Next Article in Journal
Thermoelectric Properties of Highly-Crystallized Ge-Te-Se Glasses Doped with Cu/Bi
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Unipolar Resistive Switching Characteristics of Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 Thin Films with High ON/OFF Ratio
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cu6Sn5 Whiskers Precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu Interconnection in Concentrator Silicon Solar Cells Solder Layer

1
School of Mechatronic Engineering, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Shenyang 110016, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Brazing Filler Metals & Technology, Zhengzhou Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou 450001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(4), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040327
Submission received: 6 February 2017 / Revised: 8 March 2017 / Accepted: 13 March 2017 / Published: 23 March 2017

Abstract

:
Cu6Sn5 whiskers precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu interconnection in concentrator silicon solar cells solder layer were found and investigated after reflow soldering and during aging. Ag3Sn fibers can be observed around Cu6Sn5 whiskers in the matrix microstructure, which can play an active effect on the reliability of interconnection. Different morphologies of Cu6Sn5 whiskers can be observed, and hexagonal rod structure is the main morphology of Cu6Sn5 whiskers. A hollow structure can be observed in hexagonal Cu6Sn5 whiskers, and a screw dislocation mechanism was used to represent the Cu6Sn5 growth. Based on mechanical property testing and finite element simulation, Cu6Sn5 whiskers were regarded as having a negative effect on the durability of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu interconnection in concentrator silicon solar cells solder layer.

1. Introduction

SnPb solders—especially SnPb eutectic alloy—have been used extensively in chip attachment and surface-mount processes in the electronic packaging industry for more than five decades. Owing to the global increasing environmental and health concerns of the toxicity of Pb, international legislations (RoHS/WEEE) proposed by the EU (European Union) have banned the use of Pb in the manufacture of consumer electronic products, which has led to an extensive research and development study of lead-free solder materials [1,2,3,4]. SnAgCu solders are proposed as the one of the best alternative lead-free alloys for the traditional SnPb alloys because of their good soldering and wetting behavior on several substrate materials [5,6]. In industry, SnAgCu solders have been used as interconnected materials in different electronic devices.
In CSP devices with capillary flow underfill, drop test results were significantly better with SnAgCu solder assembly than with SnPb eutectic alloy [7]. Comparing the induced inelastic strains in the SnAgCu and SnPb solder joints, the lead-free SnAgCu generally scored better than SnPb for QFN (Quad Flat No-lead Package) thanks to the lower creep strain rate, and for the CSP and flip chip package, SnAgCu scored worse for the more extreme loading conditions when the inelastic dissipated energy density was selected as damage parameter [8]. Kang [9] found that the Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu solders yielded three phases upon solidification: β-Sn, Ag3Sn, and Cu6Sn5; large plate-like pro-eutectic Ag3Sn structures can grow rapidly within the liquid phase, which can potentially adversely affect the mechanical behavior and reduce the fatigue life of solder joints. However, in Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu0.03Ce solder, only bulk Cu6Sn5 was found with different morphologies [10]. Moreover, the Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu solders have been proposed for use in the electronic industry, and the evolution of Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5 phases should be studied further to assess the long-term reliability of SnAgCu solder joints in service.
In this work, Cu6Sn5 whiskers precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu solder joints with deep corrosion are represented, and the growth mechanism of Cu6Sn5 whiskers was studied. The results can provide the reference for the reliability research of lead-free solder joints in service.

2. Experimental

The materials of the solder layer in solar cell are shown in Figure 1a; to simplify the research object, a simplified experimental sample (Figure 1b) was established to analyze the Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu solder joints in the concentrator silicon solar cells’ solder layer. Commercial Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu paste was put on the surface of the Cu substrate, and interconnection between Cu and SnAgCu paste was carried out by reflow soldering with peak temperature 245 °C. The samples were aged at 200 °C for 1 h. The microstructures of SnAgCu/Cu solder joint were characterized using a solution of 5% (vol.) HNO3 and 95% (vol.) CH3OH for 12 h, and ultrasonic cleaner was used to etch away the Sn matrix for 15 min; the schematic illustration is shown in Figure 1c. Then, a scanning electron microscope (Quanta200) equipped with a thermo-electron X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) attachment was used to determine the phases in the matrix microstructure.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the SEM images of the Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu solder joints; when the Sn matrix has been etched away, the Ag3Sn fibers and Cu6Sn5 whiskers can be observed. The formation of Ag3Sn fibers can be attributed to the solder composition bearing 3.0% Ag—not enough Ag to form large Ag3Sn intermetallic compound. Kim [10] found that the high Ag content alloys exhibited the formation of large Ag3Sn plates—especially at the solder-reaction layer interfaces—regardless of the kind of substrate. Tu [11] reported that Ag3Sn precipitates were plate-like in eutectic SnAg and eutectic SnAgCu, and the formation of Ag3Sn crystal has been demonstrated in a stress concentration region (e.g., the corner region between a solder bump and under-bump metallization). Cracks can initiate and propagate along the interface between the Ag3Sn and the solder. However, in this paper, for Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu solder joints after soldering, only small Ag3Sn fibers and no plates can be observed. Two reasons can be used to explain the formation of Ag3Sn fibers during aging: (1) the Ag3Sn particles act as pin sites and Ag atoms diffuse to nucleate and adhere to particles; (2) with the increase of thermal stress in the solder joints, small Ag3Sn particles can merge. With the formation of Ag3Sn fibers, the lengths of the fibers may be as long as tens of micrometers, and the matrix microstructure of solder joints can be strengthened. Moreover, the growth rate of Cu6Sn5 whiskers is higher than Ag3Sn fibers, the diameters of Cu6Sn5 whiskers are varied from 10 μm to 20 μm, and different morphologies of Cu6Sn5 whiskers can be observed—hexagonal rod structure is the main morphology of Cu6Sn5 whiskers.
In service, microstructure evolution is more significant for lead-free solder joints than traditional SnPb solder joints—especially for the intermetallic compounds. The reliability of solder joints is more prone to be adversely affected by intermetallic compounds; in our research, no plate Ag3Sn was found, Cu6Sn5 whiskers were observed, and the bulk Cu6Sn5 can lead to worse thermal fatigue resistance than joints containing Ag3Sn plates under specific cycling conditions [12]. For the SnAgCu/Cu solder joints, the Cu substrate can provide enough Cu atoms diffused to SnAgCu solder. In the solder matrix, the diffused Cu atoms will adhere to Cu6Sn5 particles to nucleate and react with Sn around the Cu6Sn5 particles. After several reflow soldering, Cu6Sn5 phases were also found by Tian [13], and two mechanisms of Cu6Sn5 growth were proposed: (1) the dissolution of large amounts of Cu into the solder leads to the precipitation of Cu6Sn5 in the form of long rods during solidification; and (2) the Cu6Sn5 at the interface may be broken into segments and then directly migrate into the solder joints; long Cu6Sn5 whiskers are easily broken into many small segments during in situ tensile test, and the crack can propagate and induce the failure of solder joints. The Cu6Sn5 can grow out as a hexagonal rod along a screw dislocation using the ledge mechanism [14]; this proposed mechanism of intermetallic formation incorporates the theory where whiskers are produced in metals using a single screw dislocation along the long axis of the whiskers [15]. Figure 3 shows SEM pictures of Cu6Sn5 with hexagonal rod structure; in order to represent the whole structure, the Sn matrix was etched away, and the intermetallic compound layer and Cu6Sn5 whisker can all be observed in Figure 4. The hexagonal rod structure of the Cu6Sn5 whiskers, and a cross-sectional view and small Cu6Sn5 grain in the intermetallic compound layer can be seen obviously.
The Sn-Cu phase diagram [16] shown in Figure 5—which plots the Sn-0.89 Cu eutectic point and 227 °C eutectic temperature—was selected for representation in this paper to further analyze the reason for the formation of the hexagonal rod structure of the Cu6Sn5 whiskers. Two crystal structures can be observed for Cu6Sn5—monoclinic η′-Cu6Sn5 at lower temperature and hexagonal η-Cu6Sn5 at higher temperature [17], and the allotropic transformation temperature is 186 °C. In this paper, the aging temperature was 200 °C for 1 h after reflow soldering (245 °C), high enough for the phase transformation to the hexagonal rod structure of Cu6Sn5 whiskers. Moreover, the cooling time was not sufficient after high temperature aging, so the hexagonal rod structure of Cu6Sn5 did not have enough time to transform to monoclinic η′-Cu6Sn5, and thus the hexagonal rod structure is the main morphology of the Cu6Sn5 whiskers. Laurila [18] reported that the available time for the transformation into this low temperature structure was not sufficient during soldering and subsequent cooling, and so the high-temperature Cu6Sn5 remained as a metastable phase; if the temperature was near room temperature, transformation did not occur with a reasonable time because of kinetic constraints. Moreover, volume thermal expansion coefficient will increase obviously from monoclinic η′-Cu6Sn5 to hexagonal η-Cu6Sn5 [19]; therefore, the mismatch of the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs) of phases in the matrix will induce thermal stress in service, which will result in the failure of solder joints.
Figure 6 shows the Cu6Sn5 whisker, wherein the hollow in the whisker can be observed. The diameters of the hollow in the Cu6Sn5 whisker was about ~2–4 μm. As also indicated by the Cu–Sn phase diagram, the intermetallic Cu6Sn5 phase with approximately 53.5 at % Cu and 46.5 at % Sn and having the typical hollow hexagonal shape was formed in all alloys, together with the β-Sn [20]. The hollow-stick-type Cu6Sn5 forms when the core of the rod dissolves due to the higher energy of screw dislocation and lower Cu concentration, and fills with molten solder [21] during reflow soldering; after solidification, the Cu atoms will diffuse into solidified solder from the Cu substrate, and based on screw dislocation mechanism, a long hollow will appear in the Cu6Sn5 whisker. Moreover, Zhang [22] proposed that the screw dislocation core can be produced by the mismatch of atoms during the formation of Cu6Sn5, which will result in rapid lateral growth to form the special structure of the Cu6Sn5 whisker. The addition of Al into SnCu solder can significantly affect the size and morphology of Cu6Sn5 whiskers, due to epitaxial nucleation of Cu6Sn5 on either Cu33Al17 or Cu9Al4 particles [23]. Another way to control the Cu6Sn5 whisker is to prevent Cu diffusion; a nickel-based diffusion barrier is commonly used as metallization [24].
To analyze the mechanical properties of solder joints bearing Cu6Sn5 whiskers in the solder layer of concentrator silicon solar cells, tensile testing of solder joints with/without Cu6Sn5 whiskers was carried out (the data is shown in Figure 7). Results reveal that the tensile strength of solder joints with Cu6Sn5 whiskers was slightly higher than that without Cu6Sn5 whiskers; however, the elongation was much higher. After 150 °C aging (750 h), the tensile strength and elongation decreased significantly; the tensile strength of solder joints with Cu6Sn5 whiskers is obviously lower than that without Cu6Sn5 whiskers, which can be attributed to the degradation of properties induced by bulk brittle Cu6Sn5 phase. Finite element simulation was selected to analyze the effect of Cu6Sn5 whiskers on the properties of solder joints during aging. Figure 8 shows the von Mises stress distribution in the solder joints, and the maximum stress can be observed in the Cu6Sn5 whiskers. Therefore, these areas may be the key locations that fail most easily in service. The stress concentration can be attributed to the CTE mismatch of solar cell, Cu, solder, Cu6Sn5, and insulate layer, because the Cu6Sn5 whiskers are very hard, brittle, and noncompliant, and most stress has to be accommodated by deformation of the Cu6Sn5 whisker. So, the durability of the solder joints in the solder layer of concentrator silicon solar cells may be decreased by Cu6Sn5 whiskers in service; the inhibition of Cu6Sn5 whiskers should be studied to enhance the durability. In Sn3.8Ag0.7Cu0.03Ce solder joints [25], bulk Cu6Sn5 phase can be found in cross-section with 2D plane structure, exhibiting a wide range of sizes (~20–50 μm), and it has been demonstrated that during thermal cycling (−55 °C to 125 °C)—based on experiments and finite element simulation—the failure site was predicted to fracture near the bulk Cu6Sn5 intermetallic interface, which can be attributed to the CTE mismatch among the bulk Cu6Sn5, Sn matrix, IMC layer, and substrates.

4. Conclusions

Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu solder joints in the solder layer of concentrator silicon solar cells were selected for analysis of microstructure evolution with deep corrosion. When the Sn matrix was etched away, Ag3Sn fibers and Cu6Sn5 whiskers could be observed. After high temperature aging, the time for cooling was not sufficient, so the hexagonal rod structure of Cu6Sn5 did not have enough time to transform to monoclinic η′-Cu6Sn5, and thus the hexagonal rod structure is the main morphology of Cu6Sn5 whiskers, and a hollow structure was found in the Cu6Sn5 whiskers. The screw dislocation mechanism was used to explain the growth of Cu6Sn5 whiskers in SnAgCu solder joints. Solder joints with Cu6Sn5 whiskers showed superior tensile strength and elongation. The degradation effect of Cu6Sn5 whiskers on mechanical properties could be demonstrated after aging for 750 h at 150 °C.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (51475220), the Qing Lan Project, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2016M591464), Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province(XCL-022) and the State Foundation of Laboratory of Advanced Brazing Filler Metals & Technology (Zhengzhou Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering) (SKLABFMT-2015-03).

Author Contributions

Liang Zhang wrote the main manuscript text and Fan Yang prepared Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Zhang, L.; Tu, K.N. Structure and properties of lead-free solders bearing micro and nano particles. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2014, 82, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Han, C.W.; Han, B.T. Board level reliability analysis of chip resistor assemblies under thermal cycling: A comparison study between and SnAgCu. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, S.W.; Wang, C.H. Interfacial reactions of Sn-Cu/Ni couples at 250 °C. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 21, 2270–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gain, A.K.; Chan, Y.C. Growth mechanism of intermetallic compounds and damping properties of Sn-Ag-Cu-1wt% nano-ZrO2 composite solders. Microelectron. Reliab. 2014, 54, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, L.; Han, J.G.; Guo, Y.H.; Sun, L. Properties and microstructures of SnAgCu-xEu alloys for concentrator silicon solar cells solder layer. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cell 2014, 130, 397–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, K.S.; Huh, S.H.; Suganuma, K. Effects of fourth alloying additive on microstructures and tensile properties of Sn-Ag-Cu alloy and joints with Cu. Microelectron. Reliab. 2003, 43, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.L.; Tian, G.Y.; Gale, S.; Johnson, R.W.; Crane, L. Lead-free chip scale packages: Assembly and drop test reliability. IEEE Electron. Packag. 2006, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vandevelde, B.; Gonzalez, M.; Limaye, P.; Ratchev, P.; Beyne, E. Thermal cycling reliability of SnAgCu and SnPb solder joints: A comparison for several IC-packages. Microelectron. Reliab. 2007, 47, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, K.K.; Shih, D.Y.; Donald, N.Y.; Henderson, W.; Gosselin, T.; Sarkhel, A.; Charles Goldsmith, N.Y.; Puttlitz, K.J.; Choi, W.K. Ag3Sn plate formation in the solidification of near-ternary eutectic Sn-Ag-Cu. JOM 2003, 55, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, K.S.; Huh, S.H.; Suganuma, K. Effects of intermetallic compounds on properties of Sn-Ag-Cu lead-free soldered joints. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 352, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tu, K.N.; Gusak, A.M.; Li, M. Physics and materials challenges for lead-free solders. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 1335–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kang, S.K.; Lauro, P.; Shih, D.Y.; Henderson, D.W.; Gosselin, T.; Bartelo, J.; Cain, S.R.; Goldsmith, C.; Puttlitz, K.J.; Hwang, T.K. Evaluation of thermal fatigue life and failure mechanisms of Sn-Ag-Cu solder joints with reduced Ag contents. In Proceedings of the 54th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1–4 June 2004; pp. 661–667. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tian, Y.H.; Liu, W.; An, R.; Zhang, W.; Niu, L.; Wang, C. Effect of intermetallic compounds on fracture behavior of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu lead-free solder joints during in situ tensile test. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2012, 23, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Frear, D.; Grivas, D.; Morris, J.W., Jr. The effect of Cu6Sn5 whisker precipitates in bulk 60Sn-40Pb solder. J. Electron. Mater. 1987, 16, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Doremus, R.H.; Roberts, B.W.; Turnbull, D. Growth and Perfection of Crystals; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nogita, K. Stabilisation of Cu6Sn5 by Ni in Sn-0.7Cu-0.05Ni lead-free solder alloys. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alam, S.N.; Mishra, M.K. SEM and EDX study of intermetallics in a copper-tin system and the oxidation behavior of tin. Microsyst. Technol. 2013, 27, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  18. Laurila, T.; Vuorinen, V.; Kivilahti, J.K. Interfacial reactions between lead-free solders and common base materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2005, 49, 1–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mu, D.K.; Read, J.; Yang, Y.F.; Nogita, K. Thermal expansion of Cu6Sn5 and (Cu, Ni)6Sn5. J. Mater. Res. 2011, 26, 2660–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mardare, C.C.; Hassel, A.W. Influence of cooling speed on the solidification of a hyper-eutectic Cu-Sn alloy. Phys. Status Solidi A 2012, 209, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, B.; Shi, Y.; Lei, Y.; Guo, F.; Xia, Z.; Zong, B. Effect of rare earth element addition on the microstructure of Sn-Ag-Cu solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 2005, 34, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Z.H. Growth Kinetics and Mechanisms of Interfacial Cu6Sn5 Phase Formation in Lead-Free Solder Joints. Ph.D. Thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 16 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xian, J.W.; Belyakov, S.A.; Britton, T.B.; Gourlay, C.M. Heterogeneous nucleation of bulk Cu6Sn5 in Sn-Ag-Cu-Al and Sn-Cu-Al solders. In Proceedings of the IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 26–29 May 2015; pp. 2241–2247. [Google Scholar]
  24. Erinc, M.; Schreurs, P.J.G.; Zhang, G.Q.; Geers, M.G.D. Microstructural damage analysis of SnAgCu solder joints and an assessment on indentation procedures. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2005, 16, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, L.; Xue, S.B.; Gao, L.L.; Sheng, Z.; Dai, W.; Ji, F.; Ye, H.; Chen, Y.; Yu, S.L. Effects of bulk Cu6Sn5 intermetallic compounds on the properties of SnAgCuCe soldered joints. Solder. Surf. Mt. Technol. 2011, 23, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of SnAgCu/Cu solder joint. (a) Physical; (b) Simplified experimental sample; (c) Deep corrosion.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of SnAgCu/Cu solder joint. (a) Physical; (b) Simplified experimental sample; (c) Deep corrosion.
Materials 10 00327 g001
Figure 2. Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5 phases.
Figure 2. Ag3Sn and Cu6Sn5 phases.
Materials 10 00327 g002
Figure 3. Cu6Sn5 whiskers.
Figure 3. Cu6Sn5 whiskers.
Materials 10 00327 g003
Figure 4. A Cu6Sn5 whisker on the surface of IMC particles.
Figure 4. A Cu6Sn5 whisker on the surface of IMC particles.
Materials 10 00327 g004
Figure 5. Sn–Cu phase and magnified view from the Sn-rich corner. (a) Cu-Sn phase diagram; (b) magnification of Cu-Sn phase diagram.
Figure 5. Sn–Cu phase and magnified view from the Sn-rich corner. (a) Cu-Sn phase diagram; (b) magnification of Cu-Sn phase diagram.
Materials 10 00327 g005
Figure 6. Cu6Sn5 whiskers with hole.
Figure 6. Cu6Sn5 whiskers with hole.
Materials 10 00327 g006
Figure 7. Tensile strength and elongation of solder joints with/without Cu6Sn5 whiskers. (a) No aging; (b) 150 °C aging (750 h).
Figure 7. Tensile strength and elongation of solder joints with/without Cu6Sn5 whiskers. (a) No aging; (b) 150 °C aging (750 h).
Materials 10 00327 g007
Figure 8. Von Mises stress in solder joints with/without Cu6Sn5 whiskers.
Figure 8. Von Mises stress in solder joints with/without Cu6Sn5 whiskers.
Materials 10 00327 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.-q.; Yang, F.; Zhong, S.-j. Cu6Sn5 Whiskers Precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu Interconnection in Concentrator Silicon Solar Cells Solder Layer. Materials 2017, 10, 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040327

AMA Style

Zhang L, Liu Z-q, Yang F, Zhong S-j. Cu6Sn5 Whiskers Precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu Interconnection in Concentrator Silicon Solar Cells Solder Layer. Materials. 2017; 10(4):327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040327

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Liang, Zhi-quan Liu, Fan Yang, and Su-juan Zhong. 2017. "Cu6Sn5 Whiskers Precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu Interconnection in Concentrator Silicon Solar Cells Solder Layer" Materials 10, no. 4: 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040327

APA Style

Zhang, L., Liu, Z. -q., Yang, F., & Zhong, S. -j. (2017). Cu6Sn5 Whiskers Precipitated in Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu/Cu Interconnection in Concentrator Silicon Solar Cells Solder Layer. Materials, 10(4), 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040327

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop