Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of Ctenotaenia marmotae (Frölich, 1802) Railliet, 1893 (Cyclophyllidea: Anoplocephalidae) Parasitizing Rodents of the Genus Marmota and Spermophilus from Eurasia
Next Article in Special Issue
Microcrustacean (Cladocera and Copepoda) Assemblages of a Tropical Karst Lake District
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular and Morphological Characterization of Two New Species of Globisporangium from Southern China, G. pengfuense and G. tenuihyphum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biodiversity and Litter Breakdown in a Karstic Freshwater System (Doberdò Lake, Northeast Italy) in Relation to Water Level Fluctuations and Environmental Features
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Population Genetic Structure of Endemic Fish Species Facilitating Their Survival in Changing Environments—A Case Study on the Genus Telestes in Croatia

1
Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
National Museum, Václavské náměstí 68, 115 79 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(7), 529; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070529
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 25 April 2022 / Accepted: 27 April 2022 / Published: 30 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiversity in Karst Landscapes)

Abstract

:
The genus Telestes primarily comprises freshwater fish distributed mostly in the Mediterranean area. Recent investigation of the evolutionary history of this genus revealed that it originated in southern Europe, where the most ancient Telestes species are still present. The isolation of rivers in the karstic region facilitated allopatric speciation, resulting in a high number of Telestes species and a great portion of endemic species in freshwater systems of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Most of the endemic Telestes species have very small distribution areas, inhabiting a single river or a few water bodies in a single karstic field, making them extremely vulnerable to anthropogenic changes. In order to contribute to practical conservation of the endemic Telestes species through the design of conservational measures that are likely to be the most effective in ensuring the future viability and undisturbed evolutionary course of those species, we have investigated their population genetic structure and estimated their viabilities. Population viability analyses were carried out based on the current state of populations and their habitats, as well as recognized threats. Several scenarios also included potential threats. Our results show that invasive species pose the biggest threat to the future survival of the endemic Telestes species. Contrary to previous opinions that a reduced genetic diversity is characteristic for small populations, high intraspecific genetic diversity was revealed inside most of the investigated species, which might enable most of the populations to cope with future changes and mitigate negative effects.

1. Introduction

Endemic species, particularly if distributed across a very small area, pose a tough set of problems in conservation biology, and their protection is complex and challenging for several reasons (see [1]). Since they are distributed in a small, restricted area, each threat occurring there is usually affecting the whole species or a great portion of its individuals. Moreover, there is no or only a limited possibility for population augmentation or reintroduction. Finally, it is often considered that such range-restricted and small population-size species, distributed in unique areas, have small genetic diversity (lowered by genetic drift [2,3,4]) and low effective population sizes, reducing their evolutionary potential and increasing their extinction risk [5]. In small populations, the importance of genetic drift relative to selection is increased, and beneficial alleles are usually thought to be lost [6]. On the other hand, deleterious alleles are more likely to reach high frequencies in comparison with the situation in larger populations [6]. Thereafter, small populations are usually considered to have lowered fitness and are more prone to extinction. The reduced genetic diversity, often thought to be characteristic for small populations, makes them less able to respond to environmental changes than larger populations [6].
The genus Telestes Bonaparte, 1837 (family Leuciscidae, order Cypriniformes, class Actinopteri) is primarily comprised of freshwater fish distributed mostly in the Mediterranean area. Ecological conditions in their habitats include moderately cold, flowing or stagnant, well-oxygenated, clean water [7]. Recent investigation of the evolutionary history of the genus [8] revealed that the origin of Telestes occurred in southern Europe, where the most ancient Telestes species are still present. Moreover, an especially high diversity of Telestes at species and intraspecific levels was revealed in the Adriatic watershed in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, as a consequence of a complex geological history of the region leading to triple colonization of that area by distinct Telestes lineages. The isolation of rivers in this karstic area facilitated allopatric speciation, resulting in a high number of Telestes species and great portion of endemic species in freshwater sources of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Out of 14 currently recognized Telestes species, as many as 10 are distributed in the mentioned area [8], 9 of which are endemics, with very restricted distribution ranges. Telestes croaticus (Steindachner, 1866) inhabits only four small karstic rivers (Jadova, Suvaja, Ričica and Obsenica), located in the Lika karstic region in Croatia; T. tursky (Heckel, 1843) has a distribution range restricted to the small Čikola River, a tributary of the Krka River; T. ukliva (Heckel, 1843) is restricted to the Cetina River basin, also in Croatia. Telestes miloradi Bogutskaya, Zupančič, Bogut and Naseka, 2012 is found only in small springs and streams in the Konavosko karstic field in Croatia. Recent investigation [8] disputed the distinctiveness of T. dabar Bogutskaya, Zupančič, Bogut and Naseka, 2012, described from the Dabar karstic field in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Nevertheless, T. metohiensis (Steindachner, 1901) is distributed in the watersheds of the karstic fields in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina. All the mentioned species are endemic species inhabiting small distribution areas in the Adriatic watershed. Three more endemic species have extremely small distribution ranges located at the border between the Adriatic and Black Sea watersheds in Croatia but belonging to the Black Sea watershed due to the underground connections. Those three species are: T. fontinalis (Karaman, 1972) from the Krbavsko karstic field, T. polylepis (Steindachner, 1866) known from a single locality—Šmit lake, and T. karsticus Marčić and Mrakovčić, 2011, inhabiting few small streams in mountain region in Croatia.
The exceptionally high diversity of Telestes in freshwater systems of middle and southern Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina is a result of several phenomena:
  • Origin of the genus most probably took place in the mentioned region and colonization started from there [8]
  • Complex geological history led to triple colonization by genetically distinct Telestes lineages [8]
  • Isolation of karstic rivers and lakes is promoting allopatric speciation (e.g., [9,10])
  • Undisturbed evolutionary development of populations in rivers that were not affected by glaciations, resulting in their high genetic diversities (e.g., [9]).
Most of the endemic Telestes species have very small distribution areas, inhabiting a single river or few watersheds in a single karstic field [8,11], making them extremely vulnerable to all anthropogenic changes affecting their limited habitats. Furthermore, it is possible that their effective population sizes are low due to the small habitat size but also due to particular environmental conditions, which include dry seasons, lowering of the water level, and droughts in part of or the whole water stream. There are indications that some, if not all, Telestes species migrate to underground shelters during the dry season (personal observation) and maybe even use underground water channels for migrations, similarly to the genus Delminichthys [12], which also inhabits karstic watershed in the same area. Unfortunately, habitats and populations of these endemic species were not spared from significant anthropogenic threats, and in some localities, there are plans for even greater impact in spite of the invaluable importance of these unique biodiversity components. Previous investigation already revealed that, out of six endemic Telestes species further investigated in this research, only T. karsticus turned out to have lower intraspecific genetic diversity, whereas the remaining five species comprised high levels of genetic diversity [8]. In this investigation, we analyzed intrapopulational genetic diversities, as well as relationships among populations in species comprising more than a single population. Furthermore, in order to contribute to practical conservation of the endemic Telestes species, particularly to the design of conservational measures that are likely to be the most effective in ensuring the future viability and undisturbed evolutionary course of those species, we have investigated their population genetic structure and estimated their viabilities. Population viability analyses were carried out based on the current status of populations and habitats, as well as currently recognized and potential threats. Thereafter, after the first investigation in which we analyzed the phylogenetic structure and evolutionary history of the genus Telestes [8], in this investigation, we have made a further step towards understanding the genetic structure of the endemic Telestes species as well as the causes and consequences of the observed genetic diversities, but also put strong emphasis on their conservation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

This investigation comprised population genetic and viability analyses of six Telestes species distributed across northern and central Dinaric karst in Croatia. We have obtained samples from a total of 12 localities (Figure 1). Fish were caught by electrofishing and a small piece of fin tissue from each individual was preserved in ethanol until further analyses. Fin clips were taken after fish were anesthetized, and the fish were released after sampling.

2.2. DNA Isolation and PCR Reactions

We have based our molecular genetic analyses on the gene for cytochrome b (cyt b), which is a part of mitochondrial DNA and turned out to be very useful in population genetic analyses of the genus Telestes [8]. Laboratory protocols for DNA isolation and polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were described in [8]. In order to obtain reliable results from the population genetic analyses, additional samples were included in this investigation (Table 1).

2.3. Interpopulation Genetic Analyses

In order to describe the intraspecific structure of the endemic Telestes species that comprise more than one population (T. karsticus, T. croaticus, T. ukliva), we calculated the genetic differentiation between populations of the same species and estimated the gene flow between them. The level of genetic differentiation among populations was estimated using DnaSP v.5. software [13]. We calculated statistics based on haplotypes (χ2 test and HST) and on nucleotide sequences (KST, KST*, Z and Z*). The null hypothesis that there is no genetic diversity between two populations was rejected based on the permutation test if p < 0.05. Interactions among populations were further investigated using a maximum-likelihood approach [14,15] implemented in MIGRATE 3.2.1 [16]. We estimated the immigration rates as mutation-scaled effective immigration rates (M), which measure the importance of immigrants vs. mutation when bringing new variants into the population, and also as the number of immigrants per generation (Nm).

2.4. Population Viability Analyses

The future viability of six endemic species was analysed using population-viability analysis (PVA), implemented in the Vortex Version 10.2.6.0 software [17]. Vortex uses a simulation model to carry a population or populations through the life cycle, predicting and quantifying the survival (as well as extinction) rates, based on the data implemented into the model in order to describe the population and habitat, as well as present and/or predicted threats and/or conservational measures. We have estimated the extinction risk of populations and species over the next 100 years. The number of repetitions for each scenario was 1000. We have designed several scenarios for each species, one of which (scenario 0) did not comprise any catastrophes, yet it was based on the observed status of populations and their habitats. Five additional scenarios comprised modifications of environmental factors in habitats of Telestes populations, as well as the effects of invasive species. These scenarios are based on realistic presumptions about how habitat characters might be deteriorated in the future, as well as expectations about answers of Telestes populations based on literature data and personal observations. As already stated, Scenario 0 is based on the current status of populations, without additional threats. For the input data for effective population sizes and migrations among populations, the results of this investigation were used, and maximum likelihood estimates for both parameters for all investigated populations were included. Input data on the reproductive system, sex ratio, reproductive rates, and mortality rates were based on previous investigations and literature data [7,18,19,20]. For the description of ecological characters of Telestes species, we have used available data on this genus. Namely, all investigated Telestes species are small species, living in similar karstic environments, occupying a similar ecological niche and with similar requirements regarding habitat conditions. Thereafter, we have described the reproductive system of all investigated Telestes species as polygynous, with the age of the first offspring for both females and males being 1+. The maximum lifespan was estimated to be six years, and we have included the possibility of reproduction until the maximum age. The number of broods per year for the investigated Telestes species is one, and the average number of progenies per brood that was included in the PVA simulation was 1500 (based on the investigation in [7]). The sex ratio by birth is considered to be 1:1 in normal conditions. The only exceptions regarding the sex ratios were Scenarios 3 and 4, as will be explained later.
Scenario 1 presumes water quality changes (due to water pollution, oxygen level lowering, or any other anthropogenic impact), so that the habitat conditions become suboptimal for Telestes species, expressed by the lowering of reproductive rates by 20% and an increase of mortality rates of the offspring by 5%.
Scenario 2 predicts the realistic possibility of invasive species spreading and their negative impact on Telestes populations. Several invasive species have already been recorded in the habitats of the investigated Telestes species (Salmo sp., Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1972), Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758), Ameiurus melas Rafinesque, 1820, Gambusia hoolbroki Girard, 1859; personal observation), and it is possible that others will be identified in the forthcoming period. The negative effects of invasive species are presumed to lower the reproductive rates by 10% and increase the mortality rates by 10% for the youngest age classes and by 7% for older ages.
Scenario 3 forecasts the water temperature increasing due to climate change and its effect on Telestes populations by means of a skewed sex ratio at birth in favor of males (predicts 70% of males by birth). Such a phenomenon of a skewed ratio has already been estimated in some Telestes populations [7,21], and its connection with elevated water temperature levels has also been suggested [7]. In several investigations [7,21], various sex ratios diverging from 1:1 were reported, between 61% and 77% of males at birth, so in Scenario 3, we have included the average value, leaving all other parameters unchanged (the same as in Scenario 0).
Scenario 4 encompasses simultaneous effects of the deterioration of the water quality, invasive species, and temperature increase due to climate change. Unfortunately, the simultaneous action of various threats has been widely observed, leading to the extinction vortex of populations, so this scenario is also realistic and possible. The negative effects of all three threats acting at the same time include a skewed sex ratio (70% of males by birth), reduced reproductive rates (by 20%) due to the deterioration of habitat conditions, and increased mortality rates (by 15% in the youngest age classes and 7% in 2+ and further classes) as a consequence of the effects of both invasive species and suboptimal habitat conditions.
Scenario 5, on the other hand, does not predict continuous lowering of any of the habitat conditions, yet it encompasses catastrophic events (defined in Vortex as events that significantly reduce the survival and/or reproduction potential of a population). Catastrophes included in Scenario 5 were predicted to occur twice in 100 years, destroying 50% of the populations and completely disabling reproduction in the year of occurrence. The catastrophes included may be of different types (e.g., extreme drought events as a consequence of climate change, extreme pollution, habitat modifications, diseases, etc.) because we did not specify their type, yet we specified their effects on the endemic Telestes populations.
It is important to notice that, obviously, it is not possible to have a full and complete forecast of future events, and we cannot know for sure what kind of threats will affect which population, or when. It is possible that the effects of the predicted threats will be more or less severe than predicted. Nevertheless, we have prepared realistic PVA scenarios, acting in the same way on various Telestes species and populations, which is an approach that enables us to pinpoint the most dangerous threats for each species, compare the responses of various Telestes species and populations to the same threat, and quantify and model their extinction risk in the next 100 years. Such information is very valuable for conservation purposes.

3. Results

A previous investigation [8] already revealed the high genetic diversity of the majority of Telestes species distributed in the karstic watersheds in Croatia, explained by a long-term evolutionary history in favorable conditions and a lack of bottlenecks during longer geologic periods. This investigation revealed intrapopulational diversities and differences between them. The intrapopulational diversities of all populations comprised under T. croaticus and T. ukliva are very high (Table 2). Populations of T. karsticus contain the lowest levels of genetic diversity, with all samples from Studenac expressing the same haplotype (no genetic diversity). The remaining populations of this species also express much lower genetic diversities than those found in populations of the remaining species. Of note, T. fontinalis and T. tursky, even though each species has an extremely small distribution range, comprise just a single population, and have small effective population sizes (1185 and 1685, respectively; see Table 3), they express high levels of genetic diversity (Table 2).
Populations of T. croaticus, T. karsticus, and T. ukliva express a high level of isolation, and only a very restricted gene flow has been noticed. The T. croaticus gene flow from Obsenica to Jadova (M = 3650, Nm = 29) as well as from Suvaja to Ričica (M = 1563, Nm = 13) has been estimated. The Sušik population of T. karsticus seems to be receiving immigrants from Studenac and Jasenak populations (for both population pairs M = 980, Nm = 11). Very small bi-directional migrations have been noticed between Cetina and Vinelić populations of T. ukliva (Nm = 5 in both directions). It is interesting that migrations were noticed among populations that are not connected to ground watercourses. Nevertheless, all estimated migration events are very small and cannot be considered as contributing significantly to the size or diversity of any of the populations. For T. croaticus, particularly high levels of nucleotide diversity (0.01074 vs. 0.00506, which is the maximum value observed in the remaining species) and the total number of nucleotide differences (12.225 vs. max. 5.758 in the remaining species) were observed. Among T. croaticus populations, those parameters were the highest in the Obsenica population, much higher than in any of the remaining populations and species.
Effective population sizes varied greatly among populations (Table 3); however, for the majority of populations, they seem appropriately high regarding the carrying capacities of geographically restricted karstic habitats. Expectedly, the lowest effective population size was estimated for the T. karsticus population from the Studenac stream, and estimates for the remaining T. karsticus populations were lower than for populations belonging to the remaining species. For T. karsticus populations, a low effective population size was observed inside the Obsenica population of T. croaticus, whereas the remaining T. croaticus populations have higher effective population sizes, particularly the population from the Ričica River.
Genetic differentiation tests revealed that populations of T. karsticus and T. ukliva are genetically uniform, whereas there is genetic distinctiveness between populations of T. croaticus. The original hypothesis that there is no genetic distinctiveness between populations was rejected only in the case of T. croaticus, where a permutation test revealed estimates obtained by all genetic differentiation tests to be statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Interesting and important results were yielded by PVA analyses conducted on the endemic Telestes species and based on a total of six different scenarios (Scenario 0 encompassing the current situation, without additional threats, and Scenarios 1–5 modelling the viability of the investigated Telestes populations and species in cases of possible future threats and catastrophes) (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The viability of all populations and species is predicted under the current conditions (the probability of extinction in the next 100 years being 0). Moreover, Scenario 0 anticipates the stability of the majority of populations. Exceptions include T. karsticus populations from the Studenac stream and Jasenak field for which a reduction in the effective population sizes is anticipated. Consequently, it is likely that the effective population size of T. karsticus as a species will be reduced in the next 100 years if the current conditions remain. All four scenarios that comprise threats on habitats of the investigating species occurring and/or being more severe and intense (Scenarios 1–4) yielded a strong prediction of all populations experiencing extinction within the next 100 years. Scenarios 2 and 4 seem to be particularly problematic, which predict the very soon extinction of all endemic Telestes species (within the next 15 years). Scenario 5, encompassing catastrophic events of strong negative effects on populations, is not likely to provoke their extinction, although fluctuations and reductions in the effective population sizes will probably occur under such conditions.

4. Discussion

Small, isolated populations inhabiting restricted areas are often considered to lose genetic diversity due to genetic drift [2,3,6,22]. Many other problems described by conservation genetics are also thought to be characteristic for small populations, such as the Allee effect, accumulation of deleterious mutations due to mutational meltdown, decrease in genetic diversity due to selection (the Bulmer effect), inbreeding depression, etc. [6,23]. There is evidence that in very small populations, natural selection is ineffective, contrary to significant genetic drift [22], and the importance of random genetic drift is increased, acting towards the loss of beneficial alleles [6]. Small populations are, thereafter, usually considered particularly endangered, and their future survival questionable. However, the results of this investigation on the endemic Telestes species clearly show that those species are not necessarily endangered just because they have small populations and are distributed in restricted areas, nor do they express genetic problems usually reported for small populations.
Almost all investigated Telestes species, despite their extremely restricted distribution ranges and mostly small effective population sizes, express moderate-to-high genetic diversities. During a long-term evolutionary history in their unique environments [8], they have developed adequate adaptations and also accumulated high amounts of genetic diversity, which is probable the reason for their future viability. This hypothesis is corroborated by our results because Scenario 0 did not result in the extinction of any of the species, not even the ones comprised of a single population. When discussing the obtained results, it is necessary to have in mind the low sample number for T. polylepis and several populations belonging to other species. Undoubtedly, a higher sample number would yield more precise and reliable results. Nevertheless, patterns that we have observed and present in this paper on the higher genetic diversity and effective population sizes corresponding with habitat carrying capacities have been observed in almost all species, and most of them are well represented with a satisfactory sample number, which makes our conclusions reliable.
Out of the investigated species, only T. karsticus has lower genetic diversity. From a conservational perspective, the situation in the Studenac stream is particularly worrying, where no genetic diversity has been recorded and all samples possess the same haplotype. Since all the remaining investigated populations express much higher levels of genetic polymorphism, the situation observed in the Studenac stream, but to a somewhat lesser extent also found in the Jasenak field population, are probable consequences of the local unfavorable conditions resulting in a bottleneck effect in the evolutionary history of the mentioned T. karsticus populations. Even though such results are not in accordance with the pattern more widely observed in this investigation (high genetic diversity present in small populations), this knowledge is very important from a conservational perspective. Without this knowledge, we might consider T. karsticus less endangered—because of its larger area of occupancy and extent of occurrence, as well as the inclusion of more than a single population—than some other endemic Telestes species, for example, T. polylepis, T. fontinalis, and T. ukliva. However, regardless of its somewhat larger distribution area and higher effective size, it has a reduced evolutionary potential (because of the reduced genetic diversity), and its viability is lower than that of the remaining investigated species, corroborated also by PVA analyses. These findings also point out the necessity of obtaining data from all populations before making conservational conclusions. Moreover, since the gene flow among T. karsticus populations is almost absent, each population depends solely on its own viability and effective size, which underlines the necessity for immediate, adequate conservation of those populations. Based on the obtained results, the conservation plan for T. karsticus should certainly include population augmentation, to prevent any additional reduction in population sizes that are predicted to occur under current conditions.
On the other hand, genetic diversities observed in the remaining populations reveal that small genetic polymorphisms are not necessary characters of small and isolated populations. Interestingly, contrary to the opinion that natural selection is ineffective in small-sized populations due to rapid genetic drift, some theoretical models [24] suggest moderate or strong balancing selection on small populations, opposing random drift and maintaining polymorphism over thousands of generations. Moreover, it was recently proposed that small populations do not continuously decline in fitness due to the fixation of slightly deleterious mutations, but only until drift-selection balance is reached and the fixation of beneficial mutations counteracts the fixation of slightly deleterious mutations [6,25]. For the lack of small-effect deleterious mutations in small populations, their adaptation to drift-robust fitness peaks has been proposed as an explanation [26]; the results of [26] suggested that small populations evolve to alternative areas of the fitness landscape by maintaining small-effect beneficial mutations. Although the authors propose that the theory of drift robustness in small populations might be true for bacterial endosymbionts and RNA viruses, their hypothesis is worth investigation in higher organisms that naturally live in small populations, in harsh conditions of karstic watersheds and, based on our results, comprise much higher genetic diversities than expected in the presence of the significant genetic drift. Furthermore, there are literature data on other mechanisms opposing a reduction in genetic diversity and loss of fitness in small populations. The authors of Ref. [27] suggested that reverse mutations (acting to return deleterious mutant alleles to the fit original forms) can substantially slow the loss of fitness. Several interesting reports (reviewed in [6]) pointed to the possibility that the rate of beneficial mutations may even increase as the mean fitness of a small population drops.
Some reports [6,28] have proposed an effective population size of a few hundred individuals to be a critical borderline below which it is likely that the population will decline in fitness but above which beneficial mutations allow the population to persist. Populations above a critical threshold size seem to be able to persist as a result of the balancing effects of the fixation of beneficial alleles [6]. Effective population sizes estimated for Telestes populations are mostly in the range of a few hundred to two thousand (exceptions are both T. ukliva populations and T. croaticus in the Ričica River, which have even higher effective population sizes but also inhabit the two largest rivers among the investigated water bodies, which are, moreover, permanent). Thereafter, the effective population sizes of Telestes species do not seem to be too small to enable population viability based on the conclusions made in [6]. For most populations, it is not likely that carrying capacities in their small, karstic environments are much higher. Exceptionally high nucleotide diversity and the number of nucleotide differences noticed in T. croaticus, particularly in the Obsenica River, corroborates pronounced genetic structuring of this species, as already revealed in a previous investigation [8]. Both lineages are present in the Obsenica River, and their taxonomic status should be investigated further.
Based on the obtained results, the investigated populations mostly seem to be isolated, and the gene flow estimates indicate a very low or non-existing gene flow among populations. Nevertheless, estimation of the gene flow between populations inhabiting rivers that currently have no surface connections, together with their existence in streams with extreme fluctuations in the surface water level, indicates the possibility that Telestes species exploit underground water systems as possible shelters during dry seasons and/or as migration routes between localities that have no aboveground connections. For example, the gene flow between T. croaticus populations from the Obsenica and Jadova Rivers has been noticed, and those two rivers have no surface connections. Similarly, two populations of T. karsticus (from Studenac and Jasenak localities) have no surface connections, but a small gene flow between them has been estimated. On the other hand, Suvaja and Ričica (inhabited by two T. croaticus populations that also exchange migrants) and Cetina and Vinalić (inhabited by two populations of T. ukliva) do have surface connections. A conclusion for migrations through underground water passages has already been reported for the genus Delminichthys, which also inhabits karstic water systems in the same area [12]. Thereafter, the possibility that fish of the genus Telestes have similar adaptations deserves further investigation.
In addition to the important conclusion that small endemic populations are not doomed to extinction and seem to express significant evolutionary potential and viability under current conditions, PVA results clearly pinpointed the most dangerous threats for the investigated species. Since Scenarios 2 and 4 predicted the rapid extinction of all the investigated populations and species, their presumptions seem to be the most problematic for the endemic Telestes species. Scenario 2 encompasses negative effects of invasive species, whereas Scenario 4 predicts simultaneous effects of different threats. Expectedly, simultaneous occurrence of several threats on the endemic Telestes species would result in their joint effects reducing the population sizes and provoking species extinctions extremely quickly. Unfortunately, this scenario is not unlikely and cases of extinction vortex, wherein different environmental and genetic problems act at the same time, enlarging negative effects on the populations, present one of the biggest threats for biodiversity conservation [29]. On the other hand, Scenario 2 reveals that invasive species can be pinpointed as the most dangerous individual threat for the endemic Telestes species. Field observations corroborate this conclusion, particularly the disappearance of T. karsticus from localities where trout species were introduced (personal observation). Invasive species are already present in habitats of several endemic Telestes species [30]. In some of the areas, the number of recorded non-native species even dominates the native ones [31]. The effective removal of already present non-native species, as well as the design and implementation of a strategy for continuous monitoring, early discovery, and quick response in order to prevent non-native species from forming stabile populations in watersheds inhabited by native Telestes species should be a top priority in Croatian practical nature conservation. The results of Scenario 3 evince that although skewed sex ratios have been recorded in various Telestes species [7,19,20,21], if this phenomenon were to occur more often due to climate change (since the water temperature is possibly a factor influencing the sex ratio at birth), it would also result in the extinction of all populations within the next 100 years. Of note, in Scenario 3, we have calculated a constant change in the sex ratio and no mitigation effects that might occur as an adaptation of the investigated populations to climate change. Thereafter, it is likely that the effects of water temperature increment will not be as harsh as predicted by Scenario 4. As a conservational measure to prevent the negative effects of a skewed sex ratio on the population viability, we propose monitoring the sex ratio in Telestes populations and augmentation with females from ex situ breeding programs in cases in which the sex ratio would be significantly in favor of males over multiple consecutive years. Interestingly, Scenario 5, comprising very intense effects of catastrophic events occurring twice in 100 years, did not result in the extinction of any of the endemic Telestes species. Since karstic environments are unfavorable and experience pronounced fluctuations, it is probable that adaptations for such environments are more likely to enable survival after catastrophic events, if they do not occur too often. Thereafter, our results clearly evince that small endemic species are by no means doomed to extinction, nor do they necessarily comprise small levels of genetic diversity. On the contrary, during their evolution to specific environments, they seem to have accumulated beneficial mutations that make their fitness high and viability pronounced, and high genetic diversity is surely a reservoir for coping with environmental changes and ensuring the future evolutionary course of the endemic Telestes species. Conservational measures should be primarily focused on the control and prevention of invasive species spreading, since they turned out to be the most dangerous threat for these unique biodiversity components.

5. Conclusions

Small populations are usually considered to be particularly problematic in conservation biology, with many genetic problems occurring in them. However, our investigation on the endemic Telestes species inhabiting very small distribution ranges in the Dinaric karst region reveals that they express moderate-to-high genetic diversities and are not necessarily endangered. We conclude that during their long-term evolutionary histories in specific karstic environments, each species has accumulated a high amount of genetic diversity, which, on the other hand, serves as a reservoir for coping with inevitable changes in their habitats. The viability of small endemic species under current conditions was corroborated by population viability analyses. Although the investigated Telestes species seem to be stable and viable despite their low effective population sizes and distribution ranges, invasive species and/or simultaneous effects of various threats (water quality deterioration, invasive species, and temperature increases due to climate change) might lead to their rapid extinction.

Author Contributions

I.B.: conceptualization (lead), formal analyses, investigation, original draft preparation, supervision. Z.M.: conceptualization, investigation, review and editing, visualization. E.F.: formal analyses, investigation. R.Š.: investigation, formal analyses, review and editing. J.V.: conceptualization, investigation, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable—This study was based on DNA samples already deposit in the Faculty of Science of the Zagreb University and the National Museum in Prague.

Data Availability Statement

All newly obtained DNA haplotypes are deposited in the GenBank under the following accession numbers: ON866740-753.

Acknowledgments

I.B. received support from the SYNTHESYS Programme project CZ-TAF-4228 at the National Museum Prague, financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 ‘‘Capacities’’ Programme. J.V. was supported by the institutional resources of the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic. R.Š. by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO 2019–2023/6.IV.d National Museum, 00023272).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frankham, R. Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995, 29, 305–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Frankham, R. Relationships of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 1996, 10, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Frankham, R. Inbreding and extinction: Island populations. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Furlan, E.; Stoklosa, J.; Griffiths, J.; Gust, N.; Ellis, R.; Huggins, R.M.; Weeks, A.R. Small population size and extremely low levels of genetic diversity in island populations of the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus. Ecol. Evol. 2012, 2, 844–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Markert, J.A.; Champlin, D.M.; Gutjahr-Gobell, R.; Grear, J.S.; Kuhn, A.; McGreevy, T.J., Jr.; Roth, A.; Bagley, M.J.; Nacci, D.E. Population genetic diversity and fitness in multiple environments. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Whitlock, M.C. Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: Drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection. Evolution 2000, 54, 1855–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marčić, Z. Taxonomic, Biological and Ecological Characteristics of the Genus Telestes Bonaparte, 1837 (Actinopterygii) in the Area of the Velika Kapela and Mala Kapela Mountains. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2013. (In Croatian). [Google Scholar]
  8. Buj, I.; Marčić, Z.; Ćaleta, M.; Šanda, R.; Giger, M.F.; Freyhof, J.; Machordom, A.; Vukić, J. Ancient connections among the European rivers and watersheds revealed from the evolutionary history of the genus Telestes (Actinopterygii; Cypriniformes). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Buj, I.; Ćaleta, M.; Marčić, Z.; Šanda, R.; Vukić, J.; Mrakovčić, M. Different histories, different destinies-impact of evolutionary history and population genetic structure on extinction risk of the Adriatic spined loaches (genus Cobitis; Cypriniformes, Actinopterygii). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Buj, I.; Marčić, Z.; Čavlović, K.; Ćaleta, M.; Tutman, P.; Zanella, D.; Duplić, A.; Raguž, L.; Ivić, L.; Horvatić, S.; et al. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis helps to untangle the taxonomic puzzle of chubs (genus Squalius; Cypriniformes, Actinopteri) in the Adriatic basin of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2020, 189, 953–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ćaleta, M.; Buj, I.; Mrakovčić, M.; Mustafić, P.; Zanella, D.; Marčić, Z.; Duplić, A.; Mihinjač, T.; Katavić, I. Croatian Endemic Fishes; State Agency for Environment Protection: Zagreb, Croatia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Palandačić, A.; Matschiner, M.; Zupančić, P.; Snoj, A. Fish migrate underground: The example of Delminichthys adspersus (Cyprinidae). Mol. Ecol. 2012, 21, 1658–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Beerli, P. Estimation of migration rates and population sizes in geographically structured populations. In Advances in Molecular Ecology; Carvalho, G., Ed.; NATOASI Workshop Series IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 39–53. [Google Scholar]
  15. Beerli, P.; Felsenstein, J. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4563–4568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Beerli, P. How to use Migrate or why are markov chain monte carlo programs difficult to use? In Population Genetics for Animal Conservation; Bertorelle, G., Bruford, M.W., Hauffe, H.C., Rizolli, A., Vernese, C., Eds.; Conservation Biology Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lacey, R.C.; Pollak, J.P. VORTEX: A Stohastic Simulation of the Extinction Process; Version 10.2.6.; Chicago Zoological Society: Brookfield, IL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vuković, N. Ecological and Biosystematics Characters of Leucisus souffia Risso, 1826 from the Upper Part of the Drina River. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1985. (In Bosnian). [Google Scholar]
  19. Zanella, D. Biological and Morphological Characters of Leuciscus souffia muticellus (Bonaparte, 1873) (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2003. (In Croatian). [Google Scholar]
  20. Zanella, D.; Mihaljević, Z.; Mrakovčić, M.; Ćaleta, M. Ecology and diet of the endemic Telestes ukliva (Cyprinidae) in the Cetina River system, Croatia. Cybium 2009, 33, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krivokapić, M. Population structure of the endemic Leuciscus souffia montenegrinus (Vuković, 1963) from the Morača River (Monte Negro, Yugoslavia). J. State Nat. Prot. Dep. Nat. Mus. Podgor. 1992, 25, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  22. Munguia-Vega, A.; Esquer-Garrigos, Y.; Rojas-Bracho, L.; Vazquez-Juarez, R.; Castro-Prietos, A.; Flores-Ramirez, S. Genetic drift vs. natural selection in a long-term small isolated population: Major histocompatibility complex class II variation in the Gulf of California endemic porpoise (Phocoena sinus). Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 4051–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. de Rochambeau, H.; Fournet-Hanocq, F.; Khang, J.V.T. Measuring and managing genetic variability in small populations. Ann. De Zootech. 2000, 49, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nevo, E.; Kirzher, V.; Beiles, A.; Karol, A. Selection versus random drift: Long-term polymorphism persistence in small populations (evidence and modelling). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1997, 352, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Poon, A.; Otto, S.P. Compensating for our load of mutations: Freezing the meltdown of small populations. Evolution 2000, 54, 1467–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. LaBar, T.; Adami, C. Evolution of drift robustness in small populations. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lande, R. Risk of population extinction from fixation of new deleterious mutations. Evolution 1994, 48, 1460–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schultz, S.T.; Lynch, M. Mutation and extinction: The role of variable mutational effects, synergistic epistasis, beneficial mutations, and degree of outcrossing. Evolution 1997, 51, 1363–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Primack, R.B. Essentials of Conservation Biology, 4th ed.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, UK.
  30. Ćaleta, M.; Marčić, Z.; Buj, I.; Zanella, D.; Mustafić, P.; Duplić, A.; Horvatić, S. A review of extant Croatian freshwater fish and lampreys—Annotated list and distribution. Croat. J. Fish. 2019, 77, 137–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Vukić, J.; Eliášová, K.; Marić, D.; Šanda, R. Occurrence of alien spirlin (Alburnoides sp.) in the Neretva river basin. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2019, 420, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. A map of the investigated area, with marked distribution ranges of the investigated Telestes species and sampling localities: (1) Jasenak field, (2) Studenac, (3) Sušik, (4) Šmit Lake, (5) Krbavsko field, (6) Jadova, (7) Suvaja, (8) Ričica, (9) Obsenica, (10) Vinalić, (11) Cetina, and (12) Čikola.
Figure 1. A map of the investigated area, with marked distribution ranges of the investigated Telestes species and sampling localities: (1) Jasenak field, (2) Studenac, (3) Sušik, (4) Šmit Lake, (5) Krbavsko field, (6) Jadova, (7) Suvaja, (8) Ričica, (9) Obsenica, (10) Vinalić, (11) Cetina, and (12) Čikola.
Diversity 14 00529 g001
Figure 2. Results of population viability analyses for T. croaticus based on six scenarios.
Figure 2. Results of population viability analyses for T. croaticus based on six scenarios.
Diversity 14 00529 g002
Figure 3. Results of population viability analyses for T. fontinalis, T. turskyi and T. polylepis based on six scenarios.
Figure 3. Results of population viability analyses for T. fontinalis, T. turskyi and T. polylepis based on six scenarios.
Diversity 14 00529 g003
Figure 4. Results of population viability analyses for T. ukliva based on six scenarios.
Figure 4. Results of population viability analyses for T. ukliva based on six scenarios.
Diversity 14 00529 g004
Figure 5. Results of population viability analyses for T. karsticus based on six scenarios.
Figure 5. Results of population viability analyses for T. karsticus based on six scenarios.
Diversity 14 00529 g005
Table 1. Number of samples obtained from each locality and for each species, as well as accession numbers of the haplotypes deposited in the GenBank (which will be added in the proof; however, alignment can be sent to the Editor, if needed).
Table 1. Number of samples obtained from each locality and for each species, as well as accession numbers of the haplotypes deposited in the GenBank (which will be added in the proof; however, alignment can be sent to the Editor, if needed).
SpeciesLocalityWatershedNumber of SamplesGenbank Accession Numbers
T. croaticusJadovaAdriatic15
RičicaAdriatic4
SuvajaAdriatic18MG372513-28, ON866740-42
ObsenicaAdriatic13
T. fontinalisKrbavsko poljeBlack Sea20MG372552-58, ON866743-45
T. turskyČikolaAdriatic20MG372552-58, ON866746-50
T. uklivaCetinaAdriatic9MG372539-47
VinalićAdriatic5MG372587-90
T. karsticusStudenacBlack Sea10
SušikBlack Sea15MG372509-12, MG372529-31, ON866751-53
Jasenak fieldBlack Sea6
T. polylepisŠmitovo lakeBlack Sea5
Table 2. Measures of intrapopulational genetic polymorphism estimated for populations of three endemic Telestes species. The remaining three species (T. polylepis, T. fontinalis, and T. turskyi) comprise a single population, so the intraspecific and intrapopulational genetic diversities are the same. N—number of sequences, S—number of polymorphic sites, η—total number of mutations, H—number of haplotypes, Hd—haplotype diversity, Hd_var—variance of haplotype diversity, K—total number of nucleotide differences, π—nucleotide diversity.
Table 2. Measures of intrapopulational genetic polymorphism estimated for populations of three endemic Telestes species. The remaining three species (T. polylepis, T. fontinalis, and T. turskyi) comprise a single population, so the intraspecific and intrapopulational genetic diversities are the same. N—number of sequences, S—number of polymorphic sites, η—total number of mutations, H—number of haplotypes, Hd—haplotype diversity, Hd_var—variance of haplotype diversity, K—total number of nucleotide differences, π—nucleotide diversity.
SpeciesLocalityNHηSHdHd_varKπ
T. croaticusJadova15829290.8290.007226.9520.00610
Ričica447710.031253.50.00307
Suvaja181220200.9220.002605.2480.00461
Obsenica13324240.5130.02062100.00877
TOTAL502244440.8870.0011612.2250.01074
T. fontinalisKrbavsko field20715150.8320.002372.6580.00233
T. turskyiČikola201118170.8950.002714.4950.00395
T. uklivaCetina99181810.002745.3890.00473
Vinalić55141410.0166.60.00579
TOTAL141327260.9890.000995.7580.00506
T. karsticusStudenac101000000
Sušik157990.6570.019161.4290.00125
Jasenak field62110.3330.04630.3330.00029
TOTAL317990.4040.012220.7570.00066
T. polylepisŠmit lake54440.90.0259220.00175
Table 3. Effective population sizes of the endemic Telestes species. *—convergence at certain percentiles could not be obtained.
Table 3. Effective population sizes of the endemic Telestes species. *—convergence at certain percentiles could not be obtained.
SpeciesPopulationMaximum LikelihoodLikelihood at Percentiles 25–75%Likelihood at Precentiles 2.5–97.5%
T. croaticusJadova1350800–19000–3265
Ričica94506700–16,4350–27835
Suvaja20151365–2735435–4700
Obsenica485135–7650–1400
T. fontinalisKrbavsko field1185700–16000–2400
T. turskyČikola16851135–2300265–3635
T. uklivaCetina91504500–11,7352900–39,265
Vinalić47552482–18,8461882–39,091
T. karsticusStudenac38565–6650–1335
Sušik985400–15650–3435
Jasenak field4850–1535*
T. polylepisŠmit lake1550609–24820–8064
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Buj, I.; Marčić, Z.; Flauder, E.; Šanda, R.; Vukić, J. Population Genetic Structure of Endemic Fish Species Facilitating Their Survival in Changing Environments—A Case Study on the Genus Telestes in Croatia. Diversity 2022, 14, 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070529

AMA Style

Buj I, Marčić Z, Flauder E, Šanda R, Vukić J. Population Genetic Structure of Endemic Fish Species Facilitating Their Survival in Changing Environments—A Case Study on the Genus Telestes in Croatia. Diversity. 2022; 14(7):529. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Buj, Ivana, Zoran Marčić, Elena Flauder, Radek Šanda, and Jasna Vukić. 2022. "Population Genetic Structure of Endemic Fish Species Facilitating Their Survival in Changing Environments—A Case Study on the Genus Telestes in Croatia" Diversity 14, no. 7: 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070529

APA Style

Buj, I., Marčić, Z., Flauder, E., Šanda, R., & Vukić, J. (2022). Population Genetic Structure of Endemic Fish Species Facilitating Their Survival in Changing Environments—A Case Study on the Genus Telestes in Croatia. Diversity, 14(7), 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop