Digital Twins for Managing Railway Bridge Maintenance, Resilience, and Climate Change Adaptation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Background
2.1. Building Information Modelling (BIM)
2.2. The BIM Life Cycle and Maturity Levels
2.3. Railway Maintenance Using BIM
2.4. Resilience in a Railway System
2.5. Railway Infrastructures
2.6. The Problem Statement
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Background Information of the Railway Bridge
3.2. Estimation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)
3.3. Sustainable Maintenance in Railway Systems
3.4. Frequency of Maintenance and Cost Schedule (5D Model)
3.5. The Material Inventory
4. Results
4.1. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)
4.2. The Bill of Quantities
4.3. Cost Estimation
4.4. Maintenance Schedule
4.5. 3D Modelling of the Railway Bridge
5. Discussion
5.1. Potential Risk Damages in Materials
- Steel/Aluminum Alloy:
- Concrete:
- Railway Bridge Repair Activities:
5.2. Climate and Environmental Impacts
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Setsobhonkul, S.; Kaewunruen, S.; Sussman, J.M. Lifecycle Assessments of Railway Bridge Transitions Exposed to Extreme Climate Events. Front. Built Environ. 2017, 3, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Zhou, Z. Sustainability-based lifecycle management for bridge infrastructure using 6D BIM. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seo, S.; Park, J.H.; Mun, H.S. Studies on safety criteria for trains running on floating railway bridges. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2020, 24, 1415–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, G.; Karoumi, R. Life cycle assessment framework for railway bridges: Literature survey and critical issues. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2012, 10, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, T.; Kaewunruen, S. Life Cycle Sustainability Assessments of an Innovative FRP Composite Footbridge. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, D.; Raman, D.; Chattopadhyay, G. Life cycle management for railway bridge assets. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit. 2013, 227, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davidson, I.N.; Skibniewski, M.J. Simulation of Automated Data Collection in Buildings. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 1995, 9, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costin, A.; Adibfar, A.; Hu, H.; Chen, S.S. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for transportation infrastructure—Literature review, applications, challenges, and recommendations. Autom. Constr. 2018, 94, 257–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Succar, B. Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Autom. Constr. 2009, 18, 357–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, B. A Practical Guide to Adopting BIM in Construction Projects; Whittles Publishing: Dunbeath, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Eadie, R.; Browne, M.; Odeyinka, H.; McKeown, C.; McNiff, S. BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Autom. Constr. 2013, 36, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boukezzi, L.; Benaissa, A.; Lehbab-Boukezzi, Z.; Nasser, B. Assessment of existing steel railway bridges, Algeria. Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng. 2021, 25, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sussman, J.M.; Einstein, H.H. Strategic framework to achieve carbon-efficient construction and maintenance of railway infrastructure systems. Front. Environ. Sci. 2015, 3, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azhar, S. Building information modelling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh. Manag. Eng. 2011, 11, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, L.; Amoako-Attah, J.; B-Jahromi, A. Government’s influence on the implementation of BIM. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE 2014), Orlando, FL, USA, 23–25 June 2014; pp. 520–527. [Google Scholar]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Ma, W.; Phil-Ebosie, O. Digital Twin Aided Vulnerability Assessment and Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Bridge Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Conditions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Lin, Y.H. Digital twins for managing railway maintenance and resilience. Open Res. Eur. 2021, 1, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Xu, N. Digital Twin for Sustainability Evaluation of Railway Station Buildings. Front. Built Environ. 2018, 4, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Peng, S.; Phil-Ebosie, O. Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitrova, E.; Tomov, S. Digital Twins: An Advanced technology for Railways Maintenance Transformation. In Proceedings of the 2021 13th Electrical Engineering Faculty Conference (BulEF), Varna, Bulgaria, 8–11 September 2021; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, É.A.; Pokropski, D.; You, R.; Kaewunruen, S. Comparison of structural design methods for railway composites and plastic sleepers and bearers. Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 2017, 18, 160–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffin, D.W.P.; Mirza, O.; Kwok, K.; Kaewunruen, S. Composite slabs for railway construction and maintenance: A mechanistic review. IES J. Part A Civil Struct. Eng. 2014, 7, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Lian, Q. Digital twin aided sustainability-based lifecycle management for railway turnout systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 1537–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Liao, P. Sustainability and recyclability of composite materials for railway turnout systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 285, 124890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardin, B. BIM and Construction Management; Wiley Publishing: Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Beach, T.; Petri, I.; Rezgui, Y.; Rana, O. Management of Collaborative BIM Data by Federating Distributed BIM Models. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 2017, 31, 04017009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kerman, J. The role of high-speed rail in mitigating climate change—The Swedish case Europabanan from a life cycle perspective. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2011, 16, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BS ISO 19650-1; Organization and Digitization of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)—Information Management Using Building Information Modelling. Part 1 Concept and Principles; British Standards Institute: London, UK, 2018.
- Ayinla, K.O.; Adamu, Z. We are bridging the digital divide gap in BIM technology adoption. Eng. Constr. Arch. Manag. 2018, 25, 1398–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safa, M.; Shahi, A.; Haas, C.T.; Hipel, K.W. Supplier selection process in an integrated construction materials management model. Autom. Constr. 2014, 48, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasidharan, M.; Burrow, M.; Ghataora, G. A whole life cycle approach under uncertainty for economically justifiable ballasted railway track maintenance. Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 80, 100815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Y.; Kiviniemi, A.; Jones, S.W. A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Saf. Sci. 2017, 97, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sa’Adin, S.L.B.; Kaewunruen, S.; Jaroszweski, D. Operational readiness for climate change of Malaysia high-speed rail. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Transp. 2016, 169, 308–320. [Google Scholar]
- Kostianaia, E.A.; Kostianoy, A.G.; Scheglov, M.A.; Karelov, A.I.; Vasileisky, A.S. Impact of Regional Climate Change on the Infrastructure and Operability of Railway Transport. Transp. Telecommun. 2021, 22, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozkurtoglu, B.H.; Kaewunruen, S. Influences of Extreme Weather Conditions on Unplanned Railway Maintenance of High-speed railway systems. In "SDGs in the European Region" in Implementing the UN Sustainable Development Goals—Regional; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Calcada, R.; Kaewunruen, S. Rail Infrastructure Resilience. A Best-Practices Handbook, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2022; ISBN 9780128210437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bešinović, N. Resilience in railway transport systems: A literature review and research agenda. Transp. Rev. 2020, 40, 457–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ummenhofer, C.C.; McIntosh, P.C.; Pook, M.J.; Risbey, J.S. Impact of surface forcing on Southern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in the Australia—New Zealand sector. J. Clim. 2013, 26, 8476–8494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nguyen, M.N.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.-H. A reliability assessment of railway track buckling during an extreme heatwave. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F J. Rail Rapid Transit 2012, 226, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Autodesk.co.uk. Navisworks|Get Prices & Buy Navisworks 2022|Autodesk. 2022. Available online: https://www.autodesk.co.uk/products/navisworks/overview (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- Autodesk.co.uk. Revit vs AutoCAD|Compare Software|Autodesk. 2022. Available online: https://www.autodesk.co.uk/solutions/revit-vs-autocad (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- BIMTalk. LEVEL of BIM Maturity. 2016. Available online: http://bimtalk.co.uk/bim_glossary:level_of_maturity (accessed on 27 October 2021).
- Famurewa, S.M.; Asplund, M.; Rantatalo, M.; Parida, A.; Kumar, U. Maintenance analysis for continuous improvement of railway infrastructure performance. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2015, 11, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esveld, C. Modern Railway Track; MRT-Productions: Zaltbommel, The Netherlands, 2001; Volume 385. [Google Scholar]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sresakoolchai, J.; Peng, J. Life Cycle Cost, Energy and Carbon Assessments of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway. Sustainability 2019, 12, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eynon, J. Construction Manager’s BIM Handbook; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Mirza, O.; Kaewunruen, S.; Dinh, C.; Pervanic, E. Numerical investigation into thermal load responses of railway transom bridge. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2016, 60, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González, M.J.; Navarro, J.G. Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build. Environ. 2006, 41, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 14064-1:2019; GHG Validation & Carbon Footprint Certification. International Standards Organisation: Belgium, Brussels, 2019.
- ANSYS. Ansys Granta Edu Pack. 2022. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/en-gb/products/materials/granta-edupack (accessed on 20 November 2022).
- Martínez-Muñoz, D.; Martí, J.V.; Yepes, V. Steel-Concrete Composite Bridges: Design, Life Cycle Assessment, Maintenance, and Decision-Making. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8823370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stenström, C.; Norrbin, P.; Parida, A.; Kumar, U. Preventive and corrective maintenance–cost comparison and cost–benefit analysis. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2016, 12, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macedo, R.; Benmansour, R.; Artiba, A.; Mladenović, N.; Urošević, D. Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities with resource constraints. Electron. Notes Discret. Math. 2017, 58, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Consilvio, A.; Di Febbraro, A.; Meo, R.; Sacco, N. Risk-based optimal scheduling of maintenance activities in a railway network. EURO J. Transp. Logist. 2018, 8, 435–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryde, D.; Broquetas, M.; Volm, J.M. The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM). Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2013, 31, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Le Maout, E.; Kato, H. Life cycle cost-estimation model for building, operating, and maintaining high-speed rail systems. Asian Transp. Stud. 2016, 4, 245–260. [Google Scholar]
- Holmgren, M. Maintenance-related losses at the Swedish Rail. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 2005, 11, 5–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, R.; Yasir, M.W.; Qian, J.; Zhang, Z. Assessments of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from stainless steel production in China using two evaluation approaches. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vögele, S.; Rübbelke, D.; Govorukha, K.; Grajewski, M. Socio-technical scenarios for energy-intensive industries: The future of steel production in Germany. Clim. Chang. 2019, 162, 1763–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Z.; Friedmann, S.J. Low-carbon production of iron and steel: Technology options, economic assessment, and policy. Joule 2021, 5, 829–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsiropoulos, I.; Nijs, W.; Tarvydas, D.; Ruiz Castello, P. Towards Net-Zero Emissions in the EU Energy System by 2050; EUR 29981 EN; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2020; ISBN 978-92-76-13097-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.-J.; Kim, R.E.; Suh, W.; Park, K. Probabilistic Fatigue Life Updating for Railway Bridges Based on Local Inspection and Repair. Sensors 2017, 17, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, X.; Yang, D.Y.; Frangopol, D.M. Optimum maintenance of deteriorated steel bridges using corrosion resistant steel based on system reliability and life-cycle cost. Eng. Struct. 2021, 243, 112633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayser, J.R.; Nowak, A.S. Capacity Loss Due to Corrosion in Steel-Girder Bridges. Eng. Struct. 1989, 115, 1525–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Sun, W. Research Status and Hot Issues of Rebar Corrosion in Concrete. CCS 2010, 38, 1753–1764. [Google Scholar]
- Sathiyanarayanan, S.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Venkatachari, G.; Trivedi, D. Corrosion protection of steel by polyaniline (PANI) pigmented paint coating. Prog. Org. Coatings 2005, 53, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, S.; Lewis, R.; Fletcher, D. Assessment of laser cladding as an option for repairing/enhancing rails. Wear 2015, 330–331, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekolu, S.O. A review on effects of curing, sheltering, and CO2 concentration upon natural carbonation of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 127, 306–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguiar, J.B.; Júnior, C. Carbonation of surface protected concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 49, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chinowsky, P.; Helman, J.; Gulati, S.; Neumann, J.; Martinich, J. Impacts of climate change on operation of the US rail network. Transp. Policy 2019, 75, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garmabaki, A.H.S.; Thaduri, A.; Famurewa, S.; Kumar, U. Adapting Railway Maintenance to Climate Change. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mojtahedi, M.; Oo, B.L. The impact of stakeholder attributes on performance of disaster recovery projects: The case of transport infrastructure. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017, 35, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, L.; Ouyang, M.; Peeta, S.; He, X.; Yan, Y. Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2015, 137, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 14064-1: 2019; Greenhouse Gases—Part 1: Specification with Guidance at the Organisation Level for Quantification and Reporting Greenhouse Gas. International Organization for Standardization: London, UK.
- Doumbouya, L.; Gao, G.; Guan, C. Adoption of the Building Information Modeling (BIM) for construction project effectiveness: The review of BIM benefits. Am. J. Civil Eng. Arch. 2016, 4, 74–79. [Google Scholar]
- Dinmohammadi, F. A risk-based modelling approach to maintenance optimization of railway rolling stock: A case study of pantograph system. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 2019, 25, 272–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, A.; Wong, A.K.D.; Wong, F.K.W. Bill of Quantities with 3D Views Using Building Information Modeling. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2015, 40, 2465–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setunge, S.; Lokuge, W.; Mohseni, H.L.; Karunasena, W. Vulnerability of road bridge infrastructure under extreme flood events. In Proceedings of the AFAC & Bushfire & Natural Hazards CRC Conference 2014, Wellington, New Zealand, 2–5 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kaewunruen, S.; Sussman, J.M.; Matsumoto, A. Grand Challenges in Transportation and Transit Systems. Front. Built Environ. 2016, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Classification | Description |
---|---|
Level 0 (CAD) | Unmanaged CAD, in 2D, with paper (or electronic paper or blue print) data exchange |
Level 1 (CAD, Solids Work) | Managed CAD in 2D or 3D format with a collaborative tool providing a common data environment with a standard approach to data structure and format. Commercial data separate. |
Level 2 (BIM) | A managed 3D environment held in separate discipline ‘BIM’ tools with data attached; commercial data will be managed by enterprise resource planning software and integrated by proprietary interfaces or bespoke middleware. The dimension of information can be further extended to 4D to include construction sequencing and 5D to include cost information. |
Level 3 (Digital Twins) | A fully integrated and collaborative process enable by ‘web service’ or an interactive network (e.g., intranet, cloud, co-simulation, Navisworks link, etc.) and compliant with emerging industry foundation class standards. Generally, at least 6 dimensions (6D) of information will be integrated. In addition to physical dimensions in 3D (width, length, depth), the dimension of information will traditionally include 4D for construction sequencing, 5D for cost information, and 6D for project life-cycle management information. An additional information layer (i.e., 7D) can also incorporate carbon footprint, environmental impacts and toxicity information. |
Level 4 (Digital Twins) | Integration of inspection data (routine condition monitoring) or interactive real-time sensors (sensing for spontaneous actions, transient responses, ambient environments, crowdsensing or live human perceptions) in the BIM/Digital twins. |
Level 5 (Digital Twins) | Automation for decision making. A full integration of inspection data, real-time sensing data, and co-simulations for predictions (using constitutive and empirical models, numerical or analytical simulation methods, machine learning and artificial intelligence, data-driven physics informed techniques, etc.). |
Material | Country | Unit | CO2e (kg CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Concrete | AUS | m3 | 116.45 |
Steel | AUS | kg | 2.25 |
Cement | AUS | kg | 0.437 |
Rebar | AUS | kg | 1.96 |
Electricity generated | AUS | kwh | 0.503 |
Fuel oil | AUS | l | 3.109 |
Diesel | AUS | l | 2.499 |
Component | Country | Unit | CO2e (kg CO2e) |
---|---|---|---|
Ballast | AUS | kg | 0.005 |
Road base/stabilised soil | AUS | kg | 0.0051 |
Insulators | AUS | kg | 3 |
Resilient fastening system | AUS | kg | 3 |
Item | Activity | Frequency | Material Cost (£) |
---|---|---|---|
Railway track components (rail, guard rail, transoms, etc. over the bridge and bridge ends) | Integrated track patrolling maintenance inspection | Twice per week | 7.63 |
Track clearance | Every year | 321.41 | |
Welded track stability analysis inspection | Every year | 561.25 | |
Rail wear and condition inspection | Every year | 10.53 | |
Rail corrosion inspection | Every year | 11.36 | |
Insulated joints inspection | Every 6 months | 12.31 | |
Detailed sleeper and resilient baseplate inspection | Every 2 years | 67.41 | |
Ballast inspection | Every year | 326.12 | |
Abrasion rate and elevation position inspection | Every 6 months | 6.76 | |
Track alignment and rail profile inspection | Every 2 months | 83.86 | |
General structural inspection of transoms and fastening systems | Every year | 26.34 | |
Bridge Components and other infrastructures | Minor concrete patching and repair | Every year | 112.66 |
Drainage system cleaning and repair | Every year | 187.76 | |
Routine cleaning, coating & structural protection of overbridge | Every 4 years | 115.36 | |
Underbridge inspection for piers’ bases, scouring and submerged components | Every 6 years | 435.86 | |
Serving of bearing | Every 4 years | 73.51 | |
Detailed inspection of structures (steel & concrete components—underbridges and overbridges) | Every 2 years | 136.91 |
Component | Item | Material |
---|---|---|
Track | Transoms | FFU composites |
Transom bolts | Steel | |
UIC 60 rail | Steel | |
Ballast | Crushed aggregate | |
Substructure | Pier | Concrete |
Abutment | Steel/Concrete | |
Superstructure | Box girder | Steel |
Bracing used for box girder | Steel | |
Bearings | Neoprene & natural rubber | |
Conductor rail | Insulation components | Galvanized steel/rubber |
Conductor rail | High conductivity steel | |
Anchor assemblies | Galvanized steel | |
Splice joint assembly | Stainless steel | |
Power and cable assemblies | Copper/metal | |
Fastening system | Rail pads | High density polyethylene/natural rubber |
Baseplates | Steel | |
Clip insulator | High density polyethylene/natural rubber | |
Anchor assemblies | Galvanized steel | |
Zero toe-load clips | Spring steel | |
Normal fastening clips | Spring steel |
Causes | Actions |
---|---|
Small cracks, spalling occurs in concrete pier or concrete transoms |
|
Track damaged by derailment |
|
Bolted joints and welds in continuous welded rail (CWR) experiencing service failure |
|
Rail seat abrasion due to deteriorated or incorrect pad and fastening assembly |
|
Element | Failure Criteria | Influence on Failure | |
---|---|---|---|
Superstructure | Beam or girder | Unseating or loss of span | Collapse |
Deck | Damage due to debris and build-up of mud, undermining | Local damage, may contribute to collapse | |
Approaches | Missing, damaged or obscured signs and delineation, guardrails | Does not lead to failure | |
Blocked inlets/outlets | Some restrictions | ||
Missing, damaged, settlement or depression of track surface | Local damage, may lead to collapse, or may restrict the services | ||
Surface | Missing, damaged, scuppers blocked | Restrict use/service | |
Substructure | Pier or column | Movement, rotation and scour Momentary damage, shear damage, bending and shear damage, inadequate ductility capacity, poor durability | Local damage, may lead to collapse |
Abutment | Wingwall, backwall damage, inclination of abutment, damage to shear keys | Local damage, may lead to collapse | |
Bearing | Missing, damaged or dislodged and poorly sealed | Local damage, may lead to collapse |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kaewunruen, S.; AbdelHadi, M.; Kongpuang, M.; Pansuk, W.; Remennikov, A.M. Digital Twins for Managing Railway Bridge Maintenance, Resilience, and Climate Change Adaptation. Sensors 2023, 23, 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010252
Kaewunruen S, AbdelHadi M, Kongpuang M, Pansuk W, Remennikov AM. Digital Twins for Managing Railway Bridge Maintenance, Resilience, and Climate Change Adaptation. Sensors. 2023; 23(1):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010252
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaewunruen, Sakdirat, Mohannad AbdelHadi, Manwika Kongpuang, Withit Pansuk, and Alex M. Remennikov. 2023. "Digital Twins for Managing Railway Bridge Maintenance, Resilience, and Climate Change Adaptation" Sensors 23, no. 1: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010252
APA StyleKaewunruen, S., AbdelHadi, M., Kongpuang, M., Pansuk, W., & Remennikov, A. M. (2023). Digital Twins for Managing Railway Bridge Maintenance, Resilience, and Climate Change Adaptation. Sensors, 23(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010252