Next Article in Journal
Mining Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors from an Edible Seaweed Pterocladiella capillacea by Using In Vitro Bioassays, Affinity Ultrafiltration LC-MS/MS, Metabolomics Tools, and In Silico Prediction
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Nutrient Deprivation on the Antioxidant Capacity and Chemical Profile of Two Diatoms from Genus Chaetoceros
Previous Article in Journal
Tandocyclinones A and B, Ether Bridged C-Glycosyl Benz[a]anthracenes from an Intertidal Zone Streptomyces sp.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variability in Macro- and Micronutrients of 15 Rarely Researched Microalgae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of a Shewanella halifaxensis Strain with Algicidal Effects on Red Tide Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum in Culture

by
Victoria Cruz-Balladares
1,*,
Vladimir Avalos
1,
Hernán Vera-Villalobos
1,
Henry Cameron
1,
Leonel Gonzalez
1,
Yanett Leyton
1 and
Carlos Riquelme
1,2
1
Centro de Bioinnovación de Antofagasta, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
2
Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(9), 501; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090501
Submission received: 22 June 2023 / Revised: 16 September 2023 / Accepted: 17 September 2023 / Published: 21 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolites in Marine Planktonic Organisms)

Abstract

:
The dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum forms high biomass blooms that discolor the water (red tides), which may pose a serious threat to marine fauna and aquaculture exploitations. In this study, the algicidal effect of a bacterial strain (0YLH) belonging to the genus Shewanella was identified and evaluated against P. triestinum. The algicidal effects on the dinoflagellate were observed when P. triestinum was exposed to cell-free supernatant (CFS) from stationary-phase cultures of the 0YLH strain. After 24 h exposure, a remarkable reduction in the photosynthetic efficiency of P. triestinum was achieved (55.9%), suggesting the presence of extracellular bioactive compounds produced by the bacteria with algicidal activity. Furthermore, the CFS exhibited stability and maintained its activity across a wide range of temperatures (20–120 °C) and pH values (3–11). These findings highlight the algicidal potential of the bacterium Shewanella halifaxensis 0YLH as a promising tool for the environmentally friendly biological control of P. triestinum blooms.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Seawater discolorations, colloquially known as “red tides”, are caused by high concentrations of pigmented microalgae. Most of these high biomass algal blooms are harmless, but occasionally, if they are not consumed and decay, they become harmful. Negative impacts on the marine environment and aquaculture resources are caused by abrupt changes in physical-chemical conditions, leading to anoxia or hyperoxygenation, high concentrations of ammonium, the excretion of mucilaginous substances and even ecosystem disruption [1,2].
High Biomass Harmful Algal Blooms (HBHAB) are driven by a combination of abiotic and biotic factors, which creates optimal conditions for the rapid growth and/or accumulation of a particular species. Climate change may affect some of these factors, leading to increased seawater temperature and stratification and related changes in light intensity, turbulence and nutrients availability and composition [3,4,5].
Reports of water discolorations in northern Chile date back to the early XIX century, when Charles Darwin, in his travel diary aboard H.M.S. “Beagle”, described an intense coloration in the sea off Valparaiso and northern Concepcion [6]. Severe paralytic (PSP) and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) outbreaks were first reported in the early 1970s, and were associated with high biomass blooms of toxic Alexandrium catenella and Dinophysis acuta, respectively [7,8]. These toxic HABs are mainly developed in the southern Patagonian provinces (reviewed by Avaria in [6]). In recent years, there has been an expansion of the HABs towards the north of Chile.
Recently, in Northern Chile, a high-density bloom persisted from November to February 2019, and occupied a huge marine area of 30 km across the shelf by 1500 km along the coast that stretched from the Atacama Region, Chile, to Arequipa, Perú. During this event, species of the genus Prorocentrum emerged as predominant, causing the massive death of squids and jellyfishes in Bahía Inglesa (27°7′ S; 70°52′ W, Atacama Region), probably associated with anoxia [9]. The genus Prorocentrum is a cosmopolitan dinoflagellate species with a complex life cycle, including benthic, planktonic and tychoplanktonic stages, and considerable morphological variability (size and shape) [10]. It is important to note that the genus Prorocentrum includes benthic species, and some of them are producers of diarrhetic shellfish toxins [11], e.g., Prorocentrum lima [12], and planktonic species. There are no toxic species within the planktonic Prorocentrum, but some of them (P. micans, P. triestinum) are frequent agents of HBHABs, particularly in upwelling systems [10,11].
Due to the negative impacts produced by HABs, various methods have been proposed to mitigate them [13]. Among these, there are physical methods which include the mechanical collection and removal of great amounts of microalgal biomass for its elimination; air pumping which produces microbubbles, generating flocs that move the microorganism to the surface for its removal [14]; magnetic separation, which uses mechanical energy together with iron oxide and powdered chloride to eliminate plankton [14,15]; separation by centrifugation; ultrasonic destruction, where sound waves are applied that affect the buoyancy of microalgae causing them to sink to the bottom of the water [14,15]; and ultraviolet radiation, which eliminates some species after a few seconds of exposure [16]. The disadvantage of physical methods is that they are slow and generate high operating costs. In addition, they are not very specific, thus affecting other aquatic organisms, so they are recommended only as a preventive strategy [14].
There are also chemical methods, such as clay flocculation, where flocs are formed by particle condensation, which promotes a rapid sinking of the aggregates. There are two types: natural clays, which have low efficiency and little flexibility, and more efficient modified clays, which are less expensive because lower quantities are required [14,17]. Another chemical method comprises surfactant compounds, which reduce the surface and interfacial tension between liquids, solids and gases. Surfactants, combined with clays, synergistically improve the removal of microalgae [14,15]. Lately, nanoparticles with algicides composed of titanium dioxide, zinc, cerium yttrium and aluminum oxides and structured barium titanate similar to coral have been designed, which act by trapping the cells and reducing the absorption of nutrients and photosynthesis [14].
Furthermore, there are widely distributed chemical products, such as ozone, chlorine, permanganate, copper sulfate, sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide, which can significantly inhibit microalgal growth, metabolic activity and photosynthesis. Their mechanism of action is based on the breakdown of cellular structures, which induces the production of free radicals, inhibits photosynthesis or hinders the synthesis of intracellular enzymes [15]. Although chemical methods are the most widely used, they are also the least safe for human health and aquatic environments. The toxicity they may have against other non-target organisms must be taken into consideration, and the releasing of residues into the environment should be reduced to the minimum [14].
The biological methods use either aquatic macroorganisms or microorganisms which produce bioactive compounds with algicidal activity. These methods are an effective alternative because they are less aggressive than the chemical and physical methods. Biological algicides have two ways of killing microalgae, either directly by contact between microorganisms with algicide activity and the algae or indirectly by exuding algicide compounds into the environment [13,14,15,18]. Among the algicidal producers, specific strains within the phylum Actinomycetes directly affect several bloom-forming species by inhibiting their physiological activity, inducing the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and causing oxidative damage [19]. Viruses also have potential as a biological control by causing lysis on cells, with the main advantage being the existence of a wide variety of species in the marine ecosystems, and also easy replication and a high specificity. However, there is a lack of information regarding virus–HABs interactions. In addition, parasitic pathogens are organisms that have been less studied, but are well known to recognize their prey, adhere to the surface, penetrate the cytoplasm, proliferate in the host and eventually cause cell death [14,15]. Finally, bacteria are the most studied microorganisms used as a biological control. Bacteria may act directly, a mode that requires bacteria-microalgae contact, inhibiting growth and causing cell lysis [14]. Conversely, indirect bacterial methods act by secreting bioactive compounds into the environment with negative effects on the microalgae, including changes in subcellular structure, the inhibition of photosynthesis and changes in enzymatic activity, functional gene expression and eventually cell lysis. The advantage of the compounds isolated from bacteria is that some of them are highly specific, a fact which turns them into a fairly safe and ecological control method against massive algae blooms [13,15,18,20,21]. Several bacteria belonging to the genera Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes, Bacillus, Deinococcus, Hahella, Mangrovimonas, Pseudoalteromonas, Pseudomonas and Shewanella have been extensively investigated for their ability to produce bioactive compounds that inhibit growth and lyse harmful algae species [19,21,22,23].
This work identified a new bacterial strain of the genus Shewanella with an apparent algicidal effect. The bioactive compounds were in the cell-free supernatant of the bacterial culture, affecting the cell morphology and photosynthetic activity of the dinoflagellate Prorocentum triestinum, leading to cell mortality in a short period of time.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization and Identification of the 0YLH Strain

The Shewanella halifaxensis strain 0YLH is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped and motile bacterium. The 16S rRNA phylogenetic tree analysis showed a visible separation between the Shewanellaceae and Alteromonadaceae families, both belonging to the order Alteromonadales. In this context, our bacterial isolate denoted as 0YLH was grouped inside the S. halifaxensis clade and was closely related with two other S. halifaxensis strains (accession number MG283319 and JQ424343) (Figure 1). In addition, the S. halifaxensis clade had a high degree of conservation since its bootstrap score was over 75.

2.2. Algicidal Activity

The CFS secreted from the 0YLH strain exhibited significant antagonistic activity against P. triestinum when the dinoflagellate was treated at a 20% (v/v) ratio. This activity was reflected in the Fv/Fv parameter related to photosynthetic efficiency, which was drastically diminished reaching values near 0. Thus, this data allowed us to estimate the algicidal activity of the CFS. Notably, a reduction in photosynthetic efficiency was observed after 24 h of exposure, with 55.9% algicidal activity of the CFS, in contrast to the control, which exhibited negative values (Figure 2A). Our results showed a high predominance of PI fluorescence when P. triestinum was exposed to CFS as compared to the control (Figure 2B).
The antagonistic activity against the dinoflagellates exposed to the strain 0YH supernatant was considerably higher when the CFS was obtained from bacterial cultures in the stationary phase (51.7% of algicide activity against P. triestinum) than when the CFS was obtained from the exponential phase (9.1% of algicidal activity) (Figure 3).

2.3. Stability of the Bacterial Supernatant of Strain 0YLH

To assess the stability of the CFS in different abiotic parameters, we evaluated the algicidal activity of the CFS in several conditions of temperature and pH. Our results showed that the CFS maintained algicidal activity over 40% against P. triestinum in a temperature range from 20 to 100 °C and a decrease to 20% when the CFS was incubated at 120 °C (Figure 4A). Additionally, the CFS showed remarkable algicidal activity under every pH condition tested, even when extreme pH values (3 or 11) were applied (Figure 4B).

2.4. Specificity of the Bacterial Supernatant of Strain 0YLH against Other Microorganisms

Assessing the toxicity of the bacterial supernatant on other phytoplankton species is crucial for evaluating the potential use of this algicidal compound. Our results showed (Figure 5) that the algicidal effects were primarily observed in dinoflagellates. Notably, maximal effects were observed within the Prorocentrum genus, with 55.9% and 34.9% algicidal activity observed against P. triestinum and P. micans, respectively. The effect, although much weaker (18.5%), was also observed against the bentonic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis sp., and the haptophyte Isochrysis sp. T-ISO presented lower values (16.8% of algicide activity). Conversely, negative values were observed with the diatom Cheatoceros calcitrans.

3. Discussion

3.1. Characterization and Identification of 0YLH Strain

Our results showed that the bacterial isolate denoted as 0YLH belongs to Shewanella halifaxensis. Members of the Shewanella genera are found in many environments, such as water, soil and animal guts [24]. This clade possesses a close relationship to the Alteromonas genus, as observed in Figure 1. Several studies have reported that the Alteromonas and Shewanella clades might reach a high potential in marine biotechnology, since several isolates have already been used as algicidal compounds against HABs-forming organisms [25,26,27]. In this context, some remarkable considerations are that the Shewanella species have shown a versatile application against HABs and no adverse effects against non-harmful species, a characteristic which diminishes their negative environmental impacts [26,28]. Additionally, Shewanella species exudates have shown algicidal activity against diverse HAB-forming dinoflagellate species of the genera Prorocentrum, Alexandrium and Karlodinium [26,27,29]. Thus, the phylogenetic classification of the 0YLH isolate suggests potential applications of this bacterial isolate.

3.2. Algicidal Activity

Conversely to some previous studies which use the concentration of chlorophyll a (Chl a) to assess algicidal activity, our study used photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) [30,31]. In this context, the CFS demonstrated a high degree of algicidal activity against P. triestinum, a dinoflagellate previously described as a HABs-forming organism. We specifically measured the Fv/Fm values as an indicator of the photosynthetic state of dinoflagellates under bacterial CFS-induced stress. Normally, Fv/Fm values range between 0.5 and 0.7 [32,33,34]. When exposing the CSF of the 0YLH strain to the dinoflagellate P. triestinum, a decrease in Fv/Fm was observed. It is known that photosynthesis is essential for the physiological activities of microalgae, and also that bacteria with algicidal activity have been documented, which induce a dysfunction of the photosynthetic system. Therefore, microalgal lysis could be explained by structural changes in the chloroplasts, inhibiting the photosynthetic activity by decreasing the transport of electrons, the absorption of photons, and the malfunction of the PSII reaction center of the dinoflagellates, generating components that could damage cell integrity and finally induce death in dinoflagellates [21,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Additionally, PI staining was applied to determine cell viability, as this dye selectively enters damaged cells and binds to DNA molecules [42], resulting in fluorescence (Figure 2B); therefore, live cells remained unaffected by PI, indicating their intact membrane integrity, which was reflected by the absence of fluorescence [43].
There is previous evidence that bacterial media could interfere with antagonistic assays due to their high and diverse nutrient content [44]. To avoid these interferences, the bacterial culture medium used in the present work, i.e., f/2 medium supplemented with bactopeptone, was designed to avoid false positives and rule out any action of the bacterial culture medium on the dinoflagellate.
Additionally, in order to optimize CFS production, we evaluate the algicidal activity of the CFS obtained from 0YLH cultures obtained in the exponential and stationary phase of bacterial growth. Our results showed that algicidal activity was predominantly observed in the stationary phase. Thus, the increased algicidal potential in bacterial cultures during the stationary phase suggests that the bioactive effects may come from secondary metabolites excreted into the medium by strain 0YLH. These results are in agreement with earlier studies with other strains from the same genus, in which the algicide activity against dinoflagellates reached values of over 90% after 24 to 72 h exposure to CFS [27,45,46,47].

3.3. Stability of the Bacterial Supernatant of Strain 0YLH

The algicidal compound present in the supernatant was active even when exposed to high temperatures (i.e., thermostable). These results agree with previous studies showing a Shewanella sp. strain IRI-160 displaying algicide activity even after being subjected to sudden changes in temperature [46]. Regarding the pH stability of the CFS, our results showed that the CFS was stable in every tested condition even when extreme pH conditions, such as a pH of 3 or 11, were applied [47]. Considering the stability of the bioactive compound in such extreme conditions in the present study, we suggest that it is unlikely that the active compound is chemically similar to a peptide, protein or enzyme [48,49].

3.4. Specificity of the Bacterial Supernatant of Strain 0YLH against Other Microorganisms

The algicide activity of the CFS tested against several phytoplankton strains from our culture collection showed important differences between species. In Figure 5, maximal algicidal effects were observed on P. triestinum, a small-sized (~20 µm) planktonic dinoflagellate with a cellular wall dominated by two somehow delicate valve-like plates [50]. The effects were lower on Ostreopsis sp., a medium-sized benthic dinoflagellate with cell wall plates with a much coarser texture [51] and probably protected by the mucilaginous secretions used to get fixed in a substrate. Our hypothesis is that these differences in cell wall shape and texture may explain the distinct algicidal effect on the two genera (Prorocentrum and Ostreopsis). In addition, the effects on the haptophyte Isochrysis sp. T-ISO and the diatom C. calcitrans were low or even negative, which could indicate a slight stimulatory effect and could be due to nutrient regeneration by bacteria during incubation [52]. These results suggest a CFS specificity over bloom-producing organisms, since the supernatant mainly affected dinoflagellates of the genus Prorocentrum. Similar observations have been described in earlier studies with Shewanella and all the above supports the algicidal effect on the dinoflagellate species tested [52]. On the other hand, there are bacteria such as Pseudoalteromonas sp., which has activity on other dinoflagellates but not on the genus Prorocentrum [47]. Studies with other bacterial strains showed a similar effect against other microalgae groups, i.e., mild for Isochrysis and null for Chaetoceros, as in this study [53].
Algicidal bacteria have a significant impact on aquatic systems by influencing community dynamics through the release of metabolites into the surrounding environment, with the capability of lysing blooming algal species [20]. These novel compounds hold great potential as alternatives to traditional solutions or may act as complements, such as hydrogen peroxide, or physical methods including UV-C radiation, which are costly and lack specificity. As a result, biological agents have emerged as a more environmentally friendly solution, offering higher specificity in targeting harmful algal blooms (HABs) [54,55,56].
There are several reports of bacterial genera with algicide activity. For example, the genus Acinetobacter and its algicide compound 4-hydroxyphenethylamine directly affects the toxin secreted by the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa during the cyanobacterial harmful events (cyanoHAB events) of this species [57]. Another bacterium, Alcaligenes denitrificans, through a direct cell–cell interaction, causes cell lysis in the species of cyanobacteria M. aeruginosa, M. viridis and M. wesenbergii, and has a highly specific effect since it does not act against Chlorophyceae species [58]. Further, the Bacillus thuringiensis Q1 strain secretes a purine-derived compound, 2-[(2-Aceramido-6-oxo-6,9-dihydro-1H-purin-9-yl)methoxy], which has a negative effect on M. aeruginosa and Anabaena flos-aquae by inhibiting chloroplast formation [59]. Some other examples are listed, such as the bacterium Deinococcus xianganensis Y35 having an algicide effect on Alexandrium tamarense and the isolated compound identified as deinoxanthin [60], and Pseudoalteromonas sp. SP48 negatively affecting A. tamarense, damaging the organelle structures [61]. The Pseudomonas strain Ps3 effects algicidal against the species of red tide Gymnodinium catenatum and Karenia mikimotoi [62]. Another example is a Vibrio sp. isolate with antagonistic activity against the Akashiwo dinoflagellate, which through an over-production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), causes failures in the antioxidant system of the cells [63].
Bacteria of the genus Shewanella have been widely studied, are present throughout the world, both in freshwater and seawater, and are known for their versatility due to their various metabolic processes [64,65]. The Shewanella genus has a diversity of species that produce bioactive compounds with various effects, including antimicrobial activity against human and fish pathogens [66], antifungal activity by secreting volatile organic compounds [67], and algicidal activity by secreting highly specific compounds towards target microorganisms. For instance, Shewanella sp. Lzh-2 has algicidal effects on cyanobacterial blooms [37]. The Shewanella Y1 strain induces the lysis of Alexandrium pacificum due to the fact that it produces a deterioration in photosynthesis, inducing the overproduction of ROS and causing strong oxidative damage [27]. Another strain, Shewanella sp. IRI-160, activates rapid negative effects on harmful dinoflagellates, Karlodinium veneficum, Karenia brevis, Gyrodinium instriatum, Cochlodinium polykrikoides, Heterocapsa triquetra, Prorocentrum minimal, Alexandrium tamarense and Oxyrrhis marina, with a small hydrophilic molecule [29,38,46,52].
Overall, phytoplankton cells which are affected by algicide compounds of Shewanella genus have inhibitory photosystem II (PSII) effects, loss of transport of photosynthetic electrons, loss of cell membrane integrity and increased oxidative stress, i.e., causing damages at the DNA level and cell cycle interruption, eventually causing cell death [64,68].
Unfortunately, the isolation and characterization of bacterial algicidal compounds remain challenging, resulting in the limited availability of these bioactive fractions [69]. The purification and characterization processes possess difficulties, contributing to the scarcity of identified bacterial algicidal compounds. Notably, our results indicate high algicidal rates using the CFS, which is obtained from a process utilizing a low-nutrient culture medium, this being a feasible approach to obtain high volumes of CFS by scaling up the bacterial cultures.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Microalgal Strains and Culture Maintenance Conditions

Prorocentrum triestinum, strain ACIZ_LEM2 in the culture collection of the Centro de Bioinnovación de Antofagasta (CBIA), was isolated from a HAB event reported between November 2018 and February 2019 along the intertidal zone of San Jorge Bay in Antofagasta, Chile (23° S). Water samples were collected at two coastal points, “Puerto Costa” (−23.644; −70.399) and “Capilla Costa” (−23.686; −70.420). The isolation of P. triestinum was carried out by the single cell microcapillar pipetting method [70] under an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71, Turkey, Japan). The drops with the individually isolated cells were deposited in 1 mL microtubes with 5 μL of a modified f/2 medium [71] (HBO3 1.86 M, NH2C(CH2OH)3 (Trizma solution) 250 mM, Na2SiO3*9H2O 105 µM). Cells were cultured photoautotrophically at a constant temperature of 21 °C and light intensity of 84–100 μmol m−2 s−1 (LED tubes). Cultures were maintained in exponential growth for subsequent experiments.

4.2. Bacterial Strain, Experimental Culture Conditions and Characterization

The bacterial strain 0YLH was isolated from the intertidal zone in San Jorge Bay, Antofagasta (23° S), at the time when P. triestinum was blooming, cultivated in 50 mL flasks of 120 mL with a modified f/2 medium supplemented with 0.2% of bactopeptone (m/v) and stirred in an orbital shaker (Thermolyne, Ramsey, MN, USA) at 120 rpm and 20 °C.

4.2.1. DNA Isolation and Capillary Electrophoresis Sequencing (CES) of the 0YLH Strain

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was obtained with the PowerSoil® MoBio extraction kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration and purity of gDNA were evaluated using Nanodrop 2000c (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pairs 27F, 518F, 800R and 1542R (27F, Forward: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′; 518F, Forward: CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG, 800R, Reverse: TACCAGGGTATCTAATCC, 1492R, Reverse: TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT). All samples were stored at −20 °C and sequenced by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) for CES services.

4.2.2. Phylogenetic Analyses of Bacterial Strain 0YLH

The 16S rRNA sequences were trimmed and contigs were assembled using Geneious Prime software (v 2022.2.2; [72]). The phylogenetic tree was developed with jModelTest-2 software (v2.1.10; [73]) and the Tamura-Nei nucleotide substitution model [74], applying 100 bootstraps for the phylogenetic tree. The target sequence was labeled as “0YLH” and aligned against 50 members of the Alteromonadales order. The outgroup member used was Photobacterium damselae (Accession number MT071398). The Maximum Likelihood algorithm PhyML [75] was used on the alignment previously obtained with the MUSCLE algorithm [76]. All assembled sequences obtained were deposited in the GenBank under the accession number OR025894.

4.3. Production of 0YLH CFS for Evaluation of Algicidal Effects

The CFS of strain 0YLH was obtained by culturing the bacterium until reaching the stationary growth phase, at a McFarland standard density of 5. The culture was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through sterile Minisart PES filters 28 mm for syringe and 0.22 µm pore size (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany).

4.4. Algicidal Activity

The algicide assays were performed in 6-well culture plates, and each well was filled with 8 mL of P. triestinum culture in the exponential phase with an initial cell density of 104 cells mL−1, and 2 mL of the CFS of the 0YLH strain (i.e., a final concentration of 20% v/v). In addition, an equivalent volume of water enriched with modified f/2 medium + BP was used as a negative control. All assays were performed in triplicate. The experiment was carried out for 24 h; cell densities in P. triestinum cultures were estimated from cell counts with an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71, Japan). The maximum potential quantum efficiency of Photo system II (PSII) (Fv/Fm) was measured through the AquaPen-C fluorometer (Photon Systems Instruments, Drásov, Czech Republic). To test cell viability, 1 mL of culture aliquots was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 1 min, 800 µL of the supernatant was removed and 2 µL of 0.014 mM PI stain was added to the remaining 200 µL and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Images were taken with a ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (BIO-RAD, USA). The algicidal activity of the 0YLH strain was calculated using the following equation:
A l g i c i d a l   a c t i v i t y   ( % ) = ( N 0 N t )   N 0 × 100
where Nt and N0 are the values of Fv/Fm of the microalgae at time t and time 0 (start of assay), respectively.
The CFS specificity was tested against microalgae species belonging to different groups, including two dinoflagellates (Prorocentrum micans and Ostreopsis sp.), one haptophyte (Isochrysis sp. T-ISO) and one diatom (Chaetoceros calcitrans).

4.5. Stability of the Bacterial Supernatant

CFS aliquots were incubated at 20 °C, 40 °C, 60 °C, 80 °C, 100 °C and 120 °C for 2 h to test the effects of temperature on the algicidal activity. Furthermore, the pH of the CFS aliquots was adjusted to 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 to assess the pH tolerance of the algicidal compound, with a pH of 7 being the control. Each treated supernatant was subsequently inoculated into P. triestinum cultures in triplicate at a final concentration of 20% (v/v) to test the algicide activity. Aliquots of f/2 medium supplemented with bactopeptone were used as a negative control.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All tests were conducted in triplicate, and all statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad PRISM software (Version 9.2.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way or two-way ANOVA and Dunnett test analyses were used. Confidence levels of 95% and p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

The classified Shewanella halifaxensis 0YLH strain isolated from Antofagasta Bay, Chile, demonstrated a robust indirect algicidal effect on the dinoflagellate P. triestinum. The exposure of P. triestinum to the filtrate of the CFS, obtained from centrifuged and filtered bacterial culture at the stationary phase, disrupted the dinoflagellate photosynthetic efficiency, leading to cell stress and eventual cell lysis. Notably, the algicidal compound exhibited a remarkable stability against high temperatures and pH variations.
Our research confirms that the 0YLH strain shows algicidal activity against P. triestinum blooms, with some level of specificity towards this genus. Consequently, it represents a promising candidate for mitigating harmful algal blooms caused by these dinoflagellates. Furthermore, it is essential that future studies isolate and identify the specific bioactive compounds responsible for the algicidal activity from the supernatant or other exudates, as they hold significant potential for future applications.

Author Contributions

V.C.-B. coordinated the experiments and wrote the manuscript with the support of V.A. V.A. carried out bacterial strain characterization, H.V.-V. performed statistical analysis, H.C. conducted antagonistic assays, L.G. investigated microalgae strain culture, and Y.L. and C.R. directed the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo grant ID20I10085.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Adrián Paredes for general guidance, Giovanka Manterola for collaborating with antagonistic assays, and Vinko Zadjelovic for translation and general comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. GEOHAB. Global Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms. In GEOHAB Core Research Project: HABs in Upwelling Systems; Pitcher, G., Moita, T., Trainer, V., Kudela, R., Figueiras, P., Probyn, T., Eds.; IOC: Baltimore, MD, USA; SCOR: Paris, France, 2005; Volume 3, p. 82. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reguera, B.; Alonso, R.; Moreira, A.; Méndez, S.; Dechraoui-Bottein, M.Y. Guide for designing and implementing a plan to monitor toxin-producing microalgae—UNESCO Biblioteca Digital. In Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 2nd ed.; UNESCO: Paris, France; Viena, Austria, 2016; pp. 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Feki, M.; Brahim, M.B.; Feki-Sahnoun, W.; Mahfoudi, M.; Sammari, C.; Hamza, A. Seasonal and spatial distributions of dinoflagellates in relation to environmental factors along the north and south coasts of Sfax (Tunisia, Eastern Mediterranean Sea). J. Coast. Life Med. 2017, 5, 299–308. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ralston, D.K.; Moore, S.K. Modeling harmful algal blooms in a changing climate. Harmful Algae 2020, 91, 101729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wells, M.L.; Trainer, V.L.; Smayda, T.J.; Karlson, B.S.O.; Trick, C.G.; Kudela, R.M.; Ishikawa, A.; Bernard, S.; Wulff, A.; Anderson, D.M.; et al. Harmful algal blooms and climate change: Learning from the past and present to forecast the future. Harmful Algae 2015, 49, 68–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. UNESCO. Mareas rojas en el plancton del Pacífico oriental. In Informe del Segundo Taller del Programa de Plancton del Pacífico Oriental, Instituto del Mar: Callao, Perú 19–20 de Noviembre de 1981; UNESCO: Callao, Peru, 1982; p. 3. [Google Scholar]
  7. Díaz, P.A.; Álvarez, G.; Pizarro, G.; Blanco, J.; Reguera, B. Lipophilic Toxins in Chile: History, Producers and Impacts. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Díaz, P.A.; Álvarez, G.; Varela, D.; Pérez-Santos, I.; Díaz, M.; Molinet, C.; Seguel, M.; Aguilera-Belmonte, A.; Guzmán, L.; Uribe, E.; et al. Impacts of harmful algal blooms on the aquaculture industry: Chile as a case study. Perspect. Phycol. 2019, 6, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ávalos, V.; Cameron, H.; Barría, S.; Riquelme, C.; Espinoza, O.; Guzmán, L.; Yarimizu, K.; Okazaki, M.; Nagai, S. Dinoflagellate toxins recorded during an extensive coastal bloom in northern Chile. Harmful Algae News 2019, 62, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gómez, F.; Qiu, D.; Lin, S. The Synonymy of the Toxic Dinoflagellates Prorocentrum mexicanum and P. rhathymum and the Description of P. steidingerae sp. Nov. (Prorocentrales, Dinophyceae). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2017, 64, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muciño Márquez, R.E.; Gárate Lizárraga, I.; López Cortés, D.J. Seasonal Variation of the Genus Prorocentrum (DINOPHYCEAE) in Two Tuna Farms in The Bahía De La Paz, Mexico. Acta Biol. Colomb. 2015, 20, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lundholm, N.; Churro, C.; Escalera, L.; Fraga, S.; Hoppenrath, M.; Iwataki, M.; Larsen, J.; Mertens, K.; Moestrup, Ø.; Tillmann, U.; et al. IOC-UNESCO Taxonomic Reference List of Harmful Micro Algae. 2009. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/hab/ (accessed on 29 August 2023).
  13. Anderson, C.R.; Berdalet, E.; Kudela, R.M.; Cusack, C.K.; Silke, J.; O’Rourke, E.; Dugan, D.; McCammon, M.; Newton, J.A.; Moore, S.K.; et al. Scaling Up from Regional Case Studies to a Global Harmful Algal Bloom Observing System. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Balaji-Prasath, B.; Wang, Y.; Su, Y.P.; Hamilton, D.P.; Lin, H.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, Y. Methods to control harmful algal blooms: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 20, 3133–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhan, M.; Liu, P.; Liu, X.; Hong, Y.; Xie, X. Inactivation and Removal Technologies for Algal-Bloom Control: Advances and Challenges. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2021, 7, 392–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, S.; Tao, Y.; Zhan, X.M.; Dao, G.H.; Hu, H.Y. UV-C irradiation for harmful algal blooms control: A literature review on effectiveness, mechanisms, influencing factors and facilities. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 137986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, L.; Pan, G. A universal method for flocculating harmful algal blooms in marine and fresh waters using modified sand. Environ Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4555–4562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, R.; Sun, P.; Zhang, J.; Esquivel-Elizondo, S.; Wu, Y. Microorganisms-based methods for harmful algal blooms control: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 248, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bai, S.J.; Huang, L.P.; Su, J.Q.; Tian, Y.; Zheng, T.L. Algicidal effects of a novel marine actinomycete on the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 62, 1774–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Meyer, N.; Bigalke, A.; Kaulfuß, A.; Pohnert, G. Strategies and ecological roles of algicidal bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 880–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, F.; Ye, Q.; Chen, Q.; Yang, K.; Zhang, D.; Chen, Z.; Lu, S.; Shao, X.; Fan, Y.; Yao, L.; et al. Algicidal activity of novel marine bacterium Paracoccus sp. strain Y42 against a harmful algal-bloom-causing dinoflagellate, Prorocentrum donghaiense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, 1015–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, F.; Xiao, Z.; Yue, L.; Wang, J.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Z.; Xing, B. Algae response to engineered nanoparticles: Current understanding, mechanisms and implications. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 1026–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shi, X.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Ding, G.; Lin, S.; Chen, J. Isolation of an algicidal bacterium and its effects against the harmful-algal- bloom dinoflagellate Prorocentrum donghaiense (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 2018, 80, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, N.T.; Takemura, T.; Pham, A.H.Q.; Tran, H.T.; Vu, K.C.T.; Tu, N.D.; Huong, T.; Cuong, N.T.; Kasuga, I.; Hasebe, I.; et al. Whole-genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of Shewanella xiamenensis strains carrying blaOXA-48-like genes isolated from a water environment in Vietnam. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 1, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, J.; Zheng, W.; Tian, Y.; Wang, G.; Zheng, T. Optimization of culture conditions and medium composition for the marine algicidal bacterium Alteromonas sp. DH46 by uniform design. J. Ocean Univ. China 2013, 12, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Y.; Coyne, K.J. Immobilization of algicidal bacterium Shewanella sp. IRI-160 and its application to control harmful dinoflagellates. Harmful Algae 2020, 1, 101798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Sun, P.; Ma, S.; Chen, T. Algicidal Effects of a High-Efficiency Algicidal Bacterium Shewanella Y1 on the Toxic Bloom-Causing Dinoflagellate Alexandrium pacificum. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Coyne, K.J.; Wang, Y.; Johnson, G. Algicidal Bacteria: A Review of Current Knowledge and Applications to Control Harmful Algal Blooms. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 7, 871177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, Y.; Coyne, K.J. Metabolomic Insights of the Effects of Bacterial Algicide IRI-160AA on Dinoflagellate Karlodinium veneficum. Metabolites 2022, 12, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Choi, C.J.; Berges, J.A.; Young, E.B. Rapid effects of diverse toxic water pollutants on chlorophyll a fluorescence: Variable responses among freshwater microalgae. Water Res. 2012, 46, 2615–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xia, Q.; Tang, H.; Fu, L.; Tan, J.; Govindjee, G.; Guo, Y. Determination of Fv/Fm from Chlorophyll a Fluorescence without Dark Adaptation by an LSSVM Model. Plant Phenomics 2023, 5, 0034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Aquino-Cruz, A.; Purdie, D.A.; Morris, S. Effect of increasing sea water temperature on the growth and toxin production of the benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima. Hydrobiologia 2018, 813, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, H.; Wang, H.; Abassi, S.; Ki, J.S. The herbicide alachlor severely affects photosystem function and photosynthetic gene expression in the marine dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2020, 55, 620–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shen, A.; Ishizaka, J.; Yang, M.; Ouyang, L.; Yin, Y.; Ma, Z. Changes in community structure and photosynthetic activities of total phytoplankton species during the growth, maintenance, and dissipation phases of a Prorocentrum donghaiense bloom. Harmful Algae 2019, 82, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ivanov, A.G.; Sane, P.V.; Hurry, V.; Öquist, G.; Huner, N.P.A. Photosystem II reaction centre quenching: Mechanisms and physiological role. Photosynth. Res. 2008, 98, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lei, X.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Cai, G.; Yang, X.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, T. Comprehensive insights into the response of Alexandrium tamarense to algicidal component secreted by a marine bacterium. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, Z.; Lin, S.; Liu, X.; Tan, J.; Pan, J.; Yang, H. A freshwater bacterial strain, Shewanella sp. Lzh-2, isolated from Lake Taihu and its two algicidal active substances, hexahydropyrrolo [1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione and 2, 3-indolinedione]. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 4737–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pokrzywinski, K.L.; Tilney, C.L.; Modla, S.; Caplan, J.L.; Ross, J.; Warner, M.E.; Coyne, K.J. Effects of the bacterial algicide IRI-160AA on cellular morphology of harmful dinoflagellates. Harmful Algae 2017, 62, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shi, X.; Zou, Y.; Zheng, W.; Liu, L.; Xie, Y.; Ma, R.; Chen, J. A Novel Algicidal Bacterium and Its Effects against the Toxic Dinoflagellate Karenia mikimotoi (Dinophyceae). Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e00429-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tilney, C.L.; Hubbard, K.A. Expression of nuclear-encoded, haptophyte-derived ftsH genes support extremely rapid PSII repair and high-light photoacclimation in Karenia brevis (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 2022, 118, 102295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ko, S.R.; Le, V.V.; Srivastava, A.; Kang, M.; Oh, H.M.; Ahn, C.Y. Algicidal activity of a novel bacterium, Qipengyuania sp. 3-20A1M, against harmful Margalefidinium polykrikoides: Effects of its active compound. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023, 186, 114397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Matantseva, O.; Berdieva, M.; Kalinina, V.; Pozdnyakov, I.; Pechkovskaya, S.; Skarlato, S. Stressor-induced ecdysis and thecate cyst formation in the armoured dinoflagellates Prorocentrum cordatum. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Skarlato, S.; Filatova, N.; Knyazev, N.; Berdieva, M.; Telesh, I. Salinity stress response of the invasive dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum. Estuar. Coast. Shelf. Sci. 2018, 211, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mankiewicz-Boczek, J.; Morón-López, J.; Serwecińska, L.; Font-Nájera, A.; Gałęzowska, G.; Jurczak, T.; Kokociński, M.; Wolska, L. Algicidal activity of Morganella morganii against axenic and environmental strains of Microcystis aeruginosa: Compound combination effects. Chemosphere 2022, 309, 136609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guan, C.; Guo, X.; Cai, G.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, T. Novel algicidal evidence of a bacterium Bacillus sp. LP-10 killing Phaeocystis globosa, a harmful algal bloom causing species. Biol. Control 2014, 76, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pokrzywinski, K.L.; Place, A.R.; Warner, M.E.; Coyne, K.J. Investigation of the algicidal exudate produced by Shewanella sp. IRI-160 and its effect on dinoflagellates. Harmful Algae 2012, 19, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, F.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, D.; Chen, S.; Bai, X.; Ma, X.; Xie, Z.; Xu, H. Effect and mechanism of the algicidal bacterium Sulfitobacter porphyrae ZFX1 on the mitigation of harmful algal blooms caused by Prorocentrum donghaiense. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yang, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, W.; Yu, C.; Zheng, T. Novel insights into the algicidal bacterium DH77-1 killing the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 482, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, L.; Chen, L.; Yin, P. Algicidal metabolites produced by Bacillus sp. strain B1 against Phaeocystis globosa. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ndhlovu, A.; Dhar, N.; Garg, N.; Xuma, T.; Pitcher, G.C.; Sym, S.D.; Durand, P.M. A red tide forming dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum: Identification, phylogeny and impacts on St Helena Bay, South Africa. Phycologia 2017, 56, 649–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. David, H.; Laza-Martínez, A.; Miguel, I.; Orive, E. Ostreopsis cf. siamensis and Ostreopsis cf. ovata from the Atlantic Iberian Peninsula: Morphological and phylogenetic characterization. Harmful Algae 2013, 30, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hare, C.E.; Demir, E.; Coyne, K.J.; Craig Cary, S.; Kirchman, D.L.; Hutchins, D.A. A bacterium that inhibits the growth of Pfiesteria piscicida and other dinoflagellates. Harmful Algae 2005, 4, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, Q.; Chen, L.; Hu, X.; Zhao, L.; Yin, P.; Li, Q. Toxic Effect of a Marine Bacterium on Aquatic Organisms and Its Algicidal Substances against Phaeocystis globosa. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 0114933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bloh, A.H.; Abdsharad, A.; Usup, G.; Ahmad, A. Extraction and Characterization of Algicidal Compounds from Algicidal Bacteria Loktanella sp. Gb03 and its Activity Against Toxic Dinoflagellate Cooliamalayensis. Sci. Rev. Chem. Commun. 2016, 6, 84–90. [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, S.; Dao, G.H.; Tao, Y.; Zhou, J.; Jiang, H.S.; Xue, Y.M.; Yu, W.W.; Yong, X.L.; Hu, H.Y. The growth suppression effects of UV-C irradiation on Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella vulgaris under solo-culture and co-culture conditions in reclaimed water. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 713, 136374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhou, T.; Cao, H.; Zheng, J.; Teng, F.; Wang, X.; Lou, K.; Zhang, X.; Tao, Y. Suppression of water-bloom cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa by algaecide hydrogen peroxide maximized through programmed cell death. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yi, Y.L.; Yu, X.B.; Zhang, C.; Wang, G.X. Growth inhibition and microcystin degradation effects of Acinetobacter guillouiae A2 on Microcystis aeruginosa. Res. Microbiol. 2015, 166, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Manage, P.M.; Kawabata, Z.; Nakano, S. Algicidal effect of the bacterium Alcaligenes denitrificans on Microcystis spp. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2000, 22, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qiao, J.C.; Zhang, C.L. Identification of a Bacillus thuringiensis Q1 compound with algicidal activity. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Lei, X.; Zhang, H.; Guan, C.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, W.; Xu, H.; Tian, Y.; Yu, Z.; et al. The first evidence of deinoxanthin from Deinococcus sp. Y35 with strong algicidal effect on the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 290, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lyu, Y.H.; Zhou, Y.X.; Li, Y.; Zhou, J.; Xu, Y.X. Optimized culturing conditions for an algicidal bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SP48 on harmful algal blooms caused by Alexandrium tamarense. Microbiologyopen 2019, 8, e00803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zheng, L.; Lin, H.; Balaji-Prasath, B.; Su, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, G. A novel algicidal properties of fermentation products from Pseudomonas sp. Ps3 strain on the toxic red tide dinoflagellate species. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1146325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, G.; Li, X.; Yang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Chen, C.Y.; Chang, J.S. Continuous production of algicidal compounds against Akashiwo sanguinea via a Vibrio sp. co-culture. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 295, 122246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fredrickson, J.K.; Romine, M.F.; Beliaev, A.S.; Auchtung, J.M.; Driscoll, M.E.; Gardner, T.S.; Nealson, K.H.; Osterman, A.L.; Pinchuk, G.; Reed, J.L.; et al. Towards environmental systems biology of Shewanella. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lemaire, O.N.; Méjean, V.; Iobbi-Nivol, C. The Shewanella genus: Ubiquitous organisms sustaining and preserving aquatic ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rachanamol, R.S.; Lipton, A.P.; Thankamani, V.; Sarika, A.R.; Selvin, J. Molecular characterization and bioactivity profile of the tropical sponge-associated bacterium Shewanella algae VCDB. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2014, 68, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gong, A.D.; Li, H.P.; Shen, L.; Zhang, J.B.; Wu, A.B.; He, W.J.; Yuan, Q.S.; He, J.D.; Liao, Y.C. The Shewanella algae strain YM8 produces volatiles with strong inhibition activity against Aspergillus pathogens and aflatoxins. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 159511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tilney, C.L.; Pokrzywinski, K.L.; Coyne, K.J.; Warner, M.E. Growth, death, and photobiology of dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) under bacterial-algicide control. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 26, 2117–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zheng, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.; Lin, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Su, J.; et al. A marine algicidal actinomycete and its active substance against the harmful algal bloom species Phaeocystis globosa. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9207–9215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hoshaw, R.W.; Rosowski, J.R. Methods for microscopic algae. In Handbook of Phycological Methods: Culture Methods and Growth measurements; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1973; pp. 53–68. [Google Scholar]
  71. Guillard, R.R.L. Culture of Phytoplankton for Feeding Marine Invertebrates. In Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals, 1st Conference on Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals Greenport; Smith, W.L., Chanley, M.H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1975; pp. 29–60. [Google Scholar]
  72. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Darriba, D.; Taboada, G.L.; Doallo, R.; Posada, D. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar]
  75. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene of bacterial strain 0YLH. The phylogenetic tree was built through Tamura-Nei nucleotide substitution model with 100 bootstraps. Strain “0YLH” was aligned against 50 members of the Alteromonadales order. Outgroup used was Photobacterium damselae (accession number MT071398). PhyML algorithm was used on the MUSCLE alignment. Target bacterial sequence “0YLH” was highlighted with bold font.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene of bacterial strain 0YLH. The phylogenetic tree was built through Tamura-Nei nucleotide substitution model with 100 bootstraps. Strain “0YLH” was aligned against 50 members of the Alteromonadales order. Outgroup used was Photobacterium damselae (accession number MT071398). PhyML algorithm was used on the MUSCLE alignment. Target bacterial sequence “0YLH” was highlighted with bold font.
Marinedrugs 21 00501 g001
Figure 2. Antagonistic effect of strain 0YLH against the dinoflagellate P. triestinum. (A) Antagonist assay with 0YLH supernatant after 24 h, (B) cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) to determine cell killing activity (red coloration). Images were taken using the ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA).
Figure 2. Antagonistic effect of strain 0YLH against the dinoflagellate P. triestinum. (A) Antagonist assay with 0YLH supernatant after 24 h, (B) cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) to determine cell killing activity (red coloration). Images were taken using the ZOE Fluorescent Cell Imager (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA).
Marinedrugs 21 00501 g002
Figure 3. Antagonistic activity of the strain 0YLH supernatant against the dinoflagellate P. triestinum using CFS obtained from cultures in exponential and stationary growth phase.
Figure 3. Antagonistic activity of the strain 0YLH supernatant against the dinoflagellate P. triestinum using CFS obtained from cultures in exponential and stationary growth phase.
Marinedrugs 21 00501 g003
Figure 4. Stability of the supernatant of strain 0YLH when exposed to different (A) temperatures and (B) pH ranges. Asterisks denote statistical differences through one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test (ns p > 0.05; * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001).
Figure 4. Stability of the supernatant of strain 0YLH when exposed to different (A) temperatures and (B) pH ranges. Asterisks denote statistical differences through one-way ANOVA and Dunnett test (ns p > 0.05; * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001; **** p ≤ 0.0001).
Marinedrugs 21 00501 g004
Figure 5. Algicidal activity of strain 0YLH against several dinoflagellate and diatoms after 24 h of exposure. Significant statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05) determined by two-way ANOVA are denoted by asterisks; ns represents no statistical difference.
Figure 5. Algicidal activity of strain 0YLH against several dinoflagellate and diatoms after 24 h of exposure. Significant statistical differences (p ≤ 0.05) determined by two-way ANOVA are denoted by asterisks; ns represents no statistical difference.
Marinedrugs 21 00501 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cruz-Balladares, V.; Avalos, V.; Vera-Villalobos, H.; Cameron, H.; Gonzalez, L.; Leyton, Y.; Riquelme, C. Identification of a Shewanella halifaxensis Strain with Algicidal Effects on Red Tide Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum in Culture. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090501

AMA Style

Cruz-Balladares V, Avalos V, Vera-Villalobos H, Cameron H, Gonzalez L, Leyton Y, Riquelme C. Identification of a Shewanella halifaxensis Strain with Algicidal Effects on Red Tide Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum in Culture. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(9):501. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090501

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cruz-Balladares, Victoria, Vladimir Avalos, Hernán Vera-Villalobos, Henry Cameron, Leonel Gonzalez, Yanett Leyton, and Carlos Riquelme. 2023. "Identification of a Shewanella halifaxensis Strain with Algicidal Effects on Red Tide Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum in Culture" Marine Drugs 21, no. 9: 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090501

APA Style

Cruz-Balladares, V., Avalos, V., Vera-Villalobos, H., Cameron, H., Gonzalez, L., Leyton, Y., & Riquelme, C. (2023). Identification of a Shewanella halifaxensis Strain with Algicidal Effects on Red Tide Dinoflagellate Prorocentrum triestinum in Culture. Marine Drugs, 21(9), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21090501

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop