Next Article in Journal
Glutathione and Its Metabolic Enzymes in Gliomal Tumor Tissue and the Peritumoral Zone at Different Degrees of Anaplasia
Next Article in Special Issue
“Losing the Brakes”—Suppressed Inhibitors Triggering Uncontrolled Wnt/ß-Catenin Signaling May Provide a Potential Therapeutic Target in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Analysis of Glutamate Receptor-like Genes in Rice (Oryza sativa L.): Genome-Wide Identification, Characteristics, Evolution, Chromatin Accessibility, gcHap Diversity, Population Variation and Expression Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
RUNX1 and RUNX3 Genes Expression Level in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia—A Case Control Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
CIMB
Volume 44
Issue 12
10.3390/cimb44120438
cimb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antileukemic Activity of hsa-miR-203a-5p by Limiting Glutathione Metabolism in Imatinib-Resistant K562 Cells

by
Priyanka Singh
1,
Radheshyam Yadav
1,
Malkhey Verma
1,2,* and
Ravindresh Chhabra
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, School of Basic Sciences, Central University of Punjab, Ghudda 151401, India
2
School of Biotechnology, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(12), 6428-6438; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120438
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 13 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Leukemia)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Imatinib has been the first and most successful tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but many patients develop resistance to it after a satisfactory response. Glutathione (GSH) metabolism is thought to be one of the factors causing the emergence of imatinib resistance. Since hsa-miR-203a-5p was found to downregulate Bcr-Abl1 oncogene and also a link between this oncogene and GSH metabolism is reported, the present study aimed to investigate whether hsa-miR-203a-5p could overcome imatinib resistance by targeting GSH metabolism in imatinib-resistant CML cells. After the development of imatinib-resistant K562 (IR-K562) cells by gradually exposing K562 (C) cells to increasing doses of imatinib, resistant cells were transfected with hsa-miR-203a-5p (R+203). Thereafter, cell lysates from various K562 cell sets (imatinib-sensitive, imatinib-resistant, and miR-transfected imatinib-resistant K562 cells) were used for GC-MS-based metabolic profiling. L-alanine, 5-oxoproline (also known as pyroglutamic acid), L-glutamic acid, glycine, and phosphoric acid (Pi)—five metabolites from our data, matched with the enumerated 28 metabolites of the MetaboAnalyst 5.0 for the GSH metabolism. All of these metabolites were present in higher concentrations in IR-K562 cells, but intriguingly, they were all reduced in R+203 and equated to imatinib-sensitive K562 cells (C). Concludingly, the identified metabolites associated with GSH metabolism could be used as diagnostic markers.

1. Introduction

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the first human malignancy associated with a single acquired genetic defect, is well-known leukemia identified by the Philadelphia (Ph+) chromosome containing the Bcr-Abl1 fused oncogene [1]. This oncogene encodes the BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein, a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that activates multiple signaling pathways, ultimately leading to aberrant proliferation in CML [2,3]. Many tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were developed to restrict this kinase, with imatinib being the most effective [4]. Even though imatinib was a highly effective drug for CML treatment, some patients acquired resistance after the initial response [5]. Several initiatives have been launched to resolve this issue, one of them being translational inhibition by microRNAs (miRNAs). Past in vitro and in vivo studies based on CML treatments have also shown that resistance to imatinib therapy can be reversed with miRNA transfection [6,7,8]. To thoroughly investigate how miRNAs regulate tumorigenesis, a metabolomic-based methodology is being incorporated into cancer therapeutics-based studies. Metabolomics is the scientific study of chemical processes involving metabolites, small molecule substrates, and intermediate products of cell metabolism. In the case of cancer, detailed analysis of altered metabolites may yield biomarkers for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes [9,10]. Something similar was observed in the case of CML, where metabolomics is currently the focus of intensive research, a panel of specific metabolites proved effective in monitoring the efficacy of TKI therapy [11,12].
The most abundant antioxidant metabolism found in living organisms is glutathione (GSH) metabolism, which maintains cellular redox homeostasis. The key player in this metabolism is Glutathione (GSH) which maintains adequate cysteine levels, detoxifies xenobiotics, and regulates transcription factors related to redox signaling [13]. This antioxidant metabolite also confers therapeutic resistance to cancer cells, and GSH overexpression eventually promotes tumor progression [14]. This statement is a little perplexing because glutathione normally maintains cell health by regulating cellular homeostasis. However, tumor cells are different because they have highly reduced intracellular environments that are accompanied by significant levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) (intracellular level of GSH is 90–95% of its total concentration), so investigation into GSH metabolism would aid in understanding the role of GSH and its associated metabolites in the development of chemotherapeutic resistance in different tumors [14,15,16]. Not only GSH is responsible for chemoresistance in the GSH metabolism, but amino acids and inorganic compounds involved in this cellular metabolism also play a significant role [17]. These metabolites support the acquisition of anticancer resistance by providing essential building blocks for biosynthetic pathways and maintaining a balanced redox state, as well as by supporting the reduced intrinsic vulnerability of cancer stem cells to antineoplastic therapy [18]. Additionally, chemoresistance-based studies have reported that alterations in the abundance of amino acids and inorganic compounds related to GSH metabolism are frequently associated with resistance to drugs such as bortezomib, sorafenib, and cisplatin [19,20,21,22].
Remarkably, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been discovered to be potent regulators, either negatively or positively, of various cellular metabolisms in a variety of cancers that ultimately affect cell proliferation [23]. In the case of GSH metabolism too, it gets regulated by several miRNAs such as miR-17-92, miR-125b, miR-126, miR-128a, miR-141, miR-200, miR-21, miR-34a, miR-210, miR-122, miR-335, and miR-320 [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Hence, in the context of the aforementioned investigations, the current study examined whether the expression of hsa-miR-203a-5p, that have previously been shown to overcome imatinib resistance in leukemic cells [32], could reconfigure the altered GSH metabolism of imatinib-resistant K562 cells (R).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

RPMI-1640 cell culture media (HiMedia, Thane, India), Fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Brough, UK), Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), Imatinib (Sigma-Aldrich, Beijing, China), Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA), Trypsin (Hi-media, Thane, India), miRNA mimic: hsa-miR-203a-5p (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), LipofectamineTM Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), Methanol (Fisher Scientific, Mumbai, India), Norvaline (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Dichloromethane (ThermoFisher Scientific, Scoresby, VIC, Australia), N-trimethylsilyl-N-methyl trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All compounds were of analytical grade and thus diluted in ultrapure water unless otherwise specified.

2.2. Cell Culture

The human CML blast crisis cell line K562 (acquired from NCCS Pune, India) was grown in RPMI-1640 culture medium supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin and 10% FBS and was kept in an incubator (at 37 °C under 5% CO2). When sufficient numbers of cells were developed, some of the cells subsequently developed into imatinib-resistant K562 (IR-K562) cells, as described in a previously published study from our laboratory [33]. After successfully establishing IR-K562 cells, hsa-miR-203a-5p was transfected into imatinib-resistant K562 (IR-K562/R) cells using Lipofectamine transfection reagent according to the protocol outlined by the manufacturer. The cells were harvested 24 h post-transfection. The following three sample sets were utilized for the metabolic profiling: (1) K562 cells (C), (2) IR-K562 cells (R), and (3) IR-K562 cells transfected with hsa-miR-203a-5p (R + miR-203).

2.3. Metabolite Extraction

All K562 cell lines were centrifuged, and the culture media was disposed of. After that, the cells were gently washed twice with PBS before being resuspended in ice-cold methanol. The supernatants of different cell sets were separated in a fresh falcon as it contained the metabolite extract after centrifugation at 3000× g at 4 °C for 10 min. The falcons were stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

2.4. Preparation of Samples for GC-MS Analysis

The sample preparation for GC-MS analysis was carried out as explained in previous studies [34,35]. Stored −80 °C falcons were taken out and thawed at room temperature, after which norvaline (1 mg/mL) was added as an internal standard to methanol containing cellular extracts of C, R, and R + miR-203; and the entire solution was transferred to glass vials. The glass vial solutions were then gently dried in an Eppendorf Vacufuge® plus Vacuum Concentrator with a gentle stream of nitrogen gas.
Subsequently, the derivatization process was carried out to volatilize and polarize metabolites such as carbohydrates, steroids, amino acids, and fatty acids [36]. Fifty microliters of dichloromethane (DCM) plus 50 μL of MSTFA (derivatization reagent) was added to the residue left after evaporation in the vacuum concentrator during the derivatization process. The vials were then vortexed and heated at 80 °C for 30 min. Then, 50 μL of the cooled derivatized solutions containing metabolite extracts from different sets of K562 cells was transferred into screw-top autosampler glass vials for GC-MS analysis.

2.5. Instrumentation and Chromatographic Parameters

The metabolic profile of all samples (C, R, and R + miR-203) was obtained using GCMS-QP2010 Ultra (Shimadzu) at the Central Instrumentation Laboratory (CIL), Central University of Punjab, Bathinda. The column temperature was set to 70 °C for 2 min, then ramped at 15 °C/min to 250 °C, held for 2 min, and at last, raised by 10 °C/min to 300 °C, then withstood for 8 min, for a complete run time of 29 min. The samples (1 μL) were introduced in the instrument in the split mode of a 10:1 ratio with the injector temperature set at 250 °C and the flux rate of the carrier gas, helium, as 1 mL/min. The temperature of the transfer line was 250 °C, that of the manifold was 40 °C and the ion source had a temperature of 200 °C.
The electron multiplier was set to relative mode with auto-tune, and the ionization was accomplished with a 1.02 kV electron beam. Electron Impact (EI) mode was active on the MS detector. The mass spectra were recorded at a rate of six scans per second over a range of 50–1000 m/z. The intensity and resolution of chromatographic peaks in all samples were investigated using norvaline as an internal standard.

2.6. Data Acquisition for GC-MS

Data files from GC-TQ-MS were extracted as Computable Document Format (CDF) files. To make the instrumental data set more comprehensible for data analysis, any biases such as background noise and retention time (RT) fluctuations were eliminated to make the instrumental data set more understandable for data analysis. For data pre-processing, MZmine 2.21 software was used [37]. The parameters were chosen for this procedure as: RT range 3.0–29.0 min; m/z range 50–600; MS data noise level 2.5 × 104; m/z tolerance 0.5; chromatogram baseline level 2.0 × 104; peak duration range 0.05–0.50 min.

2.7. Identification of Metabolites

The National Institute of Standards and Technology Mass Spectral Library (NIST17M1.Lib) database was used for the identification of specific compounds. In addition, the name, molecular weight, and CAS number of each compound were ascertained by NIST WebBook and PubChem.
When metabolites were identified, their area under curve (AUC) values were calculated and the data were normalized by dividing the area of each metabolite by the area of norvaline (internal standard). Eventually, the normalized AUC values were considered as the concentration of each metabolite; and metabolic profiling and statistical analysis of each sample (C, R, and R + miR-203) were performed afterward. SMPDB (Small Molecule Pathway Database), Human Metabolic Database (HMDB), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes were used to obtain data for pathways and metabolites (KEGG).

2.8. Analysis of Metabolic Pathways

Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA), notably pathway over-representation analysis (ORA), was executed on the GC-MS metabolite data using the free online software MetaboAnalyst 5.0 [38]. This was used to identify biologically significant patterns in resistant cells and to verify which metabolic pathways were altered and contributed the most to the distinction between different K562 cell sets (C, R, and R + miR-203).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Following enrichment analysis, the retrieved data was statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Target Identification of hsa-miR-203a-5p

MiRNAs are frequently implicated in cancer chemoresistance, and hsa-miR-203a-5p has been extensively studied in vitro and in vivo to overcome imatinib resistance [32,39,40]. As evidenced by TargetScan, this could be due to the presence of hsa-miR-203a-5p binding sites in both the Bcr and Abl1 subunits of the Bcr-Abl1 oncogene (Figure 1a). Furthermore, qRT-PCR results revealed that hsa-miR-203a-5p significantly suppressed Bcr-Abl1 expression, as endogenous expression was low (0.09-fold) in miR-transfected cells compared to resistant cells (Figure 1b).
BCR-ABL1-positive cells were also reported to have altered cellular metabolisms, which were involved in the development of imatinib resistance [41,42,43]. Correspondingly, since hsa-miR-203a-5p was found to downregulate Bcr-Abl1 oncogene, we postulated that ectopic expression of this miRNA could make resistant cells more susceptible to imatinib by restoring the altered metabolomics of imatinib-resistant K562 cells.

3.2. Pathway Enrichment Analysis Utilizing Metabolite Sets in Imatinib-Sensitive (C) and -Resistant (R) K562 Cells

To see the effect of resistance and its reversibility after miRNA transfection, the intracellular GC-MS-based metabolic profiling of K562 cells (C), IR-K562 cells (R), and hsa-miR-203a-5p transfected IR-K562 cells (R + miR-203) were carried out. GC-MS profiling identified 75 major metabolites in total, 32 of which were reported in all sets of K562 cells. These common metabolites were subjected to the MetaboAnalyst 5.0 metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) to identify biologically relevant patterns that are significantly enriched in quantitative metabolomic data. MSEA offers three enrichment analysis algorithms, and for our analysis, we chose the Quantitative Enrichment Analysis (QEA) algorithm. QEA requires a compound concentration table—entered as a comma-separated (.csv) file with each sample per row and each metabolite concentration per column. The analysis revealed that GSH metabolism is the most enriched cellular metabolism in imatinib-sensitive (C) versus -resistant (R) K562 cells, and the same cellular metabolism may be responsible for resistance emergence in imatinib-resistant K562 cells (Figure 2). The conclusion that GSH metabolism was possibly responsible for the emergence of resistance was supported by earlier research, which revealed that drug-sensitive CML cells had lower glutathione levels than resistant cells [44,45].
Then, by uploading the list of GC-MS-based identified metabolites, the pathway analysis feature of MetaboAnalyst was exploited, and it was determined that five (depicted in red text in Figure 3) metabolites for GSH metabolism—L-alanine, 5-oxoproline (also known as pyroglutamic acid), L-glutamic acid, glycine, and phosphoric acid (Pi)—matched with our data with the enlisted 28 metabolites of the MetaboAnalyst. Of the five identified metabolites, L-glutamic acid and glycine are the most important as they both are precursor amino acids of GSH [13].

3.3. Comparison of Glutathione (GSH) Metabolism-Related Metabolites in Different K562 Cell Sets

Following the revelation of glutathione (GSH) metabolism and five metabolites (L-alanine, 5-oxoproline, L-glutamic acid, glycine, and phosphoric acid) that are involved in this metabolism, the relative abundance of these selected metabolites was investigated in subsequent studies after hsa-miR-203a-5p transfection to investigate whether the miRNA could overcome resistance by reducing the levels of these metabolites (Figure 4).
All five metabolites were found in higher concentrations in imatinib-resistant (R) than in imatinib-sensitive (C) K562 cells, but their relative abundance was significantly reduced when resistant cells were transfected with hsa-miR-203a-5p (R + 203) (Figure 4). Except for the phosphoric acid, there was no statistically significant (ns) difference in relative abundance between sensitive (C) and miRNA-transfected (R + 203) K562 cells which means that transfected cells exhibited levels of L-alanine, 5-oxoproline, L-glutamic acid, and phosphoric acid approximately equivalent to imatinib-sensitive K562 cells.
Levels of L-alanine, the metabolite that forms cysteineglycine and (5-L-glutamyl)-L-alanine with GSH, were found to be significantly higher (1.35-fold) in imatinib-resistant (R) than imatinib-sensitive (C) K562 cells, and it declined by 0.79-fold in hsa-miR-203a-5p transfected resistant K562 cells (R + 203) (Figure 4a). Likewise, the 5-oxoproline level was relatively high in R cells than in C cells (3.75-fold), and this decreased significantly in the presence of miRNA (0.36-fold) (Figure 4b). L-glutamic acid, a key metabolite of GSH metabolism, increased significantly (4.12-fold) in resistant cells, whereas R+203 showed a substantial decrease (0.23-fold) in contrast to resistant cells (Figure 4c). Glycine, an important amino acid that is essential for GSH production, increased by 1.29-fold in resistant cells compared with imatinib-sensitive K562 cells and decreased by 0.73-fold in miRNA-transfected resistant cells (Figure 4d). Once resistant K562 cells were transfected with hsa-miR-203a-5p, the fold change for phosphoric acid (Pi), a notable inorganic compound of GSH metabolism, considerably decreased (0.49-fold) compared to imatinib-resistant cells (Figure 4e).

4. Discussion

Despite significant therapeutic advances, drug resistance remains the primary obstacle to effective cancer treatment, and the same holds for imatinib in the case of CML patients. Many factors contribute to drug resistance, one of which is cellular metabolism, which is generally beneficial to normal cells but causes tumorigenesis in cancer cells after being altered by overstimulated growth factors. This altered metabolism along with mitochondrial dysfunction, and persistent genetic alterations in tumor cells causes a high yield of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the accumulation of oxidized proteins, DNA, and lipids [46]. As a result, cancer cells have elevated levels of ROS-scavenging molecules as an adaptive response, with glutathione (GSH) being the most effective free radical scavenger. This scavenging molecule maintains a highly reducing milieu in the cellular compartments (cytosol, nucleus, mitochondrial matrix, and peroxisome) to facilitate proper folding and activity; furthermore, GSH prevents apoptosis by reacting with ROS in mitochondria [14]. Other than this, high GSH levels in cancer cells also incentivize metastasis and contribute to the emergence of chemotherapy drug resistance [47,48]. Since miRNAs play a role in the regulation of cellular metabolism by directly targeting enzymes or indirectly by modulating the expression of transcription factors [49,50], a miRNA-based approach to restrain metabolisms may be expected to overcome imatinib resistance.
Taking into account all of these facts, the current study was conducted in the anticipation that hsa-miR-203a-5p would reduce GSH metabolism to overcome imatinib resistance, as the GC-MS results demonstrated that GSH metabolism is prominent in imatinib-resistant leukemic (IR-K562/R) cells. L-alanine, 5-oxoproline/pyroglutamic acid, L-glutamic acid, glycine, and phosphoric acid (Pi), which were identified through MetaboAnalyst 5.0 to be related to GSH metabolism, were found to be differentially expressed among different K562 cell sets (Figure 4). L-alanine, the metabolite that enters the cell and initiates GSH metabolism, has been recognized as a new cancer-associated biomarker because of its elevated levels in malignant cells [51,52]. Since L-alanine is a glucogenic amino acid, it contributes to gluconeogenesis and meets the immediate energy requirements of cancer cells whenever its levels increase in cancer patients [53,54]. Higher concentrations of pyroglutamic acid, also known as 5-oxoproline, signal upregulated GSH metabolism and oxidative stress [55]. Oxidative stress, which means ROS generation, has long been involved in cancer as tumor cells use ROS to activate protumorigenic signaling processes that support cancer cell growth, survival, angiogenesis, and metastasis [56,57]. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the driving force behind all metabolisms, leads to the generation of phosphoric acid (Pi) while regulating the autophosphorylation of signaling pathway components [58]. Phosphoric acid (Pi) maintains an acidic environment in cancer cells, which promotes immunosuppression and unregulated cancer cell proliferation [59]. The increased production of phosphoric acid (Pi) in resistant cells indicated that ATP catabolism occurred more rapidly in resistant cells than in control cells, suggesting that glutathione metabolism was speeding up to meet the reduced milieu demand of resistant leukemic cells.
Since GSH (L-glutamyl-L-cysteinyl-glycine) is a tripeptide that incorporates L-glutamic acid and glycine, the rate of GSH synthesis is influenced by these amino acids and both are well-studied GSH metabolites in the context of cancer [60]. The determined values of L-glutamic acid and glycine in the current study assisted in differentiating the metabolic profiles of imatinib-sensitive, imatinib-resistant, and miRNA-transfected leukemic K562 cells and better understanding the cause of drug resistance. In tumor cells, in addition to participating in GSH metabolism, L-glutamic acid also serves as a nitrogen source in cancer cells alongside L-glutamine [56]. An intriguing fact about L-glutamic acid is that all of its derivatives have the potential to be used therapeutically, and they all behave in a way that is completely different from how L-glutamic acid causes tumorigenesis [55,61]. As a result, L-glutamic acid, its conjugated derivatives, and glutathione metabolism have suddenly become the target of cancer-related research. Glycine, an essential component of GSH, has been identified as a new target for cancer therapeutic interventions as this amino acid contributes to the biosynthesis of purines, and also its catabolism encourages tumorigenesis and malignancy [62]. It has been postulated that glycine availability is the limiting factor in glutathione synthesis [63]. Since cancer cells rely more on L-glutamic acid and glycine, these two glutathione-related metabolites have been identified as possible targets.
Overall, this study uncovered a strong correlation between glutathione metabolism and the emergence of resistance. We can say this with assurance because results are consistent with a previous study by Kalinina et al., which proved that the emergence of cellular drug resistance against doxorubicin (DOX) in erythroleukemic K562 cells was caused by elevated levels of antioxidant enzymes and GSH [64]. Besides that, it was exposed that imatinib resistance could be overcome by lowering the levels of the five aforementioned metabolites through miRNA transfection, as their concentrations in hsa-miR-203a-5p transfected resistant K562 cells (R+203) were equivalent to those in imatinib-sensitive K562 cells (C).

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the metabolic profile of different sets of K562 cells and demonstrated that glutathione (GSH) metabolism plays a significant role in tumor initiation, progression, and drug resistance. With a better understanding of this pathway and the role of metabolites related to GSH metabolism, other drugs could be used in combination to effectively limit CML growth. At last, it can be concluded that our result will hopefully lead to the establishment of novel diagnostic tools.

Author Contributions

M.V. conceived and designed the study. R.C. assisted with the design of the experiments as well as the drafting of the manuscript. P.S. conducted experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. R.Y. contributed to the experimental investigations. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The funding agency had no role in the conceptualization of the study, in the experimental design and interpretation of data, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors.

Informed Consent Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants. This article does not contain any studies with human research participants, so informed consent is not required.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated for the preparation of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support received from the Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, in writing this manuscript. The Central Instrumentation Laboratory (CIL), Central University of Punjab, Bathinda is also acknowledged by the authors for providing the GC-MS facility. The authors are also gratified to the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (DST-FIST-SR/FST/LS-I/2018/125©) for financial support under the DST-FIST programs to the Department of Biochemistry, Central University of Punjab. The authors also thank Anuradha Kumari, a research student in the Department of Biochemistry at the Central University of Punjab, for her valuable help during GC-MS. PS is grateful to the CSIR, New Delhi, to award her fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kantarjian, H.M.; Talpaz, M.; Giles, F.; O’Brien, S.; Cortes, J. New Insights into the Pathophysiology of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Imatinib Resistance. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 145, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuepper, M.K.; Bütow, M.; Herrmann, O.; Ziemons, J.; Chatain, N.; Maurer, A.; Kirschner, M.; Maié, T.; Costa, I.G.; Eschweiler, J.; et al. Stem cell persistence in CML is mediated by extrinsically activated JAK1-STAT3 signaling. Leukemia 2019, 33, 1964–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, P.; Kumar, V.; Gupta, S.K.; Kumari, G.; Verma, M. Combating TKI resistance in CML by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in combination with TKIs: A review. Med. Oncol. 2021, 38, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fava, C.; Rege-Cambrin, G.; Saglio, G. Imatinib: The First-Line CML Therapy. In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Hematologic Malignancies; Hehlmann, R., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 49–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Volpe, G.; Panuzzo, C.; Ulisciani, S.; Cilloni, D. Imatinib resistance in CML. Cancer Lett. 2009, 274, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, G.; Zhao, R.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, D.; Jin, Y.; Liu, X.I.; Zhao, C.I.; Zhu, Y.; Ren, C.; et al. MicroRNA-181a enhances the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of chronic myeloid leukemia to imatinib. Oncol Lett. 2015, 10, 2835–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, P.H.; Liu, A.J.; Ho, K.H.; Chiu, Y.T.; Lin, Z.H.; Lee, Y.T.; Shih, C.M.; Chen, K.C. microRNA-199a/b-5p enhance imatinib efficacy via repressing WNT2 signaling-mediated protective autophagy in imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 291, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Hu, C.; Zhang, A.; Ren, Y.; Xu, X. MicroRNA-221 sensitizes chronic myeloid leukemia cells to imatinib by targeting STAT5. Leuk. Lymphoma 2019, 60, 1709–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gonzalez-Covarrubias, V.; Martínez-Martínez, E.; del Bosque-Plata, L. The Potential of Metabolomics in Biomedical Applications. Metabolites 2022, 12, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trivedi, D.K.; Goodacre, R. The role of metabolomics in personalized medicine. In Metabolomics for Biomedical Research; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 227–244. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, B.; Wang, C.; Xie, Y.; Xu, L.; Wu, X.; Wu, D. Monitoring tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapeutic responses with a panel of metabolic biomarkers in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 777–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Karlíková, R.; Široká, J.; Friedecký, D.; Faber, E.; Hrdá, M.; Mičová, K.; Fikarová, I.; Gardlo, A.; Janecková, H.; Vrobel, I.; et al. Metabolite Profiling of the Plasma and Leukocytes of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 3158–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Traverso, N.; Ricciarelli, R.; Nitti, M.; Marengo, B.; Furfaro, A.L.; Pronzato, M.A.; Marinari, U.M.; Domenicotti, C. Role of glutathione in cancer progression and chemoresistance. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 972913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bansal, A.; Simon, M.C. Glutathione metabolism in cancer progression and treatment resistance. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 2291–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Thelwall, P.E.; Simpson, N.E.; Rabbani, Z.N.; Clark, M.D.; Pourdeyhimi, R.; Macdonald, J.M.; Blackband, S.J.; Gamcsik, M.P. In vivo MR studies of glycine and glutathione metabolism in a rat mammary tumor. NMR Biomed. 2012, 25, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Dwivedi, D.; Megha, K.; Mishra, R.; Mandal, P.K. Glutathione in Brain: Overview of Its Conformations, Functions, Biochemical Characteristics, Quantitation and Potential Therapeutic Role in Brain Disorders. Neurochem. Res. 2020, 45, 1461–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pranzini, E.; Pardella, E.; Paoli, P.; Fendt, S.M.; Taddei, M.L. Metabolic Reprogramming in Anticancer Drug Resistance: A Focus on Amino Acids. Trends Cancer 2021, 7, 682–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chaiswing, L.; Clair, W.H.S.; Clair, D.K.S. Redox Paradox: A Novel Approach to Therapeutics-Resistant Cancer. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2018, 29, 1237–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vučetić, M.; Cormerais, Y.; Parks, S.K.; Pouysségur, J. The central role of amino acids in cancer redox homeostasis: Vulnerability points of the cancer redox code. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zaal, E.A.; Wu, W.; Jansen, G.; Zweegman, S.; Cloos, J.; Berkers, C.R. Bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma is associated with increased serine synthesis. Cancer Metab. 2017, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Kim, M.J.; Choi, Y.K.; Park, S.Y.; Jang, S.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Ham, H.J.; Kim, B.G.; Jeon, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.G.; et al. PPARδ reprograms glutamine metabolism in sorafenib-resistant HCC. Mol. Cancer Res. 2017, 15, 1230–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wangpaichitr, M.; Wu, C.; Li, Y.Y.; Nguyen, D.J.M.; Kandemir, H.; Shah, S.; Chen, S.; Feun, L.G.; Prince, J.S.; Kuo, M.T.; et al. Exploiting ROS and metabolic differences to kill cisplatin resistant lung cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 49275–49292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marengo, B.; Pulliero, A.; Izzotti, A.; Domenicotti, C. miRNA Regulation of Glutathione Homeostasis in Cancer Initiation, Progression and Therapy Resistance. MicroRNA 2019, 9, 187–197. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tili, E.; Michaille, J.J.; Luo, Z.; Volinia, S.; Rassenti, L.Z.; Kipps, T.J.; Croce, C.M. The down-regulation of miR-125b in chronic lymphocytic leukemias leads to metabolic adaptation of cells to a transformed state. Blood 2012, 120, 2631–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, P.; Luthra, R. Hypoxia-regulated microRNA-210 modulates mitochondrial function and decreases ISCU and COX10 expression. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4362–4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Burchard, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, A.M.; Poon, R.T.P.; Lee, N.P.Y.; Wong, K.F.; Sham, P.C.; Lam, B.Y.; Ferguson, M.D.; Tokiwa, G.; et al. microRNA-122 as a regulator of mitochondrial metabolic gene network in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Venkataraman, S.; Alimova, I.; Fan, R.; Harris, P.; Foreman, N.; Vibhakar, R. MicroRNA 128a Increases Intracellular ROS Level by Targeting Bmi-1 and Inhibits Medulloblastoma Cancer Cell Growth by Promoting Senescence. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mateescu, B.; Batista, L.; Cardon, M.; Gruosso, T.; de Feraudy, Y.; Mariani, O.; Nicolas, A.; Meyniel, J.P.; Cottu, P.; Sastre-Garau, X.; et al. miR-141 and miR-200a act on ovarian tumorigenesis by controlling oxidative stress response. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, S.Z.; Hu, Y.Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Y.B.; Sun, J.D.; Yang, Y.F.; Ji, C.C.; Liu, Z.B.; Cao, W.D.; Qu, Y.; et al. MicroRNA-34a induces apoptosis in the human glioma cell line, A172, through enhanced ROS production and NOX2 expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. 2014, 444, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tomasetti, M.; Nocchi, L.; Staffolani, S.; Manzella, N.; Amati, M.; Goodwin, J.; Kluckova, K.; Nguyen, M.; Strafella, E.; Bajzikova, M.; et al. MicroRNA-126 Suppresses Mesothelioma Malignancy by Targeting IRS1 and Interfering with the Mitochondrial Function. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2014, 21, 2109–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ebi, H.; Sato, T.; Sugito, N.; Hosono, Y.; Yatabe, Y.; Matsuyama, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Osada, H.; Suzuki, M.; Takahashi, T. Counterbalance between RB inactivation and miR-17–92 overexpression in reactive oxygen species and DNA damage induction in lung cancers. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3371–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lu, Y.H.; Huang, Z.Y. Global identification of circular RNAs in imatinib (IM) resistance of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) by modulating signaling pathways of circ_0080145/miR-203/ABL1 and circ 0051886/miR-637/ABL1. Mol. Med. 2021, 27, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gupta, S.K.; Singh, P.; Chhabra, R.; Verma, M. Novel pharmacological approach for the prevention of multidrug resistance (MDR) in a human leukemia cell line. Leuk Res. 2021, 109, 106641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lima, A.R.; Araújo, A.M.; Pinto, J.; Jerónimo, C.; Henrique, R.; Bastos, M.D.L.; Carvalho, M.; Guedes de Pinho, P. GC-MS-Based Endometabolome Analysis Differentiates Prostate Cancer from Normal Prostate Cells. Metabolites 2018, 8, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rodrigues, D.; Pinto, J.; Araújo, A.M.; Jerónimo, C.; Henrique, R.; Bastos, M.D.; Guedes de Pinho, P.; Carvalho, M. GC-MS Metabolomics Reveals Distinct Profiles of Low- and High-Grade Bladder Cancer Cultured Cells. Metabolites 2019, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pereira, D.M.; Vinholes, J.; de Pinho, P.G.; Valentão, P.; Mouga, T.; Teixeira, N.; Andrade, P.B. A gas chromatography–mass spectrometry multi-target method for the simultaneous analysis of three classes of metabolites in marine organisms. Talanta 2012, 100, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pluskal, T.; Castillo, S.; Villar-Briones, A.; Orešič, M. MZmine 2: Modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pang, Z.; Chong, J.; Zhou, G.; de Lima Morais, D.A.; Chang, L.; Barrette, M.; Gauthier, C.; Jacques, P.É.; Li, S.; Xia, J. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: Narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W388–W396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liao, H.; Bai, Y.; Qiu, S.; Zheng, L.; Huang, L.; Liu, T.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, N.; Yan, X.; et al. MiR-203 downregulation is responsible for chemoresistance in human glioblastoma by promoting epithelial-mesenchymal transition via SNAI2. Oncotarget 2015, 11, 8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Tao, K.; Wang, X.; Xiao, Q.; Huang, Z.; Zhong, L.; Cao, W.; Wen, J.; Feng, W. Inhibition of BCR/ABL Protein Expression by miR-203 Sensitizes for Imatinib Mesylate. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ko, B.W.; Han, J.; Heo, J.Y.; Jang, Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, J.; Lee, M.J.; Ryu, M.J.; Song, I.C.; Jo, Y.S.; et al. Metabolic characterization of imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL T315I chronic myeloid leukemia cells indicates down-regulation of glycolytic pathway and low ROS production. Leuk. Lymphoma 2016, 57, 2180–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, C.; D’Alessandro, A.; Wellendorf, A.M.; Mohmoud, F.; Serrano-Lopez, J.; Perentesis, J.P.; Komurov, K.; Alexe, G.; Stegmaier, K.; Whitsett, J.A.; et al. KLF5 controls glutathione metabolism to suppress p190-BCR-ABL+ B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 29665–29679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kominsky, D.J.; Klawitter, J.; Brown, J.L.; Boros, L.G.; Melo, J.V.; Eckhardt, S.G.; Serkova, N.J. Abnormalities in Glucose Uptake and Metabolism in Imatinib-Resistant Human BCR-ABL–Positive Cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 3442–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, C.Y.; Chung, Y.H.; Wu, S.Y.; Wang, H.Y.; Lin, Z.Y.; Yang, T.J.; Feng, J.M.; Hu, C.M.; Chang, Z.F. Targeting Reductive Metabolic Shifts by T315I Mutation in BCR-ABL Myeloid Leukemia for Therapy. BioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Głowacki, S.; Synowiec, E.; Szwed, M.; Toma, M.; Skorski, T.; Śliwiński, T. Relationship between Oxidative Stress and Imatinib Resistance in Model Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Cells. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chatterjee, N.; Walker, G.C. Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2017, 58, 235–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Vairetti, M.; Di Pasqua, L.G.; Cagna, M.; Richelmi, P.; Ferrigno, A.; Berardo, C. Changes in Glutathione Content in Liver Diseases: An Update. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Estrela, J.M.; Ortega, A.; Obrador, E. Glutathione in Cancer Biology and Therapy. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2006, 43, 143–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Espinosa-Diez, C.; Miguel, V.; Mennerich, D.; Kietzmann, T.; Sánchez-Pérez, P.; Cadenas, S.; Lamas, S. Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2015, 6, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Subramaniam, S.; Jeet, V.; Clements, J.A.; Gunter, J.H.; Batra, J. Emergence of MicroRNAs as Key Players in Cancer Cell Metabolism. Clin. Chem. 2019, 65, 1090–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leichtle, A.B.; Nuoffer, J.M.; Ceglarek, U.; Kase, J.; Conrad, T.; Witzigmann, H.; Thiery, J.; Fiedler, G.M. Serum amino acid profiles and their alterations in colorectal cancer. Metabolomics 2012, 8, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Denkert, C.; Budczies, J.; Weichert, W.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Scholz, M.; Kind, T.; Niesporek, S.; Noske, A.; Buckendahl, A.; Dietel, M.; et al. Metabolite profiling of human colon carcinoma—Deregulation of TCA cycle and amino acid turnover. Mol. Cancer 2008, 7, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Taherizadeh, M.; Khoshnia, M.; Shams, S.; Hesari, Z.; Joshaghani, H. Clinical Significance of Plasma Levels of Gluconeogenic Amino Acids in Esophageal Cancer Patients. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 21, 2463–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pietkiewicz, D.; Klupczynska-Gabryszak, A.; Plewa, S.; Misiura, M.; Horala, A.; Miltyk, W.; Nowak-Markwitz, E.; Kokot, Z.J.; Matysiak, J. Free Amino Acid Alterations in Patients with Gynecological and Breast Cancer: A Review. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Turathum, B.; Gao, E.M.; Yang, F.; Liu, Y.B.; Yang, Z.Y.; Liu, C.C.; Xue, Y.J.; Wu, M.H.; Wang, L.; Grataitong, K.; et al. Role of pyroglutamic acid in cumulus cells of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Reczek, C.R.; Chandel, N.S. The Two Faces of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2017, 1, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jee, S.H.; Kim, M.; Kim, M.; Kang, M.; Seo, Y.W.; Jung, K.J.; Lee, S.J.; Hong, S.; Lee, J.H. Clinical relevance of glycerophospholipid, sphingomyelin and glutathione metabolism in the pathogenesis of pharyngolaryngeal cancer in smokers: The Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II. Metabolomics 2016, 12, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kepp, O.; Bezu, L.; Yamazaki, T.; di Virgilio, F.; Smyth, M.J.; Kroemer, G.; Galluzzi, L. ATP and cancer immunosurveillance. EMBO J. 2021, 40, e108130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moreno-Sanchez, R.; Marin-Hernandez, A.; Saavedra, E.; Pardo, J.P.; Ralph, S.J.; Rodríguez-Enríquez, S. Who controls the ATP supply in cancer cells? Biochemistry lessons to understand cancer energy metabolism. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 50, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kalinina, E.V.; Gavriliuk, L.A. Glutathione Synthesis in Cancer Cells. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 895–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moldovan, O.L.; Rusu, A.; Tanase, C.; Vari, C.E. Glutamate—A multifaceted molecule: Endogenous neurotransmitter, controversial food additive, design compound for anti-cancer drugs. A critical appraisal. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 153, 112290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jain, M.; Nilsson, R.; Sharma, S.; Madhusudhan, N.; Kitami, T.; Souza, A.L.; Kafri, R.; Kirschner, M.W.; Clish, C.B.; Mootha, V.K. Metabolite Profiling Identifies a Key Role for Glycine in Rapid Cancer Cell Proliferation. Science 2012, 336, 1040–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. McCarty, M.F.; O’Keefe, J.H.; DiNicolantonio, J.J. Dietary Glycine Is Rate-Limiting for Glutathione Synthesis and May Have Broad Potential for Health Protection. Ochsner J. 2018, 18, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Kalinina, E.V.; Saprin, A.N.; Solomka, V.S.; Shcherbak, N.P.; Chermnykh, N.S.; Piruzian, L.A. Role of the antioxidant system and redox-dependent regulation of transcription factors bcl-2 and p53 in forming resistance of human K562 erythroleukemia cells to doxorubicin. Vopr. Onkol. 2001, 47, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Cimb 44 00438 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of predicted target regions of hsa-miR-203a-5p in 3′UTR of Bcr and Abl1 subunits of the Bcr-Abl1 oncogene using TargetScan (b) Relative gene expression of Bcr-Abl1 (/GAPDH) following miRNA transfection. C: imatinib-sensitive K562 cells R: imatinib-resistant K562 cells (IR-K562 cells), R + miR-203: IR-K562 transfected with hsa-miR-203a-5p. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) with statistical significance ** p ≤ 0.005.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic illustration of predicted target regions of hsa-miR-203a-5p in 3′UTR of Bcr and Abl1 subunits of the Bcr-Abl1 oncogene using TargetScan (b) Relative gene expression of Bcr-Abl1 (/GAPDH) following miRNA transfection. C: imatinib-sensitive K562 cells R: imatinib-resistant K562 cells (IR-K562 cells), R + miR-203: IR-K562 transfected with hsa-miR-203a-5p. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) with statistical significance ** p ≤ 0.005.
Cimb 44 00438 g001
Cimb 44 00438 g002 550
Figure 2. Overview of metabolite sets enrichment: Quantitative Enrichment Analysis (QEA) algorithm summary plot for all significantly transformed metabolites between the imatinib-sensitive (C) and imatinib-resistant (R) K562 cells.
Figure 2. Overview of metabolite sets enrichment: Quantitative Enrichment Analysis (QEA) algorithm summary plot for all significantly transformed metabolites between the imatinib-sensitive (C) and imatinib-resistant (R) K562 cells.
Cimb 44 00438 g002
Cimb 44 00438 g003 550
Figure 3. Glutathione (GSH) Metabolism Overview: L-glutamic acid, cysteine, and glycine sequentially synthesize GSH by glutamylcysteine synthetase and GSH synthetase, respectively. L-glutamic acid and cysteine are combined by glutamate-cysteine ligase, which is powered by ATP, to form γ-glutamylcysteine. The enzyme glutathione synthetase, which is also powered by ATP, can synthesize γ-glutamylcysteine and glycine. GSH exists in two states: oxidized (GSSG) and reduced (GSH). GSH oxidation occurs as a result of a relatively high GSH concentration within cells. Figure created with BioRender.com. (Note: Metabolites—L-alanine, 5-oxoproline/pyroglutamic acid, L-glutamic acid, glycine, and phosphoric acid (Pi)—matching the user-uploaded data with the 28 metabolites listed by MetaboAnalyst are indicated in red text).
Figure 3. Glutathione (GSH) Metabolism Overview: L-glutamic acid, cysteine, and glycine sequentially synthesize GSH by glutamylcysteine synthetase and GSH synthetase, respectively. L-glutamic acid and cysteine are combined by glutamate-cysteine ligase, which is powered by ATP, to form γ-glutamylcysteine. The enzyme glutathione synthetase, which is also powered by ATP, can synthesize γ-glutamylcysteine and glycine. GSH exists in two states: oxidized (GSSG) and reduced (GSH). GSH oxidation occurs as a result of a relatively high GSH concentration within cells. Figure created with BioRender.com. (Note: Metabolites—L-alanine, 5-oxoproline/pyroglutamic acid, L-glutamic acid, glycine, and phosphoric acid (Pi)—matching the user-uploaded data with the 28 metabolites listed by MetaboAnalyst are indicated in red text).
Cimb 44 00438 g003
Cimb 44 00438 g004 550
Figure 4. Bar plot showing the relative abundance of—(a) L-alanine, (b) 5-oxoproline (also known as pyroglutamic acid), (c) L-glutamic acid, (d) glycine, and (e) phosphoric acid (Pi)—the metabolites involved in glutathione (GSH) metabolism. All data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) with statistical significance # p ≤ 0.05, **, ## p ≤ 0.005, and ***, ### p ≤ 0.0005.(ns: non-significant, C: imatinib-sensitive K562 cells, R: imatinib-resistant K562 cells, R + 203: hsa-miR-203a-5p transfected imatinib-resistant K562 cells).
Figure 4. Bar plot showing the relative abundance of—(a) L-alanine, (b) 5-oxoproline (also known as pyroglutamic acid), (c) L-glutamic acid, (d) glycine, and (e) phosphoric acid (Pi)—the metabolites involved in glutathione (GSH) metabolism. All data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3) with statistical significance # p ≤ 0.05, **, ## p ≤ 0.005, and ***, ### p ≤ 0.0005.(ns: non-significant, C: imatinib-sensitive K562 cells, R: imatinib-resistant K562 cells, R + 203: hsa-miR-203a-5p transfected imatinib-resistant K562 cells).
Cimb 44 00438 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, P.; Yadav, R.; Verma, M.; Chhabra, R. Antileukemic Activity of hsa-miR-203a-5p by Limiting Glutathione Metabolism in Imatinib-Resistant K562 Cells. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 6428-6438. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120438

AMA Style

Singh P, Yadav R, Verma M, Chhabra R. Antileukemic Activity of hsa-miR-203a-5p by Limiting Glutathione Metabolism in Imatinib-Resistant K562 Cells. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(12):6428-6438. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120438

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Priyanka, Radheshyam Yadav, Malkhey Verma, and Ravindresh Chhabra. 2022. "Antileukemic Activity of hsa-miR-203a-5p by Limiting Glutathione Metabolism in Imatinib-Resistant K562 Cells" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 12: 6428-6438. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120438

APA Style

Singh, P., Yadav, R., Verma, M., & Chhabra, R. (2022). Antileukemic Activity of hsa-miR-203a-5p by Limiting Glutathione Metabolism in Imatinib-Resistant K562 Cells. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 44(12), 6428-6438. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44120438

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop