Next Article in Journal
Correlation between Microstructural Alteration, Mechanical Properties and Manufacturability after Cryogenic Treatment: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Sintering Behaviors, Microstructure, and Microwave Dielectric Properties of CaTiO3–LaAlO3 Ceramics Using CuO/B2O3 Additions
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Study on Welding Characteristics of Laser-CMT and Plasma-CMT Hybrid Welded AA6082-T6 Aluminum Alloy Butt Joints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Temperature Stable Cold Sintered (Bi0.95Li0.05)(V0.9Mo0.1)O4-Na2Mo2O7 Microwave Dielectric Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Electrophysical Properties of PZT-Type Ceramics Obtained by Conventional and Mechanochemical Methods

by
Dariusz Bochenek
1,*,
Przemysław Niemiec
1,
Izabela Szafraniak-Wiza
2 and
Grzegorz Dercz
1
1
Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Materials Engineering, University of Silesia in Katowice, 75 Pułku Piechoty 1a, 41–500 Chorzów, Poland
2
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Jana Pawła II 24, 61-138 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(20), 3301; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203301
Submission received: 15 September 2019 / Revised: 2 October 2019 / Accepted: 9 October 2019 / Published: 11 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electroceramic Materials)

Abstract

:
In the paper, the multicomponent PZT-type ceramics with Pb(Zr0.49Ti0.51)0.94Mn0.015Sb0.01W0.015Ni0.03O3 composition have been obtained by conventional and mechanochemical methods. With conventional ceramic technology, PZT-type ceramics have been synthesized by the method of calcination powder (850 °C/4 h). Instead of this step, the mechanochemical synthesis process for different milling periods (15 h, 25 h, 50 h, 75 h) has been applied for a second batch of samples. To obtain the dense PZT-type ceramic samples, powders have been sintered by free sintering method at conditions of 1150 °C/2 h. Studies have shown that the perovskite structure of the PZT-type material is formed during mechanochemical activation of powders during the technological process at low temperature. The application of the mechanochemical synthesis to obtain the PZT-type materials also allows shortening of the technological process, and the useful electrophysical properties of ceramic samples are not reduced at the same time. The presented results have confirmed that the investigated materials can be used in microelectronic applications, especially as elements of actuators and piezoelectric transducers.

1. Introduction

The most common ceramic solid solutions, extensively used in the electronic industry, are perovskite ferroelectric oxides with a general formula ABO3, for example, Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 (PZT). To improve the piezoelectric properties of those materials, various modifications, such as different doping, have been carefully examined. The PZT materials in a Zr/Ti proportion close to 52/48 (known as morphotropic phase boundary, MPB) are most functional for the application point of view, because they exhibit one of the highest values of piezoelectric parameters, that is, electromechanical coupling factor kp (0.53–0.65) and piezoelectric coefficient d33 (250–325 pC/N) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Other merits of the PZT materials are their moderate permittivity, low dielectric losses, and high piezoelectric factors (kp, kt, kij) which make them interesting for actuators, piezoelectric transducers, microsensors, ultrasonic transmitters and receivers, sound transducers, microphones, and so forth [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. PZT powders are usually synthesized by the solid-state reaction process (i.e., calcination method) using mixed oxides as starting materials. Also, the conventional solid-state reacted PZT powders are sintered at very high temperatures [17]. It has been shown that the chemical reactivity of starting materials could be improved remarkably after an appropriate milling treatment, for example, high-energy ball milling (HEBM), which is also known as mechanochemical activation or mechanochemical synthesis. Moreover, in many materials, the perovskite phase formation takes place directly during the high-energy milling process [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The fundamental advantage of application of the mechanochemical process during PZT-type ceramic preparation is the avoidance of the multiple steps of technology at upraised temperatures [27,28].
The aim of this work has been the comparison of useful ceramic properties obtained by conventional and mechanochemical methods. The multicomponent Pb(Zr0.49Ti0.51)O3 doped by Mn4+, Sb3+, W6+, Ni2+ was chosen, that is, the type of so-called “ferroelectric hard/soft” doping [29] was used (with Sb3+, Ni2+ “ferroelectric hard” admixtures and W6+ “ferroelectric soft” admixture) in order to obtain ceramic materials with optimal piezoelectric properties (average values), but with high time stability of their physical properties. Additionally, Mn4+ admixture was aimed at increasing grain homogeneity in the ceramic microstructure.
Both the powder and ceramic preparations were carefully monitored at different preparation stages using differential thermal analysis (DTA), thermogravimetric analysis (TG), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) methods. The final properties of the ceramics samples were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and DC electrical conductivity tests, testing dielectric, ferroelectric, and piezoelectric properties.

2. Experiment

In this work, the multicomponent PZT-type ceramic samples with the chemical compositions Pb(Zr0.49Ti0.51)0.94Mn0.015Sb0.01W0.015Ni0.03O3 (PZTMSWN) were obtained and investigated. Two fabrication methods were used to obtain ceramic samples: (i) conventional ceramic technology (C) and (ii) mechanochemical synthesis (M). The starting mixture consisted of the following simple oxides: PbO, ZrO2, TiO2, WO3, Sb2O3, MnO2, and NiO. In both cases, a stoichiometric ratio of starting oxides was used. The first stage of the conventional route was the mixing of powders for 24 h in ethyl alcohol using a Fritsch planetary ball mill. Next, the powder mixture was synthesized by calcination method at conditions: T = 850 °C for t = 4 h. The temperature synthesis was appointed on the basis of thermogravimetric analysis (DTA, DTG, TG) tests using a Q-1500D derivatograph (from 20 °C to 1030 °C). Finally, the sintering (densification) was carried out by the free sintering method at conditions: T = 1150 °C for t = 2, 3, 4 h (dT/dt = 150 °C/h). At work, the sample with the best properties (3 h) was chosen to compare the results (marked as C3h).
In the case of the mechanochemical synthesis, the high-energy ball milling was carried out in the shaker-type 8000 Mixer Mill (SPEX SamplePrep, Metuchen, NJ, USA) at room temperature (in the air atmosphere) [30]. The ball-to-powder weight ratio parameter was kept as 5:1. The oxides were milled for different periods (i.e., 15 h, 25 h, 50 h, and 75 h). The synthesis process was controlled by X-ray diffraction tests at various milling times. The XRD tests were performed on a PANalytical Empyrean X-ray (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) powder diffractometer (CuKα radiation, 45 kV, 40 mA). The powders, obtained after mechanochemical synthesis, were used for the ceramic samples’ preparation. The compacting (densification) of the ceramic samples was performed at the same condition as the conventional ones (i.e., by a free sintering method at Ts = 1150 °C for ts = 2 h). Due to the poor physical quality (not the single phase material) of 15 h milled samples, this series was omitted from further investigations. The ceramics, obtained from mechanochemical synthesised powders, were marked as M25h, M50h, and M75h, respectively. Finally, both batches of the ceramic samples were ground, polished, and annealed at a temperature of 700 °C for 15 min in order to remove mechanical stresses.
The X-ray diffraction patterns (PANalytical, Phillips X’Pert Pro, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were registered at room temperature (Tr) in the 2θ range: 10° to 80° in steps-scan mode: 0.05° and 4 s/step. The microstructures of the ceramic samples were examined by scanning electron microscope (JSM-7100 TTL LV Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Dielectric properties were measured using a capacity bridge of a QuadTech 1920 Precision LCR Meter (Quad/Tech, Inc., Maynard, MA, USA) in the heating cycle and in the frequency range from 1 kHz to 1 MHz (in the range of 20–450 °C). Hysteresis (P-E) loops were examined with a Sawyer–Tower circuit and a HEOPS-5B6 precision high-voltage amplifier (Matsusada Inc., Kusatsu, Japan) in the range of 20–110 °C. DC conductivity tests were carried out in temperatures ranging from 20 °C to 440 °C with a 6517B Keithley electrometer (Cleveland, OH, USA).
To calculate piezoelectric constants, the ceramic samples were electrically poled by the high-voltage method using a Matsusada Precision Inc. HEOPS-5B6 high voltage supply (Kusatsu, Japan) (silicon oil, poling field Epol = 30 kV/cm, poling time tpol = 0.5 h, at poling temperature Tpol = 120 °C). Piezoelectric parameters were calculated using the resonance–antiresonance method. The piezoelectric coefficient d33 was measured at Tr using a YE2730A d33 meter (APC International Ltd., Mackeyville, PA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

The properties of ceramics are closely related to preparation conditions. In the case of conventional synthesis, the appropriate thermal treatment (especially temperature) is the one of the most important factors. In the case of the volatile reagents (e.g., PbO at high temperature), it is necessary to lower the calcination/sintering temperature to avoid any stoichiometric (and structural) changes. One possible method to determinate the correct preparation condition is based on DTA/TG analyses. The mixture of the starting oxides, used also in conventional ceramic technology, was studied by DTA/TG analyses (Figure 1). On both the TG and DTA curves, several anomalies can be observed. The TG anomalies are related with the mass loss of the sample during the heating cycle. For the investigated PZTMSWN powder, the largest weight loss was observed near 400 °C and the total loss of mass was 0.3% in the measured temperature range from 20 °C to 1030 °C. Further details are clearly visible on the DTG curve. It shows the change in the rate of decomposition of the tested powders with the rise of temperature. The several processes corresponding to local minima on the DTG curve are visible on the graph. The first one, visible as minima below 120 °C on the DTG curves, is associated with loss of water moisture from the sample surfaces. The DTG minima are associated with the changes occurring on the DTA curve. The strong peak, visible at 623 °C on the DTA curve, is related to the formation of undesirable phases (the pyrochlore phase) in the PZT material. Fast temperature increase during the synthesis process prevents the formation of this unnecessary parasitic phase. Further minima are related to creation of the perovskite PZT-like structure and other intermediate phases. The DTA results have shown that the synthesis process of the ceramic materials is realized at 786 °C. Based on this research, the synthesis of the ceramic powders was carried out at Tsynth = 850 °C and tsynt = 4 h.
In regard to the mechanochemical synthesis, the mills are kept at ambient condition, however, local temperature can rise due to the collisions with balls. Among several parameters having impact on the synthesis process, the milling duration is the most important one. To monitor the synthesis development, the powders after different milling durations were examined by XRD measurements (Figure 2). For the investigated powders, the perovskite phase appeared directly during milling (without any additional thermal treatment). The perovskite phase was already present for the powders milled for 15 h. However, the powder included also secondary phases (beside the diffraction peak related to the perovskite phase, there are other peaks present on the diffraction patterns). As a result of the longer milling, the amount of the perovskite phase increased, which is associated with sharpening of characteristic peaks.
The X-ray diffraction pattern of the PZTMSWN material is shown in Figure 3 (at room temperature). The diagram shows strong peaks related to the perovskite phase. The diffraction peaks matched to JCPDS card No. 04-002-5961 pattern with tetragonal perovskite structure and P4mm space group a0 = 4.03, b0 = 4.03, c0 = 4.08. In Figure 3, the graph shows also the trace amounts of the pyrochlore phase.
The SEM investigations (fractures of samples) were carried out on all samples (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Both batches of the samples had dense structures; however, their morphology was different (shape of grains, grain boundaries, and grain size). In the case of the C3h ceramics, the breakthrough of the sample consisting of grains glued together, without clear grain boundaries. The microstructures of the ceramic samples obtained by mechanochemical synthesis (Figure 5) showed a high degree of sintering and the grains had firmly solidified with each other.
The domain structure of the samples was revealed by fracture surface etching, after they were ground and polished (Figure 6). SEM images show a large heterogeneity of grain shape for a series of samples obtained by mechanochemical activation method (Figure 6b–d) compared to a sample obtained by classical technology (Figure 6a); the largest occurred for the composition with the lowest mixing time in the HEBM method (M25h). It resulted from the specificity and method of mixing powder in the MS method. The average grain size decreased with increasing mechanochemical activation time. For the tested ceramic materials, it was 1.48 μm, 1.52 μm, 1.40 μm, and 1.32 μm for the C3h, M25h, M50h, and M75h samples, respectively.
At Tr, DC resistivity of the investigated ceramic samples was of the order of magnitude from 107 Ωm to 109 Ωm (Table 1). Figure 7 shows the lnσ(1000/T) dependencies for the PZTMSWN ceramics. The electric conductivity increased with the increase in temperature. In the entire measurement range, the lowest electrical conductivity was found in the M50B sample, whereas the M25B sample showed the highest electrical conductivity. Based on Arrhenius’ law [31] and the slope of the linear portion of lnσ(1000/T) dependence, the activation energy in two selected areas (below and above phase transition) was calculated. The calculated values of the activation energy are listed in Table 1.
The temperature dependencies of ε(T) for the PZTMSWN materials are depicted in Figure 8. All ceramic samples exhibited the highest values of dielectric permitivity at RT and of the maximum dielectric permittivity (εmax). The investigated PZTMSWN materials did not exhibit temperature shift of the phase transition with measurement frequency. In the case of the series of samples obtained by mechanochemical synthesis (Figure 8b–d), the values of dielectric permittivity were slightly smaller than in the case of the ceramic sample obtained by classical method (Figure 8a). However, for samples obtained by mechanochemical synthesis, the phase transition occurred in a narrower temperature range. In the case of the perovskite materials, a wide temperature range of the phase transitions was related to a degree of crystalline structure ordering in the B position. When this ordering of the crystalline structure is better, the phase transitions are observed in a narrow range of temperatures. The comparision of ε(T) measured for 1 kHz for all investigated samples is shown in Figure 10a and the changes described above are clearly visible.
PZTMSWN samples showed low values of dielectric loss (tanδ) (Figure 9). The dielectric loss and the tanδ(T) exhibited similar behavior for all samples and the preparation methods did not affect dielectric properties in the entire temperature measurement area. The summary graph ε(T) for the investigated samples is depicted in Figure 10b.
The hysteresis loops were reordered on all samples at several temperatures (Figure 11). At room temperature, the ceramic samples did not show any saturated hysteresis loops and Ec coercive field from 1.08 kV/mm to 1.43 kV/mm (Table 1). In the case of the C3h sample, the value of Pr remnant polarization was higher (11.80 μC/cm2), while the samples obtained by mechanochemical synthesis had small values of Pr (from 2.60 μC/cm2 to 4.35 μC/cm2). The hysteresis loop became well saturated at the higher temperature (70–80 °C) and the remnant polarization increased. The values of the Pr increased almost three times in the range from RT to 110 °C (Figure 12). At the same time, the Ec coercive field did not change visibly (at higher temperatures there was a slight increase Ec). It may be related to the used admixtures, which increased the ferroelectric properties’ stability. In the designed composition, larger amounts of the hard admixture (like Mn, Ni) were used to increase the stability of the ceramic piezoelectric parameters. In regard to the samples obtained in high-energy milling technology, the ferroelectric hysteresis loops show higher saturation observed at higher temperatures compared to the sample obtained by the conventional technology.
From the application point of view, the piezoelectric properties play the most important role. For the piezoelectric tests, all investigated ceramic samples were electrically poled by high-voltage method (in silicon oil). The values of the piezoelectric parameters were calculated using a common resonance–antiresonance method (Table 1). The PZTMSWN ceramic samples exhibited a medium level of the piezoelectric parameters, which is characteristic for hard doping of the PZT material.

4. Conclusions

The ferroelectric multicomponent PZTMSWN samples with the chemical formula Pb(Zr0.49Ti0.51)0.94Mn0.015Sb0.01W0.015Ni0.03O3 were obtained. The ceramic samples were obtained by mechanochemical synthesis (after different milling periods) and the classical technology. The properties of both samples were investigated in detail and compared.
The XRD investigations confirmed the perovskite structure with the tetragonal phase at room temperature with small amounts of the pyrochlore phase. The mechanochemical synthesis of ceramic powders allows the formation of perovskite structure of the PZT-type material at low temperature (room temperature). The fine-grain powders obtained by this technology are appropriate for preparation of dense ceramic material.
The usage of the HEBM method during the technological process of multicomponent PZT ceramics does not worsen significantly the wide spectrum of physical properties of the obtained materials; however, it significantly shortens the time of the technological process of piezoelectric ceramics (this also shortens the sintering time of the ceramic samples). The PZTMSWN ceramic samples exhibit medium values of the piezoelectric parameters, which is characteristic for hard doping of the PZT material. Lower but stable electrophysical parameters of the piezoceramic materials are extremely important for microelectronic and micromechatronic applications. The optimal dielectric parameters and good piezoelectric properties are required for ceramic elements to build actuators and piezoelectric transducers.

Author Contributions

D.B., the main author and originator of the work, performed SEM measurements and scientific description of most measurements in the work. P.N., contractor in the technology of ceramic samples, performed P-E and dielectric tests, electrical conductivity, and developed the interpretation of results. I.S.-W., contractor in the technology of ceramic powders by HEBM methods, performed X-ray tests of ceramic powders and the interpretation of these results. G.D. carried out research and interpretation X-ray tests.

Funding

The present paper in part was financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within statutory activity.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Uchino, K.; Giniewicz, J.R. Micromechatronics, 1st ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim, B.G.; Cho, S.M.; Kim, T.Y.; Jang, H.M. Giant dielectric permittivity observed in Pb-based perovskite ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86, 3404–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Noheda, B.; Cox, D.E. Bridging phases at the morphotropic boundaries of lead oxide solid solutions. Phase Transit. 2006, 79, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Li, J.; Sun, Q. Effects of Cr2O3 doping on the electrical properties and the temperature stabilities of PZT binary piezoelectric ceramics. Rare Met. 2008, 27, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chu, S.-Y.; Chen, T.-Y.; Tsai, I.-T.; Water, W. Doping effects of Nb additives on the piezoelectric and dielectric properties of PZT ceramics and its application on SAW device. Sens. Actuators A 2004, 113, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maiwa, H.; Kimura, O.; Shoji, K.; Ochiai, H. Low temperature sintering of PZT ceramics without additives via an ordinary ceramic route. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 25, 2383–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jo, W.; Dittmer, R.; Acosta, M.; Zang, J.; Groh, C.; Sapper, E.; Wang, K.; Rödel, J. Giant electric-field-induced strains in lead-free ceramics for actuator applications—status and perspective. J. Electroceram. 2012, 29, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prasatkhetragarn, A.; Yimnirun, R. Phase formation, electrical properties and morphotropic phase boundary of 0.95Pb(ZrxTi1-x)O3–0.05Pb(Mn1/3Nb2/3)O3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, S91–S95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moulson, A.J.; Herbert, J.M. Electroceramics, Properties, Applications; Wiley–Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ozaki, K.; Matin, A.; Numata, Y.; Akai, D.; Sawada, K.; Ishida, M. Fabrication and characterization of a smart epitaxial piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducer. Mat. Sci. Eng. B 2014, 190, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sitko, R.; Zawisza, B.; Jurczyk, J.; Bochenek, D.; Płońska, M. Multielement XRF Semimicroanalysis of Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 type ferroelectric ceramic materials doped with Pb(Nb,Mn)O3 and Bi2O3 by the thin layer metod. Microchim. Acta 2004, 144, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu, Y. Ferroelectric Materials and Their Applications; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tzou, H.S.; Lee, H.-J.; Arnolod, S.M. Smart materials, precision sensors/actuators, smart structures, and structronic systems. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struc. 2014, 11, 367–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zachariasz, R.; Bochenek, D. Properties of the PZT type ceramics admixed with barium and niobium. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2009, 54, 895–902. [Google Scholar]
  15. Boucher, E.; Guiffard, B.; Lebrun, L.; Guyomar, D. Effects of Zr/Ti ratio on structural, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of Mn- and (Mn, F)-doped lead zirconate titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2006, 2, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yadav, K.L.; Sharma, P. Synthesis and characterization of Mn doped PZT ceramics. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2008, 15, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shrout, T.R.; Papet, P.; Kim, S.; Lee, G.-S. Conventionally prepared submicrometer lead-based perovskite powders by reactive calcination. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 1862–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mahmud, I.; Ur, S.-Ch.; Yoon, M.-S. Effect of high-energy milling process on microstructure and piezoelectric/dielectric properties of 0.99Pb(Zr0.53Ti0.47)O3-0.01BiYO3 ceramic for piezoelectric energy harvesting devices. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2014, 10, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Miclea, C.; Tanasoiu, C.; Gheorghiu, A.; Miclea, C.F.; Tanasoiu, V. Synthesis and piezoelectric properties of nanocrystalline PZT-based ceramics prepared by high energy ball milling process. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 5431–5434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kong, L.B.; Ma, J.; Zhu, W.; Tan, O.K. Preparation of PMN–PT ceramics via a high-energy ball milling process. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 336, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stojanovic, B.D.; Simoes, A.Z.; Paiva-Santos, C.O.; Jovalekic, C.; Mitic, V.V.; Varela, J.A. Mechanochemical synthesis of barium titanate. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 25, 1985–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Maurya, D.; Thota, H.; Nalwa, K.S.; Garg, A. BiFeO3 ceramics synthesized by mechanical activation assisted versus conventional solid-state-reaction process: A comparative study. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 477, 780–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stojanovic, B.D. Mechanochemical synthesis of ceramic powders with perovskite structure. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 2003, 143, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khamman, O.; Sarakonsri, T.; Rujiwatra, A.; Laosiritaworn, Y.; Yimnirun, R.; Ananta, S. Effects of milling time and calcination condition on phase formation and particle size of lead zirconate nanopowders prepared by vibro-milling. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 8438–8446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, X.; Akdogan, E.K.; Safari, A.; Riman, R.E. Mechanically activated synthesis of PZT and its electromechanical properties. Appl. Phys. A 2005, 81, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xingsen, G.; Xue, J.; Wang, J. Mechanical activation-induced sequential combination, morphotric segregation and order/disorder transformation in Pb-based relaxors. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2003, B99, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kong, L.B.; Ma, J.; Zhang, R.F.; Zhu, W.; Tan, O.K. Lead zirconate titanate ceramics achieved by reaction sintering of PbO and high-energy ball milled (ZrTi)O2 nanosized powders. Mater. Lett. 2002, 55, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Branković, Z.; Branković, G.; Jovalekić, Č.; Maniette, Y.; Cilense, M.; Varela, J.A. Mechanochemical synthesis of PZT powder. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 345, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bochenek, D.; Surowiak, Z. Influence of admixtures on the properties of biferroic Pb(Fe0.5Nb0.5)O3 ceramics. Phys. Status Solidi A 2009, 206, 2857–2865. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Adamczyk, M.; Szafraniak-Wiza, I. Physical properties of lead-free BaFe1/2Nb1/2O3 ceramics obtained from mechanochemically synthesized powders. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 13501–13512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Skulski, R.; Adamczyk, M.; Brzezińska, D. Electrophysical properties of the multicomponent PBZT-type ceramics doped by Sn4+. J. Electroceram. 2019, 42, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis of the PZTMSWN powder (C3h sample).
Figure 1. Thermogravimetric analysis of the PZTMSWN powder (C3h sample).
Materials 12 03301 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of the powders after different milling periods (15 h, 25 h, 50 h, and 75 h). The peaks related to the perovskite are marked by ●.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of the powders after different milling periods (15 h, 25 h, 50 h, and 75 h). The peaks related to the perovskite are marked by ●.
Materials 12 03301 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of powders of the C3h sample.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of powders of the C3h sample.
Materials 12 03301 g003
Figure 4. SEM microstructure of the C3h fracture of sample.
Figure 4. SEM microstructure of the C3h fracture of sample.
Materials 12 03301 g004
Figure 5. SEM microstructure of the M series ceramic samples (fractures of samples): (a) M25h; (b) M50h; (c) M75h.
Figure 5. SEM microstructure of the M series ceramic samples (fractures of samples): (a) M25h; (b) M50h; (c) M75h.
Materials 12 03301 g005
Figure 6. SEM microstructure of the PZTMSWN samples (etched surfaces): (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Figure 6. SEM microstructure of the PZTMSWN samples (etched surfaces): (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Materials 12 03301 g006
Figure 7. The lnσ(1000/T) relationship for the PZTMSWN ceramics.
Figure 7. The lnσ(1000/T) relationship for the PZTMSWN ceramics.
Materials 12 03301 g007
Figure 8. Temperature dependencies of the ε(T) for the PZTMSWN ceramics: (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Figure 8. Temperature dependencies of the ε(T) for the PZTMSWN ceramics: (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Materials 12 03301 g008
Figure 9. Temperature dependencies of the tanδ for the PZTMSWN ceramics: (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Figure 9. Temperature dependencies of the tanδ for the PZTMSWN ceramics: (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Materials 12 03301 g009
Figure 10. The comparision of the ε(T) (a) and dielectric loss (b) for the PZTMSWN ceramics measured at 1 kHz.
Figure 10. The comparision of the ε(T) (a) and dielectric loss (b) for the PZTMSWN ceramics measured at 1 kHz.
Materials 12 03301 g010
Figure 11. Hysteresis loops P-E (from 20 °C to 110 °C) of the PZTMSWN ceramics: (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Figure 11. Hysteresis loops P-E (from 20 °C to 110 °C) of the PZTMSWN ceramics: (a) C3h; (b) M25h; (c) M50h; (d) M75h.
Materials 12 03301 g011
Figure 12. Temperature dependencies of the Pr and Ec of the PZTMSWN ceramic samples.
Figure 12. Temperature dependencies of the Pr and Ec of the PZTMSWN ceramic samples.
Materials 12 03301 g012
Table 1. Physical Parameters of the PZTMSWN Ceramic Samples.
Table 1. Physical Parameters of the PZTMSWN Ceramic Samples.
ParameterC3hM25hM50hM75h
ρDC at Tr (Ωm)3.98 × 1098.45 × 1077.15 × 1094.70 × 108
EAct in I (eV)0.460.130.490.47
EAct in II (eV)0.940.870.870.92
TC (°C)320315316316
εr at RT1227745727726
εmax at TC16,62914,93113,54113,140
tanδ at RT0.0110.0180.0180.017
tanδ at TC0.1820.1730.1690.170
Pr (μC/cm2) at RT11.804.353.332.60
Ec (kV/mm) at RT1.431.431.281.08
kp0.470.450.430.41
d31 (pC/N)52.2352.7154.3844.10
g31 × 10−3 (Vm/N)8.007.377.686.48
Qm219235334497
d33 (pC/N)262149147143
RT—room temperature.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bochenek, D.; Niemiec, P.; Szafraniak-Wiza, I.; Dercz, G. Comparison of Electrophysical Properties of PZT-Type Ceramics Obtained by Conventional and Mechanochemical Methods. Materials 2019, 12, 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203301

AMA Style

Bochenek D, Niemiec P, Szafraniak-Wiza I, Dercz G. Comparison of Electrophysical Properties of PZT-Type Ceramics Obtained by Conventional and Mechanochemical Methods. Materials. 2019; 12(20):3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bochenek, Dariusz, Przemysław Niemiec, Izabela Szafraniak-Wiza, and Grzegorz Dercz. 2019. "Comparison of Electrophysical Properties of PZT-Type Ceramics Obtained by Conventional and Mechanochemical Methods" Materials 12, no. 20: 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203301

APA Style

Bochenek, D., Niemiec, P., Szafraniak-Wiza, I., & Dercz, G. (2019). Comparison of Electrophysical Properties of PZT-Type Ceramics Obtained by Conventional and Mechanochemical Methods. Materials, 12(20), 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12203301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop