A Comparative Study on Skid Resistance of Concrete Pavements Differing in Texturing Technique
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of Concrete Pavement Specimens
- burlap drag (longitudinally to the road axis) (BuD);
- brush drag (in the direction perpendicular to the road axis) (BrD);
- transverse tined (in the direction perpendicular to the road axis) (TT);
- longitudinal tined (in the direction parallel to the road axis) (LT);
- exposed aggregate concrete pavement (EAC).
2.2. Test Methods
- in phase I after 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min;
- in phase II after 185, 190, 195, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330 and 360 min.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Changes in Skid Resistance during the Polishing Process
3.1.1. Changes in BPN Value
3.1.2. Changes in Surface Macrotexture
3.2. The Influence of the Texturing Method on the BPN and MPD Coefficients in the Polishing Process
4. Conclusions
- The least favorable results in relation to BPN and the MPD macrotexture parameter were obtained for the BuD and LT surfaces. This pavement was characterized by the lowest BPN values (51 and 54, respectively) and a poorly developed macrotexture (0.26 mm and 0.30 mm, respectively);
- The BrD and TT surfaces were characterized by the highest BPN values in the initial period and after finishing the polishing process. However, they obtained very low macrostructure values (0.25 mm and 0.45 mm);
- The EAC surfaces proved to be the most resistant to conditions simulating the phenomena of abrasion and polishing;
- Analysis of variance showed significant differences between the BPN and MPD parameters depending on the texturing methods of concrete pavements. The type of texturing has a significant impact on the skid resistance of concrete pavements;
- The effect of the texturing direction on the skid resistance is shown. In many cases, from the pavements with the same texturing direction, homogeneous groups were created—longitudinal (BuD, LT), transverse (BrD, TT) and non-directional (EAC8, EAC11) (using Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test).
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ahammed, M.A.; Tighe, S.L. Concrete pavement surface textures and multivariables frictional performance analysis: A North American case study. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2008, 35, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, R.O.; Resendez, Y.A.; Chang, G.K.; Ferragut, T.R. Concrete Pavement Solutions for Reducing Tire-Pavement Noise; National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Snyder, M.B. Concrete Pavement Texturing. In Fhwa-Hif-17-011; Tech Brief: Vishnu Garden, Delhi, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Izevbekhai, B.I.; Watson, M. Evaluation of concrete pavement texturing practice in Minnesota using the weather accident evaluation criterion. In Report No. MN/RC–2008-46; Minnesota Department of Transportation: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, R.O.; Wiegand, P.D.; Fick, G.J.; Harrington, D.S. How to Reduce Tire-Pavement Noise: Better Practices for Constructing and Texturing Concrete Pavement Surfaces. In Report No. DTFH61-06-H-00011 Work Plan 7 TPF-5(139); Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation: Ames, IA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Donovan, P.R.; Rymer, B. Effects of Aging on Tire–Pavement Noise Generation for Concrete Pavements of Different Textures. Transp. Res. Rec. 2011, 2233, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skarabis, J.; Stockert, U. Noise emission of concrete pavement surfaces produced by diamond grinding. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2015, 2, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Altreuther, B.; Beckenbauer, T.; Skarabis, J.; Gehlen, C.; Villaret, S.; Frohbose, B. Acoustical assessment of exposed aggregate concrete roads. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Concrete Roads 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, 23–26 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Šernas, O.; Zofka, A.; Vaitkus, A.; Gražulytė, J. The effect of exposed aggregate concrete gradation on the texture characteristics and durability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasilewska, M.; Gardziejczyk, W.; Gierasimiuk, P. Evaluation of skid resistance of exposed aggregate concrete pavement in the initial exploatation period = Ocena właściwości przecipoślizgowych nawierzchni betonowych z odkrytym kruszywem w początkowym okresie ich użytkowania. Roads Bridges 2017, 16, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akkari, A.; Izevbekhai, B. Composite Pavements and Exposed Aggregate Texturing at MnROAD: Cells 70, 71, and 72 Construction Report and Early Performance Evaluation. In Final Report MN/RC 2012-29; Office of Materials and Road Research Minnesota Department of Transportation: Maplewood, MN, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Teuns, K.C.J.G.; Stet, M.J.A.; van Keulen, W. Full Scale Pavement Tests of Exposed Concrete Aggregates: Acoustical Aspects and Friction Characteristics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Concrete Roads, Istanbul, Turkey, 27–30 May 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Daskova, J.; Kudrna, J. The experience with Wehner/Schulze procedure in the Czech Republic, In Proceedings of SIIV-5th International Congress-Sustainability of Road Infrastructures. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 53, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tompkins, D.; Khazanovich, L.; Darter, M.I. 2008 Survey of European Composite Pavements; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Sommer, H. Longtime experience with exposed aggregate surfaces in Austria. Theme 3–Pavement Performance and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Concrete Roads, Lisbon, Portugal, 13–16 September 1998; pp. 117–121. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, K.W.; Uhlmeyer, J.S.; Russell, M.; Weston, J. Evaluation of Long-Term Pavement Performance and Noise Characteristics of the Next Generation Concrete Surface. In Report No. Wa-Rd 767.1; Washington State Department of Transportation: Washington, WA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cable, J.K.; Wiegand, P. Surface characteristics next generation grooving and grinding Iowa test site construction. In Final Report; National Concrete Pavement Technology Center: Aimes, IA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Guada, I.M.; Rezaei, A.; Harvey, J.T.; Spinne, D. Evaluation of Grind and Groove (Next Generation Concrete Surface) Pilot Projects in California. In Report No.: UCPRC-RR-2013-01; California Department of Transportation, Division of Research, Innovation and Spatial Information: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Scofield, L. Development and Implementation of the Next Generation Concrete Surface. In Final Report; IGGA/ACPA: Coxsackie, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Scofield, L. Development of the Next -Generation, Low-Maintenance Concrete Surface. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Preservation, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Concrete Pavements, St. Louis, MO, USA, 21–24 April 2009; pp. 269–286. [Google Scholar]
- Sandberg, U.; Goubert, L.; Vieira, T. New Measures for Characterization of Negative Surface Textures. In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Pavement Surface Characteristics: SURF 2018–Vehicle to Road ConnectivityBrisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2–4 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Fwa, T.F. Skid resistance determination for pavement management and wet-weather road safety. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, R.; Scofield, L.; Sorenson, J. Providing Durable, Safe, and Quiet Highways. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, International Society for Concrete Pavements, Bridgeville, PA, USA, 14–18 August 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Cairney, P.; Styles, E. A Pilot Study of the Relationship Between Macrotexture and Crash Occurrence. In Road Safety Research Report Cr223; ARRB Transport Research Ltd. to Australian Transport Safety Bureau: Victoria, Australia, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Piyatrapoomi, N.; Weligamage, J.; Kumar, A.; Bunker, J. Identifying relationship between skid resistance and road crashes using probability-based approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Safer Roads Conference, Cheltenham, UK, 11–14 May 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Pulugurtha, S.S. Relationship between Pavement Macrotexture and Crash Incidences on North Carolina Roads. In Final Report FHWA/NC/2007-12; North Carolina Department of Transportation: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Wallbank, C.; Viner, H.; Smith, L.; Smith, R. The relationship between collisions and skid resistance on the Strategic Road Network. In Public Project Report Ppr806; TRL Limited: Crowthorne, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Chu, L.J.; Fwa, T.F. Pavement skid resistance consideration in rain-related wet-weather speed limits determination. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2018, 83, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wambold, J.C.; Henry, J.J.; Hegmon, R.R. Evaluation of pavement surface texture significance and measurement techniques. Wear 1982, 83, 351–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Do, M.-T.; Cerezo, V.; Yannick, B.; Kane, M. Influence of Thin Water Film on Skid Resistance. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2020, 2, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Guan, B.; Chen, H.; Liu, K.; Xiong, R.; Xie, C. Dynamic Model of Polished Stone Value Attenuation in Coarse Aggregate. Materials 2020, 13, 1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, L.; Guo, W.; Fwa, T.F. Theoretical and practical engineering significance of British pendulum test. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Wang, K.J.; Zhou, W.F. Evaluation of surface textures and skid resistance of pervious concrete pavement. J. Cent. South Univ. 2015, 20, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandler, J.W.B.E.; Phillips, S.M.; Roe, P.G.; Viner, H.E. Quieter concrete roads: Construction, texture, skid resistance and noise. TRL Rep. Trl576 2003, 12, 40. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Zhang, Q. Test Study on Abrasion of Skid resistant Textures on Concrete Pavements. In Proceedings of the GeoHunan International Conference 2009, Hunan, China, 3–6 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Hofko, B.; Kugler, H.; Chankov, G.; Spielhofer, R. A laboratory procedure for predicting skid and polishing resistance of road surfaces. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2019, 20, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kudrna, J.; Daskova, J.; Nekulova, P.; Nekula, L. Skid resistance of concrete pavements and their durability. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Concrete Roads 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, 23–26 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Li, B.; Kang, H.-W.; Zhang, Z.-W. Comparison of skid resistance and noise between transverse and longitudinal grooving pavements in newly constructed concrete pavement. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 446–449, 2637–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nelson, T. Evaluation of skid resistance of turf drag textured concrete pavements. In Report No. MN/RC-2011-12; Minnesota Department of Transportation: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cerezo, V.; Rado, Z.; Kane, M. Comparison of European and American Methods for Harmonizing Friction Measurements–Results of 1st European Pavement Friction Workshop. In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Pavement Surface Characteristics: SURF 2018, Brisbane, Queensland, 2–4 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Nekula, L.; Stryk, J.; Nekulova, P.; Brezina, I. Potential Improvement in Data Interpretation Regarding Simultaneous Measurement of Friction Coefficient and IRI. In Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Pavement Surface Characteristics: SURF 2018, Brisbane, Queensland, 2–4 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Weller, D.E.; Maynard, D.P. The influence of materials and mix design on the skid resistance value and texture depth of concrete. In Report LR 334; Road Research Laboratory Ministry of Transport RRT: Wokingham, Great Britain, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, J.W.; Smith, K.L.; Titus-Glover, L.; Wambold, J.C.; Yager, T.J.; Rado, Z. Guide for pavement friction NCHRP Web-Only Document 108. In Final Report for NCHRP Project 01-43; National Cooperative Highway Research Program: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Henry, J.J. Evaluation of Pavement Friction Characteristics. In Nchrp Synth. 291; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Wesolowski, M.; Blacha, K. Evaluation of airfield pavement micro and macrotexture in the light of skid resistance (friction coefficient) measurements. In Proceedings of the 64 Scientific Conference of the Committee for Civil Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Science Committee of the Polish Association of Civil Engineers (PZITB), Krynica Zdroj, Poland, 16–20 September 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasilewska, M.; Gardziejczyk, W.; Gierasimiuk, P. Comparison of measurement methods used for evaluation the skid resistance of road pavements in Poland-case study. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2018, 21, 1662–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PN-EN 12350-3:2019-07. Testing Fresh Concrete; Polish Standard; Vebe Test: Warsaw, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN 12350-7:2011. Testing Fresh Concrete—Part 7: Air Content; Polish Standard; Pressure Methods: Warsaw, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN 12350-6:2019. Testing Fresh Concrete; Polish Standard; Density: Warsaw, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN 12390-7:2019. Testing Fresh Concrete; Polish Standard; Air Content. Pressure Methods: Warsaw, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN 12390-3:2019. Testing Hardened Concrete; Polish Standard; Compressive Strength of Test Specimens: Warsaw, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN 12390-5:2019. Testing Hardened Concrete; Polish Standard; Flexural Strength of Test Specimens: Warsaw, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN 13877-2:2013. Concrete Pavements; Polish Standard; Functional Requirements for Concrete Pavements: Warsaw, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wasilewska, M.; Gardziejczyk, W. Assessment of Skid Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures in Laboratory Conditions. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2012, 58, 521–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM E303-93. Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM E2157-15. Standard Test Method for Measuring Pavement Macrotexture Properties Using the Circular Track Meter; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- van Bijsterveld, W.; del Val, M.A. Towards quantification of seasonal variations in skid resistance measurements. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2016, 17, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasilewska, M.; Gardziejczyk, W. Evaluation of microtexture changes of coarse aggregate during simulated polishing. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2016, 62, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yun, D.; Hu, L.; Tang, C. Tire–Road Contact Area on Asphalt Concrete Pavement and Its Relationship with the Skid Resistance. Materials 2020, 13, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kogbara, R.B.; Masad, E.A.; Kassem, E.; Scarpas, A.T.; Anupam, K. A state-of-the-art review of parameters influencing measurement and modeling of skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 602–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kane, M.; Edmondson, V. Long-term skid resistance of asphalt surfacings and aggregates’ mineralogical composition: Generalisation to pavements made of different aggregate types. Wear 2020, 454–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Property | BrD; BuD; TT; LT | EAC8 | EAC11 |
---|---|---|---|
Strength class | C35/45 | C35/45 | C35/45 |
Consistency class acc. to PN-EN 12350-3 [47] | V2 | V2 | V2 |
Exposure class | XF4 | XF4 | XF4 |
Dmax (mm) | 16 | 8 | 11 |
Cement type and class | CEM I 42.5 R | CEM I 42.5 R | CEM I 42.5 R |
Cement (kg/m3) | 400.0 | 440.0 | 440.0 |
w/c | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.38 |
Fine aggregate | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
Coarse aggregate | 2/5, 4/8, 8/11, 11/16 | 2/5, 4/8 | 2/5, 4/8, 8/11 |
Admixture 1 | Air-entraining | Air-entraining | Air-entraining |
Admixture 2 | Water reducing admix. based on polycarboxylates and phosphonates | Water reducing admix. based on polycarboxylates and phosphonates | Water reducing admix. based on polycarboxylates and phosphonates |
Property | BrD; BuD; TT; LT | EAC8 | EAC11 |
---|---|---|---|
Air content acc. to PN-EN 12350-7 [48] (%) | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Density acc. to PN-EN 12350-6 [49] (kg/m3) | 2433 | 2453 | 2410 |
Density acc. to PN-EN 12390-7 [50] (kg/m3) | 2380 | 2413 | 2376 |
Compressive strength acc. to PN-EN 12390-3 [51] (MPa) | 59.0 | 60.5 | 50.5 |
Flexural strength acc. to PN-EN 12390-5 [52] (MPa) | 6.9 | 8.0 | 7.4 |
Freezing/thawing in the presence of deicing agents, freeze resistance category acc. to PN-EN 13877-2 [53] | FT2 | FT2 | FT2 |
Texturing Method | Stage of Test | STD, (–) | V, (%) | BPNmin, (–) | BPNmax, (–) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BuD | Before phase I | 55 | 7.2 | 13% | 44 | 67 |
After phase I | 65 | 1.4 | 2% | 61 | 66 | |
After phase II | 48 | 1.3 | 3% | 46 | 51 | |
BrD | Before phase I | 77 | 5.1 | 7% | 70 | 86 |
After phase I | 70 | 1.7 | 3% | 66 | 73 | |
After phase II | 59 | 1.7 | 3% | 55 | 61 | |
TT | Before phase I | 79 | 6.6 | 8% | 70 | 90 |
After phase I | 69 | 3.9 | 6% | 65 | 81 | |
After phase II | 60 | 2.5 | 4% | 56 | 65 | |
LT | Before phase I | 66 | 4.0 | 6% | 60 | 76 |
After phase I | 63 | 3.4 | 5% | 55 | 68 | |
After phase II | 51 | 1.6 | 3% | 48 | 54 | |
EAC8 | Before phase I | 76 | 3.6 | 5% | 69 | 81 |
After phase I | 59 | 0.9 | 1% | 58 | 61 | |
After phase II | 52 | 1.3 | 2% | 50 | 55 | |
EAC11 | Before phase I | 73 | 2.6 | 4% | 70 | 80 |
After phase I | 61 | 1.2 | 2% | 59 | 64 | |
After phase II | 56 | 1.5 | 3% | 53 | 58 |
Texturing Method | Stage of Test | STD, (mm) | V, (%) | MPDMin, (mm) | MPDMax, (mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BuD | Before phase I | 0.27 | 0.1 | 36% | 0.18 | 0.55 |
After phase I | 0.23 | 0.06 | 26% | 0.15 | 0.40 | |
After phase II | 0.26 | 0.09 | 33% | 0.13 | 0.40 | |
BrD | Before phase I | 0.75 | 0.17 | 23% | 0.51 | 1.06 |
After phase I | 0.25 | 0.06 | 23% | 0.17 | 0.40 | |
After phase II | 0.25 | 0.08 | 32% | 0.11 | 0.40 | |
TT | Before phase I | 0.80 | 0.13 | 17% | 0.56 | 0.97 |
After phase I | 0.47 | 0.11 | 23% | 0.34 | 0.78 | |
After phase II | 0.47 | 0.12 | 26% | 0.31 | 0.78 | |
LT | Before phase I | 0.49 | 0.14 | 29% | 0.32 | 0.74 |
After phase I | 0.32 | 0.11 | 36% | 0.17 | 0.45 | |
After phase II | 0.30 | 0.11 | 37% | 0.15 | 0.45 | |
EAC8 | Before phase I | 1.15 | 0.26 | 22% | 0.85 | 1.57 |
After phase I | 0.90 | 0.17 | 19% | 0.62 | 1.11 | |
After phase II | 0.81 | 0.14 | 17% | 0.61 | 1.11 | |
EAC11 | Before phase I | 1.11 | 0.13 | 11% | 0.92 | 1.35 |
After phase I | 0.91 | 0.12 | 13% | 0.73 | 1.16 | |
After phase II | 0.84 | 0.13 | 16% | 0.67 | 1.16 |
Effect | Sum of Squares, SS | Degrees of Freedom, df | Mean Sum of Squares, MS | FA,obl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1601.00 | 5 | 320.20 | 11.79 | 0.00 |
Error | 489.00 | 18 | 27.20 | - | - |
Sum | 2090.00 | 23 | - | - | - |
Effect | Sum of Squares, SS | Degrees of Freedom, df | Mean Sum of Squares, MS | FA,obl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 9.39 | 5 | 1.88 | 75.22 | 0.00 |
Error | 2.25 | 90 | 27.20 | ||
Sum | 11.63 | 95 |
Effect | Sum of Squares, SS | Degrees of Freedom, df | Mean Sum of Squares, MS | FA.obl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 326.03 | 5 | 65.37 | 15.69 | 0.00 |
Error | 75.00 | 18 | 4.17 | ||
Sum | 401.83 | 23 |
Effect | Sum of Squares, SS | Degrees of Freedom, df | Mean Sum of Squares, MS | FA,obl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 7.76 | 5 | 1.55 | 129.59 | 0.00 |
Error | 1.08 | 90 | 0.01 | ||
Sum | 1.28 | 95 |
Effect | Sum of Squares, SS | Degrees of Freedom, df | Mean Sum of Squares, MS | FA,obl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 442.38 | 5 | 88.48 | 50.96 | 0.00 |
Error | 31.25 | 18 | 1.74 | ||
Sum | 473.63 | 23 |
Effect | Sum of Squares, SS | Degrees of Freedom, df | Mean Sum of Squares, MS | FA,obl | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 5.90 | 5 | 1.18 | 97.64 | 0.00 |
Error | 1.09 | 90 | 0.01 | ||
Sum | 6.98 | 95 |
Texturing Method | BuD | BrD | TT | LT | EAC8 | EAC11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before test | ||||||
BuD | ||||||
BrD | 0.000 | |||||
TT | 0.000 | 0.994 | ||||
LT | 0.073 | 0.073 | 0.025 | |||
EAC8 | 0.001 | 0.997 | 0.906 | 0.173 | ||
EAC11 | 0.002 | 0.787 | 0.472 | 0.551 | 0.961 | |
After phase I | ||||||
BuD | ||||||
BrD | 0.040 | |||||
TT | 0.109 | 0.995 | ||||
LT | 0.735 | 0.002 | 0.007 | |||
EAC8 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.263 | ||
EAC11 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.898 | 0.825 | |
After phase II | ||||||
BuD | ||||||
BrD | 0.000 | |||||
TT | 0.000 | 0.759 | ||||
LT | 0.078 | 0.002 | 0.000 | |||
EAC8 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.759 | ||
EAC11 | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.027 |
Texturing Method | BuD | BrD | TT | LT | EAC8 | EAC11 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before test | ||||||
BuD | ||||||
BrD | 0.000 | |||||
TT | 0.000 | 0.984 | ||||
LT | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
EAC8 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
EAC11 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.985 | |
After phase I | ||||||
BuD | ||||||
BrD | 0.996 | |||||
TT | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
LT | 0.208 | 0.476 | 0.001 | |||
EAC8 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
EAC11 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.999 | |
After phase II | ||||||
BuD | ||||||
BrD | 0.999 | |||||
TT | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||
LT | 0.912 | 0.774 | 0.001 | |||
EAC8 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
EAC11 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.989 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gierasimiuk, P.; Wasilewska, M.; Gardziejczyk, W. A Comparative Study on Skid Resistance of Concrete Pavements Differing in Texturing Technique. Materials 2021, 14, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010178
Gierasimiuk P, Wasilewska M, Gardziejczyk W. A Comparative Study on Skid Resistance of Concrete Pavements Differing in Texturing Technique. Materials. 2021; 14(1):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010178
Chicago/Turabian StyleGierasimiuk, Pawel, Marta Wasilewska, and Wladyslaw Gardziejczyk. 2021. "A Comparative Study on Skid Resistance of Concrete Pavements Differing in Texturing Technique" Materials 14, no. 1: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010178
APA StyleGierasimiuk, P., Wasilewska, M., & Gardziejczyk, W. (2021). A Comparative Study on Skid Resistance of Concrete Pavements Differing in Texturing Technique. Materials, 14(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14010178