Next Article in Journal
Distribution and Characteristics of Two Species of Stingless Bee Hives (Tetragonula spp.) in the Rural Landscape of Sumedang Regency (Indonesia)
Next Article in Special Issue
Branching Lithophyllum Coralline Algae: Dominant Reef Builders on Herbivory-Depressed Tropical Reefs after High Coral Mortality
Previous Article in Journal
Next Generation Sequencing of Bee Gut Microbiota in Urban and Rural Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Face-Down, Tail-Up: Unusual In Situ Behavior of the Blackchins Neoscopelus macrolepidotus, Neoscopelus microchir, and Scopelengys tristis (Myctophiformes: Neoscopelidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Something’s Fishy: An Unexpected Intertidal Encounter with the New Zealand Lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), near the Whangarei Heads, NZ

1
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
2
Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands
3
Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2333 BE Leiden, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2023, 15(9), 1017; https://doi.org/10.3390/d15091017
Submission received: 15 August 2023 / Revised: 31 August 2023 / Accepted: 13 September 2023 / Published: 14 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images from the Sea)

Abstract

:
A specimen of the endemic New Zealand lancelet Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901) was found and photographed in the intertidal area of a beach near the Whangarei Heads in New Zealand. This only lancelet species for New Zealand is rarely caught and is known for its specific habitat requirements, demanding clean, coarse sand. The specimen was found in an almost dried-out puddle during low tide on a beach with a lot of human activity. The species is also known to inhabit greater depths, making this observation (together with another recent, unpublished record) a constitution for evidence that it also inhabits tidal areas. Distribution records from the literature are reviewed, plotted on a map, and supplemented by this new observation.

Lancelets (Chordata: Cephalochordata) are filter feeders that burrow into loose sediments. For this reason, most species need specific sediment profiles and are only found in clean gravel or (coarse) sand. The New Zealand lancelet Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), in Māori called “puhi”, is rarely observed and is the only known cephalochordate species of New Zealand [1]. The specific habitat requirements are thought to make the species susceptible to (human-induced) siltation events [2]. The species appears to be a rare endemic that is only recorded from a few coastal areas of the Northern Island and the northern coast of the Southern Island [1,3]. Where populations are viable, the species can be locally common. An overview of published distribution records [1,2], as well as more recent observations from The Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, NIWA (Wellington, New Zealand) [4], the Auckland War Memorial Museum, and the citizen-scientist observation platform iNaturalist (including the one from this paper) can be found below (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S1).
On 4 June 2023, a vermiform animal was photographed with an Olympus Tough TG6 macro-camera during a tide-pool survey along the coast of Urquharts Bay, near the Whangarei Heads on the Northern Island of New Zealand. On closer inspection of the macro-pictures (Figure 2 and Figure 3), myotomes were observed on the lateral sides of the animal. This, in combination with the absence of eye spots and paired fins, identified the specimen as a lancelet. As there is no evidence of more than one species from New Zealand waters, the specimen was identified as Epigonichthys hectori. The adult specimen was found in the daytime, in the intertidal area of the beach. It was found at low tide, underneath a big but movable rock (approx. 20 cm in diameter), in a small puddle of seawater, >5 m from the shoreline. Upon lifting the rock, the lancelet made ‘fish-like’ (anguilliform) motions, moving in lateral directions, escaping the puddle. The specimen was approximately 5 cm in length, showing a translucent yellow-brown color. Myotomes were present along the entirety of its flanks and a low dorsal fin along the entirety of the body. Neither a caudal fin nor oral hood (including buccal cirri) were observed, possibly due to the animal being out of the water. The characteristic ‘notch’ between the rostrum and dorsal fin also could not be observed, possibly for the same reason. In addition, the full transparency of the animal described by Paulin [2] and Struthers [1] did not match the in-life color observed here. The specimen was released after the pictures were taken. The lancelet shared the habitat with several species of anomuran and brachyuran crabs, a few species of fish, and pistol shrimp.
A previous study [6] suggests that juvenile specimens of the New Zealand lancelet migrate to open water and greater depths at night and retreat to the sediment during the day. Adult specimens are known from depths ranging from 0 to 55 m [1]. The distribution and depth information from this source is based on collection material from Te Papa Tongarewa, but upon closer inspection, no apparent records from the intertidal were found (Supplementary Table S1). Museum specimens (including some loaned materials), which were caught before 1977 and examined by Paulin [2], feature a depth distribution starting at 4 m depth. One exception was found: the holotype was apparently found at “low tide” [2]. However, the original description by Benham [7] does not list any information on the depth of the collected specimens. A few specimens from the Te Papa museum have an unknown depth, but the majority of them have been caught far from the coast or by commercial fishing, which implies that these specimens were not collected in the intertidal (Supplementary Table S1). The two remaining samples, the paratype specimen (NMNZ3263) and one caught by Max Hancock (NMNZ14033) [8] are annotated with an unknown depth range (Supplementary Table S1). This means that these samples may have been caught in shallow water. A few samples from other collections were annotated with a minimum depth of 3 to 5 m, but there is no record of intertidal capture (Supplementary Table S1).
In 2022, Luca Davenport-Thomas shared several in situ photos of specimens on iNaturalist (obs. 123766123). He found the specimens in shallow water of about 10 to 15 cm deep in the intertidal [5]. This makes his record the first but unpublished observation of the species in a very shallow environment. The record from this paper constitutes, together with the observation from 2022, evidence that the species can survive in the intertidal zone, and it is not just an abnormal encounter.
As mentioned before, New Zealand lancelets require certain grain sizes (predominantly > 0.125 mm) for the sediments in which they thrive. In addition, the sediment has to be loose and clean in order for the lancelets to feed [2]. Interestingly, the current specimen was found in the intertidal area of a beach, which was (at the time of capture) heavily used by local fishermen and upturned and pressed by vehicles (including tractors)pulling boat-loaders. Such human activities may be indicative of high levels of pollution in the water and beach of Urquharts Bay (e.g., in 2006) [9]. Water quality has improved since 2006 [10,11], and while the oil refinery at Marsden Point (located on the other side of the channel) was decommissioned in April 2023, the area is still used to import and transfer oil, albeit with strict environmental management [10].
The current state of the beach may give an indication of the apparent resilience of the New Zealand lancelet. We hope that these photos and observation data reignite enthusiasm to search for and photograph rare species for both professional scientists and citizen scientists on iNaturalist. These observations can aid researchers in mapping the distribution of rarely caught species, thereby also improving the knowledge of their habitat requirements.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d15091017/s1, Table S1: NMNZ, NIWA, and AWMM holdings of Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901)—with additional records; File S1: R-code to visualize depth and geographic distribution of museum records.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.d.G. and J.H.; validation, W.d.G. and J.H.; investigation, W.d.G. and J.H.; resources, W.d.G. and J.H.; data curation, W.d.G. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, W.d.G.; writing—review and editing, W.d.G. and J.H.; visualization, W.d.G. and J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this article can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the VLIZ library (Oostende, Belgium) for making the paper by Paulin [2] available. Kareen Schnabel (NIWA, Wellington, NZ) is thanked for her cooperation in getting us into contact with the ichthyology staff at the Te Papa Tongarewa Museum. For sending us the collection records for the specimens at the Te Papa museum, we would like to thank Jeremy Barker (Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, NZ), and for the records of the Auckland museum, we thank Severine Hannam (Auckland War Memorial Museum, Auckland, NZ) In addition, we would like to thank Luca Davenport-Thomas for sending us additional information on the specimens photographed in Wellington. Two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for their thoughtful comments and feedback.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Struthers, C.D. 1. Family Epigonichthyidae, Lancelets; 1.1 Epichonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901). In The Fishes of New Zealand; Roberts, C., Stewart, A.L., Struthers, C.D., Eds.; Te Papa Press: Wellington, New Zealand, 2015; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Paulin, C.D. Epigonichthys hectori (Benham), the New Zealand lancelet (Leptocardii: Epigonichthyidae). Natl. Mus. N. Z. Rec. 1977, 1, 143–147. [Google Scholar]
  3. King, C.M.; Roberts, C.D.; Bell, B.D.; Fordyce, R.E.; Nicoll, R.S.; Worthy, T.H.; Paulin, C.D.; Hitchmough, R.A.; Keyes, I.W.; Baker, A.N.; et al. Twenty-Four: Phylum Chordata—lancelets, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals. In New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity: Volume One: Kingdom Animalia; Gordon, D.P., Ed.; Caterbury University Press: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. NIWA. NIWA Invertebrate Collection. v1.1. The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA). Dataset/Occurrence. 2018. Available online: https://nzobisipt.niwa.co.nz/resource?r=obisspecify&v=1.1 (accessed on 28 August 2023).
  5. Davenport-Thomas, L. iNaturalist Observation. 2022. Available online: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/123766123 (accessed on 31 July 2023).
  6. Crossland, J. Occurrence of the New Zealand lancelet in the plankton. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1979, 13, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Benham, W.B. Memoirs: Heteropleuron hectori, the New Zealand Lancelet. J. Cell Sci. 1901, 2, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gardner, N.; Gardner, N. Poirieria, from the Auckland Institute and Museum, Conchology Section. 7 (1): 1–177. BHL. 1973. Available online: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/204891 (accessed on 25 August 2023).
  9. Lynch, B. Contamination Threat ‘Extreme’ in Harbor (News Article: The Northern Advocate). 2006. Available online: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/contamination-threat-extreme-in-harbour/HMJJUB7S4II3KP3PB44C7TDE64/ (accessed on 31 July 2023).
  10. NIWA. New Zealand Coastal Water Quality Assessment 2021; Prepared for Ministry for the Environment, October, 2021; Fraser, C., White, R., Snelder, T., Stoffels, R., Eds.; National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd.: Auckland, New Zealand, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tweddle, S.; Eyre, R.; Griffiths, R.; McRae, A. State of Environment Water Quality in the Whāngārei Harbour 2000–2010; Northland Regional Council: Whāngārei, New Zealand, 2011.
Figure 1. Geographic and depth distribution records of the New Zealand lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901) in New Zealand. Each point indicates a record of one or more specimens; the color indicates the depth; grey points have an unknown depth. The locality of the intertidal specimens from 2022 [5] and 2023 (this study) are annotated.
Figure 1. Geographic and depth distribution records of the New Zealand lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901) in New Zealand. Each point indicates a record of one or more specimens; the color indicates the depth; grey points have an unknown depth. The locality of the intertidal specimens from 2022 [5] and 2023 (this study) are annotated.
Diversity 15 01017 g001
Figure 2. A New Zealand lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), in situ, after it escaped a puddle. The habitat consists of large rocks on coarse (black, vulcanic) sand.
Figure 2. A New Zealand lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), in situ, after it escaped a puddle. The habitat consists of large rocks on coarse (black, vulcanic) sand.
Diversity 15 01017 g002
Figure 3. A close-up of the frontal (oral) region of a New Zealand lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), on the hand of the first author. The oral hood and buccal cirri appear to be retracted.
Figure 3. A close-up of the frontal (oral) region of a New Zealand lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), on the hand of the first author. The oral hood and buccal cirri appear to be retracted.
Diversity 15 01017 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Gier, W.; Hubert, J. Something’s Fishy: An Unexpected Intertidal Encounter with the New Zealand Lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), near the Whangarei Heads, NZ. Diversity 2023, 15, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15091017

AMA Style

de Gier W, Hubert J. Something’s Fishy: An Unexpected Intertidal Encounter with the New Zealand Lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), near the Whangarei Heads, NZ. Diversity. 2023; 15(9):1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15091017

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Gier, Werner, and Jeroen Hubert. 2023. "Something’s Fishy: An Unexpected Intertidal Encounter with the New Zealand Lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), near the Whangarei Heads, NZ" Diversity 15, no. 9: 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15091017

APA Style

de Gier, W., & Hubert, J. (2023). Something’s Fishy: An Unexpected Intertidal Encounter with the New Zealand Lancelet, Epigonichthys hectori (Benham, 1901), near the Whangarei Heads, NZ. Diversity, 15(9), 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15091017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop