Commercially Available Ion-Releasing Dental Materials and Cavitated Carious Lesions: Clinical Treatment Options
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Definition of IRB
3. Reasons and When to Intervene
- Patient with a high individual caries risk: to favor the caries risk rebalance [3,23,24,25,26,27]. The microbiological diagnosis can be part of the patient caries risk and the individual caries assessment is mainly based on protective factors (e.g., regular preventive oral care), patient factors (e.g., visible old dental plaque) and clinical finding (e.g., approximal carious lesion).
- Active carious dentine lesion: to promote caries reversion, buffering effect and interdiffusion zone with a remineralization potential [28].
4. Therapeutic Options for Excavation and Tissue Conditioning
- To improve carious lesion assessment and its treatment, cleaning the tooth is recommended. One simple and easy way to clean the tooth is the use of an airflow device (e.g., erythritol powder or soft sodium bicarbonate) to remove the biofilm and debris without damaging the remaining hard tissues (Figure 1) [31]. Prophylactic paste applied with rotative brushes could interfere with the photonic signal of visual aids [31,32].
- Peripheral seal concept: This procedure improves the sealing of the border and may preserve the inner dental tissue. Ceramic or polymer burs could help to selectively remove the carious tissue to hard dentine (on border, 2 mm width) and preserve the gingival enamel margin. In particular, polymer burs are offering a compromise between the caries removal effectiveness (CRE) and minimal invasiveness potential (MIP) to remove the soft carious tissue [34,35,36].
- Options:
- Chlorhexidine (CHX 2%, 1 min, no rinsing) has been recommended for its antibacterial effect and its action against MMPs [40]. However, its use is still controversial in regard to long term result [2,41], but leathery or firm carious dentine remain infected and the remnant bacteria in the dentine could provoke subclinical pulpal inflammation over time. That raises questions about carious dentine disinfection [42].
- Photo-active disinfection (PAD) as an antimicrobial aid using photoactive compounds (e.g., 1 min of tolonium chloride, then 1 min of light activation with a specific wavelength and rinse) to produce oxygen-based free radical under a light source. Its efficiency is reduced as the “reactive oxygen species” diffuse more or less around 100 nm with a very short half-life. However, PAD remains a promising technique in restorative and periodontal treatments [43,44,45].
- Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl): Replacing traditional acid dentine conditioning with a 10% polyacrylic acid solution, before GIC application, a deproteinization and antibacterial step with NaOCL 6% for 15 sec can be used. The general appearance of the hybrid layer was maintained after deproteinization, even with 10% NaOCl gel subject to not exceeding 30 s of application [46,47,48].
- Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) under an HV-GICs restoration. The combination of SDF and CMRC or Papain enzyme would enhance the anti-bacterial effect [53].
- Adhesive system options including antiseptic molecules:
- Individual caries risk assessment evaluation is mandatory.
- Magnifying and using photonic signals to evaluate the caries score and caries activities could be useful.
- Use bioactive materials according to the caries activity, the individual caries risk assessment, the available enamel amount in gingival margins and accessibility of the lesion (Table 1).
Types of Materials | Bio-Interactive Properties | Biological Effects | Drawbacks | Commercially Available Products |
---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional GICs/Glass polyalkenoates | Ions released: F, Ca and Al Formation of polyalkenoate salts with a interdiffusion zone and calcium polycarbonate. * Flowable GIC with higher fluoride release | Antibacterial effects, hard tissues remineralization, bulk-fill reaction | Long setting reaction, low wear resistance, esthetic | IonoStar Plus, IonoFil, Aqua Ionofil Plus Plus (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany), Ketac Universal, Ketac Fil Plus (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Riva Self Cure, Riva protect * (SDI, Victoria, Australia). * Fuji Triage (GC, Tokyo, Japan) |
High-viscosity GICs | Ions released and reloaded: F, Ca, Al. Formation of polyalkenoate salts with an interdiffusion zone and calcium polycarbonate | Antibacterial effects, hard tissues remineralization, bulk-fill reaction | Short setting reaction, high viscosity depends on products | Fuji IX (Fast, Extra), (GC, Tokyo, Japan). Chemfil Rock (Dentsply, York, PA, USA), IonoStar Molar, Ionofil Molar, Ionofil Molar AC Quick (VOCO, Cuxhaven, Germany), Ketac Molar, Ketac Molar Quick, (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Riva self-cure HV (SDI, Victoria, Australia) |
Glass hybrid cements | Ions released and reloaded: F, Ca, Al. Formation of polyalkenoate salts with an interdiffusion zone and calcium polycarbonate | Antibacterial effects, hard tissues remineralization, bulk-fill reaction | Short setting reaction, high viscosity depends on products | Equia Forte, Equia HT (GC, Tokyo, Japan) |
RM-GICs and RM-GICs HV | Ion released: F, Ca, Al. Formation of polyalkenoate salts with interdiffusion zone. Formation of calcium polycarbonate | Facilitates tissues remineralisation, antibacterial effects | Not a true bulk-fill reaction, no covalent or ionic bond between the 2 networks, absorption of water due to residual HEMA, low wear resistance, except RMGICs-HV | Fuji II, Fuji II LC (GC, Tokyo, Japan), Ionolux (VOCO, Cuxhaven Germany), Photac Fil Quick Aplicap, Ketac Nano, Vitremer (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), Riva Light-cure, Riva Light Cure HV, (SDI, Victoria, Australia) |
Mineral-enriched resin composite | Release of F, powder containing fluoro-alumino silicate particles and polyacid components | Material * can reduce the degradation during load cycling and/or prolonged storage in artificial saliva of the hybrid layer created with modern universal adhesive applied in etch and rinse mode | Lack of studies for Re-Gen products | Activa, Activa liner *, Presto * (Pulpdent, Watertown, NY, USA), Re-Gen Flowable Composite, Re-Gen Bulk Fill Composite (Apex, Las Vegas, NV, USA), Replica bulkfil (Parkwell, Boston, MA, USA) |
Mineral-enriched self-adhesive resin composite | High molecular weight polyacrylic acid functionalized with polymerizable groups (MOPOS). Photo and chemical activation. F and Al ions release. No adhesive system combined | Release of F, C and Al. | Very high viscosity, lack of evidence as new product, short time setting. Lack of studies | Surfil 1 Self-adhesive hybrid resin composite (Dentsply, York, PA, USA) |
Giomers | Resin composite materials where a pre-reacted glass-ionomer (PRG) filler technology has been incorporated | The main advantage of this material would be its improved F release, but otherwise their clinical performance can be compared to conventional resin composites | To be used as resin composite for restorative dentistry | Beautifil II, Beautifil II Gingiva Shades, BeautiSealant (Shofu Dental Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) |
Mineral-enriched Alkasite resin composite | No acid/base reaction. Alkaline glass filler reacting with water. In this SiO2, 3 salts are connected (Na2O, CaO, CaF2). In contact with the saliva these salts are dissolved and released Ca, F and OH ions depend on the pH. Combine with a specific primer. | Hydroxyl ion: regulates the pH-value during acid attack and prevent demineralization. Buffering ability at pH 5.7F and Ca: to prevent demineralization of the tooth substrate. Forming apatite in vitro on dentine at pH 7 if phosphate available | Very high viscosity, lack of evidence as new product, short time setting. Lack of studies | Cention N (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechstenstein) |
Calcium silicate-based | These materials set by a hydration and precipitation mechanism. The remineralisation mechanism is based on an alkaline reaction. The alkaline setting reaction of these cements can reduce MMP activity and also has beneficial antibacterial effects on caries-affected (and infected) dentine | Degradation of collagen fibrils occurs and leads to the formation of a porous structure, which facilitates the penetration of high concentrations of Ca and carbonate ions, leading to increased mineralisation in the interface zone | Time setting very long. Liner or temporary restoration | Biodentine (Septodont, St Maures des fossés, France) |
OKResin-modified MTA | Bio-interactivity principles close to the calcium silicate based material but less effective | Vital pulp therapy. Easy to use, dentine bridge formation | Used as liner if close to the dental-pulp complex | TheraCal LC (Bisco, Schaumburg, IL USA), MTA Plus, Neo MTA (Avalon Biomed Inc., Houston, TX, USA), Endosequence BC sealer (Brasseler, Savannah, GA, USA), Angelus MTA, MTA Bio (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil). BioAggregate® (Innovative BioCeramix), RetroMTA and BioMTA, (IBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada) |
Silver Diamine Fluoride | Silver is an anti-microbial agent. F has bacteriostatic effect and potassium iodide used in conjunction with SDF provides a powerful antimicrobial effect as well as reducing potential staining of teeth | High caries risk, geriatric dentistry. Apply before HV-GIC. Can be combined with enzyme or chemo mechanical conditioning | Discoloration. A new version with water solution (e.g., Riva Star Aqua) could reduce this drawback. | Riva Star, Riva Star Aqua (SDI, Victoria, Australia), Cariestop (Biodinâmica, Ibipora, Brazil), FAgamin (Tedequim, Cordoba, Argentina), Advantage Arrest (Elevate Oral Care, West Palm Beach, FL, USA), e-SDF (Kids-E-Dental, Mumbai, India), Saforide (Toyo Seiyaku Kasei Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) |
Resin-modified glass-ionomeradhesives | Ionglass™ fillers, which contain fluoro-aluminosilicate glass for radiopacity and F release. | With composite restoration alone or combined with RM-GICs as dentine | Riva Bond LC™ (SDI, Victoria, Australia) | |
Adhesive with CHX | Release of CHX | Antibacterial effects, stabilization of the hybrid layer, anti-MMPs effects | Time limiting effects | Peak adhesive (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) |
- Individual caries susceptibility/risk (ICR): high caries risk (HCR), low caries risk (LCR).
- Carious lesion activity.
- Carious lesion extension: moderate or extensive.
- ○
- Option 1: if RM-GICs: apply “dentine conditioner”, rinse then inject RM-GICs as dentine substitute.
- ○
- Option 2: if RM-GICs or RM-GICs-based resin composite (mineral-enriched resin composite): can be used with universal adhesive in etch-rinse* (5 s selective etching) may contribute to maintain the bonding performance [61].
- ○
- Option 3: if HV-GICs (self or light cure): apply with “dentine conditioner”, (see optional recommendations), rinse then inject HV-GICs.
- ○
- Option 4: if the bottom of the preparation remains far from the dental-pulp complex, traditional restoration with resin composite can be used.
- ○
- Caries risk.
- Carious lesion activity.
- The presence or not of bondable enamel at the gingival margins.
- HCR: see therapeutic options for occlusal lesions for HCR patients (Figure 3).
- LCR:
- Option 1: If a slot or a tunnel preparation (Figure 4), the use of IRB for active and non-active carious lesions remains mandatory. Prefer RM-GICs or HV-GICs light cure, as it is easier to use due to the longest setting time and easy removal in case of overflow. The occlusal increment of the tunnel restoration is preferably covered with a resin composite after adhesive procedures.
- Option 2: if conventional preparations and inactive carious lesion, all technics are possible, and IRB is preferred as dentine substitute in case of active caries depend on the residual dentine thickness.
- Caries risk.
- Caries lesion activity.
- Enamel available in gingival margins.
- LCR: IRB as dentine substitute for both active or inactive caries [12].
- Option 1: RM-GICs or HV-GICs (self or light cure), mineral enriched resin composite.
- Option 2: mineral-enriched-alkasite resin composite or mineral enriched self-adhesive resin composite only (new products with lack of evidence).
- Option 3: Calcium silicate-based or resin modified MTA.
5. Discussion
Clinical and Scientific Considerations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Martignon, S.; Pitts, N.B.; Goffin, G.; Mazevet, M.; Douglas, G.V.A.; Newton, J.T.; Twetman, S.; Deery, C.; Doméjean, S.; Jablonski-Momeni, A.; et al. CariesCare practice guide: Consensus on evidence into practice. Br. Dent. J. 2019, 227, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Banerjee, A.; Frencken, J.E.; Schwendicke, F.; Innes, N.P.T. Contemporary operative caries management: Consensus recommendations on minimally invasive caries removal. Br. Dent. J. 2017, 223, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Featherstone, J.; Chaffee, B. The Evidence for Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA®). Adv. Dent. Res. 2018, 29, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, A. Minimum intervention oral healthcare delivery—Is there consensus? Br. Dent. J. 2020, 229, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A. “Minimum intervention”—MI inspiring future oral healthcare? Br. Dent. J. 2017, 223, 133–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A. ’MI’opia or 20/20 vision? Br. Dent. J. 2013, 214, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A. Minimum Intervention (Ml) Oral Healthcare Delivery Implementation—Overcoming the Hurdles. Prim. Dent. J. 2017, 6, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerjee, A. The Contemporary Practice of Minimally Invasive Dentistry. Fac. Dent. J. 2015, 6, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A. Minimal intervention dentistry: Part Minimally invasive operative caries management: Rationale and techniques. Br. Dent. J. 2013, 214, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A.; Doméjean, S. The Contemporary Approach to Tooth Preservation: Minimum Intervention (MI) Caries Management in General Practice. Prim. Dent. J. 2013, 2, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, A.; Splieth, C.; Breschi, L.; Fontana, M.; Paris, S.; Burrow, M.; Crombie, F.; Foster Page, L.; Gatón-Hernández, P.; Giacaman, R.A.; et al. When to intervene in the caries process? A Delphi consensus statement. Br. Dent. J. 2020, 229, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spencer, P.; Ye, Q.; Song, L.; Parthasarathy, R.; Boone, K.; Misra, A.; Tamerler, C. Threats to adhesive/dentin interfacial integrity and next generation bio-enabled multifunctional adhesives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2019, 107, 2673–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bohaty, B.S.; Spencer, P.; Misra, A.; Ye, Q.; Sene, F. Posterior composite restoration update: Focus on factors influencing form and function. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2013, 5, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Y.; Carrera, C.; Chen, R.; Li, J.; Lenton, P.; Rudney, J.; Jones, R.; Aparicio, C.; Fok, A. Degradation in the dentin–composite interface subjected to multi-species biofilm challenges. Acta Biomater. 2013, 10, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kreth, J.; Merritt, J.; Pfeifer, C.; Khajotia, S.; Ferracane, J. Interaction between the Oral Microbiome and Dental Composite Biomaterials: Where We Are and Where We Should Go. J. Dent. Res. 2020, 99, 1140–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, H.; Galler, K.M.; Tomson, P.L.; Simon, S.; El Karim, I.; Kundzina, R.; Krastl, G.; Dammaschke, T.; Fransson, H.; Markvart, M.; et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hashem, D.F.; Mannocci, F.; Patel, S.; Manoharan, A.; Brown, J.E.; Watson, T.F.; Banerjee, A. Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of the Efficacy of Calcium Silicate Indirect Pulp Capping. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nedeljkovic, I.; De Munck, J.; Slomka, V.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Teughels, W.; Van Landuyt, K. Lack of Buffering by Composites Promotes Shift to More Cariogenic Bacteria. J. Dent. Res. 2016, 95, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vallittu, P.K.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Hupa, L.; Watts, D.C. Bioactive dental materials—Do they exist and what does bioactivity mean? Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 693–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hench, L.L. The story of Bioglass®. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2006, 17, 967–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pires, P.M.; Neves, A.D.A.; Makeeva, I.M.; Schwendicke, F.; Faus-Matoses, V.; Yoshihara, K.; Banerjee, A.; Sauro, S. Contemporary restorative ion-releasing materials: Current status, interfacial properties and operative approaches. Br. Dent. J. 2020, 229, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwendicke, F.; Splieth, C.; Breschi, L.; Banerjee, A.; Fontana, M.; Paris, S.; Burrow, M.F.; Crombie, F.; Page, L.F.; Gatón-Hernández, P.; et al. When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 3691–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mjör, I.A.; Gordan, V.V. A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Int. Dent. J. 1999, 49, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngo, H.; Vital, S. Minimal intervention dentistry II: Part Minimal intervention in cariology: The role of glass-ionomer cements in the preservation of tooth structures against caries. Br. Dent. J. 2014, 216, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doméjean, S.; White, J.M.; Featherstone, J.D.B. Validation of the CDA CAMBRA caries risk assessment—A six-year retrospective study. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2011, 39, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Doméjean, S.; Banerjee, A.; Featherstone, J.D.B. Caries risk/susceptibility assessment: Its value in minimum intervention oral healthcare. Br. Dent. J. 2017, 223, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, H.A.; Soares, A.P.; Paris, S.; Elhennawy, K.; Zaslansky, P. The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: A systematic review. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020, 24, 2189–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nyvad, B.; Machiulskiene, V.; Baelum, V. Reliability of a New Caries Diagnostic System Differentiating between Active and Inactive Caries Lesions. Caries Res. 1999, 33, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trairatvorakul, C.; Techalertpaisarn, P.; Siwawut, S.; Ingprapankorn, A. Effect of Glass Ionomer Cement and Fluoride Varnish on the Remineralization of Artificial Proximal Caries in Situ. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2009, 34, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dijken, J.W.V.; Kieri, C.; Carlén, M. Longevity of Extensive Class II Open-sandwich Restorations with a Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement. J. Dent. Res. 1999, 78, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slimani, A.; Terrer, E.; Manton, D.J.; Tassery, H. Carious lesion detection technologies: Factual clinical approaches. Br. Dent. J. 2020, 229, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tassery, H.; Levallois, B.; Terrer, E.; Manton, D.; Otsuki, M.; Koubi, S.; Gugnani, N.; Panayotov, I.; Jacquot, B.; Cuisinier, F.; et al. Use of new minimum intervention dentistry technologies in caries management. Aust. Dent. J. 2013, 58, 40–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tassery, H.; Manton, D.J. Detection and diagnosis of carious lesions. In Evidence-Based Caries Prevention; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toledano, M.; Ghinea, R.; Cardona, J.C.; Cabello, I.; Yamauti, M.; Perez, M.M.; Osorio, R. Digital image analysis method to assess the performance of conventional and self-limiting concepts in dentine caries removal. J. Dent. 2013, 41, e31–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alleman, D.S.; Magne, P. A systematic approach to deep caries removal end points: The peripheral seal concept in adhesive dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2012, 43, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- De Almeida Nevesa, A.; Coutinhob, E.; Cardosoc, M.V.; Lambrechtsd, P.; Van Meerbeeke, B. Current concepts and techniques for caries excavation and adhesion to residual dentin. J. Adhes. Dent. 2011, 13, 7–22. [Google Scholar]
- Banerjee, A.; Kidd, E.; Watson, T. In vitro Evaluation of Five Alternative Methods of Carious Dentine Excavation. Caries Res. 2000, 34, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Holmgren, C.J.; Roux, D.; Doméjean, S. Minimal intervention dentistry: Part Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)—A minimum intervention and minimally invasive approach for the management of dental caries. Br. Dent. J. 2013, 214, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sauro, S.; Pashley, D.H. Strategies to stabilise dentine-bonded interfaces through remineralising operative approaches—State of The Art. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2016, 69, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricci, H.A.; Sanabe, M.E.; Costa, C.A.D.S.; Pashley, D.H.; Hebling, J. Chlorhexidine increases the longevity of in vivo resin-dentin bonds. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2010, 118, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdigão, J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion—Not there yet. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2020, 56, 190–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ricucci, D.; Siqueira, J.F.; Rôças, I.N.; Lipski, M.; Shiban, A.; Tay, F.R. Pulp and dentine responses to selective caries excavation: A histological and histobacteriological human study. J. Dent. 2020, 100, 103430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, S.; Logani, A.; Shah, N. Comparative efficacy of photo-activated disinfection and calcium hydroxide for disinfection of remaining carious dentin in deep cavities: A clinical study. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2014, 39, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Diniz, I.M.A.; Horta, I.D.; Azevedo, C.S.; Elmadjian, T.R.; Matos, A.B.; Simionato, M.R.L.; Marques, M.M. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: A promise candidate for caries lesions treatment. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2015, 12, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Araújo, N.C.; Fontana, C.R.; Bagnato, V.S.; Gerbi, M.E.M. Photodynamic antimicrobial therapy of curcumin in biofilms and carious dentine. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 29, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neel, E.A.A.; Knowles, J.C.; Bozec, L. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on adhesive charactersitics of dentin: A systematic review of laboratory-based testing. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2019, 95, 102419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nima, G.; Cavalli, V.; Bacelar-Sá, R.; Ambrosano, G.M.B.; Giannini, M. Effects of sodium hypochlorite as dentin deproteinizing agent and aging media on bond strength of two conventional adhesives. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2020, 83, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perdigão, J.; Lopes, M.; Geraldeli, S.; Lopes, G.; García-Godoy, F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent. Mater. 2000, 16, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chittem, J.; Sajjan, G.S.; Varma, K.M. Comparative evaluation of microshear bond strength of the caries-affected dentinal surface treated with conventional method and chemomechanical method (papain). J. Conserv. Dent. 2015, 18, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ismail, M.M.M.; Al Haidar, M.J. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Caries Removal Using Papain Gel (Brix 3000) and Smart Preparation Bur (in vivo Comparative Study). J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2019, 11, 444–449. [Google Scholar]
- Hamama, H.H.H.; Yiu, C.K.Y.; Burrow, M.F. Effect of Chemomechanical Caries Removal on Bonding of Self-etching Adhesives to Caries-affected Dentin. J. Adhes Dent. 2014, 16, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hamama, H.; Yiu, C.; Burrow, M. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of resin-modified glass ionomer cement adhesives to caries-affected dentine. Aust. Dent. J. 2015, 60, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hamama, H.; Yiu, C.; Burrow, M. Effect of silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide on residual bacteria in dentinal tubules. Aust. Dent. J. 2015, 60, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hameed, H.; Babu, B.P.; Sagir, V.M.M.; Chiriyath, K.J.; Mathias, J.; Shaji, A.P. Microleakage in Resin Composite Restoration following Antimicrobial Pre-treatments with 2% Chlorhexidine and Clearfil Protect Bond. J. Int. Oral Health 2015, 7, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Alaghehmad, H.; Mansouri, E.; Esmaili, B.; Bijani, A.; Nejadkarimi, S.; Rahchamani, M. Effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine and zinc nanoparticles on the microshear bond strength of dentin with a fifth-generation adhesive. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Imazato, S.; Kuramoto, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Ebisu, S.; Peters, M.C. In vitro antibacterial effects of the dentin primer of Clearfil Protect Bond. Dent. Mater. 2006, 22, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muratovska, I.; Kitagawa, H.; Hirose, N.; Kitagawa, R.; Imazato, S. Antibacterial activity and dentin bonding ability of combined use of Clearfil SE Protect and sodium hypochlorite. Dent. Mater. J. 2018, 37, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schwendicke, F.; Frencken, J.E.; Bjørndal, L.; Maltz, M.; Manton, D.J.; Ricketts, D.; Van Landuyt, K.; Banarjee, A.; Campus, G.; Doméjean, S.; et al. Managing carious lesions: Consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv. Dent. Res. 2016, 28, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Türkün, L.S.; Kanik, Ö. A prospective six-year clinical study evaluating reinforced glass ionomer cements with resin coating on posterior teeth: Quo Vadis? Oper. Dent. 2016, 41, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Francois, P.; Fouquet, V.; Attal, J.-P.; Dursun, E. Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification. Materials 2020, 13, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sauro, S.; Makeeva, I.; Faus-Matoses, V.; Foschi, F.; Giovarruscio, M.; Pires, P.M.; Moura, M.E.M.; Neves, A.A.; Faus-Llácer, V. Effects of Ions-Releasing Restorative Materials on the Dentine Bonding Longevity of Modern Universal Adhesives after Load-Cycle and Prolonged Artificial Saliva Aging. Materials 2019, 12, 722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hashem, D.; Mannocci, F.; Patel, S.; Manoharan, A.; Watson, T.F.; Banerjee, A. Evaluation of the efficacy of calcium silicate vs. glass ionomer cement indirect pulp capping and restoration assessment criteria: A randomised controlled clinical trial—2-year results. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 1931–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tezvergil-Mutluay, A.; Seseogullari-Dirihan, R.; Feitosa, V.; Cama, G.; Brauer, D.; Sauro, S. Effects of Composites Containing Bioactive Glasses on Demineralized Dentin. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sauro, S.; Osorio, R.; Watson, T.F.; Toledano, M. Therapeutic effects of novel resin bonding systems containing bioactive glasses on mineral-depleted areas within the bonded-dentine interface. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2012, 23, 1521–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sauro, S.; Watson, T.; Moscardó, A.P.; Luzi, A.; Feitosa, V.P.; Banerjee, A. The effect of dentine pre-treatment using bioglass and/or polyacrylic acid on the interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J. Dent. 2018, 73, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Spagnuolo, G.; Pires, P.M.; Calarco, A.; Peluso, G.; Banerjee, A.; Rengo, S.; Elias Boneta, A.R.; Sauro, S. An in-vitro study investigating the effect of air-abrasion bioactive glasses on dental adhesion, cytotoxicity and odontogenic gene expression. Dent. Mater. 2021, 21, 00248-7. [Google Scholar]
- Kabil, N.S.; Badran, A.; Wassel, M.O. Effect of the addition of chlorhexidine and miswak extract on the clinical performance and antibacterial properties of conventional glass ionomer: An in vivo study. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2016, 27, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mobarak, E. Effect of Chlorhexidine Pretreatment on Bond Strength Durability of Caries–affected Dentin Over 2-Year Aging in Artificial Saliva and Under Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure. Oper. Dent. 2011, 36, 649–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dursun, E.; Le Goff, S.; Ruse, D.; Attal, J. Effect of Chlorhexidine Application on the Long-term Shear Bond Strength to Dentin of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer. Oper. Dent. 2013, 38, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neves, A.; Coutinho, E.; De Munck, J.; Van Meerbeek, B. Caries-removal effectiveness and minimal-invasiveness potential of caries-excavation techniques: A micro-CT investigation. J. Dent. 2011, 39, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cazzaniga, G.; Ottobelli, M.; Ionescu, A.; Paolone, G.; Gherlone, E.; Ferracane, J.L.; Brambilla, E. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J. Dent. 2017, 67, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Polizzi, E.; Tetè, G.; Targa, C.; Salviato, B.; Ferrini, F.; Gastaldi, G. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of the Diode Laser in the Reduction of the Volume of the Edematous Gingival Tissue after Causal Therapy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lucchese, A.; Matarese, G.; Ghislanzoni, L.H.; Gastaldi, G.; Manuelli, M.; Gherlone, E. Efficacy and effects of palifermin for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Lymphoma 2015, 57, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Capparè, P.; Tetè, G.; Sberna, M.T.; Panina-Bordignon, P. The Emerging Role of Stem Cells in Regenerative Dentistry. Curr. Gene Ther. 2020, 20, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Slimani, A.; Sauro, S.; Gatón Hernández, P.; Gurgan, S.; Turkun, L.S.; Miletic, I.; Banerjee, A.; Tassery, H. Commercially Available Ion-Releasing Dental Materials and Cavitated Carious Lesions: Clinical Treatment Options. Materials 2021, 14, 6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216272
Slimani A, Sauro S, Gatón Hernández P, Gurgan S, Turkun LS, Miletic I, Banerjee A, Tassery H. Commercially Available Ion-Releasing Dental Materials and Cavitated Carious Lesions: Clinical Treatment Options. Materials. 2021; 14(21):6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216272
Chicago/Turabian StyleSlimani, Amel, Salvatore Sauro, Patricia Gatón Hernández, Sevil Gurgan, Lezize Sebnem Turkun, Ivana Miletic, Avijit Banerjee, and Hervé Tassery. 2021. "Commercially Available Ion-Releasing Dental Materials and Cavitated Carious Lesions: Clinical Treatment Options" Materials 14, no. 21: 6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216272
APA StyleSlimani, A., Sauro, S., Gatón Hernández, P., Gurgan, S., Turkun, L. S., Miletic, I., Banerjee, A., & Tassery, H. (2021). Commercially Available Ion-Releasing Dental Materials and Cavitated Carious Lesions: Clinical Treatment Options. Materials, 14(21), 6272. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216272