Next Article in Journal
Modeling and Forecasting the GPS Zenith Troposphere Delay in West Antarctica Based on Different Blind Source Separation Methods and Deep Learning
Previous Article in Journal
A Simple, Reliable, and Inexpensive Solution for Contact Color Measurement in Small Plant Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Folding-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Determination of β-Lactoglobulin on Poly-L-Lysine Modified Graphite Electrodes

by
Olaya Amor-Gutiérrez
1,2,
Giulia Selvolini
1,
M. Teresa Fernández-Abedul
3,
Alfredo de la Escosura-Muñiz
2 and
Giovanna Marrazza
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy
2
NanoBioAnalysis Group, Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, University of Oviedo, Julián Clavería 8, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
3
BioNanoAnalytical Spectrometry and Electrochemistry Group, Department of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, University of Oviedo, Julián Clavería 8, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(8), 2349; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082349
Submission received: 31 March 2020 / Revised: 16 April 2020 / Accepted: 18 April 2020 / Published: 20 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Biosensors)

Abstract

:
Nowadays, food allergy is a very important health issue, causing adverse reactions of the immune system when exposed to different allergens present in food. Because of this, the development of point-of-use devices using miniaturized, user-friendly, and low-cost instrumentation has become of outstanding importance. According to this, electrochemical aptasensors have been demonstrated as useful tools to quantify a broad variety of targets. In this work, we develop a simple methodology for the determination of β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) in food samples using a folding-based electrochemical aptasensor built on poly-L-lysine modified graphite screen-printed electrodes (GSPEs) and an anti-β-lactoglobulin aptamer tagged with methylene blue (MB). This aptamer changes its conformation when the sample contains β-LG, and due to this, the spacing between MB and the electrode surface (and therefore the electron transfer efficiency) also changes. The response of this biosensor was linear for concentrations of β-LG within the range 0.1–10 ng·mL−1, with a limit of detection of 0.09 ng·mL−1. The biosensor was satisfactorily employed for the determination of spiked β-LG in real food samples.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, allergy to food is a very important global health problem, thus an emerging topic when talking about food safety [1,2]. Allergy to food has been recently defined by the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology [3] and it involves an immune reaction deriving from the intake or other type of interaction with specific food [4,5]. Food allergy is a type I hypersensitivity immunological response against ingested substances that can result in serious health problems [6,7]. The reactions can be caused when even little quantities of food are consumed, usually between 10 and 100 mg [4,8]. It is known that this kind of hypersensitivity is having an impact especially in developed countries: between 1% and 3% of adults and between 3% and 8% of children are affected all over the world [9,10]. Symptoms vary from person to person, but can involve, for example, digestive disorders, circulatory or respiratory symptoms or skin irritations, among others. Moreover, an allergic reaction can also provoke in some cases anaphylactic shocks, that are life-threatening situations [11].
Allergens are mainly divided into eight different groups: fish, shellfish, wheat, milk, eggs, soy tree nuts, and nuts [12]. A study carried out in 2014 by Nwaru and collaborators about the incidence of the most popular food allergies throughout Europe [13] revealed that allergy to cow’s milk is, nowadays, the most frequent food allergy, especially in early-age children, implying a percentage of around 6% in the youngest population [14,15]. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) normally mediates cow’s milk allergy, and the symptoms usually occur within 2 h after milk intake [16]. In whey from cow’s milk, one of the most important proteins considered to be an allergen is β-lactoglobulin (β-LG), which is classified within the lipocalins, a group of binding proteins with small ligands [17]. Its quaternary structure, identified in 1997 using X-Ray diffraction [18], is dependent on the pH. For example, at pH values between 5.2 and 7.0, it is a dimer, and its molecular weight (MW) is around 37 kDa. However, at pH values over 8.0, it exists as a monomer, and its MW is approximately 18 kDa [19]. This protein has a great potential as milk allergen because it is remarkably stable and it is not present in human milk [20], and, apart from that, it is regularly used as an additive in lots of food products [21].
The development of analytical approaches used to detect and quantify food allergens has become increasingly significant [22] because labeling in food is crucial for the consumers, in order to prevent major health problems. The analysis of allergens in food samples [23] is usually carried out by immunoassay-based approaches, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) [11,14,24] or lateral-flow immunoassays (LFIAs) [25,26], as well as DNA-based methods, which detect the genes encoding for the proteins using amplifying methods, for instance, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [27,28]. Proteomic tests have been also used for the determination of allergens [29]. Although these methods are very sensitive, they are time-consuming and the instrumentation needed is very expensive. Because of this, there is an increasing interest in developing new analytical tools which are faster, simpler and with a lower-cost, also keeping good analytical characteristics [3,30]. Hence, electrochemical biosensors satisfy all these requirements, and, in particular, aptamer-based sensors (also known as aptasensors) are listed as one of the most powerful type of biosensors [31]. In contrast to DNA biosensors, which cannot detect the allergen itself, aptasensors can directly indicate the presence of the analyte [32,33,34].
Among all electrochemical aptasensors, those based on structure-switching aptamers represent an encouraging methodology due to the fast, sensitive, and cheap determination of different target analytes [35]. This approach benefits from the variations in the conformation of the recognition aptamer, immobilized on the electrode surface [36,37]. This aptamer is usually altered at the 5’-end by a molecule containing a group able to link to the surface of the electrode (for example, a thiol) and labelled at the opposite side (3’-end) with a redox probe, for instance, methylene blue (MB) [38], which has been widely used as label for DNA-based biosensors [39]. This type of aptasensor, also known as a “folding-based aptasensor”, requires an alteration on the aptamer’s conformation when the analyte is present [40], allowing to detect changes in the efficiency of the electron transfer, which relies upon the spacing that exists between the surface of the electrode and the redox probe.
Conducting polymers, also known as the “fourth generation of polymeric materials”, have become competitive materials for biosensing applications [41,42]. The first time that a polymer was electrochemically prepared and characterized was in 1862 by Letheby [43], who carried out the electrolytic oxidation of a sulphatic solution of aniline, obtaining polyaniline. Since then, conducting polymers have been broadly used to modify electrodes for the development of chemical sensors and biosensors, because they conduct electricity very well, have an effective superficial area and are easy to prepare [44]. Considerably different conducting polymers have been stated [45], and polyaniline (PANI) [46], polyacetylene [47], polypyrrole (PPy) [48], and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) [49] are among the most widely used. Apart from them, another polymer that has attracted attention is poly-L-lysine (PLL), due to its versatility, good biocompatibility, stability, and good solubility in water [50,51]. It can be quickly prepared by the electropolymerization of L-lysine, an essential amino acid usually employed in protein biosynthesis [52]. It has been firstly described in 1977 by Shima and Sakai as a product of the fermentation of Streptomyces [53], and, after that, it has been widely used as food preservative. It also presents a great potential for using it as modifier of electrodes in electrochemical biosensors [54].
In this work, we present a folding-based aptasensor able to quantify β-lactoglobulin (β-LG) using graphite screen-printed electrodes (GSPEs). On their surface, a film made of a conducting polymer, poly-L-lysine, combined with electrogenerated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is used in order to improve the electrodic area. A thiolated aptamer that specifically recognizes β-LG is modified with methylene blue on the 3’-end, a redox probe, and is linked to the AuNPs via a thiol modification on the 5’-end. The strategy presented here takes advantage of: (i) the higher electroactive area of the GSPE when it is modified with PLL and AuNPs, (ii) the strong binding between AuNPs and the thiolated aptamer, (iii) the conformational changes the aptamer suffers when β-LG is present, and (iv) the differences in the electron transfer, which are dependent on the space existent in between MB and the modified electrode. This approach represents a sensitive, simple, and accurate methodology for the fast quantification of β-LG in real alimentary samples, using miniaturized and low-cost instrumentation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Di-sodium hydrogen phosphate (Na2HPO4), sodium dihydrogenphosphate dihydrate (NaH2PO4·2H2O), sodium chloride (NaCl), L-lysine hydrochloride (C6H14N2O2·HCl), tetrachloroauric acid (HAuCl4), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and potassium chloride (KCl) were acquired from Merck (Milan, Italy). Potassium hexacyanoferrate (II) trihydrate (K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2O), potassium hexacyanoferrate (III) (K3[Fe(CN)6]), Trizma® Base (Tris), magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O), β-lactoglobulin B (β-LG), and 6-mercapto-1-hexanol (MCH) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy).
The thiolated aptamer used, modified in the 3’-end with methylene blue (MB), had the following sequence: 5’-HS-CGA CGA TCG GAC CGC AGT ACC CAC CCA CCA GCC CCA ACA TCA TGC CCA TCC GTG TGT G-MB-3’, and was obtained from Biomers.net (Ulm, Germany).
All the reagents used were of analytical grade and used as they were received, without the need of further purification. Milli-Q water (18 MΩ) was used to prepare all the solutions.

2.2. Apparatus

An AUTOLAB PGSTAT 10 potentiostat/galvanostat from Eco Chemie (Utrecht, The Netherlands) was used to carry out the electrochemical measurements, interfaced to a computer system and controlled by General Purpose Electrochemical System (GPES) software (Eco Chemie, Utrecht, The Netherlands).
The graphite screen-printed electrodes (GSPEs) used for the development of this aptasensor, which contained a silver pseudoreference electrode and a graphite auxiliary electrode, were purchased from EcoBioServices (Florence, Italy).
The microcentrifuge used for the real samples treatment was an Eppendorf® miniSpin®, from Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany).

2.3. Sensor Development

2.3.1. Gold-Nanoparticles @ Poly-L-Lysine Electrodeposition

The surface of the working electrodes was, initially, modified by electropolymerization of L-lysine in order to create a poly-L-lysine (PLL) film following a procedure described by Kuralay and collaborators with some modifications [55]. Then, another modification of the polymer-modified electrodic surface was performed by the electrodeposition of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Both modifications have been performed using cyclic voltammetry (CV). Briefly, 50 µL of a 10 mM L-lysine solution in 50 mM phosphate buffer, 0.1 M NaCl, pH = 7.5 were dropped onto the electrochemical cell. Cyclic voltammograms were registered from –0.5 V to +1.5 V for 15 scans at a scan rate of 100 mV·s−1. The poly-L-lysine-modified GSPEs (PLL/GSPEs) were washed with 50 µL of 0.5 M H2SO4.
Then, AuNPs were electrogenerated by putting a drop of 50 µL of 0.5 mM HAuCl4 solution in 0.5 M H2SO4 on the PLL/GSPEs, and the potential was switched from −0.2 V to +1.2 V at 100 mV·s−1 for 15 cycles. Finally, the gold nanoparticles/poly-L-lysine-modified GSPEs (AuNPs@PLL/GSPEs) were washed three times with 100 µL of Milli-Q water, to remove the excess of free ions from the surface. It has been assessed that the modified GSPEs are stable at 4 °C in dry conditions for several weeks to use them in following experiments without affecting the analytical characteristics.

2.3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of the Modified GSPEs

The modification of the GSPEs was monitored by cyclic voltammetry, dropping 50 µL of the redox probe [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− (equimolar solutions of 5.0 mM in 0.1 M KCl). The potential was cycled from –0.4 V to +0.8 V using different scan rates (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 mV·s−1). The intensity of the current (ip, A) was measured and plotted against the square root of the scan rate (ν, V·s−1), showing a linear behaviour. The equation was fitted using the Randles–Sevcik equation [56,57], as in every reversible and diffusion-controlled process:
i p = 0.446   nFAC 0 nF ν D 0 RT
where n is the number of electrons exchanged, A is the electrode surface area (cm2), C0 is the bulk concentration of the electroactive species (mol·cm−3), and D0 is the diffusion coefficient of the electroactive species (cm2·s−1) [58].
The sensors were considered as single use, so after each measurement, the electrodes were discarded.

2.3.3. Aptamer Immobilization

The aptamer immobilization was carried out by depositing 1 µM of the thiolated aptamer in 50 mM Tris buffer solution (150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, pH = 7.4) and letting it to react overnight. The aptamer was immobilized by chemisorption between AuNPs and the thiolated aptamer. After that, a self-assembled monolayer was formed with 1 mM 6-mercapto-1-hexanol solution in Milli-Q water and incubating it for 60 min, as previously described by our group [59]. Then, the aptasensors were washed with 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer solution, containing 150 mM NaCl (pH = 7.4).

2.3.4. β-Lactoglobulin Detection

With the aim of obtaining the calibration curve for β-lactoglobulin, various protein concentrations have been tested. Several β-lactoglobulin solutions of increasing concentrations (between 0.1 ng·mL−1 and 10 ng·mL−1) in 0.1 M PBS buffer solution (150 mM NaCl, pH = 7.4) have been analyzed.

2.3.5. Differential Pulse Voltammetry Measurements

Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) measurements were carried out using 0.1 M PBS buffer solution, containing 150 mM NaCl (pH = 7.4) under the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; initial potential −0.60 V; end potential +0.15 V; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. The height of the resulting peak at around −0.03 V, corresponding to the oxidation of the MB attached to the aptamer, was taken as the analytical signal.

2.3.6. Real Samples Analysis

Real samples were treated following a procedure described elsewhere [60]. Spike and recovery experiment was done in order to see if a real sample matrix affects the quantification of β-lactoglobulin, comparing it to the electrolyte solution used in the standard calibration curve (PBS). Biscuits and soya yoghourt were purchased in local markets.
The procedure was carried out as follows: 1 g of biscuit and 1 g of soya yoghourt were dissolved in 20 mL of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0, containing 2% Tween-20) and stirred at room temperature for 5 hours. After that, the mixtures were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant was collected. The samples were enriched with 1 and 5 ng·mL−1 of β-LG and the concentration was determined using the aptasensor. Finally, the recovery (%) of the concentration was calculated in the real samples.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Modification of GSPEs

The modification was evaluated in all the steps of the modification using cyclic voltammetry at different scan rates (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 mV·s−1) using the redox probe ferro/ferricyanide ([Fe(CN)6]4−/3−). Cyclic voltammograms obtained for bare GSPEs, poly-L-lysine-modified GSPEs (PLL/GSPE), and gold nanoparticles/poly-L-lysine-modified GSPEs (AuNPs@PLL/GSPE) in [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− solutions are represented in Figure 1. The redox peaks recorded with PLL@AuNPs/GSPEs and PLL/GSPEs were higher than those obtained with bare GSPEs, as well as the reversibility.
This demonstrates the formation of polymer on the graphite surface. The electroactive surface area, which can be seen in Table 1, was calculated by applying the Randles–Sevcik equation using the slope of the linear regression obtained by plotting the current peak height against the square root of the scan rate.
The scan rate study depicted in Figure 1 shows that anodic and cathodic intensities (ipa and ipc, respectively) increased with the scan rate, which was varied between 25 and 150 mV·s−1. Concerning the area of the electroactive surface, it can be seen in Table 1 that it increases in each step of the modification, being maximum when the GSPE is modified with both PLL and AuNPs.

3.2. Aptasensor Assay

The aptasensor described here works with a folding-based mechanism (Figure 2), using a thiolated aptamer tagged with methylene blue (MB). The aptamer immobilization takes advantage of the covalent linking between thiolated groups and AuNPs. When there is no β-lactoglobulin, there is more distance between the redox probe (MB) and the electrode surface, so the signal is lower. However, when the analyte is added, the conformation of the aptamer changes, thus bringing the redox probe and the electrode surface together and increasing the signal, measured using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV).
For the purpose of obtaining the best analytical characteristics of this aptasensor, different parameters were optimized, as detailed in the following paragraphs.

3.2.1. Electrolyte Solution

Different buffer solutions were tested for the MB detection with the objective of obtaining the highest signal-to-noise ratio: 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.5 (with and without 2 mM MgCl2) and 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4 (with and without 2 mM MgCl2). In Figure 3, the results of this optimization are depicted, testing a blank solution of buffer (background electrolyte) and 5 ng·mL−1 of β-LG in each case.
As shown in Figure 3, the highest signal-to background ratio was obtained when PBS-based buffers were used. In particular, the signal-to-noise ratio is bigger without MgCl2, so this buffer solution was selected for the following measurements. This suggests that magnesium ions can influence the conformation of the aptamer, and therefore its interaction with the protein, taking into account the decrease in the mobility of the aptamer and the water molecules when Mg2+ is present, as reported by Alexander D. MacKerell [61].

3.2.2. Aptamer Concentration

A crucial stage in the development of the aptasensor is the concentration of aptamer immobilized. Different concentrations of anti-β-LG aptamer labeled with MB (0.5, 1, and 2 µM) were immobilized on the AuNPs@PLL/GSPE, and the aptasensor response is shown in Figure 4.
The best concentration was chosen to be 1 µM because of the higher signal-to-background ratio obtained. The precision was also better in this case.

3.2.3. Incubation Time

Incubation time is a very important parameter that can affect the measurements, inasmuch as it can affect to an appropriate conformational change in the aptamer structure when it binds the analyte. The results for incubation times of 30, 45, and 60 min are shown in Figure 5. As can be seen, a bigger signal-to noise ratio is obtained for 45 min, that being the time chosen as the optimum incubation time.

3.3. β-Lactoglobulin Detection in Standard Solutions

The influence of the concentration of β-LG on the analytical signal (taking into account the voltammetric peak at around –0.03 V) under the optimized conditions was evaluated, as shown in Figure 6. Different β-LG concentrations ranging from 0.10 to 10.0 ng·mL−1 were analyzed.
The current peak intensity resulted to be directly proportional to β-LG concentration, so the experimental data were fitted with a linear relationship in the range studied, in accordance with the following equation:
iox (µA) = 0.2237 (µA·mL·ng−1)·[β-LG] (ng·mL−1) + 0.4106 (µA)
R2 = 0.997
A limit of detection (LOD), calculated as three times the standard deviation of the intercept divided by the slope, was found to be 0.09 ng·mL−1. This LOD is below the threshold established for proteins in cow’s milk [8,62] so it would be very suitable for the determination of trace concentrations in food in order to avoid undesired reactions in allergenic patients. In addition, the levels of β-LG assayed in this work are close (and even beneath) to those achieved using alternative approaches based on liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry [22], ELISA [60], capillary-electrophoresis, and laser-induced fluorescence [63] or magneto-immunoassays [64].
Apart from that, the reproducibility of the method was very good, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) below 13% (obtained for three repetitive measurements for all the concentrations tested).
Before using the biosensor for analyzing real samples, the effect of different interferences that can affect the signal of this aptasensor was studied. One of the main components present in milk samples that can interfere is casein. In this way, individual solutions of β-LG and casein and a mixture of both were used.
As can be seen in Figure 7, casein on its own did not produce any interference, giving a signal very similar to the one obtained with buffer. In the case of the mixture, the presence of casein hardly affects the β-LG signal, demonstrating the high specificity of the aptamer employed.

3.4. β-Lactoglobulin Detection in Real Samples

The main goal for demonstrating the applicability of the aptasensor is analysis in real food samples.
The performance of the aptasensor towards the analysis of real food samples has been verified using commercially available biscuits and soya yoghourt, and its response has been tested using the same conditions used for the β-LG calibration curve.
The samples were treated as specified in the Experimental Section, and a spike and recovery experiment was performed. The results are summarized in Table 2. The recovery rates of the concentration reveal that the matrix doesn’t affect the methodology to a great extent. This opens up the way to β-LG quantification in food samples with high accuracy for the detection of allergens.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a simple and sensitive aptasensor for the detection of β-lactoglobulin, one of the most important proteins found in milk, has been designed. The aptasensor developed here is built on disposable graphite screen-printed electrodes modified with a conducting polymer (poly-L-lysine) and gold nanoparticles. The modification of the biosensor surface was carried out by the electropolymerization of L-lysine, in a first step, and the electrogeneration of AuNPs using gold tetrachloroauric acid.
The thiolated aptamer used in this aptasensor is modified with the redox probe methylene blue at the 3’-end. The strategy presented in this work benefits from the conformational changes of the aptamer when β-LG is present, and as a result, from changes in the electron transfer, hanging on the distance between methylene blue and the electrodic surface. A good linear relationship between the peak current values and β-LG concentration in the range between 0.10 and 10 ng·mL−1, with a limit of detection of 0.09 ng·mL−1, was obtained. The aptasensor was also applied for the determination of spiked β-LG in real food samples found in local supermarkets.

Author Contributions

G.M., O.A.-G. and G.S. conceived and designed the experiments; O.A.-G. and G.S. performed the experiments; O.A.-G., G.M and G.S. analyzed the data; O.A.-G. wrote the paper; O.A.-G., G.S., M.T.F.-A., A.d.l.E.-M. and G.M. reviewed and edited the paper; G.M. was in charge of supervision, administrated the project and acquired funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Italian Government in the framework of PRIN 2017, Prot. 2017YER72 K_005. O. Amor-Gutiérrez thanks the University of Oviedo for the award of the grants "Ayudas para la realización de tesis doctorales" (PAPI-18-PF-13) and "Ayudas económicas de movilidad de excelencia para docentes e investigadores", funded by Banco Santander. A. de la Escosura-Muñiz acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation MICINN (Spain) for the “Ramón y Cajal” Research Fellow (RyC-2016-20299).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qi, K.; Liu, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yin, J.; Ding, X.; Qin, W.; Yang, Y. A rapid immobilized trypsin digestion combined with liquid chromatography—Tandem mass spectrometry for the detection of milk allergens in baked food. Food Control 2019, 102, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ross, G.M.S.; Bremer, M.G.E.G.; Nielen, M.W.F. Consumer-friendly food allergen detection: Moving towards smartphone-based immunoassays. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 5353–5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hosu, O.; Selvolini, G.; Marrazza, G. Recent advances of immunosensors for detecting food allergens. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 10, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ward, R.K. Introduction to food allergy. In Handbook of Food Allergen Detection and Control; Flanagan, S., Ed.; Elsevier: Cambridge, UK, 2015; pp. 1–14. ISBN 978-1-78242-012-5. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gómez-Arribas, L.N.; Benito-Peña, E.; Hurtado-Sánchez, M.D.C.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C. Biosensing based on nanoparticles for food allergens detection. Sensors 2018, 18, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Neethirajan, S.; Weng, X.; Tah, A.; Cordero, J.O.; Ragavan, K.V. Nano-biosensor platforms for detecting food allergens—New trends. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2018, 18, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Sampson, H.A. Treatments for food allergy: How close are we? Immunol. Res. 2012, 54, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Taylor, S.L.; Gendel, S.M.; Houben, G.F.; Julien, E. The key events dose-response framework: A foundation for examining variability in elicitation thresholds for food allergens. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sicherer, S.H.; Sampson, H.A. Food allergy: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khedri, M.; Ramezani, M.; Rafatpanah, H.; Abnous, K. Detection of food-born allergens with aptamer-based biosensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 103, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schubert-Ullrich, P.; Rudolf, J.; Ansari, P.; Galler, B.; Führer, M.; Molinelli, A.; Baumgartner, S. Commercialized rapid immunoanalytical tests for determination of allergenic food proteins: An overview. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vasilescu, A.; Nunes, G.; Hayat, A.; Latif, U.; Marty, J.L. Electrochemical affinity biosensors based on disposable screen-printed electrodes for detection of food allergens. Sensors 2016, 16, 1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Nwaru, B.I.; Hickstein, L.; Panesar, S.S.; Roberts, G.; Muraro, A.; Sheikh, A. Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 69, 992–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Villa, C.; Costa, J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Mafra, I. Cow’s milk allergens: Screening gene markers for the detection of milk ingredients in complex meat products. Food Control 2020, 108, 106823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. D’Auria, E.; Mameli, C.; Piras, C.; Cococcioni, L.; Urbani, A.; Zuccotti, G.V.; Roncada, P. Precision medicine in cow’s milk allergy: Proteomics perspectives from allergens to patients. J. Proteom. 2018, 188, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Villa, C.; Costa, J.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Mafra, I. Bovine Milk Allergens: A Comprehensive Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 137–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jylhä, S.; Mäkinen-Kiljunen, S.; Haahtela, T.; Söderlund, H.; Takkinen, K.; Laukkanen, M.L. Selection of recombinant IgE antibodies binding the β-lactoglobulin allergen in a conformation-dependent manner. J. Immunol. Methods 2009, 350, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brownlow, S.; Morais Cabral, J.H.; Cooper, R.; Flower, D.R.; Yewdall, S.J.; Polikarpov, I.; North, A.C.T.; Sawyer, L. Bovine β-lactoglobulin at 1.8 Å resolution—Still an enigmatic lipocalin. Structure 1997, 5, 481–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kelly, P.; Woonton, B.W.; Smithers, G.W. Improving the Sensory Quality, Shelf-Life and Functionality of Milk; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2009; ISBN 9781845693428. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lettieri, M.; Hosu, O.; Adumitrachioaie, A.; Cristea, C.; Marrazza, G. Beta-lactoglobulin Electrochemical Detection Based with an Innovative Platform Based on Composite Polymer. Electroanalysis 2019, 32, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stojadinovic, M.; Pieters, R.; Smit, J.; Velickovic, T.C. Cross-linking of β-lactoglobulin enhances allergic sensitization through changes in cellular uptake and processing. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 140, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ji, J.; Zhu, P.; Pi, F.; Sun, C.; Sun, J.; Jia, M.; Ying, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X. Development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous detection of the main milk allergens. Food Control 2017, 74, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Monaci, L.; Visconti, A. Immunochemical and DNA-based methods in food allergen analysis and quality assurance perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Taylor, S.L.; Nordlee, J.A.; Niemann, L.M.; Lambrecht, D.M. Allergen immunoassays-considerations for use of naturally incurred standards. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 395, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ross, G.M.S.; Salentijn, G.I.; Nielen, M.W.F. A critical comparison between flow-through and lateral flow immunoassay formats for visual and smartphone-based multiplex allergen detection. Biosensors 2019, 9, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Masiri, J.; Barrios-Lopez, B.; Benoit, L.; Tamayo, J.; Day, J.; Nadala, C.; Sung, S.L.; Samadpour, M. Development and validation of a lateral flow immunoassay test kit for dual detection of casein and b-lactoglobulin residues. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Villa, C.; Costa, J.; Mafra, I. Detection and quantification of milk ingredients as hidden allergens in meat products by a novel specific real-time PCR method. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Costa, J.; Fernandes, T.J.R.; Villa, C.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Mafra, I. Advances in food allergen analysis. Food Saf. Innov. Anal. Tools Saf. Assess. 2016, 305–360. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sancho, A.I.; Mills, E.N.C. Proteomic approaches for qualitative and quantitative characterisation of food allergens. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58, S42–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rotariu, L.; Lagarde, F.; Jaffrezic-Renault, N.; Bala, C. Electrochemical biosensors for fast detection of food contaminants - trends and perspective. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Campuzano, S.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; Pingarrón, J.M. Electrochemical affinity biosensors in food safety. Chemosensors 2017, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Song, S.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Fan, C.; Zhao, J. Aptamer-based biosensors. TrAC—Trends Anal. Chem. 2008, 27, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cucu, T.; Jacxsens, L.; De Meulenaer, B. Analysis to support allergen risk management: Which way to go? J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 5624–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mansouri, R.; Azadbakht, A. Aptamer-Based Approach as Potential Tools for Construction the Electrochemical Aptasensor. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2019, 29, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Catanante, G.; Mishra, R.K.; Hayat, A.; Marty, J.L. Sensitive analytical performance of folding based biosensor using methylene blue tagged aptamers. Talanta 2016, 153, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xiao, Y.; Lubin, A.A.; Heeger, A.J.; Plaxco, K.W. Label-Free Electronic Detection of Thrombin in Blood Serum by Using an Aptamer-Based Sensor. Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5592–5595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schoukroun-Barnes, L.R.; Wagan, S.; White, R.J. Enhancing the analytical performance of electrochemical RNA aptamer-based sensors for sensitive detection of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, W.; Xiong, E.; Chen, J. Sensitive electrochemical aptasensor by coupling “signal-on’’ and ‘signal-off’ strategies. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 8397–8402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. García-González, R.; Costa-García, A.; Fernández-Abedul, M.T. Methylene blue covalently attached to single stranded DNA as electroactive label for potential bioassays. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 191, 784–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ferapontova, E.E.; Olsen, E.M.; Gothelf, K.V. An RNA aptamer-based electrochemical biosensor for detection of theophylline in serum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4256–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cabaj, J.; Soloducho, J. Conducting Polymers as Elements of Miniature Biocompatible Sensor. In Green Electronics; Ravariu, C., Mihaiescu, D., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
  42. Saberi, R.S.; Shahrokhian, S.; Marrazza, G. Amplified electrochemical DNA sensor based on polyaniline film and gold nanoparticles. Electroanalysis 2013, 25, 1373–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Letheby, H. On the production of a blue substance by the electrolysis of sulphate of aniline. J. Chem. Soc. 1862, 15, 161–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Moon, J.M.; Thapliyal, N.; Hussain, K.K.; Goyal, R.N.; Shim, Y.B. Conducting polymer-based electrochemical biosensors for neurotransmitters: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 102, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ates, M. A review study of (bio)sensor systems based on conducting polymers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Selvolini, G.; Lazzarini, C.; Marrazza, G. Electrochemical nanocomposite single-use sensor for dopamine detection. Sensors 2019, 19, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Zeng, Q.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Qin, J.; Tang, B.Z. New polyacetylene-based chemosensory materials for the “turn-on” sensing of α-amino acids. Polymer 2009, 50, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, J.; Jiang, M.; Fortes, A.; Mukherjee, B. New label-free DNA recognition based on doping nucleic-acid probes within conducting polymer films. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 402, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, G.; Han, R.; Su, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, G.; Luo, X. Zwitterionic peptide anchored to conducting polymer PEDOT for the development of antifouling and ultrasensitive electrochemical DNA sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dalkıran, B.; Erden, P.E.; Kaçar, C.; Kılıç, E. Disposable Amperometric Biosensor Based on Poly-L-lysine and Fe3O4 NPs-chitosan Composite for the Detection of Tyramine in Cheese. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 1324–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, C.; Yang, T.; Jiao, K.; Gao, H. A DNA electrochemical sensor with poly-l-lysine/single-walled carbon nanotubes films and its application for the highly sensitive EIS detection of PAT gene fragment and PCR amplification of NOS gene. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 2917–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laurinavičius, L.; Radzevič, A.; Ignatjev, I.; Niaura, G.; Vitkutė, K.; Širšinaitis, T.; Trusovas, R.; Pauliukaite, R. Investigation of electrochemical polymerisation of L-lysine and application for immobilisation of functionalised graphene as platform for electrochemical sensing. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 299, 936–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shima, S.; Sakai, H. Polylysine produced by streptomyces. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1977, 41, 1807–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhang, D.; Li, L.; Ma, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y. Electrodeposited reduced graphene oxide incorporating polymerization of L-lysine on electrode surface and its application in simultaneous electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kuralay, F.; Dükar, N.; Bayramlı, Y. Poly-L-lysine Coated Surfaces for Ultrasensitive Nucleic Acid Detection. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 1556–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Elgrishi, N.; Rountree, K.J.; McCarthy, B.D.; Rountree, E.S.; Eisenhart, T.T.; Dempsey, J.L. A practical beginner’s guide to cyclic voltammetry. J. Chem. Educ. 2018, 95, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. de los Santos Álvarez, N.; Fernández Abedul, M.T. Determination of ascorbic acid in dietary supplements by cyclic voltammetry. In Laboratory Methods in Dynamic Electroanalysis; Fernández-Abedul, M.T., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 13–23. ISBN 9780128159323. [Google Scholar]
  58. Konopka, S.J.; McDuffie, B. Diffusion coefficients of ferri- and ferrocyanide ions in aqueous media, using twin-electrode thin-layer electrochemistry. Anal. Chem. 1970, 42, 1741–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Carpini, G.; Lucarelli, F.; Marrazza, G.; Mascini, M. Oligonucleotide-modified screen-printed gold electrodes for enzyme-amplified sensing of nucleic acids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 20, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. He, S.; Li, X.; Wu, Y.; Wu, S.; Wu, Z.; Yang, A.; Tong, P.; Yuan, J.; Gao, J.; Chen, H. Highly sensitive detection of bovine β-Lactoglobulin with wide linear dynamic range based on platinum nanoparticles probe. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 11830–11838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. MacKerell, A.D. Influence of magnesium ions on duplex DNA structural, dynamic, and solvation properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Allen, K.J.; Remington, B.C.; Baumert, J.L.; Crevel, R.W.R.; Houben, G.F.; Brooke-Taylor, S.; Kruizinga, A.G.; Taylor, S.L. Allergen reference doses for precautionary labeling (VITAL 2.0): Clinical implications. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Pelaez-Lorenzo, C.; Diez-Masa, J.C.; Vasallo, I.; de Frutos, M. A new sample preparation method compatible with capillary electrophoresis and laser-induced fluorescence for improving detection of low levels of β-lactoglobulin in infant foods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 649, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ruiz-Valdepeñas Montiel, V.; Campuzano, S.; Conzuelo, F.; Torrente-Rodríguez, R.M.; Gamella, M.; Reviejo, A.J.; Pingarrón, J.M. Electrochemical magnetoimmunosensing platform for determination of the milk allergen β-lactoglobulin. Talanta 2015, 131, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms recorded with bare and modified GSPEs in an equimolecular solution of 5 mM ferro/ferricyanide ([Fe(CN)6]4−/3−) in 0.1 M KCl. (a) GSPE; (b) PLL/GSPE and (c) AuNPs@PLL/GSPE. Experimental parameters: potential range from −0.4 V to +0.8 V; scan rate: 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 mV·s−1.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms recorded with bare and modified GSPEs in an equimolecular solution of 5 mM ferro/ferricyanide ([Fe(CN)6]4−/3−) in 0.1 M KCl. (a) GSPE; (b) PLL/GSPE and (c) AuNPs@PLL/GSPE. Experimental parameters: potential range from −0.4 V to +0.8 V; scan rate: 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 mV·s−1.
Sensors 20 02349 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sensing strategy of the proposed aptasensor.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sensing strategy of the proposed aptasensor.
Sensors 20 02349 g002
Figure 3. Optimization of the electrolyte solution. Experimental conditions: [β-LG] = 0 and 5 ng·mL−1, [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between −0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3. Optimization of the electrolyte solution. Experimental conditions: [β-LG] = 0 and 5 ng·mL−1, [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between −0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Sensors 20 02349 g003
Figure 4. Optimization of the concentration of aptamer immobilized on the AuNPs@PLL/GSPE. Experimental conditions: [β-LG] = 0 and 5.0 ng·mL−1, incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between –0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4. Optimization of the concentration of aptamer immobilized on the AuNPs@PLL/GSPE. Experimental conditions: [β-LG] = 0 and 5.0 ng·mL−1, incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between –0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Sensors 20 02349 g004
Figure 5. Optimization of the incubation time (aptamer-target interaction) in the AuNPs@PLL-GSPE. Experimental conditions: [β-LG] = 0 and 5.0 ng·mL−1, [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, oxidation DPV recorded between −0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5. Optimization of the incubation time (aptamer-target interaction) in the AuNPs@PLL-GSPE. Experimental conditions: [β-LG] = 0 and 5.0 ng·mL−1, [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, oxidation DPV recorded between −0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Sensors 20 02349 g005
Figure 6. (a) DPV measurements for increasing concentrations of β-LG under the optimized conditions; (b) calibration curve for β-LG on AuNPs@PLL/GSPEs. Experimental conditions: [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, Incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between –0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 6. (a) DPV measurements for increasing concentrations of β-LG under the optimized conditions; (b) calibration curve for β-LG on AuNPs@PLL/GSPEs. Experimental conditions: [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, Incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between –0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Sensors 20 02349 g006
Figure 7. Study of the possible interference caused by casein. Experimental conditions: [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, Incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between –0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 7. Study of the possible interference caused by casein. Experimental conditions: [Apt-MB] = 1 µM, Incubation time: 45 min, oxidation DPV recorded between –0.60 V and +0.15 V, using the following conditions: modulation time: 0.02 s; interval time: 0.5 s; step potential 0.005 V; modulation amplitude 0.10 V. Solutions made in 0.1 M PBS, 150 mM NaCl pH = 7.4. Data are given as average ± SD (n = 3).
Sensors 20 02349 g007
Table 1. Electroactive surface area at the different steps of the modification of the GSPEs, calculated from the CV scans performed in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− equimolecular redox probe in 0.1 M KCl.
Table 1. Electroactive surface area at the different steps of the modification of the GSPEs, calculated from the CV scans performed in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4−/3− equimolecular redox probe in 0.1 M KCl.
Aanodic (mm2)Acathodic (mm2)Aaverage (mm2)RSD (%)
GSPE13.573.823.694.8
PLL/GSPE24.894.424.657.2
AuNPs@PLL/GSPE35.935.305.617.8
1 GSPE: Graphite screen-printed electrodes. 2 PLL/GSPE: Poly-L-lysine modified GSPE. 3 AuNPs@PLL/GSPE: Gold nanoparticles and PLL-modified GSPE.
Table 2. Spike and recovery experiment data. Concentrations of 1.0 and 5.0 ng·mL−1 of β-LG were spiked in biscuit and soya yoghourt samples (n = 3 for each). The recovery (%) was calculated comparing the concentration obtained with the samples with that obtained in PBS buffer, using the optimized conditions.
Table 2. Spike and recovery experiment data. Concentrations of 1.0 and 5.0 ng·mL−1 of β-LG were spiked in biscuit and soya yoghourt samples (n = 3 for each). The recovery (%) was calculated comparing the concentration obtained with the samples with that obtained in PBS buffer, using the optimized conditions.
SamplesSpiked [β-LG] (ng·mL−1)Found [β-LG] (ng·mL−1)Recovery (%)
Biscuit1.01.17117
5.05.18103
Soya yoghourt1.01.16116
5.04.7895

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amor-Gutiérrez, O.; Selvolini, G.; Fernández-Abedul, M.T.; de la Escosura-Muñiz, A.; Marrazza, G. Folding-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Determination of β-Lactoglobulin on Poly-L-Lysine Modified Graphite Electrodes. Sensors 2020, 20, 2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082349

AMA Style

Amor-Gutiérrez O, Selvolini G, Fernández-Abedul MT, de la Escosura-Muñiz A, Marrazza G. Folding-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Determination of β-Lactoglobulin on Poly-L-Lysine Modified Graphite Electrodes. Sensors. 2020; 20(8):2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082349

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amor-Gutiérrez, Olaya, Giulia Selvolini, M. Teresa Fernández-Abedul, Alfredo de la Escosura-Muñiz, and Giovanna Marrazza. 2020. "Folding-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Determination of β-Lactoglobulin on Poly-L-Lysine Modified Graphite Electrodes" Sensors 20, no. 8: 2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082349

APA Style

Amor-Gutiérrez, O., Selvolini, G., Fernández-Abedul, M. T., de la Escosura-Muñiz, A., & Marrazza, G. (2020). Folding-Based Electrochemical Aptasensor for the Determination of β-Lactoglobulin on Poly-L-Lysine Modified Graphite Electrodes. Sensors, 20(8), 2349. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082349

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop