Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Selected Test Conditions on the Impact Strength of Adhesively Bonded Connections
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Co-Based Amorphous Composite Coatings Synthesized by Laser Cladding for Neutron Shielding
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Gellan Gum/Tuna Skin Film in Guided Bone Regeneration in Artificial Bone Defect in Rabbit Calvaria
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multiple Twin-Roller Casting Technique for Producing Metallic Glass and Metallic Glass Composite Strips
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soft Ferromagnetic Bulk Metallic Glass with Potential Self-Healing Ability

1
Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Jahnstraße 12, Leoben A-8700, Austria
2
Laboratory of Metal Physics and Technology, Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
3
National Institute of Research and Development for Technical Physics, 47 Mangeron Boulevard, RO-700050 Iaşi, Romania
4
Department of Materials Science, Chair of Materials Physics, Montanuniversität Leoben, Jahnstraße 12, Leoben A-8700, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(6), 1319; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061319
Submission received: 19 February 2020 / Revised: 10 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 14 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metallic Glass Matrix Composites)

Abstract

:
A new concept of soft ferromagnetic bulk metallic glass (BMG) with self-healing ability is proposed. The specific [Fe36Co36B19.2Si4.8Nb4]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and1.5) BMGs prepared by copper mold casting were investigated as a function of Ga content. The Ga-containing BMGs still hold soft magnetic properties and exhibit large plastic strain of 1.53% in compression. Local melting during shearing produces molten droplets of several µm size throughout the fracture surface. This concept of local melting during shearing can be utilized to produce BMGs with self-healing ability. The molten regions play a vital role in deflecting shear transformation zones, thereby enhancing the mechanical properties.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among several bulk metallic glass (BMGs) systems, Fe-based BMGs are considered as a class of engineering materials with enormous potential for many fields of application due to their unique combination of excellent magnetic properties, good corrosion resistance, high hardness, high fracture strength, and low cost [1,2,3]. However, these Fe-based BMGs do not exhibit strain hardening and cannot sustain plastic deformation at room temperature. This brittle behavior under mechanical loading severely limits their application as engineering and structural materials. In recent years, huge efforts have been undertaken to improve the plastic deformability of monolithic BMGs or BMG composites [4]. Several researchers have proved that plastic deformability in metallic glasses can be largely enhanced by introducing different microstructural heterogeneities such as nano-crystals, phase separation, or short-/medium-ranged clusters into the glassy matrix by controlling the casting process [5,6,7,8]. In the case of Fe-based BMGs, the room temperature plasticity was improved by the addition of small amounts of soft elements like Ni, Er, and Cu [9,10,11,12]. In recent years, among the several Fe-based glassy alloys Fe-Co-B-Si-Nb BMGs have been regarded as one of the most promising alloys because of its combined advantages of functional and structural materials [1].
Motivated by these results, we considered to dope a Fe36Co36B19.2Si4.8Nb4 base alloy (hereafter named FeCoBSiNb) with Ga. Since the compositional variation of the Ga content in steps of 0.1 at.% is very difficult, we considered adding Ga in steps of 0.5 at.%. In previous works, Ga was employed as a main alloying element to improve the glass-forming ability (GFA) in a few glass-forming alloy systems [13,14,15]. However, in the present study, Ga is considered as a doping element to improve the plastic deformability of Fe-based BMGs without hindering their GFA.

2. Materials and Methods

In this work, Ga-containing glassy samples were produced in 3 steps. An eutectic Fe25Nb75 (wt.%) pre-alloy, together with the crystalline B (99 wt.%), crystalline Si (99.99 wt.%), Fe and Co lumps (99.9 wt.%), were melted together by induction heating under a protective Argon atmosphere. To this master alloy the desired amount of Ga (99.99 wt.%) was added through arc-melting. Cylindrical samples were prepared by remelting the pieces of the master alloys in quartz tubes and subsequently injecting into a water-cooled copper mold. Structural characterization of the as-cast and annealed samples was done by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a PHILIPS PW 1050 diffractometer with Co-Kα radiation (λ = 0.17889 nm). Microstructural investigation of the as-cast glassy samples was performed using a Carl Zeiss Libra 200MC High Resolution Transmission Microscope (HRTEM). The thermal behavior of the glassy samples was evaluated with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) NETZSCH DSC 404 C with an accuracy of ± 2 K. To study the structural evaluation, samples were annealed for 5 min. at different temperatures using the same DSC, with a constant heating and cooling rate of 20 K/min. For compression testing, an INSTRON 8562 device was used in constant strain rate mode at room temperature. The fracture surfaces of the samples were investigated using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Zeiss LEO 1525, equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). For magnetic measurements, DC M-H hysteresis loops were recorded with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) at ambient temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Thermal Characterization

Figure 1a shows the XRD pattern of as-cast (FeCoBSiNb)100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5) glassy samples with maximum achievable diameter for each composition.
All samples exhibit similar diffuse patterns without any distinct crystal diffraction peaks indicating the formation of a glassy structure. However, a second broad diffraction maximum is observed around 98.35° for the samples containing 1 and 1.5 at.% Ga. According to Bernal’s dense random packing hard sphere model [16], the position of the first and second broad diffraction maxima contain information about mean interatomic distances and medium-range order (MRO) in glassy systems. Therefore, it can be assumed that the substitution of Ga atoms leads to some atomic level rearrangements. As reported in the literature, the critical diameter (Dc) for this FeCoBSiNb alloy is 5 mm [1]. If the alloy is fluxed with B2O3 prior to casting then Dc can be increased up to 7.7 mm [17]. In our work, following the above described experimental route, Dc is 3 mm. The difference in Dc could be due to the purity of the starting raw materials, the casting technique and the casting parameters used. The addition of Ga does not affect the GFA of this FeCoBSiNb alloy and Dc (3 mm) also remains the same up to 1.5 at.% Ga addition. This may be due to the relatively large atomic radius of Ga (1.53 nm) and negative heats of mixing for Fe-Ga, Co-Ga pairs [18].
The DSC traces of as-cast glassy samples with Dc are shown in Figure 1b. For all compositions, the DSC traces display a clear glass transition event, followed by a supercooled liquid region (SLR) and crystallization, further confirming the glassy structure of these alloys. The thermal properties, such as onset temperature of crystallization Tx, glass transition temperature Tg, crystallization peak temperatures (Tp1, Tp2 and Tp3), liquidus temperature Tliq, extension of the SLR ΔTx (ΔTx = TxTg), the GFA parameter γ (γ = Tx/(Tg + Tliq)), and the reduced glass transition temperature Trg (Trg = Tg/Tliq) for the present BMGs are listed in Table 1. The addition of Ga does not affect Tg, but Tx marginally increases from 858 K to 863 K for both 0.5 and 1 at.% Ga, and to 869 K for 1.5 at.% Ga-added glasses. On the other hand, the two small exothermic events Tp2 and Tp3 observed for FeCoBSiNb glass disappears. Instead, a single strong exothermic event Tp2 is observed for Ga-added glasses.
Figure 1c illustrates the XRD patterns of the (FeCoBSiNb)100−xGax (x = 0, 0.5, 1and 1.5) glassy samples after constant-rate heating in the DSC up to the end of their first crystallization event, which is at 902 K. The crystallization sequence of the BMGs containing 0 and 0.5 at.% Ga is almost identical. The BMGs with 1 and 1.5 at.% Ga show distinct bcc-(Fe,Co) peaks along with (Fe,Co)23B6-type peaks at the end of the first crystallization event. The formation of the bcc-(Fe,Co) phase for BMGs with higher Ga contents may be associated to the presence of Ga atoms in the matrix, which may aid the nucleation of the bcc-(Fe,Co) phase. The absence of bcc-(Fe,Co) phase for lower Ga contents indicates that 0.5 at.% of Ga is not sufficient to trigger the nucleation of this phase.
The M-H hysteresis loops of the different BMGs are shown in Figure 1d. From the hysteresis loops it is clear that saturation occurs at relatively similar magnetic fields for all glassy samples. The saturation magnetization (Ms) decreases marginally from 108 to 105 Am2/kg when the Ga content increases from 0 to 1.5 at.%. This decrease in Ms is attributed to the addition of the non-magnetic element Ga.
High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) investigations were carried out to understand the effect of Ga addition in FeCoBSiNb glass. As-cast FeCoBSiNb and FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Ga samples were subjected to wide-angle X-ray diffraction before preparing for HRTEM investigations and the samples were amorphous. HRTEM micrographs for FeCoBSiNb and FeCoBSiNb+0.5Ga samples are shown in Figure 2a,b, together with their corresponding fast Fourier transformed (FFT) images (shown as insets). The as-cast FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Ga glass exhibits some locally ordered regions, which are marked by white circles in the image, but it is not evident whether the Ga atoms cause this ordering/cluster structure. The exact identification of the chemical composition of these locally ordered regions is not easy due to their very small size and the fact that they are dispersed in a chemically complex multicomponent glassy matrix. EDX analysis indicates a faint clustering of Ga atoms.
However, it should be noted that the presence of ordered zones/clusters in a glassy matrix does not necessarily imply that they act as nucleation sites for crystal growth. The ordered embryos must be larger than the critical nucleus size in order for their growth to be thermodynamically favorable [19,20,21]. Since no ordered regions were observed in the Ga- free glass, it can be assumed that these ordered zones are due to the Ga atoms. From the above structural evaluation and thermal stability data it is evident that these ordered zones do not act as heterogeneous nucleation sites, thereby the GFA remains unaffected.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

The room temperature compressive true stress-true strain curves for the as-cast [FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Gax)(x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) BMGs are shown in Figure 3. All the curves are offset from the origin for better visibility. All samples exhibit an elastic deformation regime followed by a small compressive plastic regime. From the stress-strain curves it is evident that the plastic strain increases gradually with increasing Ga content.
For the 0.5 at.% Ga-added sample, the yield strength σy, elastic strain ɛy, fracture strength σf and plastic strain ɛpl are almost the same as for the FeCoBSiNb parent glass, i.e., 3.95 ± 0.02 GPa, 2.80%, 4.06 ± 0.02 GPa and 0.43%, respectively. For higher amounts of Ga addition, the plastic deformation is improved. The yield stress is 3.71and 3.62 ± 0.2 GPa for the 1 and 1.5 at.% Ga-added samples and their corresponding elastic strain values are 2.73% and 3.30%, respectively. The fracture of all Ga-added samples occurs at nearly the same value of true stress, around 4 GPa, but the corresponding fracture strain is different: 3.87% for 1 at.% Ga- and 4.83% for 1.5 at.% Ga-added samples. The plastic deformation of the samples extends up to 1.07% and 1.53% for 1 at.% and 1.5 at.% Ga-added samples. The improvement in the plastic deformability of the glassy rods containing Ga can be explained based on the ordered zones observed in the TEM investigations. The dispersed ordered zones seem to be responsible for promoting plastic deformability in the Ga-containing samples, which is not observed for the Ga-free samples loaded under the same conditions. The ordered zones present in the Ga-containing samples affect the localized deformation in the glassy matrix. They may hinder shear band propagation by acting as pinning centers or by deflecting the shear bands into multiple small branches. The volume and density of these ordered zones also play a crucial role in deflecting the shear bands. If they are distributed densely in a narrow zone, then the deflection will be very less leading to brittle failure. The plasticity increase in the stress-strain curves reveals that the volume fraction and density of these ordered zones are large enough for affecting the shear band propagation through the material but not too high to cause distinct ductile failure. Sarac et al. [22] in their recent work showed that the presence of soft zones/nanocrystals in an amorphous matrix plays a key role in improving the plasticity by controlling the shear propagation rate.

3.3. Fracture Surface Analysis

The fracture surface morphology of the samples after the compression tests was investigated using SEM. The fracture surface of the FeCoBSiNb and FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Ga samples consists of a number of small fracture zones and their zone planes appear to be inclined by about 70°–90° to the direction of the applied load. This kind of failure is mainly due to the simultaneous generation of a large number of small facture events at many sites, at a very high stress level close to 4.0 GPa. The high fracture strength of these glasses is mainly due to the covalent bonding nature of their constituents [1,23]. Although a slight increase in plastic strain is observed for FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Ga samples, the overall appearance of the fracture surface points towards a brittle fracture mode, with many shells indicating the generation and propagation of cracks. Neither shear bands on the lateral surfaces nor typical vein patterns are observed on the fracture surface of these samples.
More interesting features are observed for the samples containing 1 and 1.5 at.% Ga. Figure 4a,b show the fracture surface of the FeCoBSiNb + 1Ga samples after compression testing taken from different regions with different magnifications. The fracture surfaces contain a large number of vein patterns together with several micro-cracks (indicated by green arrows in the image). At first the material starts to deform plastically; after a while brittle fracture starts, because the cracks are superimposed on the vein patterns, indicating a combination of ductile and brittle failure modes.
Figure 4c represents the fracture surface of the FeCoBSiNb + 1.5Ga samples taken from the center of the samples after compression testing and Figure 4d shows a magnified image of the area marked with dotted lines in Figure 4c. The red arrows indicate metal droplets, which are observed throughout the fracture surface. Compared to the 1 at.% Ga samples, the fracture surface of the 1.5 at.% Ga samples displays more vein patterns and less micro-cracks. Again, the micro-cracks are superimposed on the vein patterns. The presence of metal droplets on the fracture surfaces suggests that at the very high stress level of 4.0 GPa, the flowed layers must have melted, as is commonly observed in case of deformable BMGs [24]. In a very recent work Stoica et al. [11] showed that during compression of FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Cu glass the temperature in the shear plane can raise up to 1352 K, by assuming a maximum shear propagation rate, i.e., 0.9Vs (Vs = speed of sound). The raise in temperature (1352 K) is just 30 K above the solidus temperature of the FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Cu alloy and barely enough to melt very thin layers. The solidus temperatures of FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Cu and (FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) alloys are ≈1310 K [25] (supplementary Figure S1). In case of FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Cu glass [11] no such molten droplets were found on the fracture surface but for FeCoBSiNb + 1.5Ga glass µm-sized molten droplets are observed throughout the fracture surface (see Figure 4c,d. EDS analysis performed on the molten droplets indicates a minor increase in Ga content compared to the other fractured regions without any melting (supplementary Figure S2 and Table S1). Researchers have already proved that Ga has a tendency to form nano-precipitates with Fe [26,27,28]. From these results it can be assumed that the ordered zones formed due to the addition of Ga atoms play an important role in deflecting shear bands and its contributing to some local melting due to the rise in temperature during shear band propagation. EBSD measurements were carried out to identify the nature of the molten droplets. The absence of Kikuchi bands indicates that they are amorphous (supplementary Figure S3). This proves that the cooling rate is high enough to freeze the molten region instantly.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have revealed that Ga can be considered as a potential doping element for Fe36Co36B19.2Si4.8Nb4 glass; it improves glass-forming ability as well as plastic deformability to about 1.07% and 1.53% plastic strain for 1 and 1.5 at.% Ga addition without deteriorating the magnetic properties. Furthermore, for the first time we reported the presence of molten regions of several µm size throughout the facture surface in Fe-based BMG. Local melting at crack tips accompanied by fast cooling can be considered as a promising healing mechanism for improving industrial applications of Fe-based BMGs in many ways.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/6/1319/s1, Figure S1: DSC traces (heating rate 20 K/min) of as-cast [FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) glassy samples, Figure S2. SEM, EDS and EBSD results obtained on a [FeCoBSiNb]98.5Ga1.5 sample after the compression test; Figure S3. (a), (b), (c) and (d) are the EBSD patterns obtained from the fracture surface for the points 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, Table S1. EDS results of all the points in Atomic percent (%). Spectra 1, 2 and 3 were recorded on molten region, spectra 4 and 5 are on fractured zone without melting.

Author Contributions

M.S. proposed the idea and designed the research plan; P.R. carried out the experiments and collected the data; G.A. performed TEM experiments and N.L. validated the TEM results; P.R. and M.S. wrote the manuscript; M.S. and J.E. arranged the funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was done in the frame of the EU Initial Training Network VitriMetTech, FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN-607080. Additional support through the European Research Council under the Advanced Grant “INTELHYB–Next Generation of Complex Metallic Materials in Intelligent Hybrid Structures” (Grant ERC-2013-ADG-340025) is gratefully acknowledged.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank A. Lassing, J. T. Kim and N. Chawake for fruitful discussions, as well as B. Bartusch, S. Donath, and M. Frey for technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Inoue, A.; Shen, B.; Chang, C. Super-high strength of over 4000 MPa for Fe-based bulk glassy alloys in [(Fe1−xCox)0.75B0.2Si0.05]96Nb4 system. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 4093–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Inoue, A.; Shinohara, Y.; Gook, J.S. Thermal and Magnetic Properties of Bulk Fe-Based Glassy Alloys Prepared by Copper Mold Casting. Mater. Trans. JIM 1995, 36, 1427–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Stoica, M.; Eckert, J.; Roth, S.; Zhang, Z.F.; Schultz, L.; Wang, W.H. Mechanical behavior of Fe65.5Cr4Mo4Ga4P12C5B5.5 bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 2005, 13, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Trexler, M.M.; Thadhani, N.N. Mechanical properties of bulk metallic glasses. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2010, 55, 759–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hui, X.; Liu, S.; Pang, S.; Zhuo, L.; Zhang, T.; Chen, G.; Liu, Z. High-zirconium-based bulk metallic glasses with large plasticity. Scripta Mater. 2010, 63, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Calin, M.; Eckert, J.; Schultz, L. Improved mechanical behavior of Cu–Ti-based bulk metallic glass by in situ formation of nanoscale precipitates. Scripta Mater. 2003, 48, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fan, C.; Inoue, A. Ductility of bulk nanocrystalline composites and metallic glasses at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 46–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Cheng, Y.-Q.; Cao, A.-J.; Xu, J.; Ma, E. Bulk metallic glasses with large plasticity: Composition design from the structural perspective. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Inoue, A.; Shen, B.L. A New Fe-based Bulk Glassy Alloy with Outstanding Mechanical Properties. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 2189–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, X.; McDermott, A.; Poon, S.J.; Shiflet, G.J. Critical Poisson’s ratio for plasticity in Fe–Mo–C–B–Ln bulk amorphous steel. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 211905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stoica, M.; Scudino, S.; Bednarčik, J.; Kaban, I.; Eckert, J. FeCoSiBNbCu bulk metallic glass with large compressive deformability studied by time-resolved synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 053520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiao, Z.; Li, H.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Z. Effects of alloying elements on glass formation, mechanical and soft-magnetic properties of Fe-based metallic glasses. Intermetallics 2011, 19, 1502–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gan, Z.; Yi, H.; Pu, J.; Wang, J.; Xiao, J. Preparation of bulk amorphous Fe–Ni–P–B–Ga alloys from industrial raw materials. Scripta Mater. 2003, 48, 1543–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pawlik, P.; Davies, H.; Gibbs, M. The glass forming abilities and magnetic properties of Fe–Al–Ga–P–B–Si and Fe–Al–Ga–P–B–C alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shen, B.-L.; Koshiba, H.; Mizushima, T.; Inoue, A. Bulk amorphous Fe–Ga–P–B–C alloys with a large supercooled liquid region. Mater. Trans. JIM 2000, 41, 873–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Bernal, J. Geometry of the structure of monatomic liquids. Nature 1960, 185, 68–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bitoh, T.; Makino, A.; Inoue, A.; Greer, A. Large bulk soft magnetic [(Fe0.5Co0.5)0.75B0.20Si0.05]96Nb4 glassy alloy prepared by B2O3 flux melting and water quenching. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 182510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Takeuchi, A.; Inoue, A. Classification of bulk metallic glasses by atomic size difference, heat of mixing and period of constituent elements and its application to characterization of the main alloying element. Mater. Trans. 2005, 46, 2817–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Turnbull, D. Kinetics of solidification of supercooled liquid mercury droplets. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Herlach, D.M. Non-equilibrium solidification of undercooled metallic metls. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 1994, 12, 177–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Christian, J.W. CHAPTER 10—The Classical Theory of Nucleation. In The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 422–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sarac, B.; Ivanov, Y.P.; Chuvilin, A.; Schöberl, T.; Stoica, M.; Zhang, Z.; Eckert, J. Origin of large plasticity and multiscale effects in iron-based metallic glasses. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Inoue, A. Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 2000, 48, 279–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Greer, A.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, E. Shear bands in metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2013, 74, 71–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parthiban, R.; Stoica, M.; Kaban, I.; Ravi, K.; Eckert, J. Viscosity and fragility of the supercooled liquids and melts from the Fe–Co–B–Si–Nb and Fe–Mo–P–C–B–Si glass-forming alloy systems. Intermetallics 2015, 66, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bhattacharyya, S.; Jinschek, J.R.; Li, J.F.; Viehland, D. Nanoscale precipitates in magnetostrictive Fe1−xGax alloys for 0.1 <x <0.23. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 501, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ikeda, O.; Kainuma, R.; Ohnuma, I.; Fukamichi, K.; Ishida, K. Phase equilibria and stability of ordered b.c.c. phases in the Fe-rich portion of the Fe–Ga system. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 347, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petculescu, G.; Wu, R.; McQueeney, R. Chapter three—Magnetoelasticity of bcc Fe–Ga Alloys. In Handbook of Magnetic Materials; Buschow, K.H.J., Ed.; Elsevier: North Holland, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 20, pp. 123–226. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns and (b) DSC traces (heating rate 20 K/min) of as-cast [FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) glassy samples with maximum achievable diameter for each composition; (c) XRD patterns of [FeCoBSiNb]100−x (Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) samples heated up to the end of the first crystallization event; (d) Hysteresis loops for 1 mm diameter as-cast [FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) glassy samples. The inset shows the behavior of the Ga-doped samples close to the saturation region, i.e., between 80 and 100 Am2/kg.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns and (b) DSC traces (heating rate 20 K/min) of as-cast [FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) glassy samples with maximum achievable diameter for each composition; (c) XRD patterns of [FeCoBSiNb]100−x (Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) samples heated up to the end of the first crystallization event; (d) Hysteresis loops for 1 mm diameter as-cast [FeCoBSiNb]100−x(Ga)x (x = 0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) glassy samples. The inset shows the behavior of the Ga-doped samples close to the saturation region, i.e., between 80 and 100 Am2/kg.
Materials 13 01319 g001
Figure 2. Bright-field HRTEM images of the as-cast (a) FeCoBSiNb and (b) [FeCoBSiNb]99.5Ga0.5 glasses. The insets show the corresponding fast Fourier transformed (FFT) images. Some features of local ordering/clusters are observed, which are marked by the white circles.
Figure 2. Bright-field HRTEM images of the as-cast (a) FeCoBSiNb and (b) [FeCoBSiNb]99.5Ga0.5 glasses. The insets show the corresponding fast Fourier transformed (FFT) images. Some features of local ordering/clusters are observed, which are marked by the white circles.
Materials 13 01319 g002
Figure 3. Room temperature compressive true stress-true strain curves for (FeCoBSiNb)100−x(Gax) (x = 0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5) glasses measured at a strain rate of 1 × 10−4/s.
Figure 3. Room temperature compressive true stress-true strain curves for (FeCoBSiNb)100−x(Gax) (x = 0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5) glasses measured at a strain rate of 1 × 10−4/s.
Materials 13 01319 g003
Figure 4. (a) and (b) SEM micrographs of a (FeCoBSiNb)99Ga1 sample, showing the fracture surface after the compression test at different regions with different magnifications. Cracks are marked by green arrows; (c) (FeCoBSiNb)98.5Ga1.5 sample, fracture surface at the center of the sample after the compression test and (d) center region at higher magnification (square region in (c)). Droplets are marked by red arrows and cracks are marked by green arrows.
Figure 4. (a) and (b) SEM micrographs of a (FeCoBSiNb)99Ga1 sample, showing the fracture surface after the compression test at different regions with different magnifications. Cracks are marked by green arrows; (c) (FeCoBSiNb)98.5Ga1.5 sample, fracture surface at the center of the sample after the compression test and (d) center region at higher magnification (square region in (c)). Droplets are marked by red arrows and cracks are marked by green arrows.
Materials 13 01319 g004
Table 1. Thermal stability parameters Tg, Tx, Tp1, Tp2, Tp3, Tliq, Trg, γ and ΔTx as a function of Ga content for [FeCoBSiNb]100-x(Ga)x (x =0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) BMGs.
Table 1. Thermal stability parameters Tg, Tx, Tp1, Tp2, Tp3, Tliq, Trg, γ and ΔTx as a function of Ga content for [FeCoBSiNb]100-x(Ga)x (x =0, 0.5, 1 and 1.5) BMGs.
CompositionsTg (K)Tx (K)Tp1 (K)Tp2 (K)Tp3 (K)Tliq (K)TrgγΔTx (K)
FeCoBSiNb825858867985105014750.560.37333
FeCoBSiNb + 0.5Ga8258638731037-14750.560.37538
FeCoBSiNb + 1Ga8258638731038-14400.570.38138
FeCoBSiNb + 1.5Ga8258698731038-14400.570.38341

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ramasamy, P.; Stoica, M.; Ababei, G.; Lupu, N.; Eckert, J. Soft Ferromagnetic Bulk Metallic Glass with Potential Self-Healing Ability. Materials 2020, 13, 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061319

AMA Style

Ramasamy P, Stoica M, Ababei G, Lupu N, Eckert J. Soft Ferromagnetic Bulk Metallic Glass with Potential Self-Healing Ability. Materials. 2020; 13(6):1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ramasamy, Parthiban, Mihai Stoica, Gabriel Ababei, Nicoleta Lupu, and Jürgen Eckert. 2020. "Soft Ferromagnetic Bulk Metallic Glass with Potential Self-Healing Ability" Materials 13, no. 6: 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061319

APA Style

Ramasamy, P., Stoica, M., Ababei, G., Lupu, N., & Eckert, J. (2020). Soft Ferromagnetic Bulk Metallic Glass with Potential Self-Healing Ability. Materials, 13(6), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop