Next Article in Journal
Gradients in the Diversity of Plants and Large Herbivores Revealed with DNA Barcoding in a Semi-Arid African Savanna
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms Generating Dichotomies in the Life Strategies of Heterotrophic Marine Prokaryotes
Previous Article in Special Issue
COI Metabarcoding Provides Insights into the Highly Diverse Diet of a Generalist Salamander, Salamandra salamandra (Caudata: Salamandridae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Ecological Role of Salamanders as Prey and Predators

by
Sebastiano Salvidio
Department of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genova, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genova, Italy
Diversity 2022, 14(3), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030218
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Accepted: 15 March 2022 / Published: 16 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Ecological Role of Salamanders as Predators and Prey)
Salamanders comprise more than 700 living species, mainly found in the Northern hemisphere (i.e., North and Central America and the northern part of Eurasia), and the Amazon region of South America. Salamanders constitute a diverse clade of amphibians with different reproduction modes that range from completely aquatic to fully terrestrial [1]. Salamanders are key components of many temperate forest ecosystems, in particular in North America [2] and in high altitude lakes, where fish are naturally absent [3]. In these temperate ecosystems, salamanders and newts are top predators that regulate top down the invertebrate prey community [4], while at the same time being high-energetic prey items for birds, mammals and reptiles [5].
In any case, despite their ecological importance, the role of salamanders in resource–consumer networks remains remarkably understudied. Therefore, this Special Issue aims to better understand the different ecological roles of these small vertebrates, both in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Indeed, the eight papers published addressed many of the issues related to the trophic strategies and the trophic position of salamanders in the ecological food web. In particular, one review paper [6] makes a significant contribution to our understanding of salamander and newt populations functioning as predators, competitors and prey in freshwater ecosystems. Furthermore, it appears relevant that four papers were all conducted in underground habitats, both of natural or artificial origin [7,8,9,10]. This relatively high number of papers dedicated to the ecological structure and functioning of underground ecosystems clearly indicates a recent growing interest of ecologists and conservation biologists over this highly understudied environment [11,12]. Indeed, in underground habitats, salamanders are, together with cave fish, the only vertebrates that were able to permanently establish reproductive populations. This fact highlights the adaptability of salamanders to extreme subterranean habitats, that were probably colonized to reduce the environmental stress and the predation level experienced in adjacent epigean habitats [13]. Two other papers of this Special Issue analyze the diet of terrestrial salamanders, the first in Spain [14] and the second in Italy [15]. In the former paper, a novel COI metabarcoding approach was used to analyze the dietary habits of the fire salamander Salamandra salamandra [14], while in the latter, the authors applied for the first time in salamanders the technique of network analysis to study the trophic strategy of the Alpine salamander Salamandra atra [15]. Finally, one paper tested the niche variation hypothesis [16] in a newt community sampled in a complex system of artificial aquatic sites [17]. These authors found that individual specialization was widespread in all populations and also provided novel insights on the level of dissimilarity of individual trophic variation in closely related and ecologically similar newt species [17].
Despite the diverse topics that were discussed by all these papers, other interesting issues involving the role of salamanders in the trophic web and their complex behaviors remain to be elucidated and deserve further attention. For example, aposematic displays and deimatic behaviors of salamanders (i.e., startling visual or auditive signals that distract a predator, giving the attacked prey an opportunity to escape) have received little attention by behavioral ecologists [18]. However, separating aposematism from deimatism in brightly colored salamanders or newts may be challenging [19]. This because the same visual signal may be perceived in a completely different way by animals possessing different visual systems, and indeed, salamanders may be attacked by many different predators that will perceive differently the colors displayed by their potential prey [5].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wake, D.B.; Koo, M.S. Primer-Amphibians. Cur. Biol. 2011, 28, R1221–R1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Burton, T.M.; Likens, G.E. Salamander populations and biomass in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Copeia 1975, 1975, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ventura, M.; Tiberti, R.; Buchaca, T.; Buñay, D.; Sabás, I.; Miró, A. Why should we preserve fishless high mountain lakes? In High Mountain Conservation in a Changing World; Catalan, J., Ninot, J.M., Aniz, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 181–205. [Google Scholar]
  4. Best, M.L.; Welsh, H.H. The trophic role of a forest salamander: Impacts on invertebrates, leaf litter retention, and the humification process. Ecosphere 2014, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wells, K.D. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians; University of Chigago Press: Chcago, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sánchez-Hernández, J. Reciprocal role of salamanders in aquatic energy flow pathways. Diversity 2020, 12, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lunghi, E.; Cianferoni, F.; Ceccolini, F.; Zhao, Y.; Manenti, R.; Corti, C.; Ficetola, G.F.; Mancinelli, G. Same diet, different strategies: Variability of individual feeding habits across three populations of ambrosi’s cave salamander (Hydromantes ambrosii). Diversity 2020, 12, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lunghi, E.; Cianferoni, F.; Ceccolini, F.; Merilli, S.; Zhao, Y.; Manenti, R.; Ficetola, G.F.; Corti, C. Ecological observations on hybrid populations of european plethodontid salamanders, genus Speleomantes. Diversity 2021, 13, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manenti, R.; Lunghi, E.; Barzaghi, B.; Melotto, A.; Falaschi, M.; Ficetola, G.F. Do salamanders limit the abundance of groundwater invertebrates in subterranean habitats? Diversity 2020, 12, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Salvidio, S.; Costa, A.; Oneto, F.; Pastorino, M.V. Variability of a subterranean prey-predator community in space and time. Diversity 2020, 12, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Culver, D.C.; Pipan, T. Shallow Subterranean Habitats: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ficetola, G.F.; Canedoli, C.; Stoch, F. The Racovitzan impediment and the hidden biodiversity of unexplored environments. Cons. Biol. 2019, 33, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salvidio, S.; Romano, A.; Palumbi, G.; Costa, A. Safe caves and dangerous forests? Predation risk may contribute to salamander colonization of subterranean habitats. Sci. Nat. 2017, 104, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Marques, A.D.M.; Mata, V.A.; Velo Anton, G. COI metabarcoding provides insights into the highly diverse diet of a generalist salamander, Salamandra salamandra (Caudata: Salamandridae). Diversity 2022, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roner, L.; Costa, A.; Pedrini, P.; Matteucci, G.; Leonardi, S.; Romano, A. A Midsummer night’s diet: Snapshot on trophic strategy of the Alpine aalamander, Salamandra atra. Diversity 2020, 12, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Valen, L. Morphological variation and width of ecological niche. Am. Nat. 1965, 99, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mirabasso, J.M.; Bissattini, A.; Bologna, M.A.; Luiselli, L.; Stellati, L.; Vignoli, L. Feeding strategies of co-occurring newt species across different conditions of syntopy: A test of the “within-population niche variation” hypothesis. Diversity 2020, 12, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruxton, G.D.; Sherratt, T.N.; Speed, M.P. Avoiding Attack. The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals, and Mimicry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barbieri, G.; Costa, A.; Salvidio, S. Is the northern spectacled salamander Salamandrina perspicillata aposematic? A preliminary test with clay models. Acta Herpetol. 2021, 16, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salvidio, S. The Ecological Role of Salamanders as Prey and Predators. Diversity 2022, 14, 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030218

AMA Style

Salvidio S. The Ecological Role of Salamanders as Prey and Predators. Diversity. 2022; 14(3):218. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salvidio, Sebastiano. 2022. "The Ecological Role of Salamanders as Prey and Predators" Diversity 14, no. 3: 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030218

APA Style

Salvidio, S. (2022). The Ecological Role of Salamanders as Prey and Predators. Diversity, 14(3), 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030218

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop