Next Article in Journal
Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Depth of the Strengthened Layer on Shafts Resulting from Roller Burnishing with Roller Braking Moment
Next Article in Special Issue
Thin Films of Nanocrystalline Fe(pz)[Pt(CN)4] Deposited by Resonant Matrix-Assisted Pulsed Laser Evaporation
Previous Article in Journal
Interface Engineering for Perovskite Solar Cells Based on 2D-Materials: A Physics Point of View
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acid Solution Processed VO2-Based Composite Films with Enhanced Thermochromic Properties for Smart Windows
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of the Iron as a Dopant on the Refractive Index of WO3

Materials 2021, 14(19), 5845; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195845
by Mariana Osiac 1, Iulian Boerasu 2, Madalin-Stefan Radu 1, Maria Jigau 1 and Ion Tirca 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2021, 14(19), 5845; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195845
Submission received: 4 August 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 30 September 2021 / Published: 6 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Properties of Thin Films)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this manuscript by Mariana Osiac et al., investigations of pristine WO3 and 2%Fe doped tungsten oxide 2%Fe - WO3  are reported. The samples were grown on the sapphire substrates by reactive pulsed laser deposition technique. The crystalline structure of 2, 3, and 4% iron doped WO3 showed the small shift compared with the pristine WO3.

The paper can be published in Materials. It is well-organized and written. The X-ray, SEM, refractive index and optical band gap measurements are reported in detail and provide sound observations on the changes of optical parameters with temperature and Fe concentration in the samples. These values are examined for different temperatures and amounts of Fe content. 

For different temperatures in the manuscript it was found that in the presence of 2%Fe doped WO3, the nanocrystallites size varied from 60 to 190 nm. This statement from abstract is absent in conclusions and not discussed in the text of the manuscript. Figure 10 should be replotted with appropriate scales and axis captions. In Figures 8 and 9 spline plots can be added for the point sets, similar to Figure 7. Conclusions can be modified to include less numbers but more generalized observations. 

The manuscript can be published in Materials with minor changes.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the optical properties of a pure 2% (weight) Fe-doped WO3 thin film deposited by pulsed laser deposition on a sapphire substrate using the Swanpole method.
However, as in the background, WO3 is Fe-doped on the assumption that it will be used as an n-type semiconductor. Therefore, the lack of electrical characteristics is insufficient as a treatise. Experiment once after rejecting, and proceed to submit again.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In this study, Influence of the Iron is studied as a dopant on the refractive index of WO3. But there are questions related to the choice of the object of research and the discussion of the results of the experiment. I recommend publication of this article after some revisions and satisfactory answers to comments.

  1. “The aim of this paper is to measure refractive indexes in the 300-1200nm spectral range of pure and 2%(weight) Fe doped WO3 thin films…” Why 2%(weight) Fe doped WO3 is selected? Specify the advantages over other concentrations of the dopant, justify the choice of Fe. “The pure and 2% Fe doped WO3 thin films were deposited on sapphire substrates…” – as stated in Materials and Methods, but “The effect of Fe as a dopant is visible for 3% and 4%Fe doped WO3 layers” – in Results and Discussion and in Conclusions. Where do the two more concentrations come from?
  2. Why the 300-1200nm spectral range is selected? It’s not discussed in the Introduction.
  3. The article is overloaded with tables and figures of the same type, which complicates the perception of the results. It is necessary to present the results of the experiment in a more understandable form, for example, to make combined figures and think about the need for so many tables.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

It has been modified and can be accepted.
However, please describe why the electrical characteristics cannot be evaluated. Since a sapphire substrate is used, it is considered possible to evaluate the I-V characteristics.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop