Next Article in Journal
Changes in Physical Activity among United Kingdom University Students Following the Implementation of Coronavirus Lockdown Measures
Next Article in Special Issue
Social-Emotional Learning Competencies and Problematic Internet Use among Chinese Adolescents: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Relative Contributions of Different Chemical Components to the Oxidative Potential of Ambient Fine Particles in Nanjing Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
How Can Bullying Victimisation Lead to Lower Academic Achievement? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Mediating Role of Cognitive-Motivational Factors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 6
10.3390/ijerph18062790
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mediating Role of Classroom Climate on School Violence

by
David Montero-Montero
1,*,
Paula López-Martínez
1,
Belén Martínez-Ferrer
1 and
David Moreno-Ruiz
2
1
Department of Education and Social Psychology, Pablo Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain
2
Department of Social Psychology, Valencia University, 46010 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(6), 2790; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062790
Submission received: 5 February 2021 / Revised: 5 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 March 2021 / Published: 10 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Problematic Internet Use, Bullying and Cyberbullying in School Children and Adolescents)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mediation analysis has been confirmed as a very useful statistical tool in the social sciences, especially in school-related studies. This type of analysis was used in the present study to examine the mediating role of classroom climate (measured with the classroom environmental scale), categorized into three dimensions, namely involvement, affiliation, and teacher support, on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression. The participants consisted of 2011 adolescents (50.67% boys and 49.32% girls), aged between 12 and 18 years old (M = 14.17; SD = 1.47), enrolled in schools in Andalusia (Spain). Findings revealed a significant direct relationship of all the dimensions. They also revealed that teacher support was the only dimension that mediates in the relationship between peer violence and peer aggression. The results and their implications for improving classroom climate and school violence are discussed.

1. Introduction

Since the first research in the field of peer aggression in the 1970s [1], many researchers have confirmed the relevance of this problem, which has great implications for the psychosocial adjustment of adolescents [2,3]. More specifically, peer aggression is considered to be a public health issue [4] that affects the well-being of children and adolescents [5], and even the development of their adult life, making it a complex problem. Previous research has identified various risk factors [6,7], and personal and social adjustment problems [8,9], associated with peer aggression and peer victimization.
Since this type of violence takes place at school, the most relevant formal institution in the psychosocial development of minors [10], research into school factors is especially important. In fact, interactions between students and also between students and teachers develop in the school setting. These relationships generate a climate that can promote the development and maintenance of maladjusted behaviours in minors. This study examines the mediating effect of classroom climate on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression in determining whether it can be related to the fact that young people who are peer victimized may develop behaviours associated with peer aggressors.

Peer Victimization, Peer Aggression, and Classroom Climate

Classroom climate is deemed to refer to the subjective meanings that students have in the classroom where they study, encompassing dimensions such as the degree of involvement and motivation of students (involvement), cohesion between students (affiliation), and the relationship between the teacher and the student (teacher support) [11,12,13]. The interest of this factor lies in the subjective element of the information obtained on students’ own perceptions of interpersonal relationships, commitment, and motivation at school [12,14]. Furthermore, both low academic engagement [15] and low perceived teacher support by students have been related to disruptive and violent behaviours at school [16]. This dimension of classroom climate, namely teacher support, is related to formal authority, whose relevance has also been widely confirmed in the study of peer aggression [17].
A positive classroom climate has been confirmed as an indicator of education quality [18]. In addition, the dimensions that make up classroom climate, such as personal involvement and affiliation between peers, can favour or harm the normal psychosocial development of children and adolescents [19]. Previous research supports the hypothesis that these dimensions may act as risk factors due to their direct link with low levels of self-esteem and empathy [10,20].
The joint perception of these components allows a distinction to be made between positive and negative climates [12]. Obtaining good academic grades, perceiving classmates as friends, teacher support, and peer affiliation, as well as having a good evaluation of the school, are aspects of a positive classroom climate. This positive assessment helps students achieve a better psychosocial adjustment and thus a lower risk of participating in episodes of peer aggression [21,22]. In contrast, a low level of connection and a largely ungratifying perception of school are related to a negative classroom climate, which favours participation in peer aggression, and also increases the risk of being victimized at school [12,21], thus facilitating the simultaneous appearance of the figure of both bully and victim.
The importance of classroom climate in the violence–victimization dynamic is a key factor that requires further study. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to examine the mediating role of the different dimensions of classroom climate (involvement, affiliation, and teacher support) in the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression. With this objective in mind, four hypotheses were developed based on the model illustrated in Figure 1.
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
Peer victimization would be positively correlated with peer aggression.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with classroom climate.
Hypothesis 2a (H2a).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with the involvement dimension of classroom climate.
Hypothesis 2b (H2b).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with the affiliation dimension of classroom climate.
Hypothesis 2c (H2c).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with the teacher support dimension of classroom climate.
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
Classroom climate would be negatively correlated with peer aggression.
Hypothesis 3a (H3a).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with the involvement dimension of classroom climate.
Hypothesis 3b (H3b).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with the affiliation dimension of classroom climate.
Hypothesis 3c (H3c).
Peer victimization would be negatively correlated with the teacher support dimension of classroom climate.
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
The dimensions of classroom climate would have a mediating effect on the relationship between peer aggression and peer victimization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants and Procedure

The data obtained in this study were obtained from a sample of 2011 adolescent students (50.67% boys and 49.32% girls) selected from 4 secondary schools (2 public and 2 state-subsidized) in Andalusia (Spain). The participants were aged between 12 and 18 (M = 14.47, SD = 1.47). Participants were selected randomly. A sampling error of ±2.5% and a confidence level of 95% were established, with an expected population variance of 0.50.
Initially, the selected educational centres were contacted to request their participation and explain the objectives of the present study. Subsequently, the participating centres sent letters to the students’ parents, explaining the research and requesting the corresponding written consent to allow their children to participate; only 0.99% of the sample (n = 20) rejected the invitation to participate. Then, the instruments were administered in a session of approximately 45 minutes. The instruments were applied in the regular classes of the participating groups and during an ordinary class period. The participants were informed that their participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous, and that they could stop participating at any point in the process.
Additionally, the study complied with the ethical values required in research with human beings and respects the fundamental principles included in the Helsinki Declaration [23] and subsequent updates thereto.

2.2. Instruments

The peer aggression scale was used to assess violent behaviour at school [24,25]. This scale comprises 25 items on a 4–point Likert-type scale (1 = never and 4 = always), where students analyze and report their aggressive behaviour towards other students (e.g., When someone makes me angry, I harm or hurt them). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed a good fit of the model to the measured data (SB Х2 = 725.2593, df = 233, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.030, I.C. 90 (0.027, 0.032)). The reliability coefficient of Cronbach’s alpha was 0.90. The validation of the scale has been confirmed in previous literature [24,26].
In the case of victimization, the peer victimization scale [24,27] was used. This scale comprises 20 items in which the students analyze and report having been victims of violent situations (e.g., A classmate has made fun of me to really upset me). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed a good fit of the model to the measured data (SB Х2 = 664.279, df = 159, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.036 (0.034, 0.039)). The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient was 0.87.
Classroom climate was measured using the classroom environment scale (CES) [20,28]. This scale comprises 30 items, with two answer options (True/False): on social climate and interpersonal relationships between the components of the student group. This instrument measures three different scales: (1) involvement (e.g. “Students show a lot of interest in what they do in class”); (2) affiliation (e.g. “In class, students get to know each other well”); and (3) teacher support (e.g., “The teacher shows interest in his/her students”). Cronbach’s alpha indicates that the reliability of these sub-scales is 0.84, 0.79, and 0.89, respectively, and that of the general scale 0.85.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The main aim was to examine the mediating role of the different dimensions of classroom climate (involvement, affiliation, and teacher support) on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression. First, descriptive statistics (rank, minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation) were obtained. All measures were standardized. Then, to achieve the main goal of the study, a simple mediational model (Model 4) with 10,000 bootstraps using the macro PROCESS [29] in SPSS (Version 25.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was performed. An 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided as an estimate. As for the mediational size effect, if the 95% CI of the index does not include zero, the index of the mediation is significant [30].

3. Results

Mediation Analyses

Descriptive results can be found in Table 1. In terms of direct significant relationships, first, peer victimization as a predictor of the classroom climate dimensions was examined. As shown in Figure 2, peer victimization was negatively related to school involvement (ß = −0.20, SE = 0.02, t = − 9.03, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (−0.24, −0.15)), affiliation (ß = −0.25, SE = 0.02, t = −11.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (−0.29, −0.21)) and teacher support (ß = −0.14, SE = 0.02, t = −6.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (−0.18, −0.10)). On the other hand, the three dimensions of classroom climate were directly and negatively related to peer aggression: school involvement (ß = −0.05, SE = 0.02, t = −2.10, p < 0.05, 95% CI = (−0.09, 0.00)), affiliation (b = −0.05, SE = 0.02, t = 2.21, p < 0.05, 95% CI = (−0.10, −0.01)) and teacher support (b = −0.12, SE = 0.02, t = −5.30, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (−0.17, −0.08)) (See Figure 2). Last, peer victimization was positively and significantly related to peer aggression (b = 0.19, SE = 0.02, t = 863, p <.001, 95% CI = (0.15, 0.24)) (See Figure 2).
As regards the indirect effect, when school involvement, affiliation, and teacher support were considered, peer victimization was still positively and significantly related to peer aggression via teacher support (ß = 0.23, SE = 0.02, t = 10.73, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (0.19, 0.27)). Therefore, peer victimization was related to a lower perception of teacher support, which was also related to higher levels of school violence (See Figure 2).
To assess the effect size of the mediation paths, the standardized indirect effect was used [31,32]. Results did not yield a significant indirect effect of involvement (effect = 0.01, SE 0.00, 95% CI (0.00–0.02)) or affiliation (effect = 0.01, SE = 0.01, 95% CI (0.00–0.03)). However, as expected, a significant indirect effect of teacher support was observed on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression (effect = 0.02, SE = 0.00, 95% IC (0.01–0.03)) and the percentage of explained variance was 9.88%. Therefore, a direct effect of peer victimization on peer aggression, and a mediational effect via teacher support, were observed, indicating that peer victimization is associated with a lower perception of teacher support, which is also negatively related to peer aggression.

4. Discussion

Peer violence at school is an important problem that affects thousands of young people around the world [31]. Nevertheless, much remains to be learned about the issues that mediate the relationship between peer violence and peer aggression.
Therefore, the main aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of the different dimensions of classroom climate (involvement, affiliation, and teacher support) in the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression. To arrive at this point, we confirmed that there was a positive relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression (H1).
In line with previous evidence, a negative relationship between peer victimization and classroom climate (involvement, affiliation, and teacher support) was identified (H2). This would imply that higher peer victimization leads to lower involvement (H2.a), lower peer affiliation (H2.b), and lower perceived teacher support (H2.c).
Similarly, a negative relationship was found between the three dimensions of classroom climate (involvement, affiliation, and teacher support) and aggression, as hypothesized (H3). These results indicate that lower involvement (H3.a), poorer peer relations (H3.b), and lower perceptions of teacher support (H3.c) may be related to an increase in peer aggression. Thus, students who report higher peer victimization also report worse perceptions of classroom climate and higher peer aggression, which is consistent with previous research [12,20].
In terms of the mediation analysis, this study supports the idea that the perception of teacher support exerts a mediating effect between peer victimization and peer aggression. Despite the direct link identified, two of the three dimensions of classroom climate, involvement and affiliation, did not have a significant indirect effect between peer victimization and peer aggression, thus refuting H4 almost entirely. However, the teacher support dimension was significant. This relationship suggests that higher peer victimization is related to lower teacher support, which is, in turn, associated with higher peer aggression. This relationship could partially explain why some young people involved in school aggression develop more serious psychosocial adjustment problems, due to all the time they spend in a space where they feel unprotected, do not perceive affiliation or teacher support, and do not perceive sufficient participation [32,33]. In this context of poor perception of protection, some studies indicate that victimized students may find violence and revenge as a solution for their situation [34], so it may be interesting to incorporate variables in this regard in future research.
The interpretation of these relationships between the dimensions of classroom climate and the processes of violence-victimization has relevant implications for understanding the psychosocial dynamics that occur in the classroom. More specifically, the role of the teacher must be highlighted. Teachers with the necessary training could help reduce episodes of peer aggression by promoting a better perception of the climate through support for students. This support can be achieved by increasing the students’ perception of whether their opinion is heard and their participation valued [35], and fostering a more collaborative and less competitive school system, which could help to strengthen ties between students (affiliation).
Direct intervention in the classroom climate not only fosters a better environment in the students’ day-to-day life and a reduction in peer aggression episodes. It is also indirectly related to other factors and contexts. For example, a greater perception of affiliation with peers is linked to greater empathy, which encourages the expression of feelings in the family system [36]. In addition to the teacher support dimension of the classroom climate, other variables not included in this study may also exert a mediating effect between peer victimization and peer aggression; hence, the need to continue research in the field of peer aggression.

Limitations

The present study provides relevant information for improving classroom climate, since specific elements are identified that can reinforce its positive perception. In this case, teacher support. However, it is important to bear in mind that this is a cross-sectional study, which, by definition, does not allow the establishment of causal relationships or the identification of behavioural patterns. Bidirectional influences should also not be ruled out, given the nature of the variables. The aforementioned complexity of school violence is evidenced precisely through its multi-factorial relationship [6,26,37]. To establish causal relationships between the dimensions analyzed in this study, it would be necessary to carry out a longitudinal study in different periods of time.
In terms of the measurement tool used for the classroom climate variable, it is important to remember that the use of self-reports, despite constituting an important source of data in this type of study, may have certain limitations due to biases such as, for example, social desirability. However, it would be of interest to contrast the information obtained in the self-report surveys with the information provided by other sources, such as parents and teachers.
In any case, the mediating effect of other variables that have not been studied in this research must be considered, as well as verifying whether the results are replicated at other educational levels, which may be taken into account for future research.

5. Conclusions

Classroom climate is an essential element when assessing educational quality. Given the importance of schools as an institution, knowledge in this respect is key to understanding the psychosocial development of young people and adolescents [38].
This study examined the mediating role exerted by classroom climate on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression, and a direct effect was observed between all the dimensions comprising classroom climate, namely involvement, affiliation, and teacher support; but indirect effect was only identified on teacher support. The importance of the results obtained is twofold: on the one hand, by focusing on subjective elements through a self-report survey, the relationship is certainly relevant; on the other, since information from schools is analyzed, it can be used as a basis for applying intervention elements to improve educational coexistence.
The implications of these findings are important and, if applied correctly, can help promote a better classroom climate. In turn, a better perception of classroom climate may favour a reduction in peer victimization and peer aggression, which would have fewer negative implications in the psychosocial development of younger people in the population. Taking into account the results obtained, the figure of the teacher should be reinforced to allow them to dedicate more time to students, and thus favour greater cohesion among students and greater personal involvement in day-to-day obligations and responsibilities in school.

Author Contributions

D.M.-M. and B.M.-F. conceived and designed the research. All authors performed the research. D.M.-M., B.M.-F., and D.M.-R. collected the data, and D.M.-M. and P.L.-M. analyzed the data. All the authors wrote the paper and read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This study was funded by the project “Problematic use of social networking sites and continuities between traditional bullying and cyberbullying from a gender perspective” – Reference: UPO-1265142 (UPO/ERDF, UE), financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and by the Regional Ministry of Economic Transformation, Industry, Knowledge and Innovation of Andalusia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Valencia (protocol code DPS.EEL.01.15).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olweus, D. Aggression in the Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1978; ISBN 978-0470993613. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hodgins, M. Taking a health promotion approach to the problem of bullying. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 2008, 8, 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ortega, R.; Calmaestra, J.; Merchán, J.M. Cyberbullying. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 2008, 8, 183–192. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bellmore, S.; Graham, A.D. Peer Victimization and Mental Health During Early Adolescence. Theory Pract. 2007, 46, 138–146. [Google Scholar]
  5. Espelage, D.L.; Bosworth, K.; Simon, T.R. Examining the social context of bullying behaviors in early adolescence. J. Couns. Dev. 2000, 78, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Garcia, O.F.; Serra, E.; Zacares, J.J.; Calafat, A.; Garcia, F. Alcohol use and abuse and motivations for drinking and non-drinking among Spanish adolescents: Do we know enough when we know parenting style? Psychol. Health 2020, 35, 645–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martínez, I.; Murgui, S.; Garcia, O.F.; Garcia, F. Parenting in the digital era: Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 90, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garcia, F.; Serra, E.; Garcia, O.F.; Martinez, I.; Cruise, E. A third emerging stage for the current digital society? Optimal parenting styles in Spain, the United States, Germany, and Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Montero-Montero, D.; López-Martínez, P.; Martínez-Ferrer, B.; Moreno-Ruiz, D. Parenting dimensions and adolescent peer aggression: A gendered analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. López, E.E.; Pérez, S.M.; Ochoa, G.M.; Ruiz, D.M. Moreno David Musiti G. Clima familiar, clima escolar y satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes. Rev. Mex. Psicol. 2008, 25, 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  11. Trickett, E.J.; Leone, P.E.; Fink, C.M.; Braaten, S.L. The Perceived Environment of Special Education Classrooms for Adolescents: A Revision of the Classroom Environment Scale. Except. Child. 1993, 59, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martínez-Ferrer, B.; Povedano-Díaz, A.; Amador-Muñoz, L.V.; Moreno-Ruiz, D. Clima escolar, satisfacción con la vida y victimización en la escuela. un análisis del efecto moderador del género. An. Psicol. 2012, 28, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Delgado, B.; Escortell, R.; Martínez-Monteagudo, M.C.; Ferrández-Ferrer, A.; Sanmartín, R. Cyberbullying, Self-concept and Academic Goals in Childhood. Span. J. Psychol. 2019, 22, E46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cohen, J.; Mccabe, E.M.; Michelli, N.M.; Pickeral, T. School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teach. Coll. Rec. 2009, 111, 180–213. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakamoto, J.; Schwartz, D. Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta-analytic review. Soc. Dev. 2010, 19, 221–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Blankemeyer, M.; Flannery, D.J.; Vazsonyi, A.T. The role of aggression and social competence in children’s perceptions of the child–teacher relationship. Psychol. Sch. 2002, 39, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Molpeceres, M.; Llinares Insa, L.; Bernad, J. La percepción de las figuras de autoridad fomales e informales y la inclinación a la conducta delictiva en la adolescencia: Un análisis preliminar de sus relaciones. Interv. Psicosoc. 1999, 8, 349–367. [Google Scholar]
  18. Quijada, A.; Ruiz, M.A.; Huertas, J.A.; Alonso-Tapia, J. Development and validation of the school climate questionnaire for secondary and high school teachers (SCQ-SHST). An. Psicol. 2020, 36, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eugene, D.R.; Crutchfield, J.; Robinson, E.D. An examination of peer victimization and internalizing problems through a racial equity lens: Does school connectedness matter? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Moreno Ruiz, D.; Estévez López, E.; Murgui Pérez, S.; Musitu Ochoa, G. Relationship between family and school environments: The role of empathy, attitude to authority and violent behavior in adolescence. Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Ther. 2009, 9, 123–136. [Google Scholar]
  21. Estévez López, E.; Pérez, S.M.; Ochoa, G.M.; Ruiz, D.M. Adolescent aggression: Effects of gender and family and school environments. J. Adolesc. 2008, 31, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gottfredson, G.D.; Gottfredson, D.C.; Payne, A.A.; Gottfredson, N.C. School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 2005, 42, 412–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. World Medical Asociation. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Martínez-Ferrer, B.; Moreno, D.; Musitu, G. Are adolescents engaged in the problematic use of social networking sites more involved in peer aggression and victimization? Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Little, T.D.; Henrich, C.C.; Jones, S.M.; Hawley, P.H. Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2003, 27, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrer, B.M.; Ochoa, G.M.; Muñoz, L.V.A.; Gimeno, M.C.M. Estatus sociométrico y violencia escolar en adolescentes: Implicaciones de la autoestima, la familia y la escuela. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2012, 44, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mynard, H.; Joseph, S. Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggress. Behav. 2000, 26, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moos, R.H.; Trickett, E.J. Classroom Environment Scale Manual; Consulting Psychologist Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; ISBN 9781609182304. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bolin, J.H. Andrew F. Hayes (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. J. Educ. Meas. 2014, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Modecki, K.L.; Minchin, J.; Harbaugh, A.G.; Guerra, N.G.; Runions, K.C. Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. J. Adolesc. Health 2014, 55, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Goldbach, J.T.; Sterzing, P.R.; Stuart, M.J. Challenging Conventions of Bullying Thresholds: Exploring Differences between Low and High Levels of Bully-Only, Victim-Only, and Bully-Victim Roles. J. Youth Adolesc. 2018, 47, 586–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schwartz, D.; Proctor, L.J.; Chien, D.H. The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001; ISBN 1572306270. [Google Scholar]
  34. Runions, K.C.; Salmivalli, C.; Shaw, T.; Burns, S.; Cross, D. Beyond the reactive-proactive dichotomy: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreational aggression predict early high school bully and bully/victim status. Aggress. Behav. 2018, 44, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reddy, R.; Rhodes, J.E.; Mulhall, P. The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years: A latent growth curve study. Dev. Psychopathol. 2003, 15, 119–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jolliffe, D.; Farrington, D.P. Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggress. Violent Behav. 2004, 9, 441–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Farrington, D.P.; Loeber, R.; Yin, Y.; Anderson, S.J. Are within-individual causes of delinquency the same as between-individual causes? Crim. Behav. Ment. Health 2002, 12, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Mateos, N.E.; Palacios, E.G.; Fernández-Zabala, A.; Antonio-Agirre, I. Internal structure, reliability and invariance across gender using the multidimensional school climate scale pace-33. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 18 02790 g001 550
Figure 1. Illustration of the proposed mediation model.
Figure 1. Illustration of the proposed mediation model.
Ijerph 18 02790 g001
Ijerph 18 02790 g002 550
Figure 2. Illustration of the resulting model with the values obtained in the analysis of the mediation role of the three classroom climate dimensions on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression. *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Illustration of the resulting model with the values obtained in the analysis of the mediation role of the three classroom climate dimensions on the relationship between peer victimization and peer aggression. *: p < 0.05, ***: p < 0.001.
Ijerph 18 02790 g002
Table
Table 1. Rank, minimum, maximum, and average values, and standard deviation.
Table 1. Rank, minimum, maximum, and average values, and standard deviation.
VariablesRankMin.Max.MSD
1. Peer Aggression1.781.002.781.3960.256
2. Peer Violence 2.661.003.661.4120.345
3. School Involvement1.001.002.001.4470.204
4. Affiliation0.901.102.001.7200.169
5. Teacher Support1.001.002.001.5920.220
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montero-Montero, D.; López-Martínez, P.; Martínez-Ferrer, B.; Moreno-Ruiz, D. The Mediating Role of Classroom Climate on School Violence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062790

AMA Style

Montero-Montero D, López-Martínez P, Martínez-Ferrer B, Moreno-Ruiz D. The Mediating Role of Classroom Climate on School Violence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(6):2790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062790

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montero-Montero, David, Paula López-Martínez, Belén Martínez-Ferrer, and David Moreno-Ruiz. 2021. "The Mediating Role of Classroom Climate on School Violence" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 6: 2790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062790

APA Style

Montero-Montero, D., López-Martínez, P., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Moreno-Ruiz, D. (2021). The Mediating Role of Classroom Climate on School Violence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062790

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop