Next Article in Journal
Empowering Materials Processing and Performance from Data and AI
Previous Article in Journal
Heat Transfer in Straw-Based Thermal Insulating Materials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 16
10.3390/ma14164404
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nonlinear Optical Properties of Porphyrin, Fullerene and Ferrocene Hybrid Materials

by
Francesca Limosani
1,
Francesca Tessore
2,*,
Gabriele Di Carlo
2,
Alessandra Forni
3 and
Pietro Tagliatesta
4
1
Photonics Micro and Nanostructures Laboratory, Physical Technologies for Safety and Health Division, Fusion and Technologies for Nuclear Safety and Security Department, ENEA C.R. Frascati, Via E. Fermi 45, 00044 Frascati, Rome, Italy
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Milan, INSTM Research Unit, Via C. Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy
3
CNR-SCITEC, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche “G. Natta”, c/o University of Milan, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(16), 4404; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164404
Submission received: 12 July 2021 / Revised: 2 August 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 6 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Porphyrins Chemistry in Material Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this research, we investigated the second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of multicomponent hybrid materials formed by meso-tetraphenylporphyrin P (both as free base and ZnII complex), carrying in 2 or 2,12 β-pyrrolic position an electron donor ferrocene (Fc), and/or an electron acceptor fullerene (C60) moiety, connected to the porphyrin core via an ethynyl or an ethynylphenyl spacer. We measured the NLO response by the electric-field-induced second-harmonic generation (EFISH) technique in CH2Cl2 solution with a 1907 nm incident wavelength, recording for all the investigated compounds unexpected negative values of μβ1907. Since density functional theory (DFT) calculations evidenced for P-Fc dyads almost null ground state dipole moments and very low values for P-C60 dyads and Fc-P-C60 triads, our EFISH results suggested a significant contribution to γEFISH of the purely electronic cubic term γ(−2ω; ω, ω, 0), which prevails on the quadratic dipolar orientational one μβ(−2ω; ω, ω)/5kT, as confirmed by computational evidence.

1. Introduction

In the last two decades, many organic and organometallic molecular chromophores have attracted attention in the scientific community for their significant second-order NLO properties, mainly arising from push–pull structures as donor—π-delocalized spacer—acceptor systems [1,2]. Among them, porphyrins and metalloporphyrins are very appealing, thanks to their thermal and chemical stability and the quite good solubility [3]. The electron-rich extended 18-electron π-conjugated core of porphyrins (P) can act as a spacer between the donor and the acceptor group in the push–pull system [4,5,6,7], or it can itself be the donor or the acceptor part of the push–pull architecture [8,9,10].
The four meso, the eight β-pyrrolic, and the two axial positions allow a wide variety of chemical functionalizations, so that many different substituents can be linked to the core and to the metal center. Moreover, by changing the metal center, its oxidation state, the type of the axial ligands, the nature of the substituents at the periphery of the macrocycle, the flexibility of the synthetic process and of structural diversification can be exploited to achieve a fine-tuning of the electronic properties and a large second-order NLO response [3].
Through the electric-field-induced second-harmonic generation (EFISH) technique [11,12], the effect of the metal [13], of the nature and of the position of the substituents [8,9,14], and of the presence of aggregation phenomena in solution [15,16] have been investigated in depth. Recently, also the non-negligible role of third-order contributions to the quadratic hyperpolarizability of A4 β-substituted ZnII porphyrins was highlighted [17].
The porphyrin core has the same structure as chlorophyll and therefore has been thoroughly studied as an efficient light harvester, for example, in dye-sensitized solar cells [18,19,20,21,22,23,24] or in systems conceived to reproduce the complex electron transfer reactions occurring in natural photosynthesis. In these molecular mimetics, porphyrins were coupled at first to benzoquinone [25], then benzoquinone was replaced by fullerene (C60) [26] to originate conjugates with increased excited charge-separated state lifetime, due to a faster forward electron transfer and a slower rate for the charge recombination reaction.
In this context, C60 has been a subject of several investigations by the scientific community, because of its unique physical and chemical properties [27,28,29]. The highly symmetric structure of C60, its ability to undergo multiple addition reactions, combined with its exceptional electron-accepting characteristics (e.g., it can accept up to six electrons) are by far the most important properties [30]. With its strong electron-accepting properties and remarkably small reorganization energy (ca. 0.23 eV), C60 is one of the most popular compounds incorporated into multicomponent molecular architecture to tune its optical properties to specific spectral regions of interest. By using chemical methods, the C60 moiety, acting as an electron acceptor in the ground electronic state, significantly improves the average hyperpolarizabilities in fullerene derivatives [31]. The observed enhancement is mainly due to the delocalization of charge from the electron-rich moiety to the electron-poor carbon cage, producing partially negatively charged fullerene moieties. For this reason, chemical modifications with a variety of electron-donating organic moieties have been studied [32].
Many other porphyrin–C60 dyads (P-C60) have been reported [33], with C60 linked through an amide bridge to the porphyrin meso-phenyl ring [34] or to the β-pyrrolic position of the core in various fashion [35,36,37].
The continuous interest in the realization of complex architectures with a long lifetime of charge-separated state has led research groups to perform extensive studies on different linear multi-porphyrin–fullerene adducts, some equipped with an additional moiety, mainly ferrocene (Fc) [38,39,40,41,42]. Because of the low oxidation potential of the iron atom, Fc displays electron-donating properties [43].
The properties of P-C60, P-Fc or Fc-P-C60 conjugates can be modified by changing the binding position (meso or β-pyrrolic) of Fc and/or C60 on the porphyrin ring or the type of connection (double or triple bond). For example, when Fc and C60 are covalently linked to the phenyl groups of a ZnII complex of a meso-tetraphenylporphyrin, as in Fc-NHCO-ZnP-NHCO-C60, a charge separation lifetime of 8 µs is observed [33], which becomes two orders of magnitude higher when Fc and C60 are connected to the porphyrin core by imidazole linkers through the β,β’-pyrrolic positions [44].
Binding of Fc moiety to the β-pyrrolic position of P through an ethynyl group is an effective way to enhance the electronic interaction between the π-system of the macrocycle and the organometallic moiety [45]. On the other hand, the introduction of an additional phenyl spacer between Fc and P provides only a small effect, as revealed by both spectroscopic and electrochemical measurements [45].
The connection of C60 to the β-pyrrolic position of P by an ethynylphenyl bridge produces an efficient donor–acceptor system, where the lowest unoccupied and the highest occupied molecular orbitals (LUMO and HOMO) are localized on P and on C60, respectively [37].
In Fc-P-C60 triads a high charge delocalization of the π-electrons between the donor Fc and the acceptor C60 moieties is reached by linking them to the 2,12 β-pyrrolic positions of P through an ethynyl or an ethynylphenyl spacer [46], thus constituting an efficient approach to the modulation of electron donor–acceptor interactions to realize hybrid materials [47,48,49,50,51,52].
Since the linkage of electron donor Fc and/or electron acceptor C60 to P turns out in Fc-P and C60-P dyads and Fc-P-C60 triads to have a push–pull structure, they might display interesting second–order NLO properties.
Therefore, this work aims to report and discuss the results of an EFISH investigation of the dyads and triads reported in Figure 1, which have never been investigated from a nonlinear optical point of view.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Dyads 3a, 3b, 3a(Zn), 3b(Zn) were synthesized and characterized as reported in [53]. Dyads 6-C60 and 6(Zn)-C60 were synthetized and characterized as reported in [36]. Triads 10a-C60, 10a(Zn)-C60, 10b-C60, 10b(Zn)-C60 were synthetized and characterized as reported in [46]. Their NMR, MS and UV spectra were in accordance with those previously reported (see Supplementary Materials, Figures S1–S6 and S9–S16, and the elemental analyses).
Electronic absorption spectra of compounds 6-C60 and 6(Zn)-C60 in CH2Cl2 solution were recorded at room temperature on a Shimadzu UV 3600 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) and are reported in the Supplementary Materials (Figures S7 and S8).

2.2. EFISH Measurements

EFISH experiments were performed on freshly prepared 10−3 M CH2Cl2 solutions. The incident wavelength at 1.907 µm was obtained by Raman shifting the 1.064 µm emission of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in a high-pressure hydrogen cell (60 bar). The 1.907 μm laser incident wavelength was chosen because its second harmonic (at 953 nm) was far enough from the absorption bands of the chromophores in CH2Cl2 [46] to avoid any enhancement of the second-order NLO response because of resonance. The Maker fringe pattern (that is the harmonic intensity variation as a function of the cell translation) was obtained through a liquid cell with thick windows in the wedge configuration. In the EFISH experiments, the incident beam was synchronized with a DC field applied to the solution, with 60 and 20 ns pulse durations, respectively, to break its centrosymmetry. The NLO response (assumed to be real because the imaginary part was neglected) was determined from the concentration dependence of the harmonic signal with respect to that of the pure solvent through the experimental value γEFISH Equation (1):
γ EFISH = μ β λ − 2 ω ; ω , ω 5 kT + γ − 2 ω ; ω , ω , 0 .
γEFISH is the sum of the purely electronic cubic contribution γ(−2ω; ω, ω, 0) and of a quadratic dipolar orientational contribution μβλ(−2ω; ω, ω)/5kT, μ being the ground state dipole moment, and βλ the projection along the dipole moment direction of the vectorial component βvec of the tensorial quadratic hyperpolarizability working with the incident wavelength λ.
The EFISH experiments were performed recording firstly the second-order response of the pure solvent, then the second-order response of the chromophore in solution, and finally the second-order response of the solvent again. The EFISH values reported were the average of 12 consecutive measurements performed on the same sample. The uncertainty of the measure was about ±15%.
All the experimental EFISH β1.907 values were defined according to the “phenomenological” convention [54].
The apparatus for the EFISH measurements was a prototype made by SOPRA (Paris, France) and the experiments were carried out in the Department of Chemistry of the University of Milano (Italy).

2.3. Computational Details

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on all compounds using the Gaussian16 suite of programs [55]. Geometry optimizations were performed with the 6-311G(d) basis set using the PBE0 functional [56,57] in CH2Cl2, adopting the polarized continuum model in its integral equation formalism (IEFPCM) to describe the solvent effect [58]. Using the same basis set, the SHG first hyperpolarizabilities, i.e., the β(−2ω; ω, ω) tensors, were computed within the coupled perturbed Kohn−Sham (CPKS) approach at the same frequency (1907 nm) used in the EFISH experiments. The SHG second hyperpolarizabilities, i.e., the γ(−2ω; ω, ω, 0) tensors, were evaluated by finite field technique. β and γ calculations were performed by using the M06-2X functional [59], owing to its optimal performance in reproducing hyperpolarizability values for midsize chromophores [60]. A pruned (99,590) grid was selected for computation and use of two-electron integrals and their derivatives. From the full tensors β and γ, the scalar quantities β|| and γ||, respectively, were derived to get a meaningful comparison with the experimental data. β|| corresponds to 3/5 times βλ, the projection along the dipole moment direction of the vectorial component of the β tensor, that is, β|| = (3/5) ∑i(μiβi)/μ, where βi = (1/5)∑j(βijj + βjij + βjji) [61,62].
γ|| is related to the tensor components according to the following: γ|| = (1/15) [3(γxxxx + γyyyy + γzzzz) + 2(γxxyy + γxxzz + γyyzz + γyyxx + γzzxx + γzzyy) + (γxyyx + γxzzx + γyzzy + γyxxy + γzxxz + γzyyz)] [61].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis

The dyads and triads investigated in this work have never been considered for nonlinear optics. They have been synthesized and characterized according to the literature, as highlighted in Section 2.1 [36,46,53].
However, since their preparation was not trivial, we summarized the main synthetic details (Scheme 1).
The possibility of placing different substituents at the β-pyrrole positions constituted a powerful approach toward the fine-tuning of tetrapyrroles and the modulation of electron donor–acceptor interactions to realize performing hybrid materials.
In Scheme 1 we show three different synthetic strategies for creating push–pull systems formed by a combination of electron donors (i.e., ferrocene), light harvester (i.e., porphyrin), and electron acceptors (i.e., C60) connected to each other through “molecular wires” of variable lengths.
Specifically, ethynyl or ethynylphenyl functionalities were selected as molecular bridges because of their synthetic versatility and their outstanding physicochemical properties. It was previously reported that these linkers assist in a good conduction of the charges due to their high electron density and the extended π-system [63,64,65].
The use of synthetic approaches that involved the Sonogashira reaction or its modification for the formation of carbon–carbon bonds allowed obtaining final mono and disubstituted compounds in β-positions of the macrocycle.
The first step involved the bromination of compound 1 using different quantities of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) to obtain preferentially monobromo-(2) and dibromo-porphyrin (7). The bromination of specific antipodal pyrrole position 2 and 2,12 was carried out following the procedure from the literature [66], using light-induced reaction and NBS in CH2Cl2. The first synthetic strategy (Strategy 1) consisted of a variation of Sonogashira coupling introduced by Li and coworkers [67] for the formation of monosubstituted compounds by linking different donor units.
Specifically, we used ferrocenyl moieties of variable length such as ethynylferrocene (a) or 4-(ferrocenyl)-phenylacetylene (b) to functionalize the β positions of the macrocycle in one step.
The approach was based on the use of tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) as reagent under copper-, amine-, and solvent-free conditions. We obtained the final compounds 3a and 3b in 50–65% of yield [53], starting from compound 2 and using Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 as catalyst.
The second strategy (Strategy 2) involved a Sonogashira coupling, using the catalytic system Pd2(dba)3/AsPh3 developed by Lindsey and coworkers [68,69,70], paying particular attention to the deoxygenation and dilution conditions and, most of all, avoiding the use of copper iodide as cocatalyst.
In this way the homocoupling side reaction between terminal alkynes was suppressed, and the desired final hybrid materials were formed by the combination of porphyrin and fullerene as acceptor unit.
In this synthetic strategy the Sonogashira coupling of compound 2 with 1.5 equivalents of p-ethynylbenzaldehyde (4) afforded porphyrin 5. For the functionalization of C60 with intermediate 5, we used the Prato–Maggini reaction [71] to achieve the final compound 6-C60 in 60% of yield [36].
To obtain disubstituted hybrid materials formed in the same structure by an acceptor and donor units, the third synthetic strategy was adopted (Strategy 3).
In addition, in this case the first step involved a Sonogashira coupling of compound 7 with 1.5 equivalents of compound 4 to obtain compound 8.
The next step was again a Sonogashira coupling reaction between compound 8 and two equivalents of different ferrocene units (a-b) to afford the corresponding intermediates 9a and 9b.
The obtained compounds 9a and 9b were subsequently used for the cycloaddition reaction with C60 [63], affording the desired 10a-C60 and 10b-C60 systems in 41 and 35% of yield, respectively [46].
In the final step of the different synthetic strategies, the respective ZnII porphyrinate complexes of all compounds (1, 3a, 3b, 6-C60, 10a-C60, 10b-C60) were obtained by dissolving the compounds in chloroform and adding a slight excess of a saturated Zn(OAc)2 methanol solution to yield 1(Zn), 3a(Zn), 3b(Zn), 6(Zn)-C60, 10a(Zn)-C60 and 10b(Zn)-C60 quantitatively.

3.2. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The electronic properties of the dyads and triads were investigated by UV-Vis spectroscopy in CH2Cl2 solution (Table 1). While the spectra of 6-C60 and 6(Zn)-C60 were recorded for the first time (Figures S7 and S8 in the Supplementary Materials), those of the other compounds have already been reported [37,46,53].
The UV-Vis spectra of the free-base porphyrins (3a, 3b, 6-C60, 10a-C60 and 10b-C60) and of their ZnII complexes (3a(Zn), 3b(Zn), 6(Zn)-C60, 10a(Zn)-C60 and 10b(Zn)-C60) fulfilled the “four orbital model” developed by Gouterman [72]. The S0➔S2 (ground➔second excited state) transition produced the intense (logε in the range 4.50–5.43) Soret or B band at 420–450 nm, and the S0➔S1 (ground➔first excited state) transitions led to four (for free bases) or two (for the ZnII complexes) weaker (logε in the range 3.42–4.50) Q bands at 520–670 nm. The reduction of the number of the Q bands by complexation was because of the increased degree of microsymmetry, from D2h of the free base to D4h of the metal complex [72].
The complexation to the metal ion induced a 3–15 nm bathochromic shift of the B band. A 2 nm redshift by complexation occurred also for the QIII band of dyads 3b and 6-C60. On the other hand, by complexation to ZnII of triads 10a-C60 and 10b-C60 the QIII band underwent a 4–6 nm ipsochromic shift and increased in intensity.
The UV-Vis data allowed us to highlight the effect that the introduction of Fc and/or C60 may have had on the electronic properties of P (and of its ZnII complex) [73].
Starting from 5, 10, 15, 20-tetraphenylporphyrin 1 (Scheme 1), the introduction in β-pyrrolic position of an electron-donating Fc moiety connected to the core by a triple bond (3a) produced a sizable redshift of the B and the Q bands (9 and 11–18 nm, respectively), suggesting an increased molecular conjugation. Conversely, the introduction in 3a of an additional phenyl unit between Fc and P (3b) slightly affected the spectroscopic properties: the B and QIV bands were almost the same, while the other three Q bands experienced a slight ipsochromic shift (1–3 nm). Hence, the insertion of the phenyl moiety was not effective in further enhancing π-delocalization.
Furthermore, linking an electron-withdrawing C60 moiety to 1 by an ethynylphenyl spacer (6-C60) led to a significant redshift of the B and Q bands (10 and 7–11 nm, respectively) and to an increased conjugation. However, different from what was observed when a –NO2 [17] or a cyanoacrylic moiety [24,65,74] was connected in the same fashion to a ZnII-porphyrin, the B band of 6(Zn)-C60 was symmetric, without any shoulder at lower energy.
In the spectra of 6-C60 and 6(Zn)-C60 the well-defined contribution of the C60 unit was also present at 255 and 329 nm, respectively [75].
Therefore, the insertion of a Fc or a C60 moiety on P affects and tunes its electronic properties, promoting a charge transfer process from the π-conjugated substituent in β-pyrrolic position to the macrocycle when the former carries an electron donor, and from the macrocycle to the π-conjugated system when this latter has an electron acceptor [17]. In other words, P behaves as an electron acceptor moiety when connected to electron-rich Fc and as an electron donor when connected to electron acceptor C60, displaying an ambivalent role [8,10].
When both Fc and C60 were bound to P in 2,12 β-pyrrolic positions [76] (triads 10a-C60 and 10b-C60 and their ZnII complexes), the UV-Vis data showed a further redshift of the B and Q bands, which was more significant for the first triad.

3.3. EFISH Investigation of the Second-Order NLO Properties

We measured the second-order NLO response of our compounds by the EFISH technique on 10−3 M CH2Cl2 solutions with a 1907 nm incident wavelength. The details are in the Materials and Methods Sections, and the results in Table 2.
All the investigated compounds showed negative γEFISH and µβ1907 values. For dyads 6-C60 and 6(Zn)-C60 and for triads 10a(Zn)-C60 and 10b(Zn)-C60 this outcome was quite unexpected. Indeed, the similar complexes BP1 and BP3 (Figure 2), with a –NO2 acceptor group (instead of C60) and a –NMe2 donor group (instead of Fc) linked to the core by an ethynylphenyl moiety in 2 and 2,12 β-pyrrolic position, displayed positive γEFISH and μβ1907 values [17].
On the other hand, the negative γEFISH and μβ1907 of dyads 3a, 3a(Zn), 3b, and 3b(Zn) were in agreement with what was observed for BP2, where Fc was replaced by –NMe2 [17].
According to the “two-level” model developed by Oudar [77,78], a negative sign of μβλ derives from a negative value of Δμeg, which is the difference between the excited and the ground state molecular dipole moments. Negative μβλ values suggest a decrease of the excited state dipole moment in comparison to the ground state [79]. This evidence occurred for C60 containing second-order NLO chromophores, in which the C60 acceptor moiety endows a cyclopropane ring bridging an ethynylthienyl spacer linked to a trimethylsilyl or an alkynyl platinum donor unit [80].
Moreover, when the second-order NLO response obtained by the EFISH technique showed an unexpected sign and/or absolute value of βλ, aggregation or other molecular interactions occurring in solution should be considered [15,16].
Nevertheless, A4 β-pyrrolic mono or disubstituted ZnII porphyrins were characterized by a remarkable steric hindrance, because of the 70–90° dihedral angle formed by the aryl rings in 5, 10, 15, 20 meso position with the mean plane of the macrocycle, which lowered the flatness of the molecule and hampered aggregation phenomena in solution [16,76].
The μβ1907 values in Table 2 derive from Equation (1), neglecting the cubic electronic contribution γ0(−2ω; ω, ω, 0) to γEFISH, and for this reason could be overestimated. Indeed, the EFISH technique is appropriate to study dipolar chromophores with a clear push–pull structure, for which the third-order contribution is much smaller than the quadratic dipolar orientational term and can be neglected. However, for macrocycles with an extended π-conjugation and significant third-order NLO properties (asymmetrically monosubstituted metal porphyrins [81], phtalocyanines [82] or porphyrazines [83]), the EFISH second-order NLO response could be affected by a significant error, since the cubic term is comparable, at least as an order of magnitude, to the quadratic orientational one. Moreover, as recently reported by some of us for the BP2 complex (Figure 2) [17], when the molecular ground state dipole moment (μ) is low, the electronic third-order term can have an overwhelming role, determining the sign of the second-order response.
To clarify these aspects, we computed the ground state dipole moments of our dyads and triads by DFT (Table 2).
The µ values for all the P-Fc dyads (3a, 3a(Zn), 3b and 3b(Zn)) were almost null, suggesting for these compounds a very low dipolar character. Notably, 3a(Zn) and 3b(Zn) showed the lowest μ ever computed for A4 β-pyrrolic monosubstituted ZnII porphyrins [8,17], with values comparable in the order of magnitude only to the ones reported for symmetric structures such as BP4 and BP5 (Figure 2). Therefore, endowing the porphyrin core either as a free core or as a ZnII complex with a donor Fc moiety did not produce an efficient push–pull system, despite the increased molecular conjugation pointed out by the UV-Vis spectroscopic data (Table 1). In other words, the electronic perturbation induced by Fc in the β-pyrrolic position of the macrocycle was trivial. The overall polarizability of the system increased, but without any sizable asymmetry in the electronic density distribution.
Hence, we can safely conclude that, similar to what was reported for slightly asymmetric BP2 and for symmetric BP4 and BP5 [17], in P-Fc dyads the electronic third-order contribution γ0(−2ω; ω, ω, 0) to γEFISH outstrips the dipolar orientational term µβ1907(−2ω; ω, ω)/5kT. Basically P-Fc dyads behave as third-order NLO chromophores, because of their almost null polarity.
This conclusion is supported by CP-DFT calculations in dichloromethane, which we chose to perform only on the ZnII dyads and triads similar to BP1, BP2 and BP3, as the most representative of our series (Table 3).
As expected, 3b(Zn) showed a very low β|| value as a consequence of a negligible μβ||/5kT in comparison to the high and negative γ|| (Table 3).
In contrast, linking a C60 moiety to P produced dyads (6-C60 and 6(Zn)-C60) with μ values in the range 3.5–4.8 D, in agreement with a decrease of the electron density on P when connected to acceptor C60 and playing the role of the electron donor part of the push–pull system [8]. The acceptor character of C60 appeared lower than that of the –NO2 group, since for BP1 a μ value of 7.8 D was computed (compared with 4.77 of 6(Zn)-C60) [17]. Moreover, an enhancement of μ occurred by complexation (the μ of 6-C60 was 4.21 D and that of 6(Zn)-C60 4.77 D) [8].
Nevertheless, P-C60 dyads, albeit more polar than the P-Fc counterparts, still showed a low molecular asymmetry. In agreement with the enhanced μ value and the more pronounced push–pull character, the computed β|| and μβ||/5kT of 6(Zn)-C60 were higher than those of 3b(Zn), but the γEFISH was still dominated by the third-order contribution, which produced a negative sign.
Eventually, the μ values of the triads were similar one to the other and to those of P-C60 dyads, confirming the insignificant contribution of the Fc unit to the polarity of the system, even in the presence of the additional phenyl spacer between Fc and P. An increase of μ occurred by complexation (3.82 D vs. 4.37 D for 10a-C60 and 10a(Zn)-C60 and 3.82 D vs. 4.14 D for 10b-C60 and 10b(Zn)-C60). Once again, the computed β||, μβ||/5kT and γ|| values supported an overwhelming contribution of the cubic term to γEFISH. Moreover, the absolute value of γ|| of 10b(Zn)-C60 was the highest among the series (Table 3), since the introduction of the ethynylphenyl spacer carrying the Fc moiety extended π-delocalization, as evidenced by the bathochromic shift of the B and Q bands in the UV-Vis spectra (Table 1).

4. Conclusions

In this work, we investigated the second-order NLO properties of a series of dyads and triads composed by meso-tetraphenylporphyrin P (both as free base and ZnII complex), carrying in 2 or 2,12 β-pyrrolic position an electron donor ferrocene (Fc), and/or an electron acceptor fullerene (C60) moiety, connected to the porphyrinic core via an ethynyl or an ethynylphenyl spacer.
UV-Vis spectroscopy showed that the introduction of a Fc or a C60 unit on the P core causes a sizable bathochromic shift of the B and Q bands of the tetrapyrrolic macrocycle, pointing to an increased molecular conjugation, in particular, with an ethynyl spacer. Indeed, the insertion of an additional phenyl moiety between Fc and P did not enhance π-delocalization significantly. On the other hand, linking both Fc and C60 to P produced a further redshift of the electronic absorption bands.
Therefore, the presence of Fc and /or C60 tuned the electronic properties of P in such a way that it behaved as an electron acceptor when connected to electron-rich Fc and as an electron donor when connected to electron-deficient C60, confirming its ambivalent role [8,10].
Surprisingly, EFISH measurements produced for all the investigated compounds negative γEFISH and µβ1907 values. Since A4 β-pyrrolic mono or disubstituted ZnII porphyrins feature a sterically hindered architecture [16,76], we could safely exclude the presence of aggregation phenomena in solution, which could affect the sign and magnitude of the EFISH response.
However, when the ground state molecular dipole moment was low, the pure electronic cubic contribution to γEFISH γ0(−2ω; ω, ω, 0) overwhelmed the dipolar orientational term μβ1907(−2ω; ω, ω)/5kT, dictating the sign of the second-order response [17].
DFT-computed dipole moments of P-Fc dyads were almost null, and for P-C60 dyads and Fc-P-C60 triads they were in the range 3.5–4.8 D, suggesting for all the investigated compounds a low polarity, which led to a non-negligible third-order contribution to their second-order NLO response, as confirmed by the calculated β||, μβ||/5kT and γ|| values of representative dyads and triads.
Therefore, our investigation proved from both an experimental and a theoretical point of view that the combination of porphyrins, fullerene, and ferrocene leads to hybrid materials with a high polarizability but a low push–pull character, whose second-order NLO properties as measured by the EFISH technique must be analyzed very carefully.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14164404/s1, Figure S1: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3a in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S2: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3a(Zn) in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S3: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3b in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S4: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 3b(Zn) in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S5: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 6-C60 in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S6: FAB MS spectrum of compound 6-C60 using as matrix NBA, Figure S7: UV-Vis spectrum of compound 6-C60 in CH2Cl2, Figure S8: UV-Vis spectrum of compound 6(Zn)-C60 in CH2Cl2, Figure S9: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 10a-C60 in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S10: MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of compound 10a-C60 using as matrix gentisic acid, Figure S11: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 10a(Zn)-C60 in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S12: MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of compound 10a-C60 using as matrix gentisic acid, Figure S13: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 10b-C60 in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S14: MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of compound 10b-C60 using as matrix gentisic acid, Figure S15: 1H-NMR spectrum of compound 10b(Zn)-C60 in CDCl3 at 300 K at 400 MHz, Figure S16: MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of compound 10b(Zn)-C60 using as matrix gentisic acid.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.T. and F.T.; formal analysis, A.F.; investigation, F.L. and F.T.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L. and F.T.; writing—review and editing, F.L., F.T., P.T., A.F., G.D.C.; visualization, F.L., F.T. and G.D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

F.T. and G.D.C. gratefully acknowledge Regione Lombardia and Fondazione Cariplo for the use of the instrumentation purchased through the SmartMatLab Centre project (Fondazione Cariplo Grant 2013–1766) and deeply thank Stefania Righetto for technical help with the EFISH measurements. P.T. and F.L. want to thank Alessandro Leoni for his technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cariati, E.; Pizzotti, M.; Roberto, D.; Tessore, F.; Ugo, R. Coordination and organometallic compounds and inorganic-organic hybrid crystalline materials for second-order non-linear optics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 1210–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Di Bella, S.; Dragonetti, C.; Pizzotti, M.; Roberto, D.; Tessore, F.; Ugo, R. Coordination and organometallic complexes as second-order nonlinear optical molecular materials. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 28, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tessore, F.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Di Carlo, G.; Pizzotti, M. Porphyrins for second order nonlinear optics (NLO): An intriguing history. Inorganics 2018, 6, 81–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Suslick, K.S.; Chen, C.T.; Meredith, G.R.; Cheng, L.T. Push-Pull porphyrins as nonlinear optical materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6928–6930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. LeCours, S.M.; Guan, H.W.; Di Magno, S.G.; Wang, C.H.; Therien, M.J. Push-pull arylethynyl porphyrins: New chromophores that exhibit large molecular first-order hyperpolarizabilities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yeung, M.; Ng, A.C.H.; Drew, M.G.E.; Vorpagel, E.; Breitung, E.M.; McMahon, R.J.; Ng, D.K. Facile synthesis and nonlinear optical properties of push-pull 5,15-diphenylporphyrins. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7143–7150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pizzotti, M.; Annoni, E.; Ugo, R.; Bruni, S.; Quici, S.; Fantucci, P.; Bruschi, M.; Zerbi, G.; Del Zoppo, M. A multitechnique investigation of the second order NLO response of 10,20-diphenylporphyrinato nickel(II) complex carrying a phenylethynyl based push-pull system in the 5- and 15-positions. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2004, 8, 1311–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Annoni, E.; Pizzotti, M.; Ugo, R.; Quici, S.; Morotti, T.; Bruschi, M.; Mussini, P. Synthesis, electronic properties and significant second-order non-linear optical responses of meso-tetraphenylporphyrins and their ZnII complexes carrying a push or pull group in the β pyrrolic position. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 3857–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morotti, T.; Pizzotti, M.; Ugo, R.; Quici, S.; Bruschi, M.; Mussini, P.; Righetto, S. Electronic characterization and significant second-order NLO response of 10,20-diphenylporphyrins and their ZnII complexes substituted in the meso position with π-delocalized linkers carrying push or pull groups. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 1743–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lopez-Duarte, I.; Reeve, J.E.; Pérez-Moreno, J.; Boczarow, I.; Depotter, G.; Fleischhauer, J.; Clays, K.; Anderson, H.L. “Push-no-pull” porphyrins for second harmonic generation imaging. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 2024–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Levine, B.F.; Bethea, C.G. Molecular hyperpolarizabilities determined from conjugated and nonconjugated organic liquids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1974, 24, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singer, K.D.; Garito, A.F. Measurements of molecular second order optical susceptibilities using dc induced second harmonic generation. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75, 3572–3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. De Angelis, F.; Fantacci, S.; Sgamellotti, A.; Pizzotti, M.; Tessore, F.; Orbelli Biroli, A. Time-dependent and coupled-perturbed DFT and HF investigations on the absorption spectrum and nonlinear optical properties of push-pull M(II)-porphyrin complexes (M=Zn, Cu, Ni). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 447, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tessore, F.; Di Carlo, G.; Forni, A.; Righetto, S.; Limosani, F.; Orbelli Biroli, A. Second order nonlinear optical properties of 4-styrylpyridines axially coordinated to A4 ZnII porphyrins: A comparative experimental and theoretical investigation. Inorganics 2020, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pizzotti, M.; Tessore, F.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Ugo, R.; De Angelis, F.; Fantacci, S.; Sgamellotti, A.; Zuccaccia, D.; Macchioni, A. An EFISH, theoretical, and PGSE NMR investigation on the relevant role of aggregation on the second order response in CHCl3 of the push-pull chromophores [5-[[4′-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]ethynyl]-15-[(4″-nitrophenyl)ethynyl]-10,20-diphenylporphyrinate]M(II) (M=Zn, Ni). J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 11131–11141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Righetto, S.; Forni, A.; Macchioni, A.; Rocchigiani, L.; Pizzotti, M.; Di Carlo, G. Intriguing influence of −COOH-driven intermolecular aggregation and acid−base interactions with N,N-dimethylformamide on the second-order nonlinear-optical response of 5,15 push−pull diarylzinc(II) porphyrinates. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 6438–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Di Carlo, G.; Pizzotti, M.; Righetto, S.; Forni, A.; Tessore, F. Electric-field-induced second harmonic generation nonlinear optic response of A4 β-pyrrolic-substituted ZnII porphyrins: When cubic contributions cannot be neglected. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 7561–7570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, L.L.; Diau, E.W.G. Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mathew, S.; Yella, A.; Gao, P.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Curchod, B.F.E.; Ashari-Astani, N.; Tavernelli, I.; Rothlisberger, U.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Dye-sensitized solar cells with 13% efficiency achieved through the molecular engineering of porphyrin sensitizers. Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lu, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, M. Push-pull porphyrins as light-harvesters for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Di Carlo, G.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Pizzotti, M.; Mussini, P.R.; Amat, A.; De Angelis, F.; Abbotto, A.; Trifiletti, V.; Ruffo, R. Physicochemical investigation of the panchromatic effect on β-substituted ZnII porphyrinates for DSSCs: The role of the π bridge between a dithienylethylene unit and the porphyrinic ring. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 7307–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Covezzi, A.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Forni, A.; Marinotto, D.; Biagini, P.; Di Carlo, G.; Pizzotti, M. 4D-π-1A type β-substituted ZnII-porphyrins: Ideal green sensitizers for building-integrated photovoltaics. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12642–12645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Colombo, A.; Di Carlo, G.; Dragonetti, C.; Magni, M.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Pizzotti, M.; Roberto, D.; Tessore, F.; Benazzi, E.; Bignozzi, C.A.; et al. Coupling of zinc porphyrin dyes and copper electrolytes: A springboard for novel sustainable dye-sensitized solar cells. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 14189–14197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Di Carlo, G.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Pizzotti, M.; Tessore, F. Efficient sunlight harvesting by A4 β-pyrrolic substitued ZnII porphyrins: A mini-review. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Antolovic, M.; Keyte, P.J.; Oliver, A.M.; Paddon-Row, M.N.; Kroon, J.; Verhoeven, J.W.; Jonker, S.A.; Warman, J.M. Modeling long-range photosynthetic electron transfer in rigidly bridged porphyrin-quinone systems. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1933–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bell, T.D.M.; Smith, T.A.; Ghiggino, K.P.; Ranasinghe, M.G.; Shephard, M.J.; Paddon-Row, M.N. Long-lived photoinduced charge separation in a bridged C60-porphyrin dyad. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 268, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guldi, D.M.; Kamat, P.V. Photophysical properties of pristine fullerenes, functionalized fullerenes, and fullerene-containing donor-bridge acceptor systems. In Fullerenes: Chemistry, Physics, and Technology, 1st ed.; Kadish, K.M., Ruoff, R.S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 225–281. [Google Scholar]
  28. Armaroli, N. Photoinduced energy transfer processes in functionalized fullerenes. In Fullerenes: From Synthesis to Optoelectronic Properties, 1st ed.; Guldi, D.M., Martin, N., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Switzerland, 2002; Volume 4, pp. 137–162. [Google Scholar]
  29. Signorini, R.; Bozio, R.; Prato, M. Optical limiting applications. In Fullerenes: From Synthesis to Optoelectronic Properties, 1st ed.; Guldi, D.M., Martin, N., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, Switzerland, 2002; Volume 4, pp. 295–326. [Google Scholar]
  30. Echegoyen, L.; Diederich, F.; Echegoyen, L.E. Electrochemistry of fullerenes. In Fullerenes: Chemistry, Physics, and Technology, 1st ed.; Kadish, K.M., Ruoff, R.S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 1–51. [Google Scholar]
  31. Loboda, O.; Zalesny, R.; Avramopoulos, A.; Luis, J.M.; Kirtman, B.; Tagmatarchis, N.; Reis, H.; Papadopoulos, M.G. Linear and nonlinear optical properties of [60]fullerene derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 1159–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Prato, M. [60]Fullerene chemistry for materials science applications. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 1097–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guldi, D.M. Fullerene-porphyrin architectures; photosynthetic antenna and reaction center models. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Imahori, H.; Hagiwara, K.; Aoki, M.; Akiyama, T.; Taniguchi, S.; Okada, T.; Shirakawa, M.; Sakata, Y. Linkage and solvent dependence of photoinduced electron transfer in zincporphyrin-C60 dyads. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11771–11782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reed, C.A.; Boyd, P.; Drovetskaya, T. A fullerene porphyrin conjugate. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7971–7974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lembo, A.; Tagliatesta, P.; Guldi, D.M. Synthesis and photophysical investigation of new porphyrin derivatives with β-pyrrole ethynyl linkage and corresponding dyad with [60]fullerene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 11424–11434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lembo, A.; Tagliatesta, P.; Guldi, D.M.; Wielopolski, M.; Nuccettelli, M. Porphyrin-β-oligo-ethynylenephenylene-[60]fullerene triads: Synthesis and electrochemical and photophysical characterization of the new porphyrin-oligo-PPE-[60]fullerene systems. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 1779–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Imahori, H.; Sakata, Y.; Nishimura, Y.; Yamazaki, I. Synthesis and photophysical properties of a diporphyrin-fullerene triad. Chem. Commun. 1999, 625–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Luo, C.; Guldi, D.M.; Imahori, H.; Tamaki, K.; Sakata, Y. Sequential energy and electron transfer in an artificial reaction center: Formation of a long-lived charge-separated state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6535–6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Imahori, H.; Tamaki, K.; Guldi, D.M.; Luo, C.; Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O.; Fukuzumi, S. Modulating charge separation and charge recombination dynamics in porphyrin-fullerene linked dyads and triads: Marcus-normal versus inverted region. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Imahori, H.; Guldi, D.M.; Tamaki, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Luo, C.; Sakata, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. Charge separation in a novel artificial photosynthetic reaction center lives 380 ns. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6617–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Imahori, H.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Kashiwagi, Y.; Sato, T.; Araki, Y.; Ito, O.; Fukuzumi, S. Long-lived charge-separated state generated in a ferrocene-meso,meso-linked porphyrin trimer-fullerene pentad with a high quantum yield. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3184–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vecchi, A.; Galloni, P.; Floris, B.; Dudkin, S.V.; Nemykin, V.N. Metallocened meet porphyrinoid: Consequences of a “fusion”. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 291, 95–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Curiel, D.; Ohkubo, K.; Reimers, J.R.; Fukuzumi, S.; Crossley, M.J. Photoinduced electron transfer in β, β’-pyrrolic fused ferrocene-(zinc porphyrin)-fullerene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 5260–5266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mazzuca, C.; Di Napoli, B.; Lentini, S.; Cicero, D.O.; Gatto, E.; Tagliatesta, P.; Palleschi, A. β-substituted ferocenyl porphyrins: The role of the spacer and of the number of substituents on their structural and spectroscopic characteristics. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2016, 20, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tagliatesta, P.; Pizzoferrato, R. Synthesis and characterization of new ferrocene, porphyrin and C60 triads, connected by triple bonds. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 787, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Limosani, F.; Possanza, F.; Ciotta, E.; Pepi, F.; Salvitti, C.; Tagliatesta, P.; Pizzoferrato, R. Synthesis and characterization of two new triads with ferrocene and C60 connected by triple bonds to the beta-positions of meso-tetraphenylporphyrin. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2017, 21, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Possanza, F.; Limosani, F.; Tagliatesta, P.; Zanoni, R.; Scarselli, M.; Ciotta, E.; Pizzoferrato, R. Functionalization of carbon spheres with a porphyrin-ferrocene diad. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2018, 19, 2243–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Scarselli, M.; Limosani, F.; Passacantando, M.; D’Orazio, F.; Nardone, M.; Cacciotti, I.; Arduini, F.; Gautron, E.; De Crescenzi, M. Influence of iron catalyst in the carbon spheres synthesis for energy and electrochemical applications. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cinti, S.; Limosani, F.; Scarselli, M.; Arduini, F. Magnetic carbon spheres and their derivatives combined with printed electrochemical sensors. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 282, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaur, R.; Possanza, F.; Limosani, F.; Bauroth, S.; Zanoni, R.; Clark, T.; Arrigoni, G.; Tagliatesta, P.; Guldi, D.M.J. Understanding and controlling short- and long-range electron/charge transfer processes in electron donor-acceptor conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 7898–7911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Limosani, F.; Kaur, R.; Cataldo, A.; Bellucci, S.; Micciulla, F.; Zanoni, R.; Lembo, A.; Wang, B.; Pizzoferrato, R.; Guldi, D.M.; et al. Designing cascades of electron transfer processes in multicomponent graphene conjugates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 23706–23715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tagliatesta, P.; Lembo, A.; Leoni, A. Synthesis and characterization of eight new tetraphenylporphyrins bearing one or two ferrocene on the β-pyrrole positions. New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 3416–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Willets, A.; Rice, J.E.; Burland, D.M.; Shelton, D.P.J. Problems in the comparison of theoretical and experimental hyperpolarizabilities. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7590–7599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision A.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ernzerhof, M.; Scuseria, G. Assessment of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 5029–5036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Adamo, C.; Barone, V. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158–6169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Scalmani, G.; Frisch, M.J. Continuous surface charge polarizable continuum models of solvation. I. General formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 114110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D.G. The Mo6 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four Mo6-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215−241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Johnson, L.E.; Dalton, L.R.; Robinson, B.H. Optimizing calculations of electronic excitations and relative hyperpolarizabilities of electrooptic chromophores. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 3258−3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kurtz, H.A.; Dudis, D. Quantum mechanical methods for predicting nonlinear optical properties. Rev. Comput. Chem. 2007, 12, 241−279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pielak, K.; Tonnelé, C.; Sanguinet, L.; Cariati, E.; Righetto, S.; Muccioli, L.; Castet, F.; Champagne, B. Dynamical behaviour and second harmonic generation responses in acido-triggered molecular switches. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 26160−26168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xiao, X.; Nagahara, L.A.; Rawlett, A.M.; Tao, N. Electrochemical gate-controlled conductance of single oligo(phenylene ethynylene)s. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9235–9240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lewis, P.A.; Inman, C.E.; Maya, F.; Tour, J.M.; Hutchinson, J.E.; Weiss, P.S. Molecular engineering of the polarity and interactions of molecular electronic switches. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17421–17426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huber, R.; Gonzalez, M.T.; Wu, S.; Langer, M.; Grunder, S.; Horhoiu, V.; Mayor, M.; Bryce, M.R.; Wang, C.; Jitchati, R.; et al. Electrical conductance of conjugated oligomers at the single molecule level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1080–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Di Carlo, G.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Pizzotti, M.; Tessore, F.; Trifiletti, V.; Ruffo, R.; Abbotto, A.; Amat, A.; De Angelis, F.; Mussini, P.R. Tetraaryl ZnII porphyrinates substituted at β-pyrrolic positions as sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells: A comparison with meso-disubstituted push-pull Zn(II) porphyrinates. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 10723–10740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Liang, Y.; Xie, Y.-X.; Li, J.-H. Modified palladium-catalyzed sonogashira cross-coupling reactions under copper-, amine-, and Solvent-Free Conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 71, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lindsey, J.S.; Prataphan, S.; Johnson, T.E.; Wagner, R.W. Porphyrin building blocks for modular construction of bioorganic model systems. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 8941–8968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wagner, R.W.; Johnson, T.E.; Lindsey, J.S. Soluble synthetic multiporphyrin arrays. 1. modular design and synthesis J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11166–11180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wagner, R.W.; Johnson, T.E.; Li, F.; Lindsey, J.S. Synthesis of ethyne-linked or butadiyne-linked porphyrin arrays using mild, copper-free, Pd-mediated coupling reactions. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5266–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maggini, M.; Scorrano, G.; Prato, M. Addition of azomethine ylides to C60: Synthesis, characterization, and functionalization of fullerene pyrrolidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9798–9799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gouterman, M. Spectra of porphyrins. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1961, 6, 138–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kumar, S.; Acharyya, J.N.; Banerjee, D.; Soma, V.R.; Prakash, G.V.; Sankar, M. Strong two-photon absorption and ultrafast dynamics of meso-functionalized “push-pull” trans-A2BC porphyrins. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 6256–6272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Vece, V.; Di Carlo, G.; Mussini, P.R.; Trifiletti, V.; De Marco, L.; Giannuzzi, R.; Manca, M.; Pizzotti, M. Highly improved performance of ZnII tetraarylporphyrinates in DSSCs by the presence of octyloxy chains in the aryl rings. J. Mater Chem. A 2015, 3, 2954–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Prato, M.; Soombar, C.; Vazquez, E.; Niziol, J.; Gondek, E.; Rau, I.; Kajar, F. Synthesis and spectroscopic properties of porphyrin derivatives of C60. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2010, 521, 253–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Di Carlo, G.; Orbelli Biroli, A.; Tessore, F.; Rizzato, S.; Forni, A.; Magnano, G.; Pizzotti, M. Light-induced regiospecific bromination of meso-tetra(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)porphyrin on 2, 12 β-pyrrolic positons. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 4973–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Oudar, J.L.; Chemla, D.S. Hyperpolarizabilities of the nitroanilines and their relations to the excited state dipole moment. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 2664–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oudar, J.L. Optical nonlinearities of conjugated molecules. Stilbene derivatives and highly polar aromatic compounds. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kanis, D.R.; Lacroix, P.G.; Ratner, M.A.; Marks, T.J. Electronic structure and quadratic hyperpolarizabilities in organotransition-metal chromophores having weakly coupled p-networks. Unusual mechanism for second-order response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10089–10102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dragonetti, C.; Colombo, A.; Fontani, M.; Marinotto, D.; Nisic, F.; Righetto, S.; Roberto, D.; Tintori, F.; Fantacci, S. Novel fullerene alkynyl complexes with high second-order nonlinear optical properties as a springboard for NLO-active polymer films. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1015–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pizzotti, M.; Ugo, R.; Annoni, E.; Quici, S.; Ledoux-Rak, I.; Zerbi, G.; Del Zoppo, M.; Fantucci, P.; Invernizzi, I. A critical evaluation of EFISH and THG non-linear optical responses of asymmetrically substituted meso-tetraphenyl porphyrins and their metal complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 340, 70−80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. De La Torre, G.; Vazquez, P.; Agullo-Lopez, F.; Torres, T. Role of structural factors in the nonlinear optical properties of phtalocyanines and related Compounds. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3723–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Belviso, S.; Santoro, E.; Penconi, M.; Righetto, S.; Tessore, F. Thioethylporphyrazines: Attractive chromophores for second order nonlinear optics and DSSCs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 13074–13082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 04404 g001 550
Figure 1. Investigated push–pull hybrid materials.
Figure 1. Investigated push–pull hybrid materials.
Materials 14 04404 g001
Materials 14 04404 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Different synthetic routes toward push–pull hybrid materials.
Scheme 1. Different synthetic routes toward push–pull hybrid materials.
Materials 14 04404 sch001
Materials 14 04404 g002 550
Figure 2. A4 β-pyrrolic ZnII porphyrins similar to the ones here investigated.
Figure 2. A4 β-pyrrolic ZnII porphyrins similar to the ones here investigated.
Materials 14 04404 g002
Table
Table 1. Synopsis of the UV-Vis spectroscopic data in CH2Cl2 of the investigated dyads and triads.
Table 1. Synopsis of the UV-Vis spectroscopic data in CH2Cl2 of the investigated dyads and triads.
CompoundSoret Band
λmax (nm)
(logε)		QIV Band
λmax (nm)
(logε)		QIII Band
λmax (nm)
(logε)		QII Band
λmax (nm)
(logε)		QI Band
λmax (nm)
(logε)
3a426
(5.30)		526
(4.22)		566
(3.93)		602
(3.95)		660
(3.56)
3a(Zn)432
(4.50)		 566
(4.08)		602
(3.83)
3b427
(5.28)		526
(4.29)		563
(3.94)		601
(3.79)		658
(3.51)
3b(Zn)436
(5.43)		 565
(4.37)		601
(4.06)
6-C60427
(5.31)		522
(4.27)		558
(3.83)		599
(3.76)		656
(3.42)
6(Zn)-C60434
(5.28)		 560
(4.15)		598
(4.00)
10a-C60434
(5.15)		527
(4.59)		580
(3.81)		616
(3.61)		670
(3.71)
10a(Zn)-C60449
(5.36)		 574
(4.37)		613
(4.34)
10b-C60435
(5.23)		532
(4.37)		574
(4.21)		609
(4.00)		666
(3.68)
10b(Zn)-C60438
(5.20)		 570
(3.76)		612
(3.61)
1417
(5.58)		515
(4.19)		550
(3.83)		591
(3.68)		647
(3.61)
1(Zn)420
(5.78)		 548
(4.41)		589
(3.76)
Table
Table 2. Experimental γEFISH and μβ1907 values (10−3 M solution in CH2Cl2) and theoretical dipole moments (μ) for the investigated dyads and triads.
Table 2. Experimental γEFISH and μβ1907 values (10−3 M solution in CH2Cl2) and theoretical dipole moments (μ) for the investigated dyads and triads.
Compoundμ
(D)		γEFISH
(x × 10−33 esu)		µβ1907
(x × 10−48 esu)
3a0.09−1.54−320
3a(Zn)0.19−3.11−640
3b0.49−1.88−390
3b(Zn)0.28−2.85−595
6-C604.21−2.84−590
6(Zn)-C604.77−3.47−720
10a-C603.82−7.12−1495
10a(Zn)-C604.37−8.08−1670
10b-C603.82−5.19−1075
10b(Zn)-C604.14−6.41−1330
Table
Table 3. Theoretical β||, μβ||/5kT and γ|| values of representative dyads and triads.
Table 3. Theoretical β||, μβ||/5kT and γ|| values of representative dyads and triads.
Compoundβ||
(x × 10−30 esu)		μβ||/5kT
(x × 10−36 esu)		γ||
(x × 10−36 esu)
3b(Zn)−21−29−1820
6(Zn)-C6030696−1543
10b(Zn)-C6042845−3225
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Limosani, F.; Tessore, F.; Di Carlo, G.; Forni, A.; Tagliatesta, P. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Porphyrin, Fullerene and Ferrocene Hybrid Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 4404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164404

AMA Style

Limosani F, Tessore F, Di Carlo G, Forni A, Tagliatesta P. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Porphyrin, Fullerene and Ferrocene Hybrid Materials. Materials. 2021; 14(16):4404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Limosani, Francesca, Francesca Tessore, Gabriele Di Carlo, Alessandra Forni, and Pietro Tagliatesta. 2021. "Nonlinear Optical Properties of Porphyrin, Fullerene and Ferrocene Hybrid Materials" Materials 14, no. 16: 4404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164404

APA Style

Limosani, F., Tessore, F., Di Carlo, G., Forni, A., & Tagliatesta, P. (2021). Nonlinear Optical Properties of Porphyrin, Fullerene and Ferrocene Hybrid Materials. Materials, 14(16), 4404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164404

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop