Next Article in Journal
Research on the Grinding Energy Density in a Jet Mill
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ni-Cr Alloy Surface Abrasive Blasting on Its Wettability by Liquid Ceramics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/ma14082005
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Hydrophobic Organosilane-Functionalized Cellulose: A Promising Filler for Thermoplastic Composites

by
Pavel Cerny
1,2,*,
Petr Bartos
1,2,
Pavel Kriz
1,2,
Pavel Olsan
2 and
Petr Spatenka
2,3,4
1
Department of Applied Physics and Technology, Faculty of Education, University of South Bohemia, Jeronymova 10, 371 15 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
2
Department of Agricultural, Transport and Handling Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia, Studentska 1668, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
3
Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 4, 166 07 Prague, Czech Republic
4
SurfaceTreat Plc., Jungmannova 695/42, 370 01 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(8), 2005; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082005
Submission received: 8 March 2021 / Revised: 8 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this work is to design and optimize the process of functionalization of cellulose fibers by organosilane functional groups using low-pressure microwave plasma discharge with hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) precursor in order to prepare a compatible hydrophobic filler for composites with nonpolar thermoplastic matrices. Particular attention was paid to the study of agglomeration of cellulose fibers in the mixture with polypropylene. In our contribution, the dependence of the surface wettability on used process gas and treatment time was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses were applied to characterize the surface morphology and chemical composition of the cellulose fibers. It was observed that the plasma treatment in oxygen process gas led to the functionalization of cellulose fibers by organosilane functional groups without degradation. In addition, the treated cellulose was highly hydrophobic with water contact angle up to 143°. The use of treated cellulose allowed to obtain a homogeneous mixture with polypropylene powder due to the significantly lower tendency of the functionalized cellulose fibers to agglomerate.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, environmental consciousness involving problems such as increasing emissions of harmful gases during incineration and increasing consumption of petroleum resources is growing. In addition, economic and environmental expectations of our society lead to widespread attention of engineers and scientists to the development of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites (NFPCs) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].
NFPCs have been considered a promising composite materials for the last few decades with applications in many different fields of industry due to their outstanding performances in biodegradability, being lightweight, low cost, and having preferable mechanical properties [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Different types of NFPCs are used in various applications in the automotive industry by many automotive companies such as Audi Group, BMW, Daimler Chrysler, Ford, Mercedes, Opel, and Volkswagen. Moreover, NFPCs have also received great importance in the food, construction, and building industry, aerospace, and sports. Specifically, NFPCs are used for the production of bicycle frames, decking, door panels, furniture, food packaging, railroad sleepers, and window frames [21,22,23,24,25].
NFPCs are produced using natural fibers obtained from animal and vegetable sources [26]. All-natural cellulose fibers including cotton, coir, jute, sisal, etc., are extracted from various crops including bagasse, barley, corn, rice, sorghum, and wheat [27,28]. In order to meet the high demands of the industry, natural cellulose fibers have also been extracted from areca palm leafstalk, Saharan aloe vera cactus leaves, and Agave americana L. as reinforcement for NFPCs [29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Natural fibers can be considered as a low-cost replacement for mineral and synthetic fibers. They are available all over the world, nontoxic, and renewable with low density, almost no carbon dioxide emissions and low abrasive effect on processing equipment [36,37,38]. On the other hand, there are several challenges that the development of NFPCs with nonpolar thermoplastic matrices must face [39]. Compared to mineral and synthetic fibers, natural fibers exhibit poor interfacial adhesion and have relatively low mechanical properties that vary depending on many factors, such as the shape, arrangement, density, etc., [40,41,42]. Moreover, mechanical properties of natural fibers can be affected by their undesirable moisture absorption leading to swelling [43,44,45].
In addition to low interfacial adhesion, composites with a non-polar matrix such as polypropylene (PP) and polar natural fibers present another problem related to the agglomeration of natural fibers due to forming hydrogen bonds between the hydrophilic fibers. Fibers tend to agglomerate into bundles and distribute unevenly in the mixture of the non-polar polymer matrix and the fiber reinforcement during the processing [46,47,48].
Above-mentioned drawbacks of natural fibers can be eliminated by suitable modification process including use of coupling agents, plasma discharges, mercerization, alkali treatment, peroxide treatment, acetylation treatment, and silane treatment [49,50,51,52,53]. Silane treatments are among the most widely used treatments for natural fibers. The advantage of silane coupling agents is the ability to interact with both the matrix and the fibers to form chemical bonds [54,55]. The chemical interaction between silane-based coupling agents and the fiber is mediated through the hydroxyl groups that are present on the surface of the natural fibers. The formed silanol is bound to the surface of the natural fiber by a covalent bond via hydroxyl groups or by hydrogen bonds [56]. Moreover, silane coupling agents can interact with maleated coupling agents (polyethylene or polypropylene-graft-maleic anhydride) to form covalent bonds [57,58,59,60,61]. Specifically, these are organosilane coupling agents with vinyl (VTS) and azide (ATS) functionality for use in NFPCs with polypropylene matrix [62,63].
Hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) is one of the most widely used precursors of organosilane functional groups. HMDSO has found rich use in various plasma processes, including deposition and plasma polymerization [64], and it is currently increasingly used for the processes of functionalization of organic surfaces [65]. Plasma decomposition of HMDSO results in a variety of chemical structures. HMDSO molecules can be cleaved in plasma into hydrophobic fragments incorporated into the substrate surface, ensuring its high hydrophobicity [65,66]. Since organosilane-based treatments using HMDSO precursor often lead to hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces, it appears to be promising not only for incorporation of organosilane functional groups but also for reducing the fiber agglomeration and moisture absorption [67,68,69,70].
The aim of this study is to design and optimize the cellulose fibers treatment process using low-pressure microwave plasma discharge with HMDSO precursor in order to prepare hydrophobic, non-moisturizing organosilane functionalized filler for thermoplastic composites with polypropylene matrix. Particular attention was paid to the study of agglomeration of cellulosic fibers in the mixture with polypropylene powder to make the compounding processing more efficient.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

In our research we used the following materials and chemical agents:
  • Cellulose fibers with a brand name of GW400 F (maximum humidity of 7%, minimum purity of 99.5%, fiber length 32–100 microns, fiber width 20–45 microns) were supplied by GreenCel Ltd. (Hencovce, Slovakia);
  • HMDSO monomer (concentration 98–99%, molar mass 162.38 g∙mol−1) was purchased from Mach Chemikalie Ltd. (Ostrava, Czech Republic);
  • UV and heat stabilized polypropylene powder with a brand name of Resinex RX 725 Natural (density 900 kg∙m−3, melt flow index at 230 °C 14 g/10 min, Vicat softening temperature 122 °C, Izod impact strength at 23 °C 21 kJ∙m−2, flexural modulus 1010 MPa) was purchased from Ravago Chemicals CZ Ltd. (Praha, Czech Republic).

2.2. Experimental Setup

The scheme of the experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. Low-pressure microwave plasma discharge was generated in cubic vacuum chamber with a volume of 56 L made of stainless steel. Microwave power supply of total power up to 1 kW powered by a pulsed microwave power unit MNG 1K-08 supplied by Radan Ltd. (Barchov, Czech Republic) was set to 500 W microwave power. The cellulose fibers were mixed in a stainless-steel blender located inside the vacuum chamber. The blender with a base diameter of 20 cm and a height of 10 cm with a total volume of 3 dm3 was equipped with a horizontal propeller stirrer maintained at a fixed speed of 150 rpm.
System of two series-connected rotary oil pumps RV 100/1 supplied by Lavat Plc. (Chotutice, Czech Republic) and Adixen 2015SD supplied by Pfeiffer Vacuum Components & Solutions Ltd. (Asslar, Germany) was used to achieve the required pressure 100 Pa inside the vacuum chamber. The process gas flow rate of 100 sccm and the pressure inside the vacuum chamber were controlled by a set of mass flow controllers model F201-CV supplied by Bronkhorst High-TechH B.V. (Ruurlo, Netherlands) and regulated by butterfly valve of the pumping system controled by Adaptive Pressure Controler PM-3 supplied by VAT Vakuumventile Plc. (Sennwald, Switzerland), respectively.
An evaporator controled by a thermostatic control unit (maintaining an internal temperature of 55 °C) with a heated pipe (60 °C) connected to a vacuum chamber through a needle valve was used to evaporate the liquid precursor (HMDSO). The flow rate of the evaporated HMDSO was set to 5 sccm by needle valve. A gas ring device was used in order to evenly supply the precursor vapors to the treated substrate.

2.3. Characterization of Cellulose Fibers

Plasma treatment influences the wettability of cellulose fibres, chemical composition, and morphology of the surface. Therefore, water contact angle measurements (WCA), chemical composition analysis by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method (XPS), and analysis of surface morfology based on emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were applied.
The water contact angle (WCA) was measured by the drop test method as described in [71] and also as reported in [72,73,74], in accordance with ISO 27448:2009. This method allows an easy evaluation of the characteristics of increasing hydrophobicity of the cellulose surface. Experimental setup was made of a portable computer-based instrument for contact angle measurement See System E supplied by Advex Instruments Ltd. (Brno, Czech Republic). The wettability of the cellulose surface was measured by initial WCA as well as the duration of absorption of water droplets (10 μL) settled on a compressed cellulose surface (dynamic WCA) in order to evaluate the surface hydrophobicity. The used water was distilled and colored with Acid Orange 7 organic dye for higher contrast.
The analysis of the chemical composition by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy method (XPS) was performed at the J. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague. The measurements were performed in a modified electron spectrometer ESCA 3 MkII under a vacuum of 10−10 mbar. Al Kα radiation (hʋ = 1686.6 eV) was used to excite the electrons. The transmission energy of the used hemispheric electron analyzer was 20 eV.
The morphology of the surface of untreated and treated cellulose fibers was characterized using JEOL JSM-7401F field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy of the Institute of Parasitology (Czech Academy of Sciences, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic).

2.4. Processing of PP/Cellulose Mixtures

Before the mixing process, the cellulose was sieved to remove large agglomerates formed during production. Subsequently, polypropylene powder and cellulose fibers with a weight ratio of 80:20 were mixed in a cylindrical stainless steel blender located in the vacuum chamber previously used for mixing cellulose fibers during the low-pressure microwave plasma treatment process. The PP/cellulose mixtures were mixed for 15 min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of Organosilane Functionalization Process

In the first stage of our research, we studied the influence of process gas with HMDSO vapors and treatment time on WCA and the duration of droplet absorption (see variants in the Table 1 and Figure 2).
Consequently, the drop test has been used for the characterization of the surface hydrophobicity. Initial WCA has been estimated immediately after droplet settling on the cellulose surface. Afterwards, the time needed for complete absorption of the droplet into the material was measured and this value is denoted as duration of droplet absorption.
Whereas the samples treated in argon have almost the same wettability as the zero sample, samples treated in air and oxygen show clear dependence of both initial WCA and duration of droplet absorption on the treatment time. The longer the treatment time is, the longer it takes to absorb the water droplet into the material. In all three process gases the highest hydrophobicity of the surface has been estimated for the samples treated for 90 min.
Only a very slight increase in initial WCA and duration of droplet absorption can be observed for the samples treated in argon for longer time i.e., 45, 60, 75, and 90 min. Therefore, treatment in argon does not lead to a significant increase of the hydrophobicity of cellulose surface and even after the treatment for 90 min the cellulose surface remains strongly hydrophilic.
All samples treated in oxygen were highly hydrophobic and showed a slightly higher initial WCA compared to samples treated in air. A significant increase of the initial WCA can be well observed for samples treated longer than 15 min. Moreover, samples treated in oxygen also showed a significantly longer duration of droplet absorption, which is up to 229 s in the case of sample 18.
The high hydrophobicity of the sample 18 compared to the zero sample is demonstrated in the Figure 3. Both photos have been captured immediately after settling of the water droplet.
Based on the data presented above, we conclude that the treatment of cellulose fibers in argon leads to only a slight increase in wettability. Conversely, hydrophobic cellulose was obtained by treatment in air and oxygen. While the initial WCAs are comparable for samples treated in air and oxygen, samples treated in oxygen show significantly longer durations of droplet absorption, probably due to a more evenly and densely functionalized surface.
The highest hydrophobicity has the sample 18, which was treated in oxygen for 90 min and which exhibits the highest WCA and duration of droplet absorption. Therefore, this sample has been subjected to further analyses, including investigation of agglomeration in the mixture with the powdered polypropylene matrix. In the text below it is referred as “functionalized cellulose.”

3.2. XPS Analysis

Samples of cellulose have been subjected to XPS analysis. The relative mass fraction of detected carbon and oxygen in the untreated cellulose (zero sample) was 61.1% and 38.9%, respectively. In the case of functionalized cellulose, the relative mass fraction of the detected carbon decreased to 42.5%, while the relative mass fraction of the detected oxygen increased to 46.1%. In addition, significant increase of silicon content has been observed since the silicon relative mass fraction of 11.4% was also detected in the functionalized cellulose. The results are summarized in the Table 2.
The photoelectron spectra of untreated (zero sample) and functionalized cellulose are shown in the Figure 4. A photoemission line with a binding energy of 100.9 eV and a photoemission line with a binding energy of 103.2 eV can be identified in the spectrum for silicon (Si 2p) of the functionalized cellulose shown in Figure 4b. A photoemission line with a binding energy of 100.9 eV can be assigned to the Si–C chemical bond. Due to the hydrophobicity of the functionalized cellulose and the chemical structure of used precursor (HMDSO), Si–CH3 bonds are likely to be present on the surface. Photoemission lines with a binding energy near to 103.2 eV are often assigned to the chemical bond of SiO2, SiO2C2, or SiO3C [67,75,76].
The photoelectron spectra of the zero sample and the functionalized cellulose prove significant increase of the proportion of carbon bond (C–H) with a binding energy of 284.8 eV from 21.7% to 33.8% (see Table 3). The Si–C bond has a very close binding energy of approximately 284.6 eV [75]. Thus, a larger carbon bond population may be responsible for the binding of silicon to the surface of the functionalized cellulose [67].
The chemical bonds probably presented on the surface of the functionalized cellulose suggest that the detected chemical structures may resemble some silane coupling agents with organofuctionalities used in natural fiber composites, particularly the VTS coupling agent with vinyl functionality [62].

3.3. SEM Analysis

Figure 5a shows SEM image of the untreated cellulose fiber (zero sample), while Figure 5b shows SEM image of the functionalized cellulose fiber. SEM images of the untreated and treated cellulose fibers show that both fibers are not completely smooth on their surface. The differences in surface morphology between these two samples are not observable. Slight difference in the color of both images can be attributed only to the technical quality of the images.
In the SEM images no inhomogeneous or discontinuous films are visible. Therefore, considering the significant change in the surface wettability, the cellulose surface has been very probably functionalized in terms of incorporation of organosilane functional groups into the treated surface.
Moreover, no burrs or other undesirable morphological changes are observable on the fiber surface in the SEM images of treated cellulose, so the plasma treatment does not cause degradation of fiber surface, although the duration of the treatment process is relatively long.

3.4. Proposed Mechanism of Cellulose Functionalization by Organosilane Groups

Based on the results of XPS and SEM analysis and considering the optimized process parameters leading to the highest hydrophobization of the substrate, we propose a mechanism of cellulose functionalization by organosilane groups during the treatment in low-pressure microwave plasma discharge.
As can be seen in Figure 6, the chemical conversion of HMDSO is based on the breaking of the molecule into several fragments. Dissociation can start with the impact of plasma electrons that can break the Si–C bond which has the lowest bond-dissociation energy (3.7 eV) of all bonds present in HMDSO molecule. In this case, a relatively large silicon radical and a methyl group are formed. Recombination of these radicals with hydrogen atoms leads to the formation of stable pentamethyldisiloxane (PMDSO). Following reaction of PMDSO with plasma electrons can lead to the formation of another silicon radical and methyl group. This silicon radical can recombine with a hydrogen atom to form tetramethyldisiloxane (TMDSO). The formed methyl groups may further form several hydrocarbon structures such as CH4, C2H6, C2H4, and C2H2 [77].
Dissociation of HMDSO molecule can also start by breaking the Si–O bond with a bond-dissociation energy of 4.6 eV. In this case, smaller silicon radicals are formed, which subsequently react with the methyl group and hydrogen atom to form tetramethylsilane (TMS) and trimethylsilane (TriMS), respectively.
All of the HMDSO fragments mentioned above may be involved in plasma processes, however, HMDSO dissociation starting with breaking the Si–C bond seems to be dominant.
Considering that the highest increase in hydrophobicity was observed after plasma treatment in oxygen-containing process gas, oxidation processes with actively involved oxygen appear to play an important role in the formation of hydrophobic functional groups on the cellulose surface. Presented results correspond to our previous studies [66,78,79] and the findings reported in [80] that noble gases, such as argon, show a reduced capability in HMDSO dissociation compared to oxygen.
In addition to electrons, oxygen plasma generates many reactive species, such as reactive oxygen, atomic oxygen (O), ozone (O3), superoxide anion (•O2−), peroxide (•O2−2). After interaction with hydrogen atoms, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (•OH) and hydroxyl ion (OH−) can also be formed [81,82]. These reactive species can react with HMDSO fragments, as well as with the formed hydrocarbons.
While the HMDSO molecule is fragmented, reactive species generated in the microwave plasma discharge also affect the cellulose surface by forming the active sites. The reaction of reactive plasma species with HMDSO fragments leads to the incorporation of hydrophobic functional groups probably bonded by Si–C, SiO2, SiO2C2, or SiO3C bonds to the active sites on the cellulose surface. A similar incorporation mechanism has also been described in [67].
The observed dependence of the duration of water droplet absorption on the treatment time can be explained by the gradual incorporation of hydrophobic organosilane functional groups to the surface of the cellulose fibers during the treatment process, as shown in Figure 7.

3.5. Agglomeration of Cellulose in the Mixture with Polypropylene Powder

Changes in agglomeration of untreated cellulose and functionalized cellulose in the mixture with polypropylene powder after the mixing process have been studied on three different mixtures of polypropylene with cellulose.
The first mixture contained polypropylene and untreated cellulose without pretreatment. The second mixture contained polypropylene and untreated cellulose, which was premixed in a blender for 90 min (corresponding to the plasma treatment time of the functionalized cellulose). The third mixture contained polypropylene and functionalized cellulose.
Figure 8 presents photographs of prepared mixtures. High dynamic range (HDR) technology was used to highlight the bundles of cellulose fibers. The mixture of polypropylene and untreated cellulose without pretreatment visibly contained large agglomerates despite the mechanical affecting on cellulose fiber bundles during the 15 min mixing process (see the Figure 8a).
In the mixture containing cellulose premixed for 90 min in the blender, the presence of large agglomerates can also be observed as in the case of the mixture with untreated cellulose. However, the bundles of cellulose do not have a visibly spherical shape and the mixture seems to exhibit a slightly higher homogeneity, as shown in Figure 8b.
The third sample of the mixture of polypropylene and functionalized cellulose (Figure 8c) contained only a small amount of much smaller spherical agglomerates and overall exhibited significantly higher homogeneity. Since the mixture with the premixed cellulose contained large agglomerates similar to the mixture with the untreated cellulose without premixing, it can be ruled out that the mechanical mixing process would have a significant effect on the higher homogeneity of the mixture with the functionalized cellulose. Conversely, it can be stated that the higher homogeneity of the mixture with the functionalized cellulose is caused mainly by the absence of functional groups present on the surface of untreated cellulose forming hydrogen bonds between the hydrophilic fibers.

4. Conclusions

  • The functionalization process of cellulose fibers by hydrophobic organosilane functional groups in a low-pressure microwave plasma discharge using HMDSO precursor was designed and optimized.
    • The degree of the obtained hydrophobicity strongly depends on both tested process conditions (used process gas and treatment time). With an increase of the treatment time, the density and uniformity of the organosilane functionalization is likely to increase and the treated cellulose fibers become less hydrophilic. Considering that treatment in argon causes only a slight change in wettability, while the treatment in air and oxygen leads to high hydrophobicity of the cellulosic fibers, oxygen appears to be responsible for hydrophobizing the cellulose fiber surface through the incorporation of organosilane functional groups.
    • The application of oxygen/HMDSO microwave low-pressure plasma discharge enabled the creation of highly hydrophobic cellulose fibers with initial WCA up to 143° and the duration of droplet absorption up to 229 s.
  • The functionalized hydrophobic cellulose was subjected to analyses of chemical composition and surface morphology.
    • XPS analysis confirmed the presence of silicon in Si–C, SiO2, SiO2C2, and SiO3C bonds on the surface of the functionalized cellulose.
    • Based on the SEM analysis, the treated cellulose fibers do not exhibit degradation or any differences in surface morphology compared to the untreated cellulose fibers. The absence of a visible deposited film or other deposited structures on the surface indicates that the treated cellulose fibers have been functionalized with organosilane functional groups.
  • The hydrophobic organosilane functionalized cellulose exhibited visibly lower tendency to agglomerate in the significantly more homogeneous mixture with non-polar powdered polypropylene matrix.
  • With respect to the following perspectives, we conclude that cellulose treated with the presented plasma functionalization process represents a promising filler for NFPCs.
    • The lower agglomeration of treated cellulose fibers during the mixing process can contribute to a more even dispersion of the fibers in the non-polar polypropylene matrix potentially leading to better mechanical properties of prepared composites.
    • The hydrophobicity of the treated cellulose fibers can significantly reduce the moisture absorption avoiding the fiber swelling and the reduction of their mechanical properties.
    • Due to its similarity to conventional organosilane coupling agents, the organosilane functionalized surface of treated cellulose fibers may be chemically compatible with the non-polar polypropylene matrix to form covalent bonds with a significant increase of interfacial adhesion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.B., P.C., and P.O.; methodology: P.B., P.C., and P.S.; resources: P.C. and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation: P.B., P.C., and P.K.; writing—review and editing: P.B., P.C., P.O., and P.K.; supervision: P.B., P.K., and P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Czech Republic, grant number FV40315—“Composite materials for pressureless technologies (3D printers and rotomoulding)”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhattacharjee, S.; Bajwa, D.S. Degradation in the mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of natural fiber filled polymer composites due to recycling. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanjay, M.R.; Madhu, P.; Jawaid, M.; Senthamaraikannan, P.; Senthil, S.; Pradeep, S. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 566–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bajaji, A.N.; Nagarajan, K.J. Characterization of alkali treated and untreated new cellulosic fiber from Saharan aloe vera cactus leaves. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 200–208. [Google Scholar]
  4. Iyer, K.A.; Torkelson, J.M. Sustainable Green Hybrids of Polyolefins and Lignin Yield Major Improvements in Mechanical Properties When Prepared via Solid-State Shear Pulverization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, T.; Gangil, B.; Patnaik, A.; Biswas, D.; Fekete, G. Agriculture waste reinforced corn starch-based biocomposites: Effect of rice husk/walnut shell on physicomechanical, biodegradable and thermal properties. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 045702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dubrovski, P.D. Woven Fabric Engineering, 1st ed.; Sciyo: Rijeka, Croatia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kozlowski, R. Handbook of Natural Fibres: Volume 1: Types, Properties and Factors Affecting Breeding and Cultivation, 1st ed.; Woodhead Pub.: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Joseph, B.; Sagarika, V.K.; Sabu, C.; Kalarikkal, N.; Thomas, S. Cellulose nanocomposites: Fabrication and biomedical applications. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luo, H.; Xiong, G.; Ma, C.; Chang, P.; Yao, F.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wan, Y. Mechanical and thermo-mechanical behaviors of sizing-treated corn fiber/polylactide composites. Polym. Test. 2014, 39, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Deng, Y.; Paraskevas, D.; Tian, Y.; Van Acker, K.; Dewulf, W.; Duflou, J.R. Life cycle assessment of flax-fibre reinforced epoxidized linseed oil composite with a flame retardant for electronic applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 427–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, Y.; Hill, C.A.S.; Xiao, Z.; Militz, H.; Mai, C. Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: A review. Compos. Part. A 2010, 41, 806–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, J.Z.; Wu, Q.; McNabb, H.S. Chemical coupling in wood fiber and polymer composites: A review of coupling agents and treatments. Wood Fiber Sci. 2000, 32, 88–104. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bledzki, A.K.; Gassan, J. Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 221–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zadorecki, P.; Michell, A.J. Future prospects for wood cellulose as reinforcement in organic polymer composites. Polym. Compos. 1989, 10, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Callum, A.S.H.; Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. Effect of fiber treatments on mechanical properties of coir or oil palm fiber reinforced polyester composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 78, 1685–1697. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiang, H.; Kamdem, D.P. Development of poly(vinyl chloride)/wood composites. A literature review. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2004, 10, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. George, J.; Sreekala, M.S.; Thomas, S. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 1471–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Narkis, M.; Chen, E.J.H.; Pipes, R.B. Review of methods for characterization of interfacial fiber-matrix interactions. Polym. Compos. 1988, 9, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ishida, H. A review of recent progress in the studies of molecular and microstructure of coupling agents and their functions in composites, coatings and adhesive joints. Polym. Compos. 1984, 5, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shubhra, Q.T.H.; Alam, A.K.M.M.; Quaiyyum, M.A. Mechanical properties of polypropylene composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. 2011, 26, 362–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shinoj, S.; Visvanathan, R.; Panigrahi, S.; Kochubabu, M. Oil palm fiber (OPF) and its composites: A review. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Oqla, F.M.; Sapuan, S.M. Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in industrial applications: Feasibility of date palm fibers for sustainable automotive industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barari, B.; Ellingham, T.K.; Qamhia, I.; Pillai, K.M.; El-Hajjar, R.; Turng, L.-S.; Sabo, R. Mechanical characterization of scalable cellulose nano-fiber based composites made using liquid composite molding process. Compos. B Eng. 2016, 84, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Azmin, S.N.H.M.; Hayat, N.A.; Hayat, N.A.B.M.; Nor, M.S.M. Development and characterization of food packaging bioplastic film from cocoa pod husk cellulose incorporated with sugarcane bagasse fibre. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, T.; Tejyan, S.; Patnaik, A.; Singh, V.; Zsoldos, I.; Fekete, G. Fabrication of waste bagasse fiber-reinforced epoxy composites: Study of physical, mechanical, and erosion properties. Polym. Compos. 2019, 40, 3777–3786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Thyavihalli Girijappa, Y.G.; Mavinkere Rangappa, S.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Siengchin, S. Natural Fibers as Sustainable and Renewable Resource for Development of Eco-Friendly Composites: A Comprehensive Review. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Barari, B.; Omrani, E.; Dorri Moghadam, A.; Menezes, P.L.; Pillai, K.M.; Rohatgi, P.K. Mechanical, physical and tribological characterization of nano-cellulose fibers reinforced bio-epoxy composites: An attempt to fabricate and scale the ‘Green’ composite. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Sarikanat, M.; Seki, Y.; Sever, K.; Durmuşkahya, C. Determination of properties of Althaea officinalis L. (Marshmallow) fibres as a potential plant fibre in polymeric composite materials. Compos. B Eng. 2014, 57, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shanmugasundaram, N.; Rajendran, I.; Ramkumar, T. Characterization of untreated and alkali treated new cellulosic fiber from an Areca palm leaf stalk as potential reinforcement in polymer composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 195, 566–575. [Google Scholar]
  30. Moridi Mahdieh, Z.; Shekarriz, S.; Afshar Taromi, F.; Montazer, M. Obtention of 74: 26 polyester/cellulose fabric blend with super-hydrophobic and super-hydrophilic properties by air corona discharge treatment and their characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belouadah, Z.; Ati, A.; Rokbi, M. Characterization of new natural cellulosic fiber from Lygeum spartum L. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 134, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Msahli, S.; Jaouadi, M.; Sakli, F.; Drean, J.-Y. Study of the Mechanical Properties of Fibers Extracted from Tunisian Agave americana L. J. Nat. Fibers 2015, 12, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miao, C.; Hamad, W.Y. Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: A critical review. Cellulose 2013, 20, 2221–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiao, Z.; Zhao, L.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Q. Review for Development of Wood Plastic Composites. J. Northeast For. Univ. 2003, 31, 39–41. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Y.; Mai, Y.W.; Ye, L. Sisal fibre and its composites: A review of recent developments. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2000, 60, 2037–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Agrawal, A.; Kaur, R.; Walia, R.S. PU foam derived from renewable sources: Perspective on properties enhancement. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 95, 255–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, S.; Xiao, M.; Zheng, A.; Xiao, H. Cellulose Microfibrils Grafted with PBA via Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization for Biocomposite Reinforcement. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3305–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Properties and Performance of Natural-Fibre Composites; Woodhead Publishing in materials; Woodhead Pub.: Cambridge, UK, 2008; ISBN 978-1-84569-267-4.
  39. Pickering, K.L.; Efendy, M.G.A.; Le, T.M. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wallenberger, F.T.; Weston, N.E. Natural Fibers, Polymers and Composites, 1st ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaynak, B.; Spoerk, M.; Shirole, A.; Ziegler, W.; Sapkota, J. Polypropylene/Cellulose Composites for Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2018, 303, 1800037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, Y.; Fan, M.; Chen, L. Interface and bonding mechanisms of plant fibre composites: An overview. Compos. B Eng. 2016, 101, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wan, Y.Z.; Luo, H.; He, F.; Liang, H.; Huang, Y.; Li, X.L. Mechanical, moisture absorption, and biodegradation behaviours of bacterial cellulose fibre-reinforced starch biocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Alhuthali, A.; Low, I.M.; Dong, C. Characterisation of the water absorption, mechanical and thermal properties of recycled cellulose fibre reinforced vinyl-ester eco-nanocomposites. Compos. B Eng. 2012, 43, 2772–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Célino, A.; Fréour, S.; Jacquemin, F.; Casari, P. The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: A review. Front. Chem. 2014, 1, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kazayawoko, M.; Balatinecz, J.J.; Matuana, L.M. Surface modification and adhesion mechanisms in woodfiber–polypropylene composites. J. Mater. Sci. 1999, 34, 6189–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, J.; Song, Z.; Li, D.; Shang, S.; Guo, Y. Cotton cellulose nanofiber-reinforced high density polyethylene composites prepared with two different pretreatment methods. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 59, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Izzati Zulkifli, N.; Samat, N.; Anuar, H.; Zainuddin, N. Mechanical properties and failure modes of recycled polypropylene/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Mater. Design 2015, 69, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cruz, J.; Fangueiro, R. Surface Modification of Natural Fibers: A Review. Procedia Eng. 2016, 155, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kumar, S.; Patel, V.K.; Mer, K.K.S.; Fekete, G.; Gangil, B.; Singh, T. Influence of woven bast-leaf hybrid fiber on the physico-mechanical and sliding wear performance of epoxy based polymer composites. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 105705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Obi Reddy, K.; Shukla, M.; Uma Maheswari, C.; Varada Rajulu, A. Mechanical and physical characterization of sodium hydroxide treated Borassus fruit fibers. J. For. Res. 2012, 23, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Surya Rajan, B.; Balaji, M.A.S.; Saravanakumar, S.S. Effect of chemical treatment and fiber loading on physico-mechanical properties of Prosopis juliflora fiber reinforced hybrid friction composite. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 035302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wei, D.W.; Wei, H.; Gauthier, A.C.; Song, J.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, H. Superhydrophobic modification of cellulose and cotton textiles: Methodologies and applications. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramamoorthy, S.K.; Skrifvars, M.; Rissanen, M. Effect of alkali and silane surface treatments on regenerated cellulose fibre type (Lyocell) intended for composites. Cellulose 2015, 22, 637–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Goriparthi, B.K.; Suman, K.N.S.; Mohan Rao, N. Effect of fiber surface treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute composites. Compos. Part. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1800–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Plueddemann, E.P. Silane Coupling Agents, 2nd ed.; Plenum: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  57. Melo, P.M.A.; Macêdo, O.B.; Barbosa, G.P.; Ueki, M.M.; Silva, L.B. High-density polyethylene/mollusk shell-waste composites: Effects of particle size and coupling agent on morphology, mechanical and thermal properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 1915–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moreno, D.D.P.; Saron, C. Low-density polyethylene waste/recycled wood composites. Compos. Struct. 2017, 176, 1152–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H. Modifying wood veneer with silane coupling agent for decorating wood fiber/high-density polyethylene composite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 224, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Government, R.M.; Onukwuli, O.D.; Azeez, T.O. Optimization and characterization of the properties of treated avocado wood flour-linear low density polyethylene composites. Alex. Eng. J. 2019, 58, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sood, M.; Deepak, D.; Gupta, V.K. Tensile properties of sisal fiber/recycled polyethylene (high density) composite: Effect of fiber chemical treatment. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 5673–5678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bengtsson, M.; Oksman, K. Silane crosslinked wood plastic composites: Processing and properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 2177–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nachtigall, S.M.B.; Cerveira, G.S.; Rosa, S.M.L. New polymeric-coupling agent for polypropylene/wood-flour composites. Polym. Test. 2007, 26, 619–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bulla, D.A.P.; Morimoto, N.I. Deposition of thick TEOS PECVD silicon oxide layers for integrated optical waveguide applications. Thin Solid Films 1998, 334, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, W.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.; Feizbakhshan, M.; Cao, Y.; Shi, S.; Nguyen, T.; Chen, M. Fast formation of hydrophobic coating on wood surface via an energy-saving dielectric barrier discharges plasma. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 125, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cerny, P.; Bartos, P.; Olsan, P.; Spatenka, P. Hydrophobization of cotton fabric by Gliding Arc plasma discharge. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2019, 19, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, W.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, X.; Bian, J.; Shi, S.; Nguyen, T.; Chen, M.; Wan, J. Fast enhancement on hydrophobicity of poplar wood surface using low-pressure dielectric barrier discharges (DBD) plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 407, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ji, Y.Y.; Hong, Y.C.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.D.; Kim, S.S. Formation of super-hydrophobic and water-repellency surface with hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) coating on polyethyleneteraphtalate fiber by atmospheric pressure plasma polymerization. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 5663–5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bastos, D.C.; Santos, A.E.F.; da Fonseca, M.D.; Simão, R.A. Inducing surface hydrophobization on cornstarch film by SF6 and HMDSO plasma treatment. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Ziari, Z.; Nouicer, I.; Sahli, S.; Rebiai, S.; Bellel, A.; Segui, Y.; Raynaud, P. Chemical and electrical properties of HMDSO plasma coated polyimide. Vacuum 2013, 93, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Antonini, C.; Amirfazli, A.; Marengo, M. Drop impact and wettability: From hydrophilic to superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 2012, 24, 102–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tissera, N.D.; Wijesena, R.N.; Perera, J.R.; de Silva, K.M.N.; Amaratunge, G.A.J. Hydrophobic cotton textile surfaces using an amphiphilic graphene oxide (GO) coating. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 324, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, Y.; Qi, H.; Li, B.; Zhanhua, H.; Li, W.; Liu, S. Novel hydrophobic cotton fibers adsorbent for the removal of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 155, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Przybylak, M.; Maciejewski, H.; Dutkiewicz, A. Preparation of highly hydrophobic cotton fabrics by modification with bifunctional silsesquioxanes in the sol-gel process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 387, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Finot, E.; Roualdes, S.; Kirchner, M.; Rouessac, V.; Berjoan, R.; Durand, J.; Goudonnet, J.P.; Cot, L. Surface investigation of plasma HMDSO membranes post-treated by CF4/Ar plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 187, 326–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tsuji, K.; Nakaya, M.; Uedono, A.; Hotta, A. Enhancement of the gas barrier property of polypropylene by introducing plasma-treated silane coating with SiOx-modified top-surface. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 284, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sonnenfeld, A.; Tun, T.M.; Zajickova, L.; Kozlov, K.V.; Wagner, H.-E.; Behnke, J.F.; Hippler, R. Deposition Process Based on Organosilicon Precursors in Dielectric Barrier Discharges at Atmospheric Pressure—A Comparison. Plasmas Polym. 2001, 6, 237–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hrach, R.; Bartos, P.; Hrachova, V. Computational study of plasma-surface interaction in plasma-assisted technologies. Eur. Phys. J. D 2009, 54, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bartos, P.; Spatenka, P.; Volfova, L. Deposition of TiO2 -Based Layer on Textile Substrate: Theoretical and Experimental Study. Plasma Process. Polym. 2009, 6, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Barni, R.; Zanini, S.; Riccardi, C. Characterization of the Chemical Kinetics in an O2/HMDSO RF Plasma for Material Processing. Adv. Phys. Chem. 2012, 2012, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jha, N.; Ryu, J.J.; Choi, E.H.; Kaushik, N.K. Generation and Role of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species Induced by Plasma, Lasers, Chemical Agents, and Other Systems in Dentistry. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bogaerts, A. Effects of oxygen addition to argon glow discharges: A hybrid Monte Carlo-fluid modeling investigation. Spectrochim. Acta B 2009, 64, 1266–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 02005 g001 550
Figure 1. Scheme of used experimental setup: (1) vacuum chamber; (2) microwave power supply; (3) blender; (4) mass flow controllers; (5) process gas cylinders; (6) pumping system; (7) evaporator; (8) needle valve; (9) gas ring.
Figure 1. Scheme of used experimental setup: (1) vacuum chamber; (2) microwave power supply; (3) blender; (4) mass flow controllers; (5) process gas cylinders; (6) pumping system; (7) evaporator; (8) needle valve; (9) gas ring.
Materials 14 02005 g001
Materials 14 02005 g002 550
Figure 2. Dynamic water contact angle on cellulose samples for various process parameters.
Figure 2. Dynamic water contact angle on cellulose samples for various process parameters.
Materials 14 02005 g002
Materials 14 02005 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of surface wettability of compressed (a) untreated and (b) functionalized cellulose (sample 18) by optimized functionalization process.
Figure 3. Comparison of surface wettability of compressed (a) untreated and (b) functionalized cellulose (sample 18) by optimized functionalization process.
Materials 14 02005 g003
Materials 14 02005 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra of the (a) zero sample and (b) functionalized cellulose.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of the (a) zero sample and (b) functionalized cellulose.
Materials 14 02005 g004
Materials 14 02005 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of (a) untreated cellulose fiber (zero sample) and (b) functionalized cellulose fiber.
Figure 5. SEM images of (a) untreated cellulose fiber (zero sample) and (b) functionalized cellulose fiber.
Materials 14 02005 g005
Materials 14 02005 g006 550
Figure 6. Scheme of the interaction of HMDSO dissociation products with reactive plasma species and cellulose fiber surface during the low-pressure microwave plasma treatment [77].
Figure 6. Scheme of the interaction of HMDSO dissociation products with reactive plasma species and cellulose fiber surface during the low-pressure microwave plasma treatment [77].
Materials 14 02005 g006
Materials 14 02005 g007 550
Figure 7. A schematic illustration of silane functionalization of the cellulose fiber surface during the low-pressure microwave plasma treatment in oxygen process gas and its interaction with water droplets.
Figure 7. A schematic illustration of silane functionalization of the cellulose fiber surface during the low-pressure microwave plasma treatment in oxygen process gas and its interaction with water droplets.
Materials 14 02005 g007
Materials 14 02005 g008 550
Figure 8. Photographs of the mixtures of polypropylene with three different cellulose samples after the mixing process, where bundles of cellulose fibers are highlighted using High dynamic range (HDR) technology: (a) PP mixture with untreated cellulose; (b) PP mixture with untreated cellulose mechanically premixed in the blender without plasma treatment for 90 min; (c) PP mixture with functionalized cellulose.
Figure 8. Photographs of the mixtures of polypropylene with three different cellulose samples after the mixing process, where bundles of cellulose fibers are highlighted using High dynamic range (HDR) technology: (a) PP mixture with untreated cellulose; (b) PP mixture with untreated cellulose mechanically premixed in the blender without plasma treatment for 90 min; (c) PP mixture with functionalized cellulose.
Materials 14 02005 g008
Table
Table 1. Wettability of cellulose samples depending on the process parameters.
Table 1. Wettability of cellulose samples depending on the process parameters.
Sample No.Process GasTreatment Time (min)Initial WCA (°)Duration of Droplet Absorption (s)
Zero sample--200.08
1argon15220.08
230230.08
345250.1
460270.15
575280.17
690290.2
7air15260.1
8301281.3
9451369.8
106013715.2
117513920.4
129013929.8
13oxygen151100.17
14301240.62
154513740.2
166013890.3
1775143171.4
1890143229
Table
Table 2. The relative mass fraction of detected elements in the zero sample and in the functionalized cellulose.
Table 2. The relative mass fraction of detected elements in the zero sample and in the functionalized cellulose.
Elements (%)COSi
Zero sample61.138.9-
Functionalized cellulose42.546.111.4
Table
Table 3. Population of chemical bonds in the zero sample and in the functionalized cellulose.
Table 3. Population of chemical bonds in the zero sample and in the functionalized cellulose.
Population of Chemical Bonds (%)C–HC–OO–C–O, C=O
Zero sample21.768.99.4
Functionalized cellulose33.855.211
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cerny, P.; Bartos, P.; Kriz, P.; Olsan, P.; Spatenka, P. Highly Hydrophobic Organosilane-Functionalized Cellulose: A Promising Filler for Thermoplastic Composites. Materials 2021, 14, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082005

AMA Style

Cerny P, Bartos P, Kriz P, Olsan P, Spatenka P. Highly Hydrophobic Organosilane-Functionalized Cellulose: A Promising Filler for Thermoplastic Composites. Materials. 2021; 14(8):2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cerny, Pavel, Petr Bartos, Pavel Kriz, Pavel Olsan, and Petr Spatenka. 2021. "Highly Hydrophobic Organosilane-Functionalized Cellulose: A Promising Filler for Thermoplastic Composites" Materials 14, no. 8: 2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082005

APA Style

Cerny, P., Bartos, P., Kriz, P., Olsan, P., & Spatenka, P. (2021). Highly Hydrophobic Organosilane-Functionalized Cellulose: A Promising Filler for Thermoplastic Composites. Materials, 14(8), 2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14082005

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop