, P.; Sturm, A.; Milla, S. Multiple corticosteroid receptors in fish: From old ideas to new concepts. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 147, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Takahashi, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Hyodo, S.; Shepherd, B.S.; Kanedo, T.; Grau, E. Expression of glucocorticoid receptor in the intestine of a euryhaline teleost, the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochrmis mossambicus): Effect of seawater exposure and cortisol treatment. Life Sci. 2006, 78, 2329–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Colombe, L.; Fostier, A.; Bury, N.; Pakdel, F.; Guiguen, Y. A mineralocorticoid-like receptor in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss: Cloning and characterization of its steroid binding domain. Steroids 2000, 65, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stolte, E.H.; Verburg, B.M.L.; Kemenade, V.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; Flik, G. Evolution of glucocorticoid receptors with different glucocorticoid sensitivity. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 190, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aruna, A.; Lan, D.S.; Nagarajan, G.; Wang, T.P.; Cao, J.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Chang, C. Differential expression of hypothalamic gill-crh system with osmotic stress in the euryh aline black porgy, Acanthopagrus Schlegelii. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 768122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 05318 g001 550
Figure 1. Analysis of the serum osmolality (a,c) and chloride concentrations (b,d) in black porgy on day 4 and 8 (n = 9, in each group). The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between control and treated groups.
Figure 1. Analysis of the serum osmolality (a,c) and chloride concentrations (b,d) in black porgy on day 4 and 8 (n = 9, in each group). The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean). Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between control and treated groups.
Ijms 24 05318 g001
Ijms 24 05318 g002 550
Figure 2. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of prl (a) and gh (b) in the pituitary during the transfer of black porgy from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and (c,d) SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4, and day 8. Gene expression was normalized to the control value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group.
Figure 2. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of prl (a) and gh (b) in the pituitary during the transfer of black porgy from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and (c,d) SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4, and day 8. Gene expression was normalized to the control value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group.
Ijms 24 05318 g002
Ijms 24 05318 g003 550
Figure 3. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the gill during the transfer of black porgy (a–d) from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and (e–h) from SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4, and day 8. The relative gene expression was normalized to the control (FW or SW group) value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group.
Figure 3. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the gill during the transfer of black porgy (a–d) from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and (e–h) from SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4, and day 8. The relative gene expression was normalized to the control (FW or SW group) value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group.
Ijms 24 05318 g003
Ijms 24 05318 g004 550
Figure 4. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the intestine during the transfer of black porgy (a–d) from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and (e–h) from SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4 and day 8. The relative gene expression was normalized to the control (FW or SW group) value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated groups.
Figure 4. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the intestine during the transfer of black porgy (a–d) from FW to 4 ppt and SW, and (e–h) from SW to 4 ppt and FW on day 4 and day 8. The relative gene expression was normalized to the control (FW or SW group) value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated groups.
Ijms 24 05318 g004
Ijms 24 05318 g005 550
Figure 5. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the kidney during the transfer of black porgy from FW to 4 ppt and SW (a–d), and from SW to 4 ppt and FW (e–h) on day 4 and day 8. The relative gene expression was normalized to the control value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group.
Figure 5. Q-PCR was performed to analyze the transcripts of α-nka, prlr, gr, and ghr in the kidney during the transfer of black porgy from FW to 4 ppt and SW (a–d), and from SW to 4 ppt and FW (e–h) on day 4 and day 8. The relative gene expression was normalized to the control value on day 4. The results (n = 9) are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the control and treated group.
Ijms 24 05318 g005
Table
Table 1. Specific primers used for Q-PCR analysis. F: forward primer, R: reverse primer.
Table 1. Specific primers used for Q-PCR analysis. F: forward primer, R: reverse primer.
GeneOrientationNucleotide SequencesUsage
prlF5′-AGTCGGACCTGTTGTCATTGG-3′Q-PCR
R5′-AGGCTGTTGGCAGAGTTGGA-3′Q-PCR
prlrF5′-CAACGCGCTGGGAAGAAC-3′Q-PCR
R5′-AGGATTGGGCTTGACGATGTAC-3′Q-PCR
ghF5′-CCTGCAGGATTTCTGTAACTCTGAT-3′Q-PCR
R5′-TGGGCTGCGCTGTGTCT-3′Q-PCR
ghrF5′-CCGTCAGCTTTCCTGATGATG-3Q-PCR
R5′-TGTCCTGGTCGTGGAGATCTG-3′Q-PCR
grF5′-AACACAGATGGCCAGCACAAC-3′Q-PCR
R5′-CTTCCTTCGGATCTTATCGATGAT-3′Q-PCR
α-nkaF5′-ACCGTGGCCCACATGTG-3′Q-PCR
R5′-GGTCCCGCTCTGGTTCTCA-3′Q-PCR
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nagarajan, G.; Aruna, A.; Chang, Y.-M.; Alkhamis, Y.A.; Mathew, R.T.; Chang, C.-F. Effects of Osmotic Stress on the mRNA Expression of prl, prlr, gr, gh, and ghr in the Pituitary and Osmoregulatory Organs of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065318

AMA Style

Nagarajan G, Aruna A, Chang Y-M, Alkhamis YA, Mathew RT, Chang C-F. Effects of Osmotic Stress on the mRNA Expression of prl, prlr, gr, gh, and ghr in the Pituitary and Osmoregulatory Organs of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(6):5318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nagarajan, Ganesan, Adimoolam Aruna, Yu-Ming Chang, Yousef Ahmed Alkhamis, Roshmon Thomas Mathew, and Ching-Fong Chang. 2023. "Effects of Osmotic Stress on the mRNA Expression of prl, prlr, gr, gh, and ghr in the Pituitary and Osmoregulatory Organs of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 6: 5318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065318

APA Style

Nagarajan, G., Aruna, A., Chang, Y. -M., Alkhamis, Y. A., Mathew, R. T., & Chang, C. -F. (2023). Effects of Osmotic Stress on the mRNA Expression of prl, prlr, gr, gh, and ghr in the Pituitary and Osmoregulatory Organs of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(6), 5318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24065318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop