Next Article in Journal
Analysis and Modification of Methods for Calculating Axial Load Capacity of High-Strength Steel-Reinforced Concrete Composite Columns
Next Article in Special Issue
Diamond Structures for Tuning of the Finesse Coefficient of Photonic Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Linear Response of Cable-Mass-Spring System in High-Rise Buildings under Stochastic Seismic Excitation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aggregation Induced Emission and Nonlinear Optical Properties of an Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Compound
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The ZnO-In2O3 Oxide System as a Material for Low-Temperature Deposition of Transparent Electrodes

1
Institute of Physics, Dagestan Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 367015 Makhachkala, Russia
2
Basic Department of Nanotechnology and Microsystem Technology, Academy of Engineering, RUDN University, 117198 Moscow, Russia
3
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography, Federal Scientific Research Center Crystallography and Photonics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119333 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(22), 6859; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226859
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Revised: 9 November 2021 / Accepted: 12 November 2021 / Published: 14 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Optoelectronic Materials)

Abstract

:
The development of optoelectronic devices based on flexible organic substrates substantially decreases the possible process temperatures during all stages of device manufacturing. This makes it urgent to search for new transparent conducting oxide (TCO) materials, cheaper than traditional indium-tin oxide (ITO), for the low-temperature deposition of transparent electrodes, a necessary component of most optoelectronic devices. The article presents the results of a vertically integrated study aimed at the low-temperature production of TCO thin films based on a zinc-indium oxide (ZIO) system with acceptable functional characteristics. First, dense and conducting ceramic targets based on the (100-x) mol% (ZnO) + x mol% (In2O3) system (x = 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0) were synthesized by the spark plasma sintering method. The dependences of the microstructure and phase composition of the ZIO ceramic targets on the In2O3 content have been studied by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy methods. Then, a set of ZIO thin films with different Zn/In ratios were obtained on unheated glass substrates by direct current (dc) magnetron sputtering of the sintered targets. Complex studies of microstructure, electrical and optical properties of the deposited films have revealed the presence of an optimal doping level (5 mol% In2O3) of the ZIO target at which the deposited TCO films, in terms of the combination of their electrical and optical properties, become comparable to the widely used expensive ITO.

1. Introduction

TCO-based transparent electrodes are currently an integral component of many optoelectronic devices (displays, light-emitting structures, solar energy converters, biosensors, etc.) [1,2,3,4]. Over the past several decades, the main material for the TCO transparent electrodes formation is binary indium-tin oxide (ITO) due to its high electrical and optical characteristics [5,6]. For all its advantages, the ITO is characterized by one significant drawback—the volume of worldwide extraction of the In, which is the main component of the ITO, no longer meet the needs of unprecedented growing markets of informational displays CuInGaSe2 solar cells and light-emitting devices. Currently, the main alternative to ITO is zinc oxide doped with elements of group III of the periodic table Al, Ga and In, which is both inexpensive and widespread. Significant attention has therefore been paid to thin films based on ZnO doped with aluminium (ZAO) and gallium (ZGO) [1,7,8]. This was mainly due to the fact that Al and Ga impurities do not disorder the ZnO lattice as much as indium, which has a large ionic radius. To date, electrical characteristics comparable to ITO have been achieved in Al (or Ga) doped ZnO films deposited at moderate substrate temperatures (up to 300 °C) [9,10]. At the same time, these transparent conductive films deposited at low substrate temperatures (≤100 °C) usually have poor crystallinity and are thus characterized by temporal and temperature unstable electrical properties, which significantly limits their use in flexible electronic devices [11]. In light of this, In has become an attractive n-type dopant for ZnO because it is less reactive and has greater oxidation-resistance [12,13].
This work presents the results of optimization of the composition of sputtered targets for the formation of transparent conducting films based on a zinc-indium oxide (ZIO) system by the direct current (dc) magnetron sputtering method, which is widely used in the mass production of microelectronic devices [14]. At that, the content of the In2O3 impurity phase in the targets varied in a wide range from 0.5 to 10 mol%. The final goal of this work was to optimize the composition of the film for the problem of low-temperature deposition of transparent conductive ZnO-based thin films with acceptable functional performances.

2. Materials and Methods

ZIO thin films were deposited by the dc magnetron sputtering technique using sintered targets. The detailed route for ceramic target preparation is as follows. Submicron powders of zinc (II) oxide (99.95% purity) and indium (III) sesquioxide (99.99% purity) were used as starting reagents. Weighed portions of five mixtures of oxide powders of the following compositions were prepared: (100-x) mol% (ZnO) + x mol% (In2O3), where x = 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0.
After 8-h of dry mixing in a ball mill, the prepared powder mixtures were used to form ceramic disc targets with a diameter of 51 mm and a thickness of 4 mm by the spark plasma sintering (SPS) technique [15] under the following technological conditions: residual air pressure in the SPS chamber—0.1 Pa, pressing pressure—25 MPa, SPS temperature—950 °C, SPS duration—3 min, rate of reaching the SPS temperature—60 °C/min, and cooling for 70 min under vacuum with no pressure. After a rubdown, the sintered ceramic discs were examined by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical X’PERT PRO MPD diffractometer with CuKα radiation, Malvern Panalytical B.V., Almelo, Netherlands), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Scios dual-beam electron microscope, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Additionally, their physical density and electrical resistance was measured by the Archimedes method (balances OHAUS Adventurer™ Analytical AX 124 (OHAUS®, Parsippany, NJ, USA) equipped by density determination kit) and the four-probe method (IUS-3, VNIIEM, Moscow, Russia), respectively.
Furthermore, the sintered ceramics were used as targets for dc magnetron sputtering. ZIO thin films were obtained on borosilicate glass substrates with dimensions of 25 × 25 × 1.1 mm, using a magnetron sputtering setup equipped with a drum-type substrate holder [16]. Before the start of each deposition procedure, the vacuum chamber was evacuated to a residual pressure of 2 × 10−4 Pa. Sputtering was carried out in Ar working gas at a pressure of 0.3 Pa in the current stabilization mode (I = 130 mA). The rotation rate of the drum substrate holder was 10 rpm, and the minimum distance from the target to the passing substrate was 100 mm. The duration of the deposition process is 180 min. It should be noted that during depositions no infrared heating of the substrates was performed. Additional measurements showed that the substrate surface was only slightly heated to temperatures not exceeding 50 °C due to the charged particle bombardment and discharge plasma radiation.
The surface morphology, growth microstructure and elemental composition of the deposited film samples were investigated by using the FEI Scios dual-beam electron microscope. Film thickness determinations were performed by using cross-sectional SEM views in the locally ion etched areas of films. The electrical properties were measured by using the four-probe technique. Optical transmittance spectra were obtained by a UV-3600 optical spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokio, Japan) in the wavelength range of 300–1100 nm. All of the electrical and optical measurements were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 presents XRD and SEM data for the sintered ceramic samples. According to the XRD data, when 0.5 mol% In2O3 is added to the initial mixture, the resulting ceramics is a monophase system; in the XRD spectrum there are only reflections corresponding to the hexagonal ZnO phase with a wurtzite structure (JCPDS 00-036-1451). The absence of other reflections in the spectrum may be due to both the insensitivity of the XRD method to small amounts of impurity phases [17] and the complete incorporation of indium into the ZnO crystal lattice without the formation of a significant number of defects such as inverted boundaries passing along the basal {00l} planes of the ZnO crystal lattice [18]. In the XRD spectrum of ceramics with 1.5 mol% In2O3, insignificant peaks of a secondary phase appear, and with a further increase in the molar fraction of In2O3 in the system, suppression of reflections of the ZnO phase and an increase in the intensity of numerous reflections corresponding to the secondary phase are observed. Additionally, Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials (SM) details the XRD spectrum of the sintered ceramics with the maximum content In2O3 in the initial oxide mixture.
The identification of the forming secondary phase using the PDF ICDD database showed that the observed peaks correspond to the compound In2Zn5O8 (JCPDS 01-089-8974). It was noted recently that in the ZnO—In2O3 binary system, along with zinc and indium oxides, the most stable compound from the homologous series In2ZnkOk+3 (k = 3–7, 9, 11, 13 b 15) is In2Zn5O8 at sintering temperatures up to 1100 °C [19].
The introduction of significant amounts of indium sesquioxide into ZnO also affects the microstructure of the ceramic. From the micrographs shown in Figure 1, it can be seen that in samples with the In2O3 content of up to 5.0 mol%, most of the grains havean isotropic form, while in ceramics with a high impurity content, the average grain size decreases and a significant number of anisotropic grains appear among them. Anisotropic lamellar form of grains is characteristic of homologous compounds M2ZnkOk+3 (where M is Ga, In, Fe, etc.) [20]. Additionally, the SEM studies revealed the presence of residual porosity in the sintered ceramics. Measurement of the physical density of the ceramics showed that their density varies without any regularity within 93–96% of the calculated values of the theoretical density for the binary system ZnO–In2O3. The absence of the regularity can be explained by the fact that the binary system after SPS treatment, as a result, is not a simple mixture of two starting oxides. However, EDX measurements confirmed the preservation of the Zn/In ratio in the sintered ceramic specimens relative to the initial one in the powder mixtures, which confirms the fact that none of the metal components predominantly volatilizes during the rapid SPS treatment under the above conditions.
Evaluation of the sheet resistance RS of ceramic samples of the same thickness showed that the RS smoothly decreases from 11.2 × 10−3 to 8.3 × 10−3 Ω/sq with an increase in the In2O3 content from 0.5 to 5.0 mol%, and then increases slightly to 9.1 × 10−3 Ω/sq at 10.0 mol% In2O3. The observed low values of the electrical resistance are due not only to the mutual alloying of oxides in the binary system with the formation of electrically conductive phases, but also to the fact that a significant oxygen deficiency could form in the ceramic body during SPS treatment. As we believe, SPS sintering of the ZnO-In2O3 system in vacuum took place in a reducing atmosphere with the participation of reactive indium hemioxide due to the use of graphite tooling (punch and matrix of the press-form, sealing materials). This can explain the rapid formation of the new homologous In2Zn5O8 phase at the SPS temperature of 950 °C without registering an intermediate spinel ZnIn2O4 phase, as is usually observed in ZnO-Al2O3 and ZnO-Ga2O3 systems.
Thus, all synthesized ceramic samples had sufficient physical density and good electrical conductivity for their further use as targets in the formation of homogeneous thin films by dc magnetron sputtering [21]. It should be noted that all targets sputtered for more than 3 h retained their integrity (Figure S2 of SM). In this case, the formation of undesirable nodules in the erosion zone, which destabilize the sputtering process and affect the final properties of the deposited film, was found only in the target with a minimum content of indium impurities [22,23].
Figure 2 shows SEM micrographs of ZIO thin films deposited by using the targets containing 0.5 mol% (which is below the solubility limit of In in ZnO of 4% [24]) and 5.0 mol% In2O3 (which is above the solubility limit). It can be seen that with an increase in the content of In2O3 in the target, the average grain size observed on the surface decreases and the film becomes smoother (this phenomenon is additionally demonstrated in Figure S3 in SM). The smooth surface morphology of TCO thin films is important for optoelectronic device applications. In addition, all deposited films are characterized by a columnar structure and with an increase in the In2O3 content, the average diameter of the columns decreases.
The results of evaluating the thickness d of ZIO thin films from SEM data showed that the growth rate of ZIO films increases monotonically with an increase in the impurity content (Table 1). Table 1 also shows the values of the In/Zn ratio for the films calculated from the EDX spectroscopy data (the corresponding EDX spectra and data are shown in Figure S4 in SM). It can be seen that, as a whole, the In/Zn ratio is in good agreement with the values initially set in the sputtered ceramics. The small deviations from the expected values observed here are most likely due to the insufficient set of statistical data during the thin film EDX measurements.
The optical transmission spectra for the deposited ZIO thin films in the wavelength range between 380 and 1100 nm are shown in Figure 3a. It is seen that all films, despite the low deposition temperature, are characterized by a high optical transparency (>80%) in the visible range. Interference fringes caused by multiple reflections on different interfaces are observed in the spectra, which indicate that all deposited ZIO films are uniform and have smooth interfaces. The observed slight decrease in the distance between the interference fringes with increasing indium content indicates an increase in the optical path across the film, which is correlated with the SEM data regarding thefilm thickness.
With an increase in the doping level, the average transmittance Tav in the visible region (380—760 nm) tends to decrease (see Inset a’ in Figure 3a). This may be due to an increase in the photon scattering on ZnO crystal lattice defects caused by the incorporation of In into the lattice [24,25,26].
Inset a” in Figure 3a shows the variations of the optical gap Eg for the deposited ZIO films as a function of In2O3 content in the targets. The procedure for Eg determining, which consists in extrapolating straight line portions of the Tauc’s graphs (αhν)2 = f(hν) to αhν = 0 is demonstrated in Figure S5 in SM [27]. It is clear that the optical gap of the films is increased from 3.22 to 3.34 eV with an increase in In2O3 content from 0.5 to 2.5 mol%. A further increase in the content of indium oxide leads to a slight decrease in the optical gap to 3.26 eV. It is known that the magnitude of the shift correlates with the concentration of free charge carriers in a degenerate semiconductor [28]. Many authors reported band gap widening with an increase in donor concentration in ZnO, which is attributed to Burstein-Moss shift [29,30]. At the same time, the nonmonotonic nature of the change in the optical gap for the ZnO-Me2O3 system (Me = Al, Sc, Y and In), depending on the content of impurity oxide to the host ZnO, was observed by other authors [27,31]. The observed band gap narrowing in the ZIO films deposited from targets with In2O3 content above 2.5 mol% is associated with the formation of a band tail in the band gap with an increase in the carrier concentration [31,32], or, conversely, due to a possible decrease in the carrier concentration related with a high probability of the formation of charged acceptor complexes ( V Z n 2 I n Z n + ) [33].
In confirmation of the above, as shown by measurements of electrical characteristics, the surface resistance RS decreases with an increase in the content of In2O3 to 5.0 mol%, and then slightly increases at 10 mol% (Figure 3b). The observed decrease in the sheet resistance of the films prepared in this work was due to In substitution into Zn sites (or interstitial sites). At the same time, the increase in RS at maximum In2O3 content may be explained by a combination of factors, including the loss of long-range crystal order [34], as well as an increase in impurity scattering due to the high concentration of charged dopant atoms in the film [12,13]. The thin film obtained by sputtering a target with 5.0 mol% In2O3 has a minimum sheet resistance RS of 69 Ω/sq and, accordingly, a maximum conductivity σ = 452.9 Ω−1·cm−1 (Table 1). A similar dependence of the conductivity on the doping level was previously observed for heavily In-doped ZnO films obtained by high-temperature dip-coating and aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition methods [34,35]. They also noticed a decrease in conductivity at same doping level. In our case, it should also be noted that the achieved conductivity value for the ZIO thin film composition with 5.0 mol% In2O3 corresponds to one of the best among values declared for transparent electrodes formed on unheated substrates [36,37,38,39].
To evaluate the performance of transparent conductive films for various applications, the optical transmission and the electrical conduction of the films should be considered cumulatively. Usually, the objective evaluation can be carried out using Haacke’s figure of merit (FOM), defined as FOM = T10/RS, where T is the average visible transmittance [40]. The dependence of FOM of ZIO thin films on the level of doping with indium is shown in Figure 3b and in the last column of Table 2. For comparison, Table 2 also shows data on an ITO film with a thickness of 410 nm, deposited under completely identical technological conditions using a commercial ceramic In2O3:SnO2 (90:10 wt.%) target from Summit-Tech. Co. (Zhubei, Taiwan) [41]. It can be seen that for ZIO thin films, maximum FOM values 2.57 × 10−3 Ω−1 correspond to the ones deposited from ZnO targets with the In2O3 content of 2.5 and 5.0 mol%, while with further In2O3 content increasing the FOM starts to decrease. From the data presented in Table 2, it can be seen that these two ZIO films with the maximum FOM are only slightly inferior in their combination of optical and electrical properties to the traditional ITO material for transparent electrodes. However, an additional 20-min rapid thermal annealing (RTA) test of the deposited ZIO films at 200 °C in air revealed that the thermal stability of the films, defined as the ratio ΔR/RS (where ΔR is the difference between the sheet resistance after RTA RRTA and the initial one RS) rapidly improves with increasing In2O3 content up to 10.0 mol%.
All these facts, taking also into account the obviousness of lower costs for a target of ZnO with 5.0 mol% In2O3 of compared to ITO one, makes it possible to consider this ZnO-based composition as a real alternative to ITO-based TCO films for various cases when a low-temperature deposition of transparent electrodes is needed.

4. Conclusions

In the presented work, the microstructure, phase composition, and physical properties of both SPS formed (ZnO–In2O3)-based ceramic targets and ZIO thin films deposited by following magnetron sputtering of these targets were studied. In particular, depending on the content of indium oxide in the sputtered target, the deposition process and the functional performances of the ZIO transparent conducting films at low substrate temperatures (≤50 °C) were studied in detail. It is shown that the In/Zn ratio in the ZIO films corresponds to the initial one, and with an increase in the In2O3 content in the sputtered target, the optical transmission coefficient of thin films tends to decrease monotonically to 83.6%, while the specific electrical conductivity reaches a maximum σ = 4.5 × 102 Ω−1·cm−1 at 5.0 mol% In2O3. Thus, the ZIO film deposited from a target containing 5.0 mol% In2O3, having an average optical transmittance in the visible range of 84.1%, and a sufficiently thermostable electrical conductivity (4.5 × 102 Ω−1cm−1), is characterized by the high FOM of 2.57 × 10−3 Ω−1, which is only slightly lower than the FOM value of a traditional ITO film deposited under the same conditions. From the point of view of commercial attractiveness, the obtained results make it possible to consider ZnO-based material with a composition of 95.0 mol% ZnO + 5.0 mol% In2O3 as an promising alternative to an expensive ITO in case of low-temperature formation of transparent electrodes, for example, in the flexible electronics area.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma14226859/s1, Figure S1: The XRD spectrum for the SPS-formed 90.0 mol% ZnO + 10.0 mol% In2O3 ceramic sample, Figure S2: A top view photography showing the appearance of ZnO-In2O3 targets subjected to more than 3 h of sputtering processes, Figure S3: SEM micrographs of top view showing the surface morphology of ZIO films deposited by using SPS synthesized ZnO-based ceramic targets with various In2O3 content, Figure S4: EDX spectra for ZIO thin films deposited by using the targets with various In2O3 content, Figure S5: Tauc’s graphs of ZIO thin films deposited by using the targets with various In2O3 content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. (Akhmed Akhmedov) and A.A. (Abil Asvarov); methodology, A.A. (Aslan Abduev) and V.K.; validation, E.M., A.M. and A.A. (Abil Asvarov); investigation, E.M. and A.A. (Akhmed Akhmedov); resources, A.A. (Aslan Abduev); writing—original draft preparation, A.A. (Akhmed Akhmedov) and A.A. (Abil Asvarov); writing—review and editing, A.A. (Abil Asvarov); visualization, A.M.; supervision, A.A. (Aslan Abduev); project administration, V.K.; funding acquisition, V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was performed in the frame of state assignments of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for Dagestan Federal Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences and Federal Scientific Research Center “Crystallography and Photonics” of Russian Academy of Sciences and partially funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (research project no. 20-21-00068-ROSATOM (V.K., A.M. and A.A. (Abil Asvarov) in the part of XRD characterization of ceramic and film samples) and research project no. 20-07-00760 (A.A. (Akhmed Akhmedov) and A.A. (Aslan Abduev)) in the part of electrical and optical characterization of film samples) and Ministry of Science and Higher Education (grant № 075-15-2021-1362 in a part of ZnO samples synthesis).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for additional technical support from the Analytical Shared Research Center of Dagestan Federal Research Center of RAS and the Shared Research Center of FSRC “Crystallography and Photonics” RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, H.; Avrutin, V.; Izyumskaya, N.; Özgür, Ü.; Morkoç, H. Transparent conducting oxides for electrode applications in light emitting and absorbing devices. Superlattices Microstruct. 2010, 48, 458–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lewis, B.G.; Paine, D.C. Applications and Processing of Transparent Conducting Oxides. MRS Bull. 2000, 25, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cao, W.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Xue, J. Transparent electrodes for organic optoelectronic devices: A review. J. Photonics Energy 2014, 4, 040990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Song, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, H.-L.; Yoon, S.; Hong, D.-K.; Kim, W.-H.; Shin, I.-S.; Seong, W.K.; Lee, K.-N. Sensitivity Improvement in Electrochemical Immunoassays Using Antibody Immobilized Magnetic Nanoparticles with a Clean ITO Working Electrode. BioChip J. 2020, 14, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, L.; Xiao, W.; Wu, W.; Liu, B. Research Progress on Flexible Oxide-Based Thin Film Transistors. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Demirhan, Y.; Koseoglu, H.; Turkoglu, F.; Uyanik, Z.; Ozdemir, M.; Aygun, G.; Ozyuzer, L. The controllable deposition of large area roll-to-roll sputtered ito thin films for photovoltaic applications. Renew. Energy 2020, 146, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nomoto, J.; Makino, H.; Tsuchiya, T.; Yamamoto, T. Chemical trends of n-type doping of Al, Ga, In, and Ti donors for ZnO polycrystalline films deposited by direct-current magnetron sputtering. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 145303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abduev, A.; Akmedov, A.; Asvarov, A.; Chiolerio, A. A Revised Growth Model for Transparent Conducting Ga Doped ZnO Films: Improving Crystallinity by Means of Buffer Layers. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Minami, T. Substitution of transparent conducting oxide thin films for indium tin oxide transparent electrode applications. Thin Solid Films 2008, 516, 1314–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yamamoto, N.; Makino, H.; Osone, S.; Ujihara, A.; Ito, T.; Hokari, H.; Maruyama, T.; Yamamoto, T. Development of Ga-doped ZnO transparent electrodes for liquid crystal display panels. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 4131–4138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Asvarov, A.; Abduev, A.; Akhmedov, A.; Abdullaev, A. Effects of a high humidity environment and air anneal treatments on the electrical resistivity of transparent conducting ZnO-based thin films. Phys. Status Solidi C 2010, 7, 1553–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, H.; Jen, Sh.-U.; Chen, Sh.-Ch.; Ye, Sh.-Sh.; Wang, X. The electrical stability of In-doped ZnO thin films deposited by RF sputtering. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 045102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Edinger, S.; Bansal, N.; Bauch, M.; Wibowo, R.A.; Újvári, G.; Hamid, R.; Trimmel, G.; Dimopoulos, T. Highly transparent and conductive indium-doped zinc oxide films deposited at low substrate temperature by spray pyrolysis from water-based solutions. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 8591–8602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Gulkowski, S.; Krawczak, E. RF/DC Magnetron Sputtering Deposition of Thin Layers for Solar Cell Fabrication. Coatings 2020, 10, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Asvarov, A.S.; Muslimov, A.E.; Akhmedov, A.K.; Abduev, A.K.; Kanevsky, V.M. A Laboratory Apparatus for Spark Plasma Sintering of Ceramic and Composite Materials. Instrum. Exp. Tech. 2019, 62, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Akhmedov, A.K.; Abduev, A.K.; Asvarov, A.S.; Muslimov, A.E.; Kanevsky, V.M. ZnO-Based Nanocrystalline Films Obtained in a Single Vacuum Cycle. Nanotechnol. Russia 2020, 15, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sundaram, M.; Natarajan, S.; Dikundwar, A.G.; Bhutani, H. Quantification of solid-state impurity with powder X-ray diffraction using laboratory source. Powder Diffr. 2020, 35, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Labegorre, J.-B.; Lebedev, O.I.; Bourges, C.; Rečnik, A.; Košir, M.; Bernik, S.; Maignan, A.; Le Mercier, T.; Pautrot-d’Alençon, L.; Guilmeau, E. Phonon Scattering and Electron Doping by 2D Structural Defects in In/ZnO. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 6415–6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jantzena, T.; Hacka, K.; Yazhenskikh, E.; Müller, M. Thermodynamic assessment of oxide system In2O3-SnO2-ZnO. Chim. Techno Acta 2018, 5, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Muktepavela, F.; Maniks, J.; Grigorjeva, L.; Zabels, R.; Rodnyi, P.; Gorokhova, E. Effect of in Doping on the ZnO Powders Morphology and Microstructure Evolution of ZnO:In Ceramics as a Material for Scintillators. Latv. J. Phys. Tech. Sci. 2018, 6, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Medvedovski, E.; Alvarez, N.A.; Szepesi, C.J.; Yankov, O.; Lippens, P. Advanced indium tin oxide ceramic sputtering targets (rotary and planar) for transparent conductive nanosized films. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2013, 12, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heintze, M.; Luciu, I. Nodule formation on sputtering targets: Causes and their control by MF power supplies. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 336, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Winnicki, M.; Wiatrowski, A.; Mazur, M. High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering of In2O3/Sn Cold Sprayed Composite Target. Materials 2021, 14, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sahoo, B.; Behera, D.; Pradhan, S.K.; Mishra, D.K.; Sahoo, S.K.; Nayak, R.R.; Sekhar, K.P.C. Analysis of structural, optical and electrical properties of nano-particulate indium doped zinc oxide thin films. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 1150a6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shinde, S.S.; Shinde, P.S.; Bhosale, C.H.; Rajpure, K.Y. Optoelectronic properties of sprayed transparent and conducting indium doped zinc oxide thin films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 105109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bharath, S.P.; Bangera, K.V.; Shivakumar, G.K. Enhanced gas sensing properties of indium doped ZnO thin films. Superlattices Microstruct. 2018, 124, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jain, A.; Sagar, P.; Mehra, R.M. Band gap widening and narrowing in moderately and heavily doped n-ZnO films. Solid State Electron. 2006, 50, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Burstein, E. Anomalous Optical Absorption Limit in InSb. Phys. Rev. 1954, 93, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sernelius, B.E.; Berggren, K.-F.; Jin, Z.-C.; Hamberg, I.; Granqvist, C.G. Band-gap tailoring of ZnO by means of heavy Al doping. Phys. Rev.B 1988, 37, 10244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lu, J.G.; Fujita, S.; Kawaharamura, T.; Nishinaka, H.; Kamada, Y.; Ohshima, T.; Ye, Z.Z.; Zeng, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Zhu, L.P.; et al. Carrier concentration dependence of band gap shift in n-typeZnO:Al films. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 083705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, G.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W. The Variation of Optical Band Gap for ZnO:In Films Prepared by Sol-Gel Technique. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 348601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Khalfallah, B.; Chaabouni, F.; Abaab, M. Some physical investigations on In-doped ZnO films prepared by RF magnetron sputtering using powder compacted target. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 5209–5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Torchynska, T.; El Filali, B.; Gomez, J.A.J.; Polupan, G.; García, J.L.R.; Shcherbyna, L. Raman scattering, emission, and deep defect evolution in ZnO:In thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2020, 38, 063409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Potter, D.B.; Bhachu, D.S.; Powell, M.J.; Darr, J.A.; Parkin, I.P.; Carmalt, C.J. Al-, Ga-, and In-doped ZnO thin films via aerosol assisted CVD for use as transparent conducting oxides. Phys. Status Solidi A 2016, 213, 1346–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Benzitouni, S.; Zaabat, M.; Mahdjoub, A.; Benaboud, A.; Boudine, B. High transparency and conductivity of heavily In-doped ZnO thin films deposited by dip-coating method. Materials Science-Poland 2018, 36, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Txintxurreta, J.; G-Berasategui, E.; Ortiz, R.; Hernández, O.; Mendizábal, L.; Barriga, J. Indium Tin Oxide Thin Film Deposition by Magnetron Sputtering at Room Temperature for the Manufacturing of Efficient Transparent Heaters. Coatings 2021, 11, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Álvarez-Fraga, L.; Jiménez-Villacorta, F.; Sánchez-Marcos, J.; de Andrés, A.; Prieto, C. Indium-tin oxide thin films deposited at room temperature on glass and PET substrates: Optical and electrical properties variation with the H2–Ar sputtering gas mixture. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 344, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Morales-Masis, M.; Dauzou, F.; Jeangros, Q.; Dabirian, A.; Lifka, H.; Gierth, R.; Ruske, M.; Moet, D.; Hessler-Wyser, A.; Ballif, C. An Indium-Free Anode for Large-Area Flexible OLEDs: Defect-Free Transparent Conductive Zinc Tin Oxide. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, H.; Liu, Y.-F.; Xiong, P.-P.; Chen, P.; Li, H.-Y.; Hou, J.-W.; Kang, B.-N.; Duan, Y. Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide Transparent Electrode Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition for Organic Light Emitting Devices. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2017, 16, 634–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haacke, G. New figure of merit for transparent conductors. J. Appl. Phys. 1976, 47, 4086–4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Akhmedov, A.K.; Asvarov, A.S.; Muslimov, A.E.; Kanevsky, V.M. A Multi-Position Drum-Type Assembly for Simultaneous Film Deposition at Different Temperatures in a Single Sputter Cycle–Application to ITO Thin Films. Coatings 2020, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD spectra and SEM micrographs of ceramic samples with different In2O3 content. In the spectra, the peaks corresponding to the hexagonal ZnO phase are marked with the symbol ♦, and the positions of the most intense reflections of the secondary hexagonal In2Zn5O8 phase are marked with black vertical lines.
Figure 1. XRD spectra and SEM micrographs of ceramic samples with different In2O3 content. In the spectra, the peaks corresponding to the hexagonal ZnO phase are marked with the symbol ♦, and the positions of the most intense reflections of the secondary hexagonal In2Zn5O8 phase are marked with black vertical lines.
Materials 14 06859 g001
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of ZIO thin films deposited by using targets with In2O3 content of 0.5 (a) and 5.0 mol% (b). To obtain an image of transverse cleavage morphology, thin-film samples were subjected to local deposition of a technological platinum layer followed by ion etching.
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of ZIO thin films deposited by using targets with In2O3 content of 0.5 (a) and 5.0 mol% (b). To obtain an image of transverse cleavage morphology, thin-film samples were subjected to local deposition of a technological platinum layer followed by ion etching.
Materials 14 06859 g002
Figure 3. (a) Transmittance spectra in the 300–1100 nm region for ZIO thin films deposited by using the targets with various In2O3 content (Inset a’ and Inset a” show the dependences of the average transmittance Tav and optical gap Eg of ZIO films on the In2O3 content, respectively); (b) Dependences of RS and FOM of the ZIO films on the In2O3 content in the sputtered ceramics.
Figure 3. (a) Transmittance spectra in the 300–1100 nm region for ZIO thin films deposited by using the targets with various In2O3 content (Inset a’ and Inset a” show the dependences of the average transmittance Tav and optical gap Eg of ZIO films on the In2O3 content, respectively); (b) Dependences of RS and FOM of the ZIO films on the In2O3 content in the sputtered ceramics.
Materials 14 06859 g003
Table 1. SEM and EDX data on film thickness d and in content for the deposited ZIO thin films.
Table 1. SEM and EDX data on film thickness d and in content for the deposited ZIO thin films.
Targetd, nmIn/Zn Ratio, %
99.5 mol% ZnO + 0.5 mol% In2O3270 ± 51.1
98.5 mol% ZnO + 1.5 mol% In2O3290 ± 52.9
97.5 mol% ZnO + 2.5 mol% In2O3310 ± 54.6
95.0 mol% ZnO + 5.0 mol% In2O3320 ± 59.2
90.0 mol% ZnO + 10.0 mol% In2O3320 ± 526.1
Table 2. Measured sheet resistance RS, calculated film conductivity σ = (RS × d)−1, average transmittances Tav in the range of 380–760 nm, and FOM of the ZIO and ITO thin films.
Table 2. Measured sheet resistance RS, calculated film conductivity σ = (RS × d)−1, average transmittances Tav in the range of 380–760 nm, and FOM of the ZIO and ITO thin films.
Targetd,
nm
RS,
Ω/sq
σ,
Ω−1.cm−1
Tav,
%
FOM,
Ω−1
ΔR/RS,
%
99.5 mol% ZnO + 0.5 mol% In2O3270 ± 596038.6 ± 1.086.02.30 × 10−4+132%
98.5 mol% ZnO + 1.5 mol% In2O3290 ± 5179192.6 ± 3.587.01.38 × 10−3+55%
97.5 mol% ZnO + 2.5 mol% In2O3310 ± 589362.5 ± 6.086.32.58 × 10−3+37%
95.0 mol% ZnO + 5.0 mol% In2O3320 ± 569452.9 ± 7.084.12.57 × 10−3+1%
90.0 mol% ZnO + 10.0 mol% In2O3320 ± 578400.6 ± 6.583.62.15 × 10−3−4%
ITO [41]410 ± 550487.8 ± 6.082.62.96 × 10−3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akhmedov, A.; Abduev, A.; Murliev, E.; Asvarov, A.; Muslimov, A.; Kanevsky, V. The ZnO-In2O3 Oxide System as a Material for Low-Temperature Deposition of Transparent Electrodes. Materials 2021, 14, 6859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226859

AMA Style

Akhmedov A, Abduev A, Murliev E, Asvarov A, Muslimov A, Kanevsky V. The ZnO-In2O3 Oxide System as a Material for Low-Temperature Deposition of Transparent Electrodes. Materials. 2021; 14(22):6859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226859

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akhmedov, Akhmed, Aslan Abduev, Eldar Murliev, Abil Asvarov, Arsen Muslimov, and Vladimir Kanevsky. 2021. "The ZnO-In2O3 Oxide System as a Material for Low-Temperature Deposition of Transparent Electrodes" Materials 14, no. 22: 6859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226859

APA Style

Akhmedov, A., Abduev, A., Murliev, E., Asvarov, A., Muslimov, A., & Kanevsky, V. (2021). The ZnO-In2O3 Oxide System as a Material for Low-Temperature Deposition of Transparent Electrodes. Materials, 14(22), 6859. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226859

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop