Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation: Introduction to the Special Issue
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bull, J.W.; Jobstvogt, N.; Böhnke-Henrichs, A.; Mascarenhas, A.; Sitas, N.; Baulcomb, C.; Koss, R. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 17, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrings, C.; Naeem, S.; Ahrestani, F.; Bunker, D.E.; Burkill, P.; Canziani, G.; Elmqvist, T.; Ferrati, R.; Fuhrman, J.; Jaksic, F.; et al. Ecosystem services for 2020. Science 2010, 330, 323–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Zheng, H.; Wen, Z.; Liu, L.; Robinson, B.E.; Li, R.; Kong, L. Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 37, 100939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raihan, A. A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. J. Environ. Sci. Econ. 2023, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taye, F.A.; Folkersen, M.V.; Fleming, C.M.; Buckwell, A.; Mackey, B.; Diwakar, K.C.; Saint Ange, C. The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 189, 107145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snäll, T.; Triviño, M.; Mair, L.; Bengtsson, J.; Moen, J. High rates of short-term dynamics of forest ecosystem services. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niemelä, J.; Saarela, S.R.; Söderman, T.; Kopperoinen, L.; Yli-Pelkonen, V.; Väre, S.; Kotze, D.J. Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: A Finland case study. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 3225–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brockerhoff, E.G.; Barbaro, L.; Castagneyrol, B.; Forrester, D.I.; Gardiner, B.; González-Olabarria, J.R.; Jactel, H. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017, 26, 3005–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bengtsson, J.; Nilsson, S.G.; Franc, A.; Menozzi, P. Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 132, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelstam, P.; Elbakidze, M.; Lawrence, A.; Manton, M.; Melecis, V.; Perera, A.H. Barriers and bridges for landscape stewardship and knowledge production to sustain functional green infrastructures. Ecosyst. Serv. For. Landsc. Broadscale Consid. 2018, 127–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, S.; Fürst, C.; Pietzsch, F. Cross-sectoral resource management: How forest management alternatives affect the provision of biomass and other ecosystem services. Forests 2015, 6, 533–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knoke, T.; Stimm, B.; Ammer, C.; Moog, M. Mixed forests reconsidered: A forest economics contribution on an ecological concept. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 213, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes LJ, R.; Meireles CI, R.; Pinto Gomes, C.J.; de Almeida Ribeiro, N.M.C. Socioeconomic aspects of the forests in Portugal: Recent evolution and perspectives of sustainability of the resource. Forests 2019, 10, 361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdoğan, S.; Çakar, N.D.; Ulucak, R.; Danish, A.; Kassouri, Y. The role of natural resources abundance and dependence in achieving environmental sustainability: Evidence from resource-based economies. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 29, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gea-Izquierdo, G.; Pastur, G.M.; Cellini, J.M.; Lencinas, M.V. Forty years of silvicultural management in southern Nothofagus pumilio primary forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 201, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bawa, K.S.; Rai, N.D.; Sodhi, N.S. Rights, governance, and conservation of biological diversity. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25, 639–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gering, J.C.; Crist, T.O.; Veech, J.A. Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: Implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17, 488–499. [Google Scholar]
- Yoccoz, N.G.; Nichols, J.D.; Boulinier, T. Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varma, V.K.; Ferguson, I.; Wild, I. Decision support system for the sustainable forest management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 128, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncker, P.S.; Barreiro, S.M.; Hengeveld, G.M.; Lind, T.; Mason, W.L.; Ambrozy, S.; Spiecker, H. Classification of forest management approaches: A new conceptual framework and its applicability to European forestry. Ecol. Soc. 2012, 17, 51. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269224 (accessed on 14 September 2023). [CrossRef]
- Bauhus, J.; Puettmann, K.J.; Kühne, C. Close-to-nature forest management in Europe: Does it support complexity and adaptability of forest ecosystems? In Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems; Routledge: Milton Park, UK, 2013; pp. 187–213. [Google Scholar]
- Tu, G.; Abildtrup, J.; Garcia, S. Preferences for urban green spaces and peri-urban forests: An analysis of stated residential choices. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 148, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beckmann-Wübbelt, A.; Fricke, A.; Sebesvari, Z.; Yakouchenkova, I.A.; Fröhlich, K.; Saha, S. High public appreciation for the cultural ecosystem services of urban and peri-urban forests during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 74, 103240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cueva, J.; Yakouchenkova, I.A.; Fröhlich, K.; Dermann, A.F.; Dermann, F.; Köhler, M.; Saha, S. Synergies and trade-offs in ecosystem services from urban and peri-urban forests and their implication to sustainable city design and planning. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 82, 103903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, A.; De Vreese, R.; Johnston, M.; Van Den Bosch, C.C.K.; Sanesi, G. Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches. Urban For. Urban Green. 2013, 12, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgenroth, J.; Östberg, J. Measuring and monitoring urban trees and urban forests. In Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry; Routledge: Milton Park, UK, 2017; pp. 33–48. [Google Scholar]
- Nesbitt, L.; Hotte, N.; Barron, S.; Cowan, J.; Sheppard, S.R. The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 25, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, P.; Yang, J. Species diversity of urban forests in China. Urban For. Urban Green. 2017, 28, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paquette, A.; Sousa-Silva, R.; Maure, F.; Cameron, E.; Belluau, M.; Messier, C. Praise for diversity: A functional approach to reduce risks in urban forests. Urban For. Urban Green. 2021, 62, 127157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Endreny, T.; Santagata, R.; Perna, A.; De Stefano, C.; Rallo, R.F.; Ulgiati, S. Implementing and managing urban forests: A much needed conservation strategy to increase ecosystem services and urban wellbeing. Ecol. Model. 2017, 360, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandt, J.S.; Buckley, R.C. A global systematic review of empirical evidence of ecotourism impacts on forests in biodiversity hotspots. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 32, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khaledi Koure, F.; Hajjarian, M.; Hossein Zadeh, O.; Alijanpour, A.; Mosadeghi, R. Ecotourism development strategies and the importance of local community engagement. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 25, 6849–6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, C.; Yin, L. Study on the rural ecotourism resource evaluation system. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, R.B.; Ham, S.H. Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to pro-conservation knowledge, attitudes and behaviour? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. J. Sustain. Tour. 2008, 16, 467–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oleśniewicz, P.; Pytel, S.; Markiewicz-Patkowska, J.; Szromek, A.R.; Jandová, S. A model of the sustainable management of the natural environment in national parks—A case study of national parks in Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittelkow, C.M.; Liang, X.; Linquist, B.A.; Van Groenigen, K.J.; Lee, J.; Lundy, M.E.; Van Kessel, C. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 2015, 517, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bell, S.; Tyrväinen, L.; Sievänen, T.; Pröbstl, U.; Simpson, M. Outdoor recreation and nature tourism: A European perspective. Living Rev. Landsc. Res. 2007, 1, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alue, B.; Salleh Hudin, N.; Mohamed, F.; Mat Said, Z.; Ismail, K. Plant Diversity along an Urbanization Gradient of a Tropical City. Diversity 2022, 14, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavilanes Montoya, A.; Castillo Vizuete, D.; Borz, S. Perceptions of Local Inhabitants towards Land Management Systems Used in the Rainforest Area of Ecuador: An Evaluation Based on Visual Rating of the Main Land Use Types. Diversity 2021, 13, 592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jandl, R.; Spathelf, P.; Bolte, A.; Prescott, C.E. Forest adaptation to climate change—Is non-management an option? Ann. For. Sci. 2019, 76, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovac, M.; Hladnik, D.; Kutnar, L. Biodiversity in (the Natura 2000) forest habitats is not static: Its conservation calls for an active management approach. J. Nat. Conserv. 2018, 43, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez-Muñoz, M.; Bonet-García, F.J.; Navarro-Cerrillo, R.; Herrero, J.; Mina, M. Forest management scenarios drive future dynamics of Mediterranean planted pine forests under climate change. Landsc. Ecol. 2023, 38, 2069–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutherland, L.A.; Huttunen, S. Linking practices of multifunctional forestry to policy objectives: Case studies in Finland and the UK. For. Policy Econ. 2018, 86, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravnjak, B.; Bavcon, J.; Čarni, A. Plant Species Turnover on Forest Gaps after Natural Disturbances in the Dinaric Fir Beech Forests (Omphalodo-Fagetum sylvaticae). Diversity 2022, 14, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cambero, C.; Sowlati, T. Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives–A review of literature. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 36, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karvonen, J.; Halder, P.; Kangas, J.; Leskinen, P. Indicators and tools for assessing sustainability impacts of the forest bioeconomy. For. Ecosyst. 2017, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farrell, E.P.; Führer, E.; Ryan, D.; Andersson, F.; Hüttl, R.; Piussi, P. European forest ecosystems: Building the future on the legacy of the past. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 132, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman, A.; Truta, A.; Viman, O.; Morar, I.; Spalevic, V.; Dan, C.; Sestras, R.; Holonec, L.; Sestras, A. Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Robinia pseudoacacia Depending on the Origin of Different Geographic Provenances. Diversity 2022, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciuvăț, A.; Abrudan, I.; Ciuvăț, C.; Marcu, C.; Lorenț, A.; Dincă, L.; Szilard, B. Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in Romanian Forestry. Diversity 2022, 14, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cântar, I.; Ciontu, C.; Dincă, L.; Borlea, G.; Crişan, V. Damage and Tolerability Thresholds for Remaining Trees after Timber Harvesting: A Case Study from Southwest Romania. Diversity 2022, 14, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Suontama, M.; Burdon, R.D.; Dungey, H.S. Genotype by environment interactions in forest tree breeding: Review of methodology and perspectives on research and application. Tree Genet. Genomes 2017, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, H.A.; Gallie, J.; Taylor, S.; Kerr, B. Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change. Nature 2013, 494, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khadivi-Khub, A.; Ebrahimi, A.; Mohammadi, A.; Kari, A. Characterization and selection of walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes from seedling origin trees. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oneț, A.; Brejea, R.; Dincă, L.; Enescu, R.; Oneț, C.; Besliu, E. Evaluation of Biological Characteristics of Soil as Indicator for Sustainable Rehabilitation of a Post-Bauxite-Mining Land. Diversity 2022, 14, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finkel, O.M.; Castrillo, G.; Paredes, S.H.; González, I.S.; Dangl, J.L. Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 38, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dinca, L.; Marin, M.; Radu, V.; Murariu, G.; Drasovean, R.; Cretu, R.; Georgescu, L.; Timiș-Gânsac, V. Which Are the Best Site and Stand Conditions for Silver Fir (Abies alba Mill.) Located in the Carpathian Mountains? Diversity 2022, 14, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dinca, L.; Zhiyanski, M. Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation: Introduction to the Special Issue. Diversity 2023, 15, 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101078
Dinca L, Zhiyanski M. Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation: Introduction to the Special Issue. Diversity. 2023; 15(10):1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101078
Chicago/Turabian StyleDinca, Lucian, and Miglena Zhiyanski. 2023. "Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation: Introduction to the Special Issue" Diversity 15, no. 10: 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101078
APA StyleDinca, L., & Zhiyanski, M. (2023). Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation: Introduction to the Special Issue. Diversity, 15(10), 1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15101078