Next Article in Journal
Appraisal of the Genus Pleurastrum (Chlorophyta) Based on Molecular and Climate Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Round Scad (Decapterus maruadsi) in the Hainan Island Offshore Area
Previous Article in Journal
Structure, Growth and Histology of Gnathal Elements in Dunkleosteus (Arthrodira, Placodermi), with a Description of a New Species from the Famennian (Upper Devonian) of the Tver Region (North-Western Russia)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Climate Events on Abundance and Distribution of Major Commercial Fishes in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea

1
South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, China
2
Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Open-Sea Fishery, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangzhou 510300, China
3
College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
4
Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(5), 649; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050649
Submission received: 15 March 2023 / Revised: 20 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 10 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity and Spatiotemporal Distribution of Nekton)

Abstract

:

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • The abundance of most of fish stocks in the Beibu Gulf continued to decline over the last 15 years.
What is the implication of the main finding?
  • Environmental variations caused by climate events can episodically enhance the abundance of certain fish stocks.
  • Warming may be the reason of northward shifts in distribution of most fishes.

Abstract

Improving prediction of ecological responses to climate variability requires understanding how local fish population dynamics are impacted by climate events. The present study was conducted in the Beibu Gulf of the northwestern South China Sea where the fisheries are characterized by high ecological and commercial value. We evaluated the relationship between major commercial fish population dynamics (abundance and distribution) and climate periods, using survey data from 2006–2020. The analysis using random forest and GAM models show that climate events are not the best predictors for the variations of fish abundance, because abundance of most fish stocks decreases significantly with the year, and the increasing fishing pressure over time can better explain the overall downward trend in fishery stocks. However, environmental variables that correlate significantly with interannual variation in ONI may impact fish abundance in short terms. Our research suggests that climate events leading to higher surface seawater salinity in winter favors pelagic fishes by improving habitat availability, and higher near-surface chlorophyll-α concentration during La Niña events provides better food condition for overwintering fish. In addition, there is no clear evidence that climatic events have a significant impact on gravity center of fish distribution, whereas climate change has caused most fishes to move to cooler coastal waters in the north.

1. Introduction

Investigating the abundance and distribution of marine fishes provides vital information to test and improve the theory of ecosystem-based fisheries management. The scale and complexity of the critical information related to fish stock dynamics are important determinants of the stability of fisheries ecosystem [1]. Fish abundance and distribution has been shown to be fundamental to understanding sustainable development of fishery resources [2], likely due to the fact that appropriate population status provides higher ecological capacity for stocks, i.e., increase fish population’s ecological resilience [3]. Changes in the abundance and distribution of most major commercial fish species have often been considered as consolidated results of environmental effect and fishing pressure [4]. Past research has emphasized that information on relationships between fish population and overfishing is essential for explaining the processes driving patterns of fish abundance and distribution [5,6]. However, influences of climate variations have proven to have substantial effects on the increase and/or decrease in the abundance and distribution of fish stocks, and the success of fish stock assessments in the future depends largely on the ability to predict the dynamic impacts of climate change on marine ecosystems [7].
The most obvious driver of interannual climate variability is generally recognized as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) [8]. This cycle of alternating warm (El Niño) and cool (La Niña) events is the dominant year-to-year climate signal on the earth [9]. These climate events exert a powerful influence on the atmospheric and marine environment in the tropical Pacific Ocean. This influence may be extended to the adjacent South China Sea through the atmospheric [10,11] and oceanic teleconnections (i.e., seawater transfer) [12]. ENSO is probably more important than processes of climate change or variability that operate more slowly, which can dramatically alter global oceanic conditions, climate, and weather patterns on short notice [9]. Although there is still a lack of consensus on how ENSO amplitude will evolve in the future, recent studies suggest that ENSO-related extreme climate events may occur more frequently with continued global warming [13,14,15]. Projections by Cai et al. [16] suggest that, with increased frequency of extreme El Niño and La Niña events, synchronizing with faster warming in the eastern equatorial Pacific, the frequency of extreme El Niño events will almost double in the future.
Extreme weather events such as those associated with ENSO could significantly affect marine ecosystems, radically change population numbers, or even destroy them altogether. A prime example is the pulsed heat stress events associated with El Niño events reinforcing the impact of global warming on coral reefs, such as coral bleaching on a global scale [17]. In addition to affecting marine ecosystems through heat transport, ENSO events are the major contributor to interannual variability of tropical cyclone in the Pacific Ocean [18]. The vulnerability across the Pacific coast is primarily affected by ENSO [19]. Overall, climate forcing of ENSO will affect physical processes [20,21], primary production [22,23], and prey–predator relations [24] in local marine ecosystems, and thereby ultimately impact habitats [25], migration patterns [26], population recruitments [27], and food webs [28], thus their effects may experience time lags before being felt via, for instance, changes in fishing efforts. Past investigations have shown that fisheries in the Pacific Ocean were strongly influenced by ENSO events, with average landings decreasing ~0.8 million tons in El Niño and increasing ~1.1 million tons in La Niña years since 1950 [29]. As the margin of the Pacific Ocean, the Yellow Sea and East China Sea marine ecosystem structure has been shown to be affected not only by fishing but also that their decadal variations correspond well with contemporaneous climatic regime shifts in the Pacific [30]. Furthermore, the study by Yin et al. [31] showed that there were obvious variations in the species composition and biomass in the Haizhou Bay ecosystem during the El Niño event, indicating that even in heavily anthropogenic activities impacted waters, the effect of climate change is still significant. Therefore, promoting biological and ecological studies, and improving understanding of the relationship between offshore fishery resources and climate events would contribute to sustainability of offshore fisheries and their adaptive capability to confront climate events in future fishery management.
The Beibu Gulf, in northwest South China Sea, is characterized by great diversity of fishes and abundant species of commercial and ecological importance; it is one of the four most prominent fishing grounds in Chinese offshore [32]. There are ~960 species of fishes, belonging to 475 genera and 162 families, and ~80% of them are demersal fishes and ~20% are pelagic fishes [33]. However, a large number of studies have demonstrated that the pelagic stocks are in a state of overfishing and demersal stocks generally in a state of depletion [34]. While a few fish stocks have increased due to niche replacement and/or reduced competition, abundances of those species with large sizes and long-life span have declined to a low level [35,36]. In addition, as a marginal sea in the west Pacific, the South China Sea is inevitably affected by ENSO events that originate from the equatorial Pacific. Numerous studies have indicated that climate events significantly affect the annual ocean-atmosphere cycle in the South China Sea, including that of volume transport [12,37], heat wave [38], rainfall [39,40], monsoon [41,42], and surface seawater temperature [43,44]. Recent research has shown that small pelagic fish blooms in Beibu Gulf occurred in the summers of La Niña years, presumably because of higher densities, smaller body sizes, and later spawning times following La Niña events [45]. Even though the strength of impacts of climate events on both fish stocks and their associated fisheries depends on the type of events, Peruvian experience in the management of commercial fisheries has demonstrated that adaptive fisheries management is well suited to cope with ENSO impacts [29]. Despite that Chinese government’s fishery management has made some progress in the South China Sea over the past decades [46], in the context of complex future trends of climate change, there is an urgent need to establish ecosystem-based fisheries management that takes into account climate variability.
Based on above description of stock status of the Beibu Gulf, the main goal of this paper is to evaluate effects of climate events on the major commercial fishes. For this purpose, we intent to answer the following questions: (i) Which is the key factor that relates fish abundance in the Beibu Gulf, climate event or fishing pressure? (ii) What is the correlation between fish populations in the Beibu Gulf and climate events or environmental variables? (iii) Do climate events affect distribution of fishes in the Beibu Gulf? These assessments of effects of climate events on major commercial fishes would improve our understanding of how large-scale climate variability influences fishery stocks, advancing our ability to further understand and manage future fishery resources.

2. Data and Method

2.1. Study Site

This study concerns the Beibu Gulf in the northwestern South China Sea. The gulf spans a distance of 300 km from the coast of Beihai City in the north (21°15′ N, 109°30′ E) to the western end of the Hainan Island in the south (17°30′ N, 106°45′ E; Figure 1). It is a semi-close gulf with tropical marine environment but with components of tropical and subtropical fish species. Benefitting from its unique geographic location and climatic conditions, the Beibu Gulf serves as spawning and feeding grounds for many important commercial fishes (Chen et al., 2009; Gao et al., 2017).

2.2. Sampling Protocol and Equipment

Data of fish sampling came from otter trawl surveys at 52 stations (from 2006 to 2020, during which period a total of 34 survey cruises were carried out (Table 1). Although most survey cruises did not cover all the 52 stations for various reasons, the sampling was generally coherent in methodology. The surveys were undertaken using a commercial fishing vessel with main engine power of 600 HP. In every survey cruise, each station was trawled once for 1-h duration with a towing speed of 2.5–3.5 knots. The headrope length the otter trawl net was 37.7 m and cod-end mesh 40 mm. Every trawl sample was sorted onboard and identified to species level, catches of each species being weighed, counted, and recorded, and length and weight frequency data were also collected for major commercial species. Based on the combination of frequency and market value, we selected 15 major commercial fishes with the highest frequencies of occurrence for the present analysis (Table 2), include 11 fish family (Centrolophidae, Sciaenidae, Trichiuridae, Priacanthidae, Sparidae, Synodontidae, Acropomatidae, Mullidae, Nemipteridae, Carangidae, and Scombridae.

2.3. Data Sources

We selected 4 environment factors that are commonly recognized to have significant impact on fish stocks, including surface seawater temperatures (SST), near-surface chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentration, mixed-layer depth (MLD), and surface seawater salinity (SSS). The SST data with resolution of 1/4° were obtained from the OI SST V2 High Resolution Dataset provided by NOAA’s Physical Science Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA (https://psl.noaa.gov, accessed on 1 October 2022). Data of Chl-a, MLD, and SSS were obtained from the Copernicus Marine Service Information (https://www.copernicus.eu/en, accessed on 1 October 2022) of the EU. The dataset of SSS and MLD are products of the GLOBAL_MULTIYEAR_PHY_001_030, which are global ocean eddy-resolving (1/12° horizontal resolution) reanalysis of the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service covering varied altimetry and since 1993, and the dataset of Chl-a is the product of the GLOBAL_REANALYSIS_BIO_001_029, which is produced at the Mercator-Ocean for the period of 1993–2019 at 1/4° horizontal resolution.
To characterize ENSO events, we also shaped data of the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) from products of the NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center (CPC; https://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/, accessed on 1 October 2022). The ONI is defined as 3-month running mean SST departures in the Niño 3.4 region (5° N–5° S, 120–170° W), and is a principal measure for monitoring, assessing, and predicting ENSO. Climate events are defined as 5 consecutive overlapping 3-month periods at or above +0.5 °C anomaly for warm (El Niño) events and at or below the-0.5 °C anomaly for cool (La Niña) events. The threshold is further broken down into Weak (with a 0.5–0.9 °C SST anomaly), Moderate (1.0–1.4 °C), Strong (1.5–1.9 °C), and Very Strong (≥2.0 °C) events. The CPC considers these anomalies must also be forecasted to persist for three consecutive months.

2.4. Data Processing

Stock densities of all the major commercial fishes were expressed as catch per unit area (CPUA), and CPUA is calculated as follows:
C P U A = C v · t · L · X
where, CPUA is the fish abundance (kg/km2); C is catching biomass (kg); v is towing speed (km/h); t is trawling duration (h); L is the headrope length (km) of the otter trawl net; and X is the fraction of headrope length of the trawl net and 0.66 is adopted for this study [47].
Since the fish abundance data in the Beibu Gulf calculated in this study cannot fully cover all seasons in the survey period, this study will use the R package of “imputeTS” to impute missing values. Furthermore, given that fish abundance varies linearly with the year and has seasonal differences, use the R package of “fields” to eliminate annual and seasonal trends by the log transformation of fish abundance. The residuals were then used for correlations with environmental variables. For the environmental variables, the interannual trends and seasonal cycles were also removed. All the data processing was performed with R.

2.5. Data Analysis

To investigate the responses of fish populations to climate events, we used linear models to identify relationships between the ONI and fish abundances and gravity centers of their ranges. Spearman correlation was used to test significance of these relationships and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Furthermore, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to compare the fish abundance and distribution between climate periods and between seasons. SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform these statistical analyses.
We used random forests (RF) algorithm as included in the package “randomForest” [48] of the R software, to identify the environment variables that best predict fish stock density in different climate periods. Like boosting and bagging trees, RF is considered an “ensemble learning” method [49], a collection or ensemble of classification trees each capable of producing a response when presented with a set of predictor values. We used 500 trees to build the RF because increasing this default number did not substantially change the results of variable importance or explained variation [48]. Variable importance measures were derived based on the difference in prediction accuracy before and after permuting each predictor variable.
We then used generalized additive models (GAMs; additive and continuous models) and the “mgcv” package for R was performed to identify the relationships between fish abundance and environmental variables. GAMs comprise a collection of non-parametric and semi-parametric regression techniques for exploring relationships between responsive and explanatory variables, whose advantage is the assumption of additive and stationary relationships between the responsive and explanatory variables. Models containing variable combinations with variance inflation factor > 10 were excluded, to eliminate potential problems with collinearity. Stock density data were modeled using a quasi-poisson distribution, implemented via a call to the “gam()” function (mgcv). The effective degrees of freedom (def; representing the level of nonlinearity) were limited to 4 for avoiding overfitting.
Spatial and temporal distribution of fishes was evaluated by determining the monthly longitudinal and latitudinal gravity centers. The gravity center of fish range was calculated by the following equation [50]:
L A T j = L A T i ,   j × D i ,   j D i , j ,   L O N j = L O N i ,   j × D i ,   j D i , j
where LATj and LONj, respectively, denote the latitude and longitude of the gravity center of fish range in a specific cruise j; Di,j denotes the abundance of a fish species in the ith station in jth cruise; and LATi,j and LONi,j, respectively, denote the latitude and longitude of the ith station in jth cruise.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Effects on Fish Abundance

In the RF analysis, ranking of the most important explanatory variables driving the log-transformed stock density of the 15 commercial fishes was obtained. Percentage increases in the MSE (mean squared error) of variables were used to estimate the importance of these predictors, and higher MSE% values imply that the predictors are more important. According to the importance ranking of the predictive variables, the significance of predictor indicated that Year, SSS, SST, Chl-a, and MLD (all p < 0.05) were the important factors for the prediction of those fishes’ stock density (Figure 2), whereas Season and Type of Climate Periods were less important.
The final GAM models were set with the results of RF analysis and collinearity analysis as follows:
log10(CPUA + 1) = a + s(Year) + s(Chl-a) + s(SSS) + s(SST) + s(MLD) + ε
where CPUA (abundance) was transformed by log10(A + 1) to downplay outlying values and better represent relationships with environmental variables; a is the intercept of the model; s () is the spline smoothing function of the variables (Year, Chl-a, SSS, SST, and MLD) (Table 3); ε is the random error term of normal distribution and with zero mean and finite variance.
The GAM plots (Figure 3) show the best fitting smoothers for effects of temporal and environmental variables on fish abundance. These plots indicate 95% confidence limits and narrow confidence limits indicate high relevance and vice versa. Abundances of the 15 major commercial fishes are significantly correlated with the Year, and abundances of 11 out of the 15 species have decreased in recent years. The GAM models also indicate that abundances of most fish species do not increase significantly with Chl-a, but are positively correlated with SSS, and the peak of abundances of most species appeared within MLD ranges of 30–50 m. In addition, abundances of these species have varied responses to SST, for example, abundances of P. anomala, T. lepturus, and A. japonicum apparently increase with SST, while S. tumbil, S. undosquamis, D. maruadsi, and T. japonicus have bimodal relationships with SST.

3.2. Changes in the Fish Abundance and Environmental Variables over Time Series

The SSS and SST slightly decreased and then increased over the time series (Figure 4). In addition, the SST and Chl-a with seasonal cycles removed were both significantly correlated with the ONI during 2006–2020 (r = 0.393 and -0.191, respectively, both p < 0.05), but SSS was significantly positively correlated with the absolute value of ONI (r = 0.108, p < 0.05).
In addition, because abundances of most fishes show downward trends with year presumably due to increasing fishing pressure, we detrended log-transformed abundances of fish for further analysis (Figure 5). Although there was no evidence that abundances of all fishes varied between climatic events (p > 0.05), abundances of most fishes increased significantly after any climatic event, exhibiting seasonal peaks and troughs. After moderate or strong (climate) events, the abundance of some demersal (e.g., P. anomala and E. cardinalis) and pelagic fish (e.g., D. maruadsi and T. japonicus) generally increased significantly compared, while some fish species (e.g., S. tumbil, and S. undosquamis) experienced higher seasonal peaks in abundance during ENSO periods.

3.3. Climate Effects on Gravity Center

Gravity centers of fish ranges showed seasonal, interannual, and inter climate period variability during 2006–2020 (Figure 6). Fish with a smaller distribution in the study area include P. macrocephalusP. macrocephalus, S. tumbil, and S. undosquamis, while almost all fishes have shown significant banded structure of gravity centers along the northeast-southwest direction. Although one-way ANOVA indicated that the gravity center of each fish species was not significantly different between climate periods (p > 0.05), there was a significant difference between seasons for more than half of the studied fishes (p < 0.05) (e.g., P. anomala, P. macrocephalus, E. cardinalis, A. japonicum, S. undosquamis, U. sulphureus, D. maruadsi, R. kanagurta, and T. japonicus). In addition, the gravity center of most fish species has shifted significantly northward during these 15 years, with only U. sulphureus and moving southward, while the gravity center of U. japonicus and D. maruadsi remained unchanged (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

Population dynamics such as abundance and distribution of fish stocks are closely linked with climate variability, and climate events are undoubtedly the main climatic forcing factors other than seasons [51]. To answer our previous questions, the results of this study showed that: (1) the effect of years on fish abundance appears to be more pronounced than that of climatic events; (2) changes in Chl-a, SSS, and SST were closely correlated to climate events, and abundances of some fish species significantly increased after climate events, especially the fishes of the Carangidae family; and (3) climate events did not affect gravity centers of fish distribution, but most fish species shifted northward over the study period.
The RF analysis of this study identified variables influencing the abundance of each fish species. It seemed that Year, SSS, SST, MLD, and Chl-a were the important predictive variables, but climate events and seasons were of less predictive than years on the temporal scales, suggesting that recent fishing pressure may have caused much disturbance to the fish stocks than climate variability. This is consistent with the previous studies of fishery stocks in the Beibu Gulf, e.g., Su et al. [52] analyzed trophic level and fishing-in-balance index and concluded that fishery stocks in the Beibu Gulf have been overfished with a general downward trend in total fish stock density over the past two decades.
The response of fish abundance to Year in the GAM model corroborated the argument that increasing fishing pressure with the year may be the main factor resulting in decrease in the abundance of most major commercial fishes (e.g., P. anomala, T. lepturus, and T. japonicus). It is also important to highlight that abundances of a few fish species (e.g., S. tumbil, N. bathybius, and R. kanagurta) did not decline obviously with year, which can be explained by the fact that low stock densities may make it difficult to observe the trends, while the decrease in fish abundance also indirectly reduces the ecological competition of the fishes in the same ecological niche and maintains the abundance of the latter under fishing pressure [53]. Despite a series of fishery management and conservation measures that have been implemented by Chinese governmental agencies in the Beibu Gulf since 1999 (including a summer moratorium on marine fishing, a zero-growth policy, the introduction of marine protected areas, and marine ranching), the loopholes in the management measures and the increased fishing pressure from Vietnam have caused decreases in the fishery stocks in this region [54,55]. This trend was exacerbated by the prevalence of unidentifiable low-value and juvenile mixed catch [45,56], which ultimately resulted in the dominant species been replaced by low-value, small-size, and low-trophic-level species [36]. It was suggested that fast-growing populations in variable environments were especially sensitive to overfishing and were more possible to collapse [57]. With a projected global increase in frequency and intensity of extreme climatic events, fish communities in the Beibu Gulf may not only have to tolerate increasing coastal anthropogenic activities but also must adapt to large-scale climatic changes, which would lead to threat of collapse of the entire ecosystem ln the Beibu Gulf.
We also found that high abundances of most fishes occurred between 30–50 m of MLD in the Beibu Gulf, but MLD was not correlated with ONI. Although ocean mixed layer is commonly considered as the column near its surface with vertically quasi-uniform oceanic tracers (temperature, salinity, and density) above a layer of more rapid vertical changes (Lorbacher et al., 2006), its variation in the Beibu Gulf seems to be constrained by more complex factors and unable to reflect the effect of climate events directly. Unlike open oceans, the MLD in the Beibu Gulf, with offshore characteristics, did not exhibit very large spatial and temporal variability [58]. However, as noted above, there is also no evidence that MLD would be significantly affected by climate events, suggesting MLD alone is insufficient to predict how climate events affect fish abundance.
Higher absolute values of ONI, which represent the intensity of climate events, were associated with higher values of detrended SSS and abundances of most fishes increased with SSS. It is well known that salinity is one of the main physical properties that govern the distribution of fish, and numerous studies have revealed that salinity provides the most efficient explanation to fish distribution patterns [59]. Variation of SSS may also cause a series of physiological impacts to marine organisms, such as imbalance of electrolytes, serum hormone levels, and energy metabolism [60]. There are unquestionable evidences that interannual variability of SSS in the South China Sea is also influenced by the ENSO events [61]. Rijnsdorp et al. [62] suggested that while the underlying mechanisms of climate change effect on fish populations remain uncertain, climate-related changes in recruitment is the key process, such as the survival in the pelagic egg or larval stage, or the changes in the quality and/or quantity of nursery habitats. Taking small pelagic fishes (D. maruadsi, T. japonicus, and R. kanagurta) of the Beibu Gulf as an example, the spawning season of those fish species in tropical is mainly in spring and summer [45,63,64], so winter may be the key period for the survival and growth of these species. As indicated previously, salinity is recognized as a key factor that impacts the growth and development of fish, including affecting fish metabolism and survival of eggs and juveniles through osmolarity [65,66]. Past fishing experience shows that Scombrid and Carangid (including D. maruadsi, T. japonicus, and R. kanagurta) pelagic fish are usually considered intermingled fishery stock in the South China Sea [67]. Previous work has also shown that distribution of juvenile and adult D. maruadsi in the inshore waters of China is usually located in high salinity waters [68]. Therefore, increased SSS by climate events may provide a more suitable habitat for these fishes in winter and reduce the pressures to survive. The surplus energy is not channeled into reproduction at an earlier age and/or smaller size [69], thereby reducing the risk of miniaturization and early maturation and indirectly increasing the fecundity of pelagic fish populations [70,71], and ultimately lead to higher abundance in the summer.
Differences found in responses of their abundances to SST in various fishes are probably related to different life history types of the fishes. It is widely known that growth of tropical fishes will show seasonal oscillation and even though only 2 °C temperature differences between summer and winter seasons are adequate to cause a detectable impact [72]. Although changes in temperature have an important effect on the physiological state and behavior of fish [73], we suggest that the intensity of climate events is generally the highest in winter making temperature anomalies more likely to affect primary productivity. Taking the U. sulphureus and P. macracanthus as an example, the results of our study shown that these demersal fishes in the Beibu Gulf have a maximum and a minimum in its abundance in winter and summer, respectively, and these variations also appear to coincide with seasonal variation of Chl-a in the Beibu Gulf. The Chl-a is a convenient biomass proxy for phytoplankton due to its uniqueness to plants and ease of quantification [74], so higher concentration of Chl-a in the winter in the Beibu Gulf indirectly reflects the emergence of phytoplankton blooms, which can sink down and export more organic energy to benthic secondary production. However, because of the degradation and consumption of organic matter during sinking, past studies have indicated that the quality and quantity of food reaching the seafloor are negatively related to water column depth, and lower food availability at depth may in turn affects trophic structure and result in depth-related patterns in biomass and body size in demersal fish communities [75]. However, colder water would obscure the early blooms, which would reduce consumption by pelagic heterotrophs and result in the input of a greater proportion of planktonic production to the bottom sediments than in years when the bloom is later and occurs in warmer water [76]. In addition, the areas with high Chl-a are conducive to zooplankton breeding and gathering, and also attract fish to come for feeding. Although fish may growth faster in the warm periods, the lower Chl-a during this period means that less prey was available for it [77,78], and warming temperatures may compound these challenges by increasing anabolic oxygen demand while decreasing oxygen solubility [79].
Among variations in oceanographic features that are observed following ENSO events are changes in surface seawater temperatures, changes in vertical and thermal structure of the ocean (particularly in coastal regions) [44], and the altered coastal and upwelling currents [80,81]. However, the gravity centers of distributions of the studied fish did not display difference between climate periods. These results indicated that it is difficult to observe significant differences in the analysis of fish distribution and large-scale climate events on small scales spatially. Instead, a significant correlation was found between seasons and gravity centers of half number of the fish species. These may be related to the coastal current from the Qiongzhou Strait interacting with the warm and high saline seawater along the western coast of Hainan Island [82]. There is no doubt that the confrontation varies with seasons under the superimposed influences of the northeast or southwest monsoons. This may explain why the gravity centers of these fishes were distributed along the west coast of Hainan Island. In addition, these results also confirm that spatial distribution of fishes can be strongly influenced by seasonal hydrologic conditions even in structurally uniform environments [83].
It is also noteworthy that gravity centers of most fish species in the Beibu Gulf have shifted northward during the studied period. Even though Beibu Gulf has become a more complex aquatic environment due to damaging effects of anthropogenic inputs, urbanization development, and an expanding industrial marine-economy on the marine ecosystem [84], it seems that these negative conditions do not prevent the gravity center of fish from moving closer to the shoreline for avoiding warmer habitats. Compared with climate events, these results demonstrated that global warming, which has a greater effect on spatial and temporal scales, is the key factor affecting the distribution of fish populations in the Beibu Gulf. Previous studies have shown that ENSO events will seemingly change the distributions of fish, both in the ocean and offshore, and even in coral reefs [85,86]. However, it appears that distribution of habitats on a smaller scale limits the capacity of fish distribution to respond to climate variability. On the contrary, climate change alters the distribution of suitable habitat, forcing organisms to shift their range or attempt to survive under suboptimal conditions [87]. For species with northerly or southerly range margins in the North Sea, half have shown boundary shifts with warming, and most shifted northward [88].
In the context of global warming and decline of offshore fishery resources in China, understanding the influence of global-scale ENSO events on abundance and distribution of commercial fish species is critical for disentangling effects of natural and anthropogenic drivers of change [89]. Such distinctions allow a systematic assessment of nature influences on the fishery stocks and are the basis of informed ecosystem-based management decisions. The predominantly negative effect that years have on fish abundance demonstrates that fishing pressure has a strong effect on fish on long time scales and emphasizes the difficulty of climate events in explaining the change in the overall trend. However, in the short term, climate events will undoubtedly significantly alter environmental variables, such as SSS, SST, and Chl-a. To a certain extent, these environmental variables will also alter the magnitude of seasonal fluctuations in fish abundance, i.e., seasonal peaks or troughs in fish abundance. Our findings did not corroborate the association between climate events and distribution of fishes. It appears that climatic events have less of an impact on distribution of fishes in small areas than seasonal changes. However, on longer time scales, distribution of fish stocks in the Beibu Gulf has shifted northward as a whole due to climate change. Given that China’s offshore fishery management measures and/or policies need to respond to the integrated challenges arising from climate change and anthropogenic activities in the future, further studies should consider the time-lagged effects on commercial fish stocks caused by climate events in different types and intensity, and consequently these effects over fishery ecosystem.

Author Contributions

X.H.: data curation, formal analysis, software, visualization, and writing—original draft. Y.Q.: writing—review and editing. Y.X., M.S. and K.Z.: investigation, data curation and validation. J.L., Y.W., S.X. and Y.C.: validation, review, and editing. Z.C.: funding acquisition, resources, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We thank all those involved in the marine surveys that collected the data used in this study. We appreciate the valuable comments made by anonymous reviewers, which significantly improved our manuscript. This work was supported by Key research and development project of Guangdong Province (2020B1111030001); Financial Fund of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P. R. of China “Survey of offshore and open-sea fishery resources in the South China Sea” (2021–2025); Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (2020TD05). The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this study were obtained from the literature, which were cited in the text and provided in the reference section.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McLean, D.L.; Langlois, T.J.; Newman, S.J.; Holmes, T.H.; Birt, M.J.; Bornt, K.R.; Bond, T.; Collins, D.L.; Evans, S.N.; Travers, M.J.; et al. Distribution, abundance, diversity and habitat associations of fishes across a bioregion experiencing rapid coastal development. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 178, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stepanenko, M.A.; Gritsay, E.V. Eastern Bering Sea pollock recruitment, abundance, distribution and approach to fishery management. Fish. Sci. 2014, 80, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sundstrom, S.M.; Angeler, D.G.; Barichievy, C.; Eason, T.; Garmestani, A.; Gunderson, L.; Knutson, M.; Nash, K.L.; Spanbauer, T.; Stow, C.; et al. The distribution and role of functional abundance in cross-scale resilience. Ecology 2018, 99, 2421–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stenevik, E.K.; Sundby, S. Impacts of climate change on commercial fish stocks in Norwegian waters. Mar. Policy 2007, 31, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berkeley, S.A.; Hixon, M.A.; Larson, R.J.; Love, M.S. Fisheries Sustainability via Protection of Age Structure and Spatial Distribution of Fish Populations. Fisheries 2004, 29, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burden, M.; Fujita, R. Better fisheries management can help reduce conflict, improve food security, and increase economic productivity in the face of climate change. Mar. Policy 2019, 108, 103610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McGowan, J.A.; Cayan, D.R.; Dorman, L.M. Climate-Ocean Variability and Ecosystem Response in the Northeast Pacific. Science 1998, 281, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lehodey, P.; Alheit, J.; Barange, M.; Baumgartner, T.; Beaugrand, G.; Drinkwater, K.; Fromentin, J.-M.; Hare, S.R.; Ottersen, G.; Perry, R.I.; et al. Climate Variability, Fish, and Fisheries. J. Clim. 2006, 19, 5009–5030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McPhaden, M.J.; Zebiak, S.E.; Glantz, M.H. ENSO as an integrating concept in earth science. Science 2006, 314, 1740–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Klein, S.A.; Soden, B.J.; Lau, N.-C. Remote Sea Surface Temperature Variations during ENSO: Evidence for a Tropical Atmospheric Bridge. J. Clim. 1999, 12, 917–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, D.; Wang, Q. Interannual variability of the South China Sea associated with El Niño. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2006, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Q.; Feng, M.; Wang, D. ENSO-induced interannual variability in the southeastern South China Sea. J. Oceanogr. 2011, 67, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jiang, N.; Zhu, C. Asymmetric Changes of ENSO Diversity Modulated by the Cold Tongue Mode Under Recent Global Warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 506–512, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, S.-Y.; L’Heureux, M.; Yoon, J.-H. Are Greenhouse Gases Changing ENSO Precursors in the Western North Pacific? J. Clim. 2013, 26, 6309–6322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yoon, J.-H.; Wang, S.Y.S.; Gillies, R.R.; Kravitz, B.; Hipps, L.; Rasch, P.J. Increasing water cycle extremes in California and in relation to ENSO cycle under global warming. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cai, W.; Santoso, A.; Wang, G.; Yeh, S.-W.; An, S.-I.; Cobb, K.M.; Collins, M.; Guilyardi, E.; Jin, F.-F.; Kug, J.-S.; et al. ENSO and greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2015, 5, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lough, J.M.; Anderson, K.D.; Hughes, T.P. Increasing thermal stress for tropical coral reefs: 1871-2017. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, I.-I.; Camargo, S.J.; Patricola, C.M.; Boucharel, J.; Chand, S.; Klotzbach, P.; Chan, J.C.L.; Wang, B.; Chang, P.; Li, T.; et al. ENSO and tropical cyclones. In El Niño Southern Oscillation in a Changing Climate; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 377–408. [Google Scholar]
  19. Barnard, P.L.; Short, A.D.; Harley, M.D.; Splinter, K.D.; Vitousek, S.; Turner, I.L.; Allan, J.; Banno, M.; Bryan, K.R.; Doria, A. Coastal vulnerability across the Pacific dominated by El Nino/Southern oscillation. Nat. Geosci. 2015, 8, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Philip, S.Y.; Collins, M.; van Oldenborgh, G.J.; van den Hurk, B.J.J.M. The role of atmosphere and ocean physical processes in ENSO in a perturbed physics coupled climate model. Ocean Sci. 2010, 6, 441–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Timmermann, A.; An, S.-I.; Kug, J.-S.; Jin, F.-F.; Cai, W.; Capotondi, A.; Cobb, K.M.; Lengaigne, M.; McPhaden, M.J.; Stuecker, M.F. El Niño–southern oscillation complexity. Nature 2018, 559, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Corno, G.; Karl, D.M.; Church, M.J.; Letelier, R.M.; Lukas, R.; Bidigare, R.R.; Abbott, M.R. Impact of climate forcing on ecosystem processes in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duque-Herrera, A.-F.; Helenes, J.; Flores-Trujillo, J.-G.; Ruiz-Fernández, A.-C.; Sánchez-Cabeza, J.-A. Dinoflagellate cysts and ENSO-PDO climate forcing in the southern Gulf of California. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2020, 560, 110055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gonzalez-Pestana, A.; Alfaro-Shigueto, J.; Mangel, J.C. A review of high trophic predator-prey relationships in the pelagic Northern Humboldt system, with a focus on anchovetas. Fish. Res. 2022, 253, 106386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, W.; Wen, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, B. El Niño–Southern Oscillation impacts on jumbo squid habitat: Implication for fisheries management. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2021, 31, 2072–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sprogis, K.R.; Christiansen, F.; Wandres, M.; Bejder, L. El Nino Southern Oscillation influences the abundance and movements of a marine top predator in coastal waters. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 1085–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cheal, A.J.; Delean, S.; Sweatman, H.; Thompson, A.A. Spatial synchrony in coral reef fish populations and the influence of climate. Ecology 2007, 88, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Taylor, M.H.; Wolff, M.; Mendo, J.; Yamashiro, C. Changes in trophic flow structure of Independence Bay (Peru) over an ENSO cycle. Prog. Oceanogr. 2008, 79, 336–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bertrand, A.; Lengaigne, M.; Takahashi, K.; Avadi, A.; Poulain, F.; Harrod, C. El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Effects on Fisheries and Aquaculture; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2020; Volume 660. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Fu, C.; Ye, Z.; Sun, P.; Yu, H.; Cheng, J.; Tian, Y. Climate-induced long-term variations in ecosystem structure and atmosphere-ocean-ecosystem processes in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 2019, 175, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, J.; Xu, J.; Xue, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Ren, Y. Evaluating the impacts of El Nino events on a marine bay ecosystem based on selected ecological network indicators. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 763, 144205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Su, L.; Xu, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Sun, M.; Zhang, K.; Chen, Z. Long-Term Change of a Fish-Based Index of Biotic Integrity for a Semi-Enclosed Bay in the Beibu Gulf. Fishes 2022, 7, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Quoc Khanh, N.; Duc Phu, T.; Trong Luong, N.; Opoku-Acheampong, A.A. Appropriate Fishing Depths for Squid Longline Fishery in the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam; Secretariat, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun, D. A Study on Fishery Resources and Sustainable Fishery Development in the Beibu Bay; Ocean University of China: Qingdao, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, Z.; Xu, S.; Qiu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Jia, X. Modeling the effects of fishery management and marine protected areas on the Beibu Gulf using spatial ecosystem simulation. Fish. Res. 2009, 100, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, K.; Cai, Y.; Liao, B.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, M.; Su, L.; Chen, Z. Population dynamics of threadfin porgy Evynnis cardinalis, an endangered species on the IUCN red list in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. J. Fish Biol. 2020, 97, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rong, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zong, H.; Cheng, Y. Interannual sea level variability in the South China Sea and its response to ENSO. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2007, 55, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, K.; Xu, K.; Zhu, C.; Liu, B. Diversity of Marine Heatwaves in the South China Sea Regulated by ENSO Phase. J. Clim. 2022, 35, 877–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Supari; Tangang, F.; Salimun, E.; Aldrian, E.; Sopaheluwakan, A.; Juneng, L. ENSO modulation of seasonal rainfall and extremes in Indonesia. Clim. Dyn. 2017, 51, 2559–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, L.-T.; Tam, C.-Y.; Zhou, W.; Chan, J.C. Influence of South China Sea SST and the ENSO on winter rainfall over South China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2010, 27, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, Y.; Fan, K.; Xu, Z.; Li, S. ENSO–South China Sea summer monsoon interaction modulated by the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. J. Clim. 2018, 31, 3061–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, W.; Chan, J.C.L. ENSO and the South China Sea summer monsoon onset. Int. J. Climatol. 2007, 27, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, J.-M.; Li, T.; Shih, C.-F. Fall Persistence Barrier of Sea Surface Temperature in the South China Sea Associated with ENSO. J. Clim. 2007, 20, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, R.; Chen, W.; Wang, G.; Hu, K. Relative contribution of ENSO and East Asian winter monsoon to the South China Sea SST anomalies during ENSO decaying years. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2014, 119, 5046–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, K.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Sun, M.; Xu, Y.; Cai, Y.; Chen, Z.; Qiu, Y. Climate-induced small pelagic fish blooms in an overexploited marine ecosystem of the South China Sea. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 145, 109598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, X.; Vincent, A.C.J. China’s policies on bottom trawl fisheries over seven decades (1949–2018). Mar. Policy 2020, 122, 104256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sparre, P. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper. 1998, 306, 1–407. [Google Scholar]
  48. Liaw, A.; Wiener, M. Classification and regression by random Forest. R News 2002, 2, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  49. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, W.; Yi, Q.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Climate-driven latitudinal shift in fishing ground of jumbo flying squid (Dosidicus gigas) in the Southeast Pacific Ocean off Peru. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 3531–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brander, K.M. Global fish production and climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19709–19714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Su, L.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, K.; Xu, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, K. Decadal-Scale Variation in Mean Trophic Level in Beibu Gulf Based on Bottom-Trawl Survey Data. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2021, 13, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Larocque, S.M.; Johnson, T.B.; Fisk, A.T. Trophic niche overlap and abundance reveal potential impact of interspecific interactions on a reintroduced fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2021, 78, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, Y.; Huang, M. Implementation of the Sino-Vietnamese Fishery Agreement: Mainly Chinese Perspective. Beijing Law Rev. 2013, 4, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tian, H.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Jing, Y.; Liu, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y. Advances in the use of nighttime light data to monitor and assess coastal fisheries under the impacts of human activities and climate and environmental changes: A case study in the Beibu Gulf. Mar. Policy 2022, 144, 105227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y. Unveiling unselective fishing in China: A nationwide meta-analysis of multispecies fisheries. Fish Fish. 2022, 24, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pinsky, M.L.; Byler, D. Fishing, fast growth and climate variability increase the risk of collapse. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2015, 282, 20151053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Courtois, P.; Hu, X.; Pennelly, C.; Spence, P.; Myers, P.G. Mixed layer depth calculation in deep convection regions in ocean numerical models. Ocean. Model. 2017, 120, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Olivar, M.P.; Beckley, L.E. Latitudinal variation in diversity and abundance of mesopelagic fishes associated with change in oceanographic variables along 110°E, south-east Indian Ocean. Deep. Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2022, 198, 105053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Choi, C.Y.; An, K.W.; An, M.I. Molecular characterization and mRNA expression of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione S-transferase during osmotic stress in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2008, 149, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kannad, A.; Goodkin, N.F.; Samanta, D.; Murty, S.A.; Ramos, R.D.; Smerdon, J.E.; Gordon, A.L. Drivers of Coral Reconstructed Salinity in the South China Sea and Maritime Continent: The Influence of the 1976 Indo-Pacific Climate Shift. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2022, 127, e2021JC017787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rijnsdorp, A.D.; Peck, M.A.; Engelhard, G.H.; Möllmann, C.; Pinnegar, J.K. Resolving the effect of climate change on fish populations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66, 1570–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jamaludin, N.A.; Mohd-Arshaad, W.; Mohd Akib, N.A.; Zainal Abidin, D.H.; Nghia, N.V.; Nor, S.M. Phylogeography of the Japanese scad, Decapterus maruadsi (Teleostei; Carangidae) across the Central Indo-West Pacific: Evidence of strong regional structure and cryptic diversity. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 2020, 31, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kamaruzzaman, Y.N.; Mustapha, M.A.; Ghaffar, M. Impacts of Sea Temperature Rise on Rastrelliger kanagurta Potential Fishing Grounds in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Off South China Sea. Sains Malays. 2021, 50, 3467–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, H.; Xu, B.; Zhang, C.; Ren, Y.; Xue, Y. Comparison between two GAMs in quantifying the spatial distribution of Hexagrammos otakii in Haizhou Bay, China. Fish. Res. 2019, 218, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhao, H.; Feng, Y.; Dong, C.; Li, Z. Spatiotemporal distribution of Decapterus maruadsi in spring and autumn in response to environmental variation in the northern South China Sea. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2021, 45, 101811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hassan, R.; Bidin, R. Management of Small Pelagic Fishery Resources in the South China Sea and Andaman Sea Areas; Secretariat, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center: Bangkok, Thailand, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ma, W.; Gao, C.; Qin, S.; Ma, J.; Zhao, J. Do Two Different Approaches to the Season in Modeling Affect the Predicted Distribution of Fish? A Case Study for Decapterus maruadsi in the Offshore Waters of Southern Zhejiang, China. Fishes 2022, 7, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Heino, M.; Dieckmann, U.; Godø, O.R. Measuring probabilistic reaction norms for age and size at maturation. Evolution 2002, 56, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kuparinen, A.; Cano, J.M.; Loehr, J.; Herczeg, G.; Gonda, A.; Merila, J. Fish age at maturation is influenced by temperature independently of growth. Oecologia 2011, 167, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. McMillan, J.R.; Dunham, J.B.; Reeves, G.H.; Mills, J.S.; Jordan, C.E. Individual condition and stream temperature influence early maturation of rainbow and steelhead trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2011, 93, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Longhurst, A.R.; Pauly, D. Ecology of Tropical Oceans; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  73. Crawshaw, L.I. Physiological and Behavioral Reactions of Fishes to Temperature Change. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1977, 34, 730–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jakobsen, H.H.; Markager, S. Carbon-to-chlorophyll ratio for phytoplankton in temperate coastal waters: Seasonal patterns and relationship to nutrients. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2016, 61, 1853–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Stasko, A.D.; Swanson, H.; Majewski, A.; Atchison, S.; Reist, J.; Power, M. Influences of depth and pelagic subsidies on the size-based trophic structure of Beaufort Sea fish communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016, 549, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Townsend, D.W.; Cammen, L.M. Potential Importance of the Timing of Spring Plankton Blooms to Benthic-Pelagic Coupling and Recruitment of Juvenile Demersal Fishes. Biol. Oceanogr. 1988, 5, 215–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Baba, K.; Sugawara, R.; Nitta, H.; Endou, K.; Miyazono, A. Relationship between spat density, food availability, and growth of spawners in cultured Mizuhopecten yessoensis in Funka Bay: Concurrence with El Niño Southern Oscillation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2009, 66, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yen, K.-W.; Lu, H.-J. Spatial–temporal variations in primary productivity and population dynamics of skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis in the western and central Pacific Ocean. Fish. Sci. 2016, 82, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Baudron, A.R.; Needle, C.L.; Rijnsdorp, A.D.; Tara Marshall, C. Warming temperatures and smaller body sizes: Synchronous changes in growth of North Sea fishes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 1023–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chu, X.; Dong, C.; Qi, Y. The influence of ENSO on an oceanic eddy pair in the South China Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2017, 122, 1643–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dang, X.; Bai, Y.; Gong, F.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Q.; Huang, H.; He, X. Different Responses of Phytoplankton to the ENSO in Two Upwelling Systems of the South China Sea. Estuaries Coasts 2021, 45, 485–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gao, J.; Wu, G.; Ya, H. Review of the circulation in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. Cont. Shelf Res. 2017, 138, 106–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mustamäki, N.; Jokinen, H.; Scheinin, M.; Bonsdorff, E.; Mattila, J. Seasonal shifts in the vertical distribution of fish in a shallow coastal area. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2016, 73, 2278–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Xu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, J. Historical Occurrence of Algal Blooms in the Northern Beibu Gulf of China and Implications for Future Trends. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lluch-Belda, D.; Lluch-Cota, D.B.; Lluch-Cota, S.E. Changes in marine faunal distributions and ENSO events in the California Current. Fish. Oceanogr. 2005, 14, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Victor, B.C.; Wellington, G.M.; Robertson, D.R.; Ruttenberg, B.I. The effect of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation event on the distribution of reef-associated labrid fishes in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2001, 69, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  87. Bell, R.J.; Richardson, D.E.; Hare, J.A.; Lynch, P.D.; Fratantoni, P.S. Disentangling the effects of climate, abundance, and size on the distribution of marine fish: An example based on four stocks from the Northeast US shelf. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2015, 72, 1311–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Perry, A.L.; Low, P.J.; Ellis, J.R.; Reynolds, J.D. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 2005, 308, 1912–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wilson, S.K.; Depcyznski, M.; Fisher, R.; Holmes, T.H.; Noble, M.M.; Radford, B.T.; Rule, M.; Shedrawi, G.; Tinkler, P.; Fulton, C.J. Climatic forcing and larval dispersal capabilities shape the replenishment of fishes and their habitat-forming biota on a tropical coral reef. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 1918–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map showing stations (black dots) for otter trawl surveys in the Beibu Gulf during 2006–2020.
Figure 1. Map showing stations (black dots) for otter trawl surveys in the Beibu Gulf during 2006–2020.
Diversity 15 00649 g001
Figure 2. Potential drivers of variation in abundance of 15 fish species in the Beibu Gulf identified by random forest analysis. Significance levels are indicated as: ns (p > 0.05), * (p < 0.05) and ** (p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Potential drivers of variation in abundance of 15 fish species in the Beibu Gulf identified by random forest analysis. Significance levels are indicated as: ns (p > 0.05), * (p < 0.05) and ** (p < 0.01).
Diversity 15 00649 g002
Figure 3. Plots of regressions found to predict abundances of 15 major commercial fishes from GAM analyses. Solid lines are fitted gam curves and gray areas indicate standard error confidence bands. Chl: Chl-a.
Figure 3. Plots of regressions found to predict abundances of 15 major commercial fishes from GAM analyses. Solid lines are fitted gam curves and gray areas indicate standard error confidence bands. Chl: Chl-a.
Diversity 15 00649 g003
Figure 4. Monthly time series of environmental variables. Gray lines are interannual trends and gray areas indicate standard error confidence bands, and red lines provide the values after the seasonal cycles were removed.
Figure 4. Monthly time series of environmental variables. Gray lines are interannual trends and gray areas indicate standard error confidence bands, and red lines provide the values after the seasonal cycles were removed.
Diversity 15 00649 g004
Figure 5. The relationships between fish abundances and the ONI. The bold lines represent residuals of fish abundances (log-transformed) after trends with year and season were removed, and the red and blue colors represent El Niño and La Niña events, respectively.
Figure 5. The relationships between fish abundances and the ONI. The bold lines represent residuals of fish abundances (log-transformed) after trends with year and season were removed, and the red and blue colors represent El Niño and La Niña events, respectively.
Diversity 15 00649 g005
Figure 6. Map showing gravity centers of 15 fishes from 2006 to 2020 overlaid with water depth in the Beibu Gulf.
Figure 6. Map showing gravity centers of 15 fishes from 2006 to 2020 overlaid with water depth in the Beibu Gulf.
Diversity 15 00649 g006
Figure 7. Time-series of gravity centers for the studied fishes. The solid black lines represent latitudinal gravity centers of the 15 fishes from 2006 to 2020, the dashed lines are their linear fitting, and the gray areas indicate standard error confidence bands.
Figure 7. Time-series of gravity centers for the studied fishes. The solid black lines represent latitudinal gravity centers of the 15 fishes from 2006 to 2020, the dashed lines are their linear fitting, and the gray areas indicate standard error confidence bands.
Diversity 15 00649 g007
Table 1. A list of sampling date and climate condition.
Table 1. A list of sampling date and climate condition.
Cruise No.Sampling Date
(Month-Year)
SeasonsClimate EventsSampling Station
Numbers
1January 2006WinterLa Niña51
2April 2006SpringNormal52
3July 2006SummerNormal52
4October 2006AutumnEl Niño51
5January 2007WinterEl Niño52
6April 2007SpringNormal52
7July 2007SummerLa Niña52
8October 2007AutumnLa Niña52
9January 2008WinterLa Niña51
10July 2008SummerNormal52
11January 2009WinterLa Niña52
12July 2009SummerEl Niño52
13January 2010WinterEl Niño52
14July 2010SummerLa Niña52
15January 2011WinterLa Niña52
16July 2011SummerLa Niña52
17January 2012WinterLa Niña52
18July 2012SummerNormal52
19January 2013WinterNormal52
20July 2013SummerNormal52
21July 2014SummerNormal52
22October 2014AutumnEl Niño38
23January 2015WinterEl Niño52
24April 2015SpringEl Niño38
25July 2016SummerLa Niña38
26November 2016AutumnLa Niña38
27January 2017WinterNormal38
28April 2017SpringNormal38
29April 2018SpringLa Niña38
30September 2018AutumnEl Niño37
31April 2019SpringEl Niño38
32September 2019AutumnNormal33
33April 2020SpringNormal38
34September 2020AutumnLa Niña35
Table 2. The 15 major commercial fishes in the Beibu Gulf.
Table 2. The 15 major commercial fishes in the Beibu Gulf.
Common NameFamilyScientific NameHabitatPrice Category
Pacific rudderfishCentrolophidaePsenopsis anomalaBenthopelagicVery high
Big-head pennah croakerSciaenidaePennahia macrocephalusDemersalMedium
Largehead hairtailTrichiuridaeTrichiurus lepturusBenthopelagicHigh
Red bigeyePriacanthidaePriacanthus macracanthusReef-associatedHigh
Threadfin porgySparidaeEvynnis cardinalisReef-associatedVery high
Greater lizardfishSynodontidaeSaurida tumbilReef-associatedVery high
Brushtooth lizardfishSynodontidaeSaurida undosquamisReef-associatedVery high
GlowbellyAcropomatidaeAcropoma japonicumDemersalUnknown
Sulphur goatfishMullidaeUpeneus sulphureusDemersalHigh
Japanese goatfishMullidaeUpeneus japonicusDemersalHigh
Golden threadfin breamNemipteridaeNemipterus virgatusDemersalVery high
Yellowbelly threadfin breamNemipteridaeNemipterus bathybiusDemersalHigh
Japanese scadCarangidaeDecapterus maruadsiPelagicVery high
Japanese jack mackerelCarangidaeTrachurus japonicusPelagicHigh
Indian mackerelScombridaeRastrelliger kanagurtaPelagicVery high
Table 3. Summary of GAM results for major commercial fishes in the Beibu Gulf.
Table 3. Summary of GAM results for major commercial fishes in the Beibu Gulf.
SpeciesR2Deviance Explained (%)GCVApproximate Significance of Smooth Terms
YearChl-aMLDSSSSST
P. anomala0.30329.71.3052**************
P. macrocephalus0.25932.91.8712******ns******
T. lepturus0.24021.31.1757***********ns
P. macracanthus0.25932.20.7861*************
E. cardinalis0.15214.81.4088***************
S. tumbil0.17418.61.1200*************
S. undosquamis0.22824.21.0546***************
A. japonicum0.24125.32.4356************
U. sulphureus0.21023.21.0214***ns*********
U. japonicus0.04913.20.6859ns***********
N. virgatus0.28732.30.8922*************
N. bathybius0.13927.90.6002*****ns*****
D. maruadsi0.23526.21.4142***************
T. japonicus0.26826.61.7240***************
R. kanagurta0.10016.30.8901*********ns
Note: GCV: Gross Calorific Value; ns (p > 0.05), * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01) and *** (p < 0.001).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, X.; Zhang, K.; Li, J.; Xu, Y.; Sun, M.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S.; Cai, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Chen, Z. Effects of Climate Events on Abundance and Distribution of Major Commercial Fishes in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. Diversity 2023, 15, 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050649

AMA Style

Hong X, Zhang K, Li J, Xu Y, Sun M, Wang Y, Xu S, Cai Y, Qiu Y, Chen Z. Effects of Climate Events on Abundance and Distribution of Major Commercial Fishes in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. Diversity. 2023; 15(5):649. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050649

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Xiaofan, Kui Zhang, Jiajun Li, Youwei Xu, Mingshuai Sun, Yuezhong Wang, Shannan Xu, Yancong Cai, Yongsong Qiu, and Zuozhi Chen. 2023. "Effects of Climate Events on Abundance and Distribution of Major Commercial Fishes in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea" Diversity 15, no. 5: 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050649

APA Style

Hong, X., Zhang, K., Li, J., Xu, Y., Sun, M., Wang, Y., Xu, S., Cai, Y., Qiu, Y., & Chen, Z. (2023). Effects of Climate Events on Abundance and Distribution of Major Commercial Fishes in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea. Diversity, 15(5), 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050649

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop