Next Article in Journal
Can Neutrophils Prevent Nosocomial Pneumonia after Serious Injury?
Next Article in Special Issue
A Million-Cow Genome-Wide Association Study of Three Fertility Traits in U.S. Holstein Cows
Previous Article in Journal
Mutated Flt3Lg Provides Reduced Flt3 Recycling Compared to Wild-Type Flt3Lg and Retains the Specificity of Flt3Lg-Based CAR T-Cell Targeting in AML Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mitochondrial DNA Supplementation of Oocytes Has Downstream Effects on the Transcriptional Profiles of Sus scrofa Adult Tissues with High mtDNA Copy Number
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Identification and Functional Analysis of foxo Genes in Chinese Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis)

1
Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CAFS), Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266071, China
2
School of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7625; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087625
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 1 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023

Abstract

:
The Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) is a traditional, precious fish in China. Due to the large growth difference between males and females, the investigation of their sex determination and differentiation mechanisms receives a great deal of attention. Forkhead Box O (FoxO) plays versatile roles in the regulation of sex differentiation and reproduction. Our recent transcriptomic analysis has shown that foxo genes may participate in the male differentiation and spermatogenesis of Chinese tongue sole. In this study, six Csfoxo members (Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, Csfoxo4, Csfoxo6-like, and Csfoxo1a-like) were identified. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that these six members were clustered into four groups corresponding to their denomination. The expression patterns of the gonads at different developmental stages were further analyzed. All members showed high levels of expression in the early stages (before 6 months post-hatching), and this expression was male-biased. In addition, promoter analysis found that the addition of C/EBPα and c-Jun transcription factors enhanced the transcriptional activities of Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, and Csfoxo4. The siRNA-mediated knockdown of the Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, and Csfoxo3b genes in the testicular cell line of Chinese tongue sole affected the expression of genes related to sex differentiation and spermatogenesis. These results have broadened the understanding of foxo’s function and provide valuable data for studying the male differentiation of tongue sole.

1. Introduction

In mammals, the forkhead box (fox) family has been reported to consist of over 40 members, including foxa-q. Forkhead box O (foxo) is a subgroup of the forkhead box transcription factor family [1]. It is the evolutionarily conserved transcription factor that was first identified in Drosophila melanogaster in 1989 [2,3]. foxo plays a major role in various cellular processes, such as cell differentiation and growth, apoptosis, proliferation, oxidative stress, and DNA damage repair [4,5]. foxo is regulated by two signalling pathways. The first is the classical insulin signaling pathway, which is regulated by phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and protein kinase B (protein kinase B, AKT) in the presence of growth factors. The second pathway is c-Jun N-terminal kinase (c-Jun N-terminal kinase, JNK), which acts during oxidative stress [4,6]. Four subtypes of foxo have been identified in mammals: foxo1, foxo3, foxo4, and foxo6, while in bony fish, seven subtypes, foxo1a, foxo1b, foxo3a, foxo3b, foxo4, foxo6a, and foxo6b, are well known [7,8]. In zebrafish, foxo2 and foxo5 have also been reported [5]. However, foxo2 is a paralogue of foxo3, while foxo5 is specifically in zebrafish and is also called foxo3b.
Foxo family members are characterized by the presence of a 100-amino acid conserved DNA binding domain [9]. This domain exists in several different transcription factors and determines cell fate during the early stage of embryogenesis [10]. The most frequently reported members are foxo1 and foxo3. According to a previous transcriptome analysis [11], foxo1 is believed to play a role in spermatogenesis and spermatogonia differentiation in mammals [12]; for example, foxo1 regulates the maintenance of male spermatogonia stem cells in mice (Mus musculus) [13]. In fish, foxo1a is reported to function in the insulin-related pathway and growth of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) [14,15], and spotted seabass (Lateolabrax maculatus) [16]. foxo3 is a key effector of cell death in mammals [17]. foxo3 can inhibit follicle growth initiation and control reproductive potential. In the orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides), foxo3a and foxo3b proteins exist in ovarian germ cells and follicular cells, which may be involved in follicular formation [18]. In zebrafish, foxo4, foxo6a, and foxo6b are reported to function in the developing brain and under the regulation of PI3-kinase signalling [19].
The Chinese tongue sole exhibits obvious sexual growth dimorphism, wherein females can grow two to four times larger than males, so the study of sex differentiation has great potential for application in aquaculture. Many fox members have been reported to function in sex determination and differentiation, such as the classical foxl2 and foxl3 [20]. Due to their important role in sex differentiation and growth, foxo genes were selected for an in-depth analysis of the Chinese tongue sole. In this study, the conserved domain, phylogenetic tree, and conserved motifs of six Csfoxo members were analyzed. Their expression patterns in gonads at different developmental stages were also studied. The transcriptional regulation of Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, and Csfoxo4 was then analyzed. Finally, the siRNA-mediated knockdown of Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, and Csfoxo3b and its effect were investigated. These results may improve our understanding of the role of foxo genes in the Chinese tongue sole.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Analysis of Csfoxo Genes

Six Csfoxo genes were identified in the tongue sole genome. Their gene IDs, chromosome localizations, amino acid numbers, molecular weights (MWs), and isoelectric points (pI) were analyzed (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1). The ORF sequences of these genes varied from 1872 to 2178 bp in length and encoded 623-725 amino acids. The predicted MWs were 66.52–78.07 kDa with pI values ranging from 4.79–6.78. As shown in Figure 1, all the proteins share a forkhead domain and contain low-complexity regions (LCRS) with little variation among different members.

2.2. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

We performed a multiple alignment procedure, which showed the similarity of the six Foxo proteins is 53.1%. To study the phylogenetic relationships, an NJ tree was constructed based on the amino acid sequences of nine fish and two mammals. As shown in Figure 2, 53 Foxo proteins were divided into four clusters (Foxo1, Foxo3, Foxo4, and Foxo6), indicating the evolutionary relationship between foxo members in vertebrates. Only one copy was found in mammals, whereas multiple copies of Foxo1, Foxo3, and Foxo6 were identified in fish. It is worth noting that inside each of the clusters, the Foxo proteins in fish and mammals formed different subclusters.

2.3. Structure Analysis of Foxo

As shown in Figure 3, a total of 12 motifs were detected, and the signature sequences of the 12 motifs are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. Motifs 1 and 2 are highly conserved FH domains, and motif 9 is only found in Foxo3 and Foxo4 of bony fish, consisting of 50 amino acids. In fish, Foxo3 contains all motifs, while Foxo4 lacks motif 10, and Foxo1 and Foxo6 lack motif 9. In mammals, the Foxo motifs differ among humans, mice, and rats (Supplementary Figure S3). In general, mammalian Foxo1 and Foxo3 lack motif 11, Foxo4 lacks motif 8, and Foxo6 lacks motifs 8, 10, and 12.

2.4. Analysis of Csfoxo Expression Patterns at Different Developmental Stages

As shown in Figure 4, the expression patterns of six Csfoxo members in the gonads at different developmental stages were analyzed. All Csfoxo members showed higher expression before 6 mph, and this expression was male-biased. However, the peak levels of different members occurred at different stages, e.g., foxo6-like at 40 dpf, foxo3a, foxo3b and foxo4 at 60 dpf, and foxo1a and foxo1a-like at 90 dpf. These data suggest their involvement in male differentiation and testicular development.

2.5. Promoter Activity Analysis

As shown in Figure 5, the promoter regions of the Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, and Csfoxo4 genes were cloned to explore promoter activity. The promoter activity of pGL3-Csfoxo1a, 3a, 3b, and 4 was significantly higher than that of pGL3-basic, indicating that the Csfoxo promoter had a positive effect on Csfoxo gene expression. The activity of pGL3-Csfoxo1, 3a, 3b, and 4 was significantly promoted by adding C/EBPα and c-Jun transcription factors, suggesting that C/EBPα and c-Jun could positively regulate foxo genes. This activity was closely related to the specific site. When the C/EBPα and c-Jun binding sites were mutated (muCsfoxo1a-C/EBPα, muCsfoxo3a-C/EBPα, muCsfoxo3b-C/EBPα, muCsfoxo4-C/EBPα, muCsfoxo1a-c-Jun, mufoxo3a-c-Jun, mufoxo3b-c-Jun, and mufoxo4-c-Jun), the levels of activity were significantly decreased.

2.6. Csfoxo Knockdown and the Effect on Other Genes

For Csfoxo1a, 3a, and 3b, three siRNAs were designed for each gene. The knockdown effect was examined, and the siRNAs with the most obvious effect (siRNA1 for Csfoxo1a, siRNA1 for Csfoxo3a, and siRNA3 for Csfoxo3b) were selected (Figure 6A,C,E). After the knockdown of Csfoxo1a, sex-related genes, including sox9a and wt1a, and the growth-related gene insulin-like growth factor igf1 were downregulated (Figure 6B). Knockdown of Csfoxo3a induced the downregulation of tesk1 (a spermatogenesis-related gene) and wt1a (Figure 6D). After Csfoxo3b knockdown, the genes igf1, neurl3 (a spermatogenesis-related gene), sox9a, and wt1a were downregulated (Figure 6F).

3. Discussion

foxo is involved in a wide range of biological processes, including cell differentiation, metabolism, tumor inhibition, cell cycle arrest, protection from stress, and cell death [21,22,23]. However, the functionality of foxo genes has not been systematically studied in the Chinese tongue sole. In this study, we first focused our attention on Csfoxo based on our previous transcriptomic analysis [11]. We identified six foxo members in the Chinese tongue sole: foxo1a, 1a-like, 3a, 3b, 4, and 6-like. In comparison to seven members present in bony fish, one copy of foxo6 seems to be missing in tongue sole [6]. The Csfoxo members share the conserved FH binding domains of “winged helix” or “forkhead box”, which can bind to B-DNA as monomers [6]. A low-complexity region (LCR) is found in all Csfoxo members; it may participate in flexible binding, and its position in the protein may determine its binding properties and specific function [24]. Structural and phylogenetic tree analysis indicate that Foxo is highly conserved in vertebrates. It is interesting that all six members showed high expression before 6 mph and were male-biased, suggesting their role in male differentiation and testicular development. However, their peak levels appeared at different stages, e.g., foxo6-like appeared at 40 dpf, foxo3b and foxo4 at 60 dpf, foxo1a and foxo1a-like at 90 dpf, and fox3a at 6 mpf. Whether they play a sequential role in male differentiation and testicular development requires further investigation.
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) is an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor in vertebrates that plays a role in cell growth and differentiation [25]. In Chinese tongue sole, C/EBPα was reported to be involved in early gonadal differentiation and to act as a negative regulator of the male-determining gene dmrt1 [26]. c-Jun is a transcriptional activator that plays an important role in cell proliferation and differentiation [27]. Based on our data, C/EBPα and c-Jun enhanced the promoter activity of all foxo members. However, the interaction of foxo with other sex-related genes (especially dmrt1) requires further investigation.
To investigate the effects of foxo genes, several growth- and sex-related genes were selected, including igf1, sox9a, wtla, tesk1, and neurl3. As a well-known growth-related gene, igf is also reported to play a role in sex differentiation. In tilapia, igf1 is distributed in the gonads at early stages [28,29], and it may be involved in the regulation of growth and differentiation [30,31]. In mammals, sox9 plays a role in cell differentiation and male differentiation [32]. In fish species, such as rainbow trout and zebrafish, sox9a showed higher expression in the testis [33,34]. Wilms tumor gene, wt1a, has multiple pivotal roles in gonads. In adult medaka, the wt1a gene is highly expressed in Sertoli cells of the testis and is required for PGC maintenance [35]. In tongue sole, the alternative splicing of wt1a has been suggested to play a role in gonadal differentiation [36]. Tesk1 plays a role in spermatogenesis in mice, especially during early spermatogenesis [37]. In Chinese tongue sole, tesk1 and neurl3 are closely related to spermatogenesis [38]. It is worth noting that the knockdown of foxo1a, foxo3a, and foxo3b led to the downregulation of all the abovementioned genes, suggesting the positive regulation of foxo members in male differentiation, testis development, and spermatogenesis. In future studies, in vivo trials are still required for the in-depth investigation of the mechanisms of foxo genes in these processes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of Csfoxo Members and Sequence Analysis

The hidden Markov model (HMM) map of foxo TAD (PF16676) was downloaded from the Pfam protein family database (http://pfam.xfam.org/ (accessed on 4 May 2022)). Subsequently, Foxo genes from nine teleost fish, namely, tongue sole, medaka (Oryzias latipes), turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), zebrafish (Danio rerio), spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus), Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), fugu (Takifugu rubripes), pufferfish (Perca fluviatilis), and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus), and two mammals, mice and humans (Homo sapiens), were used for evolutionary analysis. The protein sequences were acquired from The National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 6 May2022)) database. The Csfoxo ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/ (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 10 May 2022)) was used to analyze the chemical and physical properties of Csfoxo, including its number of amino acids, molecular weight (MW), and theoretical isoelectric point (pI).

4.2. Phylogenetic Tree and Structural Characterization

A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the protein sequences of nine teleost fish and two mammals using MEGA v7.0. The adjacency (NJ) method and 1000 bootstrap replications were used. All protein sequences were downloaded from the NCBI database, and the information is shown in Supplementary Table S1. The conserved motifs were analyzed using MEME (5.4.1) (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 20 May 2022)) [39]. The number of motifs identified was 12, and other parameters were set to default values to obtain conservative motifs.

4.3. Experimental Animals and Ethics Approval

The Chinese tongue sole used in this experiment were from the breeding stock of Chinese tongue sole of Weizhuo aquatic company (Tangshan, China). MS-222 (20 mg/L solubilized in seawater, treated for 5 min) was used for anesthesia to minimize suffering before the gonads were dissected. Different developmental stages were selected, including 40 days post-hatching (dpf), 60 dpf, 90 dpf, 6 months post-hatching (mpf), 1.5 years post-hatching (ypf), and 3 ypf. For each stage, three male and three female individuals were examined. The gonads were quickly removed, placed into RNA preservation solution, and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction was performed. The study was conducted under the inspection of the committee at the Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute (Approval number, YSFRI-2022035).

4.4. Gene Expression Pattern Analysis

TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract RNA from gonads at different developmental stages. The quality and quantity of RNA were determined using a P100 Series spectrophotometer (Pultton, San Jose, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using the Prime Script TM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). Specific primers for Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, Csfoxo4, Csfoxo6-like, and Csfoxo1a-like were designed to analyze gonad expression in different developmental stages (Supplementary Table S2). A total reaction volume of 10 μL was used, including forward and reverse primers (0.2 μL each), 1 μL of cDNA, 5 μL of THUNDERBIRD® Next SYBR® qPCR Mix (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan), and 3.6 μL of ddH2O. qPCR was performed in a 7500 rapid real-time quantitative PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The PCR program was set as follows: 95 °C dissociation for 30 s and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C dissociation for 30 s. β-a ctin was used as an internal reference. The relative transcription level of genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔct method [40]. The data were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and then using multiple comparisons in SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), where differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.

4.5. Promoter Activity Analysis

Promoter plasmids (1500–3000 bp upstream of ATG) of Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, and Csfoxo4 were constructed to detect dual-luciferase activity. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The fragments were inserted into the pGL3-basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) using the TOROIVD® One Step Fusion Cloning MIX Seamless cloning kit (Toroivd, Shanghai, China) to obtain pGL3-C-foxo1a, pGL3-C-foxo3a, pGL3-C-foxo3b, and pGL3-C-foxo4. Transcription factors of the C/EBPα gene and c-Jun amino terminal kinase gene were predicted to regulate foxo genes in the promoter region using Promo usage (http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/cgi-bin/promo_v3/promo/promoinit.cgi?dirDB=TF_8.3 (accessed on 30 May 2022)). According to the binding sites of transcription factors (C/EBPα and c-Jun binding sites), mutations in foxo were generated using the rapid site-directed mutagenesis kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). After successful mutation was confirmed via sequencing, transfection and double luciferase assays were performed.
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells were maintained in DME/F-12 containing 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, New York, NY, USA) and 1% bFGF (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. pGL3-foxo (pGL3-foxo1a, pGL3-foxo3a, pGL3-foxo3b, and pGL3-foxo4), pGL3-foxo+pcDNA3.1-C/EBPα, pGL3-foxo+pcDNA3.1-c-Jun, pGL3-control (positive control), and pGL3-basic (negative control) were transfected into 293T cells (800 ng plasmid/well). Lipo8000TM transfection reagent (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used, while the pRL-TK plasmid was transfected as an internal reference (40 ng/well), with three replicates per sample. At 48 h after transfection, 100 μL cell lysates from each well were collected using a double luciferase reporter assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and analyzed with Origin 2021.

4.6. siRNA-Mediated Knockdown of Csfoxo in Testicular Cells

The siRNAs of Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, and Csfoxo3b were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China). Three siRNAs targeting different sites were designed for each gene, and the siRNA with the best knockdown effect was selected for further study. siRNA interference transfection was performed in a tongue sole testicular cell line (predominantly Sertoli cells) from our laboratory using a CP Reagent transfection kit (Ribobio, Guangzhou, China). According to the previously established experimental protocol, the Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, and Csfoxo3b siRNA transfection and negative control (NC) transfection were performed in triplicate [41]. The cell status and fluorescence of cy3-transfected cells were examined 48 h after transfection. qPCR was used to detect the knockdown effect and the expression profiles of sex-related genes, such as sox9a and tesk1.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24087625/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.C. and W.X.; investigation, T.Z., M.Z., Y.S. and L.L.; resources, P.C.; data curation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, W.X.; writing—review and editing, N.W.; supervision and project administration, S.C. and W.X.; funding acquisition, S.C. and W.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD2400405), the National Natural Science Foundation (32072295), Shandong Key R&D Program (For Academician team in Shandong, 2023ZLYS02), and Taishan Scholar Climbing Project Fund of Shandong, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study was conducted under the inspection of the committee at the Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute (Approval number, YSFRI-2022035).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hannenhalli, S.; Kaestner, K.H. The evolution of Fox genes and their role in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hosaka, T.; Biggs, W.R.; Tieu, D.; Boyer, A.D.; Varki, N.M.; Cavenee, W.K.; Arden, K.C. Disruption of forkhead transcription factor (FOXO) family members in mice reveals their functional diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Matsuzaki, H.; Daitoku, H.; Hatta, M.; Aoyama, H.; Yoshimochi, K.; Fukamizu, A. Acetylation of Foxo1 alters its DNA-binding ability and sensitivity to phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fu, Z.; Tindall, D.J. FOXOs, cancer and regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene 2008, 27, 2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, X.; Tang, N.; Hadden, T.J.; Rishi, A.K. Akt, FoxO and regulation of apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eijkelenboom, A.; Burgering, B.M. FOXOs: Signalling integrators for homeostasis maintenance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2013, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, L.; Yuan, Z.; Zhou, T.; Yang, Y.; Gao, D.; Dunham, R.; Liu, Z. FOXO genes in channel catfish and their response after bacterial infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 97, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ni, Y.G.; Berenji, K.; Wang, N.; Oh, M.; Sachan, N.; Dey, A.; Cheng, J.; Lu, G.; Morris, D.J.; Castrillon, D.H.; et al. Foxo transcription factors blunt cardiac hypertrophy by inhibiting calcineurin signaling. Circulation 2006, 114, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arden, K.C.; Biggs, W.R. Regulation of the FoxO family of transcription factors by phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase-activated signaling. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2002, 403, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hacker, U.; Grossniklaus, U.; Gehring, W.J.; Jackle, H. Developmentally regulated Drosophila gene family encoding the fork head domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 8754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, Y.; Li, M.; Cui, Z.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, L.; Wang, N.; Xu, X.; Wei, M.; Xu, W. Transcriptomic Analysis Revealed Candidate Genes Involved in Pseudomale Sperm Abnormalities in Chinese Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Biology 2022, 11, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Goertz, M.J.; Wu, Z.; Gallardo, T.D.; Hamra, F.K.; Castrillon, D.H. Foxo1 is required in mouse spermatogonial stem cells for their maintenance and the initiation of spermatogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tarnawa, E.D.; Baker, M.D.; Aloisio, G.M.; Carr, B.R.; Castrillon, D.H. Gonadal expression of Foxo1, but not Foxo3, is conserved in diverse Mammalian species. Biol. Reprod. 2013, 88, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lansard, M.; Panserat, S.; Plagnes-Juan, E.; Seiliez, I.; Skiba-Cassy, S. Integration of insulin and amino acid signals that regulate hepatic metabolism-related gene expression in rainbow trout: Role of TOR. Amino. Acids 2010, 39, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, Y.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, P.; Gong, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, N.; Wei, M.; Xu, X.; Xu, W. pitpbeta_w Encoding Phosphatidylinositol Transfer Protein Is Involved in Female Differentiation of Chinese Tongue Sole, Cynoglossus semilaevis. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 861763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, Q.; Wen, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Mao, X.; Li, J.; Qi, X. FOXO1A promotes neuropeptide FF transcription subsequently regulating the expression of feeding-related genes in spotted sea bass (Lateolabrax maculatus). Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2020, 517, 110871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hedrick, S.M. The cunning little vixen: Foxo and the cycle of life and death. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, B.; Lu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W. Foxo3b but not Foxo3a activates cyp19a1a in Epinephelus coioides. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 56, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, S.J.; Chiang, M.C.; Shih, H.Y.; Chiang, K.C.; Cheng, Y.C. Spatiotemporal expression of foxo4, foxo6a, and foxo6b in the developing brain and retina are transcriptionally regulated by PI3K signaling in zebrafish. Dev. Genes Evol. 2017, 227, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bertho, S.; Pasquier, J.; Pan, Q.; Le Trionnaire, G.; Bobe, J.; Postlethwait, J.H.; Pailhoux, E.; Schartl, M.; Herpin, A.; Guiguen, Y. Foxl2 and Its Relatives Are Evolutionary Conserved Players in Gonadal Sex Differentiation. Sex. Dev. 2016, 10, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barthel, A.; Schmoll, D.; Unterman, T.G. FoxO proteins in insulin action and metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 16, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Accili, D.; Arden, K.C. FoxOs at the crossroads of cellular metabolism, differentiation, and transformation. Cell 2004, 117, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Greer, E.L.; Brunet, A. FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression. Oncogene 2005, 24, 7410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Coletta, A.; Pinney, J.W.; Solis, D.Y.; Marsh, J.; Pettifer, S.R.; Attwood, T.K. Low-complexity regions within protein sequences have position-dependent roles. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, W.; Guo, J.; Jiang, F.; Lu, J.; Ding, Y.; Li, A.; Liang, X.; Jia, W. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha is a crucial regulator of human fat mass and obesity associated gene transcription and expression. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 406909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Q.; Wang, R.; Feng, B.; Li, S.; Mahboob, S.; Shao, C. Cloning and functional analysis of c/ebpalpha as negative regulator of dmrt1 in Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Gene 2021, 768, 145321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hilberg, F.; Aguzzi, A.; Howells, N.; Wagner, E.F. c-jun is essential for normal mouse development and hepatogenesis. Nature 1993, 365, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Berishvili, G.; D’Cotta, H.; Baroiller, J.F.; Segner, H.; Reinecke, M. Differential expression of IGF-I mRNA and peptide in the male and female gonad during early development of a bony fish, the tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2006, 146, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reinecke, M. Insulin-like growth factors and fish reproduction. Biol. Reprod. 2010, 82, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reinecke, M.; Collet, C. The phylogeny of the insulin-like growth factors. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1998, 183, 1–94. [Google Scholar]
  31. Reinecke, M.; Bjornsson, B.T.; Dickhoff, W.W.; McCormick, S.D.; Navarro, I.; Power, D.M.; Gutierrez, J. Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factors in fish: Where we are and where to go. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2005, 142, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jakob, S.; Lovell-Badge, R. Sex determination and the control of Sox9 expression in mammals. Febs. J. 2011, 278, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Takamatsu, N.; Kanda, H.; Ito, M.; Yamashita, A.; Yamashita, S.; Shiba, T. Rainbow trout SOX9: cDNA cloning, gene structure and expression. Gene 1997, 202, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chiang, E.F.; Pai, C.I.; Wyatt, M.; Yan, Y.L.; Postlethwait, J.; Chung, B. Two sox9 genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes: Expression of similar transcription activators in distinct sites. Dev. Biol. 2001, 231, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kluver, N.; Herpin, A.; Braasch, I.; Driessle, J.; Schartl, M. Regulatory back-up circuit of medaka Wt1 co-orthologs ensures PGC maintenance. Dev. Biol. 2009, 325, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lu, Y.F.; Liu, Q.; Liu, K.Q.; Wang, H.Y.; Li, C.H.; Wang, Q.; Shao, C.W. Identification of global alternative splicing and sex-specific splicing via comparative transcriptome analysis of gonads of Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Zool. Res. 2022, 43, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Toshima, J.; Koji, T.; Mizuno, K. Stage-specific expression of testis-specific protein kinase 1 (TESK1) in rat spermatogenic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 249, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Meng, L.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Shao, C.; Wang, N.; Chen, S. Cloning and characterization of tesk1, a novel spermatogenesis-related gene, in the tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, N.; Gong, Z.; Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Yang, Q.; Chen, S. Characterization of Chinese tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase: Expression profile, epigenetic modification, and its knock-down effect. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2021, 312, 113870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The conserved domain of the Csfoxo protein. Horizontal grey bars represent amino acid sequences with no predictive functional domains, while colored boxes represent regions with reliable predictive domains. Forkhead binding domain (yellow); Low-complexity region (pink).
Figure 1. The conserved domain of the Csfoxo protein. Horizontal grey bars represent amino acid sequences with no predictive functional domains, while colored boxes represent regions with reliable predictive domains. Forkhead binding domain (yellow); Low-complexity region (pink).
Ijms 24 07625 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of foxo from nine fish, Chinese tongue sole (Csfoxo), medaka (Olfoxo), turbot (Smfoxo), zebrafish (Drfoxo), spotted gar (Lofoxo), Nile tilapia (Onfoxo), fugu (Trfoxo), pufferfish (Pffoxo), and Atlantic halibut (Hhfoxo), and two mammals, mice (Mmfoxo) and humans (Hsfoxo). Different colors in the circle represent different fox members (blue for foxo1, red for foxo6, green for foxo3, orange for foxo4), and light color for fish and dark color for mammal. Red pentagrams indicate fox members of Chinese tongue sole.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees of foxo from nine fish, Chinese tongue sole (Csfoxo), medaka (Olfoxo), turbot (Smfoxo), zebrafish (Drfoxo), spotted gar (Lofoxo), Nile tilapia (Onfoxo), fugu (Trfoxo), pufferfish (Pffoxo), and Atlantic halibut (Hhfoxo), and two mammals, mice (Mmfoxo) and humans (Hsfoxo). Different colors in the circle represent different fox members (blue for foxo1, red for foxo6, green for foxo3, orange for foxo4), and light color for fish and dark color for mammal. Red pentagrams indicate fox members of Chinese tongue sole.
Ijms 24 07625 g002
Figure 3. Structure and motif analysis of Foxo proteins in five fish species: Chinese tongue sole (Csfoxo), medaka (Olfoxo), turbot (Smfoxo), Nile tilapia (Onfoxo), and fugu (Trfoxo).
Figure 3. Structure and motif analysis of Foxo proteins in five fish species: Chinese tongue sole (Csfoxo), medaka (Olfoxo), turbot (Smfoxo), Nile tilapia (Onfoxo), and fugu (Trfoxo).
Ijms 24 07625 g003
Figure 4. Expression patterns of Csfoxo in gonads at different developmental stages. (A) Expression patterns of Csfoxo1a at different developmental stages; (B) expression patterns of Csfoxo3a at different developmental stages; (C) expression patterns of Csfoxo3b at different developmental stages; (D) expression patterns of Csfoxo4 at different developmental stages; (E) expression patterns of Csfoxo6-like at different developmental stages; (F) expression patterns of Csfoxo1a-like at different developmental stages. The letters above each chart indicate significant differences, and the bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 4. Expression patterns of Csfoxo in gonads at different developmental stages. (A) Expression patterns of Csfoxo1a at different developmental stages; (B) expression patterns of Csfoxo3a at different developmental stages; (C) expression patterns of Csfoxo3b at different developmental stages; (D) expression patterns of Csfoxo4 at different developmental stages; (E) expression patterns of Csfoxo6-like at different developmental stages; (F) expression patterns of Csfoxo1a-like at different developmental stages. The letters above each chart indicate significant differences, and the bars represent standard deviations.
Ijms 24 07625 g004
Figure 5. Transcriptional activity of the Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, and Csfoxo4 promoters: (A) Csfoxo1a; (B) Csfoxo3a; (C) Csfoxo3b; (D) Csfoxo4. Results correspond to the addition of c-Jun and C/EBPα transcription factors, and the effect on the mutation of two transcription-factor-binding sites. Different letters indicate significant differences, and bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 5. Transcriptional activity of the Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, Csfoxo3b, and Csfoxo4 promoters: (A) Csfoxo1a; (B) Csfoxo3a; (C) Csfoxo3b; (D) Csfoxo4. Results correspond to the addition of c-Jun and C/EBPα transcription factors, and the effect on the mutation of two transcription-factor-binding sites. Different letters indicate significant differences, and bars represent standard deviations.
Ijms 24 07625 g005
Figure 6. Effects of the knockdown of the genes Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, and Csfoxo3b in a testicular cell line. (A) The effect of the knockdown of three siRNAs on Csfoxo1a. (B) The effect of the knockdown of Csfoxo1a on other genes. (C) The effect of the knockdown of three siRNAs on Csfoxo3a. (D) The effect of the knockdown of Csfoxo3a on other genes. (E) The effect of the knockdown of three siRNAs on Csfoxo3b. (F) The effect of the knockdown of Csfoxo3b on other genes. * indicates significant differences.
Figure 6. Effects of the knockdown of the genes Csfoxo1a, Csfoxo3a, and Csfoxo3b in a testicular cell line. (A) The effect of the knockdown of three siRNAs on Csfoxo1a. (B) The effect of the knockdown of Csfoxo1a on other genes. (C) The effect of the knockdown of three siRNAs on Csfoxo3a. (D) The effect of the knockdown of Csfoxo3a on other genes. (E) The effect of the knockdown of three siRNAs on Csfoxo3b. (F) The effect of the knockdown of Csfoxo3b on other genes. * indicates significant differences.
Ijms 24 07625 g006
Table 1. Abbreviations used in this table: Chr, chromosome; ORF, open reading frame; AA, amino acid; MW, protein molecular weight; pI, isoelectric point.
Table 1. Abbreviations used in this table: Chr, chromosome; ORF, open reading frame; AA, amino acid; MW, protein molecular weight; pI, isoelectric point.
NameGene IDChrGenomic LocationORFAAMW (kDa)pI
Csfoxo1a103378152412505667-12537512199266371.496.29
Csfoxo3a103379355111149558-11159268187262366.525.02
Csfoxo3b10338065271249234-1287747198966270.124.79
Csfoxo4103390850158667641-8676081196865569.555.71
Csfoxo6-like103387887131015113-1050104217872578.076.78
Csfoxo1a-like1033957071917163967-17178152187262367.96.6
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, T.; Zhang, M.; Sun, Y.; Li, L.; Cheng, P.; Li, X.; Wang, N.; Chen, S.; Xu, W. Identification and Functional Analysis of foxo Genes in Chinese Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087625

AMA Style

Zhang T, Zhang M, Sun Y, Li L, Cheng P, Li X, Wang N, Chen S, Xu W. Identification and Functional Analysis of foxo Genes in Chinese Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087625

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Tingting, Mengqian Zhang, Yuxuan Sun, Lu Li, Peng Cheng, Xihong Li, Na Wang, Songlin Chen, and Wenteng Xu. 2023. "Identification and Functional Analysis of foxo Genes in Chinese Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087625

APA Style

Zhang, T., Zhang, M., Sun, Y., Li, L., Cheng, P., Li, X., Wang, N., Chen, S., & Xu, W. (2023). Identification and Functional Analysis of foxo Genes in Chinese Tongue Sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7625. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087625

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop