Next Article in Journal
An Arrhenius-Based Simulation Tool for Predicting Aging of Lithium Manganese Dioxide Primary Batteries in Implantable Medical Devices
Previous Article in Journal
In Search of Energy Security: Nuclear Energy Development in the Visegrad Group Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation

Environmental Meteorology, University of Freiburg, Werthmannstrasse 10, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
Energies 2024, 17(21), 5391; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215391
Submission received: 23 October 2024 / Accepted: 28 October 2024 / Published: 30 October 2024

1. Introduction

The expansion of wind energy has progressed rapidly in recent years. Since 2014, the installed capacity has almost tripled globally. In 2023, the installed capacity exceeded 1 TW for the first time [1]. There are various reasons for the growing popularity of wind energy, including the need to transition to renewable energy sources, advances in wind turbine technology, and increasing investment. The continued success of wind energy depends on factors such as available wind resources, land, wind turbine design, political and economic conditions, environmental impact, and social acceptance. Here, the most recent developments and future perspectives of wind power generation in the scientific literature are briefly reviewed. Five decisive topics for the future development of onshore and offshore wind energy are described and discussed.

2. Wind Potential Assessment

The opportunities for operating wind turbines depend on wind potential. It is divided hierarchically into sub-potentials: the resource potential, the geographical potential, the technical potential, and the economic potential [2]. Each of these potentials varies spatially and temporally. Improvements in the literature compared to the status quo are needed to ensure an accurate assessment of wind potential. These include better validation of wind resource assessments, the application of sensitivity analysis to input data, the inclusion of social and political factors, the appropriate consideration of wind turbine design, the consideration of large-scale kinetic energy extraction, the application of dynamic approaches, the development of holistic frameworks, and the production of a complete balance sheet [3].
The Special Issue ‘Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation’ comprises articles that consider some of these shortcomings. Amsharuk and Łaska [4] apply a hybrid model including multi-criteria decision-making and a semi-automatic spatial analysis method for wind farm site selection in Poland. They also consider economic, social, and environmental criteria and constraints. Bogdanović and Ivošević [5] assess the offshore wind energy potential in Montenegro related to wind farm structure (floating, fixed, and jacket).
Statistical wind speed distributions are required to estimate technical potential. The two-parameter Weibull distribution is often used as a wind speed distribution [6]. However, current studies reveal that higher-parameter distributions (e.g., Kappa, Wakeby) and bimodal distributions (e.g., bimodal Weibull distribution) may be more suitable [6]. Lencastre et al. [7] investigate the accuracy of the Weibull distribution compared with other low-parameter distributions. They find better goodness-of-fits for the Gaussian, Nakagami, and Rice distributions for short wind speed time series.
Besides the wind speed distribution, power curves are needed to assess the technical potential [8]. However, applying the traditional theoretical power curve approach yields uncertainties [9]. Thus, Ferreira et al. [9] introduce a new nonparametric method for a more accurate wind speed–wind power relationship.

3. Wind Power Forecasting

The wind speed volatility introduces issues in power system operations [10,11]. Wind speed and power forecasting assist in assessing the uncertainties. Physical, statistical, and hybrid methods are used for wind power forecasting in studies. Furthermore, time horizons, input features, and error measurements vary [12].
There is a need for improvement in wind power forecasting. Progress is achieved by applying hybrid methods for large wind farms, improving the removal of noise in the raw data, developing suitable methods for offshore wind regimes, and developing a base model that works well when benchmarking other forecasting methods [12]. Artificial intelligence should be more often considered for wind speed forecasting as it copes well with the complex non-linear behavior of wind speed [13].

4. Wind Power Under Climate Change

In addition to short-term fluctuations in wind speed, it also varies on long time scales [14]. Long-term trends and inter-annual variability characterize wind resources in many global regions [15]. Global warming will also lead to changes in spatio-temporal wind speed patterns [16]. Climate models simulate decreasing and increasing wind resources, depending on the geographical area [17]. In the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, wind speed is likely to decline due to lower baroclinicity resulting from polar air temperature amplification [18]. In contrast, wind speed may increase in regions close to the equator as the warming of the land surface exceeds the warming of the ocean surface [18]. Studies dealing with wind resources under climate change may be improved by using realistic shared socioeconomic pathways, applying multi-model ensembles, and investigating periods of more than 30 years [19].
The changes in wind resources attributable to climate change are often minor. Pryor et al. [20] found that natural variability because of internal climate modes is generally more relevant than the non-stationarity of wind speed caused by climate change. Consequently, the further development of the wind turbine fleet leads to increasing capacity factors despite a slight decrease in wind resources due to climate change in the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere [21].

5. Socioeconomic and Environmental Factors of Wind Energy Expansion

Wind energy expansion yields socioeconomic and environmental benefits such as CO2 emission reductions, fossil fuel substitutions, and job creation [22]. However, wind energy use also has unfavorable socioeconomic and environmental impacts [23], jeopardizing public acceptance of wind energy [24].
A comprehensive review summarizes the recent literature on the impacts of onshore wind energy on the environment [25]. The analyzed abiotic environmental impacts include ecosystem processes, micrometeorology, mitigation strategies, pollution, and soil physics. Furthermore, it investigates biotic impacts on bats, birds, other animals, forests, and vegetation. Noise and visual impacts are also examined. The review detects substantial research gaps and biases. It concludes that adverse impacts should be considered in a broader context of anthropogenic influences. Besides, adequate mitigation strategies can minimize the negative impacts. Sander et al. [25] criticize the unbalanced media debate about the effects on the environment.
The socioeconomic and environmental impacts of offshore wind energy partly differ from those of onshore wind energy. Chomać-Pierzecka [26] investigates the socioeconomic and environmental aspects of offshore wind energy in Poland. The study detects public concerns regarding the effects of the construction and operation of offshore wind farms on ecosystems. The negative public opinions toward offshore wind energy result from potential landscape changes and their negative consequences for coastal tourism.
Floating offshore wind farms operate further away from the coast [27]. However, they also impact marine species and habitats and may pose a risk to mammals, seabirds, fishes, and benthic ecosystems [28].

6. Wind Turbine Design Development

Today, wind power generation is a mature technology [29]. Bošnjaković et al. [30] highlight that future development will include upscaling wind turbines. For instance, in Germany, the mean wind turbine hub height of the onshore wind turbine fleet increased from 79 m to 96 m from 2010 to 2021 [31]. In addition, the rotor diameter increased from 65 to 82 m in the same period [31].
The operation of large wind turbines impacts wake effects within a wind farm [32]. Baruah et al. [33] analyze the wake–rotor and wake-to-wake interactions between two wind turbines in a tandem layout fully and partially aligned with incoming wind. Their work contributes to the understanding of the evolution of wind turbine wakes.
Pucci et al. [34] analyze the performance of a 50 kW ducted wind turbine positioned on top of various hills. The study identifies the geometric characteristics of the diffuser most suitable for power maximization.
Besides upscaling, minor design improvements, including advancements in rotor blade aerodynamics, active control of the rotor blade rotation system, and aerodynamic brakes, will enhance wind turbine efficiency [30]. Furthermore, improvements in system maintenance, early diagnosis of transmission and power-related faults, and blade surface damage will occur to reduce downtimes [30]. In Germany, improved wind turbine technology caused 7.3% higher capacity factors in 2019–2021 compared to 2010–2012 [31].
Besides common horizontal-axis onshore wind power generation, other wind power technologies such as airborne and offshore technologies, smart rotors, and multi-rotors will expand the portfolio of wind energy utilization options [35].
The design of offshore wind turbines is challenging due to the operational requirements and environmental conditions [36]. Nevertheless, in the coming years, newly installed offshore wind turbines will often have rated powers exceeding 15 MW and rotor diameters of 240 m and more [37], leading to an enormous increase in offshore wind energy yields [38]. Furthermore, due to floating offshore wind energy installations, wind resource-rich locations with sea depths of up to 1000 m will be developed [39,40].

7. Conclusions

Wind energy expansion will accelerate further in the coming years and decades. Numerous crucial research questions will be associated with this development. The editorial highlighted much-needed improvements in the scientific research of wind potential assessment, wind power forecasting, wind power development under climate change, socioeconomic and environmental factors of wind energy expansion, and wind turbine design development. Multidisciplinary approaches are becoming increasingly important since research into wind energy utilization covers many areas. The Special Issue ‘Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation’ provides valuable articles, closing some research gaps.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the contributors of the Special Issue ‘Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation’. The author would also like to thank MDPI for the invitation as Guest Editor and the professional cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable Energy Capacity Statistics 2024. Available online: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Mar/Renewable-capacity-statistics-2024 (accessed on 15 April 2024).
  2. Hoogwijk, M.; De Vries, B.; Turkenburg, W. Assessment of the global and regional geographical, technical and economic potential of onshore wind energy. Energy Econ. 2004, 26, 889–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McKenna, R.; Pfenninger, S.; Heinrichs, H.; Schmidt, J.; Staffell, I.; Bauer, C.; Gruber, K.; Hahmann, A.N.; Jansen, M.; Klingler, M.; et al. High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs. Renew. Energy 2022, 182, 659–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amsharuk, A.; Łaska, G. Site Selection of Wind Farms in Poland: Combining Theory with Reality. Energies 2024, 17, 2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bogdanović, M.; Ivošević, Š. Winds of Change: A Study on the Resource Viability of Offshore Wind Energy in Montenegro. Energies 2024, 17, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jung, C.; Schindler, D. Wind speed distribution selection—A review of recent development and progress. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 114, 109290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lencastre, P.; Yazidi, A.; Lind, P.G. Modeling Wind-Speed Statistics beyond the Weibull Distribution. Energies 2024, 17, 2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lydia, M.; Kumar, S.S.; Selvakumar, A.I.; Kumar, G.E.P. A comprehensive review on wind turbine power curve modeling techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 30, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Aquino Ferreira, S.C.; Maçaira, P.M.; Cyrino Oliveira, F.L. Joint Modeling of Wind Speed and Power via a Nonparametric Approach. Energies 2024, 17, 3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, P.; Ye, L.; Zhao, Y.; Dai, B.; Pei, M.; Tang, Y. Review of meta-heuristic algorithms for wind power prediction: Methodologies, applications and challenges. Appl. Energy 2021, 301, 117446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Robak, S.; Raczkowski, R.; Piekarz, M. Development of the Wind Generation Sector and Its Effect on the Grid Operation—The Case of Poland. Energies 2023, 16, 6805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hanifi, S.; Liu, X.; Lin, Z.; Lotfian, S. A critical review of wind power forecasting methods—Past, present and future. Energies 2020, 13, 3764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Zou, R.; Liu, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Q. A review of wind speed and wind power forecasting with deep neural networks. Appl. Energy 2021, 304, 117766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McVicar, T.R.; Roderick, M.L.; Donohue, R.J.; Li, L.T.; Van Niel, T.G.; Thomas, A.; Dinpashoh, Y. Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: Implications for evaporation. J. Hydrol. 2012, 416, 182–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Klink, K. Trends and interannual variability of wind speed distributions in Minnesota. J. Clim. 2002, 15, 3311–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bloomfield, H.C.; Brayshaw, D.J.; Troccoli, A.; Goodess, C.M.; De Felice, M.; Dubus, L.; Bett, P.E.; Saint-Drenan, Y.M. Quantifying the sensitivity of European power systems to energy scenarios and climate change projections. Renew. Energy 2021, 164, 1062–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gernaat, D.E.; de Boer, H.S.; Daioglou, V.; Yalew, S.G.; Müller, C.; van Vuuren, D.P. Climate change impacts on renewable energy supply. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2021, 11, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karnauskas, K.B.; Lundquist, J.K.; Zhang, L. Southward shift of the global wind energy resource under high carbon dioxide emissions. Nat. Geosci. 2018, 11, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jung, C.; Schindler, D. A review of recent studies on wind resource projections under climate change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 165, 112596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pryor, S.C.; Barthelmie, R.J.; Bukovsky, M.S.; Leung, L.R.; Sakaguchi, K. Climate change impacts on wind power generation. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 627–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jung, C.; Schindler, D. Development of onshore wind turbine fleet counteracts climate change-induced reduction in global capacity factor. Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 608–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ortega-Izquierdo, M.; del Río, P. An analysis of the socioeconomic and environmental benefits of wind energy deployment in Europe. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1067–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Şener, Ş.E.C.; Anctil, A.; Sharp, J.L. Economic and environmental factors of wind energy deployment in the United States. Renew. Energy Focus 2023, 45, 150–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bolwig, S.; Bolkesjø, T.F.; Klitkou, A.; Lund, P.D.; Bergaentzlé, C.; Borch, K.; Olsen, O.J.; Kirkerud, J.G.; Chen, Y.K.; Gunkel, P.A.; et al. Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020, 67, 101559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sander, L.; Jung, C.; Schindler, D. Global Review on Environmental Impacts of Onshore Wind Energy in the Field of Tension between Human Societies and Natural Systems. Energies 2024, 17, 3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chomać-Pierzecka, E. Offshore Energy Development in Poland—Social and Economic Dimensions. Energies 2024, 17, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Díaz, H.; Soares, C.G. An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 134, 110328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Maxwell, S.M.; Kershaw, F.; Locke, C.C.; Conners, M.G.; Dawson, C.; Aylesworth, S.; Loomis, R.; Johnson, A.F. Potential impacts of floating wind turbine technology for marine species and habitats. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 307, 114577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, S.; Wei, J.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y. China in global wind power development: Role, status and impact. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 127, 109881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bošnjaković, M.; Katinić, M.; Santa, R.; Marić, D. Wind turbine technology trends. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jung, C.; Schindler, D. Reasons for the Recent Onshore Wind Capacity Factor Increase. Energies 2023, 16, 5390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Porté-Agel, F.; Bastankhah, M.; Shamsoddin, S. Wind-turbine and wind-farm flows: A review. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2020, 174, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Baruah, A.; Ponta, F.; Farrell, A. Simulation of the Multi-Wake Evolution of Two Sandia National Labs/National Rotor Testbed Turbines Operating in a Tandem Layout. Energies 2024, 17, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pucci, M.; Zanforlin, S. The Ability of Convergent–Divergent Diffusers for Wind Turbines to Exploit Yawed Flows on Moderate-to-High-Slope Hills. Energies 2024, 17, 990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roga, S.; Bardhan, S.; Kumar, Y.; Dubey, S.K. Recent technology and challenges of wind energy generation: A review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, J.; Kim, M.H. Review of recent offshore wind turbine research and optimization methodologies in their design. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Offshore Wind Turbine Documentation. 2024. Available online: https://nrel.github.io/turbine-models/Offshore.html (accessed on 11 June 2024).
  38. Jung, C.; Sander, L.; Schindler, D. Future global offshore wind energy under climate change and advanced wind turbine technology. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 321, 119075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Serri, L.; Colle, L.; Vitali, B.; Bonomi, T. Floating offshore wind farms in Italy beyond 2030 and beyond 2060: Preliminary results of a techno-economic assessment. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castro-Santos, L.; Silva, D.; Bento, A.R.; Salvação, N.; Soares, C.G. Economic feasibility of floating offshore wind farms in Portugal. Ocean Eng. 2020, 207, 107393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, C. Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation. Energies 2024, 17, 5391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215391

AMA Style

Jung C. Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation. Energies. 2024; 17(21):5391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Christopher. 2024. "Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation" Energies 17, no. 21: 5391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215391

APA Style

Jung, C. (2024). Recent Development and Future Perspective of Wind Power Generation. Energies, 17(21), 5391. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop