The Influence of Welding Process Parameters on Pore Formation in Pulsed Laser-Welded Vacuum Plate Glazing
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Preparation
2.2. Experimental Materials
2.3. Experimental Testing Instrument
2.3.1. Metallographic Analysis
2.3.2. Micromorphology and Phase Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Pore Source and Formation Reasons
3.2. Effect of Pulse Current on Sealing Layer Pores
3.3. Effect of Pulse Duration Time on Sealing Layer Pores
3.4. Effect of Pulse Frequency on Sealing Layer Pores
3.5. Effect of Welding Speed on Sealing Layer Pores
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The pores in the laser welded vacuum plate glazing are probably caused by the residual air and steam between the solder powders.
- (2)
- The porosity decreases with the increase of the pulse current. When the pulse current is 160 A, the porosity is at least, at 0.1%. The porosity of the sealing layer decreases first and then increases. When the pulse duration time is 2 ms, the porosity is the lowest. The porosity decreases first and then increases. When the pulse frequency is 18 Hz, the lowest porosity is 0.08%. When the welding speed is increased, the joint cooling rate is higher than the air hole escape speed, resulting in the number of the sealing layer pores increasing.
- (3)
- According to the porosity variation curve of the sealing layer under different welding parameters, the slope formula is used to calculate the influence level on porosity under different welding parameters. Results show that the variation of pulse duration times has the greatest influence on the porosity, the influence of pulse frequency on porosity is the second, and the variations of pulse current and welding speed have the slight influence on the porosity. Therefore, the influence level on the porosity under different welding parameters is as follows: pulse duration times > pulse frequency > pulse current ≈ welding speed.
- (4)
- When the pulse current I is 160 A, pulse duration time τ is 2 ms, pulse frequency f is 18 Hz and welding speed v is 90 mm/min, the sealing layer has low porosity and good welding quality, which represents an optimal set of process parameters.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kim, J.K.; Kim, Y.S.; Jeon, E.S. Optimization of glazing edge sealing process using microwaves for fabrication of vacuum glazing. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.; Kang, J.; Cho, S.W. A new structure of vacuum insulation glazing for edge effect reduction: A parametric study. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2018, 19, 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, S.; Farukh, F.; Kandan, K. Effect of cavity vacuum pressure diminution on thermal performance of triple vacuum glazing. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.J.; Jeon, E.S. Analysis of the edge sealing strength for vacuum glazing panel using design of experiment. J. Korea Acad.-Ind. Coop. Soc. 2014, 15, 1819–1824. [Google Scholar]
- Memon, S.; Farukh, F.; Eames, P.C.; Silberschmidt, V.V. A new low-temperature hermetic composite edge seal for the fabrication of triple vacuum glazing. Vacuum 2015, 120, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y.S.; Jeon, E.S. Using a hydrogen gas torch to seal edges of vacuum glazing panels and analysis of the related characteristic strength according to the sealed edge shapes. Vacuum 2018, 149, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Miao, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q. Formation mechanism of sealing edge pores for vacuum glazing using laser brazing technique. Vacuum 2018, 147, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, S.; Fang, Y.; Eames, P.C. The influence of low-temperature surface induction on evacuation, pump-out hole sealing and thermal performance of composite edge-sealed vacuum insulated glazing. Renew. Energy 2019, 135, 450–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, H.; Shan, X.; Zhang, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, H. Effect of sealing temperature on the sealing edge performance of vacuum glazing. Vacuum 2015, 116, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.F.; Eames, P.C.; Hyde, T.J.; Fang, Y.; Wang, J. A modified pump-out technique used for fabrication of low temperature metal sealed vacuum glazing. Sol. Energy 2007, 81, 1072–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Pablos-Martín, A.; Höche, T. Laser welding of glasses using a nanosecond pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2017, 90, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tian, R.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, W.; Ding, X.; Yin, L.; Zhang, J. Improved the quality of the glass/glass laser bonding through the optimization of glass powder size in planetary ball mill. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2017, 651, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, D.D.; Shen, Y.F.; Pan, Y.F.; Xu, C.T. Research on mechanism of direct metal laser sintering. J. Mater. Eng. 2004, 5, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
- Matsunawa, A.; Semak, V. The simulation of front keyhole wall dynamics during laser welding. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1997, 30, 798–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsunawa, A.; Kim, J.-D.; Seto, N.; Mizutani, M.; Katayama, S. Dynamics of keyhole and molten pool in laser welding. J. Laser Appl. 1998, 10, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Chemical Composition | Mass Fraction (%) |
---|---|
SiO2 | 0.67–0.74 |
CaO | 0.05–0.11 |
MgO | 0–0.04 |
Na2O | 0.10–0.17 |
Al2O3 | 0–0.03 |
Pulse Current (A) | Pulse Duration Time (ms) | Pulse Frequency (Hz) | Welding Speed (mm/min) | Single Pulse Energy (J) | Average Power (W) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100 | 2 | 15 | 90 | 2.28 | 34.2 |
120 | 2 | 15 | 90 | 2.74 | 41.1 |
140 | 2 | 15 | 90 | 3.19 | 47.9 |
160 | 2 | 15 | 90 | 3.65 | 54.8 |
160 | 1 | 15 | 90 | 1.82 | 27.4 |
160 | 2 | 15 | 90 | 3.65 | 54.8 |
160 | 3 | 15 | 90 | 5.47 | 82.1 |
160 | 3.5 | 15 | 90 | 6.38 | 95.8 |
160 | 2 | 12 | 90 | 3.65 | 43.8 |
160 | 2 | 15 | 90 | 3.65 | 54.8 |
160 | 2 | 18 | 90 | 3.65 | 65.7 |
160 | 2 | 21 | 90 | 3.65 | 76.6 |
160 | 2 | 18 | 80 | 3.65 | 65.7 |
160 | 2 | 18 | 90 | 3.65 | 65.7 |
160 | 2 | 18 | 100 | 3.65 | 65.7 |
160 | 2 | 18 | 110 | 3.65 | 65.7 |
Chemical Composition | Mass Fraction (%) |
---|---|
PbO | 0.75 |
TiO2 | 0.15 |
SiO2 | 0.10 |
CuO | <0.025 |
Fe2O3 | <0.025 |
Area | Pb | Ti | O | Si | Na | Ca | Al | Mg | Fe | K | Cu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sealing layer | 21.02 | 16.56 | 60.55 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.04 | - | 0.41 | - | 0.40 |
Glazing | 15.68 | 4.25 | 69.11 | 7.88 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.28 | - | 1.38 | 0.12 | 0.61 |
Reaction wetting layer | 0.08 | 0.03 | 59.23 | 24.77 | 9.22 | 3.95 | 0.34 | 1.97 | 0.07 | 0.33 | - |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, S.; Li, C.; Miao, H.; He, Q. The Influence of Welding Process Parameters on Pore Formation in Pulsed Laser-Welded Vacuum Plate Glazing. Materials 2019, 12, 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111790
Zhang S, Li C, Miao H, He Q. The Influence of Welding Process Parameters on Pore Formation in Pulsed Laser-Welded Vacuum Plate Glazing. Materials. 2019; 12(11):1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111790
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Shanwen, Chong Li, Hong Miao, and Qiang He. 2019. "The Influence of Welding Process Parameters on Pore Formation in Pulsed Laser-Welded Vacuum Plate Glazing" Materials 12, no. 11: 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111790
APA StyleZhang, S., Li, C., Miao, H., & He, Q. (2019). The Influence of Welding Process Parameters on Pore Formation in Pulsed Laser-Welded Vacuum Plate Glazing. Materials, 12(11), 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111790