Next Article in Journal
Cyclodextrins Modified/Coated Metal–Organic Frameworks
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Activation of Li2MnO3 Electrodes at 0 °C and Its Impact on the Subsequent Performance at Higher Temperatures
Previous Article in Journal
g-C3N4/CeO2 Binary Composite Prepared and Its Application in Automobile Exhaust Degradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Performances Investigation of New Carbon-Coated Nickel Sulfides as Electrode Material for Supercapacitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of High Surface Area α-KyMnO2 Nanoneedles Using Extract of Broccoli as Bioactive Reducing Agent and Application in Lithium Battery

1
Inorganic Chemistry Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth Str. (former El Tahir Str.), Dokki-Giza 12622, Egypt
2
Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Helmholtz-Institute Muenster (HI MS), IEK-12, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
3
MEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Muenster, Corrensstr. 46, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
4
Institut de Minéralogie, Physique des Matériaux et Cosmologie (IMPMC), Sorbonne Université, CNRS-UMR 7590, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(6), 1269; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061269
Submission received: 21 January 2020 / Revised: 4 March 2020 / Accepted: 9 March 2020 / Published: 11 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Materials for Electrochemical Energy Storage)

Abstract

:
With the aim to reduce the entire cost of lithium-ion batteries and to diminish the environmental impact, the extract of broccoli is used as a strong benign reducing agent for potassium permanganate to synthesize α-KyMnO2 cathode material with pure nanostructured phase. Material purity is confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction and thermogravimetric analyses. Images of transmission electron microscopy show samples with a spider-net shape consisting of very fine interconnected nanoneedles. The nanostructure is characterized by crystallite of 4.4 nm in diameter and large surface area of 160.7 m2 g−1. The material delivers an initial capacity of 211 mAh g−1 with high Coulombic efficiency of 99% and 82% capacity retention after 100 cycles. Thus, α-KyMnO2 synthesized via a green process exhibits very promising electrochemical performance in terms of initial capacity, cycling stability and rate capability.

1. Introduction

Lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) have been widely used to power many systems (e.g., portable electronics, tools, hybrid and electric vehicles, etc.) [1,2,3]. However, to increase the gravimetric energy density, it is necessary to find optimized, safe and suitable electrode materials, which are the limiting elements of LiBs [4,5].
Manganese dioxide (MDO) is an abundant, rather cheap and green material, which is not only used in primary lithium batteries [6], but also developed as advanced electrode material for Li-ion, Li-sulfur or Li-air secondary batteries [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. It can deliver a theoretical capacity of ~320 mAh g−1 based on the transfer of one electron per formula in the potential range of 1.5–4.0 V (vs. Li+/Li). In addition to applications in batteries, MnO2 has also been used as a component in composite electrodes for electrochemical supercapacitors [14]. It crystallizes in various polymorphic forms, e.g., α-, β-, γ-, λ- and δ-MnO2, etc., which differ from each other by the different assembly of octahedral MnO6 units. Thus, the electrochemical performance of MnO2 strongly depend on the number of sites available for Li-ion insertion in its tunnel framework. According to different conditions of reaction or synthesis methods, MnO2 can be obtained with various morphologies (e.g., nanowires (NWs), nanoneedles (NNs), nanofibers (NFs), nanoflakes (NKs), nanosheets (NSs), nanorods (NRs), etc.) that promote suitable electrode material for LiBs [10]. According to intensive investigations on nanostructured materials, the needle-shaped specimen is proved to be a good choice in order to enhance the electrochemical performance of MnO2 [15]. The nanoscale and nanofiber-type morphology can provide more active sites for Faradaic reaction and, hence, reduce the diffusion time of lithium ions in the core of particles due to the one-dimensional transport pathway and the large surface-to-volume ratio [16].
Among different MnO2 polymorphs, the tetragonal α-phase has attracted special attention because its large 2 × 2 tunnels are favorable for the transportation and accommodation of foreign ions [17,18], such as K+ in the cryptomelane-type KxMn8O16 compounds [19]. Zhang et al. reported that K0.25Mn2O4 nanofibers exhibit excellent lithium insertion properties with high charge capacities and good rate capability [20].
The preparation of α-MnO2 nanostructured particles has been realized by different techniques, including co-precipitation [16], comproportionation [21], hydrothermal [22], sonochemical reduction [23], micro-emulsion route [24], simple redox reaction [25] and reflux method [26]. Green synthesis is also one of these approaches using extracts of plants as reducing agents taking into account the presence of flavonoids and polyphenols [27,28,29]. Phenolic compounds are characterized to have at least one aromatic ring attached to one or more hydroxyl groups, with various arrangements of their carbon atoms. The reducing or antioxidant ability of flavonoids and phenolic acids is closely related to the number and position of hydroxyl groups in the molecule. The higher the number of hydroxyl groups, the higher the antioxidant activity [30]. Previously, we reported successful preparations of nanostructured MnO2 via biological reducing agents such as extract of green and black tea [27], citrus peel [31], and extract of orange peel [25]. Broccoli is a kind of vegetable similar to cauliflower and cabbage, all of them are rich in natural antioxidants, antimicrobial and anticancer activities [32]. Such vegetables have a high number of phenolic components and are appreciable sources of polyphenols, especially flavonoids [33]. Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the chemical composition of broccoli extract including the antioxidant species (i.e., α-lipoic acid, sulforaphane and coenzyme Q10) [32,34]. These flavonoids and phenolic acids are present in leaves, flowering tissues and other parts of the broccoli plant.
The aim of this work is to prepare α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles with a low concentration of potassium ions using a two-step green synthesis approach with the extract of broccoli plant as reducing agent, and to investigate the electrochemical performance of the as-prepared sample. The structure and morphology of the prepared sample are investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area method, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) experiments are carried out in lithium-metal cells with α-KyMnO2 as the positive electrode. Finally, the rate capability and cyclability of α-KyMnO2 NNs are further investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

All chemicals were analytical grade and used without further purifying. The redox reaction between KMnO4 (oxidizing agent) and the extract of broccoli (reducing agent) was directly employed to prepare KyMnO2 nanowires without templates or surfactants, thus the synthesis can be considered as a green approach. A concentrated extract of broccoli sprouts was obtained through fresh seasonal vegetables cleaned in distilled water followed by 10 min boiling at 100 °C [35]. After filtration of the decoction, the bioactive compound (2 g) was added to 3 g of KMnO4 (19 mmol) dissolved in 100 mL distilled water (DI) and acidified with 2 mL of 2.5 mol L−1 H2SO4. The entire mixture was stirred vigorously for 1 h at room temperature. Then, a change in color from purple to black was observed as KMnO4 was completely reduced by the broccoli extract and black precipitate was formed. The precipitate was isolated by filtration and washed several times by distilled water, then was dried overnight at 90 °C and further calcined at 300 °C for 5 h in air.
The crystal structure of the final product was determined by XRD using Philips X’Pert apparatus (Philips, Hambourg, Germany) equipped with a CuKα X-ray source (λ = 1.54056 Å) in the 2θ range of 10–80°. TGA measurements were carried out using a thermal gravimetric analyzer (Perkin Elmer, TGA 7 series, Baesweiler, Germany) in the temperature range of 50–1000 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in air. The morphology of the prepared sample was investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL, JEM-2100, Electron microscope, Tokyo, Japan). The BET specific surface area was measured by nitrogen adsorption/desorption at 77 K in a relative pressure P/P0 = 0.0–1.0, with P and P0 being the equilibrium and saturation pressure, respectively, using a Quantachrome NOVA Automated Gas Sorption analyzer (Anton Paar GmbH, Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany). The pore size distribution and pore volume were estimated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method [36].
Electrodes for electrochemical testing were prepared by casting a slurry (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) used as the processing solvent) composed with 85 wt.% α-KyMnO2 active material, 10 wt.% conductive carbon C65 (TIMCAL), and 5 wt.% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVdF) onto an Al foil. The dried sheet was punched into ∅ 12 mm discs, and the mass loading of active material was evaluated to be 1.2–1.3 mg cm−2. These positive electrodes were assembled inside 2016 coin cells with Li metal foil as the counter electrode and 1 mol L−1 LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate:dimethyl carbonate (EC:DMC, 1:1 in vol.) as electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were carried out at scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1 using a coin-cell with a 2-electrode configuration, that implies cumulative electrochemical response of both electrodes. The cycling and rate performance were obtained by galvanostatically discharging and charging cells on a Maccor series 4000 battery tester (Maccor Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) between 4.0 and 1.5 V at 25 °C under different current densities from 0.1 to 10 C rate (1 C = 320 mAh g−1).

3. Results

3.1. Morphology, Structure and Composition

The structure, composition and morphology of the as-prepared KyMnO2 were investigated by XRD, TGA, BET and TEM measurements. Particular attention was paid to characterize the crystal-chemistry of KyMnO2 synthesized via the reduction of potassium permanganate, which always induces a residual fraction of K+ ions (VIIIK ionic radius of 1.51 Å) located in the 2 × 2 tunnels of the α-MnO2 lattice, whose main functions are templating and stabilizing the tunneled network [37]. Although numerous works published in the literature neglect this aspect. Several articles considered the presence of potassium as the combined outcome of the preparation of cryptomelane or birnessite MnO2 phases [27,38,39,40]. As a result, mixed +4 and +3 oxidation states of Mn cations could be induced in the α-MnO2 (Mn8O16) lattice (i.e., KMnIV7MnIIIO16). Thus, the degree of insertion of K+ ions located in the crystal tunnels depends on the synthesis process as it will be discussed in infra.
SEM and TEM images of KyMnO2 are shown in Figure 2a–d. In the SEM picture (Figure 2a), micron-sized particles with average size ~500 nm have almost identical shape and distribution. The sample calcined at 300 °C for 5 h in air grows with the morphology of secondary particles (agglomerates) composed of interconnected nanoneedles. Particles are constituted by a complex arrangement of very fine interconnected nanoneedles with diameters in the range of 5–20 nm and lengths of 100–300 nm. Thus, KyMnO2 architecture is an assembly of nanoneedles interwoven into a mesoporous network as it will be characterized in infra. The HRTEM bright-field image of a selected well-crystallized nanoneedle (Figure 2d) displays uniform lattice fringes with an interplanar distance of 0.70 nm, which corresponds to the separation between the (110) crystal planes of the α-MnO2 phase indicating the well-ordered tunnel structure along the b-axis. These images suggest that the shape and small size of nanoparticles can be attributed to the fast reduction process of KMnO4 [16] and the acidification by 2.5 mol L−1 H2SO4. The dependence of chemical composition, the nanoparticle size and lattice structure with growing conditions (i.e., temperature and acidity) has been investigated in previous works [41,42,43,44,45,46]. For example, the cryptomelane phase is formed in an acidic solution, while the birnessite-type MnO2 is synthesized in a basic solution. Portehault at al. obtained cryptomelane nanowires (15–40 nm in diameter) when the pH value of the solution has been controlled in the range of 0.9–1.25 [21]. It appears that up-scalable synthesis can be achieved using a facile method at low temperature with very cheap green chemistry. Villegas et al. showed that the reduction of KMnO4 by H2O2 under acidic condition produced NNs with width of a few tens of nanometers [45]. In contrast, Kumar et al. addressed the preparation of highly-dispersed α-MnO2 NNs (20–30 nm in size) without K+ inclusion using a sonochemical hydrolysis of Mn(3)acetate with a solution close to neutral pH followed by mild drying [46].
Figure 3a shows the XRD pattern of as-prepared KyMnO2 NNs. The main characteristic peak appearing at 2θ value of 37° is indexed to the (211) plane, while other diffraction peaks at 42.0°, 55.5° and 66.4° with low intensity in pattern are assigned to the (301), (600) and (002) planes, respectively, of the tetragonal α-MnO2 phase (space group I4/m, JCPDS 44-0141) with no apparent impurities. No diffraction pattern attributable to other crystallographic MnO2 is observed. The low intensity is due to the poor crystallinity and the peak broadening indicates the nanosized character of α-KyMnO2 samples. The refined lattice parameters are a = 9.95(2) Å, c = 2.76(7) Å and V = 274.1 Å3. A comparison with values of the α-MnO2 crystal (JCPDS card 44-0141, a = 9.7845 Å, c = 2.8630 Å) confirms the lattice expansion along the a-axis direction, which may have originated by the presence of bigger six-coordinated Mn3+ ions (high-spin state, rMn3+ = 0.645 Å) than Mn4+ (rMn4+ = 0.53 Å). Meanwhile, the elementary unit volume matches well with values of the α-KyMnO2 structure, in which a low concentration of K+ ions is inserted in the 2 × 2 tunnels (i.e., typically y < 4 in α-KyMn8O16) [43]. For example, a slight bigger elementary volume of 279.6 Å3 was reported by Vicat et al. for K1.33Mn8O16 [19]. Scherrer crystallite size calculated from the half-width at half-maximum of the (211) diffraction line at 2θ ≈ 37.6° is found to be of 4.4 nm, showing the polycrystalline character of α-KyMnO2 NNs. The combination of XRD data and HRTEM image reveals that NNs are composed of a few aggregated crystallites. This result is comparable with those obtained from α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles prepared by the mild synthetic method using the extract of tea as reducing agent, in which XRD patterns are dominated by the (211) Bragg line and the crystallite size is found to be ~4 nm [27].
Figure 3b shows the N2 adsorption desorption isotherm and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) pore-size distribution for as-prepared α-KyMnO2. It can be noticed that the isotherm curve displays an increase in the amount of adsorbed N2 with increase of the P/P0 value; the appearance of a hysteresis loop indicates the hierarchical mesoporous structure of α-KyMnO2 NNs. At P/P0 = 0.97, the volume of N2 adsorbed is found to be 450 cm3 g−1. The mesoporous nature of the as-prepared α-KyMnO2 is also illustrated by the graph in inset of Figure 3b, which was obtained according to BJH method. Suib et al. [47] have described the formation of mesoporosity by aggregation of MnO2 nanoparticles (nanorods or nanoneedles) along the lateral faces. The mesopore-size distribution in the range 1–20 nm displays a single peak centered at 10.4 nm, with total pore volume of 0.950 cm3 g−1. The α-KyMnO2 samples (powders) are composed of secondary particles (agglomerates), which are interconnected nanoneedles (primary particles) with diameters in the range of 5–20 nm and lengths of 100–300 nm. The mesopores (10 nm in size) correspond to the intraconnecting voids existing between randomly-packed nanoneedles [47].
The effects of the particle size and the surface area of the nanostructured MnO2 materials were studied extensively (see, for example, [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]) because the mesoporous structure plays a significant role in enhancing the active sites at electrode surface and improves the electrochemical properties sequentially. Xia et al. stated that the mesopore size for MnO2 decreases from 8 to 4 nm with the increase of the hydrothermal synthesis temperature [48]. Li et al. reported an average mesopore diameter of ~8 nm for mesoporous MnO2 with a BET surface area of 226 m2 g−1 [49] The BET surface area value of 161 m2 g−1 is greater than values reported for MnO2 prepared by different methods (e.g., microemulsion method (123 m2 g−1) [50], hydrothermal synthesis (150 m2 g−1) [51], silica templating combined with ion-exchange route (142 m2 g−1) [52], mild reaction [53] and exfoliation [49]).
Thus, the synthesis technique used in this work appears to be efficient in providing mesoporous pure α-phase KyMnO2 NNs with relatively small particles. The K-birnessite-type MnO2 hydrothermally synthesized at 160 °C for 30 min exhibits a narrow pore size distribution around 5.4 nm [54]. Regarding the HRTEM results, the pore size value describes cross-section of a single nano-needle. The value of 10 nm is in good agreement with the inner diameter measured by HRTEM. Similar results were reported for mesoporous α-MnO2 nanorods (NRs) synthesized by reduction of KMnO4 with a triblock polymer assisted by sonication (i.e., a pore volume of 1.0 cm3 g−1 but smaller pore diameter of 13.5 nm) [23]. The mesoporous MnO2 nanorods prepared by the solvent-free synthesis method show a unique pore-size distribution peak positioned at 16 nm [55].
The chemical composition of KyMnO2 NNs analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) measurements shows 52.62 wt.% Mn and 1.45 wt.% K. This result confirms that the cryptomelane-type sample contains a small concentration of potassium. The formula can be calculated as α-K0.03MnO2, taking into account the error of measurements. The presence of K+ ions inside 2 × 2 tunnels is considered to be positive to stabilize the tetragonal structure and enhance the Li-diffusion kinetics [56]. This composition as well as the chemisorbed water were further determined by thermogravimetry (TG). The TG curve shown in Figure 4a displays three distinct weight losses. A first step of ~10% at ca. 120 °C (region I) is attributed to the loss of moisture from the sample surface. The second weight loss of ~20% in the range 200–400 °C (region II) is due to the removal of structural water. The third step (viewed as a fast drop) in the range of 480–520 °C (region III) is signed to the reduction of MnO2 to the non-conductive Mn2O3 (dense bixbyite structure) occurring with a release of oxygen (2MnO2→Mn2O3 + ½O2) via an exothermic reaction [57]. Several studies have shown that the onset temperature of the rapid weight loss in region III depends on the concentration of tunneled foreign ions (potassium or ammonium) in the cryptomelane KyMn8O16 structure [39,58]. Generally, the MnO2→Mn2O3 transformation occurs in the temperature range of 480–670 °C, 480 °C being the decomposition temperature for a material without any large stabilizing cations and 670 °C being the transformation temperature of K2Mn8O16 to bixbyite [59]. The decomposition temperature of 504 °C was estimated from the differential (DTG) weight loss as shown in Figure 4b. Using different DTG behaviors of the literature, it was found that there is an almost linear relationship between the transition temperature and the content of K+ ions in α-KxMn8O16. According to Figure 2 shown in [27], we can estimate a concentration of potassium (i.e., x = 0.035), which is close to the value obtained from ICP measurement. Thus, the amount of electrochemically inactive K+ ions (1.45 wt.%) is confirmed to be much smaller than that of Mn (52.82 wt.%), and does not obviously affect the specific capacity of the electrode.

3.2. Electrochemical Performance

The suitability of the α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles as a cathode material for lithium batteries was tested electrochemically by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge discharge (GCD) experiments using 2016-type coin cells. All measurements were carried out at room temperature. Note that without reference electrode, the choice of cell voltage range should exclude that of the lithium electrode. Figure 5a shows the CV curves of α-KyMnO2 NNs recorded at scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 within the voltage range of 1.0–4.0 V. The redox peak is attributed to the Li insertion associated with the Mn4+/Mn3+ couple. The initial open circuit voltage (OCV) of the cell with α-KyMnO2 NNs electrode was 3.08 V. The broadening of CV peaks is attributed to the poor crystallinity of α-KyMnO2 electrode [27] rather than the nanosized morphology [60]. Two reduction peaks occur at about 2.58 and 1.37 V during the first discharge, which suggest multiple inequivalent sites for lithium insertion into MnO2 tunnels. The second cycle and subsequent ones differ notably from the first one with cathodic peaks shifted to higher voltage at 2.85 and 1.73 V. The voltage shift is very small for the anodic peak at the second cycle indicating a stabilization of the insertion/extraction mechanism in K0.03MnO2 host lattice. Poyraz et al. [39] demonstrated that cathodic-anodic peak positions and the peak separations depend on the K+ content in the tunnels. Sample with high K+ content have smaller initial discharge capacities compared to low K+ containing sample. The initial electrochemical modification (1st cycle) is assigned to the “Li-cell formation” with the structural change that results from the so-called “loss of lithium inventory” [61]. A fraction of the Li+ ions inserted during the first discharge remains trapped in the tunnel structure. Both structural K+ and trapped Li+ ions stabilize the MnO2 framework for the second and further discharge-charge cycles. The inserted Li+ ions occupying the 8h and 8h’ Wyckoff sites of the tetragonal lattice requires different energies of formation [62].
However, during the first cycle, the cathodic peak shift has been observed by several workers, but the reason for such trend is not exactly clear [20,63,64]. The shift of the initial cathodic peak in K0.25MnO2 at about 2.22 V vs. Li+/Li toward higher potential in subsequent cycles was reported by Zhang et al. [20]. Some local restructuring or activation taking place during the initial Li insertion was conjectured. Two options can be considered. (i) As a part of Li is trapped in the KyMnO2 lattice, more Mn3+ ions remain at the end of the redox process. Mn3+ is a Jahn–Teller ion, which induce a lattice distortion and, consequently, a change in the Mn4+/3+ redox potential. (ii) The redox potential shift could be due to the reduction of Mn3+/Mn2+. Let us consider the standard potentials Mn4+/Mn3+ and Mn3+/Mn2+ redox reactions in solids. For aqueous systems, the MnIVO2 → Mn3+ → Mn2+ redox reactions occur at the standard potential of 0.96 and 1.51 V vs. NHE, respectively. Mn3+/Mn4+ displays an oxidation potential at 0.8 V vs. RHE in perovskites. Spinel materials containing Mn3+ and Mn2+ also exhibit high activities at 0.8 V vs. RHE. The reduction of β-MnO2 and the formation of Mn3O4 (with tetrahedral Mn2+ and octahedral Mn3+) occurs at 0.70 V vs. RHE. For aprotic systems, the lithium pyrophosphate Li2MnP2O7 and LiMnPO4 olivine display a Mn3+/Mn2+ redox potential centered at 1.17 and 0.82 V vs. SCE, respectively. Wang et al. [65] reported the redox reactions between Mn species in MnO2: the anode and cathodic peaks at 0.45 and 0.22 V vs. SCE are assigned to the Mn4+/Mn3+ reaction, while 0.0 and −0.25 V are the anodic and cathodic peaks of the Mn3+/Mn2+ reaction. Thus, the difference in the cathodic peak positions of 0.47 V is higher than the potential shift (0.27 V) observed in our voltammograms.
The oxidation process occurs with the appearance of corresponding anodic peaks at 2.90 and 2.38 V. The overlapping of the charge–discharge profile of the second cycle with subsequent ones implies a good reversibility. Similar electrochemical features have been observed previously for K0.25MnO2 [20]. In addition, the peak separation voltage (polarization) between Eox (2.85 V) and Ered (2.58 V) is ΔE = 0.27 V in the first cycle, but diminishes to as low as 0.05 V in forthcoming cycles, which is the other good evidence for high reversibility of as prepared α-KyMnO2. Furthermore, the good reversibility is due to the presence of K+ ions within the 2 × 2 tunnels of the α-MnO2 structure maintained stable towards Li insertion and extraction during cycling. The excellent redox reversibility in the electrode is also demonstrated by the equal charge calculated by integration of the area under the reductive (discharge) and oxidative (charge) CV peaks. It is worthy to note that the polarization ΔE of 50 mV at a sweep rate of 0.1 mV s−1 for K0.03MnO2 NNs is smaller than ΔE = 170 mV of α-MnO2 synthesized by acid digestion of Mn2O3 powders, due to the higher electronic conductivity of K-doped MnO2 [66] and the fast diffusion kinetics of Li+ ions [67]. It was also mentioned that ΔE is irrespective of the degree of structural order [27]. Moreover, the peak current Ip vs. scan rate ν−1/2 plot shows a linear behavior, which corresponds to a diffusion-controlled process.
Figure 5b shows the galvanostatic discharge-charge curves of the α-K0.03MnO2//Li cells cycled in the voltage range of 1.5–4.0 V at constant current density of 30 mA g−1 at 25 °C. We can observe a slow decrease of the cell voltage with the presence of two pseudo-plateaus, which are evidenced as an S-shaped profile indicating a topotactic reaction for the Li insertion in the MnO2 framework, in which two inequivalent sites are available to coordinate Li+. Furthermore, the electrochemical behavior observed in CV measurement is confirmed by GCD experiment. There is a notable difference between the first discharge profile and forthcoming ones with a shift of plateaus to higher potential starting from the second cycle. The material also exhibits a capacity loss in initial four cycles from 211 to 198 mAh g−1. The Faraday yield of 0.68 F mol−1 for MnO2 is consistent with the mean oxidation state +3.885 for Mn ions determined by elemental analysis assuming an equal number of K+ and Mn3+ cations.
The pronounced changes in the electrochemical profile of the second cycle have been reported several times [20,27,56,68,69,70]. Different hypotheses have been conjectured: (i) A local activation can take place during the initial lithium insertion on the off-center 8h and 8h’ Wyckoff position (near the walls of the 2 × 2 tunnels), (ii) an ion-exchange reaction inducing a partial extraction of potassium from the centered 4e site, and (iii) a fraction of inserted lithium ions become trapped within the crystal structure of MnO2 during the first charge that enhances the lattice stabilization. Johnson [71] assigned the increase in voltage plateaus after the first cycle to a decrease in the cell impedance that occurs during cycling of α-MnO2 prepared by the acid digestion of Mn2O3 by H2SO4 but did not justify this claim by complementary experiments. Considering the small amount of K+ ions, the pronounced change in electrochemical behaviors in the second cycle (vs. the first cycle) could be signed to the difference in the site occupation by Li+ ions rather than the ion exchange in our sample. Recently, the CV peak shift during first scans has also been observed in the Li-KyMnO2 system due to the irreversible local activation in the intercalated lattice and the formation of the solid interphase (SEI) layer [27,72].
Figure 5c,d show the incremental capacity curves (IC) (i.e., differential capacity vs. cell voltage (dQ/dV), of the first and second lithiation processes). This analysis can be considered as an efficient tool to determine the electrochemical spectroscopy of an electrode [73]. For instance, IC has been successfully applied to analyze the behavior of doped or blended cathodes [74,75]. The IC curves were extracted from the GCD profiles (lithiation process) to further characterize the electrochemical behavior at the first and second cycles showing the transformation after the first lithiation process. Each plot displays two broad peaks in the voltage range of 1.5–3.0 V corresponding to the plateaus in GCD curves. These results show clearly the upward potential shift after the first cycle, which indicate a change of the Li location in the host KyMnO2 framework.
The rate capability and cycling stability of the α-K0.03MnO2 electrode were tested in the voltage range 1.5–4.0 V at various current densities in the range 0.1–10 C. Results are presented in Figure 6a–c. Upon the increase of the current density, we observe a decay in the specific capacity without significant change of the charge and discharge profiles (Figure 6a). The S-shaped profile is maintained in the tested C-rate range. As shown in Figure 6b, the modified Peukert plot (i.e., discharge capacity vs. C-rate) exhibits an almost semi-logarithmic behavior, and the α-K0.03MnO2 electrode delivers a specific capacity of ~32 mAh g−1 at 10 C. Figure 6c presents the cycling performance of the α-K0.03MnO2 electrode carried out at 30 mA g−1 up to 100 cycles. Except for the first few cycles, the capacities decrease steadily. The fade rate of 0.3 mAh g−1 per cycle for α-K0.03MnO2 NNs electrode is much smaller than that for the unstabilized α-MnO2 (2.3 mAh g−1 per cycle) [68]. This behavior is similar to that observed for KMn8O16 nanofibers [20] and for KMn8O16 nanorods [26]. The good reversibility of the α-K0.03MnO2 NNs is evidenced by the relevant coulombic efficiency that remains around 98.8% after several cycles. Considering the satisfying electrochemical stability, it seems that the cationic exchange (i.e., Li+ vs. K+) is negligible during the Li insertion in the α-K0.03MnO2 framework.

4. Discussion

Although the application of cryptomelane KyMnO2 nanoparticles have been widely investigated in supercapacitor, to the best our knowledge, there is a limited number of studies devoted as cathode materials in LiBs [20,26,60,72,73,74,75,76,77]. In this work, the nanostructured cryptomelane-type KyMnO2 has been successfully prepared by the reduction of MnO4 ions in acidic medium at room temperature. Nanoneedles are well formed even within a short reaction duration of 1 h. A lot of literature has been reported on the synthesis of nanoparticle α-MnO2 based materials, a brief summary is given here. Gao and Norby reported that the growth of α-MnO2 nanofibers started after 30 min as a mixture of birnessite and cryptomelane phase via hydrothermal route at 140 °C. Relatively pure cryptomelane nanofibers would only be obtained after a reaction time of ~4 h [37]. Single-crystal α-MnO2 nanowires (average diameter of 30 nm) were synthesized by only using potassium permanganate and sodium nitrite (molar KMNO4:NaNO2 ratio of 2:1) in acidic solution, while nanorods (50–100 nm diameter) were formed for decreasing molar ratio to 2:5 [78]. Similar MnO2 nanoneedles with diameter of 10–50 nm and length of 200–500 nm were prepared by a two-step synthesis at temperature of 83 °C with a more complex procedure using MnCl2·4H2O, isopropanol and KMnO4 raw materials [16].
Excellent properties of α-KyMnO2 have been obtained using a much simple synthesis process, in which the biologic reducing agent allows shorter reaction duration in ambient conditions. Let compare our material with others. Cryptomelane-type K0.106Mn2O4 nanoneedles were prepared via a template-free, one-step hydrothermal method (HTM) using a complex chemistry composed of manganese(II) acetate tetrahydrate (MnAc24H2O) 99%, oxone monopersulfate compound (triple salt 2KHSO5KHSO4K2SO4), and potassium nitrate (KNO3). Needle-like samples were obtained by HTM at 200 °C for 20 h [38]. Similar process was employed to prepare K0.25Mn2O4 nanofibers with high potassium content with diameters in the range of 10–20 nm [20]. Liu et al. demonstrated that the size of nanoneedles can be controlled by cross-linking reagents (e.g., polyvinyl acetate (PVA), glycerol and glucose); the shorter K0.3MnO2 nanocrystals were obtained using PVA [42]. Cheng et al. controlled the synthesis of α-MnO2 NWs using a hydrothermal method, in which potassium permanganate is reduced by acetic acid. The NWs with a length about 6–10 mm and an average diameter of 20 nm were obtained using 3 mmol KMnO4 dissolved in 0.4 mol L−1 CH3COOH solution (30 mL) [79]. Li et al. succeeded to grow α-MnO2 nanowires (width of ~30 nm and length of ~10 µm) with exposed (110) crystal plane using KMnO4 and NH4F in hydrothermal conditions but did not report the presence of tunneled K+ ions [80].
The nanoneedles morphology of α-KyMnO2 appeared to be favorable of enhanced electrochemical performance partly due to the modified lattice parameters (i.e., the expansion in the a-direction and the slight contraction in the c-direction without obvious change in volume). Similar results have been reported by Feng et al. for the urchin-like MnO2 formed by the assembly of nanoneedles prepared in acidic conditions [81]. A second key issue is the specific surface area. The BET value of 161 m2 g−1 is greater than values reported for MnO2 prepared by different methods [48,49,50,51,52,53]. BET surface area of 132 m2 g−1 was reported for mesoporous α-MnO2 hollow urchins prepared by mild reaction route [52]. Similar results were reported for mesoporous α-MnO2 nanorods synthesized by reduction of KMnO4 with a triblock polymer assisted by sonication (i.e., a pore volume of 1.0 cm3 g−1 but smaller pore diameter of 13.5 nm) [23]. Specific surface areas varying in the range of 35–110 m2 g−1 for α-MnO2 NWs were shown to be dependent on the growth conditions [21]. α-MnO2 nanotubes with large surface area (226 m2 g−1) fabricated by exfoliation of α-MnO2 nanoflowers exhibited enhanced lithium storage properties [54] The morphology of our sample is different from the heavy K-doped MnO2 with fiber-like morphology growing along the c-axis [82]. Dai et al. pointed out that only nanoneedles as short fibers are obtained because the weak stabilization of tunnels by low K+ ions concentration in the tetragonal crystal [69]. As the growth of α-MnO2 nanoparticles is time- and temperature-dependent, it is noteworthy that the use of extract of broccoli favors the formation of nanoneedle-shape. During the synthesis, the purple color of KMnO4 disappeared quickly after less than 1 h at room temperature and nanoneedles with diameter of about 5 nm and length of about 100 nm were formed. On the contrary, for the synthesis of K0.08MnO2 from the reduction of KMnO4 in sulfuric acid without chelating agent, the final product was obtained after a reaction at high temperature of 60 °C for longer duration of 8 h [53].
Several studies have demonstrated that introduction of K+ ions in the cryptomelane structure maintains the integrity of the lattice and is suitable for improving electrochemical properties of α-MnO2 when applying as the cathode material for LIBs [37,38,39,72,83]. There is a kind of effective pillaring effect in presence of large cations with an ionic radius of 1.51 Å for eight-coordinated K+ ions. Tompsett and Islam performed a comprehensive ab initio study of Li insertion in hollandite α-MnO2 but did not consider a lattice with K+ ions in the tunnels [61]. However, there is a compromise in the choice of potassium concentration in the 2 × 2 tunnels of MnO2. Due to the lattice expansion and the electron donation, higher concentration of K+ ions not only improves the Li+ diffusion coefficient (DLi+) and enhances the electronic conductivity by boosting electrons hopping via Mn3+/Mn4+ couples, but also reduces the specific discharge capacity because the addition of inactive K+ ions. An enhanced DLi+ has been estimated from 2.8 × 10−15 to 1.9 × 10−12 cm2 s−1 when pure α-MnO2 was doped with 0.25 K+ ion per formula [77]. Bach et al. [84] calculated a value of DLi+ ≈ 10−10 cm2 s−1 for the hydrated α-phase K0.062MnO2 using cyclic voltammetry. Recently, using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Abuzeid et al. reported DLi+ values of 5.2 × 10−11 and 2.1 × 10−11 cm2 s−1 for K0.11MnO2 and K0.06MnO2, respectively, showing the diffusivity enhancement with the higher content of K+ ions [27]. Meanwhile, different synthetic approaches provide nanostructured cryptomelane-type MnO2 with different particle shapes, particle sizes and particle size distributions [85,86]. Additionally, it has been achieved that nanoneedles or nanowires can accommodate large strain without pulverization and exhibit short lithium insertion pathways [87,88].
The α-KyMnO2 nanoneedle-like material reported herein synthesized with the assistance of extract of broccoli plant as reducing agent with a small concentration of potassium has shown excellent electrochemical performances. However, the use of nanoneedles as electrode requested careful fabrication. It is worth noting that the composite hardly adheres to the Al foil during the electrode coating. This may attribute to the rather soft aluminum foil and the weak interaction between the very fine MnO2 nanoneedle and aluminum (i.e., van der Waals forces). Thus, the preparation of α-KyMnO2 electrode with ultra-high mass loading would be difficult and calls for the further study.
It is well known that the discharge capacity of α-KyMnO2 comes from the insertion of lithium ions on available empty sites inside the (2 × 2) tunnels, i.e., off-center 8h Wyckoff positions [61] with the electrochemical reaction of KyMnO2 + xLi+ + xe → LixKyMnO2. However, the real situation seems to be more complex due to the presence of K+ ions in the MnO2 tunnels. We observed a drastic change of the discharge voltage profile after the first cycle. Such a behavior has been revealed by several reports on α-MnO2 materials with different tunneled cations [89,90]. After the formation, the voltage plateau remains stable at 2.88 V for our nanoneedle-like samples and is slightly higher than 2.80 V for K0.00MnO2 reported by Poyraz et al. [39], who showed that the discharge plateau voltage decreases systematically with increasing K+ concentration (i.e., 2.62 V for K0.04MnO2). However, data of the literature are quite controversial showing the major influence of the central cation in the tunnel and the main role of the material morphology. In the early work, Rossouw et al. [91] observed CV curves with two well-resolved steps during cathodic and anodic scans, while Hill et al. [70] revealed a unique broad anodic peak during charge for nanofibers (~15–25 nm in diameter), for which the cathodic peak slightly shifted from 2.82 to 2.90 V. Dai et al. reported also changes in the CV curves in cryptomelane-type hydronium-doped MnO2 (i.e., (H3O)0.106MnO2·0.3H2O) upon Li insertion that implies similar free energies for the different hosting Li sites after several cycles [68]. Johnson et al. [89] indicated the disappearance of the voltage plateau-type shape at about 2.5 V for lithia-stabilized α-MnO2 (i.e., α-(Li2O)0.143MnO2), while the discharge profile change is less pronounced for ammonia-stabilized sample (i.e., α-(NH3)0.2MnO2). Kijima et al. confirmed the loss of the plateau with cycling of α-(Li2O)0.12MnO2) [90]. This group demonstrated initial discharge capacity improvement by stabilizing the structure with chemical insertion of two Li-ions per unit cell. Zhang et al. reported the electrochemical performance of α-K1.0Mn8O16 synthesized by hydrothermal route at 120 °C that showed a voltage plateau at ca. 2.3 V and an initial discharge capacity of 360 mAh g−1 at current density of 0.1 A g−1. A non-negligible amount of K+ ions were extracted from the K1.0Mn8O16 nanofibers cathode in the first charge reaction but showed a Coulombic efficiency of ~50% at C/3 rate [20]. Similar conclusion was claimed for the electrochemical reactions KMn8O16 nanorods [26]. In contrast, Ranjusha et al. [60] observed GCD single slopped curve without distinct voltage plateau for well-crystallized MnO2 nanowires (30 nm in diameter) prepared by oxidation of Mn2+ by MnO4 and an initial capacity of 251 mAh g−1 at C/2 rate but the K+ content was not mentioned. Kumakai et al. demonstrated a two S-shaped discharge behavior with plateaus at 2.6 and 2.3 V for K0.72Mn8O16 prepared by hydrothermal method at 80 °C [76]. They stated that, in α-KyMnO2 and its Co-doped specimen (KyMn0.88Co0.12O2), the Li is inserted into two types of empty sites of the small (1 × 1) and large (2 × 2) tunnels with an initial discharge capacity of 250 mAh g−1 at 10 mA g−1.
Table 1 compares the electrochemical performance of the nanoneedle-like α-KyMnO2 prepared in this work to previous reported cryptomelane-type α-KyMnO2 cathode materials. In the early work by Ohzuku et al. [92], KyMn8O16 cathode materials prepared by two different methods showed S-shaped discharge curves with the relatively high voltage plateaus at 3.0 and 2.45 V. Sol–gel K1.2Mn8O16 and acid digestion K1.3Mn8O16 exhibit modest initial discharge capacities of 160 and 188 mAh g−1, when cycled at 50 mA g−1, respectively, due to the micrometer-sized particles [91]. Similar results were obtained for heavy doped α-KyMn8O16 nanorods (y ≈1, with a diameter of 5–15 nm and a length of 50–300 nm) synthesized using a reflux method with capacity of 159 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1 [26]. A comparison between K0.25MnO2 prepared by hydrothermal method at 160 °C and MnO2 obtained by acid digestion (HNO3 treatment) of the K-doped material shows specific discharge capacities of 143 and 170 mAh g−1 at current density of 0.1 A g−1, while in terms of cyclability, the capacity retention of 62% at 5 C rate is better for K0.25MnO2 than for the undoped cathode [74]. The Co-doped hydrothermal product K0.14Mn0.9Co0.1O2 from MnSO4 and K2S2O8 solution showed higher initial discharge capacity 180–200 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1 [93]. After 200 cycles the hydrated K0.84Mn8O16·0.25H2O nanowire-type electrode material fabricated by thermal regeneration process of MnO2 waste delivered a specific capacity of 120 mAh g−1 at 50 mA g−1 [94]. KyMnO2 nanorods (100 nm in size) prepared by template-based sol-gel method delivered an initial discharge capacity of 183 mAh g−1, which stabilized on subsequent cycles to 134 mAh g−1 [95]. Urchin-like α-K0.04MnO2 formed by nanoneedles synthesized by sol-gel assisted by a redox reaction between ascorbic acid and KMnO4 showed an outstanding initial specific capacity of 230 mAh g−1 and 45% capacity retention at cycle one hundred [96]. Compared to the state-of-art of MDO materials, the cryptomelane-type α-KyMnO2 cathode prepared via biological reducing agent (broccoli extract) assisted synthesis shows good electrochemical performance.

5. Conclusions

In this work, one-dimensional α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles in pure cryptomelane phase were successfully prepared by a facile, one pot, scalable and environmentally-friendly method. An alternative biological reducing agent, i.e., extract of broccoli plant, was used instead of a traditional chemical chelate. This green-synthesis route is a straightforward and inexpensive facilitating mass production of nanostructured α-MnO2 particles stabilized by potassium ions without templates. The nanostructure characterized by crystallite of 4.4 nm, large surface area 160.7 m2 g−1, high porosity and low potassium content of 0.03 per formula in the 2 × 2 tunnels favors good electrochemical performance. Electrochemical tests show an initial capacity ca. 211 mAh g−1 with high Coulombic efficiency of 99% and good reversibility with a capacity retention 82% after 100 cycles. Thus, α-K0.03MnO2 nanoneedle-shaped material synthesized via the broccoli-extract-assisted green process could be considered as a promising cathode for LiBs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.H.; investigation, A.M.H., H.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.H.; writing—review and editing, C.M.J., J.L.; supervision, M.W.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

A.M.H. is grateful to financial support from Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) through the project number 23159 (Economical synthesis methods for nanosized energy storage cathode materials to be used in lithium-ion batteries).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Betz, J.; Bieker, G.; Meister, P.; Placke, T.; Winter, M.; Schmuch, R. Theoretical vs. practical energy: A plea for more transparency in the energy calculation of different rechargeable battery systems. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803170–1803187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Winter, M.; Brodd, R.J. What are batteries, fuel cells and supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4245–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A.; Vijh, A.; Zaghib, K. Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fergus, J.W. Recent developments in cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 939–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiao, F.; Bruce, P.G. Mesoporous crystalline β-MnO2–a reversible positive electrode for rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. GlobTeck, Inc. Lithium Manganese Dioxide Battery Li-MnO2. Available online: https://fr.globtek.com/lithium-manganese-dioxide-battery-li-mno2-batteries/ (accessed on 12 June 2019).
  7. Zhang, K.; Han, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. Nanostructured Mn-based oxides for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 699–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reddy, A.L.M.; Shaijumon, M.M.; Gowda, S.R.; Ajayan, P.M. Coaxial MnO2/carbon nanotube array electrodes for high-performance lithium batteries. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A. Nanostructured MnO2 as electrodes materials for energy storage. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tang, Y.; Zheng, S.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, X.; Xue, H.; Pang, H. Advanced batteries based on manganese dioxide and its composites. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 12, 284–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, X.; Wang, J.; Jia, H.; Kloepsch, R.; Liu, H.; Beltrop, K.; Li, J. Ionic liquid-assisted solvothermal synthesis of hollow Mn2O3 anode and LiMn2O4 cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Lou, X.W. Hollow carbon nanofibers filled with MnO2 nanosheets as efficient sulfur hosts for lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12886–12890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Débart, A.; Peterson, A.J.; Bao, J.; Bruce, P.G. α-MnO2 nanowires: A catalyst for the O2 electrode in rechargeable lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4521–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Toupin, M.; Brousse, T.; Bélanger, D. Charge storage mechanism of MnO2 electrode used in aqueous electrochemical capacitor. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3184–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kim, M.; Hwang, Y.; Min, K.; Kim, J. Introduction of MnO2 nanoneedles to activated carbon to fabricate high-performance electrodes as electrochemical supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 113, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, S.; Zhu, J.; Han, Q.; Zheng, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X. Shape-controlled synthesis of one-dimensional MnO2 via a facile quick-precipitation procedure and its electrochemical properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 4356–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Meng, Y.; Yu, M.; Yi, J.; Wu, Y.; Lu, X.; Tong, Y. Achieving ultrahigh energy density and long durability in a flexible rechargeable quasi-solid-state Zn-MnO2 battery. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Housel, L.M.; Wang, L.; Abraham, A.; Huang, J.; Renderos, G.D.; Quilty, C.D.; Brady, A.B.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S. Investigation of α-MnO2 tunneled structures as model cation hosts for energy storage. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 16, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vicat, J.; Fanchon, E.; Strobel, P.; Tran-Qui, D. The structure of K1.33Mn8O16 and cation ordering in hollandite-type structures. Acta Crystallogr. B 1986, 42, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, C.; Feng, C.; Zhang, P.; Guo, Z.; Chen, Z.; Lid, S.; Liu, H. K0.25Mn2O4 nanofiber microclusters as high power cathode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 1643–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Portehault, D.; Cassaignon, S.; Baudrin, E.; Jolivet, J.P. Morphology control of cryptomelane type MnO2 nanowires by soft chemistry. Growth mechanisms in aqueous medium. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 5410–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, L.; Pan, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, G. One-dimensional α-MnO2: Trapping chemistry of tunnel structures, structure stability, and magnetic transitions. J. Solid State Chem. 2007, 180, 2896–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nayak, P.K.; Munichandraiah, N. Rapid sonochemical synthesis of mesoporous MnO2 for supercapacitor applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2012, 177, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Devaraj, S.; Munichandraiah, N. Electrochemical supercapacitor studies of nanostructured α-MnO2 synthesized by microemulsion method and the effect of annealing. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2007, 154, A80–A88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abuzeid, H.M.; Elsherif, S.A.; Abdel-Ghany, N.A.; Hashem, A.M. Facile, cost-effective and eco-friendly green synthesis method of MnO2 as storage electrode materials for supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2019, 21, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zheng, H.; Feng, C.; Kim, S.-J.; Yin, S.; Wu, H.; Wang, S.; Li, S. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of KMn8O16 nanorods for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 88, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abuzeid, H.M.; Hashem, A.M.; Kaus, M.; Knapp, M.; Indris, S.; Ehrenberg, H.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Electrochemical performance of nanosized MnO2 synthesized by redox route using biological reducing agents. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 746, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Porrawatkul, P.; Nuthong, W.; Pimsen, R.; Thongsom, M. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Barringtonia acutangula (L.) Gaertn leaf extract as reducing agent and their antibacterial and antioxidant activity. J. Appl. Sci. 2017, 16, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fatimah, I. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using extract of Parkia speciose Hassk pods assisted by microwave irradiation. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cartea, M.E.; Francisco, M.; Soengas, P.; Velasco, P. Phenolic compounds in brassica vegetables. Molecules 2011, 16, 251–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hashem, A.M.; Abuzeid, H.; Kaus, M.; Indris, S.; Ehrenberg, H.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Green synthesis of nanosized manganese dioxide as positive electrode for lithium-ion batteries using lemon juice and citrus peel. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 262, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kochhar, M.; Kochhar, A. Proximate composition, available carbohydrates, dietary fibre and anti-nutritional factors of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Italica Plenck) leaf and floret powder. Biosci. Discov. 2014, 5, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  33. Campas-Baypoli, O.N.; Sánchez-Machado, D.I.; Bueno-Solano, C.; Núñez-Gastélum, J.A.; Reyes-Moreno, C.; López-Cervantes, J. Biochemical composition and physicochemical properties of broccoli flours. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 60, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vallejo, F.; Tomas-Barberan, F.; Garcia-Viguera, C. Health-promoting compounds in broccoli as influenced by refrigerated transport and retail sale period. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 3029–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pathare, P.B.; Mohapatra, D. Bioactive compounds in broccoli: Extraction and processing. In Vegetable Processing and Bioactive Compounds; Kadam, D.M., Sharma, M., Kaur, D., Eds.; Studium Press India Ltd.: New Delhi, India, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. Barrett, E.P.; Joyner, L.G.; Halenda, P.P. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, T.; Norby, P. Frame stability of tunnel-structured cryptomelane nanofibers: The role of tunnel cations. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 2013, 4948–4957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Galindo, H.M.; Carvajal, Y.; Njagi, E.; Ristau, R.A.; Suib, S.L. Facile one-step template-free synthesis of uniform hollow microstructures of cryptomelane-type manganese oxide K-OMS-2. Langmuir 2010, 26, 13677–13683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poyraz, A.S.; Huang, J.; Pelliccione, C.J.; Tong, X.; Cheng, S.; Wu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S. Synthesis of cryptomelane type α-MnO2 (KxMn8O16) cathode materials with tunable K+ content: The role of tunnel cation concentration on electrochemistry. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16914–16928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gaillot, A.-C.; Flot, D.; Drits, V.A.; Manceau, A.; Burghammer, M.; Lanson, B. Structure of synthetic K-rich birnessite obtained by high-temperature decomposition of KMnO4. I. Two-layer polytype from 800 °C experiment. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 4666–4678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, X.; Li, Y. Synthesis and formation mechanism of manganese dioxide nanowires/nanorods. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, J.; Son, Y.C.; Cai, J.; Shen, X.; Suib, S.L.; Aindow, M. Size control, metal substitution, and catalytic application of cryptomelane nanomaterials prepared using cross-linking reagents. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McKenzie, R.M. The synthesis of birnessite, cryptomelane and some other oxides and hydroxides of manganese. Miner. Mag. 1971, 38, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Davoglio, R.A.; Cabello, G.; Marco, J.F.; Biaggio, S.R. Synthesis and characterization of α-MnO2 nanoneedles for electrochemical supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 261, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Villegas, J.C.; Garces, L.J.; Gomez, S.; Durand, J.P.; Suib, S.L. Particle size control of cryptomelane nanomaterials by use of H2O2 in acidic conditions. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1910–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kumar, V.G.; Kim, K.B. Organized and highly dispersed growth of MnO2 nano-rods by sonochemical hydrolysis of Mn(3)acetate. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2006, 13, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Poyraz, A.S.; Kuo, C.-H.; Biswas, S.; King’ondu, C.K.; Suib, S.L. A general approach to crystalline and monomodal pore size mesoporous materials. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Xia, A.; Yu, W.; Tan, G.; Ren, H.; Liu, C. Synthesis of porous δ-MnO2 nanosheets and their supercapacitor performance. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 839, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, L.; Nan, C.; Lu, J.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. α-MnO2 nanotubes: High surface area and enhanced lithium battery properties. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6945–6947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Devaraj, S.; Munichandraiah, N. Effect of crystallographic structure of MnO2 on its electrochemical capacitance properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4406–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Subramanian, V.; Zhu, H.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M.; Wei, B. Hydrothermal synthesis and pseudocapacitance properties of MnO2 nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 20207–20214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, H.; Dong, X.; Shi, J.; Zhao, J.; Hua, Z.; Gao, J.; Ruan, M.; Yan, D. Templated synthesis of hierarchically porous manganese oxide with a crystalline nanorod framework and its high electrochemical performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, B.; Rong, G.; Xie, Y.; Huang, L.; Feng, C. Low-temperature synthesis of alpha-MnO2 hollow urchins and their application in rechargeable Li+ batteries. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 6404–6410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.; Yu, P.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, D.; Sun, X.; Ma, Y. Rapid hydrothermal synthesis of hierarchical nanostructures assembled from ultrathin birnessite-type MnO2 nanosheets for supercapacitor applications. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 89, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alfaruqi, M.H.; Islam, S.; Gim, J.; Song, J.; Kim, S.; Pham, D.T.; Jo, J.; Xiu, Z.; Mathew, V.; Kim, J. A high surface area tunnel-type α-MnO2 nanorod cathode by a simple solvent-free synthesis for rechargeable aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 650, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yuan, Y.; Nie, A.; Odegard, G.M.; Xu, R.; Zhou, D.; Santhanagopalan, S.; He, K.; Asayesh-Ardakani, H.; Meng, D.D.; Klie, R.F.; et al. Asynchronous crystal cell expansion during lithiation of K+-stabilized α-MnO2. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2998–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ohzuku, T.; Tari, I.; Hirai, T. Thermal gravimetric studies of manganese dioxide. Electrochim. Acta 1982, 27, 1049–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Muraoka, Y.; Chiba, H.; Atou, T.; Kikuchi, M.; Hiraga, K.; Syono, Y.; Sugiyama, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Grenier, J.C. Preparation of α-MnO2 with an open tunnel. J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 144, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Feng, Q.; Kanoh, H.; Miyai, Y.; Ooi, K. Alkali metal ions insertion/extraction reactions with hollandite-type manganese oxide in the aqueous phase. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ranjusha, R.; Sonia, T.S.; Roshny, S.; Lakshmi, V.; Kalluri, S.; Kim, T.N.; Nair, S.V.; Balakrishnan, A. Synthesis, characterization and rate capability performance of the micro-porous MnO2 nanowires as cathode material in lithium batteries. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 70, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sarasketa-Zabala, E.; Aguesse, F.; Villareal, I.; Rodriguez-Martinez, L.M.; Lopez, C.M.; Kubiak, P. Understanding lithium inventory loss and sudden performance fade in cylindrical cells during cycling with deep-discharge steps. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 896–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tompsett, D.A.; Islam, M.S. Electrochemistry of hollandite a-MnO2: Li-ion and Na-ion insertion and Li2O incorporation. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 2515–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Esmanski, A.; Ozin, G.A. Silicon inverse-opal-based microporous materials as negative electrodes for lithium ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 12, 1999–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chan, C.K.; Peng, H.; Liu, G.; McIlwrath, K.; Zhang, X.F.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. High-performance lithium battery anodes using silicon nanowires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, L.; Deng, M.; Ding, G.; Chen, S.; Xu, F. Manganese dioxide based ternary nanocomposite for catalytic reduction and nonenzymatic sensing of hydrogen peroxide. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 114, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Johnson, C.S.; Dees, D.W.; Mansuetto, M.F.; Thackeray, M.M.; Vissers, D.R.; Argyriou, D.; Loong, C.K.; Christensen, L.J. Structural and electrochemical studies of α-manganese dioxide (α-MnO2). J. Power Sources 1997, 68, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tseng, L.-T.; Lu, Y.; Fan, H.M.; Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Liu, T.; Munroe, P.; Li, S.; Yi, J. Magnetic properties in α-MnO2 doped with alkaline elements. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Yang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, F. Hydrothermal synthesis and electrochemical characterization of α-MnO2 nanorods as cathode material for lithium batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2008, 3, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  69. Dai, J.; Li, S.F.Y.; Siow, K.S.; Gao, Z. Synthesis and characterization of the hollandite-type MnO2 as a cathode material in lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2211–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hill, L.I.; Verbaere, A.; Guyomard, D. MnO2 (α-, β-, γ-) compounds prepared by hydrothermal-electrochemical synthesis: Characterization, morphology, and lithium insertion behavior. J. Power Sources 2003, 119–121, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Johnson, C.S. Development and utility of manganese oxides as cathodes in lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 2007, 165, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kim, K.; Daniel, G.; Kessler, V.G.; Seisenbaeva, G.A.; Pol, V.G. Basic medium heterogeneous solution synthesis of α-MnO2 nanoflakes as an anode or cathode in half cell configuration (vs. lithium) of Li-ion batteries. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Zhang, X.; Jiang, W.J.; Mauger, A.; Gendron, F.; Julien, C.M.; Qilu, R. Minimization of the cation mixing in Li1+x(NMC)1-xO2 as cathode material. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 1292–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kobayashi, T.; Kawasaki, N.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shono, K.; Mita, Y.; Miyashiro, H. A method of separating the capacities of layer and spinel compounds in blended cathode. J. Power Sources 2014, 245, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hashem, A.M.; Abdel-Ghany, A.E.; Scheuermann, M.; Indris, S.; Ehrenberg, H.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Doped nanoscale NMC333 as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Materials 2019, 12, 2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Kumagai, N.; Sasaki, T.; Oshitari, S.; Komaba, S. Characterization and lithium insertion characteristics of hollandite-type Ky(Mn1-xMx)O2 for rechargeable lithium battery electrodes. J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. 2006, 9, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yuan, Y.; Zhan, C.; He, K.; Chen, H.; Yao, W.; Shari-Asl, S.; Song, B.; Yang, Z.; Nie, A.; Luo, X.; et al. The influence of large cations on the electrochemical properties of tunnel-structured metal oxides. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kumar, N.; Dineshkumar, P.; Rameshbabu, R.; Sen, A. Morphological analysis of ultra fine α-MnO2 nanowires under different reaction conditions. Mater. Lett. 2015, 158, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Cheng, G.; Yu, L.; Lan, B.; Sun, M.; Lin, T.; Fu, Z.; Su, X.; Qiu, M.; Guo, C.; Xu, B. Controlled synthesis of α-MnO2 nanowires and their catalytic performance for toluene combustion. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 75, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, W.; Cui, X.; Zeng, R.; Du, G.; Sun, Z.; Zheng, R.; Ringer, S.P.; Dou, S.X. Performance modulation of α-MnO2 nanowires by crystal facet engineering. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Feng, L.; Xuan, Z.; Zhao, H.; Bai, Y.; Guo, J.; Su, C.; Chen, X. MnO2 prepared by hydrothermal method and electrochemical performance as anode for lithium-ion battery. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Xiao, T.D.; Bokhimi, X.; Benaissa, M.; Perez, R.; Strutt, P.R.; Yacaman, M.J. Microstructural characteristics of chemically processed manganese oxide nanofibers. Acta Mater. 1997, 45, 1685–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ahn, D.; Yoo, I.; Koo, Y.-M.; Shin, N.; Kim, J.; Shin, T.J. Effects of cobalt-intercalation and polyaniline coating on electrochemical performance of layered manganese oxides. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5282–5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Bach, S.; Pereira-Ramos, J.P.; Baffier, N. A new MnO2 tunnel related phase as host lattice for Li intercalation. Solid State Ion. 1995, 80, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Huang, H.; Sithambaram, S.; Chen, C.-H.; Kithongo, C.K.; Xu, L.; Iyer, A.; Garces, H.F.; Suib, S.L. Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of cryptomelane-type octahedral molecular sieves (OMS-2) and their catalytic studies. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 3664–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hu, B.; Chen, C.-H.; Frueh, S.J.; Jin, L.; Joesten, R.; Suib, S.L. Removal of aqueous phenol by adsorption and oxidation with doped hydrophobic cryptomelane-type manganese oxide (K−OMS-2) nanofibers. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9835–9844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Green, M.; Fielder, E.; Scrosati, B.; Wachtler, M.; Moreno, J.S. Structured silicon anodes for lithium battery applications. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2003, 6, A75–A79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cheng, F.-Y.; Zhao, J.-Z.; Song, W.; Li, C.-S.; Ma, H.; Chen, J.; Shen, P.-W. Facile controlled synthesis of MnO2 nanostructures of novel shapes and their application in batteries. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 2038–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Johnson, C.S.; Thackeray, M.M. Ammonia- and lithia-doped manganese dioxide for 3 V lithium batteries. J. Power Sources 2001, 97–98, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kijima, N.; Takahashi, Y.; Akimoto, J.; Awaka, J. Lithium ion insertion and extraction reactions with hollandite-type manganese dioxide free from any stabilizing cations in its tunnel cavity. J. Solid State Chem. 2005, 178, 2741–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rossouw, M.H.; Liles, D.C.; Thackeray, M.M. Alpha manganese dioxide for lithium batteries: A structural and electrochemical study. Mater. Res. Bull. 1992, 27, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ohzuku, T.; Kitagawa, M.; Sawai, K.; Hirai, T. Topotactic reduction of alpha-manganese (di)oxide in nonaqueous lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kadoma, Y.; Akahira, T.; Fukuda, T.; Ui, K.; Kumagai, N. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of nanofiber hollandite-type manganese oxides using hydrothermal method. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2012, 5, 1250004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Poyraz, A.S.; Huang, J.; Cheng, S.; Bock, D.C.; Wu, L.; Zhu, Y.; Marschilok, A.C.; Takeuchi, K.J.; Takeuchi, E.S. Effective recycling of manganese oxide cathodes for lithium based batteries. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3414–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sugantha, M.; Ramakrishnan, P.A.; Hermann, A.M.; Warmsingh, C.P.; Ginley, D.S. Nanostructured MnO2 for Li batteries. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2003, 28, 597–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hashem, A.M.; Abdel-Ghany, A.E.; El-Tawil, R.; Bhaskar, A.; Hunzinger, B.; Ehrenberg, H.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Urchin-like α-MnO2 formed by nanoneedles for high-performance lithium batteries. Ionics 2016, 22, 2263–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the chemical composition of broccoli extract. Chemical structure of (a) sulforaphane, (b) vitamin coenzyme Q10 and (c) α-lipoic acid.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the chemical composition of broccoli extract. Chemical structure of (a) sulforaphane, (b) vitamin coenzyme Q10 and (c) α-lipoic acid.
Materials 13 01269 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM images of cryptomelane-type KyMnO2 nanoneedles, (b) TEM image showing the interconnected nanoneedles and (c,d) HRTEM images. The lattice fringes (image (c)) show an interplanar distance of 0.70 nm, which corresponds to the separation between the (110) crystal planes in the cryptomelane α-MnO2 structure.
Figure 2. (a) SEM images of cryptomelane-type KyMnO2 nanoneedles, (b) TEM image showing the interconnected nanoneedles and (c,d) HRTEM images. The lattice fringes (image (c)) show an interplanar distance of 0.70 nm, which corresponds to the separation between the (110) crystal planes in the cryptomelane α-MnO2 structure.
Materials 13 01269 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles. (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles and the pore size distribution (inset).
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles. (b) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm of α-KyMnO2 nanoneedles and the pore size distribution (inset).
Materials 13 01269 g003
Figure 4. (a) TG curve of green synthesized KyMnO2 nanoneedles. (b) Differential weight dW/dT showing the decomposition temperature from α-KyMnO2 to Mn2O3.
Figure 4. (a) TG curve of green synthesized KyMnO2 nanoneedles. (b) Differential weight dW/dT showing the decomposition temperature from α-KyMnO2 to Mn2O3.
Materials 13 01269 g004
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of α-K0.03MnO2 nanoneedles recorded at scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage range from 1.0 to 4.0 V. (b) Voltage profiles of a K0.03MnO2 NNs‖Li cell over 50 cycles carried out at 30 mA g−1. (c,d) Incremental discharge capacity at the first and second cycles showing the electrochemical transformation after the first lithiation process.
Figure 5. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of α-K0.03MnO2 nanoneedles recorded at scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 in the voltage range from 1.0 to 4.0 V. (b) Voltage profiles of a K0.03MnO2 NNs‖Li cell over 50 cycles carried out at 30 mA g−1. (c,d) Incremental discharge capacity at the first and second cycles showing the electrochemical transformation after the first lithiation process.
Materials 13 01269 g005
Figure 6. (a) Voltage profiles (2nd cycle) of the K0.03MnO2‖Li cells at various C-rates. (b) Modified Peukert plot in the range 0.1 to 10 C. (c) Cycling stability of the K0.03MnO2‖Li cell obtained at 0.1 C.
Figure 6. (a) Voltage profiles (2nd cycle) of the K0.03MnO2‖Li cells at various C-rates. (b) Modified Peukert plot in the range 0.1 to 10 C. (c) Cycling stability of the K0.03MnO2‖Li cell obtained at 0.1 C.
Materials 13 01269 g006
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical performance of cryptomelane-type α-KyMnO2 cathode materials.
Table 1. Comparison of electrochemical performance of cryptomelane-type α-KyMnO2 cathode materials.
CompositionMorphology (Synthesis) aSpecific CapacityCurrent Density
(mAh g−1)(mA g−1)Ref.
KyMnO2NRs (H)18950[68]
K0.06MnO2NNs (R)23610[27]
K0.11MnO2NNs (H)19810[27]
K0.14MnO2NNs (H)16050[93]
K0.14Mn0.9Co0.1O2NNs (H)20050[93]
K0.25MnO2NWs (H)143100[77]
K0.125MnO2NRs (Ox)16050[26]
K0.84Mn8O16·0.25H2ONWs (Rc)12050[94]
KyMnO2NRs (R)18310[95]
K0.04MnO2NNs (R)23030[96]
K0.32Mn8O16NFs (H)20050[39]
K0.75Mn8O16NFs (H)16550[39]
K0.25Mn8O16NKs (R)26050[67]
K0.125MnO2NFs (H)190100[20]
K0.03MnO2NNs (R)21030this work
a H—hydrothermal; R—redox reaction; Ox—oxidation of Mn2+; Rc—MnO2 recycling.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hashem, A.M.; Abuzeid, H.M.; Winter, M.; Li, J.; Julien, C.M. Synthesis of High Surface Area α-KyMnO2 Nanoneedles Using Extract of Broccoli as Bioactive Reducing Agent and Application in Lithium Battery. Materials 2020, 13, 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061269

AMA Style

Hashem AM, Abuzeid HM, Winter M, Li J, Julien CM. Synthesis of High Surface Area α-KyMnO2 Nanoneedles Using Extract of Broccoli as Bioactive Reducing Agent and Application in Lithium Battery. Materials. 2020; 13(6):1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hashem, Ahmed M., Hanaa M. Abuzeid, Martin Winter, Jie Li, and Christian M. Julien. 2020. "Synthesis of High Surface Area α-KyMnO2 Nanoneedles Using Extract of Broccoli as Bioactive Reducing Agent and Application in Lithium Battery" Materials 13, no. 6: 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061269

APA Style

Hashem, A. M., Abuzeid, H. M., Winter, M., Li, J., & Julien, C. M. (2020). Synthesis of High Surface Area α-KyMnO2 Nanoneedles Using Extract of Broccoli as Bioactive Reducing Agent and Application in Lithium Battery. Materials, 13(6), 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop