Next Article in Journal
Practice Must Be Backed up by Theory! A Special Issue on Plant Community Ecology
Next Article in Special Issue
Addendum: Tellez, P.H.; et al. Relationships between Foliar Fungal Endophyte Communities and Ecophysiological Traits of CAM and C3 Epiphytic Bromeliads in a Neotropical Rainforest. Diversity 2020, 12, 378
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Organic and Conventional Systems Used to Grow Pecan Trees on Diversity of Soil Microbiota
Previous Article in Special Issue
Relationships between Foliar Fungal Endophyte Communities and Ecophysiological Traits of CAM and C3 Epiphytic Bromeliads in a Neotropical Rainforest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Fungal Diversity

by
Sunshine A. Van Bael
1,2
1
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
2
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama
Diversity 2020, 12(11), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/d12110437
Submission received: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Diversity)
Fungi play key roles at two levels of ecological organization: in communities, fungi are symbionts of plants and animals, while in ecosystems, fungi are decomposers that recycle nutrients to other organisms. Connections occur between the community and ecosystem levels, however, as some symbioses result in nutrient acquisition to increase primary productivity. Moreover, at the community level, the outcome of fungal symbioses can range along a spectrum from parasitic to mutualistic for the host. Parasites can decrease primary productivity, and thus influence ecosystem processes. Kingdom Fungi offers a journey up the ladder from micro to macro to global.
As fungi interact with diverse hosts and substrates, Kingdom Fungi encompass high levels of diversity, with recent estimates that range from 2.2 to 3.8 million species on the planet [1]. A large part of this diversity relates to plant symbioses and to decomposition. The study of microfungi as symbionts and decomposers has benefitted from recent advances in sequencing from environmental samples. High-throughput sequencing has allowed the refinement of fungal diversity estimates, but the majority of fungal taxa that are identified as unique sequences remains unidentified [1]. Still, broad community patterns are helpful for understanding the influence of environmental or host changes on fungal communities.
In this Special Issue, the authors described trends in fungal diversity in various environments and using different techniques. All of the articles dealt with fungi and their relation to plants and soil, and most of the contributions touched on how human disturbance or restoration actions influence fungi. The contributions differed in the techniques used to describe fungal communities, with two culture-independent studies and three culture-dependent studies. Culture-independent studies are useful for in-depth descriptions of fungal diversity patterns and of cryptic diversity from non-culturable organisms. Culture-dependent studies can be used to estimate fungal abundance and diversity, describe taxonomy, and provide strains for tests of ecological function.
Both of the culture-independent studies in this Special Issue took place in coastal wetlands. Schroeder et al. [2] studied the fungal communities associated with the roots and soil of an invasive plant species, Phragmites australis, with comparisons to native species. Their study highlights the prevalence of pathogens accumulating in the tissues of invasive species. Almeida et al. [3] studied the soil fungal diversity on restored tree islands in the Florida Everglades. The tree islands are surrounded by grassy wetlands and serve as habitat for many plants and animals. Their study took place 15 years after restoration actions created the islands, and they found that fungal communities differed with respect to restoration techniques.
The culture-dependent studies in this issue were associated with agricultural and tropical systems. Ortega Fors et al. [4] described strains of dark septate endophytes in several varieties of sugar cane. They established that it was common to observe dark septate endophytes in the roots of sugar cane and identified at least five fungal species. Barney et al. [5] investigated how the use of glyphosate and copper-based herbicides has influenced communities of yeasts in the Appalachian region of USA. This work showed how anthropogenic activity has reduced biodiversity and has resulted in artificial selection of non-target organisms like yeast. Finally, Tellez et al. [6] presented patterns on endophytic fungi in epiphytes of tropical forests. Their study related foliar endophyte communities to the physiological and physical traits of epiphyte leaves. Together, these five studies increase our understanding of fungal diversity and will aid in outlining the challenges involved in fungal conservation.

Funding

This research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation, NSF-DEB 1556583 to S.A.V.B.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to the School of Science and Engineering at Tulane University and the Van Bael lab members.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hawksworth, D.L.; Lücking, R. Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. In The Fungal Kingdom; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; pp. 79–95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Schroeder, C.S.; Halbrook, S.; Birnbaum, C.; Waryszak, P.; Wilber, W.; Farrer, E.C. Phragmites australis Associates with Belowground Fungal Communities Characterized by High Diversity and Pathogen Abundance. Diversity 2020, 12, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Almeida, B.K.; Ross, M.S.; Stoffella, S.L.; Sah, J.P.; Cline, E.; Sklar, F.; Afkhami, M.E. Diversity and Structure of Soil Fungal Communities across Experimental Everglades Tree Islands. Diversity 2020, 12, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fors, R.O.; Patreze, C.M.; Louro Berbara, R.L.; Carbone Carneiro, M.A.; Saggin-Júnior, O.J. Dark Septate Endophytic Fungi Associated with Sugarcane Plants Cultivated in São Paulo, Brazil. Diversity 2020, 12, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barney, J.B.; Winans, M.J.; Blackwood, C.B.; Pupo, A.; Gallagher, J.E. The Yeast Atlas of Appalachia: Species and Phenotypic Diversity of Herbicide Resistance in Wild Yeast. Diversity 2020, 12, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tellez, P.H.; Woods, C.L.; Formel, S.; Bael, S.A. Relationships between Foliar Fungal Endophyte Communities and Ecophysiological Traits of CAM and C3 Epiphytic Bromeliads in a Neotropical Rainforest. Diversity 2020, 12, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Van Bael, S.A. Fungal Diversity. Diversity 2020, 12, 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12110437

AMA Style

Van Bael SA. Fungal Diversity. Diversity. 2020; 12(11):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12110437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Van Bael, Sunshine A. 2020. "Fungal Diversity" Diversity 12, no. 11: 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12110437

APA Style

Van Bael, S. A. (2020). Fungal Diversity. Diversity, 12(11), 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12110437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop